Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Operation Michael

Operation Michael was a major German offensive launched on 21 March 1918 during the final year of , serving as the opening phase of the broader (known as the Kaiserschlacht) on the Western Front. Commanded by General , it targeted the British Fifth and Third Armies along a 46-mile front near Saint-Quentin, with the primary objective of breaking through Allied lines to capture the strategic rail hub of and separate British forces from their allies, thereby compelling Britain to seek an armistice. The attack involved approximately 65 German divisions—totaling around 800,000 men—and 6,600 artillery pieces, vastly outnumbering the 26 British divisions and 3,300 guns they faced, and it employed innovative infiltration tactics supported by a five-hour preliminary bombardment that included poison gas shells. The offensive's planning capitalized on Germany's temporary numerical advantage following the March 1918 , which ended hostilities with and allowed the transfer of from the Eastern Front to the west before substantial reinforcements could arrive. Ludendorff's strategy emphasized speed and surprise, with elite units bypassing strongpoints to exploit weaknesses in the lines, which had been weakened by recent transfers to counter a perceived threat elsewhere. The assault began at 4:40 a.m. on 21 March with one of the war's heaviest barrages, overwhelming British defenses and leading to rapid German advances; by the end of the first day, the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) suffered 38,500 casualties, including 21,000 prisoners—the second worst day for forces in the war. Over the next two weeks, German forces captured significant territory, including the towns of and , and advanced up to 40 miles in some sectors, seizing 1,200 square miles of ground and inflicting heavy losses on the retreating Allies. However, the offensive stalled by early April due to overextended supply lines, exhaustion among the stormtroopers, logistical challenges exacerbated by a lack of motorized transport and , and effective Allied countermeasures, including the appointment of General as on 26 March to coordinate and responses. Canadian units, such as the Canadian Cavalry Brigade and Motor Machine Gun Brigade, played supporting roles in counterattacks and reconnaissance, notably at . Ultimately, Operation Michael ended on 5 April 1918 without achieving its decisive goals, as the Germans failed to reach or fracture the Allied front, suffering approximately 240,000 casualties—many from elite units—while the Allies lost around 250,000 men across and French forces. Though it represented Germany's last major push for victory, the offensive depleted its reserves and exposed strategic vulnerabilities, paving the way for subsequent Allied counteroffensives that would lead to the war's end later that year.

Background

Strategic Developments

The signing of the on 3 March 1918 ended Russia's participation in , allowing Germany to redirect substantial forces from the Eastern Front to the Western Front. This treaty freed up approximately 50 German divisions, enabling a significant reinforcement of the Western theater where the faced mounting pressure from the . The redeployment bolstered German numerical superiority temporarily, providing the High Command with a narrow window to launch a major offensive before Allied resources could fully mobilize. German leaders Field Marshal and General recognized the strategic urgency created by the impending arrival of American troops, with American troop arrivals in France increasing to over 10,000 soldiers per week by 1918. They understood that continued U.S. reinforcements would soon tip the balance toward Allied numerical dominance, necessitating a decisive blow to fracture the Entente coalition and force a favorable peace. Ludendorff, in particular, viewed the spring of 1918 as the last opportunity for Germany to achieve victory through offensive action, given the exhaustion of domestic resources and the rapid buildup of American divisions. The broader , codenamed Kaiserschlacht, was conceived as a multi-phase operation aimed at separating the and armies by driving a wedge between them, potentially isolating the British Expeditionary Force and compelling to seek terms. formed the initial thrust of this , targeting the British sector south of to exploit perceived weaknesses and achieve a breakthrough toward the . This approach reflected the High Command's intent to capitalize on recent territorial gains and tactical innovations for a war-ending push. Allied dispositions inadvertently amplified these opportunities, as the British Fifth Army assumed an extended front of 42 miles following sector swaps with French forces in early 1918. These adjustments, agreed upon at conferences like the one at Doullens in January, stretched British lines thin, particularly creating vulnerabilities south of where defenses were incomplete and manpower shortages acute. Compounding these issues was a severe manpower shortage, leading to the reduction of rifle strength in British infantry battalions and the diversion of several divisions to other theaters, such as following the . The expansion, totaling about 50 miles of additional frontage taken over from the French, left the Fifth Army with fewer divisions to cover a broader area, heightening the of penetration in the event of a concentrated German assault.

