Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

No overall control

No overall control () is a situation in in which no single secures a of seats on a , requiring through coalitions between parties, minority administrations led by the largest group, or other negotiated arrangements. This outcome arises from fragmented election results, often reflecting voter dissatisfaction with major parties or the rise of independents and smaller groups, and it contrasts with single-party dominance by distributing power more diffusely. The prevalence of NOC has increased markedly in recent years, with the number of such councils in more than doubling since 2019 to affect approximately one in three local authorities as of 2023, driven by multi-party contests and declining support for traditional -Conservative binaries. In practice, the largest party frequently forms a minority without formal alliances, relying on case-by-case deals for policy passage, though coalitions—sometimes involving unusual pairings like Conservatives with Democrats or with independents—provide more stable leadership. Notable examples include councils such as those in and following 2023 elections, where Conservatives lost majorities amid gains by Greens and others, leading to and independent-led pacts. While fosters cross-party negotiation and can mitigate extreme policies through compromise, it introduces challenges such as slower decision-making, heightened political maneuvering, and occasional instability from shifting alliances, as seen in cases like in 2017 where members faced expulsion for participation. Critics argue the label obscures electoral realities, as it may leave voters unclear on the effective controlling group despite one party often holding the of seats, potentially undermining perceptions of democratic . Overall, exemplifies the pluralistic dynamics of subnational , where empirical seat distributions compel pragmatic over ideological purity.

Definition and Historical Context

Core Definition

No overall control (NOC) denotes a situation in local government where no single or group secures a of seats on a , preventing any one entity from unilaterally dominating decision-making. This outcome arises when election results distribute seats such that the largest party holds fewer than the threshold required for —typically more than 50% of seats, calculated as floor(n/2) + 1 where n is the number of seats. Councils declare NOC formally through their returning officers post-election, mirroring the concept of a at the national level, where no party achieves an absolute in the . Under , councils cannot form a single-party , necessitating alternative structures to appoint a leader and , such as formal coalitions involving multiple parties, minority administrations supported by informal pacts or abstentions from opposition groups, or arrangements with councillors. These mechanisms ensure continuity in service delivery, including planning, social care, and , though they may introduce delays or compromises compared to majority control. The designation highlights fragmented representation reflective of diverse voter preferences but has drawn criticism for obscuring the effective "winner" (often the largest party) in media reporting and voter perception.

Origins and Evolution in UK Local Government

The situation of no overall control in local government emerged alongside the politicization of municipal elections in the . The reformed borough governance by introducing elected councils, initially dominated by independents and ratepayers' associations rather than national parties, though instances of divided control occurred where no group secured a majority. began formally contesting local seats from the onward, with Conservatives and Liberals aligning municipal campaigns to national ideologies, occasionally resulting in hung councils in competitive urban areas. The Local Government Act 1888 extended elected bodies to county councils, intensifying party competition and producing early examples of no overall control, particularly in counties with balanced and Conservative support. Throughout the early , non-partisan or majorities remained common in rural and smaller authorities, but urban boroughs increasingly saw fragmented results as entered local contests post-1900, displacing Liberals and creating multi-party balances without outright majorities. The post-World War II era and the Local Government Act 1972, which restructured into two-tier systems of counties and districts effective from 1974, initially favored two-party dominance, with and Conservatives securing majorities in most authorities during 1973 elections. However, the resurgence of Liberal and (later Liberal Democrat) candidacies in the 1980s fragmented votes, elevating hung outcomes; by the 1990s, Liberal Democrat breakthroughs in southern shires and metropolitan areas routinely denied single-party control. Into the , no overall control evolved from occasional to prevalent, driven by sustained third-party and independent representation. In 2007, 37% of English councils were hung—the largest category ahead of (32%) and Conservative (27%) control—reflecting or minority administrations as norms. Subsequent rises in UKIP (2010s), Greens, and have accelerated this trend, with 2023 elections yielding no overall control in 91 of 230 English councils contested, exceeding single-party gains amid voter fragmentation. By 2025, parliamentary analysis noted hung status as more likely than party control in many cycles, underscoring a shift toward negotiated over unilateral rule.

Statistical Overview

As of October 2025, 170 of the 369 local authorities in operate under (), where no single holds a of seats, necessitating coalitions, minority administrations, or other arrangements for . This equates to roughly 46% of councils, with the remainder under control by parties such as (103 full controls), Conservatives (31), Liberal Democrats (41), or smaller groups like (9). In specifically, which accounts for 317 principal-tier authorities, the pattern mirrors the national fragmentation, though exact disaggregated figures fluctuate with periodic elections and by-elections. The prevalence of has increased over the past decade, driven by vote fragmentation among multiple parties and independents, eroding the traditional two-party dominance at the local level. In the 2023 local elections covering 230 English councils, 91 (about 40%) resulted in outcomes, reflecting losses for incumbent parties and gains for challengers. The May 1, 2025, elections across 23 English councils further exemplified this trend, with securing control of several authorities for the first time while contributing to hung results in others through its 41% seat share in contested areas. Under , the largest party or group typically leads via formal or informal agreements, though in approximately 20% of cases, independents or minor parties assume roles, often sidelining larger national parties. This arrangement promotes cross-party collaboration but can lead to instability, as evidenced by occasional collapses or expulsions, such as the 2017 Aberdeen case where councillors faced for participation. Overall, NOC councils highlight the multipolar nature of contemporary local , with empirical data showing sustained growth in such configurations since the .

Recent Developments (2019–2025)

In the 2019 local elections, 73 out of 248 councils with seats up for election in resulted in no overall control, representing over a quarter of those contests and marking a sharp increase from the just over 30 councils nationwide prior to the vote. This uptick reflected growing electoral fragmentation, driven by declining support for the two main parties and gains for Liberal Democrats, independents, and others in specific locales. Subsequent elections in 2021 and 2022 sustained this pattern, with minority administrations or coalitions becoming common in hung councils, often requiring cross-party agreements to select leaders and pass budgets. By 2023, the trend intensified, with outcomes showing councils more likely to end in no overall control than under single-party majority rule for the first time in recent cycles, as smaller parties and independents eroded traditional majorities. This shift prompted institutional responses, including the Local Government Association's 2023 publication of a 30-step framework for chief executives to manage transitions to , emphasizing neutral facilitation of negotiations among fragmented groups. Coalitions and minority deals proliferated, with examples including Democrat-led administrations supported by Conservatives or in various districts. The 2024 and 2025 elections further entrenched fragmentation, particularly with UK's emergence splitting the right-of-centre vote and preventing Conservative majorities in multiple authorities. In May 2025, secured outright control in 10 councils but contributed to no overall control in others, such as , where its gains displaced dominance without achieving a majority. Post-election, at least 10 English councils remained hung, including and , where Conservatives lost control amid multi-party balances. By early 2025, nearly one in five councils were led by independents or minor parties, sidelining larger groups and highlighting challenges like frequent no-confidence motions and compromises. Overall, NOCs rose to comprise a of outcomes in contested authorities, complicating service delivery amid fiscal pressures but fostering localized bargaining over centralized mandates.

