Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Language Spoken at Home

Language spoken at home is the primary used by individuals within their households, a demographic metric captured in and surveys to quantify linguistic composition, cultural persistence, and proficiency in dominant societal languages among populations aged five and older. Globally, claims the most native speakers—approximately 939 million—who predominantly use it at home, followed by with 485 million and English with 380 million native speakers, reflecting concentrations in , , and Anglophone nations respectively. In the United States, where detailed annual data are available via the , 78.3% of residents aged five and older spoke only English at home from 2018 to 2022, underscoring its role as the de facto despite a rising share of non-English speakers driven by patterns. ranks as the leading non-English home language, spoken by about 13.2% of the or roughly 41 million people, with other notable languages including , , , and . This indicator informs resource allocation for , translation services, and integration efforts, while highlighting causal links between sustained high from non-English-speaking regions and slower linguistic rates compared to historical norms.

Historical Development

Early Census Inquiries (1890-1970)

The marked the first inclusion of language-related inquiries, targeting foreign-born individuals to determine their ability to speak English and, for those unable, the specific spoken. This question was designed to gauge immigrant , levels, and origins, with data revealing that approximately 80% of foreign-born whites reported proficiency in English, while non-proficiency was concentrated among recent arrivals from Southern and . Subsequent censuses from 1900 to 1930 expanded these inquiries amid rising and I-era concerns over non-English speakers' loyalties, shifting toward pre- language use and parental tongues. The 1900 asked foreign-born respondents for the language spoken prior to , while 1910 and 1920 censuses collected "mother tongue" (defined as the language spoken in earliest childhood) for all foreign-born persons and, in some cases, their native-born children's parental mother tongues to track intergenerational transmission. By 1930, similar mother tongue data highlighted proficiency trends, with 86% of immigrants from 1900-1930 reporting English usage, reflecting pressures for linguistic during periods of nativist sentiment. From 1940 to 1970, questions retained a focus on mother tongue primarily for foreign-born individuals and those of foreign parentage, emphasizing native-born second-generation shifts away from ancestral s. The 1940 specified mother tongue as the language spoken in the home during earliest childhood, yielding data that showed marked declines in non-English mother tongues among U.S.-born children of immigrants, with only about 10 million individuals (roughly 10% of the population) reporting non-English mother tongues in peaking earlier but receding by mid-century. Empirical patterns indicated rapid linguistic for earlier immigrant waves, such as and speakers, who typically transitioned to English-dominant home use within one to two generations due to educational mandates, economic incentives, and .

Modern Formulation and Standardization (1980-Present)

In 1980, the U.S. Bureau established a standardized three-part question on spoken at home in the decennial census long form, shifting from prior inquiries on mother tongue to focus on current household practices for individuals aged 5 and older. The sequence asked: (1) whether the person speaks a language other than English at home; (2) if yes, the specific non-English spoken (with instructions to report the one spoken most often if multiple were used); and (3) the self-reported English-speaking ability, categorized as "very well," "well," "not well," or "not at all." This formulation aimed to capture primary home dynamics influenced by ongoing and generational shifts, providing data for policy on , services, and demographics. The question persisted through the 1990 and 2000 es with minimal changes, maintaining emphasis on age 5+ to assess school-age exposure. In 2005, as the decennial long form was discontinued, the items transitioned fully to the (ACS), a continuous annual sample survey replacing periodic detail with more frequent estimates. This shift enabled timelier tracking of household use amid demographic changes, including immigration-driven diversity, while standardizing response options for consistency across years. Subsequent ACS iterations, including those supporting 2020 Census data supplementation, incorporated clarifications for respondent accuracy, such as explicit guidance on designating the predominant non-English in multilingual homes. The 2018-2022 ACS data, for example, reported 78.3% of the aged 5 and older speaking only English at , with the non-English share holding steady proportionally despite absolute increases from to over 60 million speakers. These refinements ensured the metric's reliability for monitoring and service needs without altering core structure.

Methodology and Data Collection

Question Design and Survey Administration

The American Community Survey (ACS) collects data on languages spoken at home from individuals aged five years and older to gauge habitual domestic language use. The core question reads: "Does this person speak a language other than English at home?" with respondents instructed to mark "Yes" if the individual sometimes or always speaks a non-English language there. Affirmative responses prompt a follow-up: "What is this language?" specifying examples like Korean or Spanish, thereby identifying the primary non-English tongue employed in the home environment. This self-identification approach emphasizes regular, routine speech patterns over sporadic or secondary languages, as the "sometimes or always" criterion filters for consistent household application without capturing transient or infrequent usage. By design, the inquiry targets linguistic habits in the residential setting, serving as a for predominant home communication while deliberately avoiding assessments of , ethnic self-perception, or external exposure. Survey administration occurs via multi-mode channels to maximize response rates, with primary emphasis on self-enumeration through questionnaires or mail-back forms sent to sampled addresses. Non-respondents receive follow-ups via telephone interviews or in-person visits by field representatives, who may conduct the survey in the respondent's preferred if needed. These questions integrate seamlessly into the ACS's annual canvass of roughly 3.5 million housing units, yielding representative on language prevalence through stratified random sampling calibrated to the U.S. .

Measures of English Proficiency and Ability

The (ACS) measures English proficiency exclusively among individuals aged 5 and older who report speaking a other than English at , posing the follow-up question: "How well does this person speak English?" Respondents select from four categories: "very well," "well," "not well," or "not at all." is operationally defined as responses of "very well" or "well," distinguishing bilingual capability from (LEP), which encompasses "not well" or "not at all." These categories enable quantification of functional English ability, correlating with self-reported speaking competence rather than formal testing. Nationally, approximately 91% of the aged 5 and older demonstrates English proficiency, comprising those who speak only English at (78.3% as of the 2018-2022 ACS period) plus non-English speakers who report "very well" or "well." The remaining roughly 9%—concentrated among recent immigrants—exhibit LEP, with proficiency gaps narrowing significantly beyond the first generation due to and education. Among speakers, the dominant non-English group, proficiency stands at about 71% for Latinos aged 5 and older, reflecting a mix of very well (around 58%) and well speakers, though rates vary by age and . These metrics illuminate generational assimilation dynamics, where non-English home use plummets from over 90% in the first generation to under 5% by the third, driven by English acquisition in schools and communities. First-generation immigrants often retain primary non-English use with variable proficiency (e.g., 50-60% proficient overall), while second-generation individuals achieve near-universal proficiency (over 90%), facilitating the shift to English-dominant households. This pattern underscores data's utility in tracking integration, independent of socioeconomic confounders.

