Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Romulus Augustulus

Romulus Augustus, commonly known as Augustulus on account of his youth, was the final emperor recognized in the Western Roman Empire, reigning nominally from 31 October 475 until his deposition on 4 September 476. Born around 461 as the son of Orestes, a powerful military commander of Germanic origin who served as magister militum, Romulus was elevated to the throne in Ravenna by his father following the expulsion of the previous emperor, Julius Nepos, whose legitimacy was still acknowledged in Constantinople. At approximately 14 years old, he held no substantive authority, functioning as a figurehead amid the empire's terminal decline, characterized by barbarian federate armies, fiscal collapse, and loss of provincial control. His brief tenure unfolded against a backdrop of escalating unrest, as Orestes refused demands from Herulian, Scirian, and Torcilingi for one-third of Italian lands, prompting their rebellion under the chieftain . captured and executed Orestes, then compelled the adolescent emperor to abdicate at Ravenna's palace, sparing his life and granting him a of 6,000 solidi annually for relocation to a villa in , later associated with the site of . This event, chronicled in sources such as ' Getica and the Anonymous Valesianus, is conventionally dated as the extinction of the Western imperial line, though Eastern emperors persisted and retained a claim until his death in 480. Romulus Augustulus fades from historical record after his , with evidence indicating survival at least until 507 or 511, possibly founding a , but his ultimate fate remains obscure, underscoring the empire's inglorious into successor kingdoms rather than any dramatic . His deposition symbolizes the culmination of long-term causal factors, including military reliance on unassimilated barbarians, administrative , and economic , rather than isolated or as sometimes mythologized.

Early Life and Background

Family and Ancestry

Romulus Augustulus was the son of Orestes, a Roman aristocrat originating from Pannonia who had served as notarius (secretary) in the court of Attila the Hun prior to rising to the position of magister militum (master of soldiers) in the Western Roman Empire around 475. Orestes' father, Tatulus—a pagan notable—accompanied a Roman diplomatic delegation to Attila's court in 449, highlighting the family's early ties to Hunnic diplomacy and the shrinking Roman frontiers in the Danube region. His mother remains unnamed in surviving sources but was the daughter of comes Romulus, another Roman envoy who led an embassy from Ravenna to Attila in 449, as recorded by the historian Priscus; this connection underscores the interconnected elite networks navigating barbarian powers during the empire's decline. The family's Pannonian roots reflect a provincial Roman aristocracy with potential Germanic ethnic elements, given the region's demographic shifts, though primary evidence emphasizes their Roman citizenship and administrative roles rather than barbarian origins. No siblings of Romulus are attested, and following his deposition in 476, elements of the family shared his exile to Campania, supported by a pension of 6,000 solidi annually.

