Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Rehat

Rehat (Punjabi: ਰਹਿਤ), meaning "conduct" or "discipline," refers to the prescribed ethical, , and guidelines that define Sikh living and . The Sikh Rehat Maryada, the official code of conduct, codifies these rules into a unified manual, approved by the —the highest temporal authority in —and the (SGPC) in the mid-20th century following earlier historical attempts to standardize practices after Guru Gobind Singh's era. This code emphasizes core Sikh tenets such as honest earning (kirat karna), sharing with the needy (vand chakna), and constant remembrance of the divine (naam japna), alongside mandatory symbols of faith known as : kesh (uncut hair), kangha (comb), kara (steel bracelet), kachera (undergarment), and (dagger). It prohibits intoxicants, , halal meat, and superstitious practices, while mandating daily prayers, ethical family life, and participation in community service through gurdwaras. The Rehat Maryada also outlines ceremonies for birth, , and death, reinforcing and rejection of distinctions in Sikh institutions. As a , the Rehat Maryada promotes uniformity among the global , though interpretations vary among sects like the or , with the SGPC version holding authoritative status for mainstream . Its enforcement underscores Sikhism's commitment to disciplined self-improvement and resistance to , historically forged amid , ensuring adherents embody the warrior-saint ideal.

Etymology and Conceptual Foundations

Linguistic Origins

The term Rehat (also spelled Rehit or Rahit) in the Sikh tradition derives from the verb rahiṇā, meaning "to live," "to remain," or "to abide," which semantically extends to signify a prescribed "mode of living" or disciplined conduct. This etymological root reflects the concept's emphasis on an ongoing, habitual adherence to ethical and spiritual norms, distinguishing it from mere rules by implying a continuous state of being aligned with Sikh principles. Punjabi, as an Indo-Aryan language, traces rahiṇā to deeper origins in roots like rah (to proceed or stay), underscoring a native South Asian linguistic heritage rather than direct borrowings from or , despite historical Perso-Arabic influences on vocabulary in other domains. In Sikh texts such as Rehitnamas—early manuals of conduct composed in interspersed with regional vernaculars—the term encapsulates lifestyle guidelines, evolving from Guru-period usages to formalized codes without altering its core connotation of sustained living practice.

Rehat in Sikh Scriptures and Guru Traditions

The principles underlying Rehat, the Sikh discipline of ethical and spiritual conduct, are embedded in the Guru Granth Sahib through teachings on righteous living aligned with divine will, rather than as a formalized code. The term "rehat" appears in Gurbani to denote steadfast adherence to hukam (divine order), as in the verse: "The enlightened one's rehat is firm obedience to the command," emphasizing internal discipline over ritualism. Core elements such as constant remembrance of the divine Name (Naam Simran), honest earning (Kirat Karni), and sharing earnings (Vand Chakna) derive directly from Guru Nanak's hymns, which reject superstition and promote moral integrity as causal to spiritual liberation. These scriptural injunctions prioritize causal efficacy of personal effort in aligning with truth, without reliance on intermediaries or caste-based practices. Guru traditions further elaborated Rehat through lived examples and progressive institutions. Guru Nanak's rejection of ritual purity and establishment of langar (communal kitchen) in the early modeled equality and service as practical disciplines. Subsequent Gurus, such as (d. 1606) in compiling the Adi Granth and (d. 1644) in adopting miri-piri (temporal-spiritual authority), integrated defensive readiness with devotion, teaching to embody resilience amid persecution. Empirical accounts from and historical records confirm these as causal responses to Mughal oppression, fostering a community ethos of . The most explicit codification emerged under (d. 1708), who on April 13, 1699, baptized the at , instituting Amrit Sanchar (initiation rite) and mandating —uncut hair (Kesh), comb (), steel bangle (Kara), dagger (), and undergarment (Kachera)—as visible commitments to sovereignty and purity. Prior to his passing at in 1708, he issued 52 hukams (commands), including directives to earn honestly, donate one-tenth of income (), memorize , abstain from intoxicants, and uphold family duties, which directly inform Khalsa Rehat. These were transmitted orally and later documented in rehitnamas attributed to contemporaries like , reflecting Gobind Singh's emphasis on collective discipline for panthic survival. No comprehensive Rehat text exists in , though its banis reinforce martial and devotional ethos used in liturgy.

Historical Evolution

Foundational Period (1699–1925)

The foundational period of Sikh Rehat began with the creation of the Khalsa Panth by Guru Gobind Singh on April 13, 1699, at Anandpur Sahib, where he instituted the Amrit Sanchar ceremony as the rite of initiation for Sikhs committed to a disciplined code of conduct. This event established core elements of Rehat, including the mandatory adoption of the Five Ks—kesh (uncut hair), kangha (comb), kara (steel bangle), kirpan (dagger), and kachera (undergarment)—as symbols of Sikh identity, along with prohibitions against cutting hair, consuming tobacco, committing adultery, and eating halal meat. These practices aimed to foster a distinct, egalitarian warrior-saint community resilient against persecution, with adherence enforced through communal accountability. In 1708, prior to his passing at , issued the 52 Hukams, a set of edicts dispatched to Sikh congregations such as those in , outlining practical guidelines for personal and communal life, including earning through honest means, donating one-tenth of income (), reciting daily prayers, maintaining hygiene, and associating with Rehat-observing Sikhs. These Hukams, recorded by contemporaries like , provided a blueprint for Sikh discipline, emphasizing spiritual devotion alongside martial readiness, though their compilation reflects oral traditions later transcribed. Following the Guru's martyrdom, early 18th-century Rahitnamas emerged as textual compilations of conduct norms, such as the Prahlad Singh Rahitnama (circa 1710) and Tankhanama (1719), which reiterated Khalsa ideals like loyalty to the and rejection of caste practices, amid the chaos of Mughal-Afghan invasions. Authenticity varies; while some like Bhai Nand Lal's align closely with principles, others, such as the later Chaupa Singh Rahitnama (circa 1790), incorporate potentially interpolated Brahmanical elements, prompting scholarly debate over their fidelity to original ethos. During the Sikh confederacies (1710–1799), Rehat sustained group cohesion in , with orders preserving strict interpretations, though regional variations arose due to survival exigencies. Under the (1799–1849), Maharaja Ranjit Singh's rule integrated Rehat into state military structure, mandating symbols like the for soldiers, yet courtly indulgences occasionally strained observance, as when Jathedar Phula Singh enforced penalties for ethical lapses. British annexation in 1849 introduced colonial influences, diluting practices among urban , but periodically reaffirmed core Rehat through hukamnamas. The late 19th century saw the (founded 1873 in , consolidated 1879 in Lahore) drive Rehat revival by purging syncretic rituals, promoting scriptural primacy, and countering proselytization from and missionaries, culminating in early codification efforts like the 1877 Rehat document, which outlined baptismal and ceremonial norms. This period's reforms emphasized exclusive Sikh identity, setting precedents for 20th-century standardization amid Gurdwara agitation leading to the 1925 SGPC Act.

