Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Peace lines

The peace lines are a series of separation barriers constructed in , primarily in , to divide interface areas between Catholic nationalist and Protestant unionist neighborhoods and thereby reduce during . The first such barriers were hastily erected in August 1969 by the using barbed wire and corrugated iron following intense rioting along the Falls Road and , with subsequent reinforcements evolving into more permanent concrete walls, metal fences, and controlled gates that frequently close overnight. Initially intended as temporary measures to prevent further clashes after events that displaced thousands and caused numerous deaths, the structures expanded over time to encompass over 40 miles of barriers across multiple locations including Derry, , and . While empirical evidence indicates they succeeded in curtailing direct confrontations at interfaces—contributing to a decline in post-1972—the peace lines have drawn criticism for institutionalizing , fostering mutual suspicion, and hindering long-term reconciliation, as communities on either side often cite persistent paramilitary threats and low trust levels in surveys. Following the 1998 , official policy has aimed for their phased removal, with the committing to eliminate all interface structures by 2023, though progress has been limited amid public opposition from residents prioritizing security, resulting in some gates reopening and new barriers emerging in recent decades.

Historical Development

Pre-1969 Sectarian Tensions and Early Barriers

Sectarian tensions in trace back to the under the , which established the six-county region as part of the amid ongoing violence between Protestant unionists and Catholic nationalists. This period saw widespread communal clashes, particularly in , where shipyard workers and residential areas became flashpoints for expulsions and killings, displacing thousands and killing hundreds in pogrom-like attacks from 1920 to 1922. Empirical records indicate that such violence followed patterns of targeted , with Catholic communities suffering disproportionate displacement—often entire streets burned out—while Protestant areas faced retaliatory strikes, establishing a cycle of territorial segregation driven by mutual fear rather than economic disparity alone. Recurring riots perpetuated these divisions through the mid-20th century, with eight major outbreaks in between 1835 and 1935, culminating in the 1935 unrest triggered by an parade on July 12. The 1935 riots resulted in 11 deaths—mostly Protestants—hundreds injured, and approximately 2,000 Catholics displaced from their homes, comprising 86% of those forced to flee despite Catholics being a minority in the affected areas. In response, authorities erected the first documented physical barrier that summer along York Street in , using structures like and fences to enforce "social distancing" between Protestant and Catholic enclaves and curb immediate cross-community assaults. Similar temporary measures, such as wire entanglements and cordons, appeared sporadically in prior decades during flare-ups, reflecting reactive efforts to contain pogroms without addressing underlying territorial claims. By the late 1960s, these patterns escalated as the organized marches from 1967 onward to protest discrimination in housing, voting, and employment, initially framed as non-sectarian but increasingly intersecting with republican agitation. Key events included the October 5, 1968, march in Derry, where baton charges and water cannons against 400 demonstrators sparked riots, injuring dozens and drawing parallels to earlier suppressions of nationalist gatherings. Loyalist counter-mobilization grew amid fears of constitutional erosion, while elements exploited the unrest to rearm and position themselves as defenders, leading to petrol bombings and street clashes that displaced families in by early 1969. This pre-1969 volatility, marked by over 100 injuries in sporadic violence, underscored entrenched communal fault lines, priming the ground for the August 1969 explosions of widespread rioting without yet resorting to permanent fortifications.

Construction Amid 1969 Riots

The riots of August 1969 in , erupting on 14 August amid sectarian clashes particularly along the Falls Road and interfaces, involved widespread arson, petrol bombings, and gunfire that displaced approximately 1,800 residents—predominantly from Catholic areas like Bombay Street, where 44 of 65 houses were burned—and injured hundreds more. These events, part of broader unrest following the , overwhelmed local police and prompted the British government's deployment of troops on 14 August to restore order, initially with around 3,000 soldiers that expanded rapidly. In response to ongoing violence, including cross-community shootings and arson attempts, engineers began constructing the first peace line on 10 September 1969 at the interface of Cupar Street (linking the Protestant Shankill and Catholic Falls areas), using improvised materials such as corrugated iron sheeting, rubble, and to create a hasty 5-foot-high barrier spanning about 1 kilometer. This initial structure aimed to physically separate hotspots prone to immediate clashes, extending from the Crumlin Road vicinity to prevent further incursions like those that razed Bombay Street earlier that month. Northern Ireland's Home Affairs Minister Robert Porter authorized these barriers as emergency, temporary measures to halt the cycle of retaliatory attacks, reflecting a pragmatic assessment that physical division was necessary given the failure of policing alone to contain the riots' momentum. By mid-September, troop numbers had surged toward 10,000, enabling the rapid engineering works amid a of heightened . The construction underscored the British Army's initial role as a stabilizing force, prioritizing over long-term resolution in the face of acute communal breakdown.

Expansion During the Troubles (1970s-1990s)

The initial temporary barricades erected in 1969 evolved into permanent concrete structures during the early 1970s, as authorities responded to persistent sectarian clashes driven by paramilitary escalations, including bombings and loyalist counterattacks. In Belfast's interface areas, such as along the Falls-Shankill divide near Divis Street, these barriers were reinforced with solid walls up to 6 meters high by the mid-1970s, manned initially by the to curb direct incursions but increasingly accepted as fixtures amid ongoing hostilities. This transition from corrugated iron and rubble to concrete reflected causal patterns of violence, where and loyalist groups exploited porous boundaries for assassinations and arson, necessitating engineered separations to disrupt attack vectors. Expansion intensified through the 1970s and 1980s, with new walls built at flashpoints triggered by specific operations; for example, UVF gun and bomb assaults on Catholic targets in the enclave in 1974 and subsequent years prompted fortified barriers to shield the isolated nationalist pocket from surrounding unionist areas. By the 1980s, the number of such interfaces had proliferated to approximately 12-14 major sites in , later reaching around 20 by the early , as hunger strikes, urban guerrilla campaigns, and retaliatory killings perpetuated cycles of territorial defense. These additions correlated with heightened lethality, including peak years of interfactional murders that underscored the barriers' role in local containment rather than broader resolution. Approaching the 1998 , the cumulative peace lines formed an extensive network spanning several miles across and adjacent towns, embodying the sustained impact of over 3,500 conflict-related deaths, many attributable to proximity-based sectarian targeting at interfaces. Empirical data from the period indicate that while walls mitigated some spontaneous riots, they did little to deter organized incursions, as evidenced by continued breaches via fire and explosives, highlighting their limits as reactive measures to underlying ideological and territorial animosities.

