Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Schuman Declaration

The Schuman Declaration was a speech delivered by , the for , on 9 May 1950, proposing the pooling of and German and production under a common supranational authority open to other countries, as a concrete step toward preventing future wars in by making conflict between former enemies "not merely unthinkable, but materially impossible." The declaration, drafted under the influence of , emphasized pragmatic economic integration over grand designs, stating that " will not be made all at once, or according to a single plan," but through achievements fostering solidarity. In the postwar context of 1950, with Europe rebuilding amid the and lingering Franco-German tensions, the proposal marked a bold shift from rivalry to interdependence, targeting and —the essential materials for armaments—as the initial focus for joint management via a . This initiative directly led to the in 1951, establishing the (ECSC) with six founding members: , , , , the , and . The ECSC's success in promoting economic recovery and political reconciliation laid the institutional groundwork for subsequent treaties, evolving into the and ultimately the . Annually commemorated as on 9 May, the declaration remains a cornerstone of supranational cooperation, though its supranational model has sparked debates over national sovereignty in later EU expansions.

Historical Context

Post-World War II Europe

World War II left in ruins, with widespread destruction of infrastructure and industries essential for economic recovery. By May 1945, when the war ended in , industrial production across the continent had fallen to approximately 50% of pre-war levels, particularly in critical sectors like and , which were vital for reconstruction but hampered by bombed factories, disrupted supply chains, and labor shortages. Western European nations, including and , faced acute shortages of these resources, exacerbating , , and ; for instance, Germany's output dropped to 20% of its 1938 peak immediately postwar. The emerging intensified these challenges by dividing Europe into hostile blocs, with the exerting control over through installed communist regimes and posing military threats to the West. Tensions escalated with the 1947 , which committed U.S. support to nations resisting Soviet expansion, signaling the onset of ideological confrontation amid fears of communist subversion in war-weakened states. , vulnerable to Soviet influence due to economic fragility, relied on American assistance, including the , which disbursed about $13 billion in aid from April 1948 to December 1951 to 16 participating countries for rebuilding infrastructure and stabilizing economies. Economic interdependence complicated recovery, as Germany's region—Europe's powerhouse for coal, steel, and coke production—remained under Allied oversight to prevent rearmament while enabling industrial revival. The , established by treaty on April 28, 1949, among the , , , the countries, and , imposed international controls on Ruhr output to balance French security needs with German economic participation, highlighting the tension between national sovereignty and collective resource management. This framework underscored the imperative for supranational mechanisms to foster stability amid mutual dependencies and lingering rivalries.

Franco-German Relations and Security Concerns

Franco-German relations were characterized by profound antagonism, with major wars fought in 1870–1871, 1914–1918, and 1939–1945, fostering French fears of recurrent German aggression rooted in industrial and military resurgence. Following , implemented occupation policies aimed at neutralizing German industrial capacity, including the establishment of a over the in 1946–1947 to secure resources and prevent their use for rearmament. In parallel, French demands emphasized the demilitarization and potential internationalization of the region, viewing its and production as essential to any future German . These measures reflected broader strategic anxieties about German economic recovery outpacing controls, as sought to maintain leverage over key resources while Allied partners pushed for . The formation of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1949, culminating in Konrad Adenauer's election as chancellor on September 15, intensified French apprehensions, with Prime Minister advocating for special statuses in regions like the to safeguard against restored enabling military revival. Bidault's stance underscored France's prioritization of security guarantees over rapid German autonomy, highlighting bilateral tensions that necessitated innovative supranational mechanisms to reconcile with mutual restraint.

Origins and Drafting

Influence of

, serving as head of the Anglo-French Coordinating Committee during , coordinated procurement efforts from the , gaining experience in supranational economic collaboration that informed his later advocacy for functional integration as a pragmatic alternative to immediate political federation. This approach emphasized incremental sector-specific cooperation to build interdependence without requiring upfront sovereign transfers, drawing from observed inefficiencies in intergovernmental bodies like the League of Nations, where Monnet had earlier served as deputy secretary-general. In the late , Monnet, as head of France's Commissariat général du Plan, circulated internal promoting a U.S.-inspired for , arguing that pooling key industries would foster mutual prosperity and reduce conflict risks by intertwining national economies. These ideas culminated in a confidential drafted by Monnet and his team toward the end of , proposing the supranational pooling of Franco-German and under a high authority to render war between the two nations "not merely unthinkable, but materially impossible," thereby constraining German industrial resurgence while advancing reconstruction. The plan targeted these sectors due to their strategic wartime role, with consuming over 150 million tons of annually and underpinning armaments, making integrated control a direct mechanism for . Monnet directly persuaded Foreign Minister by presenting the proposal outside traditional diplomatic channels at the , leveraging his position as a non-career technocrat to avoid bureaucratic from foreign policy elites wary of ceding . He urged framing the initiative as a bold, irreversible public commitment to preempt sabotage through prolonged negotiations or dilutions, insisting on a supranational structure whose decisions would bind participating states equally, thus shifting from bilateral to shared in vital resources. This strategic maneuver reflected Monnet's first-principles view that causal interdependence in production—rather than abstract treaties—would realistically deter aggression by aligning economic incentives with lasting reconciliation.

