Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Regulatory sequence

A regulatory sequence is a segment of non-coding DNA that controls gene expression by providing binding sites for transcription factors and other regulatory proteins, thereby determining the timing, location, and level at which genes are transcribed into RNA.^[1]^[2] These sequences encode instructions for precise regulation, influencing processes from embryonic development to cellular responses in adults.^[2] Regulatory sequences encompass several key types, each with distinct functions and positions relative to the genes they regulate. Core promoters, located immediately upstream of the transcription start site (typically spanning less than 1 kb), serve as docking sites for RNA polymerase II and the preinitiation complex to initiate basal transcription.^[3] Proximal promoters, extending a few hundred base pairs upstream, contain binding sites for activators that enhance transcription initiation, often associated with CpG islands in about 60% of human genes.^[3] Enhancers act as distal activators, boosting transcription rates through DNA looping mechanisms and exhibiting tissue-specific activity; they can be located up to 1 Mb away, upstream, downstream, or within introns.^[1]^[3] In contrast, silencers repress gene expression by recruiting repressor proteins and corepressors, functioning similarly over variable distances, including in introns or 3' regions.^[1]^[3] Insulators, or boundary elements, prevent inappropriate enhancer-promoter interactions and block the spread of repressive chromatin, thereby defining distinct expression domains across the genome.^[1]^[3] These sequences are fundamental to eukaryotic genomes, where non-coding DNA comprises over 98% in humans, with regulatory sequences forming a key functional subset and playing critical roles in health, disease, and evolution.^[1] Variations in regulatory sequences, such as single-nucleotide polymorphisms, can disrupt binding sites and lead to misregulated gene expression, contributing to conditions like cancer, developmental disorders, and complex traits identified through genome-wide association studies.^[2] Advances in high-throughput sequencing and functional genomics continue to map their architecture, revealing modular organizations of transcription factor binding sites influenced by sequence context, chromatin structure, and epigenetic modifications.^[2]^[3]

Definition and Function

Core Definition

Regulatory sequences are segments of non-coding DNA that control the timing, tissue specificity, and level of gene expression without being translated into proteins.^[1] These sequences function by providing binding sites for transcription factors, RNA polymerase, and other regulatory proteins, which influence the initiation, elongation, or termination of transcription for associated genes.^[4] In contrast to coding sequences, which are transcribed into messenger RNA and subsequently translated into proteins, regulatory sequences do not encode amino acids but instead orchestrate the transcriptional activity of protein-coding genes.^[5] This distinction underscores their role in the precise regulation of gene activity rather than direct protein synthesis. Regulatory sequences can be positioned upstream (5') of the transcription start site, downstream (3') of the gene, or intragenically within non-coding regions such as introns.^[3] Many such sequences display high evolutionary conservation across diverse species, owing to their critical involvement in developmental processes and adaptive responses.

Role in Gene Expression

Regulatory sequences integrate into the transcription process by serving as docking sites for transcription factors and the transcription initiation complex, thereby modulating the assembly of RNA polymerase II and associated machinery at gene promoters. This binding influences basal transcription rates, which represent the constitutive low-level expression of genes, as well as induced transcription in response to cellular signals, where regulatory sequences enhance or repress activity through combinatorial interactions. For instance, sequence variants in these elements can alter transcription factor occupancy, leading to changes in chromatin accessibility and the recruitment of co-activators or co-repressors, ultimately affecting the efficiency of transcription initiation.^[6]^[7] These sequences enable precise spatial and temporal control of gene expression, ensuring that genes are activated in specific tissues or cell types and at appropriate developmental stages. By harboring binding motifs for tissue-specific transcription factors, regulatory sequences dictate localized expression patterns, such as those observed in enhancers driving neuron-specific genes in the brain versus muscle-specific genes in cardiac tissue. Temporal regulation occurs through dynamic accessibility changes during development, where regulatory elements respond to signaling cues to synchronize expression timing, as seen in eQTL studies showing tissue-dependent effects across conditions like embryonic versus adult stages.^[6]^[7] Quantitative regulation of gene expression is achieved through the combinatorial binding of multiple transcription factors to regulatory sequences, which determines the abundance of mRNA transcripts by integrating signals from various pathways. The number and affinity of binding sites within these sequences can lead to additive effects on transcription rates, with enhancer activity scaling linearly or saturating based on factor concentration, thereby fine-tuning output levels without binary on/off switches. This mechanism underlies expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), where genetic variants in regulatory regions correlate with measurable differences in mRNA abundance across cell populations.^[7]^[6] Some regulatory sequences participate in feedback loops that support autoregulation or cross-regulation between genes, stabilizing expression levels and adapting to environmental changes. In autoregulation, a transcription factor binds to its own regulatory sequence—often in the promoter—to positively or negatively modulate its expression, as exemplified by the Drosophila fushi tarazu gene, where an upstream element amplifies stripe-specific expression through direct autoactivation. Cross-regulation occurs via shared regulatory elements that link gene networks, such as the mutual activation between twist and Mef2 in muscle development, forming robust feed-forward loops that buffer noise and ensure coordinated outputs. These loops enhance the reliability of gene expression in dynamic contexts like development.^[8]^[8]

