Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

S-layer

S-layers, or surface layers, are highly ordered, paracrystalline two-dimensional protein arrays that form the outermost component of the cell envelope in numerous species of bacteria and archaea.^[1] These structures, typically composed of a single protein or glycoprotein species self-assembling into lattice-like formations, provide a protective coating that covers the entire cell surface and constitutes 10–15% of the organism's total cellular protein content in archaea.^[2] Discovered in the mid-20th century, S-layers exhibit remarkable regularity, with lattice spacings ranging from 12 to 30 nm and pore sizes of 2–6 nm, enabling functions such as molecular sieving while maintaining structural integrity across diverse environmental conditions.^[1] In terms of composition, bacterial S-layers are predominantly made of weakly acidic proteins or glycoproteins rich in hydrophobic amino acids (40–60%), often featuring N- or O-linked glycosylation that enhances stability, particularly in extremophiles like thermophiles and halophiles.^[3] Archaeal S-layers similarly rely on one or two glycoproteins, with glycosylation pathways involving dedicated gene clusters (e.g., agl genes in Haloferax volcanii) that attach complex glycans, adapting to factors such as salinity or temperature.^[2] Structurally, these layers display various symmetries—such as hexagonal (p6), tetragonal (p4), or oblique (p2)—with hexagonal lattices predominant in euryarchaeotes and more variable forms in crenarchaeotes; recent high-resolution cryo-EM structures, including those of RsaA from Caulobacter crescentus and the SlaA/SlaB complex from Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, have revealed intricate domain organizations and anchoring mechanisms like SLH domains binding to secondary cell wall polymers.^[4]^[1] Functionally, S-layers serve multiple roles essential for prokaryotic survival, including maintaining cell shape, protecting against environmental stresses like osmotic shock or predation, and acting as a scaffold for cell wall biogenesis and motility in flagellated species.^[1] In pathogenic bacteria such as Bacillus anthracis and Clostridium difficile, they facilitate host cell adhesion, immune evasion through antigenic variation, and biofilm formation.^[1] For archaea, lacking peptidoglycan, S-layers are the primary structural element, also mediating surface recognition, ion trapping, and enzyme display.^[2] Biogenesis of S-layers involves secretion via dedicated systems (e.g., Sec or TAT pathways in bacteria), followed by self-assembly at the cell surface, often anchored by covalent or non-covalent interactions with underlying pseudomurein, lipopolysaccharides, or secondary cell wall polymers.^[1] Evolutionary analyses indicate S-layers as an ancient innovation, conserved across prokaryotes with diverse genetic adaptations, and recent in silico tools like AlphaFold have enabled prediction of structures for over 150 S-layer proteins from uncultured microbes, highlighting their role in microbial ecology and pathogenicity.^[4] Beyond biology, S-layers inspire applications in nanotechnology, such as templating for biomimetic materials and drug delivery, due to their precise porosity and self-assembly properties.^[1]

Overview and History

Definition and Characteristics

S-layers are monomolecular, crystalline arrays composed of a single species of protein or glycoprotein subunits that form the outermost layer of the cell envelope in numerous prokaryotes, including many bacteria and archaea.^[3] These paracrystalline structures self-assemble into two-dimensional lattices that envelop the entire cell surface, providing a highly ordered and regular arrangement visible at the nanometer scale.^[1] As one of the most abundant prokaryotic cell envelope components, S-layers represent a primitive yet versatile biological membrane system evolved across diverse taxa.^[5] Key characteristics of S-layers include a uniform thickness ranging from 5 to 25 nm, with a smooth outer surface and a more corrugated inner surface that facilitates attachment to the underlying cell wall.^[6] They exhibit high porosity, typically 30-70%, punctuated by pores of identical size and morphology measuring 2-8 nm in diameter, which allow selective permeability while maintaining structural integrity.^[7] S-layer proteins can constitute up to 15% of the total cellular protein content, underscoring their significant biosynthetic investment and prevalence in prokaryotic cells.^[8] In terms of composition, S-layers are primarily formed by surface-layer proteins (SLPs) with molecular weights between 40 and 200 kDa, enabling versatile assembly into lattice structures.^[9] These proteins are often glycosylated, particularly in archaea, where carbohydrate attachments enhance stability and functionality against extreme environments.^[2] The first observations of S-layers were made through electron microscopy in the 1950s, revealing their distinctive crystalline patterns on prokaryotic surfaces.^[1]