Preparation and Key Decisions

In early May 1950, amid intensifying international discussions on within the framework of the and broader Western defense needs, French Foreign Minister consulted key figures in the French government, including Prime Minister René Pleven, to refine the coal and steel pooling proposal originated by . The cabinet convened on the morning of 9 May 1950 and approved the plan late that morning, enabling its immediate public presentation without prior leaks or foreign input. A pivotal decision was to structure the initiative as a fait accompli, requiring participating governments to accept its core principles—supranational pooling of production and a binding high authority—before detailed negotiations, thereby leveraging the element of surprise to preempt domestic opposition and secure a perceived advantage in promoting Franco-German . This approach reflected France's strategic calculus to bind Germany's industrial capacity irrevocably to European institutions, addressing French security anxieties over potential unilateral German resurgence without vetoing rearmament outright. External factors shaped the proposal's scope, including U.S. diplomatic encouragement for European economic federation to enhance collective defense contributions against Soviet threats, as evidenced by American support for integrating German resources into a multilateral . reluctance toward supranational mechanisms, prioritizing Commonwealth ties and national sovereignty, led to phrasing the invitation openly to "other European countries" while realistically anticipating participation from the Benelux states, , and —the so-called Six—rather than broader inclusion.

Content and Proposals

Announcement and Core Text

On 9 May 1950, , the French Minister of Foreign Affairs, delivered the declaration as a public speech in the Salon de l'Horloge at the in . The immediate intent, as articulated in the text, was to propose concrete measures for safeguarding peace by addressing the root of historical Franco-German antagonism through in strategic industries. The declaration opened by asserting that "world peace cannot be safeguarded without the making of creative efforts proportionate to the dangers which threaten it," framing Europe's role as indispensable for maintaining peaceful relations amid post-war vulnerabilities. The core proposal centered on eliminating rivalry in and , declaring that "the coming together of the nations of requires the elimination of the age-old opposition of and ," with initial action targeting these two nations. It specifically called for "Franco-German production of and as a whole [to] be placed under a common High Authority, within the framework of an organization open to the participation of the other countries of ." This pooling was presented as creating " " through irreversible , rendering "not merely unthinkable, but materially impossible" by establishing a "powerful productive unit" that would supply basic industrial elements equally to members and expand markets without discrimination. The text emphasized economic modernization as a priority task for the High Authority, mandating it to secure "in the shortest possible time the modernization of production and the improvement of its quality," alongside equalizing supply terms, developing exports, and improving workers' conditions via transitional measures like production plans and restructuring funds. It envisioned broader outcomes, including fusion of markets, rational distribution of production, and contribution to African development with Europe's increased resources, positioning the initiative as "the leaven from which may grow a wider and deeper community" toward political federation. The declaration concluded by outlining negotiation bases, including a for , an arbitrator for disputes, and a UN representative for oversight, without detailing specific institutional forms beyond the binding decisions of the High Authority composed of independent persons.

Supranational Authority Concept

The Schuman Declaration proposed pooling the and industries of and under a supranational High Authority to address the material basis of , as these resources formed the foundational inputs for armaments and essential to warfare. By integrating production and placing it under joint control, the initiative aimed to render Franco-German war "not merely unthinkable, but materially impossible," thereby disrupting the causal pathway from resource rivalry to military escalation. This approach targeted the concrete economic enablers of aggression rather than relying solely on diplomatic assurances or alliances prone to breakdown. Central to the proposal was the creation of a High Authority vested with genuine executive powers, including oversight of production quotas, pricing, and , independent of direct national government control. Composed of personalities selected jointly by participating governments but operating autonomously, this body would enforce equitable access and modernization, fostering interdependence that preempted unilateral rearmament. Accountability mechanisms included reporting to an assembly representing the peoples and a from member states, balancing supranational decision-making with governmental input without granting individual vetoes. This framework marked a deliberate shift from traditional intergovernmental cooperation, where sovereign states retained full discretion and could withdraw or block decisions, toward a where participants ceded sectoral for binding collective . The opt-in structure allowed other nations to join voluntarily, implying that benefits like and security would incentivize participation, though initial focus remained on and to ensure feasibility. Implicit in this design were trade-offs: relinquishing national autonomy over critical industries in exchange for shared prosperity and structural , with the High Authority's powers designed to prioritize long-term over short-term national interests.

