Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Miami and Erie Canal

The Miami and Erie Canal was a 249-mile-long waterway in , constructed between 1825 and 1845 to connect the at with at , facilitating trade and transportation across western . Authorized by the Ohio Legislature in 1825 and financed through state bonds and federal land sales at a cost exceeding $8 million, the canal system included 103 lift locks, 19 aqueducts, and several reservoirs to navigate the 513-foot elevation change from the to the Loramie Summit along its route, which followed the Great Miami River valley northward before joining the . Completed in sections amid challenges like cholera epidemics and engineering difficulties, the canal opened fully for navigation in 1845 and quickly became a vital artery for , carrying agricultural products, , and manufactured on flatboats and packet boats towed by mules. It spurred by drastically reducing shipping costs— from $100 per by to $10 per by canal—boosting settlement in rural areas, elevating land values, and fostering the development of cities like Dayton and Defiance into industrial hubs. At its peak in the , the canal generated annual revenues of over $350,000 and supported around 400 boats, while also providing waterpower for mills and factories along its banks. Notable engineering feats included the Deep Cut, a 6,600-foot-long excavation through a clay ridge near Spencerville that reached depths of up to 52 feet, and extensive lock systems like the preserved stair-step locks at Lockington, which handled heavy traffic for decades. However, by the , competition from faster and more reliable railroads led to the canal's decline; operations ceased after severe flooding in 1913, and most sections were abandoned or repurposed. Today, remnants of the Miami and Erie Canal are preserved as historic sites, state parks, and recreational trails, with reservoirs such as Grand Lake St. Marys and Indian Lake serving as enduring legacies of Ohio's early infrastructure boom.

Background and Planning

Transportation Challenges in Early Ohio

In the early , Ohio's transportation was rudimentary, with roads consisting largely of unimproved trails that became nearly impassable during rainy seasons or winter, severely limiting the movement of goods and people. These earthen paths, often cut through dense forests, were prone to mud, ruts, and washouts, making overland travel unreliable and expensive for settlers and merchants alike. As a result, commerce heavily depended on rivers such as the and its tributary, the Great Miami River, which served as primary arteries for transporting agricultural products, lumber, and furs southward toward New Orleans, though their navigability was seasonal and restricted to downstream flow, hindering north-south and east-west exchanges within the state. The formed a formidable that further exacerbated these issues, blocking efficient east-west trade routes and isolating Ohio's growing interior from Atlantic seaboard markets. This geographical obstacle forced traders to rely on circuitous paths like the , completed to Wheeling in 1818, or perilous mountain passes, which increased transit times and costs while favoring southern river outlets over direct connections to the Northeast. Ohio's admission to statehood in 1803, following the 1800 of 45,365, marked the beginning of explosive demographic expansion—reaching 230,760 by 1810 and 937,903 by 1830—fueled by immigration and land availability, yet this growth amplified the strain on inadequate transport networks, stalling and keeping rural communities disconnected from urban centers. These challenges were starkly illustrated by the prohibitive economics of overland freight, where costs averaged $15 or more per ton for every 100 miles hauled by wagon, rendering it unfeasible to ship bulky commodities like or corn to eastern ports and depressing local prices to as low as 20-30 cents per in areas like Massillon. Travel times compounded the problem, with wagons typically advancing only 10-15 miles per day over rough terrain, often taking weeks to cross the state and exposing goods to spoilage or theft. The completion of New York's in 1825 provided a compelling model, slashing similar freight rates there from $100 per ton to $10 and reducing transit times from weeks to days, inspiring Ohio leaders to pursue analogous to integrate the state's with national trade networks.