Discovery and Research Milestones

The initial discovery of S-layers occurred in the early 1950s through electron microscopy observations of bacterial cell walls. In 1953, A. L. Houwink described a paracrystalline protein array on the surface of Spirillum serpens, representing the first documented evidence of these monolayer structures in prokaryotes.^[10] Subsequent studies extended these findings to Bacillus species and other bacteria, confirming the presence of similar ordered lattices via shadow-casting and thin-sectioning techniques during the decade.^[3] Research advanced significantly in the 1970s, when U. B. Sleytr and colleagues identified S-layers as self-assembling protein lattices using innovative freeze-etching methods, which revealed their ultrastructure in species like Clostridium and Bacillus. The 1980s and 1990s focused on elucidating self-assembly mechanisms, building on C. C. Brinton's 1969 demonstration of in vitro recrystallization and Sleytr's 1975 studies on reattachment to cell walls; this era also saw the first gene sequencing of an S-layer protein in Bacillus brevis by A. Tsuboi et al. in 1986. Molecular cloning of surface layer protein (slp) genes expanded post-2000, enabling detailed genetic and functional analyses across diverse species. By the 2020s, S-layers had been confirmed in hundreds of bacterial and archaeal species, underscoring their prevalence in prokaryotic envelopes.^[11] Recent milestones include B. Schuster and U. B. Sleytr's 2021 advancements in S-layer-based ultrafiltration membranes for biotechnological applications, leveraging self-assembly for precise pore formation. In 2023, Jaeok Kim et al. developed scalable biomimetic sensors using S-layer arrays to position membrane receptors for molecular detection.^[12] The following year, C. Buhlheller et al. introduced the SymProFold computational tool, which predicts symmetrical S-layer assemblies from AlphaFold models, accelerating structural research. As of 2025, ongoing research continues to explore S-layer applications in microbial ecology and nanotechnology, with no major new milestones reported by November.

Occurrence and Location

In Archaea

S-layers are ubiquitous in Archaea, present in nearly all described species and often serving as the primary or sole component of the cell envelope due to the absence of peptidoglycan.^[13] These paracrystalline protein lattices, typically composed of one or two glycoproteins, envelop the cytoplasmic membrane and provide structural integrity in diverse archaeal lineages, including methanogens, halophiles, and thermophiles. In many extremophilic archaea, the S-layer constitutes the entire cell wall, enabling adaptation to harsh conditions without additional polymeric supports. Prominent examples illustrate the prevalence and specialized features of archaeal S-layers. In the halophilic archaeon Halobacterium salinarum, the S-layer forms a hexagonal lattice that maintains stability in hypersaline environments, such as 5 M NaCl concentrations, contributing to osmotic balance. Similarly, in the methanogenic archaeon Methanococcus voltae, the S-layer associates closely with pseudomurein, a unique archaeal cell wall polymer, and exhibits N-linked glycosylation that enhances surface properties.^[14] Archaeal S-layers are frequently heavily glycosylated, with carbohydrate content around 10-12% in species such as Halobacterium salinarum, often higher than in many bacterial counterparts, which aids in osmotic protection and stability within extreme environments like high salinity and elevated temperatures.^[2] This extensive glycosylation, often involving unique N-linked glycans, fortifies the lattice against environmental stresses prevalent in archaeal habitats, such as acidic hot springs or saturated salt lakes.

In Bacteria

S-layers are widespread in bacteria and have been observed in species across nearly every taxonomic group of walled bacteria, including both Gram-positive and Gram-negative taxa.^[3] They are particularly prevalent in Gram-positive genera such as Bacillus and Clostridium, as well as in select Gram-negative species, and are notably absent in model organisms like Escherichia coli.^[1]^[3] This distribution underscores their commonality in anaerobes and many pathogens, where they contribute to cell envelope architecture.^[3] In Gram-positive bacteria, S-layers integrate with the cell envelope by anchoring to the rigid peptidoglycan layer through interactions with secondary cell wall polymers, such as pyruvylated polysaccharides.^[3] In contrast, Gram-negative bacteria associate S-layers with the outer membrane via binding to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) components, facilitating surface attachment without a direct peptidoglycan link.^[15] These anchoring mechanisms ensure stable paracrystalline array formation on the cell exterior.^[1] Key bacterial examples highlight S-layer diversity and roles in envelope integration. In the Gram-negative pathogen Campylobacter jejuni, the S-layer promotes adhesion to host cells as part of its pathogenic strategy.^[3] Among Gram-positive probiotics, Lactobacillus species like L. acidophilus feature S-layers that form protective surface layers aiding gut colonization.^[3] Similarly, in anaerobes such as Clostridium difficile and Bacillus anthracis, S-layers comprise a significant portion of cellular protein (up to 10-15% in B. anthracis) and integrate tightly with peptidoglycan for structural support.^[1]

Structure and Composition

Lattice Architecture

S-layers form highly ordered, paracrystalline protein lattices that envelop the entire cell surface of many prokaryotes, exhibiting one of three primary symmetry types: oblique (p1 or p2), square (p4), or hexagonal (p3 or p6).^[15]^[16] These lattices consist of repeating morphological units composed of identical protein subunits, with oblique symmetries featuring one or two subunits per unit cell, square symmetries four subunits, and hexagonal symmetries three or six.^[16] The unit cell dimensions typically range from 3 to 30 nm, determining the overall periodicity and density of the array.^[16]^[7] Among these, hexagonal lattices predominate, observed in the majority of characterized S-layers, which confers six-fold rotational symmetry and often results in a closed, honeycomb-like structure that tiles the cell surface seamlessly.^[15]^[17] The lattices are inherently porous, with regularly distributed pores of uniform size spanning 2 to 8 nm across the array, contributing to the overall meshwork architecture without compromising structural integrity.^[18]^[7] These features arise from the self-assembly of surface-layer proteins into extended two-dimensional crystals, where intermolecular bonds dictate the precise geometric arrangement.^[16] High-resolution imaging techniques have been essential for elucidating S-layer lattice architecture. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), often with negative staining or cryo-EM preparation, reveals the overall symmetry and periodicity of the lattices on isolated cell wall fragments or whole cells.^[1]^[17] Atomic force microscopy (AFM) complements these methods by providing three-dimensional topographic data under physiological conditions, enabling visualization of surface features at near-atomic resolution without the need for vacuum environments.^[19]^[1] Such techniques have confirmed the paracrystalline nature of S-layers, highlighting their regular, crystalline order akin to a molecular-scale tiling pattern.^[6]

