Logarithmic scale
A logarithmic scale is a method of scaling measurements or graphical representations where the positions or values are proportional to the logarithms of the numbers being represented, rather than the numbers themselves.[1] This approach transforms multiplicative relationships into additive ones, allowing data spanning vast ranges—often several orders of magnitude—to be displayed compactly and analyzed effectively without losing detail on smaller scales.[2] Unlike linear scales, which increase additively, logarithmic scales expand proportionally with each successive power of the base (typically 10), compressing large values while stretching small ones to reveal patterns in exponential or power-law phenomena.[3] Logarithmic scales originated from the invention of logarithms by Scottish mathematician John Napier in 1614, who developed them to simplify astronomical calculations by converting multiplications into additions.[4] Napier's work, published in Mirifici Logarithmorum Canonis Descriptio, laid the foundation for logarithm tables and later tools like the slide rule, which physically embodied logarithmic scaling for rapid computations.[5] Over time, refinements by mathematicians such as Henry Briggs introduced the common base-10 logarithm, enhancing its utility in science and engineering.[6] In modern applications, logarithmic scales are essential across disciplines for handling extreme value ranges. In seismology, the Richter scale measures earthquake magnitude as the base-10 logarithm of seismic energy released, where each whole-number increase represents about 31 times more energy.[7] Acoustics employs the decibel scale, which logarithmically quantifies sound intensity relative to a reference level, capturing human perception's nonlinear response.[8] Chemistry uses the pH scale to express hydrogen ion concentration logarithmically, with each unit change indicating a tenfold variation in acidity or basicity.[9] In mathematics and data visualization, log scales facilitate plotting exponential growth, such as population models or financial compounding, and are standard in tools like semilog graphs.[10] These scales also appear in biology for growth rates,[9] in economics,[11] and in physics for stellar magnitudes in astronomy.[12]Fundamentals
Definition
A logarithmic scale is a scale of measurement in which the position of a point on the scale is proportional to the logarithm of the value being represented, rather than the value itself. This means that equal distances on the scale correspond to equal ratios (multiplicative factors) in the magnitude of the variable, making it particularly useful for data spanning multiple orders of magnitude.[13][14] To understand logarithmic scales, it is essential to recall that a logarithm is the inverse operation to exponentiation: if b^y = x, then y = \log_b x, where b is the base of the logarithm, a positive real number not equal to 1. Common bases include 10 for the common logarithm (often denoted \log x) and e \approx 2.718 for the natural logarithm (denoted \ln x). On a logarithmic scale with base b, the positions of values x are marked proportionally to y = \log_b x.[15][16][17][18] In contrast to a linear scale, where equal intervals represent equal absolute additions (arithmetic progression, such as increments of 1 from 1 to 10), a logarithmic scale represents equal intervals as multiplications by a constant factor (geometric progression, such as doubling from 1 to 2 to 4 to 8). This distinction allows logarithmic scales to compress large ranges of values into a manageable visual or numerical space, avoiding the distortion caused by linear representation of exponentially varying data.[13][19] For a simple visual comparison, consider a number line from 1 to 1000. On a linear scale, the distance from 1 to 2 is the same as from 999 to 1000 (both 1 unit), emphasizing small differences at high values. On a base-10 logarithmic scale, the distance from 1 ($10^0) to 10 ($10^1) equals that from 10 to 100 ($10^2), and from 100 to 1000 ($10^3), each spanning one logarithmic unit and highlighting proportional growth equally across the range.[20][13]Mathematical Properties
