Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Interview

An interview is a purposeful conversation in which one participant systematically asks questions to elicit detailed responses from another, enabling the collection of qualitative data on experiences, opinions, behaviors, or qualifications.^[1]^[2] Interviews are employed across domains including psychological and social research, employment selection, and journalism, with formats varying from highly structured—featuring predetermined questions and scoring rubrics—to unstructured, allowing flexible dialogue to explore emergent themes.^[3]^[4] Despite their ubiquity, empirical analyses reveal interviews often exhibit modest validity and reliability, particularly in predicting job performance, due to pervasive biases such as confirmation bias, anchoring effects, and subjective interpretations influenced by interviewer preconceptions.^[5]^[6]^[7] Pioneered in modern form by figures like Thomas Edison in the early 20th century for candidate evaluation beyond formal credentials, the technique has evolved but retains challenges in mitigating subjectivity, prompting recommendations for structured protocols to enhance objectivity.^[8]^[9]

Fundamentals

Definition and Etymology

An interview constitutes a deliberate, structured exchange wherein an interviewer poses targeted questions to an interviewee to extract specific information, opinions, or evaluations, thereby minimizing informational disparities through directed verbal interaction rather than unstructured discourse.^[10] This process hinges on the interviewer's control over the inquiry's sequence and focus to yield data amenable to verification or analysis, as opposed to spontaneous chit-chat lacking predefined objectives.^[11] Such methodical elicitation underpins interviews' utility in ascertaining facts or capabilities via empirical respondent input, fostering causal insights into the subject's knowledge or behavior.^[12] The term "interview" derives from the Old French entrevue, denoting a mutual sighting or brief encounter, itself stemming from the verb s'entrevoir ("to see each other"), combining the prefix entre- (indicating reciprocity) with voir ("to see").^[12] This etymon entered English around 1514, initially signifying a formal meeting, often in diplomatic or inquisitorial settings where parties confronted one another for questioning or negotiation.^[10] By the 16th century, its application had broadened in English to encompass systematic interrogations, reflecting a shift from mere visual or physical proximity to purposeful verbal probing, as evidenced in early diplomatic correspondences.^[13] This linguistic evolution underscores the concept's foundational emphasis on intentional engagement over incidental interaction.^[11]

Purposes Across Contexts

Interviews fulfill instrumental purposes across domains by enabling targeted assessment of capabilities, extraction of verifiable information, and diagnosis of underlying conditions or states. In employment selection, they assess job fit through evaluation of skills, past behaviors, and situational responses, aiming to predict subsequent performance rather than merely solicit self-appraisals.^[14] A meta-analysis of 85 validity studies reported a mean observed correlation of 0.38 between interview ratings and job performance criteria, with structured interviews—those using standardized questions tied to job demands—exhibiting higher predictive power (up to 0.51 corrected for artifacts) compared to unstructured variants (around 0.27).^[15]^[16] In journalistic and media contexts, interviews extract factual details, eyewitness accounts, and expert insights to construct accurate reports on events, policies, or individuals, prioritizing comprehensive sourcing over casual conversation.^[17] This method bridges informational gaps by directly querying sources on verifiable occurrences, yielding material for public dissemination that withstands scrutiny when corroborated.^[18] Research interviews, particularly in social sciences and organizational studies, serve to gather nuanced data on experiences and phenomena, facilitating causal explanations through iterative probing of participants' recollections and rationales.^[19] Empirical evaluations affirm their utility for generating interpretable qualitative insights, though efficacy depends on methodological rigor to minimize recall biases.^[20] Clinically, interviews diagnose psychological or medical conditions by systematically eliciting symptom histories, behavioral patterns, and contextual factors, often outperforming self-report inventories in capturing dynamic interpersonal cues.^[21] Standardized clinical interviews demonstrate high inter-rater reliability for major diagnoses, with tools like the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM achieving kappa coefficients above 0.70 for disorders such as schizophrenia.^[22] Across these uses, interviews' causal mechanism lies in their capacity to elicit observable proxies for latent traits or events, enhancing predictive or informational yield when questions align with empirically validated outcomes rather than abstract preferences.^[4]

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Modern Origins

The practice of interviewing originated in ancient methods of structured inquiry designed to extract and test information through targeted questioning. In classical Greece, around the 5th to 4th centuries BCE, Socrates utilized elenchus—a dialectical technique of probing questions to reveal inconsistencies in interlocutors' responses and approximate truth— as recorded in Plato's early dialogues, such as Euthyphro and Apology, composed circa 399–390 BCE.^[23]^[24] This approach functioned as an early form of interpersonal interrogation, prioritizing empirical scrutiny of replies over authoritative assertion to assess conceptual validity.^[25] Roman legal traditions further developed inquisitorial procedures, deriving from the Latin inquirere ("to inquire"), where magistrates initiated investigations by summoning and systematically questioning witnesses, suspects, and experts to compile evidence, as evidenced in codes like the Digest of Justinian compiled in 533 CE.^[26] This contrasted with adversarial systems by empowering the inquisitor to direct the flow of information, focusing on observable consistencies in testimony to establish facts rather than relying solely on accusations.^[27] In medieval Europe, ecclesiastical confession evolved into a formalized inquiry process following the Fourth Lateran Council's decree in 1215, which mandated annual auricular confession and instructed priests to guide penitents through sequential questions on sins, motives, and circumstances to evaluate moral culpability.^[28]^[29] Manuals like those of Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century outlined structured scripts for interrogating responses, emphasizing detection of evasion or contradiction to inform absolution, thereby institutionalizing interviewing as a tool for causal analysis of behavior.^[30] By the early modern period (17th–18th centuries), such techniques informed espionage and diplomatic intelligence-gathering, where European states employed agents to interrogate captives or informants under controlled conditions to verify reports, as documented in Venetian and French archival records of resident spies from the 1600s.^[31] Diplomats similarly cross-examined envoys and locals to map alliances and threats, assessing reliability through behavioral cues like hesitation or alignment with prior intelligence.^[33] These practices prefigured modern empiricism by valuing predictive consistency in answers over narrative coherence, with early periodicals occasionally simulating interrogative dialogues to probe public opinions, as in Daniel Defoe's essayistic contributions to outlets like Applebee's Original Weekly Journal in the 1720s.^[34]

20th-Century Formalization and Key Milestones

In 1921, inventor Thomas Edison implemented a rigorous 146-question examination for prospective employees at his West Orange laboratory, targeting college graduates for executive roles and emphasizing practical knowledge, scientific reasoning, and real-world problem-solving over mere credentials or references.^[35]^[36] This approach represented an early departure from informal, impression-based hiring, prioritizing verifiable competence through standardized probing, though it drew criticism for its demanding nature and limited scope to general knowledge rather than job-specific skills.^[35] During World War II, U.S. military personnel selection integrated psychological research with interview protocols, as the Army evaluated over 1.3 million inductees using assessments that included structured questioning to classify roles based on aptitude and temperament, informed by industrial-organizational psychology advancements from World War I.^[37]^[38] These efforts, exemplified by the Office of Strategic Services' assessment centers, combined interviews with tests to predict performance under stress, yielding data on reliability that highlighted the pitfalls of unstructured formats reliant on interviewer intuition.^[38] Concurrently, in 1947, John E. Reid developed the foundational elements of the Reid Technique for investigative interviews, incorporating behavioral observation, baseline questioning, and nine-step interrogation to elicit truthful responses, which evolved into a widely adopted framework for law enforcement despite later debates over coercion risks.^[39]^[40] Postwar empirical scrutiny, including reviews from the late 1940s onward, exposed the low predictive validity of unstructured interviews—often correlating at r ≈ 0.14 with job performance due to biases like affinity for similar candidates and halo effects—contrasting sharply with higher validities (up to r ≈ 0.51) for structured variants tied to job criteria.^[41]^[42] These findings, synthesized in meta-analyses drawing on mid-century studies, underscored how intuitive methods prioritized subjective rapport over causal predictors of success, spurring reforms like job-analysis-derived questions and rater training by the 1960s and 1970s to enhance objectivity and reduce error variance.^[41] This data-driven pivot marked a causal shift from anecdotal selection to protocols validated against performance outcomes, though implementation lagged amid entrenched preferences for personal judgment.^[5]

