Rex Reed
Rex Taylor Reed (born October 2, 1938) is an American film critic, journalist, actor, and media personality recognized for his incisive, often polemical reviews that emphasize stylistic flaws, cultural pretensions, and performer shortcomings in cinema.[1][2] Born in Fort Worth, Texas, and raised in Louisiana, Reed graduated from Louisiana State University before entering journalism, initially as a publicity writer and copy boy for studios like Twentieth Century-Fox, then as a television critic for Women's Wear Daily in the mid-1960s.[1][3] His career breakthrough came with film criticism for publications including The New York Times and Holiday magazine, but he achieved enduring prominence through decades-long columns for The New York Observer, where he has dissected films since the 1980s with a contrarian lens favoring narrative coherence and artistic merit over commercial hype or ideological agendas.[4][2] Reed co-hosted the early syndicated television program At the Movies alongside Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert, contributing to its format of thumbs-up/down verdicts before departing amid stylistic clashes, and he has authored nine books on film while appearing in movies such as Superman (1978) and Myra Breckinridge (1970).[5][2] Defining his tenure are signature takedowns—like panning Martin Scorsese's Taxi Driver (1976) as derivative urban nihilism or dismissing Black Swan (2010) as hysterical excess—that underscore his resistance to auteur reverence or psychological indulgence, though they have drawn rebukes for perceived factual lapses or ad hominem barbs, such as weight-based jabs at Melissa McCarthy in his Identity Thief (2013) critique.[6][7] After over six decades in the field, Reed remains a polarizing figure, lauded by adherents for unfiltered candor against Hollywood's self-congratulation and critiqued by detractors for reviews occasionally based on partial viewings or outsized vitriol.[2][8]Early Life and Education
Birth and Family Background
Rex Taylor Reed was born on October 2, 1938, in Fort Worth, Texas.[3][9] He was the only child of James M. Reed, an oil company executive often referred to as Jimmy Reed, and Jewell Reed (née Smith).[3][10] Reed's early years were marked by frequent relocations across the American South, driven by his father's career in the oil industry, which eventually led the family to settle in Louisiana where Reed spent much of his childhood.[9][1] His mother, originally from Oklahoma, came from a family with ties to the region's outlaw history, including second cousins associated with the Dalton Gang, though such familial lore reflects anecdotal rather than documented genealogical precision.[1] Reed has described his parents as supportive—his mother fostering an expansive worldview in her son, and his father providing steadfast affection amid the family's nomadic lifestyle.[8]Academic and Formative Influences
Reed attended Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge, where he earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in journalism in 1960.[3] During his time at the university, he developed an early interest in criticism by writing reviews of films and plays, which foreshadowed his future career path.[11] Reed's formative influences were deeply rooted in cinema from a young age, as he has described movies as the central thread of his life, shaping his worldview and ambitions.[8] Raised in the American South amid frequent relocations due to his father's work as an oil company supervisor, Reed was encouraged by his mother to pursue unrestricted exploration of the world, fostering a bold, inquisitive mindset.[8] His father provided unwavering support, which, combined with exposure to Hollywood icons like Bette Davis—whom he attempted to see perform in New Orleans during college—instilled a passion for theater and film that drove him toward journalism as a means to engage with the entertainment industry.[9] This Southern upbringing and familial dynamic emphasized self-determination and cultural immersion, propelling Reed's move to New York City immediately after graduation to pursue opportunities in writing and criticism.[12]Professional Career
Entry into Journalism and Writing
Reed earned a Bachelor of Arts in journalism from Louisiana State University in 1960, during which time he contributed film and play reviews to the student newspaper and interviewed celebrities including Angela Lansbury and Paul Newman.[3][8] After graduating, he moved to New York City in 1960 and took entry-level roles in the industry, such as publicity writer and copy boy for Twentieth Century-Fox, alongside miscellaneous positions like jazz singer, record salesperson, and cook, to support himself while pursuing writing opportunities.[3][8] His professional breakthrough occurred circa 1965, when unsolicited celebrity interviews—characterized by a bold, revelatory style—were accepted for publication in The New York Times and the New York Herald Tribune's New York Magazine, establishing him as a freelance feature writer focused on entertainment figures like Ava Gardner and Barbra Streisand.