Protein and Glycoprotein Properties

S-layer proteins (Slps) are generally composed of a single protein species with molecular masses ranging from 40 to 200 kDa, though some systems involve multiple protein subunits forming the lattice.^[18]^[20] These proteins exhibit a modular architecture, often featuring one or more domains dedicated to lattice formation and cell envelope anchoring.^[21] The lattice-forming domains are predominantly composed of beta-sheet-rich motifs, including beta-sandwiches, beta-rolls, and beta-helices, which promote stable intermolecular interactions essential for paracrystalline array assembly.^[20]^[21] A hallmark of many Slps is their glycoprotein nature, with post-translational modifications enhancing stability, assembly, and interactions. Glycosylation is particularly prevalent in archaeal Slps, where N-linked attachments to asparagine residues carry complex heteropolysaccharides, sometimes up to 25 sites per protein, contributing to surface diversity and protection.^[6]^[18] In bacterial Slps, O-linked glycosylation to serine, threonine, or tyrosine residues predominates, typically at 2–4 sites, with glycan chains comprising short oligosaccharides that constitute 2–10% of the protein's weight.^[6]^[18] Phosphorylation, including rare tyrosine modifications, also occurs, potentially regulating assembly or anchoring dynamics.^[20]^[18] Anchoring of Slps to the cell envelope relies on specific sequence motifs and mechanisms tailored to the organism's cell wall composition. In Gram-positive bacteria, SLH (S-layer homology) domains—approximately 55 amino acids long and often present in tandem repeats of three—mediate non-covalent attachment to secondary cell wall polymers (SCWPs) linked to peptidoglycan.^[22]^[18] These SLH domains bind pyruvylated polysaccharides in SCWPs, such as 4,6-O-pyruvylated β-D-ManNAc, with high affinity (e.g., K_D ≈ 29 nM for Paenibacillus alvei SpaA), involving conserved motifs like TRAE for ligand recognition.^[22] In archaea, anchoring occurs via covalent or non-covalent bonds to pseudomurein or direct membrane association through hydrophobic C-terminal transmembrane segments or lipidation.^[20]^[6] SLH-like domains in some archaea similarly interact with SCWPs for stable attachment.^[22] By 2024, numerous Slp structures have been solved by X-ray crystallography, including full-length proteins like those from Caulobacter crescentus (RsaA) and Clostridium difficile (SlpA), providing atomic-level insights into domain organization, glycan attachments, and anchoring interfaces.^[21]^[23]^[24] These structural data underscore the beta-sheet dominance and modular design that support lattice formation from individual protein units.^[20]

Biological Functions

Protective and Structural Roles

S-layers serve as essential structural components in many prokaryotes, providing mechanical stabilization to the cell envelope by acting as a rigid scaffold that withstands mechanical stresses and osmotic pressures, particularly in hypotonic environments. In archaea, where S-layers often constitute the sole cell wall component, they enhance the integrity of lipid membranes against hydrostatic and osmotic forces, as demonstrated in species like Thermoproteus tenax.^[25] In bacteria such as Bacillus anthracis, the S-layer functions as an exoskeleton-like structure, imparting osmotic stabilization and resistance to internal pressure fluctuations. Theoretical models of archaeal S-layer-membrane assemblies further quantify this osmoprotection, showing increased membrane resistance to osmotic shock through the lattice's symmetry and unit cell dimensions.^[26] As a protective barrier, S-layers defend against environmental threats, including bacteriophage infection and predation by protozoans or predatory bacteria. They act as molecular sieves with defined pore sizes that exclude phages, as observed in Gram-negative bacteria like Aeromonas salmonicida, where the lattice prevents viral adsorption and penetration.^[27] Resistance to predation is evident in organisms such as Caulobacter crescentus, where the S-layer shields against invaders like Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus by masking vulnerable surface components and providing a physical barrier.^[28] Additionally, S-layers protect cellular enzymes from degradation; for instance, in Sporosarcina ureae, the lattice safeguards the underlying peptidoglycan layer from lysozyme attack, while in Bacillus stearothermophilus, it stabilizes surface-bound enzymes like amylase against denaturation.^[29] S-layers are crucial for maintaining cell shape and morphology, especially in wall-less or thin-walled prokaryotes, where they determine overall geometry during growth and division. In archaea like Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, the paracrystalline array enforces rod or coccoid forms under mechanical and osmotic stress. This role extends to bacteria, where lattice faults correlate with morphological variations, underscoring the S-layer's influence on cell integrity.^[30] A notable example is in Deinococcus radiodurans, where the S-layer, via the protein DR_2577 bound to deinoxanthin, shields DNA from ionizing and UV radiation, contributing to the bacterium's extreme radiation resistance by absorbing harmful wavelengths and preventing intracellular damage.^[31]

