Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Button

A button is a small, typically circular or disc-shaped device used as a fastener in clothing and other fabrics, secured by passing it through a slit or loop known as a buttonhole to join overlapping edges. Archaeological evidence indicates that button-like objects first appeared as decorative ornaments rather than functional closures in the Indus Valley Civilization circa 2800–2600 BCE, with early examples crafted from materials like shell and bone found at sites such as Mohenjo-daro. Their evolution into practical fasteners occurred in 13th-century Europe, coinciding with the development of tailored buttonholes that enabled more fitted garments and marked a shift from lacing or brooches. Buttons have since been produced in varied types, including sew-through models with holes for threading, shank varieties for thicker fabrics, and toggles for secure fastening under tension, utilizing materials ranging from natural substances like pearl oyster shell and horn to metals and modern plastics. This versatility has positioned buttons as both essential utilitarian elements and status symbols, with ornate designs in precious metals or enamel signifying wealth during the Renaissance and beyond. Industrial advancements, such as stamping machines in the 19th century and synthetic alternatives post-World War II, democratized production while preserving artisanal traditions in high-end fashion.

History

Ancient and Prehistoric Origins

The earliest known buttons, dating to approximately 2800–2000 BCE, were discovered at the Indus Valley Civilization site of in present-day ; these artifacts, crafted from seashells such as conus shell, featured a single drilled hole suggestive of attachment to garments but lacked evidence of corresponding buttonholes, indicating primary use as ornaments rather than fasteners. Archaeological analysis of these shell objects, often geometrically shaped, supports their role in denoting status or aesthetic enhancement, as their placement in contexts and absence of wear patterns consistent with repeated fastening imply decorative intent over utilitarian closure. Similar button-like objects appeared in around 2000–1500 BCE, including bone and shell examples from sites in and the , where drilled perforations allowed sewing onto clothing as symbols of social distinction, though functional fastening remained inconsistent due to the era's reliance on lacing or pins for garment securement. In ancient , contemporaneous artifacts from Bronze Age contexts (c. 2000–1500 BCE) exhibited comparable features—small discs or toggles with holes—but empirical examination of associated textiles reveals no standardized buttonhole integration, reinforcing their ornamental precedence amid sparse evidence for closure mechanisms. In , buttons from the and early classical periods (c. 1500–500 BCE) were predominantly employed as status markers on elite attire, with materials like bone or drilled for attachment; however, artistic depictions and artifact preservation indicate irregular application without the precision required for reliable fastening, marking a persistence of adornment over emerging utilitarian potential. This prehistoric pattern underscores a gradual evolution, where rudimentary closure experiments—evident in some perforated shells paired with looped cords—hinted at future functionality, yet comprehensive artifact studies affirm that consistent fastening roles did not materialize until later technological adaptations in garment construction.

Medieval Functionalization

The functional use of buttons emerged in 13th-century , particularly in , where buttonholes were first developed to pair with buttons for secure garment closures. This innovation marked a departure from earlier methods like lacing or clasps, enabling the creation of fitted garments such as that conformed closely to the body without relying on ties that could loosen during movement. Prior to this, buttons had primarily served decorative roles, but the buttonhole's introduction allowed for practical fastening that maintained garment integrity under physical activity. Fitted clothing like doublets benefited from buttons' adjustability and durability, providing a causal advantage over laces by preventing slippage and allowing incremental tightening or loosening to accommodate body changes or climatic variations. Historical reconstructions of medieval garments demonstrate that buttoned closures supported greater mobility and hygiene, as they permitted full opening for airing and cleaning without dismantling laces, which often tangled or frayed. These empirical benefits aligned with evolving clothing needs in medieval Europe, where tailored fits enhanced functionality for equestrian and labor-intensive pursuits common among the nobility. Initially adopted by the upper es, buttons were often ornate, crafted from metals or , reflecting and prompting sumptuary laws that restricted their use to to preserve distinctions. Surviving textiles from the period, including buttoned doublets, corroborate this uptake before to broader society, with regulations in regions like limiting precious materials in buttons to curb ostentation among merchants. Such laws underscore buttons' dual role in utility and signaling , as verified through archival legal texts and artifact analyses.

Renaissance Elaboration

During the 16th and 17th centuries in , buttons transitioned from primarily utilitarian fasteners to highly decorative artifacts, embodying the focus on artistry and individual expression in attire. Crafted from precious metals such as and silver, , and embellished with gems or carved motifs, these buttons adorned doublets, jerkins, and sleeves, functioning as overt signals of and . Contemporary accounts and surviving artifacts illustrate their use on garments of the , where the quantity and quality of buttons directly correlated with social standing, as evidenced by detailed descriptions in period inventories and wardrobe accounts from and courts. The proliferation of button-making guilds across , particularly in and from the early , drove technical innovations and economic specialization in this craft. These guilds, often allied with lace producers, regulated quality and materials, fostering advancements like thread-wrapped constructions over wooden or metal cores and early fabric coverings that permitted or textile matching to garments. Such developments enabled more precise tailoring of fitted ensembles, improving both closure efficacy and aesthetic harmony, while guild charters record booming trade fueled by expanding luxury markets. This ornamental escalation, however, provoked sumptuary legislation aimed at preserving class distinctions amid rising merchant prosperity. In , for example, ordinances extended prior medieval codes to restrict button placement and extravagance on lower-status clothing, such as prohibiting excess beyond elbows for servants, reflecting elite concerns over blurred hierarchies through imitative . While these buttons advanced sartorial precision and cultural of artisans, critics via legal edicts decried their role in exacerbating visible inequalities, as documented in petitions and regulatory texts that balanced with .

Industrial Mass Production

The Industrial Revolution facilitated the transition from handmade to mechanized button production, introducing stamping presses and lathes that enabled efficient manufacturing of metal and bone buttons. In Britain, the buttony trade expanded in the early 18th century, employing thousands in Birmingham and other centers where brass buttons were stamped from sheet metal, peaking between 1820 and 1850 as demand for durable fasteners grew with ready-made clothing. These machines reduced production times from hours per button to minutes, lowering costs and making buttons accessible beyond elite garments to everyday apparel for the working class. In the United States, shell button manufacturing emerged in the mid-19th century, with mother-of-pearl buttons introduced around 1855 using imported shells, but domestic production surged in the late 1890s via cutting and turning machines applied to abundant freshwater mussels from Midwestern rivers. Centers like , and other Mississippi Valley towns established factories that processed shells into blanks, with output escalating rapidly; by the early 1900s, annual production reached 1.5 billion buttons, reflecting the scale achieved through mechanized blanking and finishing. This industry democratized button use by supplying inexpensive, high-quality fasteners to mass-market producers, supported by trade data showing exponential growth from niche to dominant supply. Molding techniques for composite buttons, such as cloth-covered or early rubber variants, also advanced in the , with patents like the 1825 cloth button machine marking steps toward , though full mass molding awaited later refinements. Overall, these innovations shifted production from artisanal workshops to factories, evidenced by surges and records, enhancing garment functionality without reliance on skilled labor.