Standardization Efforts (1925–1945)

Following the enactment of the Sikh Gurdwaras Act on July 29, 1925, which established the (SGPC) as the elected body managing Sikh gurdwaras, the SGPC initiated systematic efforts to standardize Sikh conduct amid post-Gurdwara Reform Movement calls for uniformity in practices varying across sects and regions. On March 15, 1927, the SGPC held a general body meeting at Sahib and appointed a 29-member ad hoc subcommittee, convened by the of , comprising Sikh scholars, theologians, and leaders such as Master Teja Singh and Giani Bagh Singh, to draft a comprehensive code drawing from historical Rehatnamas and principles. In 1931, the SGPC reconstituted efforts with another subcommittee of 29 prominent intellectuals and theologians to compile a modern standard Rehat, involving analysis of pre-modern texts like Bhai Chaupa Singh's Rehatnama and consultations to resolve discrepancies in rituals such as initiation (Amrit Sanchar) and daily observances. The drafting phase spanned 1932 to 1936, featuring iterative reviews, debates on contentious issues like meat consumption and gender roles in congregations, and harmonization of versus practices to emphasize core Sikh identity markers including (Kesh, , Kara, Kachera, ). By 1945, after revisions incorporating feedback from Sikh bodies, the SGPC approved the Sikh Rehat Maryada on August 11 at a Panthic conference convened at , marking its formal adoption as the authoritative guide despite ongoing minor sectarian critiques.

Post-Approval Developments (1945–Present)

Following its formal approval by the (SGPC) on February 3, 1945, the Sikh Rehat Maryada underwent further endorsement by the broader Sikh community, known as the sangat, in , which affirmed its role as the definitive code governing Sikh conduct and conventions. This addressed lingering variances in practices across Sikh institutions and helped standardize observance of core elements such as the wearing of (kesh, kangha, kara, kachera, and kirpan) and prohibitions against intoxicants, , and meat. The document's implementation marked a shift toward centralized authority under the SGPC and , reducing reliance on disparate historical rehatnamas from the 18th and 19th centuries. In the postwar era, the Rehat Maryada faced challenges from sectarian groups, including Namdharis and certain traditions, who maintained alternative codes derived from pre-SGPC texts like those attributed to Bhai Chaupa Singh or . These groups argued that the 1945 version diluted stricter historical disciplines, such as expanded bans on certain foods or ritual observances, though consistently upheld the SGPC formulation as Panthic consensus. Enforcement intensified during periods of Sikh political mobilization, notably in the 1970s and 1980s amid the , where adherence to Rehat symbolized resistance to perceived cultural erosion; issued directives, for instance, reinforcing the ban on uninitiated individuals performing in Gurdwaras. The late 20th and early 21st centuries saw no officially sanctioned amendments to the core text, as confirmed in SGPC publications presenting the document as originating from the 1945 resolution. However, reprints and translations, particularly in the mid-2000s, sparked when Sikh intellectuals identified wording alterations—such as softened on in congregations or clarifications on sanchar procedures—attributed by critics to editorial interventions rather than Panthic approval. These changes, discussed in Sikh forums and scholarly critiques around 2006, were decried as unauthorized dilutions, prompting calls for reversion to the original draft to preserve doctrinal integrity. Contemporary developments emphasize stricter enforcement amid urbanization and diaspora influences. jathedars have issued hukamnamas targeting deviations, including a 2015 directive against mixed-faith ceremonies and repeated affirmations in the 2020s of gender-specific roles in services, such as limiting certain duties to Amritdhari Sikhs. In 2023, amid disputes with groups like , reiterated the Rehat Maryada's supremacy, rejecting external challenges and underscoring its role in defining Sikh orthodoxy against syncretic practices. Despite interpretive debates, the code's endurance reflects its grounding in collective Sikh deliberation, with over 50,000 worldwide nominally adhering to its provisions as of recent estimates.

Authority and Structure of the Sikh Rehat Maryada

Approval Process and Institutional Role

The standardization of the Sikh Rehat Maryada began in 1931 under the auspices of the (SGPC), which convened an advisory committee to compile a uniform drawing from , historical precedents, and contemporary practices. This committee included representatives such as Mohan Singh of , ensuring input from the highest temporal authority in . Drafts were circulated for review among Sikh scholars and organizations, with revisions incorporating feedback to address variations in regional rehats. The final document received formal approval from the SGPC's general body on February 3, 1945, via resolution No. 97, marking its adoption as the official Sikh Code of Conduct. This approval process reflected the SGPC's mandate under the Sikh Gurdwaras Act of 1925, which established it as the elected body responsible for administering historic gurdwaras and promoting panthic unity, including efforts to codify religious discipline amid post-colonial reforms. Subsequent minor amendments have been made, but the 1945 version remains the foundational text. Institutionally, the serves as the supreme temporal seat of authority within the Sikh , empowered to issue (edicts) on matters of rehat, excommunicate violators, and oversee affairs indirectly through its influence on the SGPC. While the SGPC holds administrative responsibility for disseminating and enforcing the Rehat Maryada, the 's role entails authentication and arbitration, as evidenced by its jathedar's participation in the drafting phase and its capacity to convene gatherings for panth-wide endorsements. However, certain traditionalist groups, such as the , have contested the Rehat Maryada's full legitimacy, arguing it lacks explicit ratification directly from the , highlighting ongoing debates over centralized versus decentralized authority in Sikh .

Legal and Theological Status Within the Panth

The Sikh Rehat Maryada occupies a theological status as a practical codification of Sikh , derived from the foundational principles articulated in the and the lived traditions of the ten , rather than as an independent scriptural authority—the alone serves as the eternal Guru and ultimate theological arbiter. It embodies theological imperatives such as devotion to one (), ethical living through honest labor (kirat karna), sharing (vand chakna), and meditation on the divine Name (naam japna), translating abstract into disciplined daily conduct to foster spiritual alignment with . Within the , the Rehat Maryada's legal status stems from its formal approval by the on February 3, 1945, following deliberation by a subcommittee of Sikh scholars under oversight, establishing it as the sole authorized code by this supreme temporal authority. This renders it binding as an internal religious norm for , particularly those initiated via Sanchar, guiding personal and communal practices, defining Sikh identity for institutional purposes (e.g., under the 1925 Gurdwaras Act), and enabling enforcement through hukumnamas and tankhaiya proceedings for violations. It lacks civil legal enforceability but functions as quasi-legal doctrine within Sikh governance structures, promoting uniformity amid the 's collective consensus. Despite this official , the Rehat Maryada's authority faces practical limitations, as not all Takhts fully adopt it, with some adhering to supplementary local rehats, underscoring debates over its comprehensive binding force across the heterogeneous . retains prerogative to amend or interpret it via Panthic sarbat, reflecting the dynamic, consensus-driven nature of Sikh temporal law.

Core Elements of Rehat

Defining Sikh Identity and Initiation

The Sikh Rehat Maryada delineates Sikh identity through Article I, defining a Sikh as any human being who faithfully believes in (i) one Immortal Being, (ii) the ten from Dev to , (iii) the , (iv) the utterances and teachings of the ten , and (v) the baptismal instituted by the tenth Guru, while owing allegiance to no other religion. This credo-centric formulation emphasizes doctrinal fidelity over mere cultural or nominal affiliation, distinguishing from adherents of other faiths and underscoring monotheistic commitment to the Guru lineage and scripture as foundational to personal and communal identity. Initiation into Sikh identity, known as Amrit Sanchar or the baptismal ceremony (Khande di Pahul), represents the formal commitment to this identity, transforming a believer into an (initiated) Sikh and member of the brotherhood established by on April 13, 1699 (). The procedure, outlined in Section Four of the Rehat Maryada, requires the presence of the , at least five initiated Sikhs () acting as representatives of the Guru, and a preparation of —sweetened water stirred with a double-edged sword (khanda) while reciting five Banis (, Jaap Sahib, Ten Swayyas, Benti Chaupai, and ). Candidates, having bathed and donned the five articles of faith (: kesh, , kara, kachera, ), recite the , pledge adherence to the Rehat, and partake of the Amrit, followed by communal recitation and Ardas; this rite imposes lifelong obligations to the full , including uncut hair, ethical living, and Panthic service. While the Rehat Maryada's definition accommodates non-initiated believers as , initiation confers authoritative status within the , enabling participation in key decisions and ceremonies; uninitiated (Sahajdhari) are encouraged but not mandated to undergo , reflecting a spectrum of commitment where full Rehat observance via aligns identity with the 's martial-spiritual ethos. This process, rooted in historical precedents from Gobind Singh's creation of the to counter , causalizes Sikh resilience through disciplined, egalitarian initiation open to all without or barriers, provided sincerity and preparatory discipline.