The logarithmic transformation underlying a logarithmic scale is defined by the function y = \log_b x, where b > 0, b \neq 1 is the base, and x > 0 is the input value from the positive real numbers.[15] This maps the positive reals to the entire real line, effectively compressing wide ranges of multiplicative data into a more manageable additive scale. A key property is its effect on products, where \log_b (xy) = \log_b x + \log_b y for x > 0, y > 0, transforming multiplicative relationships into additive ones, which is particularly useful for data spanning orders of magnitude.[21] Logarithmic scales exhibit additivity with respect to ratios, as \log_b (x/y) = \log_b x - \log_b y, allowing differences in the transformed space to directly represent relative changes.[21] The domain is restricted to positive real numbers, rendering the function undefined for zero or negative values, with a vertical asymptote at x = 0.[22] As x approaches 0 from the right, \log_b x approaches -\infty, creating a singularity at the origin that emphasizes the scale's sensitivity to small values.[23] The change of base formula, \log_b x = \frac{\log_k x}{\log_k b} for any valid base k, facilitates computation and equivalence across different logarithmic bases.[24] This scale is the inverse of an exponential scale, where x = b^y, highlighting their complementary roles in representing growth and compression.[15] In constructing a logarithmic scale, the physical or graphical distance between consecutive marks for values x_i and x_{i+1} (with x_{i+1} > x_i > 0) is proportional to \log_b (x_{i+1} / x_i ), ensuring that equal ratios in the original data correspond to equal intervals on the scale.[25] This derivation follows from positioning points at y_i = \log_b x_i, so the interval length is |\log_b x_{i+1} - \log_b x_i| = |\log_b (x_{i+1} / x_i)|.[26]Graphical Representations
Semi-logarithmic Plots
A semi-logarithmic plot, commonly referred to as a semi-log plot, features one axis scaled logarithmically and the other linearly, making it ideal for visualizing data that follows exponential growth or decay patterns. Typically, the vertical (y) axis employs the logarithmic scale to accommodate wide-ranging values, while the horizontal (x) axis remains linear for uniform time or independent variable progression. This configuration transforms multiplicative changes in the dependent variable into additive ones, facilitating the analysis of relative rates over absolute magnitudes.[25][27] To construct a semi-log plot, the logarithmic axis is marked with ticks at intervals corresponding to powers of the base (often 10), such as 1, 10, 100, and 1000, where the physical spacing between these marks is equal despite the increasing numerical differences. Subdivisions between major ticks represent finer logarithmic increments, like factors of 2 or 3 within each decade, ensuring the scale compresses large values while expanding small ones. The linear axis, in contrast, uses standard equal intervals for its ticks, allowing direct plotting of the original data points without transformation on that dimension. Data points are then connected or fitted, often revealing patterns obscured in linear plots.[25][28] In interpretation, a straight line on a semi-log plot with logarithmic y-axis signifies an underlying exponential relationship, such as y = a \cdot b^x, where the line's slope corresponds to \log b, indicating the constant relative growth or decay rate per unit change in x. Deviations from linearity highlight shifts, like saturation or inhibition, in the process. This linearization simplifies slope calculations for rate constants and enables straightforward extrapolation or comparison across datasets with vastly different scales.[27][29] A classic example is plotting bacterial population growth over time, where the exponential phase appears as a straight line on a semi-log graph, allowing easy determination of the growth rate from the slope, as cell numbers double at constant intervals under ideal conditions. Similarly, in radioactive decay, the activity or remaining nuclei versus time yields a linear semi-log plot, with the negative slope reflecting the half-life, enabling precise estimation of decay constants from experimental counts spanning multiple orders of magnitude.[29][28] The primary advantages of semi-log plots lie in their ability to clearly depict percentage or relative changes, compressing wide dynamic ranges into a readable format without losing detail on slower variations. This makes them invaluable in biology for growth curves, in physics for decay processes, and in finance for tracking stock prices over extended periods, where a semi-log scale accurately represents compounding returns as steady trends rather than distorting curves. By linearizing exponentials, they enhance trend identification and statistical fitting compared to linear scales.[27][30]Log-log Plots