Interaction and Pathogenic Roles

S-layers play a critical role in mediating bacterial adhesion to host tissues and environmental surfaces, facilitating colonization in both commensal and pathogenic contexts. In probiotic bacteria such as Lactobacillus plantarum, surface-layer proteins enhance auto-aggregation, hydrophobicity, and binding to intestinal epithelial cells, enabling persistent gut colonization as demonstrated in shrimp intestinal models where surface protein extraction reduced adhesion by over 75%.^[32] Similarly, in the pathogen Clostridioides difficile, the S-layer promotes adhesion to the intestinal mucosa, supporting initial gut colonization during infection.^[3] In pathogenic bacteria, S-layers contribute significantly to virulence by modulating host immune responses and aiding toxin delivery. For C. difficile, the major S-layer protein SlpA activates Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling, driving proinflammatory cytokine production and enhancing disease severity in mouse models, where S-layer-null mutants exhibit reduced weight loss and delayed immune activation despite comparable colonization levels.^[33] SlpA deletion also impairs toxin A and B production, reducing extracellular toxin levels and weakening host cell adhesion to 58% of wild-type efficiency, thereby attenuating overall pathogenicity.^[34] In Campylobacter fetus, S-layers are essential for intestinal colonization and placental translocation in ovine models, with S-layer-positive strains achieving 91% colonization rates and inducing abortion, while mutants fail to colonize; additionally, these layers confer resistance to complement-mediated killing and phagocytosis, enabling immune evasion and systemic spread.^[35]^[36] S-layers further support biofilm formation in pathogens, promoting multilayer community assembly and persistence. In C. difficile, an intact S-layer, via SlpA, enhances biofilm development on abiotic surfaces and host tissues, with mutants showing increased but disorganized biofilm production alongside reduced adhesion, contributing to recurrent infections by shielding communities from antibiotics and immune clearance.^[34]^[33]

Self-Assembly Mechanisms

In Vivo Assembly

The in vivo assembly of S-layers begins with the continuous synthesis of surface layer proteins (Slps) in the prokaryotic cytoplasm through ongoing transcription and translation of dedicated Slp genes. These proteins often represent a substantial fraction of total cellular protein content, comprising 5–10% in species such as Bacillus anthracis, where multiple Slp genes like those encoding EA1 and Sap are expressed. Synthesis rates are exceptionally high to support rapid cell surface coverage, reaching approximately 500 Slp subunits per second in bacteria with generation times under 20 minutes, such as certain Bacillus species, ensuring the lattice keeps pace with cellular expansion.^[6]^[3]^[1] In archaea, Slp synthesis similarly occurs in the cytoplasm, often constituting 10–15% of total protein, with secretion typically via Sec or twin-arginine translocation (TAT) pathways, followed by self-assembly and anchoring to underlying layers like pseudomurein via S-layer homology (SLH) domains or covalent linkages.^[2] Following synthesis, Slp monomers are secreted across the cytoplasmic membrane primarily via accessory Sec systems, such as SecA2, in Gram-positive bacteria like Bacillus anthracis and Clostridium difficile. This process involves an accessory Sec system that facilitates translocation of precursors with N-terminal signal peptides, which are cleaved during export, anchoring the proteins to the cell envelope through interactions with secondary cell wall polymers or lipopolysaccharide in Gram-negative species. In select organisms, such as Campylobacter fetus, a type I secretion system contributes to export, highlighting mechanistic diversity while maintaining efficient delivery to the outer surface. Secretion is tightly controlled, with minimal Slp accumulation in the growth medium, preventing wasteful extracellular aggregation.^[1]^[3]^[37] Nucleation of the S-layer lattice occurs at specific cellular sites, such as division septa or polar patches, where initial monomer binding initiates non-classical crystallization without dedicated nucleation agents. This process involves an amorphous precursor stage transitioning to ordered crystalline growth, as observed in Caulobacter crescentus, where monomers diffuse on the lipopolysaccharide layer before integrating into the lattice. Growth proceeds continuously through subunit insertion, forming helical bands or expanding domains that match cell elongation, with lattice dislocations at poles and septa facilitating division while preserving overall integrity. In Gram-positive bacteria like Geobacillus stearothermophilus, assembly starts as oblique or square lattices at division sites, expanding via edge propagation to cover the entire surface.^[1]^[38]^[3] Assembly is regulated in a cell cycle-dependent manner, synchronizing with envelope biogenesis and division, as demonstrated in Caulobacter crescentus where S-layer formation coordinates with peptidoglycan synthesis to maintain structural order. Environmental cues further modulate the process: divalent cations like Ca²⁺ promote nucleation and stability in species such as Lysinibacillus sphaericus, while pH shifts and ionic strength influence adhesion and growth kinetics, with acidic conditions favoring lattice expansion in Geobacillus stearothermophilus. Oxygen stress can trigger Slp gene switches, as in Bacillus stearothermophilus where sbsA expression yields to sbsB under aerobic conditions, adapting the lattice to changing redox environments. These regulatory mechanisms ensure the S-layer dynamically responds to both intrinsic developmental stages and extrinsic factors, optimizing cellular fitness.^[39]^[1]^[40]

