Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Proconsulidae

Proconsulidae is an extinct family of primitive catarrhine primates, classified as stem hominoids, that lived during the early to middle Miocene epoch approximately 23 to 14 million years ago, primarily in East Africa.^[1] The family was established by L.S.B. Leakey in 1963 based on fossil discoveries from sites in Kenya and Uganda, and it includes genera such as Proconsul and Ekembo.^[2] Members of Proconsulidae are notable for their role in early hominoid diversification, representing a transitional form between more primitive Old World monkeys and later apes, with fossils providing key insights into the evolutionary origins of tailless, arboreal primates. Characteristic of Proconsulidae are their short faces, generalized dentition suited for a frugivorous diet, and adaptations for above-branch arboreal quadrupedalism, including flexible limbs and a long trunk.^[3] Unlike modern apes, they lacked many specialized suspensory features but shared a tailless condition, as evidenced by the absence of caudal vertebrae in skeletal remains and sacral morphology that precludes tail support.^[4] Body sizes varied across species, ranging from gibbon-like (~15 kg for Ekembo heseloni) to chimpanzee-sized (~35–75 kg for species like Proconsul africanus and Proconsul major), reflecting ecological diversity in dense, closed-canopy tropical forests. The phylogenetic position of Proconsulidae remains debated, with some analyses placing them as basal to crown catarrhines and others as direct ancestors to modern hominoids, but their fossils underscore a period of rapid ape radiation in Africa before dispersals to Eurasia.^[5] Recent systematic revisions have refined genus-level taxonomy within the family, distinguishing Ekembo (from Rusinga and Mfangano Islands) from Proconsul (from mainland sites like Koru), based on differences in incisor morphology, canine size, and mandibular robusticity.^[5] These primates' postcranial skeleton suggests versatile locomotion without the commitment to brachiation seen in later apes, highlighting their importance in understanding the adaptive shifts that led to modern great ape and human lineages.^[6]

Discovery and Naming

Initial Fossils and Description

The first fossils of what would become known as Proconsul were discovered in 1927 at the Koru locality in western Kenya by local collector H. L. Gordon, who unearthed a partial lower jaw containing teeth indicative of a primate. This specimen, along with additional dental and cranial fragments recovered shortly thereafter, was transported to the British Museum (Natural History) in London for scientific examination, marking the initial recognition of early Miocene primate remains in sub-Saharan Africa.^[7] In 1933, paleontologist Arthur T. Hopwood formally named the genus Proconsul based on these Koru finds, with the type species designated as Proconsul africanus. The etymology combines the Greek prefix "pro-" (meaning "before") with "Consul," the name of a renowned performing chimpanzee exhibited at the London Zoo during the early 20th century, underscoring the fossil's perceived primitive, ape-like qualities in contrast to more derived modern forms. Hopwood's description, published in the Journal of the Linnean Society of London, emphasized the dental morphology, including sectorial canines and bilophodont molars with low cusps and thin enamel, which exhibited a blend of characteristics seen in Old World monkeys and apes.^[8] Early analyses by Hopwood and contemporaries in the 1930s focused on these fragmentary cranial and dental elements, noting features such as a relatively large canine and premolar row suggestive of catarrhine affinities, yet with dental proportions and enamel thickness more reminiscent of cercopithecoid monkeys. The absence of postcranial remains in these initial collections provided no direct evidence for a tail, leading to its provisional classification as an early catarrhine primate transitional between monkey-like and ape-like forms, without definitive indications of taillessness.^[9]

