Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Great Depression

The Great Depression was a profound and protracted economic downturn that commenced in the United States with the of October 1929 and extended globally through the 1930s, culminating in widespread bank failures, , and industrial collapse. In the U.S., contracted by nearly 30 percent between 1929 and 1933, while surged to a peak of 25 percent of the labor force. The crisis stemmed principally from the Federal Reserve's errors, including its failure to expand the money supply amid banking panics, which exacerbated a one-third decline in the money stock and triggered severe . Globally, the Depression diminished economic output by approximately 10 to 15 percent on average, with industrial production in major economies like the and falling to about half of 1929 levels, and world unemployment reaching nearly 30 percent by 1932. Trade volumes plummeted due to protectionist measures such as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of , which intensified the contraction by disrupting international commerce. The event challenged prevailing economic doctrines, prompting shifts away from the gold standard and toward expansive fiscal interventions, though recovery remained uneven until wartime mobilization in the early 1940s. Defining characteristics included mass migration, agricultural distress exemplified by the , and social upheavals that fueled political extremism in . Controversies persist regarding the efficacy of subsequent policies, with empirical analyses highlighting how initial monetary contraction, rather than inherent market failures, amplified the downturn's severity.

Overview

Definition and Chronology

The Great Depression was a profound economic contraction originating in the United States that expanded globally, marked by substantial reductions in output, employment, and trade from 1929 through the early 1940s. In the U.S., it commenced with the cessation of postwar economic expansion in August 1929, followed by the stock market collapse in October, leading to a cumulative decline in real GDP of approximately 30 percent by 1933, a 45 percent drop in industrial production, and deflation exceeding 25 percent. Unemployment surged to 24.9 percent of the workforce in 1933, affecting over 12.8 million individuals, while thousands of banks failed, eroding savings and credit availability. The chronology unfolded in phases: an initial in late 1929 transitioned into deepening and financial instability through 1930–1932, with successive banking panics culminating in the widespread suspension of operations in early 1933. U.S. gross national product had fallen by nearly half from peak to trough, and volumes contracted by two-thirds amid protectionist policies. Recovery initiated after March 1933 with banking reforms and fiscal measures, yielding annual GDP growth averaging 9 percent from 1933 to 1937, though a in 1937–1938 interrupted progress, and sustained expansion required wartime production mobilization starting in 1941. Globally, the Depression's timeline mirrored the U.S. pattern, with experiencing acute distress by 1931 due to , war debts, and rigidities, while commodity-dependent nations like and saw output declines exceeding 10 percent annually in the early . The crisis persisted variably across regions until World War II's demands restored industrial capacity and employment, underscoring the Depression's decade-long duration as the most protracted downturn in industrialized history.

Scale and Key Metrics

The Great Depression involved unprecedented economic contraction in the United States, with real gross domestic product (GDP) falling by 29 percent from 1929 to , marking the deepest decline in modern U.S. history. This downturn persisted beyond the initial trough, with full recovery not occurring until the military mobilization preceding in the late 1930s. reached a peak of 25 percent in , affecting approximately 13 million workers out of a labor force of about 52 million. Industrial production, as measured by the Federal Reserve's index, experienced a sharp collapse during the early , reflecting reduced manufacturing output and amid falling . Wholesale prices plummeted by 32 percent, while consumer prices declined by 25 percent over the same period, exacerbating burdens through deflationary pressures. Banking compounded the crisis, with thousands of failures eroding public and availability; between 1930 and 1933, widespread panics led to the closure of nonmember banks outside the System, which numbered nearly 16,000 at the onset. Globally, the Depression's impact was substantial though less uniform, with estimates indicating a worldwide GDP contraction of approximately 15 percent from 1929 to 1932, driven by interconnected trade and financial linkages. The following table summarizes key U.S. metrics:
MetricValuePeriod/Source
Real GDP Decline29%1929–1933
Peak25%1933
Consumer Price Decline25%1929–1933
Wholesale Price Decline32%1929–1933

Global Dimensions

The Great Depression propagated internationally through , collapsing trade networks, and rigid monetary constraints under the gold standard, transforming a U.S.-centric downturn into a synchronized global contraction. World industrial production halved from to 1932, while volumes declined by more than 50%, as demand evaporated and surged. The U.S. Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, enacted June 17, 1930, elevated average tariffs to nearly 60% on dutiable imports, eliciting retaliatory barriers from , , and others, which further constricted commerce—U.S. exports to fell 61% by 1933. In , war debts, reparations, and gold outflows amplified vulnerabilities. Germany's industrial output dropped to 53% of 1929 levels by 1932 amid banking collapses like the Credit-Anstalt failure in on May 11, 1931, triggering contagion; exceeded 30%, fostering . The suspended gold convertibility on September 21, 1931, devaluing the pound by 30% and enabling monetary easing that spurred recovery—GDP bottomed in 1931 and grew 4% annually thereafter. clung to gold until 1936, enduring deflation and output contraction of 15% by 1936, as high interest rates defended reserves at the expense of domestic demand. Countries abandoning gold earlier, such as those in 1931, registered industrial production gains of 20-30% by 1935, outperforming gold adherents by sustaining deflationary traps. Beyond Europe, commodity-dependent regions suffered acutely from price collapses—global raw material indices fell 50-70%—yet responses varied. Latin American exporters like and saw GDP plummet 20-30% initially, prompting de facto devaluations and import-substitution industrialization; 's coffee valorization scheme destroyed 80 million bags to prop prices, aiding stabilization by 1933. , quitting gold on December 13, 1931, devalued the yen 50%, boosting exports and averting deeper slump; real GDP expanded 8.5% in 1933 alone via and Manchurian ventures, achieving by mid-decade. In and , agrarian price dives induced famines and unrest, though colonial ties buffered some core areas; overall, peripheral economies recovered via exchange flexibility, underscoring adherence as a transmission vector rather than mere synchronization.

Prelude to Crisis

Post-World War I Economic Patterns

The economy, which had expanded rapidly during due to wartime production demands, faced a sharp contraction upon the war's end in November 1918. Industrial output peaked in mid-1920 before declining amid reduced and the end of demand for . Real output fell by approximately 8.7 percent during the , with dropping by 30 percent by autumn 1920. Wholesale prices plummeted by about 15 percent, reflecting severe deflationary pressures as wartime reversed. rose to around 12 percent, and stock prices declined by 47 percent over the 18-month downturn. Policymakers under President responded with fiscal restraint, slashing federal spending by nearly 50 percent between 1920 and 1922, and the maintained tight to curb inherited from the war era. No large-scale stimulus or bailouts were implemented, allowing for rapid liquidation of malinvestments in sectors like and , where wartime price supports had distorted production. This approach facilitated a swift recovery; by 1922, industrial production surged 26 percent, automobile output jumped 63 percent, and returned to pre-recession levels by 1923. The episode highlighted the economy's capacity for self-correction through and wage adjustments, contrasting with prolonged interventions seen later. Globally, post-war patterns were marked by massive debts and that sowed seeds of instability. The U.S. emerged as a net creditor, holding $10 billion in Allied war loans, while European nations grappled with reconstruction costs and Germany's obligation to pay 132 billion gold marks in under the . Protectionist policies proliferated, with tariffs rising in response to competitive pressures, hampering trade recovery. Many countries, including and , delayed returning to the gold standard or did so at pre-war parities, leading to overvalued currencies and persistent inflationary tendencies that masked underlying imbalances. The U.S., returning to gold convertibility promptly in 1919, achieved price stability but accumulated gold reserves that strained international liquidity. These dynamics created a fragile credit structure reliant on American loans to service European debts, setting the stage for interconnected vulnerabilities.

1920s Boom: Credit Expansion and Imbalances

The U.S. economy expanded rapidly during the 1920s, with real gross national product (GNP) growing at an average annual rate of 4.2 percent from 1920 to 1929, and per capita GNP advancing 2.7 percent annually. This period, known as the Roaring Twenties, featured productivity surges in manufacturing driven by electrification—reaching 70 percent of factories by 1929—and assembly line innovations, boosting output in automobiles, where 60 percent of families owned cars by decade's end, and electrical appliances. Commercial banks supported this growth through aggressive credit extension, shifting into installment loans for consumer durables, urban real estate mortgages, and securities underwriting, which amplified liquidity and investment. Credit metrics underscored the boom's artificial stimulus. The ratio of to GDP climbed from 2.43 in 1913 to 4.08 by 1929, while debt tripled from $8 billion to $27 billion. Consumer relative to personal income doubled to over 9 percent by 1929, reflecting widespread borrowing for automobiles and homes. policies, holding discount rates low after the 1920-1921 , enabled this surge, but channeled much credit into ; brokers' loans ballooned, allowing stock purchases on 10 percent margins and propelling the from 63 in August 1921 to 381 in September 1929. Sectoral disparities revealed underlying fragilities. Agriculture, plagued by wartime overexpansion and , endured collapsing prices—farm products fell 53.3 percent in 1920-1921—with real per farm plunging 72.6 percent that year and aggregate farm incomes halving from $22 billion in to $13 billion by 1929. outpaced agriculture, but real wages for farmworkers declined amid the decade's prosperity, while skilled urban workers saw gains of 5.3 to 8.7 percent from 1923 to 1929. Nonresidential construction spending rose 56 percent from 1920 to 1929, peaking above $5 billion annually, diverting resources into potentially malinvested areas and exacerbating as capital gains accrued to participants. These imbalances, propped by credit-fueled distortions rather than balanced gains, heightened systemic risks.

Stock Market Bubble and Crash of October 1929

The U.S. of the stemmed from widespread fueled by optimistic economic prospects and readily available . Share prices surged as the climbed from 63 points in August 1921 to a peak of 381 points on September 3, 1929, reflecting a sixfold increase over eight years. This rise was amplified by the proliferation of margin accounts, allowing investors to purchase stocks with borrowed funds, often leveraging up to 90% of the value, which encouraged excessive risk-taking and inflated asset prices beyond underlying corporate earnings. Investment trusts and holding companies further expanded , drawing in retail investors previously sidelined from direct participation. Federal Reserve policies contributed to the bubble's formation through low interest rates in the mid-1920s, which facilitated credit expansion, though the raised discount rates in 1928 and 1929 to curb speculation, tightening liquidity and sowing seeds of reversal. By midsummer 1929, approximately 300 million shares were held on margin, heightening vulnerability to downturns as brokers issued margin calls amid eroding collateral values. The bubble burst in October 1929, initiating a sharp contraction. On October 24, known as , panic selling overwhelmed the , with a record 12.9 million shares traded as prices plummeted, prompting major bankers to intervene by purchasing select stocks to stabilize the market temporarily. The New York Federal Reserve supported this effort by buying government securities and easing lending to inject liquidity. Selling intensified over the weekend, leading to , October 28, when the fell nearly 13%, erasing significant paper wealth. The following day, Black Tuesday, October 29, saw another 12% drop, with over 16 million shares exchanged in frenzied trading, marking one of the highest volume days in exchange history up to that point and culminating in losses estimated at $14 billion in a single session. By mid-November, the Dow had declined about 40% from its September peak, signaling the end of the speculative era and contributing to broader economic contraction through wealth destruction and reduced confidence.

Deepening of the Depression

Initial Recession and Deflationary Pressures

The of October 1929 triggered a sharp contraction in economic activity, initiating a that deepened into the Great Depression. Consumer spending slowed and inventories of unsold goods accumulated even before the , but the market plunge shattered business and public confidence, leading to abrupt reductions in and durable goods purchases. Industrial production, which had peaked in July 1929, declined by 37 percent by December 1930 as firms liquidated excess capacity and cut output in response to falling demand. Unemployment rose rapidly from 3.2 percent of the labor force in 1929, reflecting layoffs in and sectors hardest hit by the downturn. contracted by approximately 8.5 percent in 1930 alone, with declines concentrated in capital goods and consumer durables. These developments stemmed from a classic contraction amplified by the psychological impact of the crash, which prompted and precautionary saving amid uncertainty. Deflationary pressures emerged as prices adjusted downward to excess supply and weakened . Wholesale prices fell by over 10 percent between late 1929 and mid-1930, increasing the real burden of existing debts and discouraging new borrowing or spending. This decline, initially driven by reduced and drawdowns rather than immediate monetary , created a feedback loop where falling revenues led to cuts and further suppression. While some signs appeared in mid-1930, such as stabilizing , persistent eroded profitability and perpetuated the recessionary spiral.

Banking Crises and Systemic Failures

![Crowd outside the failed Bank of the United States][float-right] The banking crises during the Great Depression unfolded in waves of panics, beginning in late , as depositor confidence eroded amid economic contraction and asset . The first major panic erupted after the failure of the Caldwell investment group on November 7, , which controlled numerous banks in the and Midwest; this triggered runs on affiliated institutions in Nashville, Knoxville, and Louisville, leading to 1,352 bank suspensions in alone. By , failures escalated to 2,294 banks, exacerbated by international financial strains and further domestic runs, particularly in the interior states where unit banking—restricting branches—amplified vulnerability to localized shocks. A pivotal event was the collapse of the Bank of the United States on December 11, 1930, the largest U.S. bank failure to date with $200 million in deposits, which intensified fears among immigrant and working-class depositors and spread contagion despite the bank's solvency issues stemming from real estate loans. Systemic failures compounded the crises: the absence of fueled self-fulfilling runs, as depositors withdrew funds en masse, converting deposits to currency and contracting the money supply by up to 30% from to 1933. The Federal Reserve's inadequate response—failing to serve as by discounting sufficient assets or injecting liquidity—allowed panics to persist, prioritizing maintenance over stabilizing the banking system. The 1931-33 panics saw continued surges, with 1,453 failures in 1932 and over 4,000 suspensions in early , culminating in a nationwide that prompted President Roosevelt's banking holiday on March 6, 1933, closing all banks temporarily. These failures wiped out savings for millions, deepened deflationary pressures, and transmitted distress globally via outflows and disruptions, as failed banks curtailed lending and intermediation essential for . Empirical analysis attributes much of the severity to inaction rather than inherent alone, with non-member banks hit hardest due to limited access. Reforms like the FDIC in later mitigated such runs by insuring deposits up to $2,500 initially.

Collapse of International Trade: Smoot-Hawley and Retaliation

The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, enacted on June 17, 1930, substantially raised U.S. import duties on more than 20,000 goods, increasing the average tariff rate on dutiable imports from approximately 40% to nearly 60%. Sponsored by Senator and Representative , the legislation aimed to shield American agriculture and manufacturing from foreign competition amid declining domestic prices following the 1929 stock market crash. Despite opposition from over 1,000 economists who warned of retaliatory measures and reduced trade, President signed the bill into law, arguing it would revive prosperity. Prior to the act's passage, volumes had already begun contracting due to the , with U.S. exports declining from $5.24 billion in 1929 to $3.84 billion in 1930. However, Smoot-Hawley accelerated the downturn by provoking widespread retaliation from trading partners. , the United States' largest export market, responded within weeks by imposing on 16 U.S. products, including automobiles and , and later redirecting trade toward the . European nations followed suit: raised tariffs on U.S. automobiles and other goods, while , , and enacted similar barriers, collectively targeting American agricultural and industrial exports. These beggar-thy-neighbor policies fragmented global markets and compounded the trade collapse. U.S. exports plummeted further to $1.65 billion by 1933, a drop of over 60% from 1929 levels, while real U.S. exports fell nearly 50% between 1929 and 1933 amid a 30% contraction in gross national product. Worldwide, the value of merchandise trade shrank to less than 40% of its 1929 peak by 1932, with volumes in industrialized countries declining by about 30% from 1929 to 1932, though quantitative assessments indicate Smoot-Hawley alone accounted for only a portion of the import collapse, as falling incomes and deflationary pressures played larger roles. The tariff war underscored the interdependence of post-World War I economies under the gold standard, where transmitted deflationary shocks across borders. Retaliatory measures not only curtailed U.S. but also exacerbated domestic banking strains in nations reliant on surpluses, contributing to currency devaluations and further trade barriers by 1932. Economic analyses, including those from the , affirm that while Smoot-Hawley did not initiate the Depression's trade contraction, its escalation of reciprocal barriers intensified the global spiral, reducing efficiency and amplifying in export-dependent sectors.

