Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

LogMAR chart

The LogMAR chart is a standardized visual acuity testing tool developed by optometrists Ian Bailey and Jan Lovie in 1976 to provide a more precise and reliable measurement of visual function compared to earlier designs like the Snellen chart.^[1] It uses a logarithmic scale representing the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (MAR)—the smallest angle of detail that can be resolved by the eye—expressed in minutes of arc, with each line of letters increasing in size by 0.1 log units for geometric progression.^[2] The chart features five sans-serif letters per row, selected from a set of 10 optotypes (C, D, E, F, L, N, O, P, T, Z) of equal legibility and difficulty, arranged with consistent spacing equal to the letter height to minimize crowding effects and ensure uniform testing conditions at a standard distance of 6 meters.^[1]^[3] This design addresses key limitations of the Snellen chart, such as irregular letter sizes, variable legibility, and uneven spacing, which can lead to inconsistent results, particularly in low-vision patients or clinical trials.^[1] By scoring each letter correctly as 0.02 logMAR units and enabling interpolation for partial line reads, the LogMAR system offers higher sensitivity, repeatability, and suitability for statistical analysis in research settings.^[4] It has become the gold standard for visual acuity assessment in ophthalmology, influencing variants like the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart, which maintains the core principles but uses Sloan letters for enhanced standardization in multicenter studies.^[1]^[3] Key advantages include its adaptability to non-standard testing distances via simple correction factors (e.g., adding 0.1 logMAR for 4-meter testing) and reduced bias in amblyopia or macular disease evaluations due to controlled contour interaction.^[1] Despite requiring more time for administration, its precision has driven widespread adoption in clinical practice, vision screening, and low-vision rehabilitation worldwide.^[3]

Fundamentals

Definition and purpose

The LogMAR chart is a standardized visual acuity testing tool that measures the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (MAR), where the MAR represents the angular size of the smallest detail resolvable by the eye at a specified distance.^[5] This design enables a more uniform and quantifiable assessment of visual function compared to earlier methods.^[1] The primary purpose of the LogMAR chart is to deliver precise, interval-scaled measurements of visual acuity, facilitating the diagnosis of refractive errors, the monitoring of progressive eye diseases such as glaucoma or macular degeneration, and the evaluation of treatment efficacy in clinical trials.^[5] Its logarithmic scaling provides greater consistency and repeatability than traditional fractional notations, reducing variability in results across different testing conditions.^[6] Introduced in 1976, the chart addresses limitations in predecessors like the Snellen chart by ensuring equal difficulty across letter sizes and improved precision for research and clinical use.^[5] For optimal accuracy, LogMAR testing is conducted at a standard distance of 6 meters, with chart illumination maintained between 80 and 320 cd/m² to standardize luminance and minimize environmental influences on performance.^[1]

Mathematical principles

The LogMAR chart measures visual acuity as the logarithm (base 10) of the minimum angle of resolution (MAR), expressed in minutes of arc, using the formula \log\text{MAR} = \log_{10}(\text{MAR}).^[5]^[1] For standard 20/20 vision, the MAR is 1.0 minute of arc, yielding a \log\text{MAR} value of 0.0.^[1] The chart employs a logarithmic progression in which successive rows decrease in optotype size by equal intervals of 0.1 \log\text{[MAR](/page/Mar)} units, corresponding to a geometric size reduction factor of $10^{0.1} \approx 1.26.^[5] This stepwise progression spans the acuity range such that a change of 1.0 \log\text{[MAR](/page/Mar)} equates to a 10-fold difference in resolution, as the logarithmic scale directly reflects proportional changes in the MAR.^[5]^[7] Conversions between Snellen fractions and \log\text{MAR} are achieved via the equation \log\text{MAR} = -\log_{10}\left(\frac{\text{numerator}}{\text{denominator}}\right), where the Snellen fraction represents the ratio of testing distance to the distance at which the optotype subtends a standard angle.^[7] For instance, a Snellen acuity of 20/20 gives \log\text{MAR} = 0.0, while 20/40 results in \log\text{MAR} = 0.3.^[7]^[8] This equal-interval logarithmic scaling transforms visual acuity into a metric suitable for parametric statistical analysis, permitting straightforward computation of means, variances, and confidence intervals, in contrast to the non-linear, ordinal properties of traditional Snellen scores.^[7]