Geopolitical Context of the Western Empire

By the mid-5th century, the Western Roman Empire had undergone profound territorial contraction following the Rhine frontier breach in 406 AD, when multiple barbarian groups—including Vandals, Suebi, and Alans—crossed into Gaul unchecked, initiating a cascade of migrations and settlements that eroded central authority. North Africa, the empire's richest province and primary grain supplier, fell to the Vandal kingdom by 439 AD after their migration from Spain, severing vital tax revenues estimated at one-third of the Western treasury and enabling Vandal raids on Italy, including the sack of Rome in 455 AD. Gaul fragmented into Visigothic territories centered in Toulouse (foederati since 418 AD), Burgundian holdings in the southeast, Frankish expansions under Childeric and Clovis from the Rhine, and a residual Roman polity under Syagrius in northern Gaul around Soissons; Hispania devolved into Suebic and Visigothic domains by the 460s, while Britain had been evacuated by imperial forces circa 410 AD, yielding to Anglo-Saxon incursions. These losses reduced effective Western control to Italy and nominal oversight of Dalmatia, where the deposed emperor Julius Nepos held out after his expulsion in 475 AD. Internally, governance devolved into a system dominated by Germanic magister militum who wielded real power through puppet emperors, a pattern epitomized by Ricimer, a Suebian general who from 456 AD orchestrated the installation and removal of figures like Majorian (457–461 AD), Libius Severus (461–465 AD), Anthemius (467–472 AD), and Olybrius (472 AD), executing or deposing them when they asserted independence. Ricimer's death in 472 AD left a vacuum filled briefly by his nephew Gundobad and then Orestes, who elevated Glycerius (473–474 AD) and Romulus Augustulus (475–476 AD), but lacked the resources to satisfy barbarian foederati demands for land grants in Italy. The army, numbering perhaps 100,000–150,000 troops by the 470s, comprised mostly non-Roman federates—Heruli, Sciri, Rugii, and Turcilingi—whose loyalty hinged on payments increasingly impossible amid fiscal collapse from lost provinces and debased currency. Civil strife, including the Eastern Empire's failed interventions like Anthemius' campaign, further sapped cohesion. In stark contrast, the Eastern Roman Empire under emperors Leo I (457–474 AD) and Zeno (474–491 AD) retained vast, defensible territories including Thrace, Anatolia, Syria, Egypt, and the Balkans, bolstered by a more professional army, robust taxation (yielding annual revenues up to 10 million solidi versus the West's diminished 5–7 million), and fortified Constantinople. The West's geopolitical vulnerability stemmed from the Hunnic empire's dissolution after Attila's death in 453 AD, which unleashed pent-up barbarian pressures without a unifying external threat, compounded by endemic usurpations—over 20 emperors or claimants from 395–476 AD—and failure to integrate foederati as loyal subjects rather than autonomous warlords. This context rendered the Western Empire by 475 AD a hollow shell, reliant on Eastern recognition for legitimacy yet unable to project power beyond Ravenna, paving the way for Odoacer's revolt of federate troops demanding one-third of Italy's lands in 476 AD.

Ascension to Power

Orestes' Role and Coup Against Julius Nepos

Orestes, a Roman official of Pannonian origin who had previously served as secretary (notarius) to the Hun, emerged as a key military figure in the disintegrating . In early 475, Emperor appointed him as (master of soldiers) and patrician, replacing the previous holder of the office, Ecdicius, likely to leverage Orestes' experience in dealing with barbarian groups amid ongoing pressures from the in . This appointment granted Orestes command over significant Roman and (federate barbarian) troops, positioning him as the power broker in . By mid-475, turned against Nepos, exploiting the emperor's vulnerabilities in a weakened administration reliant on eastern support and facing internal discontent. Rallying troops loyal to him—primarily Germanic under his influence— marched on , the imperial capital, initiating a swift coup. On August 28, 475, as ' forces approached, Nepos fled the city by ship to in , abandoning his throne and effectively ending his control over . The coup succeeded without major resistance, reflecting the empire's dependence on personal loyalties among generals rather than institutional allegiance to the emperor. Orestes assumed effective control of the government, though he refrained from claiming the imperial title himself, instead elevating his young son Romulus to the purple on October 31, 475, to maintain a veneer of continuity. Nepos continued to assert his claim from exile, recognized by the Eastern Roman Empire, but Orestes' seizure of Ravenna and the loyalty of the Italian soldiery solidified the regime change. Primary accounts, such as those in Jordanes' Getica and the Anonymus Valesianus, corroborate the timeline and Orestes' decisive role, underscoring the event as a internal military revolt rather than foreign invasion.