Physical Structure and Locations

Materials and Design Features

The initial peace lines erected in consisted of temporary, makeshift barriers assembled from corrugated iron sheets, rubble from demolished houses, burnt-out vehicles, and construction debris to rapidly separate warring nationalist and unionist communities amid widespread rioting. These early structures were rudimentary and intended for short-term use by the and . Subsequent reconstructions from the early 1970s onward shifted to more permanent and robust designs, predominantly high walls reinforced for durability against attacks, with some segments featuring red facades accented by trimmings or metal panels. Heights generally range from 3 to 9 meters, providing a substantial physical deterrent while allowing visibility over the barriers. Upper sections often include protective toppings such as chain-link mesh , coils, and anti-climb protrusions to impede scaling or breaching attempts. Certain walls incorporate designated surfaces for community murals or , serving both aesthetic and informal monitoring functions without compromising structural integrity. Design evolution accelerated after bombings and sustained violence in the , leading to fortified reinforcements like embedded steel rods in concrete pours and integrated surveillance infrastructure, including cameras installed primarily in the 1990s for real-time monitoring of interface zones. Controlled access points feature heavy-duty gates, some motorized and automated as "peace gates," programmed to open during daylight hours—typically from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.—to facilitate limited cross-community movement while restricting nighttime vulnerabilities. Ongoing maintenance, handled by the Department of Justice, involves periodic inspections, repairs, and upgrades, with annual expenditures exceeding £120,000 as of 2010 and recent three-year tenders valued at around £450,000 to address , , and structural wear.

Key Sites in Belfast and Beyond

The primary concentrations of peace lines in emerged at interfaces between nationalist and unionist communities where peaked during the late 1960s and 1970s, particularly in West, North, and East . In West , the most extensive network separates the predominantly Catholic Falls Road area from the Protestant , encompassing segments like Cupar Way and Bombay Street, which were among the earliest barriers erected following the 1969 riots. These structures, totaling several kilometers by the late 1970s, buffered hotspots of intercommunal clashes that displaced thousands and caused numerous fatalities. North Belfast features multiple interfaces, including the area bordering Protestant estates like Twaddell Avenue, where barriers delineate boundaries amid persistent low-level violence into the ; other clusters span Oldpark Road and the Crumlin Road, reflecting fragmented residential patterns shaped by demographic shifts and activities. East Belfast's enclave, a small Catholic pocket surrounded by larger Protestant neighborhoods, hosts shorter but strategically placed lines to contain flare-ups, such as those during the 1970s hunger strikes era. This uneven distribution—dense in urban cores with historical riot data correlating to over 80% of Belfast's Troubles-related deaths—highlights construction priorities tied to empirical violence patterns rather than uniform geographic coverage. Beyond Belfast, peace lines extended to other Northern Irish locales with analogous tensions, though far less extensively. In , barriers appeared in the area post-1969 clashes, separating nationalist districts from unionist Waterside; saw lines along the Garvaghy Road interface after Drumcree parade disputes in the 1990s, while hosted similar structures amid loyalist-nationalist standoffs. By the late 1990s, these outlying sites comprised a minor fraction of the overall network, with Belfast accounting for the bulk of an estimated 15-20 kilometers of barriers province-wide, underscoring the capital's role as the epicenter of sectarian flashpoints.

Purpose and Empirical Effectiveness

Stated Objectives and Initial Rationale

The initial peace lines were constructed by engineers starting on 10 September , directly following sectarian riots in from 14 to 16 August that killed nine people—six Catholics and three Protestants—and injured over 150, primarily from gunfire and petrol bombs exchanged across community interfaces. The riots exemplified direct clashes driven by longstanding mutual sectarian hostilities between Catholic nationalist and Protestant unionist neighborhoods, prompting residents in affected areas like the Falls and Shankill to erect impromptu barricades for self-protection before formal intervention. Northern Ireland Prime Minister announced the measure on 9 September 1969 via television, stating that the army would erect and man a "firm peace line" as a temporary to physically separate the opposing communities and halt immediate violence. This primary objective focused on creating zones to block line-of-sight attacks and crowd surges, as articulated in government communiqués emphasizing physical division between the Falls (Catholic) and Shankill (Protestant) districts, initially using coils and sandbags later reinforced with concrete. Secondary rationales included facilitating targeted policing within segregated zones and curbing cross-community raids, reflecting petitions and demands from local residents for military-guaranteed separation amid fears of unchecked incursions. The approach prioritized immediate causal interruption of proximity-enabled violence over broader socioeconomic reforms, acknowledging the riots' roots in entrenched communal animosities rather than isolated grievances.

Data on Violence Reduction

Following the construction of initial peace lines in in September amid severe sectarian riots that resulted in at least 10 deaths and over 1,500 injuries across , primarily at interfaces like the Falls-Shankill area, documented instances of large-scale interface rioting declined sharply in those demarcated zones by 1972. British Army records indicate that the barriers physically separated opposing crowds, preventing the mass clashes characteristic of the 1969 disturbances, with riot-related deaths at key interfaces dropping to near zero in the immediate separated areas as violence shifted to intra-community actions elsewhere. Empirical analyses of Troubles-era violence patterns reveal that interfactional fatalities, often occurring at or near interfaces, comprised a minority of total deaths—approximately 15-20% in —but peace lines correlated with sustained reductions in such cross-community incidents post-erection, as barriers limited direct access for retaliatory attacks. (PSNI) historical overviews and academic spatial studies confirm low interfactional murder rates at barricaded interfaces after the expansions, with incidents remaining below pre-barrier levels through the ceasefire period, attributing this to the physical deterrence of spontaneous incursions. Comparative data from segregated versus mixed residential areas during the Troubles further supports the barriers' role in curbing exposure to interfactional violence: residents in mixed neighborhoods reported significantly higher rates of direct political violence encounters—up to 25% greater threat perception and victimization—than those in highly segregated zones reinforced by peace lines, where separation minimized cross-community contact opportunities for escalation. This pattern held across micro-level analyses, indicating that enforced segregation via barriers provided a measurable buffer against the heightened risks observed in integrated estates lacking such divisions.