A log-log plot is a graphical representation in which both the horizontal (x) and vertical (y) axes are scaled logarithmically, enabling the effective display of data spanning multiple orders of magnitude.[31] This dual logarithmic scaling is particularly suited for data exhibiting power-law relationships, where quantities vary multiplicatively rather than additively.[32] The construction of a log-log plot involves marking ticks on both axes according to a logarithmic progression, commonly using base 10 to denote decades—such as positions at 0.1, 1, 10, 100, and so on—allowing uniform spacing for exponentially increasing values.[33] Data points are then plotted by taking the logarithm of both variables, which transforms the coordinates without altering the relative relationships.[34] Mathematically, if the underlying relationship follows a power law of the form y = a x^b, applying logarithms to both sides yields: \log y = \log a + b \log x or, denoting x' = \log x and y' = \log y, y' = \log a + b x'. This results in a straight line on the plot, where the slope b represents the scaling exponent and the y-intercept is \log a.[32] The linearity confirms the presence of a power-law dependence, facilitating parameter estimation through simple linear regression on the transformed data.[31] In interpretation, the slope of the line directly quantifies the exponent b, providing insight into the nature of scaling phenomena across disciplines.[31] For example, in biology, log-log plots are used to analyze allometric scaling, where traits like metabolic rate scale with body mass according to a power law, often with exponents around 0.75 for mammals.[35] Similarly, plotting earthquake magnitude against energy release on a log-log scale reveals the power-law relationship, with energy E approximating $10^{1.5M} where M is magnitude, highlighting how small increases in magnitude correspond to disproportionately large energy jumps.[36] Another illustrative case is Zipf's law for city sizes, where log-log plots of city rank versus population show linear trends with an exponent approximately -1, reflecting self-similar patterns in the distribution of city sizes.[37] Log-log plots excel at accommodating wide dynamic ranges, compressing vast scales into a manageable visual form without losing proportionality.[31] This double-logarithmic linearization is especially valuable for multiplicative processes, such as those generating power-law distributions in natural and social systems, by converting exponential growth or decay into straightforward linear trends for analysis.[34]Extensions and Variations
Variations of logarithmic scales adapt the transformation to specific data types, such as probabilities or values near boundaries. The logit scale applies the logit transformation, defined as \log\left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right) where p is a probability between 0 and 1, to linearize sigmoid relationships in plots of binary outcomes or proportions.[38] This scale expands regions near 0 and 1, facilitating comparison of probabilities across a wide range without compression at the extremes.[39] Similarly, the probit scale uses the inverse cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution, \Phi^{-1}(p), to transform probabilities, often employed in dose-response curves or Q-Q plots to assess normality or model cumulative probabilities.[40] Reversed log scales invert the direction of the logarithmic progression, which can emphasize differences in small values near zero by allocating more visual space to lower magnitudes in certain visualization contexts.[41] Extensions of logarithmic scales address limitations like handling negative values, zeros, or discontinuous ranges. The sym-log (symmetric logarithmic) scale combines a linear region near zero with logarithmic scaling elsewhere to accommodate negative values, zero, and wide dynamic ranges while preserving continuity. Its construction follows the formula y = \sign(x) \log_{10} \left(1 + \frac{|x|}{10^{C}}\right), where C (linthresh exponent) sets the crossover point between linear and logarithmic behavior, typically chosen based on data spread.[42] Broken log scales integrate linear segments for low-value regions with logarithmic segments for higher values, creating a piecewise transformation to avoid distortion in mixed-range datasets.[43] For shifted data that does not include zero, double-log plots with offsets apply logarithmic scaling to adjusted variables, such as \log(x + a) versus \log(y + b), where offsets a and b shift the domain appropriately.[44] These extensions find use in scenarios requiring robust visualization of heterogeneous data. Sym-log scales are effective for histograms containing outliers, such as income distributions, where they reveal both modal clusters near zero and extreme tails without clipping or excessive compression.[42] Broken scales suit engineering plots with sparse low values and dense high values, like signal intensities, by providing clarity across segments.[45] Double-log with offsets aids analysis of bounded or offset datasets, such as growth curves starting from a baseline. Developments in these scales stem from needs in computational tools; for instance, sym-log originated in visualization software to extend log capabilities, with Matplotlib implementing it based on Webber's bi-symmetric transformation for broad applicability in scientific plotting. Similar adaptations appear in libraries like D3.js, enhancing interactive graphics for wide-range data.[46]Common Applications
In Data Visualization