Types of Interviews

Employment and Selection Interviews

Employment and selection interviews constitute a primary method for organizations to assess candidates' suitability for roles, focusing on competencies such as technical skills, problem-solving, and interpersonal abilities to forecast job performance. These interviews form part of a multi-stage selection process that initiates with resume screening to filter applicants meeting minimum qualifications, advances to preliminary assessments like phone screens for basic verification, and culminates in comprehensive evaluations tailored to job demands.^[43]^[44] Common formats include panel interviews, where a group of stakeholders questions the candidate to gain diverse perspectives; sequential interviews, involving successive meetings with different interviewers to build cumulative insights; behavioral interviews, which elicit past experiences via questions like "Describe a time when you resolved a team conflict"; and situational or case-based interviews, often featuring hypothetical scenarios or practical tasks, such as coding exercises in software engineering positions at technology companies. Behavioral and situational approaches rely on the principle that historical behavior predicts future actions, with candidates encouraged to structure responses using frameworks like STAR (Situation, Task, Action, Result).^[45]^[46]^[47] Meta-analytic evidence underscores the superior predictive power of structured interviews, which employ predetermined, job-relevant questions and scoring rubrics, yielding an average validity coefficient of 0.51 against job performance criteria, versus 0.38 for unstructured formats lacking such standardization. This differential arises from reduced subjectivity in structured methods, enabling more reliable differentiation among candidates; combining structured interviews with general mental ability tests further elevates validity to approximately 0.63. Recent reanalyses confirm these estimates hold after adjustments for methodological artifacts like range restriction, affirming interviews as among the top predictors when properly designed.^[48]^[49]^[50] By 2025, amid persistent talent shortages reported by 72% of employers, hiring practices have increasingly prioritized skills-based assessments over degree requirements, with 85% of organizations adopting such approaches to widen candidate pools and address skill gaps in areas like AI and digital technologies. This trend manifests in interviews emphasizing verifiable demonstrations of proficiency, such as portfolio reviews or live simulations, over credential checklists, thereby enhancing access to underrepresented talent while aligning selections with empirical performance indicators.^[51]^[52]^[53]

Journalistic and Media Interviews

Journalistic interviews are conducted by reporters, anchors, or producers to gather firsthand information, statements, or perspectives from sources for dissemination through news outlets, including television, radio, print, and digital platforms.^[54] These interactions prioritize extracting details relevant to current events, policy matters, or public figures, with outputs intended for audience evaluation rather than private assessment.^[55] Unlike employment screenings, the goal centers on informational yield for broader discourse, often under time constraints that favor concise exchanges over exhaustive exploration.^[56] Formats vary from collaborative one-on-one sessions, akin to podcast dialogues where rapport builds extended responses, to confrontational setups like live studio cross-examinations or doorstep ambushes, which test resilience under pressure.^[57] Adversarial styles, common in political debates, mimic legal questioning to expose inconsistencies, while background or off-the-record variants allow deeper sourcing without immediate attribution.^[55] Radio and outdoor broadcasts add immediacy, demanding sound-bite clarity amid environmental distractions.^[58] Empirical research highlights vulnerabilities to distortion, particularly through leading questions that steer responses toward preconceived narratives, reducing accuracy in elicited testimony by embedding assumptions that align with interviewer expectations.^[59] In political interviews, quantitative analyses of coverage patterns show media outlets amplifying selective negativity or framing, often tied to issue ownership, which skews public perception beyond raw event data.^[60] Systematic reviews of bias detection confirm recurring ideological tilts, including gatekeeping that favors certain viewpoints, complicating neutral fact extraction.^[61] Truth-oriented practices emphasize causal probing—questioning mechanisms and evidence chains underlying claims—over "gotcha" maneuvers that prioritize viral entrapment at the expense of substantive insight.^[62] Critics from conservative perspectives contend that mainstream outlets, exhibiting documented left-leaning tendencies, frequently deploy lenient "softball" questioning on aligned figures, sidestepping rigorous dissection of policy outcomes like economic interventions or border enforcement lapses.^[63] Such disparities, as in uneven scrutiny of Democratic leaders versus Republicans, underscore credibility issues in institutions prone to narrative conformity over empirical accountability.^[61] Effective interviews thus demand interviewer restraint to minimize confirmation effects, fostering outputs verifiable against primary data rather than amplified spin.^[64]

Research and Psychological Interviews

Research interviews in academic settings serve to collect primary data for hypothesis testing, exploring social phenomena, or validating theoretical models through systematic participant questioning. These differ from journalistic formats by emphasizing replicable protocols that prioritize empirical rigor over narrative appeal, with structured variants yielding higher inter-rater reliability for quantitative analysis.^[65]^[66] Semi-structured interviews, common in qualitative research such as ethnography, employ a flexible guide of open-ended questions to probe contextual depth while allowing follow-up based on responses, facilitating immersion in cultural or experiential settings.^[67]^[68] This approach supports hypothesis generation by capturing nuanced, participant-driven insights, though it risks interviewer bias if not paired with triangulation methods like observation. In contrast, standardized interviews in psychological research enforce fixed questions and scoring to assess traits or diagnose conditions, as in the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5), which operationalizes criteria for disorders like PTSD with demonstrated psychometric reliability.^[69]^[70] The Cognitive Interview technique, developed by Ronald Fisher and R. Edward Geiselman in the 1980s, exemplifies evidence-based enhancement of recall accuracy in psychological contexts, such as eyewitness testimony or memory studies. By reinstating contextual cues, encouraging varied retrieval orders, and minimizing leading questions, it increases the volume of correct details reported—field tests with crime victims showed up to 63% more information elicited compared to standard methods, without elevating error rates.^[71]^[72] Unstructured interviews, lacking such constraints, are susceptible to recall distortions, including confabulation influenced by suggestion or social pressures, with empirical reviews indicating reduced predictive validity for trait assessment relative to protocol-driven alternatives.^[73]^[74] Protocols like the Cognitive Interview thus align with causal principles by targeting memory encoding and retrieval mechanisms, yielding data more amenable to falsification and generalization in hypothesis-driven research.^[75]

Clinical and Therapeutic Interviews

Clinical interviews in mental health settings serve as semi-structured diagnostic tools to evaluate symptoms against established criteria, such as those in the DSM-5, facilitating accurate identification of disorders like major depression or personality disorders.^[76] The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5), a widely used instrument, systematically probes for Axis I and II conditions through targeted questioning, yielding reliable diagnoses when administered by trained clinicians, with inter-rater reliability often exceeding 0.70 in validation studies.^[77] These interviews occur during initial intakes to establish baselines for psychopathology severity and guide treatment planning, distinguishing them from purely observational or questionnaire-based assessments by incorporating real-time clinician judgment to resolve ambiguities in patient responses.^[70] Therapeutic interviews extend beyond diagnosis into active intervention, employing techniques to foster behavioral change and alliance-building within psychotherapy sessions. Motivational interviewing (MI), formalized by William R. Miller in 1983 as a directive yet client-centered approach for addressing ambivalence in problem drinkers, has since demonstrated efficacy in addiction treatment by eliciting self-motivational statements and resolving discrepancies between current behaviors and goals.^[78] Meta-analyses of randomized trials indicate MI reduces substance use more effectively than no-treatment controls, with effect sizes ranging from small to moderate (d ≈ 0.2–0.5) across alcohol, drug, and tobacco interventions, particularly when brief sessions precede longer therapies.^[79] In ongoing therapy, such protocols prioritize evidence-based strategies like reflective listening and open-ended questions to enhance patient engagement, correlating with 10–20% higher retention rates in outpatient programs compared to confrontational methods.^[80] Despite their utility, clinical and therapeutic interviews warrant caution against undue dependence on self-reported data, as empirical comparisons reveal inconsistencies with objective biomarkers; for instance, functional neuroimaging studies in mood disorders show symptom severity misalignments in up to 20% of cases where verbal accounts under- or over-estimate neural activation patterns linked to emotional processing.^[81] This discrepancy underscores the need for multi-method validation, integrating interviews with physiological measures to mitigate recall biases or social desirability effects that inflate or distort causal attributions of distress. Evidence-based protocols thus emphasize triangulation—combining interview data with collateral informant reports or standardized scales—to approximate causal realities of underlying psychopathology, avoiding overpathologization from unverified narratives alone.^[82] In practice, this approach aligns therapeutic goals with verifiable progress markers, such as reduced relapse rates in MI-augmented treatments for substance use disorders, where sustained outcomes track beyond session endpoints.^[83]

Techniques and Methodologies

Structured Versus Unstructured Approaches

Structured interviews utilize a standardized protocol wherein interviewers pose a fixed set of predetermined questions, often 10-15 per targeted competency, with responses evaluated against objective scoring rubrics or behavioral anchors to ensure consistency across candidates. This format minimizes discretionary judgment by anchoring assessments to job-relevant criteria derived from task analyses. Meta-analytic syntheses of personnel selection studies report corrected predictive validity coefficients for structured interviews ranging from 0.51 to 0.62 against criteria such as job performance and training success.^[41]^[84] Unstructured interviews, in opposition, rely on open-ended, interviewer-driven dialogue without scripted questions or uniform evaluation standards, allowing adaptive probing but permitting substantial variability in content and interpretation. Such flexibility correlates with diminished predictive power, yielding uncorrected validity estimates as low as 0.14 and corrected figures around 0.31 to 0.38, attributable to unchecked influences like generalized impressions overriding specific evidence.^[85]^[84] Fundamentally, structured approaches enforce direct causal mapping between elicited responses and requisite performance determinants by curtailing extraneous interpretive variance, thereby elevating the evidentiary fidelity of conclusions over subjective intuition. In high-stakes applications, including selection processes, empirical consensus favors structured methods, as reflected in human resource management standards emphasizing their superiority for defensible, outcome-oriented decisions.^[86]^[87]