Historical development

Origins and key contributors

The LogMAR chart was developed in 1976 by optometrist Ian L. Bailey and researcher Jan E. Lovie at the National Vision Research Institute of Australia in Melbourne.^[5] Their work aimed to create a more precise tool for measuring visual acuity, particularly to address the shortcomings of traditional charts like the Snellen, which often produced variable results due to uneven letter spacing, inconsistent row sizes, and non-standardized scoring.^[9] This innovation was driven by the need for a psychophysically valid scale suitable for low vision research, where accurate assessment of subtle acuity changes was essential for studying resolution limits in impaired vision.^[9] The design drew inspiration from earlier psychophysical studies on resolution acuity, incorporating logarithmic sizing to ensure that visual angle subtended by letters increased geometrically, providing equal difficulty across rows and enabling finer gradations in measurement.^[5] Bailey and Lovie's approach emphasized standardization to minimize testing errors, making the chart particularly valuable for clinical evaluations of patients with reduced vision.^[1] The inaugural Bailey-Lovie chart, the first implementation of LogMAR principles, was detailed in their seminal 1976 publication, where it was tested for reliability in clinical settings, demonstrating improved repeatability compared to prior methods.^[5] By the late 1970s, the chart saw early adoption in ophthalmology studies, influencing research on visual function and paving the way for its broader use in acuity assessment.^[9]

Evolution and standardization

Following the foundational Bailey-Lovie chart, post-1976 developments advanced LogMAR-based visual acuity measurement through refined designs and broader clinical integration. In 1984, the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) group introduced the ETDRS chart, which adapted the LogMAR principle by incorporating the Sloan letter set—a standardized collection of 10 optotypes designed for equal legibility—to enhance consistency across tests.^[9] This innovation addressed variability in optotype difficulty, making the ETDRS chart particularly suitable for longitudinal studies in conditions like diabetic retinopathy.^[10] Over the subsequent decades, more than 10 variants of LogMAR charts emerged to address specific clinical needs, such as pediatric testing or digital administration. Notable examples include the COMPlog, a computerized single-letter scoring system that maintains LogMAR precision while reducing testing time, and crowded LogMAR charts, which incorporate surrounding optotypes to simulate real-world contour interaction effects. Among these, the ETDRS chart solidified as the gold standard for clinical trials due to its high test-retest reliability and adoption in multicenter research protocols.^[11] Standardization efforts further propelled LogMAR adoption. In 1984, the International Council of Ophthalmology recommended LogMAR as the preferred scale for visual acuity measurement, emphasizing its logarithmic progression for accurate resolution assessment. Complementing this, the ISO 8596 standard, first published in 1994 and revised in 2009 and 2017, established protocols for chart presentation, including a testing distance of 4 meters and recommended chart luminance of 200 cd/m² (range 80–320 cd/m²) to ensure photopic conditions and minimize environmental variability.^[12]^[13] By the 1990s, LogMAR charts achieved widespread use in ophthalmic research worldwide, supplanting Snellen charts in rigorous studies and influencing global benchmarks for visual impairment. This shift informed the World Health Organization's criteria for categorizing vision loss, where thresholds like mild impairment (logMAR 0.3–0.5) provide precise equivalents to traditional Snellen definitions, facilitating consistent epidemiological reporting.^[4]

Design and construction

Optotypes and chart layout

The LogMAR chart utilizes standardized optotypes selected for their equal legibility and recognizability to ensure consistent measurement of visual acuity across the chart. In the original design, a set of ten non-serif letters—D, E, F, H, N, P, R, U, V, and Z—with a 5:4 height-to-width ratio, drawn from British standards (1968), was employed to achieve approximately equal difficulty in identification.^[1]^[5] Modern implementations, such as the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts, commonly use the Sloan letter set—including C, D, H, K, N, O, R, S, V, and Z—which are designed to be square-proportioned and have similar legibility profiles based on empirical testing.^[14] For non-literate patients or children, alternative optotypes like the tumbling E are incorporated, allowing orientation-based identification without reliance on letter recognition.^[15] The layout of the LogMAR chart features five optotypes per line, providing a uniform number of symbols unlike the variable counts in traditional Snellen charts, which helps maintain equivalent task difficulty across rows.^[5] Inter-letter and inter-line spacing is fixed at one optotype height, reducing variability in crowding effects and promoting precise acuity assessment.^[5] This arrangement spans rows in 0.1 logMAR increments, typically ranging from 1.0 logMAR (corresponding to severely reduced acuity) to -0.3 logMAR (superior acuity). The logarithmic scaling ensures proportional size steps between lines.^[5] Optotype sizes progress logarithmically, with the angular size halving approximately every 0.3 logMAR units, representing a 2-fold (doubling) change in resolution capability and accommodating testing from low vision levels (1.0 logMAR or worse) with larger symbols down to high-acuity thresholds.^[5] To better simulate everyday reading conditions, some LogMAR chart variants include optional crowding bars—surrounding contours or flanking elements—that introduce controlled interference around optotypes without altering the core spacing principles.^[16]

