Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Maximato

The Maximato was a pivotal era in post-revolutionary spanning 1928 to 1934, characterized by the extraconstitutional dominance of General , who, after serving as president from 1924 to 1928, styled himself as the Jefe Máximo de la Revolución and wielded control over the executive branch through handpicked successors. This period followed the assassination of , Calles's ally and elected successor, which created a power vacuum that Calles filled by manipulating the political system, including the extension of presidential terms to six years and the founding of the Partido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR) in 1929 as a mechanism to institutionalize revolutionary authority under his influence. During the Maximato, Calles orchestrated the tenures of three interim or provisional presidents—Emilio Portes Gil (1928–1930), Pascual Ortiz Rubio (1930–1932), and Abelardo L. Rodríguez (1932–1934)—each of whom functioned as a figurehead while Calles directed policy from behind the scenes, centralizing power in the federal government and suppressing regional autonomies and opposition factions. Key achievements included the negotiated settlement of the Cristero War in 1929, which ended armed Catholic resistance to anticlerical reforms, and efforts to modernize the economy through infrastructure projects and labor organization, though these were marred by authoritarian tactics, including electoral fraud and the violent quelling of dissident groups like the Catholic Church and communist elements. The era's defining controversy lay in its subversion of democratic norms, as Calles's iron grip fostered corruption, cronyism, and a cult of personality, ultimately sowing the seeds for his ouster by his protégé Lázaro Cárdenas in 1935–1936, who exiled Calles and pivoted toward greater populism and decentralization.

Origins

Post-Revolutionary Context and Obregón Assassination

In the aftermath of the Mexican Revolution, which effectively ended by 1920 with the consolidation of power under 's presidency from December 1, 1920, to November 30, 1924, Mexico focused on stabilizing its institutions amid ongoing factional tensions. Obregón's administration suppressed the De la Huerta rebellion, launched in December 1923 by former Finance Minister against Obregón's designation of as successor, with federal forces defeating the insurgents by February 1924. This victory reinforced the alliance between Obregón and Calles, both Sonoran generals who had risen together during the revolution, enabling a transition to Calles' presidency on December 1, 1924. Calles intensified revolutionary reforms, including aggressive enforcement of the 1917 Constitution's anti-clerical provisions through the of June 14, 1926, which restricted religious practices and clergy rights, precipitating the —a Catholic insurgency that erupted in western Mexico in August 1926. The no-reelection principle, a of the 1917 Constitution to prevent dominance, faced erosion as Obregón eyed a return to power after Calles' term. In October 1926, amid the escalating Cristero conflict, Congress amended Article 83 to permit non-consecutive re-elections, paving the way for Obregón's candidacy despite public alarm over potential perpetual rule by the Sonoran duo. Obregón formally announced his run in May 1927, and after the murders of opposition candidates—acts supported or orchestrated by Obregón—he faced no viable challengers in the July 1, 1928, election, securing approximately 1.07 million votes in a virtually uncontested race. Obregón's assassination on July 17, 1928, occurred during a celebratory banquet at the La Bombilla restaurant in , where 27-year-old José de León Toral, a Catholic activist radicalized by the and government religious persecutions, approached disguised as a and fired six shots from a , fatally wounding Obregón with four bullets to the torso and arm. Obregón succumbed to his injuries shortly after, marking the end of his second prospective term before inauguration. While Toral was convicted and executed in February 1929, with official accounts attributing the act to his personal fanaticism aided by a small circle including his fiancée, persistent rumors implicated broader conspiracies, including clerical networks or even Calles himself, though investigations yielded no substantiating evidence and such claims often stemmed from political opponents wary of the power shift. The vacuum left by Obregón's death prompted Calles to orchestrate an interim government, initiating his behind-the-scenes dominance known as the Maximato.

Calles' Consolidation of Power (1924-1928)


took office as president on December 1, 1924, inheriting a post-revolutionary state marked by factional divisions and economic instability. To stabilize finances and assert federal control over , his administration decreed the creation of Banco de México on August 25, 1925, which began operations on September 1 and ended reliance on foreign banks for currency issuance. Calles also pursued infrastructure projects and continued land redistribution to agrarian groups, fostering loyalty among revolutionary constituencies while strengthening the executive's regulatory reach over economic interests. These measures centralized fiscal authority and reduced regional warlords' influence, laying institutional foundations for enduring state power.
Facing clerical opposition, Calles enforced Article 130 of the 1917 Constitution through the so-called Calles Law of June 14, 1926, which mandated registration of , banned public worship outside churches, and expelled foreign , prompting Catholic bishops to suspend masses on August 1, 1926, and igniting the later that month. The uprising, centered in west-central , involved armed Catholic insurgents challenging federal authority; Calles responded with campaigns, surveillance via the Confidential Department, deportations of dissidents to penal colonies like , and blacklisting of rebels, suppressing the core rebellion by 1929 though sporadic violence persisted. Concurrently, he neutralized secular plots, such as General Enrique Estrada's 1926 , through arrests and executions, eliminating rival threats. By aligning the military, labor unions like the , and agrarian sectors under revolutionary ideology, Calles marginalized conservative landowners and as political forces. His regime's repressive tactics and institutional innovations curtailed autonomous power centers, enabling Álvaro Obregón's re-election on July 1, 1928, and positioning Calles to exert influence beyond his term. This consolidation transformed the fragmented revolutionary coalition into a more cohesive state apparatus, prioritizing federal sovereignty over regional or ecclesiastical autonomy.

Institutional Framework

Formation of the Partido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR)

The Partido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR) was established on March 4, 1929, under the initiative of , who sought to unify the fragmented revolutionary factions in the wake of Álvaro Obregón's assassination on July 17, 1928. This formation addressed the instability arising from rivalries and violent power transitions that had characterized post-revolutionary , aiming to channel diverse political currents—including military leaders, labor groups, and regional bosses—into a single institutional framework. The PNR's statutes emphasized principles derived from the 1917 Constitution, such as , workers' rights, and anticlerical measures, while prioritizing orderly presidential succession to prevent further armed conflicts. Calles, positioning himself as the Jefe Máximo de la Revolución, orchestrated the party's creation as a strategic tool for consolidating his personal and extending influence beyond his 1924–1928 presidency. Rather than a movement, the PNR functioned as a top-down of existing entities, such as remnants of the Partido Laborista and other and constitutionalist groups, effectively absorbing them to form a centralized apparatus loyal to Calles' directives. This structure enabled the party to nominate candidates aligned with Calles' vision, as evidenced by its role in selecting as interim president later in 1928 and subsequent figures during the Maximato. By institutionalizing revolutionary politics, the PNR marked a shift from alliances to a proto-hegemonic , though it initially lacked deep ideological cohesion and relied heavily on Calles' networks for cohesion. This foundation laid the groundwork for the party's dominance, ensuring that executive power remained within a controlled revolutionary elite while mitigating immediate threats from dissident generals and external challengers.