Questioning Strategies and Behavioral Methods

Behavioral interviewing strategies emphasize probes into candidates' past actions, such as "Tell me about a time when you faced a challenge with a team member," under the premise that historical behavior predicts future performance more reliably than hypothetical responses or self-reported traits.^[88] Meta-analytic evidence indicates that ratings from past behavioral questions correlate at approximately 0.55 with subsequent job performance in structured formats, outperforming unstructured methods due to reduced subjectivity and anchoring in verifiable examples.^[89] This approach draws from causal reasoning that observable actions reveal competencies like problem-solving or adaptability, with empirical support from controlled studies showing incremental validity over cognitive tests alone.^[66] Situational questioning, conversely, presents hypothetical scenarios—"What would you do if tasked with a tight deadline and limited resources?"—to assess foresight and decision-making under simulated conditions. While less predictive than behavioral methods in higher-level roles (correlations around 0.30-0.40), situational probes complement behavioral ones by evaluating cognitive flexibility, particularly when job demands involve novel situations.^[90] Their utility stems from revealing reasoning processes, though validity hinges on clear scenario design tied to job analysis to minimize variance from imagined rather than enacted behaviors.^[88] The STAR framework (Situation, Task, Action, Result) integrates both strategies, guiding respondents to outline context, responsibilities, specific steps taken, and outcomes, thereby standardizing responses for consistent evaluation. Widely adopted in corporate training by 2025, STAR enhances interrater reliability by focusing on quantifiable results, with studies confirming its role in eliciting detailed, behaviorally anchored narratives that boost predictive accuracy to levels comparable with full structured interviews.^[91] Open-ended formulations within these methods—favoring "how" and "what" over yes/no queries—yield responses with twice the informational density, as linguistic analyses demonstrate greater elaboration and contextual nuance compared to closed questions, which constrain depth and invite superficial affirmation.^[92] Empirical trials underscore avoiding closed questions to maximize data richness, as they limit probes into underlying motivations and experiences essential for validity.^[93]

Biases and Predictive Validity

Common Biases and Their Mechanisms

Confirmation bias among interviewers arises from the tendency to selectively seek, interpret, and emphasize information that aligns with initial preconceptions about a candidate, while discounting contradictory evidence to maintain cognitive consistency and reduce mental dissonance. This mechanism is driven by the brain's efficiency in processing familiar patterns, prioritizing confirmatory data over comprehensive evaluation, which can lead to premature judgments in unstructured interviews where probing is ad hoc. Empirical analyses of hiring processes demonstrate that confirmation bias distorts assessment by reinforcing stereotypes formed from resumes or early interactions, thereby undermining objective competency measurement.^[94]^[9] Similarity bias, or affinity bias, operates through an automatic preference for candidates sharing demographic, experiential, or ideological traits with the interviewer, stemming from evolved mechanisms of in-group favoritism that foster trust via perceived shared values and reduce perceived risk in social judgments. This bias causally skews evaluations by eliciting undue rapport and leniency toward similars, often manifesting as higher ratings for likable traits irrelevant to job performance, particularly in free-form discussions lacking standardized criteria. Recruitment studies confirm its role in perpetuating homogeneity in selections, as interviewers project familiarity as a proxy for reliability without verifying causal links to actual aptitude.^[95]^[96] From the interviewee's perspective, social desirability bias compels responses that exaggerate positive attributes and minimize flaws to align with anticipated norms of competence or morality, rooted in impression management strategies that prioritize external approval over factual accuracy. Paulhus's framework distinguishes this as comprising self-deceptive positivity and deliberate faking, with the latter exploiting interviewers' expectations to inflate self-reported skills or experiences in behavioral questions. This distortion empirically compromises the validity of introspective data, as respondents calibrate answers to inferred ideals rather than genuine capabilities, especially under evaluative pressure. The fundamental attribution error further erodes accuracy by prompting interviewers to overattribute candidate behaviors—such as hesitancy or eloquence—to stable personality traits while underweighting transient situational influences like question ambiguity, fatigue, or environmental stressors. This heuristic shortcut, grounded in the perceptual primacy of agency over context, misfires in interviews by conflating performance artifacts with enduring dispositions, particularly in unstructured formats where behavioral baselines are uncontrolled. Causal analysis reveals that human action emerges from interactions of traits and circumstances, yet this bias systematically privileges the former, yielding predictions that fail to account for variability across roles or conditions.^[97]^[98]

Empirical Studies on Reliability

Meta-analyses of employment interviews have established that structured formats exhibit substantially higher inter-rater reliability than unstructured ones, with coefficients typically ranging from 0.50 to 0.70 for structured interviews compared to approximately 0.20 for unstructured approaches.^[99]^[100] This disparity arises from standardized question sets and scoring rubrics in structured interviews, which reduce subjective variance among raters, as evidenced in reviews spanning data from 1998 to 2016. Internal consistency reliability, measured via coefficient alpha, similarly favors structured methods, averaging above 0.70, underscoring their greater psychometric stability for selection decisions.^[99] Predictive validity studies reveal interviews as modestly effective predictors of job performance, with meta-analytic correlations (r) around 0.38 overall, outperforming reference checks (r ≈ 0.26) but lagging behind cognitive ability tests (r ≈ 0.51).^[41] Validity is strongest for cognitive task performance (r up to 0.63), where interviews probe reasoning and problem-solving, but weakens for interpersonal outcomes (r ≈ 0.25), reflecting challenges in assessing traits like teamwork through verbal responses alone.^[101] Structured interviews consistently yield higher validities (r = 0.51) than unstructured (r = 0.38), with boundary conditions such as job complexity moderating effects; these findings aggregate hundreds of studies, correcting for artifacts like range restriction.^[102] Recent 2024 investigations into AI-augmented interviews indicate improvements in consistency, with algorithmic scoring enhancing inter-rater agreement by up to 15% over purely human evaluations, though unexplained variance persists due to nuanced human judgment in contextual interpretation.^[103] These studies, often comparing generative AI thematic analysis to manual methods, affirm AI's role in reducing noise while highlighting limitations in capturing behavioral subtleties, as AI outputs show high test-retest reliability but require human oversight for validity.^[104]

Mitigation Through Evidence-Based Practices

Blind evaluation techniques, such as anonymizing resumes by removing names, photographs, and demographic indicators, have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing hiring biases without compromising merit-based selection. In field experiments, resumes with ethnic minority-sounding names receive 24-50% fewer callbacks than identical resumes with white-sounding names, indicating name-based discrimination in initial screening. Anonymization addresses this by focusing evaluations on qualifications alone, leading to more equitable advancement rates for qualified candidates across groups. Similarly, in symphony orchestra auditions, implementing screens to conceal performers' identities during blind rounds increased the probability of female musicians advancing by approximately 50% in preliminary stages and accounted for 25-30% of the subsequent rise in female hires, as merit was assessed solely on audible performance.^[105]^[106]^[107] Structured interviews, employing standardized questions tied to job competencies and scored via predefined rubrics, further mitigate subjective biases by enforcing consistent, evidence-linked criteria over ad hoc judgments. Meta-analyses confirm that structured formats yield predictive validities for job performance roughly double those of unstructured interviews, with reduced susceptibility to interviewer idiosyncrasies like similarity bias or halo effects. These methods prioritize causal predictors of success, such as past behavioral evidence, over extraneous traits, ensuring decisions align with empirical performance data rather than demographic proxies.^[108]^[109]^[9] Interviewer training programs, including rater calibration workshops that emphasize objective scoring and bias recognition, reduce inter-rater variance by fostering alignment on evaluation standards. Studies indicate such training enhances rating reliability and decreases measurement error, with supervised practice contributing to more uniform assessments across panels. Complementing this, panel-based interviews—where multiple trained evaluators independently score candidates before aggregating—dilute individual biases through diverse perspectives, improving decision accuracy over solo judgments. These practices collectively uphold meritocratic principles by countering biases through verifiable, performance-centric mechanisms, avoiding quota-driven adjustments that may sideline empirical qualifications in favor of compositional targets lacking robust causal links to organizational outcomes. Empirical critiques highlight that uncalibrated diversity mandates can overlook performance disparities, whereas blind and structured approaches achieve broader representation via genuine equity in evaluation.^[113]

