Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Operation Mars

Operation Mars was a major Soviet offensive operation on the Eastern Front of , launched from 25 November to 20 December 1942 against the German Rzhev salient northwest of . Coordinated by Marshal and executed by the Kalinin Front under General and the Western Front under General , it sought to encircle and annihilate the German 9th Army, liquidate the Rzhev-Vyazma salient, and thereby secure the Moscow region while diverting German reserves from the Stalingrad sector during the concurrent . The Soviet forces committed to the operation totaled approximately 703,000 personnel supported by 1,720 tanks and significant artillery, outnumbering the defending German 9th Army of about 350,000 men with 1,615 tanks under the command of Field Marshal within Army Group Center led by Field Marshal . Initial assaults achieved limited penetrations along the Vazuza, Luchesa, and Osuga Rivers, but these stalled amid determined German counterattacks, severe weather, supply shortages, and the marshy terrain, preventing any breakthrough or . The operation ultimately failed to achieve its objectives, with the Germans retaining control of the salient until their voluntary withdrawal in the following March. Soviet casualties were catastrophic, estimated at 100,000 killed and 235,000 wounded alongside the loss of over 1,600 tanks, while German losses amounted to roughly 40,000 men. Historian has argued that Mars represented the Red Army's principal winter offensive of 1942–1943—intended to collapse the entire German Army Group Center and advance toward and beyond—rather than a mere for Stalingrad, rendering its collapse one of Zhukov's most profound strategic defeats and a episode long suppressed in Soviet narratives due to its scale of loss and embarrassment.

Background

Strategic Context

After the German Army's failure to capture during Operation Typhoon in late 1941, the Eastern Front entered a period of stalemate in early 1942, with Axis forces halted approximately 100-250 kilometers west of the Soviet capital following the Red Army's winter counteroffensive. This equilibrium persisted as both sides rebuilt strength, but the Germans retained offensive momentum, launching Operation Blau in June 1942 to seize the Caucasus oil fields and advance to the River, leading to the protracted and grueling from August through November. A persistent threat to was the Rzhev-Vyazma salient, a roughly 150-by-150-kilometer bulge in German lines held primarily by the Ninth Army of Army Group Center, which protruded eastward and forced the Soviets to commit substantial forces—over a million troops—to defend the capital's western approaches. This fortified position, anchored by cities like , Sychevka, and Belyi and protected by natural barriers such as rivers and dense forests, not only endangered but also diverted critical Soviet resources from other fronts, exacerbating the strain amid ongoing German pressure in the south. To break this impasse, Soviet leader and the (Supreme High Command) resolved in mid-1942 to conduct simultaneous major offensives: one to collapse the Rzhev salient and eliminate Army Group Center's threat to , and another to encircle German forces at Stalingrad, thereby regaining the strategic initiative across the front and preventing enemy reinforcements from shifting between sectors. These operations, codenamed Mars and Uranus respectively, reflected the 's emphasis on multi-axis attacks to exploit German overextension, with Mars prioritized as the main effort due to its potential to unhinge the entire central front. Key developments unfolded from July to November 1942: In July, the began massing reserves, including fresh formations from the , to support the planned thrusts. On September 26, directed the and Kalinin Fronts to prepare an offensive against while the readied its counterblow. By October 28, detailed planning for Mars was complete, though poor weather postponed its start from early November to November 25; concurrently, launched on November 19, achieving a rapid of the German Sixth Army and shifting the broader strategic balance.

Preceding Operations

The Rzhev–Sychevka Offensive, conducted from 30 July to late September 1942 by the Soviet Western Front under General Georgy Zhukov as a continuation of earlier 1942 efforts to collapse the salient, sought to encircle and destroy elements of the German 9th Army through coordinated assaults. Key forces included the 30th Army, which spearheaded attacks toward Sychevka from the south, supported by the 29th Army and 20th Army in flanking maneuvers, with over 500,000 troops and more than 1,000 tanks committed to the effort. Initial advances penetrated German defenses up to 10 kilometers in places, with renewed assaults in September along the Vazuza River and toward the Rzhev-Sychevka highway achieving limited tactical successes such as small bridgeheads, but the offensive stalled amid fierce counterattacks by German reserves, including the 6th Panzer Division, resulting in heavy Soviet casualties estimated at around 290,000 killed or wounded. These preceding operations collectively failed to dislodge the 9th Army from the salient due to persistent logistical strains, including inadequate supply lines exacerbated by muddy terrain, harsh weather that immobilized and vehicles, and the rapid deployment of reinforcements that restored defensive lines. Soviet commanders noted these shortcomings, which informed adjustments in and tactics for subsequent efforts, though the cumulative weakened Western Front units significantly.