Personal Conduct and Daily Discipline

The Sikh Rehat Maryada prescribes a structured daily routine emphasizing spiritual discipline and physical purity, beginning with rising during the ambrosial hours—approximately three hours before dawn—for and on the divine name "". This practice, known as (daily recitation), requires Sikhs to perform specific scriptural readings to cultivate and . Morning recitations include the , Jaap Sahib, and the Ten Swayyas beginning with "Sarawag sudh", followed by conclusion with Ardas, a formal invoking the Guru's guidance. Evening prayers, after sunset, consist of the Rehras comprising nine selected hymns, Benti Chaupai, a Swayya, Dohira, the first five and final stanzas of , Mundawani, and Slok Mahla 5, again ending with Ardas. At night, before sleep, Sikhs recite . These recitations reinforce personal commitment to the Guru's teachings and are obligatory for maintaining spiritual discipline. Personal grooming upholds the principle of accepting the natural form as ordained by the divine, prohibiting the cutting or alteration of on any body part, including for children, and forbidding nose or ear piercings for adornments. Men are required to wear a covering uncut , while women have discretion but must cover their heads in congregational settings; entering a bare-headed is prohibited. extends to washing feet if soiled before prayers or entering sacred spaces, ensuring purity in both body and intent. Ethical conduct demands adherence to core virtues: exclusive worship of one formless , rejection of distinctions, and avoidance of superstitions such as omens, horoscopes, or idol worship. must earn through honest means, shunning , dubious associations, and intoxicants including , , , or . Familial duties include treating others' daughters as one's own, fidelity to one's spouse, and opposition to . Greetings among use the phrase "Waheguru ji ka , Waheguru ji ki ", affirming communal under divine will. Violations such as dishonouring hair, consuming meat, , or use constitute cardinal transgressions undermining personal Rehat.

Communal and Congregational Practices

The Sikh Rehat Maryada prescribes regular participation in sangat, the congregational gathering, as essential for Sikhs to deepen understanding and reflection on through collective worship. In Gurdwaras, services commence with the ceremonial opening of the , followed by —devotional singing limited to verses from the , compositions of , and —scriptural exposition, and explanatory discourses on Sikh teachings. The service concludes with recitation of , collective Ardas (supplicatory prayer), distribution of karah prasad (sacred pudding prepared and offered according to specified rituals), issuance of the (random verse from the for guidance), and the proclamation of Waheguru ji ka , Waheguru ji ki . The must be opened daily for services and maintained in a pristine state, with closure after Rehras unless extended gatherings occur. Entry to the requires to remove shoes, cover their heads, wash feet if soiled, and prostrate before the , while prohibiting entry to those carrying tobacco or intoxicants; no distinctions based on , , or status apply, allowing universal access to promote . Sewa (voluntary ) forms a core communal duty, training in humility through tasks such as cleaning and plastering premises, fanning or serving water to the congregation, assisting in communal kitchens, and tending to visitors' footwear. This practice underscores altruistic labor as integral to Sikh religious life, fostering discipline and erasure of social hierarchies. Guru ka Langar, the community kitchen, embodies egalitarian principles by providing free meals to all attendees irrespective of background, served in pangat (rows on the floor) to dismantle and barriers while instilling sewa. Preparation adheres to strict and vegetarian standards, with distribution emphasizing non-discrimination; however, sharing plates is restricted to Amritdhari to maintain ceremonial purity. These practices, formalized in the Rehat Maryada approved by the on February 3, 1945, reinforce collective Panthic discipline and communal harmony.

Ceremonial and Scriptural Observances

Ceremonial observances in the Sikh Rehat Maryada encompass key life events, emphasizing simplicity, congregational participation in the presence of the , and avoidance of superstitious or caste-based practices. For birth and naming ceremonies, following the child's birth, the family visits a , offers karhah prashad, recites hymns such as "Parmeshar dita bana," and obtains a (random verse) from the to determine the name, which begins with the first letter of the ; boys append "" and girls "." This is followed by recitation of , Ardas, and distribution of prashad. Marriage ceremonies adhere strictly to the rite, conducted before the without regard to , horoscopes, or ; the couple circumambulates the scripture four times while specific Lavan stanzas are recited, after which , Ardas, and prashad distribution occur. Child marriages and rituals invoking deceased ancestors are prohibited. Death and funeral observances mandate of the body after bathing and placement on a cot, accompanied by Ardas and recitation of ; wailing, elaborate rituals like kapal kriya, or secondary s are forbidden. A reading of the commences immediately, concluding on the tenth day with , Ardas, and prashad. Ashes are immersed in running water with Ardas. Scriptural observances center on the reverent handling and recitation of the , treated as the living Guru, installed on a high pedestal under rumalas (clean cloths) in gurdwaras or homes, with ceremonial opening via Ardas and initial . Readings include Sadharan Path, an intermittent personal or group recitation ideally completed in one to two months, and , a continuous 48-hour unbroken reading by relays of readers for occasions of joy, hardship, or commemoration, requiring precise pronunciation without pauses. Both conclude with Mundawani or Rah Mala, , Ardas, and prashad; demands at least five participants and is not for commercial gain. These paths integrate into ceremonies, underscoring scriptural centrality over priestly mediation.