Long-Term Security Outcomes

Since the 1998 , peace lines have sustained low levels of at Belfast interfaces, with overall conflict-related deaths in dropping to single digits annually from a peak of 480 in 1972. While low-intensity intergroup incidents persist at these sites, they represent a fraction of pre-agreement violence, as barriers physically separate opposing communities and restrict clashes to localized areas rather than citywide spread. This containment aligns with resident assessments, where 69% of those living nearest the walls in surveys deemed them essential to avert potential renewed attacks, reflecting empirical patterns of reduced fatalities post-1998. In flashpoints such as the riots triggered by union flag protests, peace lines limited violence to specific interfaces like and Woodvale, involving petrol bombs and clashes but avoiding the uncontrolled escalation of the 1969 disturbances that displaced thousands and killed dozens without such divisions. Absent barriers, historical precedents indicate higher casualties, as 1969's unconfined riots demonstrated rapid contagion across undivided neighborhoods, underscoring the structures' role in capping incident scale despite ongoing tensions. Recent testimonies from interface residents affirm this, with individuals reporting heightened personal security due to the walls' presence amid sporadic threats. Comparisons to barrier-free alternatives highlight realism over removal optimism: pre-1969 sectarian frictions escalated unchecked into widespread arson and fatalities, whereas post-construction stability has held, enabling adjacent zones to avoid reversion to pre-Troubles volatility levels. Data trends confirm interfaces account for minimal shares of total post-agreement disturbances relative to the Troubles era, attributing this durability to the lines' deterrence of cross-community incursions.

Societal and Psychological Impacts

Reinforcement of

The presence of peace lines has institutionalized sectarian divisions in Belfast's interface areas by physically delineating and entrenching single-identity residential zones, where demographic is pronounced. analyses indicate that populations within 100 meters of peace walls are overwhelmingly skewed, with 65% identifying as Catholic and 27% as Protestant, reflecting a stark separation that predates but has been perpetuated by the barriers. In overall, over 90% of social housing remains segregated into single-identity communities, a pattern intensified in interface zones where cross-community mixing is minimal due to the barriers' isolating effect. This residential entrenchment limits routine interactions, fostering sustained mistrust rooted in historical animosities rather than the walls themselves creating division anew. Educational segregation mirrors and reinforces this pattern, with over 90% of schools in operating as single-identity institutions, particularly acute in Belfast's interface areas where peace lines constrain access to integrated facilities. The resultant scarcity of cross-community contact during formative years perpetuates psychological barriers, as children in these zones encounter the "other" community primarily through mediated or adversarial lenses shaped by legacies. However, the barriers emerged as a pragmatic response to acute in 1969, institutionalizing divisions that arose from pre-existing sectarian hatreds and rioting, not originating them; the underlying causal driver remains inter-communal conflict predating the structures. Economically, peace lines impose tangible costs that hinder broader integration by depressing property values in proximate areas. Empirical studies of the housing market demonstrate a negative pricing effect correlating with proximity to the walls, with properties nearer the barriers experiencing discounts attributable to perceived insecurity and reduced market appeal, though exact magnitudes vary by locale and do not exceed 20% in analyzed cases. This devaluation reinforces economic silos within segregated zones, as lower values limit investment and mobility, yet the walls' erection addressed immediate threats from violence rather than fabricating the hatreds that necessitated separation.

Community Security Perceptions

Residents in interface communities adjacent to peace lines in consistently express strong preferences for retaining physical barriers, citing enhanced personal and familial security against potential cross-community violence. A 2024 analysis of resident attitudes found that only 40% of those living near peace lines hoped for eventual removal, implying a opposition rooted in fears of without deterrents. Similarly, a 2015 survey of residents beside peace walls revealed widespread perceptions that barriers remain essential for immediate safety, with many prioritizing tangible protections over abstract reconciliation efforts amid sporadic interface disturbances. Testimonies from both Protestant/unionist/loyalist (PUL) and Catholic/nationalist/ (CNR) families underscore the walls' role as practical safeguards during flare-ups. For instance, in August 2025, a longtime resident described the peace line behind her home as providing reassurance, stating, "You feel safer with it up," reflecting a common sentiment that its presence mitigates risks from opportunistic attacks or intimidation. Residents on both sides have likened the structures to "lifelines" in recollections of 1990s sectarian feuds and riots, where barriers prevented direct incursions into neighborhoods, allowing families to shelter without fear of immediate breach. These perceptions align with psychological needs for visible in contexts of incomplete restoration, where abstract assurances like increased policing fail to substitute for physical separation. Interface dwellers report that peace lines offer concrete deterrence against low-level threats, such as stone-throwing or , which persist despite overall violence declines, fostering a sense of amid unresolved intercommunal tensions. This subjective is not dismissed as mere but grounded in lived experiences of past breaches during unguarded periods, reinforcing the barriers' utility for daily psychological stability.

Post-1998 Efforts and Challenges

Good Friday Agreement and Removal Initiatives

The , signed on April 10, 1998, committed parties to normalizing security arrangements in "as early as possible," which encompassed demilitarization efforts including the phased reduction of physical interface barriers like peace lines. This provision reflected an expectation that ending violence would enable the removal of such structures, though it did not mandate specific timelines or mechanisms for peace lines. The Irish Republican Army's full decommissioning, verified on September 26, 2005, by the Independent International Commission on Decommissioning—which confirmed all weapons put beyond use—diminished the immediate threat from republican paramilitaries and aligned with the agreement's disarmament goals, theoretically reducing the rationale for retaining barriers. However, ongoing loyalist paramilitary activity, including sporadic violence and control over interface areas, sustained demands for physical separations despite the republican-side progress. In response, the Executive's 2013 "Together: Building a United Community" strategy established a target to remove all interface barriers by 2023, framing it as essential for and confidence-building between communities. Supporting this, the Department of Justice launched the Interface Programme to coordinate removals through community consultations and incremental steps, such as installing "peace gates"—timed access points designed to foster supervised interaction before full dismantling. These initiatives prioritized areas with lower tension, but the 2023 deadline passed unmet, with over 50 peace lines still in place by early 2023, underscoring persistent security perceptions over optimistic policy timelines.

Partial Dismantlings and Government Programs

Since the early 2010s, partial removals of peace lines have occurred in select locations, often involving the opening of gates or demolition of short segments rather than wholesale elimination. In September , a was installed and opened in the peace wall bisecting in north , allowing supervised pedestrian access across the barrier originally erected in 1994 to curb sectarian clashes; this measure aimed to foster incremental integration while retaining the structure. By 2015, proposals emerged to remove portions of this barrier entirely, though full implementation lagged. In 2013, the launched the "Together: Building a " strategy, committing to the removal of all barriers, including peace lines, by through a phased approach emphasizing consultation and replacement with shared spaces. This initiative facilitated approximately 18 full removals and a similar number of reductions or modifications to peace walls over the subsequent decade, primarily in , often substituting barriers with landscaping, fencing, or communal areas to mitigate perceived security gaps. The International Fund for has supported these efforts via its Walls Programme, established in 2012, which has allocated over £5.2 million to projects promoting cross- confidence-building and barrier mitigation, including site-specific interventions like enhanced in lieu of walls. Progress has remained limited in scale, affecting an estimated 10-20% of structures since 2010 amid extended consultations and site assessments, with total dismantled lengths comprising only a few miles out of over 20 miles of remaining barriers as of 2025. Notable recent actions include the October 2024 removal of over 40 meters of peace wall along Ballygomartin Road in west to create a shared community space, and the January 2025 demolition of a 3-meter-high metal structure in , , after 27 years of service. These incremental steps highlight ongoing governmental of targeted dismantlings, though the 2023 deadline was not met due to procedural delays and the persistence of new or extended barriers in some areas.