Soviet Planning

Objectives and Strategy

Operation Mars, launched by the Soviet and Kalinin Fronts in late , had as its primary objective the encirclement and destruction of the German 9th Army entrenched in the salient, thereby eliminating the ongoing threat to and freeing up Soviet forces for other sectors of the front. This aimed to collapse the salient's defenses and secure the Moscow-Velikie Luki railroad, which had been a persistent logistical challenge following the unsuccessful preceding operations in the region. Secondary goals included linking up the two fronts to achieve a double envelopment of German forces and diverting enemy reserves northward to support the concurrent at Stalingrad, preventing reinforcements from reaching the southern theater. By pinning down approximately 30 German divisions in the Rzhev-Sychyovka-Olenino-Belyi area, the operation sought to fragment defenses through multiple coordinated thrusts, creating opportunities for deeper exploitation. Marshal served as the overall coordinator for the and Kalinin Fronts, directing the offensive's planning and execution to ensure synchronized assaults on the salient's flanks. The strategy emphasized attacks from the north by the Kalinin Front's 39th Army across the Molodoi Tud River toward Olenino, and from the south by the Front's 20th, 29th, and 31st Armies along the Osuga and Vazuza Rivers northeast of Sychevka. The operation was originally scheduled to begin on 28 October 1942 but was postponed until 25 November due to weather and coordination with , with plans for deep penetrations to capture and advance toward by early December.

Forces and Preparation

The Soviet forces committed to Operation Mars totaled approximately 703,000 personnel, organized under the Western Front, commanded by Ivan S. Konev, and the Kalinin Front, led by Maksim A. Purkayev, with Marshal Georgy K. Zhukov providing overall coordination. The Western Front formed the main effort against the Rzhev salient's southern and eastern flanks, supported by approximately 1,720 s and over 13,500 artillery pieces and mortars across both fronts. The Kalinin Front focused on the northern sector to support envelopment maneuvers. Key exploitation units included the 1st Guards Cavalry Corps, designed for rapid advances following breakthroughs, alongside multiple tank and mechanized corps such as the 1st and 3rd Mechanized Corps and the 5th and 6th Tank Corps. Facing them was the German 9th Army, part of Army Group Center under Günther von , commanded by General and comprising about 350,000 troops entrenched in the salient. This force included battle-hardened infantry divisions like the 102nd Infantry Division, supported by armored reserves such as the 5th Panzer Division in the primary breakthrough zone, with additional mobile formations including the 1st and 9th Panzer Divisions, Grossdeutschland Division, and 14th Motorized Division held in reserve. Defenses featured a network of fortified positions, including minefields, anti-tank ditches, and strongpoints in villages, representing early precursors to the more extensive Panther-Wotan line constructed later in the war. These layered obstacles exploited the terrain's forests, swamps, and rivers to channel Soviet assaults into kill zones. Soviet preparations emphasized logistical buildup during the autumn rasputitsa, the seasonal mud period from October to early November 1942, which turned roads into quagmires but aided in concealing concentrations of men and materiel near the front lines. Supplies were stockpiled in forward depots despite transportation challenges, with engineers constructing corduroy roads over marshy areas to facilitate the movement of heavy and . Intelligence assessments, derived from and defectors, significantly undercounted German strength, estimating the 9th Army at half its actual size and overlooking the depth of fortifications, which contributed to overly optimistic planning for rapid penetrations. Troops underwent intensive training in combined-arms breakthrough tactics, simulating assaults on mock positions to coordinate , armor, and fire. On the side, awareness of the impending offensive grew through intercepted Soviet radio signals, aerial photographic revealing troop movements, and interrogations of prisoners, yet these indicators were largely dismissed by Hitler and the OKH as diversions or feints to relieve pressure on forces at Stalingrad. Model reinforced key sectors with reserves while maintaining aggressive patrolling to disrupt Soviet preparations, but the high command's focus on the southern front led to underestimation of Mars's scale, allowing the buildup to proceed with partial surprise.