20th Century Standardization

Following , the button industry saw accelerated adoption of synthetic plastics such as and , driven by wartime shortages of natural materials like , bone, and metal. These materials offered cost-efficient production and durability, replacing traditional pearl buttons in shirts and blouses by the early 1950s as pearl button industries declined. Standardization efforts intensified with the refinement of the sizing system, an established unit where 1 ligne equals approximately 0.635 mm and 40 lignes correspond to 1 inch, facilitating uniform button diameters for interchangeable use in mass-produced . This system, rooted in centuries-old button-making practices, gained international consistency amid 20th-century industrialization, supporting garments by ensuring compatibility across global manufacturers. The shift to plastics and standardized sizing aligned with expanding global trade, enabling uniform, affordable fasteners that underpinned the uniformity of fashion production, where synthetic buttons became prevalent for their moldability into consistent shapes and sizes. By the mid-20th century, this uniformity extended to utilitarian designs, prioritizing functionality over decoration in everyday apparel.

Materials and Production

Traditional Materials

Traditional buttons utilized natural materials sourced from animal, vegetal, and mineral origins, selected for their availability, workability, and capacity to withstand mechanical stress in fastening applications. , , , , and metals such as predominated due to regional abundance and inherent properties like tensile strength, with choices reflecting practical constraints rather than ornamental priorities. Bone buttons, typically fashioned from cow or remains prevalent in agrarian societies, were processed by softening through soaking or steaming to enable disc-cutting, yielding a with robust and natural biodegradability, though susceptible to cracking under extreme torsion. , harvested from horns abundant in economies, provided a keratin-based substance denser than , exhibiting superior resistance to repeated flexing and while remaining lightweight and non-conductive. Shell buttons, chiefly mother-of-pearl derived from marine mollusks like those in the and eastern trade networks, were imported in volumes reaching 2,000 tons annually to by 1859, offering iridescent durability in compression but brittleness from impact due to high calcium carbonate content. Wood, sourced from local timber in forested regions, formed economical toggles and discs valued for machinability and renewability, yet prone to moisture-induced swelling and lower resistance compared to osseous alternatives. Metals including and , extracted via in metallurgically advanced civilizations, delivered exceptional longevity against abrasion and tensile loads, tempered by weight and potential oxidation unless alloyed appropriately, with historical ledgers evidencing routes from ore-rich deposits to button-producing centers.

Manufacturing Techniques

Early button manufacturing relied on manual techniques such as carving from organic materials and casting in metal molds, processes that required skilled labor for each individual piece. These methods, prevalent through the medieval and Renaissance periods, prioritized craftsmanship for functional and decorative uniformity but limited output to small scales suitable for luxury garments. The transition to industrial production accelerated in the with the of stamping machines for metal buttons, enabling punch-and-die operations that produced consistent shapes from more efficiently than prior or . Post-1769 innovations in guided stamping mechanisms improved alignment and reduced waste, marking a shift from artisanal variability to mechanized precision. By the , dies and presses further standardized forms, allowing factories to generate volumes unattainable by hand, with operations scaling to employ thousands in specialized trades like buttony. For fabric-covered buttons, traditional sewing involved wrapping material over a core and securing with stitches or shanks, a labor-intensive process yielding bespoke results for high-end attire. Mechanized variants emerged in the late , using adjustable dies and punches to automate covering and assembly, boosting throughput while maintaining decorative appeal. This automation exemplified first-principles efficiency, as fixed tooling minimized per-unit variability and labor time compared to freehand methods. Scale effects distinguished production modes: handcraft persisted for items demanding intricate detailing, whereas presses facilitated mass output for everyday , dramatically lowering costs through division of labor and repetitive operations. Early factories, however, drew criticism for employing child labor, with young workers enduring extended shifts in hazardous conditions akin to those in contemporaneous mills. Such practices, while ethically contentious, coincided with productivity surges that democratized fasteners, rendering apparel affordable beyond elite classes by the Revolution's close.

Modern Materials and Sustainability

In contemporary button production for apparel, and plastics dominate due to their low cost, high durability, and ease of molding into complex shapes, accounting for approximately 75% of buttons used in and . These synthetic materials, derived from petroleum-based resins, enable via injection molding, outperforming natural alternatives in resistance to wear and environmental exposure during garment use. However, non-biodegradable plastic buttons contribute to broader textile waste challenges, with global apparel generating an estimated 8.3 million tons of in 2019, including from laundering and end-of-life disposal. In the United States, rates stood at 14.7% in 2018, leaving over 85% of discarded and components, such as buttons, to enter landfills where they persist for centuries without breaking down. Lifecycle analyses indicate that while virgin plastics offer superior longevity—reducing the need for frequent replacements—their environmental footprint intensifies in cycles with low reuse rates, though improved sorting and mechanical could offset up to 30% of waste impacts through higher . Since the 2010s, industry responses have included recycled buttons from post-consumer bottles and bio-based alternatives like and , which decompose naturally and require less energy in production. The natural button market, encompassing these materials, was valued at USD 1.2 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 1.9 billion by 2033, driven by demand for verifiable certifications amid regulatory pressures on emissions. Empirical data supports that such shifts enhance circularity without sacrificing functionality, as buttons match tensile strength in durability tests while enabling compostability, provided infrastructure scales to capture durable synthetics effectively. This balances advantages—longer garment lifespan versus biodegradable fragility—with data-backed pathways to mitigate waste accumulation.