The Role of the Jefe Máximo

Following the assassination of on July 17, 1928, assumed the self-styled title of Jefe Máximo de la Revolución Mexicana, positioning himself as the supreme arbiter of national politics to avert a amid revolutionary factions. In this role, Calles exercised control over Mexico's government from 1928 to 1934, directing policy and administration without holding the presidency, thereby institutionalizing his dominance through military loyalty and political maneuvering. His influence extended to appointing and overseeing three successive presidents—, , and —who functioned as proxies, implementing directives aligned with Calles's vision for revolutionary consolidation. As Jefe Máximo, Calles centralized authority by leveraging his command over the armed forces and forging alliances with regional caudillos, ensuring compliance through patronage and suppression of dissent. He orchestrated the formation of the Partido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR) on February 4, 1929, as a mechanism to unify disparate revolutionary groups under a single institutional umbrella, thereby channeling political ambitions and mitigating inter-factional violence that had plagued post-revolutionary . This party structure amplified his role, transforming personal influence into a proto-party apparatus that vetted candidates and enforced ideological continuity, while Calles retained veto power over major decisions, including economic stabilization and anticlerical enforcement. Calles's tenure as Jefe Máximo involved direct interventions, such as compelling Ortiz Rubio's resignation on , 1932, after disputes over autonomy, which underscored the limits imposed on nominal presidents and reinforced Calles's unchallenged supremacy. Through these mechanisms, he advanced reforms aimed at modernizing Mexico's economy and state apparatus, though his authoritarian style drew criticism for subverting democratic norms and prioritizing hierarchy over electoral legitimacy. This period solidified Calles's as the architect of Mexico's one-party dominance, laying groundwork for subsequent PRI rule, even as it sowed tensions that culminated in his 1935-1936 exile under .

Governing Presidencies

Emilio Portes Gil Interim Presidency (1928-1930)

Following the assassination of president-elect on July 17, 1928, the Mexican unanimously elected as provisional president on September 25, 1928; he assumed office on December 1, 1928, and served until February 4, 1930, completing the term Obregón would have served. A lawyer and administrator who had previously governed from 1925 to 1928 under , Portes Gil maintained close alignment with Calles, who exerted de facto control as Jefe Máximo during the Maximato period, rendering Portes Gil's administration an extension of Calles' influence rather than independent governance. Portes Gil's tenure focused on stabilizing the country amid ongoing conflicts, most notably negotiating an end to the Cristero War, a religious uprising triggered by Calles' stringent enforcement of 1917 Constitution anticlerical provisions that restricted clergy numbers and worship practices. With mediation from U.S. Ambassador Dwight Morrow, Portes Gil reached an accord with exiled Archbishop Leopoldo Ruiz y Flores on June 21, 1929, whereby Cristero forces agreed to disarm by June 27, 1929, in exchange for the government's suspension of priest registration enforcement and de facto tolerance of reopened churches, though constitutional articles remained unaltered and full religious freedoms were not restored. This pragmatic settlement, driven by the war's estimated 90,000 casualties and economic drain, prioritized state authority over ideological purity but faced criticism from hardline anticlericals for concessions and from Cristeros for unfulfilled promises, as government forces subsequently targeted rebel leaders. Domestically, Portes Gil emphasized administrative continuity, overseeing the convening of a on March 4, 1929, that established the Partido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR) as a unifying revolutionary party, though operational details fell under Calles' strategic oversight. He also managed electoral processes leading to Pascual Ortiz Rubio's selection as successor, ensuring a controlled transition that preserved the revolutionary elite's dominance without major policy innovations in economics or , which remained constrained by post-revolutionary fiscal limits and foreign debt obligations. Portes Gil's interim role thus bridged Obregón's intended return and the Maximato's institutionalization, prioritizing conflict resolution and power consolidation over transformative agendas.

Pascual Ortiz Rubio Presidency (1930-1932)


Pascual Ortiz Rubio, a military officer and engineer selected by Plutarco Elías Calles as the Partido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR) candidate due to his lack of independent political base, was elected president on November 17, 1929, to complete the term interrupted by Álvaro Obregón's assassination. He took office on February 5, 1930, in a joint session of Congress, marking the continuation of the Maximato period where Calles, as Jefe Máximo, retained de facto control over governance despite formally retiring from the presidency.
Two hours after his inauguration, Ortiz Rubio survived an assassination attempt by Daniel Flores, who fired shots wounding him in the cheek and jaw; the attack highlighted ongoing political instability from the revolutionary era. Throughout his term, policies aligned with Calles' directives, including economic stabilization efforts via the Gold Standard's adoption in 1931 and projects, though Ortiz Rubio's administration faced criticism for limited autonomy. Tensions escalated as Calles interfered in appointments and , exemplified by demands for ministerial resignations that Ortiz Rubio initially resisted. By mid-1932, persistent conflicts over presidential sovereignty led Ortiz Rubio to submit his resignation to Congress on September 3, 1932, citing health issues publicly but protesting his lack of authority in practice; he became the only Mexican president to resign since the Revolution's onset in 1910. Congress accepted the resignation the following day, paving the way for Abelardo L. Rodríguez's interim presidency under continued Calles influence. This episode underscored the Maximato's authoritarian structure, where nominal presidents served at Calles' discretion, prioritizing institutional continuity over individual leadership.

Abelardo L. Rodríguez Presidency (1932-1934)


Abelardo L. Rodríguez assumed the presidency as interim leader on September 5, 1932, following the resignation of Pascual Ortiz Rubio on September 3, 1932, amid irreconcilable differences with Plutarco Elías Calles, the de facto power behind the Maximato. The Mexican Congress unanimously elected Rodríguez, a Sonoran general and longtime associate of Calles since 1917, to complete the term until December 1, 1934. His administration operated under Calles's overarching influence as the final phase of the Maximato, yet Rodríguez exercised notable autonomy, particularly in economic policy, earning the label "Rodriguismo" for his independent initiatives blending capitalist stabilization with social measures inspired by the U.S. New Deal.
Rodríguez's tenure coincided with the Great Depression's impact on , prompting efforts to stabilize the economy and support workers. In August 1932, he signed the National Law of Agricultural Services to bolster rural productivity. By August 1933, he advocated for a , proposing an initial daily rate of four pesos to address worker poverty and stimulate demand, which was enacted later that year and took effect on January 1, 1934, through regional commissions under state labor boards. He also reformed administrative structures, converting the Department of Commerce, Labor, and Industry into the Secretariat of National Economy to centralize economic oversight. In 1934, Rodríguez advanced implementation of the 's Six-Year Plan, originally designed for the incoming administration, incorporating social reforms that laid groundwork for 's later policies on labor and agrarian issues. This period marked a subtle shift, as Rodríguez began replacing Calles loyalists with Cárdenas supporters, facilitating a smoother transition and signaling the 's conclusion by December 1, 1934, when Cárdenas assumed office, effectively ending the 's dominance. Despite his subordination to Calles, these actions positioned Rodríguez as a pivotal caretaker who bridged authoritarian consolidation with emerging reformist momentum.