Legislative Authorization and Funding

The Ohio General Assembly authorized the construction of the Miami and Erie Canal through the Canal Act passed on , 1825, which provided for the internal improvement of the state by navigation and established a comprehensive canal system connecting the to . This legislation was influenced by the success of New York's and aimed to address Ohio's transportation needs with state-led initiative. was secured primarily through the sale of public lands granted by the federal government, particularly in the Miami Valley, where over one million acres were donated to the state and sold in minimum 80-acre lots to generate more than $2 million for canal development. In preparation for the act, the established the Board of Canal Commissioners in 1822 to oversee planning and route selection. The commission hired self-trained engineer James Geddes, who had prior experience on the , to conduct surveys of potential routes across the state. Geddes's work confirmed feasible paths, enabling the 1825 authorization. The initial estimated cost for the Miami and Erie Canal was approximately $2.9 million, though the overall project for both major canals was projected at around $8 million (equivalent to about $262 million in 2025 dollars), financed through state-issued bonds sold in eastern markets and anticipated toll revenues. Debates preceding the authorization centered on the balance between state, private, and funding, with proponents arguing that state control was essential to prevent private monopolies and leverage better credit terms from investors. Early proposals, such as those in and , conditioned progress on federal land grants or aid, but congressional inaction—stemming from ongoing controversies over the constitutionality of federal internal improvements, including James Madison's 1817 veto—pushed toward self-financing. Private capital was considered a fallback but ultimately rejected in favor of state bonds, with the first $400,000 issued in 1825 to Rathbone and Lord of to initiate construction.

Construction and Engineering

Building Phases and Timeline

The construction of the Miami and Erie Canal began with initial surveys conducted between 1824 and 1825 to determine feasible routes from northward to . Engineers, including Samuel Forrer, mapped potential paths through challenging terrain, leading to the division of the project into a southern section known as the Miami Canal from to Dayton and a northern extension from Dayton to near Defiance, connecting to the to reach . occurred on July 21, 1825, at , where dignitaries including former New York Governor turned the first sod, marking the official start of excavation. The southern section progressed rapidly, with the 66-mile Miami Canal from to Dayton completed and opened to navigation in 1829, facilitating early trade and boosting local economies along the route. Construction of the northern Miami Extension Canal, spanning approximately 110 miles from Dayton through the difficult to near Defiance, advanced in phases amid significant obstacles. By 1843, the Wabash and Erie Canal's connection to allowed indirect access, but the full Miami Extension reached on July 4, 1845, completing the 249-mile waterway. A labor force of thousands, primarily immigrants supplemented by and French workers, performed the grueling manual digging and structure-building over the 20-year span. Workers endured harsh conditions, including treacherous swampy terrain that required extensive drainage, outbreaks of and that claimed many lives, and funding delays exacerbated by the Panic of 1837. To address water supply needs for the summit levels, reservoirs were constructed, notably Grand Lake St. Marys, which began development in 1837 as the largest artificial lake in the world at the time to feed the canal system.

Locks, Aqueducts, and Other Structures

The Miami and Erie Canal incorporated 103 lift locks and three guard locks at the terminus in , designed to raise and lower boats by increments of 8 to 10 feet each, facilitating navigation over varying terrain. These locks, typically measuring 80 feet in length and 14 feet in width to accommodate standard canal boats, were constructed primarily from blocks and featured wooden gates operated by hand-cranked winches or balance beams. Overall, these locks enabled boats to ascend 513 feet from the to the Loramie Summit and descend 395 feet from the summit to , with the summit representing the canal's highest point at approximately 513 feet above the (or 395 feet above ). The canal featured 19 aqueducts to carry the waterway over rivers, streams, and valleys without interrupting the flow, showcasing advanced for the era. These structures, often built with multiple stone arches supported by piers, spanned distances up to several hundred feet and were elevated 20 to 50 feet above the obstacles below. A representative example is the Six Mile Creek Aqueduct in Auglaize County, a bi-level and approximately 200 feet long that supported both the canal channel and an adjacent , with for water level control. Another notable aqueduct crossed the Great Miami River near , measuring about 590 feet in length and utilizing seven arches to bridge the 300-foot-wide valley, constructed between 1836 and 1840 using local limestone. Other essential structures included hand-dug channels measuring 40 feet wide at the , 26 feet at the , and 4 to 5 feet deep, lined with puddled clay or timber to prevent leakage, alongside a 10-foot-wide for mule teams pulling boats at 2 to 3 miles per hour. Feeder canals, such as the Sidney Feeder from the Great Miami River, supplied water to maintain levels, drawing from reservoirs like the 17,000-acre Grand Lake St. Marys. Innovations for water management included waste weirs—overflow channels that spilled excess water to prevent flooding—and over 100 culverts, typically arched stone passages 3 to 6 feet in diameter, allowing streams and roads to pass beneath the canal without disruption. These elements, built largely by hand labor using picks, shovels, and wheelbarrows, ensured the canal's operational integrity across its 249-mile length.