Tactical Developments

The development of (Sturmtruppen) units represented a pivotal evolution in German during , pioneered by Captain , who assumed command of the first Assault Detachment (Sturmabteilung Rohr) in late 1915. These units emphasized small, highly mobile groups of elite soldiers equipped with light machine guns, grenades, and flame-throwers, trained to infiltrate enemy lines by bypassing fortified strongpoints and exploiting weaknesses for deep penetration into rear areas, rather than engaging in direct assaults on prepared positions. Rohr's innovations, tested in actions like the capture of Hartmannsweilerkopf in January 1916, integrated tactics, including close coordination with artillery and engineers, and by October 1916, the German High Command () mandated the formation of similar stormtroop units across all Western Front armies to standardize these methods. Building on these foundations, the Hutier tactics—named after General but developed collectively through German experiences—emerged prominently during the 1917 Battle of on the Eastern Front, where they combined short, intense artillery barrages with rapid infantry infiltration to achieve surprise and breakthrough. At , German forces employed a brief five-hour preparation fire from 615 guns and 544 mortars over a 9-kilometer front, followed by stormtrooper-led advances that penetrated and enveloped positions without prolonged bombardments that could alert the enemy or exhaust resources. These tactics avoided the attrition of extended shelling seen in earlier offensives like the , instead prioritizing neutralization of enemy artillery and command structures through infiltration, with follow-up waves securing gains; this doctrinal shift, formalized in the January 1918 manual The Attack in Position Warfare, directly informed the tactical framework for Operation Michael. For Operation Michael, German preparations included a massive buildup of 6,608 guns and howitzers—representing a 2.5:1 superiority over —massed along a 64-kilometer front, with approximately 70 percent consisting of heavy pieces for counter-battery and deep-target fires. The bombardment on 21 March 1918 lasted just five hours, firing over 3.2 million shells, one-third of which were gas-filled, including to contaminate rear areas and disrupt Allied reinforcements without revealing the assault's scale through preliminary registration. This employed creeping barrages (Feuerwalze) synchronized with advances, using Colonel Georg Bruchmüller's methods for surprise, such as sound-ranging and predicted fire via the Pulkowski method, to maintain momentum and suppress defenses effectively. Logistical innovations addressed vulnerabilities exposed in prior offensives, such as supply failures during the 1916 campaign, by establishing forward supply dumps within hundreds of meters of the front line under strict secrecy and deploying light railways to rapidly transport and for the 56 assault divisions. These narrow-gauge railways, supplemented by horse-drawn wagons, enabled the movement of heavy pieces close to the line despite challenges, ensuring sustained for the anticipated deep penetrations and mitigating the risks of overextension. Training for these tactics intensified during the winter of 1917–1918 at specialized assault schools in rear areas, where divisions conducted live-fire rehearsals on mock trench systems to hone squad-level initiative, weapon handling, and coordination with creeping barrages. Emphasis was placed on proficiency with flame-throwers for clearing bunkers, grenades for , and light machine guns for , transforming ordinary into versatile stormtroopers capable of independent action in fluid battles.

Prelude

German Plan of Attack

Operation Michael, the opening phase of the , aimed to shatter the British Fifth Army by launching a massive along an 80-kilometer (50-mile) front from to La Fère, with the primary objective of capturing the key rail hub at and advancing northwest to the , thereby isolating the British Expeditionary Force from its French allies and supply lines. This strategic thrust was designed to exploit the temporary numerical superiority gained from the , forcing to the negotiating table and potentially compelling to seek an armistice. Overall command rested with General as Chief of the , who coordinated the operation across two army groups: one under Crown Prince Rupprecht of encompassing the 17th Army (General ) and 2nd Army (General ), and another under Wilhelm including the 18th Army (General ). The 17th and 2nd Armies were tasked with the northern sector to fix forces near , while the 18th Army led the main southern thrust toward the crossings, leveraging Hutier's expertise in to bypass strongpoints. The plan unfolded in phases, beginning with an initial penetration of up to 8 kilometers on the first day to seize forward positions and disrupt British command, followed by exploitation beyond the Somme toward Amiens, approximately 50-60 kilometers total depth, for resupply and consolidation. Exploitation forces would then push toward Hazebrouck to sever British communications, with a contingency for a northward pivot along the Lys River if resistance along the primary axis proved too stiff, allowing flexibility to envelop the British left flank. This blueprint emphasized speed and depth over broad frontal assaults, integrating specialized stormtrooper units for rapid breakthroughs. To achieve surprise, German planners enforced strict secrecy measures, including nighttime troop concentrations, radio silence to avoid interception, and deceptive maneuvers such as simulated attacks toward in the north and diversions in the Argonne and sectors to draw Allied reserves away from the . Meteorological forecasts were critical, with the operation timed for 21 March 1918 under anticipated fog and low cloud cover to conceal the five-hour preparatory barrage of over 3.2 million shells and hinder Allied aerial observation. Air support was integral, with the German allocating 326 for , close ground attack, and bombing missions to secure local air superiority and British rear areas. Planners prioritized the fog-shrouded launch to limit initial Allied air response, enabling unhindered low-level operations by ground-attack squadrons once the weather cleared, though endurance limitations later constrained deeper exploitation.