Legal and Ethical Dimensions

Compliance with Anti-Discrimination Laws

In the United States, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, extending to hiring processes including interviews where disparate treatment or disparate impact may occur.^[114] The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces this through guidelines that restrict pre-employment inquiries into protected characteristics unless directly related to job requirements, such as avoiding questions on marital status, number of children, or gender unless they predict performance without adverse impact.^[115] ^[116] Violations can result in lawsuits alleging pretextual discrimination, prompting employers to document interview criteria focused on verifiable skills and behaviors to demonstrate neutral, job-related evaluations.^[117] Empirical data from EEOC enforcement shows a rise in litigation risks post-2000, with the agency filing 143 discrimination or harassment lawsuits in fiscal year 2023 alone, up from prior years, and securing over $513 million for victims in fiscal year 2022.^[118] ^[119] This trend correlates with heightened scrutiny of interview practices, incentivizing structured, standardized questioning to mitigate claims of bias, though such measures do not preclude suits challenging selection outcomes on impact grounds.^[120] Internationally, frameworks like the European Union's Employment Equality Directive (2000/78/EC) ban discrimination in recruitment on grounds of religion or belief, disability, age, or sexual orientation, requiring member states to ensure interview processes avoid indirect discrimination through non-job-related criteria.^[121] Compliance often integrates data protection rules under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for handling applicant information, emphasizing proportionality in inquiries to prevent discriminatory processing.^[122] These regulations causally redirect interview focus toward objective competencies, reducing vulnerability to enforcement actions but sustaining challenges where outcomes disproportionately affect protected groups despite neutral policies.^[123] Informed consent in interviews requires participants to be fully apprised of the purpose, procedures, potential risks, and uses of shared information prior to engagement, particularly in clinical and therapeutic settings where psychological vulnerability heightens stakes. The American Psychological Association's Ethical Principles mandate obtaining informed consent for assessments, including explanations of limits to confidentiality and recording practices, to safeguard autonomy and prevent coercion.^[124] Failure to secure such consent, as seen in cases of inadequate disclosure during qualitative research recruitment, can result from power imbalances between interviewers and interviewees, leading to coerced participation without genuine understanding.^[125] In journalistic interviews, the Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics emphasizes seeking truth while minimizing harm, advising explicit agreements on off-the-record elements to avoid misleading sources.^[126] Challenges arise when consent processes overlook contextual factors, such as interviewees' limited comprehension of long-term data uses or the interviewer’s dual roles in research and therapy, potentially invalidating voluntariness. Ethical analyses of phone-based interviews highlight difficulties in verifying comprehension remotely, where verbal consent may mask underlying reticence due to cultural or literacy barriers.^[127] In employment contexts, consent for background probes or behavioral assessments often competes with applicants' expectations of discretion, with ethical guidelines urging transparency to mitigate perceptions of exploitation, though self-reported adherence remains inconsistent across organizations.^[128] Violations of consent erode interpersonal and institutional trust, fostering interviewee wariness in subsequent interactions; qualitative studies of research misconduct reveal participants experiencing betrayal and reduced willingness to engage, with some cohorts showing heightened skepticism toward authority figures post-breach.^[129] Empirical reviews of clinical trial consent failures indicate that undisclosed risks amplify this effect, diminishing future participation rates and complicating data validity in longitudinal studies.^[130] Such outcomes underscore a causal link between procedural lapses and behavioral reticence, where affected individuals withhold information to self-protect, thereby hindering the interview's truth-eliciting utility. Privacy concerns intensify these dilemmas, as interviews often elicit sensitive data—such as health histories or personal beliefs—vulnerable to misuse like unauthorized dissemination or hacking, with documented harms including stigma and professional repercussions for interviewees. In therapeutic interviews, ethical imperatives demand strict confidentiality except in mandated reporting scenarios, yet breaches via poor data handling have led to verifiable identity exposures in aggregated datasets.^[131] Employment interviews pose parallel risks, where probing family status or disabilities, even if outcome-relevant, can perpetuate unintended disclosures; ethical frameworks critique excessive restrictions on such inquiries when they obscure predictive validity for job fitness, arguing that overprotection may prioritize subjective comfort over empirical utility in selection processes.^[132] Professional codes provide aspirational standards but reveal enforcement gaps, as journalistic self-regulation under SPJ principles rarely incurs penalties for privacy intrusions absent public outcry, while psychological associations rely on complaint-driven oversight with limited proactive audits. Comparative analyses note that employment ethics, often guided by internal HR policies rather than codified mandates, suffer from empirical underreporting of violations, allowing recurrent patterns of data overreach without systemic correction.^[133] Balancing privacy with informational needs thus demands pragmatic realism: ethical conduct favors targeted disclosures that advance causal understanding—such as verifying interviewee claims—while evidence of harm from breaches justifies stringent safeguards, though unverified fears of offense should not eclipse verifiable risks like fraudulent responses.

Technological Integration

Shift to Virtual and Hybrid Formats

The acceleration of virtual interviews began in 2020 amid COVID-19 restrictions, with 82% of employers incorporating them by 2025, primarily for initial screening stages.^[134] This format expanded access to global talent pools, enabling recruiters to evaluate candidates without geographic constraints, while cutting per-interview costs from an average of $358 in-person to $122 virtually.^[135] Broader recruitment budgets similarly declined, as one program's shift from in-person to virtual reduced annual expenses from over $70,000 to $10,000-$20,000.^[136] These efficiencies stem from eliminated travel and venue requirements, though they introduce dependencies on stable internet, where bandwidth disruptions can distort communication timing and intent perception. Hybrid models, featuring virtual preliminary rounds followed by selective in-person finals, have gained traction to mitigate pure virtual limitations while retaining logistical gains. In medical residency cycles from 2023-2024, such approaches aligned program directors' satisfaction with match outcomes to pre-pandemic norms, provided virtual segments used reliable platforms.^[137] Empirical comparisons indicate hybrid validity approximates in-person when technical reliability is assured, as randomized trials in structured assessments show negligible differences in elicited responses under controlled online conditions versus face-to-face.^[138] However, bandwidth variability remains a causal factor in validity erosion, with lags amplifying hesitation misreads and reducing evaluative precision in dynamic exchanges. Virtual and hybrid shifts, while pragmatically enabling scale, constrain non-verbal signal capture essential for causal inference in candidate fit. Interviewers in video formats report heightened difficulty assessing body language and subtle rapport indicators, as camera angles and screen mediation filter micro-expressions and posture shifts available in-person.^[139] This informational deficit hampers accuracy in interpersonal judgments, with qualitative studies documenting lost contextual cues that in-person settings provide for probing behavioral authenticity.^[140] Consequently, reliance on verbal content alone risks overemphasizing scripted responses over holistic indicators, though structured protocols can partially offset these gaps by standardizing observable metrics.^[141]

AI-Driven Screening and Assessment

AI-driven screening employs algorithms, including natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning models, to automate the evaluation of candidate responses during initial interviews, often via asynchronous video platforms.^[142] Tools like HireVue facilitate chatbot-based Q&A or video assessments where candidates respond to predefined questions, with AI scoring traits such as communication skills and job-relevant competencies based on linguistic patterns, sentiment, and vocal metrics.^[143] These systems process over 30 million interviews as of 2025, generating employability scores predictive of on-job performance.^[144] Empirical studies indicate that NLP-driven scoring in automated video interviews achieves predictive validity coefficients of approximately 0.40 to 0.50 against job performance metrics, aligning with or slightly below structured human interviews' mean of 0.44, as AI enforces standardized evaluation criteria to minimize subjective variance.^[145] ^[146] For instance, algorithms trained on verbal and paraverbal data demonstrate reliability in assessing Big Five personality traits, with validity evidence supporting their use for initial filtering when calibrated against criterion outcomes like retention and productivity.^[147] This consistency counters human interviewer biases, such as halo effects or affinity, by relying on data-driven patterns rather than personal impressions.^[148] From 2024 to 2025, advancements in bias mitigation have emphasized regular audits and anonymization protocols, with platforms implementing feature removal (e.g., excluding names, accents, or demographics) to curb disparate impact.^[149] Such techniques have reduced demographic skew in candidate rankings, for example, boosting callback rates for women from 18% to 30% in anonymized resume screenings, a 67% relative improvement attributable to diminished name-based inferences.^[150] HR confidence in AI recommendations rose from 37% in 2024 to 51% in 2025, driven by these refinements and startups' agile deployments favoring job-specific models over generalized Big Tech systems.^[151] Nonetheless, full efficacy demands human oversight to interpret causal nuances, like role-specific contextual behaviors, that pure algorithmic analysis may overlook due to training data limitations.^[152]

Controversies and Debates

Merit-Based Selection Versus Diversity Mandates

Structured interviews, which emphasize job-relevant competencies through standardized questions and scoring, demonstrate superior predictive validity for job performance compared to unstructured formats or diversity-focused mandates, with validity coefficients ranging from 0.42 to 0.70.^[153]^[154] This enables organizations to identify candidates likely to deliver 20-30% higher productivity, as meta-analyses link such selection rigor to reduced variance in outcomes and elevated team efficiency.^[102] In contrast, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) mandates often prioritize demographic representation over these metrics, correlating with empirical mismatches where lowered thresholds for certain groups undermine overall performance.^[155] Proponents of diversity mandates argue they foster innovation through varied perspectives, yet causal evidence reveals frequent inefficacy, as mandatory diversity training—intended to bias-correct hiring—has been shown to backfire, increasing resentment and failing to boost underrepresented hires.^[156] Quota-like approaches exacerbate this by sidelining top talent, with 2020s analyses indicating that rigid demographic targets compromise team cohesion and output when standards are adjusted to meet equity goals.^[157] Reverse discrimination claims have surged post-mandate implementations, with race-based EEOC charges rising by approximately 7,000 from fiscal year 2022 onward, reflecting legal pushback against perceived favoritism that erodes meritocratic trust.^[158]^[159] By 2025, merit-excellence-intelligence (MEI) frameworks have gained traction as alternatives, explicitly prioritizing skills, proven results, and cognitive aptitude in interviews to supplant DEI's equity focus.^[160] Companies adopting MEI, such as Scale AI, report sustained high performance without demographic quotas, aligning selection with verifiable outcomes like innovation velocity and error reduction over ideological targets.^[161] This shift underscores a data-driven pivot, where empirical ties between meritocratic processes and superior organizational results—evident in reduced turnover and elevated metrics—outweigh unsubstantiated diversity benefits.^[162]

