Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Modality

Modality is the philosophical study of necessity, possibility, contingency, and impossibility, focusing on the ways in which propositions or states of affairs obtain across alternative scenarios rather than solely in actuality.^[1]^[2] It distinguishes between what must be the case (necessary truths, true in all relevant possibilities), what could be the case (possible truths, true in at least one relevant possibility), and what cannot be the case (impossibilities).^[3] Central to metaphysics and logic, modality underpins debates about essence, identity, causation, and the structure of reality, with metaphysical modality often tied to objective constraints like natural laws or intrinsic natures rather than mere conceivability or linguistic conventions.^[2]^[3] Originating in ancient inquiries by Aristotle into potentiality and actuality, it gained formal rigor in the 20th century through modal logic and possible worlds semantics, enabling precise analysis of counterfactuals and essential properties.^[4] Notable achievements include Saul Kripke's framework for rigid designators and a posteriori necessities, which challenged empiricist reductions of modality to conceptual analysis. Controversies persist over its foundations, such as whether modality reduces to essences (prioritizing definitional sources of necessity) or vice versa, and whether extreme views like David Lewis's modal realism—positing concrete infinite possible worlds—are empirically defensible or metaphysically extravagant.^[3] Varieties include epistemic modality (tied to knowledge and evidence), deontic modality (obligation and permission), and nomic modality (governed by physical laws), each informing distinct domains from ethics to science.^[2]

Philosophy and Logic

Historical Foundations

Aristotle laid the groundwork for modal reasoning in philosophy and logic through his development of modal syllogistics in the Prior Analytics, composed around 350 BCE, where he extended categorical syllogisms to incorporate operators of necessity and possibility, analyzing valid inferences such as those from necessary premises to possible conclusions.^[5] This framework treated modality temporally or statistically in some interpretations, distinguishing de dicto (about propositions) from de re (about things) modalities, though Aristotle's system faced challenges in consistency, as later scholars noted inconsistencies in mixed modal moods.^[6] In the Islamic Golden Age, Avicenna (Ibn Sina, 980–1037 CE) advanced modal metaphysics by integrating Aristotelian logic with ontological distinctions, positing that every existent is either necessary per se (whose essence entails existence, like the divine being) or possible per se (whose essence neither entails nor precludes existence, requiring an external cause for actualization).^[7] This essence-existence distinction provided a causal foundation for modality, independent of Aristotle's syllogistic, influencing subsequent Islamic and Latin thinkers by modalizing essences to explain contingency in the created world.^[8] Avicenna's approach emphasized that possibility arises from the contingency of existence relative to essence, contrasting with purely logical modalities.^[9] Medieval Latin philosophers, building on translated Aristotelian and Avicennian texts from the 12th century onward, refined modal theories, often favoring extensional interpretations tying modality to actual predicates until the late 13th century, when intensional shifts emerged in works by figures like Thomas Aquinas, who reconciled modal necessity with divine causation. These developments preserved Aristotle's syllogistic while incorporating Avicenna's ontological modalities, fostering debates on whether necessity inheres in essences or propositions. In the early modern period, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) reconceived modality through the lens of possible worlds, arguing that a proposition is necessary if true in all possible worlds—maximal coherent sets of compossible individuals—and contingent if true only in some, including the actual world chosen by God as the optimal one.^[10] Leibniz's framework, articulated in works like the Theodicy (1710), shifted emphasis from temporal or essential modalities to a metaphysical pluralism of worlds, resolving puzzles of compossibility and influencing later logical analyses.^[11] The transition to formal modal logic occurred in the 20th century with Clarence Irving Lewis, who in 1918 introduced axiomatic systems distinguishing strict implication (necessary connection) from material implication, critiquing the latter's inadequacy for intuitive modal inferences in his Survey of Symbolic Logic.^[12] Lewis's S-systems (e.g., S4, S5) provided rigorous deductive frameworks, reviving interest in modality as a branch of logic distinct from classical propositional systems.^[13]

Core Concepts and Types

In philosophy and logic, modality refers to the study of necessity, possibility, and related notions, extending propositional and predicate logic to evaluate statements beyond mere truth or falsity in the actual world. Core modal concepts include necessity (denoted □P, meaning P holds in all relevant possible scenarios), possibility (◇P, meaning P holds in at least one relevant scenario, equivalently ¬□¬P), contingency (P is possible but not necessary), and impossibility (¬◇P). These concepts allow reasoning about what must be true, could be true, or cannot be true, often formalized through possible worlds semantics, where truth is assessed across a set of accessible worlds rather than a single actual world.^[14]^[15] Alethic modality, the foundational type, concerns objective truth conditions, encompassing logical necessity (true by virtue of form alone, as in tautologies), metaphysical necessity (true across all metaphysically possible worlds, such as identity statements like "Hesperus is Phosphorus"), and nomic necessity (true according to physical laws, e.g., water boiling at 100°C under standard pressure). This type prioritizes alethic operators to distinguish analytically necessary truths from synthetic ones, with philosophers like Saul Kripke arguing in 1972 that metaphysical necessities are a posteriori discoverable via rigid designators.^[15]^[14] Deontic modality shifts focus to normative concepts, modeling obligation (O(P): it ought to be that P), permission (P(P): it is permitted that P), and prohibition (F(P): it is forbidden that P, or O(¬P)), akin to alethic but interpreted over deontic alternatives rather than truth-bearing worlds. Developed systematically by G.H. von Wright in 1951, it applies to ethical, legal, and rational norms, where violations introduce conflicts resolvable via principles like the Kantian "ought implies can" (O(P) → ◇P).^[16] Epistemic modality evaluates compatibility with knowledge or evidence, where □P means "P is known" or "necessarily true given what is known," and ◇P means "P is epistemically possible" (consistent with the evidence). Unlike alethic, it is subjective, varying with an agent's information state, as in "the butler might have done it" based on incomplete evidence. This type underpins debates in epistemology, with systems like S4 and S5 axiomatizing knowledge as factive and transitive.^[17] Other types include doxastic modality (governed by belief states, e.g., "S believes P is necessary"), temporal modality (what is always true across times), and dynamic modality (ability or effort-based, e.g., "S can bring about P"). These extend core alethic frameworks, with logical systems varying by accessibility relations between worlds—reflexive for epistemic, symmetric for deontic—to capture domain-specific constraints.^[15]^[14]

Key Debates and Controversies

One central controversy in the philosophy of modality concerns the ontological status of possible worlds. David Lewis defended modal realism, positing that all possible worlds exist concretely as spatiotemporal entities on par with the actual world, thereby providing a reductive account of modal claims like necessity and possibility in terms of concrete resemblance and isolation between worlds.^[18] This view faces criticism for entailing extreme ontological commitments, such as the reality of infinite duplicate individuals, which many philosophers reject as extravagant and unverifiable empirically.^[19] Opposing perspectives, including actualism, maintain that only the actual world exists, treating possible worlds as abstract representations or linguistic constructs (ersatzism) to avoid such proliferation while preserving modal distinctions.^[19] W.V.O. Quine mounted a influential skepticism toward modality, particularly quantified modal logic, arguing that modal operators introduce referential opacity, rendering substitutions of co-referring terms invalid within modal contexts and thereby undermining classical logic's extensionality.^[20] Quine contended that de re modal claims—attributing essential properties to objects themselves, such as "9 is necessarily greater than 7"—commit to Aristotelian essentialism, which he viewed as scientifically untenable and lacking clear criteria for distinguishing necessary from contingent properties.^[21] Critics, including Saul Kripke, responded by developing rigid designators to salvage de re modality, arguing that modal logic clarifies metaphysical necessities discernible a posteriori, as in cases like water's chemical composition entailing its necessity as H₂O.^[22] Quine's critiques persist in debates over whether modality presupposes obscure intensional entities or can be grounded in empirical or conceptual analysis.^[20] The de re/de dicto distinction fuels ongoing disputes about essentialism and modality's scope. De dicto modalities apply to propositions as wholes (e.g., "It is necessary that 9 > 7"), while de re modalities concern objects directly (e.g., "The number of planets is necessarily greater than 7," which fails under referential opacity if "the number of planets" shifts denotation).^[23] Quine exploited this to argue de re readings invite paradoxes and essentialist doctrines incompatible with naturalism, as objects lack intrinsic modal properties independent of descriptions.^[24] Defenders counter that essentialism is indispensable for metaphysics, enabling explanations of identity across worlds without reducing to mere verbal conventions, though empirical tests for essences remain elusive.^[24] Debates also surround the axioms of modal logic, notably whether S5—characterizing modalities where accessibility between worlds is an equivalence relation—adequately captures metaphysical necessity and possibility. S5's axiom 5 (◊P → □◊P) implies that genuine possibilities are necessarily possible, aligning with views of modality as governed by logical or metaphysical constraints unvarying across worlds.^[25] Critics question its universality, suggesting weaker systems like S4 better suit contingent domains (e.g., epistemic modality), where possibilities might not persist modally stable, potentially leading to overcommitment in applications like arguments for necessary beings.^[25] Proponents, drawing on absolute necessity's transitivity, defend S5 as the default for metaphysical modality, supported by its success in formalizing intuitions about unchangeable logical truths.^[25] These axiomatic choices influence broader controversies, such as modality's reducibility to non-modal primitives versus its status as irreducible.^[26]

