Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

MPEG-3

MPEG-3 was a proposed audiovisual compression standard by the Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG), an international body under ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 established in 1988 to develop standards for digital coding of moving pictures and associated audio for storage and transmission.^[1] Specifically, MPEG-3 aimed to enable efficient coding of high-definition television (HDTV) content at bit rates of approximately 40 Mb/s, building on the foundations of earlier MPEG efforts for lower-bitrate applications.^[1] However, the initiative was abandoned before completion, as its requirements were deemed adequately covered by the emerging MPEG-2 standard, which supported both standard-definition and HDTV profiles at bit rates around 10 Mb/s and higher.^[1] The origins of MPEG-3 trace back to the inaugural MPEG work plan in 1988, where it was outlined as a future phase for coding moving pictures at higher bit rates ranging from 5 to 60 Mb/s, following MPEG-1 (targeted at ~1.5 Mb/s for digital storage media like CDs) and preceding more advanced multimedia standards.^[2] By 1992, during MPEG meetings that grew to include hundreds of experts from industry and academia, the group recognized significant overlap between the planned MPEG-3 features—such as enhanced scalability for HDTV—and the capabilities already being developed in MPEG-2, which was finalized later that year with profiles suitable for broadcast television and digital video.^[1] This merger avoided redundancy, ensured backward compatibility, and streamlined adoption, with MPEG-2 ultimately becoming the basis for DVD video, digital TV broadcasting, and even the U.S. HDTV standard selected by the Grand Alliance in the mid-1990s.^[1] A common point of confusion is the association of MPEG-3 with the MP3 audio format, which revolutionized digital music distribution but has no direct connection to the video-centric MPEG-3 proposal; MP3 derives from MPEG-1 Audio Layer 3, standardized in 1992 as part of the MPEG-1 suite for low-bitrate audio compression at 128–320 kb/s.^[2] The absence of a distinct MPEG-3 standard highlights the adaptive nature of the MPEG process, where ongoing technical advancements and market needs led to the evolution of subsequent standards like MPEG-4 (for low-bitrate multimedia and internet applications, finalized in 1999) without numbering gaps.^[2] Today, the legacy of MPEG's early work, including the integration of HDTV capabilities into MPEG-2, underpins much of modern video infrastructure, with billions of devices worldwide supporting these compression technologies.^[1]

Overview

Status as a standard

MPEG-3 was initially proposed as part of the Moving Picture Experts Group's (MPEG) early standardization efforts in 1988, with a specific focus on developing video coding standards for high-definition television (HDTV) at bit rates around 40 Mb/s.^[1] This positioned it as the third work item in the original MPEG plan, following MPEG-1 for low-bit-rate applications and MPEG-2 for standard-definition television.^[2] Despite the proposal, MPEG-3 never progressed to a finalized ISO/IEC standard and was officially abandoned before any draft specification could be completed. The project was launched to address HDTV requirements while MPEG-2 development was ongoing, but evaluations revealed significant overlap in technical needs.^[1] In July 1992, during the MPEG 19 meeting in Angra dos Reis, Brazil, the group voted to drop the MPEG-3 work item, determining that MPEG-2 could be extended to encompass HDTV functionalities without requiring a separate standard.^[3] This decision avoided redundant development efforts and streamlined the MPEG family's progression, with MPEG-3's goals formally incorporated into the evolving MPEG-2 specifications.^[4]

