Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mattel Interactive

Mattel Interactive was an and distributor that operated as a subsidiary of the toy manufacturer , Inc., from 1999 to 2000. It originated from Mattel Media, founded in 1996 to develop interactive content based on Mattel's brands, and was renamed Mattel Interactive in 1999 following Mattel's $3.8 billion stock acquisition of , completed in May 1999, which aimed to diversify the parent company's portfolio into interactive media and high-tech children's entertainment amid slowing traditional toy sales. The division inherited a catalog of popular edutainment titles, including the Reader Rabbit series and Carmen Sandiego adventures, while also developing and publishing games based on Mattel's iconic brands such as Barbie and Hot Wheels. Under Mattel Interactive, the company shifted focus from purely to a broader range of licensed video games and consumer applications, generating over $400 million in annual sales at its peak but struggling with integration challenges and market shifts. The acquisition, led by then-CEO , was intended to create a synergistic "one-stop " model for children's products, combining physical toys with to appeal to tech-savvy families. However, operational issues quickly emerged, including unsold inventory, outdated product lines, and inadequate , leading to significant quarterly losses—such as $105 million in the third quarter of alone. The venture proved disastrous for , contributing to a $206 million loss from operations in 1999 and prompting Barad's resignation in 2000. In October 2000, sold Mattel Interactive and its assets to the Gores Technology Group for just $27.3 million in a no-upfront-cash deal, resulting in an after-tax loss of approximately $430 million for the parent company and marking the end of its brief foray into interactive entertainment. This transaction, part of a larger that included workforce reductions and asset refocusing, is frequently analyzed as a of overambitious mergers in the late tech boom.

Overview

Founding and Initial Focus

Mattel Media was established on February 12, 1996, as a wholly owned of Inc., headquartered in , with the primary aim of developing products such as titles. This division marked Mattel's strategic entry into the burgeoning digital entertainment sector, capitalizing on the company's established toy brands to create interactive content. The initial purpose of Mattel Media was to leverage iconic franchises like and to produce interactive software targeted at children, thereby entering the expanding edutainment market where educational and entertainment elements converged in digital formats. By adapting physical toys into software experiences, the subsidiary sought to complement traditional product lines and diversify revenue beyond manufacturing, addressing the growing demand for home computing among families in the mid-1990s. Early strategic goals emphasized creating accessible, gender-targeted , particularly filling the gap in software appealing to girls, who were underserved in the male-dominated landscape at the time. This approach aimed to extend from physical toys to virtual interactions, priced affordably at $20 to $40 per title to encourage widespread adoption. A key early milestone was the release of in November 1996, a game allowing users to design and print customizable outfits for dolls, which sold over 500,000 copies and generated more than $14 million in revenue by year's end, validating the viability of Media's model. The division was later renamed Mattel Interactive in 1999.

Corporate Structure and Leadership

Mattel Interactive operated as a wholly-owned of Inc., initially established in 1996 as Mattel Media before being restructured and renamed in 1999 following the acquisition of . The entity was organized into key divisions encompassing , , and , with a focus on integrating across the full from ideation to global distribution. It reported directly to Inc.'s CEO, initially , ensuring alignment with the parent company's overarching toy and entertainment strategy. Leadership at Mattel Interactive evolved rapidly amid its expansion. Doug Glen served as the initial president of Mattel Media from 1994 to 1997, overseeing the launch of early interactive products tied to Mattel brands like . David Haddad succeeded as president of Mattel Media in early 1999, managing the transition during the integration of acquired assets. In early 2000, Bernard Stolar was appointed president of the newly formed Mattel Interactive, bringing expertise from prior roles at and to lead the combined software operations. Other key figures included Francesca Luzuriaga as in late 1999, responsible for finance, operations, and restructuring efforts. The organization featured dedicated internal teams for content creation, closely linked to Mattel's core brands such as and , with in-house studios handling development and . These teams collaborated with external developers and partners, including for co-branded interactive toys like the IntelPlay line, to produce educational and entertainment software. This structure supported a pipeline of products blending proprietary with third-party expertise. By , ahead of the full integration of —which significantly expanded the organizational framework—Mattel Interactive and its precursors employed staff dedicated to initiatives. This workforce spanned roles in creative development, technical engineering, and commercial operations, reflecting the unit's growing emphasis on innovation within Mattel's portfolio.