Domestic Policies

Economic Measures and Stabilization Efforts

During the Maximato, Mexico grappled with persistent post-revolutionary economic instability, compounded by the onset of the in 1929, which caused a sharp decline in exports such as silver, henequen, and , leading to a contraction in GDP and widespread . Under Plutarco Elías Calles's dominant influence as jefe máximo, the governing presidencies prioritized stabilization through conservative fiscal measures and a temporary restraint on redistributive policies to safeguard agricultural output, which accounted for over 50% of exports in the late . Calles explicitly ordered a near halt to further land redistribution, arguing that excessive ejido grants had disrupted productivity on large haciendas; this policy shift, implemented from 1929 onward, aimed to restore commercial farming efficiency amid falling global commodity prices, though it drew criticism from agrarian radicals for favoring elites. Emilio Portes Gil's interim administration (1928–1930) focused on infrastructural consolidation to support recovery, including the of the nation's railroads between and , which integrated fragmented lines under federal control to reduce operational inefficiencies and facilitate domestic goods transport at a time when volumes had plummeted by over 60% from levels. This move, justified as essential for national sovereignty over strategic assets previously dominated by foreign interests, laid groundwork for future public investment but strained budgets already pressured by declining revenues. Portes Gil also emphasized elevating rural economic conditions through targeted credits and cooperatives, though these efforts yielded limited immediate results amid the crisis. Pascual Ortiz Rubio's presidency (1930–1932) enforced to combat fiscal deficits, directing all government departments to implement strict budget reductions for the starting in 1930, with directives for " and more " to curb expenditures amid peso and import reliance. These measures reflected Calles's pro-capitalist orientation, which sought to reassure domestic and foreign investors by curbing inflationary pressures and public spending, even as repatriation of Mexican workers from the —numbering over 400,000 by 1932—added domestic labor surplus and strained resources. projects, such as road expansions initiated under prior regimes, continued selectively to stimulate , aligning with the Obregón-Calles legacy of development-oriented . Abelardo L. Rodríguez's provisional term (1932–1934) addressed deepening effects through experimental stabilization tactics, including enhanced customs protections and incentives for national manufacturing to offset import declines, marking an early pivot toward import-substitution strategies that gained traction post-1931. Rodríguez, leveraging his , promoted fiscal prudence via revenue diversification, such as expanded lotteries funding public relief, while maintaining Calles's emphasis on industrial promotion during his stint as Minister of Industry and Commerce; these steps contributed to modest signals by 1934, with export values stabilizing after a 1932 , though full rebound awaited Lázaro Cárdenas's administration. Overall, Maximato economic efforts underscored a , balancing ideals with imperatives for and , often at the expense of accelerated .

Anticlerical Policies and Cristero War Aftermath

![Emilio Portes Gil][float-right] The , sparked by President ' enforcement of anticlerical provisions in the 1917 Constitution through the June 14, 1926, —commonly known as the —imposed strict limits on numbers per state, mandated priest registration, prohibited , and banned public worship outside , leading to widespread church closures and the suspension of divine services by Mexican bishops on July 12, 1926. This escalation resulted in an armed Catholic rebellion that persisted until 1929, causing an estimated 90,000 deaths, including combatants and civilians. Following the assassination of President-elect Álvaro Obregón on July 17, 1928, Emilio Portes Gil assumed the interim presidency on December 1, 1928, and prioritized ending the conflict amid economic strain and international pressure, including mediation by U.S. Ambassador Dwight Morrow. On June 21, 1929, Portes Gil negotiated the "arreglos" with Catholic representatives, including Archbishop Leopoldo Ruiz y Flores, granting concessions such as permission for priests to resume worship without state registration, reopening of churches, and amnesty for Cristero fighters in exchange for disarmament, though the Calles Law remained in effect and clergy retained no voting or political rights. Despite the truce, federal and state authorities under Calles' Maximato influence often disregarded the agreement, perpetuating sporadic persecutions, church seizures, and executions of former Cristeros labeled as bandits, particularly in western states like and , where defiance against secular reforms continued into the early 1930s. During Pascual Ortiz Rubio's presidency (1930–1932) and Abelardo L. Rodríguez's term (1932–1934), anticlerical policies enforced secular education and restricted monastic orders, with regional governors aligned with Calles closing additional religious institutions and suppressing lay Catholic organizations like the Liga Nacional para la Defensa de la Libertad Religiosa. This inconsistent enforcement reflected Calles' ongoing commitment to revolutionary secularism, prioritizing state control over religious influence to consolidate power, though it sowed latent tensions that resurfaced in localized violence, such as the 1932–1934 Tomóchic and Nayarit uprisings, until broader de-escalation under Lázaro Cárdenas.

Labor, Agrarian, and Social Reforms

During the Maximato, agrarian reforms slowed significantly compared to earlier revolutionary efforts, as Plutarco Elías Calles prioritized agricultural productivity over rapid redistribution to avoid disrupting output. This policy reflected a conservative shift, with Calles viewing extensive land grants as detrimental to economic stability amid post-revolutionary recovery. Despite the general moratorium, interim President Emilio Portes Gil authorized the distribution of approximately 2.5 million acres (about 1 million hectares) to over 100,000 peasant households between 1928 and 1930, often during Calles's absences abroad, framing it as continuation of revolutionary promises while warning large landowners of mandatory contributions. Subsequent presidents Pascual Ortiz Rubio and Abelardo L. Rodríguez maintained modest distributions, totaling far less than the 3.2 million hectares granted during Calles's own presidency (1924–1928), with efforts focused on regularization of existing ejidos rather than expansion. Labor policies under the Maximato emphasized state mediation to curb strikes and radicalism while bolstering allied unions, particularly through Calles's alliance with Luis N. Morones and the Regional Confederation of Mexican Workers (CROM). Portes Gil, who had drafted early labor legislation as governor, advocated for a comprehensive federal labor code to protect Mexican workers from foreign exploitation and ensure industrial peace, though full enactment occurred later. In 1931, under Ortiz Rubio, Mexico promulgated its Federal Labor Law on February 28, codifying constitutional rights from Article 123, including the eight-hour workday, minimum wage provisions, and dispute resolution mechanisms, which helped suppress labor unrest by institutionalizing government oversight. Ortiz Rubio also advanced a workers' compensation bill in 1931, providing benefits for workplace injuries ahead of similar U.S. measures. These steps maintained modest wage gains and benefits but subordinated unions to regime control, limiting independent agitation. Social reforms remained limited during the Maximato, characterized more by stabilization than expansive initiatives, amid economic and political consolidation. Efforts focused on incremental and anti-poverty measures, such as early campaigns against urban begging in around 1930, which proposed unemployment insurance and expanded labor protections but lacked broad implementation. Comprehensive social security systems, including old-age pensions and , were deferred until the late and 1940s under subsequent administrations, as Maximato leaders paid lip service to revolutionary social goals without significant fiscal commitments. Rodríguez's (1932–1934) introduced minor and relief programs tied to economic recovery, but these did not constitute systemic .