Critiques of Subjectivity and Over-Reliance

Unstructured interviews exhibit low predictive validity for job performance, with meta-analytic estimates placing the correlation coefficient (r) at approximately 0.14, rendering them scarcely more effective than chance in forecasting employee success. This subjectivity arises from interviewers' reliance on impressionistic judgments, often influenced by irrelevant factors such as likability or nonverbal cues, which correlate weakly with actual on-the-job outcomes.^[16] Such flaws contribute to elevated rates of suboptimal hires, with studies indicating that inadequate selection processes, dominated by unstructured formats, account for up to 45% of poor hiring decisions, incurring substantial organizational costs including turnover and retraining.^[163] Over-reliance on interviews, particularly unstructured variants, overlooks superior alternatives like work sample tests, which demonstrate higher validity coefficients around 0.54 for predicting job performance by directly simulating job tasks.^[164] These methods prioritize observable competencies over verbal self-presentation, reducing the causal impact of interviewer biases and yielding more reliable forecasts of productivity.^[16] Empirical syntheses, such as those by Schmidt and Hunter, underscore that while interviews can be refined, their dominance in hiring pipelines often stems from tradition rather than evidentiary superiority, leading to inefficient resource allocation in talent acquisition. In global contexts, unstructured interviews amplify cultural biases, as evaluators from dominant cultural norms may penalize candidates exhibiting divergent communication styles or emotional expressions deemed less assertive or engaging.^[165] Research documents disparate outcomes, with minority candidates receiving fewer positive evaluations due to implicit stereotypes, exacerbating inequities in cross-cultural hiring without standardized questioning.^[9] This vulnerability persists even in ostensibly neutral settings, where subjective interpretations override objective criteria. Structured interviews mitigate these issues, achieving validity coefficients up to 0.42—outperforming unstructured approaches and intuitive judgments—through predefined questions and scoring rubrics that anchor evaluations to job-relevant behaviors.^[166] Recent integrations of AI in hybrid formats further enhance reliability, with 2025 analyses showing bias reductions of up to 50% via automated analysis of responses, complementing human oversight without supplanting interpersonal assessment.^[167] These advancements affirm interviews as improvable instruments within multifaceted selection systems, rather than infallible or dispensable tools, emphasizing empirical calibration over uncritical dependence.^[168]