History

Formation and Early Expansion (1996–1998)

Mattel established its multimedia division, initially named Mattel Media, in 1996 to extend its brand into interactive software and video games, leveraging popular toy lines like for digital content. The division's formation aligned with 's strategy to diversify beyond physical toys amid growing demand for computer-based entertainment, starting with a modest $20 million in sales from a single Barbie title that year. Early expansion focused on building development pipelines for PC software, with initial releases timed for holiday seasons to capitalize on family purchasing. The flagship product, , launched in fall 1996 and became a commercial hit, selling over 200,000 units in its first month and generating $11.5 million in retail sales during the final two months of the year. This success validated the approach, leading to additional PC titles in 1997, such as , and further releases in 1998, including the , which sold more than 300,000 units and ranked as the top new software product of the year. While primarily PC-oriented, efforts began exploring console adaptations to broaden reach, though core output remained CD-ROM-based edutainment. Mattel Media positioned its products as "edutainment," combining educational elements like creativity and problem-solving with entertainment drawn from familiar franchises, targeting parents through tied to displays and promotions. This strategy emphasized parental appeal by integrating software with physical toys, encouraging cross-purchases in Mattel's retail ecosystem. By 1998, the division's had grown to approximately $100 million, representing a significant share of Mattel's non-toy income and contributing to overall diversification. In 1999, the division was renamed Mattel Interactive to signal expanded ambitions in , building on the operational foundation laid during its early years.

Major Acquisition and Growth Challenges (1998–1999)

In late 1998, Mattel announced its acquisition of (), a leading producer of , for approximately $3.8 billion in stock, with the deal closing in May 1999. This move was part of Mattel's broader strategy to diversify beyond traditional toys into the burgeoning sector, particularly children's , where held popular titles such as and . By combining 's software expertise with Mattel's iconic brands like , the company aimed to establish itself as a dominant force in the children's market, projecting combined software revenues exceeding $1 billion annually. However, the integration of into 's operations quickly revealed significant challenges, stemming from fundamental mismatches between the two companies' business models and cultures. , rooted in the seasonal, inventory-driven toy industry, struggled to align with 's software-centric approach, which involved rapid product cycles, high return rates from retailers, and dependency on licensing deals. These differences led to operational disruptions, including cultural clashes that hindered collaboration and decision-making; for instance, 's executives reported difficulties adapting to 's hierarchical structure, while 's toy-focused leadership underestimated software market volatility. By April 1999, these issues prompted a companywide , resulting in approximately 3,000 layoffs across both entities to cut costs and streamline operations. Early warning signs of trouble emerged soon after the announcement, including the overvaluation of TLC's assets at a premium of about 4.5 times its annual sales, despite the company's history of inconsistent profitability—its key brands had posted losses in most years since 1992. Analysts criticized the deal for inadequate , which overlooked declining software demand and TLC's reliance on aging titles amid shifting consumer preferences toward online content. These factors contributed to Mattel's first quarterly loss in the third quarter of 1999, with TLC reporting a $105 million shortfall instead of the anticipated , driven by unexpectedly high product returns and a failed $60 million licensing agreement. The mismatch exacerbated broader financial strains, marking a pivotal setback in Mattel's growth ambitions.