Allied Defensive Preparations

The British Fifth Army, commanded by General Sir Hubert Gough, faced significant challenges in defending a front extending approximately 42 miles from the Somme River south to the Oise, a sector that had been extended in early 1918 to relieve French forces and incorporate poorly maintained trench lines inherited from them. Due to acute manpower shortages in the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), which had reduced infantry battalions per division from 12 to 9 by March 1918, the Fifth Army deployed only 14 divisions across its zone, many of them understrength and reliant on a thin forward posture with limited reserves positioned up to 10 miles to the rear. This overextension left the army vulnerable, as the defensive layout emphasized holding the line with static positions rather than mobile counterattacks, exacerbating the strain on exhausted troops. The BEF's defensive doctrine called for a three-zone system: a forward zone of outposts and patrols for early warning, a main battle zone with strongpoints and redoubts for absorbing attacks, and a rear zone for counterattacks and fallback positions. However, implementation was incomplete along the Fifth Army's front, particularly in the southern sectors where engineering resources were scarce and the terrain—marked by old French trenches in disrepair—hindered construction of interconnected lines and switch trenches. Outposts in the forward zone were often manned by small, understrength units lacking depth, while the battle zone suffered from insufficient machine-gun posts and wire entanglements, reflecting broader logistical constraints and the recent reorganization to address manpower deficits. Training emphasized trench-holding tactics suited to previous static warfare, but this approach proved ill-adapted to anticipated breakthroughs, contributing to low morale among troops who had endured prolonged rotations without adequate rest. Intelligence efforts revealed signs of a major German offensive, including reports of troop concentrations and supply buildups near St. Quentin, as well as warnings from German deserters who described massive artillery preparations and assault plans just days before the attack. Despite these indicators, British high command dismissed much of the evidence, overreliant on assumptions of continued trench stalemate and underestimating the scale of German innovations in observed in prior operations like Caporetto. Captured German documents and interrogations further corroborated the buildup, yet these were not acted upon decisively, partly due to competing predictions of attacks elsewhere, such as at , leading to dispersed reserves. French support for the Fifth Army was limited to coordination on the extreme right flank, where the British XIX Corps adjoined French positions near Roye, but no substantial reinforcements were pre-positioned, with plans calling for intervention only if the British line showed signs of collapse. This cautious approach stemmed from priorities in maintaining their own reserves amid ongoing recovery from 1917 mutinies, leaving the Fifth Army to bear the initial brunt without immediate Allied integration under the newly appointed General Foch. Overall, these preparations highlighted systemic vulnerabilities in manpower, fortifications, and anticipation, setting the stage for the rapid German advances that followed.

Opposing Forces

The German forces assembled for Operation Michael included 65 divisions totaling approximately 800,000 men, organized under the Seventeenth Army (commanded by ), the Second Army (under ), and the Eighteenth Army (under ). These comprised elite formations such as and divisions, specially trained in infiltration and tactics to spearhead the assault. The Germans enjoyed overwhelming superiority, deploying over 6,600 guns and more than 3.2 million shells for the opening bombardment alone, enabling a five-hour barrage that devastated Allied positions. In terms of armored support, the Germans committed a limited number of their domestically produced heavy tanks—only about 10 operational vehicles—supplemented by a handful of captured British Mark IV tanks repurposed for assault detachments. Aerial forces provided further dominance, with 326 fighter aircraft allocated to achieve local air superiority over the battlefield. Reserves were substantial, with an additional 50 divisions available from recent transfers from the Eastern Front following the , allowing for sustained pressure. Logistically, prior withdrawals to the had shortened supply lines, facilitating the rapid buildup of men and materiel near the front. Opposing the Germans were primarily British forces from the Fifth Army under General , comprising 14 divisions with roughly 150,000 men, flanked by elements of the Third Army under General Julian Byng, including the III Corps. French detachments reinforced the line in the southern sector. Allied armored assets numbered over 100 tanks, mostly British Mark IV and Mark V models, though mechanical reliability limited their immediate impact. In the air, the Allies fielded approximately 300 in the operational area, facing German numerical and qualitative superiority that hampered reconnaissance and close support. British reserves, totaling around 30 divisions under General Haig's command, were hampered by delays, leaving only about 6 divisions immediately available for counter-moves in the first days. Allied supply lines were extended across a thinly held 50-mile front, exacerbating vulnerabilities in the quiet sector targeted by the offensive.
AspectGerman ForcesAllied Forces
Divisions (Initial)65 (Seventeenth, Second, Eighteenth Armies)25 (Fifth and Third Armies, plus detachments)
Personnel~800,000 men~180,000 men ( primary)
6,600+ guns; 3.2 million shells~2,600 guns
~10-20 (A7Vs and captured Mark IVs)100+ (primarily Mark IV/V)
326 fighters~300 (mixed types)
Reserves50 additional divisions30 total, but only 6 immediately deployable
Shortened lines post-Hindenburg withdrawalExtended fronts; rail delays