References

[1]
Chapter 11. Interviewing – Introduction to Qualitative Research ...
An interview can be variously defined as “a conversation with a purpose” (Lune and Berg 2018) and an attempt to understand the world from the point of view of ...
[2]
Interview Method In Psychology Research
Sep 10, 2024 · Interviews in psychology research are purposeful conversations, often using a question-answer format. Types include structured, semi-structured ...
[3]
Types of Interviews in Research | Guide & Examples - Scribbr
Mar 10, 2022 · An interview is a qualitative research method that relies on asking questions in order to collect data. Interviews involve two or more people.What is a structured interview? · Examples of interview questions
[4]
Interview Techniques - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Research confirms interviewing is an effective system of gathering essential information regarding the personality and character of another person.
[5]
A brief history of the selection interview: May the next 100 years be ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Over the past 100 years, the interview has received much attention. It is generally agreed that the interview is modest in terms of reliability or validity.
[6]
Interview expectancies: awareness of potential biases influences ...
These findings support the hypothesis that expectancy effects can noticeably alter interviewee behaviour.
[7]
Exploring bias in incident investigations: An empirical examination ...
Results: Common biases were revealed including confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and fundamental attribution error. Analysis was also able to unpack when and ...
[8]
Thomas Edison and the Origins of the Job Interview - Acciona People
In 1921, Thomas Edison was convinced that academic qualifications weren't enough to assess a candidate. To filter the applicants eager to work for his ...
[9]
Best Practices for Reducing Bias in the Interview Process - PMC
Oct 12, 2022 · There is growing literature that using structured interviews reduces bias, increases diversity, and recruits successful residents.
[10]
interview, n. meanings, etymology and more
The earliest known use of the noun interview is in the early 1500s. OED's earliest evidence for interview is from 1514, in a letter by Duke of Suffolk et al.
[11]
INTERVIEW Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
The meaning of INTERVIEW is a formal consultation usually to evaluate ... Word History. Etymology. Noun. Anglo-French entreveue meeting, from (s ...
[12]
Interview - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from French entrevue (1510s), from s'entrevoir "to see each other," interview means a face-to-face meeting or conversation, especially for ...
[13]
Interview Definition & Meaning | YourDictionary
Origin of Interview From Anglo-Norman entreveue (French: entrevue), feminine singular past participle of entrevëoir, from entre- + vëoir (“to see”).<|separator|>
[14]
The Employment Interview: A Review of Recent Research and ...
The present review is a comprehensive examination of interview research conducted since Harris last reviewed this literature.Abstract · Conventional Wisdom On The... · Interview Research Since...
[15]
The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and ...
Structured interviews were found to have higher validity than unstructured interviews. Interviews showed similar validity for job performance and training ...
[16]
Best and Worst Predictors of Job Performance - eSkill
Jun 11, 2025 · Structured interviews had a validity coefficient of 0.42, making them significantly more predictive than resumes, unstructured interviews, or ...
[17]
9.2 Purposes of the Interview – Information Strategies for ...
Their common goal is the gathering of accurate, factual, and comprehensive material that will contribute to an appropriate and interesting message. Sometimes ...
[18]
Introduction to interviews - Media Helping Media
Interviews are a basic journalism tool to gather facts, insights, or opinions, and to build contacts, and are a mix of technical and personal skills.
[19]
[PDF] Qualitative interviewing in the field of work and organisational ...
Jun 16, 2022 · Qualitative interview research is particularly well suited for the purposes of describing, explaining, and interpreting phenomena (Lee et al., ...
[20]
Effectiveness of Qualitative Research Methods: Interviews and Diaries
Aug 6, 2025 · The present study aims to explore the effectiveness of qualitative research methods. The qualitative research method has been opted after a thorough literature ...
[21]
Clinical Interviewing: An Essential but Neglected Method of Medicine
Feb 21, 2024 · Clinical interviewing is the basic method to understand how a person feels and what are the presenting complaints, obtain medical history, ...Flow And Hypothesis Testing · Clinical Domains · Settings And Goals
[22]
The reliability of the Standard for Clinicians' Interview in Psychiatry ...
The SCIP is a reliable tool for assessing psychological symptoms, signs and dimensions of the main psychiatric diagnoses.Abstract · Introduction · References (33)
[23]
Socratic Questioning in Psychology: Examples and Techniques
Jun 19, 2020 · Socratic questioning involves a disciplined and thoughtful dialogue between two or more people. It is widely used in teaching and counseling.
[24]
What is Socratic Dialogue — Definition, Examples & Uses
Feb 10, 2025 · A Socratic dialogue is a conversation between two or more people in which participants are forced to think critically, yet independently.
[25]
The Socratic Method Versus Motivational Interviewing
Jun 4, 2025 · The Socratic Method sometimes poses questions with a gotcha mentality, like an investigative reporter or a prosecutor cross-examining a witness.
[26]
A Brief History of the Inquisitions - University of Notre Dame
In the first centuries of the Common Era, there arose beside the accusatorial system of Roman justice an inquisitorial (Lat. inquirere, meaning "to inquire") ...Missing: structured questioning
[27]
Historical Meaning of Inquisition
1200s: Machinery of the Inquisition was established when the Roman Catholic Church confronted the so-called Cathar heresy [ID] in southern France. Cathars ...
[28]
Learning from the Confessional in the Later Thirteenth Century
Aug 15, 2019 · Implementation of the canons of the Fourth Lateran Council dramatically expanded the practice of auricular confession among laypeople.Missing: structured | Show results with:structured
[29]
Learning from the Confessional in the Later Thirteenth Century - jstor
What is revealed from confession not only provides a window onto medieval private lives, but it also provided confessors with information about human activities ...Missing: structured | Show results with:structured
[30]
[PDF] The Form of Confession: A Later Medieval Genre for Examining ...
No other kind of pastoral literature comes as close as the form of confession to representing what was to be said by the penitent in the practice of confession.
[31]
Full article: Case studies in early modern European intelligence
... history of espionage and diplomacy in his groundbreaking and extensive study of Louis XIV's (r. 1643–1715) foreign policy. Bély spoke of 'spies and ...
[32]
Espionage and Intelligence in Pre-Modern Europe (HI2L3)
It will explore how espionage was used and understood as well as its relationship with diplomacy and the development of communication and information-gathering ...
[33]
https://brill.com/downloadpdf/edcollbook/title/58752.pdf
[34]
Periodicals, News, and Journalism (Chapter 10) - Daniel Defoe in ...
Defoe played a formative role in the development of the periodical press in the early eighteenth century, not least because his body of work makes a sustained ...
[35]
EDISON QUESTIONS STIR UP A STORM; "Victims" of Test Say Only ...
Thomas A. Edison's examination questions for college graduates seeking employment as executives in his plant and the inventor's unfavorable opinion of ...
[36]
Take the 146-Question Knowledge Test Thomas Edison Gave to ...
Mar 16, 2015 · Take the 146-Question Knowledge Test Thomas Edison Gave to Prospective Employees (1921). in History, Science | March 16th, 2015 3 Comments.Missing: Electric | Show results with:Electric
[37]
https://oxfordre.com/psychology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-731
[38]
[PDF] The Office of Strategic Services Psychological Selection Program.
Jun 2, 1995 · This study evaluates this assessment program. First, the history and development of. Army selection from World War I through World War II is ...
[39]
The Reid Technique – Celebrating 77 Years of Excellence
The Reid Technique of Interviewing and Interrogation has evolved extensively over the last 77 years. Here is a brief overview.
[40]
[PDF] Reid Technique of Investigative Interviewing and Positive Persuasion
Mar 11, 2020 · John E. Reid and Associates began developing interview and interrogation techniques in 1947. The Reid Technique is now the most widely used ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[41]
[PDF] The Validity of Employment Interviews: A Comprehensive Review ...
Aug 9, 2011 · Structured interviews were found to have higher validity than unstructured interviews. Interviews showed similar validity for job performance ...
[42]
The Problem of Predictive Validity - in the Selection of Employees
For the interview, which is the most widely used of these instruments, Hunterand. Hunter (1984) in their meta-analysis found an average validity of r = + 0.14.
[43]
Selection Process: 7 Steps & Best Practices To Hire Top Talent - AIHR
The selection process includes: Application, Screening & pre-selection, Interview, Assessment, References and background check, Decision, and Job offer & ...
[44]
Screening Interview: A Complete Guide for HR [2025 Edition] - AIHR
A screening interview is an early hiring stage to evaluate candidates' minimum requirements, qualifications, and fit with the company, and to avoid investing ...Missing: elements | Show results with:elements
[45]
Types of Interviews - Human Resources | Virginia Tech
Sequential. Typically a face-to-face interview format, though it could also be by phone, a sequential interview is where members of a search committee ...
[46]
Interview Types - Texas A&M Career Center
Common interview types include traditional, behavioral, sequential, group/panel, and technical interviews.
[47]
Different Types of Interviews - HyreSnap
Sep 30, 2023 · Sequential Interviews: In a sequential interview, a candidate meets with multiple interviewers or panels one after another, each evaluating ...Behavioral Interviews · Situational Interviews · Hyresnap Interview As A...Missing: employment | Show results with:employment
[48]
[PDF] 1 Schmidt, F. & Hunter, J. (1998). The validity and utility of selection ...
The average validity of structured interviews is .51, versus .38 for unstructured interviews. An equally weighted combination of structured interview and GMA ...
[49]
3 Things You Must Know About Selection, According to Schmidt ...
Based upon their meta-analysis, Schmidt & Hunter argue three things: ... The combination of a GMA test and a structured interview had a composite validity of 0.63 ...
[50]
[PDF] Revisiting Meta-Analytic Estimates of Validity in Personnel Selection
This paper systematically revisits prior meta-analytic conclusions about the criterion-related validity of personnel selection procedures, and particularly ...
[51]
The Rise of Skills-based Hiring - Tier4 Group
Oct 15, 2025 · According to Deloitte's Global Talent Trend's Report, 72% of companies say that talent shortages are major challenge. As a result, companies ...
[52]
The State of Skills-Based Hiring 2025 Report - TestGorilla
The way companies hire is changing. 85% are using skills-based hiring in 2025, an increase from 81% last year. 67% are using resumes – down from 73% in 2024 – ...
[53]
[PDF] Skills-Based Hiring: - LinkedIn's Economic Graph
Mar 3, 2025 · The expanded talent pool may be most beneficial in jobs where there are shortages of workers, which may occur in cases like in AI and in the ...
[54]
Journalistic interview: How to interview someone for an article
Jan 31, 2024 · Interview objectives · Unearthing valuable insights: · Highlighting the truth through questions: · Presenting diverse perspectives: · Crafting ...
[55]
6 Basic Types of Media Interviews for Subject Matter Experts - Jaffe PR
Meet-and-greet interview: This type of interview can be difficult to secure. · Background interview: · Off-the-record interview: · On-the-record interview: · Email ...
[56]
3.1 Types of interviews and their purposes - Fiveable
News interviews aim to gather the most important facts and details about a current event or story · Profile interviews provide a comprehensive understanding of ...
[57]
16 different media interview formats and how to handle them
Jan 8, 2020 · Broadcast interviews · TV Studio interviews · Down-the-line · The doorstep interview · The sofa interview · Outdoor broadcast interviews · Sound bite ...
[58]
[PDF] Working with the Media: Types of Interviews