Decline, Sale, and Dissolution (2000–2001)

Following the integration of into Mattel Interactive, the division experienced severe financial difficulties, leading Mattel Inc. to record a $3.6 billion charge in early 2000. This write-down accounted for the substantial overpayment in the 1999 acquisition, where had valued the at approximately $3.6 billion in , far exceeding its actual worth amid declining and integration challenges. The charge exacerbated a at the parent company, contributing to a net loss of $430.9 million for the year and prompting leadership changes, including the resignation of CEO in 2000. To stem the losses, which reached $1 million per day by mid-2000, Mattel sold the assets of and to Gores Technology Group in October 2000 for no upfront cash payment, in exchange for a contractual right to potential future proceeds based on performance or resale. Gores assumed certain liabilities and briefly operated the acquired properties under the name while initiating cost-cutting measures, including staff reductions of about 350 positions. The transaction resulted in an additional $474.5 million net loss on disposal for Mattel, underscoring the failed venture's total cost exceeding $3.6 billion. Under Gores' ownership, the entity underwent rapid restructuring, with the gaming division—encompassing entertainment software from Mattel Interactive, such as titles under the Red Orb and Mindscape labels—sold to in March 2001. Separately, in September 2001, the educational software assets, including core brands like and , were acquired by Riverdeep for $40 million in stock plus assumption of $20 million in liabilities; Riverdeep later merged with . These sales marked the complete dissolution of Mattel Interactive as an independent operation. The collapse was driven by several interconnected factors, including Mattel's aggressive overexpansion into during the late 1990s boom, the subsequent burst of the in 2000 that eroded software valuations, and insufficient on The Learning Company's financial health prior to the acquisition. These issues led to mismatched corporate cultures, inventory overruns, and plummeting demand for CD-ROM-based educational products as technologies shifted market dynamics.

Products and Operations

Educational Software Portfolio

Mattel Interactive's educational software portfolio primarily featured titles acquired through its ownership of , including the longstanding series and variants of , both aligned with K-8 curricula to foster skills in reading, mathematics, history, and . The franchise, targeting children aged 3-9, offered age-specific editions like Reader Rabbit Thinking Adventures Ages 4-6 and Reader Rabbit Preschool, which used narrative-driven activities to teach , vocabulary, and basic computation through colorful, animated worlds. Similarly, editions, such as the 4th Edition, simulated 19th-century pioneer journeys to build decision-making and problem-solving abilities, often integrated into school social studies programs for grades 3-8. The development approach emphasized gamified learning on PC platforms, suitable for both home and classroom environments, with a focus on integration to enhance engagement for young users aged 3-12. Titles incorporated , sing-along songs, and interactive mini-games to deliver curriculum-aligned content without overwhelming complexity. Post-acquisition, there were plans to integrate brands into some educational titles, though this was not extensively realized in the core portfolios. This innovation in early design—combining and —aimed to make abstract skills tangible and enjoyable, representing a shift toward accessible tools in the late 1990s. Distribution occurred through major retailers like Toys "R" Us, leveraging Mattel's toy retail networks to reach families and educators, with CD-ROMs bundled or sold alongside for broad . was mixed: the software was lauded for its user-friendly interfaces and appeal to beginners, earning praise for making approachable via fun, low-pressure formats that encouraged repeated play. However, post-acquisition critiques highlighted limited depth in content and , with some observers noting rushed and insufficient R&D led to shallower learning experiences compared to pre-Mattel iterations, ultimately contributing to the portfolio's commercial decline.