Proclamation and Legitimacy Issues

Following the flight of from on 28 August 475 after being ousted by his , the latter elevated his young son to the imperial throne on 31 October 475. , a former secretary to the Hun who had risen through military ranks, proclaimed the boy—aged approximately fourteen—as emperor, naming him Romulus Augustus, with the nickname Augustulus reflecting his youth and perceived insignificance. This act served to formalize ' control, positioning him as the ruler while avoiding personal assumption of the purple, which might have alienated Roman elites or barbarian federates wary of non-dynastic claimants. The proclamation lacked traditional legitimizing elements, such as endorsement from the Roman Senate or acclamation by broader provincial authorities, relying instead on the support of the Italian field army under Orestes' command. Coinage was minted in Romulus' name, attesting to his nominal sovereignty in Italy, yet his authority extended little beyond the peninsula, with Nepos retaining de facto rule over Dalmatia and nominal claims in parts of Gaul. Historians note that Orestes' strategy may have aimed to invoke Roman symbolism through the child's name—evoking Rome's legendary founder Romulus—while circumventing demands from Germanic foederati for land grants, which Orestes had refused, thereby preserving a facade of imperial continuity. Legitimacy was immediately contested, as the Eastern Roman Empire under withheld recognition, continuing to regard as the lawful Western emperor until Nepos' death in 480. This refusal underscored ' status as a usurper in Eastern eyes, with no diplomatic exchanges or exchanges to affirm his rule. Modern scholarship views the installation as a puppet regime engineered for ' benefit, emblematic of the Western Empire's fragmentation, where military strongmen dictated successions amid eroding central authority. Some argue Nepos' persistence as the last emperor recognized by renders ' ten-month tenure a mere in rather than a fully legitimate reign.

Reign

Nominal Authority and Puppet Governance

Romulus Augustulus ascended to the imperial throne on 31 October 475 as a of about 15 years, but his authority remained entirely nominal throughout his ten-month tenure. His father, , who served as and orchestrated the deposition of , wielded effective control over the Western Roman government from the capital at . Orestes managed military affairs, diplomacy, and administrative decisions, positioning Romulus as a symbolic figurehead to preserve the appearance of continuity in Roman imperial tradition. This puppet arrangement reflected the eroded power of the imperial office in the late fifth century, where real governance depended on the allegiance of barbarian foederati troops rather than a centralized Roman bureaucracy. Orestes, leveraging his prior experience as a Roman official and former associate in Attila's court, directed the state's limited resources toward maintaining fragile alliances with these Germanic federates, who comprised the bulk of the army and demanded concessions such as land grants. Romulus issued no independent edicts or policies; coinage and official documents bore his name and likeness, yet these served merely to legitimize Orestes' de facto rule. The nominal nature of Romulus's authority underscored the Western Empire's structural weaknesses, including fiscal insolvency and territorial fragmentation, which left the emperor reliant on a single powerbroker like Orestes. Without personal command over loyal legions or senatorial support, Romulus functioned as a passive emblem of Roman sovereignty, unable to influence the escalating tensions with the foederati that would soon precipitate his deposition.

Key Events and Policies

Romulus Augustulus' reign from October 31, 475, to September 4, 476, featured no substantive policies or initiatives attributable to the himself, who was a child under the de facto control of his father , the . Orestes prioritized military cohesion by sustaining payments to the —barbarian allied troops who formed the bulk of the Western Roman army—amid ongoing fiscal strains, though specific administrative reforms or legislative acts remain undocumented in contemporary records. The defining policy tension arose in early 476, when the , including , , and Turcilingi under leaders like , petitioned for a grant of one-third of Italy's arable lands as compensation for their service and to enable . Orestes rejected this demand, aiming to preserve and fiscal revenues from taxation, which exacerbated grievances among the non- troops reliant on such allotments for stability. This refusal, rooted in efforts to limit barbarian entrenchment within , directly catalyzed and the federation's rebellion against the regime. No major military campaigns or diplomatic engagements marked the period, reflecting the regime's defensive posture in a fragmented empire where effective control was confined largely to Italy. Orestes' approach underscored the causal dependency on barbarian military labor without ceding territorial sovereignty, a strategy that proved unsustainable given the foederati's growing expectations for integration akin to prior Gothic settlements.