Variations Across Sikh Traditions

Orthodox Samprada Rehats

Orthodox samprada rehats encompass the traditional codes of conduct upheld by longstanding Sikh orders, such as the and , which draw from historical Rehatnamas attributed to companions of , including and Bhai Chaupa Singh, predating the 20th-century Sikh Rehat Maryada (SRM). These sampradas maintain that their practices preserve the original discipline established in 1699, emphasizing stricter personal discipline, extended scriptural recitations, and martial ethos over the SRM's perceived dilutions influenced by Singh Sabha reforms. Adherents argue these rehats align more closely with empirical Sikh historical practices, rejecting SRM provisions like abbreviated banis as deviations from Gurbani-mandated completeness. The , tracing its lineage to Guru Gobind Singh's establishment of the Taksal for scriptural propagation around 1700–1706, codifies its Gurmat Rehat Maryada with rigorous daily comprising , Jaap Sahib, Tav Prasad Savaiye, full Chaupai Sahib (up to 55th pauri), full (40 pauris), extended Rehras including Salok Mehala 9 and Ath Chaupai, and . () mandates five beloved ones preparing via khanda stirred in iron batasa and water, with pauls reciting specific ; post-initiation, newborns receive symbolic drops from the kirpan tip, followed by the mother's consumption of the remainder, underscoring early integration. Prohibitions extend beyond SRM to absolute bans on and , mandatory uncut (hair) with full turbaning, and (tithe) strictly for Sikh causes, with violations risking tankhaiya (disciplinary action) by the . This maryada prioritizes parchar (preaching) in , rejecting Romanized transliterations as erosive to phonetic purity. Akali Nihang rehats, preserved by the Buddha Dal and Taruna Dal since the 18th-century Dal Khalsa era, integrate martial rigor with spiritual discipline, viewing Rehat as Guru-granted for Akal Fauj (eternal army) readiness. Core practices include (attire) with five weapons—, , (quoit), khanda, and katara—worn daily, alongside (weaponry training) and horsemanship to embody miri-piri (temporal-spiritual) balance. mirrors Taksal extensions but adds emphasis on Sarbloh (all-iron) utensils for langar, meat consumption for sustenance during campaigns (permitted under Guru-period allowances), and occasional (cannabis) use in moderation for focus during akharas, rooted in 18th-century Nihang survival tactics rather than intoxication. Communal observances mandate akhand paths with full exposition, rejection of non-Sikh rituals, and guardianship of takhts, with breaches addressed via dal-level biradari courts enforcing re-Amrit if necessary. These elements reflect causal continuity from Guru Gobind Singh's 1699–1708 edicts, prioritizing battlefield-tested over institutional standardization. Other aligned sampradas, such as Sursingh and Bhai Daya Singh lineages, echo these by insisting on pre-SRM Nitnem completeness and strict 5 Ks, often critiquing SRM for omitting banis like full Sukhmani in some contexts or lax enforcement on sura (alcohol). Collectively, orthodox rehats foster a decentralized yet lineage-bound authority, deriving legitimacy from unbroken jathedari chains rather than SGPC oversight, enabling adaptations like intensified parmarth (devotion) during historical persecutions while upholding verifiable Gurbani-derived minima.

Heterodox and Reformist Interpretations

The sect, established by Baba Ram Singh in the 1860s, maintains a distinct Rehat emphasizing absolute as a core tenet, in contrast to the Sikh Rehat Maryada's allowance for ritually slaughtered () meat among non-vegetarians. practices also include recognition of a continued lineage of living Gurus succeeding , which shapes their initiation ceremonies and daily disciplines, such as wearing white attire for baptized members rather than the standard blue. This framework rejects the finality of the as sole living Guru, positioning Rehat as a parallel system focused on ascetic purity and political activism, including non-cooperation with British rule in the . Sikh authorities, including the , view these deviations as incompatible with Panthic consensus, leading to historical excommunications. The Nirankari movement, initiated by Baba Dayal Das in 1803 in Rawalpindi, represents an early reformist effort to eliminate perceived idolatrous elements in Sikh practice, such as excessive ritualism around the Guru Granth Sahib, by prioritizing direct devotion to the formless Nirankar (God). Their Rehat diverges through simplified ceremonies, rejection of traditional Sikh symbols in some contexts, and an emphasis on ethical living over elaborate codes, influencing later orthodox reforms like the Singh Sabha Movement but ultimately forming a separate identity. The Sant Nirankari Mission, evolving from this in the 20th century under Gurbachan Singh, further adapts by framing itself as a non-sectarian spiritual path open to all, with practices including mass congregations focused on satguru realization rather than strict adherence to Maryada-prescribed Amrit Sanchar or martial training. These interpretations prioritize inner formlessness over external orthodoxy, drawing criticism from mainstream Sikhs for undermining Khalsa discipline established by Guru Gobind Singh in 1699. In Western contexts, groups like (Healthy, Happy, Holy Organization), founded by Harbhajan Singh () in 1969, integrate Sikh Rehat with practices, including specific kriyas, pranayama, and tantric meditations not outlined in the Maryada. Initiates adopt but supplement them with yogic disciplines aimed at awakening latent energy, which deviates from the Maryada's focus on scriptural recitation, , and ethical conduct derived from . This syncretic approach, promoted through teacher training and retreats, has been critiqued by traditionalists as introducing extraneous Hindu tantric elements, diluting Sikh martial and monotheistic ethos. Despite formal alignment with some Maryada elements, such as uncut hair and communal service, the emphasis on proprietary yoga sequences over Panthic consensus has led to perceptions of it as a heterodox offshoot, particularly following revelations of leadership controversies in the 2020s. Contemporary reformist voices, often in communities, advocate loosening Rehat strictures—such as optional (uncut hair) or inclusive adaptations for and lifestyle—to align with modern , as seen in critiques labeling traditional Maryada as overly legalistic. These proposals, articulated in forums and essays since the , draw from rationalist reinterpretations of emphasizing personal devotion over ritual, but lack institutional endorsement and face resistance for potentially eroding communal identity forged through historical persecutions. Empirical surveys of Sikh populations in indicate that while core practices like persist, heterodox adaptations correlate with lower adherence to baptism rates, highlighting tensions between preservation and evolution.

Controversies and Criticisms

Debates on Authenticity and Universality

The Sikh Rehat Maryada (SRM), formalized by the (SGPC) with a draft approved in 1936 and final version ratified by the in 1950, represents a synthesized code drawing from scriptural injunctions in the , 18th- and 19th-century Rehatnamas (such as those attributed to and Bhai Chaupa Singh), and oral traditions tracing to the Gurus. Critics, including traditionalist scholars from groups like the , contend that this codification selectively interprets or omits elements from puratan (ancient) rehats, such as stricter prohibitions on tobacco or endorsements of (), arguing that the SRM reflects Singh Sabha-era reforms influenced by 19th-century revivalism rather than unadulterated Guru-era practices. Authenticity debates center on the SRM's status as a human-authored rather than direct Guru vak (word), with historical evidence showing pre-SRM rehats varied by samprada (tradition)—for instance, and Nirmala texts permitting ritual hunt , which the SRM ambiguously addresses amid panthic pressures. Some historians note that colonial-era standardization under British influence prioritized uniformity over diverse martial-ascetic customs, potentially diluting causal links to Guru Gobind Singh's formation in 1699, where rehat emphasized kesh (uncut hair) and but lacked the SRM's detailed congregational protocols. Proponents counter that the SRM authentically distills empirical Sikh conduct from centuries of practice, as evidenced by its alignment with core and amrit sanchar rites, though they acknowledge interpretive flexibility in non-scriptural matters. On universality, the SRM's claim to panthic applicability—intended to unify post-Gurdwara Reform Movement of the 1920s—faces resistance from heterodox groups like Namdharis and Udasis, who maintain autonomous rehats rejecting oversight, and from diaspora communities citing impracticalities in global contexts, such as uniform keshadhari (baptized) requirements amid secular pressures. Empirical surveys of Sikh practices reveal non-adherence rates, with only partial observance of daily (prayers) or (tithe) among urban Sikhs, fueling arguments that rigid universality undermines the Guru Granth Sahib's emphasis on inner over external . These divides persist, as seen in ongoing rulings on deviations, highlighting causal tensions between centralized authority and decentralized historical traditions.