Battle

Breakthrough at St. Quentin (21–23 March)

Operation Michael commenced at 4:40 a.m. on 21 March 1918 with an intense barrage from over 6,000 German guns, unleashing more than 1 million shells across a 50-mile front in just five hours. This was followed by an at 9:40 a.m., led by elite units employing to bypass strongpoints and exploit weaknesses in the Allied lines. Dense fog, reducing visibility to less than 50 yards, shrouded the battlefield, neutralizing and air while enabling the Germans to achieve complete surprise against the exposed divisions and adjacent outposts in the forward zone. By evening, the stormtroopers had overrun the forward defenses, capturing 21,000 and prisoners and advancing up to 4 miles in some sectors, marking the initial penetration of General Hubert Gough's Fifth Army lines near St. Quentin. On 22 March, the German advance continued under the cover of lingering mist, with General Oskar von Hutier's Eighteenth Army in the south pushing forward 4 to 5 miles and breaching the Omignon and Tortille rivers after swift assaults on weakened British positions. The British 36th (Ulster) Division mounted fierce resistance around the Tortille but became isolated as flanking units were enveloped, forcing a fighting withdrawal while maintaining cohesion amid the chaos. Hutier's forces reached the Crozat Canal by evening and pressed toward the Somme, exploiting gaps in the British defenses where reserves were thinly spread. The fog persisted into the afternoon, further hampering Allied counter-battery fire and allowing German stormtroopers to disrupt communications and isolate artillery batteries. Gough's Fifth Army, facing overwhelming pressure on its right flank, began consolidating on the battle zone but suffered significant losses in men and materiel as the German salient deepened. By 23 March, St. Quentin had fallen to the Germans following concentrated attacks that overwhelmed the remaining defenders, with Hutier's Eighteenth Army gaining another 6 miles and forcing multiple crossings of the Somme River at points like Ham and Pithon. Key fighting erupted at Holnon Wood, where British troops east of the position conducted rearguard actions before withdrawing under heavy assault, preventing an immediate encirclement but exposing the Fifth Army's right to further exploitation. The persistent poor weather continued to deny the Allies effective artillery support and aerial observation, compounding the disarray as German forces consolidated their bridgeheads over the Somme. In response, Gough ordered a general retreat to the Green Line—the third and final defensive position—resulting in the loss of approximately 50 square miles of territory and the near-collapse of the Fifth Army's southern sector. This breakthrough at St. Quentin represented the offensive's most decisive early success, shattering the Allied front and setting the stage for deeper penetrations.

Somme Crossings and Bapaume Advance (24–25 March)

On 24 March, elements of the German Second Army, commanded by General Georg von der Marwitz, forced crossings of the Somme River at Cléry and Hamel, exploiting the breach achieved in prior defensive zones during the initial assault at St. Quentin. Despite determined British counterattacks by the 66th Division near Cléry and the 14th Division at Hamel, the Germans secured bridgeheads and advanced roughly 4 miles westward, capturing 15,000 British prisoners and over 100 guns in the sector south of Péronne. In response, the British Fifth Army, under General Hubert Gough, conducted a fighting withdrawal to the line of the Ancre River to avoid encirclement, while initial French reinforcements began arriving in a piecemeal fashion to shore up the southern flank. By 25 March, the German advance continued toward as part of the First Battle of Bapaume, with assault troops reaching the town's outskirts amid heavy street fighting against units of the British Third Army, including the Division. The Third Army maintained its positions in the salient to the north, blunting the momentum of the central thrust. Morning fog initially hampered operations, but as it lifted later in the day, the Royal Flying Corps conducted limited low-level interdiction sorties, machine-gunning German columns and dropping bombs on advancing infantry. Emerging logistical challenges further impeded the German exploitation phase, as supply columns struggled through mud-churned terrain from recent rains, stretching lines over 30 miles from starting positions and delaying resupply efforts. The few deployed heavy tanks of the were particularly affected, their 33-ton frames bogging down in the soft ground and mechanical unreliability exacerbating mobility issues during the push. These strains, combined with resistance in Bapaume's streets, temporarily halted the advance by nightfall.