Design and Functionality

Attachment Mechanisms

Buttons attach to fabric primarily through three mechanisms: sew-through holes, shanks, and toggles, each optimized for load distribution and fabric thickness. Sew-through buttons feature 2 to 4 holes drilled perpendicularly through the face, allowing to pass directly from button to fabric, which evenly distributes tensile forces across multiple points during fastening stress. This design, evident in pierced artifacts from the Indus Valley Civilization around 2000 BCE, minimizes localized strain but risks fabric pull-through under repeated shear if thread count is insufficient. Engineering tests on garment buttons show that four-hole configurations achieve up to 25% higher breaking strength than two-hole variants when using size 20 thread on fabrics, due to broader tension sharing. Shank buttons incorporate a protruding or eyelet on the underside, elevating the button above the fabric surface and channeling pull forces through the rather than the fabric weave, which enhances reliability on layered or bulky materials like overcoats. This mechanism evolved from early metal wire loops in 13th-century garments, providing a that reduces abrasion by 30-50% in simulated wear cycles compared to flat sew-through types. Pull-strength evaluations indicate shank attachments withstand 1.5 times more cycles before detachment in standardized abrasion tests, attributed to the shank's role in isolating stress from the button body. However, poorly constructed shanks in low-cost variants exhibit higher failure rates from shank under lateral , as documented in garment analyses. Toggle mechanisms employ a rigid or cord-bound stick inserted through a fabric or slit, relying on and for retention rather than , ideal for high-movement areas like parkas. Originating in prehistoric cord-and-stick fasteners, toggles persist in modern outerwear for their quick-release under extreme loads, with primarily from wear rather than the toggle itself. Comparative assessments confirm toggles distribute dynamic better than pinned alternatives in cold-weather simulations, though they demand precise sizing to avoid slippage. Across types, reinforcements like wrapped shanks—sewn post-attachment—have reduced overall detachment incidents by reinforcing weak points, as verified in button pull tests varying parameters. Cheap implementations, often in fast-fashion production, compromise these benefits, leading to elevated in laundering cycles exceeding 50 washes.

Sizing and Standards

The ligne (L) system serves as the predominant international standard for measuring button diameter, with 1 ligne defined as 0.635 mm, such that 40 lignes equate to 1 inch (25.4 mm). This unit originated as a French term for "line" and was adopted by button manufacturers for precise diameter assessment, enabling consistent production across suppliers. To determine a button's ligne size, its diameter in millimeters is divided by 0.635; for example, an 18 mm button approximates 28 lignes. Regional variations persist, particularly in the United States where sizes may be denominated in inches or fractional inches (e.g., 1/2 inch or 13 mm equating to 20 lignes), contrasting with Europe's predominant use of lignes or direct metric measurements. Conversion charts are routinely employed to reconcile these systems, as discrepancies in application—such as rounding errors in ligne-to-inch translations—can affect button-to-buttonhole alignment in garments. Contemporary manufacturing emphasizes the system's universality to support efficient global supply chains, where standardized minimizes production variances and ensures between components from diverse origins. While formal ISO standards govern overall size designation (e.g., ISO 8559 series for anthropometric-based garment ), button-specific adherence relies on the convention rather than dedicated metrics, promoting practical consistency without mandatory regulatory enforcement. This approach facilitates scalable apparel assembly, as evidenced by common specifications like 16–20 lignes for plackets.

Decorative and Coating Methods

Decorative techniques for buttons have historically emphasized aesthetic enhancement through materials like and inlays. Enameling, involving the fusion of powdered glass to metal bases for colored designs, emerged prominently in button production by the in , France, where painted enamel techniques allowed intricate motifs. Elite garments featured buttons embellished with gems such as , , and precious stones, signaling wealth until regulatory sumptuary laws curbed excesses in medieval . on fabric-covered buttons added textured patterns, often reserved for high-status clothing in the 17th and 18th centuries. Coating methods replicate natural lusters or enable printed imagery. Pearlizing coatings, applied to base metals or plastics to mimic mother-of-pearl , gained traction in the alongside natural shell buttons from the American industry. facilitated mass reproduction of detailed designs on button surfaces, adapting printing to apparel accessories by the early . Fabric wrapping, entailing coverage with textiles or , provided customizable decoration while integrating buttons seamlessly with garment fabrics. These embellishments introduce functional trade-offs, as added materials increase button weight, potentially straining lightweight fabrics or altering drape in historical garments analyzed through structural studies. In modern contexts, such decorations prioritize visual appeal over utility, with non-functional buttons appearing as ornamental clusters on pieces during 2025 fashion weeks, emphasizing sculptural form over fastening.

Applications in Clothing

Historical Positioning Practices

In medieval garments, buttons first appeared on fitted men's clothing around the 13th century, positioned along center-front plackets to secure overlapping edges, typically closing left over right to facilitate fastening with the dominant right hand. This arrangement aligned with the ergonomic needs of self-dressing warriors and laborers, where quick access and secure hold were prioritized over decorative symmetry. Tailoring conventions emphasized placement at the garment's edge rather than inset, ensuring taut closure without bunching fabric. Sleeve cuffs featured clusters of smaller buttons, often 4 to 12 in number, spaced closely (approximately 1-2 cm apart) from to mid-forearm or , allowing graduated tightening for mobility during activities like riding or . Front placket buttons were larger and more widely spaced (up to 5-7 cm intervals), calibrated to contours at stress points such as the and chest, distributing to avert tears in or fabrics under strain. Vents at hems or sides, emerging in 15th-century doublets, incorporated 1-3 buttons on flaps to enable stride without restriction, a practical adaptation verified in surviving artifacts and period illustrations. Gender-based variations solidified later; while early button use was predominantly male-oriented, men's attire retained the right-side button (wearer's right), whereas women's rarer buttoned garments showed inconsistent placement until the , when left-side buttons (right over left) became standard, possibly to differentiate from male uniforms amid industrialization. Cultural differences appeared in non-European contexts, such as or Asian robes with central or symmetric closures, but Western traditions prioritized handedness-driven asymmetry for efficiency. Empirical spacing practices, derived from trial-and-error in workshops, minimized pull-out risks by aligning buttons with natural fold lines, as evidenced in 14th-century effigies showing even distribution to withstand repeated stress. ![Historical doublet showing front placket buttons][float-right]