Logarithmic scales play a crucial role in data visualization by compressing wide-ranging data into a more manageable and interpretable format, allowing viewers to discern patterns across orders of magnitude that would otherwise be obscured on linear scales. For instance, when plotting values spanning from 1 to 1,000,000, a logarithmic scale transforms the axis to represent multiplicative changes equally, preventing smaller values from being compressed to near-zero and invisible while highlighting relative growth rates. This approach is particularly effective for datasets exhibiting exponential or power-law distributions, such as income distributions or network traffic, where linear scales distort the visual emphasis on lower-end values. In practice, logarithmic scales are applied in various chart types to handle skewed data effectively. Histograms using log scales can reveal the distribution of species abundance in ecology, where rare events dominate without overwhelming the view of common occurrences. Similarly, scatter plots with log-log axes facilitate the analysis of relationships in multiplicative processes, like city sizes versus population densities, by linearizing power-law trends. Bar charts on log scales are useful for comparing web traffic volumes across sites, where a logarithmic y-axis ensures that sites with 10 visits are not dwarfed by those with millions. Best practices for implementing logarithmic scales emphasize clarity and user accessibility to mitigate their counterintuitive nature for non-experts. Axes should be labeled with actual data values at tick marks rather than logarithmic indices, enabling direct reading of magnitudes without mental conversion. Designers must also include annotations or legends warning that equal intervals on the scale represent multiplicative rather than additive differences, as this can lead to misinterpretation of growth rates. For datasets with zeros or negative values, transformations like adding a small constant or using a log(1+x) variant are recommended to avoid undefined points. Software tools simplify the adoption of logarithmic scales in visualizations. In Python's Matplotlib library, theyscale('log') function automatically applies a logarithmic y-axis to plots, supporting seamless integration with pandas dataframes for exploratory analysis. R's ggplot2 package offers scale_y_log10() for customizable log transformations in layered graphics, ideal for statistical reporting. Tableau provides drag-and-drop options for axis scaling, with automatic log detection for measures like sales data, enhancing interactive dashboards.
A notable example is the early visualization of COVID-19 case growth during the 2020 pandemic, where logarithmic scales on line charts effectively illustrated exponential phases across regions, making it easier to compare trajectories from dozens to thousands of cases without the curves flattening misleadingly on linear axes.
In Scientific and Engineering Contexts
In physics, logarithmic scales are essential for spectrum analysis, particularly in examining frequency responses where data spans multiple orders of magnitude. For instance, power spectra are frequently plotted using decibels (dB), a logarithmic unit that compresses wide dynamic ranges into a manageable view, allowing clear identification of signal components in electronics and optics.[47] In control systems, Bode plots utilize a logarithmic frequency axis to represent the magnitude and phase of a system's transfer function, facilitating the analysis of stability and response characteristics across frequencies from hertz to kilohertz.[48] In engineering applications, especially signal processing, logarithmic scales enable precise quantification of gain in amplifiers through the decibel scale, where a 3 dB increase corresponds to a doubling of power, simplifying the handling of ratios in circuit design and audio systems.[49] The Richter scale in seismology exemplifies this in geophysics, defining earthquake magnitude as the base-10 logarithm of the maximum amplitude of seismic waves recorded by a seismograph, adjusted for distance, which captures the exponential increase in energy release—each whole number step represents about 31 times more energy.[36] Logarithmic scales prove invaluable in scientific modeling of complex phenomena involving scale-invariant or exponential processes. In turbulence studies, Kolmogorov's theory describes energy cascades across scales, with logarithmic scaling observed in the inertial subrange of pipe flow velocity profiles, where the logarithmic layer begins around 100 times the Kolmogorov length scale, aiding predictions of dissipation rates.[50] For pharmacokinetics, semi-logarithmic plots of plasma drug concentrations versus time reveal first-order elimination kinetics, where the log-linear decay half-life simplifies dosing calculations for exponential clearance.