Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Qube (cable television)

Qube (stylized QUBE) was an experimental two-way interactive cable television system launched by Warner Cable on December 1, 1977, in Columbus, Ohio, marking an early effort to enable viewer participation beyond passive viewing. The system delivered 30 channels to approximately 30,000 households, incorporating premium programming, pay-per-view events, and specialized interactive services that allowed subscribers to respond to on-screen polls, vote in real-time on game show outcomes or programming decisions, and access rudimentary home shopping or information retrieval via a custom remote control with four response buttons. Expanding to cities including Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, and Houston, Qube demonstrated technical feasibility for digital signaling over coaxial cable at speeds sufficient for audience feedback, influencing Warner's acquisition of cable franchises and spawning programming experiments that contributed to the origins of channels like MTV and Nickelodeon. However, persistent operational costs and cumulative losses surpassing $30 million led to the curtailment of its interactive features in 1984, as Warner Amex confronted financial pressures and shifted priorities, though the Qube brand lingered in some Warner cable deployments.

Origins and Development

Conception by Warner Cable

In 1975, , president of Warner Communications, conceived the idea for Qube after encountering a semi-interactive system at Tokyo's Otani Hotel, developed by Pioneer Electronics. This encounter prompted Ross to envision adapting similar technology for Warner's cable operations, aiming to deliver films directly to subscribers and enable viewer interaction to differentiate from competitors during the late-1970s cable franchise wars. Warner Cable, a division of Warner Communications, pursued Qube as part of a broader termed "doing " by Gus Hauser, the company's chair and CEO, who approved the project to enhance an existing small cable system in . The initiative focused on expanding beyond traditional offerings—targeting up to 30 channels—and incorporating via specialized set-top boxes, with polling intervals of approximately six seconds to capture viewer responses in . Paul Dempsey, appointed chief engineer for the Columbus implementation, translated these concepts into technical specifications, collaborating with to develop the necessary hardware. The conception emphasized empirical testing in a mid-sized market like , selected for its demographics and Warner's prior infrastructure, to validate interactivity's commercial viability without massive upfront urban builds. This approach reflected Warner Cable's goal of pioneering applications, including opinion polling and , to boost subscriber engagement and revenue amid regulatory hurdles limiting broadcast alternatives.

Technological Foundations and Initial Testing

QUBE's technological foundations rested on bi-directional infrastructure, enabling upstream data transmission from subscribers' homes to the headend for interactive features. This utilized low-bandwidth return paths in the cable plant, allowing viewer responses via specialized remotes to be polled and aggregated in by central computers. The system operated at a communication speed of 256 kbps, significantly faster than contemporary dial-up modems, supporting rapid tallying of votes every six seconds during polls. The core hardware included custom wired remote consoles developed in collaboration with Pioneer Electronics, featuring three banks of ten channel buttons and five response buttons for or selection. These remotes connected directly to the and line, transmitting signals upstream without requiring separate phone lines. At the headend, banks of computers processed inputs from up to 30,000 households, handling feedback, billing, and data logging for aggregated viewer behavior analysis. Initial testing occurred within Warner Cable's existing small-scale system in , selected for its demographics as a . Development drew inspiration from a 1975 interactive hotel TV system in , with Warner upgrading the local infrastructure starting in the mid-1970s to support 30 channels and interactivity. By spring 1977, staff were hired to refine programming and operations, culminating in a full-scale launch on December 1, 1977, which served as the primary experimental deployment to evaluate commercial viability. Early operations tested features like instant polls and through programs such as viewer-voted talent shows and games, gathering data on user engagement without prior large-scale pilots elsewhere.

Launch and Operations

Rollout in Columbus, Ohio (1977)

Warner Cable selected , as the initial for Qube due to its demographics mirroring the national average, educated population, and suitable infrastructure access. The system was announced publicly in February 1977, following development costs estimated at $10-25 million. Qube officially launched on December 1, 1977, marking the debut of the first large-scale interactive service in the United States. Installation involved upgrading Warner's existing small cable system with bi-directional capabilities, including large computer banks and a new production studio at headquarters on 1201 Olentangy River Road, repurposed from a former appliance warehouse. Each subscribing received a specialized set-top console connected to their television, enabling via polling every six seconds from a central studio computer. The rollout targeted the area with over 100,000 potential s. Subscribers paid a base monthly fee of approximately $10.95 for access to 30 channels, comprising standard broadcasts, themed local programming, and premium options. By February 1978, initial uptake reached 13,000 subscribers. The launch generated significant media attention, with outlets like Time magazine describing Columbus as a "prototype electronic village." Early operations emphasized interactive features such as live polling during shows, though the system's high maintenance costs for studios and resources foreshadowed future financial challenges.