Governance Mechanisms

Formation of Administrations

In UK local government, following elections that result in no overall control—defined as no single political group holding more than half the seats—councils must form an administration capable of commanding majority support for key decisions, particularly the election of a leader. The process begins with the council's annual meeting, convened within 21 days of the election under standard procedure rules, where the full council votes to elect its leader by simple majority. This election requires prior negotiations among parties, as the candidate must secure votes from at least half plus one of the sitting councillors; failure to do so can lead to repeated ballots or temporary arrangements until a viable administration emerges. Under the leader-cabinet executive model mandated by the Local Government Act 2000 for most English councils, the elected leader appoints a of typically 8–10 members to handle , with decisions made collectively or delegated. In no overall control scenarios, the largest party often attempts to form a minority administration, governing without formal partners but relying on informal abstentions or support from others to pass budgets and policies. Alternatively, coalitions form through explicit agreements, distributing cabinet posts proportionally among participating groups to ensure stable majorities; these have become more common in recent years, though single-party minority setups remain prevalent, outnumbering coalitions by roughly 2:1 as of earlier surveys. Less frequently, arrangements resemble parliamentary confidence-and-supply deals, where smaller parties agree to back the administration on specific votes (e.g., annual budgets) without joining the cabinet, or rare coalitions unite multiple minor groups to exclude the largest party. The chief executive and senior officers play a facilitative role, providing neutral procedural guidance and without influencing outcomes, often preparing multiple administrative options in advance to minimize disruption. These formations prioritize operational continuity, as councils lack statutory deadlines for resolution beyond the leader election, but prolonged risks service delays. Variations occur by council type and constitution; for instance, unitary authorities or metropolitan boroughs may adapt sizes, while Welsh councils under separate follow analogous processes emphasizing cross-party pacts. Empirical data from post-2019 elections indicate that about 40% of English councils experienced no overall control at some point, with administrations stabilizing through negotiation rather than legal compulsion.

Decision-Making Processes

In councils under no overall control, adheres to the leader-cabinet model mandated by the Local Government Act 2000 for most English authorities, whereby a of 8-10 members, appointed by the leader, proposes policies, budgets, and strategies for by the full . Lacking a , the —typically formed by the largest party or a —must negotiate support from opposition groups or independents to secure simple majorities (over 50% of votes cast) in meetings for binding resolutions. In minority administrations, comprising the largest group without formal partners, decisions proceed unilaterally but face frequent challenges in full votes, necessitating ad-hoc deals, concessions, or abstentions to pass items like annual budgets or service contracts. This issue-specific bargaining can extend timelines, as seen in post-2023 election s where opposition leverage delayed approvals until compromises were reached. Coalition administrations, formed via multi-party pacts, integrate seats proportionally and establish joint decision protocols, including shared policy platforms, dispute clauses, and periodic agreement reviews to preempt fractures. Internal consensus on executive proposals reduces full council contention, though major votes still demand unified bloc support; breakdowns, such as policy vetoes over "red line" issues, can trigger reshuffles or early challenges. Scrutiny and overview occur through cross-party committees that review executive actions, with enhanced negotiation in no overall control settings to build broader legitimacy, while council officers provide impartial implementation and . Following the May 2024 local elections, 56 of 108 no overall control councils relied on minority models—prone to protracted votes—versus 52 coalitions, which prioritize pre-vote alignment for efficiency. These dynamics promote compromise on apolitical priorities like infrastructure but can stall reforms, contributing to observed variability across England's one-third NOC authorities as of 2025.

Local Authority Types

County Councils

County councils operate as the upper tier in England's two-tier system, covering non-metropolitan () counties and delivering strategic services including , highways, , , and across districts and boroughs. These councils consist of 50 to 80 councillors elected from single-member county divisions via first-past-the-post system, with all seats contested every four years. As of May 2024, 21 county councils exist, following structural reforms that converted some to unitary authorities. No overall control arises when no party secures a of seats, often due to fragmented vote shares in rural and semi-rural constituencies where Conservatives historically dominated but face challenges from Liberal Democrats, independents, and emerging parties like . In such cases, formal requires post-election negotiations for a leader and , typically under a leader- model prescribed by the Local Government Act 2000. The largest party may form a minority supported by confidence-and-supply agreements, or coalitions may emerge, distributing portfolios proportionally; for instance, Liberal Democrat-led minorities have operated in several counties through cross-party pacts on key votes. The May 1, 2025, elections exemplified dynamics in county councils, with (62 seats) resulting in no after Conservatives lost ground to gains and Liberal Democrat advances, prompting talks for a potential cross-party deal. Similarly, other participating counties like those in the County Councils Network saw shifts to or control changes, reflecting national trends where captured significant seats but rarely outright in upper-tier contests. These outcomes necessitate rapid stabilization, often guided by chief executives using frameworks like the 30-step to manage and ensure service . Under , decision-making emphasizes committee scrutiny and full council votes for major policies, potentially enhancing on long-term issues like but risking delays in disputes; empirical reviews indicate higher overheads compared to administrations, though data from prior cycles (e.g., 2021) show functional delivery in most cases via pragmatic alliances.