Negotiations and Implementation

Responses from Key Nations

, Chancellor of , provided a swift and positive response to the Schuman Declaration announced on May 9, 1950, having already replied affirmatively in private correspondence with on May 8 to the advance notification received the previous day. Adenauer viewed the proposal as a mechanism to integrate economically with , thereby facilitating the end of Allied controls and restoring German sovereignty on equal terms with . In , Prime Minister expressed strong enthusiasm for the declaration, interpreting it as a practical step toward broader and economic recovery, which aligned with Italy's postwar need for stability and markets. The Italian government quickly signaled readiness to participate, seeing the pooling of and as an opportunity to bind and in interdependence while advancing Italy's industrial interests. The Benelux countries—, the , and —offered generally supportive but cautious reactions, welcoming the initiative's aim to prevent conflict through economic ties while voicing concerns about potential dominance by and in the proposed supranational authority. Their governments emphasized the need for an independent high authority to ensure balanced representation and avoid bilateral Franco-German control over vital resources. The rejected involvement, with stating on May 11, 1950, in the that would examine the plan but could not accept supranational institutions that might compromise or ties to the and the . officials prioritized maintaining preferences and special over continental integration. In the United States, the declaration received approval from the administration, which saw it as bolstering European unity against Soviet influence in line with strategy and objectives. Domestically in , responses were divided: the government under Schuman promoted the plan as a bold initiative, but Gaullists and nationalists criticized its supranational features as a risky surrender of , preferring stricter national oversight of German industry rather than shared authority. Some industrialists and communists dismissed it as a potential favoring producers over workers or consumers.

Treaty of Paris and ECSC Formation

Following the Schuman Declaration of 9 May 1950, formal negotiations on its implementation began in on 20 June 1950, involving representatives from , , , , the Netherlands, and . These discussions focused on defining the supranational framework, particularly the independent powers of a proposed High Authority to manage and and markets, as well as the of a Court of Justice to enforce obligations and resolve disputes between member states and the Authority. Over the next ten months, delegates addressed technical and sovereignty-related disputes, such as investment funding mechanisms and the extent of the High Authority's regulatory oversight, through iterative drafts that balanced federalist ambitions with national veto rights in a Special . The negotiations concluded with the finalization of a 100-article text, which enshrined the pooling of and resources under supranational control while establishing institutional checks. On 18 1951, the —formally the Treaty constituting the (ECSC)—was signed in by the foreign ministers of the six nations: for , for , for , and counterparts from the states. The treaty required by national parliaments, a process completed without major delays despite domestic opposition in some countries, leading to its entry into force on 23 July 1952 after deposit of the final instrument on 24 July. With the treaty's activation, the ECSC's core institutions were constituted: the nine-member High Authority, vested with executive powers to set production quotas, prices, and trade rules; a Common Assembly of 78 appointed parliamentarians for consultative oversight; a Special for coordinating national policies; and a seven-judge Court of Justice to adjudicate legal challenges. was appointed the first President of the High Authority, which convened its inaugural session on 10 August 1952 in , marking the operational launch of the Community's supranational governance.

Short-term Outcomes

Institutional Setup

The , which entered into force on 23 July 1952, established the High Authority as the ECSC's central supranational institution, an independent executive body composed of nine members appointed for renewable six-year terms, with no more than two nationals from any single to ensure impartiality. The High Authority held exclusive regulatory authority over the coal and steel sectors, including the power to impose production quotas during market crises or shortages to maintain equitable distribution (Article 58), fix maximum and minimum prices to curb discriminatory practices and ensure fair competition (Articles 60-61), and authorize or condition investments while providing loans and guarantees to align them with Community-wide economic expansion goals (Article 54). These competencies operated supranationally, free from direct national government control, with binding decisions enforceable directly on enterprises and states, subject only to potential suspension by . Complementing the High Authority, a supranational Court of Justice with seven independent judges appointed for six-year terms was instituted to safeguard the Treaty's application, empowered to annul unlawful acts, adjudicate disputes between institutions or member states, and interpret provisions uniformly across jurisdictions (Articles 33, 36, 44). This judicial body underscored the ECSC's legal autonomy, issuing binding rulings that overrode conflicting national laws and fostering a nascent jurisprudence. The Common Assembly, serving as a consultative and oversight body, consisted of 78 delegates appointed annually by the member states' national parliaments, with representation weighted by population—18 seats each for , , and , 10 for and the , and 4 for —to reflect demographic disparities while transcending purely intergovernmental dynamics. Though lacking legislative initiative, it exercised supervisory functions over the High Authority, including the ability to force its resignation via a two-thirds vote (Article 24), positioning it as an embryonic parliamentary check on executive supranationalism. In the ECSC's formative years from onward, institutional operations encountered hurdles in reconciling supranational mandates with legacy national structures, particularly in dismantling or adapting entrenched cartels—prevalent in sectors like coal syndicates and steel associations—to Treaty Article 65's prohibition on restrictive agreements absent High approval. faltered as member governments intermittently intervened with subsidies or rescues for domestic producers, undermining uniform application of quotas and pricing rules and testing the High Authority's enforcement capacity amid divergent national economic pressures.