Expansion Efforts and Geographic Scope

Warner Cable pursued aggressive expansion of the Qube system beyond its initial Columbus rollout, leveraging the technology's interactive features to secure cable franchises in competitive urban markets. By promoting Qube's two-way capabilities as a differentiator, the company won bids in several major cities, including , , , , and , with installations beginning as early as 1979. These efforts aimed to replicate 's model of 30-channel service with polling and options, but required substantial investment in fiber-optic infrastructure and specialized set-top boxes. The first major expansions occurred in and , where Warner Amex initiated deployments in 1981. In , the system targeted up to 170,000 homes in the greater area and an additional 161,000 within the city limits, offering subscribers access to interactive programming similar to Columbus. Houston followed a parallel rollout, focusing on two-way interactivity to attract households in a growing market. Further installations extended to , , and , establishing six operational Qube outlets by 1984, primarily in the Midwest and . These sites emphasized urban centers with potential for high subscriber density, though full-scale implementation varied due to local regulatory approvals and construction challenges. Geographically, Qube's scope remained confined to these select U.S. cities, serving a niche audience rather than achieving nationwide penetration. The system's footprint totaled approximately 300,000 potential households across the expansions, but actual subscriber uptake was hampered by elevated monthly fees—around $10–$15 plus equipment costs—and competition from conventional providers. Unlike standard expansions, Qube's reliance on proprietary limited , confining its operations to regions where Warner held franchises and could justify the capital outlay for bidirectional signaling. Efforts to broaden beyond these hubs, such as exploratory plans for and suburbs, did not materialize into sustained systems.

Technical Components

System Architecture and Infrastructure

The Qube system employed a bi-directional television network, with downstream signals transmitted in the 54–300 MHz range and upstream data in the 5.75–29.75 MHz subsplit band on 300 MHz systems capable of supporting approximately 30 channels. This infrastructure utilized or topologies spanning 7–50 miles, with providing high-bandwidth capacity, though upstream paths were constrained by noise insertion from taps and amplifiers in residential setups. Aggregate data rates reached up to 5 Mbps per 6 MHz channel via (FDM), enabling polling-based interactions where subscriber terminals were queried 3–4 times per minute by unique identifiers for status, channel selection, and button presses. At the headend, three Data General Eclipse S-200 minicomputers—each 16-bit processors with 256 memory—processed incoming , managed polling protocols, and handled interactive services like aggregation. Reverse path signals required mitigation of ingress noise through digital regenerators costing about $70 each or configurations to maintain bit error rates (BER) of 10⁻⁸ to 10⁻¹⁰, ensuring reliable low-volume upstream for the system's 32,000 subscribers across 100,000 passed homes in . Warner Cable re-engineered existing one-way plants by activating the return path and upgrading amplifiers and bridger switches, a process that supported scalability to larger 400 MHz plants for up to 52–60 channels in later expansions, though initial deployments prioritized over expansion. Subscriber-side infrastructure integrated Pioneer-manufactured converters and units, costing around $100 per subscriber, which interfaced with the plant for two-way flow at rates of 0.256 Mbps, using RF modems for analog-digital conversion. This setup formed a centralized polling rather than contention-based access, minimizing collisions in the shared upstream medium and aligning with the era's hardware limitations, where full-duplex operations were achieved through frequency translation at the headend. Overall, Qube's design represented an early of broadcast video distribution and return, laying groundwork for modems despite vulnerabilities to maintenance-induced signal degradation.