In Vitro Assembly

In vitro assembly of S-layer proteins involves the recrystallization of isolated subunits into ordered two-dimensional lattices under controlled laboratory conditions, mimicking their native paracrystalline structure without cellular components. This process typically begins with the extraction and purification of S-layer proteins from bacterial cell walls, followed by removal of denaturants such as guanidine hydrochloride or urea through dialysis. The first in vitro self-assembly of the S-layer protein from Bacillus stearothermophilus was demonstrated in 1976, where dissociated subunits reformed regular lattices identical to those on intact cells.^[41] Recrystallization methods vary by support to facilitate oriented or complete lattice formation. On solid supports like mica or hydrophobized silicon wafers, proteins adsorb and nucleate into monolayers, often achieving greater than 90% surface coverage for high-resolution analysis. On lipid monolayers using Langmuir-Blodgett troughs, S-layer proteins align via electrostatic interactions with phospholipid headgroups, forming hybrid structures suitable for studying interfacial assembly. Emulsion-based approaches, such as coating oil droplets or liposomes, promote curved lattices that reveal flexibility in protein conformation during growth. These methods require specific conditions, including divalent cations like Ca²⁺ for lattice stabilization and a pH range of 7-9 to maintain protein solubility and charge balance.^[7]^[42]^[18] The kinetics of in vitro assembly follow two-dimensional crystal growth models, characterized by rapid nucleation within minutes followed by slower lateral expansion into coherent domains. Nucleation is often rate-limiting and influenced by surface hydrophobicity or ionic strength, while growth proceeds via subunit addition to lattice edges, sometimes encountering kinetic traps that yield incomplete sheets. Modern protocols yield uniform, closed-end or open sheets for structural and functional studies, enabling precise truncation experiments to isolate self-assembly domains such as the N-terminal regions responsible for nucleation. These assemblies parallel in vivo processes by highlighting non-covalent bonding mechanisms but allow isolation of variables like ion concentration.^[7]^[42]

Evolution and Diversity

Evolutionary Origins

S-layers represent one of the most ancient prokaryotic cell envelope components, likely originating in the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) due to their monomolecular simplicity and structural stability, which would have provided an early mechanism for cellular protection and organization. Their conservation across nearly all archaea and many bacteria underscores this deep phylogenetic root, with archaeal S-layers exhibiting a more unified evolutionary trajectory compared to the multiple independent acquisitions observed in bacterial lineages.^[43]^[1] Evolutionary pressures in primordial environments, such as the harsh conditions of early microbial mats, likely drove the emergence of S-layers as a selective advantage for withstanding osmotic stress, predation, and physicochemical fluctuations.^[43] Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) has further disseminated S-layer protein (Slp) genes, enabling rapid adaptation and diversification across prokaryotic taxa through mechanisms like plasmid exchange and phage-mediated transfer.^[44]

Genetic and Structural Diversity

The genetic basis of S-layer proteins (SLPs), often encoded by slp or sap genes, frequently involves organization into clusters or large gene families within prokaryotic genomes, enabling the production of multiple variants for adaptive responses. In species such as Clostridium difficile and Bacillus anthracis, these genes form paralogous arrays or cassettes that facilitate differential expression under varying conditions.^[1] For instance, the slpA locus in C. difficile includes multiple homologous genes that contribute to surface antigenicity.^[45] Phase variation in S-layer expression, which alters protein display to promote immune evasion or environmental adaptation, is commonly mediated by DNA recombination mechanisms rather than slipped-strand mispairing, though the latter occurs in some bacterial phase-variable systems. Site-specific recombination and invertible promoters allow switching between silent and active slp alleles, as seen in Lactobacillus species where promoter inversion regulates expression efficiency.^[46] In pathogens like Campylobacter fetus, the sap locus undergoes recombinational switching via gene conversion-like events at the sapA promoter, generating diverse surface proteins from a shared promoter.^[47] Similarly, in Geobacillus stearothermophilus (formerly Bacillus stearothermophilus), antigenic variation arises through DNA rearrangements between chromosomal slp genes and naturally occurring megaplasmids, enabling evasion of host immunity by altering surface epitopes.^[48] Structural diversity among SLPs stems from modular domain architectures, where conserved N-terminal anchoring motifs (e.g., SLH domains) pair with variable C-terminal assembly domains, leading to distinct lattice morphologies such as hexagonal (p6) or square (p4) arrays. Domain shuffling and fusions generate further variability; for example, in pathogenic B. anthracis, the adhesin BslA is fused to an SLP-like domain, enhancing host interaction while maintaining lattice integrity.^[1] Across taxa, SLP sequence identity typically ranges from 20% to 80%, reflecting evolutionary pressures for functional specialization, with low inter-species homology despite conserved self-assembly properties.^[6] Recent phylogenetic analyses as of April 2025 have revealed evolutionary plasticity in bacterial S-layers, including multiple independent anchor replacements among Gram-positive Peptostreptococcaceae, highlighting functional and structural diversity.^[49] By 2025, over 150 SLPs have been structurally characterized, underscoring the extensive genetic and morphological adaptability observed in bacteria and archaea.^[4]

