Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Macro virus

A macro virus is a type of that infects documents and files by embedding malicious code within —small programs or scripts used to automate tasks in applications such as or Excel—and executes upon opening the infected file, often spreading to other documents without user knowledge. These viruses exploit the macro programming capabilities built into , allowing them to replicate and propagate across systems, typically targeting Windows-based environments where such applications are prevalent. Unlike traditional file-infecting viruses, macro viruses focus on data files rather than programs, making them particularly insidious in settings where document sharing is common. The emergence of macro viruses marked a significant evolution in malware during the mid-1990s, coinciding with the widespread adoption of graphical user interfaces and office suites that supported macro languages such as WordBasic (the predecessor to , or VBA). The first known macro virus, , appeared in 1995 and targeted 6.0 documents on and Macintosh systems, demonstrating the potential for self-replicating code in non-executable files. This was followed by variants like Laroux, which infected Excel spreadsheets in 1996, and more destructive examples such as in 1999, a Word macro virus that spread rapidly via attachments, overwhelming corporate networks and causing an estimated $80 million in damages by disrupting email servers. Melissa's impact was profound, infecting hundreds of thousands of computers within hours of its release and prompting early antivirus responses and legal actions against its creator. In their heyday, macro viruses accounted for a substantial portion of incidents, with reports indicating they comprised almost 90% of all reported virus incidents by the end of 1999 due to the ease of creation and distribution through and shared drives. They often performed actions like deleting files, stealing data, or displaying messages, though their primary threat lay in rather than direct destruction. As of 2025, while less dominant thanks to built-in protections in modern software—such as macro disabling by default in —their legacy persists in campaigns that trick users into enabling macros in downloaded documents to deliver other . Prevention strategies include keeping software updated, using reputable antivirus tools for regular scans, and avoiding macros from untrusted sources, which have significantly reduced their prevalence but not eliminated the risk entirely.

Fundamentals

Definition and Characteristics

A macro virus is a type of that embeds malicious code within the macro programming language of application software, such as , Excel, or PowerPoint, to infect documents or templates. These viruses exploit the automation features of —small scripts designed to perform repetitive tasks—to execute harmful actions when the infected file is opened. Unlike traditional viruses, macro viruses are platform-specific to office productivity applications and do not directly target the operating system. Key characteristics of macro viruses include their self-replicating nature, where the malicious code attaches to and propagates through document files upon activation. They remain dormant until a user enables macros, often prompted by a dialog in the host application, which allows the code to run. Propagation typically occurs through shared infected files via email attachments, removable media, or network drives, enabling rapid spread within compatible software environments. Macro viruses primarily target older binary file formats such as .doc for Word, .xls for Excel, and .ppt for PowerPoint, where macros are natively supported. Over time, they have adapted to infect newer XML-based formats like .docx or .xlsx, provided the files include enabled macros (e.g., via .docm extensions). Common symptoms include unexpected modifications to files, such as automatic saving as templates or deletion of content; system slowdowns or application crashes; unauthorized network connections for ; and intrusive pop-up messages or prompts upon file opening.

Distinction from Other Malware

Macro viruses differ from traditional file infectors, which attach malicious to such as . programs, thereby altering the host application's to propagate upon execution. In contrast, macro viruses embed their within the macros of non- data , like documents or Excel spreadsheets, without modifying the underlying itself. This attachment to office productivity allows macro viruses to leverage the application's built-in macro execution features, such as (VBA) in , for activation. Unlike script viruses that exploit general-purpose scripting languages, such as embedded in web pages or batch scripts in operating systems, macro viruses are specifically bound to the macro systems of productivity applications. Script viruses operate independently in broader environments like browsers or system shells, enabling propagation through web downloads or automated scripts, whereas macro viruses remain confined to document-based ecosystems and require the host application to interpret and run the infected macro. Macro viruses also diverge from worms and Trojans in their propagation and execution mechanisms. self-replicate and spread autonomously across networks without needing a or , often exploiting vulnerabilities to infect remote systems directly. In comparison, macro viruses depend on infected documents for dissemination, typically requiring users to open the and enable to trigger infection. Similarly, while Trojans disguise themselves as legitimate standalone programs to trick users into installation, macro viruses masquerade as benign or useful within trusted documents, relying on social engineering to prompt activation rather than independent execution. A key unique risk of macro viruses lies in their exploitation of the inherently trusted environments of office applications, where users often enable for legitimate automation tasks, facilitating stealthy in professional and personal settings. Additionally, some macro viruses exhibit polymorphic behavior by varying their macro code during replication, complicating detection by that relies on static signatures.