Types of Regulatory Sequences

Promoters

Promoters are proximal DNA sequences located upstream of the transcription start site (TSS) that serve as binding platforms for RNA polymerase and associated factors to initiate gene transcription. In prokaryotes, promoters typically consist of two conserved sequence motifs: the -10 box (also known as the Pribnow box), centered approximately 10 base pairs upstream of the TSS, and the -35 box, located about 35 base pairs upstream. These elements are recognized by the sigma subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase, facilitating specific binding and unwinding of DNA to form the open complex for transcription initiation.^[9]^[10] In eukaryotes, core promoters are more diverse and often lack strict consensus sequences, but key elements include the TATA box, an A/T-rich motif positioned 25-35 base pairs upstream of the TSS, which binds the TATA-binding protein (TBP) subunit of TFIID. Other motifs encompass the initiator (Inr), spanning the TSS and recognized by TFIID in TATA-less promoters, and the downstream promoter element (DPE), located 25-35 base pairs downstream of the TSS, which cooperates with Inr to enhance TFIID binding. These elements collectively direct the assembly of the pre-initiation complex (PIC), where RNA polymerase II associates with general transcription factors such as TFIID, TFIIA, TFIIB, TFIIE, TFIIF, and TFIIH; TFIIB bridges TFIID-DNA interactions with the polymerase, while TFIIH unwinds DNA using its helicase activity to enable promoter clearance.^[11]^[12]^[13] Promoters exhibit variability in structure and activity to support different expression patterns. Housekeeping promoters, associated with ubiquitously expressed genes essential for cellular maintenance, are often GC-rich and contain CpG islands—unmethylated clusters of CpG dinucleotides spanning the TSS and proximal upstream region—in vertebrate genomes, promoting constitutive low-level transcription. In contrast, tissue-specific promoters drive expression in particular cell types and may lack CpG islands, relying instead on combinations of core elements tailored to developmental or environmental cues.^[14]^[15] Promoters are classified by strength based on their intrinsic efficiency in recruiting the transcription machinery, influencing basal expression levels. Strong promoters, such as those from viruses like cytomegalovirus (CMV), feature optimal core element spacing and sequences that support high-affinity PIC assembly, enabling robust transcription without additional factors. Weak promoters, common in many eukaryotic genes, have suboptimal motifs and lower basal activity, often necessitating cooperation with distal enhancers to achieve sufficient expression.^[16]^[17]

Enhancers and Silencers

Enhancers are modular DNA segments, typically ranging from 50 to 1,500 base pairs in length, that increase the rate of transcription of target genes by facilitating the recruitment of transcriptional machinery.^[18] These elements function independently of their orientation relative to the gene and can operate from positions either upstream, downstream, or within introns, often at distances up to a megabase away from the promoter.^[18] Enhancers bind sequence-specific activator proteins, such as AP-1 and NF-κB, which recruit coactivators to modulate chromatin structure and promote RNA polymerase II assembly.^[18] The concept of enhancers was first established through studies on viral DNA sequences, such as the SV40 enhancer, which dramatically boosted transcription of linked genes in mammalian cells.90413-X) Silencers serve as the repressive counterparts to enhancers, consisting of DNA sequences that inhibit transcription from associated promoters by binding repressor proteins.^[19] Like enhancers, silencers are modular, position-independent, and orientation-insensitive, allowing them to exert control over distant genes through similar architectural flexibility.^[19] They typically recruit repressors such as REST, which suppresses neuronal genes in non-neuronal cells, or other factors like Snail and KLF12 that block activator access or promote chromatin compaction.^[19] Although first identified in yeast as sequences opposing enhancer activity, silencers in metazoans play crucial roles in preventing ectopic gene expression during development.90058-5) Both enhancers and silencers interact with promoters through DNA looping, a process that brings these distal elements into physical proximity with the transcriptional start site.^[18] This looping is mediated by protein complexes, including the Mediator complex for enhancer-promoter contacts and cohesin for stabilizing chromatin loops that facilitate either activation or repression.^[18] In the case of silencers, looping can manifest as "antilooping" mechanisms where repressors like Snail prevent enhancer-promoter interactions, thereby enforcing transcriptional inhibition.^[19] Tissue specificity of enhancers and silencers arises from a combinatorial code of transcription factor binding sites within these elements, which dictates their activity in particular cell types.^[18] For instance, the presence of specific activator or repressor motifs allows enhancers to drive expression in one tissue while silencers suppress it in others, ensuring precise spatiotemporal control of gene regulation.^[19] This modular binding architecture enables fine-tuned responses to developmental cues and environmental signals across diverse cellular contexts.^[18]

