Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Managing general agent

A managing general agent (MGA) is a specialized type of that, unlike traditional s or brokers, is vested by an insurer with authority to bind coverage, issue policies, appoint sub-producers, and often handle claims adjustment or arrangements on the insurer's behalf. MGAs play a crucial role in the property and casualty (P&C) sector by enabling insurers to outsource specialized and functions, particularly in niche markets such as professional liability, surplus lines, or regional areas where traditional operations may be inefficient. They typically operate under a contractual with one or more insurers, managing all or part of the insurer's while assuming limited , and they earn commissions based on premiums written. In the United States, MGAs are subject to stringent state-level regulation, including licensing requirements and oversight under the ' (NAIC) MGA Model Act, which mandates that insurers file appointments and monitor MGAs to prevent unauthorized activities or conflicts of interest. For instance, in , an MGA must be licensed as an and only qualifies if it handles risks or premiums exceeding 5% of the insurer's policyholder surplus or claims over $25,000. The model has experienced significant growth, driven by increasing investments and the demand for agile, expertise-driven solutions. This growth continued into 2024, with MGA premiums rising 16% year-over-year. As of 2024, hundreds of MGAs in the placed around $114 billion in premiums annually, representing about 11% of the P&C market, while in the , over 350 MGAs accounted for more than 10% of premiums. This expansion is fueled by MGAs' high EBITDA margins—often in the 20s to 30s percent range—low capital requirements, and their ability to leverage data analytics for efficiency, making them attractive for , with robust activity continuing into 2024 and 2025. For insurers, partnering with MGAs provides access to specialized expertise and faster market entry, as evidenced by 43% of the top 100 P&C insurers utilizing MGAs for premium sourcing as of 2021. However, successful MGA operations hinge on strong insurer relationships—typically 2-3 per program—and robust discipline to mitigate risks like agent concentration or regulatory non-compliance.

Definition and Overview

Definition

A managing general agent (MGA) is an individual or entity authorized by an insurer to perform substantial functions on the insurer's behalf, including , binding coverage, collecting premiums, and adjusting claims, without being an employee of the insurer. This delegated authority distinguishes MGAs from traditional agents or brokers, as they act as intermediaries managing significant portions of the insurer's operations under a contractual agreement. Key characteristics of MGAs include their operation through a formal contractual that grants specific delegated authority from the insurer, enabling them to handle and related tasks independently. Unlike salaried employees, MGAs are typically compensated via commissions based on premiums written or fees for services rendered, aligning their incentives with policy production and . They often specialize in particular lines of , such as , casualty, or specialty coverages, allowing insurers to leverage MGA expertise in targeted areas without expanding internal staff. The concept of an was first formalized in U.S. model legislation through the ' (NAIC) Managing General Agents Model Act (#225), adopted in 1989, which defines an MGA as any person who manages "all or part of the insurance business of an insurer," including production and underwriting activities where the gross direct written premium equals or exceeds 5% of the insurer's policyholder surplus in any one quarter or year, and/or adjusting or paying claims exceeding $10,000, relative to the insurer's surplus. This statutory framework established uniform standards for MGA operations across states, emphasizing oversight to mitigate risks from delegated authority. In practice, MGAs frequently manage entire portfolios for niche markets, such as , where they underwrite complex risks like data breaches, or excess and surplus lines, covering non-standard exposures that traditional markets avoid. These examples illustrate how MGAs enable insurers to access specialized segments efficiently through focused expertise and authority.

Role in the Insurance Industry

Managing general agents (MGAs) serve as key intermediaries in the ecosystem, bridging the gap between insurers and policyholders by facilitating the distribution of insurance products, particularly in specialty lines and underserved markets where traditional carriers may lack the necessary expertise or infrastructure. They enable insurers to access niche risks efficiently, acting as extensions of the carrier's operations while providing policyholders with tailored coverage options that might otherwise be unavailable. This positioning is especially vital in complex segments such as surplus lines, where MGAs handle non-standard risks that require specialized knowledge. MGAs contribute significantly to operational efficiency by allowing insurers to outsource day-to-day functions like , premium collection, and policy issuance, freeing carriers to concentrate on allocation and strategic oversight. Through these delegated arrangements, MGAs advanced technologies, including data analytics and , to streamline processes and reduce costs for insurers entering new markets. They often specialize in high-risk or emerging areas, such as climate-related products that address events, where their agility and domain expertise enable rapid adaptation to evolving threats. Economically, the MGA sector has demonstrated robust growth, with the U.S. market exceeding $80 billion in premiums in 2023 and reaching approximately $90 billion in 2024, reflecting annual increases of 13-16% driven by insurtech integrations and demand for specialized distribution. This expansion underscores MGAs' role in enhancing market capacity, particularly as non-affiliated MGAs now account for nearly half of premiums, supporting broader risk diversification. In terms of relationship dynamics, MGAs typically enter into agency agreements with multiple insurers, offering non-exclusive partnerships that provide and flexibility for carriers seeking to expand into new geographies or product lines without building internal capabilities. These arrangements, which often include binding authority for , allow insurers to mitigate risks through diversified channels while MGAs benefit from shared models.