History

Origins and Early Development

The origins of macro viruses trace back to the mid-1990s, coinciding with the widespread adoption of that incorporated programmable . The first known virus, (Document Virus), emerged in December 1994 as a proof-of-concept created by researcher McNamara for 6.0 on the Macintosh platform. McNamara developed to demonstrate the potential for to propagate malicious code, and he simultaneously published a detailed study on macro virus behavior, though he initially withheld public release of the virus itself to avoid unintended spread. This early experiment highlighted vulnerabilities in macro systems but remained confined to testing environments. The debut of macro viruses as a widespread threat occurred in July 1995 with the virus, the first self-replicating macro virus targeting 6.0 on Windows systems. Written in WordBasic, demonstrated how macros embedded in documents could automatically infect other files upon opening, exploiting the seamless integration of scripting in office applications. Its emergence marked a shift from traditional executable-based to document-centric threats, rapidly spreading through shared files in professional and academic settings. Macro viruses soon expanded beyond Word to other office applications, with XM/Laroux appearing in 1996 as the first for 4.0 and later versions. Laroux infected spreadsheet macros using (VBA), replicating across workbooks and underscoring the growing risk to the entire suite. These developments were enabled by the evolution of macro support in office software, which began with rudimentary features in early releases like 1.0 in 1983 but became highly exploitable in the mid-1990s through advanced languages like WordBasic, coupled with the complete lack of built-in in those versions to restrict macro access to system resources. Prior to malicious deployments, early academic and hobbyist experiments played a key role in exposing these vulnerabilities. McNamara's 1994 work, for instance, served as a foundational , alerting developers and researchers to the risks of unchecked execution without prompting or sandboxing. Such proofs-of-concept, often shared in technical papers and online forums, paved the way for both defensive measures and the eventual creation of more sophisticated threats.

Major Outbreaks and Evolution

One of the most significant macro virus incidents occurred on March 26, 1999, when the Melissa virus emerged, rapidly spreading via email attachments containing an infected Microsoft Word document. This malware combined traditional macro virus infection mechanisms with worm-like self-propagation, automatically emailing itself to the first 50 contacts in the victim's Microsoft Outlook address book upon execution. Within days, Melissa infected over 100,000 systems worldwide, overwhelming corporate email servers and causing widespread denial-of-service disruptions. The outbreak, traced to a programmer using a hijacked AOL account to post the virus on an internet newsgroup, highlighted the dangers of macro-enabled documents in professional environments and prompted immediate responses from antivirus vendors. Throughout the 1990s, macro viruses proliferated rapidly following the 1995 debut of the Concept virus, which demonstrated infection of documents via floppy disks and early sharing. By the late 1990s, thousands of macro virus variants had emerged, exploiting the ubiquity of applications and the ease of document exchange in business settings. These threats peaked amid the growing adoption of personal computers and connectivity, with infections often occurring through shared media like floppy disks before became the dominant vector. The prevalence of macro viruses declined sharply in the 2000s due to enhanced security measures introduced by , including the default disabling of macros and the requirement of user prompts for VBA execution starting with Office 2000. Office 2000 also implemented verification to trust only signed macros, significantly reducing unintended activations. This shift, combined with improved antivirus detection and greater user awareness, curtailed mass outbreaks, while malware authors increasingly turned to non-macro vectors such as PDF exploits for document-based attacks. Macro viruses adapted to subsequent iterations, particularly after the 2007 release, which introduced macro-enabled file formats like .docm to support legitimate while maintaining prompts. In the 2010s, these threats evolved by integrating with campaigns, where malicious macro-laden documents were delivered via attachments to bypass protections and download additional payloads. Statistical trends reflect this trajectory: the saw thousands of variants during their heyday, but detections became less frequent yet persistent into the 2020s, comprising a notable share of Office-related according to antivirus reports.

Operation

Macro Language Basics

Macros in the context of office productivity applications are automated scripts designed to perform repetitive tasks and extend application functionality. Prior to 1997, utilized WordBasic, a macro programming language introduced with Word 6.0 in 1993, which allowed users to record and execute sequences of commands for tasks such as text manipulation and formatting. Starting with (released in 1996), (VBA) superseded WordBasic and other application-specific macro languages like Excel's XLM, providing a unified, more powerful scripting environment across Office suite applications including Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. VBA macros enable of complex operations, such as applying consistent formatting to documents, inserting from external sources, or generating reports, thereby enhancing in professional settings like and document management. These scripts are typically stored within the document itself (in macro-enabled file formats like .docm or .xlsm), in global templates such as Word's Normal.dotm, or in personal macro workbooks for broader accessibility across sessions. The execution model of macros relies on event-driven triggers, where code runs in response to specific actions; for instance, an AutoOpen macro automatically executes upon opening a document, while AutoExec runs when the application launches, and user-initiated events like button clicks can also invoke scripts. In contemporary versions of Microsoft Office, macro execution requires explicit user permission through security prompts managed via the Trust Center, with settings that can disable all macros by default or allow them only from trusted locations to mitigate risks. Additionally, since April 2022, Office applications block macros in files downloaded from the internet by default, displaying a security risk banner that users must override to enable them. Despite these safeguards, VBA macros introduce vulnerabilities due to their extensive system access; in legacy compatibility modes, auto-execution can occur without prompts, and VBA's integration permits scripts to interact with the (e.g., reading/writing files), modify the , and initiate network connections, potentially enabling unauthorized operations if permissions are granted. Similar macro systems exist in alternative office suites, extending the potential for exploitation beyond products; for example, employs , a VBA-compatible derived from the earlier StarBasic used in , to automate tasks in its and components. Older spreadsheet applications like featured a dedicated macro based on command-driven sequences and @functions for automating calculations and worksheet operations, which influenced early macro design paradigms.