Deposition

Revolt of the Foederati

In 476, the —primarily Herulian, Scirian, Rugian, and Torcilingian barbarian troops serving in the of —demanded permanent land grants for settlement, seeking to establish their families on Italian soil after years of service without adequate compensation. , as , refused this petition, prioritizing Roman landowners' interests and avoiding further fragmentation of imperial authority amid ongoing fiscal strains. This denial ignited widespread discontent among the roughly 10,000–20,000 warriors, who viewed it as a of prior promises made during to bolster the depleted Roman forces. The troops elevated Odoacer, a seasoned officer of uncertain but likely Scirian or Herulian descent who had risen through the ranks, as their leader to enforce their claims. On August 23, 476, was proclaimed king (rex) by the mutineers near , marking the formal start of the uprising; his forces rapidly coalesced, exploiting ' divided loyalties among remaining Roman units. retreated westward, rallying supporters at (modern ), but 's coalition advanced swiftly, defeating ' army in skirmishes en route and capturing his brother , whom they executed. By late August, Odoacer's troops besieged Ticinum, where Orestes had fortified himself; the city fell after minimal resistance, and Orestes was captured and summarily executed on August 28, 476, near Piacenza (Placentia), severing the puppet regime's military backbone. With Orestes dead, the foederati turned to Ravenna, the imperial capital, initiating a short siege that compelled the abdication of Romulus Augustulus; this revolt underscored the Western Empire's terminal reliance on unassimilated barbarian contingents, whose autonomy eroded central control. Contemporary chronicler Marcellinus Comes records the occupation of Italy by these groups under Odoacer, confirming the swift deposition without noting prolonged conflict.

Odoacer's Intervention and Abdication

Following the execution of at Placentia on August 28, 476, advanced his forces toward , the fortified capital where Romulus Augustulus held nominal court under the protection of remaining loyalists. , commanding a coalition of approximately 10,000 Herulian, Scirian, and Rugian troops disillusioned by unfulfilled grants, besieged the , leveraging superior numbers and the recent momentum from their . The siege, though brief due to Ravenna's isolation and limited defenses, compelled surrender as imperial resistance crumbled without broader support from the fragmented Western provinces. On September 4, 476, Odoacer entered Ravenna and compelled the 16-year-old Romulus Augustulus to abdicate the Western imperial throne, marking the effective end of centralized Roman authority in Italy. Rather than executing the youth—reportedly out of regard for his innocence and the legendary resonance of his name with Rome's founder—Odoacer spared him, granting an annual pension of 6,000 solidi and exiling him to a villa in Campania. Odoacer refrained from assuming the imperial title himself, instead proclaiming kingship over Italy while dispatching the Western regalia to Eastern Emperor Zeno in Constantinople, affirming nominal subordination to the Eastern Empire and avoiding claims of outright usurpation. This act underscored Odoacer's pragmatic recognition of the East's enduring legitimacy, as Zeno neither endorsed a new Western emperor nor formally abolished the title, effectively dissolving the dual emperorship structure.

Later Life

Immediate Aftermath and Exile

Following his forced abdication on September 4, 476, spared the life of the young Romulus Augustulus, diverging from the typical practice of executing deposed emperors. Instead, Odoacer granted him an annual of 6,000 solidi—equivalent to the of a high-ranking senator—and relocated him to a villa in , near modern . This estate, identified as the castellum Lucullanum, provided a secure retirement away from political intrigue in . Odoacer's leniency toward Romulus, who was likely around 16 years old at the time, reflected a pragmatic approach to consolidating power without unnecessary bloodshed, possibly influenced by the boy's lack of direct involvement in his father's policies. The former emperor's insignia and imperial regalia were dispatched to Constantinople, signaling the end of Western imperial claims while nominally preserving continuity under Eastern authority. In exile, Romulus faded from historical records, with no evidence of further political activity or attempts to reclaim power. This arrangement allowed Odoacer to rule Italy as king while avoiding outright rejection by the Eastern Roman Empire.

Long-Term Fate and Possible Descendants

Following his abdication on 4 September 476, Odoacer spared Romulus Augustulus from execution, citing his youth, and granted him an annual pension of 6,000 solidi for maintenance before exiling him to the castellum Lucullanum, a fortified villa in Campania near Naples. This arrangement allowed Romulus a degree of security uncommon for deposed Roman rulers, reflecting Odoacer's pragmatic approach to consolidating power without unnecessary bloodshed. The castellum Lucullanum, originally built by the Roman general , served as Romulus's retirement residence, where he lived in relative obscurity. Some late sources associate him with the foundation of a at the site in the 480s or early 490s, potentially involving a noblewoman named Barbaria, identified by historians as likely his mother, though details remain sparse and unverified by primary evidence. Beyond these possibilities, no further activities or public roles are recorded for him under Odoacer's or subsequent Ostrogothic rule in . Romulus Augustulus's date and circumstances of death are unknown, with the last potential references to him dating to around 507–511 in fragmentary chronicles, but he was certainly deceased by the mid-530s, as Procopius's detailed accounts of Emperor Justinian's Gothic War campaigns in Italy omit any mention of a surviving former emperor who might have been leveraged politically. No historical sources document any marriage, children, or descendants for Romulus, who was approximately 10–16 years old at deposition; his lineage effectively ended with him, as his father Orestes had been executed and no siblings or extended family continuity is attested in contemporary records.