Operation and Route

Overall Path from Cincinnati to Toledo

The Miami and Erie Canal extended 249 miles (401 km) from its southern terminus at Cincinnati on the Ohio River to its northern end at Toledo on Lake Erie, traversing western Ohio and linking the two major waterways to facilitate inland navigation. The route divided into three major segments defined by regional geography and river systems. The southern segment wound through the Miami Valley parallel to the Great Miami River, ascending gradually from Cincinnati northward to Dayton via a series of constructed channels that paralleled the river's course to minimize excavation in the rolling terrain. From Dayton, the central segment crossed the watershed divide through the headwaters of the St. Marys and Auglaize Rivers, where the canal reached its highest elevation at the Loramie Summit, 395 feet (120 m) above Lake Erie; this level was maintained by feeder canals drawing water from reservoirs such as Grand Lake St. Marys and Lake Loramie to supply the summit and compensate for evaporation and leakage. The northern segment descended along the Auglaize and Maumee Rivers toward Toledo, utilizing slackwater navigation on the Maumee River and integrating with the natural flow to reach the lakefront via a short side cut connecting to the harbor. Integration with Ohio's natural waterways was achieved through strategic feeders and branches that enhanced the main channel's capacity. Feeders from the Grand Reservoir at St. Marys, the Lewistown Reservoir, and other impoundments provided essential , allowing the canal to follow river valleys where possible while cutting across divides. Along the path, the canal featured locks and aqueducts to manage elevation changes and cross obstacles like streams and valleys.

Daily Operations and Boat Traffic

The Miami and Erie Canal facilitated the movement of freight and passengers through a system of specialized designed to navigate its 40-foot-wide channel and 90-foot-long locks. Freight boats, typically measuring up to 90 feet in length and 14 feet in width, could carry approximately 100 tons of cargo such as , , and manufactured goods, while passenger packets provided faster accommodations for travelers, often featuring enclosed cabins for comfort. These vessels were towed by teams of two to four mules walking along the adjacent , adhering to a strict of 4 miles per hour to prevent of the canal banks. A full northbound transit from to , covering 249 miles with 103 lift locks, generally took 3 to 4 days, depending on water levels, lock operations, and conditions. Tolls were calculated based on type and , with merchandise charged at 2 cents per ton-mile, encouraging efficient loading to maximize profitability. traffic was coordinated at locks and aqueducts, where operators managed queues and water flow to ensure steady passage, often requiring brief stops for transfers or inspections. Operations were strictly seasonal, running from to to avoid winter freezing, which rendered the canal unnavigable and necessitated ice removal or draining in colder months. Water levels were maintained through a network of reservoirs and feeder canals, such as the Lewistown Reservoir, which supplied fresh water to compensate for , lock usage, and seepage. Peak activity occurred in the and , when thousands of boats—nearly 4,000 annually in high-traffic segments—plied the route, supporting daily for and along the canal's path.