Key Expeditions and Additional Finds

In 1931, Louis Leakey, along with Arthur Hopwood, conducted an expedition to western Kenya that uncovered numerous additional specimens at Koru and Rusinga Island, expanding the known fossil record beyond the initial fragmentary finds. These Rusinga specimens were initially classified as Proconsul but were reassigned to the genus Ekembo in a 2015 taxonomic revision based on differences in cranial and dental morphology.^[10] This effort marked a significant step in systematic collection from Miocene deposits around Lake Victoria.^[10] Following World War II, the British-Kenya Miocene Expeditions from 1947 to 1950, directed by Leakey and supported by the British Museum (Natural History), yielded a wealth of material, including partial skeletons from sites such as Karungu and Songhor.^[11]^[10] These excavations, involving international collaboration, recovered fossils from fluvio-lacustrine sediments, contributing to over 100 Miocene primate specimens during the campaigns.^[11] Later efforts in the 1960s, including those affiliated with Harvard-affiliated researchers studying the collections, further documented material from these localities.^[12] In 1963, L.S.B. Leakey established the family Proconsulidae to include the genus Proconsul and related early Miocene hominoids based on the accumulating fossil evidence. A notable discovery occurred in 1948 during the second season of the British-Kenya Miocene Expedition on Rusinga Island, where Mary Leakey identified fragments leading to the recovery of a significant specimen (now attributed to Ekembo), offering early insights into ontogenetic patterns.^[13] This find, extracted under challenging conditions, was transported to Britain for analysis.^[13] Across all sites, fossils attributable to Proconsulidae represent remains from over 20 individuals, predominantly fragmentary but including important postcranial elements that enhanced understanding of the family's diversity.^[10]

Taxonomy and Classification

Included Genera and Species

The family Proconsulidae includes several genera, with Proconsul and Ekembo as the core genera based on a 2015 systematic revision.^[5] Proconsul comprises species such as P. africanus and P. major, while Ekembo includes E. heseloni (formerly P. heseloni) and E. nyanzae (formerly P. nyanzae), distinguished by differences in incisor morphology, canine size, and mandibular robusticity. These genera share key diagnostic traits typical of the family, including a Y-5 molar cusp pattern, sectorial lower premolars adapted for shearing, and the absence of a tail as indicated by preserved postcranial elements. Across the family, body masses range from approximately 10 kg to 70 kg, underscoring a diversity in build and inferred locomotor capabilities. Fossils of Proconsulidae are predominantly recovered from Early Miocene sites in the East African Rift Valley, such as Rusinga Island, Mfangano Island, Songhor, and Koru in Kenya, with each major species represented by 15–20 described specimens providing a robust sample for taxonomic analysis.^[5] P. africanus, a small species with an estimated body mass of ~15 kg, is primarily known from dental remains that highlight a relatively primitive morphology within the genus, including low-crowned molars suited to a frugivorous diet.^[14] E. heseloni, the smallest species (around 10–15 kg), is best documented from Rusinga Island, where multiple partial skeletons reveal a generalized quadrupedal adaptation.^[5] P. major, the largest at 50–70 kg, displays a more robust skeletal build, with fossils from sites like Napudet indicating greater structural reinforcement in the limbs.^[14] E. nyanzae, intermediate in size (approximately 30–35 kg) and showing morphological variability, is represented by cranial and dental material from multiple localities, suggesting potential sexual dimorphism or ontogenetic variation.^[5]^[15] Beyond Proconsul and Ekembo, the family includes the additional genus Rangwapithecus, represented by the single species R. gordoni, a small-bodied taxon (comparable to 10–15 kg) known from mandibular and dental fossils at Songhor, with dentition featuring high, shearing crests inferred to indicate folivory. Historically, genera such as Dendropithecus were included in Proconsulidae based on shared dental features like the Y-5 pattern, but current assessments debate this placement, often assigning it to a separate dendropithecid lineage due to differences in premolar structure and overall size.^[5]