Entertainment and Franchise-Based Games

Mattel Interactive's entertainment and franchise-based games primarily extended the company's iconic toy brands into interactive digital experiences, focusing on leisure and play rather than structured learning. These titles leveraged popular franchises like and to create engaging, accessible software that appealed to children and families. A flagship example was , released in 1996 for personal computers, which allowed players to customize outfits for dolls using digital tools and print designs onto fabric sheets for real-world application. The game sold over 500,000 copies in its first two months and more than 1 million units by 1998, generating over $14 million in revenue by the end of its launch year. Other notable titles included Barbie Magic Hair Styler (1998), which emphasized creative styling mechanics, and Barbie Super Sports (1999), featuring sports simulations tailored to the doll's adventurous persona. For the line, (1998) introduced high-speed racing and stunt-building gameplay on PC, simulating the thrill of physical track sets with customizable courses and vehicle selections. Additional action games, such as Hot Wheels Stunt Track Driver 2 (2000), expanded on these mechanics with enhanced 3D environments and multiplayer options. The design philosophy behind these games centered on translating tangible toy interactions into digital formats, prioritizing , , and light action elements to replicate and extend physical play. For instance, games encouraged imaginative dress-up and storytelling, while titles focused on velocity-driven challenges and construction, all while maintaining non-violent, age-appropriate content suitable for young audiences. This approach aimed to bridge the gap between toys and screens, fostering creativity without overwhelming complexity. Releases spanned multiple platforms, with a strong emphasis on Windows-based PCs for accessibility in home settings, but also extending to consoles like , , and for broader reach. Examples include Barbie Super Sports (1999), available on , which brought franchise-themed sports simulations to dedicated gaming hardware. The portfolio's family-friendly focus ensured content remained engaging yet safe, often incorporating mild educational crossovers like basic in customization features. Commercially, the Barbie series stood out as a pioneer in girls' gaming, challenging the male-dominated market of the by proving demand for titles designed specifically for female players and influencing industry segmentation toward gender-inclusive development. This success helped expand the overall audience, with topping sales charts ahead of titles like and sparking a wave of similar "games for girls" initiatives.

Subsidiaries and Acquisitions

Mattel Interactive's operations were bolstered by several key acquisitions that expanded its portfolio in educational and entertainment software. The cornerstone was the acquisition of in December 1998 for approximately $3.8 billion in stock, which closed in May 1999 and formed the core of Mattel Interactive's educational publishing arm. brought a robust library of edutainment , including titles focused on learning through interactive play, enabling to integrate toy brands like into software experiences. Prior to Mattel's purchase, The Learning Company itself had acquired Mindscape in March 1998 for $150 million in cash and stock, adding significant development expertise in adventure and multimedia games. Mindscape contributed specialized studios and technology assets valued at around $40 million, enhancing Mattel Interactive's capacity for creating immersive software beyond pure education. Similarly, The Learning Company's June 1998 acquisition of Broderbund Software for $416 million incorporated Red Orb Entertainment, Broderbund's division dedicated to strategy and adult-oriented interactive media such as puzzle and adventure titles. Red Orb provided a distinct publishing line that separated entertainment-focused products from edutainment, allowing Mattel Interactive to target broader demographics. In March 1999, directly acquired Purple Moon, a developer of narrative-driven software for tween girls, shortly after the company's initial shutdown, integrating its CD-ROMs and website into the interactive division. Purple Moon's emphasis on story-based experiences aimed at girls aged 8-14 complemented 's gender-targeted toy lines, fostering content that emphasized emotional and social development through . These entities were centralized under Mattel Interactive for unified and , though varying degrees of operational persisted, contributing to challenges and inefficiencies such as overlapping resources and cultural clashes from rapid consolidation. By 1999, the combined subsidiaries employed over 2,000 people and amassed extensive libraries spanning educational tools, adventure games, and narrative software. These assets were later divested in 2000 as part of Mattel Interactive's sale to the Gores Technology Group.

Legacy and Impact

Financial and Strategic Consequences for

The acquisition of for $3.8 billion in stock in May 1999 represented a significant financial commitment by to enter the interactive software market, but it quickly turned into a massive loss as the unit underperformed. By September 2000, effectively gave away the subsidiary to Gores Technology Group in a no-cash deal, recording an after-tax loss of $430 million on the disposition while agreeing to retire $500 million in related debt. Overall, the venture contributed to 's first annual net loss of $82 million in 1999, primarily driven by $183 million in fourth-quarter charges from the unit's operational shortfalls. These financial setbacks triggered a sharp decline in Mattel's stock price, which fell more than 50% from around $26 per share in May 1999 to under $12 by late 2000, erasing billions in market value and eroding investor confidence. The mounting losses culminated in the resignation of CEO in February 2000, who cited the unacceptable results at the interactive division as a key factor, amid broader scrutiny of her aggressive expansion strategy. This episode highlighted the risks of overpaying for tech assets during the dot-com boom, forcing Mattel to confront its overreach. In response, Mattel shifted its strategy toward refocusing on core toy brands like and , implementing aggressive cost-cutting measures that included workforce reductions and operational streamlining to stabilize finances. The company also pursued debt restructuring, paying down obligations tied to the failed acquisition and divesting non-core assets to fund recovery, which helped restore profitability by 2001. Long-term, the debacle delayed Mattel's digital initiatives for over a , as it avoided large-scale tech investments until the 2010s, when it began forming selective partnerships such as the 2010 global licensing deal with for action figures and related media. Under CEO Ynon Kreiz's leadership since 2018, Mattel has emphasized measured interactivity through IP-driven content like films and games, leveraging brands for entertainment extensions without repeating past overextensions.