Historiography and Legacy

Contemporary Roman and Eastern Views

The deposition of Romulus Augustulus elicited little immediate commentary from Western elites, reflecting his status as a child puppet under his father ' control and the perception of 's takeover as a routine shift in barbarian leadership rather than an existential collapse of authority. Primary Western accounts, such as the brief entry in the Anonymous Valesianus (Origo Constantini), record the event factually without lament, noting 's mercy in sparing the boy and granting him a of 6,000 solidi annually, suggesting continuity of administrative norms under new rulers. This muted response aligns with broader contemporary indifference in , where senatorial aristocrats prioritized stability and retained influence under , who maintained and fiscal systems while styling himself rex rather than emperor. In contrast, Eastern Roman perspectives, preserved in fragmentary histories, treated Romulus' elevation and fall as illegitimate usurpations that did not warrant formal recognition, with Constantinople viewing Julius Nepos as the lawful Western emperor until his murder in 480. The Byzantine historian Malchus of Philadelphia, writing in the late 5th century, provides the most detailed contemporary Eastern account, describing how Odoacer, after defeating Orestes on August 23, 476, deposed the 16-year-old Romulus on September 4 near Ravenna, exiled him to the Villa Lucullana in Campania, and compelled the Senate to dispatch the imperial insignia—diadem, purple cloak, and other regalia—to Emperor Zeno as a gesture of submission. Malchus portrays Zeno's acceptance of these tokens without appointing a replacement as tacit endorsement of the end of separate Western emperorship, emphasizing Odoacer's pragmatic deference to Eastern sovereignty over any dramatic imperial demise. Later Eastern chroniclers like Marcellinus Comes, active under Justinian, explicitly dated the cessation of the Western Empire to Romulus' abdication in 476, framing it as a pivotal rupture in the consular fasti and imperial continuity. Procopius of Caesarea, in his 6th-century Wars, acknowledges Romulus as the final Western ruler but subordinates the event to broader narratives of Gothic-Italic transitions, reflecting an Eastern historiographical focus on reconquest potential rather than irreversible loss. These accounts underscore a causal realism in Byzantine sources: the "fall" stemmed from internal factionalism and barbarian integration failures, not external conquest, with scant evidence of panic or ideological crisis in Constantinople, where administrative pragmatism prevailed.

Modern Interpretations and Debates on the "Fall"

