Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Power dressing

Power dressing denotes a deliberate style of professional clothing, chiefly adopted by women in the late 1970s and 1980s, featuring tailored suits with broad shoulder pads, fitted skirts or trousers, and bold accessories to project authority, competence, and leadership in business environments. This approach emerged as greater numbers of women accessed corporate roles following expansions in workforce participation, with early advocacy from John T. Molloy's 1977 book The Woman’s Dress for Success Book, which prescribed skirted suits to secure credibility amid gender-based skepticism. The style's core elements included structured jackets emphasizing wide silhouettes via pads—often reaching extremes in television influences like —alongside vibrant hues such as or , silk blouses, and status-signaling jewelry like large pearls or gilt earrings, adapting menswear tailoring to feminine forms while signaling conformity to hierarchical norms. Exemplified by figures such as , whose resolute attire reinforced her political stature, power dressing reflected a pragmatic to realities, where attire causally shaped perceptions of dominance and professionalism, as evidenced by studies linking formal wear to heightened self-perceived and external attributions of . Empirical observations indicate its efficacy, with surveys showing better-dressed professionals more frequently advanced in promotions, underscoring clothing's role in person perception and status signaling rather than mere aesthetics. While critiqued in some quarters as a conservative concession mimicking male garb to appease patriarchal structures, power dressing demonstrably facilitated women's integration into high-stakes arenas by leveraging visual cues of power, though its prevalence waned in the 1990s amid relaxed dress codes.

Definition and Core Elements

Defining Features

Power dressing encompasses structured, tailored garments selected to project authority, competence, and confidence in professional settings, particularly as women sought to assert presence in male-dominated workplaces during the late and . Central to this style is the use of sharp silhouettes that emphasize geometric lines and bodily proportions to convey control and professionalism, drawing from earlier concepts in John Molloy's 1975 book Dress for Success, which advocated clothing as a tool for signaling status though initially focused on men. Key visual elements include tailored suits or jackets with defined, often padded shoulders to create an imposing upper-body frame, paired with straight or tapered trousers, knee-length A-line skirts, and crisp blouses in high-quality fabrics such as blends or . These components prioritize fit over ornamentation, with minimal accessories like simple jewelry or scarves to maintain a cohesive, distraction-free appearance that enhances perceived . Color palettes typically feature dark neutrals—navy, , gray—to evoke sobriety and reliability, avoiding patterns or hues that might dilute the authoritative signal. The style's efficacy stems from its alignment with nonverbal cues of dominance, such as expanded and vertical lines, which links to increased self-assurance and external perceptions of power, as demonstrated in studies on expansive influencing levels like testosterone. Unlike casual or feminine attire, power dressing rejects fluidity for rigidity, using precise tailoring to mimic or uniforms historically associated with command structures. This deliberate of masculine suiting norms served as a reformist , enabling wearers to challenge hierarchies through visual equivalence rather than novelty.

Psychological and Signaling Mechanisms

Power dressing leverages enclothed cognition, wherein attire symbolically associated with authority—such as tailored suits or structured blazers—influences the wearer's psychological state, enhancing self-perceived power and cognitive performance. A 2015 study demonstrated that participants assigned formal clothing exhibited greater abstract thinking and social distancing in decision-making tasks compared to those in casual wear, attributing this to the symbolic meaning of formality evoking psychological formality. Similarly, experiments involving lab coats, a proxy for professional authority, revealed improved sustained attention and reduced errors in tasks requiring focus, effects absent when the same garment lacked symbolic relevance. These findings indicate that power dressing causally boosts executive function and confidence through embodied symbolism rather than mere physical comfort. From a signaling , power dressing conveys and hierarchical status to observers, eliciting and via evolved social heuristics for assessing capability. Formal attire correlates with perceptions of higher and ethicality in contexts, as formal dress outperforms casual styles in evoking and attributions. Field experiments confirm this: requesters in authoritative uniforms secured 20-30% higher rates for mundane tasks than those in everyday clothing, with verbal justifications citing the uniform's implied legitimacy. Such signals align with costly signaling theory, where high-effort, standardized dress (e.g., ) reliably indicates resources and discipline, distinguishing wearers from lower-status mimics without equivalent investment. These mechanisms interact bidirectionally: the wearer's amplified reinforces signaling efficacy, while observer attributions can induce self-fulfilling behavioral adjustments, such as riskier negotiations or firmer stances in power dynamics. and hormonal assays further support causality, showing formal dress elevates testosterone and lowers in wearers during high-stakes interactions, mirroring physiological responses to actual gains. However, signaling potency diminishes in informal cultures or when over-formality violates contextual norms, potentially inverting perceptions toward rigidity over .