Influence on Interactive Media Industry

Mattel Interactive played a pivotal role in pioneering gender-targeted gaming, particularly through its franchise titles that catered specifically to girls in the late 1990s. The 1996 release of became a landmark product, selling more than 1 million copies by 1998 and demonstrating the viability of non-violent, creative gameplay focused on and , which broadened the audience beyond traditional demographics. This success sparked the "games for girls" movement, encouraging developers to explore relational and expressive mechanics, thereby influencing the broader sector to diversify content for underrepresented players. As a , Interactive's aggressive expansion during the late-1990s tech boom highlighted the perils of overvaluing software assets in edutainment. The 1999 acquisition of for $3.8 billion, rebranded under Interactive, exemplified speculative mergers driven by hype around educational , only to falter amid slumping sales and integration challenges. By 2000, the unit was sold at a massive loss—effectively for a share of future profits—to Gores Technology Group, contributing to post-dot-com skepticism toward rapid consolidations in children's interactive content and underscoring the need for sustainable business models in the sector. The enduring intellectual property from Mattel Interactive's portfolio has continued to shape modern digital experiences. Titles like inspired subsequent apps and adaptations, such as Peeka's 2023 Barbie: You Can Be a Fashion Designer VR, which extends creative play into immersive environments. Following the 2000 sale to Gores Technology Group, key assets including educational and franchise-based games were maintained and further developed under new ownership, ensuring ongoing innovation in children's media without the original financial burdens. Mattel Interactive's trajectory prompted a more measured approach to blending toys with technology in the industry. The high-profile failure fostered caution against unchecked digital expansions, paving the way for balanced integrations seen in later ventures like (2015), which successfully merged physical with elements through strategic partnerships rather than outright acquisitions. This shift emphasized incremental and risk mitigation, influencing how toy companies now pursue to complement rather than dominate core play experiences.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Edutainment Case Study - Joan Ganz Cooney Center
    Mattel then purchased TLC in 1999 for $3.8 billion, renaming it "Mattel Interactive”, holding it only until 2000, when the toy maker offloaded the company ...
  2. [2]
    Mattel and Learning Co. Plan $3.8-Billion Merger - Los Angeles Times
    Dec 15, 1998 · Toy manufacturer Mattel Inc. on Monday announced a $3.8-billion merger with Learning Co., the nation's second-largest software company and owner of popular ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Learning from Mattel - Tuck School of Business - Dartmouth
    Nov 7, 1999 · Additionally, two of Learning Co.'s deals, while it was named Softkey International, rank among the 10 worst U.S. acquisitions during 1994-1996 ...
  4. [4]
    Mattel To Ditch The Learning Company - Forbes
    Apr 3, 2000 · Mattel said today that it is looking to sell its interactive software unit, The Learning Company, which the toy maker had characterized as a distraction.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  5. [5]
    Mattel Cuts Its Losses by Giving Learning Co. Away
    Sep 30, 2000 · Mattel will take an after-tax loss of $430 million. Mattel will share Learning Co. gains if Gores Technology either sells the company or brings it to ...Missing: Interactive | Show results with:Interactive
  6. [6]
    Mattel Will Squeeze Onto Multimedia Bandwagon - Los Angeles Times
    Feb 9, 1996 · Mattel Inc. said it has established a multimedia subsidiary in El Segundo called Mattel Media that will use the toy giant's strength in ...Missing: source | Show results with:source<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Mattel Makes Its Move Into Multimedia - SFGATE