Infection and Propagation

Macro viruses primarily infect systems through documents containing malicious macros, such as those in or Excel files. When an infected document is opened in an application with macro execution enabled, the within the macro automatically copies itself to the application's global template, typically the Normal.dot or Normal.dotm in . This template serves as the default for all new documents, ensuring that the embeds itself in every subsequent created or opened by the user, thereby establishing a foothold on the system. Propagation occurs mainly via common file-sharing vectors that exploit user trust. Infected documents often spread as email attachments, where the file appears legitimate but contains the embedded macro; for instance, a .doc file with VBA code that activates upon opening. Additional methods include sharing over networks, transferring via USB drives or other removable media, and downloading from malicious websites disguised as useful content. Once infected, the virus can self-propagate by accessing the user's email contacts to send copies of itself, facilitating rapid dissemination across organizations or personal networks. Following infection, the activates to execute harmful actions, often triggered immediately upon enablement or events like opening or saving. Typical payloads include automating the emailing of infected attachments to contacts in the user's address book, downloading additional such as trojans from remote servers, or performing destructive operations like deleting files or corrupting data. For example, the virus may use VBA functions to replicate and distribute itself without further user intervention, amplifying the infection scope. Persistence is achieved by embedding in the global template, which loads automatically with the application, ensuring the virus remains active across sessions until manually removed, such as by deleting or repairing the Normal.dot file. Some macro viruses exhibit cross-application compatibility due to shared VBA environments, allowing infection to spread from Word documents to Excel spreadsheets or even PowerPoint files if the malicious code targets multiple components. This multi-application persistence heightens the risk, as the virus can reinfect cleaned files if the template remains compromised. To evade detection, macro viruses employ techniques in their code, such as encoding strings or using complex algorithms to hide malicious intent from static antivirus scans. They may also leverage variables to check system conditions, like the number of running processes or network configurations, terminating execution in sandboxed analysis environments with fewer than 50 processes to avoid behavioral detection. Conditional execution based on system checks, such as verifying filenames for analysis tool indicators, further allows the virus to remain dormant until in a real user .

Notable Examples

Concept and Laroux Viruses

The Concept virus, released in July 1995, was the first known macro virus targeting Microsoft Word version 6.0 and written in the WordBasic programming language. It consisted of five macros—AutoOpen, FileSaveAs, PayLoad, AAAZAO, and AAAZFS—embedded within an infected document such as WinWord6.doc. Upon opening an infected file, the AutoOpen macro executed automatically, checking the system's global template file, NORMAL.DOT, for the presence of the PayLoad or FileSaveAs macros; if absent, it copied the virus code into NORMAL.DOT, enabling infection of all subsequently created or opened documents. The FileSaveAs macro was modified to ensure replication during save operations, allowing the virus to spread across Word documents (.doc and .dot files) without altering their content visibly. The payload was benign, merely displaying a dialog box showing an infection count of "1" (due to a coding error that prevented accurate tallying) and containing a comment in the PayLoad macro stating "That’s enough to prove my point," emphasizing its proof-of-concept nature rather than destructive intent. Technically, the virus stored its code within the document's macro storage mechanism, leveraging Word's macro storage mechanism to remain hidden from casual users. This approach demonstrated the feasibility of using application macros for , infecting not only Windows systems but also cross-platform environments like Macintosh and where Word was available. The virus spread primarily through shared documents via systems () and early attachments, with reports of it being pre-installed on some corporate distributions, accelerating its dissemination. Antivirus vendors responded swiftly by developing initial signatures for detection, such as on the unique macro names and code strings, marking one of the earliest widespread adaptations in macro virus defense. The Laroux virus, discovered in late 1996—specifically July in oil drilling companies in and —was the first macro virus for , targeting versions 5.0 and later and exploiting macro sheets. It consisted of two macros, Auto_Open and Check_Files, stored in a hidden worksheet named "laroux" within the PERSONAL.XLS file, Excel's global macro repository located in the startup directory. Upon opening an infected workbook, the Auto_Open macro triggered the Check_Files routine, which scanned for the "laroux" sheet; if absent in PERSONAL.XLS, it created the file and inserted the macros, then infected all open workbooks by appending the malicious sheet to them. This global infection mechanism ensured persistence across sessions, as macros in PERSONAL.XLS executed automatically for any Excel file. Like , Laroux's payload was non-destructive, focusing solely on replication without data alteration or overt actions, serving as a proof-of-concept for spreadsheet macro vulnerabilities. Laroux was written in (VBA), embedding code to create a hidden macro sheet for stealthy propagation. Its simplicity—lacking error handling, which could trigger visible "Macro Error" dialogs on protected drives—highlighted early macro security gaps in Excel's architecture. The virus affected users internationally due to Excel's widespread adoption in business environments, spreading via shared spreadsheets over networks and floppies. In response, antivirus tools updated signatures to detect the "laroux" sheet and macro patterns, while Microsoft began incorporating macro confirmation prompts in subsequent updates, such as Excel 97. Both and Laroux established the viability of macro-based , prompting to enhance security features like macro disabling by default and digital signatures in applications starting from the late . Their legacy lies in proving that office could serve as vectors for infection, influencing the development of behavior-based detection in and user education on macro risks.