Limitations, Accuracy, and Methodological Critiques

Self-reported responses to questions on language spoken at home and English proficiency in the (ACS) are susceptible to subjectivity, including overestimation of proficiency due to or vague personal benchmarks for ability levels. A U.S. Bureau analysis comparing ACS self-reports to objective English literacy tests revealed systematic discrepancies, with respondents often rating their skills higher than test performance indicated, particularly among non-native speakers. Such biases can distort estimates of , as self-assessments correlate only moderately with validated proficiency measures in immigrant populations. Sampling and nonresponse issues further compromise data accuracy, with ACS response rates declining in the 2020s and exhibiting patterns of lower participation in households with or non-English dominant languages. Language barriers exacerbate nonresponse and measurement errors, as respondents may misinterpret questions or interviewers face inaccuracies, potentially underrepresenting non-English use and biasing results toward English-only households. Household composition has been shown to influence overall ACS data quality, with non-English environments linked to higher error rates in reporting. The ACS restricts language questions to individuals aged 5 and older, excluding preschool children whose home environments may reflect distinct patterns of multilingual exposure or early non-household influences on language acquisition, thereby limiting insights into intergenerational transmission and nascent assimilation. This methodological choice overlooks a demographic segment prone to undercounting in Census operations, compounding gaps in understanding full household linguistic dynamics. Validation efforts, including comparisons of self-reports to direct assessments, highlight persistent mismatches, underscoring the need for supplementary objective testing to refine estimates.

National and Regional Statistics (2018-2023 ACS)

According to the 2018-2022 (ACS) 5-year estimates, 78.3 percent of the U.S. population aged 5 years and older spoke only at home. The remaining 21.7 percent spoke a non- language, categorized broadly into (approximately 13.3 percent of the total population, comprising 61.1 percent of non-English speakers), other (around 3.5-4 percent), Asian and Pacific Island languages (about 3.6-4 percent), and other languages (roughly 2.4 percent). Updates from 2023 ACS estimates and related analyses indicate a modest increase in non-English language prevalence to around 23 percent nationally, largely driven by -related demographic shifts. This rise includes notable growth in specific groups, such as speakers, who increased by approximately 165,000 individuals since 2018 amid broader patterns of Middle Eastern and North African . Geographic disparities highlight concentrations tied to historical migration corridors and urban immigrant hubs. In Southwestern states like (over 40 percent non-English), (about 33 percent), and (exceeding 30 percent), non-English usage substantially outpaces the national average due to proximity to and established communities. Midwestern states, by comparison, maintain lower rates of 10-15 percent, reflecting limited recent and higher native-born populations. Metropolitan areas nationwide average over 25 percent non-English speakers, compared to under 15 percent in rural counties, as immigrants cluster in cities for economic opportunities.

Demographic Breakdowns by Age, Ethnicity, and Immigration Status

Among individuals aged 5 and older, the prevalence of non-English languages spoken at home varies significantly by age, with younger cohorts in immigrant-heavy subgroups showing elevated rates due to parental origins, while rates decline among older native-born populations. For children aged 5-17 in households with at least one foreign-born parent, approximately 40-50% speak a non-English language at home, reflecting intergenerational transmission from immigrant parents; this drops to under 10% for those aged 65 and older, who are predominantly native-born and assimilated. By ethnicity, or individuals exhibit the highest rates of non-English home use, with 68.2% aged 5 and older speaking a other than English at home, predominantly , driven by recent immigration from . show rates of 63%, encompassing diverse s such as , , and , with variation by subgroup origin. Non- whites and Blacks have far lower rates, typically under 5%, aligning with their native-born majorities. Immigration status and generational position strongly predict home patterns, underscoring dynamics. Among the foreign-born (first ), over 80% speak a non-English at home, with only about 12% speaking English exclusively. Native-born children of immigrants (second ) show 40-50% non-English home use, often retaining parental languages partially. By the third (grandchildren of immigrants), this falls below 10%, with English dominating as U.S.-born status across generations correlates empirically with monolingual English households.
Demographic Group% Speaking Non-English at Home (Aged 5+)Primary LanguagesSource
68.2%
63%, , etc.
Foreign-born~88%Varies by origin
40-50%Parental heritage languages
Third generation<10%Minimal retention
From 1980 to 2019, the number of U.S. residents aged 5 and older who spoke a language other than English at home nearly tripled, rising from 23.1 million (approximately 11% of the population) to 67.8 million (about 23%). This increase reflects sustained immigration from non-English-speaking regions, particularly Latin America and Asia, though the share stabilized somewhat in recent years at around 22% based on 2017-2021 data. Concurrently, English proficiency among those speaking a non-English language at home showed a modest upward trend, with 56% rated as fully proficient in 1980 compared to 60% in 2015, indicating gradual linguistic integration despite the expanding non-English base. Assimilation patterns demonstrate rapid shifts toward English dominance across generations, a consistent with historical waves since the late . By the third generation, over 90% of descendants from Asian immigrant groups speak only English at home, while for groups, the figure ranges from 60-70% only English but approaches 90% or higher when including proficient bilingualism. Intermarriage with English-dominant partners accelerates this transition, reducing retention, as evidenced in studies of post-1965 cohorts mirroring patterns from 1880-1920 where third-generation immigrants exhibited near-complete linguistic . These rates underscore that while first- and second-generation immigrants maintain non-English home use, subsequent generations prioritize English, limiting persistent linguistic diversity. Projections indicate that the non-English home language share may continue rising modestly to 25% or more by 2040 under sustained high levels similar to the , driven by incoming cohorts, but dynamics will constrain long-term . differentials favor English-dominant populations over time, and generational shifts—exemplified by declining retention even among Hispanics—suggest the overall proportion will plateau below 30%, as third-generation English exclusivity caps accumulation. Factors like increasing intermarriage rates (now over 25% for second-generation immigrants) further reinforce this trajectory, aligning with causal mechanisms observed in prior waves where societal pressures and opportunity structures favored English adoption.