    Mattel Media also will create multimedia games for its Hot Wheels racing toys and several preschool games. This is Mattel's second foray into ...Missing: edutainment | Show results with:edutainment
  8. [8]
    Mattel, Inc. - Company-Histories.com
    was sold to Gores Technology Group, a corporate turnaround firm, for no cash and an unspecified share of future Learning Co. earnings. Mattel agreed to pay off ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] mattel, inc. 1999 annual report
    Feb 17, 2000 · acquired software business, which was closed following the merger with Learning. Company. Lease termination costs include penalties imposed ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Chief of Mattel Steps Down After Reporting Loss in 1999
    Feb 4, 2000 · Jill E Barad, chairwoman and chief executive of Mattel Inc for three years, resigns as toymaker reports loss for 1999 and continuing ...
  11. [11]
    Gender Blender - WIRED
    Nov 1, 1996 · As president of Mattel Media, Doug Glen is taking Barbie into cyberspace, stereotypes and all.
  12. [12]
    A Top Manager Leaves Mattel To Lead an Internet Start-Up
    Oct 4, 1999 · David Haddad resigns as president of Mattel Media, one of fastest growing businesses at Mattel Inc, to head Eparties, which will use Web to ...
  13. [13]
    2 Top Execs Leave Mattel Education Software Unit
    Nov 11, 1999 · A search is underway for a replacement for Perik, who in October took over as chairman of Mattel Interactive, Bozarth said.
  14. [14]
    Mattel Inc | Encyclopedia.com
    Mattel was founded in 1944 by Elliot and Ruth Handler. The youngest of ten children of Polish immigrants, Ruth Handler was a secretary for Paramount Pictures in ...
  15. [15]
    The Learning Company Inc. | Encyclopedia.com
    The Learning Company Inc. 1 Athenaeum PLCambridge, Massachusetts 02142U.S.A. ... Employees: 1400Sales: $392.4 million (1997)Stock Exchanges: New ...
  16. [16]
    Firings at Broderbund - WIRED
    Sep 11, 1998 · Sep 11, 1998 12:45 PM. Firings at Broderbund. The Learning Company fires 500 people, or 42 percent of all employees, at recently acquired ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Mattel, Inc. 1998 Annual Report - AnnualReports.com
    In December 1998, Mattel and The Learning Company entered into a merger agreement. The stock-for-stock transaction is subject to approval by the ...
  18. [18]
    Digital Library: Communications of the ACM
    Mattel sold more than 200,000 units within the first month of its release. In the last two months of 1996, retailers sold $11.5 million worth. With the success ...
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    Mattel's Mixed Day: A Deal and Falling Profits - The New York Times
    Dec 15, 1998 · ''Given this $500 million revenue decline, we expect our 1998 sales to be flat with last year,'' she said. The company had revenue of $4.84 ...Missing: 1997 | Show results with:1997
  21. [21]
    Mattel to buy Learning Company - CNET
    Dec 14, 1998 · The Learning Company has about $850 million in projected revenue for 1998, and is considered the world's second-largest consumer software ...
  22. [22]
    Mattel to Cut 3000 Jobs, Close Plants, Invest in Internet
    Apr 16, 1999 · Scrambling to regain momentum in the rapidly changing toy industry, Mattel Inc. on Thursday said it will cut costs by eliminating 3,000 jobs ...
  23. [23]
    Failed Mergers And Acquisitions: 15 Worst Examples Of All Time
    The strategy made sense, but the cultural clash between the two companies caused major problems. ... When Mattel acquired the Learning Company in 1998, it had big ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Mattel's Earnings Tumble By 42% in Third Quarter - The New York ...
    Oct 22, 1999 · Mattel Inc reports 42 percent drop in third-quarter earnings caused by huge loss at Learning Co that it spent $3.8 billion to acquire only ...