Mechanisms of Activation

Enhancer-Mediated Activation

Enhancers drive transcriptional activation by interacting with promoters over long distances in the genome, facilitating the recruitment of transcriptional machinery to initiate gene expression. This process involves the binding of sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs) to enhancer DNA elements, which then serve as platforms for assembling multi-protein complexes that modify chromatin structure and promote RNA polymerase II recruitment. Unlike direct promoter interactions, enhancer-mediated activation often requires three-dimensional chromatin folding to bring distal enhancers into physical proximity with target promoters, enabling efficient signal transduction from regulatory inputs to gene output. A key step in enhancer-mediated activation is the recruitment of co-activators, such as histone acetyltransferases (HATs) like p300/CBP, which acetylate histones to loosen chromatin packing and create an open, accessible environment for transcription. Enhancers bound by TFs, including Mediator and p300/CBP, facilitate this by serving as docking sites that bridge enhancers to the basal transcription apparatus at promoters. For instance, in the activation of the β-globin locus, enhancer-bound TFs recruit p300 to acetylate H3K27, correlating with increased transcription rates. This co-activator recruitment not only modifies local chromatin but also stabilizes looping interactions essential for sustained activation. Chromatin looping models explain how enhancers contact promoters despite genomic separation, often mediated by architectural proteins like CTCF and cohesin. CTCF binds to convergent sites on enhancer and promoter loops, while cohesin extrudes chromatin fibers to form stable loops within topologically associating domains (TADs), bringing enhancers and promoters into close spatial proximity. High-resolution chromatin conformation capture techniques, such as Hi-C, have revealed that these loops insulate regulatory interactions and enhance activation efficiency; disruption of CTCF or cohesin binding abolishes looping and can significantly reduce gene expression in model systems. Recent studies (as of 2025) indicate that while CTCF depletion impairs chromatin hubs, effects on gene expression are often modest, highlighting nuanced roles in regulation.^[20] Additionally, liquid-liquid phase separation in super-enhancer complexes can concentrate TFs and co-activators, further stabilizing these loops through multivalent interactions. Super-enhancers, first described in embryonic stem cells and differentiated lineages, represent clusters of enhancers occupied by exceptionally high densities of TFs, Mediator, and BRD4, driving robust, cell-type-specific gene expression. These large regulatory hubs, often spanning tens to hundreds of kilobases, exhibit strong enhancer activity and are associated with genes critical for cell identity, such as those encoding master regulatory TFs. In a seminal study, super-enhancers were identified through genome-wide ChIP-seq analysis, showing they produce high levels of enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) that contribute to looping and activation; inhibition of BRD4, a key component, selectively suppresses super-enhancer-driven genes. Their discovery in 2013 highlighted how enhancer clustering amplifies transcriptional output, with examples like the MYC super-enhancer in cancers underscoring their role in disease. Signal-responsive enhancers integrate extracellular cues to dynamically regulate activation, often through pathways like Wnt or Notch that modulate TF binding and co-activator recruitment. In the Wnt pathway, β-catenin accumulates upon signaling and binds TCF/LEF motifs in enhancers, recruiting p300 to activate target genes like c-Myc; this process involves chromatin remodeling and looping to distal promoters. Similarly, Notch signaling activates enhancers via the RBPJ transcription factor, which recruits co-activators to drive expression in developmental contexts, such as T-cell differentiation. These enhancers thus act as rheostats, fine-tuning gene expression in response to environmental signals while maintaining specificity through combinatorial TF inputs.