Languages and Classifications

Dominant Non-English Languages and Their Prevalence

is the predominant non-English language spoken at home , accounting for 61.1% of all individuals age 5 and older who speak a language other than English, or approximately 42 million speakers based on the 2018-2022 (ACS) 5-year estimates. This concentration is particularly evident in the Southwest and other high-immigration states, with over half of home speakers residing in , , and . Among individuals age 5 and older—who largely overlap with home speakers—71% demonstrated English proficiency in 2024, reflecting substantial bilingualism despite primary home use of . The next most prevalent non-English languages include (encompassing dialects such as and ) at 5.1% of non-English speakers (roughly 3.5 million), at 2.1% (about 1.4 million), at around 2% (approximately 1.4 million), and at 1.7% (about 1.2 million), per the same ACS period. English proficiency varies markedly among these groups, with speakers of European-origin languages generally exhibiting higher rates than those from more recent Middle Eastern or Asian immigrant waves; for instance, Arabic home speakers often show proficiency below 60%, influenced by shorter U.S. residency durations. Indo-European languages beyond Spanish, such as (including ), , and , collectively represent a stable but relatively declining share of non-English home use, comprising about 4.1% of the total population speaking any non-English at home. These languages maintain smaller speaker bases—typically under 1 million each—and reflect historical patterns rather than recent influxes, leading to slower growth compared to Asian or . Empirical data indicate rapid across all major non-English groups, with home use dropping by over 50% from the first to due to educational and social pressures, as documented in analyses of intergenerational . This pattern holds even for , which exhibits higher retention than non-Indo-European languages but still experiences substantial decline, underscoring the non-permanent nature of non-English dominance in subsequent generations.
LanguageApproximate Speakers (millions, age 5+)Share of Non-English Home SpeakersKey Notes
4261.1%Concentrated in Southwest; 71% English proficiency among Latinos.
Chinese (all dialects)3.55.1%Includes /Cantonese; variable proficiency by dialect and recency.
1.42.1%Primarily Filipino-American communities.
1.4~2%Southeast Asian immigrant base.
1.2~1.7%Lower English proficiency (~50%).

Emerging Languages, Groupings, and Shifts in Composition

In recent years, has emerged as one of the fastest-growing non-English languages spoken at home , with approximately 1.4 million speakers aged 5 and older reported in 2021, reflecting a more than 580% increase from 215,000 in 1980. This surge correlates with increased immigration from Middle Eastern and North African countries, particularly following conflicts and economic migrations since the . Similarly, languages from , such as and , have seen niche growth tied to resettlements and family reunifications; for instance, speakers numbered around 150,000 by the late 2010s, driven by inflows from East African diaspora communities in states like and Ohio. The U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) employs language groupings to aggregate data across linguistic families, facilitating analysis without overemphasizing minor dialects or variants. These include "Other Indo-European languages" (encompassing Germanic, Romance, and Slavic tongues excluding Spanish), "Asian and Pacific Island languages" (covering Sino-Tibetan, Japonic, Austronesian, and Dravidian families), and "Other languages" (for African, Native American, and unclassified tongues). Such classifications, derived from self-reported responses coded against standardized linguistic hierarchies, enable tracking of broader compositional shifts while accounting for the fluidity of spoken forms; for example, they group Hindi and Urdu variants under Indo-European but distinguish major branches to avoid inflating counts of low-prevalence dialects. Longitudinal ACS data reveal marked shifts in the composition of non-English s, with -origin tongues declining in relative share due to generational and reduced from . , once the third-most spoken non-English in 1980 with about 1.6 million speakers, has seen its prevalence drop by roughly 50% in proportional terms amid native speaker attrition, now numbering under 1 million primarily among heritage communities. has similarly declined in absolute numbers since 1980, overtaken by newer arrivals. Conversely, and families have risen, comprising over 40% of non-English speakers by 2019—up from under 20% in 1980—fueled by post-1965 reforms favoring and recent inflows. These groupings underscore that non-English languages, even amid shifts, constitute a minority (about 22% of the aged 5+ in 2017-2021), with no of displacement for English dominance in household use. Aggregate trends highlight migration-driven diversification rather than uniform growth across all categories, as shares wane while Asian/Pacific and "Other" categories expand modestly within stable totals.

Applications and Societal Implications

Demographic Analysis and Policy Utilization

Data from the (ACS) on languages spoken at home enables demographers to analyze , including correlations between non-English usage and patterns or status. For instance, among non-citizens, only 11.1% speak English exclusively at home, compared to 89.3% of native-born citizens, illustrating how recent inflows sustain linguistic diversity while native populations exhibit near-universal English dominance. This granularity supports causal inferences about barriers, such as lower rates in households maintaining primary non-English use, derived from cross-tabulated ACS tables on and language. In policy contexts, ACS language data directs resource allocation for services targeting limited English proficient (LEP) individuals. Federal English language acquisition grants under Title III of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) rely on ACS estimates of LEP students and recent immigrants to distribute over $800 million annually as of fiscal year 2023, prioritizing states with higher non-English home language prevalence. Similarly, for Title VI compliance, agencies like the use ACS LEP data to develop language access plans, identifying thresholds for vital services such as public notices and assistance in jurisdictions exceeding 5% non-English speakers. The data also underpins Voting Rights Act implementations. Section 203 mandates assistance in elections for covered areas, with the Census Bureau's 2021 determinations—based on 2015-2019 ACS data—designating 331 jurisdictions, mostly for (206 areas), Asian languages (68), and Native American languages (57), to ensure without English barriers. In , ACS language metrics supplement demographic profiles to evaluate minority vote dilution under Section 2, aiding states in drawing districts that preserve cohesive language minority communities. While these applications enhance targeted governance, analyses note that raw diversity metrics from ACS can be selectively invoked in discourse to underscore , often sidelining complementary indicators of like intergenerational English shift rates, which exceed 90% by the third generation per longitudinal reviews. Government sources such as the Census Bureau maintain methodological rigor, yet interpretive frameworks in advocacy-driven reports may amplify persistence over convergence trends.