Calibration and variations

Calibration of LogMAR charts ensures consistent and reliable visual acuity measurements by adhering to standardized conditions. The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) LogMAR chart, for instance, is designed for a viewing distance of 4 meters to align with logarithmic scaling principles. Uniform illumination levels between 120 and 300 cd/m² are recommended to minimize variability in test results, as lower or inconsistent lighting can affect acuity outcomes. Charts maintain high contrast ratios of 90-95% to optimize letter legibility under daylight conditions, as specified in international standards for visual acuity testing. Transilluminated versions of LogMAR charts, often backlit for controlled environments, facilitate precise testing in clinical settings by providing even luminance across the chart surface. Variations in LogMAR charts adapt the core design for specific applications while preserving logarithmic progression. The original Bailey-Lovie chart, introduced in 1976, features five letters per row, selected from a set of ten letters, with equal spacing and sizing to achieve uniform difficulty across lines. The ETDRS chart refines this for research by using five Sloan letters per line, with randomized letter orders across multiple chart versions to reduce memorization effects and enhance test reliability. Pediatric versions incorporate Lea symbols—simple pictograms like an apple, house, circle, and square—arranged in proportionally spaced logMAR lines to accommodate young children's recognition abilities, typically tested at distances equivalent to 20/80 to 20/8 Snellen acuity. Quality control in LogMAR chart production emphasizes precise optotype proportions to uphold the scale's validity. Letters must have a stroke width equal to one-fifth of their height, ensuring consistent resolvability and adherence to minimum angle of resolution principles. Proportional spacing between letters and lines, matching letter width, prevents crowding effects that could skew measurements. Modern updates to LogMAR charts include computer-generated and electronic adaptations, enabling dynamic presentation of optotypes for repeated testing without fatigue or learning biases. These digital systems comply with ISO 8596:2017 standards (as amended) for ophthalmic visual acuity testing, supporting LogMAR notation alongside other scales like decimal and Snellen equivalents.^[12]

Administration and measurement

Testing procedure

The testing procedure for the LogMAR chart, often implemented using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol, begins with thorough preparation to ensure accurate results. The patient is positioned at a standard distance of 4 meters from the illuminated chart in a controlled environment with room lighting maintained at 50-100 foot-candles to minimize glare and shadows. Optimal refractive correction is verified using glasses, contact lenses, or a trial frame, and the non-tested eye is fully occluded with an eye patch or occluder to prevent any binocular summation effects during monocular testing. Different charts are used for each eye to avoid memorization, and the procedure typically starts with the right eye, followed by the left, before optional binocular assessment.^[17]^[2] Administration involves presenting the chart, which features five letters per line in decreasing size, and instructing the patient to read the letters aloud starting from the largest (top) line and proceeding downward. The examiner encourages the patient to attempt identification of every letter, even if unsure, employing a forced-choice method to maximize responses and reduce bias from hesitation. Testing continues line by line until the patient reaches a row where fewer than three out of five letters can be correctly identified, at which point the procedure stops for that eye to avoid fatigue and inefficiency. No strict time limits are imposed per line in standard protocols, though examiners monitor for prolonged delays that might indicate memorization attempts in repeated testing scenarios.^[17]^[18] Monocular testing is standard for diagnostic purposes to isolate each eye's performance, while binocular testing may follow to evaluate functional vision in everyday scenarios, using a separate chart to prevent carryover effects. For patients with low vision, adaptations include starting at a larger optotype size estimated from preliminary screening rather than the top line, or switching to a 1-meter distance with a +0.75 diopter lens addition if fewer than 20 letters are read at 4 meters. In cases of severe impairment, single-letter presentation with surrounding bars may be used to assess uncrowded acuity, though crowded line testing remains the norm for clinical accuracy. These modifications ensure the procedure remains feasible and reliable across acuity ranges.^[2]^[17]^[19]