Response to DNA Damage

Regulatory sequences play a critical role in the cellular response to DNA damage, particularly double-strand breaks (DSBs), by facilitating the recruitment of key repair factors and enabling rapid transcriptional activation of repair pathways. Upon DSB formation, nearby regulatory elements, such as promoters and potential enhancer regions, recruit poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), which catalyzes poly(ADP-ribosylation) of histones and non-histone proteins to create a scaffold for damage response factors. This modification promotes the assembly of repair complexes and initial transcriptional silencing to prevent error-prone processing, while also signaling broader activation.^[21] Concurrently, ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase is autophosphorylated at DSB sites, phosphorylating histone variant H2AX to form γH2AX foci that extend over megabases, recruiting additional factors like MRE11 and 53BP1 to coordinate non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). These events near regulatory sequences enhance the activation of the p53 pathway, where p53 transcriptionally upregulates genes such as p21, PUMA, and BAX to promote cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, or apoptosis, with chromatin remodelers like RSF1 maintaining histone acetylation for efficient p53-mediated transcription.^[21]^[21] In contrast, responses to single-strand breaks (SSBs) involve regulatory sequences through the base excision repair (BER) pathway, where XRCC1 acts as a scaffold to orchestrate repair and protect transcriptional integrity. SSBs, often arising from oxidative damage or BER intermediates, trigger PARP1 binding and activation, but XRCC1 directly interacts with poly(ADP-ribose) to regulate PARP1 activity, preventing excessive ADP-ribosylation that could lead to toxic trapping on DNA. Loss of XRCC1 results in persistent PARP1 signaling, recruiting deubiquitinase USP3 to reduce histone monoubiquitination (e.g., H2Aub and H2Bub) at nearby regulatory elements, thereby compacting chromatin and suppressing transcription recovery after damage like H₂O₂ exposure. This alteration of regulatory histone marks near SSBs disrupts gene expression, as seen in XRCC1-deficient cells where transcription fails to rebound within hours, highlighting XRCC1's role in maintaining accessible regulatory sequences during BER.^[22]^[22] DSBs also induce the formation of transient, de novo regulatory sequences that function as temporary enhancers to drive rapid activation of repair genes. These damage-induced short non-coding RNAs, known as DSB-induced RNAs (DDRNAs), are transcribed from sequences immediately adjacent to break sites and processed by DICER and DROSHA, forming RNA-mediated foci that recruit repair proteins like 53BP1 through liquid-liquid phase separation. Such de novo elements mimic enhancer activity by promoting preinitiation complexes and facilitating quick transcriptional reprogramming at distal repair loci, ensuring timely DDR activation without relying on pre-existing regulatory architecture. This mechanism allows cells to mount a swift response, as evidenced by increased DDRNA production correlating with enhanced repair efficiency in mammalian cells.^[23]^[23] Evolutionarily, the integration of DNA damage responses with regulatory sequence-mediated transcriptional reprogramming has been conserved to enhance cellular survival under genotoxic stress. Chromatin remodeling factors, such as those recruited by PARP1 and ATM, likely evolved to couple DSB detection with rapid histone modifications at regulatory sites, enabling metabolic shifts—like ATP-mediated rerouting to antioxidant pathways—that buffer oxidative damage and prevent accumulation of unrepaired lesions. This linkage, observed in models of nucleotide excision repair deficiency, underscores how damage-triggered reprogramming of regulatory elements promotes longevity and genomic stability across species, from yeast to mammals.^[21]^[24]

Epigenetic Regulation

DNA Methylation

DNA methylation is a fundamental epigenetic modification that involves the addition of a methyl group to the fifth carbon of cytosine bases, primarily at CpG dinucleotides, which are symmetrically occurring cytosine-guanine pairs in DNA. CpG islands (CGIs) are GC-rich regions, typically spanning 0.5–4 kb, that are often located in the promoter regions of genes and are normally unmethylated to allow active transcription. Methylation of these CGIs leads to transcriptional silencing by altering chromatin structure and preventing the binding of transcription factors. In regulatory sequences, such as promoters, this modification serves as a repressive mark that fine-tunes gene expression patterns.^[25]^[26] The process of DNA methylation is catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). DNMT1 functions primarily as a maintenance methyltransferase, faithfully copying methylation patterns to the newly synthesized daughter strand during DNA replication to preserve epigenetic memory. In contrast, de novo methylation is established by DNMT3A and DNMT3B, which add methyl groups to previously unmethylated CpG sites, particularly in CGIs during development and differentiation. Once methylated, 5-methylcytosine (5mC) recruits methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) proteins, such as MeCP2, which in turn interact with histone deacetylases (HDACs) to deacetylate histones, promoting a compact chromatin state that represses transcription. This mechanism is crucial for silencing regulatory sequences in a stable, heritable manner.^[26]^[27]^[28] Demethylation counteracts this repression through both active and passive pathways. Active demethylation is mediated by ten-eleven translocation (TET) enzymes (TET1, TET2, TET3), which oxidize 5mC to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) and further to 5-formylcytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC); these intermediates are then excised by thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) and repaired via base excision repair to yield unmethylated cytosine. Passive demethylation occurs during cell division when maintenance by DNMT1 fails, leading to dilution of 5mC over successive replication cycles. These processes enable dynamic reactivation of regulatory sequences when needed.^[29]^[30] Aberrant DNA methylation profoundly impacts gene regulation, particularly in disease contexts. Hypermethylation of CGI promoters silences tumor suppressor genes, such as p16INK4a and MLH1, contributing to cancer progression by removing checkpoints on cell growth. Conversely, global hypomethylation activates oncogenes and transposable elements, leading to genomic instability and aberrant expression, as observed in various carcinomas. Tissue-specific methylation patterns are established during embryonic development primarily through DNMT3A and DNMT3B, which methylate enhancers and promoters in a lineage-restricted manner to lock in cell identity and prevent inappropriate gene activation.^[31]^[32]^[33]