Historical Development

Early Precursors (1920s-1970s)

In the , pioneered tailored suits for women, featuring a cardigan-style jacket paired with a slim , which borrowed from menswear to create a streamlined, androgynous that emphasized mobility and understated elegance over ornate . This design, introduced around 1925, marked an early shift toward professional attire that projected competence and independence, aligning with women's expanding roles post-World War I suffrage gains. Chanel's wool jersey fabrics and lack of corsetry facilitated practical dressing for urban working women, setting a template for authority-signaling that rejected Victorian excess. The 1930s introduced structured shoulder pads into women's fashion, enhancing the perception of strength and broadening the silhouette to mimic male suiting proportions, as seen in designs by and others influenced by Hollywood icons like . These pads, first appearing around 1930, created angular lines that conveyed resilience amid the , with padded jackets and dresses worn by professional women entering clerical and sales roles. By the , wartime necessities amplified this trend, as women adopted utilitarian broad-shouldered suits and slacks for factory and office work, blending functionality with authoritative posture under rationing constraints that prioritized durable wool and cotton blends. Postwar 1950s fashion briefly reverted to softer, waist-emphasizing forms under Christian Dior's "New Look," yet tailored day suits persisted for businesswomen, maintaining Chanel-esque simplicity in neutral tones and knee-length skirts. The 1960s saw Yves Saint Laurent's 1966 introduction of women's trousers in collections, evolving into pantsuits that challenged skirt mandates in offices and symbolized feminist assertions of . These matching jacket-and-trouser ensembles, popularized by designers like , gained traction as women comprised 40% of the U.S. workforce by 1970, offering a unisex armor against male-dominated environments. In the , proliferated as a staple of women's business attire, with wide-legged and blazers in or signaling ambition amid economic shifts and ; figures like U.S. congressional women adopted them for legislative visibility, predating the decade's exaggerated pads. By 1977, surveys indicated over 50% of professional women preferred suits with pants for perceived authority, reflecting causal links between attire adaptation and workplace advancement in sectors like and . This era's designs, often in bold patterns or solids, laid groundwork for amplifications by prioritizing over ornamentation.

Peak in the 1980s

Power dressing reached its zenith in the 1980s, characterized by structured tailored suits featuring exaggerated shoulder pads that created a broad, authoritative silhouette for women entering male-dominated professional environments. This style emphasized sharp lines, wide lapels, and fitted skirts or trousers, often in solid colors like navy or black, to mimic the authority associated with traditional male business attire while adapting it for female wearers. The trend solidified as more women ascended to executive and political roles, with shoulder widths expanding progressively throughout the decade to project competence and dominance in boardrooms and legislatures. The surge in power dressing coincided with a marked increase in women's workforce participation, particularly among middle-class professionals, driven by economic shifts and the lingering momentum of feminist gains that opened corporate ladders previously reserved for men. By the mid-1980s, this attire became synonymous with "" culture—young urban professionals thriving in deregulated financial sectors under policies like those of U.S. President and UK Prime Minister , where visible symbols of status and control were paramount. Designers such as epitomized the aesthetic, pioneering voluminous shoulders that by 1985 defined high fashion's alignment with corporate ambition, influencing lines sold widely to aspiring executives. Margaret Thatcher, serving as Britain's first female prime minister from 1979 to 1990, embodied and amplified power dressing's peak through her consistent choice of boxy, padded-shouldered suits paired with low-heeled pumps, crafting an image of unyielding authority that resonated globally among female leaders. Her styling rejected frills for conservative tailoring, often in blue to signal steadfastness, which studies attribute to reinforcing her political persona amid conservative governance emphasizing . This approach not only normalized structured suiting for women in power but also set precedents for subsequent politicians, underscoring how attire served as a strategic tool for commanding respect in adversarial settings.

Post-1980s Evolution and Decline

In the late 1980s, power dressing began to soften as tailoring transitioned from the rigid, padded-shoulder structures of the decade's peak to slimmer, less imposing silhouettes that carried into the and . Trousers increasingly supplanted skirts in corporate wardrobes, while overall aesthetics shifted toward and relaxed fits, marking an evolution away from the aggressive angularity epitomized by designers like . By the early , this manifested in unstructured jackets, wide-legged pants, long tunics, and fluid pantsuits, as exemplified in collections from and , which emphasized suppleness over formality. This decline accelerated with the broader casualization of attire, driven by economic constraints that curbed full-outfit purchases in favor of mix-and-match pieces, alongside shifts toward gentler, less hierarchical expressions post-Reagan . clothing sales and stagnated amid a less formal marketplace, with comfort-oriented fabrics like Lycra gaining traction and shoulder pads largely vanishing from business suits. Corporate dress codes relaxed, incorporating vibrant colors, body-conscious tailoring, and playful elements such as mini skirt suits or embellished knits from houses like and , reflecting greater self-expression but diluting the uniform signaling of authority inherent to 1980s power dressing. Into the 2000s and beyond, the trend toward supplanted formal suiting, with Gallup polls indicating that by , only 3% of U.S. workers wore business professional attire—down from 7% in —while business casual rose to 41%. The intensified this via widespread telecommuting, boosting casual adoption among remote workers (58% business casual versus 24% for in-office), as long-line jackets and became lingering staples but without the structured intent of power ensembles. Consequently, power dressing's core elements receded, yielding to individualized, comfort-prioritizing styles that prioritized versatility over authoritative projection.

