Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Open Library


Open Library is an initiative of the non-profit , functioning as an editable online catalog that aims to create a dedicated for every ever published, compiling bibliographic from various sources and user contributions to facilitate discovery and access to . Launched in , it maintains over 20 million records accessible via a wiki-style interface, allowing users to add, edit, and expand entries while integrating with the Internet Archive's broader efforts. The project emphasizes and software, drawing from large institutional catalogs to build a comprehensive index, and supports features like borrowing through controlled digital lending (CDL), where copies are loaned in one-to-one correspondence with owned physical volumes for limited periods. This model has enabled access to millions of digitized works, promoting universal availability of knowledge, though its scale relies on partnerships and grants, such as those from the Kahle/Austin Foundation. Open Library's editable nature fosters collaborative improvement, distinguishing it from static databases by inviting input from librarians, readers, and authors to refine and coverage. Despite these achievements, Open Library has faced significant legal challenges, particularly over its CDL practices, which publishers including argued constituted willful by enabling unauthorized digital distribution. In the 2020 lawsuit , a U.S. district court ruled in 2023 that the lending exceeded , a decision upheld on appeal in 2024, leading to the removal of numerous titles from lending availability and restrictions on the program's scope. These rulings highlight tensions between and enforcement, impacting Open Library's role in providing equitable access to out-of-print and in-copyright materials.

Overview

Purpose and Organizational Context

Open Library operates as an open-source initiative to construct a comprehensive, editable catalog of , with the explicit objective of generating a dedicated for every ever published worldwide. This collaborative platform enables users to contribute and refine bibliographic details, such as titles, authors, and publication information, while aggregating data from external sources including OCLC's database and scans of physical library holdings. The emphasis on openness distinguishes it as a crowdsourced effort, where registered participants can verify editions, add covers, and link to borrowing options, fostering a dynamic repository that prioritizes over proprietary control. As a project embedded within the , a 501(c)(3) established in 1996 by , Open Library aligns with the parent entity's mission to preserve and provide universal access to digital cultural artifacts. The supplies the infrastructural backbone, including its extensive scanning operations that have digitized over 25 million , enabling Open Library to integrate links to borrowable digital copies where available. This affiliation leverages the Archive's vast repository of scanned materials, but Open Library itself functions primarily as a hub rather than a storage facility, directing users to external resources for acquisition or reading. Unlike conventional libraries that maintain physical collections and circulation systems, Open Library eschews tangible holdings in favor of a virtual index focused on bibliographic and lending facilitation. Its model supports and enrichment without owning or housing physical volumes, thereby complementing the Internet Archive's preservation efforts by emphasizing discoverability and community-driven accuracy in cataloging. This approach underscores a commitment to and , allowing with global library networks while avoiding the logistical constraints of brick-and-mortar institutions.

Core Components and Scale

Open Library's bibliographic catalog aggregates over 20 million records of book metadata, drawn from sources such as library partnerships, data, and community contributions, covering editions, works, authors, and subjects. This extensive dataset forms the foundational component, enabling comprehensive coverage of published works, including out-of-print titles and materials. The lending system centers on a collection of more than 3 million borrowable digital books as of 2025, with internal metrics indicating up to 4.5 million items available for controlled digital lending, primarily consisting of scanned physical volumes hosted via integration with the . These scans incorporate out-of-print and works, processed to support digital access while adhering to one-to-one lending ratios for in-copyright holdings. To enhance searchability, the platform links to OCR-applied scans from the , allowing text-based querying across digitized content. External scalability is supported by RESTful , including the Books API for retrieving edition details by identifiers like or OLID, the Search API for catalog queries, and the Covers API for imagery, enabling integration into third-party library systems and applications. Scale vulnerabilities were exposed in when over 500,000 in-copyright books were removed from the borrowable collection following publisher demands amid ongoing litigation, contracting the active lending pool and highlighting dependencies on legal tolerances for digitized holdings.

Historical Development

Founding and Initial Launch (2006–2010)

Open Library was initiated in 2006 by , who served as its technical lead under the auspices of the , with the goal of creating an open, editable catalog encompassing every book ever published. Swartz announced the project publicly on July 16, 2007, describing it as an effort to construct "the world's greatest library" by aggregating and making freely available bibliographic data for universal access and community editing. The beta version launched that year emphasized metadata collection from diverse sources, including records from major libraries like the and the British National Library, to establish a centralized, wiki-style database without initially prioritizing full-text . The project emerged within the broader context of the Open Content Alliance, a collaborative initiative founded by Internet Archive director Brewster Kahle to promote non-proprietary book digitization and open access to cultural materials. Early development involved partnerships with libraries participating in scanning programs, where physical volumes were digitized to create digital surrogates owned outright by the institutions, reflecting a commitment to preserving and democratizing access to knowledge through verifiable physical holdings rather than licensing dependencies. These efforts focused on public domain works, enabling direct online reading without the lending restrictions that would later apply to copyrighted materials. By 2010, Open Library had integrated basic digital borrowing capabilities for ebooks from the Archive's scanned collections, allowing users to access one at a time in a manner analogous to traditional library checkouts, though limited to non-circulating online views for these freely available titles. This feature built on the platform's foundation, providing over one million out-of-copyright volumes for immediate perusal and underscoring the project's foundational aim of equitable distribution based on owned physical assets.

Expansion and Integration with Internet Archive (2011–2020)

Open Library deepened its integration with the during the , leveraging the organization's scanning infrastructure to expand the digitized collection significantly. By the late , this collaboration facilitated the processing of millions of volumes, including contributions from partner libraries and institutions, as part of initiatives like the Open Libraries project aimed at acquiring or digitizing four million books while respecting publisher agreements where applicable. A key development was the implementation of controlled digital lending (CDL), which applied a one-to-one ratio mirroring physical library practices—lending one digital scan per owned physical copy, with enforced borrowing periods and waitlists to prevent overuse. Piloted in the early through collaborative and lending efforts, CDL enabled access to 20th-century in-copyright titles contributed by libraries, positioning Open Library as a digital extension of traditional lending models. In October 2019, Open Library launched a Scan on Demand sponsorship program, enabling users to directly fund the of targeted books, thereby expansion of the borrowable catalog. This user-driven approach complemented institutional scanning by prioritizing reader-requested titles for conversion into lendable digital formats. Responding to library closures during the , Open Library initiated the National Emergency Library in March 2020, temporarily removing waitlists to allow concurrent borrowing of digital books until June 16, 2020, after which it reverted to standard CDL protocols. This measure provided crisis-time access to over a million titles but drew criticism from publishers for exceeding boundaries. Throughout this period, accessibility features advanced, including DAISY-formatted books for print-disabled users, which offered navigable audio and text substitutes compliant with standards for the visually impaired.