Linguistics and Semantics

Grammatical Expression

Grammatical modality encompasses the inflectional and syntactic devices by which languages encode concepts of possibility, necessity, permission, obligation, and volition, distinguishing them from declarative assertions of fact. These expressions integrate modal notions directly into the verb phrase or clause structure, often through dedicated morphological categories like mood or auxiliary elements, rather than solely lexical means such as adverbs. In formal linguistic analysis, grammatical mood serves as a primary vehicle for modality, contrasting indicative forms (for actualized events) with subjunctive or irrealis forms (for hypothetical or non-actualized scenarios).^[27]^[28] In English, modality is predominantly realized via a closed class of modal auxiliary verbs—can, could, may, might, must, shall, should, will, and would—which lack non-finite forms and require a main verb complement to convey epistemic (knowledge-based) or deontic (obligation-based) senses. For instance, must signals strong necessity ("The law requires compliance"), while may indicates permission or epistemic possibility ("It may rain tomorrow"). These auxiliaries exhibit defective paradigms, inverting with subjects in questions and preceding negation without "do"-support, traits that underscore their grammatical integration. Beyond auxiliaries, English employs semi-modals like have to or be able to for similar functions, and residual subjunctive moods in clauses like "I suggest that he go," though these are declining in contemporary usage.^[29] Cross-linguistically, grammatical expression varies significantly: analytic languages like English rely on invariant auxiliaries, whereas fusional languages such as Spanish use subjunctive inflections (e.g., quiera for "that he/she want" in optative contexts) to mark irrealis modality. Agglutinative languages, including Turkish, incorporate modal suffixes directly onto verbs (e.g., -ebil- for possibility), allowing stacked morphemes for nuanced combinations. Some languages lexicalize modality via particles or adverbs without dedicated verb morphology, while others blend evidentiality (source of information) with modality, as in Quechua's suffix -sh- for conjectural possibility. These differences highlight that while modality universally supplements propositional content with attitudinal layers, its grammatical encoding reflects typological priorities, with functional morphemes enabling compact expression in morphologically rich systems.^[30]^[31]

Semantic Analysis and Theories

In formal semantics, modality is analyzed as the expression of necessity and possibility relative to propositions evaluated across possible worlds, adapting frameworks from modal logic to natural language. Necessity modals, such as "must," are interpreted as universal quantifiers over an accessible set of possible worlds, asserting that the prejacent proposition holds in all such worlds; possibility modals, such as "may" or "can," function as existential quantifiers, requiring the prejacent to hold in at least one accessible world.^[32] This possible worlds approach, rooted in Saul Kripke's 1963 development of Kripke frames with accessibility relations, enables precise truth-conditional semantics for modal sentences by relativizing evaluation to contextually determined accessibility.^[33] In linguistics, accessibility is not fixed by logical relations alone but varies with modal flavor, distinguishing alethic modality (logical necessity/possibility) from epistemic (compatibility with evidence or knowledge), deontic (obligation or permission), bouletic (desire-based), and circumstantial or teleological types.^[32] Angelika Kratzer's framework (1981) refines this for natural language modals by decomposing their semantics into two context-dependent parameters: a modal base, which maps the evaluation world to a set of propositions whose intersection yields the accessible worlds, and an ordering source, which imposes a partial preorder on those worlds according to stereotypical or preferential ideals.^[34] Necessity holds if the prejacent is true in all worlds minimal with respect to the ordering among the accessible ones; possibility if true in some minimal world.^[32] Modal flavor emerges from the interaction: epistemic modals typically pair an epistemic modal base (worlds compatible with the speaker's knowledge as of 2025 contextual standards) with a realistic (veridical) ordering source, yielding interpretations like "John must be home" based on evidence; deontic modals combine a circumstantial modal base with a deontic ordering source prioritizing legal or moral ideals, as in "John must pay the fine."^[32] ^[34] This accounts for the polysemy of English modals like "must," which shifts interpretation without lexical ambiguity, and extends to cross-linguistic data where modals embed under attitudes or conditionals.^[34] Alternative theories critique or extend Kratzer's ordering for overgenerating non-ideal worlds in certain contexts, proposing instead dynamic updates to modal bases via discourse or pragmatic enrichment.^[35] David Lewis's counterpart theory (1968), while influential in philosophical modal semantics, has limited direct uptake in linguistics due to its emphasis on transworld identity via counterparts rather than direct quantification over worlds, though it informs de re readings of modals like "John could have won."^[36] Empirical support for these analyses draws from controlled experiments, such as those showing scalar implicatures under modals (e.g., "Some students might pass" implying not all, tested in 2010s psycholinguistic studies), validating truth-conditional predictions against Gricean alternatives.^[32]

Cross-Linguistic Variations

Cross-linguistic variations in modality encompass diverse grammatical strategies for encoding notions of possibility, necessity, permission, obligation, and speaker attitudes toward propositions, ranging from highly grammaticalized inflectional systems to analytic or lexical constructions. Typological studies reveal that in approximately half of 207 surveyed languages, a single modal marker can express both epistemic (knowledge-based) and deontic (obligation-based) modality, while the other half maintain lexical distinctions between these types.^[37] This polysemy often depends on contextual factors, as seen in Malay where mesti ('must') serves both epistemic necessity and deontic obligation, but mungkin ('possibly') is restricted to epistemic uses with variable strength.^[37] In Indo-European languages, modality frequently involves analytic modal auxiliaries or inflectional moods. English modals like may and must exhibit ambiguity across epistemic and root (deontic/dynamic) interpretations, as in "It may rain" (epistemic possibility) versus "You may leave" (permission), with disambiguation via pragmatics.^[37] Romance languages grammaticalize non-factuality through subjunctive moods or epistemic futures, such as Spanish podría (conditional for weakened possibility) or Italian future tenses implying probability. Germanic languages supplement modals with particles for epistemic nuance, like German vielleicht ('perhaps') or wohl (inferential).^[38] Agglutinative languages often fuse modality into verbal suffixes, allowing compact expression of layered meanings. Turkish employs suffixes for ability (-ebil-, e.g., okuyabilirim 'I can read') and necessity (-meli-, e.g., gelmeli 'must come'), with evidential -DI- adding inferential or hearsay modality to past events, as in reported inferences carrying epistemic doubt.^[39]^[40] West Greenlandic similarly uses polysemous suffixes like -ssa- ('must') and -sinnaa- ('can') for both epistemic and deontic senses.^[37] Japanese modality operates via a clause-layered structure integrating auxiliaries, suffixes, and particles, prioritizing speaker subjectivity over rigid force distinctions. Potential -rareru- conveys ability or possibility (e.g., taberareru 'can eat'), while epistemic particles like darou express conjecture or uncertainty, often combining with evidentials like yō for reported hearsay.^[41]^[42] This contrasts with Salishan languages like St’át’imcets, where clitics distinguish epistemic (=k’a=) from deontic (=ka=) modality, and subjunctive mood obligatorily weakens modal force by restricting conversational backgrounds, differing from Indo-European subjunctives that primarily mark irrealis.^[37]^[43] These differences reflect broader typological patterns, including interactions with evidentiality (e.g., inferential marking implying reduced commitment in Turkish or Japanese) and hierarchical models separating factuality from attitudes like epistemic commitment or deontic authority. Languages with low grammaticalization, such as some isolating ones, express modality primarily through lexical verbs or adverbs, relying on context for interpretation, highlighting how modal systems adapt to cultural and cognitive priorities in encoding uncertainty and obligation.^[38]^[44]