A live studio interview can be as short as four or five minutes, or as long as an hour; there may also be a phone-in component, where listeners can call in with.
[59]
Directive Leading Questions and Preparation Technique Effects on ...
Jan 9, 2020 · Research conducted has reliably demonstrated how leading questions can significantly reduce the accuracy of testimony (e.g., Andrews et al., ...
[60]
Disproportionality in media representations of campaign negativity
Feb 10, 2020 · This contribution argues that the media systematically exaggerate patterns of negativity based on issue ownership structures.
[61]
A systematic review on media bias detection - ScienceDirect.com
Mar 1, 2024 · We present a systematic review of the literature related to media bias detection, in order to characterize and classify the different types of media bias.
[62]
Nicolais: Gotcha journalism is not the same as accountability
Jul 14, 2024 · Gotcha journalism is looking to catch and highlight soundbites out of full context. It focuses on the sensational over the substantive.Missing: critiques probing
[63]
NPR doesn't have space for all perspectives: Whistleblower
Apr 10, 2024 · The veteran journalist acknowledged that his criticism of what he sees as a lack of political diversity at NPR and a failure to present balanced ...
[64]
Swayed by leading questions | Quality & Quantity
Jul 10, 2024 · The objective of this paper was to test how easily the public is swayed by leading questions in poorly designed surveys.
[65]
Sage Research Methods - Semistructured Interview
The defining characteristic of semistructured interviews is that they have a flexible and fluid structure, unlike structured interviews, which ...
[66]
[PDF] The Structured Employment Interview: Narrative and Quantitative ...
In the 20 years since frameworks of employment interview structure have been developed, a considerable body of empirical research has accumulated.
[67]
Which research designs use semi-structured interviews?
Mar 4, 2024 · Ethnographic Research: Immersion in Context. In ethnographic studies, semi-structured interviews facilitate immersion within cultural contexts.
[68]
Conducting Interviews | Ethnography Made Simple - Manifold @CUNY
For semi-structured, or formal qualitative interviews you should be asking open-ended questions, and avoid questions that will elicit yes or no responses.
[69]
Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 (SCID PTSD Module)
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) is a semi-structured interview for making the major DSM-5 diagnoses.
[70]
Psychometric properties of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐5 ...
Mar 17, 2021 · Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM (SCID) is a semistructured interview that provides diagnoses based on DSM.
[71]
Field test of the cognitive interview: Enhancing the recollection of ...
The Cognitive Interview was tested in the field to enhance the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime.
[72]
[PDF] Enhancing the Recollection of Actual Victims and Witnesses of Crime
The Cognitive Interview was tested in the field to enhance the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime. The technique is based on ...Missing: boost | Show results with:boost
[73]
The cognitive interview method to enhance eyewitness recall.
Describes the Cognitive Interview (CI), a questioning technique designed to facilitate recall of personal experiences. The authors review recent studies ...<|separator|>
[74]
interviewer and rememberer characteristics relate to memory distortion
Using a subsample from that study, we examined the hypothesis that memory distortion is related to characteristics of interviewers and rememberers.Missing: unstructured rates empirical studies
[75]
Cognitive Interview Technique - Simply Psychology
Jun 15, 2023 · Geiselman and Fisher proposed that due to the recency effect, people tend to recall more recent events more clearly than others. Witnesses ...
[76]
Rapid and Accurate Behavioral Health Diagnostic Screening
Mar 23, 2018 · The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) is considered the gold standard assessment for accurate, reliable psychiatric diagnoses; ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[77]
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 - APA
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) is a semistructured interview guide for making the major DSM-5 diagnoses.Users Guide for the Structured... · SET of SCID-5-CV and SCID-5... · Learn more
[78]
Motivational Interviewing Research - Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation
History of Motivational Interviewing In 1983, William R. Miller wrote about an interpersonal process in working with problem drinkers.
[79]
Motivational interviewing for substance abuse - PMC
The results show that people who have received MI have reduced their use of substances more than people who have not received any treatment. However, it seems ...
[80]
Toward a Theory of Motivational Interviewing - PMC - NIH
The good and poor outcome groups did not differ from each other significantly at baseline on drug use or on measures of pre-treatment motivation for change. Yet ...
[81]
The Puzzle of Neuroimaging and Psychiatric Diagnosis - NIH
Although neuroimaging research has demonstrated differences among brain activity in different psychiatric disorders, it is an open empirical question whether ...Missing: discrepancy | Show results with:discrepancy
[82]
The Heterogeneity of Mental Health Assessment - Frontiers
We provide an analysis of 126 different questionnaires and interviews commonly used to diagnose and screen for 10 different disorder types.<|separator|>
[83]
Motivational interviewing in treating addictions. - APA PsycNet
Motivational interviewing (MI) began as a tool for treating alcohol problems and quickly found applications in addressing other drug and gambling problems ...
[84]
Do structured interviews eliminate bias? A meta-analytic comparison ...
Sep 30, 2016 · We conducted a meta-analysis of studies investigating the extent to which structured and unstructured interviews are affected by such sources of potential bias.
[85]
Structured Interviews: The Smarter Way to Hire Top Talent
May 5, 2025 · Research shows that unstructured interviews have a predictive validity of only about 14%, meaning they barely predict future job performance ...
[86]
[PDF] Selection Assessment Methods | SHRM
This document is a guide to implementing formal assessments to build a high-quality workforce, as part of the Effective Practice Guidelines series.
[87]
A meta‐analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and ...
Structured interviews had twice the validity of unstructured ones. Interview structure moderated predictive validity coefficients considerably.
[88]
Are we asking the right questions? Predictive validity comparison of ...
Results indicated that ratings of background, situational, and past behavioral interview questions significantly predicted job performance.
[89]
A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE IN THE SELECTION INTERVIEW - 1997
Dec 7, 2006 · This paper reviews the research literature in order to describe and evaluate the many ways interviews can be structured.Missing: correlation | Show results with:correlation
[90]
(PDF) Comparison of Situational and Behavior Description Interview ...
Results confirmed that situational interviews are much less predictive of performance in these types of positions. Moreover, results indicated very little ...
[91]
How To Use the STAR Interview Response Technique | Indeed.com
Oct 2, 2025 · The STAR interview method helps you answer behavioral and situational questions with a clear story structure based on situation, task, action, ...
[92]
Open-ended vs. Closed Questions in User Research - SightX
Nov 6, 2024 · Open-ended questions bring richness and depth, uncovering the nuances behind user opinions and behaviors, while closed questions provide structure and ...Missing: linguistics studies
[93]
What are the psychological principles behind effective interview ...
Mar 2, 2025 · A study by Schmidt and Hunter (1998) found that structured interviews can predict job performance more accurately than unstructured interviews, ...
[94]
Confirmation Bias In Hiring And How To Avoid It | Vervoe
May 2, 2022 · Confirmation bias is seeking and favoring information that agrees with what you already think to be true, rather than evaluating all available data objectively.Types of confirmation bias in... · common confirmation bias...
[95]
How HR Can Identify and Overcome Affinity Bias - AIHR
Affinity bias is an unconscious tendency to favor people with similar interests, beliefs, and backgrounds, which can be detrimental in the workplace.What is affinity bias? · How does affinity bias impact... · Examples of affinity bias in...
[96]
What is Affinity/similarity Bias - Definition & Examples in Recruitment
Affinity/similarity bias (also called in-group bias) is the tendency favour one candidate over another candidate because you share a characteristic trait or ...What is affinity/similarity bias? · What is similarity bias in... · Similarity bias examples
[97]
Fundamental Attribution Error - The Decision Lab
The fundamental attribution error describes how we overemphasize a person's internal traits when trying to explain their behavior and underemphasize ...
[98]
What is 'Fundamental attribution error' in Recruiting - WeCP
Jan 18, 2025 · The Fundamental Attribution Error, a concept from social psychology, suggests that we tend to overemphasize personal characteristics and underestimate ...
[99]
A meta-analysis of interrater and internal consistency reliability of ...
A meta-analysis of 111 interrater reliability coefficients and 49 coefficient alphas from selection interviews was conducted.
[100]
Employment Interview Reliability: New meta-analytic estimates by ...
Aug 10, 2025 · Indeed, unstructured employment interviews often have relatively low interrater reliability (Huffcutt et al., 2013) , and with revised meta- ...
[101]
A Meta-Analysis of Interviews and Cognitive Ability - ResearchGate
Apr 10, 2025 · Research has shown that individuals with particularly high levels of cognitive ability tend to be more successful in job interviews (Berry et al ...
[102]
The Validity of Employment Interviews: A Comprehensive Review ...
Oct 9, 2025 · Structured interviews were found to have higher validity than unstructured interviews. Interviews showed similar validity for job ...
[103]
Comparing the Efficacy and Efficiency of Human and Generative AI
Aug 2, 2024 · The primary objectives of our study were to evaluate the consistency in themes, reliability of coding, and time needed for inductive and deductive thematic ...
[104]
[PDF] Consistency and Fairness as Keys to Reliable AI - ACL Anthology
To systematically assess relia- bility, we employ robust statistical measures, in- cluding the Test-Retest Consistency Score (TRCS),. Intraclass Correlation ...
[105]
Meta-analysis of field experiments shows no change in racial ... - NIH
Sep 12, 2017 · Since 1989, whites receive on average 36% more callbacks than African Americans, and 24% more callbacks than Latinos. ... study design (resume or ...
[106]
White-sounding names get called for jobs more than Black ... - NPR
Apr 11, 2024 · The watershed study found that applicants with names suggesting they were white got 50% more callbacks from employers than those whose names indicated they ...
[107]
Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of "Blind" Auditions on Female ...
The weight of the evidence suggests that the blind audition procedure fostered impartiality in hiring and increased the proportion women in symphony orchestras.
[108]
How to use structured interviews to assess candidates - eSkill
Aug 15, 2025 · Meta-analyses (Sackett 2022; Schmidt & Hunter 1998) show structured interviews nearly double the predictive validity of unstructured ones, ...
[109]
Hire Better with Structured Interviews - Criteria Corp
A recent meta-analysis of the predictive validity of various selection methods found that structured interviews were two times more predictive than ...
[110]
Impact of a training and certification program on the quality of ...
Available evidence supports training and supervision as effective ways to reduce interviewer-related error, although neither appears to be sufficient by itself.
[111]
Impact of a training and certification program on the quality of ...
Dec 3, 2011 · It is clear that training, supervision, and ongoing practice contribute to interviewer skill, which in turn affects the quality of data. The ...
[112]
Interviewer bias: How to reduce subjectivity in interviews at scale
Sep 22, 2025 · Interviewer bias occurs when personal beliefs, stereotypes, or unconscious preferences infiltrate the candidate evaluation process. Instead of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[113]
Cutting the cord: Good riddance to ineffective DEI programs
Nov 19, 2024 · Instead, the criticism against DEI highlighted by the focal article indicates that DEI training may be ineffective, prohibiting the subset of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[114]