Melissa Virus and Later Variants

The Melissa virus, released in late March 1999 by programmer David L. Smith using a hijacked America Online account, marked a significant advancement in macro virus propagation. It consisted of (VBA) code embedded in a document named List.doc, which was posted to the alt.sex. Upon opening the infected document, the virus exploited to automatically email copies of itself as an attachment to the first 50 entries in the user's address book, using the subject line "Important Message From [sender's username]" and a body message promising "a list of the best pornographic sites on the ." Additionally, it disabled macro security warnings in Word 97 and Word 2000 by altering registry keys, such as setting HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\9.0\Word\Security\Level to 1 (low security), thereby facilitating further infections without user prompts. The virus's primary payload relied on its self-propagation mechanism rather than direct file destruction, leading to rapid network overloads as infected machines flooded email servers with outbound messages. This caused widespread disruptions, including the temporary shutdown of email systems at major corporations like and , with an estimated one million email accounts affected and significant slowdowns in global within days of its release. The List.doc attachment itself contained innocuous text mimicking a list of passwords to adult websites, serving as social engineering bait to encourage opening, though the virus did not actively download external content. In the months following Melissa's outbreak, numerous variants emerged, including , Mad Cow, , and , which modified the original VBA code to alter email subjects, payloads, or infection routines in attempts to bypass antivirus signatures. These adaptations highlighted the virus's influence on subsequent malware, such as the 1999 Love Bug (), a VBScript worm that, while not a pure macro virus, adopted Melissa's mass-mailing strategy via Outlook but added destructive elements like overwriting files and downloading a backdoor . By the early , macro viruses evolved further by emphasizing social engineering—using deceptive email subjects and attachments to persuade users to manually enable macros—and incorporating backdoor capabilities for remote access, alongside techniques to circumvent enhanced security in Office XP, such as prompting users to lower protection levels during document trust decisions. As of 2025, macro viruses like variants of Melissa-inspired attacks continue to appear in phishing campaigns, often requiring users to enable macros in Office documents. The Melissa incident led to swift legal action, with Smith arrested on April 1, 1999, in after investigators traced the account and code similarities to his prior viruses. In May 2002, he pleaded guilty to creating and releasing the virus and was sentenced to 20 months in federal prison, along with five years of supervised release and a $5,000 fine. This case spurred unprecedented collaboration between law enforcement, such as the FBI and U.S. , and antivirus firms like and , accelerating real-time threat sharing and macro security improvements in .

Impact

Security and Economic Consequences

Macro viruses pose significant security risks by exploiting the privileges granted to macro languages in , such as , to access and manipulate sensitive system resources. These viruses can steal data by reading contacts, attaching themselves to outgoing messages, or extracting files from local storage and cloud services, facilitating and unauthorized . For instance, malicious macros often include code to harvest credentials or personal information stored in documents, enabling attackers to impersonate users or sell stolen data on underground markets. Beyond direct theft, macro viruses serve as effective gateways for more destructive payloads, including , by acting as initial loaders that download and execute secondary once activated. In targeted attacks, (APT) groups, such as the Gamaredon group, have employed VBA macros in spearphishing emails to establish persistent access, exfiltrate data, and deploy command-and-control infrastructure without leaving traditional file traces. This exploitation underscores macros' role in sophisticated campaigns, where they bypass initial defenses to enable lateral movement within networks. Economically, macro viruses have inflicted substantial damages through direct losses and indirect costs like system remediation and operational disruptions. The 1999 Melissa virus alone caused an estimated $80 million in cleanup and repair expenses across affected U.S. systems, primarily due to overwhelmed servers and halted business operations. Globally, its impact reached up to $1.1 billion, highlighting the scale of lost from forced shutdowns and manual file recoveries. In the broader malware landscape, including macro viruses, annual worldwide damages exceeded $13 billion by the early 2000s, driving corporate investments in antivirus upgrades and security training estimated in the billions. These costs encompassed not only immediate fixes but also ongoing losses, as organizations diverted IT resources to virus hunts and system restores. The proliferation of macro viruses eroded public and corporate trust in office documents, transforming routine into a potential for and prompting stricter default settings in software like . This shift influenced regulatory frameworks, with high-profile incidents contributing to the development of EU data protection laws like the GDPR, which mandate breach notifications and emphasize cybersecurity resilience to mitigate data theft risks. In healthcare, macro virus outbreaks in the led to significant downtime, as infected documents disrupted hospital networks, delaying care and administrative functions; such events underscored the human cost, with diverted resources straining understaffed IT teams and postponing non-emergency procedures. Over the long term, the vulnerabilities exposed by macro viruses accelerated the malware landscape's evolution toward fileless attacks, where code executes in memory using legitimate system tools rather than persistent files, evading traditional detection. Despite these advancements, macros persist as a key entry vector, often serving as the initial infection stage for fileless payloads in modern campaigns.

Modern Relevance and Persistence

Despite a general decline in the standalone use of macro viruses since their peak in the early , they remain a persistent in 2025 cybersecurity landscapes, particularly as initial vectors in campaigns targeting applications. Antivirus reports indicate a noted resurgence in malicious macros within sophisticated campaigns deploying and trojans. This prevalence is amplified by the increasing sharing of macro-enabled templates via cloud platforms like and , where collaborative documents can inadvertently propagate infections if macro execution is enabled, bypassing traditional filters. As of Q2 2025, attacks increased 13% from the previous quarter, with attachments continuing as a primary . Attackers have adapted macro viruses to evade modern detection by employing techniques such as encoding in VBA and using macros as droppers for advanced malware like and Qakbot. These adaptations allow macros to download secondary payloads, integrating them into multi-stage attacks rather than operating independently. In the 2020s, notable examples include variants of the banking , which since 2015 have leveraged macros in emails to steal financial credentials, with active campaigns documented as late as 2021. State-sponsored actors have also incorporated macro exploits in geopolitical operations, such as reported attacks in amid the 2022 Russia-Ukraine conflict, where macros facilitated initial access for . The shift to has heightened risks by expanding reliance on attachments and shared files, while legacy enterprise systems—often running unpatched versions of —remain susceptible to older macro exploits. Although pure macro viruses have declined due to built-in protections like Microsoft's default macro blocking, their persistence lies in hybrid integrations with broader attack chains. Emerging trends point to the continued use of macros in , with reports noting increases in malicious macro activity in early 2025.