Monetary and International Factors

Federal Reserve Policy Errors

The 's policy responses following the October 1929 stock market crash exacerbated the economic downturn through a series of passive and contractionary measures. Rather than expanding to counteract the initial , the Fed maintained tight monetary conditions, including raising the from 5% in late 1929 to 6% by early 1930, which discouraged borrowing and contributed to credit scarcity. This approach stemmed from concerns over stock market and adherence to the real bills doctrine, which limited operations and viewed non-commercial lending as inflationary. As banking panics erupted in late 1930, the failed to serve as an effective , allowing over 9,000 banks to fail between 1930 and 1933 and permitting the money supply () to contract by approximately one-third, from $26.6 billion in 1929 to $17.3 billion by 1933. Economists and argued in their 1963 work A Monetary History of the United States that this contraction was not inevitable but resulted from the Fed's inaction during waves of panics, which eroded public confidence and led to of and reduced bank lending. The 's decentralized structure, with regional banks prioritizing local concerns over national stability, further hampered coordinated intervention, such as insufficient purchases to offset reserve drains. In 1931, amid Britain's abandonment of the gold standard and gold outflows from the U.S., the raised the sharply from 1.5% to 3.5% in October to defend dollar convertibility, prioritizing gold reserves over domestic economic support. This move intensified deflationary pressures, as higher rates amid falling prices increased real interest burdens on debtors and discouraged investment. Empirical analyses, including simulations based on and data, suggest that stabilizing the money supply could have limited the decline in nominal GDP to around 10% rather than the observed 46% from to 1933. Critics like Allan Meltzer have noted that while the avoided outright errors in judgment, its rigid commitment to rules and incomplete understanding of monetary transmission mechanisms amplified the crisis. These policies contrasted with potential alternatives, such as aggressive liquidity provision akin to the Bank of England's actions pre-1931, which might have mitigated panic contagion. The Fed's errors, rooted in doctrinal and institutional limitations, transformed a severe into the prolonged Great Depression by undermining the banking system and contracting credit availability.

Gold Standard Constraints and Transmission Mechanisms

The standard, which pegged currencies to fixed quantities of and required convertibility at par values, imposed strict constraints on during the by limiting central banks' ability to expand the money supply independently of reserves. To defend parities amid or trade imbalances, policymakers were compelled to raise interest rates or pursue deflationary measures, such as contracting credit, which exacerbated economic downturns rather than countering them. This rigidity prevented the elastic monetary responses needed to offset banking panics and falling output, as seen in the United States where adherence to convertibility contributed to a 30% contraction in the money stock between and 1933. Transmission mechanisms operated through balance-of-payments adjustments: deficits triggered outflows, forcing importing countries to sterilize inflows or domestic economies to restore , thereby propagating and internationally. U.S. deflationary shocks, amplified by banking failures and inaction, were relayed via these channels; for instance, inflows to the U.S. from in 1931–1932 drained reserves elsewhere, compelling higher interest rates in countries like and prompting credit squeezes that deepened the global slump. France's overvaluation and hoarding after stabilizing its in 1928 further tightened world liquidity, as its accumulated nearly 20% of global monetary by 1932, starving other economies of reserves and intensifying the need for contractionary policies abroad. Empirical evidence underscores these dynamics: nations that suspended gold convertibility earlier experienced faster recoveries, with industrial production rising an average of 7% annually post-abandonment compared to stagnation under adherence. , exiting on September 21, 1931, and devaluing the pound by about 30%, saw GDP growth resume by 1932, while gold bloc adherents like and the , clinging to parities until 1936, endured prolonged and output losses exceeding 10% below trend. Cross-country regressions confirm that adherence prolonged depressions by 1–2 years on average, as fixed rates synchronized policy errors across borders rather than allowing unilateral easing. This pattern held despite varied domestic conditions, isolating the standard's role in channeling U.S.-originated shocks—such as the 1929 stock crash and subsequent banking collapses—into synchronized global declines in and .

European Crises: Germany 1931 and Britain 1931

The originated with the collapse of Austria's bank on May 11, 1931, which exposed massive losses from bad loans and triggered deposit withdrawals across . This failure stemmed from Austria's postwar economic vulnerabilities, including heavy reliance on short-term foreign funding and exposure to failed industrial investments, amplifying the transmission of the U.S.-originated Depression through linkages and capital flows. The crisis rapidly spread to , where interconnected banking systems and similar dependencies on American loans—halted after 1929—led to liquidity strains. In Germany, the crisis intensified in June 1931 with runs on major banks, culminating in the failure of Danatbank on July 13, 1931, one of the country's largest universal banks handling about 15% of commercial deposits. German authorities responded by declaring a on July 14, imposing strict capital controls, and suspending convertibility on July 15 to stem outflows, which had drained reserves amid pressures and reaching 28% by mid-1931. These measures, while halting immediate collapse, deepened the contraction: industrial production fell by over 40% from 1929 peaks, and GDP declined by approximately 25% by 1932, as credit froze and evaporated under retaliatory tariffs. The Reichsbank's adherence to rules prior to suspension constrained monetary expansion, exacerbating and bank insolvencies that wiped out nearly half of banking assets. The German turmoil pressured Britain, already strained by reparations, war debts, and a overvalued pound tied to gold at prewar parity, leading to speculative attacks on sterling in September 1931. Foreign withdrawals accelerated after Germany's controls, as investors feared contagion; Britain's gold reserves dropped from £170 million in 1929 to under £100 million by September, while budget deficits from unemployment benefits and naval expenditures eroded confidence. On September 21, 1931, the new National Government suspended gold convertibility, devaluing the pound by about 30% against the dollar, which halted reserve losses and enabled interest rate cuts from 6% to 2% by 1932. This departure facilitated a swifter recovery than in gold-adherent nations, with GDP bottoming in 1931 and exports rebounding due to competitiveness gains, though unemployment lingered above 20% into 1933. The crises underscored gold standard rigidities in transmitting deflationary shocks, prompting further abandonments and contributing to global fragmentation.

Theoretical Explanations of Causes

Monetarist Analysis: Money Supply Contraction

Monetarists, led by economists and , argue that the Great Depression's depth and duration stemmed primarily from a massive contraction in the U.S. , which the failed to counteract. In their seminal work A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960, they documented that the money stock—comprising currency and demand deposits—fell by approximately one-third, from $26.6 billion in August 1929 to $17.3 billion by March 1933. This decline exceeded that of any prior U.S. economic downturn and amplified deflationary pressures, reducing nominal income and asset values while exacerbating debt burdens. The contraction originated from a vicious cycle of banking panics and shortages. Between 1930 and 1933, over 9,000 banks failed, representing about one-third of all U.S. banks, as depositors shifted holdings to amid fears of . This hoarding reduced the money multiplier, as banks held and curtailed lending; rose relative to deposits, further contracting the broad by nearly 30% from late 1930 to early 1933. Monetarists contend the , established partly to serve as a , neglected this role by not injecting reserves through open market operations or lending, instead allowing the to stagnate or decline in key periods. Friedman and Schwartz emphasized that the Fed's passivity turned a manageable into a depression, as the money supply drop directly correlated with output collapse—real GNP fell 30% from to —and severe , with prices dropping 25-30%. They rejected real factors like shocks as primary causes, attributing the transmission via reduced spending and availability; empirical studies, including vector autoregressions on historical data, have supported a causal link from money to output during this era, though debates persist on the exact channels. The Fed's adherence to the real bills doctrine and constraints contributed to inaction, prioritizing short-term liquidity over systemic stability. Recovery began only after monetary expansion under the Roosevelt administration, including the abandonment of the gold standard in 1933 and subsequent , which restored growth and ended by 1934. Monetarists view this as validation: had the Fed expanded aggressively from 1930, the Depression's severity could have been mitigated, akin to milder contractions in prior panics. Critics, including some Keynesians, argue sticky wages and demand deficiencies amplified effects independently, but monetarist evidence highlights the Fed's policy errors as avoidable and central.

Austrian Business Cycle Theory: Malinvestments from Credit Expansion

The (ABCT), developed by economists such as and , posits that business cycles originate from central bank-induced credit expansion, which distorts price signals and leads to malinvestments—allocations of resources into unsustainable projects that would not occur under genuine market conditions. In this framework, artificially low interest rates, resulting from amplified by policy, mimic an increase in voluntary savings but instead fuel excessive investment in time-intensive, capital-heavy sectors like and durable goods production, elongating the economy's production structure beyond consumer preferences. This misallocation creates an illusory boom, as resources are diverted from consumer goods toward higher-order capital goods, but the expansion proves untenable when credit growth slows, revealing the absence of real savings and triggering a corrective characterized by of errors and reallocation. Applied to the 1920s , ABCT attributes the decade's prosperity to [Federal Reserve](/page/Federal Reserve) policies that expanded credit through open-market purchases of acceptances and low discount rates, maintaining real interest rates below natural levels despite postwar recovery. Under Governor Benjamin Strong, the Fed aimed to stabilize the gold standard internationally by aiding Britain's return in , which involved keeping U.S. rates low (around 3-4% for in mid-decade) and increasing member by over 50% from 1921 to 1929, fueling a credit boom that bypassed broad price inflation due to productivity gains but manifested in asset bubbles. This expansion directed investments toward radial deepening—overbuilding in automobiles (production rose from 1.5 million units in 1921 to 4.8 million by 1929), residential construction (peaking at 937,000 units in ), and industrial capacity—creating malinvestments disconnected from underlying savings rates, which remained stable at around 5-7% of income. The 1929 stock market crash marked the onset of the bust phase, as credit contraction exposed the imbalances, with the plummeting 89% from its September peak by July 1932, initiating widespread liquidation of unprofitable projects and bankruptcies in overleveraged sectors. Austrian analysts like argue this was not an exogenous shock but the inevitable correction of the prior decade's distortions, where Fed-fueled speculation had inflated stock values to 33 times earnings by 1929, far exceeding fundamentals. , in works from the onward, similarly identified the U.S. boom as a monetary overexpansion driving unsustainable , warning that suppressing the ensuing through further intervention would prolong maladjustments rather than allow market-driven reequilibration. Empirical proxies for malinvestment, such as the surge in capital goods output (up 70% from 1921-1929) outpacing consumer durables, support this view, as the bust revealed excess capacity in steel and machinery, with industrial production falling 46% by 1932. Critics of ABCT contend that the 1920s credit growth was moderate relative to GDP ( M2 rose about 60% over the decade) and question the theory's emphasis on signals over real factors like technological shifts, yet Austrian proponents counter that the qualitative —favoring long-term over short-term —better explains the clustered errors in specific sectors than metrics alone. The theory underscores that the Great Depression's depth stemmed not merely from the bust but from subsequent policy errors impeding liquidation, such as Hoover's wage rigidities and the Fed's initial inaction followed by contraction.

Keynesian Perspective: Aggregate Demand Shortfall

Keynesian economists posit that the Great Depression stemmed fundamentally from a precipitous decline in , which curtailed production and engendered persistent despite available labor and capital. In this view, the economy entered a state of equilibrium below , where output is determined not by supply constraints but by the level of total spending—comprising consumption, investment, government expenditure, and net exports. , in his 1936 work The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, argued that erroneously assumed automatic market clearance toward ; instead, rigidities such as sticky wages and prices, coupled with fluctuations in investor confidence ("animal spirits"), prevented self-correction. The 1929 stock market crash exemplified the trigger for demand insufficiency, as it eroded household wealth by approximately $30 billion (equivalent to about $500 billion in 2023 dollars), prompting reduced consumption through the . Investment spending, sensitive to expectations of future profitability, collapsed from $16.1 billion in 1929 to $1.4 billion by 1932, exacerbating the downturn via the multiplier effect: an initial drop in spending leads to income losses for recipients, who then curtail their own expenditures, amplifying the contraction. Keynesians highlight how this dynamic manifested empirically, with U.S. real GDP plummeting 29% from 1929 to 1933 and industrial production falling 47%, outcomes they attribute to deficient demand rather than supply-side disruptions. Further reinforcing the perspective, Keynesians invoke the , whereby heightened saving inclinations—rational amid uncertainty—collectively diminish demand, as unspent income fails to circulate. This mechanism, they contend, prolonged the slump despite deflationary pressures that should have theoretically stimulated spending under classical models. Proponents like Alvin Hansen extended this analysis postwar, arguing that from demographic trends and investment opportunities amplified demand shortfalls, though empirical validation remains debated among favoring monetary explanations. To counteract demand deficiency, Keynes advocated countercyclical , including deficit-financed and tax cuts to elevate spending directly and indirectly through multipliers estimated at 1.5 to 2 in Depression-era contexts. Such interventions, absent in the early administration's balanced-budget orthodoxy, were partially realized under Roosevelt's from 1933, though Keynesians critique their scale as insufficient until wartime mobilization. This framework underscores aggregate demand's primacy in short-run fluctuations, influencing subsequent macroeconomic policy despite critiques that it overlooks long-term supply dynamics and inflation risks.

Heterodox Views: Inequality, Productivity Shocks, and Marxism

Some heterodox economists, drawing on theories, have posited that rising in the 1920s contributed to the Great Depression by suppressing . Proponents argue that the top 1% of earners captured approximately 24% of total U.S. by 1928, up from 18% in 1918, while wages for the bottom 90% stagnated relative to gains, leading households to increase and reduce as a share of . This view, echoed in certain post-Keynesian analyses, suggests that outpaced , exacerbating the 1929 downturn, though critics contend it overlooks evidence of stable or rising propensity among lower- groups prior to the crash and fails to explain why did not trigger earlier crises. Alternative heterodox perspectives emphasize productivity shocks as a primary driver, aligning with real models that attribute economic contractions to exogenous declines in rather than monetary or demand factors. Research indicates that negative productivity shocks accounted for roughly two-thirds of the output drop in the U.S. and international economies during the early , with measured falling by about 20% between 1929 and 1933 due to factors like sectoral reallocations and technological disruptions in and . These shocks, proponents claim, propagated and by shifting the economy along a neoclassical production frontier, though empirical challenges persist, including difficulties reconciling observed labor hoarding with pure supply-side explanations. Marxist interpretations frame the Great Depression as an inevitable outcome of capitalism's internal contradictions, particularly the tendency of the rate of profit to fall amid overaccumulation and overproduction. Analysts in this tradition argue that the 1920s boom, fueled by credit expansion and uneven capitalist development post-World War I, led to a crisis of disproportionality by 1929, where industrial capacity exceeded solvent markets, resulting in a sharp profit squeeze—U.S. corporate profits plummeted 80% from 1929 to 1932—and mass unemployment as capital sought to restore profitability through deflation and wage cuts. This perspective highlights the unplanned anarchy of production under private ownership, with the Depression validating Marx's prediction of periodic crises resolving contradictions only temporarily via destruction of capital, yet it has been critiqued for underemphasizing contingent policy failures and over-relying on long-run tendencies without precise timing mechanisms.

Government Interventions and Their Outcomes

U.S. Policies Under Hoover and Roosevelt

President initially pursued policies emphasizing voluntary cooperation between government, business, and labor to stabilize the economy without direct federal relief. In late 1929, he convened conferences urging industrial leaders to maintain wages and employment levels amid falling demand, securing pledges for $1.8 billion in private construction spending for 1930. However, these efforts faltered as and intensified, with industrial production dropping sharply. also supported limited , such as the project initiated in 1930, but federal spending remained constrained relative to the crisis scale. A pivotal Hoover policy was the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, signed on June 17, 1930, which raised average duties on dutiable imports by about 6 percentage points, prompting retaliatory tariffs from trading partners and contributing to a 66% collapse in global trade volume by 1933. Federal government spending rose under from $3.1 billion in fiscal year 1929 to $4.7 billion by 1932, financed partly by tax increases including the Revenue Act of 1932, which doubled rates and introduced new levies on dividends and estates. In response to banking failures exceeding 9,000 by 1932, Hoover established the (RFC) on January 22, 1932, authorizing $2 billion in loans initially to banks, railroads, and agricultural agencies, marking a shift toward direct federal credit intervention. Despite these measures, GDP contracted by 8.5% in 1932, and unemployment reached 24.9%. Upon taking office in March 1933, President implemented the , a series of programs for relief, recovery, and reform. The "" Congress passed the Emergency Banking Act on March 9, 1933, following a national banking holiday declared on March 6, which temporarily halted withdrawals and facilitated federal inspections to reopen solvent banks; this was supplemented by the Glass-Steagall Act creating the (FDIC) to insure deposits up to $2,500. Agricultural policies included the (AAA) of May 1933, which paid farmers to reduce production, boosting farm prices by 50% by 1936 but raising food costs for consumers. Industrial recovery efforts featured the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) of June 1933, establishing the (NRA) to set industry codes for wages, prices, and output, which covered 95% of manufacturing but was ruled unconstitutional in 1935 for delegating legislative power. The NIRA's wage floors, averaging 20-50% above market levels in covered sectors, correlated with reduced employment in those industries per empirical studies. Fiscal expansion accelerated, with federal spending surging from 4% of GDP in 1933 to 10% by 1936, funded by deficits; public works under the (PWA) and (CCC) employed over 3 million by 1935. Yet, real GDP per adult remained 27% below 1929 levels by 1939, and unemployment averaged 17.2% through the decade, with recessions in 1937-1938 attributed by some analyses to policy-induced uncertainty and rigidities rather than fiscal contraction alone.