Histone Modifications

Histone modifications involve covalent alterations to the amino-terminal tails of histone proteins, which package DNA into nucleosomes, thereby influencing the accessibility of regulatory sequences to transcription factors and other regulatory proteins. These modifications, including acetylation and methylation, dynamically regulate chromatin structure, promoting either open euchromatin states that facilitate gene expression or compact heterochromatin states that repress it. In the context of regulatory sequences such as promoters and enhancers, specific histone marks serve as binding platforms for effector proteins, enabling precise control over gene activity.^[34] Acetylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27ac) is a prominent mark associated with active enhancers and promoters, distinguishing them from poised or inactive elements. This modification is catalyzed by histone acetyltransferases (HATs), such as p300/CBP, which neutralize the positive charge on lysine residues, reducing the affinity between histones and negatively charged DNA to favor an open euchromatin conformation conducive to transcription initiation. H3K27ac enrichment correlates with increased chromatin accessibility and recruitment of co-activators, thereby enhancing the regulatory potential of these sequences.00208-4)^[35]00208-4) Methylation of histone H3 exhibits context-dependent effects on regulatory sequences. Trimethylation at lysine 4 (H3K4me3) marks active promoters, where it is deposited by methyltransferases like SET1/MLL complexes, facilitating the recruitment of RNA polymerase II and promoting transcriptional elongation. In contrast, trimethylation at lysine 9 (H3K9me3) or lysine 27 (H3K27me3) signals repression; H3K9me3, mediated by SUV39H1/2 enzymes, recruits heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) to induce heterochromatin formation and silence nearby regulatory elements, while H3K27me3, catalyzed by the Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) containing EZH2, propagates silencing through PRC1 recruitment and chromatin compaction.00600-9) Bivalent domains, characterized by the coexistence of activating H3K4me3 and repressive H3K27me3 marks, are prevalent at promoters of developmental genes in embryonic stem cells, maintaining these loci in a poised state for rapid activation or repression during differentiation. This dual marking prevents premature expression while preserving accessibility, allowing environmental signals to resolve bivalency into monovalent states that drive lineage-specific gene programs.00380-1) The interpretation of these modifications relies on "reader" proteins that recognize specific marks to propagate epigenetic states. Bromodomain-containing proteins, such as those in the BET family (e.g., BRD4), bind acetylated lysines like H3K27ac via a conserved helical structure, recruiting additional factors to sustain active transcription at regulatory sequences. The writers (e.g., HATs and methyltransferases) and readers respond to environmental cues, such as signaling pathways or metabolic changes, enabling dynamic remodeling of chromatin accessibility in response to cellular needs.80057-9)^[34]

Examples in Specific Genes

Insulin Gene Regulation

The insulin gene promoter in pancreatic β-cells features a proximal regulatory region spanning approximately 400 base pairs upstream of the transcription start site, which includes specific binding sites for key transcription factors that drive β-cell-specific expression. PDX1 binds to multiple A-box elements (A1, A3, A5) and the GG2 element within this promoter, while NeuroD1 (also known as Beta2) binds to the E1 E-box as a heterodimer with E47, and MafA binds to the C1 element. These factors act synergistically to activate transcription, with MafA enhancing the activity of PDX1 and NeuroD1 at their respective sites to maintain high-level insulin expression in mature β-cells.^[36]^[37]^[38] Beyond the proximal promoter, the insulin gene is regulated by multiple distal enhancer elements that confer responsiveness to metabolic signals, such as glucose levels. Sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP) also contributes to this glucose-mediated regulation by influencing lipid metabolism pathways that intersect with β-cell glucose sensing and insulin transcription. These enhancers loop to the promoter via chromatin interactions, amplifying expression during periods of high glucose demand.^[39]^[40] Epigenetic modifications play a critical role in establishing and maintaining insulin gene expression during pancreatic development and in mature β-cells. Demethylation of CpG sites within the insulin promoter occurs progressively during endocrine progenitor differentiation into β-cells, enabling tissue-specific expression and β-cell maturation; this process is essential as hypermethylated promoters in non-β-cells silence the gene. Histone acetylation, particularly hyperacetylation of histone H4 at the insulin locus induced by glucose stimulation, promotes an open chromatin conformation that facilitates access by PDX1, NeuroD1, and MafA, thereby enhancing transcription.^[41]^[42]^[43] In pathological conditions like type 2 diabetes, dysregulation of these regulatory sequences contributes to impaired insulin production. Hypermethylation of CpG sites in the insulin promoter correlates with reduced gene expression in pancreatic islets from diabetic patients, leading to decreased β-cell function and insufficient insulin secretion in response to glucose. This epigenetic alteration is associated with disease progression and may exacerbate hyperglycemia by limiting the promoter's accessibility to activating transcription factors.^[44]^[45]