Community Opposition to Removal

Local residents in interface areas have voiced opposition to peace line removal through public demonstrations and attitudinal surveys, emphasizing perceived security benefits over symbolic reconciliation. In September 2023, residents protested planned dismantlings, arguing that the walls prevent sectarian clashes amid insufficient policing and unresolved animosities. This resistance draws on experiences from partial removals, such as the halted Dogleg interface project, where community fears of escalated anti-social behavior and violence prompted reversals. Attitudinal surveys underscore a persistent view of peace lines as essential safeguards. A 2015 University of Ulster study of interface residents found 30% favored retaining walls unchanged—rising to 44% among Protestants—with 70% citing protection against opposing-community violence as their primary role and 61% reporting enhanced personal safety. The 2019 International Fund for Ireland survey similarly showed 58% identifying safety and security as the barriers' core function, with 30% expressing uncertainty about outcomes post-removal and 19% preferring no change, though these figures declined slightly from prior years amid gradual shifts. Cross-community data reveals broader consensus on walls' practical necessity, particularly where trust remains low. Such opposition stems from unaddressed legacies of , including over 3,500 deaths that entrenched inter-community distrust, compounded by residual presence in deprived interface zones that sustains intimidation and deters integration. Local analyses, including 2025 commentary on Slugger O'Toole, frame the barriers as a "" for averting unrest, privileging residents' direct experiences of over optimistic elite narratives.

Controversies and Debates

Symbolism as Division vs. Practical Necessity

Critics of the peace lines portray them as enduring symbols of societal fracture, akin to Cold War-era divisions like the , arguing they institutionalize separation and foster a culture of mutual suspicion and victimhood rather than progress toward unity. A 2023 analysis in highlighted their role as "potent symbols of division," suggesting they undermine the normalization of shared spaces in post-conflict by visually reinforcing historical grievances over communal reconciliation. Such views often prioritize optics and aspirational narratives of , yet overlook the causal mechanisms of sectarian hostility rooted in territorial disputes and legacies that predate and outlast ideological conflicts elsewhere in . In contrast, pragmatic assessments underscore the peace lines' necessity as physical deterrents to violence, erected amid the 1969 riots that killed at least 10 civilians and displaced over 1,500 families in Belfast alone, channeling subsequent clashes to contained interfaces rather than citywide anarchy. These barriers, Europe's sole extensive post-Cold War dividers sustained by ethno-religious rather than state-imposed ideological rifts, have empirically facilitated violence containment by segregating high-risk zones where 70% of Belfast Troubles-era fatalities occurred within 500 meters of interfaces. Without them, first-principles analysis of human behavior in polarized enclaves—evident in recurrent youth riots at exposed sites—suggests reversion to pre-barrier patterns of opportunistic attacks and retaliatory cycles, as documented in localized flare-ups even after the 1998 Good Friday Agreement. Defenders argue the structures symbolize effective over utopian unity, enabling broader peace dividends like a 99% drop in annual deaths from the 1972 peak of 480 without mandating risky . Residents proximate to the walls frequently cite enhanced personal , with one 2025 report quoting interface dwellers: "You feel safer with it up," reflecting grounded perceptions that outweigh symbolic critiques. Premature removal advocacy, often amplified by media emphasizing optics, risks disregarding this evidence; policy analyses warn such actions could disrupt stability in vulnerable areas, potentially amplifying tensions absent alternative safeguards like sustained policing or attitudinal shifts. Thus, while the lines embody stalled , their persistence aligns with causal realism: separation averts provocation in contexts where empirical trust-building lags behind physical buffers.

Political Perspectives from Unionists and Nationalists

Unionist politicians, particularly those from the (DUP), maintain that peace lines serve a critical security function against persistent threats from dissident republican paramilitaries, such as remnants of the (IRA), and oppose their removal absent demonstrable cross-community trust and reduced violence. In September 2020, DUP representatives in North Belfast explicitly opposed reopening the Flax Street interface by removing its barrier, arguing it would heighten risks to Protestant residents in amid ongoing sectarian tensions. This stance reflects broader unionist prioritization of practical deterrence over symbolic gestures, with advocates citing the walls' role in containing sporadic attacks during events like parades or anniversaries, where data from the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) records hundreds of interface-related incidents annually as late as 2023. Nationalist leaders, led by , characterize peace lines as state-enforced relics of that embody systemic discrimination akin to , advocating their dismantlement as essential for psychological normalization and Irish unity aspirations, even when local polls indicate majority resident reluctance due to safety fears. MLAs endorsed the 2013-2023 executive strategy to eliminate all barriers by mutual consent, positioning removals as milestones in post-Good Friday reconciliation despite failures to meet timelines amid persistent low-level violence. This perspective attributes the walls' endurance to unionist intransigence and British policy, downplaying threats while emphasizing symbolic progress, as evidenced by 's support for partial removals in areas like in January 2025. voices from former paramilitaries on both sides underscore the walls' pragmatic value in averting escalation, with some ex-loyalists conceding they forestalled "mutual annihilation" during by physically constraining retaliatory cycles that claimed over 3,500 lives from 1969 to 1998. Ian Shanks, coordinating reintegration for former loyalist prisoners, affirmed in 2023 that the structures persist as "safety mechanisms" amid paramilitary influence in interface zones, where PSNI reports note ongoing intimidation and feuds. Similarly, accounts from ex-republican figures highlight how barriers halted unchecked pogroms, such as those in 1969 that displaced thousands, though nationalists frame this admission as validating removal only after comprehensive decommissioning and policing reforms.