Battles of Rosières and Arras (26–29 March)

On 26 March 1918, as part of , the Eighteenth Army under General launched a renewed assault against the southern flank of the Fifth Army near Rosières-en-Santerre, aiming to break through toward and sever Allied supply lines. The attack targeted the battered XIX Corps, which had been conducting a fighting withdrawal since the crossings two days earlier, with waves advancing under cover of artillery fire to exploit the disorganized Allied positions. Despite initial successes that allowed the Germans to capture the village of Rosières, the defended key positions with machine-gun fire and supporting artillery, forming temporary salients that halted the momentum. French reinforcements arriving under the newly unified command of General helped stabilize the line, while elements of the , newly deployed to the sector, repelled probing attacks near , preventing a deeper penetration. The fighting at Rosières intensified on 27 March, with German forces pressing the XIX Corps in an attempt to roll up the flank and advance within striking distance of . The 18th , supported by remnants of the 61st , launched a determined led by E.P. Riddell, recapturing lost ground and inflicting significant casualties on the advancing Germans. This action, conducted amid chaotic conditions following the rapid German advances of prior days, succeeded in halting the enemy approximately three miles short of , though the line formed an exposed that necessitated a tactical to more defensible positions. Clearing weather during these engagements enabled Allied to achieve superiority, as improved visibility allowed for more accurate fire and limited the effectiveness of German . Concurrently, from 28 to 29 March, the Third Battle of unfolded as a diversionary effort under , where Crown Prince Rupprecht's Sixth Army—comprising elements of the Seventeenth Army—assaulted the British Third Army on a 33-mile front north of the . Following a preparatory , 29 German divisions advanced toward , seeking to encircle the city and cut off Allied forces, but encountered fortified British positions held by General Julian Byng's Third Army, including , , and Canadian units. The Germans achieved limited gains of about four miles in some sectors, such as near Monchy-le-Preux, but suffered heavy losses from intense rifle, machine-gun, and artillery fire, exacerbated by the absence of the morning fog that had aided earlier assaults. German units, exhausted after nine days of continuous offensive operations since 21 March, struggled to maintain cohesion, while premature commitment of reserves to the sector—intended as a —diluted the main effort toward and allowed Allied forces to consolidate. By 30 March, the line had stabilized, with British counterpressure preventing further advances, and German attempts to pivot southward toward faltered amid mounting logistical challenges and Allied reinforcements. These battles marked a turning point in Operation Michael, where initial German momentum began to dissipate against increasingly coordinated Allied defenses.

Final Engagements at Avre and Ancre (4–5 April)

On 4 April 1918, the German Eighteenth Army, under General , renewed its assault along the Avre River as part of the final push in Operation Michael, targeting the defenses east of near . Fifteen German divisions, including the 228th Division, 9th Bavarian Reserve Division, and Guards Ersatz Division, attacked positions held by seven Allied divisions, such as the British 18th Division and elements of the Australian Corps. The Germans briefly captured during intense fighting, marking the first simultaneous deployment of tanks by both sides, with British Mark IV tanks supporting the defenders against German models. However, the town was ejected by a night counter-attack from the exhausted British 54th Brigade, reinforced by Australian units from the 35th Battalion and French First Army divisions rushed to the sector under the newly appointed , . Allied coordination proved decisive, as Foch's assumption of overall command on 3 enabled rapid reinforcement, including troops from the First Army, which stabilized the line and prevented a breakthrough toward . The German advance faltered due to overextended supply lines and terrain obstacles like streams and villages, which slowed their units despite initial gains of several kilometers. By nightfall, the assault had lost momentum, with the salient protruding 40 miles into Allied territory but lacking the depth for strategic . On 5 April, the Battle of the Ancre saw limited probes by the Second Army against lines north of , attempting to exploit weaknesses in the Third Army's sector amid worsening weather. Heavy rain turned the ground into mud, restricting movement and artillery support, while defenses, bolstered by reserves, repelled the attacks with minimal ground conceded—typically only a few hundred meters in isolated areas. troops showed signs of fatigue, resorting to looting abandoned villages for and , which further eroded and combat effectiveness. These engagements signaled the culmination of Operation Michael, as General halted the offensive on 5 April due to logistical exhaustion, including shortages of and , and the inability to sustain further advances across the elongated . With the failure to capture —a near-miss from earlier phases—the Germans shifted focus to the Lys sector for Operation Georgette, leaving the Avre and Ancre lines as the offensive's ineffective close.