Modern Fashion Integration

In contemporary apparel design, buttons are routinely integrated with alternative fasteners such as zippers and to enhance both practicality and visual interest, allowing for selective use where rapid closure is needed alongside customizable . This is evident in casual and garments, where zippers handle high-stress areas like pant flies while buttons provide adjustable or ornamental elements on cuffs and . Such hybrid systems leverage buttons' reliability in low-volume fastening, maintaining their role despite the prevalence of mechanical alternatives. High fashion collections frequently employ buttons in decorative excess, featuring oversized, multi-layered, or materially diverse variants—such as mixing metal and fabric-covered types—to create focal points that emphasize and over pure utility. This approach underscores buttons' persistence due to their adaptability for and statement-making, rather than displacement by newer fasteners. Post-2020, DIY customization of buttons has surged, driven by consumer demand for individualized ; makers use accessible tools to print or assemble designs, aligning with broader trends in sustainable self-expression and . The global clothing buttons market reflects this enduring versatility, valued at approximately USD 2.13 billion in 2024 and projected to reach USD 2.92 billion by 2033, expanding at a CAGR of 3.6%, with growth attributed to rising preferences for eco-friendly and customizable options amid pressures. Synthetic buttons, however, draw criticism for exacerbating , as and resin variants shed particles during or laundering and resist , complicating waste streams. Counterbalancing this, buttons from natural materials like corozo or recycled polymers offer higher recyclability, as they integrate more readily into mechanical separation processes without contaminating fiber reuse. These attributes sustain buttons' integration, prioritizing functional durability over ephemeral trends.

Comparisons to Alternative Fasteners

Buttons provide superior adjustability over hooks and eyes or laces, enabling precise incremental fastening that accommodates contours and without the or knot-based limitations of alternatives. Hooks and eyes allow rapid engagement for structured garments but offer minimal tension variation, while laces permit broad adjustability yet demand manual tying, increasing wear time and risk of unintended loosening during activity. In comparison to , patented around , and zippers, which gained practical form in the early , buttons excel in repair simplicity and cost-effectiveness, as a single lost or damaged unit can be hand-sewn using basic thread without tools or matching components. Snaps facilitate quick, tool-free attachment suitable for infant wear or layered outerwear but underperform in high-tension scenarios, where prong deformation reduces reliability over repeated cycles. Zippers ensure faster traversal of long seams with a streamlined profile, yet their mechanical complexity leads to higher failure rates from jamming or separation, often requiring machine replacement that elevates downtime and expense. Buttons' endurance in apparel stems from their aesthetic adaptability across fabrics and designs, where they integrate as ornamental elements without the bulk or uniformity imposed by tracks or arrays, preserving garment versatility in both formal and casual contexts. While s dominate high-volume production for efficiency, buttons' modular nature supports user-level , mitigating in repair-averse settings and enabling hybrids that leverage complementary strengths, such as button plackets over concealed s for enhanced in tailored fits.

Cultural and Symbolic Roles

Status and Artistic Significance

![Peter Carl Fabergé buttons at the Cleveland Museum of Art][float-right] Throughout the period, buttons crafted from precious materials such as , pearls, , and gemstones served as prominent symbols of wealth and social standing, often adorning the garments of and reflecting artistic expression in . These ornate pieces, including examples featuring designs with pearls and stones, functioned not merely as fasteners but as declarations of prestige, with their rarity and craftsmanship underscoring the wearer's status. In indigenous contexts, such as among the people of the , buttons integrated into ceremonial button blankets from the onward signified hereditary rights, tribal identity, and social prestige. These wool garments, embellished with thousands of traded metal buttons forming crests like ravens or whales, were worn at potlatches and feasts to assert family heritage and elevate communal wealth in traditional Tlingit terms, blending European trade goods with native artistry for cultural endurance. Artistically, buttons have held value as standalone studio craft objects, exemplified by Fabergé's gold and guilloché enamel creations from the late 19th and early 20th centuries, which command significant auction prices—such as sets by workmasters like Erik Kollin fetching £2,000–£4,000—due to their intricate techniques and imperial associations. Archaeologically, buttons provide empirical indicators of past social hierarchies, with material composition and quantity revealing status differences in sites from medieval Europe to 19th-century burials, where gilded or abundant examples denoted higher socioeconomic positions. However, the proliferation of mass-produced reproductions has diluted the intrinsic status conveyed by genuine buttons, as copies of rare designs—such as pictorial or jeweled variants—flood markets, undermining the rarity that historically amplified their signaling value and collectible worth.

Political and Campaign Uses

The use of buttons as political campaign badges emerged during the late 19th century, evolving from earlier fabric rosettes and sew-on pins to mass-produced celluloid-covered metal disks. The modern pin-back format, which facilitated inexpensive replication and attachment to , was first widely deployed in the 1896 presidential election, where buttons promoting William McKinley's pro-gold standard stance outnumbered those for William Jennings Bryan's advocacy by estimates of production runs in the millions across partisan lines. This design, patented in 1893 by the Whitehead & Hoag Company, standardized button production by the early , allowing campaigns to distribute them at rallies and through volunteers for visible signaling of support. Campaign buttons excelled in low-cost dissemination, fostering a form of analog virality where wearers amplified messages via personal interactions and public gatherings, particularly in resource-constrained local races. For instance, conservative-leaning buttons from the 1920s onward, such as those backing Calvin Coolidge's fiscal restraint policies, paralleled liberal counterparts like Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal-era pins, both achieving broad circulation without digital infrastructure. Empirical assessments of their causal impact on mobilization remain limited, with field experiments on analogous low-touch materials like direct mail indicating negligible boosts to —typically under 1%—compared to intensive efforts. Critics have dismissed buttons as superficial tools that prioritize emotive sloganeering over depth, a view substantiated by their frequent reuse of hyperbolic across ideologies, from McKinley's "Sound Money" pins to later conservative badges decrying government overreach. Nonetheless, their persistence in both major-party campaigns underscores a practical utility in low-barrier identity reinforcement, though rigorous causal analyses attribute any turnout correlations more to underlying supporter enthusiasm than the buttons themselves. Balanced historical collections reveal no partisan monopoly on this medium, with right-leaning examples like Barry Goldwater's 1964 "In Your Heart You Know He's Right" buttons matching the volume and stylistic innovation of left-leaning ones from contemporaneous Democratic efforts.