[13] These pieces exemplified an emerging "new journalism" approach, blending personal insight with scandalous detail, which garnered attention from editors at magazines including Esquire.[13][14] Reed secured his initial salaried critic role as television reviewer for Women's Wear Daily from 1965 to 1969, a position he later described as confining due to the medium's transience and his preference for cinema, prompting a shift toward film-related profiles and commentary in outlets like The New York Times Sunday sections.[8] This early freelance success culminated in his 1968 book Do You Sleep in the Nude?, a collection of interviews that solidified his reputation in celebrity journalism.[3]Establishment as Film Critic
Reed began his tenure as a film critic in 1965 at Women's Wear Daily, where he was initially employed as a television reviewer but successfully petitioned to incorporate motion picture critiques into his portfolio due to his aversion to nightly TV viewing.[8][3] He continued in this dual role until 1969, cultivating a reviewing style marked by sharp observations and personal anecdotes drawn from his extensive knowledge of cinema history.[3] Parallel to his Women's Wear Daily work, Reed contributed celebrity profiles to The New York Times throughout the 1960s, leveraging interviews with stars like Paul Newman to demonstrate his command of film personalities and bolster his credentials in entertainment journalism.[8] A pivotal advancement occurred in 1968 with the release of Do You Sleep in the Nude?, a collection of his Hollywood interviews that became a bestseller and elevated his profile by highlighting his probing, irreverent approach to celebrity discourse, thereby cementing his emergence as a prominent voice in film commentary.[9] This foundation enabled Reed to secure more influential positions, including film critic for the New York Daily News starting in 1971, where his columns gained wider syndication and readership, solidifying his status amid the evolving landscape of 1970s film criticism.[3]Television and Broadcasting Roles
Reed entered television as a panelist on the syndicated game show The Gong Show, appearing regularly from 1976 to 1980.[3] In 1980, he launched and hosted the syndicated series Rex Reed's Movie Guide, which provided film reviews and recommendations.[3] Reed served as a correspondent for ABC's Inside America in 1982, contributing segments on entertainment and cultural topics.[3] He also appeared as a regular guest on NBC's late-night talk program Tomorrow, hosted by Tom Snyder, discussing films and media.[15] In 1986, following the exit of Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert to their own Disney-backed series, Reed co-hosted the syndicated film criticism program At the Movies alongside Bill Harris, a correspondent from Entertainment Tonight; the format retained the thumbs-up/thumbs-down review style but shifted to a more conversational tone under the new hosts.[15][16] The version with Reed and Harris aired for one season before the program was discontinued.[9]Authorship and Publications
Reed authored eight books, primarily collections of celebrity interviews, Hollywood profiles, and film reviews drawn from his journalism. His debut, Do You Sleep in the Nude?, published in 1968 by New American Library, compiled interviews with figures including Marlon Brando and Ava Gardner, achieving bestseller status through its raw, unfiltered style.[17][18] Subsequent publications include Conversations in the Raw (1969), featuring additional celebrity dialogues; People Are Crazy Here (1974, Delacorte Press), a memoir-like account of film industry excesses with anecdotes from Reed's Hollywood experiences; and Valentines and Vitriol (1977, Delacorte Press), an anthology of his mixed film critiques from the prior decade.[19][20] Later works encompass Big Screen, Little Screen and Personal Effects, extending his commentary on cinema and culture into the 1980s and 1990s.[21] Beyond books, Reed's authored content appears in periodicals such as Vogue, GQ, The New York Times, New York Daily News, and New York Post, where he contributed film columns and features starting in the 1960s. Since 2005, he has maintained a regular "On the Town with Rex Reed" column in the New York Observer, reviewing films and cultural events.[4][22]Critical Style and Public Reception
Characteristics of Reed's Reviews