International Responses and Protectionism

![Senators Reed Smoot and Willis Hawley, proponents of the 1930 tariff act]float-right The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, enacted on June 17, 1930, substantially raised U.S. import duties on over 20,000 goods, with average tariffs increasing by approximately 20 percent, aiming to shield domestic agriculture and industry from foreign competition. This legislation prompted swift retaliatory measures from major trading partners, including Canada, which imposed counter-tariffs on U.S. exports such as automobiles and agricultural products, and European nations that elevated barriers on American goods. These responses initiated a cascade of protectionist policies worldwide, contracting international commerce amid already faltering demand. Global trade volumes plummeted by roughly two-thirds in value between 1929 and 1933, a decline exceeding the drop in world output and attributable in part to escalating tariffs and quotas that fragmented markets. In , long adherent to , the economic crisis prompted abandonment of the gold standard in September 1931 and a pivot to ; the Import Duties Act of introduced a general 10 percent on non-empire imports, while the Ottawa Agreements later that year established systems favoring Commonwealth trade, reducing reliance on external partners. maintained high tariffs averaging 34 percent on British exports, alongside quotas and currency devaluation efforts to preserve domestic industries, though these measures insulated rather than revived growth. Germany, facing hyperinflation's aftermath and reparations burdens, intensified import controls and bilateral barter agreements by 1931, curtailing trade with deficit countries and fostering autarkic tendencies that presaged later Nazi policies. Such fragmented responses, while politically expedient for protecting in specific sectors, amplified deflationary pressures and obstructed recovery by diminishing export markets and resource efficiencies, as empirical analyses indicate deepened the transnational transmission of the downturn.

Critiques of Intervention: Prolongation vs. Mitigation Debates

Economists associated with the Austrian School, such as and , contended that government interventions under Presidents and interfered with the necessary market adjustments following the crash, thereby prolonging the Depression by preventing the of malinvestments and distorting price signals. Hoover's policies, including exhortations to businesses to maintain nominal wages and the Reconstruction Finance Corporation's loans to banks and firms starting in 1932, aimed to stabilize the economy but resulted in real wage rigidity, with average hourly earnings rising 17% from to 1933 while prices fell 25%, exacerbating by discouraging hiring. These measures, in the Austrian view, extended the downturn by sustaining unprofitable enterprises and delaying resource reallocation, as evidenced by industrial production remaining 45% below levels by 1933. Real business cycle theorists and Lee Ohanian formalized this prolongation argument in their 2004 analysis, estimating that policies, particularly the National Industrial Recovery Act (NRA) of 1933—which enforced industry-wide codes fixing prices and wages—reduced competition and raised by up to 25% above market-clearing levels, accounting for about half of the output shortfall from 1933 to 1939. Their dynamic general equilibrium model showed U.S. GDP in 1939 at 27% below a counterfactual trend absent these interventions, with persisting at 17-20% due to cartel-like restrictions that mimicked pricing and labor power, policies invalidated by the in 1935 but whose effects lingered. Similarly, the (AAA) of 1933 paid farmers to reduce output, destroying 10 million acres of crops and 6 million pigs in 1933 alone, which artificially propped up prices but deepened scarcity and farm foreclosures, contributing to rural distress without accelerating recovery. Critics of the prolongation thesis, often aligned with Keynesian frameworks, argue that interventions mitigated human suffering and laid institutional foundations for eventual recovery, pointing to the New Deal's relief programs like the (employing 3 million by 1940) and (restoring banking confidence after 9,000 failures in 1933). Proponents such as have emphasized that fiscal multipliers from spending, though modest at 0.5-1.0, cushioned demand shortfalls, with industrial production rising 57% from March 1933 to July 1933 following the banking holiday and suspension. However, these defenses face empirical challenges: the 1937-1938 saw GDP drop 18% and rise to 19% after partial policy reversals, including reduced WPA spending from $4.4 billion to $1.4 billion, suggesting interventions sustained fragility rather than robust growth, as pre-New Deal economies like 1920-1921 recovered swiftly without such measures. The debate hinges on counterfactuals, with prolongation advocates citing faster recoveries in countries like (which abandoned in and cut spending) versus the U.S., where GNP per capita remained below 1929 levels until 1939, attributing delays to policy-induced distortions over monetary failures alone. Mitigation claims often rely on qualitative relief metrics but struggle against quantitative models showing interventions halved potential employment gains, underscoring a causal tension between short-term stabilization and long-term adjustment.

Path to Recovery

Monetary Reforms: Devaluation and Reflation

Several nations abandoned the gold standard during the early 1930s, enabling currency and monetary to counter deflationary pressures. In the , the government suspended gold convertibility on September 21, 1931, leading to a approximately 30% of the against the U.S. . This policy shift altered expectations from continued to moderate , facilitating a robust by mid-1932, with real GDP growth accelerating and beginning to decline after peaking at around 22%. Empirical analysis indicates that the devaluation boosted exports and employment, particularly in and export-oriented sectors, contributing to Britain's faster recovery compared to countries adhering to the gold standard. In the United States, adherence to the gold standard prolonged until President Franklin D. Roosevelt's interventions in 1933. Following a banking crisis, Roosevelt declared a nationwide on March 6, 1933, and on April 19, 1933, issued an prohibiting gold exports and suspending dollar convertibility into gold, effectively abandoning the gold standard. The subsequent of January 30, 1934, devalued the dollar by 41%, raising the official price of gold from $20.67 to $35 per ounce, which transferred value from gold holders to the Treasury and permitted monetary base expansion. This revaluation, combined with gold inflows from devaluation-induced and European instability, increased U.S. gold reserves by over 70% between 1933 and 1936, enabling the to expand the money supply after years of contraction. Reflationary effects materialized rapidly, with wholesale prices rising 15% in the six months following the April 1933 suspension, ending the deflationary spiral. Industrial production surged from an index of 58 in March 1933 to 110 by July 1933, and real GNP grew by 10.8% in 1933 alone, marking the onset of . Studies attribute this turnaround to heightened expectations and fiscal-monetary coordination, which reduced real burdens and stimulated and , contrasting with slower recoveries in gold bloc nations like . While some analyses emphasize inflows as exogenous drivers, the devaluation policy framework was instrumental in converting deflationary expectations into expansionary ones, supporting monetary easing without immediate inflationary excess.

Fiscal Experiments and New Deal Programs

Following Franklin D. Roosevelt's inauguration on March 4, 1933, the introduced a series of fiscal experiments characterized by substantial increases in federal spending and the creation of numerous government agencies aimed at providing relief, recovery, and reform. Real federal outlays rose from 5.9 percent of 1929 real GDP in 1933 to nearly 11 percent by 1939, reflecting a shift toward financing to stimulate economic activity. The national debt increased from $22 billion in 1933 to $33 billion by 1936, funding programs that employed millions through and direct relief. Major initiatives included the , established in March 1933, which provided jobs for over 3 million young men in conservation projects by 1942; the , launched under the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) in June 1933, which allocated $3.3 billion for infrastructure like dams and highways; and the , created in 1935, employing 8.5 million people on projects including roads, schools, and arts programs until 1943. of 1933 sought to raise farm prices by paying farmers to reduce production, while the , also under NIRA, imposed industry codes to set wages and prices, though it was declared unconstitutional in 1935. The Second New Deal from 1935 featured the , establishing unemployment insurance and old-age pensions, and the Wagner Act bolstering labor unions. These programs temporarily reduced unemployment from 24.9 percent in 1933 to 14.3 percent by 1937, but a recession in 1937-1938 pushed it back to 19 percent, with full recovery only occurring during World War II mobilization. Empirical analyses, such as that by economists Harold Cole and Lee Ohanian, argue that New Deal policies like the NRA's cartelization distorted labor and product markets by elevating real wages above market-clearing levels and reducing competition, accounting for about 60 percent of the persistent output gap between actual and trend GDP from 1933 to 1939. Their model estimates these interventions prolonged the Depression by roughly seven years relative to a counterfactual without such distortions. While proponents credit the New Deal with stabilizing banking via the FDIC (1933) and providing essential relief, critics contend the fiscal expansions crowded out private investment and failed to address underlying structural issues, as evidenced by sluggish private sector growth and repeated downturns despite rising public expenditure.

World War II's Economic Mobilization

The United States' economic mobilization for World War II, accelerating after the December 7, 1941, attack on Pearl Harbor, transformed the lingering Depression-era economy through unprecedented government-directed industrial expansion and labor absorption. Federal defense expenditures escalated from $1.7 billion in fiscal year 1939 (1.4% of GDP) to $12.8 billion in 1941 and peaked at $98.7 billion in 1945 (37.5% of GDP), funded largely by deficit spending and war bonds. This shift reoriented factories from civilian to military production, with output of aircraft rising from 6,000 in 1939 to 96,000 in 1944, ships from negligible to over 5 million tons annually by 1943, and tanks from zero to 29,000 in 1943 alone. Labor mobilization complemented industrial efforts, drafting 10 million men into the armed forces between 1940 and 1945 while creating 17 million new civilian jobs, drawing women and minorities into the workforce en masse. plummeted from an annual average of 14.6% in 1940 to 9.9% in 1941, 4.7% in 1942, 1.9% in 1943, and a low of 1.2% in 1944, reflecting near-full employment as idle resources were directed toward war needs. Real GDP grew at annual rates exceeding 15% from 1942 to 1944, doubling from $124.5 billion in 1939 (in 1929 dollars) to approximately $223 billion by 1945, driven by wartime demand that outstripped pre-Depression peaks achieved in 1937. While this mobilization empirically resolved Depression indicators like high and output gaps through stimulus via fiscal outlays, it relied on coercive measures including wage-price controls, of consumer goods, and suppressed private investment, which fell as a share of GDP. Corporate profits after taxes doubled from 1939 to 1945, yet consumption stagnated until postwar , underscoring that wartime "prosperity" prioritized military over civilian welfare. Economists debate whether this validates as a tool or merely masked underlying distortions, with some heterodox views attributing sustained growth to prewar monetary rather than war alone.

Empirical Evidence on Recovery Drivers

Real gross domestic product (GDP) in the United States bottomed out in 1933 at approximately 66% of its 1929 peak, then expanded at an average annual rate of 8.5% from 1933 to 1937, recovering to about 105% of pre-Depression levels by 1937. , which reached 25% in 1933, declined to 14% by 1937, indicating substantial labor market improvement prior to major mobilization. These trends suggest recovery drivers activated around 1933, coinciding with the abandonment of the gold standard and subsequent monetary expansion rather than sustained fiscal outlays or wartime , which accelerated only after 1940. Econometric analysis by attributes nearly all observed output growth from to 1942 to increases in driven primarily by changes, estimating that monetary expansion raised real GNP by a factor sufficient to explain the without relying on fiscal multipliers exceeding unity. Specifically, the of the dollar by about 40% following the Gold Reserve Act of January 1934 facilitated , with () growing from $19.2 billion in to $30.8 billion by , correlating strongly with industrial production rises of over 50% in the same period. Cross-country evidence supports this, as nations exiting the gold standard earlier, such as the in 1931, experienced faster recoveries; U.S. industrial production lagged until post-1933 , after which it outpaced gold bloc countries adhering to fixed exchange rates. Fiscal interventions under the , while increasing federal spending from 5.9% of 1929 GDP in 1933 to 11% by 1939, showed limited causal impact on recovery according to models, with multipliers estimated below 1 and some programs inducing uncertainty that deterred private investment. For instance, National Industrial Recovery Act codes, intended to boost wages and prices, correlated with output stagnation in affected sectors, suggesting supply-side distortions outweighed demand stimulus. The 1937-1938 , triggered by reserve requirement hikes and New Deal spending cuts, further underscores monetary contraction's role in halting progress, as output fell 18% and unemployment rose to 19% despite prior fiscal buildup. World War II mobilization from 1941, raising government spending to 43% of GDP by 1944, eliminated remaining unemployment slack but did not initiate recovery, as pre-war GDP had already surpassed 1929 levels; wartime controls, including price ceilings and , masked underlying distortions rather than fostering organic growth, with postwar yielding sustained expansion absent such interventions. Productivity data reinforce that endogenous factors like monetary stabilization, not exogenous shocks like war, drove the 1933-1937 upturn, with growth averaging 2.5% annually post-. Overall, empirical correlations and counterfactual simulations prioritize monetary reflation over fiscal or military drivers, highlighting policy-induced demand restoration as the core mechanism.

Country-Specific Impacts

United States

The Great Depression profoundly impacted the economy, initiating with the on October 29, 1929, known as Black Tuesday, when the dropped nearly 12 percent amid trading of over 16 million shares. From its peak of 381 points in September 1929, the Dow declined sharply, reaching a low of 41 points by July 1932, erasing much of the speculative gains from the boom. contracted by 29 percent between 1929 and 1933, reflecting a collapse in industrial production and consumer spending. surged to a peak of 25 percent in 1933, affecting approximately 15 million workers and leading to widespread joblessness, particularly in and sectors. Banking instability exacerbated the downturn, with banking panics triggering runs that resulted in over 9,000 bank failures between 1930 and 1933, equivalent to about one-third of all U.S. banks and wiping out depositors' savings without federal . This financial chaos contracted the money supply, deepened —which saw consumer prices fall 25 percent—and hindered availability for businesses and households. Agricultural regions faced compounded distress from falling prices and environmental catastrophe; farm incomes plummeted as wheat and cotton prices halved, while the droughts and dust storms from 1930 to 1936 eroded topsoil across 100 million acres in the , displacing over 2.5 million people in migrations like the "" exodus to . Social consequences included the proliferation of shantytowns dubbed Hoovervilles, reliance on soup kitchens, and increased urban poverty, with families resorting to makeshift housing and charitable aid amid federal relief efforts that proved insufficient under President Hoover's administration. Rural depopulation accelerated as foreclosures claimed one-third of farms, and urban industrial cities like and saw factory closures and breadlines. Despite some recovery signs post-1933 banking reforms, per capita income remained 25 percent below 1929 levels by 1939, underscoring the Depression's protracted grip until wartime mobilization.

Germany

Germany's economy, still recovering from the 1923 and reliant on short-term loans under the , faced acute vulnerability when the 1929 Wall Street Crash triggered a withdrawal of . Short-term foreign credits, totaling around 13 billion Reichsmarks by 1928, evaporated as U.S. banks recalled funds, leading to a and multiple bank failures, including the collapse of the Darmstädter und Nationalbank in 1931. Industrial production plummeted by approximately 40% between 1929 and 1932, while contracted by 15.7%. exploded from 1.5 million at the end of 1929 to over 6 million by early 1933, representing nearly 30% of the workforce, with full-time employment dropping from 20 million to 11.5 million workers. Wages declined by 39% in the same period, exacerbating widespread and social unrest. Chancellor Heinrich Brüning, appointed in March 1930, responded with deflationary austerity measures, including sharp cuts to wages, salaries, pensions, and , alongside tax increases to balance the budget and service . These policies, intended to restore fiscal credibility and avert reminiscent of 1923, instead intensified the by suppressing and prolonging , which doubled figures and fueled . Brüning's reliance on decrees bypassed the , eroding democratic legitimacy as centrist coalitions fractured; the Nazi Party's vote share surged from 2.6% in 1928 to 37.3% in July 1932 elections, capitalizing on economic despair. The Social Democrats and Communists gained initially but lost ground to the Nazis' promises of , amid and a breakdown in parliamentary governance. Historians note that Brüning's orthodox approach, while avoiding , amplified the Depression's severity compared to countries pursuing expansionary policies. Following Adolf Hitler's appointment as on January 30, 1933, the Nazi regime implemented aggressive reflation through programs, such as the Reichsarbeitsdienst and construction, financed via and mechanisms like to circumvent balanced-budget constraints. Rearmament, violating the , absorbed labor into arms production, while policies excluding women from the workforce and mandating conscripted service further reduced official unemployment rolls. These measures halved unemployment to 2.5 million by 1935 and near zero by 1938, alongside modest GDP growth averaging 8-10% annually from 1933-1936, though real wages stagnated and living standards were propped by suppressed consumption and autarkic trade controls. Economic historian attributes this "miracle" to state-directed investment prioritizing military buildup over sustainable civilian recovery, setting the stage for aggressive . While effective in restoring , the model relied on plunder from annexed territories by 1938 and suppressed dissent, illustrating how Depression-era desperation facilitated totalitarian consolidation.