Scoring and interpretation

The scoring of visual acuity on a LogMAR chart is performed on a letter-by-letter basis, where each line spans 0.1 logMAR units and typically contains five optotypes, assigning 0.02 logMAR units per optotype. The LogMAR value is determined by identifying the finest line the patient can read completely (or nearly so) and adjusting for any errors: specifically, add 0.02 logMAR for each optotype missed on that line, yielding the final acuity score. For instance, if a patient reads all optotypes correctly up to the 0.2 logMAR line but misses one optotype on the 0.3 logMAR line before stopping, the score is calculated as 0.3 + 0.02 = 0.32 logMAR.^[20]^[21] Interpretation of LogMAR scores provides a continuous measure of acuity, where 0.0 logMAR corresponds to normal vision equivalent to 20/20 Snellen, negative values indicate superior acuity (e.g., -0.3 logMAR for 20/10 Snellen), and positive values denote impairment, with scores ranging typically from -0.3 logMAR for superior vision to greater than 1.0 logMAR for severe impairment. Values exceeding 0.3 logMAR are classified as mild visual impairment, reflecting reduced resolution starting around 20/40 Snellen equivalence.^[20]^[22] For partial lines, interpolation is used to refine the score by estimating position between adjacent lines; for example, reading three out of five optotypes on a line interpolates the value 0.04 logMAR above the previous complete line (two-fifths of the 0.1 logMAR interval). In cases of repeated testing, scores are averaged arithmetically, as the logMAR scale supports interval-level statistics due to its logarithmic nature.^[21]^[7] In the ETDRS protocol, an adaptation of the LogMAR system, acuity is often notated in terms of total letters correct across the chart, where each correctly identified letter improves the score by 0.02 logMAR (equivalent to five letters per 0.1 logMAR line), facilitating precise tracking in clinical studies. The total letter score can then be converted to logMAR using the formula LogMAR = 1.7 - (0.02 × number of letters read correctly at 4 meters).

Comparisons and advantages

Relation to Snellen chart

The LogMAR chart emerged as a direct evolution from the Snellen chart, which was introduced by Dutch ophthalmologist Herman Snellen in 1862 as the first standardized tool for measuring visual acuity through progressively smaller optotypes viewed at a fixed distance.^[1] Both charts share fundamental principles in assessing resolution acuity, employing rows of letters or symbols that decrease in size to test the smallest optotype resolvable, typically at a distance of 6 meters (or 20 feet), where the size corresponds to the minimum angle of resolution (MAR).^[4] For instance, the Snellen chart's 20/20 line represents letters subtending 5 arcminutes, with each stroke approximately 1 arcminute, a benchmark akin to the LogMAR chart's 0.0 level, which also targets 1 arcminute resolution.^[1] Despite these commonalities, the LogMAR chart, developed by Ian Bailey and Jan Lovie in 1976, addresses several methodological inconsistencies in the Snellen design to enhance precision and uniformity. The Snellen chart features variable numbers of letters per row—ranging from one at the top to up to ten at the bottom—and follows a geometric progression in letter sizes (typically increasing by 1.25 to 1.5 times per line), leading to irregular spacing and potential crowding effects that vary line difficulty.^[4] In contrast, the LogMAR standardizes five letters per row with equal proportional spacing between letters and lines, employing a logarithmic scale for size progression in 0.1 logMAR units, and denotes acuity as a decimal value rather than the Snellen's fractional notation (e.g., 20/40).^[23] This logarithmic basis ensures consistent difficulty across rows, mitigating the Snellen's reliance on subjective line-by-line reading where partial credit is not systematically awarded. Equivalence between the two systems allows for approximate conversions, facilitating comparison in clinical contexts, though direct mappings reveal limitations in the Snellen chart.^[1] A Snellen acuity of 20/200 corresponds roughly to a LogMAR value of 1.0, while 20/20 equates to LogMAR 0.0; however, at lower acuities, the Snellen chart tends to overestimate performance due to its unequal letter difficulties and non-uniform progression, potentially inflating results by up to 0.2–0.3 LogMAR units in poor vision cases.^[4] These conversions, derived from standardized tables, underscore the LogMAR's role as a refined successor that builds on Snellen's foundational framework while promoting more reliable acuity assessment.^[23]