Phylogenetic Relationships

Proconsulidae is classified within the superfamily Proconsuloidea, which encompasses early Miocene hominoids from East Africa that predate and are morphologically distinct from the crown Hominoidea, lacking specialized suspensory adaptations characteristic of later apes.^[16] This placement positions Proconsulidae as a basal group in catarrhine evolution, representing a transitional stage between more primitive catarrhines and the modern radiation of apes and Old World monkeys. The family traditionally includes subfamilies such as Proconsulinae, which contains the genera Proconsul and Ekembo and their species, and Afropithecinae, encompassing genera like Afropithecus, though the latter's inclusion remains debated due to potential affinities with later hominoids.^[16] Early phylogenetic analyses, such as those by Andrews and Martin (1987), proposed Proconsulidae as the sister group to crown catarrhines, emphasizing shared primitive features with both cercopithecoids and hominoids while highlighting its exclusion from the crown Hominoidea.^[17] Subsequent cladistic studies have reinforced this view, depicting genera like Proconsul and Ekembo as stem hominoids that bridge cercopithecoids and hominoids through mosaic retention of monkey-like traits (e.g., positional behaviors) alongside emerging ape-like dental and cranial features.^[18] Recent molecular clock estimates, incorporating genomic data, date the divergence between hominoids and cercopithecoids to approximately 25–30 million years ago, aligning with the late Oligocene origins of stem catarrhines and supporting Proconsulidae's role in the early Miocene diversification.^[19] Ongoing debates center on subfamily boundaries and exclusions within Proconsulidae; for instance, Nyanzapithecinae, previously included, was reassigned to the separate family Dendropithecidae in revisions during the 2010s, based on distinct postcranial and dental specializations indicating closer ties to dendropithecoids rather than proconsuloids.^[20] These reclassifications underscore the mosaic nature of early Miocene catarrhine evolution, where Proconsulidae exhibits a mix of plesiomorphic traits shared with Old World monkeys and autapomorphic features foreshadowing hominoid adaptations, without fully resolving its exact position relative to crown groups.

Anatomy and Morphology

Cranial and Dental Features

The crania of Proconsulidae are characterized by a short, prognathic face lacking prominent brow ridges or supraorbital tori, and featuring an incomplete postorbital closure typical of primitive catarrhines. The braincase is relatively small and rounded, with cranial capacities estimated at 100–150 cm³ in the smallest species such as Ekembo heseloni, while Proconsul africanus reaches approximately 167 cm³, comparable to those of modern Old World monkeys and indicative of limited encephalization relative to later hominoids. For instance, a reconstructed skull of P. africanus yields a cranial capacity of approximately 167 cm³, based on regression analyses of midline arc measurements against recent catarrhine data. These features reflect a primitive morphology bridging cercopithecoids and more derived hominoids, with no evidence of specialized facial robusticity seen in later Miocene apes.^[21]^[22] The dentition of Proconsulidae follows the catarrhine formula of 2.1.2.3, with incisors that are vertically implanted and low-crowned, canines that are large but lack a specialized honing complex, and premolars and molars adapted for shearing and grinding soft foods. Upper molars exhibit bilophodonty with low, rounded cusps and reduced heteromorphy, while the lower third premolar (P3) is sectorial, facilitating initial food breakdown; enamel thickness is thin to moderate, thicker than in some earlier catarrhines but thinner than in middle to late Miocene hominoids, supporting inferences of a primarily frugivorous diet focused on ripe fruits and young leaves rather than hard or abrasive items. The absence of a canine–premolar (C/P3) honing complex, where the upper canine would sharpen against the lower P3, represents a primitive trait retained from stem catarrhines and contrasting with the derived honing seen in extant great apes.^[22]^[23] Species-level variations highlight intermediate dental traits between cercopithecoids and hominoids, with overall dentition showing reduced molar shelves and a lack of simian shelf on the mandible. In larger species like P. major and Ekembo nyanzae, canines are notably enlarged and sexually dimorphic, with males exhibiting broader and more projecting upper canines than females, suggesting behavioral roles in display or agonism; smaller species such as Ekembo heseloni display proportionally similar but scaled-down features. A key example is the Koru mandible (e.g., specimens from the type locality in Kenya), which preserves complete dentition without a simian shelf or C/P3 honing, underscoring the primitive mandibular architecture and sectorial P3 morphology across the family.^[5]^[22]