Initial Economic and Political Effects

The (ECSC), operational from July 1952 with markets opening in 1953, facilitated the removal of tariffs, quotas, and other trade barriers among its six member states, creating a unified market for and that encouraged cross-border flows and joint investments. This structure enabled coordinated , with the High Authority directing funds from levies and loans toward modernization projects, contributing to a 25% increase in production between 1952 and 1955. output saw more modest growth, rising from 238.9 million metric tons in 1952 to 246.4 million in 1955, amid emerging competition from alternative energy sources. Politically, the ECSC's supranational framework alleviated French anxieties over West German industrial resurgence by pooling control of key war-making resources, fostering bilateral trust that supported the Paris Agreements of 1954 and West Germany's subsequent accession to on May 6, 1955. This integration signaled a shift from occupation toward sovereign partnership, with the ECSC's success in binding economies helping to override domestic opposition in to within the Western alliance. Early challenges included the 1953 recession, during which global demand slumped and U.S. steel exports intensified competition through lower prices; however, the common market mitigated localized surpluses by redistributing steel from high-production areas like to deficit regions in and , limiting the recession's severity compared to pre-ECSC fragmentation. The High Authority's interventions, such as price alignment and investment directives, provided initial stability but highlighted tensions over national preferences versus community-wide coordination.

Achievements

Peace and Reconciliation Impacts

The Schuman Declaration explicitly aimed to forge lasting peace between and by pooling their and industries—essential for armaments—under a common supranational , thereby rendering future war "not merely unthinkable, but materially impossible." This mechanism sought to align economic incentives against conflict, transforming historical rivalry into interdependent cooperation. In the immediate postwar context, the declaration's implementation via the (ECSC), established by the on April 18, 1951, and operational from July 1952, helped mitigate French anxieties over West German remilitarization. The outbreak of the on June 25, 1950, intensified U.S. pressure for German rearmament to bolster , prompting French proposals like the Pleven Plan in October 1950 for a supranational . By demonstrating viable Franco-German economic fusion, the ECSC reduced perceived security risks, as integrated resource control limited unilateral weapon production capabilities amid the war's 1950–1953 duration. The ECSC's early successes in fostering trust contributed to the 1954 (September 28–October 3 in London; October 20–23 in Paris), where acquiesced to restoring West German sovereignty and permitting its accession without veto. These agreements, signed on October 23, 1954, ended the occupation regime and modified the 1948 Brussels Pact into the , marking a pivotal shift from to . Empirically, the absence of any Franco-German armed conflict since 1950 contrasts sharply with the prior century's pattern of major wars: the (1870–1871), (1914–1918), and (1939–1945). This non-recurrence, sustained through economic entanglement and institutional frameworks originating in the Schuman initiative, provides observable evidence of deterrence against resurgence of hostilities, even amid divisions.

Economic Modernization Benefits

The (ECSC), established following the Schuman Declaration, promoted economic modernization in the and sectors by imposing production levies that generated funds for targeted investments. The High Authority levied approximately 1% on the value of and output, creating an independent budget that financed low-interest loans for plant , equipment upgrades, and enhancements across member states. These resources supported the transition from war-damaged facilities to more efficient operations, with over 300 million units of account disbursed in loans by 1958 for modernization projects. Integration under the ECSC eliminated internal tariffs and quotas, fostering and regional synergies, notably between Germany's coal basin and France's iron ore fields, which optimized supply chains previously hindered by national barriers. This common market enabled rationalization of production, reducing duplication and enhancing competitiveness; steel output in ECSC countries expanded from 43 million metric tons in 1953 to 72 million metric tons by 1960, reflecting doubled and technological upgrades. Productivity gains followed, with steel sector labor efficiency rising due to larger-scale operations and investments in and oxygen converters. As a sectoral precursor to the broader of the , the ECSC model demonstrated the benefits of supranational coordination in driving industrial output, which spilled over to ancillary sectors like and through increased demand for inputs and machinery. Member states' heavy industries benefited from stabilized pricing and expanded markets, contributing to sustained expansion amid 4-5% average annual GDP growth in the 1950s, though broader factors like aid also played roles. These outcomes informed subsequent treaties, emphasizing empirical gains from market liberalization over .

Criticisms and Controversies

Sovereignty Erosion Debates

In , Gaullist parliamentarians expressed strong reservations about the Schuman Plan's establishment of the High Authority, a supranational body wielding executive powers over and production that bypassed national parliaments and risked undermining democratic accountability. During ratification debates in 1951, they argued that ceding control over strategic industries to an unelected authority represented an irrevocable delegation of sovereign decision-making, prioritizing institutional momentum over national veto rights. This critique echoed broader Gaullist skepticism toward supranationalism, viewing it as a mechanism that subordinated state autonomy to technocratic elites rather than intergovernmental cooperation among equals. The 's decision to abstain from the Schuman negotiations and decline ECSC membership further highlighted sovereignty primacy, with British leaders under Labour citing unwillingness to surrender policy control over key industries to a supranational as a core reason. Officials emphasized that participation would entangle the in commitments incompatible with its global imperial ties and independent , effectively treating the proposal as a threat to parliamentary supremacy and economic . This , formalized by non-participation in the 1951 , set a for British , where national trumped integrative pooling despite invitations to join on observer terms. Critics have since identified the ECSC as an empirical starting point for sovereignty erosion in subsequent , where initial sector-specific pooling evolved into broader transfers that diminished national vetoes through mechanisms like qualified majority voting. The High Authority's independent enforcement powers over member states' industries demonstrated how delegated authority could expand beyond original mandates, fostering path-dependent institutions that favored collective decision-making and made reversals politically and legally arduous. This dynamic manifested in later addressing perceived overreach, such as the 1975 European Communities membership , where 67.2% voted to remain amid debates on loss, and the 2005 French rejection of the Constitutional by 54.7%, with voters citing fears of unchecked supranational dominance eroding national control. Such outcomes underscored arguments that sovereignty pooling inherently prioritizes supranational interests, rendering opt-outs rare and reinforcing critiques of irreversible transfers from the ECSC's foundational model.