History and Evolution

Origins in the Insurance Sector

The concept of managing general agents (MGAs) in the insurance sector originated in the 19th century, evolving from general agents tasked with basic sales and distribution for entities like Lloyd's of London and early U.S. mutual insurers. These precursors operated without formal underwriting authority, focusing instead on soliciting policies, collecting premiums, and providing local representation to extend insurer reach into new territories amid growing maritime and property risks. For example, Lloyd's established a network of agents in the early 1800s to handle overseas correspondence and claims settlements, while U.S. mutuals, starting with the Philadelphia Contributionship in 1752, relied on part-time sales agents to build membership and manage simple operations. By the late 19th century, as property/casualty insurers expanded westward, general agents like those appointed by Aetna in the 1850s gained broader administrative duties, such as appointing sub-agents and settling minor losses, setting the stage for more delegated roles. A pivotal early milestone emerged in the and , when U.S. state laws began formally recognizing specialized agents to address surplus lines amid post-Great market contractions. The foundational New York surplus lines statute of 1890 had already created a framework for non-admitted coverage, but interwar expansions—driven by economic turmoil that reduced admitted capacity by up to 30% in casualty lines—empowered agents with delegated authority to underwrite high-risk or niche policies unavailable through standard markets. This period laid the groundwork for MGAs by filling gaps in coverage for industries like and transportation, where traditional insurers retreated due to financial instability. Post-World War II expansion in the 1950s further solidified MGAs' role, fueled by rising complexity in and the postwar commercial boom that doubled industrial output and urban development. Agents increasingly took on administrative responsibilities, such as policy issuance and loss adjustment, to support insurers handling novel risks like and in expanding sectors. Innovations like the 1950 homeowners policy, which bundled multiple coverages, exemplified how MGAs enabled efficient scaling without carriers overhauling internal structures. Early MGAs encountered significant challenges, including scrutiny for potential conflicts of interest arising from their to coverage while earning commissions, which could incentivize volume over prudence. This prompted informal guidelines in the mid-20th century, such as contractual stipulations on reporting and oversight, to curb risks like before robust statutory regulations emerged.

Modern Developments

The adoption of the (NAIC) Managing General Agents Act (Model #225) in 1990 marked a pivotal formalization of operations in the United States, establishing standardized requirements for licensing, contracts, and oversight to mitigate risks associated with delegated authority. By the early , most U.S. states had enacted versions of this model legislation, which clarified the roles and responsibilities of MGAs, thereby reducing regulatory ambiguity and encouraging the proliferation of these entities as insurers sought specialized distribution channels. This regulatory framework spurred a significant surge in MGA formations, transforming them from niche intermediaries into a more structured segment of the insurance ecosystem. Entering the , MGAs experienced accelerated growth during the , fueled by the emergence of insurtech innovations that enabled agile, technology-driven and models. Insurtech MGAs, defined as those established in 2010 or later, leveraged digital tools such as data analytics and remote platforms to streamline operations, allowing for faster entry and of products. By 2025, the global MGA sector had expanded substantially, with over 1,100 entities operating in the U.S. alone and a broader international footprint supporting premiums exceeding $100 billion annually, driven by these technological advancements. Key trends in the MGA landscape include diversification into and international markets, where MGAs have increasingly partnered with reinsurers to access capacity for excess and surplus lines, particularly in the U.S., while navigating regulatory environments. In , MGAs have adapted to the EU's framework by aligning capital and risk management practices with its prudential requirements, facilitating entry into markets like the and through compliant fronting arrangements. This expansion has been accompanied by heightened merger and acquisition activity, with firms injecting substantial capital—estimated in the billions—to consolidate specialist MGAs and scale operations amid rising demand for niche expertise. In response to major disruptions, MGAs demonstrated resilience during the by rapidly adopting virtual claims processing technologies, enabling remote assessments and payouts to maintain service continuity without physical inspections. Similarly, to address escalating climate risks, many MGAs have specialized in products, which trigger automatic payouts based on predefined events like thresholds, thereby filling protection gaps in traditional coverage for natural catastrophes. These adaptations underscore MGAs' role in enhancing industry agility amid evolving environmental and operational challenges.