Specific Doctrinal Disputes

One prominent doctrinal dispute within Sikh Rehat concerns the permissibility of meat consumption beyond ritually slaughtered (kutha or halal) meat. The Sikh Rehat Maryada (SRM), approved by the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) in 1945, explicitly lists eating halal meat as a bajjar kurehit (cardinal sin) alongside dishonesty, adultery, and gambling, but does not prohibit non-ritual (jhatka) meat outright. This aligns with historical Sikh martial traditions, where jhatka—quick, non-ritual slaughter—was practiced to reject Muslim halal and Hindu kosher influences, as evidenced in early rahitnamas like the Prem Sumarag Granth. However, certain Sikh groups, including some influenced by Vaishnavite or Udasi traditions, advocate strict vegetarianism, interpreting Gurbani passages against ritual killing (e.g., Guru Nanak's critique of animal sacrifice in Japji Sahib) as a broader ban on meat to promote ahimsa (non-violence). This view gained traction in 19th-20th century reform movements but conflicts with Guru Gobind Singh's reported consumption of meat during Khalsa initiations and Nihang Singh practices, leading to ongoing debates where orthodox factions like Damdami Taksal permit jhatka while Akhand Kirtani Jatha (AKJ) enforces vegetarianism as essential Rehat. A related contention involves the mandatory nature of Amrit Sanchar (Khalsa ) for defining a true Sikh. The SRM delineates a Sikh as one affirming belief in one God, the ten Gurus, Guru Granth Sahib, and the baptismal tradition instituted by in 1699, without requiring Amrit for basic identity. Yet, purist interpretations from groups like Nihangs and Taksali Sikhs insist that only Amritdhari (baptized) individuals fully embody Rehat, viewing non-baptized Sikhs as incomplete or (gradualists), a stance rooted in 18th-century rahitnamas emphasizing Khalsa purity amid persecution. Disputes intensified post-1945, with critics arguing the SRM dilutes Khalsa exclusivity by accommodating non-Amritdhari practitioners in gurdwaras, while reformists cite Guru Nanak's inclusive ethos and historical flexibility for women and converts, questioning rigid enforcement as a later invention rather than Guru-mandated. Historical evidence, including Bhai Gurdas's Varaan and early Khalsa records, supports baptism as voluntary commitment rather than prerequisite, fueling accusations that strict Amrit mandates reflect 20th-century political consolidation by bodies like the SGPC rather than unaltered tradition. Further disputes center on the authenticity and of rahitnamas—pre-20th-century texts codifying Rehat—versus the standardized SRM. Numerous rahitnamas, such as the Chaupa Singh Rahitnama (ca. 1765) and Sakhi Rahit Pātshāhī 10, contain conflicting injunctions, including bans on certain meats or rituals now deemed adulterated by non-Sikh influences like or asceticism. Scholars note interpolations post-Guru Gobind Singh, with some texts promoting distinctions or idol avoidance in ways diverging from Gurbani's , leading to debates over which embody genuine Guru Rehat. The SRM sought to resolve this by compiling consensus from approved sources in the 1930s-1940s amid Gurdwara Reform Movement pressures, but critics, including SGPC members like Dr. Amarjit Chawla in , challenge its doctrinal integrity, alleging omissions of stricter rahit elements from Damdami or traditions to appease modernist or Sikhs. This has sparked calls for revisions, with traditionalists arguing the SRM's political origins under British-era influences undermine its claim to universality, while proponents defend it as empirical harmonization of verifiable Guru-era practices over fragmented, unverifiable manuscripts.

Modern Enforcement Challenges

In contemporary , enforcing the Rehat Maryada faces significant institutional hurdles due to questions surrounding the legitimacy and authority of the , the supreme temporal seat responsible for issuing edicts on code of conduct compliance. Political entanglements, particularly the (SGPC)'s affiliation with the , have eroded trust, exemplified by controversies such as the 2015 forgiveness of , a figure accused of sacrilege, which prompted widespread criticism of selective enforcement. Internal divisions, including rival leadership claims from events like the 1986 and 2015 gatherings, have fragmented adherence, with some Sikhs aligning with alternative jathedars who challenge official rulings on Rehat violations, such as bans on preachers for doctrinal misinterpretations. The , comprising over 25 million Sikhs globally with major concentrations in , , and , amplifies enforcement difficulties through geographical separation from Amritsar-based authority and pressures of . Lacking or in SGPC elections, diaspora communities often adapt Rehat practices to local legal and social norms, leading to inconsistent compliance on issues like ceremonial observances and personal conduct, while facing tensions between preserving identity and integrating into secular societies. Calls for structural reforms, such as including diaspora voices in SGPC governance, have emerged to foster reciprocal legitimacy, yet implementation remains stalled amid panthic (community-wide) disputes. Digital platforms exacerbate challenges by enabling unauthorized dissemination of Rehat interpretations, with self-proclaimed Nihangs and preachers using and podcasts to promote heterodox views that dilute core prohibitions, such as against intoxicants or ritual deviations, complicating centralized oversight. Recent panthic crises, including the 2025 removal of jathedars and alleged violations of directives on political enrollments, highlight ongoing enforcement gaps, where community dialogue is urged but rarely resolves underlying authority deficits. These factors collectively undermine uniform Rehat adherence, prompting debates on whether revisions or stricter transnational mechanisms are needed to reconcile tradition with global realities.

Impact and Contemporary Relevance

Influence on Sikh Identity and Society

The Sikh Rehat Maryada, as the codified standard of conduct, has fundamentally shaped Sikh identity by mandating adherence to —kesh (uncut hair), (comb), kara (steel bangle), kachera (undergarment), and ()—which serve as enduring symbols of and discipline, distinguishing visually and spiritually from surrounding populations. This requirement, rooted in the initiation by in 1699 and formalized in the 20th-century Maryada, reinforces personal commitment and communal uniformity, with surveys indicating over 90% of baptized (Amritdhari) maintaining these articles as core to self-identification. In society, the Rehat promotes cohesion through standardized practices such as daily recitations and mandatory participation in congregations (sangat) and communal kitchens (langar), where egalitarian seating eradicates distinctions and fosters social bonds, historically enabling Sikh resilience during periods of persecution under and later rule. Prohibitions against intoxicants, , and instill ethical discipline, contributing to lower reported rates of in observant Sikh communities compared to regional averages in , where adherence correlates with enhanced family stability and economic productivity via emphasis on honest labor (kirat karna). The code's evolution from 18th-century Rehitnamas to the 1945 SGPC-approved version addressed fragmentation post-Guru period, standardizing rituals to prevent with or and preserving doctrinal purity, which bolstered Sikh political autonomy, as evidenced by the establishment of the under Maharaja in 1799, where Rehat-guided martial ethos was pivotal. In modern contexts, particularly among the global exceeding 25 million as of 2020, Rehat observance counters pressures, with studies showing higher retention of cultural practices in families enforcing the Maryada, thereby sustaining panthic amid diverse host societies.

Global Adaptations and Future Prospects

![Global_thinking.svg.png][float-right] In countries with substantial Sikh populations, such as (approximately 771,000 Sikhs as of recent estimates), the , and the , gurdwaras typically adhere to the (SGPC) Rehat Maryada for communal practices, ensuring uniformity in ceremonies and langar operations. However, personal observance often incorporates local adaptations; for example, services are frequently scheduled on Sundays to align with Western workweeks, rather than traditional weekdays prevalent in . This flexibility addresses practical constraints while maintaining core rituals like the recitation of and adherence to among amritdhari . Diaspora communities face pressures from secular environments and , which can lead to selective compliance, particularly regarding prohibitions on intoxicants and interfaith marriages, though gurdwaras enforce stricter standards for participation in religious roles. Visible symbols of Rehat, such as the uncut hair (kesh) and , are more consistently maintained in the as markers of distinct identity amid minority status, contrasting with variable observance in where is the majority faith in . Enforcement challenges arise from individualism and , prompting community-led education initiatives to reinforce Rehat amid rising intermarriage rates and youth disengagement. Looking ahead, the Rehat Maryada's future involves reconciling traditional edicts with modern dilemmas, including technology's impact on practices and ethical issues like , as explored in contemporary Sikh forums. Proponents advocate interpretive applications rooted in principles to ensure relevance, while critics warn against dilutions that could erode doctrinal integrity. Global connectivity via digital platforms offers prospects for standardized teaching and virtual sangat, potentially strengthening observance, but sustained institutional authority from bodies like the remains essential to counter reformist pressures and preserve causal links to Guru Gobind Singh's vision.

