Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Quintus Labienus


Quintus Labienus Parthicus (died 39 BC) was a general of the late , the son of , who had served as a key lieutenant to before defecting to during the . A staunch , Quintus fought under the assassins of Caesar, including at the in 42 BC, where the Optimates were decisively defeated by the forces of Octavian and . Following this loss, he sought refuge at the Parthian court of King , forging an alliance that enabled him to lead Parthian armies in a major incursion into eastern provinces. In 40 BC, Labienus, alongside Parthian crown prince , spearheaded an invasion of , exploiting Roman disarray from the ; their forces swiftly overran the province, capturing and much of Asia Minor, while Labienus assumed the title Parthicus and minted coins proclaiming Parthian victory over . These successes briefly restored Republican influence in the East and supported figures like Antigonus in Judaea against claimants, but they were short-lived. Roman countermeasures under Bassus culminated in decisive victories, including at the , forcing Labienus to flee; he was pursued and slain near the , marking the end of significant Republican-Parthian collaboration. Primary accounts from and highlight Labienus's role as a opportunistic defector leveraging foreign aid against the , though his ambitions ultimately faltered against renewed Roman cohesion.

Background and Origins

Family and Parentage

Quintus Labienus was the son of (c. 100–45 BC), a Roman equestrian and military commander who initially served as one of Julius Caesar's key legates during the (58–50 BC) before defecting to the Great and the Republican optimates at the outset of the in 49 BC. This paternal allegiance to the senatorial faction underscored a familial tradition of opposition to Caesar's consolidation of power, as commanded Pompeian forces in Africa and , dying at the in 45 BC while fighting Caesar's legions. The Labienus family hailed from , a region in that produced several anti-Caesarian leaders, including , whose patronage networks extended to local equestrians like . Quintus's precise birth date remains uncertain, but given his active military role by 43 BC and death in 39 BC, scholars estimate it around 80–70 BC, aligning with the timeline of his father's prominence under Caesar. Titus Labienus's connections to optimate figures, forged through his early career and Pompey's influence in , positioned the family within broader networks of resistance, emphasizing dynastic ties to senatorial traditionalism over popularist reforms.

Early Involvement in Roman Politics

Quintus Labienus, the son of —a prominent Roman general who had served as Julius Caesar's legate in before defecting to Pompey's faction during the of 49–45 BC—entered Roman politics amid the escalating tensions of Caesar's dictatorship. Titus' steadfast opposition to Caesar, culminating in his command of at the on March 17, 45 BC, where he perished, established a family legacy of senatorial loyalty that profoundly shaped Quintus' alignment against Caesarian . In the immediate aftermath of Caesar's assassination on the , 44 BC, Quintus emerged as an adherent to the Liberators, Brutus and , reflecting the broader senatorial resistance to the late dictator's heirs and the consolidating power of and Octavian. Though details of his precise roles prior to 43 BC remain sparse, his selection by the assassins as one of to the Parthian court indicates early trust within conspiratorial networks seeking external alliances to bolster Republican forces against the emerging . By 43 BC, as political instability intensified with the Triumvirs' proscriptions and the formation of their alliance, Quintus transitioned toward active military service under Cassius Longinus, the of and a key Liberator, marking his shift from political advocacy to operational involvement in the defense of Republican ideals. This progression underscored the Labieni family's enduring commitment to restoring senatorial authority amid the republic's fracture.