Recent Milestones and Adaptations (2021–2025)

In 2022, Open Library implemented a community reviews feature, allowing users to apply predefined tags—such as content warnings or thematic descriptors—to book entries, thereby qualitative while maintaining editorial controls to prevent . This adaptation built on prior user editing capabilities, aiming to enrich discovery without relying on external review aggregators. Concurrently, the platform sustained elevated borrowing volumes following the 2020 National Emergency Library suspension of waitlists, which facilitated broader access during library closures and contributed to a surge in digital checkouts amid ongoing pandemic disruptions. By 2024, Open Library complied with court-mandated restrictions by delisting over 500,000 titles from its controlled digital lending program, curtailing in-copyright ebook loans and redirecting resources toward scans and open-access editions. This shift emphasized verifiable non-infringing materials, including newly works from 1929 entering free use on January 1, 2025, such as literary titles by and . Reduced lending capacity prompted operational resilience measures, including read-only access protocols during high-demand periods to preserve catalog integrity. These changes coincided with Internet Archive-wide advancements, notably reaching the milestone of 1 trillion archived web pages in October 2025, underscoring Open Library's integration within a larger preservation prioritizing durable, accessible artifacts over contested lending models.

Operational Features

Bibliographic Catalog and Editing

The Open Library bibliographic catalog functions as a crowdsourced, wiki-style database of , encompassing over 20 million records derived from bulk imports of library catalogs and user-submitted data. It distinguishes between "works," which aggregate canonical bibliographic information across editions, and specific "editions," which detail publication variants including publishers, formats, and identifiers such as ISBNs, numbers, LCCNs, and Open Library IDs (OLIDs). This structure enables comprehensive tracking of publication histories, with users contributing details like author attributions, subject classifications, and cover images via an accessible "" interface on individual record pages. Public editing privileges emphasize decentralized accuracy through community input over centralized institutional oversight, allowing registered users to create new entries, merge duplicates, or refine existing metadata without formal credentials. Contributions integrate empirical elements, such as linking records to digitized scans from partner libraries, alongside subjective additions like subjects or summaries, fostering iterative improvements but contingent on participant diligence. The model draws initial data from established library systems, enhancing coverage through user expansions, though it lacks automated cross-verification against primary sources, potentially perpetuating unconfirmed details until subsequent edits occur. Search functionalities support queries by , , or , yielding results with facets for filtering by edition specifics, publication dates, languages, and related translations. For instance, searches employ controlled vocabularies to retrieve thematically linked works, while pages link to associated editions and variant translations, with guidelines specifying original-language titles for works and translated titles for editions. This faceted approach facilitates discovery of bibliographic variants, such as international editions, but accuracy hinges on the completeness of user-maintained identifiers and classifications.

Controlled Digital Lending Mechanism

The Controlled Digital Lending (CDL) mechanism employed by Open Library operates on the principle of maintaining a one-to-one correspondence between owned physical copies and loaned digital versions, aiming to replicate the constraints of traditional in a digital format. Under this system, physical books acquired through purchase or donation are digitized via scanning, after which the corresponding physical copy is stored and rendered unavailable for lending during the digital loan period to prevent concurrent access. Digital loans consist of ephemeral files delivered through secure viewers, such as browser-based access or with (DRM), which restrict downloading, printing, or redistribution beyond the licensed view-only duration. This approach is predicated on the theory that such controls preserve the economic and access limitations inherent in physical lending, thereby aligning with principles without enabling reproduction beyond owned quantities. Implementation details include standardized loan periods of 14 days for most titles, during which a single user accesses the digital copy, followed by automatic expiration and return to availability for the next borrower; shorter one-hour loans are available on a first-come, first-served basis for select items, while high-demand titles feature waitlists with notifications. Circulation software enforces the one-digital-per-physical by tracking unique identifiers and blocking simultaneous loans, theoretically ensuring no net increase in accessible copies beyond the physical collection. Prior to legal restrictions, this supported lending from approximately 750,000 scanned titles, primarily comprising in-copyright works held by the . Following the 2020 initiation of publisher lawsuits, CDL operations faced publisher-initiated opt-outs for specific titles and judicial limitations, culminating in a 2023 district court ruling and 2024 appellate affirmation that rejected defenses for the program, mandating removal of over 500,000 titles from circulation. From a causal standpoint, the mechanism's efficacy hinges on verifiable ownership chains for physical copies—such as matched serial numbers or acquisition records—to prevent discrepancies where digital loans exceed physical holdings, a scalability challenge exacerbated by bulk acquisitions without granular tracking, as critiqued in analyses of potential effects. Publishers have contested the sufficiency of these controls, arguing they fail to mitigate unauthorized proliferation risks inherent in without publisher consent.

User Engagement and Sponsorship Programs

Open Library's book sponsorship program, launched on October 23, 2019, enables users to direct donations toward acquiring and digitizing specific titles not yet available in the collection, with scanned books subsequently offered for free borrowing. This initiative supports targeted expansion of the digital holdings by leveraging individual contributions to cover costs associated with purchasing physical copies and performing scans. Complementing sponsorship, users actively contribute to catalog maintenance through editable records, where they can add new , update edition details such as publishers and , and refine work-level information like descriptions, with all changes tracked in edit histories. entries can also be managed, including merging duplicates upon approval, fostering a collaborative refinement of bibliographic data. To encourage evaluative input, Open Library implemented Community Reviews in August 2021, a structured tagging system permitting users to select predefined categories via a interface and assign 1-5 star ratings applicable to works rather than editions, with data anonymized and aggregated for display on book pages. These reviews eschew free-form text in favor of tag-based classification, enabling statistical overviews of community sentiment and aiding discovery. Users further engage by curating content through and a , accessible via management, where can be categorized thematically—such as by or personal interest—and status-tracked as "want to read," "reading," or "read," supporting individualized organization without built-in public sharing mechanisms. Such tools promote sustained interaction, aligning user preferences with catalog utility while empowering niche prioritization in sponsorship-driven .