Economic and Social Impacts

Trade, Commerce, and Economic Growth

The Miami and Erie Canal played a pivotal role in 's economic expansion by enabling efficient transport of goods between the basin and [Lake Erie](/page/Lake Erie). Southbound shipments primarily consisted of agricultural products such as grain, pork, and tobacco, along with lumber and coal from northwest , while northbound traffic carried manufactured goods like iron and , as well as salt from southern sources. This bidirectional flow integrated regional producers with broader markets, fostering that extended to national routes. The canal dramatically reduced freight costs, dropping them from approximately 27.5 cents per ton-mile by to 1.6 cents per ton-mile by , a reduction of about 95 percent that made long-distance shipping viable for the first time. For a typical 200-mile haul, this translated to savings on the order of $50 per ton, directly stimulating agricultural expansion in northwest by providing affordable access to southern and eastern markets. Boat traffic volumes, which included hundreds of vessels annually carrying diverse cargoes, underscored the canal's capacity to handle growing demand during its operational peak. Industrial development flourished along the canal route, with the establishment of flour mills, distilleries, and pork-packing facilities that processed local raw materials for shipment. In areas like and Dayton, these industries thrived due to the canal's linkage of local resources to national networks via the southward and northward, enabling exports to the and the . The canal's infrastructure investment of approximately $8 million (equivalent to about $270 million in 2024 dollars) was recouped through toll revenues, which peaked at approximately $350,000 in 1851 and funded further state infrastructure projects. The canal's economic contributions were evident in Ohio's rapid demographic and fiscal growth; the state's population more than doubled from 581,434 in to 1,519,467 in , driven in part by the opportunities created by improved . By connecting isolated regions to commercial hubs, the Miami and Erie Canal transformed Ohio from a frontier economy into an industrial powerhouse, with revenues supporting ongoing that sustained long-term development.

Influence on Settlements and Urban Development

The construction of the Miami and Erie Canal significantly accelerated the growth of key towns along its route, transforming them into vital economic and population centers. As the southern terminus, experienced rapid expansion, with its population surging from around 9,600 in 1820 to over 115,000 by 1850, fueled by the canal's completion in that linked it directly to northern markets and resources. Dayton similarly boomed after the canal reached it in 1829, establishing the city as an international port and commercial hub for goods like whiskey, , and manufactured products, which would have otherwise limited its development to a smaller scale. Further north, emerged as a canal hub supporting agricultural trade, while Defiance's population grew from 700 in 1846 to nearly 5,900 by 1880, evolving from a outpost into a bustling center for , , and shipping at the confluence of major rivers. In , the canal profoundly shaped urban neighborhoods, particularly the area just north of the waterway. German immigrants, arriving in large numbers from the onward, settled this formerly rural land, converting it into a densely packed working-class district of breweries, markets, and tenement housing to accommodate industrial laborers. The neighborhood earned its name from the canal, which locals likened to the River in , with bridges over the water symbolizing crossings into a familiar cultural enclave; by the late , it housed over 45,000 residents, about 75% of whom were first- or second-generation German-Americans. This development not only provided housing for canal-related workers but also fostered a vibrant German-American community that influenced the city's social and economic fabric. Beyond urban centers, the canal spurred rural development in the Miami Valley by improving market access for farmers and encouraging the establishment of new villages and homesteads. The waterway facilitated the transport of surplus crops and goods from isolated areas, leading to increased and the proliferation of farms along its banks, which integrated previously remote regions into broader trade networks. This connectivity transformed the valley's landscape, promoting settlement in areas like Shelby County where the canal's presence drove local commerce and population growth more than any other single factor during the early . The canal's construction and operation also altered demographics through a significant influx of immigrants, particularly and laborers, who comprised the primary workforce and reshaped community compositions. immigrants, fleeing in the , endured grueling conditions digging the canal for about 30 cents per day, often facing high mortality from and accidents, yet their efforts enabled settlement patterns that tripled 's foreign-born population by mid-century. , meanwhile, followed as operators and settlers, concentrating along the canal corridor from northward and establishing ethnic enclaves that diversified Ohio's . By 1900, these groups formed the state's two largest immigrant populations, influencing local politics, religion, and social structures in canal towns.