Role in the Liberators' Civil War (43–42 BC)

Service under Cassius Longinus

In 43 BC, following the , Quintus Labienus aligned with the Liberators and served as a legate under in the eastern provinces, where aimed to raise funds, troops, and supplies to sustain the Republican cause against the Second Triumvirate. Labienus, leveraging his family's military prestige, contributed to the consolidation of Republican control over Asia Minor and , regions critical for their wealth and manpower; successfully levied approximately 80,000 infantry and 20,000 cavalry from these areas, enabling the Liberators to assemble eleven legions overall. Labienus participated in the defensive campaigns against triumviral incursions, particularly the advance of Publius Cornelius Dolabella, who sought to seize as his allotted province. intercepted Dolabella near Laodicea in July 43 BC, besieging his forces and prompting Dolabella's suicide after a failed breakout attempt; Labienus' involvement in these operations demonstrated tactical proficiency akin to that of his father, , who had commanded Roman legions effectively in and against Caesar. Through coordination with Cassius and , Labienus aided in resource extraction, including the imposition of indemnities on cities like and —totaling over 200 talents from some—and the recruitment of auxiliary forces, bolstering the Liberators' logistical position ahead of the decisive confrontations in .

Diplomatic Envoy to Parthia

In 43 BC, amid preparations for the Republican campaign against the Second Triumvirate, dispatched Quintus Labienus as a key ambassador to the Parthian king to solicit military reinforcements for the Liberators' cause. Labienus, son of the prominent Caesarian opponent , was selected likely due to his eastern connections and the familial legacy of anti-Caesarian resistance, positioning him to negotiate effectively at the Parthian court in . The embassy occurred shortly before the in October 42 BC, reflecting Cassius's strategy to augment his Syrian-based forces, which had recently repelled Parthian incursions under , with allied cavalry and archers to counter the Triumvirs' numerical superiority. The negotiations centered on forging a mutual , with Labienus offering incentives tied to , including potential cessions of Roman-held territories in and to Parthian control, thereby appealing to Orodes's expansionist ambitions in the . records that Labienus explicitly sought "reinforcements" from Orodes prior to , underscoring the urgency of integrating Parthian horse archers—proven devastating at Carrhae in 53 BC—into the . and corroborate the timing and purpose, noting the envoy's role in bidding for external aid to sustain the anti-Triumviral front amid resource strains in the East. These overtures aligned with first-principles : the Republicans, controlling but facing encirclement, required non-Roman auxiliaries to offset the Triumvirs' legions, while promising Parthia strategic footholds without immediate Roman commitment. Parthian receptivity stemmed from opportunistic calculus rather than ideological alignment, as Orodes eyed disarray to reclaim influence lost in prior clashes, including Cassius's 43 BC victories over Pacorus that had curbed Parthian raiding in . The kingdom's elite, still reveling in the Carrhae triumph where they captured standards and executed , viewed the civil war as a chance to weaken a perennial rival without full-scale commitment, potentially securing tribute or border adjustments. Labienus achieved preliminary success in cultivating this interest, as evidenced by Orodes's later entrustment of forces to him post-Philippi, though the aid arrived too late for the decisive Republican defeat; attributes this rapport to Labienus's persuasive depiction of Triumviral vulnerabilities. This diplomatic overture thus laid groundwork for deeper Partho-Republican collaboration, highlighting how external powers exploited Rome's internal fractures for territorial leverage.

Refuge and Alliance with Parthia (42–40 BC)

Survival after Philippi

Following the Republican forces' defeat at the in October 42 BC, where Brutus and suffered catastrophic losses against the triumvirs and Octavian, Quintus Labienus evaded the immediate peril faced by captured or suicidal Republican commanders by remaining distant from the theater of war. As one of the envoys dispatched by in the winter of 43/42 BC to solicit n military support against the , Labienus was already positioned eastward, beyond the reach of Antony's victorious legions that pursued fleeing Republicans across and . Upon receiving news of the Philippi debacle and the intensified proscriptions targeting sympathizers, Labienus opted against repatriation, which would have exposed him to execution akin to that of figures such as the proscribed senators rounded up by Antony's agents in the ensuing months. Instead, he capitalized on his established diplomatic ties at the Parthian court under King to secure refuge, effectively prolonging resistance through foreign alliance rather than direct confrontation or surrender. This decision marooned him in Parthian territory but preserved his life and agency, distinguishing his trajectory from the suicides of Brutus and or the captures enabling summary executions by triumviral forces. Ancient accounts, including those preserved in Cassius Dio's Roman History (Book 47 for the embassy's dispatch and Book 48 for contextual aftermath), underscore the premeditated nature of Labienus's mission preceding , with his post-defeat retention in framed as a pragmatic pivot amid the collapse of organized Republican opposition in the west. While precise itineraries of his eastward progress—likely traversing and —are not detailed in surviving sources, the envoy's prior authorization by facilitated unhindered access to Parthian domains, averting interception by patrolling Roman auxiliaries or local proxies loyal to the triumvirs. This survival mechanism exemplified the fragmented prolongation of civil war resistance beyond Philippi's decisive closure.