Accessibility Initiatives for Disabled Users

Open Library facilitates access to digitized books in specialized formats for users with print disabilities, such as blindness, , or , through integration with the Internet Archive's programs. These efforts leverage the Chafee Amendment (17 U.S.C. § 121), which exempts authorized entities from when reproducing works in accessible formats exclusively for eligible individuals who cannot read standard print due to physical or perceptual limitations. Unlike controlled digital lending for the general public, which relies on and imposes one-to-one borrowing limits, print disability access operates under this statutory exemption, allowing unlimited distribution to qualified users without concurrent circulation restrictions. The primary format provided is (Digital Accessible Information System), a structured audio-text hybrid enabling navigation by chapters, headings, and images via screen readers or displays, with support for unencrypted text files in works. Users must qualify as print disabled—certified by a , optometrist, or authorized —and obtain a free account with a special , streamlining eligibility as updated in a May 30, 2025, process enhancement. Once approved, eligible patrons can borrow and download -formatted books directly, bypassing general waitlists; Ready Format (BRF) support is available for compatible titles through compatible devices. Launched in 2010, the initiative initially unlocked over 1 million volumes in format, drawn from the Internet Archive's scanned collections, with expansions by 2018 providing access to millions more for visually impaired users via web-based reading or downloads. This scale reflects ongoing digitization of physical scans optimized for accessibility, including (OCR) enhancements, ensuring compatibility with assistive technologies like or NVDA screen readers. The program's legal distinction from broader lending models has insulated it from challenges in related litigation, prioritizing equitable access grounded in congressional intent for disability exemptions.

Legal Challenges and Controversies

Early Copyright Disputes

In the early 2010s, as Open Library expanded its controlled digital lending program—beginning with a partnership with the in 2011—publishers and authors raised initial concerns about unauthorized scanning and reproduction of ed works. Critics alleged that the project's digitization of entire books, followed by digital loans without publisher consent, exceeded and enabled potential through downloadable copies. These claims intensified in late 2017, when the highlighted Open Library's practices as copyright violations, noting the availability of in-print titles for digital borrowing without remuneration to rights holders. The Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America (SFWA) formalized these objections in a January 2018 infringement alert, asserting that Open Library's scanning of books published as recently as the constituted direct infringement rather than analogous physical lending, as it involved creating new digital copies not licensed from publishers. SFWA and allied groups, including Writer Beware, urged authors to verify their works' presence on Open Library and submit DMCA takedown notices, emphasizing that the platform's scale—potentially encompassing millions of titles—amplified the risks of unauthorized distribution. In response, Internet Archive founder defended the initiative in a January 2018 blog post, arguing that and one-to-one lending preserved library traditions without supplanting sales, and committed to honoring takedown requests while maintaining an opt-out list for publishers seeking broader exclusions. By 2019, these tensions persisted, with the Authors Guild issuing an open letter protesting controlled digital lending as a flawed model that undermined author earnings by treating digital copies as fungible equivalents to print ones, despite lacking contractual agreements with rights holders. Internet Archive countered that the practice was transformative, serving non-commercial preservation goals akin to physical libraries' interlibrary loans, and relied on fair use doctrine to justify limiting loans to the number of owned physical copies. The prevalence of DMCA notices and opt-out requests during this period empirically demonstrated gaps in Open Library's permission-based framework, as reactive removals addressed individual complaints but did not resolve systemic disputes over proactive scanning authorizations.

Hachette Book Group et al. v. Internet Archive Lawsuit (2020–2024)

In June 2020, , Inc., Publishers LLC, LLC, and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. filed a lawsuit against the in the United States District Court for the Southern District of , alleging willful violations through the defendant's Open Library program. The complaint targeted the 's Controlled Digital Lending (CDL) system, which involved scanning physical print books owned by the organization or its partners, creating digital copies, and lending those ebooks on a one-to-one basis with the physical copies—effectively digitizing and distributing unauthorized reproductions of the publishers' works without licenses. The suit specifically highlighted 127 titles from the plaintiffs' catalogs, including works like and , but sought remedies for broader infringement affecting tens of thousands of books. The filing was precipitated by the Internet Archive's launch of the National Emergency Library (NEL) on March 24, 2020, a temporary expansion of CDL that suspended waitlists and enabled simultaneous loans equivalent to its entire print collection of over 1.4 million titles, in response to physical library closures during the . Plaintiffs contended that CDL and NEL constituted systematic piracy, not protected library lending, as the process generated new copies that competed directly with licensed sales and subscriptions, evidenced by internal data showing millions of loans—including to users in markets with available purchases—and peak daily circulations exceeding 100,000 during NEL. They argued this harmed downstream licensing markets for , audiobooks, and print editions, rejecting any claim by emphasizing the commercial substitutability of the free loans, the lack of transformation in the reproductions, and the scale of unauthorized copying as exceeding traditional library exceptions. The Internet Archive defended CDL as a faithful digital analog to longstanding physical library practices, asserting that it maintained a strict owned-to-loaned ratio (one digital per physical copy, with the book secured during lending), ensured non-commercial without or user fees, and served transformative purposes of preservation, , and equitable amid scarcity. Regarding NEL, the described it as a short-term (March 24 to June 16, 2020) humanitarian response to pandemic disruptions, not a permanent shift, and maintained that both initiatives fell under doctrine per 17 U.S.C. § 107 by favoring public benefit over market effects in non-profit contexts. The cited precedents like interlibrary loans and argued no of net market harm, as loans were time-limited (typically 14 days) and targeted users without easy ebook alternatives, while highlighting the Internet Archive's of physical copies predating . Following discovery, which included depositions and production of lending logs revealing over 500,000 CDL loans in 2019 alone, the parties filed cross-motions for in early 2022. The district court, in a March 20, 2023 ruling by Judge , granted partial to the plaintiffs on direct infringement claims for both CDL and NEL, holding that the practices failed all four factors: non-transformative purpose, reproduction of expressive core content, excessive scope beyond criticism or education, and demonstrable harm to ebook licensing revenues. The court deferred damages and certain secondary claims for further proceedings but issued a permanent limiting the Internet Archive's digital lending of the plaintiffs' works, prompting the defendant to remove over 500,000 titles from availability pending appeal.