References

  1. [1]
    Rehat Maryada The Code of Sikh Conduct and Conventions
    The Rehat Maryada is the only version authorized by the Akal Takht, the seat of supreme temporal authority for Sikhs.
  2. [2]
    Rehat Maryada (Sikh Code Of Conduct) - Discover Sikhism
    The Rehat Maryada is the Sikh code of conduct, which is a set of rules outlining the responsibilities and the proper practices for individual Sikhs and the ...
  3. [3]
    Sikh Rehat Maryada | FremontGurdwara
    The Sikh Rehat Maryada is a code of conduct for Sikhs. This document was preceded by the Gurdwaras Act of 1925, which laid down the definition of a Sikh.
  4. [4]
    Rehat: Complete Guide To Origin, Meaning, And Popularity
    Jul 9, 2025 · Rehat is derived from the Punjabi word rahiṇā, meaning 'to live' or 'to remain,' and takes on the meaning of 'mode of living.'
  5. [5]
    Rehitnama - Dasvandh Network
    Derived from the Punjabi words "rehit," meaning "mode of living," and "nama," meaning "manual," Rehitnama encapsulates the code of conduct that Sikhs are ...
  6. [6]
    Sikh Rehat Maryada:The Code of Sikh Conduct - PunjabiSikhSangat
    Reht means mode of living or conduct and Maryada means tradition, practice of the faith or code or discipline of life. It extends its meaning to life discipline ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  7. [7]
    Rehat of the Entire Sri Guru Granth Sahib - gurbani.org
    ਙਿਆਨੀ ਰਹਤ ਆਗਿਆ ਦ੍ਰਿੜੁ ਜਾ ਕੈ ॥ : 'REHAT' of a spiritually Enlightened person is to remain firmly committed to the Divine Hukam (i.e. 'ਹੁਕਮਿ ਰਜਾਈ ਚਲਣਾ ਨਾਨਕ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਨਾਲਿ'). (sggs 251) ...
  8. [8]
    Sikh Rehat Maryada (Sikh Code Of Conduct) - Sikhism
    The Sikh Gurus prescribed comprehensive rules and a code of conduct (Reht Maryada) for the Sikhs to be followed truthfully in their day to day life.
  9. [9]
    Sikh Code of Conduct - SikhiWiki
    Dec 27, 2009 · The Sikh code includes worshipping one God, remembering God, working honestly, practicing truth, controlling five evils, and practicing five ...
  10. [10]
    52 Hukams of Guru Gobind Singh Ji
    The Sikh code of conduct, Rehat Maryada, is based on 52 hukams or edicts issued by Guru Gobind Singh in 1708 at Nanded before Guru Sahib re-joined God.
  11. [11]
    52 Hukams of Guru Gobind Singh ji - SikhiWiki
    Jan 3, 2021 · 1) Dharam di Kirat karni - Earn by honest means. 2) Daswand dena - Give one tenth of your salary. 3) Gurbani kantth karni - Memorize Gurbani ...
  12. [12]
    In which Granth can I find Rehat Maryada? Is it in Sri Dasam or Sri ...
    You can't find Rehat Maryada in any Gurbani Granth. It is a collection of codes of conducts written by contemporary Sikhs of the times of Guru Gobind Singh.
  13. [13]
    Rehat Maryada - Dasvandh Network
    The Rehat Maryada is the official code of conduct for Sikhs, providing guidelines on religious and social practices to ensure uniformity across Globe.
  14. [14]
    52 Hukams of Guru Gobind Singh | Discover Sikhism
    The Sikh code of conduct, Rehat Maryada, is based on 52 hukams or edicts issued by Guru Gobind Singh in 1708 at Nanded before Guru Sahib re-joined God.
  15. [15]
    History of Rehat Maryada - SikhiWiki, free Sikh encyclopedia.
    Sep 12, 2006 · In 1915 and later in 1931, attempts were made to create a modern standard Rehat (Rahit or code). This effort involved several Sikh scholars who ...Missing: period 1699-1925
  16. [16]
    Critique of Chaupa Singh Rahitnama | Sikh Centre's Weblog
    Feb 5, 2008 · It has been established upto now that Rahitnamas do not carry the Sikh spirit in total. They carry the personal attitude and bent of mind of the writers.
  17. [17]
    Akali Phula Singh - Dasvandh Network
    At one point, Ranjit Singh committed an act that violated Sikh ethics. Phula Singh, as Jathedar of the Akal Takht, held the responsibility of enforcing the Sikh ...
  18. [18]
    Singh Sabha Movement | Discover Sikhism
    The Singh Sabha Movement was a Sikh movement begun in the late 19th century in reaction to the proselytizing activities of Arya Samajis and Christians.
  19. [19]
    File:Rehat Maryada document issued by the Akal Takht in the year ...
    Aug 4, 2025 · English: Rehat Maryada document issued by the Akal Takht in the year 1877 C.E. (full-view). The seal of the Akal Takht is present on the top of ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] A historical and theological evaluation of the Sikh Gurdwaras Act ...
    This study is a historical and theological evaluation of the Sikh Gurdwaras. Act, which was a secular legislation introduced in 1925 by the British.
  21. [21]
    How Sikhs Got Their Rehat Maryada - SikhNet
    Jan 2, 2013 · For Sikhs, this code of conduct - Rehat Maryada - evolved slowly over several centuries from the time of Guru Nanak, the founder of the faith, ...
  22. [22]
    How was the current Sikh Rehat Maryada formulated and by whom?
    After the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) formed in 1925, an Ad Hoc Rehat Maryada Committee—featuring stalwarts like Master Teja Singh, Giani ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Sikh Rehat Maryada - Gurudwara Guru Nanak Darbar
    The Rehat Maryada is the Official Sikh Code of Conduct and Conventions. There were a number of unsuccessful attempts in the eighteenth century following the ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Gurmat Rehat Maryada - AKJ.ORG
    In the early 1930s, a special committee was constituted by the newly formed S.G.P.C. to draft Gursikh Rahit Maryada. This committee, after detailed ...
  25. [25]
    Sikh Rehat Maryada - Gurdwara Sahib Sukh Sagar
    The Rehat Nama (Rehat Maryada) was given final changes & approved by Gurdwara Shiromani in 1945. The Sikh sangat approved of the Maryada in 1950 and thus it ...Missing: developments | Show results with:developments
  26. [26]
    Red Herrings and Real Issues. The Case of the Sikh Rehat Maryada.
    Jul 2, 2023 · Three, the SGPC of today is no longer the SGPC of 1939 – when the SRM was formulated; or of 1945 – when the SRM was proclaimed. Over the past ...Missing: revisions post-
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Sikh Rehat Maryada English.cdr - Amritsar - SGPC
    An Abridgement of the mul mantar (lit. fundamental formula or root chant) with which the Sikh holy book. the Adi Granth. begins and with the full or abridged ...
  28. [28]
    Change In Maryada?!?!? - WHAT'S HAPPENING? - SIKH SANGAT
    Mar 7, 2006 · A comparative study of two versions of the 'Sikh Rehat Maryada' - one of 1945 and the recent one published by the SGPC - shows glaring ...
  29. [29]
    The Institution of the Akal Takht: The Transformation of Authority in ...