Prevention and Mitigation

User Best Practices

Users should adopt cautious behaviors when handling attachments and files to minimize the of macro virus infections. Avoid opening attachments from unknown or unexpected senders, as macro viruses often propagate through malicious in emails. Instead, use preview modes in email clients to inspect content without enabling macros, and always scan attachments with up-to-date before proceeding. If a document prompts to enable macros for viewing, decline unless the source is verified as trustworthy. Configuring macro settings in applications is a fundamental step for protection. By default, disable all macros through the Trust Center: navigate to File > Options > Trust Center > Trust Center Settings > Macro Settings, and select "Disable all macros without notification." Only enable macros for documents from known, trusted sources, such as those digitally signed by verified publishers or stored in designated trusted locations. This setting prevents automatic execution of potentially harmful code in (VBA). Maintaining general security habits further reduces exposure. Keep and the operating system updated to apply patches that address VBA-related vulnerabilities, such as those fixed in regular security updates. For suspicious documents, utilize —a read-only mode that blocks macro execution—or open files in isolated environments to contain any potential threats. Users should also be vigilant against attempts, such as emails promising "important updates" that urge enabling macros, by verifying sender legitimacy and avoiding urgent requests. Regular backups serve as a critical against from macro virus payloads, which may delete or corrupt files. Maintain offline or encrypted backups of important documents and test their restorability periodically to ensure recovery without reintroducing . To view documents safely without macro risks, employ tools that lack macro support, such as converting files to PDF format before opening or using web-based viewers that render content statically. This strips executable code while preserving readable information.

Software and Detection Measures

Microsoft Office provides built-in protections against macro viruses through the Trust Center, where administrators can configure macro security settings to disable all macros without notification, thereby blocking potentially malicious code from executing. The highest security level prevents all macros from running unless they are digitally signed by a trusted publisher, reducing the risk of infection from unsigned or suspicious VBA code. Additionally, opens downloaded files in a read-only mode that disables macros by default, particularly those originating from the , to isolate potentially harmful content until the user explicitly enables editing. Digital signatures serve as a , allowing only macros from certified publishers to run after validation, which helps distinguish legitimate from viral threats. Antivirus software integrates with Office applications to detect macro viruses through real-time scanning of documents and templates, flagging files containing VBA code for inspection. Many solutions employ to identify suspicious patterns in macro code, such as obfuscated scripts or unauthorized file access attempts, even for previously unknown variants. These tools often combine signature-based detection for known macro virus patterns with behavioral heuristics to monitor VBA elements during file operations. Advanced detection relies on (EDR) tools that monitor macro execution in , using behavioral analysis to detect anomalies like unauthorized network calls or system modifications triggered by VBA. EDR platforms apply AI-driven behavioral monitoring to environments, isolating processes and rolling back malicious changes upon identifying macro-based threats. Security suites may include components that analyze VBA code for indicators using heuristics without full execution, aiding in proactive threat hunting. In enterprise settings, organizational policies enhance detection by deploying email gateways that automatically block or quarantine macro-enabled files, such as .docm or .xlsm attachments, to prevent initial propagation. Macro whitelisting allows only pre-approved VBA code from trusted sources to execute across the network, enforced via group policies in . Regular updates to antivirus definitions ensure coverage against evolving macro virus variants, with automated patch management distributing signatures for newly identified threats. For removal, antivirus cleaners scan and infected templates like Normal.dot or global add-ins, deleting malicious VBA modules while preserving legitimate content. Manual checks involve opening the VBA editor (Alt+F11 in ) to review and remove anomalous , such as auto-execute routines or external references, followed by a full system scan to confirm eradication.