Context in MPEG family

The Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG), formally known as ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, was established in February 1988 by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) to develop international standards for the coded representation of digital audio and video.^[1] This working group aimed to create generic compression technologies applicable across various storage media and transmission channels, addressing the growing need for efficient digital multimedia in the late 1980s.^[5] MPEG's early efforts focused on low-bitrate applications suitable for emerging digital storage devices. MPEG-1, the group's inaugural standard, targeted video and audio compression at approximately 1.5 Mbps for interactive video on compact disc-read only memory (CD-ROM), with development beginning in 1988 and the standard (ISO/IEC 11172) reaching final draft international standard status in 1992 before publication in 1993.^[2] Concurrently, work on MPEG-2 commenced in 1990, initially intended for higher bitrates around 4–9 Mbps to support digital storage media for broadcast-quality television, though its scope expanded over time.^[6] MPEG-3 was envisioned as the next evolutionary step to bridge the gap toward high-definition television (HDTV) applications, as outlined in the original 1988 work plan, with further considerations for bitrates exceeding 20 Mbps for enhanced resolutions and quality emerging in early 1990s discussions.^[6] This positioned MPEG-3 as a successor to MPEG-2's broadcast focus, aiming to enable scalable compression for professional and consumer HDTV delivery while maintaining compatibility with prior standards.^[1] Subsequent developments saw MPEG-2 (ISO/IEC 13818) absorb many of MPEG-3's objectives upon its finalization in 1994, effectively rendering a separate MPEG-3 unnecessary.^[7] This paved the way for MPEG-4 in 1999 (ISO/IEC 14496), which shifted toward object-based multimedia coding for interactive and networked environments, continuing the family's progression from storage-centric to versatile digital media standards.^[2]

Development history

Initial proposals

The concept of MPEG-3 originated in the initial MPEG work plan established in 1988, targeting higher bitrates for advanced applications like high-definition television (HDTV), extending beyond the low-bitrate video capabilities of MPEG-1, which targeted applications like CD-ROM storage at around 1.5 Mbps.^[2] This reflected the group's strategic planning to address future multimedia requirements following the near-completion of MPEG-1. Led by Leonardo Chiariglione, the convener of the MPEG working group, the initiative recognized the growing need for efficient encoding of more demanding formats in the evolving digital media landscape. The original plan envisioned bitrates from 5 to 60 Mb/s for moving pictures on digital storage media and broadcast, with HDTV as a key application at the higher end (20-40 Mb/s).^[2] Key motivators for the MPEG-3 proposal stemmed from the surging demand for high-definition television (HDTV) compression, fueled by international broadcasters and regulatory bodies seeking viable digital transmission standards. The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) actively advocated for advanced HDTV systems in Europe, emphasizing the need for robust compression to enable widespread adoption amid analog-to-digital transitions.^[8] Similarly, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was advancing HDTV initiatives through its Advisory Committee on Advanced Television Service (ACATS), established in 1987, with proposals for all-digital systems gaining traction by 1990 to fit HDTV signals within existing broadcast channels.^[9] These pressures highlighted the limitations of existing standards and positioned MPEG-3 as a potential solution for scalable, high-fidelity video delivery. The scope of the MPEG-3 proposal focused on supporting bitrates of 20-40 Mbps specifically tailored for HDTV applications, enabling compressed transmission of high-resolution content while ensuring backward compatibility with MPEG-1 and the emerging MPEG-2 for interoperability across devices and networks. Contributions from major industry players, including Philips, Sony, and Thomson, shaped the early discussions, providing technical inputs on compression algorithms and system architectures suited to broadcast environments.^[2]^[8]

Cancellation and merger

By mid-1992, the scope of the MPEG-2 project had been expanded to include high-definition television (HDTV) applications, which had initially been designated as the focus of the separate MPEG-3 effort.^[10] This expansion arose from the recognition that advancements in MPEG-2's scalable coding techniques could effectively address HDTV requirements without necessitating a distinct standard.^[11] At the 19th MPEG meeting, held in Angra dos Reis, Brazil, from July 6 to 10, 1992, the committee formally acknowledged the substantial overlap between MPEG-2 and MPEG-3, particularly in bitrate scalability for HDTV bitrates around 40 Mb/s.^[11] The decision to cancel MPEG-3 was made by general acclamation during this meeting, led by contributions from the U.S. delegation under Cliff Reader, who highlighted that MPEG-2's profiles for standard-definition television at 10 Mb/s could extend to HDTV needs.^[1] No further resources were allocated to MPEG-3 development following this resolution.^[11] The merger was driven by the desire to avoid market fragmentation and development delays that a standalone MPEG-3 would cause, as MPEG-2's framework already provided the necessary extensibility through profiles like scalable and high-resolution variants.^[1] In the outcomes, MPEG-2's Main Profile at High Level and other variants, including High 1440 level where applicable, were adapted to incorporate the HDTV functionalities originally planned for MPEG-3, ensuring a unified standard without preserving separate numbering.^[11] This integration ultimately led to the direct progression from MPEG-2 to MPEG-4 in the numbering sequence.^[1]