Aftermath

Operational Analysis

Operation Michael achieved significant tactical successes in its initial phases, marking the deepest penetration by German forces on the Western Front since 1914, with advances reaching up to 40 miles over two weeks and capturing approximately 1,200 square miles of territory. The offensive shattered British morale through rapid breakthroughs that caused massive dislocation within the British Expeditionary Force, while capturing around 90,000 Allied prisoners and 1,300 guns, which temporarily disrupted Allied supply lines and command structures. These gains were facilitated by innovative stormtrooper tactics that bypassed strongpoints and exploited weak sectors in the British Fifth Army defenses. Despite these tactical victories, the operation stalled short of its strategic goals due to overambitious objectives that disregarded logistical constraints, leading to an inability to fully exploit breakthroughs as advancing troops outpaced supply lines reliant on horse-drawn wagons and limited motorized transport. Daily advances of several miles exhausted reserves, with resupply and ammunition delivery lagging behind, forcing units to halt before reaching key objectives like . Command errors further undermined the offensive, as Erich Ludendorff's resulted in frequent shifts of the main effort, including a diversion to on 28 March that diluted the focus on and fragmented German forces across diverging axes. This lack of concentration prevented the convergence of armies on critical junctions, squandering the momentum gained from initial penetrations and allowing Allied forces to regroup. Allied adaptations played a crucial role in halting the advance, with Ferdinand Foch's appointment as on 26 March enabling rapid reinforcement of British lines by French troops, who employed defensive depth and localized counterattacks to restore cohesion and block further German exploitation. These measures, combined with the Third Army's stubborn resistance at , prevented the collapse of the Allied front despite the initial shock. Environmental factors influenced the operation's trajectory, as thick fog on 21 March concealed German stormtrooper movements and aided surprise, but subsequent March rains turned the terrain into mud, immobilizing artillery and hindering supply wagons across the devastated landscape. The choice of drier over waterlogged mitigated some issues initially, yet the worsening conditions ultimately exacerbated logistical strains and contributed to the offensive's exhaustion.

Casualties and Losses

The German Army suffered approximately 239,800 casualties during Operation Michael, including around 50,000 killed, representing a significant toll on its offensive capabilities. This figure encompassed heavy losses among elite stormtrooper units, which experienced severe depletion through high attrition rates, undermining their role in subsequent assaults. Allied forces incurred substantial human and material losses in defending against the offensive. The Expeditionary Force recorded 177,739 , comprising about 22,000 killed and 75,000 prisoners of , while forces suffered 77,000 overall. In total, the Allies lost around 90,000 prisoners and 1,300 guns, with losses exceeding 200 vehicles due to the intensity of the fighting.
SideCasualtiesKey Breakdown
German239,800~50,000 killed; severe stormtrooper depletion (high attrition);
British177,739~22,000 killed; 75,000 POWs; 200+ tanks lost
French77,000Included in total Allied POWs of 90,000
Allied Total254,73990,000 POWs; 1,300 guns lost
Despite these costs, the Germans achieved notable territorial gains, advancing up to 40 miles and creating a salient approximately 50 miles wide, though the Hindenburg Line remained intact and undefended in the rear. The offensive involved firing over 1 million shells in its initial phases, contributing to German exhaustion and the draining of reserves needed for future operations, while their limited A7V tank fleet—only 20 operational vehicles—proved unreliable in combat.

Strategic Impact

Operation Michael's initial successes created immediate pressure on the Allied high commands, accelerating efforts toward unified leadership. On 26 March 1918, during the Doullens Conference, British Field Marshal Douglas Haig agreed to the appointment of French Marshal as in exchange for French reinforcements, formally integrating British and French operations under a single authority for the first time. This step built on the existing , established in late 1917, but the offensive's scale necessitated Foch's expanded role to coordinate defenses across the Western Front. Furthermore, the crisis hastened the integration of into Allied lines, drawing U.S. divisions into combat earlier than planned and committing over a million troops by mid-1918 to bolster the faltering sectors. Despite tactical gains, Operation Michael represented a strategic setback for Germany, as it failed to isolate the British Expeditionary Force or seize key Channel ports, thereby shifting the war's momentum to the Allies. The offensive depleted elite stormtrooper units and exhausted reserves, leaving German forces overextended and unable to sustain further major pushes; this weakness undermined subsequent operations like Georgette on the Lys River in April and Blücher on the Chemin des Dames in May, both of which stalled due to insufficient follow-through strength. Ludendorff's decision to redirect efforts after halting Michael on 5 April further fragmented German strategy, preventing a decisive blow against Britain. The long-term repercussions of Operation Michael extended into the Allied counteroffensives, rendering the advanced German salient vulnerable to exploitation. During the , launched in August 1918, Allied forces recaptured the territory gained in March, including the critical rail hub, which had remained operational despite German objectives to disrupt it. This reversal not only restored Allied positions but also boosted morale following the initial shock of the retreat, reinforcing confidence in Foch's coordinated command. Recent historiographical analyses, particularly post-2020 studies, underscore Ludendorff's overestimation of logistical sustainability in planning as a key factor in Germany's broader defeat. These works highlight how inadequate supply lines and transportation failed to support the rapid advances, exacerbating resource shortages and contributing to the exhaustion that preceded the Allied victories later in 1918.