Postcranial Skeleton and Locomotion

The postcranial skeleton of Proconsulidae reveals adaptations consistent with an arboreal lifestyle emphasizing quadrupedalism and climbing, distinct from the suspensory behaviors of modern apes. The forelimbs feature elongated humeri and radii with highly mobile glenohumeral joints, enabling extensive shoulder rotation for navigating three-dimensional arboreal substrates. Phalanges exhibit moderate curvature, supporting powerful grasping during climbing, but lack the elongated, hook-like morphology associated with brachiation in extant hominoids.^[24] These traits are evident in partial skeletons such as KNM-RU 2036 from Rusinga Island, indicating a reliance on above-branch quadrupedal progression rather than below-branch suspension.^[25] Hindlimb morphology complements this locomotor repertoire, with intermembral indices near 100 reflecting roughly equal fore- and hindlimb lengths suited to balanced quadrupedalism on slender branches. The pelvis includes a short ischium lacking robust tuberosities for tail musculature, corroborating the tailless condition inferred from sacral fragments and supporting stability during pronograde postures without caudal counterbalancing. Femora and tibiae are robust with mediolaterally broad distal articulations, facilitating mobile hip and knee extensions for weight support in climbing and walking. The near-complete right femur from the KNM-MW 13142 partial skeleton of Ekembo nyanzae exemplifies these features, with a hominoid-like trochanteric morphology enhancing leverage for arboreal propulsion. The vertebral column underscores a flexible axial skeleton adapted for pronograde locomotion, comprising approximately 13 thoracic and 6 lumbar vertebrae that permit sagittal bending and lateral flexion during branch traversal. Transverse processes on lumbar vertebrae are elongated and ventrally oriented, providing attachment for muscles that stabilize a narrow, mediolaterally compressed torso in horizontal postures. Evidence from early discoveries, including the 1947 juvenile skeleton (KNM-RU 1673) from Rusinga Island, highlights this configuration, with a long, mobile spine bridging cercopithecoid-like flexibility and early hominoid stiffening.^[26] Body size variations across Proconsulidae species influenced locomotor agility, with smaller forms like Ekembo heseloni (estimated 15–20 kg) exhibiting slender long bones conducive to nimble climbing in fine-branch niches. In contrast, larger P. major individuals (up to 50–75 kg) display proportionally sturdier hindlimbs and pelves, suggesting enhanced capability for terrestrial or mixed-substrate quadrupedalism while retaining arboreal competence. These differences are quantified through regressions on femoral head diameters and humeral robusticity indices from multiple Napak and Rusinga specimens.

Paleoecology and Distribution

Geological and Temporal Range

The Proconsulidae family is known exclusively from fossils dating to the Early Miocene, with a temporal range spanning approximately 23 to 17 million years ago (Ma).^[5] Radiometric dating, primarily using potassium-argon (K-Ar) and argon-argon (⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar) methods on associated volcanic tuffs, has provided precise ages for key sites, such as 22–18 Ma for the main Kenyan localities.^[27] Fossils of Proconsulidae have been recovered from several volcanic and sedimentary formations in East Africa, notably Kenya's Hiwegi Formation on Rusinga Island (dated to ~18 Ma), the Legetet Formation near Koru (~19–20 Ma), and the Rusinga Formation (~20–17 Ma).^[28] In Uganda, significant finds come from sites like Napak and Bukwa, associated with early Miocene volcanic deposits dated to ~22–19 Ma.^[29] These formations consist of tuffaceous sandstones, agglomerates, and lacustrine sediments that interlayer with volcanic materials, enabling accurate geochronological constraints.^[16] Geographically, Proconsulidae exhibits a restricted distribution limited to East Africa, with all confirmed specimens from Kenya (e.g., Rusinga Island, Songhor, Koru) and Uganda (e.g., Napak, Moroto). No verified fossils have been reported outside this region, supporting interpretations of African endemism during the early stages of hominoid diversification.^[16] Stratigraphically, the fossils occur in deposits interpreted as ancient lake margins and forested volcanic terrains, where volcanic tuffs and fine-grained sediments facilitated preservation.^[6] Taphonomic processes in these settings show biases toward arboreal taxa, as articulated skeletons and isolated elements are often preserved in contexts suggesting entrapment or rapid burial near water bodies, favoring recovery of tree-dwelling forms over terrestrial ones.^[5]