Decline, Abandonment, and Legacy

Factors Leading to Decline and Closure

The decline of the began in the mid-19th century, primarily due to the rise of railroads, which offered faster, more reliable, and year-round transportation compared to the canal's seasonal operations limited by freezing winters. Railroads emerged in during the 1830s and expanded rapidly, with lines such as the Dayton and Railroad reaching key areas by the 1850s, undercutting the canal's toll revenues by providing lower-cost shipping for both freight and passengers. By 1856, competition from railroads like the and Western Railroad had halved the canal's receipts in affected sections, as they could transport larger loads more efficiently. This shift was exacerbated by 's growing rail network, which totaled 2,946 miles by 1860, dominating the movement of goods and rendering the canal obsolete for most commercial purposes. Economic changes further eroded the canal's viability, as railroads captured demand for bulk commodities like grain and salted pork that the canal had once specialized in transporting, while evolving consumer needs reduced reliance on traditional canal-haulable products such as ice, timber, and quarried stone—especially after the invention of concrete diminished stone shipments. Maintenance challenges compounded these issues, with high operational costs for dredging silt accumulation and repairing infrastructure straining state resources, particularly after the canal was leased to private operators from 1861 to 1878, during which neglect led to deteriorating conditions and water management problems. By the late 19th century, traffic had dwindled to mostly local hauls, and the state began repurposing underused sections, such as granting the Cincinnati right-of-way for road construction in 1863. The canal's end came with the , when torrential rains—up to 12 inches in some areas—devastated infrastructure, particularly south of Dayton along the Great Miami River, destroying aqueducts, washing out banks, and filling channels with debris and silt, rendering repairs economically unfeasible given the prior decline. Although some segments continued limited local use after partial repairs, the flood marked the effective abandonment for navigation, with the last full canal boat operating in 1907 and a final short run from Newport to Fort Loramie in 1912. The state passed the Tom Act in 1927, ending navigation, and formally closed the system in 1929, draining remaining operational sections and converting others into roads to support modern infrastructure needs.

Preservation Efforts and Modern Uses

Throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, preservation initiatives have focused on restoring and maintaining remnants of the to highlight its historical significance. Organizations such as the , established in 1996, have led efforts to protect the corridor spanning Allen, Auglaize, , Shelby, and Van Wert counties in western , advocating for its designation as a state and through education, partnerships, and community events. Numerous structures have survived, including operational sections and locks at key sites; for example, in Dayton preserves Lock No. 17 along with the adjacent Canal Superintendent's Office, offering visitors insight into 19th-century canal engineering. Similarly, Providence Metropark near maintains over a mile of the original canal, , and Lock No. 44—the only fully functional original lock in —as well as the historic Isaac Ludwig Mill and Providence Dam. Other preserved features include the four visible stair-step locks at Lockington Locks, managed by the , and the reconstructed Lock No. 1 in New Bremen, completed in the mid-2000s with an accompanying lock house serving as a visitors' center. Modern repurposing has transformed canal remnants into recreational and educational assets, enhancing urban greenways and tourism. The Ohio to Erie Trail, a 326-mile multi-use path connecting the to , incorporates sections of the Miami and Erie Canal towpaths, such as the 40-mile Miami & Erie Canal Towpath Trail from Delphos to Fort Loramie, popular for and through rural and historic landscapes. At Providence Metropark, the Canal Experience provides mule-drawn boat rides on a restored section, simulating 1870s travel and educating visitors on canal operations through guided tours available seasonally from May to October. Museums like the Delphos Canal Commission Museum showcase artifacts and folklore related to the canal's role in local development, while MECCA supports interpretive programs and events to promote . These initiatives emphasize the canal's legacy in transportation history without restoring full navigation. Recent developments through 2025 have advanced restoration amid ongoing challenges like weather-related maintenance. In New Bremen, the reconstructed Lock No. 1 continues to bolster local tourism as part of preserved sites. Piqua launched the $2.6 million "Canalley" project in 2024 to revitalize an alley along the former canal alignment into a business and green space hub, with design phases ongoing as of 2025. The 2025 bicentennial of the canal's groundbreaking featured statewide commemorations, including the July 21 anniversary event in Middletown organized by the Middletown Historical Society to highlight preservation progress, along with tours of sites like New Bremen locks in November 2025. At sites like Lockington, feasibility studies for stabilizing flood-damaged structures continue, building on earlier recoveries from natural events to ensure long-term accessibility.