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    Mattel Decides to Put on Sale Software Unit Bought in May
    Apr 4, 2000 · Learning's revenue growth had already slowed before Mattel closed its acquisition. And in August, Mr. Perik and Mr. O'Leary sold a majority of ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] MATTEL, INC. 2000 ANNUAL REPORT - AnnualReports.com
    The US Boys-. Entertainment segment sales decreased 4% due to a 3% decrease in sales of Wheels products and a 7% decrease in sales of Entertainment products.Missing: dissolution | Show results with:dissolution
  28. [28]
    COMPANY NEWS; MATTEL TO SELL EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE ...
    Sep 30, 2000 · Mattel is selling Learning Co, its educational software unit, to Gores Technology Group; will cut about 350 jobs at its headquarters and ...Missing: Interactive | Show results with:Interactive
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Agrees To Sell Its Non-Core Entertainment Division To Ubi
    FROM MATTEL; AGREES TO SELL ITS NON-CORE ENTERTAINMENT ... Gores lauded Mattel's management for recognizing that this business was outside of the company's.
  30. [30]
    COMPANY NEWS; IRISH EDUCATION CONCERN TO BUY THE ...
    Sep 7, 2001 · Irish education software company Riverdeep Group acquires educational assets of Learning Co for $40 million ... Gores acquired Learning ...
  31. [31]
    Riverdeep Agrees to Buy Some Assets of Learning Co.
    Sep 7, 2001 · It gobbled up more than 60 companies before being acquired by Mattel, which gave Learning Co. to Gores in exchange for the right to a portion of ...Missing: Interactive | Show results with:Interactive
  32. [32]
    [PDF] MATTEL AND THE LEARNING COMPANY: A CASE OF AN ... - WDSI
    In October 2000, Mattel announced a final deal whereby the Learning Company would be sold to Gores Technology Group, a closely held company that specializes in ...
  33. [33]
    The rise and fall of the company behind 'Reader Rabbit' and all your ...
    4.5 times The Learning Company's annual revenue. The deal was ill-advised from the start. Analysts ...Missing: Interactive | Show results with:Interactive
  34. [34]
    The Learning Company - Giant Bomb
    Sep 22, 2022 · The Learning Company is an American educational software company; publisher of educational games such as Oregon Trail, the Reader Rabbit series, and the Super ...Missing: Barbie | Show results with:Barbie
  35. [35]
    Learning Co. Sold To Mattel / $3.8 billion deal joins Barbie, Carmen ...
    Dec 15, 1998 · acquired the best-selling Carmen Sandiego educational series and the popular game Myst when it bought Broderbund for $420 million. Just last ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Reader Rabbit 1st Grade Game Review | Common Sense Media
    Rating 4.0 · Review by Christopher HealyNov 11, 2020 · Reader Rabbit 1st Grade presents kids with a fun (if somewhat surreal) interactive story, throughout which there are educational mini-games to conquer.Missing: Mattel criticism
  37. [37]
    A Generation of Gamers Started Out Playing Barbie Fashion Designer
    Dec 20, 2022 · It was a game marketed to little girls in 1996, and it was so successful it launched a flurry of games designed with girls in mind.
  38. [38]
    Hot Wheels: Stunt Track Driver (1998) - MobyGames
    Jun 5, 2006 · Released: July 15, 1998 on Windows ; Credits: 15 people ; Publishers. THQ Inc. Mattel Interactive Deutschland GmbH ; Developers. Semi Logic ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Mattel Interactive Games - IGN
    Mattel Interactive Games ; 1 vs. 100. Dec 31, 2007 ; Adventure Ocean Discovery ; Adventures With Barbie: Ocean Discovery. Oct 1, 1997 ; Arthur Ready To Race. Nov 16 ...
  40. [40]
    Barbie Gets Some Education | WIRED
    Dec 14, 1998 · Under terms of the agreement, Mattel will pay $33 a share for The Learning Co. (TLC), based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The companies said they ...Missing: exact date