Habitat and Diet Inferences

Proconsulidae inhabited humid subtropical forests within rift valley settings during the early Miocene, as evidenced by fossil sites in East Africa such as those on Rusinga Island in the Nyanza Rift.^[30] Pollen, phytolith, and fossil wood analyses from these deposits reveal a dense, closed-canopy woodland environment dominated by evergreen dicot trees, with high mean annual precipitation estimates of 1,394–2,618 mm and mean annual temperatures of 22.6–34.5 °C, supporting multistoried forest structures.^[6] Faunal associations, including early bovids like Dorcatherium pigotti and other herbivores adapted to forested habitats, further indicate closed-canopy conditions with limited open grasslands.^[6] The diet of Proconsulidae was primarily frugivorous, focused on soft fruits, with supplementary folivory in smaller species, as inferred from dental morphology and microwear patterns. Low-crowned molars with rounded cusps and thin enamel in genera like Proconsul suggest adaptation to ripe, soft fruits rather than hard objects or tough vegetation.^[31] Microwear analysis of Proconsul teeth from Kenyan Rift Valley sites shows low scratch densities and pit features consistent with soft-fruit consumption, distinguishing it from more folivorous contemporaries like Rangwapithecus.^[32] Smaller species, such as Proconsul africanus, exhibit slightly higher shearing crests and occasional folivorous signals in microwear, indicating seasonal leaf intake to supplement fruit availability.^[33] As arboreal generalists, Proconsulidae occupied a broad ecological niche in forested canopies, coexisting with early cercopithecoids through resource partitioning based on body size differences across species. Larger forms like Proconsul major likely targeted higher canopy fruits, while smaller Proconsul africanus exploited mid-level foliage and understory resources, reducing direct competition with incoming old world monkeys that favored more specialized folivorous or insectivorous diets.^[6] This size-based partitioning is inferred from the sympatric occurrence of multiple Proconsul species with distinct body masses ranging from 10–50 kg at sites like Rusinga, where faunal diversity supports a stable, fruit-rich arboreal community.^[30] Site-specific variations are prominent at Rusinga Island, where fossils dated to approximately 18 Ma occur in swampy, riverine forest settings within the Hiwegi Formation's volcaniclastic deposits.^[30] These environments featured localized wetlands amid broader closed woodlands, as shown by palaeosol profiles and stump casts indicating water-influenced, humid lowlands that supported diverse primate assemblages including Ekembo heseloni.^[6]^[5]

Evolutionary Significance

Role in Hominoid Evolution

Proconsulidae represents a pivotal group of stem hominoids that emerged following the divergence of Hominoidea from Cercopithecoidea approximately 25 million years ago during the late Oligocene to early Miocene transition.^[34] These early Miocene primates, primarily known from East African fossils dated between 23 and 17 million years ago, exhibit a mosaic of primitive catarrhine features and incipient hominoid specializations, positioning them as transitional forms in ape ancestry.^[35] Unlike later crown hominoids, Proconsulidae lacked fully realized advanced traits such as orthogrady and extensive suspensory locomotion, but they did show evidence of tail loss, a key hominoid synapomorphy that likely evolved early in the clade to support arboreal adaptations.^[36] Key traits in Proconsulidae bridge earlier catarrhine lineages and later apes, including a generalized quadrupedalism that emphasized pronogrady and facilitated versatile arboreal and terrestrial movement, prefiguring the more specialized suspension seen in extant hominoids.^[34] Dentally, they display an evolving hominoid pattern with sectorial premolars, reduced incisors, and low-crowned molars adapted for frugivory, marking a shift from the more cercopithecoid-like dentition of predecessors.^[35] These features underscore their role as basal hominoids, retaining monkey-like postcranial proportions while advancing toward ape-like cranial and dental morphology. In the context of human evolution, Proconsulidae provides the earliest fossil evidence for the radiation of African apes, informing the biogeographic and temporal framework of hominoid diversification on the continent.^[34] Their fossils help calibrate the timing of the Pongidae-Hominidae split, which occurred approximately 15-20 million years ago in the middle Miocene, well after the Proconsulid phase, as subsequent lineages like those represented by Afropithecus and Kenyapithecus developed greater specializations.^[35] Comparative studies highlight similarities to the earlier Oligocene Aegyptopithecus, such as conservative dental and cranial retentions, but Proconsulidae is more derived, evidenced by larger body size (9–90 kg versus 4.5-7.5 kg), increased brain size (encephalization quotient 1.19-1.96 versus 0.65-1.04), and enhanced postcranial adaptations toward hominoid locomotion.^[37]^[38]