Influential Figures and Innovations

Designers and Stylists

defined much of the 1980s power dressing aesthetic through his structured, broad-shouldered suits, earning him the title "King of the Shoulder Pad" for designs that projected unyielding authority via exaggerated silhouettes in , , and metallic fabrics. His collections from 1979 onward emphasized fitted waists and voluminous upper bodies, influencing corporate wardrobes by amplifying physical presence without sacrificing . Montana's work, peaking in shows like his 1985 -dominated , directly shaped the era's emphasis on visual dominance in professional environments. Thierry Mugler advanced power dressing with architectural, high-drama suits featuring extreme shoulder padding and corseted lines, debuting transformative womenswear in 1973 but reaching icon status by the mid-1980s through bold, futuristic tailoring. His 1980s collections incorporated metallic sheens and peplums, worn by figures seeking to command attention in boardrooms and beyond, with sales surging amid the decade's economic boom. Mugler's influence extended to ready-to-wear lines that democratized these elements for working women. Giorgio Armani pioneered a softer variant of power suiting starting with his 1975 menswear debut, evolving into deconstructed jackets by the that relaxed traditional rigidity while maintaining authoritative lines through fluid draping and neutral palettes. Armani's designs, adopted in over 500 boutiques worldwide by 1980, emphasized understated elegance for executives, contrasting sharper competitors and influencing global corporate dress codes. Norma Kamali contributed innovative oversized blazers and shirt dresses with padded shoulders in the early , merging functionality with professional tailoring to offer versatile power looks. Her 1981 collections featured bold, boxy silhouettes in synthetic fabrics, appealing to women balancing career and mobility, and remain archived as exemplars of adaptive 1980s suiting. Stylists and costume designers like , who outfitted from its 1981 premiere, popularized power dressing motifs through by amplifying shoulder pads and jewel-toned suits on characters embodying ambition, thus embedding the style in public consciousness. Miller's designs for over 200 episodes reinforced causal links between attire and perceived power, with replicated looks boosting designer sales. While personal stylists were nascent in the era, these tastemakers advised on adaptations for real-world application.

Political and Corporate Exemplars

, serving as of the from May 4, 1979, to November 28, 1990, became the archetype of power dressing in politics through her adoption of structured suits with exaggerated , often paired with pussy-bow blouses and pearl necklaces. This , favoring colors like to evoke and authority, was tailored by British houses such as and emphasized a feminine yet commanding to counter perceptions of weakness in male-dominated arenas. Thatcher's consistent styling from the late 1970s onward signaled resolve and professionalism, influencing global perceptions of female leadership attire during the peak of the trend. In the corporate sector, power dressing manifested among female executives navigating 1980s and boardrooms, where women donned menswear-inspired tailored suits from designers like to project competence and deter dismissal in environments where only 3% of CEOs were women by 1980. Figures such as Linda Wachner, who rose to lead apparel firms like Warnaco by the late 1980s, exemplified this by favoring sharp, authoritative suiting that mirrored male counterparts' pinstripes and broad lapels. While specific corporate icons were less publicly cataloged than political ones, the style's prevalence among rising professionals underscored its role in signaling ambition amid economic and mergers that amplified female entry into high . Hillary Clinton, as U.S. Senator from 2001 to 2009 and from 2009 to 2013, adapted power dressing via signature pantsuits, evolving the skirt suit into a more mobile form while retaining structured shoulders for ; her frequent use of this uniform, including a notable ensemble in , reinforced authority in diplomatic and legislative settings. This approach, distinct from Thatcher's , prioritized practicality but similarly aimed to neutralize gender biases through formal equivalence to male suiting.

Media and Cultural Impact

Portrayals in Film and Television

In the , television series such as (1981–1989) exemplified power dressing through characters like Alexis Carrington Colby, portrayed by in big-shouldered suits designed by , which emphasized structured silhouettes to convey corporate authority and glamour. These outfits, featuring padded shoulders and tailored jackets, mirrored and amplified real-world trends, influencing viewers to adopt similar attire for professional empowerment. Films of the era, including (1988), portrayed power dressing as a tool for , with protagonist Tess McGill () transforming from casual secretary outfits to sharp, wide-shouldered business suits to navigate a competitive environment. Similarly, in Baby Boom (1987), Diane Keaton's character adopted power suits with prominent shoulder pads to balance career demands and personal life, underscoring the attire's role in projecting competence amid gender barriers. Later depictions shifted toward refined iterations of power dressing. In The Devil Wears Prada (2006), Meryl Streep's embodied high-fashion authority through minimalist, tailored ensembles inspired by editorial leaders, illustrating how sleek lines and luxury fabrics sustained the style's signaling of dominance in . On television, (2012–2018) featured () in a wardrobe of structured coats, sheath dresses, and neutral-toned suits curated by Lyn , where the attire symbolized confidence and crisis management prowess in . emphasized that such dressing fostered a of solidity, evolving from stark whites to bolder hues as the character's arcs intensified. These portrayals often highlighted power dressing's psychological edge while critiquing its performative aspects in high-stakes settings.

Influence in Advertising and Broader Pop Culture

In the , advertising campaigns prominently featured power dressing to align brands with emerging narratives of female professional authority and economic ascent. Lauren's early advertisements depicted women in broad-shouldered, tailored suits that mirrored menswear silhouettes while incorporating feminine blouses, positioning the attire as a tool for workplace equivalence and signaling a departure from softer, domestic imagery prevalent in prior decades. These visuals, often captured in aspirational settings, contributed to the commercialization of power suits as symbols of ambition amid Wall Street's boom. Fashion magazines amplified this through editorial spreads that blurred advertising and cultural commentary. A notable example is Helmut Newton's October 1985 "Power Dressing...a New Way" feature in US Vogue, which portrayed models in structured suits by designers such as Chanel and Yves Saint Laurent, hovering dominantly over subservient men at a gas station, thereby reinforcing the style's connotations of control and reversal of gender hierarchies in visual narratives. Beyond print, power dressing permeated broader pop culture via television soap operas, where lavish wardrobes set trends for millions of viewers. Shows like Dynasty (1981–1989) and Dallas (1978–1991) showcased characters in padded-shoulder suits, bold jewel tones, and fur-trimmed ensembles, with Dynasty's Alexis Carrington exemplifying the archetype through over 200 custom outfits per season that blended opulence with assertiveness, directly spurring retail demand for similar pieces. The Bold and the Beautiful (debuting 1987) extended this by integrating power suits into daytime drama, further embedding the style in suburban aspirations. Music videos on also adopted power dressing elements, with performers in brightly colored, tailored suits evoking authority amid the era's and fusion; for instance, the structured shoulders and fitted lines in videos by artists like underscored themes of self-empowerment, influencing fan emulation and extending the trend from boardrooms to entertainment. This cross-medium reinforcement solidified power dressing as a cultural shorthand for ambition, though its exaggerated forms later faced in later decades' retrospectives.