References

  1. [1]
    History of the Ohio Canal System
    Jul 16, 2025 · The Miami and Erie Canal, traversing 249 miles from Cincinnati to Toledo, was begun on July 25, 1825 near Middletown. It was built in sections ...Missing: length | Show results with:length
  2. [2]
    [PDF] $^wi!i&''-f;?&^f*:' - "::':=::" - NPGallery - National Park Service
    Begun in 1825, the Miami and Erie Canal stretched from Cincinnati to Toledo by way of Dayton. As shallow as five feet, the Deep Cut section of the.
  3. [3]
    Lockington Locks - Ohio History Connection
    The extensive stair step canal lock walls, among the best preserved in Ohio, were part of the Miami and Erie Canal system, which opened for navigation in 1845 ...
  4. [4]
    The Ohio & Erie Canal: Catalyst of Economic Development for Ohio ...
    Mar 30, 2023 · Ohio officials felt that if they built their own canal system, some of their transportation and economic problems could be solved. On July 4 ...Missing: challenges early
  5. [5]
    [PDF] HISTORY - Ohio.gov
    The success of the Erie Canal helped influence the investment and construction of canals in Ohio. The 308-mile Ohio & Erie Canal (O&E) connected Lake Erie and ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] A history of transportation in the Ohio valley, with special reference ...
    a whole. Before its improvement and the intrusions of indus- try the Ohio had moods all its own. In the winter sea- son it sometimes retired from the world ...
  7. [7]
    The Chesapeake And Ohio Canal, Survival Of An Era
    The gravest national problem confronting the young nation, as the nineteenth century opened was the conquest of the natural Appalachian barrier which lay ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] HISTORY OF NAVIGATION IN THE OHIO RIVER BASIN - GovInfo
    Colonial settlers and frontiersmen followed eastern rivers to their headwaters, established routes through the Appalachian barrier, and again headed west on the ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Social and Economic Effects Affected Environment
    By 1803, the Ohio territory's population had reached 60,000, the level required for statehood, and Ohio entered the. Union on March 1, 1803. The earliest and ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] FINAL REPORT - Ohio Department of Transportation
    Jan 1, 2015 · Trends That Brought Ohio to Where It Is Today. Population and economic activity in Ohio boomed in the early 19th century, as part of the.
  11. [11]
    ECONOMY | Encyclopedia of Cleveland History
    Previously, the products of Ohio's farms, mines, forests, and workshops had been kept out of national markets by the price of road transport, $15 or more per ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Ohio and Erie Canal - NPS History
    On February 4, 1825, the legislators authorized the. Board of Canal Commissioners to select a route for the western canal, the Miami and. Erie, and a route for ...
  13. [13]
    Financing the Canal - Shelby County Historical Society
    The recently formed federal government could not assist financially, but it did donate over one million acres of land, primarily in northwest Ohio, to the state ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  14. [14]
    Connecting the State and the Nation: Ohio Canal History -
    Aug 19, 2021 · In 1822, the Ohio General Assembly created an Ohio Canal Commission and hired James Geddes, an engineer who had worked on New York's Erie Canal, ...
  15. [15]
    James Geddes portrait - Ohio History Connection Selections -
    James Geddes (1763-1838) was a self-trained engineer and surveyor. In 1822, the Ohio Canal Commission hired Geddes to survey possible canal routes in the state.
  16. [16]
    Canal Facts - Miami-Erie Canal Corridor Association
    In 1825, the Ohio Legislature approved funding to construct an Ohio Canal system. It took 20 years, from 1825 to 1845, to complete the Miami-Erie Canal.
  17. [17]
    $$8000000 in 1825 → 2025 - Inflation Calculator
    $$8,000,000 in 1825 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $261,798,787.88 today, an increase of $253,798,787.88 over 200 years. The dollar had an average ...
  18. [18]
    The Ohio Canal Movement, 1820-1825 - OHJ Archive
    veys proved the canal could not be built by the state without. federal aid, then private capital could be attracted, as a last. resort, through the granting ...
  19. [19]
    Bio Sketch: Samuel Forrer (1793-1874), Miami-Erie Canal engineer