Biotechnological Applications

Nanomaterials and Biosensors

S-layers have emerged as versatile scaffolds in nanotechnology due to their highly ordered, porous lattices, which enable precise templating of inorganic nanoparticles. For instance, the S-layer protein SbpA from Lysinibacillus sphaericus CCM 2177, featuring a square lattice with a 13.1 nm constant, serves as a bioinspired template for silica mineralization using tetramethoxysilane (TMOS) as a precursor.^[50] This process results in nanostructured silica layers that replicate the S-layer topography, with deposition enhanced by phosphate ions or chemical activation of carboxyl groups, yielding up to 21 monolayers of amorphous silica gel.^[50] Similarly, S-layers from Deinococcus radiodurans and Sulfolobus acidocaldarius facilitate the self-assembly of citrate-capped gold nanoparticles into ordered arrays with spacings of 7–22 nm, leveraging electrostatic interactions to form honeycomb-like patterns at lattice vertices.^[51] Beyond nanoparticle mineralization, S-layers support the arranged immobilization of enzymes, enhancing biocatalytic efficiency through site-directed orientation. Fusion proteins combining SbpA with extremophilic enzymes, such as laminarinase from Pyrococcus furiosus, self-assemble into crystalline lattices on supports like glass slides or silicon wafers, exposing the enzyme's active site for optimal activity.^[52] This approach doubles glucose release rates compared to random immobilization (e.g., 6.8 mM/cm² versus 0.4 mM/cm²) and imparts thermal stability, retaining 50% activity after 40 hours at 90°C.^[52] S-layer fusion proteins further enable site-specific immobilization of macromolecules, achieving resolutions down to approximately 10 nm in arrays, corresponding to the lattice unit cell dimensions.^[53] In biosensor applications, S-layers' uniform pores (typically 2–5 nm) allow for selective detection of biomolecules by confining analytes within the lattice for targeted interactions. A 2023 biomimetic system integrates recombinant S-layer proteins with graphene transistor arrays and redesigned membrane receptors, enabling scalable, high-sensitivity electrical detection of analytes through dual-monolayer probes positioned on the crystalline scaffold.^[12] For heavy metal sensing, S-layer proteins functionalized with gold nanoparticles exhibit colorimetric responses to ions like Cu²⁺ and Pb²⁺, exploiting the proteins' metal-binding affinity to induce aggregation and detectable spectral shifts.^[54] S-layer ultrafiltration membranes, fabricated via in vitro self-assembly of S-layer fragments on microfiltration supports (pore size 0.05–0.1 µm), provide robust platforms for nanomaterial integration.^[55] Pressure-assisted deposition followed by glutaraldehyde crosslinking yields coherent multilayers with 30–70% porosity and a molecular weight cut-off of 30,000–40,000 Da, suitable for sieving macromolecules while supporting enzyme or antibody immobilization for enhanced sensor stability.^[55] These membranes maintain functionality under harsh conditions, with lipid-supported variants extending operational lifetimes to 17–18 hours for amperometric biosensing.^[55]

Medical and Vaccine Uses

S-layer proteins have emerged as promising components in medical applications, particularly for targeted drug delivery due to their self-assembly into stable, biocompatible nanostructures. When recrystallized onto lipid-based carriers such as emulsomes or liposomes, S-layers provide a protective coating that enhances stability against environmental degradation, improves cellular uptake, and enables the display of targeting ligands for site-specific delivery. For example, S-layer fusion proteins on emulsomes have been used to deliver amphotericin B for antifungal therapy and curcumin for anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects, reducing cytotoxicity while increasing efficacy in eukaryotic cells.^[56] Similarly, S-layer-coated liposomes from Lactobacillus kefir promote adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells (e.g., Caco-2) and facilitate oral delivery of biomacromolecules like insulin, leveraging the proteins' electrostatic interactions for gastrointestinal stability.^[57] In vaccine development, S-layers function as versatile carriers and adjuvants, exploiting their high surface density for antigen presentation and immunostimulatory properties. S-layer glycoproteins from Lactobacillus kefiri, recognized by C-type lectin receptors like Mincle, enhance CD4⁺ T-cell responses and IFN-γ production when co-administered with antigens such as ovalbumin, with adjuvant effects dependent on glycan integrity.^[58] Fusion proteins combining S-layers with allergens, such as Bet v1 from birch pollen expressed in endotoxin-free Bacillus subtilis, self-assemble into lattices that retain IgE reactivity, offering potential for subcutaneous immunotherapy of type I allergies with yields up to 50 mg/L.^[59] S-layers from lactobacilli have also been engineered as mucosal vaccine delivery systems, displaying foreign epitopes like poliovirus VP1 or c-Myc on their surface to achieve superior antigen density compared to other bacterial platforms. In veterinary applications, Lactobacillus brevis S-layer fusions protected calves against neonatal diarrhea via oral immunization, demonstrating enhanced immunogenicity and adherence to mucosal sites.^[60] For human pathogens, S-layers show promise in multicomponent vaccines against Clostridium difficile, where their immunostimulatory role could target high-risk patients by eliciting protective antibody responses.^[18] Additionally, S-layer-coated liposomes have boosted IgG titers in hepatitis B vaccination models, with levels reaching 55.24 ± 17.50 ng/mL after 12 weeks, supporting oral vaccine strategies.^[57]