Economic and Structural Flaws

Despite prohibitions under Article 65 of the Treaty of Paris, cartels and restrictive practices persisted in the ECSC, undermining the goal of a competitive common market. In a 1954 report, the High Authority acknowledged the failure of its price transparency initiatives due to widespread non-compliance by member states and firms. France, for instance, maintained regional differential pricing for steel and orchestrated mergers that violated anti-cartel rules, while Germany's market coordination through banks resembled cartel behavior. The High Authority's "Monnet Margin" policy, allowing limited price deviations of 2.5%, was ultimately ruled illegal by the European Court of Justice, highlighting enforcement weaknesses. Economic benefits were unevenly distributed, favoring established industrial regions over peripheral areas. Coal and steel production was concentrated in northern , the in , Belgium's , and Italy's industrialized north, leaving underdeveloped southern regions like Italy's Mezzogiorno with minimal direct gains from ECSC investments and modernization funds. Free movement of labor and capital under the treaty risked exacerbating regional disparities by drawing workers from less industrialized areas without adequate compensatory measures. The ECSC's structures proved rigid during the late 1950s economic downturns, exposing limitations in crisis response. A 1959 coal oversupply crisis, driven by falling world prices, competition from oil, and excess European production, led to mine closures and redundancies, but the High Authority could not declare a "manifest crisis" after rejection by the Special Council of Ministers on May 14, 1959, blocking unified quotas or import restrictions. Member states pursued divergent national policies, such as subsidies and adaptation funds, rather than supranational coordination, revealing the treaty's inflexibility amid shifting energy demands. Structurally, the unelected High Authority—nine appointed technocrats independent of national governments—bypassed parliamentary oversight in key decisions on production, pricing, and investments, contributing to early criticisms of a and bureaucratic overreach. This supranational model prioritized technocratic intervention over market signals or elected accountability, setting a pattern for regulatory frameworks that intervened in sector allocations, with limited checks from the intergovernmental .

Long-term Legacy

Evolution into Broader European Integration

The Messina Conference, convened from June 1 to 3, 1955, by the foreign ministers of the six ECSC member states—Belgium, France, West Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands—initiated deliberations on expanding economic integration beyond coal and steel, proposing a common market and cooperation in atomic energy. This led to the establishment of the Intergovernmental Committee chaired by Paul-Henri Spaak, whose October 1955 report recommended two new treaties, culminating in the signing of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (EEC) and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) on March 25, 1957, in Rome. Both treaties entered into force on January 1, 1958, extending supranational governance to broader sectors like agriculture, transport, and trade, while building on the ECSC's precedent of pooled sovereignty to foster economic interdependence among the founding six. The 1965 Merger Treaty, signed on April 8, 1965, in Brussels and effective from July 1, 1967, unified the executive bodies of the ECSC, EEC, and Euratom by replacing the ECSC's High Authority and the separate commissions of the EEC and Euratom with a single European Commission, alongside a unified Council of the European Communities. This institutional consolidation preserved the supranational character of the High Authority—tasked with independent enforcement of common policies—transferring its functions, personnel, and decision-making autonomy to the Commission, which assumed oversight of the ECSC's residual operations until its expiry. Concurrently, the ECSC's Common Assembly evolved into a shared parliamentary body for the three communities; renamed the European Parliamentary Assembly in 1962 and later the European Parliament, it transitioned from a consultative role nominated by national parliaments to direct elections in 1979, incrementally gaining budgetary and legislative co-decision powers rooted in the ECSC's embryonic representative framework. The ECSC Treaty expired on July 23, 2002, exactly 50 years after its , with its assets and liabilities integrated into the European Community (predecessor to the ) under the in Liquidation protocol, ensuring seamless continuity without disrupting the broader . This absorption underscored the causal lineage from the ECSC's sector-specific integration to the 's comprehensive framework, where the founding six's institutional model—emphasizing supranational executive authority and progressive market liberalization—shaped subsequent enlargements starting in and the completion of the via the 1986 , maintaining empirical focus on verifiable economic convergence over expansive .