    Jul 19, 2012 · These exploratory surveys continued from 1822 through 1824.[11]. In January 1825, the Canal Commission recommended construction. Although it ...
  20. [20]
    Shelby County Historical Society - Canals - Construction of the Canal
    ### Construction Timeline and Details of the Miami Canal
  21. [21]
    Beginning of the Miami Canal - Shelby County Historical Society
    The General Assembly passed a bill authorizing construction of the Ohio & Erie Canal and the Miami Canal from Cincinnati to Dayton in February 1825.
  22. [22]
    The Miami-Erie Canal - Warren County OHGenWeb
    Aug 4, 2004 · The Miami Canal, which extended from Cincinnati to Dayton, was completed in 1829. The next phase was the Miami Extension Canal which ran from Dayton to the ...
  23. [23]
    31-48 Miami & Erie Canal - Remarkable Ohio
    The Wabash & Erie Canal opened between Toledo and Lafayette, Indiana, May 8, 1843. The Miami Extension Canal was completed to Junction, Ohio, on July 4,
  24. [24]
    The Transformative Role of Canals in Defiance, OH
    Aug 20, 2025 · The construction of the Miami and Erie Canal and the Wabash and Erie ... disease, particularly malaria and cholera. Safety standards ...
  25. [25]
    History | St. Marys Develops
    Grand Lake St. Marys came into being as a reservoir to supply water for the Miami & Erie Canal. It was begun in 1837, long before the days of mechanized ...
  26. [26]
    Six Mile Creek Aqueduct | Ohio Department of Natural Resources
    The Six Mile Creek Aqueduct carries the historic Miami and Erie Canal waters over Six Mile Creek. This multi-arch masonry and formed concrete flume create a ...
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    [PDF] THE TOWPATH - New Bremen Historic Association
    ground for the Miami and Erie Canal. The initial ... approximately 395 feet above Lake Erie and 513 feet ... level stretch of canal that maintained a constant ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Miami and Erie Canal
    The Miami and Erie Canal followed the Maumee River southwest from ... Miami Aqueduct (west end). Montgomery. 193. Abutment still extant. 39E52'35.07"N ...
  30. [30]
    Throwback Thursday: Take a Trip on the Miami and Erie Canal
    Sep 2, 2021 · Completed in 1845, the 274-mile-long Miami and Erie Canal allowed raw materials to flow into the city, and finished goods to flow out. The canal ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] 58 - The American Canal Society
    the old Miami and Erie Canal, is filled with ... These were really two separate boats, hinged at the junction, and jointly carrying up to 100 tons.
  32. [32]
    Miami and Erie Canal Lock 15 - The Historical Marker Database
    Travel on the Miami and Erie Canal was limited to four miles per hour for boats pulled by mules in order to prevent boat wash from eroding the clay banks of the ...Missing: towing | Show results with:towing
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    [PDF] geology along the towpath: stones of the ohio & erie and miami ...
    ... ERIE AND MIAMI & ERIE CANALS. STOP 13. PIQUA HISTORICAL AREA, LOCK 8 OF THE MIAMI & ERIE CANAL. The Piqua Historical Area is in Miami County 3 miles. (4.8 km) ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Lake Erie to Ohio River Trail
    Aug 12, 2025 · height of canal usage, almost 4,000 boats a year passed through the area, ... preserves a vital stretch of the Miami and Erie Canal. Explore the ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Falling Behind - The University of Akron
    27 Additionally, concerns over the natural resource curse in Ohio and the long run economic impact of relying on natural resource ... “Miami and Erie Canal.” http ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] RESOURCE PLAN - Future of the Miami and Erie Canal
    The Miami and Erie system had an accounted “cost” in 1845 of. $8,062,680.80, of which nearly 25 percent was paid for by the sale of. U.S. land within Ohio ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Census for 1820
    Dec 16, 2021 · Displays the U.S. population grouped by sex age, race, civil and naturalization status, and participation on broad areas of economic ...Missing: 1840 | Show results with:1840
  39. [39]
    1840 Census: Compendium of the Enumeration of the Inhabitants
    Mar 7, 2023 · This 1840 Census (the sixth Census) publication contains population data, and economic data pertaining to agriculture, commerce and ...Missing: 1820 | Show results with:1820
  40. [40]
    How Ohio's Canal Era Helped Shape the State's History