United Kingdom

The United Kingdom experienced a severe but relatively contained economic contraction during the Great Depression, with falling sharply by approximately 5.5% between and 1931, driven by declining exports, industrial output, and investment amid global trade disruptions. surged from about 1.1 million in to over 3 million by late 1932, representing roughly 22% of the insured workforce, with particularly acute impacts in export-dependent heavy industries like , , , and textiles in , , and . These figures reflected structural vulnerabilities from Britain's return to the gold standard at pre-war parity in , which had overvalued the pound and eroded competitiveness, exacerbating the downturn when global demand collapsed after the crash. In response to a banking crisis and speculative attacks on the pound, the Labour government collapsed in August 1931, leading to form a National Government coalition with Conservatives and Liberals on 24 August 1931, which implemented initial measures including 10% cuts to and wages to balance the budget and defend the currency. Despite these efforts, reserves drained rapidly, forcing suspension of the gold standard on 21 September 1931; the pound immediately depreciated by about 25-30% against gold-backed currencies, enabling the to pursue expansionary with interest rates cut to 2% by 1932, fostering cheaper credit and stimulating domestic demand. This boosted net exports by improving price competitiveness—exports rose 20% in real terms by —and correlated with a decline in , as the adjustment directly reduced joblessness by an estimated 5-7 percentage points through trade channels. Fiscal and trade policies shifted toward after the 1931 election landslide for the National Government. The Import Duties Act of February 1932 imposed a 10% on most imports (except food from the ), while the Ottawa Agreements, negotiated at the Economic from July to August 1932, established preferential tariffs among and its dominions, reducing duties on intra-Empire trade by up to 50% in some cases and redirecting about 40% of British exports toward markets by the mid-1930s. These measures, combined with low interest rates, spurred a boom—over 2.5 million homes built between 1931 and 1939—and recovery in light industries, with GDP growth averaging 3-4% annually from 1932 to 1937, outpacing the . Unemployment fell to around 1.5-1.8 million by 1937, though regional disparities persisted, with the industrial north lagging behind the consumer-driven south. Social hardships fueled protests, including hunger marches by the National Unemployed Workers' Movement and the introduction of a stringent in 1931 that reduced benefits for those with assets or family support, affecting over a million claimants. The Crusade in October 1936 exemplified northern despair, as 200 unemployed shipyard workers marched 280 miles to with a signed by 11,000 locals, highlighting 70% in Jarrow after steelworks closures, though the government offered no special aid beyond general rearmament plans. Rearmament from 1936, prompted by rising geopolitical tensions, further aided recovery by absorbing labor into defense industries, reducing below 10% by 1939 without the deflationary rigidities that prolonged slumps elsewhere. Overall, Britain's exit from and pivot to and mild enabled swifter stabilization than gold-adherent nations, underscoring the causal role of monetary flexibility in mitigating depression-era contractions.

France

France initially weathered the initial waves of the Great Depression better than many industrial peers due to its large gold reserves and conservative monetary policy, but by 1931 the downturn intensified with a sharp contraction in exports from 52 billion francs in 1929 to 20 billion in 1932 (in current prices). Industrial production declined starting in June 1930, accompanied by falling consumer prices, marking the onset of deflationary pressures. The economy's average annual GDP growth slowed to 0.63% in the 1930s from 4.43% in the 1920s, reflecting prolonged stagnation rather than acute collapse. Adherence to the gold standard until September 1936 enforced deflationary orthodoxy, delaying recovery as resisted devaluation amid balance-of-payments strains and gold outflows. peaked in winter 1934–1935 and summer 1936 at levels below 5%, milder than in the United States or , with no systemic banking collapse but localized credit crunches from 1930 to 1932. Industrial output fell by up to 20% from 1929 peaks, concentrated in export-dependent sectors. Political fragmentation exacerbated economic rigidity, with short-lived governments prioritizing fiscal over . The coalition, led by and elected in May 1936, responded with labor reforms including a 40-hour workweek, two weeks' paid vacation, and mandates, fueled by widespread factory occupations. These supply-side measures, akin to U.S. cartels, aimed to raise wages and but triggered , , and strikes, undermining export competitiveness. Devaluation of the on September 26, 1936, ended gold convertibility, enabling monetary expansion and partial recovery, though social turmoil and policy reversals under subsequent governments limited gains until mobilization. reserves had dwindled 37% by 1936 from pre-devaluation levels, highlighting the unsustainability of prior defenses. The episode underscored how rigid exchange commitments amplified deflationary spirals, with linking bloc persistence to deeper, longer contractions compared to earlier abandoners.

Canada

Canada's economy contracted sharply during the Great Depression, with gross national product falling by more than 40% by 1933. Real GDP declined by over 10% in both 1931 and 1932, reaching a low point in 1933 before modest recovery began in 1934. Unemployment surged to approximately 27-30% of the labor force by 1933, remaining above 20% through much of the decade and exceeding 12% until the onset of mobilization in 1939. The downturn stemmed from Canada's heavy reliance on exports, particularly , whose global prices collapsed amid and reduced demand; prairie farmers faced compounded devastation from prolonged and storms starting in 1929, leading to , crop failures, and the abandonment or loss of nearly 750,000 farms by the late . These environmental shocks, exacerbated by farming practices on marginal lands, created a "" analogous to the Midwest, displacing populations and deepening rural poverty in , , and . Under R.B. Bennett's Conservative government (1930-1935), initial responses emphasized , including sharp increases in 1930 to shield domestic industries, though these measures curtailed and failed to revive exports. The and Farm Relief Act of 1931 allocated $28 million for direct aid to the jobless and agricultural sectors, supplemented by federal transfers to provinces for relief, but municipal and provincial funding shortfalls limited effectiveness. Bennett established transient relief camps in 1932 for single unemployed men, employing them in remote forestry and infrastructure projects to reduce urban unrest, though conditions were harsh and strikes ensued. Facing political pressure, Bennett introduced "" reforms in January 1935, including bills for unemployment insurance, minimum wages, a 48-hour workweek, and progressive taxation, modeled partly on U.S. initiatives; however, most were invalidated by the Judicial Committee of the or lacked implementation before the 1935 election defeat. The Liberal government of , elected in 1935, pursued limited fiscal expansion and constitutional amendments to enable federal intervention, but economic recovery remained sluggish, hampered by balanced-budget orthodoxy and provincial resistance. Provincial experiments, such as Alberta's measures under (1935 onward), attempted and but faced legal challenges and mixed outcomes. Sustained rebound occurred only with wartime production demands; national unemployment insurance was enacted in 1940, alongside industrial mobilization that absorbed labor and boosted output. The Depression thus exposed structural vulnerabilities in Canada's export-dependent, agrarian economy, prompting postwar commitments to social safety nets while underscoring the limits of domestic policy absent global demand recovery.

Australia and New Zealand

Australia's export-dependent economy, centered on , , and other primary commodities, began contracting in 1928 amid falling global prices, with the 1929 crash intensifying the downturn through halted overseas lending and collapsed . Real GDP fell by about 10 percent in 1930-31, while national income declined by roughly one-third over the period. Unemployment surged from 10 percent in mid-1929 to a peak of 32 percent in mid-1932, with factory output dropping nearly 10 percent in 1929-30 alone. Federal and state leaders responded with the Premiers' Plan in June 1931, endorsing deflationary orthodoxy: 20 percent reductions in spending, 10 percent wage cuts across sectors, increased taxes, and conversion of short-term internal debt to longer terms to achieve balanced budgets and creditor confidence. Critics, including some economists, contended these measures deepened contraction by suppressing demand, though defenders credited them with averting default on external obligations. New South Wales Premier Jack 's rival "Lang Plan," proposing suspension of overseas interest payments and debt repudiation, was deemed unconstitutional and led to his removal by the Governor in May 1932. Signs of recovery emerged in 1932-33, driven primarily by Australia's devaluation of the by approximately 30 percent in 1931—preceding sterling's abandonment of —which enhanced export competitiveness and supported rural incomes as and prices rebounded modestly. Complementary tariffs raised effective rates, shielding manufacturing, while limited fiscal expansion via loan-funded works followed. declined steadily but remained above 20 percent until 1935, with pre-Depression employment levels not restored until mobilization. Empirical analyses attribute much of the upturn to devaluation and over initial fiscal restraint. New Zealand, similarly vulnerable to commodity export slumps in dairy, meat, and wool, saw exports contract 45 percent from 1929 to 1931 and national income fall 40 percent, amplifying and bank strains. estimates peaked at 15-30 percent in 1933, with official rates around 12-15 percent understating totals as many registered for relief work under punitive conditions, including remote labor camps. High pre-existing public , exceeding 170 percent of GDP, constrained options amid frozen overseas capital inflows. The United-Reform coalition under George Forbes pursued from 1930, slashing wages by up to 20 percent, trimming pay, and funding relief via ad hoc and sustenance allowances that prioritized family men but fostered unrest, including riots and the Unemployed Workers' Movement demanding better aid. No centralized unemployment insurance existed, leaving local bodies overburdened. The Labour Party's landslide victory in November 1935 shifted policy toward reflation: Michael Joseph Savage's administration reversed wage cuts, enacted a 40-hour workweek, guaranteed minimum family benefits, and launched expansive , state housing, and social security via the 1938 , financed partly by progressive taxation and Reserve Bank credit. These interventions boosted domestic demand and employment, coinciding with export recovery, though sustained growth awaited wartime demands; unemployment fell below 10 percent by 1938.

Japan

Japan's return to the gold standard on January 11, 1930, at the pre-World War I parity rate overvalued the yen by approximately 50-60% against major currencies, exacerbating deflationary pressures amid the global downturn. Industrial production declined by only 6% from levels to its 1931 trough, a milder compared to 47% in or 40% in . Real GDP fell modestly in 1930-1931, with the Showa Depression largely confined to those two years, contrasting with prolonged slumps elsewhere. Agricultural sectors suffered acutely from falling rice prices due to overproduction and poor 1931 harvests, leading to widespread rural bankruptcies, malnutrition, and social distress; farmers' incomes plummeted, prompting some to sell daughters into servitude amid famine-like conditions in regions like Tohoku. Urban unemployment rose, though official figures understated it due to limited social safety nets, fueling labor unrest and peasant uprisings that pressured the government toward expansionary measures. On December 13, 1931, Japan suspended gold convertibility under Finance Minister , devaluing the yen by 60% against the U.S. dollar and 44% against the British pound, which reversed and enabled monetary expansion through note issuance. Accompanying fiscal stimulus, including deficit-financed military expenditures and , boosted ; banknote circulation grew at 7% annually from 1932-1936, supporting 5.9% real GDP growth over the same period. Exports surged post-devaluation, particularly silk and textiles to the , aiding industrial recovery; by 1937, industrial production reached 175% of 1929 levels, outpacing Western economies still below pre-Depression peaks. Overall GDP expanded at 6.1% annually from 1930-1937, driven by Takahashi's coordinated , loose , and fiscal activism, which monetized without immediate inflationary crisis. Economic recovery intertwined with militarism; rural distress and urban discontent bolstered ultranationalist factions, culminating in the 1931 Manchurian invasion for resource access and the 1932 assassination of , accelerating army dominance. Takahashi's policies, while effective in ending the slump, financed imperial expansion, setting the stage for wartime economy by mid-decade.

Latin America

Latin American economies, predominantly export-oriented and dependent on primary commodities such as coffee from , beef and wheat from , oil from , and copper from , experienced acute shocks from the global demand collapse after the 1929 Wall Street crash. Commodity prices fell sharply, with export values declining by over 50 percent in many countries between 1929 and 1932, exacerbating balance-of-payments crises and depleting . Terms of trade deteriorated as export prices dropped faster than import prices, leading to reduced fiscal revenues and widespread in export-dependent sectors; real GDP contracted by about 10 percent in and from 1929 to 1933, while saw a 37 percent plunge, among the region's most severe. In response, governments across the region swiftly abandoned the gold standard—often by 1931—to allow currency devaluation, which improved export competitiveness and stemmed reserve outflows. , for example, cut imports by 75 percent from $416.6 million in to $108.6 million in 1932, while exports declined less proportionally, enabling a trade surplus that supported recovery; the Vargas administration (seizing power in 1930) subsidized producers by stockpiling and destroying surpluses to stabilize prices. Similar interventions occurred elsewhere: imposed exchange controls and debt moratoriums in 1931, nationalized oil resources amid falling revenues, and diversified into state-led mining. These measures reflected a causal shift from export-led —previously stimulated by foreign —to inward-oriented policies, including high tariffs and quotas to protect nascent industries. This policy pivot laid the groundwork for (ISI), prioritizing domestic production of consumer goods to replace imports and conserve foreign currency. Larger economies like , , , and led in experimentation, with governments investing in , utilities, and through state enterprises and fiscal incentives; by the mid-1930s, industrial output began rising, contributing to shallower and shorter contractions compared to industrialized nations, as primary export supply elasticities allowed quicker adjustments. However, ISI's early reliance on fostered inefficiencies and urban-rural imbalances, though it initially boosted and output amid global . Recovery accelerated by 1933–1934 as devalued currencies and diversified partners mitigated the downturn, underscoring the role of monetary flexibility over rigid adherence to pre-Depression .

Soviet Union

The Soviet Union's centrally insulated it from the direct shocks of the global Great Depression, as foreign trade constituted less than 5% of national income in 1928 and declined further amid autarkic policies that prioritized self-sufficiency over market integration. This isolation stemmed from the abandonment of the in 1928, which had allowed limited private enterprise, in favor of total state control under the (1928–1932), aimed at transforming the agrarian economy into an industrial powerhouse through forced resource allocation. Industrial production surged under the plan, with official figures reporting annual growth rates exceeding 20% in heavy sectors like , , and machinery by , enabling the USSR to emerge as a leading producer of oil, , and by the mid-1930s. estimates adjust these to more modest but still positive rates of 5–7% annual national income growth from 1928 to 1937, contrasting sharply with contractions in Western economies, though such metrics emphasized gross output over or quality adjustments. The Second (1933–1937) sustained this momentum, focusing on expanding consumer goods and , but prioritized military-related industries amid rising geopolitical tensions. Agricultural collectivization, enforced from 1929 to 1933, underpinned industrialization by consolidating over 200,000 peasant households into state-controlled kolkhozy and sovkhozy, extracting grain surpluses for export to purchase foreign machinery despite domestic shortages. This policy triggered widespread resistance, including the slaughter of livestock—reducing the horse population by 50% and cattle by one-third between 1929 and 1933—and culminated in the 1932–1933 , which caused 5–7 million deaths across , , and other regions due to requisition quotas, seed confiscations, and export mandates totaling 1.8 million tons of grain in 1932–1933. Grain output fell to 68.4 million tons in 1932 from 83.5 million in 1928, reflecting not only policy-induced disruption but also underlying inefficiencies in coerced labor systems. The Depression indirectly aided Soviet development by drawing skilled labor from the West; for instance, in 1931, Soviet agencies received over 100,000 applications for 6,000 engineering positions, facilitating technology transfers in sectors like automotive and production. However, growth masked severe human and efficiency costs, including until 1935, urban food shortages, and the system's expansion to provide forced labor for projects like the , completed in 1933 at the expense of tens of thousands of lives. Soviet touted immunity to capitalist crises as proof of socialism's superiority, but reveals expansion from a low pre-industrial base via extractive coercion rather than productive innovation, with living standards lagging far behind even depressed Western levels.