Functions and Responsibilities

Underwriting and Binding Authority

Managing general agents (MGAs) play a pivotal role in the underwriting process by evaluating and approving on behalf of insurers, utilizing detailed guidelines provided by the carrier to ensure alignment with the insurer's and profitability objectives. This allows MGAs to conduct eligibility reviews for applicants and issue endorsements or modifications to policies without requiring prior approval from the insurer, streamlining the issuance of coverage up to predefined limits. The underwriting process typically involves analyzing submission data, applying actuarial principles to determine appropriate premiums, and assessing factors such as the type of , exposure levels, and historical loss data to decide on acceptance, rejection, or conditional . The scope of an MGA's binding generally encompasses facultative (case-by-case) approvals for individual risks and programmatic authority for classes of risks, both adhering to insurer guidelines for direct . MGAs are prohibited from binding reinsurance contracts, which must be handled by an insurer . For instance, MGAs specializing in commercial lines may quote and bind premiums for policies covering manufacturing facilities or commercial auto coverage for fleet operators, leveraging their niche expertise to handle complex or underserved markets efficiently. This delegated distinguishes MGAs from standard agents, as it empowers them to commit the insurer's capital directly, often for specialized lines like professional liability or surplus lines that require tailored . To support accurate risk evaluation, MGAs employ advanced tools such as actuarial models and specialized software for risk scoring, which integrate to predict loss probabilities and ensure with standards outlined in their contracts. These tools facilitate precise eligibility determinations by cross-referencing applicant information against territorial limits, exclusions, and maximum volumes specified by the . Additionally, MGAs are required to maintain errors and omissions (E&O) to mitigate potential liabilities from errors, with coverage limits typically reviewed annually to protect both the MGA and the from financial repercussions of mistakes. Insurers may also require MGAs to maintain a surety bond of at least $100,000 or 10% of the average annual premiums produced for the insurer in the prior three years (up to $500,000), whichever is greater. Binding authority is strictly capped by contractual terms to control exposure, varying by the and the insurer's arrangements. Exceeding these limits without approval can result in policy invalidation or financial penalties for the . To maintain oversight, MGAs must provide regular reporting to insurers, including monthly accounts of bound premiums, losses incurred, and transactional details via bordereaux, as well as quarterly reconciliations of production data to enable ongoing monitoring of portfolio performance.

Policy Administration and Claims Handling

Managing general agents (MGAs) handle the issuance and ongoing servicing of policies on behalf of insurers, including generating certificates of , processing renewals, endorsements, and collecting premiums. They maintain comprehensive records and ensure with state-specific filings and regulatory requirements, such as approved forms and rates. Funds collected are held in accounts and remitted to the insurer monthly, with MGAs retaining only limited amounts for estimated claims payments. In claims handling, MGAs manage the initial , set reserves for potential losses, and negotiate up to their authorized limits, often coordinating with adjusters for complex cases like or claims. They must report significant claims promptly to the insurer, forwarding files when claims exceed their authorized limits—as defined in the —or involve disputes, extended durations, or other specified conditions. This ensures efficient resolution while protecting the insurer's interests, with claim files treated as joint property. authority is limited such that MGAs may not pay or commit the insurer to pay a claim exceeding 1% of the insurer's policyholder surplus without prior approval, net of . MGAs fulfill reporting obligations by submitting monthly bordereaux to insurers, which detail premiums written and collected, claims paid, outstanding reserves, and other transactions. These reports provide into and facilitate insurer oversight of delegated operations. To streamline these functions, MGAs integrate policy management systems like Guidewire PolicyCenter, which automate issuance, servicing, and bordereaux generation while supporting and data transmission. They may outsource specific sub-tasks, such as certain claims adjustments, to licensed third-party administrators, provided insurer approval and licensure requirements are met.

Regulation and Licensing

Managing general agents (MGAs) must adhere to specific contractual and statutory obligations to operate legally within the industry. These requirements ensure accountability, financial stability, and protection for insurers and policyholders. The primary framework is provided by the (NAIC) Managing General Agents Act (Model #225), which serves as a model for state laws, though individual states may impose variations. Contractual agreements between insurers and MGAs form the foundation of legal operations and must be documented in writing. These contracts delineate the scope of the MGA's authority, including guidelines such as premium volume limits, rating criteria, acceptable types, limits, exclusions, territorial restrictions, cancellation procedures, and issuance periods. Compensation structures typically include commissions ranging from 10% to 20% of , often supplemented by profit-sharing arrangements where interim profits are shared only after verification—after for property lines and five years for casualty lines. Termination clauses allow the insurer to end the agreement for cause with written notice and permit suspension of the MGA's or claims settlement authority during disputes. Additionally, MGAs are required to maintain a or bond for the insurer's protection, with a minimum amount of or 10% of the MGA's prior year's written (whichever is greater, up to a maximum of $500,000). State-specific statutes, often based on the Model Act, mandate financial and operational compliance for MGAs. MGAs must demonstrate positive through audited for the preceding two fiscal years; for newer MGAs in existence for less than two years, certified prepared according to generally accepted accounting principles () are required for completed periods. Some states impose minimum requirements in addition to the positive standard, alongside annual audited financial reports that include consolidated statements with detailed worksheets explaining inter-entity transactions. These provisions ensure the MGA's financial integrity and capacity to fulfill obligations. The appointment process for MGAs involves formal filings with state insurance regulators to establish and maintain authority. Insurers must notify the state within 30 days of entering into or terminating an , providing details on the MGA's duties, lines of , and contract terms. This filing includes disclosures of ownership structure and requires the MGA to be licensed as a , with access to records for regulatory review. Background checks are integrated through licensure requirements, ensuring suitability for the delegated authorities. Prohibited practices safeguard against conflicts and mismanagement. MGAs are barred from , such as serving on the insurer's or sharing employees with the insurer in a way that compromises . of funds is forbidden; premiums and funds must be held in a capacity in separate accounts, limited to no more than three months' estimated claims payments and loss adjustment expenses. Rebating premiums to insureds or others is prohibited under broader statutes applicable to MGAs. Furthermore, annual audits or at least semi-annual on-site reviews by the insurer are required to monitor and financial health.