Criticisms and Controversies

Debates on Efficacy and Authenticity

Psychological studies indicate that elements of power dressing, such as tailored suits and formal attire, can enhance wearers' self-perceptions of , , and confidence, while also influencing observers' judgments in similar ways. For example, research on demonstrates that donning clothing symbolically associated with professionalism— like a lab coat or business suit—improves attention, abstract thinking, and feelings of power, suggesting a causal link between attire and cognitive-behavioral outcomes. Formal professional dress has been shown to increase perceived prototypical qualities, though it may not boost unless it contrasts cultural norms, as evidenced in experiments with leader portraits and CEO analyses. These findings support the efficacy of power dressing in shaping immediate interpersonal dynamics and , particularly in professional settings where first impressions influence opportunities. However, debates persist over whether these perceptual effects yield long-term career advantages or merely provide superficial boosts overshadowed by substantive skills and systemic barriers. Critics argue that while attire may signal authority, for sustained efficacy—such as promotions or outcomes—is anecdotal or correlational, not causal, and fails to address entrenched biases in male-dominated fields. Some studies highlight in casual-leaning modern workplaces, where overly formal power dressing risks appearing outdated or out of touch, potentially undermining rather than enhancing perceived relevance. Proponents counter that the psychological priming from such dress fosters behaviors aligned with success, like risk-taking and persistence, though rigorous longitudinal data remains sparse. On authenticity, power dressing faces contention for potentially requiring women to mimic masculine codes—broad shoulders, neutral palettes—to project , which some feminist critiques view as inauthentic conformity to patriarchal norms rather than genuine self-expression. This perspective posits that adopting "" symbols derived from male tailoring reinforces hierarchies by prioritizing assimilation over subversion, rendering the style performative and disconnected from feminine . Defenders argue it authentically embodies ambition and strategic signaling in competitive arenas, where attire functions as a credible, low-cost mechanism to convey capability without altering underlying competence; from a causal standpoint, such signals evolve from evolutionary cues of status and reliability, aligning with the wearer's intent regardless of gendered origins. Empirical support for authenticity lies in self-report studies where formal attire aligns with users' goals, enhancing intrinsic rather than masking deficits. feminist , often amplified in , may overstate inauthenticity claims due to ideological priors favoring disruption over , but peer-reviewed work emphasizes adaptive functionality over essentialist critiques.

Ideological and Socioeconomic Critiques

Critics from feminist perspectives have argued that power dressing, by encouraging women to adopt masculine silhouettes such as broad-shouldered suits and tailored trousers, reinforces patriarchal structures rather than challenging them, as it requires assimilation into male-dominated norms to achieve authority. This approach, they contend, undermines female identity by prioritizing conformity to a cisgender white male standard, marginalizing women who embody ethnic, religious, or alternative expressions of femininity, such as through hairstyles or jewelry deemed "unprofessional." Such conformity is seen as a form of risk avoidance, limiting women's ability to innovate or express individuality in professional settings, as evidenced in analyses of leaders like Margaret Thatcher and Hillary Clinton, whose repetitive suiting styles evoked stylistic paralysis amid public scrutiny. Further ideological critiques highlight power dressing's paradoxical nature: while intended as armor against workplace misogyny, it often objectifies women by sexualizing elements like high heels or fitted skirts, reducing professional credibility to managed sexuality rather than substantive achievement. In post-feminist interpretations, this ambiguity reflects a tension between acknowledging gender barriers and failing to foster collective feminist progress, instead promoting individualistic adaptation to existing power dynamics. These views, prevalent in academic and student discourse, contrast with liberal feminist endorsements of power dressing as pragmatic empowerment, though critics note the former's alignment with broader institutional biases favoring structural critiques over practical reforms. Socioeconomically, power dressing has been faulted for exacerbating class divides, as its emphasis on high-quality, designer-tailored garments—often costing hundreds of dollars per ensemble in the —renders it inaccessible to women from lower-income backgrounds, thereby confining upward mobility to the affluent. This exclusivity perpetuates within professional spheres, where attire signals not just competence but , aligning with the era's culture of and reinforcing inequalities under neoliberal economic policies. Detractors argue that such trends, driven by luxury designers like , commodify ambition, prioritizing image over merit and entrenching barriers for underrepresented groups in corporate ladders.