[51] Specific examples highlight these applications: in chemistry, the pH scale measures acidity as \mathrm{pH} = -\log_{10} [\mathrm{H}^+], where [\mathrm{H}^+] is the hydrogen ion molar concentration, compressing the 10^{-14} to 10^0 range into a 0-14 scale for practical analysis of solutions.[52] In astronomy, stellar magnitudes use a logarithmic system where apparent magnitude m relates to brightness flux F by m = -2.5 \log_{10} (F / F_0), with F_0 a reference, allowing comparison of stars differing by factors of 100 in brightness across a five-magnitude interval.[12] These scales offer key advantages in scientific and engineering contexts by accommodating data over vast orders of magnitude—such as from microvolts to kilovolts in signals—enabling equitable comparisons without distortion from linear plotting.[8] They also align with natural laws exhibiting inverse-square or exponential dependencies, like gravitational or radiative fluxes, transforming multiplicative relationships into additive ones for easier modeling and interpretation.[53]In Human Perception and Everyday Uses
Human perception of sensory stimuli often follows logarithmic relationships, as described by the Weber-Fechner law, which states that the just noticeable difference in a stimulus is proportional to the magnitude of the stimulus, leading to a logarithmic scaling of perceived intensity.[54] This psychophysical principle, formulated by Ernst Heinrich Weber and Gustav Theodor Fechner in the 19th century, explains why equal ratios in physical stimuli produce equal perceptual increments across various senses.[55] In auditory perception, loudness is quantified using the sone scale, where perceived loudness grows linearly with the logarithm of sound intensity, such that a 10-phon increase roughly doubles the subjective loudness. For visual perception, brightness is approximately the logarithm of luminance, allowing the human eye to discern a wide range of light levels from dim twilight to bright sunlight on a compressed scale.[56] Similarly, intensities in taste and smell follow power laws close to logarithmic transformations, where perceived strength increases more slowly than the physical concentration of stimuli, as established in sensory scaling experiments.[57] Everyday tools leverage these logarithmic principles for practical computation and measurement; for instance, the slide rule, a historical analog device invented around 1622 by William Oughtred, uses aligned logarithmic scales on sliding rulers to perform multiplication and division by addition and subtraction of log values.[58] Audio equipment often features decibel markings on volume controls and meters, a logarithmic unit where a 10 dB increase corresponds to a tenfold rise in sound power, aligning with human hearing sensitivity.[59] Modern consumer devices incorporate logarithmic scales to enhance usability; smartphone spectrum analyzer apps, such as FrequenSee, display frequency responses on logarithmic axes to mimic human auditory perception, providing clearer visualization of audio spectra from low bass to high treble. Fitness trackers, like those from Fitbit, log heart rate data in zones that reflect exponential increases in effort and physiological response, using percentage-based thresholds derived from maximum heart rate to track progress in a perceptually relevant manner.[60] Culturally and historically, logarithmic scales underpin music theory, where octaves represent a frequency ratio of 2:1, perceived as equivalent pitches across registers due to the logarithmic nature of auditory frequency discrimination.[61] In cartography, logarithmic azimuthal projections, developed by Torsten Hägerstrand in the mid-20th century, compress distances from a central point using logarithms to better represent global connectivity and migration patterns on flat maps.[62]Logarithmic Units
General Concept
Logarithmic units are dimensionless measures that express the magnitude of a physical quantity relative to a specified reference level using a logarithm of their ratio, ensuring the result is inherently relative and scale-invariant. These units arise naturally when quantifying ratios of quantities with identical dimensions, such as power or intensity, where the logarithm transforms multiplicative relationships into additive ones. A prototypical form is the level of a quantity, given by the formula L = 10 \log_{10} \left( \frac{P}{P_0} \right), where P is the measured power and P_0 is the reference power; this expression yields a value in decibels (dB).[63] Such units are dimensionless because the ratio P / P_0 cancels out the physical dimensions, leaving a pure number scaled by the logarithmic factor.