References

  1. [1]
    macro virus - Glossary | CSRC
    Definitions: A virus that attaches itself to documents and uses the macro programming capabilities of the document's application to execute and propagate.
  2. [2]
    What are macro viruses and how do they work? - TechTarget
    Sep 9, 2021 · A macro virus is a computer virus written in the same macro language used to create software programs such as Microsoft Excel or Word.
  3. [3]
    What is a Macro Virus? - Kaspersky
    Macro viruses add their code to the macros associated with documents, spreadsheets and other data files.
  4. [4]
    History of Computer Viruses & Malware | What Was Their Impact?
    viruses which could infect documents created via programs like Microsoft Word — rose in popularity in the mid-to-late 1990s. ...
  5. [5]
    What Is a Macro Virus? - Sangfor Technologies
    Nov 6, 2024 · Voyager Macro Virus: The Voyager macro virus is one of the most well-known macro viruses in cybersecurity history. · Melissa Virus: First ...
  6. [6]
    The Melissa Virus - FBI.gov
    Mar 25, 2019 · Two decades ago, computer viruses were still relatively new notions to most Americans, but the fast-moving and destructive Melissa virus ...
  7. [7]
    History of Computer Viruses, Part 2: Macro Viruses and Worms
    Dec 13, 2013 · Macro viruses were designed to target specific applications, most commonly Microsoft Word. One particularly effective macro virus, called ...
  8. [8]
    Macro Virus: What It is, How It Works, Prevention - Investopedia
    A macro virus is a type of computer exploit or malware that automatically triggers a series of software functions, often with deleterious effect. · In addition ...
  9. [9]
    What is Macro Virus? Risks, Prevention, and Detection - SentinelOne
    Sep 2, 2025 · Macro viruses are malicious code embedded in documents that exploit macro capabilities. This guide explores how macro viruses operate, their risks, and ...
  10. [10]
    Macro Virus: What Is It and How to Remove It - Avast
    Apr 7, 2021 · A macro virus is a serious security risk that infects PCs and Macs, targeting applications, not the OS. Learn how to recognize and remove ...
  11. [11]
    Macro Viruses/Malware - Trend Micro Online Help Center
    Macro viruses/malware are application-specific. They infect macro utilities that accompany such applications as Microsoft Word (.doc) and Microsoft Excel (.xls ...
  12. [12]
    What is a macro virus? + How to remove one - Norton
    May 13, 2024 · Your computer starts running slower than usual. · Files that don't usually ask for passwords ask for one. · Your computer saves documents as “ ...How macro viruses work and... · Macro virus examples · How to spot a macro virusMissing: symptoms | Show results with:symptoms
  13. [13]
    [PDF] ARE THERE ANY POLYMORPHIC MACRO VIRUSES AT ALL ...
    This paper will investigate how the currently known polymorphic macro viruses fit into the usual terms used for binary polymorphic viruses and what special ...
  14. [14]
    DMV - F‑Secure
    Mr. McNamara wrote WordMacro/DMV in fall 1994 - at the same time, he published a detailed study about macro viruses. He kept his test virus under wraps ...
  15. [15]
    Throwback Thursday: Macro Viruses - Part 1 (September 1999)
    Jun 18, 2015 · In December 1994 ... Joel McNamara wrote the first real macro virus for demonstration purposes. It was called DMV (Document Macro Virus).
  16. [16]
    Macro Virus Definition and Prevention - Kaspersky
    Macro viruses are most commonly found embedded in documents or inserted as malicious code into word-processing programs. They may come from documents attached ...
  17. [17]
    Changing threats, changing solutions: A history of viruses and ...
    Apr 14, 2008 · Macro viruses. A major shift in development took place in July 1995, with the appearance of the first macro virus, called Concept. Macro ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  18. [18]
    Virus:X97M/Laroux | F-Secure
    Virus:X97M/Laroux is the first real Microsoft Excel macro virus was found in July 1996. Laroux was written in Visual Basic for Applications (VBA), a macro ...
  19. [19]
    Virus:X97M/Laroux threat description - Microsoft Security Intelligence
    Feb 20, 2012 · X97M/Laroux is a family of viruses that spreads using Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. The 'X97M' means that variants of this virus use spreadsheets created in ...Missing: 1996 | Show results with:1996
  20. [20]
    Heimdal™ Security's Lost & Found Bin – The Macro Virus
    Jun 17, 2022 · Joel McNamara, the comp scientist behind DMV simply wanted to study how a macro-aided virus can interact (and disrupt) OS operations. DMV and ...
  21. [21]
    1999 in Tech: The Melissa Virus - Boson Blog
    Jun 15, 2023 · The Melissa virus, identified in 1999, spread via email attachments from infected Word documents, causing rapid infections and server overload.
  22. [22]
    What is the Melissa Virus? - TechTarget
    Dec 7, 2021 · Melissa was a type of email virus that initially became an issue in early 1999. It was a mass-mailing macro virus that targeted Microsoft Word- and Outlook- ...Missing: outbreak | Show results with:outbreak
  23. [23]
    Malicious Life Podcast: The Melissa Virus - Cybereason
    In the span of just five days, Melissa infected over 100,000 computers around the world: in doing so, it quickly became the fastest-spreading virus in computer ...Missing: outbreak | Show results with:outbreak
  24. [24]
    What is Macro Virus? - zenarmor.com
    Feb 13, 2022 · Macro viruses can cause your computer to slow down, delete or alter data, and affect the functionality of your device. The following are some ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Macro Viruses
    A macro virus author can program his creation to do almost anything that is possible with a PC. It can corrupt data, create new files, move text, flash colors, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
    The real reason for the decline of the macro virus - Virus Bulletin
    Jan 1, 2006 · Users have become more 'security-aware' (and are, apparently, no longer opening Office documents from unknown sources). · Virus writers have ...
  27. [27]
    Macro Intruders: Sneaking Past Office Defenses - Cisco Talos Blog
    Aug 2, 2016 · DOC files, used by MS Word prior to MS Office 2007 allowed numerous components, including macros, to be embedded within the document. Users ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Malicious Macros: The Holes in Microsoft Software That Hackers ...