Educational Outcomes and Bilingualism Programs

Students from non-English-speaking homes often enter school with lower English proficiency, correlating with initial academic challenges in reading and . In fall 2021, English learners (ELs) comprised 10.6% of U.S. students, totaling approximately 5.3 million, with many requiring support services. This demographic faces persistent gaps on assessments like the (NAEP), where ELs score below non-EL peers, though overall NAEP reading and math trends for ages 9 and 13 showed declines from 2020 to 2023 across student groups, including lower percentiles disproportionately affecting ELs. Structured English immersion programs, which prioritize rapid English acquisition through content taught primarily in English with targeted language support, demonstrate faster proficiency gains compared to prolonged models. Following California's Proposition 227 in , which mandated over native-language instruction, EL reclassification rates as English proficient increased, and scores in reading and math improved for ELs by , narrowing gaps with non-EL students over time. Longitudinal data indicate that ELs in settings typically achieve English proficiency in 3 to 5 years, with averages around 3.8 years for reading and oral skills, enabling quicker access to curricula. In contrast, dual-language programs, blending English and native s, yield mixed results, often taking longer for English dominance while benefiting biliteracy but not consistently outperforming in core academic metrics. The 1968 , which funded native-language instruction to support ELs, has faced criticism for extending dependency on bilingual programs and slowing , as evidenced by stagnant NAEP proficiency rates for ELs despite expanded services. Critics argue these models strain resources amid rising EL enrollment, with over 93% of ELs receiving language instruction programs by 2021, yet proportional outcome improvements lag, particularly in high-immigration states like where ELs exceed 20% of students. Empirical reviews highlight that while bilingual approaches avoid harm, immersion's emphasis on structured English accelerates gap closure without sacrificing long-term gains.

Economic Impacts and Labor Market Dynamics

Individuals with (LEP) in the United States experience a substantial earnings penalty, with studies estimating that LEP workers earn 17 to 135 percent less than proficient counterparts, varying by and controlling for and . Bureau analysis further indicates that difficulty speaking English reduces the likelihood of full-time and competitive wages, with immigrants speaking only "good" English facing approximately 18 percent lower wages compared to those with "very good" proficiency. This proficiency premium, often ranging from 10 to 20 percent for full fluency, underscores the causal link between and labor market access, as English dominance in job communications and skill requirements limits LEP individuals to lower-wage, manual sectors like production and transportation. Residence in linguistic enclaves, where non-English languages predominate, correlates with diminished , including reduced geographic and occupational mobility and elevated participation. on and immigrants shows that enclave concentration hinders English proficiency , thereby constraining job opportunities beyond ethnic networks and perpetuating reliance on co-ethnic, low-productivity . Quasi-experimental from immigrant settlement patterns reveals that higher ethnic clustering increases usage among newcomers, as shared non-English norms and limited exposure to mainstream labor markets foster dependency rather than self-sufficiency. Households where is the primary spoken at home, often indicative of limited , exhibit poverty rates around 17 percent—roughly double the rate for non-Hispanic households at 8.2 percent—reflecting intertwined effects of language barriers and enclave effects on . While bilingualism confers targeted advantages, such as enhanced in trade-oriented and customer-facing sectors, the broader economic costs of widespread non-English home use predominate. Demand for bilingual workers in industries like , exports, and services has doubled since , with multilingual skills linked to higher firm-level exports and to non-English-speaking clients. However, these gains are sector-specific and do not offset the systemic drags from LEP populations, including expenditures on outsourced services totaling $4.5 billion since 1990, alongside costs from forgone mobility and . Longitudinal data on second-generation immigrants demonstrate convergence toward native levels, with relative improving by about 5 percentage points on average, a pattern strengthened by the shift to English-dominant home environments that facilitate skill acquisition and network expansion. This generational effect holds across cohorts, as English proficiency enables occupational upgrading and reduces the intergenerational transmission of language-related barriers, supporting the causal primacy of linguistic integration for sustained labor market gains.

Controversies and Viewpoints

Debates on Linguistic Assimilation and Integration

Advocates for linguistic assimilation argue that widespread adoption of English as the primary home language is crucial for social cohesion and economic integration in the United States, supported by empirical evidence linking English proficiency to improved outcomes. Studies show that adult immigrants participating in English language training experience doubled voter participation rates and annual earnings increases of approximately $2,400, or 56% relative to non-participants, indicating causal benefits for civic and economic engagement. Similarly, English-proficient immigrants exhibit higher homeownership rates compared to non-proficient or monolingual non-English speakers, with bilingual individuals falling in between. Generational data reinforces this, as English proficiency rises sharply: among second-generation immigrants, about 90% are proficient, and by the third generation, less than 9% retain balanced bilingualism in a heritage language, with most shifting to English-only usage, countering claims of perpetual linguistic diversity. Critics of rapid highlight risks of cultural erosion and potential economic advantages from , positing that retention enriches innovation and preserves identity without undermining national unity. Proponents of this view, often from multiculturalist perspectives, contend that the "" model overlooks contributions of bilingualism to and global competitiveness, though empirical support for superior societal outcomes remains limited compared to metrics. However, data on challenges in linguistically concentrated areas underscore pro- concerns: in Miami-Dade County, 66.6% of the aged 5 and older speaks at home, fostering enclaves where English dominance is lower, potentially impeding broader civic participation and labor . Such patterns correlate with lower rates among low-proficiency groups, suggesting causal barriers to full rather than benign . While some left-leaning critiques frame pressures as xenophobic, prioritizing heritage languages over English , causal evidence favors the latter for reducing and enhancing outcomes like reduced reliance on ethnic networks that may correlate with lower . High third-generation English dominance—evident across immigrant waves—validates that occurs without enforced perpetual , as heritage languages typically fade within three generations per historical patterns. This generational shift debunks fears of non-assimilating subgroups, emphasizing English's role in fostering shared amid diverse inflows.

Language Policy Conflicts, Including Official English Movements

The lacks a constitutionally designated at the level, though English has functioned as the language of government and public life since the nation's founding. 13166, issued by President Clinton on August 16, 2000, requires agencies and recipients of funds to provide meaningful access to services for persons with (LEP), including and interpretation, without regard to English's status. Compliance with this order has imposed substantial costs on governments; for instance, multilingual outpatient services alone were estimated to cost $180.8 million annually as of 2016, with broader inpatient and administrative expenses contributing to billions in total , state, and local expenditures over time. On March 1, 2025, President Trump issued an designating English as the of the , aiming to prioritize its use in federal communications while not immediately overturning LEP access mandates. In contrast, state-level policies have actively promoted English through designations, with 32 states adopting such measures by 2023, often via or voter initiatives dating back to Nebraska's 1920 law. These declarations typically mandate English for official proceedings, ballots, and , though enforcement varies; for example, Alabama's 1990 requires state documents in English unless otherwise specified. Proponents of these movements, including organizations like U.S. English founded in , argue that official status accelerates English acquisition and reduces administrative fragmentation, citing anecdotal and comparative data from states like , which became the 32nd in 2019. Empirical correlations between official English policies and higher proficiency rates remain debated, with limited causal studies; however, states with such laws often exhibit lower shares of LEP residents relative to immigrant-heavy non-official states like (19% LEP in 2016), per analysis, potentially linked to policy incentives for integration. Naturalization data further underscores tensions, as only 11.1% of non-citizens speak English exclusively at home, compared to proficiency rates that strongly predict attainment—immigrants proficient in English naturalize at rates up to twice those with LEP. Key conflicts arise over bilingual voting assistance under Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act (reauthorized 2006), which mandates ballots and materials in prevalent non-English languages for jurisdictions exceeding thresholds of LEP citizens (e.g., over 10,000 LEP speakers or 5% LEP voting-age citizens). Critics, including conservative analysts, contend this fosters dependency and indirectly enables non-citizen electoral influence by easing access in areas with high unauthorized populations, despite federal prohibitions on non-citizen voting; documented remains rare, with under 0.0001% of votes invalidated for ineligibility in recent audits, but low in non-English households (e.g., speakers less likely to naturalize than Asian language groups) amplifies concerns over sustained . Conservative viewpoints, advanced by groups like and U.S. English, prioritize national cohesion and fiscal efficiency, estimating savings from streamlined English-only operations could redirect billions from translation to core services, while emphasizing English mandates as a prerequisite for civic participation. Progressive advocates, such as the ACLU, counter with equity arguments, asserting that multilingual aids ensure eligible citizens' without proven widespread abuse, though data indicates such provisions correlate with slower proficiency gains among beneficiaries, potentially perpetuating LEP cycles over generations.