Physical and Natural Sciences

Modal analysis characterizes the dynamic behavior of linear structures by determining their natural frequencies, mode shapes, and damping ratios, which represent the inherent vibration modes arising from the system's mass and stiffness properties. These parameters are derived from solving the eigenvalue problem of the governing equations of motion, where the structure's response to excitation reveals resonant frequencies at which energy absorption is maximized. In physics, this aligns with principles of oscillatory systems, such as those described by the wave equation for continuous media, while in engineering, it enables prediction of resonance conditions that could lead to structural failure under operational loads.^[45]^[46] The technique encompasses analytical, experimental, and computational approaches. Analytical modal analysis involves deriving exact solutions for simple systems, such as beams or plates, using differential equations to compute undamped natural frequencies \omega_n = \sqrt{k/m} for single-degree-of-freedom models or generalized eigenvalue formulations for multi-degree systems. Experimental modal analysis (EMA) employs physical testing with exciters like impact hammers or shakers to measure frequency response functions (FRFs) from accelerometers, followed by curve-fitting algorithms to extract modal constants; this method gained prominence in the 1970s with advancements in piezoelectric sensors produced en masse by 1973. Computational methods, particularly finite element analysis (FEA), discretize complex geometries into elements to approximate mode shapes via numerical solvers, often validated against EMA data for accuracy in real-world applications.^[47]^[48]^[49] In engineering practice, modal analysis is essential for designing against fatigue and excessive vibrations in domains like aerospace, where it identifies critical modes in aircraft wings to prevent flutter, and automotive engineering, for chassis optimization to mitigate road-induced resonances. For instance, finite element modal analysis of permanent magnet linear synchronous motors has revealed natural frequencies influencing thrust ripple, guiding material and geometry refinements. Validation through EMA-FEA correlation, as in tennis racket prototypes, ensures models predict dynamic responses within 5-10% error, enhancing reliability in load-bearing structures. Historically rooted in 19th-century structural dynamics theories, modern experimental techniques evolved from 1960s digital signal processing, with seminal contributions from researchers like David Ewins, who formalized modal testing protocols in the late 20th century.^[50]^[51]^[52]^[53]

Applications in Other Scientific Domains

In geology and petrology, modal analysis quantifies the volume percentages of mineral constituents in rocks, aiding classification and provenance studies. Traditional methods involve point counting on thin sections, where 500–1500 points are sampled per slide to estimate modal abundances with statistical precision.^[54] Modern alternatives, such as X-ray diffraction (XRD) combined with Rietveld refinement, offer non-destructive analysis comparable to point counting for rock-forming minerals, though they require calibration for accuracy in fine-grained samples.^[55] These techniques reveal compositional variations, as in sandstones where modal data distinguish quartzose from lithic types, informing sedimentary processes.^[56] In biology and biomechanics, modal analysis extends vibration characterization to organic structures, identifying natural frequencies and mode shapes in tissues or bio-inspired designs. For instance, finite element models of the human body during standing or whole-body vibration yield modal parameters like frequencies below 10 Hz for postural sway modes, crucial for assessing injury risks in dynamic environments.^[57] Applications include analyzing insect hind wings via digital image correlation, where modal frequencies guide biomimetic flapping mechanisms with resonances up to several hundred Hz.^[58] Such analyses support ergonomic designs and reveal biomechanical damping, as in seated human transmissibility studies measuring modes at head, spine, and pelvis sites.^[59] In fluid-influenced natural systems like oceanography, modal analysis decomposes wave or flow dynamics into orthogonal modes, enhancing predictions of coastal erosion or sediment transport, though primarily rooted in physics extensions.^[60] These cross-domain uses underscore modal techniques' versatility for empirical characterization beyond structural engineering.

Medicine and Healthcare

Evidence-Based Therapeutic Modalities

In rehabilitation medicine, evidence-based therapeutic modalities primarily involve physical agents such as electrotherapy, ultrasound, and thermal applications, validated through randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses for managing pain, inflammation, and tissue repair in musculoskeletal conditions. These interventions are typically adjunctive, enhancing outcomes when combined with therapeutic exercise and manual therapy, which demonstrate stronger empirical support for long-term functional improvements.^[61]^[62] Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), a form of electrotherapy, applies low-voltage electrical currents via skin electrodes to modulate pain signals. Systematic reviews provide moderate-certainty evidence that TENS reduces pain intensity during or immediately after application compared to placebo in chronic pain conditions, with no serious adverse events reported across trials involving thousands of participants.^[63]^[64] However, effects are short-term and marginal in some analyses, with very low certainty for clinically meaningful long-term reductions or impacts on disability.^[65] Low-frequency TENS shows particular promise for non-pharmacological pain control in chronic scenarios.^[66] Therapeutic ultrasound delivers acoustic energy to tissues, promoting analgesia and functional recovery in conditions like knee osteoarthritis. Meta-analyses of randomized trials indicate that both continuous and pulsed ultrasound significantly outperform sham treatments for pain relief and joint function, with effect sizes supporting its safety and efficacy in outpatient settings.^[67] Recent systematic reviews confirm ultrasound's superiority over controls for musculoskeletal pain reduction, though heterogeneity in protocols limits generalizability.^[68] For lateral epicondylitis, ultrasound aids tendon healing when integrated with exercise, per controlled studies.^[69] Cryotherapy and thermotherapy represent thermal modalities, with cryotherapy (cold application) effectively decreasing acute pain and swelling post-injury via vasoconstriction and reduced metabolic activity. Evidence from rehabilitation protocols supports its use for short-term symptom control in soft-tissue injuries, often measured by visual analog scales in trials.^[70] Thermotherapy (heat) similarly alleviates chronic stiffness by increasing blood flow, though both require cautious application to avoid tissue damage, and their benefits plateau without active rehabilitation.^[71] Despite widespread clinical adoption, meta-analyses highlight that biophysical modalities like these yield modest effects compared to placebo in broad populations, underscoring the need for patient-specific selection based on high-quality evidence rather than routine use.^[72] Prioritizing modalities with demonstrated causal mechanisms—such as nerve gating in TENS or thermal modulation of inflammation—over unverified assumptions ensures alignment with empirical outcomes in practice.^[73]