Long-Term Legacy

Institutional Changes: Banking and Monetary Systems

The collapse of thousands of banks during the early 1930s, with over 9,000 failures between 1930 and 1933 wiping out depositors' savings, prompted major institutional reforms to stabilize the financial system. In the United States, the Banking Act of 1933, signed into law on June 16 by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, introduced key changes including the separation of commercial and investment banking activities to prevent speculative risks from affecting depositors. This legislation prohibited commercial banks from underwriting or dealing in securities, aiming to curb the practices that exacerbated the 1929 crash and subsequent panics. A core provision of the 1933 Act was the establishment of the (FDIC) as an independent agency to insure deposits up to $2,500 initially, later increased, thereby restoring public confidence and reducing the incidence of bank runs. The FDIC's creation directly addressed the absence of deposit protection that had amplified panics, as evidenced by regional crises in 1930-1931 escalating into a nationwide collapse by early 1933. Prior to this, the Federal Reserve's limited lender-of-last-resort actions under the 1932 Banking Act had proven insufficient to halt the systemic failures. On the monetary front, the Great Depression accelerated the global abandonment of the gold standard, which constrained central banks' ability to expand money supplies amid deflationary pressures. suspended convertibility in September 1931, followed by in late 1931 and the in 1933 via , which prohibited private gold ownership and devalued the dollar by raising the official price from $20.67 to $35 per ounce under the Gold Reserve Act of 1934. This shift enabled discretionary monetary policies, with countries leaving gold earlier experiencing faster recoveries through currency depreciation and . Internationally, the (), founded in 1930 under the to manage German , evolved into a for coordination, facilitating discussions on monetary stability amid the crisis. These changes marked a transition from rigid gold-backed systems to more flexible fiat-oriented frameworks, influencing post-war institutions like Bretton Woods, though the 's role during was limited by geopolitical tensions. Overall, the reforms emphasized government intervention in banking supervision and monetary control, reducing future panic risks but expanding central authority over credit allocation.

Political Realignments and Totalitarianism Risks

![Adolf Hitler at an NSDAP event in Rosenheim][float-right] The Great Depression catalyzed profound political realignments, shifting voter coalitions toward parties promising economic relief and state intervention, while heightening risks of totalitarian regimes in vulnerable democracies. In the United States, the crisis eroded Republican dominance established since the 1920s, culminating in Franklin D. Roosevelt's landslide victory over incumbent Herbert Hoover in the November 8, 1932, presidential election, where Democrats secured overwhelming majorities in Congress for the first time since the Civil War era. This realignment forged a durable Democratic coalition encompassing urban laborers, ethnic minorities, Southern whites, and intellectuals, sustained by New Deal policies that expanded federal welfare and regulatory powers, marking a pivot from laissez-faire traditions without descending into authoritarianism. In , economic collapse undermined liberal democratic institutions, fostering support for radical ideologies that exploited public disillusionment with parliamentary gridlock and measures. Germany's exemplified these risks: unemployment soared to approximately 30% by 1932, correlating with the Nazi Party's (NSDAP) electoral surge from 2.6% of the vote in 1928 to 37.3% in the July 1932 election, enabling Adolf Hitler's appointment as chancellor on January 30, 1933. policies, including fiscal tightening amid frozen reparations, amplified Nazi gains in Protestant rural districts and among the fearful of , as voters prioritized promises of employment and national revival over democratic norms. Historians attribute this trajectory partly to the Depression's exacerbation of Versailles Treaty resentments and legacies, though pre-existing polarization and elite miscalculations also facilitated the totalitarian shift. Elsewhere, similar dynamics propelled authoritarian consolidations: in , Benito Mussolini's fascist regime, entrenched since 1922, leveraged Depression-era hardships to intensify corporatist controls and suppress dissent, while in and , economic distress fueled civil strife and dictatorships. These cases underscore causal mechanisms where prolonged mass —exceeding 20% in affected nations—erodes faith in and representative government, incentivizing demagogues offering illusory certainties through centralized power, a pattern absent in the U.S. due to its federal resilience and Roosevelt's reformist containment. Empirical analyses confirm that districts with sharper downturns exhibited disproportionate extremist vote swings, highlighting totalitarianism's latent vulnerability in crises absent timely democratic adaptations.

Lessons for Modern Policy and Myth Debunking

The 's failure to expand the money supply during the early 1930s exacerbated banking panics and , contracting the money stock by approximately one-third between 1929 and 1933, which transformed a into a severe depression. This monetary contraction, rather than the 1929 alone, was the primary driver of the downturn's depth, as the crash preceded the 's onset in August 1929 and synchronized with tightening. A key lesson for modern central banks is the necessity of aggressive liquidity provision and serving as a to avert systemic bank runs, as demonstrated by the contrasting actions during the where rapid interventions prevented a similar collapse. Contrary to the myth of Herbert Hoover's inaction, his administration pursued significant interventions, including the in 1932 to lend to banks and businesses, voluntary wage and via conferences with industry leaders, and federal spending increases of 48 percent that funded and pledges totaling billions from utilities and railroads. These measures, intended to stabilize the economy, instead distorted price signals and , illustrating a lesson that government coordination of wages and production can rigidify labor markets and hinder adjustment. For contemporary policy, this underscores the risks of micro-managing sectoral agreements over flexible , favoring instead targeted support without broad controls. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, raising duties on over 20,000 imported goods to record levels, provoked retaliatory tariffs from trading partners and contributed to a 66 percent collapse in global trade volume by 1933, though its passage occurred after the Depression's initial contraction and amplified rather than initiated the downturn. Empirical analysis indicates tariffs accounted for about 5 percent of U.S. output loss, secondary to domestic monetary failures, debunking claims of it as the singular cause while highlighting the modern imperative to avoid protectionist escalations that compound recessions through reduced exports and higher input costs. Franklin D. Roosevelt's policies, particularly the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) of 1933 which cartelized industries and enforced above-market wages, prolonged the Depression by an estimated 7 years according to econometric models, as rigidities prevented output recovery to 1929 levels until 1939 despite . Real GDP growth averaged only 0.8 percent annually from 1933 to 1939, with lingering above 14 percent, suggesting fiscal multipliers were low and that wartime mobilization, not programs, drove full recovery. This challenges the narrative of efficacy, emphasizing for today's policymakers the pitfalls of industrial codes and wage mandates that suppress employment, and the value of prioritizing monetary easing and over expansive fiscal interventions with uncertain offsets. Broader lessons include the benefits of international monetary coordination to share recovery burdens, as unilateral devaluations and adherence deepened global deflation, contrasting with post-2008 G20 commitments that mitigated spillover effects. Additionally, avoiding premature policy normalization—such as the 1937 tightening that induced a within the Depression—reinforces the need for sustained expansionary measures until sustained growth is evident. These insights, drawn from monetary histories and counterfactual analyses, prioritize causal mechanisms like and trade flows over interventionist panaceas often overstated in politically aligned narratives.

Historiography and Comparisons

Evolution of Scholarly Interpretations

Early scholarly interpretations of the Great Depression emphasized structural and monetary factors rooted in pre-existing imbalances. Contemporary economists like , in his 1933 paper "The Debt-Deflation Theory of Great Depressions," argued that a combination of over-indebtedness from the credit boom and subsequent created a vicious cycle: falling prices increased real debt burdens, prompting forced asset sales, further price declines, and contractions in net worth, output, and employment. Austrian School economists, including and , attributed the downturn to artificial credit expansion by the in the , which distorted investment patterns and led to unsustainable malinvestments; they viewed the Depression as a necessary liquidation phase to reallocate resources, warning against interventions that would prolong distortions. The publication of John Maynard Keynes's The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money in 1936 marked a pivotal shift, framing the Depression as primarily a of insufficient due to pessimistic expectations, sticky wages, and liquidity traps, rather than supply-side or monetary rigidities alone. Keynes advocated countercyclical fiscal and monetary policies to boost spending and restore equilibrium, influencing interpretations that downplayed market self-correction in favor of government stabilization. This demand-side view gained prominence during , aligning with policies, though empirical evidence of recovery timing—such as the U.S. economy's rebound coinciding more with monetary post-1933 than fiscal outlays—remained debated. Post-World War II, a Keynesian consensus dominated academic and policy circles through the , portraying the Depression as evidence of inherent capitalist instability requiring active to avert chronic ; this era's textbooks often attributed causes to , wage rigidities, and inadequate , sidelining earlier monetary analyses amid a prevailing view that fiscal multipliers were key to the incomplete recovery. Challenges emerged in the late 1950s and with monetarist critiques, notably and Anna Schwartz's 1963 A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960, which used empirical data to demonstrate the Federal Reserve's failure to act as , allowing bank failures to contract the by approximately one-third between and , amplifying the initial downturn into a prolonged . Their shifted to errors in monetary control, arguing that orthodox money stock maintenance could have mitigated severity, as evidenced by correlations between money supply drops and output falls exceeding those in prior panics. Subsequent decades saw diversification, with Austrian perspectives revived in Murray Rothbard's 1963 America's Great Depression, reiterating credit-fueled booms as the root cause and critiquing and interventions for distorting liquidation. By the 1980s, a partial formed around multiple interacting factors—, Smoot-Hawley tariffs, banking fragility, and constraints—but monetarist evidence underscored inaction as central to propagation, influencing modern central banking doctrines like . Real models in the 1980s posited supply shocks, yet empirical studies reaffirmed monetary transmission's role, with Fisher's debt-deflation mechanism integrated into analyses of balance sheet recessions. Contemporary scholarship, informed by cliometric data, rejects monocausal narratives, emphasizing empirical validation over ideological priors, though debates persist on intervention efficacy given the Depression's global scope and varied national recoveries.

Naming Conventions and Other Depressions

The term "depression" entered economic lexicon in the early 19th century to denote a sustained decline in economic activity, evoking a state of lowered vitality akin to medical depression, and was applied to downturns without the later distinction of milder "recessions," which emerged post-1930s to describe shorter contractions. Prior to the 1930s crisis, all major U.S. economic slumps—regardless of scale—were commonly labeled depressions, reflecting a era when such terms lacked the precise quantitative thresholds used today, such as a 10% GDP drop or multi-year duration. The 1929–1939 downturn earned the qualifier "Great" to underscore its unprecedented depth—U.S. GDP fell by approximately 30% from peak to trough—and longevity, surpassing prior episodes in industrialized economies; this naming gained traction amid the crisis's persistence, with U.S. President publicly adopting "depression" by November 1931 to characterize the slump's severity. British economist formalized the phrase in his 1934 book The Great Depression, analyzing the event's global scope and critiquing policy responses, which helped cement its usage over alternatives like "Hoover Depression" or mere "Crash of '29". The designation distinguished it from earlier downturns, though contemporaries sometimes invoked "great" hyperbolically for 19th-century events; by the late , as began, the term solidified in and scholarly discourse without implying positivity, but rather exceptional magnitude relative to historical benchmarks. Numerous depressions preceded the 1930s event, often triggered by banking panics, speculative bubbles, or monetary contractions, providing context for why the later crisis warranted the "great" prefix through metrics like unemployment peaks exceeding 20% and deflationary spirals unmatched in prior U.S. history.
  • Panic of 1837 and ensuing depression (1837–1843): Sparked by speculative land bubbles, federal specie circular policies restricting banknotes, and British trade contractions, this led to over 600 bank failures, unemployment rates estimated at 25% in urban areas, and a six-year GDP contraction of roughly 30%, marking one of the longest pre-1930s slumps.
  • Long Depression (1873–1879, extending variably to 1896): Initiated by the Panic of 1873 amid railroad overinvestment and European financial strains from the Franco-Prussian War, it featured deflation of 1–2% annually, industrial output drops of up to 20% in affected sectors, and global trade stagnation; contemporaries occasionally dubbed it a "great depression" due to its multi-decade price declines, though real output recovered unevenly.
  • Panic of 1893 and depression (1893–1897): Driven by railroad failures, silver overproduction eroding gold reserves, and agricultural distress, this caused 500 bank closures, unemployment nearing 18%, and a 15% GDP fall, exacerbating farm foreclosures in the Midwest and South.
These episodes, while severe, generally lacked the synchronized global banking collapses and policy-induced contractions—such as adherence to the gold standard—that amplified the downturn, justifying its elevated nomenclature.

Parallels with the Great Recession and Recent Crises

The Great Depression and the of 2007–2009 shared origins in financial instability, including asset price collapses and banking sector vulnerabilities, though the latter stemmed from a housing market bubble fueled by rather than the stock market speculation of . In both cases, credit contraction amplified the downturn: U.S. real GDP fell by approximately 29% from to during the Depression, compared to a 4.3% decline from peak to trough in the Great Recession. Unemployment peaked at over 25% in versus 10% in October 2009, reflecting similar mechanisms of and reduced lending but differing in scale due to the Recession's more contained . Deflationary pressures emerged in both, with consumer prices dropping about 25% in the early Depression years and brief in 2009, eroding burdens and discouraging spending.
IndicatorGreat Depression (1929–1933)Great Recession (2007–2009)
Real GDP Decline~29%~4.3%
Peak Unemployment25% (1933)10% (2009)
Duration of Contraction~4 years~18 months
Policy responses diverged sharply, informed by Depression-era errors. The Federal Reserve's passive stance in the 1930s, allowing the money supply to shrink by one-third, exacerbated bank failures and output collapse, whereas in 2008 it implemented aggressive , injecting trillions in liquidity and lowering rates to near zero to stabilize markets. Fiscal interventions also contrasted: limited under versus the $800 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in , which, alongside automatic stabilizers, mitigated deeper contraction but drew criticism for inefficiency in allocation. These measures prevented a Depression-scale repeat, underscoring causal lessons in averting monetary contraction as a primary of financial shocks. Parallels extend to the 2020 , the sharpest quarterly GDP drop since 1947 at 31.2% annualized in Q2 2020, evoking Depression-era supply disruptions and surges to 14.8% in April 2020, though demand-side fiscal outlays exceeding $5 trillion enabled a rapid rebound absent in . Unlike the Depression's endogenous banking crisis, the pandemic involved exogenous shutdowns, yet both featured government-induced contractions—lockdowns mirroring early production controls—and risks of prolonged scarring from labor market mismatches. Subsequent spikes post-2021, reaching 9.1% in June 2022, highlighted parallels to 1930s commodity volatility but were driven more by expansionary overshoot than the Depression's deflationary spiral, with central banks raising rates to combat demand excesses rather than tolerating contraction. These crises illustrate recurring vulnerabilities to leverage and policy lags, yet empirical evidence affirms that proactive monetary expansion, absent in 1929–1933, has consistently shortened modern downturns.