Modern Reinterpretations and Anniversaries

Europe Day, observed annually on May 9, commemorates the Schuman Declaration as a foundational act for European peace and cooperation, symbolizing the shift from rivalry to pooled sovereignty in key industries. Official events typically feature speeches by EU leaders reaffirming the declaration's role in fostering unity, though these celebrations often emphasize institutional continuity over critical reflection on supranational expansion. The 75th anniversary in 2025 highlighted renewed commitments to solidarity amid geopolitical tensions, with events including visits to Schuman's birthplace in Luxembourg by figures such as European Parliament President Roberta Metsola and Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, alongside commemorative €2 coins issued by the European Central Bank. These observances framed the declaration as a bulwark against division, yet they coincided with broader EU crises, prompting debates on whether its supranational model sustains resilience or exacerbates fractures. Contemporary Euroskeptic interpretations trace the declaration's pooling of resources as the genesis of "ever-closer union," a phrase enshrined in subsequent treaties that critics argue eroded national in domains like and migration policy, culminating in the UK's 2016 Brexit referendum where 51.9% voted to reclaim control. Right-leaning analysts contend this elite-initiated , absent broad public consent, prioritized over democratic input, viewing Schuman's as a cautionary origin for unaccountable governance rather than an unalloyed triumph. Empirical evaluations affirm the declaration's success in averting interstate conflict among core members for over seven decades, with no Franco-German wars since 1945 correlating to institutional ties. However, reassessments highlight persistent democratic deficits, as evidenced by the 2005 referenda rejecting the Constitutional Treaty—54.7% "no" in and 61.6% in the —signaling public wariness of further integration that elites later circumvented via the Lisbon Treaty, thus questioning the model's alignment with voter accountability.