Reed's film reviews are characterized by a blunt, contrarian approach that prioritizes unfiltered personal judgment over consensus acclaim, often delivering fiery condemnations of perceived Hollywood mediocrity.[6] He employs vivid, acerbic language to eviscerate films he deems artistically deficient, such as labeling Martin Scorsese's Killers of the Flower Moon (2023) as "exhausting" and incoherent despite its pedigree.[6] This style reflects a pugnacious independence, unbound by publicist influence or deference to celebrities, positioning him as a relic of unrestrained criticism in an era of tempered discourse.[23] His prose frequently contrasts sharply with mainstream praise, targeting modern blockbusters and genre fare—particularly superhero films and fantastical elements—with disdain for their formulaic execution and lack of substance.[24] Reed's assessments emphasize narrative coherence, technical quality, and cultural impact, often invoking nostalgia for classical Hollywood while decrying contemporary "truckloads of mediocrity."[25] For instance, in reviewing over 60 films in 2023 alone, he reserved high praise for works like Oppenheimer for their intellectual rigor, while savaging others for stylistic excess and absence of suspense.[26] [27] This no-holds-barred tenor extends to a broader cultural critique, where Reed laments the dilution of cinematic artistry amid celebrity-driven spectacle, maintaining a relentlessly acidic tone that underscores his commitment to substantive evaluation over populist appeal.[9] His reviews thus serve as polemics against industry trends, blending sharp-tongued invective with demands for elevated standards, as seen in his consistent excoriation of overwrought direction and incoherent plotting.[27]Notable Achievements and Positive Impact
Reed's tenure as co-host of the syndicated television series At the Movies (1975–1982), alongside Bill Beutel, marked an early effort to popularize film criticism on broadcast media, reaching national audiences with weekly discussions of current releases and thereby broadening public engagement with cinematic analysis.[5] His reviews during this period and beyond appeared in prominent outlets such as The New York Post and The Chicago Sun-Times, contributing to the discourse on films through a distinctive, unfiltered perspective that prioritized personal observation over consensus.[2] Over his 62-year career in film reviewing, Reed authored nine books, including interview collections like Do You Sleep in the Nude? (1968), which offered in-depth profiles of Hollywood figures and sold widely, providing readers with candid insights into celebrity culture and the film industry.[2][28] These works, alongside his columns for The New York Observer spanning decades, documented evolving trends in cinema and preserved detailed accounts of productions from the 1960s onward.[8] As a longtime member of the New York Film Critics Circle, Reed has participated in annual awards selections, influencing recognition for films and performers through group deliberations that emphasize critical rigor.[2] His persistence in delivering verbose, literate critiques amid shifting media landscapes has been credited with upholding a tradition of independent, no-holds-barred evaluation, fostering deeper appreciation for cinema's artistic merits among dedicated followers.[23] In 2025, he received a standing ovation at the Circle's annual dinner commemorating his 50th year as a New York film critic, highlighting sustained professional respect within the field.[29]Influence on Film Criticism
Rex Reed's distinctive style of film criticism, marked by vivid prose, personal anecdotes, and unsparing wit, helped transition the field from purely analytical essays toward more subjective, engaging narratives that appealed to broader readerships during the 1960s and 1970s. Writing for outlets such as Esquire and The New York Times, Reed emphasized sensory details and cultural context in his reviews, drawing from influences like James Agee and Walter Kerr to foster a deeper public appreciation for cinema's historical significance.[8] This approach elevated film reviewing as a form of entertainment journalism, influencing subsequent writers who adopted similarly theatrical voices to convey authority and immediacy.[8] His contrarian and pugnacious tone, often prioritizing individual judgment over consensus, exemplified a pre-digital era of "no-holds-barred" criticism that resisted publicist pressures and star worship, a model Reed himself credits with shaping his career over five decades.[23] By maintaining this stance amid shifting industry norms, Reed embodied the archetype of the independent critic, impacting perceptions of the role as one demanding bold, literate dissent rather than rote acclaim—though detractors argue it prioritized provocation over precision.[6] His longevity, reviewing for the New York Observer since 1987, has positioned him as a bridge between Hollywood's golden age and contemporary cinema, inspiring some journalists to emulate his unapologetic reverence for classical filmmaking standards.[4] Reed's forays into television further extended his reach, appearing as a guest critic and media personality on programs that popularized on-air film discourse, contributing indirectly to the format's evolution into syndicated staples by the late 1970s.[8] While not the originator of TV criticism, his high-profile presence helped normalize critics as cultural commentators, blending review analysis with personality-driven commentary—a template evident in later shows featuring dueling opinions. This visibility amplified film criticism's public footprint, even as Reed's own broadcasts underscored the tension between accessibility and depth.[23]Criticisms and Controversies