Sensory and Diagnostic Modalities

Sensory modalities encompass the distinct channels through which the human nervous system receives and processes stimuli from the internal and external environment. These are broadly classified into general somatic senses, which include touch, pressure, pain, temperature, vibration, and proprioception, detected by receptors in the skin, muscles, and viscera; and special senses, comprising vision, hearing, equilibrium (vestibular sense), taste (gustation), and smell (olfaction), mediated by dedicated organs such as the eyes, ears, tongue, and nasal epithelium.^[74] This categorization reflects the physiological specificity of receptor types, where, for example, mechanoreceptors respond to mechanical deformation for touch and proprioception, while photoreceptors in the retina handle light for vision.^[75] In medical diagnostics, evaluation of sensory modalities is essential for identifying impairments in neural pathways, often through clinical tests like two-point discrimination for tactile acuity or Romberg testing for proprioceptive and vestibular function. Deficits in these modalities can signal conditions such as diabetic neuropathy, where up to 50% of patients experience sensory loss in distal extremities due to axonal damage, or multiple sclerosis, characterized by demyelination affecting sensory conduction.^[76] Electrophysiological assessments, including nerve conduction studies, quantify sensory nerve function by measuring evoked potentials, with normal sensory nerve action potential amplitudes typically exceeding 10 microvolts in upper limbs.^[77] Diagnostic modalities in healthcare refer to the technical methods used to gather objective data on patient physiology and pathology, predominantly through imaging and functional testing. Imaging modalities dominate, with X-ray radiography providing rapid visualization of bone and dense tissues via ionizing radiation absorption, utilized in over 100 million procedures annually in the U.S. for fractures and chest pathology.^[78] Computed tomography (CT) enhances resolution by acquiring multiple X-ray projections reconstructed into cross-sectional images, offering sensitivity for detecting pulmonary emboli at rates exceeding 90% in validated protocols.^[79] Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) employs radiofrequency pulses in a strong magnetic field to generate detailed soft-tissue contrast without radiation, proving superior for neurological and musculoskeletal diagnostics, such as identifying multiple sclerosis plaques with 85-95% accuracy in lesion detection.^[80] Ultrasound uses high-frequency sound waves for real-time, non-invasive imaging of vascular flow and fetal development, with Doppler variants quantifying blood velocity to diagnose stenosis, where peak systolic velocities above 200 cm/s indicate carotid artery narrowing.^[81] Nuclear medicine modalities, like positron emission tomography (PET), trace radiotracers to assess metabolic activity, aiding oncology by distinguishing malignant from benign lesions based on standardized uptake values greater than 2.5.^[79] These modalities are selected based on diagnostic yield, radiation exposure, and cost, with evidence from randomized trials guiding preferences, such as MRI over CT for non-traumatic headaches to minimize unnecessary radiation.^[82] Integration of sensory and diagnostic modalities enhances precision; for instance, sensory evoked potentials complement MRI in confirming optic neuritis by measuring delayed visual responses, with latencies prolonged beyond 120 milliseconds indicating demyelination.^[74] Empirical validation through prospective studies underscores their reliability, though limitations like MRI contraindications in patients with pacemakers necessitate multimodal approaches.^[79]

Emerging Modalities and Innovations

New drug modalities, including antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), bispecific antibodies, and targeted protein degraders, have expanded the pharmaceutical pipeline, accounting for 60% of its projected value in 2025, up from 57% in 2024.^[83] These approaches target previously "undruggable" proteins by inducing degradation rather than inhibition, offering potential for treating cancers and rare diseases where traditional small molecules fail. Gene editing via CRISPR-Cas9 has advanced into clinical applications, with Casgevy (exagamglogene autotemcel), approved by the FDA in December 2023 for sickle cell disease and beta-thalassemia, marking the first CRISPR-based therapy to reach market.^[83] Innovations like AI-integrated CRISPR tools, such as Stanford's CRISPR-GPT model released in September 2025, accelerate guide RNA design and experiment validation, reducing development timelines for personalized therapies.^[84] In May 2025, the first patient received an on-demand, in vivo CRISPR therapy for a rare genetic disorder, developed in just six months from sequencing to administration.^[85] Cell therapies, including CAR-T cells, continue to evolve for solid tumors and autoimmune conditions, with ongoing trials expanding beyond hematologic malignancies.^[86] RNA-based modalities, such as mRNA vaccines tailored for cancer, enable personalized immunization against tumor-specific antigens, with phase I trials demonstrating immune responses in patients as of 2025.^[87] In diagnostics, AI-driven multimodal analysis integrates imaging, genomics, and clinical data for predictive modeling, improving early detection accuracy in oncology and cardiology.^[88] Point-of-care nanobiosensors and liquid biopsies facilitate non-invasive, real-time monitoring of biomarkers like circulating tumor DNA, with advancements reported in 2025 enabling rapid sepsis and cancer screening.^[89] Wearable devices with embedded AI for continuous physiological tracking, combined with telemedicine platforms, support remote patient monitoring, reducing hospital readmissions by up to 30% in chronic disease management per 2024-2025 studies.^[90] Robotic-assisted surgery and 3D-printed implants represent procedural innovations, enhancing precision in orthopedics and personalized prosthetics.^[87] These modalities face challenges including scalability, off-target effects in gene editing, and regulatory hurdles, yet empirical data from trials underscore their causal efficacy in altering disease trajectories where prior interventions lacked impact.^[91]

Technology and Computing

Multimodal Data Processing

Multimodal data processing refers to the integration and joint analysis of data from diverse input types, or modalities, such as text, images, audio, video, and sensor signals, within computational systems to enable more robust inference and decision-making.^[92]^[93] This approach leverages complementarity across modalities, where, for instance, visual cues can disambiguate textual ambiguities, improving overall model performance beyond unimodal systems.^[94] Core principles include handling modality heterogeneity—differing data structures and scales—establishing connections between modalities, and modeling their interactions for synergistic representations.^[94] In practice, processing pipelines typically involve representation learning to encode each modality into a shared latent space, followed by fusion techniques. Early fusion concatenates raw inputs before a unified model, late fusion combines separate unimodal outputs via decision-level aggregation, and hybrid methods blend these for flexibility, as seen in architectures like multimodal transformers that use cross-attention mechanisms to align features.^[95] Alignment challenges arise from temporal or spatial mismatches, addressed through techniques like contrastive learning in models such as CLIP, which pretrains on image-text pairs to learn joint embeddings without explicit supervision.^[96] Co-learning strategies further enable modalities to mutually inform each other, enhancing generalization, though they demand large-scale paired datasets.^[97] Applications in computing span natural language processing, computer vision, and robotics, where multimodal systems power tasks like visual question answering—combining image analysis with query parsing—or autonomous agents that fuse lidar, camera, and textual instructions for navigation.^[98] In large language models, extensions like vision-language models process interleaved inputs, enabling capabilities such as image captioning or document understanding from scanned visuals and text.^[99] These systems outperform unimodal counterparts in benchmarks, with multimodal models achieving up to 20-30% gains in accuracy on datasets like Visual Genome for relational reasoning.^[94] Key challenges include data heterogeneity, requiring standardization across modalities' varying resolutions and noise levels, and computational demands, as joint training scales quadratically with modality count, often necessitating distributed systems or efficient approximations like low-rank adaptations.^[100] Fusion risks information loss if alignments fail, while scarcity of high-quality multimodal datasets hampers training, mitigated partially by synthetic data generation but introducing bias amplification.^[97] Ethical concerns, such as amplified biases from imbalanced modalities, underscore the need for rigorous evaluation.^[101] Recent advancements from 2023 to 2025 have accelerated with unified foundation models like GPT-4o, released in May 2024, which natively processes text, audio, and vision in a single architecture, supporting real-time voice interactions and image reasoning with latencies under 300ms.^[102] Google's Gemini 1.5, launched February 2024, extended context windows to 1 million tokens across modalities, enabling analysis of hour-long videos alongside text.^[102] By mid-2025, trends shifted toward multimodal agents that chain reasoning across inputs, as in xAI's Grok-2 vision capabilities integrated in August 2024, and open-source efforts like LLaVA achieving near-parity with proprietary models on benchmarks such as MMMU, where scores rose from 40% in 2023 to over 60% in 2025 iterations.^[103] These developments, driven by scaled pretraining on trillions of tokens and interdisciplinary datasets, promise broader deployment but highlight ongoing needs for robust alignment to causal structures in real-world data.^[104]

Other Technological Applications

In software engineering, modality manifests in the design of dialog boxes, distinguishing between modal and modeless variants to control user focus and workflow. Modal dialogs suspend interaction with the parent application or other windows until the user provides input or dismisses the dialog, commonly used for essential operations like file save confirmations or authentication prompts to prevent unintended actions.^[105] This approach traces to early graphical user interfaces in the 1980s, where it ensured sequential task handling in resource-constrained environments.^[106] Modeless dialogs, by contrast, remain open while allowing concurrent access to the main interface, facilitating multitasking in scenarios such as reference toolbars or status monitors.^[105] Broader application of modes in user interfaces involves discrete system states that reinterpret user inputs, such as command versus insertion modes in text editors like Vim, where keystrokes toggle between navigation and editing behaviors.^[107] Such modes optimize efficiency for power users by condensing functions into shared inputs but introduce risks of "mode errors," where mismatched expectations lead to faults; for example, pressing a key intended for editing in a navigation mode may delete content unexpectedly.^[107] Empirical studies from the 1990s onward, including analyses by usability experts, recommend minimizing modes in consumer software to reduce cognitive load, influencing shifts toward modeless paradigms in applications like web browsers and mobile apps.^[107] In human-computer interaction, modality denotes specific sensory or input channels—such as visual displays, auditory cues, or haptic vibrations—enabling tailored system responses independent of multi-channel fusion. Haptic modalities, for instance, deliver force feedback through vibrations or resistance in devices like gaming controllers, providing spatial orientation cues with latencies under 10 milliseconds in optimized setups.^[108] Voice modalities support hands-free control in embedded systems, as seen in automotive interfaces where speech recognition processes commands with accuracy rates exceeding 95% in quiet environments.^[109] These applications enhance accessibility, allowing users with visual impairments to rely on non-visual feedback, though effectiveness varies by environmental noise and device calibration.^[108]