References

  1. [1]
    Schuman Declaration May 1950 | European Union
    The Schuman Declaration was presented by French foreign minister Robert Schuman on 9 May 1950. It proposed the creation of a European Coal and Steel Community.
  2. [2]
    The Schuman Declaration (Paris, 9 May 1950) - CVCE Website
    On 9 May 1950, the declaration made in the salon de l'Horloge at the French Foreign Ministry by the French Foreign Minister, Robert Schuman, marks the decisive ...
  3. [3]
    The Schuman Declaration - consilium.europa.eu
    Apr 24, 2025 · On 9 May 1950, the foundation of the European Union as we know it was set out in an extraordinary declaration based on two core principles: peace and ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  4. [4]
    The Schuman Declaration of 9 May 1950 - Publications Office of the ...
    May 5, 2015 · On 9 May 1950, French Foreign Minister Robert Schuman, inspired by Jean Monnet, first publicly proposed the ideas that led to the creation of the European ...
  5. [5]
    The economic and social consequences - CVCE Website
    The immediate effects of the Second World War on the European economy had been disastrous. ... coal and steel industries. It was in this difficult economic ...
  6. [6]
    Exploitation and destruction in Nazi-occupied Europe - CEPR
    Sep 11, 2019 · It is true that the Western European economies declined from 1942 as the production of consumer goods was prohibited and supplies of coal and ...
  7. [7]
    Coal, War, and Peace in Twentieth-Century Europe - Springs
    Jul 21, 2022 · Coal was particularly scarce in the USSR and yet its central importance had been proven throughout Europe during the two world wars.Missing: II | Show results with:II
  8. [8]
    The Truman Doctrine, 1947 - Office of the Historian
    President Harry S. Truman established that the United States would provide political, military and economic assistance to all democratic nations under threat.Missing: onset | Show results with:onset
  9. [9]
    Marshall Plan, 1948 - Office of the Historian
    The Marshall Plan generated a resurgence of European industrialization and brought extensive investment into the region.
  10. [10]
    Cooperation for Recovery: The Marshall Plan
    In the end, a total of $13.6 billion (equivalent to $88 billion in 1997 money) was appropriated to the plan. The Marshall Plan was a success.
  11. [11]
    Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
    For documentation relating to the negotiations for the establishment of an International Authority for the Ruhr, including the text of the draft Ruhr Agreement, ...
  12. [12]
    AGREEMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INTER- NATIONAL ...
    AGREEMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INTER-. NATIONAL AUTHORITY FOR THE RUHR. Signed at London, April 28, 1949; in force same date.1. Whereas international ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] The International Authority for the Ruhr
    Jul 8, 2016 · But in March 1948, the French Foreign Ministry finally obtained US agreement for the establishment of a regulatory authority for the Ruhr on the ...
  14. [14]
    Franco-German War | History, Causes, & Results - Britannica
    Sep 6, 2025 · Franco-German War, (July 19, 1870–May 10, 1871), war in which a coalition of German states led by Prussia defeated France.Missing: 1870-1940 | Show results with:1870-1940
  15. [15]
    The international context - From the Schuman Plan to the Paris ...
    After the Second World War, France faced a dilemma with regard to its large German neighbour. Even though it dreaded the prospect of Germany's rearmament.<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    [PDF] 'The status of the Saar' from the <i>Internationale Spectator</i> (21 ...
    Sep 22, 2025 · However, France acquired economic rights in the Saar region in the Treaty of Versailles: the right to own and exploit the coal mines (reducing ...
  17. [17]
    The Ruhr question - From the Schuman Plan to the Paris Treaty ...
    For Paris, the plan was driven by both security and economic concerns. The French were of course aiming to prevent the resources of the Ruhr from being used ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] The Impact of the Franco-German Relationship on the Security of ...
    I will attenpt to argue that the major role which the Franco-. German relationship has played in European security, from after. World War II to the present, ...
  19. [19]
    Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
    Bidault restated the French view that a special status for the Rhineland is essential to the security of France and the rest of Europe. In order to avoid ...
  20. [20]
    Konrad Adenauer 1949 - Federal Chancellor - Bundeskanzler.de
    Apr 27, 2018 · It was during Adenauer's period in office that West Germany and France became founding members of the European Economic Community (EEC), out of ...Missing: reaction | Show results with:reaction
  21. [21]
    [PDF] The Anglo-french Co-ordinating Committee, 1939-1940.
    Note by Jean Monnet on Purchases in the United States,. February 1, 1940 ... chairman of the Anglo-French Co-ordinating Committee, Jean Monnet, has ...
  22. [22]
    Jean Monnet and the Strategy of International Defence Cooperation
    Mar 5, 2025 · Jean-Marc Lieberherr examines Jean Monnet's vital role in securing US arms for Britain and France during the Second World War and in driving ...Missing: background Commission
  23. [23]
    Rediscovering Functionalism - The Jean Monnet Program
    In the past, European integration was based on the `Monnet method' with its comunitarisation approach in European institutions and policy. This gradual process ...
  24. [24]
    His Method - Institut Jean Monnet
    For Monnet, economic integration has always been a foundation of political union, with the single market leading to monetary union and finally to political ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] EUROPEAN INTEGRATION - Fondation Jean Monnet
    The Second World War wore. Europe out, triggered the gradual dissolution of Europe's colonial empires and led to the global domination of the international.Missing: memos | Show results with:memos
  26. [26]
    [PDF] The Schuman Declaration 9 May 1950 - National Security
    The pooling of coal and steel production should immediately provide for the setting up of common foundations for economic development as a first step in the ...
  27. [27]
    The Jean Monnet Plan - Historical events in the European ...
    There were two main reasons why Jean Monnet proposed the pooling of coal and steel in 1950. The six Member States of the future ECSC used coal more than any ...Missing: secret April
  28. [28]
    Pooling coal and steel resources | Europeana
    The coal and steel community brought together 155 million consumers. Pooling these resources made a new Franco-German war unthinkable and materially impossible.Missing: Jean secret April
  29. [29]
    The Schuman Declaration | Strasbourg Europe
    Persuaded by the need to “change the course of events” but also “the minds of men”, Jean Monnet sent a long note to Robert Schuman on May 1, 1950 affirming the ...
  30. [30]
    The declaration of 9 May 1950 - From the Schuman Plan to the Paris ...
    Robert Schuman and Jean Monnet sought to use this almost revolutionary declaration to generate a shock wave that would launch the process of European ...
  31. [31]
    The Monnet-Schuman partnership - Europeana
    Jean Monnet, Director of the French National Planning Agency for Modernisation and Infrastructure, regarded economic rapprochement among the states of Europe ...
  32. [32]
    Reactions to the declaration of 9 May 1950 - CVCE Website
    In general, however, the public was favourable towards Robert Schuman's declaration, even if the full significance of the Plan was difficult to grasp. At ...
  33. [33]
    Foreign Relations of the United States, 1950, Western Europe ...
    In all countries and between countries there are pressures operating against integration. Particularly in Britain, Cripps and the doctrinaire socialist group of ...Missing: hesitancy | Show results with:hesitancy