Metropolitan Boroughs

Metropolitan boroughs, also known as metropolitan districts, comprise 36 single-tier local authorities in England, each responsible for delivering a full range of local government services within large urban conurbations. These authorities were established under the Local Government Act 1972, which reorganized local government to create metropolitan counties and their constituent districts, coming into effect on 1 April 1974. Following the abolition of the metropolitan county councils in 1986 via the Local Government Act 1985, metropolitan boroughs assumed unitary status, handling all principal local authority functions without an overlying county tier. Geographically, the 36 metropolitan boroughs are grouped into six former metropolitan counties: Greater Manchester (10 boroughs, including Manchester, Salford, and Stockport), Merseyside (5, including Liverpool and Sefton), South Yorkshire (4, including Sheffield and Doncaster), Tyne and Wear (4, including Newcastle upon Tyne and Sunderland), West Midlands (7, including Birmingham, Coventry, and Wolverhampton), and West Yorkshire (6, including Leeds, Bradford, and Wakefield). This structure targets high-density urban populations, with the boroughs collectively serving over 14 million residents as of the 2021 census, accounting for approximately 25% of England's population in compact, economically integrated areas. Unlike two-tier non-metropolitan districts, which share responsibilities like education and social care with county councils, metropolitan boroughs exercise independent control over these services, akin to unitary authorities but retaining a borough designation rooted in their 1974 origins. The primary functions of metropolitan borough councils include education (schools and further education), social services (adult and children's care), housing provision and regulation, strategic planning and development control, waste management and recycling, maintenance of local highways and transport infrastructure, leisure and cultural facilities, environmental health, and registration services. Councils derive powers from various statutes, including the Highways Act 1980 for road maintenance and the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for land-use decisions, with funding from council tax, government grants, and business rates retention. In practice, these boroughs often collaborate through combined authorities—such as the Greater Manchester Combined Authority established in 2011—for strategic transport, economic development, and devolved powers like adult skills funding, though day-to-day service delivery remains decentralized to individual boroughs. Governance within metropolitan boroughs typically follows a leader and executive model, as permitted under the Local Government Act 2000, where the council leader—elected by full council members from the majority political group—appoints a of up to 10 portfolio holders to oversee policy areas, subject to scrutiny by overview and scrutiny . Full councils consist of 30 to 90 elected councillors, depending on size, with elections held every four years on a cycle of thirds (one-third of seats contested annually) or all-out, as determined locally; for instance, elections occur in thirds across its 101 seats. A minority operate under a system for collective decision-making, though the model predominates for its alignment with efficient accountability. As of 2025, no has a directly elected at the level, distinguishing them from some unitary authorities, though leaders participate in mayoral combined authority executives where applicable.

Unitary Authorities

Unitary authorities in are single-tier entities that assume full responsibility for delivering all principal local services within their geographic areas, effectively merging the strategic oversight of county councils with the operational duties of district councils. This structure eliminates the two-tier division prevalent in many counties, enabling unified decision-making on policies and resource allocation. As of 2023, maintains 62 unitary authorities, concentrated in cities, larger towns, and select non-metropolitan regions where no subordinate district councils exist. These authorities handle an extensive range of functions, including provision and management, adult and children's care, highways maintenance and transport planning, and building control, allocation and development, and control, cultural and leisure services, and refuse collection alongside initiatives. Unlike two-tier systems, where responsibilities split between upper and lower levels lead to potential coordination challenges, unitary authorities centralize accountability, with elected councillors overseeing executive functions through cabinet or committee models as prescribed by the Localism Act 2011. Formation of unitary authorities typically occurs through government-initiated restructurings under legislation such as the Local Government Changes for England Regulations 1994 and the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007, often involving the amalgamation of existing councils to achieve economies of scale. Notable recent examples include Somerset Council, established on 1 April 2023 by merging five prior authorities (Somerset County Council, Mendip District Council, Sedgemoor District Council, South Somerset District Council, and Taunton Deane Borough Council), and North Yorkshire Council, similarly formed from eight entities effective the same date, encompassing expansive rural and coastal territories. Several unitary authorities, such as those with borough or city charters (e.g., Kingston upon Hull or the City of York), retain historical titles that imply ceremonial precedence but do not alter their statutory powers. Empirical assessments of unitary structures indicate varied outcomes; while proponents cite potential administrative savings—estimated at £2.4 to £2.9 billion over five years from select reconfigurations—transition expenses and implementation disruptions have frequently offset these in practice, as documented in independent analyses. Nonetheless, the model persists as a mechanism for consolidating fragmented , with ongoing invitations for two-tier areas to propose unitary under the Levelling Up and Regeneration Act 2023.

London Boroughs

The constitute the primary tier of within , numbering 32 distinct authorities that collectively administer the majority of the region's non-strategic functions. These boroughs were created through the London Government Act 1963, which abolished prior entities such as metropolitan boroughs, urban districts, and rural districts, consolidating them into a unified structure effective from 1 1965. This reform aimed to address administrative fragmentation in the expanding metropolitan area by establishing boroughs capable of handling population growth and service demands, drawing boundaries that incorporated parts of , , , , and alongside districts. Each borough operates as a unitary-like authority for most local services, exercising powers over , social services, , environmental health, highways maintenance, waste collection, and leisure facilities, while strategic oversight for , policing, fire services, and regional planning resides with the (GLA). Borough councils derive their executive model primarily from the Local Government Act 2000, typically adopting a leader-and-cabinet system where a directly elected leader heads a cabinet responsible for policy decisions, subject to scrutiny by overview committees and full council approval for budgets and major strategies. Elections occur every four years, with all council seats contested on a first-past-the-post basis across single- or multi-member wards, resulting in councils of 40 to 90 members depending on borough size and population. The 12 inner London boroughs—Camden, Greenwich, Hackney, Hammersmith and Fulham, Islington, Kensington and Chelsea, Lambeth, Lewisham, Southwark, Tower Hamlets, Wandsworth, and Westminster—along with the 20 outer boroughs, share equivalent statutory powers, though inner boroughs historically received distinct central government grants for education until equalization efforts in the 1980s and 1990s reduced disparities. Outer boroughs, encompassing areas like Barnet, Croydon, and Hillingdon, often manage larger suburban populations and green spaces, influencing priorities toward commuter infrastructure and family-oriented services, but governance processes remain standardized across both classifications. The City of London Corporation functions separately as a sui generis authority, exempt from borough status due to its unique ancient privileges and focus on the financial district. Boroughs fund operations through , national grants, and fees, with precepting responsibilities for the GLA's budget contributing to London's aggregated fiscal pressures, where per-capita spending on services like adult social care averaged £1,200 annually as of data. Empirical assessments indicate borough-level enables localized responsiveness, such as tailored allocations amid London's net of 80,000 residents yearly, though coordination challenges with the GLA persist in areas like air quality enforcement.