Execution of the Offensive

Launch and Initial Assaults

Operation Mars commenced on November 25, 1942, with a massive 90-minute preparation beginning at 0730 hours, involving thousands of guns and mortars across the fronts to soften German defenses in the salient. This barrage was followed immediately by coordinated infantry and tank assaults from the Kalinin and Western Fronts, aiming to achieve rapid breakthroughs against the German 9th Army. The offensive's opening phase unfolded amid harsh weather conditions, including dense fog that hampered Soviet air support and observation, while minefields and prepared German positions inflicted immediate heavy casualties. In the northern sector, the Kalinin Front's 39th Army, commanded by A. I. Zyryanov and comprising approximately 80,000 troops with over 200 tanks, launched its main attack across the Molodoi Tud River toward Olenino, targeting the German 251st Division. The assault achieved initial penetrations of 3-5 kilometers in the first day, overrunning forward German outposts, but progress stalled by November 26 at deep anti-tank ditches and fortified lines defended by the 251st Division's reserves. Despite the use of tanks to support the infantry, German defensive tactics, including well-sited anti-tank guns, limited further advances and caused significant armored losses in this sector. On the southern sector, the Western Front's 20th and 31st Armies, under V. V. Kiriukhin for the 20th, totaling over 200,000 men and around 500 tanks, struck along the Vazuza and Osuga Rivers against the German 78th Infantry Division, securing a breakthrough and capturing key bridges over the Osuga River on November 25-26. This success allowed elements of the 20th Army to establish a narrow , though it came at a steep cost due to intense close-quarters fighting. Meanwhile, the neighboring 29th Army, led by V. I. Shvetsov, made slower progress against adjacent German positions, advancing only limited distances amid similar obstacles and failing to achieve a decisive penetration in the initial assaults. Throughout the opening days, Soviet forces encountered formidable challenges from the terrain and German countermeasures, including extensive minefields that crippled formations and anti-tank guns that proved highly effective against T-34s at close range. These factors contributed to heavy initial losses, with over T-34s destroyed or disabled in the first few days across both sectors, underscoring the difficulties in sustaining momentum despite the preparatory barrage. By the end of November 26, while some tactical gains had been made, the assaults had largely bogged down, setting the stage for prolonged engagements.

Key Engagements

The key engagements of Operation Mars unfolded primarily in the central and southern sectors of the salient during late November and early , where Soviet forces sought to breach defenses and link up for an of the Ninth Army. These battles featured intense, localized fighting characterized by Soviet massed assaults—often described as human-wave tactics—against entrenched positions employing elastic defense principles, allowing for retreats under pressure followed by counterstrikes. Harsh winter conditions, including deep snow, further complicated operations, with both sides suffering heavy attrition in a series of grueling, multi-day clashes. In the southern sector, the 31st Army launched repeated assaults starting on , targeting key terrain features such as Hill 238.1 near Tuchevichi as part of efforts to advance toward the Osuga River line and encircle German forces. The 133rd Rifle Division led these attacks, supported by tank brigades, against elements of the German 1st Panzer Division, which held the heights with fortified positions and rapid counter-maneuvers. Soviet troops attempted to envelop the hill to cut off German reinforcements, but the assaults faltered amid minefields, artillery barrages, and , resulting in significant encirclement failures and high casualties for the rifle division over several days of fighting. Further north along the Osuga River axis, the 29th Army pushed aggressively in late , clashing repeatedly with the 6th Division in the snow-covered terrain. Soviet ski troops, trained for winter mobility, were deployed to outflank lines and exploit breakthroughs, but they encountered stiff resistance from well-entrenched and supporting armor, leading to stalled advances and fragmented engagements through early . These fights highlighted the limitations of Soviet mobility in deep snow, where ski units provided initial gains but were vulnerable to ambushes and machine-gun fire during consolidation attempts. In the northern sector along the Luchesa River, the 22nd Army advanced approximately 15 kilometers but encountered strong resistance and failed to achieve deeper penetrations. The northern pincer at Belyy saw the 41st Army's determined but ultimately unsuccessful efforts to link up with southern forces, marked by heavy fighting from late November onward. Assaults by rifle divisions against the German 256th Infantry Division met with fierce counterattacks, particularly during the intensified phase from to 3, where Soviet human-wave infantry charges—preceded by artillery preparation—were repulsed at great cost due to the Germans' elastic defenses that yielded ground temporarily before striking back with reserves. The failure to achieve the link-up resulted in isolated Soviet penetrations being cut off, inflicting severe casualties on the 41st Army and underscoring the challenges of coordinating multi-army offensives in the salient's constricted geography.