Oversight by Regulatory Bodies

In the United States, primary oversight of managing general agents (MGAs) is conducted by state insurance departments, such as departments of insurance (DOIs) in each state, which enforce licensing, contract , and operational standards under the NAIC's Model Managing General Agents Act (Model 225). These departments have to examine MGAs as if they were insurers, treating MGA actions as those of the insurer for regulatory purposes, while the (NAIC) coordinates model standards and best practices across jurisdictions to promote uniformity. Insurers bear shared liability for MGA misconduct, requiring them to notify state commissioners of MGA contracts and ensure ongoing . Monitoring activities include annual financial audits of MGAs, which insurers must maintain for at least the prior two fiscal years, alongside semi-annual on-site reviews of and claims practices by insurers. DOIs conduct market conduct examinations and targeted audits to assess , reserve adequacy, and adherence to authority limits, with the NAIC's Financial Condition Examiner's providing guidance on evaluating insurer over MGAs during these reviews. Violations, such as unauthorized of coverage or improper claims handling, can result in actions including suspension, revocation, or civil penalties as determined by law (often up to $5,000 per violation in adopting states) under the model act framework, with states like imposing heightened scrutiny through recent amendments requiring enhanced MGA reporting. Internationally, oversight varies by jurisdiction. In the , the (FCA) supervises MGAs under delegated authority rules within the Product Oversight and Governance (PROD) framework, mandating clear co-manufacturing agreements, fair value assessments, and ongoing monitoring to prevent customer harm from inadequate product governance. The FCA requires insurers to retain ultimate responsibility for oversight, with enforcement potentially involving remedial actions or product withdrawals for failures in value delivery. In the , the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) provides guidelines on outsourcing to MGAs through and system of governance requirements, emphasizing risk-based supervision, notification of critical functions, and convergence across national supervisory authorities (NSAs). EIOPA's 2022 peer review, followed by a 2025 follow-up report, highlights the need for NSAs to address cross-border MGA activities, such as underwriting in multiple member states, by standardizing criteria for material developments, prohibiting "empty shell" structures to ensure effective control, and noting progress in monitoring while identifying ongoing deficiencies in reporting and oversight to reduce regulatory arbitrage.

Comparisons with Other Insurance Intermediaries

Versus Independent Agents

Managing general agents (MGAs) differ significantly from agents in terms of authority scope. agents represent multiple insurance carriers and can sell policies from various companies, but they generally lack the or to independently approve and issue coverage without carrier approval for each quote or . In contrast, MGAs are granted delegated by insurers, allowing them to bind policies, set terms, and make coverage decisions on behalf of the carrier within predefined guidelines, often for complex or non-standard risks. This broader positions MGAs as extensions of the insurer's operations, while agents function primarily as intermediaries reliant on insurer oversight. Operationally, MGAs handle comprehensive portfolio management and back-office functions, such as policy administration, claims processing, and reinsurance negotiations, for one or more insurers, effectively managing significant portions of an insurer's business—equal to or greater than 5% of the insurer’s policyholder surplus. Independent agents, however, concentrate on retail sales and client servicing with limited administrative responsibilities, focusing on quoting, selling, and renewing policies without the scale of operational delegation seen in MGAs. This distinction enables MGAs to operate like specialized mini-insurers in niche areas, whereas independent agents maintain a more localized, sales-oriented model with minimal involvement in broader insurer functions. Regarding compensation and risk, MGAs often receive a combination of commissions, fees for administrative services, and potential profit-sharing, but they assume greater exposure to errors and omissions (E&O) due to their decision-making role in and claims, which can lead to higher regulatory and bonding requirements. agents, by comparison, earn straightforward commissions on sales without bearing for underwriting errors, as they do not make decisions, resulting in lower but also limited beyond direct placements. This risk-reward structure underscores the MGAs' deeper alignment with insurer interests. In terms of focus, independent agents serve a range of lines, including personal lines such as and for individual consumers and products for businesses, through accessible, standard offerings from multiple carriers. MGAs, however, target and specialty risks, including professional liability or surplus lines, where their expertise allows them to underwrite hard-to-place coverages that standard agents cannot handle independently. This specialization enables MGAs to fill gaps in the for complex, high-value needs.