Welsh Principal Areas

The principal areas of Wales form the foundational structure of in the country, consisting of unitary authorities that deliver all core local services within defined geographic boundaries. These areas, operational since 1 April 1996, encompass the entirety of and operate as single-tier entities, eliminating the prior two-tier arrangement of counties and that existed before reorganization. Each principal area is governed by an elected council comprising councillors chosen through local elections, typically held every five years, with the council assuming full responsibility for policy formulation and service provision. Under the Local Government (Wales) Act 1994, principal areas were delineated to promote efficient administration, with boundaries drawn to reflect demographic, economic, and geographic considerations; for instance, larger rural counties like cover extensive land areas exceeding 5,000 square kilometers, while urban county boroughs such as serve populations over 360,000 as of mid-2023 estimates. The 22 areas include 11 counties and 11 county boroughs (with , , and holding additional ), and they maintain preserved county names for ceremonial purposes but function independently for administrative tasks. Councils derive their authority from statutes enacted by the , including duties for education provision under the Education Act 1996, social services via the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014, and environmental health through the , among others. Principal area councils exercise discretionary powers in areas like local planning and development control, preparing statutory local development plans every six years to guide and , subject to approval. They also manage fiscal operations, raising —averaging a band D rate of £1,600 in 2024—and receiving central grants, with responsibilities extending to highways maintenance, (recycling rates mandated at 70% by 2025 under Welsh regulations), and public libraries. Unlike community councils, which handle limited parish-level functions, principal councils bear no mandatory delegation of powers downward, ensuring unitary control over services like allocations and fire and rescue coordination, though collaborations occur via regional bodies for efficiency. Oversight by the includes audit requirements under the Local Government (Wales) Measure 2009 and performance scrutiny, with councils required to publish annual accounts and face public inspections for financial probity. Recent legislative updates, such as the Local Government and Elections () Act 2021, have enhanced council capabilities, including provisions for voluntary mergers—none enacted by 2025—and improved electoral processes like optional all-postal , aiming to bolster democratic engagement without altering the 22-area framework. Population distribution varies significantly, with urban centers like accounting for about 10% of ' 3.1 million residents in 2024, necessitating tailored service delivery models, such as integrated care boards for health-social care partnerships mandated since 2019. This unitary model contrasts with England's mixed tiers, providing streamlined decision-making but exposing councils to fiscal pressures, as evidenced by aggregate budget deficits exceeding £500 million across in the 2023-2024 financial year due to and demand growth in social care.

District Councils

District councils, also known as councils or shire districts, form the lower tier of in two-tier authorities across rural and semi-rural areas of outside metropolitan counties and . There are 188 such councils, each covering smaller geographic areas than councils and handling localized services including housing provision, local permissions, and , facilities, , and collection. These councils typically consist of 30 to 50 elected councillors serving four-year terms, often elected all at once in cycle with county elections, though some operate a thirds system. In situations of (NOC), where no single secures a of seats—requiring more than 50% plus one—district councils must navigate governance without unified party dominance, a frequent outcome given the fragmented nature of local electorates. Following the May 2024 local elections, numerous district councils entered or remained in NOC, contributing to the 108 English councils overall operating under such arrangements, often split evenly between coalition-led and minority administrations. Governance typically involves the largest party or group forming a minority executive, supported by informal confidence-and-supply agreements or formal coalitions with smaller parties or independents, as mandated by the Localism Act 2011's flexible . Examples include Council, which shifted to after the 2023 elections, establishing a partnership administration comprising , Liberal Democrat, and independent councillors to manage services like planning and housing amid divided seats. Similarly, Wealden District Council operates under with no party holding majority control, relying on cross-party collaboration for decisions on local development and . In two-tier systems, at the district level can complicate coordination with upper-tier county councils, particularly on shared competencies like or , potentially delaying joint initiatives if political alignments differ. Under , district councils face heightened challenges in decision-making, as policies require broader , often slowing processes for time-sensitive issues like approvals or planning appeals compared to majority-controlled peers. Empirical observations indicate that while such arrangements foster compromise on non-partisan services like refuse collection, they risk inconsistency or paralysis if negotiations falter, with chief executives playing a pivotal role in mediating via frameworks like the Local Government Association's 30-step transition guide. Despite these hurdles, districts have demonstrated resilience in service delivery, with no systemic evidence of inferior fiscal outcomes attributable solely to divided control, though protracted debates can strain limited resources in cash-strapped authorities.

Advantages and Criticisms

Purported Benefits

Proponents of no overall control () in local councils argue that it fosters cross-party collaboration, enabling councillors to prioritize local issues over conflicts. In practice, such arrangements are said to encourage politicians to negotiate and build , reducing the dominance of in favor of pragmatic solutions tailored to community needs. For instance, coalitions or minority administrations under NOC can form cabinets that secure support for decisions, allowing effective without a single party's monopoly. NOC is also claimed to enhance plurality in decision-making and political debate, potentially matching or exceeding the operational effectiveness of majority-controlled councils. This stems from the necessity of gaining opposition buy-in, which proponents assert promotes balanced and moderates extreme policies through compromise. Examples include councils like , where a of smaller parties leads despite holding the most seats, demonstrating viable multi-party leadership. Additionally, situations are viewed as opportunities to reset structures, addressing inefficiencies in previously majority-led administrations by introducing fresh processes and broader involvement. While empirical studies on fiscal or service outcomes under are limited, advocates highlight a track record of "getting business done effectively" in such councils, attributing this to reduced internal divisiveness.

Empirical Drawbacks and Criticisms

Empirical analyses of councils under (NOC) indicate slower processes compared to those with , as negotiations among parties often extend timelines for approvals and adoption. For instance, in decisions, the development process has been found to take longer in hung councils, attributed to the need for cross-party amid competing priorities. Similarly, case studies of NOC arrangements, such as in , document prolonged deliberations that delay implementation while enhancing perceived credibility of outcomes, though at the cost of . Instability in governance frequently manifests as fragile coalitions or minority administrations prone to collapse due to disagreements or personality conflicts, leading to periods of "rudderless" reliant on intervention rather than elected direction. In , a 1986 working arrangement between parties dissolved amid disputes over , resulting in administrative gaps filled by unelected officials until 1989. Surveys of group leaders in hung councils reveal 42% perceived deteriorated quality, with traditional ruling parties reporting even higher rates of negative impact (80% noting decline), alongside 26.9% of chief executives citing reduced coherence from inconsistent guidance. Such turnover contributes to short-term prioritization over long-term , as parties hedge against electoral volatility. Performance outcomes under show disproportionate representation in lower-performing local authority categories, suggesting causal links to fragmented leadership hindering service delivery. Budget processes become more conflictual, requiring repeated compromises that blur strategic priorities and elevate officer workloads, as evidenced in where service cuts like library closures exacerbated consensus challenges. The rise in councils—from a doubling since 2019 to 91 in by May 2023—amplifies these risks, with fragile alliances fostering political turmoil over unified execution. While some studies note improved policy quality via broader input (53.6% of leaders agreeing), the net empirical effect favors majority control for operational stability and reduced administrative friction.