Benefits over other acuity charts

The LogMAR chart provides enhanced precision and reproducibility in visual acuity measurements compared to alternatives like the Snellen chart, primarily through its standardized design featuring an equal number of five optotypes per row and proportional spacing that maintains consistent crowding across all sizes. This uniformity reduces inter- and intra-observer variability, with test-retest standard deviations typically around 0.05 logMAR for LogMAR charts, in contrast to approximately 0.15 logMAR for Snellen charts. As a result, LogMAR testing is more effective for detecting subtle clinical changes, such as a one-line improvement equivalent to 0.1 logMAR units, enabling finer monitoring of conditions like amblyopia or post-surgical outcomes. The logarithmic scale of LogMAR charts introduces a linear progression in acuity units, which supports reliable statistical analyses including averaging of scores and application of parametric tests—operations that are invalid with the nonlinear Snellen fractions. This property is particularly advantageous in clinical trials, where LogMAR-based assessments, such as those in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), offer greater sensitivity to treatment effects. Such statistical robustness minimizes bias in group comparisons and enhances the power of research endpoints.^[4] In evaluating low vision, LogMAR charts excel by extending the testable range beyond 1.0 logMAR (corresponding to Snellen 20/200 or worse) while preserving uniform crowding, which mitigates floor and ceiling effects that limit Snellen charts at acuity extremes. This consistent format yields more accurate and repeatable results for patients with severe impairment, facilitating better classification of visual disability without disproportionate measurement errors at poorer levels. Although LogMAR charts offer these benefits, they demand more administration time—often 2-3 minutes per eye versus under 1 minute for Snellen—and require greater testing space (typically 4-6 meters), which can pose logistical challenges in busy clinics. Additionally, in uncrowded configurations, LogMAR measurements may overestimate acuity by 0.1-0.2 logMAR compared to crowded standards, potentially affecting interpretations in non-standardized settings.

Applications

Defining low vision and blindness

The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies low vision as a best-corrected visual acuity in the better eye greater than 0.3 logMAR (equivalent to worse than 20/40 Snellen) up to 1.3 logMAR (equivalent to 20/400 Snellen), encompassing mild to severe impairments that cannot be fully corrected with standard refractive means.^[24] Blindness is defined as a best-corrected visual acuity worse than 1.3 logMAR in the better eye, often corresponding to profound loss of functional vision.^[25] These thresholds, derived from LogMAR measurements obtained through standardized chart scoring, enable precise categorization for epidemiological and clinical purposes.^[26] Clinical thresholds further subdivide low vision into levels based on LogMAR values: mild impairment ranges from 0.3 to 0.5 logMAR (approximately 20/40 to 20/63 Snellen), moderate from 0.5 to 1.0 logMAR (20/63 to 20/200 Snellen), and severe greater than 1.0 logMAR (worse than 20/200 Snellen) up to the blindness cutoff.^[24] These LogMAR-based categories provide a more consistent and quantifiable contrast to traditional Snellen definitions, which can vary due to uneven spacing and subjective interpretation.^[27] Functionally, a LogMAR value of 0.5 or worse significantly impacts daily activities, such as driving, where many international standards require acuity better than 0.3 logMAR in the better eye for licensing.^[28] Distinctions between best-corrected acuity (optimal refraction) and presenting acuity (current correction) are critical, as the former assesses inherent impairment while the latter reflects real-world vision needs.^[29]