Modern historians continue to debate whether the deposition of Romulus Augustulus in AD marked a genuine "fall" of the or merely a phase in its transformation into successor states. The traditional narrative, exemplified by Edward Gibbon's The History of the Decline and Fall of the (1776–1789), portrayed 476 as the culmination of internal moral and institutional decay combined with relentless barbarian invasions, ending unified imperial rule in the West. However, mid-20th-century scholarship shifted toward models of gradual dissolution rather than abrupt collapse, with Peter Brown arguing in The World of (1971) for cultural and institutional continuity through the and barbarian-Roman integration, extending the "end" to around 750 AD with the rise of . Recent historiography has revived elements of the collapse thesis, emphasizing empirical evidence of disruption. Bryan Ward-Perkins (2005) highlighted archaeological data—such as reduced pottery production, smaller livestock sizes, and abandoned villas—indicating a sharp drop in living standards and economic complexity post-476, challenging notions of seamless transition. Peter Heather (2005) synthesizes this by attributing the fall to Rome's overextension, which fostered powerful barbarian polities through prolonged contact and Hunnic disruptions; the Western Empire's fiscal-military system collapsed under unsustainable provincial losses, culminating in Odoacer's deposition of the nominal emperor Romulus, a mere child installed by his father Orestes in 475 AD. Guy Halsall (2007) counters by stressing that the empire's internal socio-political transformations—ethnic identity shifts and elite fragmentation—preceded and enabled migrations, with 476 symbolizing the failure of central authority rather than barbarian conquest alone. The event's significance lies in its representation of terminal institutional breakdown: Romulus held no real power, and Odoacer's regime maintained Roman administrative structures while ruling as rex under Eastern Emperor Zeno's nominal oversight, sending the imperial regalia to Constantinople in 476 or 477 AD. Yet, this did not preserve Western unity; the loss of tax-rich provinces like North Africa to Vandals (439–455 AD) had already halved revenues, rendering field armies unpaid and provinces indefensible against foederati revolts. Debates persist on causation, with Heather emphasizing external military overload—Hunnic expulsion of Goths in 376 AD initiating a cascade of settlements and usurpations—over internal factors like Christianity or lead poisoning, which lack causal primacy. Halsall prioritizes endogenous changes, such as Roman accommodation of barbarian customs eroding loyalty, arguing the empire's fall generated further migrations rather than vice versa. Archaeological and quantitative models underscore rupture: Western territory shrank from 1.5 million square kilometers in 395 AD to fragmented kingdoms by 500 AD, with coinage production halving post-450 AD due to mint closures. While successor states like Ostrogothic retained and elites, urban depopulation (e.g., Rome's inhabitants falling from 500,000 in 400 AD to 50,000 by 550 AD) and trade collapse refute pure continuity narratives. The Eastern Empire's survival—bolstered by defensible frontiers and untapped Anatolian manpower—highlights contingent factors, not inevitability, in the 's demise. No exists, but evidence favors viewing as the effective end of centralized in the , enabling medieval fragmentation.