[64] The foundational unit is the bel (B), defined as the common (base-10) logarithm of the ratio of two powers, introduced in the context of telecommunications to quantify signal attenuation and gain. The decibel, as its decimal submultiple (1 B = 10 dB), provides a more practical scale for measurements, with the general formula for level differences between two quantities following \Delta L = 10 \log_{10} (P_2 / P_1) in dB. This approach circumvents the need for arbitrary scaling when expressing ratios, promoting consistency across applications, and is prevalent in domains like acoustics, optics, and communications engineering.[65][63] Logarithmic units offer significant advantages in handling concatenated systems, where values add directly—for instance, the total gain in dB of cascaded amplifiers is the sum of individual gains, simplifying calculations that would otherwise involve products. They also compress vast dynamic ranges into a compact scale, preventing numerical overflow in computations involving orders-of-magnitude variations, such as signal strengths spanning microwatts to kilowatts.[66] In contrast to absolute units like watts, which quantify the intrinsic value of a quantity in a specific physical dimension (e.g., energy per time), logarithmic units such as the bel or dB solely capture relative differences or ratios without reference to absolute magnitude. For example, 3 dB represents a doubling of power regardless of the baseline wattage, underscoring their role in comparative assessments rather than standalone measurements.[64][67]Units in Information Theory
In information theory, logarithmic units quantify the uncertainty or information content of probabilistic events, with the base of the logarithm determining the specific unit. The foundational unit is the bit (short for binary digit), introduced by Claude Shannon as the information associated with a binary choice between two equally likely outcomes, equivalent to \log_2 2 = 1 bit.[68] This measure arises from the self-information of an event with probability p, defined as I(p) = -\log_2 p bits, where lower probabilities yield higher information content due to greater surprise.[68] For a discrete random variable with outcomes x_i having probabilities p_i, the average information, or entropy H(X), is given by the formula H(X) = -\sum_i p_i \log_2 p_i bits, representing the expected information needed to specify an outcome.[68] This entropy formula, derived in Shannon's seminal 1948 paper, provides the theoretical limit for efficient encoding of information sources.[68] Other logarithmic bases yield alternative units: the nat, based on the natural logarithm \ln (base e), measures information in natural units where 1 nat corresponds to the information from an event with probability $1/e; the dit (decimal information unit), using base-10 logarithm, aligns with decimal digits; and the hartley, also base-10, quantifies information in terms of decimal choices, with 1 hartley equaling \log_{10} 10 = 1.[69] These units relate via conversion factors, such as 1 nat \approx 1.4427 bits and 1 hartley \approx 3.3219 bits, allowing flexibility in mathematical or practical contexts.[69] Logarithmic units find key applications in data compression, where entropy sets the minimum bits per symbol required for lossless encoding, as per Shannon's source coding theorem, enabling algorithms like Huffman coding to approach this bound.[68] In channel capacity, the maximum reliable transmission rate is measured in bits per second, limited by the channel's noise characteristics, as formalized in Shannon's noisy-channel coding theorem.[68] For instance, file sizes are often expressed logarithmically, such as kilobits ( $2^{10} bits) or megabits, reflecting the exponential growth in storage needs and aligning with entropy-based compression efficiencies.[69] Similarly, in algorithmic complexity, terms like O(\log n) describe logarithmic scaling in operations such as binary search, where the information content grows as \log_2 n bits to resolve n possibilities.[69]Units in Physics and Acoustics
In physics, logarithmic scales are employed to quantify ratios of physical quantities, particularly in fields like acoustics, electromagnetism, and optics, where wide dynamic ranges are common. The decibel (dB) is a widely used dimensionless unit for expressing such ratios, defined for power as L = 10 \log_{10} \left( \frac{P}{P_0} \right), where P is the measured power and P_0 is the reference power.[70] For amplitude quantities, such as voltage or pressure, the formula adjusts to L = 20 \log_{10} \left( \frac{A}{A_0} \right), reflecting the quadratic relationship between amplitude and power.[70] Variants like the dBm express power relative to 1 milliwatt (P_0 = 1 mW), facilitating comparisons in electrical engineering and radio frequency applications.[71] The neper (Np) serves as another logarithmic unit, based on the natural logarithm and often applied in transmission line analysis and wave propagation. It is defined for amplitude ratios as L = \ln \left( \frac{A}{A_0} \right), providing a measure of attenuation or gain in systems like electrical cables or acoustic waveguides.