Foreign Policy

Relations with the United States

US Ambassador , serving from 1927 to 1930, significantly influenced bilateral relations by prioritizing non-interventionist diplomacy and economic goodwill gestures, such as personal investments in Mexican banking and , to build trust amid the Cristero War's . Morrow's efforts culminated in brokering the June 1929 arreglos between the Mexican government under interim President and Catholic leaders, which suspended anticlerical enforcement in exchange for the Church's withdrawal of support for the Cristero rebels, thereby ending major hostilities and averting potential US domestic pressure from Catholic groups that had complicated relations. This mediation aligned with Calles' strategic interest in stabilization as Jefe Máximo, reflecting a pragmatic Mexican that sought US of while mitigating risks of . Economic ties, particularly , remained a focal point but saw no acute crises during the Maximato, building on partial resolutions from the petroleum regulations. The 1928 oil settlement discussions addressed lingering uncertainties over pre-1917 concessions, allowing US firms like to continue operations under amended contracts, though production curtailed due to legal ambiguities and declining global demand amid the emerging . Mexican authorities under Calles' influence enforced labor and regulatory compliance without expropriation, prioritizing revenue from exports—peaking at around 140 million barrels annually by 1929—to fund stabilization, while US policymakers viewed the regime's control as preferable to revolutionary chaos. The onset of the in 1929 strained cross-border migration and trade, prompting repatriation drives that returned over 400,000 Mexicans and Mexican-Americans by 1934, often coercively, yet Mexican leadership under Presidents and maintained diplomatic restraint to preserve investment flows. By 1932–1934, Rodríguez's provisional administration pursued fiscal reforms, including peso devaluation and tariff adjustments, in tacit coordination with counterparts to weather the crisis, signaling a rightward policy shift that eased ideological frictions and prefigured smoother transitions before Lázaro Cárdenas' more assertive nationalism. Overall, the period marked a consolidation of stable, if asymmetrical, relations, with Calles' behind-the-scenes authority ensuring continuity in asserting resource sovereignty without provoking outright confrontation.

Interventions in Central America and Policy Shifts

During the Maximato, Mexico under the influence of maintained an anti-imperialist stance toward U.S. interventions in , particularly in , where American Marines occupied the country from 1912 to 1933 to protect interests amid political instability. Mexican officials expressed diplomatic opposition to the U.S. presence, viewing it as a violation of , and offered mediation services under interim President in 1929 to resolve the Nicaraguan conflict, though these proposals were rejected by the . This reflected a broader of with regional nationalists resisting foreign dominance, but Mexico avoided direct involvement to prevent escalation with its northern neighbor. Unofficial sympathy extended to Nicaraguan guerrilla leader , whose forces fought U.S. troops from 1927 to 1933; Sandino's prior residence in (1921–1926) fostered ties with radical labor and revolutionary groups there, leading to rumors of extraofficial Mexican arms and financial aid channeled through sympathetic networks, estimated by U.S. intelligence at modest levels by mid-1928. Such support aligned with Calles' earlier recognition of the in 1924 and ideological opposition to U.S. , yet official policy emphasized restraint to stabilize relations with , especially amid Mexico's post-revolutionary consolidation. Mexican diplomats in monitored Sandino's activities, but no verified state-sponsored intervention occurred, highlighting the tension between rhetoric and pragmatism. A notable policy shift materialized in 1930 with the , articulated by Foreign Secretary Genaro Estrada under President . This principle rejected formal recognition or non-recognition of foreign governments based on their legitimacy, instead extending diplomatic relations to all effective regimes as a means of upholding non-intervention and sovereignty—implicitly critiquing U.S. practices like the applied in . The doctrine marked a pivot from activist under Presidents Obregón and Calles toward a passive, legalistic framework, reducing Mexico's vulnerability to Central American entanglements amid the Great Depression's economic pressures and the need for U.S. investment. Applied regionally, it facilitated neutral engagement without endorsing coups or revolutions, influencing Mexico's abstention from direct involvement in Honduran or Guatemalan upheavals during the period. These approaches yielded limited tangible interventions, prioritizing ideological projection over concrete action; for instance, border tensions with over indigenous refugee flows and unresolved demarcation persisted without escalation, while saw no significant Mexican diplomatic push despite shared anti-U.S. sentiments in banana republic dynamics. The Maximato's thus balanced revolutionary principles with realist constraints, foreshadowing Cárdenas' later assertiveness while avoiding the direct confrontations that characterized earlier Obregón-era overtures.

Controversies and Opposition

Authoritarian Governance and Suppression of Dissent

During the Maximato, exerted control over the Mexican presidency from 1928 to 1934, positioning himself as the "jefe máximo" (supreme leader) and treating successors , , and as puppets to enforce his policies. This arrangement institutionalized authoritarian governance through the formation of the Partido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR) in , which centralized power under Calles' faction by co-opting regional leaders, military officers, and labor groups into a single party structure designed to preempt opposition. Critics, including opposition candidate , denounced this as thinly veiled dictatorship, highlighting Calles' reliance on military loyalty and bureaucratic patronage to sideline rivals. Suppression of dissent manifested prominently in electoral manipulation, as seen in the 1929 presidential election where Rubio, Calles' handpicked successor, secured a reported 99.9% of the vote against Vasconcelos through widespread ballot stuffing and intimidation, prompting Vasconcelos to allege and attempt an armed uprising that was swiftly crushed. Calles' regime further demonstrated intolerance for independence among subordinates when Rubio clashed with him over policy autonomy; on September 3, 1932, Rubio resigned the presidency amid mounting pressure from Calles, who viewed such assertions of authority as threats to centralized control. This episode underscored the Maximato's hierarchical enforcement, where deviation invited removal, reinforcing Calles' unchallenged dominance. Limits on press freedom also served as a tool for quelling opposition, with the government engaging in bureaucratic and judicial battles to restrict critical during Ortiz Rubio's and Rodríguez's terms, including of court orders against dissenting outlets after prolonged struggles. Such measures, combined with selective denial of coverage to political adversaries, helped maintain narrative control and deter broader challenges to the regime's authority. Overall, these practices reflected a prioritizing through over pluralistic contestation, though Calles' influence faced internal crises due to his limited personal popularity compared to other era strongmen.