Modern Adaptations and Revival

Shifts in the 2010s-2020s

In the , traditional power dressing gave way to widespread casualization in professional environments, particularly within and startup sectors, where executives like adopted minimalist uniforms of t-shirts and hoodies to prioritize perceived efficiency and innovation over formal signaling of authority. This evolution aligned with the expansion of "" policies, reducing the prevalence of tailored suits and ties in favor of , , and unstructured blazers, as companies sought to foster creativity and retain talent amid competitive labor markets. For women, the era marked a softening of 1980s-era elements like padded shoulders and high heels, with minimalist pantsuits and loafers gaining traction to balance comfort and competence without overt emulation of male suiting. The , beginning in 2020, intensified these trends through the normalization of , prompting "Zoom tops"—polished blouses paired with casual bottoms—and a broader rejection of daily suiting due to reduced in-person interactions and hygiene concerns over fabrics like . By 2021, surveys indicated that over 80% of U.S. workers preferred flexible dress codes post-lockdown, correlating with studies showing no causal link between formal attire and in knowledge-based roles. However, this informality persisted unevenly, with and legal fields retaining suits for client-facing roles where attire reinforced hierarchical trust. Into the mid-2020s, a partial revival of power dressing emerged amid return-to-office mandates and economic uncertainty, evidenced by increased sales of tailored blazers and wide-leg —up 25% in some markets by 2025—and nods to silhouettes as symbols of resilience. This resurgence, observed in executive portraits and boardrooms, reflected causal pressures like and hybrid schedules demanding versatile yet authoritative wardrobes, though casual elements like endured in tech hubs. Critics attribute the shift less to debates and more to signaling stability in volatile job markets, with women leading adaptations via gender-neutral suiting that emphasizes fit over exaggeration.

Global Perspectives and Future Directions

In East Asia, power dressing aligns closely with Western corporate norms but emphasizes uniformity and modesty to signal hierarchy and discipline. Japanese salarymen typically wear dark navy or gray suits with white shirts and subdued ties, a style codified since the post-World War II economic boom to foster group cohesion in hierarchical firms. Similarly, in China, professionals in major cities like Beijing and Shanghai opt for conservative black or navy suits, with women favoring pantsuits or knee-length skirts to avoid ostentation amid cultural values prioritizing restraint. Across , power dressing often hybridizes global business suits with indigenous elements, adapting to diverse climates and traditions. In and , executives incorporate vibrant Ankara or Kente fabrics into tailored blazers or dresses, enabling cultural assertion while meeting international standards for negotiations. This approach, evident in corporate hubs like , balances professional authority with identity preservation, contrasting purer Western adoptions. In the and parts of , modesty and regional formality shape adaptations; Saudi Arabian businesswomen pair abayas with structured blazers post-2019 reforms allowing professional visibility, while European leaders like Italy's employ sharp tailoring to project resolve without exaggeration. Future trajectories point to hybridized, flexible iterations driven by generational shifts and technological integration. By 2025, tailored dresses with exaggerated shoulders are supplanting rigid suits as versatile power symbols, accommodating hybrid work while retaining authoritative lines. influences favor gender-neutral silhouettes, bold colors, and sneakers paired with blazers, prioritizing personal authenticity over conformity amid remote and office-hybrid norms post-COVID. Sustainability pressures may incorporate recycled fabrics into structured wear, though empirical efficacy remains tied to fit and context rather than material novelty alone. could further diffuse these blends, with AI-driven customization enabling culturally attuned attire for cross-border roles.