  41. [41]
    Mattel Acquires The Learning Company | Mergr M&A Deal Summary
    On December 14, 1998, Mattel acquired software company The Learning Company for 3.8B USD. Acquisition Highlights. This is Mattel's 1st transaction in the ...Missing: exact | Show results with:exact
  42. [42]
    Learning Co. to buy Mindscape - CNET
    Mar 6, 1998 · The Learning Company agrees to buy Mindscape in a $150 million deal, another sign of consolidation in educational software.
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
    Red Orb Entertainment - Audiovisual Identity Database
    It was specifically formed to distinguish games like Riven and Prince of Persia 3D away from the company's edutainment titles. The name is "broder" spelled ...
  45. [45]
    Mattel acquires Purple Moon - Forbes
    Mar 18, 1999 · The firm would acquire the defunct girl games software developer Purple Moon. The San Francisco-based software firm was shut down in February.Missing: Mindscape Red Orb
  46. [46]
    Mattel to Buy Girls' Games Innovator Purple Moon - Los Angeles Times
    Mar 19, 1999 · Mergers: Deal revives just-shuttered company and allows toy giant to reach an older market for computer games.Missing: Mindscape Red Orb
  47. [47]
    Mattel to Buy Purple Moon, A Video-Game Concern
    Mar 19, 1999 · Mattel Inc. said today that it would acquire a pre-teen-age girls' entertainment company, Purple Moon, which makes CD-ROM computer games.
  48. [48]
    Mindscape Acquired By Learning Company - San Francisco Chronicle
    In May, The Learning Company -- which now employs about 260 workers in Fremont and Redwood City -- laid off about 50 employees and pared back ...
  49. [49]
    The Learning Co. to cut 500 jobs at Broderbund - SFGATE
    Sep 12, 1998 · Integration of Broderbund Software Inc. into the organizational structure of The Learning Co. will include reductions of 500 jobs ...
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    Learning Company a big loss for Mattel
    Sep 30, 2000 · Mattel stock has lost more than half its value since Mattel bought Learning Co. in May 1999, falling from around $26 to less than $12. The ...Missing: first quarterly overvaluation
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
    Mattel and WWE® Renew Global Licensing Partnership
    Mattel and WWE have partnered to deliver a dynamic and diverse lineup of toys since 2010, now sold in over 50 markets worldwide. Mattel's WWE action figures ...
  54. [54]
    Meet the Man Who's Making Barbie a Hollywood Star - Time Magazine
    Feb 20, 2022 · Ynon Kreiz envisions Mattel as more than a simple toymaker. With a portfolio of brands, including American Girl, Barbie, Fisher-Price, Hot Wheels, Thomas & ...Missing: selective interactivity
  55. [55]
    How Barbie Fashion Designer, the first mass-market 'game for girls ...
    Jul 3, 2023 · “[Barbie Fashion Designer] was a bestselling software title in 1996 ... Barbie Cool Looks Fashion Designer, which was released in 1997.
  56. [56]
    Party Like It's 1995: The Rise and Fall of the Girl Game - Autostraddle
    Sep 17, 2015 · It was obvious that what developers thought girls should want were games that weren't violent, were colorful, and focused on relationships and ...
  57. [57]
    Is the Educational Games Industry Falling Into the Same Trap It Did ...
    Feb 7, 2016 · ... Mattel bought The Learning Company for $3.6 billion in 1998. The Learning Company and all its subsidiaries became Mattel Interactive. But ...
  58. [58]
    Peeka VR - Facebook
    Oct 16, 2023 · We are proud to be the first ever company to make a Barbie experience in VR with our new “Barbie: You Can Be a Fashion Designer VR”. It's live ...
  59. [59]
    LEGOs: Still “The Apple of Toys”? - Digital Innovation and ...
    Feb 1, 2018 · It's very interesting to contrast Lego's more progressive digital transformation to Mattel's as described in another post. Yet, as was the ...Missing: Interactive | Show results with:Interactive