Pseudoscience and Alternative Claims

Common Pseudoscientific Modalities

Homeopathy, developed in 1796 by Samuel Hahnemann, posits that substances causing symptoms in healthy individuals can treat similar symptoms in the ill through serial dilutions often exceeding Avogadro's limit, rendering remedies devoid of original molecules.^[110] Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials, including a 2017 meta-analysis, find homeopathic effects equivalent to placebos across conditions like respiratory infections and postoperative ileus, with no evidence of efficacy beyond nonspecific effects.^[111] This contradicts causal mechanisms in pharmacology, as dilutions lack active agents yet claim specific therapeutic action, a hallmark of pseudoscience unsupported by reproducible empirical data.^[112] Reiki, originated in early 20th-century Japan by Mikao Usui, involves practitioners placing hands on or near patients to purportedly channel "universal life energy" for healing.^[113] Clinical trials and reviews, such as those assessing pain and anxiety reduction, demonstrate outcomes attributable to placebo responses rather than any detectable energy transfer, with physiological measures like heart rate variability showing no unique Reiki effects.^[114] Cancer Research UK concludes there is no scientific evidence that Reiki prevents, treats, or cures any condition, including cancer, as claims rely on unverifiable subjective experiences without falsifiable mechanisms.^[115] The modality's foundational assumption of manipulable biofields lacks detection via standard instrumentation, aligning it with pseudoscientific energy medicine practices.^[113] Applied kinesiology (AK), introduced in 1964 by George Goodheart, employs manual muscle testing to diagnose nutritional deficiencies, organ dysfunction, or allergies by assessing resistance to arm pressure under verbal or substance stimuli.^[116] Double-blind studies, including a 2014 randomized trial, reveal AK's diagnostic accuracy no better than chance, failing to reliably detect conditions like nutrient imbalances or venom allergies.^[117] A 2007 review disentangling AK from orthodox muscle testing found unique procedures either refuted or unsupported by evidence, with results influenced by practitioner expectations rather than physiological states.^[116] This diagnostic modality violates principles of causal realism, as muscle responses do not correlate with internal pathologies absent biomechanical links, rendering it empirically invalid for medical assessment.^[118] Other prevalent pseudoscientific modalities, such as therapeutic touch and chromotherapy, similarly invoke unmeasurable energies or color vibrations for healing without controlled evidence. Therapeutic touch, akin to Reiki, claims aura manipulation but trials like the 1988 nurse study showed practitioners unable to detect human presences beyond guessing. Energy therapies broadly persist despite meta-analyses indicating placebo-level effects, often promoted in integrative settings despite rejecting empirical validation.^[119] These practices endure due to anecdotal appeal and regulatory leniency, but rigorous scrutiny consistently exposes their incompatibility with established physics and biology.^[120]

Empirical Critiques and Debunking

Empirical investigations into pseudoscientific modalities, particularly those claiming to manipulate biofields, energies, or vibrations without mechanistic plausibility, have consistently failed to demonstrate effects beyond placebo or chance. Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses reveal that practitioners cannot reliably detect purported energy fields, and therapeutic outcomes align with expectation biases rather than causal interventions. These findings underscore the absence of verifiable mechanisms, as modalities like therapeutic touch and Reiki rely on untestable assertions detached from physiological or physical principles.^[121]^[122] A landmark experiment by Emily Rosa, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1998, tested 21 therapeutic touch practitioners' ability to detect a purported human energy field using a simple blind setup with outstretched hands separated by a small barrier. None succeeded in 210 trials, with detection rates at chance levels (p < 0.001), directly contradicting claims of sensory modality for bioenergy manipulation.^[123] This study, the first by a child author in JAMA, highlighted methodological flaws in prior supportive research, such as lack of blinding, and has withstood replication attempts affirming null results. Meta-analyses of homeopathy, often promoted as a vibrational or informational modality, similarly expose placebo equivalence. A 2005 Lancet review by Shang et al. analyzed 110 homeopathy trials against matched conventional medicine trials, finding homeopathic effects indistinguishable from placebo after excluding biased studies, with no evidence for dilution-based potency claims.67177-2/fulltext) Subsequent critiques and reanalyses, including those addressing publication bias, confirm that apparent benefits evaporate under rigorous controls, attributing persistence to selective reporting in alternative medicine literature.^[124]^[125] Reiki, a hands-off energy channeling modality, lacks empirical support in systematic reviews. A 2009 review in The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine evaluated 13 studies and concluded insufficient evidence for significant treatment effects, with positive findings attributable to non-specific factors like relaxation rather than qi transfer.^[126] Cochrane analyses on Reiki for anxiety and depression, updated through 2015, report low-quality evidence and no reliable benefits over sham controls, emphasizing the need for larger, blinded trials that have yet to yield positive causal data. Crystal healing, asserting vibrational resonance for healing, fares no better under scrutiny. A 2001 study by psychologist Christopher French at Goldsmiths, University of London, found participants reported subjective benefits from crystals identical to those from fake ones, indicating placebo-driven illusions of efficacy without objective physiological changes.^[122] Lacking randomized trial support, such modalities persist via anecdotal endorsement, but empirical null results align with physical principles: crystals exhibit no unique bioenergetic properties beyond inert matter.^[127]