Ongoing Debates and Recent Insights

One ongoing debate in Proconsulidae research concerns the taxonomic validity of the superfamily Proconsuloidea, with some analyses suggesting it may represent a paraphyletic assemblage of stem catarrhines rather than a monophyletic group distinct from Hominoidea. This contention arises from phylogenetic studies in the 2010s and 2020s that highlight shared primitive features among Proconsulidae genera and early hominoids, complicating the delineation of superfamily boundaries. For instance, total evidence tip-dating approaches incorporating morphological and molecular data have questioned the monophyly of Proconsuloidea by placing certain taxa closer to crown catarrhines.^[39]^[34]^[40] Advances in imaging technology, particularly CT scans of cranial material from the 2010s, have revealed new details that challenge the traditional morphological divide between apes and Old World monkeys in early Miocene catarrhines. The 2017 discovery and analysis of the Nyanzapithecus alesi infant cranium from Kenya, utilizing high-resolution CT scans, demonstrated a mosaic of features including an expanded braincase akin to apes but a prognathic face resembling cercopithecoids, suggesting a more gradual evolutionary transition than previously assumed. These findings underscore the primitive nature of Proconsulidae and prompt reevaluation of cranial synapomorphies used to separate hominoid lineages.^[41]^[42] Recent fossil discoveries from Ugandan sites in the late 2010s and early 2020s have expanded the known geographic and temporal range of Proconsulidae, with new hominoid remains from Moroto II providing additional postcranial elements that refine understandings of early Miocene diversity. A 2023 study on these Moroto fossils indicates that hominoid locomotor versatility originated in association with folivory in seasonally dry woodlands with early C4 grasses, rather than solely closed-canopy frugivory.^[43]^[44] Complementing these, stable isotope analyses of enamel from associated fauna around 2015–2016 confirm a predominantly C3 plant-based diet for Proconsulidae taxa, indicative of closed-canopy forested environments rather than open grasslands. Classification revisions have further clarified family boundaries, excluding Afropithecus from Proconsulidae into its own family Afropithecidae based on distinct dental and postcranial traits, as emphasized in recent systematic reviews that highlight implications for assessing early Miocene hominoid radiation.^[45]^[46] Future research priorities include the recovery of more complete skeletons to resolve ongoing debates about Proconsulidae locomotion, which current evidence suggests involved versatile arboreal quadrupedalism but lacks consensus on terrestriality. Integrating these fossils with molecular phylogenies through Bayesian tip-dating methods will be essential to calibrate divergence timings and test hypotheses of hominoid ancestry.^[40]^[39]