Cultural Preservation Versus National Cohesion Arguments

Advocates for cultural preservation argue that maintaining heritage languages strengthens intergenerational family bonds and cultural identity among immigrant communities. Studies indicate that proficiency in a heritage language fosters closer parent-child relationships by enabling direct communication with elders, reducing relational strains that arise from language barriers. Heritage language use has also been linked to improved mental health outcomes, such as fewer behavioral problems in youth from cohesive families, without imposing significant societal costs through targeted community programs. Proponents further contend that preserving linguistic diversity enhances global connectivity for diaspora groups and enriches national culture through varied perspectives, as multilingual individuals often maintain ties to origin countries that benefit trade and diplomacy. Opponents emphasize that prioritizing national cohesion through English dominance mitigates risks of social fragmentation observed in multilingual polities with rigid preservation policies. In Canada, Quebec's entrenched French-language protections have fueled separatist movements and intergroup tensions, contrasting with the United States where assimilation norms have prevented analogous divisions despite historical immigration waves. Empirical data from U.S. immigrant cohorts reveal rapid language shift: by the second generation, over 90% of Hispanics speak English proficiently, and by the 2.5 generation, only 17% speak a foreign language well at home, with preferences overwhelmingly favoring English. This market-driven attrition, evident in the near-disappearance of European heritage languages like German or Italian (now comprising less than 1% of non-English home use combined), demonstrates how English serves as a unifying medium, fostering shared civic participation without enforced balkanization. Causal analysis underscores that unassimilated linguistic enclaves correlate with heightened metrics, as seen in studies linking neighborhood linguistic to elevated mortality risks among non-English dominant groups. While diversity advocates highlight enrichment from sustained heritage languages, evidence suggests that incomplete exacerbates social silos, impeding broad interpersonal and national solidarity more than the incidental cultural losses from shift. Thus, the pits familial and identitarian gains against the broader derived from linguistic convergence, with historical U.S. patterns favoring the latter through voluntary rather than state-mandated preservation.