Collectibility and Preservation

The maintains an extensive archive of buttons, with search results indicating over 2,000 cataloged items spanning materials like , silver, and from various historical periods. Other institutions, such as the , hold comparable collections documenting utilitarian and ornamental examples from the 18th to 20th centuries. These holdings serve primarily for scholarly documentation rather than display, emphasizing buttons' role in costume history without elevating their aesthetic over functional origins. Private button collecting emerged as a formalized hobby in the United States during the 1930s, driven by interest in classifying items by material, era, and form amid economic recovery efforts that repurposed household scraps. The National Button Society, founded in 1938, standardized terminology and categorization, fostering organized exchanges that expanded post-1940s as wartime rationing ended and disposable income rose, though no unique "boom" occurred exclusively after World War II. Collectors distinguish utilitarian buttons—often mass-produced from shell or metal, valued under $50 at auction—for everyday historical insight from rare ornamental pieces, such as 18th-century cut-steel examples, which command higher prices due to scarcity and craftsmanship. Antique button auctions reflect modest market values, with lots of Victorian-era enamel or metal groups typically selling for $100–500, while exceptional singles like Fabergé or variants exceed $1,000 based on condition and provenance. Rarity, not sentiment, drives premiums; for instance, a 2025 auction lot of mixed 1930s–1940s buttons fetched under $300, underscoring that most utilitarian items retain low economic worth despite collectible appeal. Preservation challenges arise from material degradation, including metal accelerated by acidic textiles or environmental , and deterioration in pin-back types exposed to light. Museums employ archival methods such as enclosing buttons in acid-free bags with cardstock supports, stored in controlled environments at 45–55% relative and below 70°F to minimize oxidation and damage. For mixed-media items, separation from fabrics prevents acid transfer, prioritizing inert storage over to preserve evidential integrity.