Impacts on Policy and Services

Policy Stability and Implementation

In councils operating under no overall control (), policy stability frequently relies on negotiated arrangements such as coalitions, minority administrations, or confidence-and-supply deals, which formalize cross-party commitments to key priorities and mitigate abrupt shifts upon electoral changes. These pacts, often documented in written agreements, foster continuity by requiring compromise on contentious issues, as evidenced by surveys of hung councils showing diverse but functional political partnerships that prioritize shared over partisan dominance. The prevalence of —rising from fewer than one in six English councils pre-2019 to over one in three by 2023—demonstrates operational resilience, with many authorities maintaining service delivery through such mechanisms despite numerical fragmentation. Implementation of policies in NOC settings emphasizes officer-led execution to bridge political divides, with chief executives playing a pivotal role in facilitating and averting paralysis. Guidance from bodies highlights that effective NOC transitions involve pre- and post-election protocols to align party leaders on procedural norms, reducing risks of ; for example, frameworks recommend early briefings and rule checks to sustain momentum in decision-making. However, the negotiation imperative can introduce delays, as cross-party approvals are needed for major initiatives, contrasting with the streamlined processes in majority-led councils where a single group can expedite implementation. Empirical analyses of specific domains, such as , reveal that does not significantly disrupt outcomes relative to partisan control when central government grants are controlled for, suggesting underlying stability in and service provision driven by statutory obligations rather than political flux. In areas like welfare assistance or rates, administrations have shown comparable trends to party-controlled ones, with variations more attributable to socioeconomic factors than form. Overall, while promotes broader policy buy-in—potentially enhancing longevity through reduced reversal risks—its success hinges on proactive institutional adaptations, as prolonged disputes can erode public confidence in timely service delivery.

Fiscal and Service Delivery Outcomes

Empirical analyses of local government fiscal policy indicate that political , including scenarios of no overall (NOC), exerts limited influence on spending and taxation decisions once grants are accounted for. A study examining English councils from 2003 to 2019 found no statistically significant effects of or Conservative —implicitly contrasting with NOC or opposition dynamics—on local fiscal outcomes such as expenditure levels or rates, attributing primary drivers to exogenous grant allocations rather than internal dynamics. This aligns with broader patterns where central funding constraints dominate, as evidenced by real-terms core spending power declines of approximately 23% across English councils from 2010–11 to 2023–24, irrespective of type. In administrations, budget approval necessitates cross-party , which can impose fiscal restraint by requiring compromises on ambitious spending proposals, potentially mitigating risks of overspending observed in some single-party contexts. However, data from support schemes post-2013 reforms show variation by control: Labour-majority councils adopted more generous schemes (covering higher proportions of low-income households), while councils often mirrored mixed or conservative approaches, suggesting moderated generosity without evidence of fiscal instability. Overall, has not been associated with higher bankruptcy rates or exceptional financial support requests compared to majority-led councils, with systemic pressures like and rising social care costs (accounting for over 40% of spending in many authorities by ) driving deficits uniformly. Service delivery under shows no robust empirical differentiation from majority control, with performance metrics historically tied more to resource availability than structure. Pre-2010 Comprehensive Performance Assessments rated councils on and , but found political fragmentation in settings did not systematically correlate with lower scores, as managerial capacity and funding levels were stronger predictors. Recent pressures, including a 50%+ cut in per-resident spending on areas like road maintenance from 2010 to 2024, have strained services across all councils, with potentially fostering collaborative improvements in targeted areas through bargaining, though protracted negotiations can delay non-urgent initiatives. Absent comprehensive post-austerity comparative studies, claims of inherent drawbacks in delivery—such as in or —remain anecdotal, overshadowed by universal challenges like demographic-driven demand surges in adult social care, which rose 50% in real terms from 2010–11 to 2023–24.

Notable Examples and Controversies

High-Profile Cases

One prominent example of no overall control () leading to significant occurred in following the May 2017 local elections, where no party secured a of the 45 seats. held 16 seats, the () 15, Conservatives 9, Liberal Democrats 3, and independents 2. To form a stable administration, six councillors joined forces with the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats to create a minority coalition led by 's Jenny Laing, sidelining the larger group. This arrangement defied explicit instructions from Scottish leader , who viewed the partnership with Conservatives as incompatible with party principles, resulting in the suspension of all nine councillors from the party on May 17, 2017. The "Aberdeen Nine," as they became known, operated as independents while the coalition implemented policies on budget cuts and city center regeneration, but the suspensions lasted until 2021, when the councillors were allowed to seek re-nomination. The episode highlighted tensions in NOC scenarios between local pragmatism and national party , with critics arguing it undermined 's opposition to Conservative measures. Slough Borough Council provides another high-profile instance of NOC compounded by governance failures. The council issued a section 114 notice on July 2, 2021, effectively declaring due to accumulated deficits exceeding £100 million, largely from risky investments in commercial property and weak oversight under prior administrations. Following the May 2023 elections, the council shifted to , with Conservatives holding 16 seats, 14, Liberal Democrats 6, and others, leading to a Conservative minority administration reliant on cross-party support. Government-appointed commissioners, including Max Caller, were installed to oversee recovery, citing persistent "significant failing in " such as inadequate financial controls and cultural issues. By 2024, the council remained in and under , with commissioners warning of vulnerability to "destabilising changes" that could hinder progress toward financial sustainability, projected to extend oversight until at least 2026. This case underscored how can exacerbate instability in financially distressed authorities, necessitating external to enforce reforms like asset sales and spending curbs. Other notable NOC situations have drawn attention for operational disruptions, such as in certain councils post-2025 local elections, where fragmented results led to vacuums and internal conflicts. For instance, among the 10 English councils ending in after the May 1, 2025, polls, several featured multi-party pacts or independent-led arrangements amid rising influence from , though specific high-profile breakdowns involved suspended councillors over procedural disputes rather than outright collapse. These examples illustrate recurring challenges in NOC environments, including coalition fragility and heightened scrutiny on decision-making legitimacy.