References

[1]
[PDF] Possibility and Necessity - rintintin.colorado.edu
1. Modality: Modality is the study of possibility and necessity. These concepts are intuitive enough. Possibility: Some things could have been different.
[2]
[PDF] Modality, Metaphysics, and Method - Princeton University
Since the modal turn of the 1960's and 1970's, modality has played a central role in metaphysical theories about numerous topics.
[3]
[PDF] ESSENCE AND MODALITY Kit Fine Philosophy, NYU June, 1992
It sees real definition rather than de re modality as central to our understanding of the concept. Let us turn first to the modal account. There are ...
[4]
[PDF] Modality - PhilPapers
An important part of philosophy of modality in the twentieth century was concerned with understanding and applying modal logics. Two classic and very ...
[5]
Aristotle's Modal Proofs: Prior Analytics A8-22 in Predicate Logic
Aristotle's modal syllogistic is his study of patterns of reasoning about necessity and possibility. Many scholars think the modal syllogistic is incoherent ...
[6]
[PDF] The Beginnings of Formal Logic: Deduction in Aristotle's Topics vs ...
In the Prior Analytics, Aristotle takes indeterminate sentences to be similar in logical force, perhaps equivalent, to the corresponding particular ones.
[7]
[PDF] Avicenna's Modal Metaphysics: The Necessity of the Actual
This dissertation explains how Avicenna's modal distinction (i.e., the view that (a) every existing being is either necessary per se or possible per se and (b) ...<|separator|>
[8]
[PDF] Modality in Medieval Philosophy - University of St Andrews
A third major thinker who developed a modal system independent of Aristotle's was Avicenna, writing in what is now Iran, on the edge of the. Islamic world, in ...
[9]
Essence and Existence in Avicenna and Averroes - ResearchGate
The distinction between essence and existence is one of the most. central and controversial aspects of Avicenna's (Arabic Ibn Sên×, ; d. 1037) philosophy. Like ...
[10]
Leibniz on Possible Worlds - ScienceDirect.com
Logicians frequently make reference to the Leibnizian idea that a proposition is a necessary truth if and only if it is true of all possible worlds when ...
[11]
Logical Modalities from Aristotle to Carnap: The Story of Necessity
Mar 16, 2017 · Many new principles of late medieval modal logic, nested modalities in early modern metaphysics, and Leibniz's modal theories show similarities ...Missing: foundations | Show results with:foundations
[12]
The Development of C. I. Lewis's Philosophy of Modal Logic ...
Sep 5, 2016 · In the 1910s, Lewis presented his modal logic largely as a response to classical logic. In the 1920s he provided an epistemological ...
[13]
C. I. Lewis: History and Philosophy of Logic
Lewis (1883–1964) was the first major figure in history and philosophy of logic—a field that has come to be recognized as a sepa- rate specialty after years of ...
[14]
Modal Logic - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Feb 29, 2000 · Modal logic is, strictly speaking, the study of the deductive behavior of the expressions 'it is necessary that' and 'it is possible that'.What is Modal Logic? · Modal Logics · Modal Axioms and Conditions...
[15]
Varieties of Modality - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Nov 27, 2012 · Modal statements tell us something about what could be or must be the case. Such claims can come in many forms. Consider:.Epistemic and Metaphysical... · Metaphysical and Nomic... · Bibliography
[16]
Deontic Logic - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Feb 7, 2006 · Alethic modal logic is the logic of necessary truth and related notions. Consider six basic alethic modal notions, expressed as sentential ...Informal Preliminaries and... · Standard Deontic Logic · Other Enrichments of SDL
[17]
The Epistemology of Modality - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Dec 5, 2007 · The epistemology of modality investigates how we can know statements like (1)–(10), as well as modal premises or conclusions in philosophical arguments.Varieties of Modality and the... · Classification Schemes in the... · Perception
[18]
Modal Realism vs. Actualism Debate | PDF - Scribd
The document discusses two perspectives on possible worlds: 1. Lewis's modal realism views possible worlds as concrete existences like the actual world, ...
[19]
[PDF] Actualist Modal Realism - MSpace
In the space I have available, I have tried to select those issues, arguments and objections that have received substantial attention in the literature from.
[20]
Quine on intensional entities: Modality and quantification, truth and ...
In this paper, I reconstruct Quineʼs arguments against quantified modal logic, from the early 1940ʼs to the early 1960ʼs.
[21]
Some remarks on Quine's arguments against modal logic
1 Quine's argument that modal contexts are referentially opaque is familiar.1. It may be stated as follows: (1) Given a true statement of identity, either of ...
[22]
[PDF] Quine and Quantified Modal Logic: Against the Received View
For Quine, the not purely designative constructions are the typical cases of the modalities: while the object, the number nine (in and of itself) under the ...
[23]
[PDF] De Dicto vs De Re - Philosophy 125 - Branden Fitelson
Nov 4, 2003 · There is another kind of modal claim, called de re (even more controversial!). • Consider the following de re claim involving the necessity ...
[24]
The Problem of de re Modality - Oxford Academic
Quine has two arguments against the intelligibility of de re modality: a “logical” and a “metaphysical” one. That the “logical” argument is central to Quine's ...
[25]
S5 as the Logic of Metaphysical Modality: Two Arguments for and ...
Two arguments for S5 being the logic of metaphysical modality are favourably discussed: one from the logic of absolute necessity, one from Timothy Williamson.
[26]
[PDF] The Varieties of Necessity - NYU Arts & Science
Thus what it is for a necessity or possibility of any of these forms to obtain does not consist in the obtaining of some other form or forms of necessity or ...
[27]
Mood and Modality | The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar
We may characterize mood as the grammatical expression of modality, often presented as a contrast between inflected indicative versus inflected subjunctive ...Missing: expression | Show results with:expression
[28]
[PDF] Modality and Language - MIT
Aug 30, 2005 · Modality is a category of linguistic meaning having to do with the expression of possibility and necessity. A modalized sentence locates an ...
[29]
[PDF] A Semantic Approach to the English Modality - Academy Publication
Various grammatical categories are possibly used to show modality. However, modal verbs are one of the most important means related to the modality. Modal verbs ...
[30]
[PDF] The grammatical category of modality - Valentine Hacquard
Languages may differ in whether modality is expressed by functional morphemes or solely by lexical ones. They further differ in whether their modals show ...
[31]
[PDF] Modality in Grammar and Discourse An Introductory Essay
Modality is the semantic domain of meaning, adding a supplement to the neutral meaning of a proposition, such as factual or declarative.
[32]
None
### Summary of Semantic Analysis of Modality
[33]
Possible Worlds - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 18, 2013 · Modal logic, therefore, is intensional: in general, the truth value of a sentence is determined by something over and above its form and the ...
[34]
[PDF] The Notional Category of Modality
In dealing with the semantics of modals, the main danger one is facing is to get utterly lost in the variety of interpretations one and the same expression can ...
[35]
[PDF] 'Ought': OUT OF ORDER - USC Dornsife
ABSTRACT: I argue that Angelika Kratzer's introduction of an ordering source parameter into the semantics for natural language modals was a mistake, ...
[36]
Counterpart-Theoretic Semantics for Quantified Modal Logic
In the semantics induced by Lewis's translation rules, formulas of quantified modal logic are true relative to a world and an assignment function.
[37]
16.4: Cross-linguistic variation - Social Sci LibreTexts
Apr 9, 2022 · In §16.2 we noted that it is common for a single modal form to be used for several different types of modality; but there are also many ...
[38]
[PDF] Cross-linguistic annotation of modality: a data-driven hierarchical ...
We present an annotation model of modal- ity which is (i) cross-linguistic, relying on a wide, strongly typologically motivated ap- proach, and (ii) ...
[39]
[PDF] a contrastive study of turkish and english modality with - Raco.cat
Jan 24, 2012 · Due to the vowel harmony in Turkish the suffix which indicates modality is either e-bilir or a-bilir depending on the vowels in the verbs. “The ...
[40]
[PDF] TENSE, ASPECT, AND MODALITY IN THE USE OF THE TURKISH ...
In its use as a past tense morpheme, the particle carries modal functions of inference and hearsay, and is pragmatically extended to expressions of surprise, ...
[41]
Modality (Chapter 16) - The Cambridge Handbook of Japanese ...
(1) Modality is a linguistic category referring to the factual status of a proposition. A proposition is modalized if it is marked for being undetermined with ...
[42]
[PDF] Japanese modality - Possibility and necessity: prioritizing, epistemic ...
Jan 30, 2017 · In Japanese linguistics, 'modality' is typically defined as the category of linguistic ex- pressions that serve to express the speakers ...
[43]
Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood
Aug 6, 2010 · The St'át'imcets subjunctive restricts the conversational background of a governing modal, but in a way which obligatorily weakens the modal's force.
[44]
DS-2008-08: Modality in Typological Perspective