Hox Gene Clusters

Hox gene clusters in vertebrates consist of four paralogous groups (HoxA, HoxB, HoxC, and HoxD), each containing multiple Hox genes arranged in a linear fashion that mirrors their expression along the anterior-posterior axis during embryogenesis.^[46] This phenomenon, known as collinear expression, is orchestrated by enhancers embedded within and around the clusters, which drive sequential activation of genes from 3' to 5' in response to signaling gradients. For instance, in the HoxD cluster, early enhancers located upstream promote temporal collinearity in the limb bud, ensuring genes like Hoxd13 are expressed posteriorly before more anterior genes like Hoxd9.^[47] These regulatory sequences coordinate patterning by integrating positional cues, such as retinoic acid gradients, to establish body plan organization.^[48] Global control regions within Hox clusters often involve long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) that mediate silencing across distant sites via epigenetic mechanisms. A prominent example is Hotair, transcribed from the HoxC cluster, which represses HoxD genes in trans by recruiting the Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) to deposit H3K27me3 marks over 40 kilobases.00684-5) This lncRNA acts as a modular scaffold, facilitating chromatin looping and stable repression during development, thereby preventing ectopic expression that could disrupt axial identity.^[49] Boundary elements, primarily bound by the CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF), function as insulators to compartmentalize regulatory influences within Hox clusters and prevent cross-regulation between adjacent genes. In vertebrate Hox clusters, conserved CTCF sites establish chromatin domains that sequentially insulate domains, allowing independent activation of gene subsets while blocking enhancer-promoter interactions across boundaries.^[50] For example, CTCF-mediated loops in the HoxB cluster maintain spatial separation, ensuring precise collinear patterns without interference.^[51] The regulatory sequences governing Hox clusters exhibit remarkable evolutionary conservation across vertebrates, underscoring their role in maintaining similar body plans despite genomic divergences. Comparative analyses reveal that non-coding regions flanking Hox genes, including enhancers and insulators, retain sequence similarity over 500 million years, as seen in alignments between human and pufferfish clusters.^[52] This conservation extends to CTCF binding motifs and lncRNA loci like Hotair, which predate the teleost-specific genome duplication and facilitate shared developmental programs in diverse species.^[53] Such preserved elements highlight how regulatory architecture evolves to sustain Hox-driven patterning essential for vertebrate morphology.^[46]