    The Akal Takht issues commands to Sikhs, holds the power of banishment, brings forward Sikh issues to governments, holds ultimate power over the gurdwaras in ...
  30. [30]
    Damdami Taksal questions SGPC-backed religious code
    Jun 15, 2016 · It has to be stopped or SGPC should prove when the draft of Rehat Maryada was approved by Akal Takht," said Bandala. Despite several attempts, ...
  31. [31]
    How Sikhs Got Their Rehat Maryada - Sikh Philosophy Network
    Sep 21, 2008 · In drafting the Sikh code of conduct, the scholars drew upon the teachings in Guru Granth, as well as the unbroken oral tradition and practice.
  32. [32]
    Sikh Rehat Maryada - General Discussion - SikhAwareness Forum
    Apr 12, 2015 · There is currently NO one Sikh Rehat Maryada. The so-called Sikh Rehat Maryada was not accepted by the panth.
  33. [33]
    Sikh Reht Maryada, The Definition of Sikh, Sikh Conduct ...
    CHAPTER 1. The Definition of Sikh : Article I Any human being who faithfully believes in i. One Immortal Being, ii. Ten Gurus, from Guru Nanak Sahib to Guru ...
  34. [34]
    Sikh Reht Maryada
    Sikh Reht Maryada - Information about sikh reht maryada, the definition of sikh, sikh conduct and conventions and sikh religion living.<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Amrit Sanskar (Ceremony of Khande di Pahul) - Gateway to Sikhism
    At the place where ambrosial baptism is to be administered, the holy Guru Granth Sahib should be installed and ceremonially opened. Also present should be six ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Rehat Maryada: Section One
    Rehat Maryada. Sikh Code of Conduct and Conventions. 12 h. It is a Sikh's duty to get his children educated in Sikhism. i. A Sikh should, in no way, harbour ...Missing: translation | Show results with:translation
  37. [37]
    Sikh Reht Maryada Section Five - SGPC
    Guru Ka Langar (Guru's Kitchen-cum-Eating House) The philosophy behind the Langar (Guru's kitchen-cum-eating-house) is two-fold : to provide training to the ...
  38. [38]
    FAQ - Damdami Taksaal
    You can't find Rehat Maryada in any Gurbani Granth. It is a collection of codes of conducts written by contemporary Sikhs of the times of Guru Gobind Singh ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    The Damdami Taksal explains why the current Sikh Rehat Maryada ...
    Feb 13, 2023 · Taksaals like the Damdami Taksal were started by Guru jee and the maryada has been kept the same from one Jathedar to the next starting with ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Gurmat Rehat Maryada
    When a child reaches the age when they can abide by the Rehat Maryada (code of conduct) he/she must take Amrit from the Panj Pyare. Importantly, before.
  41. [41]
    Rehat Maryada - Damdami Taksal
    By living according to the Rehat, Guru Sahib will bless the individual and he says,. ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਕੈ ਜਨਮੇ ਗਵਨੁ ਮਿਟਾਇਆ ॥ "Through the teachings of the True Guru and birth in ...
  42. [42]
    Full text of "Gurmat Rehat Maryada - Damdami Taksal"
    This Rehat Maryada is a moral standard that all Sikhs should aim to achieve. We pray that Satguru blesses us and all those that read this Rehat Maryada.
  43. [43]
    A Quick Look At Some Provisions Of The Damdami Taksal Rehat ...
    Nov 21, 2006 · Giani Gurbachan Singh (Taksal leader) himself prefixed the following “alankaars” to his name : “Srimaan - Panth Ratan -Vidya Martand – Sant – ...
  44. [44]
    Khalsa Rehat - Nihang Perspective - Sikh Sampardaaye Section
    Mar 14, 2010 · Rehat is one of the most precious aspect of a Nihang Singh's life and is believed to be granted only by the grace of the Guru.bana! - Sikh Sampardaaye Section - SikhAwareness ForumIf u want to become a Nihang do you have to re take amrit?More results from www.sikhawareness.com
  45. [45]
    Nihang Rehat? - GURBANI | SAKHIAN | HISTORY - sikh sangat
    Apr 16, 2007 · This topic is going to lead to an argument as per the norm when nihang rehit is discussed. For those who want to know, obtain a budda dal sunder gutkha and ...Nihang Rehat - Page 5 - GURBANI | SAKHIAN | HISTORYNihang Rehat - Page 8 - GURBANI | SAKHIAN | HISTORYMore results from www.sikhsangat.comMissing: specifics | Show results with:specifics
  46. [46]
    Nihangs - Dasvandh Network
    The Nihangs follow a strict code of conduct (Rehat) that shapes their disciplined and spiritual lifestyle. This code is rooted in the teachings of the Sikh ...Missing: specifics | Show results with:specifics
  47. [47]
    Nihang Rehit And Taksal Rehit Maryada - GURBANI - sikh sangat
    Nov 2, 2008 · I have become a fan of Nihang rehit mentioned in Khalsa Sunder Gutka. Are there any contradictions between Nihang rehit and Damdami Taksal Rehit ...Sikh Rehat Maryada - Regarding Hindu Rituals - Page 3 - GURBANINihang Rehat - Page 8 - GURBANI | SAKHIAN | HISTORYMore results from www.sikhsangat.comMissing: traditional orthodox rehats sampradas
  48. [48]
    Different Rehat Maryadas : r/Sikh - Reddit
    Oct 28, 2022 · Sursingh is basically like Taksalis or Bhai Daya Singh Samparda (Hoti Mardan, Rara Sahib, Mastuana, Harkhowal, Nanaksar, etc). I am not too ...Are all Sikhs required to follow the tenants of the Rehat Maryada?Is there a consolidated Rehatnama that outlines the Maryada a Sikh ...More results from www.reddit.com
  49. [49]
    Comparing The Khalsa Rehat: Damdami, Nihang, Nanaksar, AKJ ...
    Oct 1, 2009 · The Damdami Taksal upholds a version of the Rahit that is significantly different from the standard manual and insists that it should be ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Sikh Groups in Britain and Their Implications for Criteria Related to ...
    Rehat Maryada, distinct from the Sikh Rehat Marywda, has clear impacts on the issue of uniformity of Sikh identity. In accordance with their Rehat Maryada ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Namdharis | Sikh Philosophy Network Discussion Forum
    Jun 14, 2005 · The Namdhari's are in essence a cult, albeit a Sikh one. They do not represent mainstream Sikhism in so much they have a different Rehat ...Being Naamdhari Is Sikhi | Page 2Mona And Sehajdhari | Page 2More results from www.sikhphilosophy.net
  52. [52]
    Sects of Sikhism - Wikipedia
    The major traditions in Sikhism, says Harjot Oberoi, have included Udasi, Nirmala, Nanakpanthi, Khalsa, Sahajdhari, Namdhari Kuka, Nirankari, and Sarvaria.
  53. [53]
    Nirankari Movement - Discover Sikhism
    They professedly reject idolatry, and all reverence and respect for whatever is held sacred by Sikhs or Hindus, except Nanak and his Granth.
  54. [54]
    Nirankari - Wikipedia
    Nirankari is a sect of Sikhism. It was a reform movement founded by Baba Dyal Das in northwest Punjab in 1851. He sought to restore the practices and ...Missing: Rehat | Show results with:Rehat