Intended specifications

Target applications

MPEG-3 was primarily targeted at high-definition television (HDTV) broadcasting, designed to handle the demands of delivering enhanced video quality over broadcast channels.^[12] This standard aimed to support HDTV resolutions such as 1920×1080 pixels at frame rates ranging from 30 to 60 frames per second, enabling a significant upgrade from standard-definition television during the 1990s transition to digital formats. The effort was driven by the growing need for analog-to-digital conversion in television infrastructure, with MPEG's working group under ISO/IEC collaborating alongside organizations like the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) on broader HDTV standardization efforts. Beyond general broadcasting, MPEG-3 was envisioned for satellite and cable distribution of HD content, where higher bitrates were necessary to maintain quality during transmission.^[13] It targeted bitrates of 20 to 40 Mbps, a substantial compression from the raw uncompressed HD video data rate of approximately 1.5 Gbps for 1920×1080 at 30 fps in typical YUV 4:2:2 sampling, facilitating efficient storage and delivery for professional video production workflows.^[13] These applications were intended to support the emerging professional sector's shift toward digital HD workflows, including content creation and distribution for television networks.^[14] The development reflected broader industry drivers in the 1990s, including the push for worldwide HDTV adoption to replace analog systems and enable new services like direct broadcast satellite television.^[15] By focusing on these use cases, MPEG-3 sought to provide scalable solutions for HD content across broadcast, satellite, and cable infrastructures before its eventual merger into MPEG-2 capabilities.^[13]

Key technical features

The proposed MPEG-3 standard was designed to extend the block-based hybrid coding approach established in prior MPEG work, utilizing discrete cosine transform (DCT) for intra-frame spatial compression and advanced motion compensation techniques to exploit inter-frame temporal redundancies, with optimizations for handling the increased data volumes of high-resolution HDTV signals up to 1920×1080 pixels at 30 to 60 Hz.^[16] This framework built on motion-compensated prediction errors processed through DCT blocks, followed by quantization and variable-length coding, to achieve efficient encoding of both progressive and interlaced formats suitable for broadcast applications.^[16] Central to MPEG-3's innovations were its scalability features, implemented via hierarchical coding structures that supported multi-resolution decoding, enabling a single bitstream to deliver high-definition content while allowing compatible standard-definition receivers to perform graceful degradation without significant quality loss.^[17] This approach combined spatial and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) scalability layers, where a base layer provided core TV resolution at around 6 Mbit/s, enhanced by upper layers for full HDTV at up to 24 Mbit/s within an 8 MHz channel, facilitating integrated satellite, cable, and terrestrial transmission systems.^[17] For audio integration, MPEG-3 was intended to incorporate the multichannel extensions and backward-compatible enhancements developed under the parallel MPEG-2 audio framework. Performance objectives emphasized compression ratios of 40-50:1 for HDTV sources at bitrates around 20-25 Mbit/s, balancing quality and bandwidth efficiency for emerging high-definition broadcast scenarios.^[16]