German Counteractions

, commander of the German 9th Army, implemented a defensive strategy focused on elastic depth-based defenses, utilizing terrain advantages around the salient and committing mobile reserves to blunt Soviet penetrations, while requesting additional panzer divisions such as the 12th, 19th, and 20th for rapid redeployment from quieter sectors. Although heavy tanks like the and were not yet widely deployed in the sector, Model integrated available panzer forces into layered positions to counter Soviet armor thrusts effectively. Critical reinforcements arrived in late November and early December, with elements of the and — including its Fusilier Regiment and 113th Panzergrenadier Regiment—reaching the Belyy area around November 26 to reinforce beleaguered units and stabilize the crumbling front. By December 1, these formations had helped restore cohesion to the , preventing further Soviet advances toward key supply routes. Between December 6 and 10, German counteroffensives regained initiative in critical sectors, with the 1st Panzer Division, Grossdeutschland, and 12th Panzer Division launching coordinated attacks south from Belyy to encircle and destroy elements of the Soviet 41st Army, recapturing lost ground at Belyy and halting penetrations near Osuga along the Luchesa River valley. units provided limited but vital during these operations, including bombing runs on Soviet concentrations despite persistent poor weather that grounded much of the fleet. The unfolding Soviet success in at Stalingrad from November 19 constrained broader German reserve commitments to the front, as higher command prioritized the southern theater, yet Model's localized countermeasures successfully contained the Soviet offensive and averted any risk of for the 9th Army.

Outcome and Aftermath

Immediate Results

The Soviet offensive during Operation Mars yielded limited territorial gains, with advances of 10-20 km achieved primarily in the southern sector by elements of the Kalinin Front, while penetrations in the northern sector remained shallow and were soon contained by German defenses. These modest successes failed to encircle the Rzhev salient or disrupt the German 9th Army on a strategic scale, as initial breakthroughs could not be exploited due to strong counterattacks and logistical challenges. On December 16, 1942, the issued orders for the Western and Kalinin Fronts to transition to the defensive, effectively halting the offensive amid deteriorating weather conditions and the shifting focus to the victorious at Stalingrad. Partial achievements included the elimination of several small salients and temporary disruptions to enemy supply lines in the Belyi and Luchesa sectors, though these did not alter the overall tactical balance. Soviet forces then executed a phased pullback, withdrawing encircled units such as the 1st Mechanized Corps between December 15 and 16, and returning to approximate initial lines by late December 1942, which prevented a total front collapse despite intense German counteroffensives.

Casualties and Losses

The suffered severe human losses during Operation Mars, with estimates from declassified archives indicating approximately 335,000 casualties across the Western Front, including around 100,000 killed or missing and 235,000 wounded or sick. The 20th Army alone incurred over 30,000 casualties in the initial phase of the offensive. These figures, derived from historian David M. Glantz's analysis of post-1990s declassified Soviet documents, reveal significantly higher tolls than earlier official Soviet reports, which underreported losses to around 215,000 total personnel for the operation in works like G. F. Krivosheev's Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses. German casualties were comparatively lighter, totaling about 40,000 men, including roughly 5,000 dead, owing to their defensive positions and effective counteractions that minimized exposure. This disparity underscores the one-sided nature of the fighting, where Soviet assaults faced entrenched defenses. In terms of equipment, the lost over 1,600 tanks—more than three-quarters of those committed—and approximately 300 , severely depleting armored and air resources. The suffered around 200 tank losses but achieved disproportionate impact by destroying far more Soviet vehicles through ambushes and fortified lines.
SideHuman CasualtiesTank LossesAircraft Losses
Soviet~335,000 (100,000 killed/missing, 235,000 wounded/sick)~1,600~300
German~40,000 (including ~5,000 dead)~200Not specified in primary estimates