References

[1]
Primate Evolution – Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological ...
This chapter explores the major trends in primate evolution from the origin of the Order Primates to the beginnings of our own lineage.
[2]
The anatomy and systematic position of the early Miocene ...
Family: Proconsulidae Leakey, 1963. Subfamily: Proconsulinae Leakey, 1963. Genus: Cranium. A large part of a frontal bone lacking the malar process on the left ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[3]
https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Courses/Fresno_City_College/ANTH_1:_Introduction_to_Biological_Anthropology_(Taylor)/08:_Primate_Evolution/8.01:_Primate_Evolution/8.1.05:_Planet_of_Apes
[4]
Proconsul did not have a tail - ScienceDirect.com
Drake et al., 1988. Drake R.L., Van Couvering J.A., Pickford M., Curtis G.H. ... Ward, 1991. Ward C.V.. Functional anatomy of the lower back and pelvis of ...
[5]
A systematic revision of Proconsul with the description of a new ...
The genus Proconsul (Hopwood, 1933) has been a mainstay in studies of hominoid evolution and diversification since its discovery in the early 20th century.Missing: Proconsulidae | Show results with:Proconsulidae
[6]
Remnants of an ancient forest provide ecological context for Early ...
Feb 18, 2014 · Here we present multiproxy evidence from Early Miocene deposits on Rusinga Island, Kenya, which directly ties the early ape Proconsul to a widespread, dense, ...Missing: Proconsulidae | Show results with:Proconsulidae
[7]
Insights on the Paleoclimate and Paleoecology of an Early Miocene ...
May 30, 2025 · 2.2 History of Research at Koru. Fossils were first found in the Koru region in 1909, and the first fossil primates in 1927 (Andrews, 1981; ...
[8]
Etymology: Other - Curiosities of Biological Nomenclature
Feb 5, 2023 · Proconsul Hopwood, 1933 (Miocene hominoid) "before Consul". Consul was the name of a popular chimpanzee in the Birmingham Zoo, England.
[9]
A systematic revision of Proconsul with the description of a new ...
06 May 2025 · The genus Proconsul was recognized over 60 years ago as the first Miocene anthropoid from sub-Saharan Africa (Hopwood, 1933). The ...
[10]
Louis Leakey, John Napier and the history of Proconsul
The first Proconsul fossil was found in 1927, but it was not until 1942 that Louis Leakey was able to devote much time to studying the Miocene.Missing: Proconsulidae | Show results with:Proconsulidae
[11]
The British-Kenya Miocene Expedition, 1947 | Nature
... Proconsul, originally described, on the basis of portions of the jaws and ... African Fossil Primates Discovered During 1947 *. W. E. LE GROS CLARK. Nature (1948).
[12]
The Ape in the Tree - Harvard University Press
Proconsul lays claim to being the best known ape in the fossil record and Alan Walker and Pat Shipman tell the story of this prized fossil superbly well.
[13]
Skull of Proconsul from Rusinga Island - Nature
### Summary of British-Kenya Miocene Expedition and Proconsul Discoveries on Rusinga Island
[14]
Evidence of a chimpanzee-sized ancestor of humans but a gibbon ...
Oct 12, 2017 · Our results suggest, contrary to previous suggestions, that the LCA of all hominoids lived in an environment that favored a gibbon-like size.<|control11|><|separator|>
[15]
Dendropithecoidea, Proconsuloidea, and Hominoidea - DOI
Three superfamilies of non-cercopithecoid catarrhines are recognized in Africa from the late Oligocene onward: Dendropithecoidea, Proconsuloidea, and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[16]
The phylogenetic relationships of the early catarrhine primates
This paper presents a review of the evolutionary relationships of the early catarrhine primates. The first stage of the analysis involves the reconstruction ...Missing: Proconsulidae | Show results with:Proconsulidae
[17]
Mosaic evolution in the origin of the Hominoidea - PubMed
The results demonstrate that proconsulids are cladistic hominoids, and that the apparent incongruence between the data sets is due to mosaic evolution.Missing: Proconsul | Show results with:Proconsul
[18]
Genomic data support the hominoid slowdown and an Early ... - PNAS
The hominoid–cercopithecoid divergence is estimated to range from 29.2 to 34.5 Mya, significantly older than most previous analyses.
[19]
The latest occurrence of the nyanzapithecines from the early Late ...
Apr 29, 2017 · The nyanzapithecines are a highly specialized group of small to medium-sized non-cercopithecoid catarrhines in the African Oligo-Miocene. At ...
[20]
The skull of Proconsul africanus: reconstruction and cranial capacity
Oct 6, 1983 · The distorted skull of a female Proconsul africanus was found by Dr M. Leakey in 1948 in early Miocene sediments at locality R106 on Rusinga Island, Kenya.
[21]
[PDF] Analysis of Miocene Primates: Kenyapithecus, Sivapithecus, and ...