Integration into Parthian Court

Following his flight from the in late 42 BC, Quintus Labienus took refuge at the court of Parthian King , where he remained as a resident exile for roughly two years until 40 BC. During this period, Labienus adapted to the Parthian aristocratic structure by leveraging his Roman military expertise and diplomatic background from his earlier embassy under Cassius Longinus, positioning himself as a valued foreign counselor amid Orodes' cautious foreign policy. Labienus earned the epithet Parthicus, signifying his integration and perceived status within Parthian elite circles, though this reflected his self-promoted role rather than formal . He exerted influence particularly over Crown Prince , Orodes' designated heir, by furnishing detailed intelligence on the fractured Roman Triumvirate's vulnerabilities—such as Mark Antony's overextended eastern command and the lingering loyalty of sympathizers in provincial garrisons. This advisory input shaped Parthian anti-Roman planning, emphasizing opportunistic strikes against underdefended frontiers while avoiding full-scale commitment that might provoke unified retaliation. Parthian court politics featured internal contention over intervention, with Orodes delaying decisions for weeks amid recollections of the costly 53 BC Carrhae and concerns over expending resources on civil strife. Labienus' persistent advocacy, rooted in firsthand knowledge of republican networks, ultimately swayed Orodes toward limited support, culminating in Labienus' designation as co-strategist alongside Pacorus for exploratory operations east of the . This alliance highlighted cultural frictions, as Parthian nobles weighed nomadic traditions against Labienus' advocacy for hybrid tactics incorporating defectors, yet pragmatic mutual interests in weakening Antony's hold prevailed over deeper assimilation.

Leadership in the Parthian-Roman Invasion (40–39 BC)

Initial Campaigns and Victories

In the spring of 40 BC, Quintus Labienus and , son of the Parthian king , led a combined Parthian-Roman force across the Euphrates River from into , initiating the under joint command. The Parthian army, numbering tens of thousands including horse archers and cataphracts, targeted key Roman strongholds, exploiting the vulnerability of provincial garrisons weakened by recent civil strife. The initial advance focused on Apamea, where two Roman legions under Decidius Saxa were stationed; an early assault was repulsed, but Labienus, leveraging his Roman identity and appeals to pro-Republican loyalties among the troops—many of whom had served under Cassius Longinus—induced their defection without further battle. This betrayal, rooted in lingering support for the Liberators' cause amid Mark Antony's preoccupation with Italian politics and his divided attentions following the Treaty of Brundisium, enabled swift territorial gains. Antioch, Syria's capital, fell shortly thereafter to the invaders, who faced minimal organized resistance as local cities surrendered en masse by midsummer 40 BC. Parallel to Labienus's operations in northern , Pacorus directed a southern thrust into and , capitalizing on regional instability and sparse Roman oversight. Cities such as and Ptolemais submitted rapidly, while in , local factions hostile to Roman-aligned Hasmonean rulers facilitated advances toward , underscoring the invasion's exploitation of pro-Republican and anti-Antonian sentiments in the . These early victories, achieved within months of the crossing, restored Labienus's imperatorial title and positioned the Parthians to control 's coastal and inland routes by late summer.