References

  1. [1]
    Roman Emperors - DIR Romulus Augustulus
    Aug 26, 1997 · Romulus, commonly called the diminutive "Augustulus" because of his youth, was named emperor by his father, Orestes, after the latter had ...
  2. [2]
    Romulus Augustulus - Livius.org
    Aug 10, 2020 · 475 Zeno is briefly dethroned by Basiliscus; during this vacuum, a Germanic leader named Orestes expels Julius Nepos from the throne in Rome and ...
  3. [3]
    The family of Romulus Augustulus - Academia.edu
    He was a native of Pannonia and the father of Orestes and Paulus, of whom it is only known that he was killed by Odoacer in Ravenna on September 4, 476, after ...
  4. [4]
    1320: Section 8: The Fall of Rome: Facts and Fictions
    Why, then, is Rome's "fall" and the dethroning of Romulus Augustulus, the birth-tale's teen namesake, treated more seriously when it has all the earmarks of ...
  5. [5]
    What actually fell in 476? - Caitlin Green
    Nov 30, 2014 · What 'fell' in 476 was merely the political structure known as the Western Roman Empire, and even this had arguably 'fallen' many years previously.
  6. [6]
    The Original Godfather: Ricimer and the Fall of Rome
    Dec 15, 2010 · In his position as patrician and magister militum, Ricimer established himself as the “emperor-maker” of the Western Empire during its last decades.
  7. [7]
    <i>DIR</p> Nepos
    Feb 8, 1998 · The Anonymous Valesianus suggests that the "enemy" sought by Orestes was none other than Nepos hlmself: "Soon Nepos arrived at Ravenna, pursued ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  8. [8]
    Romulus Augustulus - Roman Emperor | UNRV Roman History
    Romulus Augustulus' accession to the throne on 31 October 475 AD quickly became overshadowed by deeper social and military forces at work in the Western Empire.
  9. [9]
    Roman Emperor Romulus Augustulus - World History Edu
    Mar 15, 2025 · Although, his exact place of birth is unknown, but his family originated from the Roman province of Pannonia. His father, Orestes, was a ...
  10. [10]
    Romulus Augustus: Life, Rule, and Death of the Last Roman Emperor
    Feb 16, 2024 · Romulus Augustus, often remembered as the last Roman emperor of the Western Roman Empire, stands as a significant figure in the annals of history.Missing: scholarly sources
  11. [11]
    Romulus Augustulus | Catholic Answers Encyclopedia
    His reign was purely nominal. After the murder of Valentinian III (455) the Theodosian dynasty was extinct in Western Europe and the Suevian Ricimer, a grandson ...
  12. [12]
    Last Roman Emperor Is Deposed | Research Starters - EBSCO
    Romulus Augustulus, the last emperor of the Western Roman Empire, was deposed on September 4, 476, by a German mercenary general named Odoacer.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  13. [13]
    Odoacer and the Fall of Rome | World History - Lumen Learning
    In 475 a Roman general named Orestes was appointed Magister militum and patrician by the Western Roman Emperor Julius Nepos and became head of the Germanic ...
  14. [14]
    The Germanic Tribes | World Civilizations I (HIS101) - Lumen Learning
    In 475 a Roman general named Orestes was appointed Magister militum and ... foederati (barbarian mercenary armies for Rome). However, Orestes proved to ...
  15. [15]
    9.2: Odoacer and the Fall of Rome - Social Sci LibreTexts
    Oct 12, 2022 · In 475 a Roman general named Orestes was appointed Magister militum ... foederati (barbarian mercenary armies for Rome). However, Orestes ...Missing: policies | Show results with:policies
  16. [16]
    https://www.worldhistoryedu.com/roman-emperor-romulus-augustulus/
  17. [17]
    476: Orestes, father of the last Roman Emperor | Executed Today
    Aug 28, 2018 · On this date in 476, the father of the very last Roman emperor was put to death by a Germanic chief … a week before that last emperor was ...
  18. [18]
    Justinian, Roman Progress, and the Death of the Western Roman ...
    In his second entry under the year 476, Marcellinus wrote, “Odoacer, king ... Marcellinus Comes, Chronicle 476.2. 21. The tradition can be traced from ...
  19. [19]
    Romulus Augustulus: The Boy Who Would Not Be an Ancient ...
    Jan 31, 2025 · In 476, the allied barbarian foederati in Italy demanded Italian lands to settle on, which was refused by Orestes. Under Odoacer, the foederati ...
  20. [20]
    Romulus Augustulus - IMPERIUM ROMANUM
    Romulus was the son of Orestes, who came from Pannonia and was his secretary during Attila's lifetime. Thanks to promotions in the Roman army, he became the ...
  21. [21]
    The Final Ship of Romulus Augustulus - THE HISTORY AVENUE
    May 4, 2025 · ... Orestes, a Roman general, installed him as emperor in 475 CE, sidelining the legitimate ruler, Julius Nepos. However, his reign was short ...
  22. [22]
    The Anonymus Valesianus II: Full Translation & Analysis
    Sep 25, 2019 · The Anonymus Valesianus II is an important source on the very last days of the Western Roman Empire and the rise in Italy of the kingdom of ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Interrogating the "Collapse" of the Roman Empire: Historiography ...
    Although many scholars agreed for centuries that the Roman Empire fell in the west with the abdication of Romulus Augustulus, during the twentieth century ...
  24. [24]
    Amazon.com: The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome ...
    30-day returnsIn this groundbreaking book, Peter Heather proposes a stunning new solution: Centuries of imperialism turned the neighbors Rome called barbarians into an enemy.
  25. [25]
    Barbarian Migrations and the Roman West, 376–568
    30-day returnsGuy Halsall reveals that the creation and maintenance of kingdoms and empires ... fall of the Roman Empire produced the barbarian migrations, not vice versa.
  26. [26]
    The Fall of the Western Roman Empire (Chapter 8)
    Jul 4, 2017 · Another saw the barbarian invasions of the fifth century AD as a primary cause of collapse; the barbarians literally carved up the western half ...
  27. [27]
    Quantifying the Dynamics of Army Size, Territory, and Coinage
    Aug 9, 2025 · We model the Western Roman Empire from 500 BCE to 500 CE, aiming to understand the interdependent dynamics of army size, conquered territory and the production ...