Prohibited Employment Policies/Practices - EEOC
It is illegal for an employer to discriminate against a job applicant because of his or her race, color, religion, sex (including transgender status, sexual ...Pre-Employment Inquiries and... · Background Checks · Disability · Gender
[115]
What shouldn't I ask when hiring? - EEOC
We recommend that you avoid asking applicants about personal characteristics that are protected by law, such as race, color, religion, sex, national origin ...
[116]
Pre-Employment Inquiries and Marital Status or Number of Children
Questions about marital status and number and ages of children are frequently used to discriminate against women and may violate Title VII.
[117]
Employment Tests and Selection Procedures - EEOC
Dec 1, 2007 · Title VII prohibits intentional discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. For example, Title VII forbids a covered ...<|separator|>
[118]
Employers Beware: Discrimination Lawsuits Continue to Rise - SHRM
Oct 17, 2023 · New federal data shows that the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed 143 discrimination or harassment lawsuits in fiscal year ...
[119]
EEOC History: 2020 - 2024 | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity ...
In FY 2022, the EEOC secured more than $513.7 million for workers subjected to discrimination in private, state and local government, and federal workplaces.
[120]
Enforcement and Litigation Statistics - EEOC
The statistics presented in the EEOC Explore data visualization tool, and in the following tables, reflect charges of employment discrimination.
[121]
Legislation - Employment Equality Directive (2000/78/EC)
The Employment Equality Directive seeks to eliminate, on grounds relating to social and public interest, all discriminatory obstacles to access to livelihoods.
[122]
Tackling discrimination at work
Fair treatment is a basic right in the European Union. It is illegal to discriminate because of a person's sex, age, disability, ethnic or racial origin, ...
[123]
Strengthening the EU Anti-Discrimination Framework: The Directives ...
Sep 30, 2025 · EBs help individuals by engaging in preventive work, investigating underlying causes of discrimination and improving public attitudes to ...
[124]
[PDF] APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (2017)
Jun 1, 2003 · 9.03 Informed Consent in Assessments. (a) Psychologists obtain informed consent for as- sessments, evaluations, or diagnostic services, as ...
[125]
Challenges regarding informed consent in recruitment to clinical ...
Dec 11, 2023 · This study explores the ethical challenges encountered by CRNs in the process of obtaining informed consent for clinical research.
[126]
[PDF] spj-code-of-ethics.pdf - Society of Professional Journalists
The highest and primary obligation of ethical journalism is to serve the public. Journalists should: ▷ Avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived. Disclose ...
[127]
Ethical considerations of phone-based interviews from three studies ...
Aug 17, 2021 · Phone-based interviews present a range of ethical challenges, including how to ensure informed consent and privacy and maintain confidentiality.
[128]
What are ethical issues in interviews? - Design Gurus
Dec 11, 2024 · Ethical issues include bias, discriminatory questions, privacy concerns, misrepresentation of job roles, and conflicts of interest.
[129]
Consent revisited: the impact of return of results on participants ...
These participants experienced guilt, a sense of betrayal by the maternity staff and researchers involved in the trial, and damage to trust. Conclusions.Missing: violation | Show results with:violation
[130]
Why Does Informed Consent Fail? A Discourse Analytic Approach
Abstract. Informed consent often fails to meet the intended goals that a prospective subject should understand fully and choose autonomously to participate in ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
[131]
Anonymising interview data: challenges and compromise in practice
Anonymising interview data is challenging, especially in sensitive contexts, requiring a balance between protecting identities and maintaining data integrity, ...
[132]
How to Avoid Ethical Issues in an Interview | Thomas.co
Mar 8, 2024 · One of the best ways to mitigate any potential issues is to establish clear policies and guidelines for ethical conduct in interviews.
[133]
SPJ's Code of Ethics | Society of Professional Journalists
Sep 6, 2014 · The SPJ Code of Ethics is a statement of abiding principles supported by explanations and position papers that address changing journalistic practices.Missing: privacy | Show results with:privacy
[134]
How Many Companies Use Virtual Interviews? | B2B Reviews
Apr 9, 2025 · 82% of employers currently use virtual interviews, with 90% using them for early-stage hiring, and 9 in 10 organizations preferring them.Missing: rate | Show results with:rate
[135]
The cost of virtual interviews; more than just the money
Sep 24, 2024 · The mean total cost of interviews was $122 for virtual and $358 for in-person. Travel for a “second look” visit cost $279.
[136]
Impact of Virtual Recruitment on Costs, Time Spent, and Applicant ...
Nov 29, 2023 · Results. Program recruitment costs decreased from over $70,000 annually for in-person interview seasons to between $10,000 and $20,000 annually ...
[137]
The Influence of the Residency Interview Format on Future ...
This study examines how the structure of the 2023–2024 interview season influenced family medicine residency program directors' intentions for future interview ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[138]
Randomised comparison of online interviews versus face-to-face ...
Mar 8, 2023 · This study builds on its sister study from the UK and aims to assess the acceptability and equivalence of in person face-to-face interviews with online ...
[139]
Research article Virtual interviews: Less carbon, less bias?
At this point, there is no evidence that in-person interviews are superior to virtual interviews in terms of selecting better candidates or creating better ...
[140]
A Systematic Comparison of In-Person and Video-Based Online ...
Sep 15, 2022 · For individual interviews, online video was notably more expensive due to platform costs. For focus groups, in-person groups were less expensive ...Comparing Logistical And... · Comparing Ethical Issues · Comparing Design Issues<|separator|>
[141]
Evidence-Based Practices for Interviewing Graduate Medical ...
Apr 15, 2024 · Applicants had mixed perceptions of virtual versus in-person interviews and reported that virtual interviews saved costs. The multiple mini ...
[142]
Hirevue | AI-Powered Skill Validation, Video Interviewing ...
Validate role-specific skills. Simplify hiring, reduce bias, and future-proof your hiring with Virtual Job Tryouts and AI-powered assessments.Video Interview Platform · About · Platform · Assessment SoftwareMissing: studies 2024
[143]
HireVue's AI Explainability Statement
Sep 26, 2024 · Platform Updates: The 2024 document introduces the Talent to Opportunity Platform™, highlighting enhancements in functionality, such as hosting ...Missing: validity studies
[144]
HireVue Review 2025: Features, Pricing & Better Alternatives | hirevire
Jul 30, 2025 · Proven AI Technology. With more than 30 million interviews processed, HireVue's AI models are highly refined, supported by extensive data.Missing: validity | Show results with:validity
[145]
How AI and the Declining Effectiveness of Interviews Are ... - LinkedIn
Feb 28, 2025 · The study found that structured interviews had a higher validity coefficient (mean validity of 0.44) compared to unstructured interviews (mean ...
[146]
[PDF] Psychometric properties of automated video interview competency ...
Jan 26, 2024 · Previous research has predominantly focused on the predictive validity of AVIs in respect to predicting big-five personality (Chen et al., 2016; ...
[147]
Validity evidence for personality scores from algorithms trained on ...
May 31, 2024 · We present multifaceted validity evidence for machine learning models (referred to as automated video interview personality assessments ...
[148]
Automated Video Interview Personality Assessments: Reliability ...
In this study, we address this gap by developing AVIs that use verbal, paraverbal, and nonverbal behaviors extracted from video interviews to assess Big Five ...
[149]
Reducing Bias in AI Recruitment: Proven Strategies & Best Practices
Oct 29, 2024 · To further reduce bias, companies can implement blind recruitment strategies that anonymize candidate details such as names, gender, and race.
[150]
5 Insights on AI Hiring: Best Practices & Key Risks to Consider
Harvard Business Review found that anonymizing resumes increased women's success rates from 18% to 30%, demonstrating the impact this practice can have on ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[151]
Hirevue's 2025 AI report shows the majority of HR leaders trust AI ...
Feb 19, 2025 · AI adoption among HR professionals surged from 58% in 2024 to 72% in 2025. Importantly, the gap between candidate and HR leader perceptions is ...
[152]
Steps to Reduce Bias in AI Hiring Tools - Reworked
Oct 2, 2025 · As AI enters the hiring process, organizations must balance efficiency with fairness by auditing data, reviewing outcomes and keeping humans ...
[153]
Structured vs Unstructured Interviews: What Works Best?
Aug 20, 2025 · Structured interviews use same questions and standardized scoring, while unstructured interviews are conversational with varied questions. ...
[154]
Structured interviews as selection method to predict job performance
Organizations can assess important predictors of job performance such as general cognitive ability through structuring questions that focus on key competencies.
[155]
(PDF) How DEI failed and What to do About it - ResearchGate
Sep 16, 2025 · ... quota hiring alone is insufficient to foster the trust, communication, and. collaborative behaviors essential for effective organizational ...
[156]
Why Diversity Programs Fail - Harvard Business Review
... discrimination suit settled in 2000 for a record $193 million. With guidance from a court-appointed external task force, executives in the North America ...Why Diversity Programs Fail · Why You Can't Just Outlaw... · Diversity Training
[157]
The Impact of Misapplied DEI on Hiring Practices: Rethinking Merit ...
Feb 7, 2025 · An overemphasis on rigid demographic criteria can inadvertently sideline highly qualified candidates and compromise organizational performance.Missing: team 2020s
[158]
“The Future of DEI, Disparate Impact, and EO 11246 after Students ...
Jan 20, 2025 · [41] EEOC data indicates that race-based charge receipts in fact have increased by approximately 7,000 since FY 2022, growing from 20,992 to ...
[159]
The Legal Landscape for DEI: One Year After the Harvard/UNC ...
Dec 12, 2024 · The number of so-called reverse discrimination suits filed under Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 has increased, as has the number ...
[160]
From DEI to MEI: The Rise of Merit-Based Hiring in Corporate America
Apr 11, 2025 · Understanding the MEI framework: From merit to intelligence ... Merit based hiring means selecting candidates based on skills, experience, ...
[161]
Hire on merit.
We hire for MEI: merit, excellence, and intelligence. This is the email I've shared with our @scale_AI team. 8684. June 13, 2024.
[162]
Recruiting Amazing Talent with Merit, Excellence and Intelligence
Jan 8, 2025 · People are starting to call it MEI, for Merit, Excellence, and Intelligence. Merit means hiring only the best person for the job. Excellence ...
[163]
What Leaders Get Wrong About Hiring (And Why It Matters) - Forbes
Mar 29, 2024 · ... bad hiring decisions, and 45% of bad hires are attributed to a lack of process. The cost of a poor hiring decision can be quite high, with ...
[164]
Designing an Assessment Strategy - OPM
For example, cognitive ability tests have an estimated validity of .51 and work sample tests have an estimated validity of .54. When combined, the two ...<|separator|>
[165]
The Subtle Way Cultural Bias Affects Job Interviews
Sep 27, 2018 · Research suggests that different cultures value different emotions in their job candidates, which might lead to bias.
[166]
Is Cognitive Ability the Best Predictor of Job Performance? New ...
Meta-analyses have overestimated both the primacy of cognitive ability and the validity of a wide range of predictors within the personnel selection arena.
[167]
AI vs Traditional Assessments: Which Yields Better Hiring Outcomes ...
Jun 29, 2025 · According to recent studies, AI-powered hiring tools can improve workforce diversity by 35% and are projected to reduce recruitment bias by 50% ...
[168]
The data is in: New research reveals the truth about AI hiring bias
Jul 11, 2025 · New research shows AI hiring systems deliver up to 45% fairer treatment than human decisions. Learn how responsible AI implementation can ...Missing: hybrid | Show results with:hybrid<|separator|>