Occupation of Syrian Provinces

In 40 BC, Quintus Labienus established provisional authority over Syria, including the key cities of Antioch and Apamea, as well as Cilicia and segments of Asia Minor, by integrating defecting Roman garrisons sympathetic to the Republican cause. Administrative efforts focused on leveraging local Roman military loyalty rather than imposing a formal bureaucracy, with Labienus positioning himself as a legitimizing figure for anti-Triumviral elements amid provincial resentment toward heavy taxation and requisitions under the Second Triumvirate. To sustain this control and incentivize further defections, he minted silver denarii and gold aurei at Antioch, featuring his bare-headed portrait on the obverse with the inscription Q. LABIENVS PARTHICVS IMP, symbolizing imperial command and ironic claims of Parthian conquest despite his alliance, while the reverse depicted a saddled horse to evoke equestrian prowess. These coins, produced in limited quantities as donatives for legions such as those formerly under Decidius Saxa, propagandized the restoration of senatorial Republican governance free from Caesarian dominance. Strategic alliances with regional elites disillusioned by Triumviral policies enhanced consolidation, particularly in Judea where Parthian detachments under Barzapharnes supported , son of , in deposing the pro-Roman and installing Antigonus as king and in late 40 BC. This Hasmonean restoration exploited longstanding Jewish opposition to Hyrcanus's Roman alignment and the family's influence, securing a client and access to Judean resources without direct Roman intervention at the time. Sustaining occupation proved challenging due to the expedition's composition—primarily Parthian cataphracts and horse archers optimized for mobility rather than static defense—and supply strains in urbanized provinces unaccustomed to nomadic-style . Internal frictions emerged between Labienus, who envisioned permanent administration in the east, and Parthian prince , whose forces emphasized raiding and territorial grabs over governance, resulting in divided commands that hampered unified policy enforcement. These misalignments, compounded by Orodes II's remote oversight from , limited long-term stabilization before reinforcements arrived.

Roman Counterattacks and Defeat

In 39 BC, dispatched Bassus with several legions to Asia Minor to reclaim the eastern provinces overrun by Quintus Labienus and Parthian forces. Ventidius advanced rapidly from Brundisium, leveraging local knowledge and auxiliary slingers to neutralize Parthian horse archers, and first engaged Labienus's army in , inflicting heavy casualties and forcing a disorganized retreat toward . Ventidius pursued relentlessly, positioning his troops on high ground in the near the , where he ambushed Labienus's retreating forces at dawn. The Romans repelled Parthian charges downhill, slaying numerous enemies including the Parthian commander Phranipates, while Labienus attempted to flee in but was overtaken, captured, and executed. This tactical shattered Labienus's control over the occupied territories, as his hybrid Roman-Parthian army disintegrated under the surprise assault. Further complicating Labienus's position, reinforcements under Parthian prince Pacorus arrived too late to coordinate effectively, as Ventidius's swift maneuvers had already deprived Labienus of initiative and severed communication lines. Labienus's failed appeals for aid highlighted the logistical vulnerabilities of the , with Parthian unable to exploit open terrain amid the mountainous defiles favoring infantry. Ventidius's victories thus expelled the invaders from key passes, restoring access to and without broader engagements.

Death and Immediate Aftermath

In 39 BC, Bassus, dispatched by with four legions, initiated a counteroffensive from against the remaining Parthian and Roman forces under Quintus Labienus. Ventidius first secured the Amanus Pass before advancing into , where he ambushed and routed Labienus's army near the in a decisive engagement. Labienus, attempting to flee, was captured by Roman troops and promptly executed by beheading. The loss of Labienus, who had served as the Parthians' primary strategist and liaison with local Roman defectors, severely undermined their campaign cohesion. , son of , abandoned his positions in —including the ongoing siege at Apamea—upon learning of the defeat and Ventidius's rapid advance, retreating eastward across the with his cavalry forces. This withdrawal enabled Ventidius to swiftly reoccupy key Syrian cities like and Laodicea without additional pitched battles, temporarily neutralizing the Parthian incursion into Roman and the . Triumviral sources, reflecting the Second Triumvirate's perspective, depicted Labienus's alliance with as perfidious treason against , justifying his summary execution as retribution for betraying the to foreign invaders. Republican-leaning accounts, however, framed his death as the martyrdom of a steadfast opponent to Antony's and Octavian's authoritarian regime, underscoring his role in prolonging the through unconventional means.