References

  1. [1]
    Operation Michael: How Imperial Germany tried to win World War ...
    Mar 21, 2023 · Operation Michael was the first phase of the Spring Offensive. Its target was British and Commonwealth positions along the Somme.
  2. [2]
    Operation Michael - The Tank Museum
    Mar 16, 2022 · Michael was a hammer blow that by its end had forced the Allies to retreat up to 40 miles. It caused massive dislocation and disruption within the British Army.Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  3. [3]
    Operation Michael | Canada's FWW Battles - The Vimy Foundation
    The first phase, Operation Michael, involved thousands of troops, artillery, and poison gas, and the Germans quickly advanced deep into the British lines, ...
  4. [4]
    The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk: How Russia Left World War I
    Mar 7, 2025 · The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk allowed Germany to transfer fifty divisions from the Eastern Front to the Western Front in France. Instead of ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    German Spring Offensives 1918
    May 24, 2016 · The Spring Offensives of 1918 were Germany's last attempt to defeat the British and French armies on the Western Front, and thereby win total victory.
  6. [6]
    End of the War - JohnDClare.net
    America: America's entry into the war would overwhelm Germany's limited resources; by Spring 1918 10,000 American troops a week were arriving in France; there ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The Marne, 15 July–6 August 1918
    Even though roughly 200,000 American soldiers were already in France in March 1918, Ludendorff and the OHL doubted that the novice American divisions could ...
  8. [8]
    The Great War 1918 - The Wonderful Year - GlobalSecurity.org
    The German spring offensive, which began on 21 March 1918, created the biggest crisis of the war for the Allies. General Erich Ludendorff was the driving force ...
  9. [9]
    British defence in depth 1918 - The Western Front - Great War Forum
    Mar 10, 2011 · Third Army occupied 28 miles of front with fourteen Divisions. Fifth Army occupied 42 miles of front with twelve infantry Divisions and 3 ...Missing: swaps | Show results with:swaps
  10. [10]
    David Lloyd George commits to an extension of the British line in ...
    British Prime Minister David Lloyd George first agreed in principle to extend the length of line occupied by the British Army in France at the Anglo-French ...Missing: swaps WWI vulnerabilities Arras
  11. [11]
    The British Army's manpower crisis of 1918
    The overstretched British Army in France came close to defeat in March and April 1918. A shortage of manpower, when 100s of 1000s of men were being held at ...Missing: 42 sector swaps vulnerabilities south
  12. [12]
    [PDF] German Tactics in the Michael Offensive March 1918 - DTIC
    The study covers the development of new German infantry tactics during limited offensive operations and conduct of the "elastic defense" on the western front It ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] The Hutier Legend - DTIC
    "Hutier Tactics" as a German secret weapon that nearly won the war in Ludendorff's spring offensive of 1918. What were the Hutier tactics and their origins ...
  14. [14]
    Germany's 1918 Spring Offensive - History on the Net
    They were opposed by the German 17th Army under Otto von Below, the 2nd Army under Georg van der Marwitz, and the 18th Army under Oscar von Hutier. The ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] The Royal Flying Corps During Operation MICHAEL
    this sounds, the 579 British aircraft were outnumbered by the German Air Service, which had ... air support was embedded in the RFC's doctrine of early 1918.
  16. [16]
    Reduced and Reconstituted British Divisions, 1918
    The reconstruction of nine BEF divisions was a component in a ways and means strategy devised to address the problem of British manpower shortages. The ...
  17. [17]
    WWI's Massive German Spring Offensive of 1918
    These developments freed up numerous German divisions that were sent west, swelling German troop strengths on the Western Front to 192 divisions totaling 3.5 ...
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
    How The Deadlock On The Western Front Was Finally Broken
    The British were beginning to suffer manpower shortages by early 1918, having increasingly taken over from the French in 1917. Even the German Army was ...
  20. [20]
    Hope is Not a Strategy: Germany's Last Best Shot at Victory
    Feb 6, 2017 · On January 21, 1918, the German leadership met again, and Ludendorff chose the option called Operation Michael, a massive attack against the ...Missing: primary sources
  21. [21]
    The First Battles of the Somme, 1918
    The German Army commits to a series of large-scale offensives. The first, Operation Michael, strikes the British Fifth and Third Armies.German Tactics · British In State Of Flux · British Order Of Battle
  22. [22]
    Action Debut of the First World War German A7V Tank
    Mar 20, 2018 · Although it was seen as part of the massive German offensive code-named MICHAEL it was only a small one, five A7V tanks (plus five captured ...
  23. [23]
    The German Spring Offensive March 1918
    Altogether 74 German divisions, 6,600 guns, 3,500 trench mortars and 326 fighter aircraft were deployed against 26 British divisions, subsequently reinforced ...Missing: support | Show results with:support
  24. [24]
    German Spring Offensive 1918 - National Records of Scotland (NRS)
    May 15, 2025 · Moreover, the Fifth Army had only recently taken over its sector and had little time to build adequate defences in depth. On 22 March 1918 the ...Missing: swaps vulnerabilities Arras
  25. [25]
    1918: Year of victory | National Army Museum
    Spring Offensive. On 21 March 1918, the Germans launched Operation Michael. Around 10,000 guns fired over a million shells in five hours against General Byng's ...
  26. [26]
    Portuguese Expeditionary Corps - 1914-1918 Online
    Jan 11, 2019 · The Portuguese Expeditionary Corps was the most important Portuguese military contribution to the First World War.Missing: Michael Richebourg
  27. [27]
    Sir Douglas Haig's sixth Despatch (German spring offensives, 1918)
    The dispatch covers winter operations, the March 21, 1918 attack (Operation Michael), the Battles of the Lys (Operation Georgette), and the Battle of Villers- ...
  28. [28]
    Voices of the First World War: The German Spring Offensive
    The German Spring Offensive, known as Kaiserschlacht, began with a massive bombardment on March 21, 1918, and a fog helped the Germans surprise the British.Missing: multi- separate
  29. [29]
    9 facts about Operation Michael
    Mar 19, 2020 · It was the first German offensive against the British Army in France and Belgium since 1915. When the offensive began at 4.40am on 21 March 1918 ...
  30. [30]
    German forces cross the Somme River | March 24, 1918 - History.com
    On March 24, 1918, German forces cross the Somme River, achieving their first goal of the major spring offensive begun three days earlier on the Western Front.Missing: mustard gas deployment
  31. [31]
    Battles in History – 1st Bapaume – March 25th 1918
    Mar 25, 2019 · ... first stage of which was codenamed, Operation Michael. The artillery bombardment began at 0435 on March 21st to the depth of 2.5 to 4 miles ...
  32. [32]
    Operation Michael, The Thirty Worst and an Advanced Dressing ...
    On 21 March, the Germans launched a massive attack with the aim of knocking the British out of the war.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] OPERATION MICHAEL - BOOKLET
    Mar 27, 2025 · Opera2on Michael was a major German military offensive during the First World War that began the Spring. Offensive on 21 March 1918.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Operation Michael: The German Spring Offensives of 1918 - MHHV
    Apr 14, 2018 · Logistical bottlenecks caused by the shortage of horses and the lack of motorised transport made it difficult to move up artillery and supplies.<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Michael Offensive - Brill Reference Works
    ... Army was placed under the German Crown Prince's Army Group. Hutier's army was far too strong a force for their actual mission of protecting the left flank ...
  36. [36]
    The Importance of the Operational Level: The Ludendorff Offensives ...
    Oct 28, 2019 · This article will provide the strategic context before presenting the objectives of the German campaign, its execution, and an analysis followed by a ...
  37. [37]
    The Kaiser's Last Battle - HistoryNet
    Mar 25, 2019 · IN MARCH 21, 1918, WIND AND RAIN RAKED ACROSS THE DESOLATE ... Operation Michael, however, was just one part of a larger plan that ...
  38. [38]
    World War I: Operation Michael - ThoughtCo
    Mar 2, 2018 · On March 30, Ludendorff ordered the last major assaults of the offensive with General Oskar von Hutier's 18th Army attacking the French along ...
  39. [39]
    Operation Michael – How Germany Tried To Win WWI - Forces News
    Mar 21, 2017 · ... British-held territory, causing 178,000 British and 77,000 French casualties (including prisoners) in the process. It kept going until ...Missing: visibility Portuguese
  40. [40]
    1918: Endgame (Chapter 6) - The Cambridge History of the First ...
    Worrying for the Allies was the loss of 1,300 guns and the fact that 75,000 British and 15,000 French soldiers had been taken prisoner. The German army had ...
  41. [41]
    5th Apr 1918: Ludendorff calls off Operation Michael
    Apr 5, 2018 · During Operation Michael the Allies lost nearly 255,000 men, 1,300 artillery pieces and 200 tanks, but all of this could be replaced ...Missing: casualties | Show results with:casualties<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    WWI Sturmpanzerwagen A7V - Mike's Research
    Mar 30, 2025 · ... captured British Mark IV tanks than A7V tanks. After the first British tanks appeared on the Western Front, in September 1916, the German ...
  43. [43]
    The Supreme War Council and Marshal Foch, 1917-1919 - DTIC
    Foch halted the German offensive, and the Supreme War council focused on prioritizing and coordinating resources needed by the operational artists to regain the ...Missing: Michael hastened unity<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Birth of an Army: Spring 1918 - World War I Centennial site
    In the spring of 1918, American forces were drawn into combat earlier than expected, in response to a series of major German offensives.