References

[1]
What is noncoding DNA?: MedlinePlus Genetics
Jan 19, 2021 · Noncoding DNA contains sequences that act as regulatory elements, determining when and where genes are turned on and off.
[2]
In pursuit of design principles of regulatory sequences - Nature
Jun 10, 2014 · Key Points. Regulatory DNA sequences contain information on the timing and level at which different genes are expressed.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
[PDF] Transcriptional Regulatory Elements in the Human Genome
Here we review the various classes of transcriptional regulatory elements (core promoters, prox- imal promoters, distal enhancers, silencers, insulators/ ...
[4]
Gene regulation | Biological Principles
A regulatory element is a DNA sequence that certain transcription factors recognize and bind to in order to recruit or repel RNA polymerase. The promoter and ...
[5]
Non-Coding DNA
Non-coding DNA corresponds to the portions of an organism's genome that do not code for amino acids, the building blocks of proteins.
[6]
The role of regulatory variation in complex traits and disease - Nature
Feb 24, 2015 · This paper provides an example of how a regulatory sequence change leads to gene expression variation at a distant gene, which in turn ...What Are Eqtls? · The Molecular Chain Of... · The Role Of Eqtls In Human...
[7]
Sequence determinants of human gene regulatory elements - Nature
Feb 21, 2022 · DNA can determine where and when genes are expressed, but the full set of sequence determinants that control gene expression is unknown.
[8]
https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(09)00552-1
[9]
10 element recognition by the bacterial RNA polymerase σ subunit
Promoter motifs recognized by primary σ factors are colored black (-35 element, extended –10 element, discriminator element) or yellow (-10 element or ...Missing: prokaryotic | Show results with:prokaryotic
[10]
Sigma Factor - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The DNA binding domains of the sigma proteins, recognizing the conserved −10 and −35 motifs of the promoters, are located in subregions 2.4 and 4.2, ...
[11]
The RNA polymerase II core promoter - Genes & Development
In this review, we will describe individual core promoter elements, and then discuss the function of core promoter motifs in the regulation of gene expression.
[12]
Eukaryotic core promoters and the functional basis of transcription ...
In promoters that lack a TATA-box, the Inr is often accompanied by another motif, the downstream promoter element (DPE), which is positioned downstream of the ...
[13]
Requirements for RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex ... - eLife
Jan 25, 2019 · Transcription by RNA polymerase II requires assembly of a preinitiation complex (PIC) composed of general transcription factors (GTFs) bound at the promoter.
[14]
CpG islands in vertebrate genomes - PubMed
Jul 20, 1987 · CpG islands were associated with the 5' ends of all housekeeping genes and many tissue-specific genes, and with the 3' ends of some tissue- ...
[15]
CpG islands and the regulation of transcription
CpG islands are GC-rich, CpG-rich, nonmethylated DNA sequences that act as genomic platforms for regulating transcription at their associated promoters.
[16]
Synthetic design of strong promoters | PNAS
Jan 21, 2010 · A well characterized synthetic promoter system has the potential to provide stronger expression, or expression levels that are precisely ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[17]
Genomic environments scale the activities of diverse core promoters
For strong promoters, genomic environments and core promoters contribute almost equally to gene expression (∼33% and ∼47%, respectively), but for weak promoters ...
[18]
Mechanisms of enhancer action: the known and the unknown
Apr 15, 2021 · Enhancers are non-coding sequences in the genome that activate the expression of target genes transcribed by the RNA polymerase II (RNAPII).<|control11|><|separator|>
[19]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8119328/
[20]
Transcriptional regulation and chromatin dynamics at DNA double ...
Oct 13, 2022 · Here, we briefly summarize the DNA damage response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and the DNA repair pathway and discuss how transcription ...The Dna Damage Response And... · Chromatin-Based Dsb Repair · Chromatin Remodeling Factors...
[21]
XRCC1 protects transcription from toxic PARP1 activity during DNA ...
Nov 22, 2021 · This defect is caused by excessive/aberrant PARP1 activity during DNA base excision repair, resulting from the loss of PARP1 regulation by XRCC1 ...
[22]
A damaged genome's transcriptional landscape through ... - Nature
May 31, 2017 · It relies on the detection of DDR factors accumulating near DSBs as a proxy for DNA damage and it is known that DDR factors recruitment to DNA ...
[23]
DNA damage and transcription stress cause ATP-mediated redesign ...
Oct 25, 2019 · Accumulation of DNA lesions causing transcription stress is associated with natural and accelerated aging and culminates with profound ...
[24]
CpG islands and the regulation of transcription - PMC - NIH
Silencing of CGI promoters is achieved through dense CpG methylation or polycomb recruitment, again using their distinctive DNA sequence composition. CGIs are ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[25]
DNA Methylation and Its Basic Function | Neuropsychopharmacology
Jul 11, 2012 · DNA methylation regulates gene expression by recruiting proteins involved in gene repression or by inhibiting the binding of transcription factor(s) to DNA.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[26]
DNA Methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b Are Essential for De ...
Here we demonstrate that two recently identified DNA methyltransferases, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b, are essential for de novo methylation and for mouse development.
[27]
Molecular Processes Connecting DNA Methylation Patterns with ...