Legacy and Historical Assessment

Numismatic Evidence and Self-Presentation

Quintus Labienus issued a limited series of aurei and denarii during his command in the Roman East from 40 to 39 BC, serving as primary numismatic evidence of his self-proclaimed authority amid the Parthian alliance. These coins, struck in both gold and silver, feature his portrait on the obverse with the inscription Q·LABIENVS·PARTHICVS·IMP, denoting his assumption of the title imperator and the honorific Parthicus, likely referencing his role in facilitating Parthian successes against Roman forces rather than direct conquests. The reverse typically depicts a saddled Parthian horse standing right, equipped with a bridle, bow-case, and quiver, symbolizing his alignment with Parthian military prowess while maintaining Roman minting standards. The use of Labienus's laureate portrait marked a continuation of the Caesarian innovation in Republican coinage, presenting him as a living commander worthy of personal veneration and legitimizing his irregular command over defected legions. This self-presentation evoked the imperium of earlier Republican generals like Pompey, positioning Labienus as a defender of senatorial liberty against the triumviral regime, despite his reliance on foreign Parthian support. The coins' donative purpose—to reward and retain loyalty among Roman troops captured or swayed during the invasion—underscored their propagandistic function, blending Roman imperial ambition with Eastern alliance imagery to assert continuity of the Pompeian cause. Numismatic studies debate the precise mint location, with evidence pointing to mobile production in Syria or southeastern Asia Minor accompanying Labienus's campaigns, possibly at under temporary occupation, though no fixed die-links confirm a single site. concerns arise for some specimens, as fourrée (plated) denarii exist, but genuine issues are verified through high-grade examples certified by firms like NGC, with only about six aurei known worldwide, attesting to their scarcity and historical contingency. These artifacts thus reveal Labienus's ideological framing of his rule as a legitimate extension of imperator tradition, even as the Parthian horse reverse acknowledged the hybrid nature of his power base.

Roman Historiographical Views

In the surviving Roman historiographical tradition, Quintus Labienus is predominantly depicted as a treacherous figure who betrayed Roman interests by collaborating with the Parthian monarchy, a portrayal shaped by the pro-imperial perspectives of later authors. , writing in the early third century AD but drawing on Augustan-era sources, describes Labienus as exploiting his dispatch from to to ingratiate himself with the Parthians, subsequently executing the Roman governor of , Saxa (no, Saxa was killed by Parthians under Labienus' influence), and coercing cities through threats of Parthian reprisals, thereby overrunning Roman provinces up to the Hellespont. emphasizes Labienus' assumption of the imperatorial title and his dissemination of propaganda letters to denigrating the triumvirs while extolling Brutus and , framing these acts as perfidious opportunism rather than principled resistance. This narrative aligns with Dio's broader emphasis on the restoration of Roman order under Octavian, casting Labienus' alliance as an aberrant alignment with "barbarians" that endangered the . Appian, composing in the second century AD, similarly subordinates Labienus' role to the Parthian incursion, portraying him as a subordinate enabler of foreign who facilitated the capture of Syrian territories but ultimately failed due to countermeasures, without crediting him independent agency or legitimacy. Such accounts reflect systemic biases in , where authors favored narratives reinforcing the triumviral victory at and the subsequent consolidation of power, marginalizing Pompeian remnants as disloyal outliers. These sources, preserved through Augustan and later editorial lenses, prioritize moral condemnation of factional defiance over analysis of Labienus' strategic calculations, such as leveraging Parthian military superiority to sustain the republican cause post-42 BC. Fragmentary evidence from Republican-leaning contemporaries, including lost works by historians like Asinius Pollio who sympathized with Caesar's assassins, likely offered contrasting views emphasizing Labienus' continuity of the senatorial mandate against triumviral . Labienus' self-presentation—via bearing his name and titles like Parthicus and imperatorial salutations—asserted his status as a legitimate commander defending the traditional , a claim echoed in his but absent from surviving pro-triumviral texts. This divergence underscores how historiographical selection under the empire suppressed sympathetic accounts, favoring causal explanations rooted in unity over the internal dynamics of civil strife.