Political Instability Instances

In Welsh principal areas operating under no overall control (), where no single party or group holds a of seats, political instability often arises from fragile coalitions, minority administrations, or reliance on independents, leading to contests, disputes, and delays. Such arrangements, common in councils like and , can result in fragmented decision-making, as cross-party agreements prove transient amid competing priorities. Empirical evidence from analyses indicates that NOC exacerbates risks of inconsistency and slow service delivery, particularly in resource-constrained environments where is required for budgets and major policies. Pembrokeshire County Council exemplifies these challenges, with its council frequently under NOC dominated by independents alongside , Conservatives, and . In June 2025, deputy leader survived a vote of no confidence initiated by opposition groups over disagreements on expanding , highlighting tensions in policy implementation without a clear majority. The council's structure, with 39 independents or minor parties often necessitating ad-hoc alliances, has contributed to repeated leadership instability, including the abrupt resignation of group leader in 2025, leaving an 18-year-old interim deputy amid internal fractures. These episodes delayed key decisions, such as education funding allocations, underscoring causal links between divided control and operational paralysis. Monmouthshire transitioned to following the May 2022 elections, where Conservatives lost their previous , resulting in forming a minority administration with just a nine-vote edge after recounts. This precarious setup fueled opposition maneuvers, including a failed May 2025 motion by Conservatives to oust leader Mary-Ann Brocklesby and install their candidate, exposing vulnerabilities to or . Further emerged in January 2025 when opposition councillors defeated the administration's budget proposals, forcing revisions and highlighting difficulties in passing fiscal measures without broad support. Such events correlate with broader drawbacks, including heightened scrutiny and negotiation costs that strain administrative efficiency. Denbighshire has endured since at least the elections, with holding 19 seats, Conservatives 12, 10, and independents and Liberal Democrats splitting the remainder in a 42-seat chamber, precluding outright . This fragmentation has prompted multiple attempts, often collapsing over local issues like and social care, leading to frequent leadership rotations—three changes between 2017 and alone. Governance reports attribute such turnover to the absence of stable majorities, fostering blame-shifting and delayed responses to pressures, as evidenced by stalled projects requiring cross-party buy-in.