DNMT1 is a maintenance methyltransferase with high preference for hemimethylated CpG sites [14,15]. In contrast, the DNMT3A and DNMT3B enzymes do not show ...3.4. Dna Methylation Canyons · 4.4. H3k9me3 · 4.5. Chromatin Remodeling...
[28]
Roles of TET and TDG in DNA demethylation in proliferating and ...
Jun 22, 2021 · TET enzymes mediate DNA demethylation by oxidizing 5-methylcytosine (5mC) in DNA to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC) ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[29]
Role of TET enzymes in DNA methylation, development, and cancer
The ten eleven translocation (TET) enzymes oxidize 5-methylcytosines (5mCs) and promote locus-specific reversal of DNA methylation.Missing: seminal papers
[30]
DNA hypermethylation in disease: mechanisms and clinical relevance
Abnormal increases or decreases in DNA methylation contribute to or are markers for cancer formation and tumour progression.
[31]
DNA hypomethylation in cancer cells - PMC - NIH
DNA hypomethylation was the initial epigenetic abnormality recognized in human tumors. However, for several decades after its independent discovery by two ...
[32]
The de novo DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A in development and ...
Thus, this review focuses on DNMT3A, a unique member of the DNMT3 family that establishes DNA methylation patterns de novo. As a de novo DNA methyltransferase, ...
[33]
The interplay of histone modifications – writers that read - EMBO Press
H3K27ac and H3K4me1 are associated with active enhancers 3, and high levels of H3K4me3 and H3 and H4 acetylation are found at the promoters of active genes 456.
[34]
The Role of Histone Acetyltransferases in Normal and ... - Frontiers
The acetylation of histones by HATs results in a dispersed structure of chromatin, which becomes accessible by transcriptional factors.Missing: euchromatin | Show results with:euchromatin
[35]
Synergistic activation of the insulin gene promoter by the β-cell ...
Pdx1 has been shown to bind to A1, A3, A5, and GG2, and Beta2 binds to E1 by forming a heterodimer with the ubiquitous factor E47. MafA was recently identified ...
[36]
MafA Regulation in β-Cells: From Transcriptional to Post ... - MDPI
Although MafA can activate the insulin promoter alone, the addition of Neurod1 and Pdx1, which bind the E box and A box of the insulin promoter, respectively, ...
[37]
PDX1, Neurogenin-3, and MAFA: critical transcription regulators for ...
Nov 2, 2017 · PDX1 also binds to the regulatory elements and increases insulin gene transcription. Likewise, MAFA binds to the enhancer/promoter region of ...
[38]
Regulation of the Insulin Gene by Glucose and Fatty Acids - PMC
Glucose is the major physiologic regulator of insulin gene expression; it coordinately controls the recruitment of transcription factors.
[39]
Loss of HNF-1α Function in Mice Leads to Abnormal Expression of ...
Nov 1, 2001 · Insulin secretory responses to glucose are markedly reduced in Hnf-1α−/− mice compared with littermate controls. Methylpyruvate, an insulin ...
[40]
Insulin Gene Expression Is Regulated by DNA Methylation - PMC
Our findings suggest that insulin promoter CpG demethylation may play a crucial role in beta cell maturation and tissue-specific insulin gene expression.
[41]
DNA Methylation Patterning and the Regulation of Beta Cell ...
The promoter regions of insulin and glucagon genes are rapidly demethylated during endocrine progenitor differentiation, regardless of the specific destined ...
[42]
Glucose regulates insulin gene transcription by hyperacetylation of ...
Our data support the idea that high concentrations of glucose stimulate insulin gene expression by causing hyperacetylation of histone H4 at the insulin gene ...
[43]
Insulin promoter DNA methylation correlates negatively with insulin ...
Nov 23, 2010 · In conclusion, four CpG sites within the insulin promoter show increased DNA methylation in pancreatic islets from patients with type 2 diabetes ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[44]
The role of DNA methylation in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes ...
Jul 11, 2020 · Collectively, these findings suggest that the demethylation of the insulin promoter CpG sites plays a key role in β cell maturation and the ...
[45]
Hox genes regulation in vertebrates - Soshnikova - 2014
Jul 5, 2013 · CIS-REGULATORY ELEMENTS. Collinear patterns of Hox genes expression are controlled by multiple proximal regulatory elements scattered ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[46]
Uncoupling Time and Space in the Collinear Regulation of Hox Genes
We show that both positive and negative regulatory influences, located on either side of the cluster, control an early phase of collinear expression in the ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[47]
Genomic Regulation of Hox Collinearity - ScienceDirect.com
In this issue of Developmental Cell, Tarchini and Duboule (2006) report that two opposite regulatory modules direct early collinear expression of Hoxd genes.Missing: seminal papers
[48]
LncRNA HOTAIR: a master regulator of chromatin dynamics ... - NIH
HOTAIR (HOX antisense intergenic RNA) is an example of lncRNA that plays major roles in gene regulation, chromatin dynamics, and cancer [12–15]. Herein, we have ...
[49]
Sequential and directional insulation by conserved CTCF sites ...
Jun 15, 2023 · During development, Hox genes are temporally activated according to their relative positions on their clusters, contributing to the proper ...
[50]
CTCF: insights into insulator function during development
Mar 15, 2012 · The nuclear protein CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) when bound to insulator sequences can prevent undesirable crosstalk between active and inactive genomic regions.
[51]
Evolutionary Conservation of Regulatory Elements in Vertebrate ...
Hox genes are highly conserved in vertebrates, occur in clusters, and are uninterrupted by other genes.Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
[52]
The chromatin insulator CTCF and the emergence of metazoan ...
Oct 8, 2012 · We demonstrate that CTCF-binding sites within vertebrate and Drosophila Hox gene clusters have been maintained for several hundred million years ...