Versus Insurance Brokers

Managing general agents (MGAs) and insurance brokers serve as intermediaries in the insurance but differ fundamentally in their alignments and capabilities. Brokers primarily act as advocates for the insured, representing client interests by searching the to identify and place suitable coverage options from multiple carriers without possessing any underwriting or . In contrast, MGAs represent appointed insurers, producing business directly on their behalf with delegated to bind policies, underwrite risks, and manage operations within specified programs. This distinction positions brokers as facilitators of risk placement and MGAs as extensions of the insurer's operations. Regarding and , brokers lack the power to or issue policies, focusing instead on advisory services and earning compensation through client fees or commissions from placed business, without sharing in the financial of losses. MGAs, however, exercise authority granted by carriers, enabling them to approve and coverage, while also assuming partial for losses through shared arrangements or performance-based incentives. This elevated responsibility underscores the MGA's role in risk selection and mitigation, distinct from the broker's non-binding placement function. In terms of business models, brokers engage in wholesale distribution, shopping risks across various markets and carriers to secure optimal terms for clients, often handling a broad portfolio of standard products. MGAs function more like quasi-insurers, specializing in niche or complex programs where they develop proprietary products, set terms, and oversee administration, thereby expanding carrier capacity in targeted segments without the brokers' multi-market sourcing. For instance, a broker might canvass several carriers to place a large risk for a client seeking competitive quotes. Conversely, an MGA such as MSI Insurance might design and underwrite a customized program offering up to $25 million in coverage tailored for organizations, handling everything from to claims.

Advantages and Challenges

Benefits for Insurers and Clients

Managing general agents (MGAs) offer significant advantages to insurers by providing access to specialized expertise and distribution networks without the need to develop internal teams, allowing carriers to leverage established , pricing, and capabilities. This partnership enables insurers to enter niche markets rapidly, as MGAs handle operational aspects such as policy issuance and claims processing, reducing the time and resources required for product launches. Additionally, MGAs absorb many operational expenses, leading to cost savings for insurers through lower overhead and improved scalability in volatile market conditions. For clients, MGAs deliver tailored coverage options in challenging areas such as high-net-worth individuals or emerging risks like exposures, where traditional carriers may lack the flexibility or to underwrite effectively. This specialization ensures policies are customized to specific needs, often incorporating innovative terms not readily available through standard channels. Clients also benefit from faster quoting and binding processes, as MGAs' delegated authority allows for quicker decisions compared to direct carrier approvals, streamlining access to coverage and enhancing responsiveness. On a market-wide level, MGAs promote enhanced and by bridging gaps in and for complex risks, fostering a more dynamic . They play a pivotal role in the excess and surplus (E&S) lines segment, which reached approximately $98 billion in direct premiums written as of 2024 (9.5% of the total U.S. /casualty ), with MGAs contributing significantly to in this specialized area. Overall, MGAs wrote about $114 billion in premiums as of 2024, accounting for 11% of the U.S. P&C . As of mid-2025, MGA premiums were projected to grow another 14-16%, continuing to support in E&S and other niches.

Potential Risks and Limitations

Over-delegation of authority to managing general agents (MGAs) can expose insurers to risks of , where higher-risk policies are disproportionately bound due to insufficient oversight, and , where MGAs may deviate from guidelines to prioritize volume over quality. Such deviations have historically led to unprofitable risk portfolios, as seen in multiple U.S. insurer insolvencies since 2017, where carriers delegated at least 96% of direct written premiums to MGAs, resulting in binding of unsuitable risks that contributed to financial distress. In these cases, weak monitoring allowed MGAs to exceed limits, amplifying losses from adverse outcomes. Insurers bear for MGA errors, as they remain ultimately responsible for policyholder obligations and any claims arising from improperly bound coverage, even if the MGA handles administration. This exposure is heightened in scenarios where MGAs lack adequate errors and omissions (E&O) coverage, potentially leaving carriers to cover costs and settlements from negligent or claims handling. To manage large losses, MGAs must secure robust arrangements, often structured to provide first-dollar protection resembling primary , though misalignment in incentives can undermine this safeguard if oversight is lax. Compliance challenges for MGAs include heightened vulnerability to fraud and non-compliance, particularly in remote operations where decentralized teams may weaken internal controls and increase the risk of unauthorized transactions or falsified claims. Economic pressures, such as those during recessions, further elevate fraudulent claim submissions, straining MGA resources without direct carrier supervision. Additionally, MGAs face scalability limitations for very large risks, as their delegated authority typically caps exposure levels, necessitating direct insurer involvement for approval and backing to avoid binding beyond guidelines. To mitigate these risks, insurers routinely implement audits of MGA operations and enforce performance metrics, such as loss ratios and submission-to-bind rates, to ensure adherence to standards and timely deviation reporting. Industry best practices also incorporate AI-driven monitoring for in claims processing, enabling real-time identification of suspicious patterns like irregular payouts or policy mismatches, thereby reducing losses and enhancing overall control.