Proconsul: The skull morphology of Proconsul demonstrates craniodental features such as a frontal air sinus, a wide frontal bone at the bregma, and the ...
[22]
Last Common Ancestor of Apes and Humans: Morphology and ...
Sep 18, 2019 · The canines are low crowned, and the upper canine is broad and angular, so thatP3 honing is absent; molars and premolars are small; the base of ...
[23]
https://karger.com/fpr/article/91/2/122/143999/Last-Common-Ancestor-of-Apes-and-Humans-Morphology
[24]
New Postcranial Fossils of Proconsul africanus and ... - SpringerLink
Although many skeletal parts have been known from small to large Proconsul species, major problems have arisen due to lack of knowledge of limb proportions and ...
[25]
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4684-8854-8_12
[26]
New age constraints for the early Miocene faunas of Rusinga and ...
Aug 5, 2025 · Their preliminary dating results using 40 Ar/ 39 Ar and paleomagnetism indicate that the oldest levels (Wayondo Formation) may be as old as 20 ...Missing: Proconsulidae | Show results with:Proconsulidae<|control11|><|separator|>
[27]
Miocene paleosols and habitats of Proconsul on Rusinga Island ...
Early Miocene (18 Ma) volcaniclastic deposits of the Hiwegi Formation on Rusinga Island include at least six distinct kinds of paleosols.Missing: Proconsulidae | Show results with:Proconsulidae
[28]
Miocene primates Paleontological site of Napak - IUGS
Napak is a deeply dissected Carbonatite-Nephelinite Volcano of Early Miocene age (20.5 – 19 Ma) in northeastern Uganda, posed impressively on the rigorously ...Missing: Proconsulidae | Show results with:Proconsulidae
[29]
Palaeoenvironments of Early Miocene Kisingiri volcano Proconsul ...
Early Miocene (c. 18 Ma) hominoid sites (Proconsul) from Rusinga Island, Lake Victoria occur in palaeosols and volcaniclastic strata deposited in a ...
[30]
Early Miocene catarrhine dietary behaviour: the influence of the Red ...
Early Miocene fossil catarrhines represent a dietary continuum ranging from more folivorous (ie, Rangwapithecus) to more frugivorous (ie, Proconsul) diets.
[31]
[PDF] MOLAR MICROWEAR AND SHEARING CREST DEVELOPMENT IN ...
Microwear patterns for Proconsul spp., and Dendropithecus are consistent with a soft-fruit diet, whereas feature shapes for Rangwapithecus may be consistent ...
[32]
Diets of Early Miocene African hominoids - ResearchGate
The environment of Proconsul was, for the most part, forested (Andrews, 1992) and it has been proposed that this taxon ingested a diet of leaves and soft fruit ...
[33]
Dendropithecoidea, Proconsuloidea, and Hominoidea (Catarrhini ...
... primates known from Africa between 14 and 6 million years ago, as well as persistent ambiguity regarding the phylogenetic status of the ape-like Miocene ...
[34]
MIOCENE HOMINOIDS AND HOMINID ORIGINS - Annual Reviews
ancestral condition for living apes, including gibbons. The first appearance of these great ape-like features in the African middle Miocene is correlated with.Missing: Proconsulidae split
[35]
Tail loss in Proconsul heseloni - ScienceDirect.com
Ward and colleagues (Ward et al., 1991) argued that Proconsul heseloni did not have a tail based on the morphology of a last sacral vertebra recovered from the ...
[36]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047248404000673
[37]
[PDF] Alba, David M. «Systematics of Miocene apes : State - DDD UAB
The molecular revolution Early studies of hominoid phylogeny based on serological data. 230 indicated that humans are more closely related to African apes ...
[38]
[PDF] Total evidence tip-dating phylogeny of platyrrhine primates ... - bioRxiv
Oct 22, 2021 · A new look at Kenyapithecus based on recent discoveries in Western Kenya. 2822. Journal of Human Evolution. 14, 113–143. 2823. Pickford, M ...
[39]
[PDF] New infant cranium from the African Miocene sheds light on ape ...
A new, nearly complete infant primate cranium, KNM-NP 59050, from the 13 million-year-old Miocene, is the most complete fossil ape cranium yet described, ...
[40]
Tiny Ancient Skeleton Redefines the Split Between Monkeys and Apes
Nov 2, 2015 · Researchers discovered part of an 11.6-million-year old skeleton that carries some ape-like characteristics, including a large braincase, but a muzzle like ...
[41]
New hominoid fossils from Moroto II, Uganda and their bearing on ...
Morotopithecus bishopi is one of at least two large-bodied primates from the Early Miocene fossil site of Moroto II in Uganda.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[42]
Neogene biomarker record of vegetation change in eastern Africa
Jun 6, 2016 · Here we present a vegetation record spanning the Neogene and Quaternary Periods that documents the appearance and subsequent expansion of C 4 grasslands in ...
[43]
Cerebral complexity preceded enlarged brain size and reduced ...
Jul 3, 2015 · Existing evidence indicates that Miocene apes (excluding Afropithecus) were substantially more encephalized than contemporary cercopithecoids, ...