References

  1. [1]
    The Great Depression - Federal Reserve History
    The Depression lasted a decade, beginning in 1929 and ending during World War II. Industrial production plummeted. Unemployment soared. Families suffered.Missing: GDP credible
  2. [2]
    Great Depression Economic Impact: How Bad Was It? | St. Louis Fed
    Real GDP fell 29% from 1929 to 1933. · The unemployment rate reached a peak of 25% in 1933. · Consumer prices fell 25%; wholesale prices plummeted 32%. · Some ...Missing: global | Show results with:global
  3. [3]
    Yes, monetary policy did cause the Great Depression - Econlib
    Dec 8, 2021 · Friedman's claim that monetary policy caused the Depression was central to his whole argument that governments, not the private sector, are ...
  4. [4]
    The Great Depression According to Milton Friedman - FEE.org
    Sep 1, 2007 · Whereas Friedman and Schwartz accepted that the bubble was caused by investors, seemingly endorsing—at least partly—the Keynesian “animal ...
  5. [5]
    Global Depression - International Monetary Fund (IMF)
    World unemployment peaked at nearly 30% in 1932 and remained in double digits through the decade. · German and US production dropped to 53% of their 1929 levels.
  6. [6]
    The Great Depression: An Unprecedented International Economic ...
    Between 1929 and 1932, global economic output declined by 10%. Wide variation around this average existed, with the United States experiencing a 25% decline in ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The great depression and the Friedman-Schwartz hypothesis
    First, there is a general consensus that the Great Depression was a consequence of the interaction of several shocks with financial markets, labor markets, and ...
  8. [8]
    Great Depression Facts - FDR Presidential Library & Museum
    Wage income for workers who were lucky enough to have kept their jobs fell 42.5% between 1929 and 1933. It was the worst economic disaster in American history.Missing: GDP credible
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Compensation from before World War I through the Great Depression
    Jan 30, 2003 · From an estimated annual rate of 3.3 percent during 1923-29, the unemployment rate rose to a peak of about 25 percent in. 1933. The economy ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    The Fed - Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17
    Jan 18, 2019 · Manufacturing IP shows a particularly sharp decline during the Great Depression of the early 1930s, but it recovers by the end of the decade.
  11. [11]
    Banking Panics of 1930-31 - Federal Reserve History
    When the crises began, over 8,000 commercial banks belonged to the Federal Reserve System, but nearly 16,000 did not. Those nonmember banks operated in an ...
  12. [12]
    The Great Depression | Boundless World History - Lumen Learning
    Between 1929 and 1932, worldwide GDP fell by an estimated 15%. By comparison, worldwide GDP fell by less than 1% from 2008 to 2009 during the Great Recession.
  13. [13]
    What Is the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act? History, Effect, and Reaction
    The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 increased import tariffs by about 20%, kicking off a global trade war that contributed to the Great Depression's ill effects ...The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act · Effect of the Great Crash of 1929 · Global Reaction
  14. [14]
    The Smoot-Hawley Tariff and the Great Depression - Cato Institute
    May 7, 2016 · From 1929 to 1932, U.S. imports from Germany fell by $181 million; U.S. exports to Germany fell by $277 million. Americans also had little use ...
  15. [15]
    The end of the gold standard and the beginning of the recovery from ...
    Apr 7, 2024 · Britain was one of these early leavers, abandoning the gold standard in September 1931. Like other nations, in 1931 Britain was in the depths of ...
  16. [16]
    The Gold Standard of the 1930s and the Euro today - Investment Office
    The evidence shows that countries that left the gold standard recovered from the Depression more quickly than countries that remained on gold.
  17. [17]
    The Great Depression in Global Perspective - Digital History
    It did not drop below 14 percent until 1941. The Great Depression transformed the American political and economic landscape.Missing: GDP | Show results with:GDP
  18. [18]
    The Great Depression and U.S. Foreign Policy - Office of the Historian
    The Great Depression caused the United States Government to pull back from major international involvement during the 1930s.
  19. [19]
    How Did the Gold Standard Contribute to the Great Depression?
    May 8, 2018 · European countries began to abandon the gold standard​​ Great Britain became the first to drop off the gold standard in 1931. Other countries ...
  20. [20]
    The Depression of 1920-1921: Why Historians—and Economists ...
    Jul 15, 2021 · By one estimate, output fell by 8.7 percent in real terms. (For comparison, output fell by 4.3 percent in the Great Recession of 2007-2009).
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Postwar Economic Perspectives 1. Experience After World War I
    The downturn in wholesale prices came 6 months later. By the autumn of 1920 a severe industrial depression had developed. Factory employment dropped 30 percent ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    In the Shadow of the Slump: The Depression of 1920-1921
    Mar 18, 2021 · The 1920-1921 depression saw a 32.5% production drop, 15% price plunge, 12% unemployment, and 47% stock price drop, lasting 18 months.Missing: 1918-1922 | Show results with:1918-1922
  23. [23]
    The Forgotten Depression 1921: The Crash That Cured Itself
    Jun 2, 2015 · A powerful, job-filled recovery followed: In 1922, industrial production leapt by 26%, domestic auto and truck production by 63%.
  24. [24]
    The U.S. Economy in the 1920s – EH.net
    Despite the 1920-1921 depression and the minor interruptions in 1924 and 1927, the American economy exhibited impressive economic growth during the 1920s.
  25. [25]
    How Economic Turmoil After WWI Led to the Great Depression
    Feb 12, 2019 · World War I's legacy of debt, protectionism and crippling reparations set the stage for a global economic disaster.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] The Great Depression as a credit boom gone wrong - BIS Working ...
    In this paper we ask how well quantitative measures of the credit boom phenomenon can explain the uneven expansion of the 1920s and the slump of the 1930s. We.
  27. [27]
    Stock Market Crash of 1929 | Federal Reserve History
    On Black Monday, October 28, 1929, the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined nearly 13 percent. Federal Reserve leaders differed on how to respond to the event ...
  28. [28]
    Economic problems in the 1920s - CCEA - BBC
    Overproduction and underconsumption of agricultural products meant that farm income fell from $22 billion in 1919 to $13 billion in 1929. Three million ...
  29. [29]
    Stock market crash of 1929 | Summary, Causes, & Facts - Britannica
    Oct 3, 2025 · Stock market crash of 1929, a sharp decline in US stock market values in 1929 that contributed to the Great Depression of the 1930s.
  30. [30]
    The 1929 Stock Market Crash – EH.net - Economic History Association
    A second probable cause was the great expansion of investment trusts, public utility holding companies, and the amount of margin buying, all of which fueled the ...
  31. [31]
    Great Depression - Stock Market Crash, Unemployment, Poverty
    In 1928 and 1929, the Federal Reserve had raised interest rates in hopes of slowing the rapid rise in stock prices.
  32. [32]
    Stock market crashes on Black Tuesday | October 29, 1929 | HISTORY
    Jul 21, 2010 · Black Tuesday hits Wall Street on October 29, 1929 as investors trade 16,410,030 shares on the New York Stock Exchange in a single day.
  33. [33]
    Great Depression Case - Economics Department - Reed College
    The most commonly cited indicator of business cycles, the unemployment rate, rose from 3.2% of the labor force in 1929 to 24.9% in 1933. Unemployment fell to ...
  34. [34]
    Great Depression | Definition, History, Dates, Causes, Effects, & Facts
    The Great Depression was a worldwide economic downturn that began in 1929 and lasted until about 1939. It was the longest and most severe depression ever ...Economic impact · Political movements and social... · Causes of the declineMissing: credible | Show results with:credible
  35. [35]
    Causes of deflation - Economics Help
    Sep 24, 2017 · One major cause of the US deflation was a fall in the money supply following the failure of many banks in the aftermath of the Wall St crash and ...
  36. [36]
    1930–1939 | FDIC.gov
    May 15, 2025 · The number of bank failures, deposits of failed banks, and currency held by the public increased sharply from September to October. Unlike the ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    The Great Depression: Where Was the Fed?
    In this video about the Great Depression, expert David Wheelock of the St. Louis Fed describes the Federal Reserve's failure to respond to the banking crisis.
  38. [38]
    Banking Panics of 1931-33 | Federal Reserve History
    Although the external drain on the US gold stock ended by late October, bank failures continued. ... failed, and the entire global financial system would have ...Missing: numbers | Show results with:numbers
  39. [39]
    How Bank Failures Contributed to the Great Depression - History.com
    May 13, 2021 · By 1933, dozen eggs cost only 13 cents, down from 50 cents in 1929. Banks failed—between a third and half of all U.S. financial institutions ...
  40. [40]
    Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act - Overview, Legislative History, Impact
    The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act raised around 900 import tariffs by an average of 40% to 60%. Also referred to as the United States Tariff Act of 1930.
  41. [41]
    The Senate Passes the Smoot-Hawley Tariff
    It was on June 13, 1930, that the Senate passed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, among the most catastrophic acts in congressional history.Missing: collapse | Show results with:collapse
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Tariffs and the Great Depression Revisited
    Real exports declined by almost 50% between 1929 and 1933 while real GNP declined by about 30% over the same period.<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    [PDF] The Smoot-Hawley Trade War
    The Smoot-Hawley trade war began after the US adopted the Smoot-Hawley tariff in June 1930, leading to retaliatory tariffs and a significant drop in US exports.
  44. [44]
    Milestones: 1921–1936: Protectionism in the Interwar Period
    Smoot-Hawley marked the end of the line for high tariffs in 20th century American trade policy. Thereafter, beginning with the 1934 Reciprocal Trade Agreements ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Vanishing World Trade | Foreign Affairs
    THE total value of world trade in 1932 was less than 39 percent of what it had been in 1929. Except for seasonal variations it had declined continuously from ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] The Smoot-Hawley Tariff: A Quantitative Assessment
    The Smoot-Hawley tariff revision, by itself, did not raise the relative price of imports enough to account for most of the tremendous collapse in imports. But ...
  47. [47]
    Did tariffs cause the Great Depression? Here's what to know - NPR
    Mar 6, 2025 · The tariffs implemented under the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act worsened the Great Depression, Richardson, Clarke and Witcher say. These tariffs also ...
  48. [48]
    Monetary Policy and the Great Crash of 1929: A Bursting Bubble or ...
    Mar 26, 1999 · Motivated by a concern about speculation in the stock market, the Fed responded aggressively. Between January and July 1928 the Fed raised the ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Monetary Policy in the Great Depression: What the Fed Did, and Why
    According to Friedman and Schwartz (1963), pp. 394-99, however, the Fed permitted gold out- flows during the Depression to reduce bank reserves and the money ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Friedman and Schwartz's Monetary Explanation of the Great ...
    Dec 31, 2012 · Friedman and Schwartz also suggest that there were other exogenous monetary shocks between 1929 and 1933, though they are vague about the number ...
  51. [51]
    The Great Depression and the Friedman-Schwartz Hypothesis
    We evaluate the Friedman-Schwartz hypothesis that a more accommodative monetary policy could have greatly reduced the severity of the Great Depression.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] The Gold Standard and the Great Depression | MIT Economics
    ... in 1929) and Britain's commitment to convertibility (abandoned in. 1931). Wages were less flexible after World War One in other countries as well. Borchardt.
  53. [53]
    Monetary Policy Regimes, the Gold Standard, and the Great ...
    The techniques and doctrine of monetary policies developed under the gold standard proved insufficient for achieving economic stability during the interwar ...
  54. [54]
    The Gold Standard and the international dimension of the Great ...
    Nov 7, 2023 · The Gold Standard turns out to be a strong transmission mechanism of monetary shocks from the USA to the rest of the world.
  55. [55]
    Transmission of the Great Depression
    The first half of this paper will describe current thinking about the relationship between the gold standard and the Great Depression. The second half of ...Missing: constraints mechanisms
  56. [56]
    Recovering from economic depressions
    Jan 23, 2024 · Many economists believe that leaving the gold standard was a necessary first step to putting an end to the Great Depression.Missing: abandoning | Show results with:abandoning
  57. [57]
    [PDF] The Gold Standard, Deflation, and Financial Crisis in the Great ...
    Countries abandoning full gold standard in 1931. Austria. Canada ... 49 Financial Crisis in the Great Depression was true for other countries. The yield ...
  58. [58]
    The Collapse of the Creditanstalt Bank - Finaeon
    Jan 5, 2019 · The collapse of the Creditanstalt is seen as the trigger to the great deflationary spiral in Europe between 1931 and 1933.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] The Austrian Banking Crisis Of 1931 - LSE Research Online
    1920s they did not perform well, and made the universal banks insolvent. The. Credit-Anstalt, which became an 'acquirer of last resort' for weak universal banks.<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Transatlantic Contagion During the Financial Crisis of 1931
    The Creditanstalt's collapse triggered the crisis that spread throughout Europe.
  61. [61]
    How failing banks paved Hitler's path to power: Financial crisis and ...
    Mar 15, 2019 · The crisis was triggered by the collapse of Danatbank, one of Germany's four big universal banks.
  62. [62]
    The German crisis of 1931: evidence and tradition | Cliometrica
    May 5, 2007 · The German crisis in the summer of 1931 was a key moment in the growing depression. It led to further currency crises and problems and to an ever-deepening ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Fetters of Debt, Deposit, or Gold during the Great Depression? The ...
    Bank distress peaked in the weeks following the German panic. The banking crisis struck the central money market of the United States more than a month before.<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    THE 1931 STERLING CRISIS — Bill Janeway
    Britain abandoned the gold standard in September 1931 in the context of a multidimensional crisis. ... On September 20, Britain again left the gold standard, with ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] The Financial Crisis of 1931 and the Impact of the Great Depression ...
    Our model indicates that the Great Depression was transmitted to the British economy through a decline in exports. This reduced GDP and caused a set back to ...
  66. [66]
    When and Why the Gold Standard Failed - Verified Investing
    On September 19, 1931, Britain abandoned the Gold Standard. Britain was still the world's leading economic power when the Great Depression forced it to abandon ...<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Causes of the Great Depression | Britannica
    It was marked by steep declines in industrial production and in prices (deflation), mass unemployment, banking panics, and sharp increases in rates of poverty ...
  68. [68]
    An Overview of the Great Depression - EH.net
    The Federal Reserve's seasonally adjusted index of industrial production stood at 114 (1935–39 = 100) in August 1929. By October it had fallen to 110 for a ...
  69. [69]
    Austrian Business Cycle Theory, Explained - Mises Institute
    Jul 9, 2019 · The “boom-bust” cycle is generated by monetary intervention in the market, specifically bank credit expansion to business.
  70. [70]
    Friedrich August von Hayek – Facts - NobelPrize.org
    In the 1920s, Friedrich von Hayek conducted important work on business cycles, but later developed broader social analyses. From the 1930s, he highlighted the ...
  71. [71]
    Boom and Bust: Rethinking Austrian Business Cycle Theory
    Jul 17, 2025 · The Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT) attributes economic cycles primarily to artificial interest rate manipulations by central banks.
  72. [72]
    Money and Gold in the 1920s and 1930s: An Austrian View - FEE.org
    Oct 1, 1999 · The Federal Reserve's Monetary Policy Was Consistently Inflationist. Joseph Salerno is a professor of economics in the Lubin School of Business ...
  73. [73]
    How the Fed Caused America's Great Depression - Mises Institute
    Feb 27, 2024 · Reasserting the Austrian view of boom and bust, the initial publication of America's Great Depression had a certain strategic significance.
  74. [74]
    Expansionary Monetary Policy at the Federal Reserve in the 1920s
    This paper analyzes the two main divergent interpretations of Federal Reserve monetary policy in the 1920s, the expansionary view described by Rothbard ...
  75. [75]
    Rothbard's Improper Diagnosis - AIER
    Jun 5, 2019 · Excessive money creation by the Federal Reserve during the Roaring Twenties led to an unsustainable excess. The boom sowed the seeds of its own ...<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    Hayek, Cassel, and the origins of the great depression - ScienceDirect
    Hayek's business cycle theory offered a monetary overexpansion account for the 1920s investment boom, the collapse of which initiated the Great Depression ...Missing: Nobel | Show results with:Nobel
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Reflections On Hayek’s Business Cycle Theory - Cato Institute
    Introduction. F. A. Hayek developed his business cycle theory in the 1920s when he visited the United States forthe first time. Let me recall that after.
  78. [78]
    32.1: The Great Depression and Keynesian Economics
    Jul 17, 2023 · For Keynesian economists, the Great Depression provided impressive confirmation of Keynes's ideas. A sharp reduction in aggregate demand had ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money