Factual Inaccuracies and Review Errors
Reed's review of The Cabin in the Woods (2012), published on April 10, 2012, in the New York Observer, drew widespread criticism for containing substantial factual inaccuracies in its plot summary, including misrepresentations of key events and character motivations that suggested a lack of comprehension or inattention during viewing.[30][31] Critics noted the review's errors comprised roughly half its descriptive content, prompting accusations that Reed failed to engage fully with the film's meta-horror structure.[32] In a July 2013 review of Identity Thief, Reed committed three major factual errors within a single four-sentence paragraph, such as misstating character actions and film details, which compounded perceptions of sloppy preparation.[32] His critique of V/H/S/2 that same year similarly featured numerous inaccuracies, including incorrect dismissals of segment premises, as cataloged by horror-focused outlets analyzing the piece.[33] A notable error appeared in Reed's December 19, 2017, review of The Shape of Water, where he falsely credited the film to being written and directed by "Benecio Del Toro," conflating actor Benicio del Toro with director Guillermo del Toro and neglecting co-writer Vanessa Taylor's contributions.[34][35] The Observer subsequently corrected the review, acknowledging the misattribution.[34] Reed's February 2018 assessment of Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri included glaring confusions of major plot points, such as erroneous interpretations of character arcs and events, echoing prior lapses in accuracy.[36] These incidents, spanning over a decade, have fueled ongoing debate about Reed's reliability, with detractors arguing they undermine his authority despite his long tenure.[31][32]Personal Attacks and Public Backlash
In February 2013, Reed's review of the film Identity Thief in the New York Observer drew widespread condemnation for its personal insults directed at actress Melissa McCarthy, whom he described as a "tractor-sized" "female hippo" and "tundra trembler" while criticizing her physical appearance rather than solely her performance.[37] The remarks prompted immediate backlash from Hollywood figures and media outlets, with actor Chad Lowe tweeting that Reed's attack was "vile & unacceptable" and calling for his dismissal by the Observer.[38] Reed defended his comments on WOR-AM radio, attributing the outrage to a publicity campaign by Universal Pictures and insisting that physical critiques were fair game in reviewing comedies reliant on body humor.[39] McCarthy later addressed the review in a June 2013 New York Times interview, expressing pity for Reed, stating, "I felt really bad for someone who is swimming in so much hate," and suggesting it reflected his personal bitterness rather than legitimate criticism.[40] The incident amplified calls for Reed's retirement or firing, with outlets like Flavorwire arguing it exemplified his outdated and offensive style, though he retained his position at the Observer until 2017.[32] Reed also faced criticism for perpetuating unfounded rumors about Marisa Tomei's 1992 Academy Award win for Best Supporting Actress in My Cousin Vinny. In a 1997 interview with Geraldo Rivera, Reed endorsed the conspiracy theory that presenter Jack Palance had misread the winner due to intoxication, claiming it was part of a "massive cover-up" despite no evidence from Academy records or officials supporting the allegation.[41] This baseless narrative, which Reed helped popularize through his columns and public statements, undermined Tomei's achievement and contributed to years of skepticism about her talent, though the Academy has consistently affirmed the correctness of the announcement.[42] The Tomei controversy highlighted Reed's tendency to blend personal disdain with unsubstantiated claims, drawing rebukes from film commentators who viewed it as an ad hominem assault rather than substantive critique, further eroding his reputation amid broader patterns of vitriol toward actors he deemed undeserving.[31]Conspiracy Theories and Broader Disputes