Corruption, Press Control, and Electoral Manipulation

During the presidency of (September 4, 1932–November 30, 1934), corruption remained entrenched within the Maximato's power structure, dominated by as jefe máximo. Calles and his allies, including military and elites, systematically exploited state resources for personal gain, a pattern that continued from earlier administrations and contributed to the erosion of ideals. Rodríguez himself, prior to and during his term as a border general in , facilitated organized vice operations, including gambling dens, brothels, and alcohol smuggling, which generated illicit revenues amid lax enforcement under federal tolerance. These activities exemplified the and informal economies that flourished under Maximato oversight, where official positions enabled unchecked profiteering without formal accountability mechanisms. Press control under Rodríguez involved a mix of regional and federal intervention, despite Article 7 of the 1917 Constitution guaranteeing freedom of expression. Local governments, aligned with the Partido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR), frequently suppressed independent outlets perceived as oppositional, employing violence, bureaucratic delays, and legal pretexts to limit critique. A notable case spanned into Rodríguez's term: in October 1931, Governor Bartolomé García Correa and socialist activists forcibly closed Diario de Yucatán, owned by Carlos R. Menéndez, branding it "reactionary"; this sparked a 17-month legal and public battle involving national press and bureaucracy, culminating in early 1933 with Menéndez regaining control via enforcement—though such victories relied on elite networks rather than consistent . These episodes highlighted the Maximato's haphazard yet pervasive , where federal authorities under Rodríguez deferred to or selectively backed regional suppression to consolidate PNR , fostering among journalists wary of reprisal. Electoral manipulation ensured PNR dominance during Rodríguez's interim tenure, building on precedents like the fraudulent and presidential contests that installed Calles's proxies through ballot stuffing, voter , and inflated tallies. With no presidential election under Rodríguez, focus shifted to congressional and state races, such as the 1933 federal elections, where opposition candidates faced systematic exclusion via co-optation, threats, and procedural irregularities to secure PNR supermajorities. This machinery paved the way for the July 1934 presidential vote, nominally won by with over 98% amid suppressed dissent and coerced turnout, though Calles initially viewed it as controlled—allegations of fraud persisted due to the regime's track record of fabricating results to preempt challenges. Such tactics, rooted in Calles's centralizing authority, prioritized regime perpetuation over democratic contestation, embedding fraud as a core PRI precursor strategy.

Transition and End

Rise of Lázaro Cárdenas and Power Struggle

del Río, a career military officer who participated in the Mexican Revolution from 1913, rose through the ranks under the patronage of , serving as governor of from 1928 to 1932 and as Secretary of War and Navy from 1933 to 1934 during Abelardo L. Rodríguez's presidency. In 1934, the Partido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR), heavily influenced by Calles, selected Cárdenas as its presidential candidate, viewing him as a loyal successor who would maintain the Maximato's continuity. Cárdenas campaigned extensively across , emphasizing revolutionary ideals of and , and won the election on July 1, 1934, with approximately 96% of the vote amid allegations of electoral irregularities but broad acceptance due to Calles' endorsement. Upon inauguration on December 1, 1934, Cárdenas initially deferred to Calles, who resided at and exerted influence through and networks, expecting to guide remotely. However, Cárdenas pursued aggressive agrarian distributions, expropriating over 10 million hectares in his first year—far exceeding prior presidents—and supported labor strikes, such as the railway workers' action in early 1935, which Calles opposed as destabilizing to . Tensions escalated in May 1935 when Calles publicly criticized the government's tolerance of strikes during a speech in , prompting Cárdenas to reshuffle his on June 14, 1935, replacing Calles loyalists with independent figures to assert autonomy. The power struggle intensified as Cárdenas purged Calles' adherents from the federal bureaucracy and , retiring over 20 generals aligned with Calles by mid-1935 and promoting younger, loyal officers. Calles attempted to rally support through the Liga de Unidad Cultural, but Cárdenas countered by forging alliances with peasant leagues, unions, and regional leaders, culminating in confrontations like the clashes on November 20, 1935, where Callista groups protested. By early 1936, Cárdenas had consolidated control, forcing Calles to confront the erosion of his influence, setting the stage for the Maximato's dissolution.

Calles' Exile and Dissolution of Maximato Control

Tensions between President and former President escalated in mid-1935, as Cárdenas accelerated land expropriations and empowered labor unions in ways that conflicted with Calles' more restrained approach to revolutionary reforms. In June 1935, Calles publicly demanded the resignation of key cabinet members aligned with Cárdenas' policies, prompting a wave of ministerial departures and mobilizing military units loyal to each faction, which raised fears of civil conflict. Cárdenas, leveraging widespread popular support from agrarian and labor groups, secured the allegiance of most of the armed forces and refused Calles' ultimatums, instead initiating a of Calles' supporters from government positions and the military hierarchy. The confrontation peaked in early 1936, with Calles accusing Cárdenas of fostering chaos through radical policies, while Cárdenas consolidated power by reorganizing the Partido Nacional Revolucionario to diminish Calles' influence within the revolutionary elite. On April 11, 1936, following evidence of plots by Calles loyalists to overthrow the administration, Cárdenas ordered Calles' exile to the United States, where he departed from Veracruz by train. This expulsion dismantled the network of Calles' control, known as the Maximato, which had persisted informally beyond his formal presidencies through puppet leaders from 1928 onward, effectively ending his role as the "Jefe Máximo" of the revolution. Calles resided in during his exile, maintaining limited contacts with Mexican exiles but unable to reassert influence amid Cárdenas' strengthened institutional base. He returned to Mexico in 1941 under from President , but the Maximato's dissolution had irrevocably shifted power toward a more autonomous presidency, paving the way for Cárdenas' independent governance until 1940.

Legacy and Historical Assessment

Institutionalization of the Revolutionary State

The Maximato represented a pivotal phase in the consolidation of the post-revolutionary Mexican state, transitioning from fragmented politics to structured institutional control under Plutarco Elías Calles's influence. Central to this process was the establishment of the Partido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR) in , which formalized Calles's as a permanent entity designed to unify revolutionary factions and manage presidential successions. The PNR operated under Calles as jefe máximo, dispensing patronage and enforcing loyalty, thereby embedding revolutionary principles into a centralized party structure that prioritized stability over ideological purity. This institutionalization extended to the formalization of the sexenio—the six-year presidential term—codified in to prevent re-election and mitigate the coups that had plagued earlier post-revolutionary governments. By channeling political competition through the PNR, Calles reduced reliance on personal authority, fostering a where the party selected candidates, ensuring continuity amid potential internal rivalries. The approach reflected a pragmatic that unchecked revolutionary fervor risked perpetual instability, leading to a corporatist integration of key sectors like labor and agrarian groups, albeit initially as a loose rather than rigid blocs. In historical assessments, the Maximato's legacy lies in laying the groundwork for Mexico's , with the PNR evolving into the Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) that governed uninterrupted from 1929 to 2000. This structure provided unprecedented political stability following the Mexican Revolution's chaos (1910–1920), enabling economic modernization and policy consistency, though at the cost of embedding authoritarian practices such as electoral control. Critics note that while it curbed violent factionalism, it perpetuated elite dominance and sidelined genuine pluralism, transforming revolutionary ideals into state orthodoxy enforced by party machinery.