    Trend Micro reports that Microsoft Office files are the most common file types used in targeted attacks. Microsoft itself admits that 98% of threats targeting ...
  29. [29]
    Macro Malware, Aging Worms Continue to Pose Threat to Present Day
    Apr 1, 2017 · Macro malware and worms, which were prominent in the 1990s, remain significant security threats to the present day and event top some top ...<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    What is VBA used for? - Noble Desktop
    Microsoft launched VBA in 1993 as a replacement for Excel's macro language. Since then, it has become a widely used language for automating various Excel tasks ...
  31. [31]
    Getting started with VBA in Office | Microsoft Learn
    Jun 7, 2022 · When you choose the Macro button on the Developer tab, it opens the Macros dialog box, which gives you access to VBA subroutines or macros that ...
  32. [32]
    Auto-Exec and Auto-Open macros in Word - Microsoft 365 Apps
    Jun 25, 2025 · Auto-Exec runs when Word starts, before a document is created. Auto-Open runs after opening a new document, when saved as part of the document ...
  33. [33]
    Enable or disable macros in Microsoft 365 files
    For automation clients to access the VBA object model, the user running the code must grant access. To turn on access, select the check box. Note: Microsoft ...
  34. [34]
    Change macro security settings in Excel - Microsoft Support
    To change macro security, go to the Developer tab, click Macro Security, then choose an option under Macro Settings. Alternatively, access via Options > Trust ...
  35. [35]
    Office Template Macros, Sub-technique T1137.001 - MITRE ATT&CK®
    Nov 7, 2019 · Adversaries inject VBA macros into Office templates such as Normal.dotm or Personal.xlsb or redirect Office template load path via registry key ...
  36. [36]
    MS Office Macro Security Registry Modifications - Elastic
    These settings include: Trust access to the VBA project object model - When enabled, Microsoft Office will trust all macros and run any code without showing a ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Lotus 1-2-3 Release 3.1 Quick Reference
    Quick Reference summarizes 1-2-3® keys, file types, label prefixes, arithmetic and logical operators, @functions, and macro commands. Quick Reference also ...
  38. [38]
    Macro Malware Employs Advanced Sandbox-Evasion Techniques
    We have seen macro malware using high-obfuscation algorithms to protect itself from static and traditional antimalware detection techniques.Missing: virus | Show results with:virus
  39. [39]
    Virus.MSWord.Concept - Kaspersky Threats
    This virus contains four macros: Load, AAAZAO, AAAZFS, AutoOpen. Macro.Word.Concept.f. This is an ancrypted virus. It contains seven macros: K, a678, PARA, SITE ...Missing: 512 bytes
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Virus Bulletin, September 1995
    Sep 24, 1995 · Concept, the AutoOpen macro first checks to see if the virus is already active on this computer, by searching the environment for the ...
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    1996 - Kaspersky IT Encyclopedia
    ... virus technique. In July 1996, Laroux; the first Microsoft Excel virus, was detected in the wild, in two oil drilling companies in Alaska and South Africa ...
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
  46. [46]
    Virus.MSExcel.Laroux - Kaspersky Threats
    It contains two macros: auto_open and check_files. While loading an infected document, Excel executes the auto macros auto_open, and the virus gains control.Missing: 4.0 | Show results with:4.0
  47. [47]
    Melissa Virus Creates a New Type of Threat - IEEE Computer Society
    There was concern because Melissa spread quickly via infected e-mail attachments that, when opened, sent the virus to people in unsuspecting victims' address ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  48. [48]
    Flashback Friday: The Melissa virus - WeLiveSecurity
    Jul 15, 2016 · In 1999, David L. Smith launched the Melissa virus. Within a few hours, it had infected thousands of computers. We take a look back at its impact.
  49. [49]
    Melissa – The Little Virus That Could... (May 1999) - Virus Bulletin
    Jun 18, 2015 · The first time an infected document is opened on a given machine, the virus receives control via the standard Document_Open() macro.Missing: VBA | Show results with:VBA
  50. [50]
    Love Bug's creator tracked down to repair shop in Manila - BBC
    May 2, 2020 · The previous year, the Melissa bug is believed to have infected a million machines using similar tactics. However, Love Bug dwarfed previous ...
  51. [51]
    Press Release: Creator of Melissa Computer Virus Sentenced to 20 ...
    Smith pleaded guilty in federal court to a one-count Information, charging him with knowingly spreading a computer virus with the intent to cause damage. The ...
  52. [52]
    Macro Security for Microsoft Office - NCSC.GOV.UK
    A macro is a small program that is often written to automate repetitive tasks in Microsoft Office applications. Macros have been historically used for a variety ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Macro Virus Explained: Comprehensive Cybersecurity Guide
    At its core, a macro virus is a type of malware that specifically targets applications that use macros—small programs or scripts that automate tasks. You might ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
    What Is a Computer Virus? - Types, Examples & More | Proofpoint US
    The malicious activity carried out by the virus's code can damage the local file system, steal data, interrupt services, download additional malware, or any ...
  55. [55]
    Office Macro Attacks - All-in-One Cybersecurity Platform - Cynet
    Oct 10, 2025 · Tips From Expert · Disable Macros by Default and Implement Strict Policies: This is the most effective way to prevent macro-based attacks.Office Macro Attacks · Why It's A Problem · Tips From Expert<|control11|><|separator|>
  56. [56]
    Gamaredon group grows its game - WeLiveSecurity
    Jun 11, 2020 · One tool, a VBA macro targeting Microsoft Outlook, uses the target's email account to send spearphishing emails to contacts in the victim's ...
  57. [57]
    Rising Trend in APT Hackers Using Excel Add-ins as Intrusion Vector
    Jan 12, 2023 · APT hackers turn to malicious Excel add-ins as initial intrusion vector, PurpleUrchin bypasses CAPTCHA and steals cloud platform resources, ...
  58. [58]