Qube Remote and User Interface

The Qube was a proprietary wired device, resembling a small connected by cable to the set-top converter , designed to enable both selection and interactive responses in Warner Cable's two-way system launched in , on December 1, 1977. It featured 18 buttons arranged for straightforward operation: three large white buttons to select categories ( broadcast stations, community programming, and premium services), ten white numeric keys (0-9) to choose specific channels within the selected category, and five larger black buttons dedicated to interactive functions. The numeric and category buttons allowed users to navigate among the system's 30 channels, including ten local affiliates, ten service-oriented community channels (such as shopping or music), and ten options, by pressing the appropriate category button followed by the channel number. Interactive engagement occurred primarily through the five black response buttons, which transmitted signals upstream via the bidirectional cable at speeds supporting rapid polling; the central headend computer could query responses from all connected households—up to 50,000 subscribers—in about six seconds at 256 Kbps. These buttons supported multiple-choice selections, such as yes/no/undecided for opinion polls, A-E options for games or quizzes, authorization codes for purchases, and bidding inputs for live auctions, with aggregated results displayed as simple text overlays on the television screen in near . This button-based interface represented an early form of user-directed interaction, facilitating features like audience voting on talent contests, sports play suggestions during Ohio State broadcasts, or local political referendums, though limited by the absence of visual feedback beyond basic overlays and reliance on scheduled programming cues for response prompts. Subsequent iterations of the remote introduced capability and expanded to ten response buttons for more complex options, but the original model emphasized simplicity for broad household adoption.

Content and Programming

Channel Structure and Themed Offerings

Qube's channel lineup consisted of 30 channels, a substantial expansion over typical cable offerings of the era, divided into three distinct categories accessible via dedicated buttons on the subscriber remote. The first category, labeled "T" channels, retransmitted ten local broadcast television stations, providing standard over-the-air programming such as network affiliates and public stations. The second category, "C" channels, featured ten community-oriented and special-interest channels produced by Qube or sourced locally, focusing on informational and niche content including weather updates, school announcements, public events, and themed programming tailored to viewer demographics. Among the "C" channels, themed offerings emphasized educational and entertainment segments for specific audiences. Pinwheel, a children's , delivered educational activities, , and age-appropriate fun, serving as an early precursor to dedicated kids' networks. Sight on Sound provided music-focused content, showcasing concert footage, artist performances, and rock-and-roll clips, which anticipated the format of later music video channels. Additional "C" programming included talk shows like "Good Day, " for morning news and community discussions, as well as instructional segments such as distance learning for skills like guitar playing. The third category, "P" channels, comprised ten premium pay-per-view options, emphasizing entertainment and events not available on basic tiers. These included first-run movies, sports broadcasts such as football games and matches, and specialized content like religious programming or time-and-weather services in some configurations. This structure allowed Qube to differentiate itself by blending conventional retransmissions with targeted thematic channels, fostering viewer choice in an era when cable fragmentation was nascent.

Interactive Features and Programming Formats

Qube's interactive features centered on enabled by a specialized with multiple buttons, allowing subscribers to transmit responses directly to the system's central computer. These buttons facilitated input for , polling, and selections, with the polling connected homes approximately every six seconds to aggregate results swiftly. This setup supported participation in live broadcasts, including opinion registration and queries during talk shows. Programming formats leveraged these capabilities to create viewer-involved content, particularly in game shows where audiences used the five-button console—often termed "touching in"—to answer questions or compete alongside studio participants. Talent contests permitted home viewers to vote on performers, simulating judging in formats reminiscent of early interactive competitions. polls integrated into various programs gauged sentiments on political issues, sports decisions such as Ohio State football plays, and other topics, providing immediate feedback to broadcasters. Additional formats included shopping programs for in-home purchases and selections like music videos on dedicated channels, alongside educational offerings such as college courses with participatory elements. Approximately 90 minutes of nightly interactive programming aired, encompassing games, contests, and specialized shows like exercise classes and sessions that incorporated viewer input. These innovations, while pioneering, emphasized direct engagement over passive viewing, influencing later cable developments despite operational challenges.