Strategic and Political Significance

The Parthian invasion of 40–39 BC, facilitated by Labienus's leadership and intelligence on Roman vulnerabilities, temporarily disrupted Mark Antony's control over eastern provinces, including the loss of Syria and parts of Asia Minor to Parthian forces, thereby straining triumviral resources amid concurrent challenges like Sextus Pompeius's naval blockade in the West. This incursion compelled Antony to delegate counteroffensives to Publius Ventidius Bassus, whose victories at the Cilician Gates and Mount Gindarus in 39–38 BC expelled the invaders and restored provincial stability, ultimately bolstering Antony's military prestige through Ventidius's triumph in Rome while accelerating the triumvirs' consolidation of power against residual republican holdouts by underscoring the perils of eastern disarray. Labienus's collaboration exemplified the tactical advantages of foreign alliances in internal conflicts—disrupting supply lines and loyalties through his insider knowledge—but revealed inherent limitations, as Parthian mounted warfare proved ill-suited for sustained against legions, and his defection branded surviving Pompeians with irreversible , eroding potential domestic support and unifying triumviral factions against external-aided threats. The campaign's failure, marked by the death of Parthian Pacorus and Labienus's execution, deterred further Parthian opportunism in civil wars, exposing the asymmetry in : while Parthians could raid effectively, they lacked the infantry and administrative capacity to hold Hellenistic territories long-term. In broader Roman-Parthian dynamics, the episode checked Parthian expansionist ambitions post-Carrhae by inflicting irreplaceable losses, paving the way for Augustus's diplomatic recovery of Crassus's standards in 20 BC without major conflict, as Orodes II's successors prioritized internal consolidation over renewed invasions. For the late , it hastened the shift toward centralized imperial defenses, as the triumvirs' successful repulsion reinforced the causal link between civil discord and foreign incursions, compelling a unified posture that prefigured Augustan reforms in provincial and frontier .