References

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
    Exhaustive Guide To Buttons And 35 Types Of Buttons - Tack Apparel
    Buttons are typically made from materials such as hard plastic, seashell, metal, and wood, while other materials are reserved for high-end or vintage pieces.
  3. [3]
    The history of sewing: the evolution of the button - Fabricana's Blog
    Feb 14, 2024 · The first evidence of a button being used dates back to 2800-2600 BCE during the Indus Valley Civilization (now modern day Pakistan).<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    A History of the Button Front Shirt - Tatter
    Apr 8, 2022 · The first buttons were decorative, the oldest extant example from ca. 2000 BC found in Mohenjo-daro, in present day Pakistan. These pieces were ...
  5. [5]
    Concepts of Manufacturing Buttons: How Button Is Made Term Paper
    Apr 1, 2024 · The beginning of the 13th century marked a new era in the fashion industry as manufacturers started developing buttonholes within buttons.
  6. [6]
    A History of Button Manufacture, Use & Classification | Crazy Crow
    May 5, 2021 · Metal Buttons: Various types of metal have been made into buttons since at least the 16th century. In the late 19th century, aluminum buttons ...
  7. [7]
    The Evolution of the Button - Nancy's Notions
    Aug 30, 2023 · The availability of new materials like glass, porcelain, and early plastics led to a proliferation of button designs, from simple and ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Chronicle of the Museum for the Arts of Decoration of the Cooper ...
    Buttons date back to ancient Egypt, with early European use in the 12th/13th centuries. Early buttons were ornamental, and the 18th century saw a great period ...
  10. [10]
    The Westward Journeys of Buttons - AramcoWorld
    Nov 2, 2020 · Buttons originated in Asia and Egypt, spread via the Silk Road and Islamic conquests, and reached Europe through the Mediterranean.
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    The History of the Button - King & Allen
    Oct 9, 2018 · The Indus Valley Civilisation are credited with the invention of the button and the earliest one we have in existence today dates from around 2000BCE.
  13. [13]
    Buttonholes, pockets and zippers: a short history - Bangor Daily News
    Jul 12, 2010 · Buttonholes appeared in Germany in the 13th century. Ancient Persians are thought to have been the first to use buttonholes in clothing before their use spread ...
  14. [14]
    Of Buttons, Buttonholes, and Samplers - PieceWork magazine
    Aug 5, 2020 · Clothing historians agree that buttons with buttonholes started to be used around the thirteenth century, a time when European clothing began to ...
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    Buttons and Lacings - Rosalies Medieval Woman
    The ability to loosen a garment at the side seams to accommodate an expanding stomach and then pull it tight again after the birth of a child, made special ...
  17. [17]
    Medieval clothing in everyday life: an experimental practical test
    Jul 31, 2024 · Medieval clothing was relatively durable compared to modern garments. The survival of numerous historical garments to the present day, some in ...
  18. [18]
    doublet | Fashion History Timeline
    Aug 15, 2018 · ... buttons. Early doublets were close fitting garments tailored to set off a man's physique; they nipped in at the waist and had short skirts below ...
  19. [19]
    Another Look: Sumptuary Laws in Medieval Europe
    And the sumptuary laws attempted to prevent middle class men and women from dressing above their station and being mistaken for and deferred to as nobility.
  20. [20]
    History of buttons
    During the Renaissance and the beginning of the sixteenth century buttons with stones decorated hats, shirts, sleeves and jackets of wealthy gentlemen and ...
  21. [21]
    Recreating 16th century buttons - The Renaissance Tailor
    Buttons were made by casting metal, constructing metal, or using organic elements. Common shapes were rounded balls. Thread-wrapped wood core buttons were also ...
  22. [22]
    (PDF) Thread-Wrapped Buttons: An examination of the creation and ...
    In the 16th century, thread-worked buttons became increasingly prevalent as both functional and decorative components of dress. The concept of thread ...
  23. [23]
    'Sfacciate donne fiorentine': Sumptuary Laws in Medieval Florence
    May 16, 2021 · In the aforementioned laws of 1356, servant women were not allowed to wear most types of hats, high heeled shoes, or any button beyond the elbow ...
  24. [24]
    Button making - Heritage Crafts
    These buttons were primarily made of silk, mohair, or other types of specialist fine threads, wrapped and woven over a wooden button mould.
  25. [25]
    eighteenthcenturylit [licensed for non-commercial use only] / Buttons
    Brass has been used to manufacture more buttons than any other material and the brass button industry peaked between 1820 and 1850. - Bone: “Bone buttons were ...
  26. [26]
    The Pearl Button Capital of the World
    Sep 27, 2015 · At the turn of the 20th Century, 1.5 billion pearl buttons were produced annually in Muscatine, the undisputed Pearl Button Capital of the World.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Bulletin 172. Manufactures. Buttons. - Census.gov
    The most noteworthy feature of its develop- ment in the United States has been the rise within the last eight years of the fresh-water shell pearl button.Missing: Midwest | Show results with:Midwest
  28. [28]
    Button Blank Industry - Encyclopedia of Arkansas
    Apr 11, 2025 · America's mother-of-pearl button industry boomed in the late 1800s due to a seemingly inexhaustible supply of freshwater mussels.<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Plastic Buttons: The Perfect Blend of Style and Durability
    Tracing the timeline back to the early 20th century, plastic buttons became a rage in the post-war era when materials such as wood, metal, and ivory were scarce ...Missing: II | Show results with:II
  30. [30]
    A Century of Plastic Buttons - Keep Homestead Museum
    The pearlized plastic buttons of today have taken the place of the real mother of pearl buttons originally used on men's shirts and women's blouses.
  31. [31]
    The Wide World of Materials | Australian Button History
    ... plastic contributed to the industry's decline by the 1950s. Buttons are still made in Muscatine, but nowadays of plastic. NB: Small amount of stud buttons ...
  32. [32]
    What is "Ligne"? The Insider's Guide to Buttons - The Lining Company
    May 17, 2018 · Ligne is a historic unit of length. It is a French word meaning “line”. It is used to measure the diameter of a button and has been used as such for centuries!
  33. [33]
    An Easy Guide to Button Measurement and Sizing
    Jun 19, 2019 · Ligne (from the French for line) is the traditional unit for measuring buttons. In fact it was first used by button manufacturers way back in ...
  34. [34]
    RESOURCE: MEASURING BUTTONS – LIGNE
    In the 9th century German button makers began to use the term ligne to measure the diameter of buttons. The consensus definition was that a ligne was the ...
  35. [35]
    Who's got the button? - National Museum of American History
    By the 1920s buttons made of synthetic materials were increasingly common. Because these could be made in larger sizes and different colors, ready-to-wear ...
  36. [36]
    Buttons – A History - Western Regional Button Association
    With the turn of the century and WWI, came the industrial revolution which definitely had an impact on the manufacture of buttons. Through the use of new ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] A Look at Buttons as Indicators of Chronology and Material Culture
    By the era examined here, from 1840 to 1860, buttons were an integral factor in women's clothing, serving as mechanical fasteners and decorative statements of ...
  38. [38]
    Bone Buttons & Manufacturing Tool - National Park Service
    Nov 4, 2022 · Bone buttons were made by pressing a metal "bit" into bone, then rotating it to cut out a disc. A brass loop was added to the center hole.
  39. [39]
    History: buttons - materiotek-mercerie
    Stamping and moulding are the traditional techniques used for the manufacture of these buttons. ... Bakelite® (1909): the first completely synthetic plastic ...
  40. [40]
    What Are the Most Durable Buttons for Everyday Wear?
    Aug 29, 2025 · Natural durability: Horn buttons are made from dense horn material that withstands fatigue better than many synthetic buttons. Sophisticated ...
  41. [41]
    Explaining Button Materials, the Singular Protrusion on Suits
    Sep 19, 2023 · However, they are more susceptible to breakage from impact, making them less durable. Since shells are primarily composed of calcium, they are ...
  42. [42]
    The History of Buttons - LibGuides