References

  1. [1]
    The History of the Power Suit for Women - JSTOR Daily
    Oct 29, 2021 · As women entered the workforce in greater numbers in the 1970s, “dressing for work [became] an exercise in politics and diplomacy,” as Kimle and ...
  2. [2]
    1980s Fashion History. Power Dressing C20Th
    Jul 25, 2023 · The 1980s was a time of bold and dramatic fashion choices, and one of the most iconic trends of the era was the shoulder pads and batwing sleeves.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Power Dressing or Overdressing? The Effect of Self and Managerial ...
    Aug 2, 2025 · One of the clearest patterns in the data is that managerial business formal attire enhances self- perceptions of competence and authority.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  4. [4]
    Perceptions of Ethicality: The Role of Attire Style ... - PubMed Central
    Feb 11, 2023 · For instance, Wood and Benitez (2003) suggest that those wearing formal attire at work are ranked higher in credibility, are taken more ...
  5. [5]
    Power Dressing - Women & the American Story
    Power suits were an example of a conservative response to the feminist movement. Compare these images of power suits with the outfits feminists wore at protests ...
  6. [6]
    What is Power Dressing? Understanding Its Impact and Elements
    ### Definition of Power Dressing
  7. [7]
    Power + Fashion - Project MUSE
    Jan 1, 2025 · As Georg Simmel famously observed, fashion's dynamic is one of both belonging and difference, and power dressing is yet another example of this.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  8. [8]
    What Is Power Dressing? | Blog | Tom James Company
    Feb 11, 2020 · Power dressing is achieved by wearing high-quality fabrics perfectly tailored to your body with carefully chosen accessories that result in a cohesive look ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] The Cognitive Consequences of Formal Clothing
    Wearing formal clothing is thus related to psychological formality and social distance, whereas casual clothing is related to intimacy and familiarity. For ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The Effect of Clothing Upon Perceptions of Source Credibility
    This study investigated the effect of clothing upon perceptions of credibility. A male and female model were dressed either formally (in a suit) or ...
  11. [11]
    The Effects of Apparel on Compliance: A Field Experiment with a ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · The results showed that compliance was higher when the confederate was dressed in a uniform. Verbal reasons given for complying also differed across conditions.
  12. [12]
    Dress for Success: How Clothes Influence Our Performance
    Jan 1, 2016 · What you wear can influence your thinking and negotiating skills, and even hormone levels and heart rate.
  13. [13]
    Clothes make the leader! How leaders can use attire to impact ...
    Wearing formal attire makes leaders appear more prototypical but not charismatic. Violating cultural dress codes makes leaders appear charismatic and garner ...
  14. [14]
    The history of power dressing - The Style Historianᵀᴹ
    Mar 3, 2024 · Enter the power dressing of the 1980s – blending fashion with professionalism while exuding confidence and authority. It was seen as pivotal ...
  15. [15]
    A History of Women's Empowerment Through Fashion - Dean Clothing
    Apr 8, 2024 · In the 1920s, pioneering women like Coco Chanel revolutionized fashion by introducing menswear-inspired elements into women's clothing, laying ...
  16. [16]
    1920-1929 | Fashion History Timeline
    May 11, 2018 · 1920s fashion featured shorter, simple skirts for women, and casual suits for men, with the flapper look and soft collars being popular.Missing: power | Show results with:power
  17. [17]
    Well padded - The History of Shoulder Pads - M.Müller & Sohn
    Wide shoulders in women's fashion first appeared in the 1930s. Women were encouraged to show “strength”. A boom followed in the 1940s with military fashion ...
  18. [18]
    The Scandalous History of Shoulder Pads - Fashion's Flashback
    May 17, 2017 · The first shoulder pads in women's fashion were seen in the 1930s. The 1930s is an interesting time in the worlds history.
  19. [19]
    The Evolution of Women's Workwear Throughout the 20th Century
    The history of women's workwear tells a unique story about the events of the 20th century and the changing role of women. Here are women workear pictures.
  20. [20]
    The Revolutionary History of the Pantsuit - VICE
    Mar 21, 2016 · French designer Marcel Rochas is credited with originating the idea of pairing pants with women's suits in 1932. The influential designer whose ...
  21. [21]
    Pantsuit Revolution | Hart Cluett Museum
    Mar 23, 2021 · Pantsuits started to be more widely accepted during the 1960s and into the 70s, evolving into the pantsuit we recognize today as a modern, sophisticated ...
  22. [22]
    What is a Pantsuit? The Symbol of Modern Femininity and Authority
    Dec 10, 2024 · The pantsuit has transcended its origins to become a symbol of empowerment and defiance against traditional gender norms in professional attire.Unpacking the History: From... · Jumpsuit vs. Pantsuit...
  23. [23]
    1970-1979 | Fashion History Timeline
    Oct 3, 2019 · Seventies fashion saw bold colors and patterns take center stage. Women's fashion looked back to the 1940s by day and pumped up the glamour ...
  24. [24]
    A 1980s Fashion History Lesson: Lycra, Power Suits, and Clothing ...
    May 20, 2024 · 1980s fashion was all about the power suit, Lycra, the rise of hip hop, yuppies, preppy style, and clothes as concept from Japanese ...
  25. [25]
    The Power Dressing eighties - Fashion History 1980-1990
    Sep 3, 2023 · 'Power dressing' became a new phenomenon as they wore sharp tailored, bold coloured suits with large shoulder pads reflecting their desire to project authority ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  26. [26]
    The Legacy of Claude Montana, the Power Dressing King of the 80s
    Feb 23, 2024 · By the peak of his popularity in the mid '80s, Montana was synonymous with the decade's style. “He is to big shoulders what Alexander Graham ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Fashion, women and power-dressing: Margaret Thatcher's impact ...