References

  1. [1]
    The Ambitions of Quintus Labienus 'Parthicus'* | Cambridge Core
    Late in 41 or early in 40 BC a force of Parthians embarked upon an unusually vigorous and penetrative irruption into the Roman province of Syria.
  2. [2]
    Quintus Labienus (42-39 B.C.) - Parthia.com
    Quintus Labienus fought to restore the republic under Gaius Cassius Longinus. Cassius, who was among Caesar's assassins, had campaigned successfully against ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  3. [3]
    Cassius Dio, Roman History 48 - Lexundria
    5Now in consequence of these successes Labienus proceeded to levy money and to rob the temples; and he styled himself imperator and Parthicus, in the latter ...
  4. [4]
    The Battle of Munda: When Caesar Fought For His Life | History Hit
    Feb 2, 2023 · Titus Labienus, once so significant to Caesar's success, died a traitor. Every standard of the Optimate legions was captured by Caesar's ...
  5. [5]
    Key to Umbria
    From this we learn that Labienus came from one of the prefectures of Picenum, and (given Caesar's information, above) we might reasonably assume that this was ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  6. [6]
    Quintus Labienus - IMPERIUM ROMANUM
    Mar 26, 2020 · Quintus Labienus was a Roman commander at the end of the Roman republic who allied with the Parthians. He was the son of Titus Labienus ...
  7. [7]
    https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/48*.html
  8. [8]
    (PDF) Orodes II - Academia.edu
    Shortly before the battle, Cassius sent Quintus Labienus to Orodes II to ask for more aid (Velleius Paterculus. 2.78.1; Appian, B Civ. 4.63; Dio Cassius, 48.24.
  9. [9]
    Labienus, Quintus | Oxford Classical Dictionary
    Labienus Parthicus imp.', claiming that a victory over the Parthians had forced them to become allies. In 39 he was defeated and killed by P. Ventidius.
  10. [10]
    A Political History of Parthia/Chapter 5 - Wikisource
    Jun 29, 2019 · ... Quintus Labienus, one of the ambassadors whom Brutus and Cassius had sent to Parthia to ​secure reinforcements. When Labienus learned ...
  11. [11]
    THE PARTHIAN INVASION - War History
    Dec 13, 2024 · Appian was to say, “He became her captive as if he were a young man ... General Quintus Labienus sat in the old Seleucid palace at ...
  12. [12]
    http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/48*.html
  13. [13]
    Ancient Roman Coins - Coins of Imperators, Praetors, and Proconsuls
    LABIENUS, Imperator Parthicus. AR Denarius (3.7 g) minted in Asia Minor (likely at Antioch), 40 BC. ... Quintus Labienus, son of the Pompeian general Titus ...
  14. [14]
    Herod the Great: Friend of the Romans and Parthians?
    Mar 29, 2013 · During the campaign the Parthians installed Antigonus, son of Aristobulus II and scion of the Hasmonean dynasty, as king of Judaea.
  15. [15]
    Cassius Dio — Book 48
    Summary of each segment:
  16. [16]
    Publius Ventidius. Neglected Roman Military Hero - jstor
    Early in 39 the Pact of Brundisium was signed, and the triumvirate was reestablished. Nothing is known of Ventidius' part in these momentous negotiations.16.
  17. [17]
    Cilicia - in ancient sources @ attalus.org
    39/5 Labienus out of Asia Minor, and defeats him near the Cilician Gates. 36/3 ibutes the territory of the kings in Cappadocia, Pontus and Cilicia. Within ...
  18. [18]
    Denarius - Quintus Labienus (Q•LABIENVS•PARTHICVS•IMP)
    Detailed information about the coin Denarius, Quintus Labienus (Q•LABIENVS•PARTHICVS•IMP), Roman Republic (509 BC, 27 BC), with pictures and collection and ...
  19. [19]
    Results 1-100 of 840 for labienus (0.01 seconds) - acsearch.info
    Labienus Parthicus AR Denarius, 40 BC Q. Labienus Parthicus. AR Denarius (18 mm, 3.55 g), mint moving with Labienus in Asia Minor 40 BC.
  20. [20]
    New coin - Quintus Labienus "Parthian horse" denarius
    Aug 17, 2025 · With Brutus and Cassius dead, Labienus now chose to throw in his lot with the Parthians and encouraged Orodes II to aid him in an attack on the ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
  21. [21]
    Quintus labienus - CNG Coins
    Quintus labienus. Triton XVI, Lot: 928. Estimate $30000. Sold for $22000. This amount does not include the buyer's fee. The Republicans. Labienus. Early 40 ...Missing: self- presentation
  22. [22]
    https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?term=labienus
  23. [23]
    Goldberg Auction Spotlights NGC-certified Rebel Roman Coin ...
    Dec 13, 2022 · The over 2,000-year-old gold coin features Quintus Labienus Parthicus on the obverse. The Roman general allied with the Parthians in 40 BC ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  24. [24]
    Q. Labienus Parthicus. AR Denarius, mint moving with ... - DeaMoneta
    Obv. Head of Q. Labienus right; around, Q·LABIENVS·PARTHICVS·IMP. ; Rev. Parthian horse right, with bridle and saddle, to which bow-case and quiver are attached.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] A POLITICAL HISTORY OF PARTHIA
    with them Quintus Labienus, one of the ambassadors whom Brutus and Cassius ... aptly describes Phraataces as an excellent youth.20. The terms arranged ...
  26. [26]
    Remembering Intervention: Parthia in Rome's Civil Wars - jstor
    The present paper aims to clarify at least one aspect ofParthian intervention by trac- ing divergent Roman attitudes towards it over time, from the late ...