Critiques of Reconciliation Narratives

Critics of narratives following the contend that its vision of a "shared future" has overstated the prospects for societal integration, as evidenced by the proliferation of peace lines despite the cessation of large-scale violence. Academic analyses highlight that barriers in expanded post-1998, with over half of the current structures erected after the accord, reaching approximately 97 interfaces totaling 30.5 kilometers by 2023, underscoring the inadequacy of political settlements absent profound cultural transformations. This empirical persistence challenges optimistic portrayals in left-leaning media and academic circles, which often normalize a "" trajectory while downplaying data on entrenched divisions, potentially influenced by institutional biases favoring progressive frameworks over hard security metrics. Such narratives are further critiqued for prioritizing relational optics over addressing power asymmetries and unresolved grievances, where reconciliation efforts risk sidelining accountability for past and ongoing sectarian tensions. For instance, surveys of interface residents reveal that 69% perceive peace walls as still essential due to credible threats of , reflecting that top-down initiatives cannot override local risk assessments without fostering genuine cross-community . From a pragmatic standpoint, often aligned with unionist viewpoints, maintaining infrastructure is defended as outperforming premature removals, which could invite renewed amid sporadic sectarian incidents, including low-level flares documented into the . These critiques emphasize causal realism: durable demands not symbolic gestures but sustained deterrence against division's material drivers, as hasty dismantlings without community buy-in have historically correlated with heightened vulnerabilities rather than breakthroughs.

Current Status

Extent and Maintenance as of 2025

As of early 2025, more than 60 peace walls persist across , primarily concentrated in Belfast's north and west districts, with the structures collectively spanning approximately 34 kilometers (21 miles). These barriers, comprising concrete walls, metal fences, and related enclosures, delineate around 40 major interfaces between unionist and nationalist communities, though the precise count varies by definition to include ancillary features like and road closures. Maintenance responsibilities fall under the Northern Ireland Department of Justice (DoJ), which oversees structural repairs, reinforcements, and security upgrades, often in coordination with the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) for operational needs. A 2022 tender for three-year upkeep services was valued at £450,000, covering inspections, graffiti removal, and fortification against weathering and vandalism, indicating annual costs in the low hundreds of thousands of pounds. These expenditures reflect ongoing necessities to prevent breaches amid sporadic interface violence, such as stone-throwing incidents, rather than full-scale redevelopment. Removals in 2025 have been minimal and localized, exemplified by the dismantling of a 3-meter-high metal peace line in , , in January, which had stood for 27 years and was removed with community agreement under DoJ auspices. Similar partial efforts, such as gate adjustments or segment reductions in 's North Queen Street area, have occurred, but the majority of structures remain intact due to resident security concerns and lack of consensus for broader deconstruction. Adaptations emphasize enhanced surveillance and , including expanded CCTV installations along key interfaces—such as those added in west in prior years—and automated "smart" gates that open during daylight hours for limited pedestrian and vehicular passage while locking at night to deter incursions.

Prospects for Full Removal

The prospects for full removal of peace lines in remain dim in the short term, as evidenced by persistent community preferences for retention amid ongoing security concerns. A 2019 poll indicated that 42% of respondents favored keeping the barriers in place for safety reasons, a sentiment echoed in more recent resident testimonies from 2025, where individuals adjacent to walls reported feeling safer with them intact despite partial openings. Incidents of unrest, including the August 2024 riots in Belfast's loyalist areas that escalated into and clashes with , underscore the fragility of inter-community relations and the perceived necessity of physical separations to contain flare-ups. Structural barriers further constrain progress, notably the requirement for local , which effectively grants power to residents and associated influences in interface areas. groups, though largely disarmed, retain sway over community decisions on infrastructure changes, as their tacit endorsement is often needed to avert intimidation or backlash. Unresolved legacies from exacerbate this, with an estimated 45,000 to 60,000 people violently displaced across communities, fostering enduring mistrust and territorial entrenchment that physical barriers symbolize and enforce. These factors demand community-level buy-in for any dismantling, yet empirical trends show opposition rooted in lived experiences of vulnerability rather than abstract ideals. Longer-term removal might occur incrementally through targeted and cross-community programs, but only if underlying causal drivers—such as sectarian conflicts and unaddressed historical animosities—are confronted directly, as superficial incentives alone have proven insufficient to shift attitudes. Analyses of stalled initiatives highlight that without eroding the root hatreds sustained by traumas and legacies, full elimination risks reigniting localized violence, rendering optimistic timelines unrealistic.