References

  1. [1]
    managing general agent (MGA) - IRMI
    A managing general agent (MGA) is a specialized type of insurance agent/broker that, unlike traditional agents/brokers, is vested with underwriting authority ...
  2. [2]
    Managing General Agent (MGA) Appointment and Termination
    Some insurers have entered into contracts with individuals or organizations, commonly referred to as managing general agents (MGAs) or managers, to manage all ...
  3. [3]
    Insurance MGAs: Opportunities and considerations for investors
    Aug 30, 2022 · MGAs are insurance intermediaries, but unlike retail and wholesale brokers, they are often granted binding authority from insurance partners.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] MO-225-1 MANAGING GENERAL AGENTS ACT Table of ... - NAIC
    “Managing general agent” (MGA) means any person who: (1). Manages all or part of the insurance business of an insurer (including the management of a separate ...
  5. [5]
    Managing General Agent (MGA) in Insurance | Distinguished
    Apr 9, 2025 · A Managing General Agent (MGA) is a specialized type of insurance intermediary that has underwriting authority granted by an insurer.
  6. [6]
    Partnering With Managing General Agents Can Be A - S&P Global
    Sep 2, 2025 · MGAs are empowered to originate, underwrite, price, and bind policies, adjust claims, and, in certain cases, negotiate reinsurance, often within ...Missing: examples cyber<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    What is an MGA? - ReSource Pro
    Jun 11, 2018 · The NAIC model regulation defines a managing general agent as “any person who (1) manages all or part of the insurance business of an insurer ( ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] 2002 MANAGING GENERAL AGENTS MODEL ACT (#225) 1 ... - NAIC
    The Managing General Agents Model Act provides the basic regulatory framework for monitoring producers who have been classified as Managing General Agents ( ...
  9. [9]
    Understanding the Role of Insurance MGAs in Today's Market
    Aug 11, 2025 · Consider a practical example: A technology-focused managing general underwriter specializing in cyber liability coverage can evaluate risks, ...Missing: excess | Show results with:excess
  10. [10]
    Players in the Surplus Lines Industry - InsCipher
    Nov 15, 2021 · Managing General Agents (MGAs) are not authorized to sell insurance directly to an insured but act as the middleman between the insurer and the ...
  11. [11]
    The Top 5 Reasons Agents should use a Specialty MGA for Excess ...
    Agents benefit from MGAs due to their expertise, access to more markets, customized solutions, risk management support, and support for complex claims.
  12. [12]
    Innovating Insurance Distribution: The Role of Managing General ...
    Aug 7, 2024 · These specialists are the bridge between insurers and retail agents/brokers, ensuring that innovative products reach the market efficiently and ...
  13. [13]
    The Role and Importance of MGAs and Other, Similar Underwriting ...
    Managing general agents and similar underwriting enterprises have seen their roles grow in recent years, along with their importance to the insurance value ...
  14. [14]
    MGAs by the Numbers: Fronting Biz, Non-Affiliated MGAs Drive Growth
    Jul 9, 2025 · Insurers recorded $91.8 billion of 2024 direct premiums written in statutory filings, a 14.3 percent jump over 2023. For statutory reporting ...
  15. [15]
    Demex and Vave Offer Parametric Extreme Temperature Insurance ...
    Nov 17, 2021 · A technology firm and a managing general agent are partnering to offer extreme temperature insurance to commercial properties across the ...Missing: specialization | Show results with:specialization<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Best's Market Segment Report: MGA Premiums Showed Double ...
    Jun 4, 2025 · Year-over-year premium generated through managing general agents (MGAs) and other delegated underwriting authority enterprises (DUAEs) grew by 15% to $89.9 ...
  17. [17]
    Editor's Question: Who Created the First U.S. MGA?
    Jul 7, 2025 · The first managing general agencies in US P/C insurance arose in the late 19th century as insurers expanded beyond their home territories.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Merchants, mariners and mavericks Lloyd's Agents, the first 200 years
    But at the start of the 19th century the companies had largely left the marine market to individual underwriters, and Lloyd's was the centre of this business.
  19. [19]
    Brief History | III - Insurance Information Institute
    1735 The Friendly Society, the first insurance company in the United States, was established in Charleston, South Carolina. This mutual insurance company went ...
  20. [20]
    Insurance Topics | Surplus Lines - NAIC
    Overview: In 1890 New York was the first state to implement a surplus lines law, which recognized the need for a supplemental market. The law was expanded in ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] A History of US Insurance - Swiss Re