User Engagement and Innovations

Polling and Voting Mechanisms

Qube's polling and voting system enabled audience interaction through a dedicated connected to a , featuring five interactive s for submitting responses. These s supported multiple-choice selections, typically four options (A, B, C, D) plus a , allowing viewers to answer polls, vote on content, or participate in games during live broadcasts. The underlying technology utilized bidirectional cable infrastructure for , with a central studio computer polling each subscriber's console every six seconds to collect data at 256 kbps speeds. Responses were aggregated instantly, enabling on-air tallying and display of results without personal identification, as nightly data dumps anonymized inputs for analysis. Polling applications spanned entertainment and ; for instance, in the Talent Search program, viewers voted mid-performance to advance or eliminate contestants, while Alive! conducted surveys on local matters, such as public feedback on snow removal following the January 1978 blizzard. Other uses included opinion polls on political issues, quiz show answers in children's programming like Flippo’s Magic Circus, and even suggestive inputs for Ohio State football plays, though not implemented by coaches. In a notable legal context, aggregated viewer data from Qube polls demonstrated that 10,500 of approximately 30,000 subscribers tuned into a specific , contributing to the of station managers in a trial on June 24, 1980. This mechanism foreshadowed modern but was constrained by the era's hardware limitations and subscriber base in , where the system launched on December 1, 1977.

Pay-Per-View and On-Demand Services

Qube provided services via ten dedicated channels that aired movies and premium content, marking an early implementation of this model in . Subscribers gained access by pressing specific buttons on the Qube , which authorized viewing and initiated billing without requiring signal . This interactive authorization process ensured that only approved households could watch the content, with charges appearing on monthly statements. The offerings included first-run films, previously available mainly in hotels, alongside sports events such as boxing matches and football games. Adult-rated films were also featured on one channel, accessible through the same button-press mechanism, which raised concerns due to the system's capabilities. These channels operated on fixed schedules, cycling through available titles rather than providing instantaneous selection of specific movies upon request. One of Qube's channels evolved into Viewer's Choice, a service that later rebranded as and expanded nationally for and event-based . While not true —lacking the ability to start content at arbitrary times—Qube's model demonstrated viewer-initiated access to premium programming, influencing subsequent developments in personalized television delivery. Usage data from the Columbus rollout showed strong interest in movie and sports PPV, contributing to the system's revenue alongside interactive polling features.

Challenges and Criticisms

Technical Shortcomings and Reliability Issues

The Qube system's upstream transmission, essential for interactive features like polling and , experienced frequent reliability problems, resulting in delayed or lost signals from subscribers' homes to the cable headend. These issues stemmed from the limitations of early two-way , which struggled with consistent return paths amid varying household conditions and load. Signal reception quality also elicited user complaints, attributed to the system's broad 30-channel capacity and experimental architecture that prioritized interactivity over robust broadcast stability. While downstream video delivery was generally adequate, the integration of addressable converters occasionally led to interference and dropout during peak interactive sessions. Hardware vulnerabilities further compounded reliability, particularly with the Qube remote control units used for premium channel access; security flaws in the initial nine pay-per-view channels necessitated retrofitting an undisclosed portion of subscriber boxes with enhanced locking mechanisms to prevent unauthorized use. This retrofit effort highlighted design oversights in tamper-resistant engineering for widespread deployment. Customer service responses to these technical glitches were often inadequate, as technicians grappled with the novelty of diagnosing interactive faults in a pre-digital diagnostic era, exacerbating downtime for affected households.

Economic Barriers and Adoption Hurdles

The deployment of Qube required substantial upfront capital investment in specialized two-way cable infrastructure, including amplifiers, converters, and response channels capable of handling interactive signals from up to 30,000 households in initial markets like . Warner Communications estimated initial outlays of $15 million to $25 million for the system's launch in 1977, encompassing hardware distribution and network upgrades that exceeded standard cable buildouts. These costs proved prohibitive for scaling beyond test cities such as and , as two-way capability demanded denser wiring and more robust headends than conventional one-way cable, limiting expansion amid Warner Amex's broader cable debt exceeding $800 million by 1983 for just 1.3 million subscribers nationwide. Subscriber acquisition faced hurdles from elevated entry barriers, including installation fees of $9.95 for existing users and $19.95 for non-subscribers, alongside a base monthly rate of $10.95—premium pricing justified by interactive features but deterring adoption in an era when broadcast television remained free and penetration hovered below 20% nationally. The mandatory Qube converter box and custom remote added hardware costs passed indirectly to users, while low utilization of and polling services failed to offset these, with interactive programming generating insufficient revenue to amortize per-home investments estimated at $600 or more. Economic realism dictated that without mass uptake, fixed costs per active user escalated, constraining penetration to under 40% in served areas despite marketing as a technological marvel. Warner Amex's overarching financial distress amplified these barriers, as $99 million in 1983 losses—compounded by an ill-advised $500 million investment collapse—diverted funds from Qube sustenance, culminating in over $30 million in direct two-way losses by 1984 and a pivot to conventional . Diminished interest in interactive elements, evidenced by underused and features, underscored causal mismatches between high spend and tepid consumer premiums, stalling and prompting phase-out of Qube's core innovations by early 1984 in favor of profitable basic tiers.