    Nov 6, 2023 · The earliest object that might have been used as a button dates back to 7000 BCE and was excavated from a burial site in the Indus Valley in present day ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] The Archaeology of Common Nineteenth-Century Buttons
    Apr 6, 2013 · This paper is about one of the smallest, humblest, and most ubiquitous artifacts found on late eighteenth and nineteenth century ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] A Structural and Functional Analysis of Eighteenth Century Buttons
    Eighteenth century buttons are examined through both the historical and archaeological records. Merchants' records provide structural and functional ...
  45. [45]
    US363214A - Button-machine - Google Patents
    The object of this invention is to provide a machine for making covered buttons of different sizes, to arrange the dies and punches so that they will perform ...
  46. [46]
    History of child labor in the United States—part 1: little children ...
    In many towns, mills and glass factories regularly employed girls and boys. Young children worked in the fields performing farm labor and on the coasts in the ...
  47. [47]
    Child Labor during the British Industrial Revolution – EH.net
    The factory owners began to hire children from poor and working-class families to work in these factories preparing and spinning cotton, flax, wool and silk.
  48. [48]
    Buttons for Clothing Market Size, Share | Global Forecast [2033]
    Plastic dominates shirt and trousers categories with 75 % share . Third, manufacturing automation and process enhancements have increased annual production ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  49. [49]
    Materials: Fashion | Butonia
    Contrary to zamak, brass is shaped or punched in a cold process. The material's flexibility and suppleness is a big advantage during the production of button ...Missing: durability | Show results with:durability
  50. [50]
    The global apparel industry is a significant yet overlooked source of ...
    Jun 12, 2024 · We estimate that the apparel industry generated 8.3 [4.8–12.3] million tons (Mt) of plastic pollution in 2019, corresponding to 14% [5.5%–30%] ...
  51. [51]
    Textiles: Material-Specific Data | US EPA
    The recycling rate for all textiles was 14.7 percent in 2018, with 2.5 million tons recycled. Within this figure, EPA estimated that the recycling rate for ...
  52. [52]
    10 Concerning Fast Fashion Waste Statistics - Earth.Org
    Aug 21, 2023 · In America alone, an estimated 11.3 million tons of textile waste – equivalent to 85% of all textiles – end up in landfills on a yearly basis.
  53. [53]
    Spinning Textile Waste into Value - Boston Consulting Group
    Aug 12, 2025 · System-wide improvements could boost that recycling rate to more than 30%, yielding new fibers with a raw material value of more than $50 ...A Problem Of Global... · ... But Barriers To Reducing... · Five Actions For Scaling A...<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    ECO-FRIENDLY buttons: All about our sustainable buttons.
    Feb 5, 2025 · Bio-resin buttons derived from plants: These buttons are made from biodegradable resins derived from plant biomass, such as sugar cane molasses.Missing: cork growth
  55. [55]
    Natural Button Market Size, Growth & Forecast Report - 2033
    Feb 25, 2025 · The global natural button market was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2024 and is anticipated to reach USD 1.9 billion by 2033, ...Missing: cork | Show results with:cork
  56. [56]
    Cork's sustainable revolution: from stoppers to aerospace
    From wine stoppers to aerospace innovations, cork is transforming industries while promoting a 100 percent circular economy and responsible forest management.
  57. [57]
    Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review
    May 20, 2018 · Forty-one studies were reviewed, whereof 85% deal with recycling and 41% with reuse (27% cover both reuse and recycling). Fibre recycling is the ...Missing: buttons | Show results with:buttons
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Sewing Technique: Buttons - DigitalCommons@USU
    There are two kinds of buttons that are normally used, a sew-through button and a shank button. Buttons can be used for garment closure and as a decorative ...Missing: mechanisms toggle advantages tension distribution
  59. [59]
    A Study about the Mechanical Properties of Various Buttons Used in ...
    The results show that the breaking strength of buttons is related to the number of holes in the button, the size of the sewing thread, and the fabric type.
  60. [60]
    The Ultimate Guide to Shank Buttons - SUNMEI BUTTON
    Mar 9, 2020 · Here's everything you need to know. From the different varieties of shank buttons available to how you sew them into place.Missing: mechanisms mechanical advantages tension
  61. [61]
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Children's Apparel Product Safety Guidelines
    Safety risks arise for children when buttons, trims and attachments create sharp edges or sharp points. These create potential risks for penetration, piercing ...
  63. [63]
    Types Of Buttons Used In Sewing (12 Varieties) - SewGuide
    Types of Buttons used in Sewing (12 varieties) · 1. Plastic Buttons · 2. Metal Buttons · 3. Shank buttons · 4. Wooden Buttons · 5. Fabric Buttons · 6. Toggle button ...Missing: distribution | Show results with:distribution
  64. [64]
    A Comprehensive Guide to Types of Buttons in Sewing
    Jul 16, 2024 · Shank buttons have a small loop or “shank” on the back that allows the button to be sewn onto the garment. This type of button is very versatile ...Types Of Buttons Guide · Buttons Types By Shape · Types Of Buttons By Material
  65. [65]
    Impact of Different Parameters on Button Pull Strength Test
    Aug 10, 2021 · The objective of our study is to find out the effect of different sewing thread count on braking strength and determine the button strength for assort stronger ...
  66. [66]
    Button Size Conversions - Wyedean Weaving
    Apr 18, 2016 · Ligne, or line, is a unit of measurement that was used for centuries prior to the adoption of metric system, to define the diameter of ...
  67. [67]
    What is Ligne? 6 key points that you should know when you choose ...
    The standardized conversion for a ligne is 0.635mm while 1 inch (25mm) equal to 40 ligne. 6 key points that you should know when you choose buttons for your ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] EMSIG MANUFACTURING
    Ligne : A button's ligne, refers to a button's size. The word ligne, is a French word that became the standard reference used by German button manufacturers ...
  69. [69]
    How do I Measure The Size of A Button | New Swell
    1 L = 0.635 mm 1 mm = 1/25" For example, if the diameter of a button is 18mm, the size of the button can be calculated to be 28L (18/0.635=28.34).
  70. [70]
    Button Size - The Button Baron
    Today, Ligne is the internationally recognized standard for button sizing. 40L to the American Inch. 20L - 1/2" = 12mm. 22L = 9/16" = 14mm. 24L = 5 ...<|separator|>
  71. [71]
  72. [72]
  73. [73]
    Button Size Chart - WAWAK Blog
    Jan 11, 2023 · Find the perfect button size for your sewing project with our handy Button Size Chart. Get accurate measurements in ligne and millimeters!
  74. [74]
    ISO 8559-1:2017 - Size designation of clothes — Part 1
    In stock 2–5 day deliveryAnnex A describes the use of the pictogram (standardized and modified) based on the selection of most usual body dimensions used for clothing size designation.
  75. [75]
    Button Basics: How to Measure and Size Like a Pro
    Ligne is a French term that means "line" and is represented by the letter L. It is an international standard for recognizing button sizes, with 1 ligne being ...
  76. [76]
  77. [77]
    ᐅ Antique jeweled buttons - Jewellery Kaleidoscope
    Mar 9, 2015 · Button-like objects of stone, glass, bone, ceramic, and gold have been found at archaeological sites dating as early as 2000 BCE.
  78. [78]
    1600-1700 – Page 4 - The Pragmatic Costumer
    May 7, 2013 · In the early 18th century, heavily embroidered stomachers blooming with polychrome flowers came into fashion, as did faux lacing and frilly bows ...
  79. [79]
    Why are designers suddenly putting buttons on everything?
    Sep 10, 2025 · This season, buttons and grommets are back, and are taking a non-functional turn.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  80. [80]
    I'm Calling It: This Random Micro-Trend Will Be Everywhere This Fall
    Aug 27, 2025 · I know what you're thinking: Buttons are a normal, functional feature on clothing. But they've been popping up bizarrely as nonfunctional ...Missing: decorative | Show results with:decorative
  81. [81]
    Placing your 14th century buttons just so - La cotte simple