References

  1. [1]
    Language Spoken at Home | American Community Survey
    The language spoken at home question originated with the 1890 Census. It was transferred to the ACS in 2005 when it replaced the decennial census long form.
  2. [2]
    What is the most spoken language? | Ethnologue Free
    Mandarin Chinese is the largest language in the world, if you count only native speakers. If you count both native and non-native speakers, English is the ...
  3. [3]
    Most Americans Speak Only English at Home ... - U.S. Census Bureau
    Dec 7, 2023 · DEC. 7, 2023 – Over three-quarters (78.3%) of the nation age 5 and older spoke only English at home, according to newly released 2018-2022 ...
  4. [4]
    The United States is rich in languages - ShareAmerica
    Feb 16, 2023 · In other words, while the largest share of the U.S. population (78.4%) speaks only English at home, a growing share (21.6%) of U.S. households ...
  5. [5]
    Growing share of US residents speak a language other than English ...
    Jun 4, 2025 · Spanish was spoken at home by 13.2% of speakers, and it was the top non-English language spoken at home in every state but Hawaii, Maine and ...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    New Data on Detailed Languages Spoken - U.S. Census Bureau
    Jun 3, 2025 · In Maine and Vermont, French was the most common language other than English. In Hawaii, Iloko, a Philippine language, was the most common ...
  7. [7]
    Eleventh Census: 1890. Report on Population of the United States
    Apr 23, 2025 · Part II contains the statistics of the population classified according to age, school attendance, illiteracy, ability to speak English, ...Missing: immigrants | Show results with:immigrants
  8. [8]
    A century of U.S. censuses and the language characteristics of ...
    Aug 1, 1999 · Since 1890, every US census but one has asked about the language characteristics of the US population. This almost uninterrupted data series, however, has been ...
  9. [9]
    Historical Language Questions - U.S. Census Bureau
    Dec 3, 2021 · What language, other than English, was spoken in this person's home when he was a child? (Spanish, French, German, Other [specify], None—English ...
  10. [10]
    1910 Census Instructions to Enumerators
    Feb 11, 2025 · Mother tongue.—The question ''What is your mother tongue or native language?'' should be asked of all persons who were born in any foreign ...Missing: 1910-1940 | Show results with:1910-1940
  11. [11]
    Immigrants Learn English: Immigrants' Language Acquisition Rates ...
    Sep 17, 2019 · About 91 percent of immigrants in the United States between 1980 and 2010 reportedly spoke English compared with 86 percent who lived here from 1900 to 1930.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Questions Asked on the 1940 Census - National Archives
    Mother Tongue (or Native Language):. Language spoken in home in earliest childhood. Veterans: Is this person a veteran of the United States military forces; or ...
  13. [13]
    Immigration & Language Diversity in the United States
    In 1910, 10 million people reported a mother tongue other than English, notably German, Italian, Yiddish, and Polish. The subsequent end of mass immigration ...Missing: assimilation | Show results with:assimilation<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    1980 Census - Decennial Census Questionnaires & Instructions
    Nov 23, 2021 · 1980 Questionnaire – Population · Does this person speak a language other than English at home? · If yes, what is this language? · If yes, how well ...Missing: spoken introduction
  15. [15]
    About Language Use in the U.S. Population - U.S. Census Bureau
    Jul 2, 2025 · In the past, various questions on language use were asked in the censuses from 1890 to 1970. ... questions asked in the American Community Survey.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Note for Language Spoken at Home from the 2016 American ...
    The American Community Survey (ACS) collects data on whether or not people five years old or older speak a language other than English at home.<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Your Guide for the American Community Survey - IPUMS International
    Mark the"Yes" box if the person sometimes or always speaks a language other than English at home. ... location where he or she worked most of the time last week.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Your Guide for the American Community Survey - Census.gov
    Do you speak a language other than. English at home? Yes. No ➜ SKIP to question 14a b. What is this language? For example: Korean, Italian, Spanish ...
  19. [19]
    Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About Language Use
    Dec 16, 2021 · LANP: Language spoken at home - 4-digit language codes for the individual languages or language groups reported. Over 130 language codes are ...
  20. [20]
    American Community Survey (ACS) Questions and Answers
    Oct 24, 2023 · ACS data are collected primarily over the internet through a self-administered questionnaire. If a household does not respond within a month ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Chapter 9: Language Assistance Program - Census.gov
    Dec 20, 2024 · The ACS language assistance program is critical in reaching populations that do not understand the questions on the survey or may not be able to ...Missing: transition | Show results with:transition
  22. [22]
    Population with Limited English Proficiency - SparkMap
    This indicator reports the percentage of the population aged 5 and older who speak a language other than English at home and speak English less than “very ...
  23. [23]
    State Language Data - US - Migration Policy Institute
    Foreign Born. English Proficiency (age 5 and older) (%), 47,490,998. Speak only English, 16.6%. Speak English "very well", 36.5%. Speak English less than ...Missing: common | Show results with:common
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    Accelerating “Americanization”: A Study of Immigration Assimilation
    Oct 12, 2023 · Moreover, new young immigrants going to every census region of the U.S. are more likely to speak English “very well,” so the rise in proficiency ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Linguistic assimilation across the generations: An analysis of home ...
    In other words, 79 percent of first- generation Mexican children and 88 percent of Chinese speak English well (or very well). Page 3. Among U.S.-born children ...
  27. [27]
    Assimilation and Language | Pew Research Center
    Mar 19, 2004 · That represented a 142% increase over the 1980 Census count, and means that Latinos now make up nearly 13% of the U.S. population overall.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] How Well—Still Good? - U.S. Census Bureau
    Oct 1, 2015 · includes both self-reported English ability and an array of tests of English literacy. ... in Table 5 also show differences in self-reported ...Missing: discrepancy | Show results with:discrepancy
  29. [29]
    Why bother with testing? The validity of immigrants' self-assessed ...
    Analyses of data for immigrant youth reveal moderate correlations between language test scores and two types of self-assessments (general ability estimates and ...
  30. [30]
    Understanding the 2024 American Community Survey 1-Year ...
    Sep 11, 2025 · The ACS has had lower response rates in the 2020s than in the 2010s, which can increase the risk of nonresponse bias.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] A Longitudinal Perspective on the Effects of Household Language ...
    The goal of this chapter is to examine the effects of household language on data quality in the American Community Survey (ACS) via the Public Use. Microdata ...
  32. [32]
    Undercounts and Overcounts of Young Children in the 2020 Census
    Apr 11, 2024 · The US Census Bureau today released new experimental estimates showing children ages 0 to 4 were undercounted in the 2020 Census in every state.Missing: language excludes critiques
  33. [33]
    Number of Non-English Speaking Households Continues to Rise in ...
    Nov 21, 2023 · The October 2023 US Census data release shows an increase in the number of non-English speaking households across all languages.
  34. [34]
    5 facts about Arabic speakers in the U.S. - Pew Research Center
    May 18, 2023 · The number of people ages 5 and older who speak Arabic at home in the U.S. has risen from 215000 in 1980 to 1.4 million in 2021.
  35. [35]
    A Growing Share Of US Residents Speak A Language Other Than ...
    Jun 5, 2025 · In California, 44% of residents spoke a language other than English at home, while it was 2.5% in West Virginia. The United States is a ...
  36. [36]
    Census Bureau estimates 1 in 3 Texans speak a language other ...
    Dec 11, 2023 · A third of Texans speak a language other than English at home, according to new estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau.Missing: Midwest | Show results with:Midwest