Ethical and Privacy Concerns

The two-way interactive capabilities of Qube, launched by Warner Amex in , in December 1977, enabled continuous from subscribers' homes, raising significant apprehensions. The system's central computer scanned each household every six seconds to monitor on/off status, channel selection, receiver functionality, and the most recent button press on the wireless . This polling generated detailed records of viewing habits and interactions, which were aggregated and stored centrally, potentially allowing for the compilation of identifiable profiles when cross-referenced with billing or demographic data. Warner Amex asserted that individual responses were not recorded and that data was anonymized for aggregate analysis, as emphasized in promotional materials to counter "" fears. Privacy risks extended to four primary categories: intrusion through persistent , interception of signals en route to the head-end computer, misuse of aggregated by third parties such as parent company , and the creation of comprehensive household profiles from seemingly innocuous inputs. Interactive surveys on Qube programming, such as a 1978 poll on awareness (yielding 65% affirmative responses) or opinions on size during the "Celebration" show, captured responses to sensitive personal and political topics without guaranteed , heightening concerns over unauthorized access or commercial exploitation. Keypad-based services for adult films further amplified issues, as viewing —though purportedly stripped of identifiers—proved marketable; in a 1980 obscenity , aggregate statistics from 10,500 of 30,000 subscribers watching an X-rated film were subpoenaed and used to acquit a theater manager, demonstrating the ethical quandary of accessibility despite assurances. Ethically, Qube's instant polling mechanisms drew criticism for potentially eroding deliberative discourse by privileging rapid, superficial responses over informed debate, as argued by political theorist in 1982, who viewed such interactivity as a superficial substitute for genuine . Broader concerns included the erosion of individual autonomy through centralized control of personal information, risking or suppression of dissenting views via surveillance-enabled dossiers, with inadequate legal remedies under existing or constitutional frameworks at the time. These issues contributed to subscriber unease, though the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 later imposed requirements for consent in and mandated destruction of records after use, reflecting retrospective acknowledgment of the vulnerabilities in early systems like Qube.

Shutdown and Aftermath

Discontinuation in 1984

Warner Amex Cable Communications announced on January 19, 1984, that it was eliminating the Qube Network, which had originated in , and provided five interactive channels featuring polling and viewer response programming. This decision curtailed the system's two-way interactive offerings, shifting emphasis to events and limited polling specials amid persistent financial shortfalls. The move followed years of substantial losses, exceeding $30 million, attributed to the high costs of maintaining bidirectional cable infrastructure and producing specialized content with insufficient returns from subscribers and advertisers. The discontinuation aligned with broader challenges at Warner Amex, including a $99 million operating loss for Warner Cable in 1982 and waning partner interest, as withdrew from the later that year, exacerbating fiscal pressures. Viewer engagement with interactive features had proven limited, with Qube serving approximately 350,000 households across markets like , , and but failing to generate sustained revenue to offset deployment expenses. By mid-1984, production staff of around 45 were laid off, effectively ending centralized Qube programming operations. While the core network ceased in , residual Qube hardware and limited services lingered in some areas, with full phase-out extending to 1994 in as systems transitioned to standard cable without interactivity. The shutdown underscored the economic infeasibility of early two-way television experiments, prioritizing scalable one-way over costly viewer participation.