Rex Reed has been linked to promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories concerning Academy Awards outcomes, most prominently regarding Marisa Tomei's 1993 Best Supporting Actress win for My Cousin Vinny. In a 1997 interview on Geraldo Rivera's television program, Reed claimed there was a "massive cover-up" by the Academy, alleging that presenter Jack Palance, reportedly intoxicated, misread the winner's name from the teleprompter or card, announcing Tomei—an underdog nominee—instead of a more favored contender such as Judy Davis or Vanessa Redgrave.[41] This theory echoed earlier rumors reported in a 1994 Hollywood Reporter article but gained wider attention through Reed's endorsement.[41] The Academy categorically denied the claims, emphasizing that envelopes are verified by Price Waterhouse accountants (now PwC) to prevent errors, and archival footage shows Palance reading directly from the card rather than the teleprompter.[41] No credible evidence has emerged to support Reed's assertions, and the theory has been widely debunked as originating from surprise over Tomei's unexpected victory for a comedic role amid more dramatic nominations. Tomei herself described the persistent rumor as "hurtful" in a 2001 Sun-Sentinel interview, noting its impact on her career perception.[41] [43] Beyond this, Reed's career has encompassed broader disputes within the film industry and criticism circles, often stemming from his contrarian positions and perceived inaccuracies. During the 1960s and 1970s, Reed clashed ideologically with influential critics like Pauline Kael and Andrew Sarris over film evaluation methodologies, with Reed favoring accessible, audience-oriented assessments against more theoretical auteur-driven analyses.[44] These tensions contributed to a polarized New York criticism scene, where Reed's populist style drew accusations of superficiality from academic-leaning peers. Additionally, Reed's 2017 departure from the New York Observer after 25 years—amid shifts toward digital media—highlighted generational disputes over traditional print criticism's relevance in an industry increasingly dominated by online aggregation and audience metrics.[45]Personal Life
Relationships and Private Matters
Reed has never married and maintains no publicly documented long-term romantic partners.[46] In a 2018 interview, he described his approach to personal connections, stating, “I don't have 'relationships,' except friends,” and adding, “I don't know, love is not something that I've been really good at.”[9] He has similarly noted the absence of a spouse or significant other, emphasizing discomfort with associated commitments.[12] Reed resides alone in a two-bedroom apartment at The Dakota building in Manhattan, which he purchased in 1969 for $30,000 using earnings from his role in Myra Breckinridge.[9][23] He has characterized the space as an “awfully comfortable bachelor pad,” filled with books and mementos from celebrity friendships, including a needlepoint pillow from Jean Simmons embroidered with “FTA” (interpreted as “F*** them all”).[9] Among his enduring non-romantic bonds are ties to Liza Minnelli, Angela Lansbury, and the late Natalie Wood and Liz Smith.[9] Reed's private life remains largely insulated from public scrutiny, with limited disclosures beyond these professional-adjacent associations.[8]Legal Incidents and Public Scrutiny
In February 2000, film critic Rex Reed was arrested at a Duane Reade pharmacy in Manhattan for allegedly attempting to steal three videotapes valued at approximately $60.[47][48] He was charged with misdemeanor counts of petty larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, both Class A misdemeanors under New York law.[49][50] Reed, then 61 years old and residing at the Dakota apartment building, was released on his own recognizance pending a court appearance.[51] The incident drew media attention due to Reed's prominence in New York cultural circles, with outlets reporting the arrest as occurring around 4:45 p.m. on February 12, 2000, after store security observed him concealing the items.[48][50] Reed did not publicly comment extensively on the matter at the time, and no trial ensued; instead, in April 2000, he received a sentence of probation, avoiding further incarceration or fines beyond court costs.[51] This resolution aligned with standard handling of first-time misdemeanor theft cases in New York, where diversionary measures like probation are common for non-violent offenders with no prior record.[51] Public scrutiny of the event was limited but amplified by Reed's celebrity status, appearing in tabloid headlines that juxtaposed his sophisticated critic persona with the mundane allegation.[50][49] No broader pattern of legal issues emerged in subsequent reporting, and the case did not lead to professional repercussions such as dismissal from his positions at publications like The New York Observer.[47] Reed continued his career without further documented arrests or civil suits involving personal conduct.Later Career and Ongoing Contributions
Adaptations to Digital Media