Assessment

Tactical Analysis

The Soviet offensive in Operation Mars suffered from significant tactical shortcomings, particularly an overreliance on massed frontal assaults against entrenched positions, which led to heavy casualties without achieving breakthroughs. This approach neglected adequate flanking maneuvers, exposing and armor to devastating fire from German anti-tank guns and , as seen in the repeated failures of the 1st Guards to penetrate the defenses. Poor coordination between the Western Front and Kalinin Front further compounded these issues, with divergent attack axes failing to synchronize and create the intended pincer effect, allowing German forces to shift reserves between sectors. Additionally, insufficient anti-tank support left Soviet tank units vulnerable; for instance, the 20th 's T-34s advanced without dedicated screens, resulting in the loss of over 1,000 to German Pak 40 guns and minefields. In contrast, German tactical doctrine under General emphasized defense in depth, utilizing layered fortifications, reverse-slope positions, and natural terrain barriers like the forests and hills around to absorb and channel Soviet attacks. Model's forces, including the 9th Army's divisions, employed elastic defenses that traded space for time, drawing Soviet armor into kill zones before unleashing rapid counterattacks with panzer reserves such as the 5th Panzer . These counteroffensives, often launched within hours of Soviet penetrations, exploited gaps in lines and recaptured lost ground, as demonstrated in the repulsion of assaults near Belyi in early December. Command decisions exacerbated the operation's tactical flaws, with Georgy Zhukov's insistence on pressing the offensive despite mounting evidence of failure reflecting a rigid commitment to initial plans over adaptive leadership. Zhukov, coordinating from with limited on-site presence, overruled calls for pauses and reinforcements, contrasting sharply with Maksim Purkayev's more cautious approach in the Kalinin Front, where phased attacks were attempted but undermined by overall resource shortages. Environmental factors severely hampered execution, as the late autumn rasputitsa turned the terrain into a quagmire, bogging down and supply convoys before an early onset of snow in mid-November further immobilized and restricted air support. These conditions not only slowed Soviet advances but also favored German defenders, who leveraged elevated positions and prepared winter fortifications to maintain mobility advantages.

Strategic Impact and Legacy

Operation Mars, launched concurrently with at Stalingrad, played a pivotal role in the broader Soviet strategic calculus of late 1942 by seeking to pin down German Army Group Center and prevent the transfer of significant reserves southward. Although the offensive achieved only limited penetrations and failed to eliminate the salient, it succeeded in preventing the transfer of a modest number of German reserves—including elements of the 1st Panzer Division and battle groups—to the , thereby contributing indirectly to the encirclement and ultimate destruction of the German Sixth Army. This diversionary effect, while not decisive on its own, aligned with Stalin's directive to conduct simultaneous major offensives across multiple fronts to overextend German defenses, as detailed in declassified Soviet archives analyzed by military historian . In the longer term, the heavy attrition inflicted on German Ninth Army during Mars eroded the defensive cohesion of , compelling subsequent reinforcements from other sectors and setting the stage for Soviet successes in 1943. The operation's failure to achieve its primary objectives nonetheless weakened the Rzhev-Vyazma bulge to such an extent that German forces were forced to evacuate the salient in during defensive withdrawals, which facilitated the Soviet Operation Suvorov in the summer of that year. This offensive, launched by the Kalinin and Western Fronts, exploited the prior exhaustion of German reserves and resulted in the complete elimination of the salient, marking a critical step in the Red Army's rollback of positions in the central sector. Glantz's underscores how Mars's cumulative impact on German manpower and —despite Soviet losses exceeding 100,000 —created vulnerabilities that subsequent offensives capitalized upon. Postwar Soviet initially downplayed Operation Mars, portraying it merely as a supporting to the Stalingrad victory to obscure its catastrophic scale and Zhukov's tactical miscalculations, with official accounts omitting details of the immense human cost and operational failures. This narrative persisted until the , when Glantz and co-author House accessed newly opened Russian archives, revealing Mars as a massive, independent offensive comparable in scope to , involving over 670,000 Soviet troops and resulting in disproportionate losses that fueled debates on Zhukov's strategic competence and the Red Army's doctrinal flaws. These revelations shifted scholarly focus toward reevaluating Zhukov's reputation, with critics arguing that his insistence on frontal assaults exemplified persistent errors in Soviet planning, while defenders highlight the operation's role in broader . The legacy of Operation Mars endures as a stark emblem of the Soviet Union's "" tactics during , characterized by high-volume infantry assaults against fortified positions that prioritized territorial pressure over casualty conservation, drawing parallels to contemporaneous failures like the second offensive at Kharkov or the initial phases of itself. In modern historiography, it serves as a in the inefficiencies of early operations, influencing analyses of how such attritional battles eroded German strength even in defeat. Post-2020 scholarship, including reinterpretations in peer-reviewed journals, has largely confirmed Glantz's findings through additional archival cross-verifications but offers no substantial revisions, reinforcing Mars's status as a pivotal yet tragic chapter in the Eastern Front's evolution toward Soviet dominance.