References

  1. [1]
    What does 'No Overall Control' mean? - LGiU
    May 2, 2025 · 'No Overall Control'; where a coalition between parties exists, or the council is run by a minority administration (mostly by the party with the most seats).
  2. [2]
    What does No Overall Control mean and what is a hung parliament?
    May 5, 2023 · No Overall Control councils are councils that have no single political party achieving the majority of the seats, resulting in neither party being able to ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    Who runs councils in no overall control? - Local Government Lawyer
    May 29, 2025 · Geoff Wild looks at the key considerations where elections see local authorities left in 'no overall control'. Councils in 'No Overall ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    Supporting transition to 'no overall control' – a 30-step framework
    May 2, 2023 · Since 2019, the number of No Overall Control (NOC) councils has more than doubled in English local government. One in three councils are now NOC ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  5. [5]
    The 10 councils left with no overall control and who leads them
    May 23, 2025 · The Conservatives lost 32 seats and control of the council, with seven councillors remaining. The Greens were the only other party to make gains ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  6. [6]
    What happens to local services when councils have no overall ...
    Apr 10, 2025 · When local councils have no overall control (NOC)—meaning no single political party has a majority—they often need to form coalitions or ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The use of the misleading 'No Overall Control' designation means ...
    The use of the misleading 'No Overall Control' designation means some voters still don't know who won their local election. Elections took place in 172 ...<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Anticipating, managing and adapting to 'No overall control' - CFGS
    ... for those operating in authorities that have experienced no overall control, authorities that are politically contestable, and single party councils.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  9. [9]
    What is a hung Parliament?
    A hung Parliament is when no single political party wins a majority in the House of Commons. It is also known as a situation of no overall control.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] History of local government in English towns and cities
    Apr 3, 2025 · Parish councils have traditionally been less common in urban areas, though a parish council can cover either a whole town or city or a.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Hung councils and local coalitions - University of Birmingham
    A few years ago, the 'political control' of the biggest group of councils in Great Britain was not Conservative or Labour, but 'hung' – in the arithmetical ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] England: local government and politics - LSE Press
    The results of the May 2018 English local elections saw the three main British parties – Conservative, Labour and Liberal. Democrats – end up holding some 92% ...
  13. [13]
    Long shadows: 50 years of the Local Government Act 1972
    Oct 26, 2022 · The 1972 Act redefined the procedures, structures, duties and geographies of all English and Welsh councils. Although it has a low profile today.
  14. [14]
    What Happens Next for Hung Councils? - Pegasus Group
    Jun 15, 2023 · Local elections were held in 230 councils in England and 91 councils returned a result of no overall political control.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Local elections 2025: Results and analysis - UK Parliament
    Jul 4, 2025 · This is the first time that Reform (or the Brexit Party, as it was previously known) has controlled any councils in local government. Labour won ...
  16. [16]
    Open Council Data UK - compositions councillors parties wards ...
    Names, parties and wards of all UK councillors, up-to-date, free to access. Stakeholder communication and campaign datasets with councillor emails and roles ...Missing: 2024 | Show results with:2024
  17. [17]
    Local government structure and elections - GOV.UK
    Jan 11, 2016 · In total there are 317 local authorities in England made up of 5 different types: county councils; district councils; unitary authorities ...
  18. [18]
    Local Elections 2025: results and analysis
    Jul 4, 2025 · On 1 May 2025, local elections were held in 23 of England's councils. Reform UK won the largest number of seats with 677, amounting to 41% of all seats up for ...
  19. [19]
    EXCLUSIVE: One in five NoC councils led by independents
    Mar 28, 2025 · Nearly one fifth of councils where there is no overall control are led by councillors from an independent or smaller party, squeezing out those parties with a ...Missing: UK | Show results with:UK
  20. [20]
    How the big parties fared in the English local elections - The Guardian
    May 2, 2025 · For example, Tory-dominated Warwickshire was knocked into no overall control – but more because of Reform gains than Lib Dem ones. And ...Missing: trends 2019-2025
  21. [21]
    Local elections 2025 in maps and charts - BBC
    May 3, 2025 · Council results. Reform UK swept to victory across England with 31% of the vote, gaining a majority in 10 areas. The party took Doncaster ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Part 4 The Council's Procedure Rules - Tendring District Council
    In a year when there is an ordinary election of councillors, the annual meeting will take place on the third Tuesday after the elections. In any other year, ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] No overall control: The experience of chief executives in councils ...
    “To operate successfully in a council with no overall control, you need to promote consensus and that encourages healthy political debate and contributes.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  24. [24]
    Understand how your council works: Decision making - GOV.UK
    How local councils work in England - types of council, decision-making, council finances, local councillors and making complaints.
  25. [25]
    The 12 components of effective coalitions
    Sep 5, 2023 · One in four councils were NOC after the 2019 local elections. After the 2023 local elections, this increased to one in three councils.
  26. [26]
    Understand how your council works: Types of council - GOV.UK
    How local councils work in England - types of council, decision-making, council finances, local councillors and making complaints.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Local government in England: structures - UK Parliament
    Apr 22, 2025 · As of May 2024, there are 317 local authorities in England, of which 21 are county councils, 164 are district councils, and 132 are single-tier ...
  28. [28]
    2025 Local Elections in England: The results - LGiU
    May 2, 2025 · They have won hundreds of council seats, and ten councils, including nine counties and one unitary. That's a pretty seismic event – especially ...Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution
  29. [29]
    Devon and Cornwall councils in no overall control - BBC
    May 3, 2025 · When the vote counters stated their work on Friday morning both Cornwall Council and Devon County Council were Conservative-controlled. By the ...Missing: English | Show results with:English
  30. [30]
    Local elections 2025: CCN stands ready to support new ...
    May 7, 2025 · ... councils changing political control, or going into no overall control ahead of new administrations being formed. If you are a new or ...
  31. [31]
    Governance without a majority: preparing for No Overall Control
    Apr 25, 2025 · A practical and insightful virtual event exploring how councils manage in NOC situations. From formal agreements to behind-the-scenes negotiations.
  32. [32]
    Local Government Act 1972 - Legislation.gov.uk
    Local Government Act 1972 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 26 October 2025. There are changes that may be brought into force at ...
  33. [33]
    Local government facts and figures: England - LGiU
    Since 1964 control has passed between Labour, the Conservatives and no overall control several times. It is currently under Labour control. London boroughs ...Missing: origins history
  34. [34]
    What are the different types of local government in England?
    Feb 27, 2025 · There are 36 metropolitan district councils in total, all situated in the north of England or the Midlands and covering large urban areas ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Local Government Structure Overview
    The structure of local government varies from area to area. In most of England, there are two tiers – county and district – with responsibility for council ...
  36. [36]
    Is a Committee system right for your council?
    Cabinet is led by a leader, who is elected by full council for a term determined by the council itself or on a four yearly basis (and will usually be the leader ...
  37. [37]
    Directly-elected mayors - House of Commons Library - UK Parliament
    May 6, 2025 · This briefing paper explains the status of directly-elected mayors in English and Welsh local government, and the routes to establishing them.
  38. [38]
    Unitary local government: An explainer
    Nov 24, 2020 · Unitary local authorities would replace multiple local authorities with a single local government in a given area.Local Government Structures... · Why Unitary Local Government... · International Evidence
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    Is my council going to be abolished? - Commons Library
    Feb 10, 2025 · The government said it will invite all two-tier local authority areas to restructure into unitary authorities, which is likely to result in fewer, larger ...
  42. [42]
    London Government Act 1963 - Legislation.gov.uk
    An Act to make provision with respect to local government and the functions of local authorities in the metropolitan area.Missing: formation history<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Politics: How London's boroughs were named 60 years ago - BBC
    Mar 30, 2025 · Once the boundaries were settled, via the London Government Act 1963, the clock was ticking. These 32 new boroughs were due to be born on 1 ...
  44. [44]
    The Greater London Authority - House of Commons Library