References

[1]
Biogenesis and functions of bacterial S-layers - Nature
Feb 10, 2014 · S-layers are two-dimensional (2D) protein arrays that are frequently found on the surface of bacteria and archaea. Genetic analysis reveals ...
[2]
Archaeal S-Layers: Overview and Current State of the Art - PMC
S-layers are composed of only one or two proteins and form different lattice structures. In this review, we summarize current understanding of archaeal S-layer ...
[3]
S‐layers: principles and applications - PMC
Most S‐layers of Bacteria are composed of weakly acidic proteins or glycoproteins, contain 40–60% hydrophobic amino acids, and possess few or no sulfur‐ ...
[4]
https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(25)02054-X/fulltext
[5]
I. Basic and applied S-layer research: an overview - Oxford Academic
S-layers are crystalline, monomolecular protein or glycoprotein assemblies, common in Archaea and Bacteria, and are considered the simplest biological membrane.
[6]
S-Layer Proteins - PMC - NIH
Most S-layers are 5 to 25 nm thick, and they reveal a rather smooth outer surface and a more corrugated inner surface. Among S-layer lattices of archaea, pillar ...
[7]
S-Layer Protein Self-Assembly - MDPI
S-layers generally represent highly porous protein meshworks (30%–70% porosity) with pores of uniform size and morphology in the two to eight nm range [37–39].
[8]
S-layers: The Proteinaceous Multifunctional Armors of Gram-Positive ...
Apr 6, 2021 · S-layers demand a high metabolic investment from the organism producing them; they comprise 5–15% of the total cellular protein production, ...Sequence-Structure Features · Figure 2 · The Two-Tiered Armor: C...
[9]
S‐Layers as a basic building block in a molecular construction kit
Dec 20, 2006 · S-Layers are highly porous protein lattices with a surface porosity of 30–70%. As S-layers are mostly composed of identical species of subunits, ...
[10]
https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3002(53)90266-2
[11]
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.663468/full
[12]
S-layers: The Proteinaceous Multifunctional Armors of Gram-Positive ...
Apr 5, 2021 · S-layers are self-assembled crystalline 2D lattices enclosing the cell envelopes of several bacteria and archaea. Despite their abundance ...
[13]
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2576
[14]
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2014.06854.x
[15]
S-Layer Proteins | Journal of Bacteriology
S-layer proteins of many archaea and those of gram-positive bacteria can possess covalently bound carbohydrate chains (for reviews, see references 70, 86 ...
[16]
S-layer fusion proteins — construction principles and applications
The crystalline arrays are generally 5–10 nm thick and represent highly porous protein lattices (30–70% porosity) with pores of uniform size and morphology in ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
[17]
Patterns in Nature—S-Layer Lattices of Bacterial and Archaeal Cells
S-layer proteins have a molecular weight (Mw) between 40 and 200 kDa ... molecular weights of 30 and 45 kDa. In addition, functional groups located on ...
[18]
S-layers: principles and applications | FEMS Microbiology Reviews
The first complete S-layer gene sequence was that for the outer wall protein (OWP) from Bacillus brevis 47 (Tsuboi et al., 1986). To date, the search term 'S- ...
[19]
Atomic Force Microscopy, a Powerful Tool in Microbiology
Oct 1, 2002 · The technique provides three-dimensional images of the surface ultrastructure with molecular resolution, in real time, under physiological conditions, and with ...
[20]
https://www.cell.com/trends/microbiology/fulltext/S0966-842X(20)30258-4
[21]
A new age in structural S-layer biology: Experimental and in silico ...
This review summarizes major achievements in S-layer protein structural research over the past 5 years, presenting them with a typical workflow for the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[22]
Structural basis of cell wall anchoring by SLH domains in ... - Nature
Aug 7, 2018 · S-layer anchoring is best characterized for Gram-positive bacteria, where S-layer proteins non-covalently attach to the PG layer via species- ...Missing: properties | Show results with:properties
[23]
https://www.rcsb.org/structure/5N97
[24]
https://www.rcsb.org/structure/7ACY
[25]
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00287.x
[26]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2007.08.004
[27]
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00252211
[28]
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07128-11
[29]
https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.177.6.1444-1451.1995
[30]
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60218-0
[31]
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00155
[32]
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.878874
[33]
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011015
[34]
https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.04005-23
[35]
https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.68.3.1687-1691.2000
[36]
Campylobacter Surface-Layers (S-Layers) and Immune Evasion
The S-layer, possessed by 2 Campylobacter species (C. fetus and C. rectus), is ... Among Gram-negative bacteria, 3 species (Aeromonas salmonicida ...
[37]
Campylobacter fetus Surface Layer Proteins Are Transported by a ...
The subunits of the S-layer are S-layer proteins (SLPs) that are secreted in the absence of an N-terminal signal sequence and attach to either type A or B C.Missing: IV | Show results with:IV
[38]
A bacterial surface layer protein exploits multistep crystallization for ...
Dec 17, 2019 · S-layer assembly in vivo occurs through continuous protein crystallization as individual secreted RsaA monomers diffuse on the LPS outer ...
[39]
Cell cycle dependent coordination of surface layer biogenesis in ...