Long-Term Impacts on Mexican Politics and Economy

The Maximato entrenched a centralized and one-party dominance that shaped Mexican politics for decades. By founding the Partido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR) in 1929, unified disparate revolutionary factions into a single , which evolved into the (PRI) and maintained effective control over the presidency and Congress until the year 2000. This institutionalization prioritized orderly successions through the sexenio term—extended to six years in 1928—and patronage networks, resolving potential conflicts peacefully, as seen in the 1930 and 1934 PNR candidate disputes, but at the cost of suppressing genuine opposition and embedding , such as Pascual Ortiz Rubio's 1929 victory with 99.9% of the vote amid documented irregularities. The period's authoritarian framework, blending revolutionary rhetoric with conservative control, fostered a meta-constitutional norm of executive supremacy over legislative and judicial branches, perpetuating corporatist co-optation of labor, peasants, and bureaucrats while marginalizing independent actors. Economically, the Maximato's conservative drift amid the prioritized stability and productivity over expansive redistribution, halting large-scale land reforms under to avoid undermining agricultural output, a policy that deferred radical agrarian changes until ' administration. Calles' earlier initiatives, including infrastructure investments and labor codes from his 1924–1928 presidency extended into the Maximato, laid groundwork for state-guided modernization, such as regulating exploitation in 1925 to assert national control while accommodating foreign capital, influencing subsequent without immediate expropriation. This approach suppressed militant unions perceived as Bolshevik-influenced, fostering a compliant labor sector that supported post-Depression recovery through peso devaluation and , but entrenched inequalities by favoring commercial and middle-class interests over smallholders. Long-term, these policies contributed to the PRI's hybrid model of state interventionism blended with private enterprise, enabling the "Mexican Miracle" of 3–6% annual growth from 1940 to 1970 via import-substitution industrialization, though rooted in the Maximato's emphasis on regime stability over equitable growth. The era's suppression of radical economic experimentation delayed broader welfare expansions, correlating with persistent informal employment exceeding 50% of the workforce by the late .