[63] One neper corresponds to approximately 8.686 dB, allowing conversions between the two scales in electromagnetism and optics contexts.[63] In acoustics, logarithmic units address the perceptual scaling of sound, where human hearing responds nonlinearly to intensity. The phon unit quantifies perceived loudness level, defined as the sound pressure level in decibels of a 1 kHz tone that matches the subjective loudness of the sound in question; for example, a 60 phon level equals the loudness of a 60 dB SPL tone at 1 kHz.[72] This ties to equal-loudness contours, emphasizing the logarithmic dependence on intensity. The sone unit provides a more linear measure of perceived loudness magnitude, with 1 sone defined as the loudness of a 1 kHz tone at 40 dB SPL; loudness in sones approximately doubles for every 10 phon increase, following S = 2^{(L_p - 40)/10}, where L_p is the phon level.[73] Beyond acoustics, logarithmic scales appear in diverse physical measurements. The Richter scale for earthquakes measures magnitude as M = \log_{10} \left( \frac{A}{A_0} \right), where A is the maximum seismic wave amplitude recorded and A_0 is a reference amplitude, capturing the logarithmic growth in energy release.[36] In chemistry and environmental physics, pH quantifies acidity as \mathrm{pH} = -\log_{10} [H^+], where [H^+] is the hydrogen ion concentration in moles per liter, such that each unit decrease represents a tenfold increase in acidity. For stellar magnitudes in astronomy, apparent magnitude m relates to flux F via m_1 - m_2 = -2.5 \log_{10} \left( \frac{F_1}{F_2} \right), a base-10 logarithmic scale inverted so brighter objects have smaller (more negative) values.[74] Logarithmic units also describe frequency intervals in wave phenomena. An octave represents a frequency ratio of 2, defined such that \log_2 (f_2 / f_1) = 1, commonly used in acoustics and optics for harmonic analysis where the upper frequency is twice the lower.[75] A decade, analogously, denotes a ratio of 10, with \log_{10} (f_2 / f_1) = 1, aiding in the visualization of broadband spectra in electromagnetism and vibration studies.[76]Comparative Table of Examples
The following table provides a comparative overview of selected logarithmic units and scales, highlighting their definitions, applications, and interpretations. All entries represent dimensionless ratios, facilitating comparisons across wide dynamic ranges in their respective fields.[77]| Unit Name | Base/Formula | Field of Use | Reference Value | Example Value Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decibel (dB) | 10 log₁₀ (power ratio); 20 log₁₀ (amplitude ratio) | Acoustics and signal processing | 10^{-12} W (1 pW) for sound power level in acoustics; 1 mW for electrical power (dBm) in signal processing; 20 μPa for sound pressure (human hearing threshold) | +60 dB indicates sound pressure 1,000 times the reference (10³ ratio), perceived as significantly louder |
| Bit (bit) | log₂ (probability ratio) | Information theory | 1 bit distinguishes 2 equally likely outcomes (probability 1/2) | 8 bits represent 256 possible states (2⁸ ratio), sufficient for one byte of data |
| pH | -log₁₀ [H⁺] (molar concentration) | Chemistry (acidity) | pH 7 equals 10⁻⁷ M H⁺ (neutral water at 25°C) | pH 4 indicates 1,000 times more acidic than neutral (10³ higher [H⁺]) |
| Richter magnitude (M_L) | log₁₀ (amplitude ratio) | Seismology | M_L 0 equals 1 μm ground displacement at 100 km distance | M_L 6 represents 1,000 times larger amplitude than M_L 3 (10³ ratio), releasing approximately 31,000 times more energy (≈31³ ratio, where each unit increase is ~31 times energy) |
| Astronomical magnitude (m) | -2.5 log₁₀ (flux ratio) | Astronomy (brightness) | m = 0 for Vega's visual flux (reference star) | m = -1 is 2.512 times brighter than m = 0 (flux ratio ≈ 2.512); difference of 5 magnitudes equals 100-fold flux change |
| Octave | log₂ (frequency ratio) = 1 | Music and acoustics (frequency intervals) | One octave doubles the reference frequency (e.g., 440 Hz to 880 Hz) | 3 octaves span 8-fold frequency increase (2³ ratio), as in musical notes from C to high C |
| Decade | log₁₀ (frequency ratio) = 1 | Engineering (frequency response) | One decade multiplies reference frequency by 10 (e.g., 100 Hz to 1 kHz) | Filter roll-off of 20 dB/decade means amplitude halves every decade, common in first-order systems |
| Bel (B) | 10 log₁₀ (power ratio) | General signal levels | 1 B equals 10-fold power increase over reference | 1 B corresponds to a 10:1 power ratio, rarely used alone due to large steps |
| Neper (Np) | ln (amplitude ratio) | General field quantities (e.g., voltage, wave amplitude) | 1 Np equals e-fold (≈2.718) amplitude increase over reference | 1 Np ≈ 8.686 dB for power-equivalent comparisons in transmission lines |