Long-Term Legacy and Influence

Qube's experimental features, including real-time polling and viewer voting implemented via dedicated keypads in over 30,000 households starting December 1, 1977, prefigured modern paradigms such as audience participation in game shows and live events on platforms like and . These mechanisms demonstrated the feasibility of aggregating viewer responses at scale, influencing subsequent innovations in audience engagement, though Qube's limitations—restricted to five response channels—highlighted early constraints on that persisted until fiber-optic and digital compression advancements in the 1990s. While Qube itself discontinued in 1984 due to high costs exceeding $100 million in infrastructure for marginal subscription gains, its proof-of-concept for home-based interactivity laid groundwork for broadband-enabled services like video-on-demand, which by 2000 accounted for billions in revenue through systems evolved from Qube's trials. Programming experiments on Qube, such as the youth-oriented "Sight on Sound" block launched in , directly contributed to the genesis of enduring cable networks; this segment's focus on music videos and short-form content inspired the format of , which debuted in 1981 under Warner Amex (Qube's parent entity), and , formalized in from similar Pinwheel programming tested on the system. Key personnel from Qube's operations, including producers who honed targeted demographics and niche content delivery, transitioned to leadership roles at these networks and , the home-shopping channel that scaled Qube's impulse-buying features into a $10 billion industry by 2020. Oral histories from former executives emphasize Qube's role in validating advertiser-supported specialty s, shifting cable from broadcast mimicry to fragmented, viewer-driven ecosystems that dominate today's 200+ lineups and streaming fragmentation. Despite its commercial shortfalls—subscriber penetration stalled below 20% in amid economic recession and competing over-the-air signals—Qube's legacy endures in regulatory and infrastructural precedents, such as FCC approvals for two-way cable in the late 1970s that enabled nationwide buildouts, culminating in 90% U.S. household cable access by 2000. Its emphasis on urban via enhanced services influenced Time Warner's (successor to Warner Amex) pivot to bundled digital tiers, foreshadowing cord-cutting reversals through interactive apps on smart TVs. Critics note, however, that Qube's top-down control over content curation, rather than user-generated models, limited its direct lineage to interactivity, positioning it more as a catalytic failure that exposed risks of overhyping nascent tech without mass affordability.