Relation to other standards

Integration into MPEG-2

The objectives of the planned MPEG-3 standard, particularly its focus on high-definition television (HDTV) encoding, were technically integrated into MPEG-2 through the adoption of the High Profile in ISO/IEC 13818-2, which explicitly supported HDTV resolutions such as 1440x1152 in the High-1440 Level.^[18] This profile extended MPEG-2's capabilities beyond the Main Profile's standard-definition limits, enabling scalable handling of higher bit rates required for HDTV without necessitating a separate standard.^[12] Key enhancements derived from early MPEG-3 drafts were incorporated into MPEG-2, including native support for 16:9 aspect ratios via aspect_ratio_information signaling in the sequence header, improved handling of higher bit depths in professional profiles like 4:2:2 for studio applications, and field-based prediction modes for interlaced video to better accommodate HDTV broadcast formats.^[19]^[20] These features allowed MPEG-2 to process progressive and interlaced content more efficiently, drawing directly from the HDTV-oriented proposals that would have defined MPEG-3.^[21] The integration accelerated the overall standardization process for MPEG-2, which was finalized in 1994 as ISO/IEC 13818 with Parts 1 (Systems), 2 (Video), 3 (Audio), and 4 (Compliance) forming the core specifications for multimedia transport and compression.^[22] By merging MPEG-3 efforts, the MPEG committee avoided redundant development and ensured HDTV readiness within a unified framework. As a result, no distinct MPEG-3 artifacts or implementations exist; all relevant features operate under the MPEG-2 umbrella and have been widely deployed in consumer and broadcast technologies, including DVD-Video for home entertainment, DVB for European digital television, and ATSC for North American over-the-air HDTV.^[23]^[24]^[25]

Common misconceptions

One of the most persistent misconceptions about MPEG-3 is its conflation with the MP3 audio format, leading many to believe that MP3 represents a video compression standard under the MPEG-3 designation.^[26] In reality, MP3, or MPEG-1 Audio Layer III, is an audio-only codec developed as part of the earlier MPEG-1 standard and has no relation to the planned video-focused MPEG-3 project.^[27] This confusion arises from the similar naming conventions, but MP3 was never intended for video applications like high-definition television (HDTV), which was the target for the aborted MPEG-3 effort.^[28] MP3 was standardized in 1993 as part of ISO/IEC 11172-3, defining a perceptual audio coding method that achieves compression by discarding inaudible sound components, typically operating at bitrates from 128 to 320 kbps for near-CD quality stereo audio.^[29]^[30] A similar Layer III specification appears in the MPEG-2 standard under ISO/IEC 13818-3, extending support for multichannel audio, but both remain strictly audio technologies without video integration. Unlike the video-centric goals of MPEG-3, which aimed at HDTV data rates of around 40 Mb/s before its cancellation, MP3's development predates and operates independently of any video compression ambitions.^[1] Another common myth is the existence of a fully developed "MPEG-3 video" codec that was simply overlooked or underutilized, often fueled by assumptions about sequential MPEG numbering. In fact, the MPEG-3 project was formally discontinued in the early 1990s after it was determined that enhancements to MPEG-2 could adequately address HDTV requirements, rendering a separate standard unnecessary.^[31] Some also mistakenly associate MPEG-3 features with MPEG-4's advanced capabilities, such as object-based coding, but MPEG-4 evolved separately to handle multimedia beyond just HDTV.^[26] The origins of these misconceptions trace back to the early 1990s, when MP3 gained popularity through audio players and software that informally marketed it as "MPEG-3" due to its Layer III status, compounded by limited public awareness of the MPEG-3 project's swift cancellation and merger into MPEG-2.^[26] This marketing shorthand persisted in consumer contexts, overshadowing the technical reality that no MPEG-3 standard was ever published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).^[31]