Reed's film criticism has adapted to the digital era primarily through the online publication of his reviews in The Observer, where his work has appeared digitally since the outlet's transition to web-based formats in the early 2000s. This shift enabled his signature verbose, polemical style—characterized by extended essays rather than brief online snippets—to reach audiences beyond print subscribers, with archives accessible via the publication's website.[4] Despite a 2017 layoff from The Observer amid staff reductions, Reed resumed contributions, maintaining an active digital footprint with reviews of contemporary releases. For instance, in 2024, he critiqued 43 films, including harsh assessments of titles like Presence, delivered through online columns that preserve his contrarian approach amid the rise of aggregated review sites and short-form digital commentary.[45][27][52] Reed has not embraced interactive digital formats such as social media engagement, personal vlogging, or podcasts, forgoing platforms like Twitter despite public backlash to his reviews often amplifying there. His output remains text-centric, with reviews aggregated on sites like Rotten Tomatoes for broader visibility, but without direct multimedia experimentation or audience interaction typical of modern critics.[22][6]Recent Reviews and Activities (2010s–2020s)
Throughout the 2010s and into the 2020s, Rex Reed sustained his position as a principal film critic for the New York Observer, delivering weekly columns that emphasized his trademark blend of erudition, personal anecdotes, and unsparing judgments on contemporary cinema.[4] His reviews often diverged from consensus views, as evidenced by his 2018 dismissal of the widely acclaimed The Shape of Water—which held a 93 percent approval on Rotten Tomatoes—as emblematic of modern mediocrity, prioritizing contrarian analysis over popular sentiment.[9] This period saw Reed critique blockbuster fare and indie efforts alike with equal rigor, frequently highlighting perceived excesses in pacing, scripting, or effects-driven storytelling. In the 2020s, Reed's output remained prolific, with annual roundups underscoring his selectivity; for 2023, he curated lists of standout films amid broader denunciations of Hollywood's output, praising select works for narrative coherence while excoriating others as formulaic or interminable.[26] A notable example was his characterization of Martin Scorsese's Killers of the Flower Moon (2023) as "exhausting," framing it within a pattern of lengthy, self-indulgent epics that tested audience endurance despite directorial prestige.[6] His 2024 assessments, spanning dozens of releases, reflected a stringent standard: approximately 28 percent earned one star, and 5 percent received zero, with horror films drawing particular ire for lacking genuine tension or originality.[27] Reed's activities extended beyond print to occasional media appearances and profiles affirming his enduring role in criticism. In a 2018 CBS interview, he reflected on decades of bold pronouncements, underscoring a career defined by independence from studio influence.[12] A 2024 Air Mail feature portrayed him at 85 as a "pugnacious, no-holds-barred" voice resistant to publicist pressures, continuing to champion film as an art form amid digital disruptions.[23] By February 2025, Reed panned Steven Soderbergh's Presence as a "lifeless, cliché-ridden ghost story" that failed to leverage its talents for scares or substance, exemplifying his ongoing scrutiny of genre conventions.[53] As a longstanding member of the New York Film Critics Circle, he contributed to the organization's discourse, though his individual reviews prioritized personal verdict over collective consensus.[2]Works
Books and Bibliography
Rex Reed has authored multiple books, predominantly anthologies of celebrity interviews, Hollywood profiles, and collected film reviews, which extended his influence from journalism into published literature during the late 1960s through the 1980s. These works often featured unfiltered conversations with stars like Elizabeth Taylor, Jack Nicholson, and Barbra Streisand, reflecting Reed's style of probing personal revelations amid professional commentary.[54] His debut publication, Do You Sleep in the Nude? (1968), a bestseller compiling profiles of film industry figures, originated from the title question posed to Tallulah Bankhead and captured the era's fascination with celebrity candor.[17][18] Conversations in the Raw (1969) followed, presenting dialogues, monologues, and short subjects with actors, emphasizing raw exchanges over polished narratives.[55][56] People Are Crazy Here (1974) explored eccentricities of Hollywood personalities through extended profiles, including intimate accounts of figures like Ava Gardner.[57][58] Later collections such as Valentines & Vitriol aggregated his acerbic reviews, while Travolta to Keaton (1980s) focused on actors from John Travolta to Diane Keaton.[54] Reed also ventured into fiction with the novel Personal Effects (1987).[59]| Title | Publication Year | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Do You Sleep in the Nude? | 1968 | Interview anthology[17] |
| Conversations in the Raw | 1969 | Dialogues and profiles[55] |
| People Are Crazy Here | 1974 | Hollywood profiles[57] |
| Valentines & Vitriol | 1980s | Review collection[54] |
| Travolta to Keaton | 1980s | Actor profiles[54] |
| Personal Effects | 1987 | Novel[59] |