Jun 14, 2022 · Abstract. Modality is a broad linguistic concept. It is an umbrella term for all sorts of meanings and can be expressed by many different ...Missing: world | Show results with:world<|control11|><|separator|>
[45]
Modal Analysis - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Modal analysis is defined as a technique used to identify modal parameters, such as frequencies and mode shapes, of structures through dynamic measurements.1 Introduction · 5 Oma And Bss Integration · 5.2 The Focus And Progress...
[46]
Modal Analysis: What It Is and Is Not - SIMTEQ Engineering -
A modal analysis tells us is at which frequency the structure will absorb all the energy applied to it, and what the shape looks like which corresponds to this ...The Real-Eigenvalue Problem · What A Mode Is · Modal Dynamics (classical...
[47]
Basics of Modal Testing and Analysis - Crystal Instruments
Modal analysis converts the vibration signals of excitation and responses measured on a complex structure into a set of modal parameters.
[48]
A Brief History of Modal Testing and Analysis - SIEMENS Community
Feb 13, 2021 · 1973 – Piezoelectric accelerometers and impact hammers start to be produced en masse for the modal testing market.
[49]
[PDF] Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis
The finite element method (FEM) is a numerical approach to build a discrete mathematical model of a system and is widely used for analytical modal analysis.
[50]
What Is Modal Analysis and Why Is It Necessary? | SimScale Blog
Mar 11, 2024 · The modal analysis provides an overview of the limits of the response of a system, studying the response amplitude in terms of frequency.
[51]
Finite element method and experimental modal analysis of PMLSM ...
Abstract: Modal analysis is a technology for vibration characteristic research. It is the foundation for structural dynamics analysis.Missing: techniques analytical
[52]
Using experimental modal analysis to validate a finite element ...
This paper presents a method of dynamically validating the FE model by comparing experimental modal analysis (EMA) data measured from a manufactured racket ...Missing: techniques analytical
[53]
David J. Ewins. 25 March 1942—25 January 2023 - Journals
Sep 4, 2024 · David Ewins was a major figure in experimental structural dynamics. He pioneered the subject that became known as modal testing, writing the seminal book on ...
[54]
Chapter 7: Quantitative Modal Analysis of Sandstone
May 23, 2022 · Modal analysis—the quantitative assessment of the volume abundances of rock constituents—is an essential element of the petrographic analysis of ...
[55]
Modal Analysis of Rock Forming Minerals: Contribution of XRD ...
Aug 10, 2025 · The modal (quantitative mineralogical) analysis of rocks is generally determined by point-counting method on thin sections or slabs.
[56]
Precision and accuracy of modal analysis methods for clastic ...
Jun 21, 2021 · Quantifying the proportions of certain components in rocks and deposits (modal analysis or componentry) is important in earth sciences.
[57]
Computational biomechanics for a standing human body: Modal ...
Jul 11, 2024 · We develop computational mechanical modeling and methods for the analysis and simulation of the motions of a human body.
[58]
Modal Analysis Using Digital Image Correlation Technique
Aug 6, 2025 · Understanding the dynamic behavior of structures has become increasingly important in the design process of any mechanical system.<|separator|>
[59]
Experimental modal analysis of the seated human body during ...
May 31, 2024 · In this paper, modal properties of the seated human body were identified from measured transmissibilities to the head, chest, lumbar spine L3, pelvis, hips and ...
[60]
Modal Analysis of Fluid Flows: An Overview | AIAA Journal
Oct 31, 2017 · Modal analysis extracts important features (modes) from complex fluid flows using techniques like POD, DMD, and Koopman analysis, to describe ...
[61]
The Need for Critical Thinking in Practice - PMC - PubMed Central
A 2019 systematic review by Zadro and colleagues14 titled, “Do physical therapists follow evidence-based guidelines when managing musculoskeletal conditions?” ...
[62]
A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials With Meta ...
Jul 19, 2022 · This systematic review recommends using manual therapy and therapeutic exercise modalities to improve join health status in combination with ...
[63]
Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve ... - BMJ Open
There was moderate-certainty evidence that pain intensity is lower during or immediately after TENS compared with placebo and without serious adverse events.
[64]
Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation ...
Feb 10, 2022 · There was moderate-certainty evidence that pain intensity is lower during or immediately after TENS compared with placebo and without serious adverse events.
[65]
Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation ...
Nov 22, 2023 · Based on very low certainty evidence, TENS resulted in brief and marginal reductions in pain (not deemed clinically important) and a short-term reduction in ...
[66]
Using TENS for Pain Control: Update on the State of the Evidence
Only TENS was identified as a promising non-pharmacological intervention for chronic pain. LF TENS demonstrated the greatest reduction in pain scores. A ...
[67]
A Meta‐Analysis of Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound Therapy for ...
Oct 29, 2021 · Our analysis confirmed that both pulsed and continuous ultrasound are effective and safe for pain relief and functional recovery of knee osteoarthritis.Abstract · Method · Results · Discussion
[68]
Ultrasound therapy for pain reduction in musculoskeletal disorders
Aug 20, 2024 · The overall meta-analysis results indicated that the efficacy of ultrasound was significantly better than the intervention (I2 = 74%, Z = 2.42, ...
[69]
Efficacy of ultrasound therapy for the treatment of lateral ... - BMJ Open
Ultrasound (US) therapy has been reported to be beneficial for various orthopaedic diseases, including tendinopathy.<|separator|>
[70]
Physical modalities and pain control in rehabilitation - NIH
Physical modalities, including thermal, electrical, mechanical energies, and light, are used for pain control in rehabilitation, but lack incontrovertible ...
[71]
Therapeutic Modalities - Non-Thermal | PM&R KnowledgeNow
Sep 19, 2024 · This review focuses on both commonly and uncommonly used physical modalities that are not temperature related.
[72]
Review of Therapeutic Ultrasound: Effectiveness Studies
There was little evidence that active therapeutic ultrasound is more effective than placebo ultrasound for treating people with pain or a range of ...Reviews of Ultrasound Research · Analysis of Methodologically... · Discussion
[73]
Physical Modality - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Physical modalities and techniques commonly used to relieve pain include therapeutic heat and cold, hydrotherapy, ultrasound, electricity, and traction.<|separator|>
[74]
Physiology, Sensory System - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
May 6, 2023 · General senses include touch, pain, temperature, proprioception, vibration, and pressure. Special senses include vision, hearing, taste, and smell.
[75]
13.2: Sensory Modalities and General Senses - Medicine LibreTexts
Dec 23, 2024 · An individual sensory modality represents the sensation of a specific type of stimulus. For example, the general sense of touch, which is known ...
[76]
Sensory Modalities – TeachMePhysiology
Aug 4, 2023 · Sensory modalities can be thought of as subtypes of sensory experiences, such as pain, temperature, pressure etc.
[77]
Physiology, Sensory Receptors - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Sensory receptors occur in specialized organs such as the eyes, ears, nose, and mouth, as well as internal organs.
[78]
Facts About Imaging Procedures | Radiation and Your Health - CDC
Feb 15, 2024 · Radiography (x-rays) and dental x-rays · Mammography · DEXA Scans (bone density) · CT scans (computed tomography scans) · Fluoroscopy · Nuclear ...The Basics · Impacts · Prevention
[79]
Modern Diagnostic Imaging Technique Applications and Risk ... - NIH
Medical imaging techniques are used to show internal structures under the skin and bones, as well as to diagnose abnormalities and treat diseases [1]. Medical ...
[80]
Different Imaging Tests Explained | UVA Radiology
Sep 17, 2019 · Learn more about our five most common modalities for our various types of imaging tests: X-ray, CT, MRI, ultrasound, and PET.
[81]
Radiology Modalities Explained: Understanding Medical Imaging ...
Radiology modalities are the different techniques and technologies used to capture images of the inside of the body.
[82]
The Diagnostic Process - Improving Diagnosis in Health Care - NCBI
The primary emphasis of this section focuses on laboratory medicine, anatomic pathology, and medical imaging (see Box 2-2). However, there are many important ...2the Diagnostic Process · Diagnostic Testing · Clinical Reasoning And...
[83]
Emerging New Drug Modalities in 2025 | BCG
Oct 9, 2025 · New modalities now account for $197 billion, 60% of the total pharma projected pipeline value, up from 57% in 2024. Wide-Ranging Performance ...
[84]
AI-powered CRISPR could lead to faster gene therapies, Stanford ...
Sep 16, 2025 · CRISPR-GPT, a large language model developed at Stanford Medicine, is accelerating gene-editing processes and increasing accessibility to CRISPR ...Missing: modalities innovations
[85]
First Patient Treated with On-Demand CRISPR in Just 6 Months
May 15, 2025 · A personalized in vivo CRISPR therapy for an infant was developed and delivered to the patient in just six months.Missing: modalities | Show results with:modalities