Legacy

Influence on video compression

The proposed MPEG-3 standard, intended for high-definition television (HDTV) applications, exerted significant influence on video compression by prompting enhancements to MPEG-2 that incorporated scalability features essential for HDTV support.^[2] Specifically, the merger of MPEG-3 concepts into MPEG-2—in July 1992, when the group adopted a profile approach—led to the extension of MPEG-2 with HDTV scalability modes, including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and spatial scalability within the High Profile, enabling efficient handling of higher resolutions and bit rates.^[12]^[10] This integration also influenced the development of the 4:2:2 Profile in MPEG-2, which provided enhanced chroma subsampling for professional video production, supporting short Group of Pictures (GOP) structures and higher data rates suitable for broadcast and post-production workflows.^[12] These scalability advancements from the MPEG-3 merger contributed to the evolution of hybrid coding paradigms in subsequent standards. For instance, the layered scalability approaches in MPEG-2 informed the design of the Scalable Video Coding (SVC) extension of MPEG-4 AVC (H.264), released in 2003, which built upon hybrid discrete cosine transform (DCT)-based prediction and motion compensation to enable temporal, spatial, and quality scalability for diverse network conditions. This progression emphasized modular bitstream structures that allowed partial decoding, a concept rooted in the HDTV-focused scalability pushed by MPEG-3 into MPEG-2.^[12] The absorption of MPEG-3 ideas accelerated the global rollout of HDTV in the 2000s through key broadcast standards. MPEG-2 became the foundational video codec for the Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) standard in the United States, enabling HDTV transmissions starting in 1998 and widespread adoption by the mid-2000s.^[23] Similarly, in Europe, the Digital Video Broadcasting - Terrestrial (DVB-T) standard utilized MPEG-2 for HDTV services, facilitating the transition to digital broadcasting and the launch of HDTV channels across multiple countries during the early 2000s.^[24] An enduring legacy of MPEG-3 lies in demonstrating the benefits of unified standards development, which avoided fragmented silos in video compression and promoted harmonization between organizations. This approach is exemplified in the joint ITU-T and ISO/IEC efforts, where MPEG-2 video was standardized as both ISO/IEC 13818-2 and ITU-T H.262, influencing the collaborative framework of the subsequent H.26x series for ongoing advancements in video coding.^[29]

Modern relevance

The MPEG-3 standard, which was proposed but ultimately canceled in 1992 without ever being finalized or released, holds no active role in contemporary video compression ecosystems. Modern high-definition television (HDTV) and video streaming rely instead on successor technologies such as High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC, also known as H.265), standardized in 2013 by the ITU-T Video Coding Experts Group and ISO/IEC Moving Picture Experts Group, which provides significantly improved compression efficiency for 4K and beyond. Similarly, the royalty-free AOMedia Video 1 (AV1) codec, finalized in 2018 by the Alliance for Open Media, has gained widespread adoption for web-based streaming due to its open-source nature and up to 30% better compression than HEVC at equivalent quality levels.^[32] Although the MPEG-3 designation itself remains obsolete, conceptual elements from its unadopted proposals, particularly multilayer scalability for handling varying bandwidth and resolution needs, continue to echo in current adaptive streaming protocols. For instance, scalability concepts from early MPEG standards contributed to the flexibility of internet video delivery systems. This persistence underscores how foundational ideas from the MPEG-3 era informed broader developments in video coding. In academic contexts, MPEG-3 retains niche significance as a historical case study in standards development. It is referenced in courses on multimedia compression history to illustrate the evolution of video coding from analog to digital eras, highlighting lessons in project cancellation and feature integration. As of 2025, MPEG-3 concepts offer no practical relevance for new developments in video compression, with industry focus shifting to advanced standards like Versatile Video Coding (VVC, H.266), approved in 2020, which achieves about 30-50% better efficiency than HEVC while supporting immersive formats. Emerging AI-enhanced codecs, integrating machine learning for predictive compression, further diminish any lingering interest in legacy proposals like MPEG-3, prioritizing neural network-based tools for next-generation applications such as 8K streaming and virtual reality.^[32]