    Ohio's canal era began on July 4, 1825, as Ohio Gov. Jeremiah Morrow and New York Gov. DeWitt Clinton, who had spearheaded his state's thriving Erie Canal, met ...Missing: debates private federal
  41. [41]
    Miami & Erie Canal History: When and Where Was Dayton's Canal?
    Jan 15, 2020 · The Miami and Erie Canal arrived in Dayton in 1829, and was completed in 1845. It was filled in in 1927, with Patterson Boulevard following its ...
  42. [42]
    OTR History - Cincinnati - Over-the-Rhine Foundation
    When the Germans started to arrive, the area north of the Miami & Erie Canal was mostly gardens and farmland. The Germans transformed it into a bustling ...
  43. [43]
    The Demise of the Canal - Shelby County Historical Society
    Despite its brief time in existence, the Miami & Erie Canal had a greater impact on the development of Shelby County, Ohio than any other event or project in ...
  44. [44]
    The Irish in Ohio - Ohio's Hill Country Heritage Area
    Mar 17, 2018 · Though immigration peaked in 1840, by 1900, Irish were the second most populous immigrant group, behind Germans.
  45. [45]
    22-31 Cincinnati's German Heritage - Remarkable Ohio
    ... Germans moved inland to settle new Ohio communities-many along the Miami and Erie canal corridor which began here. German-Americans have greatly influenced ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    The Demise of the Miami and Erie Canal - Waterville Historical Society
    Jun 6, 2023 · The canal had a long, slow decline. Railroads came into being at nearly the same time the canal was opened and expanded over the years.
  47. [47]
    Early Canal Traffic and Railroad Competition in Ohio - jstor
    Miami & Erie Canal, the receipts of which were practically cut in half by the competition of the Toledo & Western R.R., when it opened for business in the ...Missing: factors | Show results with:factors
  48. [48]
    Miami & Erie Canal - Abandoned
    Jun 2, 2023 · The construction of the canal bed and ten locks in the county was completed on June 20, 1837. The first canal boat in Piqua, called the Emigrant ...
  49. [49]
    Miami & Erie Canal, Warren County Canal, and Cincinnati Subway
    The Ohio House and Senate had worked for two decades to pass legislation authorizing a canal, and they finally succeeded on February 4, 1825 after it became ...
  50. [50]
    Miami-Erie Canal Corridor Association | HOME
    The Miami & Erie Canal Corridor Association (MECCA) works to preserve and enhance the Miami & Erie Canal Corridor as a viable resource; advancing the cultural, ...
  51. [51]
    Park Map - Dayton History
    Miami and Erie Canal Lock No. 17. 33. Miami ... Located in the original canal bed dug between 1825 and 1829 which runs through Carillon Park.
  52. [52]
    Providence - Metroparks Toledo
    At Providence, you can get a sense of what canal travel was like along an original section of the Miami and Erie Canal, complete with Lock #44. A replica of ...
  53. [53]
    Restoration - The American Canal Society
    9) In Ohio, the city of New Bremen has just completed rebuilding of Miami & Erie Canal Lock 1 north, which is in the center of the village. They have also ...
  54. [54]
    Ohio to Erie Trail: Home
    This scenic 326 mile trail links the Ohio River to Lake Erie, primarily on rail trails and canal paths. It traverses four major cities, numerous quaint small ...Interactive Map · Shop for trail guides, shirts... · Trail Partners · Trail News page
  55. [55]
    Miami & Erie Canal Towpath | Ohio Trails - TrailLink
    Rating 4.0 (13) The Miami & Erie Canal Trail spans nearly 40 miles from Delphos to Fort Loramie, passing through many quaint western Ohio towns and villages.
  56. [56]
    Canal Experience | Metroparks Toledo
    Step back in time at the Canal Experience and get a taste of life on the Miami and Erie Canal in 1876. Providence Metropark is located in what was once the ...
  57. [57]
    Delphos Canal Commission Museum - Visit Greater Lima
    This folklore museum, consisting of 8500 square feet on 3 floors, features the history of the Miami-Erie Canal and the city and people of Delphos.Missing: educational reenactments
  58. [58]
    Piqua's 'Canalley' project to transform historic spot into vibrant ...
    Dec 21, 2024 · The $2.6 million project would transform the alleyway along the old Miami-Erie Canal alignment into a vibrant business hub. The “Canalley” is a ...
  59. [59]
    Canal Bicentennial | middletownhistory - Middletown Historical Society
    July 21, 2025 marks the 200 year Bicentennial Anniversary of the Miami-Erie Canal. Groundbreaking for the statewide project began in Middletown.