    Dec 18, 2016 · Instead, the former Prime Minster adopted the signature “power-dressing” style of the 1980s. “Like many politicians, she created a personal ...
  28. [28]
    A Study on the Power Dressing of Margaret Thatcher - ResearchGate
    The results of this study are as follows: Margaret Thatcher expresses authority through blue clothes which symbolizes conservatism at conservative parties, ...
  29. [29]
    A Look at Margaret Thatcher's Style - The Art of Power Dressing
    Feb 28, 2021 · Thatcher's signature look established an art of power dressing that continues to influence the wardrobe choices of many female leaders today.Missing: 1980s | Show results with:1980s
  30. [30]
    Slouching Into the '90s : Say goodby to power suits and shoulder ...
    Nov 13, 1992 · Slouching Into the '90s : Say goodby to power suits and shoulder pads. The new style is all about soft, relaxed dressing. - Los Angeles Times.Missing: decline 2000s
  31. [31]
    The 1990s Fashion History - Dressing Down - Fashion-Era
    Jul 21, 2023 · Ordinary retail clothing sales, textile manufacturing industries and stores all declined from a less active more casual marketplace. The range ...
  32. [32]
    Tailored for Power: Tracing the Evolution of Power Dressing
    Mar 25, 2025 · The 1990s–2000s: Softening the Edges. In the 1990s and early 2000s, power dressing shed its rigid, imposing aesthetic in favor of a more ...Missing: decline | Show results with:decline
  33. [33]
    Casual Work Attire Is the Norm for U.S. Workers - Gallup News
    Sep 8, 2023 · Compared with 2019, American workers' workplace attire is significantly more casual today, with a seven-percentage-point increase in the share ...
  34. [34]
    1980-1989 | Fashion History Timeline
    May 29, 2020 · In the mid- to late-eighties, power dressing also made it into men's style with the “power suit.” These were pin-striped, double breasted suits ...
  35. [35]
    The '80s Fashion Designers Who Changed The Game
    Aug 15, 2024 · Jean Paul Gaultier. Jean-Paul Gaultier in his showroom in Paris, 1984. · Thierry Mugler. Thierry Mugler in his office in Paris, 1985. · Claude ...
  36. [36]
    https://newretro.net/blogs/main/80s-fashion-designers-who-changed-the-industry
  37. [37]
    History of the Power Suit
    Jul 20, 2019 · By the 1980s, women embraced what would become the now classic version of the power suit. Women were entering the corporate world in greater ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Margaret Thatcher Set the Bar for Power Dressing - Fashionista
    Apr 8, 2013 · In many ways Thatcher's dress sense set the mold for how female politicians dress today: conservative, powerful (yet feminine) and above all, ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence<|control11|><|separator|>
  39. [39]
    The Look Of Power: How Women Have Dressed For Success - NPR
    Oct 20, 2014 · The elegant pantsuits of Giorgio Armani and Calvin Klein made the power suit and its knockoffs rabidly popular for several years. But as ...
  40. [40]
    https://www.michaelandrews.com/history-womens-suits/
  41. [41]
    Power Dressing: Hillary Clinton, Angela Merkel And The ... - Forbes
    Hillary Clinton, Margaret Thatcher — but a wide range of different ways women ...
  42. [42]
    The Politics of Power Dressing
    Hilary Clinton's 1993 'Cold Shoulder dress' by Donna Karan is one of the more notable moments of power dressing in politics. It made the statement that one can ...
  43. [43]
    The fashion of 'Dynasty': The looks that inspired a generation
    Jan 11, 2023 · From Alexis Carrington Colby's, played by Joan Collins, big-shouldered power suits to her sequined formalwear, not to mention the other iconic looks worn by ...
  44. [44]
    How Dynasty's Costume Designer Conjures the 1980s - The Cut
    Nov 14, 2017 · Dynasty's costume designer, Meredith Markworth-Pollack, speaks about how she is making the '80s soap opera's fashion fresh.
  45. [45]
    80s Film Working Girl Pioneered The Power Suit - The Zoe Report
    Dec 21, 2023 · As it celebrates its 35th anniversary, we take a retrospective glance at Oscar-winning '80s film Working Girl and its iconic power suiting ...
  46. [46]
    Working Girl: The Culture of Power Dressing | http://clothesonfilm.net
    Nov 9, 2019 · The power suit was a formidable garment. Wide shoulders were the key detail, jacket tailored and fitted, along with knee length skirt and plain shirt.
  47. [47]
    80s Fashion Trends: See the Iconic Outfits & Clothing Styles
    Aug 12, 2025 · Power Suits: Strong Attire. Diane Keaton Baby Boom Power Dressing Shoulder Pads Diane Keaton takes on power suits for the 1987 movie Baby Boom.
  48. [48]
    https://classicsixny.com/blogs/classic-chronicles/fashion-on-film-how-iconic-movies-shape-style-trends
  49. [49]
    https://adacollection.com/blogs/ada-collection/what-the-devil-wears-prada-teaches-us-about-power-dressing
  50. [50]
    Kerry Washington Reveals Secrets of Her 'Scandal' Power Wardrobe
    Feb 20, 2018 · The actress, who will be honored at Tuesday's Costume Designer Guild Awards, talks about Olivia Pope's look and what it was like to wear Anita Hill's turquoise ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Is power dressing important? In Olivia Pope's 'Scandal' world, it's an ...
    Oct 5, 2017 · “Power dressing for me means confidence,” said Lyn Paolo, costume designer for “Scandal.” “You can walk into any situation and feel solid and grounded.”
  52. [52]
    Throughout Seven Seasons of Scandal, Olivia Pope's Style Tells Its ...
    Feb 8, 2018 · Costume designer Lyn Paolo tells us about her favorite Olivia Pope looks from the past seven seasons of Scandal.
  53. [53]
    How film and TV sexed up women's office wear - The Independent
    Aug 18, 2021 · From 'Mad Men' to 'Industry', women's on-screen office wear has reflected their professional standing while alluding to their sexuality.
  54. [54]
    6 Women Empowerment Ads That Propelled Women Forward
    Mar 23, 2023 · Ralph Lauren's iconic power suit advertisement might not seem all that revolutionary to us today, but in the early 1980s, it was a different ...
  55. [55]