References

  1. [1]
    Maximato (Mexican history, 1928-1934) - CONA Iconography Record
    Note: Six-year period during which former president Plutarco Elías Calles, self-styled as the "jefe máximo" remained the de facto leader of Mexico.
  2. [2]
    The Maximato - Mexico - Country Studies
    Beginning with the 1928 election, the presidential term was increased from four to six years (sexenio ). Thereafter, the sexenio formed the basis for regular ...
  3. [3]
    President Abelardo Rodriguez (1932-34): From Maximato to ...
    Dec 10, 2019 · More specifically, during the period known as the Maximato (1928-34), Calles, the Jefe Maximo, attempted to contro1 three different presidents ...
  4. [4]
    El minimato presidencial: Historia política del maximato (1928–1935)
    May 1, 1984 · El minimato presidencial: Historia política del maximato (1928–1935) | Hispanic American Historical Review | Duke University Press.
  5. [5]
    Unfolding Maps during the Maximato in Mexico - UC Press Journals
    Jan 1, 2019 · In the expanding national network taking shape during the Maximato, all roads ultimately led to Mexico City. A 1932 map suggests the increasing ...
  6. [6]
    The Role of the United States in the Adolfo de la Huerta Rebellion ...
    In December 1923 Adolfo de la Huerta led a rebellion against the government of President Alvaro Obregón. It lasted into the last three months of 1924 and ...
  7. [7]
    5 MEXICAN STATES IN OPEN REBELLION, BACK DE LA HUERTA
    The de la Huerta party charged President Obregon with using Federal machinery to place General Calles in office. Calles followers charged de la Huerta with ...
  8. [8]
    History of the Cristiada - LAITS
    But it was Plutarco Elías Calles, Obregón's successor in 1924, who took the church head on bringing a fierce anti-clerical ideology to the presidency.
  9. [9]
    How Mexico's “Undefeated Caudillo” Met His End - Americas Quarterly
    Jan 31, 2023 · Many Obregón supporters did not believe the official “lone wolf” theory of his assassination, believing that Calles' government had murdered him ...
  10. [10]
    Álvaro Obregón | Research Starters - EBSCO
    Died: July 17, 1928 ... After surviving a series of assassination attempts in 1927 and 1928, President-elect Obregón met his death at a banquet in Mexico City in ...
  11. [11]
    Álvaro Obregón's Vision for Mexico - The Mexican Revolution and ...
    Obregón wanted Mexico to rejoin the world, cut the military, established public education, and started beautification projects to enrich the lower classes.
  12. [12]
    The Assassination of President-Elect Obregon - jstor
    His assassin, a young art student named José de Leon Toral, gained admission to the banquet hall in an assumed rôle of political cartoonist.
  13. [13]
    History - Banco de México
    Banco de México, which was created on September 1, 1925, was the pinnacle of a long-awaited aspiration by Mexicans. Its creation ended a long period of ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The history of coins and banknotes in México
    Banco de México began its activities on September 1st 1925, thanks to the budgetary efforts and organization of the then President of the Republic, Plutarco ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    State, Dependency, and Nationalism: Revolutionary Mexico - jstor
    Although the Calles government consistently strove to consolidate the new state's ability to regulate and tax powerful economic interests, the state's fiscal ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    The Calles Government and Catholic Dissidents: Mexico ...
    Feb 17, 2015 · ... Plutarco ElíasCalles (1924-1928) confronted multiple challenges to state consolidation.These included plots by political rivals, foreign ...
  17. [17]
    Consolidating the Mexican State: Constitutionalism during the Presidency of Plutarco Elías Calles
    ### Summary of Key Events, Policies, and Actions by Plutarco Elías Calles (1924-1928)
  18. [18]
    Fundación del Partido Nacional Revolucionario - Memórica
    Así, el 4 de marzo de 1929 se fundó el Partido Nacional Revolucionario (pnr) como un bloque que reunía a distintas corrientes, con fuerzas políticas diferentes ...
  19. [19]
    La fundación del PNR, el nacimiento hegemónico México
    Mar 3, 2024 · El Partido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR) nació el 4 de marzo de 1929 como producto de una necesidad política del grupo vencedor de la Revolució ...Missing: exacta | Show results with:exacta
  20. [20]
    The National Revolutionary Party | World History - Lumen Learning
    The Mexican political party founded in 1929 that held executive power within the country for an uninterrupted 71 years. It underwent two name changes during its ...Missing: date details
  21. [21]
    HISTORIA DEL PRI - PRIEDOMEX
    “La primera declaración de principios del partido de la Revolución, se aprobó durante la creación del mismo, el 4 de marzo de 1929, en plena recesión económica, ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    [PDF] la formación del partido nacional revolucionario - UNAM
    De esta forma, podría considerarse que la creación del PNR fue una estrategia de Calles para mantener el poder político, para consolidar su hegemonía personal ...
  23. [23]
    Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) - Mexico - Country Studies
    The PRI was founded by Calles in 1929 as the National Revolutionary Party (Partido Nacional Revolucionario--PNR), a loose confederation of local political ...Missing: merging | Show results with:merging
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    El Partido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR), de la lucha armada al ...
    A partir del 04 de marzo de 1929 –fecha oficial de su fundación–, el PNR fue el puente para aquellos que quisieran acceder al poder; así como el órgano que ...
  26. [26]
    Plutarco Elías Calles and the Maximato in Revolutionary Mexico
    – This article questions the traditional historiographical interpretation regard- ing a significant period of Mexican history, the so-called Maximato (1928–1935) ...
  27. [27]
    Plutarco Elías Calles | Research Starters - EBSCO
    As president and jefe máximo, he institutionalized the Mexican Revolution and embarked on a reform program that laid the foundation for modern Mexico's ...
  28. [28]
    (PDF) Plutarco Elías Calles and the Maximato in Revolutionary Mexico
    ... Obregón suspected. Calles of having played a role in the assassination attempt. In addition,. Calles had reason to fear that he might be the next target of an ...
  29. [29]
    Plutarco Elías Calles and the Mexican Revolution
    May 1, 2009 · Here Buchenau explores the minutiae of their relationships, the power of the “Sonoran Triangle,” and the immense effect Obregón's assassination ...
  30. [30]
    PORTES GIL ELECTED MEXICAN PRESIDENT; 37-Year-Old Calles ...
    25.—Emilio Portes Gil was unanimously elected Provisional President of the Mexican Republic tonight at a joint session of Congress, composed of the majority of ...
  31. [31]
    Portes Gil, Emilio (1890–1978) | Encyclopedia.com
    Portes Gil was the first of three Mexicans to serve out the six-year term presidential term won by General Álvaro Obregón, who was assassinated before he could ...
  32. [32]
    Emilio Portes Gil | Mexican Revolution, Reforms, Politics | Britannica
    Sep 29, 2025 · Mexican political leader and diplomat who served as the provisional president of Mexico from Dec. 1, 1928, after the assassination of President-elect Alvaro ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] provisional president emilio portes gil discusses
    Emilio Portes Gil entered the service of the. Mexican Revolution at an early age and served in a variety of governmental posts from 1914 until 1928 when he was ...
  34. [34]
    Revolution and the Cristeros - Oxford Academic
    During Mexico's Cristero War (1926–1929), when Mexican Catholic rebels took up arms to overthrow the anticlerical government of President Plutarco Elías Calles.
  35. [35]
    Secretary of War's Historical Commission: Military Historians and the ...
    Aug 28, 2018 · The Cristero Rebellion (1926–1929), also known as La Cristiada, was a conflict between the Catholic Church and the Mexican government. The ...
  36. [36]
    A Nation of Parties (Chapter 7) - The Mexican Revolution's Wake
    Feb 19, 2018 · Portes Gil declared in 1930: “[The PNR] will be the orienting organ, always respectful of the regional parties of the states […] it will ...
  37. [37]
    Biography of Ortiz Rubio, Pascual - Archontology.org
    May 12, 2025 · Chronology: 17 Nov 1929, elected by general indirect voting [1] ; 12:00 (noon) 5 Feb 1930, sworn in, joint session of the thirty-third Congreso ...Missing: historical facts
  38. [38]
    Message to President Pascual Ortiz Rubio of Mexico About His ...
    Two hours after taking the oath of office on February 5, 1930, President Rubio was wounded in the cheek and jaw by a series of shots fired by Daniel Flores.Missing: 1930-1932 historical facts
  39. [39]
    Ortiz Rubio, Pascual (1877–1963) - Encyclopedia.com
    He became the National Revolutionary Party's presidential candidate in 1929. After resigning the presidency in 1932, the only Mexican to do so since 1913, he ...
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    Biography of Rodriguez, Abelardo L. - Archontology.org
    May 12, 2025 · Abelardo Luján Rodriguez. b. 12 May 1891, San José de Guaymas, Sonora, Mexico d. 13 Feb 1967, Jolla, California, U.S. ; Title: Presidente ...Missing: Maximato | Show results with:Maximato
  42. [42]
    Message to Abelardo Rodriguez on His Inauguration as President of ...
    On September 4, 1932, the Mexican Congress unanimously elected General Rodriguez to succeed Pascual Ortiz Rubio who had resigned as President of Mexico.Missing: L. 1932-1934 Maximato<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Rodríguez Luján, Abelardo (1889–1967) - Encyclopedia.com