Use in clinical research

The LogMAR chart serves as a primary outcome measure in numerous clinical trials evaluating visual acuity changes, particularly in ophthalmological research on retinal diseases. For instance, in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), LogMAR-based charts were employed to assess visual acuity progression following panretinal photocoagulation in patients with diabetic retinopathy, enabling precise quantification of treatment effects.^[19] A change of 0.2 logMAR, equivalent to two lines or 10 letters on the chart, is widely regarded as clinically meaningful for detecting significant improvements or deteriorations in visual function across such trials.^[30] The logarithmic scale of LogMAR charts facilitates statistical linearity, supporting parametric analyses and meta-analyses of visual acuity data from heterogeneous studies, which enhances the power to detect subtle treatment differences. This sensitivity allows for reliable identification of a 0.1 logMAR change, corresponding to a five-letter improvement, making it ideal for endpoint assessments in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). LogMAR measurements are the preferred standard in modern ophthalmology RCTs involving visual acuity outcomes.^[27] In age-related macular degeneration (AMD) research, the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) utilized ETDRS LogMAR charts to track long-term visual acuity stability and the impact of antioxidant supplementation, revealing modest but significant preservation of function in supplemented cohorts. Similarly, in refractive surgery trials, LogMAR charts quantify postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, with studies reporting mean improvements of 0.3 to 1.4 logMAR in procedures like LASIK for myopia correction. These applications often integrate LogMAR data with retinal imaging modalities, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), to correlate acuity losses with microstructural changes like macular thickness, as demonstrated in diabetic macular edema and retinal vein occlusion studies.^[31]^[32]^[33] Emerging directions include digital LogMAR implementations for teleophthalmology, where validated home-based ETDRS-style charts enable remote monitoring in large cohorts during pandemics or underserved settings, with test-retest variability comparable to in-clinic assessments. Additionally, AI-assisted scoring systems are being developed to automate letter recognition and acuity estimation from digital chart images, potentially scaling analysis for population-level research while maintaining high accuracy against manual ETDRS readings.^[34]^[35]