    Ads that break rules #BreakTheBias - Ruler Digital Agency Athens
    Mar 4, 2022 · The power suit. 1980: Power Suit – Ralph Lauren The power suit, oh right, the power suit. Women's empowerment image from the early 1980s. In ...
  56. [56]
    Power Dressing...a New Way Photo Helmut Newton US VOGUE ...
    Power Dressing...a New Way Photo Helmut Newton US VOGUE October 1985.
  57. [57]
    https://digitalcommonplacebookblog.wordpress.com/2025/10/22/power-dressing-women-of-the-1980s/
  58. [58]
    Blog Post 6: 80s Fashion Trends - Sharon Hutchins
    Dec 16, 2019 · The exaggerated shoulder pads and power dressing of the 1980s was also vividly seen in the American soap operas Dallas and Dynasty. These ...
  59. [59]
    Evolution of Fashion in 80s Music Videos - Kids In America Band
    Jan 2, 2024 · In addition to shoulder pads, other elements of power dressing were prevalent in 80s music videos. Brightly colored tailored suits made a ...
  60. [60]
    https://newretro.net/blogs/main/how-80s-pop-music-influenced-fashion
  61. [61]
    Power dressing - Do You Remember?
    Dallas, Dynasty and Working Girl - not only are these great examples of 80s entertainment, but also of the fashions around at that time.
  62. [62]
    Dress, body and self: research in the social psychology of dress
    Nov 22, 2014 · Experimental research shows that self-objectification in women can be induced by revealing clothing manipulations such as asking women to ...Provocative Dress As Stimuli · Effects Of Dress On The... · The Physical Body And The...
  63. [63]
    Dress is a Fundamental Component of Person Perception - PMC
    Dress is perhaps one of the primary vectors through which individuals lower in power and status can express themselves. Don Letts, a prominent DJ and filmmaker, ...
  64. [64]
    Is Power Dressing Just The Patriarchy At Play? - Refinery29
    Oct 7, 2021 · Power dressing reflects the lionisation of all things stereotypically masculine which are infused with meanings of authority, power, and control.
  65. [65]
    Power dressing and the Patriarchy - Varsity
    Jan 16, 2017 · Power dressing is dressing in a style that gives off an air of importance, of professionalism. In short, looking more masculine.
  66. [66]
    Dressing the part: women, power, fashion - and that bloody jacket!
    Apr 25, 2013 · So-called power dressing is a vexing paradox. It is associated with risk avoidance rather than adventure, conformity rather than trail blazing ...
  67. [67]
    View of “Power Dressing”: Hyper-Feminine Performance and the ...
    Jul 25, 2023 · The recurring theme of power-dressing is concerned to 'manage' one's sexuality so as to acquire 'authority', respect and power at work.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Identity, Post-Feminism, and Power Dressing - InVisible Culture
    May 2, 2023 · Furthermore, 1980s power dressing can be seen as enabling the construction of a new kind of feminine subject specifically, as much power ...
  69. [69]
    The Death of the Office Heel - MajorRelate with Dr Eliza Filby
    Sep 5, 2025 · The rise of Silicon Valley chic - hoodies, jeans and trainers - seeped into the corporate world, eroding once-rigid codes of officewear. By the ...
  70. [70]
    A history of office workwear and what comes next - Raconteur
    May 1, 2025 · “Women were power dressing to assert themselves in the workplace,” Newton says. But, while the most senior women sought to express power in ...
  71. [71]
    The new face of women's corporate fashion - City AM
    Sep 30, 2025 · Over the last 30 years, we have witnessed the casualisation of office attire and, more specifically, the decline of the heel. ... power-suits when ...
  72. [72]
    Is the formal 'suited and booted' office dress code extinct? - BBC
    Jul 15, 2021 · We've been drifting away from formal office dress codes for years. The pandemic may have finished them off for good.
  73. [73]
    The '80s power suit is so back. Is it a recession indicator?
    Oct 7, 2025 · In 2025, the '80s power suit can indeed be a recession indicator. It can also be wishful thinking: dressing for the job you want. It can be ...
  74. [74]
    The Return of Business Attire: Why Professional Dress Codes Are ...
    Business attire is making a bold comeback, redefining professionalism and mindset in today's post-pandemic workplace.
  75. [75]
    Dressing Appropriately for Business in Asia - CEO SUITE
    Feb 25, 2015 · Suit jacket and pants in navy blue or black · Conservatively coloured shirt and necktie · Clean, sharp shoes in a dark colour · Conservative skirts ...
  76. [76]
    How to Dress for the Office in Clothing Inspired by African Fashion
    May 3, 2023 · In this article, we will explore the idea of dressing for the office in clothing inspired by African fashion.
  77. [77]
    Navigating Professional Dress Codes Around the World
    Dec 31, 2024 · Meanwhile, in the Middle East and Africa, professional attire often reflects a mix of traditional elements and modern business standards.<|control11|><|separator|>
  78. [78]
    The Psychology Of Power Dressing And How Women Leaders Are ...
    Jul 23, 2024 · From Kamala Harris to Giorgia Meloni, global leaders are resorting to power dressing to bring out the best of them and shape public's opinion.
  79. [79]
    Tailored dresses are replacing suits as the new power look
    Sep 14, 2025 · Tailored dresses are replacing suits as the new power look · Short dress with structured shoulders · Mini-dress with exaggerated shoulder pads and ...Missing: future 2020s
  80. [80]
    The New Power Dressing: What Gen Z Is Teaching Us About ...
    Sep 22, 2025 · This generation asks: Why can't power dressing include sneakers, bold colors, or gender-fluid silhouettes? For them, clothing should reflect who ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  81. [81]
    Modern Power Dressing: How Women Are Redefining Office Style in ...
    1. Tailored Silhouettes, Relaxed Details · 2. Statement Accessories with Purpose · 3. Elevated Neutrals + Strategic Pops of Color · 4. Quiet Luxury FabricsMissing: future 2020s
  82. [82]
    Power Dressing in the Modern Age: Mixing Business and Beauty
    Jul 9, 2025 · Power dressing today is about mixing beauty with business, style with strategy, elegance with character, and confidence with comfort.