Appellate Rulings and Final Resolution (2024–2025)

On September 4, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, sitting en banc, affirmed the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York's March 2023 summary judgment ruling in Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive. The appellate court held that the Internet Archive's (IA) Controlled Digital Lending (CDL) practices through its Open Library and Free Digital Library programs did not constitute fair use under Section 107 of the Copyright Act, rejecting IA's defense across all four statutory factors. Specifically, the court found that IA's scanning of physical books it owned into digital formats and lending those exact digital copies on a one-to-one basis with print counterparts created direct market substitutes for licensed e-books, undermining publishers' licensing revenues without the transformative purpose required for fair use. The Second Circuit dismissed IA's analogy to traditional library lending, noting that digital copies lack the physical wear or geographic constraints of print books, enabling unlimited simultaneous access and nationwide distribution that competes with commercial e-book markets. On the fourth factor—effect on the potential market—the panel emphasized of harm to plaintiffs' sales, including for authorized editions, and declined to limit analysis to the 127 titles directly at issue, viewing CDL as a systemic to broader licensing ecosystems. The upheld the district court's permanent prohibiting IA from further distributing the scanned copies of the sued-upon works and similar infringing activities. Following the affirmation, IA did not file a petition for with the U.S. by the December 3, 2024, deadline, effectively concluding the litigation after over four years. In a December 4, 2024, announcement, IA confirmed it would comply with its prior stipulation to the Association of American Publishers (AAP), removing from circulation over 500,000 scanned titles subject to the publishers' claims, while preserving access to works and legally licensed materials. This dismantled IA's CDL model for copyrighted in-print books without monetary or further appeals, establishing that digital replication and lending of owned print copies does not inherently qualify as absent transformative elements or negligible market impact.

Reception and Criticisms

Supporter Perspectives on Preservation and Access

Supporters of Open Library, including leadership and collaborating librarians, contend that its digitization efforts safeguard by making available out-of-print and obscure titles neglected by commercial markets due to low profitability. An study found that % of books published in the twentieth century remain unavailable for purchase from major online retailers like , highlighting a preservation gap that Open Library addresses through scanning and cataloging over 20 million bibliographic records, including millions of rare volumes. In response to the , the National Emergency Library extension of Open Library suspended one-book-at-a-time waitlists from March 24, 2020, to June 30, 2020, enabling simultaneous remote borrowing of 1.4 million digitized titles by users worldwide, particularly benefiting students and remote learners cut off from physical collections. officials described this as fulfilling libraries' core mission of equitable access during crises, with the initiative drawing endorsements from educators for sustaining and continuity amid widespread closures. Advocates, such as Open Libraries Director Chris Freeland, argue that the platform promotes broader by providing free digital loans of low-demand works excluded from commercial e-book ecosystems, which favor bestsellers, and overcomes geographic barriers inherent in brick-and-mortar libraries. Lending data from Open Library's over 3 million borrowable items underscores usage patterns favoring educational and niche content, with supporters asserting this model supplements rather than supplants market availability, fostering informed citizenship without evidence of widespread substitution for purchasable editions.

Publisher and Author Objections to Market Harm

Publishers and authors have contended that Open Library's controlled digital lending (CDL) practice inflicts direct economic harm by enabling unauthorized digital access that substitutes for licensed purchases and library licenses, thereby eroding royalties and sales revenue. The has highlighted that CDL threatens author incomes by allowing libraries to and lend entire books without permission, bypassing the ebook market where authors typically receive royalties from licensed distributions. Specifically, authors earn approximately 25 percent of revenue from library ebook licenses, a stream that CDL circumvents by offering free digital loans, potentially rendering paid licensing obsolete for many titles. This , critics argue, creates disincentives for new , as creators forgo compensation for works that libraries could otherwise purchase or digitally. Even small losses significantly impact authors' livelihoods, given the marginal of writing, where CDL's scale—scanning and lending millions of titles—amplifies the harm akin to unauthorized distribution despite one-user-at-a-time controls. The Association of American Publishers has asserted that any purported public benefits from CDL fail to justify the damage to publishers' actual and potential markets, including lost opportunities from controlled digital exploitation. Following the U.S. District Court's March 2023 ruling and the Second Circuit's September 2024 affirmation in v. , publishers emphasized that upholding rights safeguards industry sustainability by preserving licensing models essential for funding authorship and publishing. The described the decisions as preventing "wholesale copying and distribution" that would "devastate the livelihoods of authors," reinforcing that contractual and protections are vital for creators to and monetize their works.

Evaluations of Fair Use Doctrine Application

In the application of the doctrine to controlled digital lending (CDL) by Open Library, courts weighed the four statutory factors under 17 U.S.C. § 107, ultimately finding against in the , Inc. v. litigation. The first factor, concerning the purpose and character of the use, was deemed unfavorable due to the lack of transformative purpose; CDL involved scanning and lending complete digital copies of books for reading, mirroring the original expressive function rather than adding new expression, criticism, or functionality, despite 's nonprofit status. Commercial elements, such as donations tied to access and partnerships yielding revenue, further tilted this factor against , though courts noted commerciality alone is not dispositive. The second and third factors—nature of the copyrighted work and amount used—also weighed against , as the works were creative fiction and books eligible for full protection, and CDL reproduced entire copies without limitation to excerpts. The fourth factor, effect on the potential market, proved decisive, with evidence showing CDL substituted for licensed sales; for instance, during the period from March to September 2020, Internet Archive's lending of 100,000+ copies of plaintiffs' titles coincided with publishers' reported revenue declines, demonstrating actual harm rather than mere speculation. Courts rejected analogies to physical lending, emphasizing copies' infinite replicability and lack of , which causally enable widespread unauthorized distribution beyond owned copies. Doctrinal tensions emerged in distinguishing CDL from precedents like (Google Books), where was upheld for creating searchable indices with snippets, not full-text lending; Google Books facilitated discovery without supplanting reading markets, whereas CDL's one-to-one digital loans functioned as direct competitors to authorized digital editions. Some academic critiques, often from library science perspectives, advocate doctrinal reform to prioritize preservation and access over market effects, arguing CDL mimics physical libraries without net harm. However, empirical evidence from publisher data—such as tracked borrowing spikes correlating with sales dips—supports the rulings' emphasis on verifiable substitution, underscoring causal market displacement over idealistic access claims, particularly given the ease of digital amplification.

Impact and Current Status

Contributions to Digital Preservation

Open Library maintains an extensive catalog comprising over 50 million edition records, aggregating and preserving bibliographic from diverse sources and community contributions, which ensures the endurance of descriptive data on published works amid potential disruptions to physical collections. This supports systematic documentation of histories, authors, and variants, countering the fragmentation inherent in decentralized analog catalogs. Complementing this, Open Library integrates with the Internet Archive's program, which has produced scans of more than 25 million books, capturing high-fidelity images of physical volumes to mitigate risks from material decay, such as paper acidification and environmental damage. These digital surrogates preserve the exact content and formatting of originals, including out-of-print titles whose physical copies are increasingly scarce or inaccessible due to library or natural attrition. By enabling verifiable access to these preserved scans, Open Library facilitates scholarly examination of historical texts without reliance on fragile artifacts, thereby reducing the incidence of content loss and supporting longitudinal studies in fields like literature and history. As a non-profit endeavor, its archiving prioritizes the stewardship of cultural artifacts over commercial interests, aligning with longstanding library mandates to safeguard human knowledge for perpetual availability.

Consequences of Legal Outcomes on Operations

Following the Second Circuit Court of Appeals' affirmation on September 4, 2024, of the district court's ruling that Open Library's controlled digital lending of in-copyright books constituted rather than , the implemented an injunction requiring the removal of affected titles from its lending catalog. This led to the delisting of over 500,000 scanned books in June 2024, primarily modern titles owned by suing publishers such as Hachette, , , and Wiley, as mandated by the court's order to halt unauthorized digital reproductions and distributions. The Association of American Publishers (AAP) agreement, which the committed to honoring even after declining review on December 4, 2024, ensured these removals persisted, eliminating a substantial portion of lendable in-copyright materials. These deletions contracted Open Library's operational scope, compelling a pivot toward works and legally acquired , as the platform could no longer rely on one-to-one lending of scanned copies for protected titles without publisher licenses. Borrowing volumes declined correspondingly, with users losing access to roughly half a million titles that had previously supported the service's scale, resulting in measurable reductions in overall lending activity and user engagement as reported by the itself. The court's determination that such lending acted as a substitute for licensed e-books—evidenced by concurrent and availability—underscored the causal link between unauthorized scanning and dissemination and publishers' lost licensing revenue, validating their claims of economic harm. Operationally, the outcomes eroded user trust, as evidenced by a June 2024 petition drive by supporters seeking restoration of removed titles, while highlighting the vulnerabilities of scaling digital libraries without explicit rights holder consent or robust precedents. This reinforced the practical necessity for licensed acquisition models, such as partnerships with publishers for authorized e-book lending, over experimental paradigms like nationwide initiatives that courts deemed to undermine primary markets. The sustained removals, upheld through the final resolution, thus constrained Open Library to a narrower preservation role focused on out-of-copyright materials, limiting its ambition as a comprehensive digital lending hub.

Future Prospects and Broader Implications

Following the Second Circuit's September 4, 2024, affirmation of the district court's ruling that the Internet Archive's Controlled Digital Lending (CDL) practices did not constitute fair use, Open Library's operators removed approximately 500,000 titles from its lending catalog to comply with the decision and an associated agreement with the Association of American Publishers. This curtailment signals a trajectory toward greater reliance on public domain works, out-of-print materials with verifiable ownership chains, or negotiated licenses, as unauthorized scanning and one-to-one lending of in-copyright books risks further infringement liability. While the Internet Archive has pursued preservation partnerships with entities like public libraries for local digital heritage and received grants for non-book archiving, such as $1 million from Press Forward in July 2025 for local news digitization, no large-scale pivot to licensed e-book lending for Open Library has materialized as of late 2025. Emerging technologies like blockchain for tracking digital copies' provenance could theoretically enable provable "owned" lending without physical counterparts, but adoption remains speculative absent demonstrated implementation or legal validation. The ruling's broader implications erode the viability of CDL as a scalable model for non-commercial digital libraries, prioritizing copyright holders' market incentives over unilateral access expansions that courts deemed competitive substitutes for licensed e-books. This outcome reinforces causal dynamics where unauthorized lending discourages publisher investment in digital formats, as evidenced by the plaintiffs' arguments that Open Library's program harmed sales without transformative value. For , market-based solutions—such as subscription platforms or licenses—offer verifiable paths forward, contrasting with idealistic open-access models lacking creator consent, which face enforcement risks amplified by the decision's rejection of across all factors. Policy debates may intensify around targeted exemptions for orphan works or expanded library privileges, but the appellate court's en banc opinion, declining Supreme Court review in December 2024, entrenches judicial skepticism toward broad digital reproductions mimicking commercial markets. Without legislative reforms, the precedent favors innovation incentives tied to enforceable rights, potentially spurring hybrid models where libraries collaborate with rights holders rather than litigate doctrinal boundaries.

References

  1. [1]
    About Us | Open Library
    ### Summary of Open Library
  2. [2]
    Open Library - The Authors Guild
    January 18, 2018: An Update on Open Library; January 9, 2019: Controlled Digital Lending Is Neither Controlled nor Legal; February 13, 2019: Controlled Digital ...
  3. [3]
    A legal blow to Internet Archive, controlled digital lending
    Mar 26, 2023 · The publishers' lawsuit had also targeted the Internet Archive's Open Library ... controlled digital lending, which it dubbed “an invented ...
  4. [4]
    Internet Archive loses appeal – what does it mean?
    Sep 25, 2024 · ” The Open Library is administered under a “controlled digital lending” model. ... The lawsuit already has a quantifiable negative impact ...
  5. [5]
    Hachette Book Group v. Internet Archive and the Future of ...
    Feb 21, 2024 · ... Controlled Digital Lending. Controlled Digital Lending is a method ... In collaboration with the Open Library of Richmond, Internet ...
  6. [6]
    About Open Library
    Jan 15, 2025 · Open Library is a universal catalog for book metadata. Our goal is to create a web page for every book ever published. We call it “Open Library” ...
  7. [7]
    Internet Archive Digitization Services » Digitizing Collections ...
    With over 25 million books digitized, we preserve knowledge and ensure universal access to information. ... 2025 – Internet Archive Canada.
  8. [8]
    Welcome to Open Library | Open Library
    Open Library is an open, editable library catalog, building towards a web page for every book ever published. Read, borrow, and discover more than 3M books ...Internet Archive logo Donate · In library · Sign Up · Borrowing Books Through...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  9. [9]
    The Open Library Blog | A web page for every book
    Last year was marked by more than 500,000 books being removed from the library, cyber security attacks, and power outages.
  10. [10]
    Borrowing Books Through Open Library
    Jun 23, 2025 · You can borrow ten books at a time from Open Library. Loans are for one hour for browsing and/or 14 days if the book is fully borrowable.What Books Can I Borrow? How... · Can I Return A Library Book... · Can I Put A Library Book On...Missing: count | Show results with:count
  11. [11]
    APIs | Open Library
    Jul 18, 2025 · Open Library offers a suite of APIs to help developers get up and running with our data. This includes RESTful APIs, which make Open Library data availabile in ...Search API · My Books API · Covers API · RESTful API
  12. [12]
    Developer Center / APIs / Books API - Open Library
    The Book API is a generic, flexible, configurable endpoint which allows requesting information on one or more books using ISBNs, OCLC Numbers, LCCNs and OLIDs ...Learnings About Works V... · The Data Format · Jscmd=data
  13. [13]
    500,000 Books Have Been Deleted From The Internet Archive's ...
    Jun 20, 2024 · If you found out that 500,000 books had been removed from your local public library, at the demands of big publishers who refused to let ...
  14. [14]
    Internet Archive's Open Library Faces Uncertain Future After Court ...
    Sep 10, 2024 · ... controlled digital lending,” where a library owns a book, scans it ... Open Library to find authors' works,” wrote the Authors Alliance ...
  15. [15]
    The Open Library - Berkman Klein Center
    Aaron Swartz is the Tech Lead for Open Library. He was previously a co-founder of Reddit.com, which was purchased by Condé Nast in late 2006. He was worked on ...
  16. [16]
    Announcing the Open Library - Aaron Swartz
    Jul 16, 2007 · Our goal is to build the world's greatest library, then put it up on the Internet free for all to use and edit. Books are the place you go when ...Missing: 2006 Alliance
  17. [17]
    Open Library Information Sheet
    Nov 23, 2009 · Open Library is an open, editable library catalog, building towards ... They are also a member of the Open Content Alliance, a group of ...
  18. [18]
    Small Moves: Open Library Integrates Digital Lending
    Jun 29, 2010 · The Internet Archive is pleased to announce 2 new borrowing options through Open Library: Borrowing ebooks through OverDrive – an ebook through your local ...Missing: domain introduction
  19. [19]
    Small Moves: Open Library Integrates Digital Lending
    Jun 29, 2010 · The Internet Archive is pleased to announce 2 new borrowing options through Open Library: Borrowing ebooks through OverDrive – an ebook through your local ...Missing: domain introduction
  20. [20]
    Internet Archive Sets Fair-Use Bait With Open Library Lending
    Jul 2, 2010 · Over a million out-of-copyright works are available, and Open Library has integrated access to the 70,000 ebooks licensed to subscriber ...Missing: introduction | Show results with:introduction
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Internet Archive Open Libraries Proposal MacArthur Foundation ...
    Jul 31, 2020 · The Internet Archive's Open Libraries offers a solution bringing four million books online, through purchase or digitization, while honoring the ...
  22. [22]
    Internet Archive Expands Partnerships for Open Libraries Project
    May 2, 2019 · The Internet Archive is seeking partners for its Open Libraries project. Recent contributors include Trent University, ON, which donated more ...Missing: integration 2011-2020
  23. [23]
    [PDF] FAQ on Controlled Digital Lending (CDL) - National Writers Union
    “Since 2010, the Internet Archive's OpenLibrary.org site has been piloting collaborative collection and lending of 20th-century books contributed by dozens of ...
  24. [24]
    Scan On Demand: Building the World's Open Library, Together
    Oct 23, 2019 · With our new book sponsorship program, readers are given the option to put money towards directly sponsoring the acquisition of a particular ...Missing: funded | Show results with:funded
  25. [25]
    Temporary National Emergency Library to close 2 weeks early ...
    Jun 10, 2020 · We are announcing the National Emergency Library will close on June 16th, rather than June 30th, returning to traditional controlled digital lending.
  26. [26]
    'National Emergency Library' Lends A Hand — And Lots Of Books!
    Mar 26, 2020 · Concerns over the coronavirus have shuttered public and school libraries around the world, depriving their regular patrons of free access to the ...
  27. [27]
    DAISY/Print Disabled Books on Open Library
    "Print disabled" books are those that have been specially formatted in the DAISY format for users who can not read regular print books.Missing: 2017 | Show results with:2017
  28. [28]
    Book Reviews | Open Library
    Apr 26, 2022 · What are community book reviews? By using Open Library's community review feature, patrons can select predefined tags that best describe a book.
  29. [29]
    Announcing a National Emergency Library to Provide Digitized ...
    Mar 24, 2020 · The Internet Archive will suspend waitlists for the 1.4 million (and growing) books in our lending library by creating a National Emergency Library.
  30. [30]
    Internet Archive Forced to Remove 500,000 Books After Court Rules ...
    Jun 23, 2024 · June 23, 2024 - Internet Archive Forced to Remove 500000 Books After Court Rules in Favor of Publishers Good e-Reader reports that "The ...
  31. [31]
    Welcome to the Public Domain in 2025 | Internet Archive Blogs
    Jan 1, 2025 · On January 1, 2025, we celebrate published works from 1929 and published sound recordings from 1924 entering the public domain!Missing: adaptations focus
  32. [32]
    Celebrating 1 Trillion Web Pages Archived | Internet Archive Blogs
    This October, the Internet Archive will celebrate an extraordinary milestone: 1 trillion web pages preserved and available for access via the Wayback ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Editing Open Library
    Jan 18, 2025 · Open Library is an open, editable library catalog, building towards a web page for every book ever published. Read, borrow, and discover ...
  34. [34]
    Search API | Open Library
    May 7, 2025 · The Open Library Search API is one of the most convenient and complete ways to retrieve book data on Open Library.Overview · Examples · Response FormatMissing: libraries | Show results with:libraries
  35. [35]
    Subjects | Open Library
    May 23, 2025 · Subject headings are a controlled vocabulary used in library records to help users find items by subject, place, people, and time period.Search Books · Romance · Fantasy · LanguagesMissing: translations | Show results with:translations
  36. [36]
    Forging the guidelines | Open Library
    Jul 28, 2020 · The work title should be the original language title. Editions have their own title (in Librarian mode), and that title should be the translated language title.Missing: features | Show results with:features
  37. [37]
    Search Books - Open Library
    Open Library is an open, editable library catalog, building towards a web page for every book ever published. Read, borrow, and discover more than 3M books ...Search Inside · Advanced Search · Authors · SubjectsMissing: features translations
  38. [38]
    Controlled digital lending and Open Libraries - Internet Archive Blogs
    Mar 9, 2020 · Open Libraries helps individuals & libraries alike, in the following ways: For individuals: Individual readers have access to all of the books ...Missing: expansion integration
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Controlled digital lending for resource sharing: Law and policy ...
    Controlled Digital Lending (CDL) allows libraries to circulate digitized titles instead of physical ones, replicating the legal and economic aspects of ...
  40. [40]
    How Internet Archive and controlled digital lending can help course ...
    Jul 30, 2020 · Our one hour borrows are first come, first served. We do have waitlists and a notification system for 14 day loans. Books added to CDL or ...
  41. [41]
    Controlled Digital Lending - Currier - 2021 - ASIS&T Digital Library
    Oct 13, 2021 · While CDL was conceptualized as an innovation in lending only about ten years ago, nascent precursors such as Project Gutenberg have existed ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  42. [42]
    Lending of Digitized Books | Internet Archive Blogs
    Sep 21, 2024 · To date, we have removed over 500,000 books from lending on archive.org (and therefore also openlibrary.org).
  43. [43]
    Internet Archive's Digital Lending Library Not Protected by Fair Use ...
    Oct 3, 2024 · The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit found that Internet Archive's (IA) free digital book lending program is not fair use under the Copyright Act.
  44. [44]
    The Internet Archive Loses on Controlled Digital Lending
    Mar 28, 2023 · Here, summary judgment was granted for 127 books. At the relatively lower end, $10,000 in damages per work would be $1,270,000. At $30,000 – the ...
  45. [45]
    Introducing: Community Reviews | The Open Library Blog
    Aug 20, 2021 · You can now publicly review books using structured book #tags on Open Library with Community Reviews. Take a look, try it out, ...A Review Of Reviews · A Collaborative Approach · Feedback
  46. [46]
    Organize your Books with Lists & the Reading Log - Open Library
    May 18, 2023 · Open Library lets you organize books using a Reading Log to track books and create themed lists. You can view and manage these at https:// ...Missing: contributions | Show results with:contributions
  47. [47]
    The Chafee Amendment: 17 U.S.C. 121 & 121A
    The Chafee Amendment allows authorized entities to reproduce or distribute previously published works in accessible formats for print-disabled persons, ...
  48. [48]
    Print Disability Access – General Information
    Books and text content available to people with print disabilities: · Unencrypted text DAISY files for books that are in the public domain · All books can be read ...Missing: Open | Show results with:Open
  49. [49]
    Streamlining Special Access for Patrons with Qualifying Print ...
    May 30, 2025 · The Internet Archive is excited to announce a new, streamlined process where patrons with qualifying print disabilities may apply for special access.
  50. [50]
    Over 1 Million Digital Books Now Available Free to the Blind and ...
    May 6, 2010 · A fantastic way to bring books to the blind and print disabled. There will be over 1 million books available free in the open-source DAISY format with more to ...
  51. [51]
    Visually Impaired Gain Access to One Million Books, Thanks to the ...
    May 11, 2010 · The Archive announced that it would offer visually impaired users free web access to over a million books in the machine-readable DAISY format.Missing: program | Show results with:program
  52. [52]
    Unlocking Books for the Blind and Visually Impaired
    Jul 12, 2016 · The Internet Archive has been making print materials more accessible to the blind ... In 2010, we launched the Open Library Accessible ...Missing: program | Show results with:program
  53. [53]
    Controlled Digital Lending Takes Center Stage at Library Leaders ...
    Oct 31, 2019 · The Internet Archive has been doing CDL since 2011, beginning with the Boston Public Library.
  54. [54]
    Infringement Alert - SFWA
    Jan 8, 2018 · It is calling this project “Open Library,” but it is SFWA's understanding that this is not library lending, but direct infringement of authors' ...
  55. [55]
    The Internet Archive's OpenLibrary project violates copyright, the ...
    Dec 19, 2017 · The Internet Archive's OpenLibrary project violates copyright, the Authors Guild warns. Four years ago, on the old site, I wrote about how ...
  56. [56]
    Alert: Copyright Infringement By the Internet Archive (and What You ...
    Jan 11, 2018 · It is calling this project “Open Library“, but it is SFWA's understanding that this is not library lending, but direct infringement of authors' ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  57. [57]
    https://blog.archive.org/2018/01/24/digital-books-on-archive-org/
  58. [58]
    National Emergency Library Closes, But Open Library Continues to ...
    While the Internet Archive shut down it's National Emergency Library, it continues to violate copyrights to the detriment of visual artists and authors.
  59. [59]
    Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive, 1:20-cv-04160
    Citation: Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive, 1:20-cv-04160, (S.D.N.Y.). Date Filed: June 1, 2020. Date Terminated: Aug. 11, 2023.
  60. [60]
    [PDF] 1 Plaintiffs Hachette Book Group, Inc. (“Hachette”), HarperCollins ...
    Works and entering judgment for Plaintiffs against Internet Archive for all damages suffered by Plaintiffs and for any profits or gain by Internet Archive.
  61. [61]
    Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive | Copyright Cases
    The Publishers sued Internet Archive (IA) for copyright infringement related to the scanning of tens of thousands of Publishers' literary works and ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  62. [62]
    What the Hachette v. Internet Archive Decision Means for Our Library
    Aug 17, 2023 · This injunction will result in a significant loss of access to valuable knowledge for the public. It means that people who are not part of an elite institution.Missing: timeline phase
  63. [63]
    Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive, No. 23-1260 (2d Cir ...
    The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, holding that IA's Free Digital Library did not qualify as fair use under the Copyright Act. The court ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Hachette Book Grp., Inc. v. Internet Archive 115 F. 4th 163 (2d Cir ...
    Plaintiffs-Appellees—four book publishers—sued IA alleging that its Free Digital Library infringes their copyrights in 127 books. IA asserted a defense of fair ...<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive - Stanford Copyright ...
    Sep 4, 2024 · The court concluded that IA's practices harmed the publishers' market for eBooks and print books, as IA's free digital copies served as a ...
  66. [66]
    Controlled Digital Lending after Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet ...
    Nov 11, 2024 · In September 2024, the Second Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that all four of the fair use factors favored the publishers ...
  67. [67]
    Second Circuit Rejects Argument that Internet Archive's E-book ...
    Sep 5, 2024 · In 2020, Plaintiffs, four book publishers, sued Internet Archive for copyright infringement. Internet Archive asserted the defense of fair use.Missing: filing date
  68. [68]
    Hachette v. Internet Archive Update: Second Circuit Court of ...
    Sep 5, 2024 · The Court affirmed the district court's decision that IA cannot circulate digital copies of books they have legitimately acquired in physical copies.
  69. [69]
    The Second Circuit Affirms Decision Rejecting Fair Use Defense ...
    Jan 10, 2025 · The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's decision that Internet Archive's digitization and widespread online distribution of free ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  70. [70]
    Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive | Loeb & Loeb LLP
    Sep 4, 2024 · Plaintiffs sued IA, alleging that its reproduction and distribution of 127 different books—titles including Lord of the Flies, The Bluest Eye ...Missing: date | Show results with:date<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    https://www.publishers.org/news/aap-celebrates-final-victory-in-infringement-case-against-internet-archive/
  72. [72]
    End of Hachette v. Internet Archive
    Dec 4, 2024 · The Internet Archive has decided not to pursue Supreme Court review. We will continue to honor the Association of American Publishers (AAP) agreement to remove ...
  73. [73]
    Internet Archive Copyright Case Ends Without Supreme Court Review
    Dec 5, 2024 · After more than four years of litigation, a closely watched copyright case over the Internet Archive's scanning and lending of library books is finally over.
  74. [74]
    AAP Celebrates Final Victory in Infringement Case Against Internet ...
    Dec 4, 2024 · Internet Archive, after Internet Archive declined to file a cert petition with the U.S. Supreme Court by the December 3, 2024 deadline.Missing: et al.
  75. [75]
    The Internet Archive Lawsuit Ends with a Whimper - Plagiarism Today
    Dec 5, 2024 · The two sides quickly reached a settlement in the case, but it allowed the IA to appeal the decision. The IA did appeal, and in September 2024, ...
  76. [76]
    Internet Archive Lawsuit Comes to an End - Self Publishing Advice
    Dec 10, 2024 · Open Library claimed that its policy of “controlled digital lending” (CDL) addressed the rights issue. CDL tied ebooks to physical books in ...
  77. [77]
    Most 20th Century Books Unavailable to Internet Users
    Jul 1, 2019 · The books of the 20th century are largely not online. They are mostly not available from even the biggest booksellers.
  78. [78]
    Open Libraries Director: “Everyone should have equal and equitable ...
    Aug 25, 2020 · Chris Freeland, Director of Open Libraries at the Internet Archive, spoke at a press conference about the copyright lawsuit brought by the publishers.Missing: supporters | Show results with:supporters
  79. [79]
    stats | Open Library
    Open Library is an open, editable library catalog, building towards a web page for every book ever published. Read, borrow, and discover more than 3M books for<|separator|>
  80. [80]
    Controlled Digital Lending Is Neither Controlled nor Legal
    Jan 9, 2019 · CDL's threat to author incomes and the ebook market comes from two directions: 1) unauthorized scanning and e-lending of books that were ...
  81. [81]
    Authors Guild Celebrates Resounding Win in Hachette v. Internet ...
    Mar 26, 2023 · However, once the Internet Archive announced it was using CDL, it stopped complying with takedown notices, and claimed its operation was ...
  82. [82]
    Authors Guild Affirms Support for Copyright Infringement Lawsuit ...
    Jun 1, 2020 · For most authors, losing even a small royalty can make a big difference to their income, and yet Internet Archive has taken it upon itself to ...Missing: statements | Show results with:statements
  83. [83]
    Statement on Flawed Theory of “Controlled Digital Lending” - AAP
    Feb 4, 2019 · Whatever public benefit libraries may claim results from CDL, it would not be sufficient to justify the harm to publishers' actual and potential ...Missing: objections evidence
  84. [84]
    Authors Guild Applauds Consent Judgment Against Internet ...
    Aug 16, 2023 · “The wholesale copying and distribution of books without permission is copyright infringement and would devastate the livelihoods of authors.”.
  85. [85]
    [PDF] March 31, 2023 - Association of American Publishers
    Mar 31, 2023 · Publishers are entitled to create the contractual and technical controls that they deem necessary to protect their intellectual property and to ...
  86. [86]
    https://authorsalliance.org/2023/03/28/judge-rules-against-internet-archive-on-controlled-digital-lending/
  87. [87]
    Second Circuit Holds That the Internet Archive's Controlled Digital ...
    Sep 11, 2024 · The Second Circuit Court of Appeals delivered a resounding victory to the publishing industry on Wednesday, September 4, 2024, in Hachette Books v. Internet ...
  88. [88]
    https://authorsalliance.org/2023/02/24/fair-use-week-2023-looking-back-at-google-books-eight-years-later/
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Hachette v. Internet Archive: How and Why the Courts Broke Copyright
    ... fair use the factors to be considered shall include—. (1) the purpose and ... Hachette, Controlled Digital Lending, and the Consequences of Divorcing Law.
  90. [90]
    Open Library Search: Balancing High-Impact with High-Demand
    Sep 12, 2025 · The Open Library is a card catalog of every book published spanning more than 50 million edition records. Fetching all of these records all ...Starting In The Red · Sentry On The Hill · With Great KnowledgeMissing: cataloged | Show results with:cataloged
  91. [91]
    Why Preserve Books? The New Physical Archive of the Internet ...
    Jun 6, 2011 · A reason to preserve the physical book that has been digitized is that it is the authentic and original version that can be used as a reference in the future.
  92. [92]
    Internet Archive's e-book lending is not fair use, appeals court rules
    Sep 4, 2024 · The Internet Archive has lost its appeal after book publishers successfully sued to block the Open Libraries Project from lending digital scans of books for ...
  93. [93]
    Internet Archive forced to remove 500,000 books after publishers ...
    Jun 21, 2024 · Internet Archive forced to remove 500,000 books after publishers' court win. Internet Archive fans beg publishers to stop emptying the open ...
  94. [94]
    The Internet Archive Lawsuit Enters its Appeal Stage - Choice 360
    Jul 10, 2024 · In late June 2024, the Internet Archive removed more than 500,000 books from its collections in accordance with the lawsuit. This sudden loss ...
  95. [95]
    The Internet Archive Loses Its Appeal of a Major Copyright Case
    Sep 4, 2024 · The Internet Archive has lost a major legal battle—in a decision that could have a significant impact on the future of internet history.
  96. [96]
    Let Readers Read - Internet Archive Blogs
    Jun 17, 2024 · Sign the Open Letter. Please help spread the word across social media ... Posted in Lending Books | Tagged CDL, controlled digital lending, ...
  97. [97]
    Internet Archive and Partners Receive Press Forward Funding to ...
    Jul 16, 2025 · Internet Archive, working with partners Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE) and The Poynter Institute, has received a $1 million grant from Press Forward.
  98. [98]
    Public Librarians Partner with Internet Archive to Preserve Local ...
    Aug 27, 2025 · We hope to continue preserving this local tradition for future generations through digitizing physical items and crawling born-digital content ...
  99. [99]
    As Publishers Beat Internet Archive, Are Libraries The Real Losers?
    Sep 8, 2024 · A court win against the Internet Archive has publishers celebrating, but what does it mean for the future of public libraries and digital access?
  100. [100]
    Internet Archive's Open Library and Copyright Law: The Final Chapter
    Jan 6, 2025 · Scanning copyright-protected books to deliver free digital copies online is not protected under fair use and therefore violates copyright law.
  101. [101]
    Experts Assure Library Community that CDL Continues - SPARC
    and is likely here to stay, according to experts ...