    Annual Worldwide Economic Damages from Malware Exceed $13 ...
    The study found that for the second year in a row, malware cost damages declined worldwide, as shown in Figure 1. In 2006, direct damages fell to $13.3 billion.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] The Economic Impact of Cyber-Attacks - NYU Faculty Digital Archive
    Apr 1, 2004 · The acceleration of costs since the mid-. 1990s, as reported by both CEI and Mi2g, is considerably more pronounced than the results of the ...
  60. [60]
    Understanding Fileless Malware - The LastPass Blog
    Sep 4, 2024 · In some cases, fileless malware may be delivered through malicious macros in documents like this VBA macros. The malware may attempt to move ...
  61. [61]
    Malicious Macros Return In Sophisticated Phishing Campaigns
    Apr 16, 2025 · Once enabled, the macros execute malicious code that can download malware, steal credentials, or establish persistence on the victim's system.
  62. [62]
    Phishing with Office Macros in 2024 - MWR CyberSec
    Apr 22, 2024 · VBA macros are a common way for malicious actors to gain access to deploy malware and ransomware. Therefore, to help improve security in Office, ...Missing: antivirus reports
  63. [63]
    Macros from the internet are blocked by default in Office
    In this article​​ VBA macros are a common way for malicious actors to gain access to deploy malware and ransomware. Therefore, to help improve security in Office ...
  64. [64]
    Purgalicious VBA: Macro Obfuscation With VBA Purging | Mandiant
    Nov 19, 2020 · This technique allows attackers to remove compressed VBA code from Office documents and still execute malicious macros without many of the VBA keywords.Missing: adaptations 2020s
  65. [65]
    Emotet Summary: November 2021 Through January 2022
    May 17, 2022 · We review recent activity from the Emotet malware family, covering changes in Emotet operations since its revival in November 2021.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  66. [66]
    Dridex Reloaded: Analysis of a New Dridex Campaign
    Mar 29, 2021 · Dridex is a banking Trojan. After almost a decade since it was first discovered, the threat is still active. According to a report published ...
  67. [67]
    13 Remote Work Security Risks in 2025 & How to Overcome Them
    Security concerns with remote work include an increased attack surface, vulnerable home networks, insecure public Wi-Fi, reliance on personal devices, increased ...Missing: macro 2024
  68. [68]
    Legacy Systems and Cybersecurity Risks: What You Need to Know ...
    Rating 5.0 (1) Sep 27, 2025 · Legacy systems cybersecurity risks are rising fast in 2025. Learn about outdated software security risks, legacy system vulnerabilities, ...Missing: macro viruses
  69. [69]
    Is Macro Phishing Dead in 2024? — A Scheduled Task for Initial ...
    May 27, 2024 · According to Proofpoint, the use of VBA and XL4 macros in phishing campaigns decreased by approximately 66% between October 2021 and June 2022.Missing: prevalence antivirus reports
  70. [70]
    [PDF] 2025 GenAI Code Security Report - Veracode
    Only 55% of AI-generated code tasks result in secure code, with 45% introducing flaws. Security performance is largely unchanged over time, and larger models ...<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Macro malware - Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
    Apr 24, 2024 · Macro malware hides in Microsoft Office files and is delivered as email attachments or inside ZIP files. These files use names that are intended to entice or ...
  72. [72]
    Protect yourself from macro viruses - Microsoft Support
    A macro virus is a type of computer virus that could be stored in macros within a Microsoft 365 file (such as a document, presentation, workbook, or template)Missing: adaptation 2007<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    How to Protect Yourself from Ransomware - Kaspersky
    Never open attachments that prompt you to run macros to view them. If the attachment is infected, opening it will run a malicious macro that gives malware ...Missing: viruses | Show results with:viruses
  74. [74]
    Release notes for Microsoft Office security updates
    These release notes provide information about security fixes that are included in updates to Microsoft Office.Missing: macro | Show results with:macro
  75. [75]
    What is Protected View? - Microsoft Support
    Protected View is a read-only mode where most editing functions are disabled. There are several reasons why a file opens in Protected View.Missing: sandboxing macro
  76. [76]
    [PDF] Guide to Malware Incident Prevention and Handling for Desktops ...
    All users should be made aware of the ways that malware enters and infects hosts, the risks that malware poses, the inability of technical controls to prevent ...
  77. [77]
    #StopRansomware Guide | CISA
    Use automatic updates for your antivirus and anti-malware software and signatures. Ensure tools are properly configured to escalate warnings and indicators to ...
  78. [78]
    Blocked attachments in Outlook - Microsoft Support
    Some attachment file types are automatically blocked because of their potential for introducing a virus into your computer.
  79. [79]
    Digital signatures and code signing in workbooks in Excel
    Jun 25, 2025 · You can create your own digital certificate for personal use or testing purposes with the SelfCert.exe tool that is provided in Microsoft Office ...Missing: Trust | Show results with:Trust
  80. [80]
    What is Heuristic Analysis? - Kaspersky
    Heuristic analysis is a method of detecting viruses by examining code for suspicious properties. It was designed to spot unknown new viruses and modified ...
  81. [81]
    What is a heuristic virus and how do I remove it? - Norton
    Sep 17, 2021 · Heuristic virus is a nickname given to the malware Heur.Invader, a virus that can disable antivirus software, modify security settings, and install additional ...
  82. [82]
    Top 10 Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Solutions for 2025
    Sep 3, 2025 · SentinelOne uses a blend of both static and behavioral detection techniques; it can neutralize known and unknown threats, even hidden threats.Missing: macro OfficeMalScanner
  83. [83]
    Scanning Settings | Sentinel Anti-Malware Documentation
    With this option enabled OLE2 files containing VBA macros, which were not detected by signatures will be marked as "Heuristics.OLE2.ContainsMacros". Default ...<|separator|>