    Nov 23, 2012 · Unlike modern people, medieval folks did not expect their openings to overlap excessively when joined by buttons. A minimal overlap was ...
  82. [82]
    Buttons Right, Buttons Left
    So let's look at historical depictions. Until the late 18th century, buttons are rare on women's dress. In the few earlier pictures, the direction often can't ...Missing: standardization | Show results with:standardization
  83. [83]
  84. [84]
  85. [85]
  86. [86]
    trend of custom buttons 2025: Personalize & Stand Out - Accio
    Oct 1, 2025 · Mix and Match: Combining different materials, colors, and styles on a single garment (e.g., mixing metal and fabric-covered buttons) is a trend ...Missing: post- 2020
  87. [87]
  88. [88]
    The hidden impact of sustainable fashion trims in circular design
    Jun 11, 2025 · Traditional plastic buttons, especially those made from polyesters or resins, won't biodegrade and often can't be recycled. Alternatives like ...
  89. [89]
    Microplastic — Fashion's Hidden Menace - 4tify
    Nov 11, 2024 · Those are some of the more common plastic materials used in textiles for clothes, not to forget add-ons like buttons, sequins, zippers etc.
  90. [90]
    Science & Tech Spotlight: Textile Recycling Technologies | U.S. GAO
    Jul 9, 2024 · Buttons, zippers, and other parts can disrupt the process and need to be removed. As previously mentioned, blended materials are not suitable ...
  91. [91]
    What are the pros and cons of using zips, compared to buttons on ...
    Sep 8, 2020 · Zips fasten quicker than buttons and zips provide a flush finish. Buttons add a more decorative aspect and also flexibility in fabric. The best ...Between zippers, buttons going into holes, snap buttons, hooks, or ...What are the advantages of using zippers instead of hooks and eyes ...More results from www.quora.com
  92. [92]
    Hook and Loop Fasteners vs. Other Fasteners | HALCO Europe
    Sep 26, 2024 · Limited Adjustability: Zippers only work along a fixed path, making them less flexible than hook and loop fasteners, which can be adjusted to ...
  93. [93]
  94. [94]
    Garment Closure Types Explained: Buttons, Zippers, Snaps and More
    May 18, 2025 · 1. What Is a Garment Closure? A garment closure is any mechanism used to open, close, or adjust a piece of clothing.
  95. [95]
    SS-32: The History of the Button: Small but Mighty
    Oct 31, 2024 · The story of the button begins around 7000 BCE, with the earliest known "button-like" object found in a burial site in Mohenjo-daro, part of the ...
  96. [96]
    These Italian Renaissance buttons, which feature a trefoil decorated ...
    Sep 6, 2025 · These Italian Renaissance buttons, which feature a trefoil decorated with pearls, enamel and precious stones, were most probably used as a ...
  97. [97]
    Button Blanket - Denver Art Museum
    The designs on the blankets are narrative art that signal the owners' tribe identity, status, and hereditary rights and privileges. Ravens, bears, and whales ...
  98. [98]
    Button Blanket - NFB
    Haida women made button blankets, ceremonial robes that were worn to signify power, hereditary rights, and duties.
  99. [99]
    Ask MOA: What Is This Blanket? - Museum of Anthropology at UBC
    May 26, 2020 · ... button blankets are also included. It would be like showing a King's heraldic banner identifying a family tree or history of inheritance.
  100. [100]
    A 19th Century set of Fabergé gold and enamel dress-buttons
    Free deliveryEstimate. GBP 2,000 – GBP 4,000 ; Closed · 6 Oct 1998 ; Details. A 19th Century set of Fabergé gold and enamel dress-buttons, by Erik Kollin, each button of pink ...
  101. [101]
    A set of six Fabergé gold and enamel buttons, workshop of Erik ...
    3–7 day deliveryA set of six Fabergé gold and enamel buttons, workshop of Erik Kollin, St Petersburg, 1904-1908. Estimate. 8,000 - 12,000 GBP. bidding is closed. Description.
  102. [102]
    [PDF] The archaeological evidence of buttons in Iceland from 1500-1800
    Social status was such a big part of everyday living in general and buttons, being part of clothing, constituted one of the key ways of signaling status.
  103. [103]
    Why Buttons are a Great Indicator of Material Culture in Archeology
    Buttons serve as significant indicators of material culture among African diaspora communities. Galle and Heath's research highlights gendered socioeconomic ...
  104. [104]
    Reproduction picture buttons - Real Or Repro
    The reproductions are copies of the most desirable, higher priced buttons. For example, Debra says an original Brother and Sister button currently sells for $65 ...Missing: counterfeit dilution
  105. [105]
    Vintage Buttons: How to Identify & Value (with Rare Examples)
    Aug 7, 2025 · Like all old items, rarity can drastically impact the value of old buttons; the rarer the piece, the higher the worth. Now, a vintage button ...Missing: counterfeit dilution
  106. [106]
    Political campaign buttons – Trail to the Voting Booth
    The first “modern” campaign button appeared during the 1896 presidential election between William McKinley and William Jennings Bryan. These buttons were made ...
  107. [107]
    Timeline Tuesday: Campaign Buttons of 1896 - History Nebraska
    ... political campaign button first became important in the presidential election of 1896. This contest, in which Republican William McKinley defeated Democrat ...
  108. [108]
    Political Campaign Buttons - Gateway Arch National Park (U.S. ...
    Feb 8, 2019 · The 1896 presidential race between Republican William McKinley and Democrat William Jennings Bryan was one of the most exciting presidential ...
  109. [109]
    How one tiny accessory popularized some of the most iconic ...
    Oct 15, 2020 · The pair reviewed 10,000 pin-back buttons spanning from their invention in 1896 to 2019, eventually whittling them down to 1,500. In the ...
  110. [110]
    Political Buttons | Harvard Kennedy School
    The Political Buttons at HKS Collection features over 5,000 buttons that represent U.S. political history from 1904 through today. It includes buttons from ...Missing: standardization 1900s
  111. [111]
    [PDF] The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on ...
    ... political mobilization. uring the last ... The effectiveness of randomization was checked using voter turnout data from the 1996 presidential election.
  112. [112]
    Does canvassing increase voter turnout? A field experiment - PMC
    This paper reports the results of a randomized field experiment involving registered voters in the city of New Haven. Nonpartisan get-out-the-vote messages ...
  113. [113]
    Political Novelties | National Museum of American History
    The Constitution made the presidency and the positions of senator and representative elective offices. By the early 19th century, ...
  114. [114]
    [PDF] Campaigning for the Future: Voter Turnout and the Effectiveness of ...
    Voter turnout has declined in presidential and congressional elections since the 1970s. This essay researches how traditional campaign tactics and.
  115. [115]
    Button - Search Results | V&A Explore the Collections
    forming (202) · relief (105) · filigree (81) · jasper dip (80) · embossing (25) · glazing (24) · pressing (20) · printing (18).
  116. [116]
    History | National Button Society
    Button collecting became a craze in the United States in the 1930s. When NBS formed in 1938, we set a standard for classifying and collecting buttons that ...
  117. [117]
    Valuable Old Buttons & How to Identify Them - LoveToKnow
    May 26, 2023 · A small number of antique buttons are valuable, but most sell for less than $50. However, some rare antique buttons can be worth much more.
  118. [118]
  119. [119]
    Buttons Archive - House of Button
    Sep 25, 2025 · A similar button can be seen in Safro and Epstein's book Buttons, p. 106. Est. selling price is $200-400. Current bid: $8. Next minimum bid: $10 ...Missing: market value
  120. [120]
    [PDF] Minnesota Historical Society Tech Talk: Conserving Political Buttons ...
    Political buttons, often pin-back, have celluloid, paper, and metal components. Knowing their materials helps with conservation. They have a celluloid outer ...
  121. [121]
    What is happening with this button? | Connecting to Collections Care
    Oct 1, 2025 · Another likely corrosion process is that the textile contains acids and that is causing any metal to touch them to corrode more quickly. Someone ...
  122. [122]
    Tag Archives: Button Storage - The Preservation Lab Blog
    Feb 9, 2022 · Buttons were sealed in polyethylene bags with cardstock support, pinned to cardstock, and grouped by size and type. They were then stored in a ...
  123. [123]
    Button, Button, Who's Got the Button? - Preservation Underground
    Dec 1, 2017 · Buttons are housed in clear zip top bags with a stiffener, which can be labeled, and then placed in trays or boxes. This method is easy to use ...