    By the early 20th century, life insurers seemed to thrive. Many companies adopted the mutual form of organization to build confidence. Steadily, low-income.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Commercial insurance intermediaries - Conflicts of interest and ...
    May 1, 2014 · Many of the conflicts of interest we identified relate to the structure of intermediaries' businesses and their sources of revenue. In ...Missing: informal | Show results with:informal
  23. [23]
    Insurtech MGAs reshape insurance models—report
    Dec 11, 2024 · The report defines “insurtech” as MGAs established in 2010 or later and draws on survey data from 50 MGAs, as well as interviews and ongoing ...
  24. [24]
    Harnessing the insurtech mindset: How traditional insurers can ...
    Dec 4, 2024 · As a result, many insurtechs act as a managing general agency (MGA) appointed by an insurance company to administer its program. As an MGA, an ...
  25. [25]
    MGAs by the Numbers: Fronting Biz, Non-Affiliated MGAs Drive Growth
    Jul 9, 2025 · July 9th, 2025. Direct premiums written by U.S. managing general agents jumped to over $114 billion in 2024, according to the latest ...Missing: worldwide | Show results with:worldwide
  26. [26]
    Strong In-House Claims Functions Help Build Trust in MGA Sector
    Oct 15, 2025 · A new report from Aon estimates that, globally, MGAs wrote $109.2 billion in direct premiums in 2024, representing growth of a staggering 242% ...
  27. [27]
    Growing MGA market a double-edged sword for reinsurers, says S&P
    Oct 20, 2025 · As figures from S&P show, the U.S. MGA market has more than doubled over the past five years, with premium volume in 2024 well over $100 billion ...<|separator|>
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    2025 Top Ranking Global Insurance MGA Groups - Beinsure
    Sep 16, 2025 · Lloyd's is the largest global market for MGAs; Lloyd's had 76 syndicates managed by 50 general agencies. Accordingly, MGAs perform certain ...
  30. [30]
    COVID-19 and the Insurance Value Chain: Impacts and Adaptations
    Apr 16, 2020 · As a result, insurers will have the opportunity to move towards an increasingly virtual claims and policy management system. Share. Copy Link ...
  31. [31]
    Parametric MGA to parametric insurer - The Parametric Post - LinkedIn
    Sep 16, 2022 · Some parametric MGAs would also face unique challenges with risk aggregation if building a portfolio as an insurer. Growing parametric insurance ...
  32. [32]
    Challenges and Risks When Outsourcing to Managing General Agents
    Aug 16, 2022 · Risk that the MGA will Deviate from the Underwriting Guidelines · Risk of Improperly Reporting of Underwriting Production Reports to the Carrier.Missing: informal | Show results with:informal
  33. [33]
    Understanding The MGA Act | AgentSync
    May 16, 2021 · An MGA is a “Managing General Agent”, which is a specialized type of insurance agent/broker who is vested with underwriting authority from an ...
  34. [34]
    Solutions for Managing General Agents (MGAs) - Guidewire
    MGAs gain native capabilities for bordereaux management, regulatory controls, layered reinsurance, and audit traceability without custom development.
  35. [35]
    Average Insurance & Benefits Broker Commissions 2025 | Mira Health
    Mar 5, 2025 · Commission Structures Across Insurance Types & Growth Trend ; Commercial Auto, 10-15% of premium, Same as first year ; Commercial Property, 10-20% ...
  36. [36]
    Managing General Agent | Department of Insurance, SC
    A copy of the $50,000 fidelity bond for the protection of the insurer as mandated in Section §38-44-30(C). A copy of the contract in force between the ...Missing: commissions | Show results with:commissions
  37. [37]
    A Carrier's Playbook: Oversight of Managing General Agents (MGAs)
    Nov 6, 2025 · The specific qualifications and procedures for managing general agents to follow, as well as the duties of insurers, are outlined in the ...
  38. [38]
    Louisiana MGA Legislation: A Sign of Heightened Scrutiny?
    Jun 25, 2024 · Louisiana recently amended its statutes regulating managing general agents, which go into effect on August 1, 2024.Missing: minimum | Show results with:minimum
  39. [39]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Peer Review on Outsourcing | EIOPA
    Furthermore, EIOPA will assess the need to further develop the concept of Managing. General Agent (MGA), in order to ensure convergence in the regulation and ...
  41. [41]
    What is an Independent Agent? - Definition from Insuranceopedia
    Nov 7, 2024 · An independent agent is an insurance professional who can sell insurance products from multiple insurance companies, unlike a captive agent who ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Overview of the Independent Insurance Agency System