References

  1. [1]
    QUBE brought the future of TV to Columbus in 1977 - WOSU
    Mar 30, 2022 · In 1977, a bold new way to watch television launched in Columbus. Warner Cable would now offer an unheard-of 30 channels.
  2. [2]
    QUBE interactive TV revolutionized the industry - Spectrum News 1
    Dec 19, 2022 · QUBE launched interactive television programming in Columbus, Ohio, in 1977.
  3. [3]
    QUBE Interactive Television History: It Came From Columbus - Tedium
    Jun 26, 2018 · Warner-Amex sold off MTV and Nickelodeon, and shuttered the rest. Early QUBE employees included Steve Bornstein, who was an executive with both ...
  4. [4]
    Happy Thanksgiving: History — A Look at Warner's QUBE Cable TV ...
    Nov 25, 2010 · In Columbus, Ohio Warner Cable constructed an experimental two-way cable system called QUBE, which brought 30,000 homes in the city access to ...
  5. [5]
    From the Archives: Qube Comes to Columbus
    Mar 25, 2019 · Qube didn't last (it ended in 1984), but programs on the service laid the foundation for such television breakthroughs as MTV and Nickelodeon.
  6. [6]
    TWO-WAY CABLE T.V. FALTERS - The New York Times
    Mar 28, 1984 · Now, after years of experience and more than $30 million in losses, QUBE's two-way programming is being substantially cut back. Last January, ...Missing: achievements shutdown<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Poor Reception: Warner Curtails Qube - Time Magazine
    Jan 30, 1984 · In 1977, when Warner Communications with great fanfare launched Qube, a “two-way television” system, Gustave Hauser, then chairman of the firm's ...
  8. [8]
    iTV | Warner's Qube - Media Visions
    Amex cash kept Qube alive as the only two-way cable system in America. After Amex withdrew from Warner in 1984, the Qube systems closed one by one over a decade ...Missing: achievements shutdown
  9. [9]
    Today in Media History: An interactive TV system in 1977 ... - Poynter
    Dec 1, 2014 · On December 1, 1977, Warner Communications began an interactive cable system in Columbus, Ohio, called Qube. Qube expanded to other cities ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] 1978 special report on qube - QUBE TV
    QUBE, pronounced "cube," is a division of Warner Cable, which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Warner Communications entertainment conglomerate. QUBE ...
  11. [11]
    QUBE TV Studio - digital collection - Columbus Metropolitan Library
    The studio building for QUBE, a cable television system that launched in Columbus, Ohio, on December 1, 1977. It provided customers with 30 channels containing ...Missing: rollout Warner
  12. [12]
    Warner to Expand Qube 2‐Way Cable TV - The New York Times
    Nov 8, 1979 · Warner Cable Corp is installing Qube 2-way cable TV system in Houston and Cincinnati 2 years after it introduced system in Columbus, Ohio; ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  13. [13]
    CINCINNATI GETTING SOPHISTICATED 2-WAY CABLE TV
    May 7, 1981 · Warner-Amex set up the first two-way Qube system as a test basis to a portion of Columbus, Ohio, 3 1/2 years ago. That 30-channel service is ...
  14. [14]
    Qube Alumni Return and Reminisce | Next TV
    Mar 22, 1998 · By that time, there were Qubes in Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, Houston and outside of Chicago (managed by future Comcast Corp. cable president Tom ...Missing: expansion | Show results with:expansion
  15. [15]
    Cable—I | The New Yorker
    May 13, 1985 · In 1981, Warner Amex began establishing QUBE interactive services in new cable systems in Houston and in Cincinnati and its suburbs, and the ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Data Communications Via Cable Television Networks - DSpace@MIT
    Apr 1, 2025 · Pioneer developed the hardware for the Warner-Amcx Qube system. See Section A.2.1.1. A.I.1.5 Jerrold. Jerrold controls over half of the ...
  17. [17]
    Gustave Hauser Oral History | Syndeo Institute at The Cable Center
    QUBE launched on December 1, 1977. Hauser details how the company had to re-engineer the cable system to activate a reverse path from the home to the headend ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Interactive TV Too Early: The False Start of QUBE
    Mar 14, 2014 · Some would say that we misdirect our energy to speculate about films no longer extant, but how might our sense of early cinema style expand ( ...
  19. [19]
    Today is QUBE Day! Tell the neighbors! - Platypus Comix
    QUBE was a cable television experiment that launched in Columbus, Ohio in 1977. Many now-common features of cable that would not become officially "modern" ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Scott Kurnit Oral History: Qube, Interactive TV & About.com
    Vivian Horner, who really started Nickelodeon in those early days as part of Warner Amex; Gus Hauser, who really with Steve Ross, was the vision behind Qube, ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    [PDF] two-way cable television: a study of experiments
    QUBE is the first two-way cable television system to offer direct interaction between the programmer and the viewer and operate as a full scale business in a ...Missing: conception | Show results with:conception
  22. [22]
    THE CITY WIRED-FOR FAILURE - D Magazine
    Nov 1, 1985 · ONE OF WARNER'S biggest stumbling blocks was customer service. Like any new technology, cable came with its own set of problems.Missing: shortcomings reliability
  23. [23]
    A LIMPING WARNER AMEX - The New York Times
    Sep 13, 1983 · For the estimated $800 million it has sunk into cable, it has only 1.3 million subscribers, or one subscriber for every $600 spent, a cost well ...
  24. [24]
    2008 CABLE SHOW: Cable @ 60: The 1980s - Nexttv
    May 16, 2008 · Between 1978 and 1983, Boston, Chicago, Cincinnati, Detroit, Dallas, Denver, Houston, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Miami, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, ...
  25. [25]
    An invasion of privacy; Home computers, cable TV - CSMonitor.com
    Nov 4, 1981 · Consumers risk four types of exposure with interactive home media: intrusion, interception, misuse of information, and aggregation of individual ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Cable Television and the Invasion of Privacy, 7 Computer L.J. 89 ...
    Numerous problems arise if the various privacy torts are relied upon to protect subscribers against invasions of privacy. 1. Inadequacy of the Remedy a.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Two-Way Cable Television and Informational Privacy
    Jan 1, 1984 · The surveys conducted by the interactive cable television system may involve serious personal and political issues. For example, in one survey ...
  28. [28]
    Warner Amex Cable Communications has announced it is ... - UPI
    Jan 19, 1984 · Warner Amex Cable Communications has announced it is eliminating Qube Network which originated in Columbus and carried five interactive ...Missing: discontinuation | Show results with:discontinuation
  29. [29]
    WARNER 2-WAY TV CUTBACKS - The New York Times
    Jan 19, 1984 · It was also learned that Warner Communications has halted an advanced two-way service that was to be tested on the Warner Amex cable system in ...Missing: failures | Show results with:failures
  30. [30]
    QUBE: The Story of a Revolutionary Experimental Station
    Apr 29, 2019 · QUBE was an experimental, two-way multi-programmed television service from Warner Communications, developed to help improve the performance of Warner's tiny ...Missing: foundations initial