References

[1]
Chiariglione and the birth of MPEG
The coding was to occur at about 10 Mb/s, and standard digital television was the main goal. Then MPEG-3 was to formulate coding standards for pictures at 40 Mb ...
[2]
The birth of an MPEG standard idea - Leonardo's Blog
Nov 30, 2019 · The idea of the first two MPEG standards was generated in 1988 when a new “Moving Picture Experts Group” was created in JTC 1/SC 2/WG 8.
[3]
MPEG-4 – Development - Riding the Media Bits
... MPEG-4, before the early dismissal of the MPEG-3 project in July 1992. At the following meeting in September 1993 in Brussels, the ad hoc group was turned ...Missing: cancelled | Show results with:cancelled
[4]
MPEG: a technological basis for multimedia applications - IEEE Xplore
... MPEG-1, -2 and -3, respectively. The group dropped the MPEG3 work item in July 1992 when it became apparent that the functionalities supported by the MPEG-2 ...
[5]
The true history of MPEG's first steps - Leonardo's Blog
Dec 28, 2019 · The first MPEG meeting took place in Ottawa in May 1988 with 29 people in attendance. At the 4th MPEG meeting in December 1988 in Hannover, the ...
[6]
[PDF] CCITT SGXV - ITU
Sep 27, 1991 · 3 ISO/IEC MPEG. MPEG has three stages of video coding specifications related to Digital Storage Medium: -. MPEG 1, defined in 1990, at 1.5 Mbit/ ...
[7]
[PDF] Digital Video Coding Standards and Their Role in Video ...
In 1992 the scope of MPEG-2 was enlarged to suit coding of HDTV—thus making an initially planned. MPEG-3 phase superfluous. The DIS for MPEG-2 video was issued ...
[8]
[PDF] Digital television and HDTV in America A progress report - EBU tech
The number of ATV proposals peaked at twenty– one, but by 1990 they had shrunk to only nine. Two of these were HDTV simulcast systems and they were both ...
[9]
F.C.C. Sets Technical Guidelines For High-Definition TV in 1990's
Sep 2, 1988 · In setting the initial guidelines for HDTV, the F.C.C. insisted that broadcasters transmit high-definition programming in the existing VHF and ...Missing: compression EBU
[10]
Thirty years ago, in MPEG - Leonardo's Blog - Chiariglione.org
Nov 14, 2023 · In November 1992, MPEG had already christened the first three parts of its first MPEG-1 standard: the System, Video, and Audio triad.Missing: 5 cancellation
[11]
MPEG-2 Development – Video - Riding the Media Bits
At the MPEG ad hoc group meeting in Tarrytown, NY in October 1992, hosted by IBM, the first steps were made toward the eventual confluence of the Grand Alliance ...
[12]
[PDF] A Guide to MPEG Fundamentals and Protocol Analysis - Tektronix
MPEG layers 1, 2, 3, or AC-3. The type of audio encoding used must be ... the basic MPEG-2 options to meet regional requirements, but these all build ...
[13]
[PDF] THE HARMONIZATION OF HDTV STANDARDS BETWEEN ... - ITU
Introduction. This Report concerns the studies of the ITU-R, pursuant to Decision ITU-R 91, with regard to the harmonization of standards for HDTV in ...Missing: 1920x1080 | Show results with:1920x1080
[14]
History of MPEG - Courses
MPEG-3 standard was dropped. The MPEG-4 standard was initiated in 1995 and reached a committee draft status in March 1998 (ISO 14496) and was finalized in end ...Joining MPEG · MPEG-1 · MPEG-2 · MPEG-4
[15]
[PDF] An Introduction to MPEG Layer-3 - MP3-Tech.org
The audio coding scheme MPEG Layer-3 will soon celebrate its 10th birthday, having been standardized in 1991. In its first years, the scheme was mainly used ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[16]
[PDF] MPEG Standards Evolution and Impact on Cable
The designation “MPEG-3” had been set aside for HDTV extensions, but. MPEG-2 worked so well for this application that MPEG-3 was never needed. MPEG-4 [3] began ...
[17]
[PDF] Scalable Coding of HDTV Pictures Using the MPEG Coder
May 18, 1994 · This suggests the use of a nine subband decomposition (three in each direction) in the spatial frequency domain. Thus, theoretically (assuming ...