    Jul 22, 2024 · The Mayor is the executive of the GLA, and is responsible for its core functions: transport, policing, fire and rescue, planning and housing.
  45. [45]
    Understanding the Local Authorities (Functions and Responsibilities ...
    Mar 26, 2025 · These functions, which include setting the budget and strategic policy framework are reserved for the full Council, rather than the executive.
  46. [46]
    Local authority, combined authority, and county combined ... - GOV.UK
    Jul 22, 2025 · These 10 unitary authorities hold whole council elections in 2025, 2029 and every 4th year. Buckinghamshire; Cornwall; County Durham; Isle of ...
  47. [47]
    Annex 2 - Inner and Outer London Boroughs
    Mar 1, 2021 · Table A2.2 - Inner and Outer London Boroughs ; Bexley. Outer ; Brent. Outer ; Bromley. Outer ; City of London. Inner*.Missing: differences | Show results with:differences
  48. [48]
    Celebrating 50 years of London boroughs
    Jul 24, 2014 · Formed on 1 April 1965 at the same time as Greater London by the London Government Act 1963, 12 boroughs were designated as inner London ...
  49. [49]
    Our role in London - City of London
    Feb 21, 2025 · We provide local government services for residents and City workers based in the Square Mile, but not those of other boroughs.
  50. [50]
    What is local government?
    Local government is responsible for a range of vital services for people and businesses in defined areas.
  51. [51]
    [PDF] powers and functions - The Greater London Authority
    May 10, 2024 · In other areas, the GLA's role is to lead policy in those areas without directly controlling all the relevant programmes and funding. The Mayor ...
  52. [52]
    Principal councils | Law Wales
    Mar 15, 2021 · For the purpose of local government, Wales is divided into 22 county and county boroughs, which are also described as 'principal areas'.
  53. [53]
    Local government - Law Wales
    Mar 15, 2021 · There are two tiers of local government in Wales. There are 22 'principal' local government areas each of which has a locally elected council ...
  54. [54]
    introduction to governance in local government [HTML] | GOV.WALES
    Jun 20, 2023 · All councils in Wales carry out the full range of local government functions and so this system of governance is not available to councils in ...
  55. [55]
    Local democracy in Wales: introduction to local government [HTML]
    Jun 20, 2023 · There are 734 community and town councils in Wales. They are not required to provide any specific services by law, and some areas do not have a ...
  56. [56]
    Wales - Office for National Statistics
    Wales is subdivided into 22 unitary authorities, which in turn are divided into electoral wards and communities.
  57. [57]
    Population estimates for England and Wales: mid-2024
    Jul 30, 2025 · National and subnational mid-year population estimates for England and Wales by administrative area, age and sex.Table Of Contents · 3. Countries And Regions · 4. Local Authorities<|separator|>
  58. [58]
  59. [59]
    East Suffolk District Council: Supporting chief executives in NOC ...
    Feb 17, 2025 · East Suffolk Council is a non-metropolitan district in Suffolk County with a population of 246000 at 2021 census. In 2023 the council moved ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  60. [60]
    Local Authority Analysis - The Public Sector
    Live List of all UK Councils ; Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council, Welsh Unitary Authority, Wales ; Bolsover District Council, English Non-Metropolitan District ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The Challenges of Working in a Council with No Overall Control
    Nov 24, 2023 · 'No overall Control' is just a convenient designation to be used when the electorate's decisions have not translated into a single party.
  62. [62]
    Mike Ball on planning delays - michael edwards
    Mar 13, 2010 · * The development control process takes longer in more affluent localities and where there are hung councils. The report concludes that ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] COALITIONS IN ENGLISH LOCAL GOVERNMENT: PARTY ...
    Recommended Citation. TEMPLE, M. (1992) COALITIONS IN ENGLISH LOCAL GOVERNMENT: PARTY POLITICAL STRATEGIES IN. HUNG COUNCILS. Thesis.Missing: governance | Show results with:governance
  64. [64]
    BBC NEWS | Talk about Newsnight | Would a hung parliament be ...
    ... UK local authority performance, where she will discover that NOC (hung) councils are disproportionately represented in the least lowest-performing groups ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] No overall control - Local Government Association
    If there is a possibility of a council moving to no overall control, there is a lot that the political group leaders can do in the pre-election period to ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  66. [66]
    Coalitions in Britain: administrative formation in hung councils in
    The survey shows that hung councils experience a wide variety of political partnerships. Contrary to earlier surveys concerning the type of administration which ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
  67. [67]
    In the grip of Whitehall? The effects of party control on local fiscal ...
    We see, that relative to the benchmark of no overall control (NOC) or Lib Dem control, Labour controlled councils set a 42% higher tax rate, but the ...
  68. [68]
    Inequalities in out-of-home care rates in England: Does local party ...
    This breakdown suggests that governance arrangements in no overall control councils are far from homogenous and related results should not be taken to represent ...
  69. [69]
    'This is counterproductive': the design of local welfare assistance ...
    Jul 28, 2024 · Sheffield City Council (No Overall Control) offers guidance and examples with the online form. ... Empirical Evidence from Homeless Services.
  70. [70]
    Blog: Political culture: understanding the mutual motivations of ...
    In the case of a council under no overall control, this need can be overlaid by one about assuring political stability – at least, until the next local election ...Missing: government | Show results with:government
  71. [71]
    How have English councils' funding and spending changed? 2010 ...
    Jun 7, 2024 · This report looks at how council funding and spending are set to have changed over the current (2019–24) parliament and puts these changes in a longer-run ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Council Tax Support Schemes in England: What Did Local ... - IFS
    political control of council: Conservative, Labour or Liberal Democrat majority or other (independent / no overall control). Individually, many of these ...
  73. [73]
    (PDF) Comprehensive Performance Assessment in English Local ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · A substantial empirical literature exists on the consequences of local government reform programs. However, much less effort has been ...
  74. [74]
    Labour suspends Aberdeen councillors over coalition with Tories
    May 17, 2017 · The Scottish Labour leader, Kezia Dugdale, has suspended every Labour councillor in Aberdeen after they ignored orders to abandon a power-sharing deal with the ...Missing: expulsion | Show results with:expulsion
  75. [75]
    Scottish Labour suspends entire council team over coalition with ...
    May 17, 2017 · Kezia Dugdale has been accused of “showing her true colours” after suspending her entire team of Labour councillors in Aberdeen for entering a coalition with ...
  76. [76]
    'Aberdeen Nine' allowed to stand for re-election - BBC News
    Sep 11, 2021 · Nine Labour councillors suspended for forming a coalition with the Tories on Aberdeen City Council have been given the go-ahead to stand for re-election.Missing: expulsion | Show results with:expulsion
  77. [77]
    Slough Borough Council: Commissioners' fourth report - GOV.UK
    Feb 22, 2024 · The authority is in no overall control. The Conservatives provide the leader and the cabinet relying on the support of the three Liberal ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Slough Borough Council: Commissioners' fifth report - GOV.UK
    Apr 30, 2024 · The Council remains in no overall control and is vulnerable to destabilising changes, which could impact the effectiveness of organisational ...
  79. [79]
    Slough Borough Council expects government oversight until 2026
    Oct 22, 2024 · A council is expected to have government intervention for another two years. Government-appointed commissioners have worked with ...Missing: governance issues control
  80. [80]
    The 10 councils left with no overall control and who leads them
    May 23, 2025 · Gains for Reform and Liberal Democrats saw some councils left under no overall control · Devon County Council · Gloucestershire County Council.Missing: examples 2020s
  81. [81]
    Council deputy leader survives no confidence vote - BBC
    Jun 2, 2025 · A deputy leader in a council has survived a vote of no confidence after a row about Welsh medium education in the county.Missing: control instability
  82. [82]
    Reform UK council boss steps down leaving 18-year-old deputy in ...
    The county council confirmed the current deputy chairman, 18-year-old George Finch, will now serve as an interim leader until a permanent replacement is chosen.
  83. [83]
    Welsh election results 2022: Tories lose their only council - BBC News
    May 6, 2022 · The Conservatives have lost control of their only council in Wales. Labour has become the biggest party in Monmouthshire, with the final results now declared ...
  84. [84]
    Attempt to Replace Monmouthshire County Council's Labour Leader ...
    May 20, 2025 · AN attempt to oust Monmouthshire County Council's Labour leader, and replace her with a Conservative, has failed. Labour took over at County ...
  85. [85]
    Opposition councillors inflict defeat on Labour administration's ...
    Jan 28, 2025 · OPPOSITION councillors have inflicted a defeat on Monmouthshire County Council's ruling administration over its budget plans ahead of a key ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  86. [86]
    The full results from around Wales in the local elections 2022
    May 7, 2022 · The political map of Wales' councils has now been confirmed and Labour has had another good election. However, the Conservatives have lost ...
  87. [87]