  37. [37]
    One in Five U.S. Residents Speaks Foreign Language at Home ...
    Oct 3, 2014 · States with the largest share of foreign-language speakers in 2013 include: California, 45 percent; New Mexico, 36 percent; Texas 35 percent; ...Missing: Midwest | Show results with:Midwest<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Almost Half Speak a Foreign Language in America's Largest Cities
    Sep 19, 2018 · In California, 44 percent of school-age (5-17) children speak a foreign language at home, and it's roughly one-third in Texas, Nevada, New ...Missing: Midwest | Show results with:Midwest
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Language Use in the United States: 2019 - U.S. Census Bureau
    language questions may have changed since they were first asked in 1890; however, the same series of three questions (discussed in this report) has appeared ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Immigration and Language Diversity in the United States - PMC
    Jul 10, 2014 · Language diversity in the United States has been driven primarily by immigration. Germans and Celts entered in large numbers in the 1840s and 1850s.<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Key facts about Asian Americans - Pew Research Center
    May 1, 2025 · Other common languages Asian immigrants speak at home include Chinese (13%) and Filipino or Tagalog (12%). More than half of Asians ages 25 and ...
  42. [42]
    Foreign-Born - U.S. Census Bureau
    This paper details migration among native-born and foreign-born populations in the United States using linked IRS, SSA, ACS, and decennial census records. All ...
  43. [43]
    Facts on U.S. immigrants, 2018 - Pew Research Center
    Aug 20, 2020 · Among the nation's immigrants, Spanish is by far the most spoken non-English language (42% of immigrants say they speak Spanish at home), but ...Previous Years' Data · Current Data · Trend Data · County Maps
  44. [44]
    A by the numbers look at the current Hispanic population in the ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · 68.2%. The percentage of the U.S. Hispanic population age 5 and older who speak a language other than English at home, according to 2024 census ...
  45. [45]
    Language spoken at home by citizenship status - Ballotpedia
    Nationwide, 89.3 percent of native-born citizens spoke only English at home, while 11.1 percent of non-citizens did so. [hide]Language spoken at home by ...
  46. [46]
    Language Diversity and English Proficiency in the United States
    Nov 11, 2016 · Sixty percent of those speaking a foreign language at home were fully proficient in English in 2015, up from 56 percent in 1980—even as ...Missing: 1980-2023 | Show results with:1980-2023
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Bilingualism Persists More Than in the Past, But English Still ...
    The language assimilation patterns of today are not precisely those of the early 20th century, but they do not appear to pose any threat to English as the ...
  48. [48]
    Percent of children who speak only English by generation and group
    Approximately 90% of third-generation Chinese immigrants to the U.S. only speak English at home, as compared to 60-70% of third-generation Spanish-speaking ...
  49. [49]
    Only English by the third generation? Loss and preservation of the ...
    Anglicization is similar for Asians and Europeans, but slower for Spanish speakers. Third-generation children's home languages are affected by intermarriage ...
  50. [50]
    What History Tells Us about Assimilation of Immigrants
    By the early 20th century, some 15 percent of the U.S. population was foreign born, comparable to the share today. If we want to know how today's newcomers will ...Missing: linguistic | Show results with:linguistic
  51. [51]
    What is the future of Spanish in the United States? | Pew Research ...
    Sep 5, 2013 · As the share of Hispanics who speak Spanish falls, the share that speaks only English at home is expected to rise. About a third (34%) of ...
  52. [52]
    What Languages Do We Speak in the United States?
    Dec 6, 2022 · Figure 3 shows educational attainment for the U.S. population ages 25 years and older by language spoken at home. About a third (33%) of ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Shift or replenishment? Reassessing the prospect of stable Spanish ...
    Jul 10, 2023 · Despite the prevalence of the intergenerational drop-off,. Spanish language has the higher retention rates among the second and third generation ...
  54. [54]
    Top Languages Other than English Spoken in 1980 and Changes in ...
    Feb 14, 2013 · In 1980, the five most commonly spoken languages other than English were Spanish, Italian, German, French, and Polish.
  55. [55]
    American Community Survey Tables on the Foreign-Born by Subject
    Apr 4, 2024 · Access demographic, economic and population data from the U.S. Census ... C16008 Citizenship Status by Language Spoken At Home for the Population ...
  56. [56]
    A Federal Policy Agenda for English Learner Education: Funding
    Currently, a state's Title III funding allocation is determined by data from the American Community Survey, state data on the number of students being ...
  57. [57]
    Title VI Toolkit: U.S. Census – Limited English Proficiency Data ...
    Sep 3, 2025 · LEP requirements can be divided into two types of services: interpretation and translation. Interpretation is the act of listening to something ...
  58. [58]
    Census Bureau Releases 2021 Determinations for Section 203 of ...
    Dec 8, 2021 · Today the U.S. Census Bureau released a list of 331 jurisdictions that are required to provide language assistance during elections.
  59. [59]
    Use of the American Community Survey in the Context of the Voting ...
    When the 2010 U.S. Decennial Census data start to flow in February 2011, the cycle of redistricting always accompanies the release of these data.
  60. [60]
    COE - English Learners in Public Schools
    In fall 2021, 10.6% of US public school students were English learners, up from 9.4% in 2011, but with a drop in 2020. Texas had the highest percentage at 20.2 ...
  61. [61]
    The English-Learner Student Population, in Charts - Education Week
    Jun 19, 2024 · English learners accounted for 10.6 percent of all public school students in fall 2021, up from 9.4 percent in fall 2011.
  62. [62]
    NAEP Long-Term Trend Assessment Results: Reading and ...
    The 2023 reading scores for age 13 students at all five selected percentile levels declined compared to 2020. The declines ranged from 3 to 4 points for middle- ...
  63. [63]
    Reading Scores Fall to New Low on NAEP, Fueled by Declines for ...
    Jan 29, 2025 · In 8th grade, scores for students in the top 75th percentile increased, while those of students in the bottom 25th percentile decreased, leading ...
  64. [64]
    California's English Learners and Their Long-Term Learning ...
    Aug 21, 2024 · We find that English learners' academic achievement by 3rd grade has improved over time, shrinking the achievement gaps between K-cohort ELs and other students.
  65. [65]
    The Initial Impact of Proposition 227 on the Instruction of English ...
    In June 1998, California voters passed Proposition 227, which severely restricted the use of primary language for instructing English learners.
  66. [66]
    How Long Does It Take ELLs to Develop English Proficiency?
    Aug 7, 2015 · On average, it took the students 3.8 years to reach English proficiency. But over the course of the study, almost 20 percent of students did not ...
  67. [67]
    How Long Does It Take For Beginning English Learners to Become ...
    Findings corroborate prior cross-sectional research suggesting that the development of full proficiency in a second language typically takes 4 to 7 years.
  68. [68]
    How well do dual-immersion programs serve English learners?
    Jun 12, 2023 · Dual-immersion programs sometimes take longer to get students proficient in English, but those students often catch up with or surpass ...
  69. [69]
    THE CONTROVERSY OVER BILINGUAL EDUCATION IN ...
    Nov 10, 1985 · Proponents and critics disagree vigorously about the successes and failures of bilingual education. The Department of Education told Congress in ...
  70. [70]
    Fast Facts: English learners (96)
    In fall 2021, some 93.1 percent of ELs (or 4.9 million students) received services in English language instruction educational programs (LIEPs) in public ...
  71. [71]
    Bilingual education for young children: review of the effects and ...
    The review finds no evidence of harmful effects from bilingual education, with much evidence for net benefits in many domains.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Proposition 227 and Instruction of English Learners in California