[18]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/motion-picture-experts-group-standards
[19]
Motion Picture Experts Group Standards - ScienceDirect.com
MPEG-1. MPEG-1,27 which was standardized in November 1992, introduced efficient coding for frame-based (progressively scanned) material based on DCT coding ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[20]
[PDF] DVB: Video/Audio Coding for Broadcast & Broadband Apps
MPEG-2 HDTV IRD, 30 Hz MPEG-2 HDTV IRD. MPEG-4 AAC, MPEG-4 HE AAC and MPEG-4 HE AAC v2 RAP: access unit in an MPEG-4 audio Bitstream at which an IRD can ...
[21]
[PDF] A Study Of MPEG-2 And H.264 Video Coding - Purdue Engineering
The MPEG-2 video compression standard [4,5] has allowed the success of DVD-video and digital high definition television. New ad- vancements in digital video ...
[22]
MPEG2 - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
MPEG-2 supports both progressive and interlaced video. For interlaced video, field-based prediction modes are available, including 16 × 8 motion ...Missing: aspect | Show results with:aspect
[23]
[PDF] MPEG video coding A simple introduction - EBU tech
5) High profile. This adds support for 4:2:2-sampled video. All MPEG-2 decoders will also decode MPEG-1 pictures (but not vice-versa). I1. B–1. B0. B–1. B0. B2.
[24]
[PDF] ATSC Digital Television Standard: Part 4 – MPEG-2 Video System ...
Aug 7, 2009 · MPEG-2 Systems, Video and Audio in Satellite, Cable and Terrestrial Broadcasting. Applications,” Doc. ETSI TS 101 154 V1.7.1, Annex B, June ...Missing: DVDs | Show results with:DVDs
[25]
Standards that changed the (media) world - DVB
Sep 13, 2023 · During the infancy of the DVB Project, the MPEG-2 video codec and MPEG-2 Layer II audio codec were the state-of- the-art international standard ...
[26]
MPEG-2 Program Stream - Library of Congress
Jun 18, 2025 · ISO/IEC 13818; first approvals in 1994. Ten parts have been published; parts 1, 2, 3, and 7 are central. Part 2 concerns the coding and ...Missing: finalized | Show results with:finalized
[27]
Media Formats Explained - Dr. Lex' Site
MPEG-4: you may wonder: what happened to MPEG-3? Well, it never existed. The MPEG numbering scheme is a story on its own, for instance after MPEG-4 comes MPEG-7 ...What Does 'bitrate' Mean? · Video Codecs · Audio Codecs
[28]
MP3 (MPEG Layer III Audio Encoding) - The Library of Congress
Mar 26, 2024 · MPEG-1 Audio (MPEG-1 Part 3), which included MPEG-1 Audio Layer I, II and III was approved as a committee draft of ISO/IEC standard in 1991, ...Identification and description · Sustainability factors · Quality and functionality factors
[29]
An Overview of Video Compression Algorithms - EE Times
MPEG-3 was merged into MPEG-2 and no longer exists. MPEG-4 is for very low bitrate coding and is scheduled to be available in draft form in late 1997 or ...Missing: cancellation | Show results with:cancellation
[30]
ISO/IEC 11172-3:1993 - Information technology — Coding of moving ...
In stock 2–5 day deliveryISO/IEC 11172-3:1993 specifies the coded representation of high quality audio for storage media at about 1.5 Mbit/s, for media like CD, DAT and magnetic hard ...
[31]
MPEG Audio Web Page - Sound at MIT edu
The predefined bit rates range from 32 to 448 kbit/s for Layer I, from 32 to 384 kbit/s for Layer II, and from 32 to 320 kbit/s for Layer III. See also the MPEG ...
[32]
[PDF] Business Review Request Letter: MPEG LA, L.L.C., et al.
Feb 18, 2014 · The MPEG-3 project was discontinued when it became evident that MPEG-2 would meet the needs MPEG-3 attempted to address. Page 9. Honorable ...Missing: canceled merged
[33]
The State of the Video Codec Market 2025 - Streaming Media
Mar 28, 2025 · I'm here to help you decide whether it's time to go all in on AV1, VVC, LCEVC, or EVC or whether it's better to stick with H.264, VP9, and HEVC.