    an appalling collapse after 1929, falling in 1932 to a figure no less than 95 per cent below the average of the quinquennium 1925−1929. The above is, to ...
  80. [80]
    Keynesian Economics: Theory and Applications - Investopedia
    Keynes advocated for higher government spending and lower taxes to stimulate demand and pull the global economy out of the Great Depression. Keynesian ...
  81. [81]
    Aggregate demand in Keynesian analysis (article) - Khan Academy
    The Keynesian perspective focuses on aggregate demand. The general idea being that firms produce output only if they expect it to sell.
  82. [82]
    What Is Keynesian Economics? - Back to Basics
    Keynes argued that inadequate overall demand could lead to prolonged periods of high unemployment. An economy's output of goods and services is the sum of four ...
  83. [83]
    Chapter 4: The Great Depression and the Keynesian Solution
    Keynesianism provided an answer to the question of how to generate growth via surplus despite rising wages. The classical economists, and the businessmen who ...
  84. [84]
    Income distribution, the Great Depression, and the relative income ...
    This paper discusses the rise of top-end inequality and its effects on household consumption, saving, and debt in the United States during the 1920s by ...
  85. [85]
    Things That Didn't Cause the Great Depression - Econlib
    Nov 22, 2023 · Theories that stock market crashes and underconsumption cause depressions are essentially useless. They are ad hoc explanations with no real supporting ...
  86. [86]
    Deflation and the International Great Depression: A Productivity Puzzle
    Feb 1, 2005 · We find that productivity is the dominant shock, accounting for about 2/3 of the Depression, with the monetary shock accounting for about 1/3.Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Deflation and the International Great Depression: A Productivity Puzzle
    In particular, we construct the monetary and productivity shocks so that the model economy exactly reproduces output and deflation in each country and for each ...
  88. [88]
    The Great Depression 1929-39: A Marxist analysis
    Jun 10, 2020 · Our task as Marxists is to learn the lessons of 1929-39 so we can find a way out of the present capitalist crisis. The 1929 crash came at the ...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] the causes of the 1929-33 - great collapse: - a marxian interpretation
    Crises are possible because of the unplanned nature of the capitalist system as a whole. But Marxist theory goes further, beyond disproportionality theory or.
  90. [90]
    The Great Depression | The Herbert Hoover Presidential Library and ...
    When Roosevelt was inaugurated on March 4, 1933, the banking system was near total collapse, and unemployment had reached 25%. Within days, Congress passed and ...Missing: chronology | Show results with:chronology
  91. [91]
    Herbert Hoover's Response to the Great Depression | Harry S. Truman
    Hoover asked Americans to work toward common goals. He asked business leaders to keep prices and wages at current levels. He asked the government to reduce ...
  92. [92]
    What Was Herbert Hoover's Fiscal Policy?: Hoisted from Five Years ...
    Aug 3, 2016 · In 1931, Hoover raised spending to $3.6 billion. And in 1932, he opened the taps to $4.7 billion, where it basically stayed into 1933 (most of ...
  93. [93]
    Reconstruction Finance Corporation Act | Federal Reserve History
    President Hoover signed the Reconstruction Finance Corporation Act on January 22, 1932, establishing the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC). The ...
  94. [94]
    President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the New Deal
    By 1939, the New Deal had run its course. In the short term, New Deal programs helped improve the lives of people suffering from the events of the depression.
  95. [95]
    New Deal | Definition, History, Programs, Summary, & Facts
    Sep 22, 2025 · US President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal (1933–39) aimed to provide immediate economic relief and to bring about reforms to stabilize the economy.
  96. [96]
    [PDF] New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression
    Introduction. The recovery from the Great Depression was weak. Figure 1 shows real output, real consumption, and hours worked. Real GDP per adult which was ...
  97. [97]
    [PDF] How FDR Prolonged the Great Depression
    Throughout the New. Deal era, the median annual unemploy- ment rate was 17.2 percent. At no point during the 1930s did unemployment go below 14 percent.
  98. [98]
    [PDF] New Deal Policies and Recovery from the Great Depression by ...
    A deficit-financed veterans' bonus provided 3.2 million World War I veterans with cash and bond payments totaling 2 percent of GDP; the typical veteran received ...
  99. [99]
    Great Depression and the Collapse of Global Trade – an overview
    Jun 9, 2025 · Between 1929 and 1933, the value of world trade fell by roughly two-thirds, an astonishing drop that far outpaced the decline in global output .
  100. [100]
    The impact of protection on trade: lessons from Britain's 1930s policy ...
    Oct 25, 2018 · This column examines the impact of Britain's decisive break with a longstanding tradition of free trade in 1931, when the country switched dramatically to a ...Missing: responses | Show results with:responses
  101. [101]
    Foreign and domestic protectionism: what impact on the British ...
    Jan 22, 2025 · To give some examples, British exports faced a cross-commodity average tariff of 3% in India, 25% in Germany, 34% in France, 73% in the United ...
  102. [102]
    The Roots of Protectionism in the Great Depression | NBER
    Oct 1, 2009 · The Great Depression was a breeding ground for protectionism. Output fell, prices declined, and unemployment rose, pressuring governments to do something to ...
  103. [103]
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123353276749137485
  104. [104]
    [PDF] Did the New Deal Prolong or Worsen the Great Depression?
    In fact, we suggest that the New Deal provided effective medicine for the Depression, though fiscal policy was not sufficiently countercyclical to conquer mass ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] REGIME CHANGE AND RECOVERY IN 1930s BRITAIN
    We show Britain's robust recovery from the Great Depression after mid-1932 was driven by a policy regime change that ended expectations of deflation.
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Devaluation, Exports, and Recovery from the Great Depression - LSE
    This paper evaluates how a major policy shift – the suspension of the gold standard in September. 1931 – affected employment outcomes in interwar Britain. We ...
  107. [107]
    Roosevelt's Gold Program - Federal Reserve History
    On April 20, President Roosevelt issued a proclamation that formally suspended the gold standard. The proclamation prohibited exports of gold and prohibited the ...
  108. [108]
    [PDF] Inflation Expectations and Recovery from the Depression in 1933
    The Great Depression of the 1930s has gained renewed interest in recent years, as countries throughout the world slipped into deep recessions in the aftermath ...
  109. [109]
    The Gold Standard, FDR, and the Recovery of 1933 | AIER
    Apr 18, 2019 · The price level is more flexible. Abandoning the gold standard allowed FDR to conduct “unbacked fiscal expansion” until a recovery came.
  110. [110]
    [PDF] Recovery of 1933 Margaret M. Jacobson, Eric M. Leeper, and Bruce ...
    Apr 5, 2023 · When Roosevelt abandoned the gold standard in April 1933, he converted government debt from a tax-backed claim to gold to a claim to dollars ...
  111. [111]
    [PDF] Recovery of 1933 - Federal Reserve Board
    When Roosevelt abandoned the gold standard in April 1933, he converted govern- ment debt from a tax-backed claim to gold to a claim to dollars, opening the door.
  112. [112]
    The Impact of New Deal Spending and Lending During the Great ...
    The Great Depression led to a dramatic change in attitudes toward federal spending and regulation. Between 1929 and 1932, real GDP declined by 25 percent.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  113. [113]
    The New Deal (1933-1936) to World War II (1939-1945)
    Dec 28, 2023 · The US debt was $22 billion in 1933 and grew by 50 percent in the three years that followed, reaching $33 billion.
  114. [114]
    Top 10 New Deal Programs of the 1930s - ThoughtCo
    Sep 2, 2024 · Purposes of the New Deal Programs · To Act or Not to Act · Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) · Civil Works Administration (CWA) · Federal Housing ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  115. [115]
    Historical U.S. Unemployment Rate by Year - Investopedia
    What Affects the Unemployment Rate? ; 1932, 23.6%, Hoover's tax hikes ; 1933, 24.9%, FDR's New Deal ; 1934, 21.7%, Depression eased ; 1935, 20.1%, N/A.What Is the Unemployment... · What Affects the... · Rate, Recessions, and...
  116. [116]
    New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression
    We evaluate the contribution to the persistence of the Depression of New Deal cartelization policies designed to limit competition and increase labor bargaining ...
  117. [117]
    FDR's policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists ...
    Harold L. Cole and Lee E. Ohanian conclude in a new study that New Deal policies signed into law 71 years ago thwarted economic recovery for seven long years.
  118. [118]
    The American Economy during World War II – EH.net
    Between 1929 and 1939, the American unemployment rate averaged 13.3 percent (calculated from “Corrected BLS” figures in Darby, 1976, 8).
  119. [119]
    The Way We Won: America's Economic Breakthrough During World ...
    Oct 1, 1992 · During the war 17 million new civilian jobs were created, industrial productivity increased by 96 percent, and corporate profits after taxes ...
  120. [120]
    What Ended the Great Depression? | NBER
    Sep 1, 1991 · This paper examines the role of aggregate demand stimulus in ending the Great Depression. A simple calculation indicates that nearly all of the ...
  121. [121]
    Economic Recovery in the Great Depression – EH.net
    Research into the forces of recovery generally concludes that the growth of the money supply (M) was the principal cause of the rise in output (y) after March ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  122. [122]
    [PDF] What Ended the Great Depression? Reevaluating the Role of Fiscal ...
    Friedman & Schwartz (1963), on the other hand, argue that the increase in money supply from 1933 onwards spearheaded the recovery. Romer (1992) suggests that.
  123. [123]
    Ask a Scholar: Did the New Deal End the Great Depression? by ...
    Sep 14, 2011 · The most recent research by economic historians suggests that the New Deal played, at most, a small role in recovery from the Great Depression.
  124. [124]
    What Ended The Great Depression? - Hoover Institution
    Oct 2, 2025 · Selgin quotes one economist's statement that “the war was, particularly for the United States, a deepening of the Depression.” The postwar boom.
  125. [125]
    [PDF] What Ended the Great Depression? It Was Not World War II
    The Great Depression ended due to forces promoting productivity growth, not just World War II, according to this article.
  126. [126]
    The Dust Bowl | U.S. History Primary Source Timeline
    Dry land farming on the Great Plains led to the systematic destruction of the prairie grasses. In the ranching regions, overgrazing also destroyed large areas ...
  127. [127]
    The Great Depression in Germany - Alpha History
    The effect of this decline was spiralling unemployment. By the end of 1929, around 1.5 million Germans were out of work; within a year this figure had more ...Stock fever in the US · The Wall Street crash · Unemployment in GermanyMissing: GDP | Show results with:GDP
  128. [128]
    https://www.statista.com/topics/9521/the-great-depression-worldwide/
  129. [129]
    How Did Germany Respond to the Great Depression? - Facing History
    Aug 2, 2016 · From mid-1929 to January 1933, the number of Germans who had full-time jobs fell from 20 million to 11.5 million; by the start of 1933, at least ...Missing: GDP decline
  130. [130]
    Brüning's deflation and Hitler's rise to power | The Other Economy
    Aug 2, 2021 · In fact, his vigorously “deflationary” policies not only worsened the German economy and doubled the number of unemployed, but also ...
  131. [131]
    The role of economic instability in the Nazi rise to power
    As a result, wages fell by 39% from 1929 to 1932. People in full time employment fell from twenty million in 1929, to just over eleven million in 1933.<|separator|>
  132. [132]
    Nazi economic recovery - Alpha History
    There were large public works programs, such as construction, roads and autobahns, to reduce unemployment. 4. An attempt to make Germany self-sufficient and end ...
  133. [133]
    To what extent were Hitler's economic policies successful up to 1939?
    The reduction in unemployment, while a significant political victory for Hitler, was thus achieved through a combination of direct state intervention, ...
  134. [134]
    Unemployment in the Great Depression - Explaining History Podcast
    Jun 12, 2025 · In percentage terms, the unemployment rate roughly doubled, rising from ~10% in 1929 to over 20% by 1931–1932 .
  135. [135]
    Thirties Britain - The National Archives
    Unemployment climbed to almost 3.5 million by 1932. It was particularly acute in the North East, the lowlands of Scotland and mining valleys of Wales. The ...<|separator|>
  136. [136]
    The Great Depression in Britain - Historic UK
    Dec 29, 2018 · This ultimately had the effect of reducing European output which resulted in large scale unemployment. Another major impact of the downturn was ...Missing: GDP | Show results with:GDP
  137. [137]
    Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression
    Jun 12, 2025 · In summary, the gold standard acted as a transmission belt for the crisis. It linked countries in a rigid fixed-rate system, so a contractionary ...
  138. [138]
    Ottawa Agreements | British history - Britannica
    Sep 29, 2025 · Ottawa Agreements, trade policies, based on the system of imperial preference, negotiated between the United Kingdom and Commonwealth nations in 1932.
  139. [139]
    [PDF] End of an Epoch: Britain's Withdrawal from the Gold Standard
    ... 1931 the Government was finally forced to abandon the gold standard, and immediately the sterling exchange rate fell by 25%. 6. The Impact of the Suspension ...
  140. [140]
    Jarrow Crusade - The National Archives
    A March has been organised for the purpose of drawing the attention of the Government to the Unemployment position in the town.
  141. [141]
    1929 - Paris School of Economics
    The depression began with a sharp fall in exports (from 52 billion francs in 1929 to 20 in 1932, in current prices), concentrated in the industries most ...
  142. [142]
    [PDF] France in the Early Depression of the Thirties - CEPII
    The starting of depression in France corresponds to a change in the regime. Industrial production went down in June 1930, de-seasonalised consumer prices in ...
  143. [143]
    [PDF] The French Depression in the Thirties
    Four basic items should be kept in mind. One, the depression started one year later in France than in the U.S. Two, there was no major banking crisis in France.
  144. [144]
    Commanding Heights : France Money | on PBS
    To preserve a sense of stability, France maintains the gold standard even as others abandon it. Stubborn defense of the franc leads to controversial tax ...
  145. [145]
    FALL OF FRANC CLOSES FIVE-YEAR GOLD DRAMA; First Act in ...
    The defection of Belgium from the gold bloc intensified the pressure against France. From that time forward gold flowed out of the Bank of France in virtually ...
  146. [146]
    Flight-to-safety and the credit crunch: A new history of the banking ...
    Nov 29, 2018 · Although scholars acknowledged that some banking failures occurred in France during the period 1930–1932, the common view is still that they ...
  147. [147]
    1936, a Year for the Worker: Factory Occupations and the Popular ...
    Aug 4, 2023 · The election of the Popular Front government in France and a wave of factory occupations secured huge gains for French workers.
  148. [148]
    [PDF] Working Paper 17-4: Supply-Side Policies in the Depression
    Elected in May 1936 and led by Léon Blum, the Popular Front government in France enacted a suite of supply-side policies that combined were a sort of NIRA on ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  149. [149]
    France - Great Depression, Political Crises | Britannica
    By 1931, however, France in its turn succumbed to the effects of the Great Depression, and the impact was no less severe than elsewhere.
  150. [150]
    How the International Gold Standard Ended in the 1930s
    May 20, 2022 · On September 26, 1936 – a Saturday – the convertibility of the French franc was suspended. It took less than 48 hours for the Netherlands and ...<|separator|>
  151. [151]
    Toward the Tripartite Agreement
    When currency depreciation finally came to France in 1936, it was accompanied by inflation and social turmoil, but not by the beneficial effects evident in ...
  152. [152]
    Did Impending War in Europe Help Destroy the Gold Bloc in 1936 ...
    The merchandise balance was negative from 1928 to the end of our period in 1936. Gold and foreign exchange reserves were 37 percent lower in December 1936 than ...
  153. [153]
    Lessons from the Great Depression - Bank of Canada Museum
    Apr 18, 2024 · By 1933, Canada's gross national product had fallen by more than 40%, and 20% of the labour force was out of work. And there was hardly any ...
  154. [154]
    8.5 The Great Depression – Canadian History: Post-Confederation
    The Dust Bowl changed the farming landscape of the prairies, and it would have a long-term impact on farming practices. It also created a new diaspora out of ...
  155. [155]
    How did the Great Depression affect Canadian unemployment rates?
    The Great Depression significantly increased Canadian unemployment rates, with nearly 30% of the labour force unemployed by 1933. The Great Depression ...
  156. [156]
    7.1 Causes and Economic Impact of the Great Depression
    The Great Depression led to unprecedented levels of unemployment in Canada, with rates reaching 27% at the depth of the crisis (Unemployment rates); Mass ...Missing: GDP | Show results with:GDP
  157. [157]
    Dust and Depression - Canada's History
    Apr 12, 2022 · Prolonged drought, insect infestations, and economic collapse caused farm losses, with nearly 750,000 farms lost in Canada between 1930 and ...
  158. [158]
    The Dust Bowl - Founding of Ducks Unlimited Canada
    The Dust Bowl was the perfect storm of poorly calculated federal land policies, changes in regional weather, and the economic devastation of the Great ...
  159. [159]
    Blaming the Prime Minister - CBC
    Bennett raised tariffs to unprecedented levels in an effort to protect Canadian markets and convinced Britain to offer Canada some preferential trading ...