References

  1. [1]
    Department of Justice Interface Programme
    The Interface Programme has been established to deliver the commitment made by the Northern Ireland Executive to remove all Interface structures by 2023.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] The Peace Walls: - AN ORAL hISTORy - International Fund for Ireland
    Peace walls were built in 1969 as a response to sectarian violence, separating communities, and are meant to act as protection, but also limit movement.
  3. [3]
    Peaceline wall | Troubles Archive
    The first peaceline was improvised from coiled barbed wire and corrugated fencing to split streets that linked the Falls Road to the Shankill Road in 1969. The ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Removing Peace Walls and Public Policy Brief (1) - NI Assembly
    Oct 8, 2015 · In some instances, listed structures might simply have become part of the urban architecture and are no longer even recognized as a peace wall.
  5. [5]
    Public Attitudes to Peace Walls - justice-ni.gov.uk
    Topics: Policing and community safety. Date published: 7 December 2020. Public Attitudes to Peace Walls 2019. Documents. Public attitudes to peace walls ...Missing: lines | Show results with:lines
  6. [6]
    [PDF] KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE SEMINAR SERIES
    While there has been considerable focus on adults' views on the removal of peace lines, particularly those living in interface area in Belfast (Community ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Belfast has more peace walls now than 25 years ago – removing ...
    Apr 26, 2023 · In November 2022, Flax Street, in north Belfast, was reopened along Crumlin Road. Before that, in 2020 a corrugated metal barrier at Duncairn ...Missing: construction | Show results with:construction
  8. [8]
    NI 100: How Northern Ireland's birth was marked by violence - BBC
    Feb 11, 2021 · After 1922, the violence settled down into an uneasy peace - but the sectarian unrest would be a dangerous feature of Northern Ireland for ...
  9. [9]
    Issues: Sectarianism: Brewer, John D. 'Northern Ireland: 1921-1998'
    Mar 9, 2025 · The violence leading up to partition ... CAIN contains information and source material on the conflict and politics in Northern Ireland.
  10. [10]
    A brief history of the partition of Ireland - HistoryExtra
    May 18, 2022 · This brutal guerrilla conflict of ambush and reprisals saw Britain lose control of nationalist areas, while sectarian violence also broke out, ...
  11. [11]
    'Intimidation and the Control of Conflict in Northern Ireland' by John ...
    Mar 9, 2025 · Between 1835 and 1935 there were eight periods of serious rioting in Belfast - in 1835, 1857, 1864,1872, 1886, 1898, 1920-22 and 1935 - and ...
  12. [12]
    Belfast Riots – A Short History - The Irish Story
    Jan 9, 2013 · The majority of the 11 people killed in the 1935 riots were Protestants, but most of those forced from their homes (86%) and injured were ...Missing: displacement | Show results with:displacement
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    Civil Rights - A Chronology of Main Events, 1964-1972
    Mar 9, 2025 · During the 9 August 1971 and the early hours of the 10 August Northern Ireland experienced the worst violence since August 1969. [Over the ...
  15. [15]
    Northern Ireland's lost moment: how the peaceful protests of '68 ...
    Apr 22, 2018 · The most vicious outbreak of sectarian violence erupted in Belfast, where hundreds of families were driven from their burning homes by a large ...
  16. [16]
    Violence and Civil Disturbances in Northern Ireland in 1969 - CAIN
    On 12 August there was a serious riot in Coalisland, while on the 13th rioting again broke out in Dungannon. 1.21 On the l3th the disturbances spread to other ...
  17. [17]
    The Deployment of British Troops - Summary of Main Events
    Mar 9, 2025 · It had been announced that the permanent military garrison, within Northern Ireland, would revert to its peacetime level of no more than 5,000 ...
  18. [18]
    Timeline - Peacewall Archive
    1866 – Belfast opens a new City Cemetery. The design includes an underground brick wall nine feet deep to separate Catholic and Protestant burial plots.
  19. [19]
    Peace lines: Patchwork of barriers that stubbornly refuse to go away ...
    Sep 27, 2024 · It was September 10 1969, when the British Army began erecting the first ... peace line near Cupar Way PICTURE: MAL MCCANN. It was five feet ...
  20. [20]
    Robert Porter, a humane if luckless minister of home affairs
    May 28, 2014 · He was indeed minister of home affairs in 1969 when demonstrations gave way to riot and finally to the events of August 1969 when the Army took ...Missing: authorization | Show results with:authorization
  21. [21]
    British troops sent into Northern Ireland – archive, 1969
    Aug 14, 2024 · On 14 August 1969, the British government deployed troops on the streets of Northern Ireland to restore public order after weeks of violent sectarian rioting.
  22. [22]
    CAIN: Chronology of the Conflict 1969 - Ulster University
    Six people were killed and many more injured during sectarian riots in Belfast. ... Political Developments; Law Order. ] Tuesday 9 September 1969 'Peace Line' ...
  23. [23]
    Peace Lines - 99% Invisible
    Aug 20, 2019 · Many of the walls in Northern Ireland went up in the 1970s and '80s at the height of what's become known as “The Troubles.” Decades later, ...
  24. [24]
    Belfast Peace Wall and its murals - how to see it for yourself (2025)
    Aug 3, 2023 · This is what peace looks like in Northern Ireland – communities separated by a wall up to six metres high; gates along its length that are still locked at ...
  25. [25]
    Segregation in Northern Ireland - CAIN Archive - Ulster University
    Mar 9, 2025 · A Process for Removing Interface Barriers: A discussion paper proposing a five phase process for the removal of 'peace walls' in Northern ...
  26. [26]
    CAIN: Chronology of the Conflict 1975 - Ulster University
    Loyalist paramilitaries killed six Catholic civilians in a gun and bomb attack on the Strand Bar, in the Short Strand area of Belfast. item mark Paul ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Fear, Mobility, and Ethno-sectarianism in the Two 'Ardoynes' - CAIN
    Between 1969 and 2003, around 20 euphemistically called 'peace-lines' (interfaces) were constructed around those areas within which the most excessive patterns ...
  28. [28]
    Belfast's peace walls: potent symbols of division are dwindling
    Apr 7, 2023 · Retaining Troubles-era “peace walls” between Catholic and Protestant areas seemed advisable even though the 1998 Good Friday agreement had ...Missing: effectiveness | Show results with:effectiveness
  29. [29]
    Visualising the Conflict: Map Set 21: Deaths Close to Peacelines
    Oct 22, 2013 · As mentioned above, to do a full analysis of the impact of peacelines on deaths would require a full examination of all the 22 peace walls.
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    The Peace Walls at the Centre of Recent Unrest in Northern Ireland
    Jun 8, 2021 · Initially constructed in 2001 as a temporary measure to shelter houses and the residents occupying them during uncontrollable sectarian violence ...
  33. [33]
    Belfast's Peace Gates: A Symbol Of Division And Hope
    Feb 6, 2025 · Constructed in 1969 during the height of The Troubles, the peace walls were initially intended as temporary safety measures to separate ...Missing: construction | Show results with:construction
  34. [34]
    The price of peace - The Economist
    Jul 14, 2011 · (There is some direct cost, however: last year, Northern Ireland's Department of Justice spent more than £120,000 maintaining the peace lines, ...Missing: maintenance | Show results with:maintenance
  35. [35]
    It won't happen by 2023 target, but work continues to remove ...
    Mar 12, 2022 · The DoJ has recently issued a tender worth around £450,000 for the maintenance of the structures over the next three years. The first interface ...
  36. [36]