    Abelardo Rodríguez Luján (b. 12 May 1889; d. 13 February 1967), president of Mexico (1932–1934). Last of the troika of presidents during the 1928–1934 ...Missing: Maximato | Show results with:Maximato
  44. [44]
    10 The Origins of the Green Revolution in Mexico Continuity or ...
    In August 1932 President Abelardo Rodríguez (1932–1934) signed the Ley de Servicios Agrícolas Nacionales (National Law of Agricultural Services), which ...
  45. [45]
    The construction of the minimum wage and nutrition in Mexico in the...
    Jan 1, 2023 · 23Rodríguez proposed a daily minimum wage of four pesos, which he anticipated would be later improved to reach one peso per hour of labor. This ...
  46. [46]
    A History of Real Wage Studies in Twentieth-Century Mexico - jstor
    " Labor law reform in. 1933 established special minimum wage commissions under the author- ity of state labor boards to determine regional minimum wages.
  47. [47]
    Mexico - Growth and Structure of the Economy - Country Studies
    Mexico's inward-looking development strategy produced sustained economic growth of 3 to 4 percent and modest 3 percent inflation annually from the 1940s until ...
  48. [48]
    ORTIZ RUBIO ASKS ECONOMY; Mexican President Orders All ...
    —Economy and more economy is the slogan of President Ortiz Rubio for the coming year. All government departments have been told that their budgets for the next ...<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    [PDF] The Great Depression as a Catalyst for Changes in Mexican ... - CORE
    Dec 15, 2008 · the Depression. Prior to the Depression, Mexico's economic ideas and policies were evolving to reflect the growing desire to strengthen ...
  50. [50]
    Church and State Relations - Visualizing the Cristero War
    [30] President Emilio Portes Gil and ex-president Calles wanted to end the hostilities. Following the Spring of 1929, the Mexican government faced a ...
  51. [51]
    Public Memory - Visualizing the Cristero War
    Along with Apostolic Delegate Mr. Leopoldo Ruiz y Flores, they met with President Emilio Portes Gil on June 21, 1929, to agree on the religious issue.
  52. [52]
    Mexico: Confrontation Between Church and State
    The insurrection eventually became known as the Cristero Rebellion as President Calles held fast to his goal of enforcing the Constitution.
  53. [53]
    Revolutionary Ideology and Political Destiny in Mexico, 1928–1934
    Nov 1, 2018 · They undertook literacy campaigns and opened secular (eventually socialist-minded) public schooling, while Tejeda also closed churches and ...
  54. [54]
    Religious Violence and the Secular State in 1930s Mexico | The ...
    Mar 11, 2022 · The thorny relationship between the Liga and the episcopate illustrates the disagreements and tensions that existed between and among clergy and ...
  55. [55]
    WARNS LANDOWNERS.; Portes Gil Says They Must Give Up ...
    Pres Gil urges workers and farmers to cooperate; warns landowners they must give up acreage to workers.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Agrarian Reform in Mexico: An Interpretation
    The reason for the failure of the Agrarian Reform to liberate working farmers from poverty and desolation is to be found in the nature of the socio-economic.
  57. [57]
    [PDF] The Mexican Federal Labour Code - ILO Research Repository
    Dr. Portes Gil, whose term as President came to an end on. 30 December 1929, had expressed a desire to see this Labour. Code adopted ...
  58. [58]
    A botched assassination and stability | - The Mex Files
    Jul 14, 2024 · Ortiz Rubio did push through a workers compensation bill… several months before Franklin Roosevelt was able to do so north of the border ...
  59. [59]
    The Mexican Labor Movement: 1917-1975 - jstor
    The future President an- nounced his policy: to control the trade unions through the CROM, to insure order and a social base for the development of production.
  60. [60]
    On October 8, 1930, on her way to the Plaza Hidalgo in Mexico City
    He urged the creation of worker unemployment insurance, old age pensions, health insurance, secure labor laws, an effective minimum wage, and expanded public ...
  61. [61]
    Dwight Morrow's Role In The Mexican Revolution: Good Neighbor ...
    May 3, 1979 · Dwight Morrow can, nevertheless, be considered a precursor to Franklin Roosevelt's Good Neighbor policy because he ardently opposed US military intervention ...Missing: War | Show results with:War
  62. [62]
    [PDF] The United States and Mexico Relations during the 1920s
    On the Mexican side, presidents, Obregón, Elías Calles, and Portes Gil, approached diplomacy with a nationalistic pragmatism that recognized the need for new ...
  63. [63]
    The Oil Settlement with Mexico | Foreign Affairs
    THE controversy between the United States and Mexico concerning the rights of American citizens to oil properties in Mexico acquired prior to May 1, 1917 ...
  64. [64]
    MEXICO AND OIL. - The New York Times
    For it the great curtailment of the output of oil, owing to the uncertain legal status of the companies, was a very serious affair, both because it interfered ...
  65. [65]
    Mexican Americans and Repatriation
    Depression-era Mexican repatriation from Texas began in 1929, gained momentum in 1930, and peaked in 1931. In the last quarter of 1931 repatriation reached ...
  66. [66]
    The Maximato (Mexico) - Country Studies
    Beginning with the 1928 election, the presidential term was increased from four to six years (sexenio ). Thereafter, the sexenio formed the basis for regular ...
  67. [67]
  68. [68]
    The Movement in Support of Augusto C. Sandino 1927–1934
    Aug 27, 2014 · The US Military Attaché in Mexico City, Major Fred T Cruise, estimated in mid-July 1928 that the total of financial support received by Sandino ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] The Estrada Doctrine and United States Policy
    Feb 1, 1973 · As Estrada suggested, a government should not have its legality subject to the judgment of foreigners. The policy and its enthusiastic ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Almost Jeffersonian: U.S. Recognition Policy toward Latin America
    The Estrada Doctrine was, therefore, an “antirecognition” recognition policy. Although the United States never officially adopted the doctrine, it had its roots ...
  71. [71]
    Mexico, the United States, and the 1926–1927 Nicaraguan Crisis
    May 1, 1986 · In the estimation of President Coolidge, Mexico, “a foreign power,” was promoting anarchy in Nicaragua, thereby endangering United States ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Part III - What Are the Effects of Authoritarian Successor Parties on ...
    Aug 24, 2018 · In 1929, after stepping down as president, Plutarco Elías Calles ... authoritarian practices of suppressing dissent to stay in power. The ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] MEXICAN ELECTIONS, 1910–1994: VOTERS, VIOLENCE, AND ...
    Sep 8, 2011 · The first two presidential elections of the period, those of 1910 and 1911, structured much of the electoral history of the twentieth century; ...
  74. [74]
    Limits on the Press and Civil Society during the Maximato - jstor
    After a seventeen- month struggle in the national press, courts, and federal bureaucracy,. President Abelardo Rodrıguez enforced a belated Supreme Court order ...
  75. [75]
    From Secret War to Cold War: Race, Catholicism, and the Un ...
    ” At the same time, he imposed a strict system of press censorship ... By denying news coverage to Calles's political opponents, Romandía Ferreira ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] The Crowd, Satire, and Censorship in Mexico City Benjamin T ...
    On the border, former president Abelardo. Rodríguez had a hand in gambling dens, brothels, and the drug trade.28 Mexicans often brushed off such corruption with ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Democratization and the PRI in Mexico: A Case Study from 1929 to ...
    country, including its ability to commit electoral fraud. These practices persisted from 1929 until the historic election of 2000. Mexico does not fit the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Lázaro Cárdenas and Cardenismo
    ### Summary of Lázaro Cárdenas' Rise and Presidency
  79. [79]
    The Political Legacy of Lázaro Cárdenas | The Americas
    Dec 11, 2015 · In 1936 Cárdenas sent Plutaro Calles into political exile (after Calks had denounced the radical policies of the government and by implication ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] THE CARDENAS YEARS. IS 1934-1940 by Standlee Greenins
    The Mexican Revolution was a political, social, and economic attempt for Mexico to become what it has tried to be--a nation, a home, and a feeling for what can ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  81. [81]
    CARDENAS OF MEXICO - jstor
    Calles. Cardenas proved to be a shrewd man- ipulator. He was able to grasp political control so completely that in the summer of 1935 Calles announced his ...
  82. [82]
    President Lázaro Cárdenas - GlobalSecurity.org
    Sep 7, 2011 · A definitive break occurred between Calles and Cárdenas when the new president fired many of Calles's followers in the federal bureaucracy and ...
  83. [83]
    Plutarco Elias Calles | Biography, Facts, PRI, & Anticlericalism
    Oct 15, 2025 · Plutarco Elias Calles, Mexican military and political leader who modernized the revolutionary armies and later became president of Mexico.
  84. [84]
    MEXICO'S CENTENNIALS: The Promise and Legacy of the Mexican ...
    The precursor to today's Partido Revolucionario Institucional (Institutional Revolutionary Party, PRI), the PNR was a conglomeration of regional parties and ...<|separator|>