  160. [160]
    R.B. Bennett - Canadian History Ehx
    Feb 26, 2021 · In 1931, Bennett's government passed the Unemployment and Farm Relief Act to stop the spiraling of The Depression in Canada, putting $28 million ...
  161. [161]
    The Great Depression: Bennett's New Deal
    He drafted a number of bills on exports, agricultural loans, minimum wages, working hours, unemployment insurance and business practice legislation. provincial.
  162. [162]
    Bennett's New Deal | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    Jan 20, 2021 · He promised a more progressive taxation system; a maximum work week; a minimum wage; closer regulation of working conditions; unemployment ...
  163. [163]
    1930s Impact | History of Canada – 1867 to Present Class Notes
    Recovery Efforts and New Deal Policies · The election of Mackenzie King's Liberal government in 1935 brought a more proactive approach to economic recovery and ...
  164. [164]
    [PDF] The Bennett Administration, 1930-1935
    Great Depression was an intensely personal event. You knew it had arrived ... R. B. Bennett was not ready in 1933 to leave the known paths that had ...
  165. [165]
    The Great Depression in Canada | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    The unemployment rate remained above 12 per cent until the start of the Second World War in 1939. Did you know? Economists distinguish between depressions and ...Causes of the Great Depression · Uneven Burden on the Country
  166. [166]
    The 1930s Depression | RDP 2001-07: A History of Last-Resort ...
    Like the depression of 1892, real GDP fell about 10 per cent in the first year of the depression 1931. The 1930s depression, however, was not as protracted.
  167. [167]
    Australia (Oceania)
    Australia was severely affected by the Great Depression. National income declined by a third, and 32% of the population was unemployed in 1932. The country ...
  168. [168]
    Research Guide: The Great Depression - Unreserved
    The Great Depression began with the 1929 Wall Street crash, causing high unemployment, falls in commodity prices, and bank failures in Australia.
  169. [169]
    1930 to 1939 - Depression and Crisis - NSW Parliament
    Unemployment, already high at 10% in mid 1929, was 21% by mid 1930 and rising, hitting almost 32% in mid-1932. Factory output fell almost 10% in 1929-30 and ...
  170. [170]
    Keynes and the Depression in Australia | RDP 2000-04
    Theodore's expansionist approach gave way to the 'sound finance' orthodoxy of the Premiers' Plan of June 1931. The plan comprised major cuts in government ...
  171. [171]
    8. The Lang Plan, 1931 | NSW Government
    As the Great Depression wrought havoc in NSW in the early 1930s, Labor Premier Jack Lang had a plan. Part of the Lang Plan was to stop paying interest owed by ...
  172. [172]
    [PDF] RECOVERY FROM THE 1930S GREAT DEPRESSION IN AUSTRALIA
    This paper examines the effectiveness of economic policies like exchange rate devaluation, protection, government demand expansion, and wage policy using a CGE ...
  173. [173]
    The Depression of the Thirties - Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand
    The great depression of the early 1930s was the most shattering economic experience ever recorded. Exports fell by 45 per cent in two years, national income by ...
  174. [174]
    [PDF] 'Mordacious years': socio-economic aspects and outcomes of New ...
    Sep 3, 2009 · With a duration of just 18 months, followed by a fast recovery, the Great Depression in New Zealand was relatively short as a purely economic ...
  175. [175]
    New Zealand and the Great Depression | croaking cassandra
    Nov 16, 2016 · Unemployment was high – estimates vary, but even among adult males the unemployment rate probably peaked near 15 per cent (I'd give you 1991 ...
  176. [176]
    8.1 The Great Depression and its impact on New Zealand society
    It caused a severe economic downturn, with plummeting export prices and soaring unemployment. The crisis led to widespread poverty, social unrest, and a decline ...
  177. [177]
    The New Zealand Legion - NZ History
    Jan 13, 2016 · The government tried to ease Depression conditions through unemployment relief schemes, which often required men to travel long distances for ...
  178. [178]
    Page 2: First Labour government, 1935 to 1949
    Oct 31, 2011 · To stimulate New Zealand's depressed economy, Labour increased wages, launched a programme of public works and state-housing construction, and ...
  179. [179]
    Japan's Forgotten "Lost Decade": The Showa Depression
    Jan 17, 2023 · After reintroducing the gold standard, the Japanese economy immediately experienced an economic double whammy.
  180. [180]
    [PDF] Japan's "Great Depression" - Yale Department of Economics
    The great depression in Japan is usually described as a traumatic event that disrupted the economy, with vivid descriptions of masses of unemployed roaming the ...
  181. [181]
    How did the Great Depression affect Japan? : r/AskHistorians - Reddit
    Sep 2, 2024 · The result was 6.1% GDP growth between 1930-1937, with the Great Depression effectively only lasting one year between 1930-1931 in Japan.So it's generally accepted that things were going extremely poorly in ...Why did Japan's economy see massive growth directly after ... - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  182. [182]
    Social Situation during the Early Showa Period - 舞鶴引揚記念館
    The following two years saw the impoverishment of agricultural regions: in 1930, farmers' incomes declined due to overproduction, and lean harvests in 1931 ...
  183. [183]
    Takahashi Korekiyo was before Keynes and saved Japan from the ...
    Nov 17, 2015 · 1. The exchange rate was devalued by 60 per cent against the US dollar and 44 per cent against the British pound after Japan came off the Gold ...
  184. [184]
    [PDF] The Japanese Economy During the Great Depression
    Thanks to Takahashi's policies, Japan emerged from its deflationary spiral and made a robust economic recovery well ahead of other major countries. Japan's real ...
  185. [185]
    Exchange rate adjustment, monetary policy and fiscal stimulus in ...
    In this respect, the Japanese economy in this period draws renewed attention as a canonical case of successful policy to bring an early recovery in the midst ...
  186. [186]
    [PDF] Latin America´s new Great Depression - LSE
    Jun 3, 2020 · Between 1929 and 1933, output fell by 10 percent in Argentina and Mexico and by an eye-popping 37 percent in Chile (the other two large.
  187. [187]
    [PDF] Latin America in Depression, 1929-1939
    Latin American exports were predominantly rural and mining products, the former showing a smaller price-elasticity of supply than the latter; some rural ...
  188. [188]
    CQ Press Books - Great Depression, Impact on Latin America
    As a result, export prices dropped much faster than import prices, and the export economies of Latin America suffered a sharp decline in ...
  189. [189]
    Latin America and the Great Depression - Econlib
    Apr 6, 2009 · The Great Depression forced many Latin American governments and economic élites to make tough decisions in exchange-rate, monetary and fiscal policies.
  190. [190]
    The Soviet Union during the Great Depression: The Autarky Model
    Having created an administrative-command system designed to insulate the domestic economy from demand and external shocks and independent of international ...
  191. [191]
    Economic Growth and Living Standards During the 1930s
    The Soviet Union became the world's leading producer of oil, coal, iron ore, and cement, and it became a major world producer of manganese, gold, natural gas ...
  192. [192]
    The Record of Soviet Economic Growth, 1928-1965 - RAND
    Otherwise, Soviet economic growth rates for the years 1928-1940 and 1950-1965 are substantially higher than U.S. rates. The postwar increase in per capita ...
  193. [193]
    [PDF] Soviet Economic Growth Since 1928 - University of Warwick
    ... Soviet product and income growth using both the Laspeyres formula with fixed weights of various base years (1928, 1937, 1955, 1970, 1982), and Paasche ...
  194. [194]
    Collectivization - Seventeen Moments in Soviet History
    Stalin hit on the idea of organizing collective and state farms as a potentially more effective and longer-term solution to the problem of extracting grain.
  195. [195]
    Stalin's Policy of Collectivisation and the Soviet Famines
    Mar 28, 2023 · The collectivisation campaign disrupted traditional farming practices and led to a decline in agricultural productivity and output. The Soviet ...
  196. [196]
    How did the Great Depression impact the Soviet Union? - Reddit
    Nov 3, 2020 · In the first eight months of 1931, a Soviet trade agency in New York advertised 6,000 positions and received more than 100,000 applications.How was the Soviet Union affected by the Great Depression? - RedditWhy was the Soviet Union unaffected by the Great Depression?More results from www.reddit.com
  197. [197]
    Banking Act of 1933 (Glass-Steagall) - Federal Reserve History
    The Glass-Steagall Act effectively separated commercial banking from investment banking and created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
  198. [198]
    Glass-Steagall Act of 1933: Definition, Effects, and Repeal
    The Glass-Steagall Act was passed in 1933 and separated investment and commercial banking activities in response to involvement in stock market investment.What Is the Glass-Steagall Act? · Provisions · Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
  199. [199]
    [PDF] A Brief History of Deposit Insurance in the United States - FDIC
    Cover Photo: On June 16, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt signed the Banking Act of 1933, a part of which established the FDIC. At Roosevelt's immediate ...
  200. [200]
    Time Period: The Great Depression | Federal Reserve History
    The longest and deepest downturn in the history of the United States and the modern industrial economy lasted more than a decade, beginning in 1929 and ending ...
  201. [201]
    Monetary policy played a pivotal role in the Great Depression
    Mar 31, 2021 · Central banks no longer tie their currencies to gold, but instead gear their monetary policy more strongly towards domestic economic objectives.
  202. [202]
    History - overview - Bank for International Settlements
    Established in 1930, the Bank for International Settlements is the oldest international financial institution. ... Bank's role and contributions over the past 50 ...
  203. [203]
    BIS History - Overview - Bank for International Settlements
    The changing role of the BIS. Since 1930, central bank cooperation at the BIS has taken place through the regular meetings in Basel of central bank Governors ...
  204. [204]
    A Momentous Political Realignment - Senate.gov
    In 1932 a political tidal wave slammed into the Senate. On November 8 of that year, Senate Democrats scored one of the greatest electoral victories in their ...
  205. [205]
    Who voted Nazi? - JohnDClare.net
    Between 1928 and 1932, the Nazi Party (NSDAP) became Germany's most popular political group, growing from 2.6% of the vote in 1928 to 37.3% by July 1932.
  206. [206]
    Hitler Comes to Power: How, When, & Key Dates
    Sep 23, 2025 · On January 30, 1933, Adolf Hitler was appointed chancellor of Germany by German President Paul von Hindenburg. Hitler was the leader of the Nazi ...Missing: NSDAP | Show results with:NSDAP
  207. [207]
    Austerity and the Rise of the Nazi Party | The Journal of Economic ...
    Jan 11, 2021 · We study the link between fiscal austerity and Nazi electoral success. Voting data from a thousand districts and a hundred cities for four elections between ...
  208. [208]
    Great Depression | Holocaust Encyclopedia
    The Great Depression was a contributing factor to dire economic conditions in Weimar Germany which led in part to the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party.
  209. [209]
    Rise of Totalitarian Regimes - OER Commons
    The events of the Great Depression resulted in an international surge of fascism and the creation of several fascist regimes and regimes that adopted fascist ...
  210. [210]
    Debate The Political Consequences of the Great Depression and ...
    The most important political consequence of the Great Depression was of course the rise of right-wing authoritarianism in Germany, Austria, Central and Eastern ...Missing: US | Show results with:US
  211. [211]
    [PDF] Austerity and the rise of the Nazi party
    Still the rapid growth of support for the Nazi party well into the Great. Depression and in a period when reparations payments were de facto frozen remains the ...
  212. [212]
    [PDF] Understanding the Great Depression: Lessons for Current Policy
    In this essay, I argue that the Federal Reserve played a key role in nearly every policy failure during this period, and so the major lessons learned from ...
  213. [213]
    Great Myths of the Great Depression - FEE.org
    The stock market crash was only a symptom—not the cause—of the Great Depression: the market rose and fell in near synchronization with what the Fed was doing.
  214. [214]
    Hoover's Economic Policies - Econlib
    Hoover actively intervened in the economy, advocating and implementing polices that were quite similar to those that Franklin Roosevelt later implemented.
  215. [215]
    Before FDR, Herbert Hoover Tried His Own 'New Deal' - History.com
    Feb 28, 2019 · After leaving the White House, Hoover became a vociferous critic of Roosevelt's economic policies. He warned that the New Deal had a “pronounced ...
  216. [216]
    Great Myths of the Great Depression - Mackinac Center
    Jan 1, 1998 · Though modern myth claims that the free market "self-destructed" in 1929, government policy was the debacle's principal culprit. If this crash ...
  217. [217]
    How did Hoovers 1930 tariffs affect the great depression? - Reddit
    Feb 5, 2025 · The passage of Smoot-Hawley led to direct retaliation by important U.S. trade partners. Countries responded to its passage by imposing tariffs ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  218. [218]
    Peddling Protectionism: Smoot-Hawley and the Great Depression
    The Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930, which raised U.S. duties on hundreds of imported goods to record levels, is America's most infamous trade law.
  219. [219]
    FDR policies doubled the length of the Great Depression
    Nov 21, 2008 · Recent empirical evidence by UCLA economists Harold Cole and Lee Ohanian suggests that FDR's economic policy added 7 years to the Great Depression.
  220. [220]
    FDR's 'New Deal' Worsened and Prolonged the Great Depression
    Aug 8, 2020 · The gargantuan expansion of the federal government undermined prosperity. In an interview with an economic organization from India last month, I ...
  221. [221]
    [PDF] Lessons from the Great Depression for Economic Recovery in 2009
    Mar 9, 2009 · But the experience of the 1930s does suggest that monetary policy can continue to have an important role to play even when interest rates are ...
  222. [222]
    Lessons from the 1930s Great Depression applied today - JANA
    The risk that a tightening of monetary and fiscal policy occurs faster than expected, and potentially when markets remain particularly fragile and sensitive to ...
  223. [223]
    [PDF] Debt-Deflation Theory of Great Depressions - FRASER
    By March, 1933, liquidation had reduced the debts about. 20 per cent, but had increased the dollar about 75 per cent, so that the real debt, that is the debt as ...
  224. [224]
    Explaining the Great Depression, by Richard Vedder
    Scholarly attitudes towards the Depression have gone through three distinct phases: Neoclassical/Austrian (1929–1935), Keynesian (1936–70), and Post-Keynesian ( ...<|separator|>
  225. [225]
    [PDF] Milton Friedman, Anna Schwartz, and A Monetary History of the US
    Feb 21, 2019 · They also argue that, to no little extent, the severity of the Great Depression was a result of the Fed's failure to properly implement monetary.
  226. [226]
    Lessons from the 1930s Great Depression - Oxford Academic
    Oct 1, 2010 · This paper provides a survey of the Great Depression comprising both a narrative account and a detailed review of the empirical evidenceAbstract · Introduction · II. Narrative · III. Analysis
  227. [227]
    Diagnosing depression - The Economist
    Dec 30, 2008 · Before the 1930s all economic downturns were commonly called depressions. The term “recession” was coined later to avoid stirring up nasty ...
  228. [228]
    When Did the Great Depression Receive Its Name? (And Who ...
    Feb 15, 2009 · Some historians argue that the true inventor of the phrase, the Great Depression, is Lionel Robbins, a British economist who lived during the ...
  229. [229]
    HOW GREAT DEPRESSION NAMED - Tampa Bay Times
    Apr 17, 2009 · It fell to Lionel Robbins, a British economist, to write a book that would give a name to the times -The Great Depression - in 1934.
  230. [230]
    Why did people call it the great depression instead of just ... - Quora
    Aug 19, 2022 · It became publicly known as the Great Depression because, applying the descriptive term to all previous panics, it was the worst in American ...Why do they call it the 'great' depression if it was so bad for everyone ...Why is the economic downturn in the 1930s referred to as 'The Great ...More results from www.quora.com
  231. [231]
    U.S. Recessions Throughout History: Causes and Effects
    A recession is a persistent downturn in economic activity. Here we look at the causes and effects of major U.S. recessions since the Great Depression.
  232. [232]
    Recessions and Depressions | Federal Reserve History
    Oct 10, 2023 · Economic downturns in American history have ranged from mild recessions to severe depressions.
  233. [233]
    The Great Recession and Its Aftermath - Federal Reserve History
    Like the Great Depression of the 1930s and the Great Inflation of the 1970s, the financial crisis of 2008 and the ensuing recession are vital areas of study ...
  234. [234]
    Great Recession vs. Great Depression: How They Compare
    The unemployment rate touched over 25%, peaked out at 25%. And the price level fell by about a third, 27%. By comparison, the worst recession in the U.S. ...
  235. [235]
    [PDF] The Great Depression and the Great Recession
    The similarities between the Great Depression and the Great Recession extend beyond the level dynamics that are implied by the VAR coeffi cients. Even the ...
  236. [236]
    Fed Strategies in the Great Depression and the Great Recession
    Faced with economic contraction, deflation, and tanking markets, the Federal Reserve resorted to unorthodox means to lower interest rates and pump liquidity ...
  237. [237]
    The Great Lockdown: Worst Economic Downturn Since the Great ...
    Apr 14, 2020 · This makes the Great Lockdown the worst recession since the Great Depression, and far worse than the Global Financial Crisis.
  238. [238]
    A tale of three depressions - CEPR
    Sep 24, 2020 · This column analyses the path of this decline and compares it to two other major global crises: the Great Depression in the 1930s and the Great Recession.