    This document presents findings from the first two years of a five-year study examining the implementation of Proposition 227 and its effects on the education ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Investing in English Skills: - Brookings Institution
    Workers proficient in English earn anywhere from 17 percent to 135 percent more than LEP workers depending on their metro location. English proficiency is an ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] How Does Ability To Speak English Affect Earnings?
    Difficulty speaking English can adversely affect the ability to get a job, get a full-time job, and earn competitive salaries in the U.S. labor market.Missing: premium | Show results with:premium
  75. [75]
    [PDF] English proficiency and earnings of U.S. immigrants
    May 3, 2018 · Speaking good English lowered wage income by 17.8 percent compared to speaking very good English. This effect was only 0.4 percentage points ...Missing: limited | Show results with:limited
  76. [76]
    [PDF] The Value of English Proficiency to the United States Economy
    Workers with limited English skills were most likely to be employed in production, transportation or shipping (30.2 percent) according to 2000 Census figures, ...Missing: ACS | Show results with:ACS
  77. [77]
    Living and working in ethnic enclaves: English Language ...
    The empirical model focuses on Mexican and Chinese immigrants in the US and explains the variation in English language proficiency (defined as speaking English ...Missing: labor | Show results with:labor
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Ethnic Enclaves and Welfare Cultures - Quasi-experimental Evidence
    Feb 8, 2005 · The purpose of this paper is to examine whether immigrant welfare use is causally affected by ethnic concentration and welfare use among their ...
  79. [79]
    Income and Poverty in the United States: 2020 - U.S. Census Bureau
    Sep 14, 2021 · Among non-Hispanic Whites, 8.2 percent were in poverty in 2020, while Hispanics had a poverty rate of 17.0 percent.
  80. [80]
    New Research Examines the Economic Benefits of Bilingualism
    Apr 25, 2019 · According to a report published by the New American Economy, the demand for multilingual workers more than doubled from 2010 to 2015.
  81. [81]
    Why speaking more than one language can boost economic growth
    Feb 6, 2018 · Being multilingual has been linked to higher exports, higher incomes and a healthier workforce. Proving it's never too soon to introduce ...Missing: sectors | Show results with:sectors
  82. [82]
    U.S. Federal Government Spends US$4.5 Billion on Outsourced ...
    The report finds that the federal government has spent US$4.5 billion on outsourced language services since 1990.
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Making it in America: Social Mobility in the Immigrant Population
    There is significant economic "catching up" between the first and second generations, with the relative wage of the second generation being, on average, about 5 ...
  84. [84]
    A Nation of Immigrants: Assimilation and Economic Outcomes in the ...
    Second-Generation Migrants in the US Labor Market. Occupational convergence between immigrants and natives may take more than one generation. On the one hand ...
  85. [85]
    Immigrant Integration in the United States: The Role of Adult English ...
    Participation doubles voter participation and increases annual earnings by $2,400 (56 percent).
  86. [86]
    Language proficiency and homeownership: Evidence from U.S. ...
    In this paper, we deliver the first causal evidence on the relationship between immigrant host-country language proficiency and homeownership.
  87. [87]
    Second-Generation Americans | Pew Research Center
    Feb 7, 2013 · Language Usage: About nine-in-ten second-generation Hispanic and Asian-American immigrants are proficient English speakers, substantially more ...Missing: linguistic | Show results with:linguistic
  88. [88]
    Multilingualism Is an American Tradition. So Is the Backlash | TIME
    Mar 13, 2024 · History shows us that the United States has been a reluctantly multilingual society, often pursuing linguistic assimilation instead of capitalizing on its ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical<|separator|>
  89. [89]
    Demographics :: County :: Miami-Dade :: Population
    Population Age 5+ by Language Spoken at HomeCounty: Miami-Dade ; Speak Spanish, 1,740,929, 66.62%, 4,889,023, 22.16%.
  90. [90]
    [PDF] The Relationship Between English Proficiency and Naturalization
    There is a relationship between English language proficiency and naturalization rates for United States immigrant populations, with higher English proficiency ...
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Language Proficiency, Immigrants and Civic Participation
    Many North American studies find a positive and direct relationship between language proficiency in the official language(s) and civic participation among ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Language Projections: 2010 to 2020 - U.S. Census Bureau
    For most U.S. immigrant groups, the shift to English monolingualism takes place within a few generations. (Hurtado and Vega, 2004). There are many incentives to ...
  93. [93]
    Official language of the United States - USAGov
    Sep 17, 2025 · English was designated as the official language of the United States in an executive order on March 1, 2025. LAST UPDATED: September 17, 2025.
  94. [94]
    [PDF] Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons ...
    Aug 16, 2000 · This order is intended only to improve the internal management of the executive branch and does not create any right or benefit, substantive or.Missing: multilingual | Show results with:multilingual
  95. [95]
    Executive Order 13166 - Legislation - USEnglish.org
    Oct 18, 2016 · ... multilingual outpatient services would cost $180.8 million annually. In addition, inpatient services in multiple languages would cost ...
  96. [96]
    Designating English as the Official Language of The United States
    Mar 1, 2025 · From the founding of our Republic, English has been used as our national language. Our Nation's historic governing documents, including the ...
  97. [97]
    Thirty states have adopted English as an official language, 11 ...
    Mar 3, 2025 · Of the 30 states that designated English as their official language, 11 (37%) did so through voter-approved ballot measures.
  98. [98]
    The Relationship Between English Proficiency and Naturalization
    Mar 28, 2023 · A correlation between English language proficiency and naturalization rates is evident among U.S. immigrant populations. Naturalized citizens ...
  99. [99]
    Civil Rights Division | Language Minority Citizens
    Jul 15, 2024 · SECTION 203 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT. The United States is a diverse land with a government selected by the votes of its citizens. Federal ...<|separator|>
  100. [100]
    Arguments for and against laws permitting noncitizens to vote in the ...
    This article covers noncitizen voting in the United States. It includes background information about the issue, language from federal law and state ...
  101. [101]
    Examining the Causal Impact of the Voting Rights Act Language ...
    Apr 6, 2016 · The potential impact of VRA coverage for Latinos and Asian Americans is substantial, particularly as increasing numbers of immigrants become ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] Why Heritage Language is Important for Immigrant Origin Children's ...
    First, it is important for children's family relationships. Children who develop skills in their heritage language tend to enjoy more harmonious relationships ...
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Helpful or Harmful? The Effect of Heritage Language Use on ...
    Aug 10, 2023 · Research has clearly shown that heritage language knowledge in particular positively influences parent-child closeness, largely due to the ...
  104. [104]
    The Behavioral and Mental Health Benefits of Speaking the Heritage ...
    Jun 24, 2023 · Our results suggest that increased use of heritage language is associated with fewer externalizing problems only in families with greater family cohesion and ...
  105. [105]
    Is bilingualism doomed? - Policy Options
    Sep 19, 2022 · Canada's fragmented linguistic geography – a result of its history of settlement – was never sustainable. Small linguistic islands, unless ...
  106. [106]
    Tensions between English and French Canadians
    The language divide between the two groups is the most visible cause of tension, with French Canadians feeling marginalized and undervalued. Acknowledging and ...
  107. [107]
    Linguistic Isolation and Mortality in Older Mexican Americans
    Jun 2, 2021 · We examined the link between living in a linguistically isolated neighborhood and all-cause mortality among an older Mexican American cohort.