    In these cases, the agency will place the insurance policy through a wholesale or managing general agency who does have a contract with that company.<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    What is the difference between an Insurance Agency and an MGA
    Apr 24, 2023 · MGA is insurance agents or brokers who are specialized ones and are authorized to perform duties like underwriting authority for an insurer.
  44. [44]
    How to Choose an Insurance Agent - NAIC
    An insurance broker represents your business by searching the local insurance market to find the right coverage for the best price. Because the broker ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Chapter 24 - Managing General Agents - NAIC
    1. Negotiates and binds ceding reinsurance contracts on behalf of an insurer or manages all or part of the insurance business of an insurer—including the ...Missing: industry | Show results with:industry
  46. [46]
    Broker vs MGA: Decoding Their Unique Roles in the Insurance ...
    Aug 24, 2023 · Representation: The fundamental difference lies in their customers. Brokers represent the insured, while MGAs represent the insurers. Functions: ...
  47. [47]
    MGA vs. Insurance Broker: Who's Who in The Insurance World
    Feb 27, 2025 · MGAs have special authority from insurers to issue policies, handle claims, and assess risks. They typically specialize in specific types of coverage.
  48. [48]
    Understanding the Difference Between a Broker, Third-Party ...
    Managing General Agencies (MGAs). An MGA is similar to an insurance broker but is a bit more specialized. The MGA is granted underwriting power by an ...
  49. [49]
    What is an MGA in Insurance? - Novatae
    Oct 4, 2023 · Managing General Agent, or MGA, is a wholesale insurance broker/agent specializing in specific insurance products and/or industries.
  50. [50]
    The Difference Between An Insurance Broker And An MGA - Tapoly
    Feb 8, 2021 · An insurance broker acts on behalf of the customer while an MGA acts for an insurer (although they also work closely with customers to find them ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    MSI Launches Cyber Insurance Program for Managed Care ...
    Jun 26, 2025 · Dedicated cyber solution offers up to $25 million in primary and excess coverage for managed care organizations. TAMPA, Fla.
  52. [52]
    The Rise Of the MGA - AM Best News
    Risk carriers are turning to managing general agents to handle a growing proportion of their own core strength--underwriting.
  53. [53]
    Top 8 Benefits of Partnering with MGAs for Your Insurance Agency's ...
    Jul 8, 2024 · One of the greatest perks of partnering with an MGA insurance company is that it broadens agency's access to specialty and non-standard insurers.
  54. [54]
    The benefits and challenges of an MGA - Total Systems
    Expertise: An MGA has in-depth expertise that insurers may not have and which can be costly to develop in-house. · Reduced risk. · Expand geographic coverage.
  55. [55]
    The Impact of an MGA in Insurance: Key Services Offered
    Jul 14, 2025 · They are often used when carriers want to enter niche markets, scale operations efficiently, or provide more personalized service without the ...
  56. [56]
    MGAs: An All-Weather Distribution Channel for Soft and Hard Markets
    Aug 30, 2022 · Many reinsurers across the globe increasingly have been doing business with certain select managing general agents (MGAs), seen as market innovators.Missing: climate- | Show results with:climate-
  57. [57]
    April 2025 U.S. Professional & Executive Liability Insurance Market ...
    Apr 15, 2025 · To help manage evolving cyber risks ... Ryan Specialty, FEATURED, RT Specialty, Cyber Liability, Professional & Executive Liability, RT ProExec ...
  58. [58]
    AM Best Report Cites MGA's Role in Insurer Insolvencies
    Dec 18, 2024 · It looked at 13 property insurer insolvencies since 2017 and found that all but one of the carriers had given at least 96% of direct written premium to their ...Missing: ultimate | Show results with:ultimate
  59. [59]
    [PDF] What insurance pros should know about MGA regulation
    Dec 21, 2020 · The insurer must periodically (at least semi-annually) conduct an on-site review of the underwriting and claims processing operations of the MGA ...
  60. [60]
    MGAs and Their Rising Challenges due to Covid-19 - ISW
    One key thing that research has flagged is that going into a period of recession and economic hardship is likely to impact the number of fraudulent claims that ...<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    5 common claim trends for MGAs – and how to mitigate them - Lockton
    Jun 11, 2024 · 1. Deviation from underwriting guidelines and agreements · 2. Claims management · 3. Inadequate IT security control and education · 4. Conflicts of ...Missing: informal | Show results with:informal
  62. [62]
    Generative AI in Insurance: Transforming Traditional Operations and ...
    Apr 2, 2025 · Advanced fraud detection systems now safeguard insurers by using AI to monitor and analyze claims data, reducing losses and protecting honest ...