    Belfast Peace Walls: History, Map + How to See Them
    Jul 16, 2024 · The Belfast Peace Walls were built to reduce tensions between Loyalist and Nationalist communities after the 1969 riots, and are now part of ...
  37. [37]
    Travel Between The Peace Walls - City Tours Belfast
    In 1969, the first Belfast peace walls were erected during the beginning of the civil unrest known as 'The Troubles'. The initial set up of the peace walls ...Missing: construction | Show results with:construction
  38. [38]
    Maps - Belfast Interface Project
    Cluster 1: Suffolk-Lenadoon · Cluster 2: Upper Springfield Road · Cluster 3: Falls-Shankill · Cluster 4: The Village-Westlink · Cluster 5: Inner Ring · Cluster 6: ...
  39. [39]
    Hidden barriers: A tour of Belfast's secret peace lines
    Apr 3, 2022 · The next site visit was the Oldpark area in north Belfast, illustrated as an example of the effects of Protestant family depopulation. From the ...
  40. [40]
    Divided by a peace wall, united through friendship - BBC
    Aug 3, 2023 · Legacy of peace walls. There are still over 20 miles of peace walls - or peace lines - across Northern Ireland, the Majority across Belfast.
  41. [41]
    The Story Behind Northern Ireland's Peace Walls - Culture Trip
    Aug 22, 2017 · Peace walls were built in 1969 to separate Catholic and Protestant areas in Belfast, as a temporary measure that never came down. They are now ...
  42. [42]
    Peacewalls 50
    10th September (Tuesday) 2019: WALK – 50 years of the Falls-Shankill Peaceline Meet at base of Divis Tower, Divis Street, Belfast BT12 4QA Time: 16.30
  43. [43]
    The start of the peace lines: Belfast, 1969. | The Treason Felony Blog
    Mar 15, 2019 · The start and end points were largely self-defined by flashpoints and the rioting of the past weeks. However, negotiating the exact position ...
  44. [44]
    Hard to miss, easy to blame? Peacelines, interfaces and political ...
    Analyses political deaths in Belfast in relation to peacelines and interfaces. Provides a new model of interface zones in the city.<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Hard to miss, easy to blame? Peacelines, interfaces and political ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · When this is considered, patterns of fatality were more intense within the cores or 'sanctuaries' of highly segregated Catholic and Protestant ...
  46. [46]
    The Effects of Living in Segregated vs. Mixed Areas in Northern Ireland
    However, our analysis also shows that respondents living in mixed neighbourhoods report higher exposure to political violence and higher perceived threat to ...
  47. [47]
    Moving Past the Troubles: The Future of Northern Ireland Peace
    The 1998 Good Friday Agreement achieved compromise by creating a new power-sharing government, facilitating disarmament, and abolishing border checks between ...
  48. [48]
    The determinants of low-intensity intergroup violence - jstor
    Jan 3, 2020 · This article explores the determinants of low-intensity sectarian violence in Northern Ireland, which has marked the post- 1998 peace agreement ...
  49. [49]
    Public policy and peace walls in Belfast - ReShare
    However, our previous research has shown that 69% of local residents living in closest proximity to the peace walls believe that the peace walls are still ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Police in Belfast fire plastic bullets to quell riots - The Guardian
    Jul 12, 2013 · Weeks after Barack Obama's appeal in Belfast for the ending of the so-called "Peace Walls" separating communities, the rioting underscored the ...
  51. [51]
    Northern Ireland interfaces: More residents want peace walls to stay
    Dec 15, 2015 · The survey found that 30% of those surveyed wanted the walls to remain, while 49% wanted them to come down.Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  52. [52]
    Living next door to a Belfast peace wall: 'You feel safer with it up'
    Aug 12, 2025 · For the first time in more than 50 years, Jean Canavan walks the stretch of road under an enormous wall at the back of her Belfast home.
  53. [53]
    The Physical And Mental Walls That Divide Us… - Slugger O'Toole
    May 20, 2025 · Peace walls in Belfast, originally erected to reduce violence between Protestant and Catholic communities, have become enduring symbols of ...
  54. [54]
    Good Friday Agreement at 25: How death toll from Troubles violence ...
    Apr 9, 2023 · Crime. Good Friday Agreement at 25: How death toll from Troubles violence changed in Northern Ireland after 1998 deal. By Adam Kula. Published ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Analysing Baseline Data on Peace Walls (6): Implications for policy
    Our survey of attitudes among residents living in proximity to peacewalls and work with projects supported under the International Fund for Ire- land (IFI) ...Missing: safer | Show results with:safer
  56. [56]
    Housing in NI: Is 90% of social housing segregated? - FactCheckNI
    Apr 17, 2025 · 90% of social housing is still segregated, in contrast to the finding that 73% of people say that they want to live in a shared neighbourhood.<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Belfast's housing policy still reflects religious and economic division
    Oct 3, 2017 · Housing policy in Northern Ireland is politically fraught and deprivation is widespread. Shared neighbourhood schemes are laudable, but not enough.
  58. [58]
    Segregation and Mixing - Shared Future News
    Oct 24, 2019 · Public housing and education remain over 90% single-identity populated. While there is more shared space in which mixing could occur, it is ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Exploring Segregation and Sharing in Belfast: a PGIS approach
    In 1969, the first peace walls and interface barriers were used to separate conflicting Catholic and Protestant communities and moderate intercommunity violence ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Exploring Segregation and Sharing in Belfast: a PGIS approach
    In 1969, the first peace walls and interface barriers were used to separate conflicting Catholic and Protestant communities and moderate intercommunity violence ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The Political Cost? Religious Segregation, Peace Walls, and House ...
    More pertinent, Belfast remains deeply segregated, with new and reinforced interfaces and peace walls reflecting new and reasserted competition over land and ...
  62. [62]
    Belfast's iron(ic) curtain: "Peace walls" and their impact on house ...
    Findings: The emerging findings demonstrate that a greater negative pricing effect is evident with proximity to the peace walls, with the exception of the ...
  63. [63]
    Belfast's iron(ic) curtain: “Peace walls” and their impact on house ...
    Nov 18, 2013 · – The emerging findings demonstrate that a greater negative pricing effect is evident with proximity to the peace walls, with the exception of ...Missing: property values
  64. [64]
    No peace beyond the wall - Belfast isn't Berlin
    Sep 14, 2024 · ... walls was normal. Of residents close to the peace lines, 40% said they hoped that in time, their nearest wall could be removed. The exact ...Missing: safety | Show results with:safety
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Public Attitudes to Peace Walls (2015) Survey Results
    People living near peace walls believe that their primary function is to separate communities and prevent violence coming from the outside into the community.
  66. [66]
    The Belfast Peace Walls: Safety, Secuirty, and Division
    Jun 1, 2023 · The first was put up in 1969 and over the next 30 years, nearly 30 miles of walls could be erected through the city.
  67. [67]
    North Belfast: Interface barrier removed at Newington Street - BBC
    Nov 26, 2014 · At the meeting, residents close to existing walls and interfaces expressed their fears over peace walls close to their homes coming down.
  68. [68]
    Northern Ireland: The Peace Process, Ongoing Challenges, and ...