References

  1. [1]
    Mars (i) | Operations & Codenames of WWII
    'Mars' (i) was a Soviet operation constituting the second battle in the Rzhev-Sychevka salient within the 'Rzhev-Sychevka Strategic Offensive Operation' ...
  2. [2]
    Operation Mars - BATTLEFIELD.RU
    After enduring months of bitter and costly defensive combat at Stalingrad, on 19 November 1942, Red Army forces struck a massive blow against the hitherto ...
  3. [3]
    Zhukov's Greatest Defeat - University Press of Kansas
    For three grueling weeks, Operation Mars was one of the most tragic and agonizing episodes in Soviet military history. Glantz's reconstruction of that failed ...
  4. [4]
    Houston on Glantz, 'Zhukov's Greatest Defeat: The Red Army's Epic ...
    It is Glantz's contention in this book that the main Soviet attack in the Winter 1942-1943 campaign was not meant to be the Stalingrad Offensive (Operation ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] The Soviet Airborne Experience - Army University Press
    Glantz, David M. The Soviet airborne experience. (Research survey / Combat ... July 1942, NAM T315, roll . 29. Reinhardt,. “Russian Air Landings,”. 16 ...
  6. [6]
    Zhukov's Greatest Defeat: The Red Army's Epic Disaster in ...
    30-day returnsAn exhaustive, illustrated account of Operation Mars, a World War II battle between Germany and the Soviets that became a catastrophe for the latter, ...Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis
  7. [7]
    Forgotten Battles of the Great Patriotic War - HistoryNet
    Nov 22, 2016 · The Red Army again seized the strategic initiative in late November 1942 by virtue of its twin offensives in the Rzhev and Stalingrad regions ( ...
  8. [8]
    David M. Glantz
    David M. Glantz- Studies and Atlases on the Soviet/Russian Army in Peace and War ; MS-009. Operation Mars (Rzhev-Sychevka operation),. 25 Nov- 16 Dec 42. 28 ; MS- ...
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
    Operation Mars (prof. Orlov) - Armchair General Magazine
    The goal of the "Mars" operation was to crush the 9th German Army, which formed the basis of the Army Group "Center" in Rzhev, Sychyovka, Olenino, Belyi area.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] The Applications of Operational Art on the Eastern Front, 1942-1943
    Jun 6, 2003 · Operation MARS, subsequently branded Zhukov's greatest failure, failed to meet its objectives. Operation URANUS however, was a success, and ...
  12. [12]
    German Intelligence Assessments of Operation Mars
    The five German Ninth Army intelligence (Ic) maps which follow illustrate the German intelligence picture just prior to and throughout the operation.Missing: awareness feint
  13. [13]
    Zhukov's greatest defeat : the Red Army's epic disaster in Operation ...
    May 11, 2022 · Zhukov's greatest defeat : the Red Army's epic disaster in Operation Mars, 1942. by: Glantz, David M. Publication date: 1999. Topics: Zhukov ...
  14. [14]
    Operation Mars - Notes
    ### Summary of Key Engagements in Operation Mars
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Rzhev '42 – Designer Notes - Amazon AWS
    According to Col Glantz, the Soviet forces used for Operation Mars, were substantially larger then the more well known. Operation Uranus, the counterattack at ...
  16. [16]
    Operation Mars - Armchair General Magazine
    Oct 27, 2003 · In the center it was an operation having the aim to surround the German 9th Army in the Rzhev Salient using forces of the Kalinin and Western ...Missing: September details
  17. [17]
    Book Review: Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses in ... - History Net
    Aug 12, 2001 · Operation Mars in the fall of 1942, with its 500,000 casualties, which David M. Glantz described in a recent issue, is an instance, and there ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] The Soviet-German War 1941-1945: Myths and realities
    A Leading world expert on the Russo-German War. Colonel Glantz discusses the many aspects of the war that have been neglected.
  19. [19]
    The Stalingrad Front | Antony Beevor, Jason Epstein
    Apr 13, 2000 · In his recent book, Zhukov's Greatest Defeat, David Glantz exposes Zhukov's falsification and recounts in detail the Mars disaster, which had ...
  20. [20]
    Full article: Patterns of War: A Re-interpretation of the Chronology of ...
    Oct 9, 2023 · Glantz has argued that in the winter of 1942, Operation Mars was as large and significant as Operation Uranus, and when combined with Operation ...