References

[1]
Evaluation of Visual Acuity - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
The LogMAR chart: To overcome the limitations of the Snellen chart, Bailey and Lovie introduced the LogMAR chart in 1976.[21] (see Image. Serifs in Snellen ...
[2]
Visual Acuity Testing
Oct 19, 2015 · LogMAR stands for Log of Minimum Angle of Resolution. This is a metric designed chart. The design of this chart allows for a logarithmic or ...
[3]
A history of visual acuity testing and optotypes | Eye - Nature
Aug 3, 2022 · Since Bailey and Lovies's chart, over 10 new LogMAR charts have been developed of which the ETDRS one became best known [60]. The same lament ...
[4]
A history of visual acuity testing and optotypes - Eye
### Summary of LogMAR Chart History and Development
[5]
New design principles for visual acuity letter charts - PubMed
This paper intoduces new principles for the design and use of letter charts for the measurement of visual acuity.
[6]
[PDF] Standards for Visual Acuity
Jun 15, 2006 · optotypes and a standard test distance of 4 meters, back illuminated to a calibrated light level, and which required a detailed protocol of ...
[7]
Visual Acuity Cheat Sheet - Michael Bach
Oct 20, 2017 · LogMAR “runs the wrong way round”, unless you think of it as measuring “visual loss”. LogMAR is approximately normally distributed. That means ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[8]
Table 2. Conversion between logMAR and Snellen Visual Acuity
Table 2. Conversion between logMAR and Snellen Visual Acuity. logMAR Visual Acuity. Snellen Visual Acuity. 0.0. 20/20. 0.1. 20/25. 0.2. 20/32. 0.3. 20/40. 0.5.
[9]
Visual acuity testing. From the laboratory to the clinic - ScienceDirect
Sep 20, 2013 · Both the original Bailey–Lovie chart and the ETDRS charts chose 5 letters at each size, a size progression in steps of exactly 0.10 log units, a ...
[10]
https://precision-vision.com/what-is-etdrs/
[11]
Shortening the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual ...
Mar 19, 2021 · The ETDRS was shown to be superior to the Snellen chart and is therefore considered the current gold standard for testing VA in clinical trials ...Missing: variants | Show results with:variants
[12]
ISO 8596:2017 - Ophthalmic optics — Visual acuity testing
ISO 8596:2017 specifies a range of Landolt ring optotypes and describes a method for measuring distance visual acuity under photopic conditions.Missing: LogMAR chart illumination
[13]
[PDF] Article 4 Comparison of Backlit and Novel Automated ETDRS Visual ...
The accompanying light box produces a standardized illumination of 120 cd/m2, which conforms to the ANSI specifications.Missing: m² | Show results with:m²
[14]
New visual acuity charts for clinical research - PubMed
The charts have high-contrast lettering on washable white polystyrene. Each line has five Sloan letters; the lines are of equal difficulty and there is a ...
[15]
Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visual acuity ...
The Reduced logMAR E chart (RLME) employs three letters per line, 'tumbling E' optotypes, and conforms to accepted contemporary design principles. Methods ...
[16]
Crowded letter and crowded picture logMAR acuity in children ... - NIH
Jul 7, 2016 · The Keeler Letter test has two crowded charts, and a matching card is available. The two crowded chart versions have different presentations ...
[17]
Visual Acuity - PhenX Toolkit: Protocols
Feb 26, 2010 · Measurement of clarity or sharpness of vision (visual acuity) using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts.
[18]
https://store.good-lite.com/blogs/news/what-is-etdrs
[19]
Standardized ETDRS Testing - VectorVision
The CSV-2000, CSV-1000 and ESV-3000 ETDRS offer automated, self-calibrating standardized test lighting for ETDRS, to ensure consistent and accurate results.Missing: 120 | Show results with:120
[20]
New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts
This paper introduces new principles for the design and use of letter charts for the measurement of visual acuity.
[21]
[PDF] VA testing in optometric practice
The Bailey-Lovie chart employs the letter set specified in the British Standard. A variant of this chart, employing the Sloan character set, was developed for ...
[22]
Vision Impairment and the Population Attributable Fraction of ...
Sep 5, 2024 · Exposures Near and distance visual acuity impairments were each defined as >0.30 logMAR. Contrast sensitivity impairment was defined as <1.55 ...
[23]
[PDF] Snellen and LogMAR acuity testing
Nov 5, 2015 · The Snellen Chart (fig 1), which traditionally has been used to measure visual acuity is easily recognised as one of the hallmarks of the ...
[24]
Visual Impairment and Low Vision Aids—A Comparison between ...
Nov 14, 2023 · Mild vision impairment is defined as a visual acuity worse than 0.3 logMAR, moderate vision impairment as worse than 0.5 logMAR, severe vision ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[25]
Low Vision (Position Paper) | ECOO
Low vision is defined as visual acuity of less than 0.3 (6/18, 0.5 logMAR) but equal to or better than 0.05 (3/60, 1.3 logMAR), or a corresponding visual field ...
[26]
[PDF] Low Vision: the essential guide for ophthalmologists
The International Classification of Diseases 11 (2018) classifies vision impairment into two groups, distance near and presenting vision impairment2. Distance ...
[27]
Measuring Acuity: LogMAR and Snellen Charts Explained
Aug 11, 2025 · LogMAR stands for logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. Developed in Australia in 1976, a LogMAR chart also has lines of letters ...
[28]
Advising patients on visual fitness to drive: implications of revised ...
Drivers with 6/7.5 (+0.10 logMAR) or better vision can be advised that they meet the driving standard. Drivers with acuity between 6/9 and 6/12 (+0.12—+0.30 ...
[29]
Low-Vision Aids - American Academy of Ophthalmology
Nov 24, 2015 · For VA less than 20/200 (0.1 logMar), optical aids should be prescribed earlier. If the VA is less than 20/400 and the central scotoma greater ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[30]
Population Prevalence of Vision Impairment in US Adults 71 Years ...
Jan 12, 2023 · Distance VI was defined using WHO definitions (mild VI: >0.30-0.48 logMAR, Snellen equivalent <20/40-20/60; moderate VI: >0.48-1.0 logMAR, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[31]
How Sensitive to Clinical Change are ETDRS logMAR Visual Acuity ...
Simulated acuity change of 0.2 logMAR (two lines of letters) or greater can be reliably distinguished from no change (both sensitivity and specificity >95%) ...Missing: randomized | Show results with:randomized
[32]
Determinants of Four-Year Visual Acuity Loss in Geographic Atrophy
Best-corrected visual acuity was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) charts.<|control11|><|separator|>
[33]
Visual acuity, refractive error, and regression outcomes in 169 ...
Feb 20, 2021 · Uncorrected distance visual acuity improved from an average logMAR 1.8 to 0.4; corrected distance visual acuity improved an average 0.3 logMAR.
[34]
Correlation Between Retinal Microstructure Detected by Optical ...
Jun 1, 2022 · This study aimed to investigate the correlation between best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and retinal microstructural parameters detected by optical ...
[35]
Validation of Home Visual Acuity Tests for Telehealth in the COVID ...
Mar 31, 2022 · This comparative effectiveness research study compares at-home visual acuity tests with in-office acuity measurements to validate their use with telehealth ...
[36]
Visual acuity prediction on real-life patient data using a machine ...
Mar 6, 2024 · To give an idea of the scale, the annotating ophthalmologists achieve 57.8% and 50 \pm 10.7% F1-score given a constant IVOM therapy scheme.