    Mar 7, 2025 · Between 1969 and 1999, roughly 3,500 people died as a result of political violence in Northern Ireland, which is a part of the United Kingdom ( ...
  69. [69]
    Inspectors: IRA Full Disarmament - CBS News
    Sep 25, 2005 · On Saturday, Adams told thousands of supporters in Dublin that IRA disarmament would have "a huge impact" on peace efforts. Adams, a veteran IRA ...
  70. [70]
    The Fresh Start Panel report on the Disbandment of Paramilitary ...
    Jun 7, 2016 · A report by the end of May 2016 with “recommendations for a strategy to disband paramilitary groups”. This task flowed from the Fresh Start agreement.Missing: peace 2008
  71. [71]
    NI Troubles: 'I would love to see that wall coming down' - BBC
    Jan 29, 2023 · The peace line at Cupar Way, between the Shankill and the Falls areas stands 14m (45ft) tall - that is three times the height of the former ...Missing: length peak
  72. [72]
    Belfast park opens door to peace | Northern Ireland | The Guardian
    Sep 16, 2011 · Gate to open in wall built in Alexandra Park to prevent Catholics and Protestants clashing.
  73. [73]
    'Peace wall' gate at Belfast's Alexandra Park may open for longer
    Dec 17, 2011 · The Alexandra Park fence or "peace wall" was put up in 1994 to try to stop sectarian fighting. The gate was opened in September from 09:00 to 15:00 on weekdays.
  74. [74]
    Alexandra Park: Backing for plan to remove section of 'peace fence'
    Jun 25, 2015 · A proposal to remove part of an interface barrier or "peace wall" in a north Belfast park has been backed by the Department of Justice.
  75. [75]
    Peace Walls Programmme - International Fund for Ireland
    It is aimed at developing and delivering a range of confidence and relationship building interventions within and between interface communities.Missing: lines | Show results with:lines
  76. [76]
    Peace walls: Support for removing barriers in Northern Ireland grows
    Nov 12, 2019 · Since 2012, the IFI has invested more than £5.2m in its peace walls programme, but Mr Harte has urged politicians and the government to step up.
  77. [77]
    Peace wall removed in Armagh after 27 years | The Irish Post
    Jan 21, 2025 · More than 20 miles of peace walls remain in Northern Ireland, with the majority located in Belfast. ... in 2010 there were 59 recognised walls.
  78. [78]
    Sections of peace wall set to be removed for new shared community ...
    Oct 22, 2024 · Over 40 metres of peace wall will be removed in the second phase of a shared space project on Ballygomartin Road in west Belfast.
  79. [79]
    Portadown peace wall removed after almost 27 years - BBC
    Jan 19, 2025 · A peace wall at an interface in Portadown in County Armagh has been taken down after almost 27 years. The 3m-tall metal structure was ...Missing: deadline | Show results with:deadline
  80. [80]
    Belfast's walls from the Troubles are set to come down, but locals ...
    Sep 7, 2023 · Belfast's peace walls, built in the Troubles to tamp sectarian violence, were slated to be torn down in 2023. But locals are protesting.Missing: surveillance | Show results with:surveillance
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Peace Walls Programme Attitudinal Survey Summary of Results ...
    Two years on, the data suggests that although respondents report higher levels of 'feeling safe' in the areas in which they live, this issue has not been ...
  82. [82]
    History - The Troubles - Violence - BBC
    The conflict in Northern Ireland during the late 20th century is known as the Troubles. Over 3,600 people were killed and thousands more injured.
  83. [83]
    Northern Ireland still divided by peace walls 20 years after conflict
    Jan 13, 2020 · In the '70s, the British government began to build separation barriers known as “peace walls” around Northern Ireland to separate Catholic and ...Missing: Executive | Show results with:Executive
  84. [84]
    Belfast walls divide wary Protestants and Catholics - RTE
    Apr 5, 2023 · In 2013, the Northern Ireland executive announced a plan to remove all peace walls by 2023. But a decade on, they are still standing.<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    DUP oppose the re-opening of Flax Street interface - Belfast Media
    Sep 24, 2020 · The DUP in North Belfast say they will oppose any attempt to remove the barrier at Flax Street in Ardoyne.
  86. [86]
    Sinn Fein MLA says peace walls will be removed by 2023
    Aug 11, 2016 · Originally few in number, they multiplied over the years, from 18 in the early 1990s to 39 peace walls and 11 gates today; in total they stretch ...
  87. [87]
    Stormont Executive committed to removing peace walls by 2023
    Aug 9, 2016 · Walls dividing Protestant and Catholic communities in Northern Ireland should be down within the next seven years, a government minister has said.Missing: dismantling | Show results with:dismantling
  88. [88]
    Belfast's 'peace walls' still stand 25 years after conflict
    “They are still a safety mechanism for people,” said Ian Shanks, head of Action for Community Transformation, which works to reintegrate former loyalist ...
  89. [89]
    Belfast, divided in the name of peace | Northern Ireland - The Guardian
    Jan 22, 2012 · This year, there were just two days of rioting in the whole summer. For all that, there are tough times ahead. As we enter the long winter of ...Missing: containing | Show results with:containing
  90. [90]
    Incomplete Peace and Social Stagnation: Shortcomings of the Good ...
    Aug 10, 2018 · Despite the lack of renewed violence in the region since 1998, the Good Friday Agreement left many issues unaddressed, hampered by the region's ...
  91. [91]
    Reconciliation and Human Rights in Northern Ireland: A False ...
    Mar 1, 2014 · Critics of a reconciliation approach may be concerned that relationship building predominates over the challenge function, ignores power ...
  92. [92]
    Belfast's Peace Walls: Can you remove the conflict architecture?
    Jan 8, 2014 · In May 2013, the Northern Ireland Executive committed to reducing or remove all peace walls by 2023.Missing: influence opposition
  93. [93]
    Systemic sectarianism in Northern Ireland - Rupert Taylor, 2025
    Nov 29, 2024 · ... sectarianism is a root cause of inequality and the political conflict. ... Belfast Violence,” Belfast Telegraph, August 6, 2024. Go to ...
  94. [94]
    Portadown peace wall removed after almost 27 years - BBC News
    Jan 20, 2025 · A peace wall at an interface in Portadown in County Armagh has been taken down after almost 27 years. The 3m-tall metal structure was removed under a ...
  95. [95]
    Removal of Peace Wall at North Queen Street Complete
    A project to remove a long-established Peace Wall in North Belfast has been completed. The main objective was to remove an 8m high Peace Wall.
  96. [96]
    Security cameras added to west Belfast peaceline - BBC News
    Feb 13, 2014 · New security cameras have been installed in a bid to build confidence at one of west Belfast's main sectarian interfaces.Missing: adaptations | Show results with:adaptations
  97. [97]
    At the Front Line of Belfast's Week of Violence - New Lines Magazine
    Aug 14, 2024 · It is plain to see that the riots in Belfast were based on lies, because the focus of the anger was immigration, while Northern Ireland actually ...
  98. [98]
    Belfast residents consider future after riots - The Guardian
    Aug 7, 2024 · Refugees who live and own businesses in area affected by violence fear it has exposed underbelly of hostility. Riots live – latest updates.Missing: lines | Show results with:lines
  99. [99]
    The Troubles: tens of thousands of people were violently displaced ...
    Feb 26, 2019 · Many of Belfast's Catholic and Protestant communities remain separated by a network of oxymoronically named “peace walls” – physical barriers ...Missing: 1935 | Show results with:1935
  100. [100]
    Dislocation, unsettledness and the long-term consequences of ...
    Sep 20, 2023 · Based on in-depth interviews, this article explores the long-term consequences of forced displacement during Northern Ireland's 30-year conflict.