  55. [55]
    Who are Nirankaris? | Who Is News - The Indian Express
    Nov 18, 2018 · The Nirankaris claim to be a secular, spiritual sect, unaffiliated with any religion, and deny that Sikhs have any authority over them. In ...
  56. [56]
    Kundalini Yoga And Yogi Bhajan - Page 4 - sikh sangat
    Oct 13, 2013 · Lastly the nine forms of worship were being distorted by adding kundalini, kriyas, and other 3HO yoga practices to them, when this is not the ...
  57. [57]
    Former 3HO members, In the aftermath of the revelations about Yogi ...
    Feb 12, 2024 · Their Guru was Yogi Bhajan and focus of their life. 3HO is like the Nation of Islam equivalent of Sikhi.Downfall of Yogi Bhajan : r/Sikh - RedditYogi Bhajan : r/Sikh - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: Rehat | Show results with:Rehat
  58. [58]
    Divided We Stand | SikhNet
    Jan 16, 2013 · The first issue of debate between these two ''groups'' is the 'Sikh Rehat Maryada'', the constitution of the Sikhs accepted by the Sikh panth in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Malesh Maryada — The Lazy Leftist Attempt to “Deconstruct” Rehit
    Jun 24, 2021 · For example, the initiative for composing the Rehat Maryada started after the Gurdwara Reform Movement, which sought to free Gurdwaras from ...
  60. [60]
    Very Interesting Critique Of Sgpc Rehat Maryada By Taksaal
    Jan 25, 2011 · They are both about 7/8 minutes long. Very interesting critique of the SGPC rehat maryada from Damdami Taksaal representatives.Missing: 2005 | Show results with:2005
  61. [61]
    A History Of The Sikh Code Of Conduct
    Aug 14, 2005 · In drafting the Sikh Code of Conduct, scholars drew upon the teachings in the Guru Granth, as also the unbroken oral tradition and practice. ...
  62. [62]
    Canon, modernity and practice of RAHIT in defining sikh identity
    Aug 9, 2025 · The first section shows the historical processes of the formation of a separate Sikh identity till the first quarter of the twentieth century.
  63. [63]
    https://www.sikhs.org/meat.htm
  64. [64]
    SIKH REHAT MARYADA: The Why & the Wherefore - SikhNet
    May 6, 2013 · The Rehat Maryada - Why do we have one? Do we even need it? Couldn't we live without it? The questions are challenging.
  65. [65]
    Misconceptions About Eating Meat by Sandeep Singh Brar - Sikhs.org
    The view of Sikhism is that eating meat or abstaining from it is the individuals choice. A Sikh is considered no lesser or greater a Sikh if they eat meat ...
  66. [66]
    Common views on meat eating - SikhiWiki, free Sikh encyclopedia.
    Mar 12, 2012 · In Sikh Rehat Maryada, only Halal meat is banned. The Maryada is authentic by Akal Takhat. Though saints have their own Maryada's, some even ...
  67. [67]
    Why is there a controversy in the Panth over eating meat?
    Some Sikhs who choose to eat meat argue that one of the Bajjar Kurehits (cardinal prohibitions) is to eat Halaal meat as opposed to eat meat in general. The ...
  68. [68]
    Two questions concerning Sikhi jurisprudence and non-amridhani.
    Dec 4, 2017 · The beliefs and practices of Sikhism are instead described in a document known as the Sikh Rehat Maryada, which is the Sikh code of honour.
  69. [69]
    How Sikhs Got Their Rehat Maryada - sikhchic.com
    Sep 14, 2008 · ... 1945 to fine-tune the code of conduct. In ... amended; similarly, the Sikh Rehat Maryada needs a constitutional convention and exploration.
  70. [70]
    Rahitname - SikhiWiki, free Sikh encyclopedia.
    Nov 20, 2005 · Bhai Nand Lal and some other Sikhs contemporary or near-contemporary with Guru Gobind Singh compiled the first rahitnamas. The chief Khalsa ...Missing: authenticity | Show results with:authenticity
  71. [71]
    The Chaupa Singh Rahitnama - Sikh Philosophy Network
    Jun 17, 2004 · Rahitnama is, therefore, a codified statement of Sikhs' conduct in life. It is supposed to be a comprehensive list of do's and don'ts, ...Sikh Exegesis : Problems And ProspectusSects - Kuka Sikhs | Sikh Philosophy Network Discussion ForumMore results from www.sikhphilosophy.net
  72. [72]
    Sikh Rehat Maryada - False Arguments, Fake Translations And ...
    Aug 11, 2018 · Three of the “Banees from Dasam Granth” – Jaap Sahib, Swaeiy and Benti Chaupai are an integral part of our daily Nitnem and Amrit Sanchar.Prakash Of Dasam Granth: The "Right" PerspectiveWhat Is Really In The Contents Of The Dasam Granth? | Page 4More results from www.sikhphilosophy.net
  73. [73]
    Akal Takht Sahib removes ban on Sikh preacher Ranjit ...
    May 21, 2025 · Akal Takht Sahib removes ban on Sikh preacher Ranjit Dhadrianwale after he apologises for 'misinterpreting Gurbani'. Preacher Ranjit Singh ...
  74. [74]
    What challenges exist in enforcing the Sikh Rehat Maryada in ...
    Walking a tightrope between centuries-old guidelines and twenty-first-century realities, enforcing the Sikh Rehat Maryada has become a nuanced challenge.
  75. [75]
    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/panthic-crisis-deepens-amid-alleged-violations-of-akal-takht-directives-in-sad-enrolment/articleshow/118610814.cms
  76. [76]
    Akal Takht's supremacy under threat - The Tribune
    Mar 10, 2025 · The controversial removal of two Takht jathedars by the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) has caused a furore within the Sikh community.Missing: Rehat enforcement
  77. [77]
    Panthic crisis deepens amid alleged violations of Akal Takht ...
    Feb 28, 2025 · The Panthic crisis embroiling Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) has deepened. Following the alleged violation of the Dec 2 Akal Takht directives regarding enrolment in ...
  78. [78]
    Sikhism by Country 2025 - World Population Review
    Overall, about 1.72% of the country's total population belongs to the Sikh faith. The next country with a large following of the religion is Canada. 771,790 ...
  79. [79]
    The Sikhs and Their Way of Life - Sikh Ceremonies and Festivals
    The Death Ceremony (Mirtak Sanskaar)​​ No wailing or lamentation is allowed, according to the Sikh Rehat Maryada. Everyone who dies is cremated. Cremation may be ...
  80. [80]
    https://archangeluniversity.odoo.com/sikhism-and-modern-challenges
  81. [81]
    Modern Challenges and the Sikh Rehat Maryada:
    Jan 25, 2025 · Discover how the Sikh Rehat Maryada can be applied to modern challenges while staying true to Gurmat values and principles.Missing: enforcement | Show results with:enforcement
  82. [82]
    Sikhism and Modern Challenges | AGU - Odoo
    Aug 26, 2025 · This seminar explores how the principles of Sikhism can be applied to navigate contemporary issues such as identity, gender equality, technology ...