[86]
Emerging Therapeutic Modalities - Pharmacology-2025
Emerging therapeutic modalities include gene therapy, RNA-based therapies, CRISPR, CAR-T cell therapy, and other advanced biologics.
[87]
Emerging Medical Treatments in 2025: What's New in Healthcare?
Apr 14, 2025 · Emerging treatments include personalized mRNA cancer vaccines, robotic surgery, telemedicine, 3D printing, and AI for data analysis.
[88]
Future of Healthcare Technology: 2025 & Beyond | StartUs Insights
Advanced AI models integrate multimodal data, including genomics, imaging, and clinical records, to provide personalized and predictive healthcare solutions.
[89]
The future of diagnostics: cutting-edge advances in healthcare ...
Jun 18, 2025 · Key developments in point-of-care diagnostics, nanobiosensors, and liquid biopsies have the potential to transform early illness identification ...Missing: modalities | Show results with:modalities
[90]
Advances in Medical Technology: 2025 and Beyond - Sermo
Feb 17, 2025 · As we witness advancements in telemedicine, artificial intelligence, wearable tech, and more, these innovations promise to enhance patient care ...
[91]
The 2024 New Drug Modalities Report | BCG
Sep 24, 2024 · BCG's second annual report reviews the growth of new drug modalities and addresses the potential impact on the biopharmaceutical industry.
[92]
What is Multimodal AI? | IBM
Multimodal AI refers to machine learning models capable of processing and integrating information from multiple modalities or types of data.
[93]
Multimodal Learning in Artificial Intelligence (AI) - GeeksforGeeks
Jul 5, 2024 · Multimodal AI refers to artificial intelligence systems that integrate and process multiple types of data, such as text, images, audio, and video.Data Fusion Techniques in... · Unimodal vs. Multimodal AI
[94]
Foundations and Trends in Multimodal Machine Learning: Principles ...
Sep 7, 2022 · We start by defining three key principles of modality heterogeneity, connections, and interactions that have driven subsequent innovations, and ...
[95]
Multimodal Deep Learning: Definition, Examples, Applications - V7 Go
Dec 15, 2022 · Multimodal machine learning is the study of computer algorithms that learn and improve performance through the use of multimodal datasets.Multimodal Learning... · Multimodal Deep Learning... · Representation
[96]
[PDF] Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy
Instead of focusing on specific multimodal applications, this paper surveys the recent advances in multimodal machine learning itself and presents them in a ...
[97]
5 Core Challenges In Multimodal Machine Learning
Jun 24, 2021 · The five core challenges in the field of multimodal ML are – representation, translation, alignment, fusion, and co-learning.
[98]
Multimodal AI: The Complete Guide for 2025 - Shaip
Multimodal AI enables machines to analyze text, images, audio, and video together, processing and generating insights from multiple data types simultaneously.
[99]
What is Multimodal Data? Types, Examples, Applications & More
Jul 25, 2025 · Multimodal data is information that exists across multiple different formats or modalities simultaneously, including text, audio, image, ...
[100]
What are the challenges in building multimodal AI systems? - Milvus
Building multimodal AI systems presents several key challenges, primarily related to integrating diverse data types, managing computational complexity, and ...
[101]
Navigating the Challenges of Multimodal AI Data Integration
Sep 10, 2024 · Multimodal AI integrates diverse data types for better decision-making but faces challenges in data integration, accuracy, and ethics.
[102]
6 Best Multimodal AI Models in 2025 - Times Of AI
Aug 22, 2025 · Top Multimodal AI Models in 2025 · GPT-4o by OpenAI · Gemini 2.5 Flash & Pro · Claude 3.7 (Anthropic) · Grok-4 Multimodal (xAI/Elon Musk) · LLaMA-4 ...Top Multimodal Ai Models In... · Gpt-4o By Openai · Gemini 2.5 Flash & ProMissing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
[103]
Top Multimodal AI Trends in 2025 - Q3 Technologies
Apr 23, 2025 · 1. Unified Multimodal Foundation Models · 2. Rise of Multimodal AI Agents · 3. Generative AI Beyond Text: Audio, Video, and 3D · 4. Enhanced Human- ...
[104]
Multimodal AI: The New Era of AI that Understands Text, Images ...
Oct 3, 2025 · Gartner predicts that by 2027, 40% of generative AI solutions will be multimodal, up from only 1% in 2023ayadata.ai. The underlying motivation ...
[105]
Modal and Modeless Dialog Boxes - Microsoft Learn
Aug 3, 2021 · Modal dialog boxes require user response before continuing, while modeless dialog boxes stay on screen and are available at any time.
[106]
A little history of the graphical user interface - UX Collective
Mar 29, 2021 · Graphical User Interface (GUI) arose precisely due to research done by engineers from the Xerox company (Alan Kay, Larry Tesler, Dan Ingalls, David Smith, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[107]
Modes in User Interfaces: When They Help and When They Hurt Users
Apr 14, 2019 · Modes are different interpretations of the user input by the system, depending on the state which is active. Same input, different results.
[108]
Multimodal feedback in HCI: haptics, non-speech audio, and their ...
If one modality is fully utilized or unavailable (e.g., due to sensory or situational impairment), then another can be exploited to ensure the interaction ...<|separator|>
[109]
Multimodal human–computer interaction: A survey - ScienceDirect
... modality or communication channel (e.g., speech, gesture, writing, and others). We use a human-centered approach and by modality we mean mode of ...
[110]
Homeopathy—where is the science? A current inventory on a pre ...
Feb 14, 2019 · Despite overwhelming evidence that it is neither effective nor rational, homeopathy still persists. We need a broad debate to discuss its damaging effects.
[111]
New meta-analysis confirms that the clinical effects of homeopathic ...
Apr 14, 2017 · New meta-analysis confirms that the clinical effects of homeopathic remedies do not differ from placebos. Published Friday 14 April 2017.  .
[112]
Why homoeopathy is pseudoscience | Synthese
Sep 14, 2022 · Homoeopathy is commonly recognised as pseudoscience. However, there is, to date, no systematic discussion that seeks to establish this view.
[113]
Should We Take Reiki Seriously? | Office for Science and Society
Feb 19, 2020 · Reiki is a Japanese technique whose adherents say can promote healing. It posits some sort of life force energy that, when low, makes us sick.
[114]
Effect of Reiki Therapy on Pain and Anxiety in Adults - NIH
Based on the size Cohen's d statistics calculated in this review, there is evidence to suggest that Reiki therapy may be effective for pain and anxiety.
[115]
Reiki | Complementary and alternative therapy - Cancer Research UK
There is no scientific evidence that reiki can help prevent, treat or cure cancer. What is Reiki? Reiki is a Japanese healing art that was developed by Mikao ...How You Have It · Research Into Reiki For... · Reiki Organisations
[116]
Disentangling manual muscle testing and Applied Kinesiology
When AK is disentangled from standard orthopedic muscle testing, the few studies evaluating unique AK procedures either refute or cannot support the validity of ...
[117]
A double-blind, randomized study to assess the validity of applied ...
The study concludes that Applied Kinesiology has not demonstrated that it is a useful or reliable diagnostic tool.
[118]
Muscle testing (kinesiology): panacea or placebo? - The Conversation
Dec 18, 2012 · But further studies found that applied kinesiology was not able to predict nutritional needs, nutritional intolerance, thyroid dysfunction, ...
[119]
Pseudoscience in medicine: cautionary recommendations - PMC
Pseudoscience in medicine is scientific denialism associated with moral failure, rejecting empirical evidence, and linked to dissident scientific publications.
[120]
Integrative medicine or infiltrative pseudoscience? - ScienceDirect
Scientific appearance is also a common practice in alternative therapies, which are considered a type of pseudoscience (Li, Forbes & Byrne, 2018).
[121]
Naturopathy, Pseudoscience, and Medicine: Myths and Fallacies vs ...
It is likely to do far more harm than good, because it is perceived as an endorsement of pseudoscientific practices and of the practitioners who perform them.
[122]
Crystal healing: Stone-cold facts about gemstone treatments
Jan 25, 2022 · "There is no evidence that crystal healing works over and above a placebo effect," French told Live Science. "That is the appropriate standard ...Crystal healing theory · How crystal healing actually... · Is crystal healing safe?
[123]
A close look at therapeutic touch - PubMed
Context: Therapeutic Touch (TT) is a widely used nursing practice rooted in mysticism but alleged to have a scientific basis. Practitioners of TT claim to treat ...
[124]
Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects ... - PubMed
We analysed trials of homoeopathy and conventional medicine and estimated treatment effects in trials least likely to be affected by bias.
[125]
The 2005 meta-analysis of homeopathy - ScienceDirect.com
Commenting on the analysis of homeopathy by Shang et al published in August 2005 ... Lancet advised “doctors need to be bold and honest with their patients ...
[126]
A Systematic Review of the Therapeutic Effects of Reiki
Nov 18, 2009 · The purpose of this systematic review was to try to evaluate whether Reiki produces a significant treatment effect.
[127]
Crystal Healing | Science-Based Medicine
Sep 18, 2019 · It is a form of energy medicine. Proponents claim that different types of crystals either contain, amplify, attract, or repel different kinds of energy.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical