Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Authors Guild

The Authors Guild is the nation's oldest and largest professional organization for published writers, with over 17,000 members representing novelists, nonfiction authors, journalists, poets, and translators.^[1] It advocates for authors' rights by promoting fair publishing contracts, copyright protection, free speech, and adequate compensation in an evolving industry landscape.^[1] Founded in 1912 as the Authors League of America, the Guild provides legal services, contract reviews, educational resources, and community support to help authors sustain viable careers.^[2]^[3] The organization has played a pivotal role in shaping copyright law through litigation, notably challenging Google's mass digitization of books in Authors Guild v. Google, where the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in 2015 that creating a searchable database constituted fair use, a decision affirmed when the Supreme Court declined review in 2016.^[4] More recently, the Guild has filed class-action suits against AI companies, including OpenAI in 2023, alleging unauthorized use of copyrighted books to train generative models, reflecting ongoing efforts to adapt protections to technological disruptions.^[5] Among its achievements, the Guild supported publishers in securing a 2023 ruling against the Internet Archive for systemic copyright infringement via uncontrolled digital lending, reinforcing authors' control over reproduction rights.^[6] It has also litigated against government policies perceived as threats to expression, such as book removal mandates and grant terminations, winning a 2025 federal court block on National Endowment for the Humanities actions that penalized dissenting viewpoints.^[7] These cases underscore the Guild's commitment to defending intellectual property while navigating debates over innovation, access, and transformative uses.^[8]

Overview

Mission and Objectives

The Authors Guild's mission is to support working writers by advocating for their rights, with a focus on protecting free speech, freedom of expression, and copyright as foundational to a vibrant literary culture.^[1] The organization emphasizes that these elements enable authors to earn a living from their creative output, fostering enforceable intellectual property rights and fair compensation mechanisms.^[1] Established as the nation's oldest professional association for published writers, it prioritizes practical advocacy over abstract ideals, aiming to secure economic viability for authorship in an evolving publishing landscape.^[1] Core objectives encompass defending copyrights as the "linchpin of professional authorship," which allows writers to derive income from their works amid threats like unauthorized digital reproduction.^[9] This includes pushing for equitable contract terms that prevent publishers from claiming undue control over subsidiary rights or reversion clauses that disadvantage authors long-term.^[10] The Guild also targets free speech protections by opposing censorship, book bans, and government overreach that suppress diverse viewpoints, while advocating in legislative and judicial arenas for policies that balance technological innovation—such as AI training on copyrighted texts—with creator consent and remuneration.^[9]^[11] Additional goals involve antitrust scrutiny of dominant market players, like retailers controlling substantial book sales shares, to prevent practices that erode authors' bargaining power and earnings.^[9] The organization combats piracy through support for streamlined copyright enforcement and collective licensing models, ensuring that freelance and book authors receive timely payments without exploitative deductions.^[12] Overall, these objectives reflect a commitment to causal mechanisms sustaining authorship as a viable profession, grounded in empirical advocacy outcomes rather than unsubstantiated equity narratives.^[13]

Membership and Governance

The Authors Guild offers membership to writers, translators, and illustrators at various career stages through distinct categories, each with specific eligibility criteria centered on publication history, income from writing, or professional involvement. Regular membership requires at least one traditionally published book in the United States, or for self-published authors and freelance writers, earnings of $5,000 or more from writing in the preceding 18 months, or for freelancers, at least three published pieces; this category provides full voting rights as active members.^[14] Associate membership extends to those with a contract offer from a U.S. publisher or agent, or self-published/freelance writers earning at least $500 in the prior 18 months, granting access to services but without voting privileges. At-large membership accommodates non-writer professionals such as literary agents, editors, heirs of deceased authors, attorneys, accountants, and publicists supporting the literary community. Emerging writer membership targets unpublished or early-career individuals actively seeking publication, while student membership is available to college or graduate students pursuing writing-related degrees, both at reduced dues. Annual dues generally range from $35 for students to $149 for professional levels, with options for monthly payments.^[14] As of recent reports, the organization maintains approximately 16,000 members, reflecting growth from recruitment efforts including over 2,900 new members in 2023 alone. Active members, defined as creators of published literary material meeting the regular eligibility thresholds, hold voting rights in guild affairs, while associate and at-large members are non-voting but contribute to the organization's broader ecosystem. Membership eligibility emphasizes verifiable professional output or income to ensure focus on working authors, distinguishing the guild from general writing associations.^[14]^[15] Governance of the Authors Guild is vested in its Board of Directors, known as the Council, which comprises 30 elected writer-members serving three-year staggered terms, with 10 positions filled annually through member elections. Council members are nominated by a dedicated committee and elected via secret ballot at the annual meeting held before March 31, with additional nominations possible if supported by at least 10 member signatures by January 31; officers, including president, vice president, treasurer, and secretary, serve two-year terms. The Council handles general management, control of funds, property, and policy direction, operating as a non-profit with no net earnings distributed to members or directors. Ex officio members include past and present presidents, and honorary members may serve five-year terms. Current officers include President W. Ralph Eubanks, Vice President Mary Bly, Treasurer Peter Petre, and Secretary Amy Bloom, all elected writers. The executive director, Mary Rasenberger, oversees day-to-day operations under Council authority. This writer-centric structure ensures decisions reflect the interests of published authors, with a quorum requiring at least five members plus one for every 10 beyond 15.^[16]^[17]

Historical Development

Founding and Early Advocacy (1912–1950s)

The Authors League of America, the predecessor organization to the modern Authors Guild, was established in 1912 in New York City as a national association to safeguard the professional interests of writers, encompassing authors of books, magazine articles, and dramatic works.^[18]^[19] Its formation addressed the need for collective representation amid uneven bargaining power with publishers, aiming to promote standardized contracts and equitable royalty payments.^[20] This initiative paralleled the earlier Society of Authors in England (1884), reflecting a broader professionalization of literary trade relations in the early 20th century.^[20] In its initial years, the League focused on negotiating improved terms for members, including protections against unauthorized serialization and subsidiary rights exploitation, which had previously allowed publishers to retain disproportionate control over ancillary income streams from authors' works.^[10] By 1915, it had formed a subcommittee for dramatic writers, evolving into the Dramatists Guild in 1919 to address theater-specific issues like play production royalties.^[21] These efforts contributed to greater author autonomy, as the organization lobbied for contractual clauses ensuring fair compensation and rights reversion, helping to shift industry norms toward recognizing authors as primary owners of their intellectual property.^[20]^[10] A key early initiative was the creation of the Authors League Fund in 1917, providing emergency financial aid to professional writers facing illness, poverty, or other crises, thereby underscoring the League's commitment to mutual support amid economic vulnerabilities in the literary profession.^[22]^[23] Through the 1920s and 1930s, the organization expanded its advocacy to include copyright enforcement and opposition to predatory reprint practices, hosting national assemblies to coordinate responses to publishing disputes.^[24] By the 1940s and into the 1950s, amid post-World War II expansions in print media, the League continued emphasizing royalty standardization and contract transparency, laying groundwork for broader free expression defenses while maintaining a non-partisan focus on economic protections for working authors.^[10]^[25]

Mid-Century Expansion and Key Campaigns (1960s–1990s)

During the 1960s and 1970s, the Authors Guild intensified its lobbying for comprehensive copyright reform amid growing unauthorized reproductions of works via photocopying machines, which threatened authors' economic interests. The organization actively participated in congressional hearings and coalitions pushing for updates to the outdated 1909 Copyright Act, emphasizing protections for reproduction rights and elimination of the manufacturing clause that required U.S. editions to be printed domestically.^[13] This advocacy contributed to the enactment of the Copyright Act of 1976 on October 19, 1976, which extended copyright terms, granted authors inalienable rights to derivative works and terminations, and established limited exemptions for library photocopying under Section 108 while facilitating collective licensing mechanisms.^[13] In the late 1970s, the Guild supported the formation of the Copyright Clearance Center in 1978 as a centralized system for transactional licensing of photocopying fees, enabling authors to receive royalties for reproduced excerpts despite initial resistance from some publishers and libraries.^[26] Membership and programmatic activities expanded during this period, with the Guild issuing regular bulletins and providing contract reviews to a broadening base of professional writers as book production surged—U.S. publishers released over 40,000 titles annually by the 1980s—reflecting postwar literary output growth.^[27] The 1980s saw the Guild spearhead a decade-long campaign for Public Lending Right (PLR) legislation from 1979 to 1989, modeled on European systems compensating authors for public library loans via government-funded royalties based on circulation data.^[28] Proponents, including Guild leaders, argued it addressed lost sales from free lending, estimating potential annual payments of $20–30 million, but opposition from librarians and fiscal conservatives citing administrative costs and taxpayer burdens stalled the effort, resulting in no U.S. adoption.^[29]^[30] The Guild also monitored publisher mergers, voicing concerns over reduced competition impacting advances and terms, though major antitrust interventions remained limited until the 1990s.^[13]

Adaptation to Digital Challenges (2000s Onward)

In the 2000s, the Authors Guild confronted the proliferation of digital publishing, e-books, and online distribution platforms, which disrupted traditional revenue models and exposed authors to widespread piracy. Author incomes declined amid these shifts, with the Guild citing piracy as a key factor in annual industry losses estimated in the hundreds of millions of dollars.^[31] To adapt, the organization expanded its advocacy beyond print-era concerns, prioritizing reforms to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to enhance enforcement against online infringement while preserving innovation.^[31] This included testimony before congressional committees in 2020 on strengthening safe harbor provisions under Section 512.^[32] The Guild developed targeted programs to equip members for digital threats, offering assistance with DMCA takedown notices, escalating complaints to platforms, and providing webinars on piracy mitigation.^[31] ^[33] It also facilitated member resources like exclusive website-building tools and an online forum for discussing digital business strategies, enabling authors to build direct online presences amid declining advances from traditional publishers.^[1] In response to e-book royalty disputes, the Guild in 2015 urged publishers to update "cobwebbed" contracts, advocating for fairer terms as digital formats shortened books and altered markets.^[34] Policy initiatives reflected proactive adaptation, including endorsement of the SMART Copyright Act in 2022, which aimed to mandate consistent anti-piracy tools across platforms, and the Foreign Anti-Digital Piracy Act to target overseas networks.^[35] ^[36] Through its Fair Contracts Initiative, launched to leverage digital-era author-reader connections, the Guild pushed for clauses addressing digital resale and piracy risks in publishing agreements.^[37] These efforts underscored a strategic pivot toward sustaining author viability in an environment where unauthorized scanning and lending eroded control over works.^[10]

Organizational Activities

Educational and Support Programs

The Authors Guild Foundation, the organization's charitable and educational affiliate, delivers programming focused on professional development for writers, including instruction on publishing contracts, marketing strategies, and financial management to enhance authors' earning potential and career sustainability.^[1] These efforts emphasize practical skills over theoretical discourse, drawing from industry expertise to address real-world challenges in authorship.^[38] A core offering is the Business Bootcamps for Writers, a complimentary webinar series launched in collaboration with publishing professionals and fellow authors, which covers topics from manuscript preparation and agent acquisition to post-publication business operations.^[39] Complementing this, the Resource Library provides downloadable guides, such as the Authors Guild Guide to Self-Publishing and resources on contract negotiation, alongside recordings of prior events for on-demand access.^[40] Additional support includes targeted mentorship initiatives, developed through partnerships with specialized writers' organizations to pair emerging authors with experienced mentors for personalized guidance on craft and industry navigation.^[41] The Launchpad program offers specialized tools and webinars on book marketing and publicity, equipping members with data-driven tactics for audience building and sales optimization.^[42] The Guild also hosts virtual and in-person events, such as sessions on residency applications and reader outreach strategies, to foster peer networking and skill-building without reliance on subsidized grants or fellowships.^[43] These programs prioritize accessibility for members while extending select resources publicly, reflecting the Foundation's mandate to protect and empower a diverse cohort of professional writers amid evolving market dynamics.^[38]

Research and Reporting Initiatives

The Authors Guild conducts research primarily through member surveys and analytical reports to document the economic realities of professional writing, with a focus on income trends and structural challenges in the publishing industry. Its Author Income Surveys, initiated to establish baseline data in 2009, provide detailed assessments of earnings from book sales, royalties, advances, and ancillary activities such as speaking or reviewing. These surveys target published authors, including traditionally, hybrid, and self-published writers, drawing responses from Guild members and affiliated organizations to quantify median incomes and identify disparities by genre, publishing model, and demographics.^[44]^[45] The 2023 Author Income Survey, released in September 2023 and based on 5,699 responses covering 2022 earnings, reported a median book income of $10,000 for full-time authors, increasing to $20,000 when including other writing-related sources; for all surveyed authors (full- and part-time), medians were $2,000 from books and $5,000 overall. Self-published full-time authors saw median book income at $12,800, with experienced self-publishers showing a 76% rise since 2018 due to expanded distribution and marketing tools like email newsletters and ebook discounts. Genre-specific data highlighted variations, such as $31,725 median book income for romance and romantic suspense authors versus $5,000 for literary fiction writers. Racial disparities were evident, with full-time Black authors earning a median $2,412 from books compared to $10,985 for White authors.^[44] Earlier iterations underscored long-term declines. The 2018 survey, analyzing 2017 data from 5,067 respondents, found median writing-related income at $6,080, a 42% drop from $10,500 in 2009 and a 21% decrease in book income alone from 2013 levels ($3,100 versus $3,900). These findings prompted further investigation into causal factors, as detailed in the February 2020 report "The Profession of Author in the 21st Century," which attributed income erosion—24% since 2013—to reduced U.S. readership (from 57% in 2002 to 53% in recent years), platform pricing practices like Amazon's Kindle model compressing royalties, the closure of over 2,000 newspapers and magazines limiting freelance opportunities, and increased self-marketing burdens delaying new works. The report concluded that 50% of full-time authors earned below the federal poverty threshold of $12,488, with literary authors facing a 46% income drop in five years and authors of color earning roughly half the median of White authors.^[45]^[46] By aggregating self-reported data and contextual analysis, these initiatives equip the Guild with evidence to advocate for policy reforms, though critics have noted potential selection biases in respondent pools favoring traditionally published authors. The surveys' longitudinal approach allows tracking of shifts, such as self-publishing gains offsetting broader stagnation, informing targeted interventions like improved contract standards and platform accountability.^[44]^[46]

Legal Advocacy Efforts

Freelance Authors' Rights Litigation (Tasini Case, 1990s–2001)

In the early 1990s, freelance authors raised concerns over publishers reproducing their articles in electronic databases, such as LEXIS/NEXIS and University Microfilms International (UMI), without securing additional permissions or providing extra compensation beyond initial print publication fees.^[47] These databases aggregated full-text articles from periodicals, often stripping away original layout and context, which authors argued constituted unauthorized derivative uses under copyright law.^[48] The Authors Guild, advocating for creators' control over digital distributions, monitored these practices and supported efforts to challenge them, emphasizing that standard freelance contracts typically granted only one-time print rights.^[49] The pivotal litigation, Tasini v. New York Times Co., was filed on September 23, 1993, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by six freelance authors, led by Jonathan Tasini of the National Writers Union, against major publishers including The New York Times Company, Newsday, Inc., Time Inc., and Houghton Mifflin Company.^[50] The plaintiffs alleged infringement of their copyrights under Section 106 of the Copyright Act, claiming that electronic reproductions exceeded the limited privilege in Section 201(c) for reproducing contributions "as part of that collective work" or "any revision" thereof.^[47] The Authors Guild participated by filing an amicus curiae brief in support of the authors at the Supreme Court stage, arguing that unchecked digital resale undermined authors' economic incentives and bargaining power.^[48] Lower courts ruled in favor of the authors: the district court granted summary judgment in 1997, holding the reproductions infringing, and the Second Circuit affirmed in 1999, rejecting publishers' claims that databases merely revised the original collective works.^[47] On June 25, 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed in a 7-2 decision authored by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, ruling that the electronic databases presented articles in a manner distinct from their original periodical context—such as standalone retrieval without accompanying articles or advertisements—thus falling outside Section 201(c)'s safe harbor and constituting infringement absent explicit author consent.^[51] Justices Stevens and Breyer dissented, viewing the databases as reasonable extensions of print microfilm archives. The Tasini ruling validated freelance authors' ownership of individual copyrights in their contributions, prompting publishers to seek explicit electronic rights in contracts and leading to negotiations for back payments, though it did not retroactively mandate removal of existing database copies.^[52] The Authors Guild leveraged the decision to advance similar claims, filing a class-action suit in 2000 against publishers for unauthorized digital uses, which contributed to broader freelance compensation frameworks in subsequent years.^[49] This litigation underscored the Guild's commitment to protecting authors from uncompensated exploitation amid the shift to digital media.^[53]

Google Books Settlement and Fair Use Dispute (2005–2015)

In September 2005, the Authors Guild, Inc., acting as lead plaintiff on behalf of a proposed class of U.S. authors and publishers, filed a class-action lawsuit against Google Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging systematic copyright infringement through Google's unauthorized scanning and digitization of books from major library collections as part of its Google Books project, which had begun in 2004.^[54]^[55] The suit claimed that Google copied entire works without permission or payment, creating digital copies that could enable unauthorized access, even if initial public use was limited to search snippets.^[56] Following years of negotiations, the parties proposed an Amended Settlement Agreement in late 2009, building on an initial 2008 outline, which aimed to resolve the claims through Google's $125 million fund to compensate authors and publishers whose works were scanned—estimated at $45.5 million for rightsholders after administrative costs—and the creation of a nonprofit Book Rights Registry managed by authors and publishers to identify owners, facilitate licensing, and handle "orphan works" (books with unlocatable rights holders).^[57]^[58] The agreement would grant Google a non-exclusive license to continue scanning and offer features like full-text display for out-of-print books with opt-out rights, while promising revenue sharing from certain uses; however, it drew objections from libraries, competitors, foreign governments, and consumer groups over antitrust risks, privacy concerns from user data collection, and the de facto exclusivity it might confer on Google for millions of titles.^[59] On March 22, 2011, U.S. District Judge Denny Chin rejected the settlement, ruling that the class-action mechanism was ill-suited for what amounted to a forward-looking licensing agreement rather than purely compensatory relief, and that it improperly granted Google monopoly-like advantages over orphan works without legislative authority, potentially violating antitrust principles and international copyright norms.^[60]^[61] With settlement off the table, the case shifted to litigating Google's fair-use defense under 17 U.S.C. § 107; Google argued its digitization transformed the works into a searchable index that facilitated discovery without substituting for full copies, providing public benefits like new scholarship and competition for publishers.^[62] In October 2012, Google moved for summary judgment, which Judge Chin granted on November 14, 2013, holding that the use was fair under the four statutory factors: it was transformative and non-commercial in purpose (favoring the first factor), highly limited in amount (snippets only, with no more than 16% of a book viewable and safeguards against overuse), and did not harm the market for original works or derivatives (fourth factor), as evidence showed increased book sales and no displacement.^[63] The Authors Guild appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, contending the scanning created a vast trove vulnerable to hacking or misuse, undermining authors' exclusive reproduction rights and potential licensing markets.^[64] On October 16, 2015, a unanimous panel affirmed the district court, emphasizing the project's public benefits in indexing knowledge without evidence of lost sales, and rejecting claims of market harm as speculative; the court noted Google's security measures and lack of competitive evidence against snippets as non-infringing.^[56]^[65] This outcome preserved Google's project, which by then included over 20 million scanned volumes, but left authors without collective redress, prompting the Guild to decry it as eroding statutory rights in favor of judicially expanded fair use.^[4]

HathiTrust and Collaborative Digitization Cases (2011–2014)

In September 2011, the Authors Guild, along with individual authors and associations, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against HathiTrust, a consortium of research universities, and related officials in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (case no. 11-cv-06351).^[66] The suit targeted HathiTrust's Digital Library (HDL), which aggregated over 10 million digitized volumes from the Google Books scanning project, enabling full-text search, preservation, and limited access for users with print disabilities.^[67] Plaintiffs alleged unauthorized reproduction and distribution of copyrighted works, including potential enabling of piracy through data mining, without licenses or compensation to rights holders.^[68] HathiTrust defended by invoking fair use under Section 107 of the Copyright Act, arguing the digitization was transformative: it facilitated search snippets without revealing full texts to non-disabled users, preserved cultural heritage, and supported scholarly analysis without market substitution.^[69] In October 2012, District Judge Harold Baer granted summary judgment for defendants on core uses, ruling the full-text search database fair use due to its non-expressive, research-oriented purpose and minimal harm to authors' markets; access for print-disabled users qualified under the Chafee Amendment's exceptions for the blind.^[70] However, the court invalidated HathiTrust's Orphan Works Program, which would have allowed access to unclaimed "orphan" copyrights upon rights holder verification, citing standing issues and potential overreach.^[71] The Authors Guild appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (no. 12-4547). On October 16, 2012, the appeals court certified the case for class action but proceeded on merits. In June 2014, a unanimous panel affirmed the district court's fair use findings for search functionality and disabled access, emphasizing the transformative nature—providing factual information like word frequency without expressive content—and low piracy risk given security measures.^[69]^[67] The panel vacated the orphan works ruling for lack of associational standing by author groups and dismissed most individual claims on standing grounds, remanding only a narrow foreign works issue.^[72] The cases arose from collaborative digitization efforts between HathiTrust members (e.g., University of Michigan, Cornell) and Google, which scanned library holdings starting in 2004 without authors' consent, prompting the Guild's challenge after a failed Google Books settlement.^[73] Authors Guild viewed the rulings as permitting unauthorized mass copying that undermined licensing markets, particularly for orphans, though courts prioritized public benefits like searchability over speculative harms.^[74] Litigation concluded January 6, 2015, via stipulated dismissal of the remanded claim, solidifying fair use protections for such nonprofit, noncommercial library digitization.^[73]

Internet Archive Controlled Digital Lending Suit (2020–2024)

In June 2020, four major publishers—Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins, Penguin Random House, and John Wiley & Sons—filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against the Internet Archive (IA) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, challenging IA's Controlled Digital Lending (CDL) program and its temporary National Emergency Library (NEL).^[75] The suit targeted IA's practice of scanning physical books acquired through purchase or donation, creating digital copies, and lending those copies on a one-to-one basis with physical books supposedly "delinked" to prevent simultaneous access, arguing this constituted unauthorized reproduction and distribution harming authors' and publishers' markets.^[76] The NEL, launched in March 2020 amid COVID-19 library closures, suspended CDL's one-user-at-a-time limits, enabling unlimited simultaneous borrowing of over 100,000 titles without permission, which plaintiffs claimed exacerbated the infringement by mimicking free e-book piracy during a period of heightened demand.^[77] The Authors Guild supported the publishers as an intervener and amicus curiae, filing briefs emphasizing that CDL and NEL undermined authors' licensing revenues and fair use precedents, such as those distinguishing transformative uses from market substitutes.^[6] In an open letter signed by thousands of authors in April 2020, the Guild demanded NEL's shutdown, describing it as an opportunistic exploitation of the pandemic to promote a legally rejected model of digital lending that bypassed copyright holders.^[78] IA defended its actions as fair use under Section 107 of the Copyright Act, analogizing CDL to traditional library lending and arguing it preserved access to out-of-print works without supplanting sales, while NEL addressed emergency access gaps.^[79] Following a bench trial in March 2023, District Judge John G. Koeltl ruled on March 24, 2023, that IA's CDL infringed copyrights on 127 tested works, rejecting fair use: the copies were not transformative, the nature of creative works weighed against fair use, the substantial portions copied (entire books) favored plaintiffs, and the practice directly competed with licensed e-book markets, causing unmitigated harm.^[6] The court issued a permanent injunction against further distribution of 90% of the tested titles via CDL and NEL, though it deferred damages calculation.^[80] IA appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which on September 4, 2024, affirmed the district court's findings in a unanimous decision, holding that IA's digital lending failed all four fair use factors as it reproduced market-substituting copies without adding new expression or purpose.^[81] On December 3, 2024, IA announced it would not seek U.S. Supreme Court review, concluding the four-year litigation; it committed to an existing Association of American Publishers agreement removing over 500,000 titles from lending and complying with the injunction, effectively halting CDL for in-copyright works.^[82] The Authors Guild hailed the outcome as a "resounding win" vindicating authors' rights against unauthorized mass digitization, warning that CDL's defeat prevents libraries from evading licensing fees under the guise of owned-to-loaned equivalence.^[82] Critics of IA, including the Guild, argued the rulings exposed CDL's flaws—such as unverifiable delinking and scalability enabling piracy-like distribution—prioritizing empirical market harm over IA's preservation rhetoric.^[76]

AI Training Data Infringement Lawsuits (2023–Present)

In September 2023, the Authors Guild, together with 17 fiction authors including David Baldacci, Michael Connelly, Sylvia Day, Jonathan Franzen, John Grisham, and Elin Hilderbrand, initiated a class-action lawsuit against OpenAI in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (case number 1:23-cv-08292), asserting direct and vicarious copyright infringement arising from the company's use of copyrighted books to train large language models like ChatGPT.^[11] ^[83] The complaint alleges that OpenAI engaged in systematic, unauthorized copying of millions of literary works—often sourced from shadow libraries containing pirated copies—without obtaining licenses or providing compensation, thereby creating datasets that form the basis of its generative AI systems.^[11] ^[84] Microsoft was added as a defendant in December 2023, with plaintiffs claiming its substantial investments and technical integrations enabled OpenAI's infringing activities.^[11] A parallel class-action suit by nonfiction authors, including several Authors Guild members such as Nicholas Basbanes and Taylor Branch, was filed against OpenAI and Microsoft in November 2023 and later consolidated with the fiction authors' case for pretrial proceedings as part of the multidistrict litigation In re OpenAI, Inc. Copyright Infringement Litigation.^[11]^[85] The consolidated claims center on the argument that ingesting entire copyrighted works for AI training constitutes reproduction and derivative use that harms authors' licensing markets, rather than qualifying as fair use under Section 107 of the Copyright Act, given the commercial scale and potential for AI outputs to compete with or regurgitate originals.^[11]^[84] OpenAI and Microsoft have countered that their training processes are transformative, akin to prior fair use precedents like the Google Books case, and do not involve direct copying in outputs, while seeking dismissal of claims related to AI-generated text as non-infringing.^[11]^[86] As of October 2025, the litigation remains in discovery, with the court schedule anticipating briefs on fair use and other dispositive motions in mid-2025, class certification pending, and no settlements or final rulings issued; the cases have been consolidated with at least 11 other author suits against OpenAI in the Southern District of New York.^[85]^[11] The Authors Guild has framed these actions as essential to enforcing copyright law in the AI era, advocating for mandatory licensing and compensation to protect authors from uncompensated exploitation of their works.^[11]

Policy Positions and Initiatives

Stance on Copyright Enforcement and Fair Use

The Authors Guild maintains a firm commitment to stringent copyright enforcement, viewing it as indispensable for enabling authors to derive sustainable income from their creations, and has consistently advocated for mechanisms that deter infringement while facilitating timely and effective remedies.^[9] In policy statements and legal briefs, the organization emphasizes preserving the independence of U.S. copyright administration from executive interference, as evidenced by their 2025 petition to Congress protesting the removal of the Register of Copyrights, which they described as an assault on congressional authority over intellectual property matters.^[87] They have also pushed for expanded statutory damages recovery windows, arguing in a 2024 Supreme Court amicus brief that copyright owners deserve compensation for the full duration of infringement upon timely filing, a position affirmed by the Court in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy on May 9, 2024.^[88] This enforcement-oriented approach extends to opposing unauthorized commercial exploitation, such as in their calls for AI developers to license works rather than rely on exemptions, asserting that uncompensated use erodes authors' markets.^[89] Regarding fair use, the Authors Guild endorses the doctrine as a limited defense against infringement liability, applicable primarily to non-commercial, transformative purposes like criticism, commentary, or scholarship that do not substitute for the original work's market.^[90] They provide guidance to members on invoking fair use when quoting or excerpting others' works in new creations, stressing evaluation of the four statutory factors—purpose and character of use, nature of the copyrighted work, amount used, and market effect—but warn that courts must rigorously assess potential harm to licensing opportunities.^[91] In practice, the Guild has contested broad fair use claims in high-profile cases; for instance, in Authors Guild v. Google (decided 2015), they argued unsuccessfully that Google's mass digitization of library books for searchable snippets exceeded fair use by creating a competing substitute product, petitioning the Supreme Court to reverse the Second Circuit's ruling on the grounds that it distorted the doctrine's market-harm analysis.^[4] Similarly, in challenges to AI systems like those in Bartz v. Anthropic (2025 summary judgment), they critiqued judicial findings favoring fair use for training data, contending that generative outputs derived from ingested copyrights inflict direct substitutional harm, regardless of claimed transformation.^[92] The organization's position contrasts with more permissive interpretations advanced by entities like tech firms or rival author groups, prioritizing empirical evidence of economic displacement over abstract public benefits; for example, they supported the Supreme Court's 2023 ruling in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, which aligned with their amicus arguments by rejecting fair use for commercial licensing of altered works that retain core expressive elements and compete with originals.^[93] This stance reflects a causal understanding that lax enforcement or inflated fair use erode incentives for creation, as documented in their critiques of precedents like Authors Guild v. HathiTrust (2014), where orphan works digitization was deemed fair despite potential unmonetized access risks.^[94] Through such advocacy, the Guild seeks to calibrate fair use narrowly to preserve copyright's foundational role in fostering original expression, often filing amicus briefs to urge courts against doctrinal expansions that favor intermediaries over creators.^[95]

Advocacy for Author Contracts and Compensation

The Authors Guild has advocated for improved author contracts since its founding, emphasizing protections against exploitative terms that diminish earnings, such as royalties calculated on net receipts rather than list price, which can reduce author compensation by approximately 40–50% at equivalent rates.^[96] In May 2015, the organization launched its Fair Contract Initiative to highlight one-sided publisher clauses and promote balanced agreements, including fixed advances treated as non-recoupable payments, royalties of at least 50% of net receipts for ebooks (ideally tied to list price), and reversion of rights when books go out of print or fail to meet sales thresholds like 300 copies per year.^[97]^[98]^[99] The initiative's eight principles critique practices like perpetual subsidiary rights grants and opaque accounting, urging authors to retain audit rights and control over derivative works.^[99] To support these efforts, the Authors Guild released an updated Model Trade Book Contract in March 2020 as an educational resource for authors, agents, and attorneys negotiating with trade publishers; it recommends minimum royalties of 10–15% on hardcover list price, 7.5–10% on trade paperback, and 25% net for ebooks, alongside clauses for competitive advances and termination rights after five to seven years of low sales.^[100] The model also addresses compensation for revisions, stipulating no reduction below 75% of original royalties for substantive changes initiated by the publisher.^[101] For literary translations, a dedicated model contract ensures translators receive 7.5% royalties on the translator's share, with primary rights reverting if translations underperform.^[102] These tools build on historical advocacy, including contributions to the 1976 Copyright Act that strengthened author reversion rights and economic protections.^[13] Through its legal services, the Authors Guild reviews publishing contracts for members, advising on retaining copyright ownership, securing advances reflective of market value, and negotiating fair payment for freelance contributions, such as avoiding work-for-hire clauses that forfeit future royalties.^[103]^[104] This includes pushing for transparent royalty statements and the ability to audit publisher accounts, as low author incomes—median $10,000 from books for full-time writers in 2022—underscore the need for contractual safeguards against declining compensation amid digital shifts.^[44] The Guild's campaigns extend to freelance compensation, exemplified by a 2015 multimillion-dollar settlement recovering payments for unauthorized republication of articles, distributing funds to over 9,000 claimants.^[105] Overall, these initiatives aim to restore equilibrium in author-publisher relations by prioritizing verifiable earnings over perpetual licenses.^[10]

Responses to Market Disruptions and Technology

The Authors Guild has responded to digital market disruptions, particularly the e-book boom and platform dominance, by advocating for revised contractual standards that reflect lower production costs and new revenue streams. Through its 2015 Fair Contract Initiative, the Guild promoted e-book royalties at 50% of net proceeds, critiquing prevailing 25% rates as insufficient given publishers' reduced expenses for digital distribution compared to print.^[106]^[107] This included model contract templates emphasizing authors' retention of digital rights and negotiation leverage to counter imbalances exacerbated by technology-driven shifts.^[10]^[108] In addressing Amazon's consolidation of market power—which encompassed 90% of e-book sales by 2010 and over 80% of online book sales by 2020—the Guild pursued antitrust advocacy to curb practices harming author incomes and industry diversity.^[109] During the 2014 Amazon-Hachette dispute, it issued white papers documenting sales drops of up to 90% for affected titles due to tactics like delayed shipments and reduced algorithmic visibility, while meeting with Department of Justice officials on August 1, 2014, to underscore ecosystem-wide risks.^[109] Post the 2013-2015 United States v. Apple e-book pricing case, the Guild in 2015 demanded DOJ probes into Amazon's "far more dangerous variant" of anticompetitive conduct, prioritizing predatory pricing and monopsony leverage over publishers.^[110] Subsequent joint letters in 2020 with the Association of American Publishers and American Booksellers Association, and in 2023 with Open Markets Institute, reiterated calls for Federal Trade Commission and DOJ scrutiny of Amazon's monopoly, citing escalating demands on suppliers that erode author royalties and stifle competition.^[111]^[112]^[113] The Guild also supported 2021 antitrust legislation targeting large platforms' gatekeeping, framing it as essential to preserving authorship viability amid concentrated digital retail.^[114] To counter technology-enabled consumer abuses in e-books, the Guild campaigned against Amazon's pre-2022 "read and return" policy, which permitted refunds after substantial reading, facilitating widespread free access and revenue loss; Amazon responded in September 2022 by capping automatic returns at purchases read no more than 10%.^[115] On self-publishing disruptions via Kindle Direct Publishing, the Guild has emphasized safeguards against content dilution, including 2023 advocacy for mandatory AI disclosure on the platform—yielding Amazon's policy requiring self-reported generative AI use—and caps on daily uploads to deter spam.^[116]^[117] In January 2025, it introduced a "human authored" certification program to verify non-AI origins, aiding reader trust and algorithmic promotion for independent works amid low-barrier floods eroding market integrity.^[118] These measures aim to harness self-publishing's accessibility while mitigating harms from unvetted digital proliferation.

Controversies and Criticisms

Allegations of Publisher Influence and Anti-Innovation Bias

Critics, including digital rights organizations and independent authors, have alleged that the Authors Guild maintains close alignment with the interests of large traditional publishers, potentially at the expense of broader author diversity and technological progress. For instance, the Guild's leadership and prominent members, such as Scott Turow, have been characterized by commentators as defenders of legacy publishing models, with positions that echo publishers' resistance to disruptive platforms like Amazon, which facilitated self-publishing growth and higher royalties for many indie authors.^[119] This alignment is evident in joint advocacy, such as the Guild's support alongside the Association of American Publishers in opposing controlled digital lending by the Internet Archive in 2020, prioritizing revenue protection over expanded access models.^[120] Such critiques extend to claims of anti-innovation bias, particularly in the Guild's litigation history against digitization efforts deemed transformative by courts. In Authors Guild v. Google (2005–2015), the organization sued over the scanning of approximately 20 million books for search indexing and previews, arguing infringement despite the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruling in 2015 that the project constituted fair use by enhancing discoverability without substituting for sales.^[121] Similarly, in Authors Guild v. HathiTrust (2011–2014), the Guild challenged a collaborative digital repository providing full-text search and access for print-disabled users, with the Second Circuit affirming fair use in 2014 for these non-consumptive purposes; opponents, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, contended this reflected an overly restrictive view of copyright that impedes scholarly and accessibility innovations.^[122]^[71] Further allegations highlight the Guild's reluctance to engage dissenting voices within its membership favoring innovation. In 2014, reports emerged that the organization declined to publicize or debate perspectives from authors supporting the Google Books settlement or broader fair use expansions, actions described by technology policy analysts as suppressing internal debate to maintain a unified front aligned with traditional stakeholders.^[123] In the context of artificial intelligence, the Guild's 2023 lawsuits against companies like OpenAI for training models on copyrighted works without licenses—despite arguments for fair use in transformative outputs—have drawn criticism from tech advocates for potentially constraining AI development, which could otherwise augment author productivity and market reach, echoing patterns of resistance to prior disruptions like ebooks.^[85] These positions, while framed by the Guild as essential for author compensation, are viewed by detractors as prioritizing entrenched revenue streams over adaptive technological ecosystems.^[124]

Debates Over Aggressive IP Enforcement vs. Public Access

The Authors Guild's advocacy for stringent copyright enforcement in digitization and lending initiatives has intensified debates over the trade-offs between safeguarding authors' economic rights and expanding public access to knowledge. The Guild argues that large-scale unauthorized reproductions, such as those in the Internet Archive's controlled digital lending program, constitute direct market substitutes that deprive creators of licensing revenue, exacerbating median author incomes that plummeted 42% to $6,080 between 2009 and 2017 according to the Guild's survey of U.S. professional authors.^[45] ^[82] In December 2024, following the Second Circuit's affirmation of infringement in Hachette v. Internet Archive, the Guild hailed the ruling as validation against "piracy," asserting that permissionless models undermine incentives for literary production amid broader market disruptions.^[82] Opponents, including digital rights advocates and library associations, contend that the Guild's litigious approach prioritizes monopoly rents over transformative technologies that enhance discoverability without net harm to sales. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), intervening in Authors Guild v. Google (2005–2015), defended mass scanning for snippet views as fair use, arguing it functions as a research tool akin to card catalogs, with empirical evidence indicating increased sales for obscure titles post-digitization while popular books experienced minimal cannibalization.^[125] ^[126] Similarly, in Authors Guild v. HathiTrust (2011–2014), the Second Circuit upheld fair use for print-disabled access and full-text search, rejecting the Guild's claims of overreach and emphasizing public benefits like preservation and scholarship.^[127] Critics from groups like Public Knowledge have accused the Guild of distrusting nonprofit institutions, suggesting its enforcement zeal ignores how controlled lending mirrors physical library practices without scalable substitution.^[128] These tensions underscore interpretive disputes over fair use factors under 17 U.S.C. § 107, where the Guild advocates limiting "transformative" claims to non-commercial, non-substitutive uses to preserve licensing markets—a position bolstered by the Supreme Court's 2023 ruling in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, aligning with the Guild's amicus brief that commercial adaptations require permission.^[93] Public access proponents counter that empirical data on projects like Google Books reveal net positives for readership and downstream purchases, particularly for out-of-print works, challenging the Guild's harm narratives as overstated given self-published authors' rising earnings (doubling since 2018 per the Guild's 2023 survey).^[129] ^[44] The debate persists in ongoing AI training suits, where the Guild seeks opt-in compensation, while tech firms invoke fair use for data ingestion, highlighting unresolved causal links between enforcement stringency and cultural output.^[130]

Impact and Empirical Assessment

Achievements in Legal and Policy Wins

The Authors Guild played a pivotal role in the passage of the Copyright Act of 1976, which modernized U.S. copyright law by extending protections to authors and eliminating formalities like mandatory notice and renewal, thereby aligning domestic standards more closely with international norms.^[13] This was followed by advocacy leading to the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988, enabling U.S. accession to the Berne Convention in 1989 and granting automatic protection for authors' works without registration requirements.^[13] In response to restrictive interpretations of fair use, the Guild supported amendments to the Copyright Act signed into law on October 27, 1992, which explicitly permitted limited use of unpublished works, overturning prior court decisions that had curtailed scholarly access and criticism.^[13] Additionally, through persistent lobbying, the organization secured revisions to the Tax Reform Act of 1986 by late 1988, restoring authors' ability to deduct business expenses annually rather than capitalizing them, thereby alleviating financial burdens on creative professionals.^[13] Litigation efforts yielded significant recoveries for members, including a class-action settlement approved in 2014—stemming from the 2001 Supreme Court ruling in New York Times Co. v. Tasini—that provided up to $18 million in compensation to thousands of freelance authors for unauthorized reproduction of their works in electronic databases, with initial payments distributed in 2015 and final disbursements totaling $9 million by April 2018.^[105]^[131] More recently, the Guild achieved key concessions in settlements against non-compliant publishers, such as the February 2023 agreement with Authors Place Press reverting rights to ten affected authors and ceasing unauthorized distributions, and a prior commitment from Adelaide Books to pay outstanding royalties.^[132] In 2025, federal courts ruled in the Guild's favor on First Amendment challenges to book removal laws, including summary judgment on August 14 against Florida's restrictions on library materials deemed harmful to minors, and a January 10 declaration that Arkansas's book ban legislation violated constitutional protections, part of a series of injunctions in states like Texas, Iowa, and Colorado.^[133]^[134] On July 28, 2025, a New York federal court granted a preliminary injunction in the Guild's class-action suit against the National Endowment for the Humanities, blocking the termination of approximately 1,400 grants to authors and scholars and affirming protections for funded expressive works against viewpoint-based revocation.^[7]

Data-Driven Analysis of Author Economic Outcomes

The Authors Guild's 2023 survey of U.S. authors, based on responses from nearly 5,700 writers, reported a median book-related income of $10,000 for full-time authors in 2022, rising to $20,000 when including other writing-related earnings such as articles and speaking fees; this figure remained below the federal poverty line for a single person ($14,580).^[135]^[136] The survey highlighted persistent disparities, with Black authors earning a median of $15,250 in total author-related income compared to $20,000 for White authors, and traditionally published authors faring worse than self-published ones in income growth since 2018. Earlier Guild data from 2018 showed a median author income of $6,080, reflecting a 42% decline from $10,500 in 2009, attributed partly to digital disruptions like piracy and platform dominance, though the organization's self-reported samples may underrepresent high-earning outliers.^[45] In contrast, surveys of self-published authors indicate more favorable trends, with the Alliance of Independent Authors (ALLi) reporting a median income of $12,749 in 2023, a 53% increase from 2021 levels, driven by direct access to digital platforms like Amazon Kindle Direct Publishing.^[137]^[138] Self-published authors experienced a 76% income surge from 2018 to 2022, outpacing traditional publishing, where advances and royalties have stagnated amid consolidation among the "Big Five" publishers; however, even self-publishers face high variance, with only 17% earning between $2,501 and $20,000 annually in recent indie surveys.^[135]^[139] These gains stem from higher royalty rates (often 60-80% versus 7.5-10% in traditional deals) and promotional tools, though success correlates strongly with marketing investment and genre niches like romance or fantasy.^[140] Broader labor statistics from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) report a median annual wage of $72,270 for "writers and authors" in May 2024, encompassing journalists and technical writers alongside book authors, which inflates figures relative to book-specific medians; employment in the category is projected to grow 4% through 2033, but book publishing revenue faces headwinds from digital shifts.^[141] Empirical studies link copyright infringement to sales losses—economists broadly agree online piracy reduces legitimate revenues by 10-20% in affected markets—yet enforcement efforts have not demonstrably reversed decade-long income erosion for most authors, as self-publishing's rise offsets some harms without Guild-led interventions.^[142]^[143] Overall, data reveal authoring as a low-median, high-variance profession, with full-time viability limited to a small cohort despite technological democratization.^[140]

Broader Influence on Publishing and IP Norms

The Authors Guild has significantly shaped publishing contract norms through its Fair Contract Initiative, launched in 2015, which critiques one-sided publisher terms and promotes equitable provisions such as time-limited grants of rights, robust out-of-print reversion clauses, and mutual warranties between authors and publishers.^[144]^[145] By releasing a publicly accessible Model Trade Book Contract in April 2021, the Guild has empowered authors to negotiate better terms, influencing industry practices by highlighting exploitative clauses like perpetual rights retention and broad morals clauses that allow publishers unilateral termination for subjective ethical breaches.^[146]^[147] This advocacy has prompted some publishers to revise standard boilerplate language, fostering a gradual shift toward contracts that better align author compensation with market value and technological changes, though adoption remains uneven due to publishers' leverage in negotiations.^[148] In intellectual property norms, the Guild's decade-long litigation against Google in Authors Guild v. Google (initiated 2005, decided 2015) tested boundaries of fair use for mass digitization, resulting in a Second Circuit ruling that Google's scanning of millions of books for searchable snippets constituted transformative use, but also sparking broader debates on the limits of non-expressive copying and the need for licensing mechanisms.^[56]^[64] The U.S. Supreme Court's 2016 denial of certiorari solidified this precedent, influencing IP standards by affirming that commercial digitization can qualify as fair use if it enhances searchability without substituting for originals, yet the Guild's opposition elevated calls for opt-in licensing and collective rights management as alternatives to unchecked technological extraction.^[4] This case has informed subsequent norms, evident in the Guild's amicus support for stricter fair use interpretations, such as the 2023 Supreme Court decision in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, which rejected transformative use as sufficient for commercial adaptations, thereby reinforcing protections against dilution of authors' exclusive rights.^[93] The Guild's recent advocacy on artificial intelligence has extended its influence to emerging digital IP norms, asserting that unauthorized ingestion of copyrighted works for AI training undermines incentives for creation and advocating author-controlled licensing over publisher or tech firm dominance.^[11] In 2024, it endorsed publisher policies like Penguin Random House's restrictions on AI exploitation of backlist titles without consent, contributing to industry standards that prioritize opt-in models and fair remuneration for data usage in generative technologies.^[149]^[150] These efforts, alongside support for legislation like the 2019 CASE Act establishing a small-claims copyright tribunal, have normalized stronger enforcement against bad-faith infringements while critiquing expansive fair use claims in AI contexts, as seen in the Guild's 2025 response to rulings favoring training copies as fair use in cases like Bartz v. Anthropic.^[151]^[92] Overall, the Guild's positions have entrenched a creator-centric framework in IP discourse, countering trends toward unfettered access but facing pushback for potentially stifling innovation in data-driven publishing ecosystems.^[58]

References

[1]
About - The Authors Guild
The Authors Guild is the nation's oldest and largest professional organization for published writers. Since our founding, we have served as the collective voice ...Our Principles · Sister Organizations · Our Team · AG in the NewsMissing: history | Show results with:history
[2]
The Authors Guild: Homepage
... authorsguild.org/app/uploads/2024/09/. Book Marketing & Publicity Resources. Promoting your work is one of the toughest parts of being an author. Authors Guild ...MembershipLog InAbout the GuildContact UsResource Library
[3]
Authors Guild Responds to New Economy of Publishing by Opening ...
Oct 11, 2016 · Since its founding in 1912, the Guild has advocated for writers through many changes in the industry, most recently from the shuttering and ...<|separator|>
[4]
Supreme Court Declines to Review Fair Use Finding in Decade ...
Apr 18, 2016 · After a decade of litigation, the Second Circuit found that Google's use of the books without compensation was “fair,” because the search ...Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
[5]
The Authors Guild, John Grisham, Jodi Picoult, David Baldacci ...
Missing: notable achievements
[6]
Authors Guild Celebrates Resounding Win in Hachette v. Internet ...
Mar 26, 2023 · Authors Guild Celebrates Resounding Win in Hachette v. Internet Archive Infringement Lawsuit. The court's ruling vindicates six years of ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
[7]
Authors Guild Wins Major First Amendment Victory in NEH Ruling
Jul 28, 2025 · The Authors Guild and eight scholar-authors* won a major First Amendment victory yesterday when a New York federal court blocked the ...Missing: notable achievements
[8]
Texas Court Sides with Authors Guild and Strikes Down ...
Sep 29, 2023 · As the Authors Guild argued in a lawsuit challenging the case, failing to rate the books would bar any vendor from selling to a Texas school ...
[9]
Advocacy - The Authors Guild
We advocate for fair contracts for all authors and fair payment terms for freelance writers and creators. Read Our Accomplishments. Pillars of Our Mission ...
[10]
Fair Contracts - The Authors Guild
Ensuring fair contract terms between authors and publishers has been a cornerstone of the Authors Guild's mission since its inception in 1912 as the Authors ...Missing: founded | Show results with:founded
[11]
Artificial Intelligence - The Authors Guild
The Authors Guild believes that it is crucial for our culture and the future of democracy to ensure that our literary arts remain vibrant and diverse.Missing: objectives | Show results with:objectives
[12]
https://authorsguild.org/advocacy/copyright/
[13]
Advocacy Accomplishments - The Authors Guild
The Authors Guild was at the forefront of urging a change in this country's laws—and succeeded first with the passage of the Copyright Act of 1976, which ...Missing: initiatives | Show results with:initiatives
[14]
Membership - The Authors Guild
Listing in our member profiles; Exclusive discounts on car rentals, publications, and more. Dues. $149/year (or $13.50/month*). Join Now. Emerging Writer ...
[15]
[PDF] Authors Guild Annual Report for 2023
Mar 18, 2024 · 2,906 new members joining in the 2023 calendar year. The number of members enrolled in auto renewal has. Recruitment. We continue to work ...
[16]
Authors Guild Council
The Authors Guild Board of Directors is called its Council, and is composed entirely of writers. They are nominated by a committee and then elected by the ...Missing: governance structure
[17]
[PDF] Constitution of The Authors Guild, Inc.
SECTION 1. The general management, control, and direction of the affairs, funds, and property of the Guild shall be vested in its Board of Directors, ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
[18]
The Screen Writers' Guild: An Early History of the Writers Guild of ...
The Authors' League of America (now the Authors Guild) was formed in New York in 1912 to represent many of the nation's writers, including dramatists, but the ...<|separator|>
[19]
Writers Guild of America Fast Facts - CNN
Aug 26, 2013 · 1912 - The Authors League of America is founded to protect the interests of professional writers. 1921 - The Writers, precursor to the ...
[20]
History of publishing - Education, Literacy, Print | Britannica
Sep 8, 2025 · At roughly the same time, the founding of the Society of Authors (1884) in England and the Authors' League (1912) in the United States helped to ...
[21]
The National Trade Association of Playwrights, Composers, Lyricists ...
And so The Authors League was created in 1912, with a subcommittee for dramatic writers established in 1915, becoming The DG in 1919. By 1926, the ...Missing: founded | Show results with:founded
[22]
About: History - Authors League Fund
Since 1917, the Authors League Fund has helped professional writers in times of crisis, such as medical and housing emergencies.Missing: advocacy | Show results with:advocacy
[23]
Sister Organizations - The Authors Guild
Its mission is to provide a safety net—and a sense of community—to writers enduring financial hardship. Learn More About the Authors League Fund. Authors ...
[24]
First National Assembly Author's League of America - WNYC
This recording contains the opening ceremony of the first national assembly of the Author's League of America, a meeting of authors and dramatists.
[25]
amicus curiae Authors Guild - Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center
Feb 26, 1996 · The Authors Guild, Inc. (the “Guild”), founded in 1912, is a national non-profit association of aImost 6,800 professional, published writers ...
[26]
[PDF] Copyright Clearance Center (CCC)
Oct 5, 2015 · photocopy and digital rights into a repertory collective license in 2007; all of these licenses remain available to interested users. • Most ...
[27]
The latest Authors Guild Bulletin contains this article. In 1980, US ...
Sep 16, 2025 · The latest Authors Guild Bulletin contains this article. In 1980, US publishers released 45,000 titles. Now the average (from traditional and ...Missing: initiatives 1990s
[28]
Writers Blocked: The Debate over Public Lending Right in the United ...
Aug 9, 2025 · This article traces the movement led by the Authors Guild in the United States from 1979 to 1989 to establish a Public Lending Right (PLR)—a ...
[29]
Publishing: Royalties In Libraries - The New York Times
Mar 7, 1980 · The Authors Guild in this country is in the study phase of a possible national effort to achieve the Public Lending Right. Such a law would ...
[30]
Writers Blocked: The Debate over Public Lending - jstor
Final Campaign by the Authors Guild. In the mid- to late 1980s the Authors Guild continued to try to build a constituency for PLR through articles in the ...
[31]
Piracy - The Authors Guild
The Authors Guild advocates a comprehensive solution to internet piracy that protects the creative marketplace without standing in the way of digital innovation ...
[32]
https://authorsguild.org/industry-advocacy/ag-president-doug-preston-testifies-before-senate-committee/
[33]
https://authorsguild.org/member-services/legal-services/
[34]
Authors Guild to Publishers: Get Ready for Pushback on E-Book ...
Feb 23, 2015 · Digital publishing, for instance, has ushered in shorter formats for books. Authors have begun adapting, some successfully and happily, some not ...
[35]
AG Supports Introduction and Passage of the SMART Copyright Act ...
Mar 18, 2022 · “It is a simple, targeted, efficient solution that has the potential to dramatically reduce piracy on internet platforms. The Authors Guild is ...Missing: initiatives digital
[36]
[PDF] The Authors Guild Annual Report 2024 1
Mar 4, 2025 · We also endorsed the Foreign Anti-. Digital Piracy Act, introduced by Rep. Zoe Lofgren. (CA-18), which targets large-scale foreign-based digital ...
[37]
A Digital Picket Line: The Authors Guild Would Like Your Attention ...
In launching its "Fair Contract Initiative," the Authors Guild intends to take advantage of the new digitally enabled rapport between…
[38]
The Foundation - The Authors Guild
The Foundation. The Authors Guild Foundation educates, supports, and protects American writers to ensure that a rich, diverse body of literature can flourish.Authors Guild Foundation Gala · The Authors Legacy Society · Donate · UtilityMissing: mission statement
[39]
Business Bootcamps for Writers - The Authors Guild
Join the Authors Guild Foundation and an array of authors and publishing experts for this FREE series of webinars on the path to publication and the business of ...
[40]
Resource Library - The Authors Guild
Find resources to help you in every stage of your professional writing career, from comprehensive guides breaking down complex legal topics to event recordings.Launchpad Marketing & Publicity · Money Matters · Business Bootcamps for Writers
[41]
Author Mentorships: Getting the Most Out of the Experience
Feb 13, 2025 · Educational Programs ... Several writers organizations have partnered with the Authors Guild Foundation to help shape these programs.
[42]
Authors Guild Launchpad: Book Marketing & Publicity
Authors Guild Foundation Gala · WIT Literary Festival · Guild Events · Educational Programs · Literary Programs · Past Events · More Events · Chapter Events ...
[43]
Upcoming Events - The Authors Guild
... Authors Guild Foundation Gala · WIT Literary Festival · Guild Events · Educational Programs · Literary Programs · Past Events · More Events · Chapter Events ...
[44]
Key Takeaways from the Authors Guild's 2023 Author Income Survey
Sep 27, 2023 · With more than 14,000 members, the Authors Guild is the nation's oldest and largest professional organization for published writers. It ...
[45]
Authors Guild Survey Shows Drastic 42 Percent Decline in Authors ...
Jan 5, 2019 · The Authors Guild surveyed its membership and the members of 14 other writers organizations in 2018, receiving detailed responses from 5,067 ...Missing: century | Show results with:century
[46]
Authors Guild Issues Report Exploring the Factors Leading to the ...
Feb 19, 2020 · The underlying social, economic and technological factors contributing to the ongoing decline of author incomes.Missing: mid- | Show results with:mid-
[47]
NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. TASINI - Law.Cornell.Edu
Jun 25, 2001 · The freelance authors' complaint alleged that their copyrights had been infringed by the inclusion of their articles in the databases. The ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[48]
New York Times Co. v. Tasini | 533 U.S. 483 (2001)
The Authors filed this suit, alleging that their copyrights were infringed when, as permitted and facilitated by the Print Publishers, LEXIS/NEXIS and UMI ( ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[49]
Freelance Settlement Update - The Authors Guild
Sep 27, 2017 · Tasini (2001), which held that several online databases and print publishers had infringed the rights of six freelance authors by reproducing ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[50]
New York Times Company, Inc. v. Tasini - Oyez
Mar 28, 2001 · The publishers treated the authors as independent contractors under contracts. The publishers each licensed rights to copy and sell articles to ...Missing: Guild | Show results with:Guild
[51]
NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. TASINI - Law.Cornell.Edu
The Authors filed this suit, alleging that their copyrights were infringed when, as permitted and facilitated by the Print Publishers, LEXIS/NEXIS and UMI ( ...
[52]
A Retrospective and Discussion of New York Times v. Tasini, 533 ...
Aug 4, 2021 · The US Supreme Court's decision in New York Times v. Tasini, 533 US 483 (2001), was an early ruling addressing the application of copyright law to the then ...
[53]
Legal Issues - Understanding and Surviving Tasini - Information Today
The Authors Guild, Jonathan Tasini, and others responded by filing lawsuits alleging that these actions were designed to limit the rights of freelance ...
[54]
Authors Guild v. Google Settlement Resources Page
Oct 28, 2008 · Litigation History: Authors Guild v Google September 20, 2005. Authors' Initial Complaint. McGraw-Hill v. Google October 19, 2005. Publishers ...Missing: 2005-2015 | Show results with:2005-2015<|separator|>
[55]
Google Case Ends, but Copyright Fight Goes On - Publishers Weekly
Apr 22, 2016 · September, 2005: Copyright infringement suit filed by Authors Guild in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. October, 2005 ...
[56]
Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., No. 13-4829 (2d Cir. 2015) - Justia Law
The district court concluded that Google's actions constituted fair use under 17 U.S.C. 107. On appeal, plaintiffs challenged the district court's grant of ...Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
[57]
Authors Guild v. Google, Part I: Proposed Class Action Settlement
The Authors Guild complained that Google was "engaging in massive copyright infringement" by scanning books and that also that Google would be guilty of ...
[58]
Google Books vs. the Authors Guild: Milestones and Impact
Apr 19, 2025 · 2005 - 2007: Authors Guild Files a Class Action ... The Authors Guild initiated a class action lawsuit against Google in the Library Partner ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
[59]
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704461304576216923562033348
[60]
The Google Settlement Rejection: What Comes Next?
Mar 28, 2011 · On March 22, after more than two years of contentious debate, Judge Denny Chin rejected the controversial proposal on copyright and antitrust ...
[61]
Case: The Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.
Google has since scanned more than 12 million books. The libraries retained digital copies of the books (see Authors Guild v. HathiTrust, in related cases).Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
[62]
Authors Guild v. Google, Inc. - Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center
Jan 31, 2023 · Plaintiffs, authors of published books under copyright, filed suit against Google for copyright infringement ... judgment in favor of Google.Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
[63]
[PDF] Authors-Guild-v-Google-804_F.3d_202.pdf - UC Berkeley Law
The fourth fair use factor, the effect of the copying use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work, fo- cuses on whether the copy brings ...
[64]
Second Circuit Affirms Fair Use in Google Books Case
Oct 16, 2015 · The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit unanimously affirmed the lower court's fair use decision in Authors Guild v. Google, also known as the “Google ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[65]
[PDF] Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 13-4829-cv (2d Cir ... - Copyright
Oct 16, 2015 · The Authors Guild appealed the district court's ruling. Issue. Whether it was fair use to digitally copy entire books from library collections,.
[66]
Case: The Authors Guild v. HathiTrust, Inc.
On September 12, 2011, the Authors Guild and several other national and international organizations representing the interest of authors filed this lawsuit ...
[67]
[PDF] Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust, 755 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2014) - Copyright
The case involved HathiTrust, a digital library created by universities, and the Authors Guild. HathiTrust's HDL contained over ten million works.Missing: 2011-2014 | Show results with:2011-2014
[68]
Court Filing Ends AG v. HathiTrust Copyright Litigation
Jan 8, 2015 · The Guild claimed the library group infringed by reproducing copyright-protected books for inclusion in its HathiTrust Digital Library, a ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[69]
Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust, No. 12-4547 (2d Cir. 2014)
The case concerned whether HathiTrust's use of copyrighted material was fair use. The court affirmed fair use for a full-text database, but vacated part of the ...
[70]
The HathiTrust Decision: A Win for Fair Use ... - EDUCAUSE Review
Oct 13, 2012 · In his ruling the judge dismissed the AG's arguments that the HathiTrust had violated copyright law by making scanned works available for ...Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome<|separator|>
[71]
Authors Guild v. HathiTrust | Electronic Frontier Foundation
Authors Guild v. HathiTrust thus presents a similar issue as the more famous Google Books lawsuit: whether digitization of books is a legal fair use of ...
[72]
2nd Circuit Issues Its Fair Use Ruling in Authors Guild v. HathiTrust
Jun 13, 2014 · The court found that the Authors Guild did not have standing to assert copyright claims on behalf of its members, and as a result, it vacated ...
[73]
Authors Guild v. HathiTrust Litigation Ends in Victory for Fair Use
Jan 8, 2015 · The Authors Guild v. HathiTrust saga ended in a strong victory for fair use as the Second Circuit opinion will now stand.Missing: details | Show results with:details
[74]
Narrow Fair Use Ruling Permits Limited Library Uses, Shoots Down ...
Jun 11, 2014 · We received yesterday's Second Circuit decision in Authors Guild v. HathiTrust with mixed feelings. The decision was not a total victory for ...Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
[75]
Authors Guild Stands with Publishers in Internet Archive ...
Jul 8, 2022 · Authors Guild Stands with Publishers in Internet Archive Infringement Lawsuit ... Library portal (and the now-defunct National Emergency ...
[76]
AAP Celebrates Final Victory in Infringement Case Against Internet ...
Dec 4, 2024 · A minor part of the case was Internet Archive's self-branded “National Emergency Library (NEL),” which the District Court dispensed with in ...
[77]
Internet Archive's National Emergency Library Harms Authors
Mar 27, 2020 · The Authors Guild is appalled by the Internet Archive's (IA) announcement that it is now making millions of in-copyright books freely ...
[78]
Our Open Letter to Internet Archive to Shut Down the So-Called ...
Apr 23, 2020 · Please join the Authors Guild in signing this open letter to shut down the National Emergency Library.
[79]
Second Circuit Holds That the Internet Archive's Controlled Digital ...
Sep 11, 2024 · The Internet Archive appealed, and on September 4, 2024, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the lower court's ruling. The Second ...
[80]
Judge sides with publishers in lawsuit over Internet Archive's ... - NPR
Mar 26, 2023 · A federal judge has ruled in favor of a group of book publishers who sued the nonprofit Internet Archive in the early days of the coronavirus pandemic.<|separator|>
[81]
Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive, No. 23-1260 (2d Cir ...
The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, holding that IA's Free Digital Library did not qualify as fair use under the Copyright Act. The court ...Missing: details timeline outcome
[82]
Authors Guild Applauds Final Court Decision Affirming Internet ...
Dec 4, 2024 · September 4, 2024: The Authors Guild is pleased with the Second Circuit's decision today affirming the lower court's ruling that the Internet ...
[83]
[PDF] Case 1:23-cv-08292-SHS Document 39 Filed 12/04/23 Page 1 of 52
Dec 4, 2023 · AUTHORS GUILD, DAVID BALDACCI,. MARY BLY, MICHAEL CONNELLY, SYLVIA. DAY, JONATHAN FRANZEN, JOHN. GRISHAM, ELIN HILDERBRAND,.
[84]
Authors Guild v OpenAI | Copyright infringement - Michalsons
Aug 26, 2024 · On 19 September 2023, 17 authors filed a class action lawsuit against OpenAI for copyright infringement. In December 2023, the plaintiffs ...
[85]
Understanding the AI Class Action Lawsuits - The Authors Guild
May 6, 2025 · Approximately a dozen lawsuits have been brought in California and New York courts against various AI companies for copyright infringement ...Missing: 2023 | Show results with:2023
[86]
OpenAI asks federal judge to toss authors' ChatGPT output copyright ...
Oct 8, 2025 · OpenAI asks federal judge to toss authors' ChatGPT output copyright claims. As part of a massive class action against the generative AI ...
[87]
Congress Receives Authors Guild Petition to Defend Copyright ...
May 20, 2025 · This administration's attempt to remove a renowned copyright expert, one of the most qualified people for the position of Register of Copyrights ...Missing: enforcement | Show results with:enforcement
[88]
Supreme Court Agrees with Authors Guild on Strengthened ...
May 20, 2024 · The court held that a copyright owner who files a timely claim for infringement is entitled to damages for the entire period of infringement, ...Missing: enforcement | Show results with:enforcement
[89]
FAQs on the Authors Guild's Positions and Advocacy Around ...
The Authors Guild is specifically lobbying for laws, regulations, and policies regarding: Consent: Require permission for the use of writers' works in ...Missing: objectives | Show results with:objectives
[90]
Fair Use for Authors: What You Need to Know About Using ...
Jul 22, 2024 · The Authors Guild Explains Copyright. This article is one of several we've published explaining the basics of copyright law for authors.
[91]
Fair Use Q&A with the Authors Guild
Sep 20, 2022 · Fair use is an exception to copyright that allows use of another's work without permission from the copyright owner.Missing: position | Show results with:position
[92]
Authors Guild Responds to Summary Judgment in Bartz v. Anthropic
Jun 25, 2025 · It is undisputed that Anthropic made unauthorized copies from illegally downloaded books and in doing so committed mass copyright infringement; ...
[93]
U.S. Supreme Court Agrees with Authors Guild in Fair Use Case
Jun 6, 2023 · U.S. Supreme Court Agrees with Authors Guild in Fair Use Case. Court's decision safeguards writers' rights, stating that transformative use ...
[94]
Authors Guild v. Google: The Future of Fair Use? - The Authors Guild
Authors Guild v. Google: The Future of Fair Use? An article first published in the Media Law Resource Center Bulletin in May 2014 by Mary Rasenberger and ...
[95]
[PDF] Authors Guild v. Google, Inc. - Supreme Court of the United States
the fair-use doctrine. Fourth, by holding that the Authors Guild lacks standing to bring copyright infringement claims on behalf of its members, the Second ...
[96]
Model Trade Book Contract - - The Authors Guild
Authors receive approximately 40–50% lower royalties from net receipts compared to royalties paid on the book's list price at the same percentage.
[97]
Authors Guild Announces Fair Contract Initiative at BEA 2015
May 28, 2015 · Our guiding principle for this new initiative is to restore balance to the author-publisher relationship and help authors achieve a fair return ...
[98]
Authors Guild Announces 'Fair Contract' Initiative - Publishers Weekly
May 28, 2015 · "Our guiding principle for this new initiative is to restore balance to the author-publisher relationship and help authors achieve a fair return ...
[99]
[PDF] AG FCI_Eight Principles_final - Authors Guild
THE AUTHORS GUILD FAIR CONTRACT INITIATIVE: EIGHT PRINCIPLES FOR FAIR CONTRACTS. Principle. Fair Contract Terms. Unfair Contract Terms. The author-publisher ...<|separator|>
[100]
Authors Guild Issues Model Trade Book Contract
Mar 12, 2020 · An educational tool to help guide authors, attorneys and literary agents when negotiating book contracts with trade publishers.
[101]
Model Trade Book Contract - - The Authors Guild
In no event shall your compensation be reduced below a specified minimum (e.g., try to insert a 75% floor for royalties for the second revision, and a 50 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[102]
Translation Contracts 101 - The Authors Guild
May 19, 2025 · Literary translators deserve recognition and compensation for their labor and creative work. While the royalties are typically low due to ...
[103]
Legal Services - The Authors Guild
We'll review your domestic publishing contracts line-by-line, recommend specific changes, additions, and deletions, and give you negotiation tips to help you ...
[104]
Legal Services for Academic Writers - The Authors Guild
Let the Authors Guild legal team review your contract before you sign it! We'll make sure you retain your copyright, earn a competitive advance and royalties, ...<|separator|>
[105]
Multimillion Dollar Freelance Settlement - The Authors Guild
They took their case all the way to the Supreme Court, which delivered a ruling in 2010 allowing these authors to participate in the settlement.Missing: Tasini 1990s- 2001 outcome
[106]
Half of Net Proceeds Is the Fair Royalty Rate for E-Books
Jul 9, 2015 · This installment of the Authors Guild Fair Contract Initiative tackles today's inadequate e-book royalties.
[107]
Authors Guild Slams 'Inadequate' E-book Royalty - Publishers Weekly
Jul 9, 2015 · Publishers have given some authors a 50% royalty rate on e-books, but the Guild said these select few have been required to sign nondisclosure ...
[108]
[PDF] The Authors Guild Fair Contract Initiative: A Fresh Look at the ...
Our guiding principle for this new initiative is to restore contractual balance to the author-publisher relationship and help authors achieve a fair return for ...
[109]
Antitrust - The Authors Guild
The Authors Guild has opposed Amazon's more ruthless tactics in order to protect authors' individual livelihoods and the future of authorship itself.
[110]
A Call to Investigate Amazon - The Authors Guild
Jul 13, 2015 · We once again request the Department of Justice to investigate Amazon for its anti-competitive behavior, a far more dangerous variant that Apple's.
[111]
AG, AAP, and ABA's Joint Letter to Congress Raises Concerns ...
Aug 17, 2020 · “Amazon controls more than 80 percent of online book sales,” said Authors Guild president Doug Preston. “Their escalating demands on ...
[112]
Open Markets, the Authors Guild, and American Booksellers Urge ...
Aug 16, 2023 · Open Markets, the Authors Guild, and American Booksellers Urge FTC and DOJ to Investigate Amazon's Book Retail Monopoly.
[113]
Open Markets, the Authors Guild & American Booksellers Urge FTC ...
Aug 16, 2023 · “Amazon has used its dominance in ways that we believe harm the interests of America's readers, impoverish the book industry as a whole, damage ...
[114]
Authors Guild Statement on Antitrust Bills
Jun 18, 2021 · The Authors Guild welcomes four antitrust bills recently introduced by House lawmakers to rein in the anticompetitive practices of large internet platforms.
[115]
Amazon to crack down on ebook 'read and return' after Authors ...
Sep 25, 2022 · It says Amazon plans to change its ebook return policy to restrict automatic returns to purchases where no more than 10% of the book has been read.
[116]
Amazon's New Disclosure Policy for AI-Generated Book Content Is a ...
Sep 7, 2023 · After months of discussions with the Authors Guild, Amazon has announced a new policy requiring those who post content to its KDP platform to ...Missing: response self-
[117]
Amazon Adds to KDP Generative AI Policy, Caps Daily Self ...
Sep 27, 2023 · The Authors Guild remains steadfast in its push for transparency and accountability around generative AI technologies impacting writers. See our ...Missing: responses disruptions
[118]
US Authors Guild launches 'human authored' certification in battle ...
Jan 31, 2025 · The US Authors Guild has launched a certification process for writers to confirm that their books “emanated from the human intellect” and not from artificial ...
[119]
How the Authors Guild Is Kind of Like the NRA and Why Scott Turow ...
Apr 8, 2013 · ... Authors Guild, the trade association that ... Check out the ebook best-seller list every week and you'll see that big publishers dominate.
[120]
Hachette v. Internet Archive - Amicus brief of Authors Guild et al
Hachette v. Internet Archive - Amicus brief of Authors Guild et al. DOCUMENT. Hachette v. Internet Archive - Amicus brief of Authors Guild et al. Thumbnails
[121]
Big Win For Fair Use In Google Books Lawsuit
Oct 16, 2015 · The Second Circuit Court of Appeals handed Google a clear victory today, soundly rejecting the Authors Guild's claim that the Google Books Project infringes ...
[122]
Digitizing Books Is Fair Use: Author's Guild v. HathiTrust
Oct 10, 2012 · The case is The Authors Guild, Inc. v. Hathitrust, the lesser-known but faster-moving stepsister to the Authors Guild's long-running lawsuit ...
[123]
Why Does The Author's Guild Refuse To Even Acknowledge Views ...
Jul 24, 2014 · What can you say about an organization calling itself an “Authors Guild”… that censors the voices of authors whose opinions it doesn't like?
[124]
Does the Authors Guild Serve the Interest of Writers?
Aug 15, 2012 · And like many of the self-published authors out there, I've found the Authors Guild's stridency toward Amazon to be a little harsh at times. Yes ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
[125]
Authors Guild v. Google, Part II: Fair Use Proceedings
The Authors Guild complained that Google was "engaging in massive copyright infringement" by scanning books and that also that Google would be guilty of ...Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
[126]
[PDF] Does digitization hurt book readership and sales? Evidence from the ...
Jun 26, 2018 · In contrast, sales for popular books – where discovery is less relevant – decrease following digitization.
[127]
Second Circuit Affirms Fair Use in Authors Guild v. HathiTrust
Jun 10, 2014 · In evaluating the four fair use factors, the court concluded that three of the four factors favor fair use and upheld the district court's ...
[128]
The Authors Guild Should Trust Universities and HathiTrust
Sep 20, 2011 · It alleges that the universities' scanning violates “the limited circumstances under which libraries are permitted to reproduce and distribute ...
[129]
Digitization and the Market for Physical Works: Evidence from the ...
We study the impact of the Google Books digitization project on the market for physical books. We find that digitization significantly boosts the demand for ...Missing: book | Show results with:book
[130]
[PDF] (final) Authors Guild Comments - AI Study (10-30-23)
Oct 30, 2023 · The Authors Guild asked Amazon to require that AI-generated books be labeled as such, and on. September 7, 2023, they adopted a policy that ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
[131]
$$9 Million Is Paid to Freelance Writers in 17-Year-Old Copyright Suit
May 1, 2018 · The Authors Guild filed the suit in 2001, along with the American Society of Journalists and Authors, the National Writers Union, and 21 ...
[132]
Authors Guild Wins Key Concessions in Settlement with Authors ...
Feb 3, 2023 · In the settlement agreement, Authors' Place owner Tony Ferraro agreed to: Revert rights to all ten authors who were plaintiffs in the lawsuit, ...Missing: victories | Show results with:victories
[133]
Authors Guild Celebrates Victory Against Florida's Book Ban Law
Aug 14, 2025 · In a sweeping victory for readers and authors, Judge Carlos Mendoza granted our coalition's motion for summary judgment in Penguin Random ...
[134]
Authors Guild Federal Court Victory: Arkansas Book Ban Declared ...
Jan 10, 2025 · The decision marks the culmination of a legal battle that began when the law was initially signed on March 30, 2023. It was blocked by a ...
[135]
Insights from the 2023 U.S. Author Income Survey - Publish Drive
Nov 6, 2023 · 1. Author earnings: · Full-time authors had a median income of $10,000 from their books in 2022, which jumped to $20,000 when considering other ...
[136]
Writing Books Remains a Tough Way to Make a Living
Sep 29, 2023 · A new Authors Guild survey finds that median book and writing-related income for authors in 2022 was below the poverty level.
[137]
Survey Finds Self-Published Authors Making Gains
Apr 17, 2023 · The survey found that the average income for self-published authors rose 53% last year over 2021, reaching a median of $12,749, a figure higher ...
[138]
[PDF] Big Indie Author Data Drop - The Alliance Independent Authors
Median self-published author income stands at $12,759 and is growing by 53%. (compared to traditionally published authors at $6-8,000 and falling). ALLi 2023.
[139]
2024 Indie Author Survey Results: Insights into Self Publishing for ...
Oct 24, 2024 · The 17% of authors earning between $2,501 and $20,000+ are proof that indie publishing can be a sustainable career with the right approach.
[140]
How Much Do Authors Make?: Average Author Salary in 2025
Feb 14, 2025 · The average author salary is $84,670 (2024), but income varies widely. Some authors make millions, others nothing, with a median of $6,080 for ...Missing: data 2020-2025
[141]
Writers and Authors : Occupational Outlook Handbook
The median annual wage for writers and authors was $72,270 in May 2024. Job Outlook. Employment of writers and authors is projected to grow 4 percent from 2024 ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
[142]
Do Copyright Professors Pay Attention to Economists? How ...
Sep 6, 2023 · It is fair to say that there is a consensus among economists that online copyright infringement does harm legitimate sales of copyrighted works.Missing: outcomes enforcement
[143]
[PDF] AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMICS OF COPYRIGHT
Additional empirical evidence on whether higher copyright protection increases creativity is necessary, but always related to how increasing revenues are ...
[144]
The Authors Guild Fair Contract Initiative: A Preview
Jun 17, 2015 · Its goal is to shine a bright light on the one-sided contract terms that publishers typically offer authors and to spur publishers to offer more ...
[145]
A Publishing Contract Should Not Be Forever - The Authors Guild
Jul 28, 2015 · This installment of the Authors Guild Fair Contract Initiative argues for time-limited book contracts and updated out-of-print clauses.
[146]
Authors Guild Releases Model Book Contract to the General Public ...
Apr 15, 2021 · The Literary Translation Model Contract and Commentary represents a synthesis of current publishing practices and fair contract advocacy by the ...<|separator|>
[147]
Why We Oppose Morals Clauses in Book Contracts
Jan 24, 2019 · The Authors Guild objects to publishers' new and increasing use of so-called “morals clauses.” These contract provisions allow publishers to ...
[148]
BEA's Author Guild Moment: Fair (or Not) Contracts for Authors
Feb 16, 2025 · Rasenberger drew her issues for the panel from the Guild's Fair Contract Initiative; the Guild is leading a consortium of international ...
[149]
Authors Guild Encouraged by Penguin Random House's New AI ...
Oct 23, 2024 · The Authors Guild applauds Penguin Random House's decisive action to protect authors' intellectual property rights from unauthorized AI ...
[150]
Authors Guild Reinforces Its Position on AI Licensing
Dec 16, 2024 · The Authors Guild has issued a lengthy statement that reiterated the organization's position that it is authors who control the rights to their work.
[151]
US Publishers Association and Authors Guild Renew Support for ...
Jul 15, 2019 · The copyright tribunal called for in the CASE Act “has the power to dismiss any spurious claim and award attorneys' fees in cases of bad faith ...