Apr 18, 2024 · Our findings present insights into how C. crescentus cells form an ordered S-layer on their surface in coordination with the biogenesis of other cell envelope ...Missing: cues | Show results with:cues
[40]
Ion-Specific Control of the Self-Assembly Dynamics of a ... - NIH
Here we systematically investigate the impact of varying solution conditions on the self-assembly of SbpA, a surface-layer protein from Lysinibacillus ...Missing: cycle cues
[41]
S-Layer of Bacillus stearothermophilus PV72 - SpringerLink
The S-layer can be dissociated into subunits which have the ability to self-assemble into lattices identical to those observed on intact cells (Sleytr, 1976).
[42]
S‐layers: principles and applications - Sleytr - Wiley Online Library
Feb 3, 2014 · The position of the cell wall-anchoring region within the protein can vary between bacterial species. ... This is one-third of this S-layer ...Missing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
[43]
Biogenesis, function and evolution of the archaeal S-layer
This review highlights the biogenesis, structural assembly, evolutionary adaptations, and functional roles of archaeal S-layers
[44]
3.5 billion-year-old rock structures are one of the oldest signs of life ...
Nov 10, 2022 · The oldest stromatolites that scientists agree were made by living organisms date back 3.43 billion years, but there are older specimens, too.
[45]
Characterization of Three Different Unusual S-Layer Proteins from ...
Together with the genomic data, this is the first description of a novel type of S-layer proteins showing features of Lactobacillus as well as of Bacillus-type ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[46]
Prediction and Inferred Evolution of Acid Tolerance Genes in the ...
Phylogenetic analysis of the proteins shows the Slp-1 protein clustering with Slp proteins of Acidithiobacillus, and Slp-2 clustered with Chromatiales Slp ...
[47]
Recombinational Switching of the Clostridium difficile S-Layer and a ...
Our purpose was to understand the diversity and evolution of slpA and nearby genes also encoding immunodominant cell surface antigens. Methods. Whole-genome ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[48]
IV. Molecular biology of S-layers | FEMS Microbiology Reviews
Phase variation, exemplified by the absence ... As in many other bacteria, S-layer proteins of Lactobacillus are very efficiently expressed and secreted.
[49]
Conservation and Diversity of sap Homologues and Their ...
Campylobacter fetus surface layer proteins (SLPs), encoded by sapA homologues, are important in virulence. In wild-type C. fetus strain 23D, all eight sapA ...
[50]
S-layer variation in Bacillus stearothermophilus PV72 is ... - PubMed
S-layer variation in Bacillus stearothermophilus PV72 is based on DNA rearrangements between the chromosome and the naturally occurring megaplasmids · Abstract.Missing: conversion | Show results with:conversion
[51]
S-layer templated bioinspired synthesis of silica - PMC - NIH
The S-layer protein SbpA of L. sphaericus CCM 2177 was used as organic template for the generation of nanostructured silica.Missing: nanoparticles | Show results with:nanoparticles
[52]
Bionanofabrication of Metallic and Semiconductor Nanoparticle ...
These results demonstrate that it is possible to exploit the physicochemical/structural diversity of prokaryotic S-layer scaffolds to vary the morphological ...
[53]
Exploitation of the S-layer self-assembly system for site directed ...
Regarding enzyme immobilization, the advantages offered by the S-layer self-assembly system are (i) the requirement of only a simple, one-step incubation ...
[54]
S-layer fusion proteins — construction principles and applications
The crystalline arrays are generally 5–10 nm thick and represent highly porous protein lattices (30–70% porosity) with pores of uniform size and morphology in ...Recombinant S-Layer Proteins · S-Layer Based Sensor... · Vaccine DevelopmentMissing: resolution | Show results with:resolution
[55]
Scalable biomimetic sensing system with membrane receptor dual ...
Jul 21, 2023 · The construct adopts redesigned water-soluble membrane receptors as specific sensing units, positioned by two-dimensional crystalline S-layer ...
[56]
S-layer protein-AuNP systems for the colorimetric detection of metal ...
Nov 1, 2019 · The aim of our investigation was to assess the behavior of different S-layer-functionalized AuNP systems with a variety of ions or ionic ...Missing: biosensor | Show results with:biosensor
[57]
S-Layer Ultrafiltration Membranes - PMC - NIH
Apr 8, 2021 · S-layer ultrafiltration membranes (SUMs) can be produced by depositing S-layer fragments as a coherent (multi)layer on microfiltration membranes.
[58]
Emulsomes Meet S-layer Proteins: An Emerging Targeted Drug ...
Abstract. Here, the use of emulsomes as a drug delivery system is reviewed and compared with other similar lipidic nanoformulations.
[59]
Slp-coated liposomes for drug delivery and biomedical applications
The S-layer, which has a thickness of 5–25 nm, provides capsule-like protection for the maintenance of bacterial cell morphology.
[60]
S-Layer Glycoprotein From Lactobacillus kefiri Exerts Its ... - Frontiers
Jun 25, 2019 · Studies of the biotechnological applications of S-layer proteins ... application of these proteins in the development of new adjuvanted vaccines.
[61]
Expression of an endotoxin-free S-layer/allergen fusion protein in ...
Feb 10, 2011 · Thus, S-layer/allergen fusion proteins were considered as suitable carriers for new immunotherapeutical vaccines for treatment of Type I ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[62]
S-layer proteins from lactobacilli as vaccine delivery systems
Aug 7, 2025 · In addition, S-layers may provide superior expression levels and surface density of antigens when compared to other bacterial antigen ...