  34. [34]
    https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1119
  35. [35]
    The United States and the Schuman Plan of 1950 - eScholarship
    This paper casts American influence over the Schuman Plan of May 1950 as a hegemonic field effect, pushing forward recent attempts to develop more dynamic ...
  36. [36]
    The Schuman Plan and Franco-British relations - CVCE Website
    On 25 May 1950, the French Government sent an official memorandum to the British Government inviting the United Kingdom to join its diplomatic initiative as ...
  37. [37]
    II - European Coal and Steel Community - France Diplomatie
    9 May 1959 – The Schuman Declaration · View the full text of the Declaration by Robert Schuman, corrected in his hand (PDF - 382 Ko), held at the French ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    [PDF] The 9th May Declaration 1950 - Fondation Robert Schuman
    May 9, 2025 · The 9th May declaration 1950 is considered to be the founding text of European integration. Delivered by Robert Schuman, French Foreign ...
  39. [39]
    The declaration by Robert Schuman (Paris, 9 May 1950)
    On 9 May 1950, Robert Schuman, French Foreign Minister, proposes to the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) and to other European countries that their coal and ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Declaration by Robert Schuman
    The coming together of the nations of Europe requires the elimination of the age-old opposition of France and Germany. Any action taken must in the first place ...
  41. [41]
    The Declaration of 9 May 1950 - Fondation Robert Schuman
    The declaration of 9 May 1950 is considered the founding text of European integration. Delivered by Robert Schuman, the French Minister of Foreign Affairs.
  42. [42]
    Official reply by Konrad Adenauer to Robert Schuman (Bonn, 8 May ...
    On 8 May 1950, in his official reply to Robert Schuman's letter which he received the previous day, the German Chancellor, Konrad Adenauer, ...Missing: Declaration response
  43. [43]
    Letter from Robert Schuman to Konrad Adenauer (Paris, 7 May 1950)
    In a letter dated 7 May 1950, the French Foreign Minister, Robert Schuman, writes to the German Chancellor, Konrad Adenauer, and informs him of his proposal ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
  44. [44]
    In Italy - From the Schuman Plan to the Paris Treaty (1950–1952)
    Reaction in Italy to the Schuman Plan was generally favourable. Alcide De Gasperi, the Prime Minister, even displayed overt enthusiasm. The Plan did indeed ...
  45. [45]
    The Schuman plan - what was at stake? - Europeana
    The Benelux countries feared Franco-German domination. They called, therefore, for a genuinely independent High Authority.
  46. [46]
    Resources for The British position on the Schuman proposal
    The research corpus 'From the Schuman Plan to the Paris Treaty (1950–1952)' looks at the origins and repercussions of the address by Robert Schuman on 9 May ...Missing: original | Show results with:original<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    Multilateral negotiations | Europeana
    On 20 June 1950, in Paris, representatives of the Six began negotiations on the Schuman Plan. Open to the idea of an independent High Authority.Missing: July powers
  48. [48]
    Introduction - Treaty of Paris – EC Library Guide
    Sep 18, 2025 · The outcome, after a year of difficult negotiations, was an agreement to establish the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), signed in Paris ...
  49. [49]
    Negotiations on the ECSC Treaty - CVCE Website
    The research corpus 'From the Schuman Plan to the Paris Treaty (1950–1952)' looks at the origins and repercussions of the address by Robert Schuman on 9 May ...Missing: July | Show results with:July
  50. [50]
    The birth of Europe – The Treaty establishing the European Coal ...
    Apr 18, 2021 · The birth of Europe – The Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community was signed in Paris on 18 April 1951 · 18 April 1951-18 April ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Signing of the ECSC Treaty - The Schuman Declaration - Europeana
    On 18 April 1951, the ECSC Treaty was signed and sealed in Paris by Robert Schuman for France, Konrad Adenauer for the Federal Republic of Germany.
  52. [52]
    Ratification of the ECSC Treaty - CVCE Website
    The ratification of the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) was completed without any major problems in most of the six signatory ...
  53. [53]
    Treaty of Paris - European Parliament
    The Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) was signed in Paris by Belgium, France, the Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Luxembourg ...
  54. [54]
    Introduction - The High Authority of the European Coal and Steel ...
    Sep 23, 2025 · ... (ECSC) and was established in Luxembourg on 10th August 1952. Jean Monnet, the initiator of the Schuman Declaration, became its first President.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community (Paris ...
    Nov 9, 2015 · The institutions of the Community shall be as follows: - a HIGH AUTHORITY, assisted by a Consultative Committee;. - a COMMON ASSEMBLY, hereafter ...
  56. [56]
    Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community, ECSC ...
    Dec 11, 2017 · Institutions. The treaty established a High Authority, an Assembly, a Council of Ministers and a Court of Justice. The ECSC had legal ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Schuman Plan and ECSC - European University Institute
    On May 9, 1950, the French foreign minister Robert Schuman proposed the creation of a single authority to control the French and Western German coal and steel ...Missing: July | Show results with:July<|control11|><|separator|>
  58. [58]
    the Common Assembly of the ECSC (1952–1958)
    This assembly, which was composed of seventy-eight members appointed to yearly terms by the na- tional parliaments, was the institution least privileged in the ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  59. [59]
    [PDF] The Theory and Reality of the European Coal and Steel Community
    Compliance with ECSC rules regarding prices, quotas, and subsidies remained problematic because national governments continued to res- cue their own industry.Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Max Kohnstamm, <i>The European Coal and Steel Community</i>
    Oct 24, 2012 · Between 1952 and 1955, the Community's steel production has grown by about one quarter; but over the same period, the number of workers in the ...
  61. [61]
    America and the European Coal and Steel Community
    From 1952 to 1955, hard-coal extraction in the ECSC was extended from 238.9 million metric tons to 246.4 million metric tons, almost all of this increase being ...
  62. [62]
    Germany's accession to NATO: 50 years on
    Jun 1, 2005 · Germany's accession to NATO 50 years ago on 6 May 1955 took place against the backdrop of both East-West conflict and the project of European integration.
  63. [63]
    Bonn and Paris Agreements on Germany (1952 and 1954)
    The Paris Agreements provided the basis for West Germany's membership of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), they brought to an end the occupation ...
  64. [64]
    European Coal And Steel Community (Agreement) - Hansard
    In 1953, during a period of recession, the effects of the recession were limited by reason of the fact that there was a common market. Within Europe there ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
  65. [65]
    [PDF] IRON AND STEEL - National Bureau of Economic Research
    74. Page 14. Iron and Steel. 209. Sharpening international competition led to an increase in ECSC ... U.S. Price Competitiveness, Iron and Steel, 1953, 1957, 1961 ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Report by the ECSC High Authority on the position of the steel ...
    Jul 5, 2016 · It is therefore understandable that buyers preferred to wait until 10 May 1953 and, in the meantime, used up their stocks. Moreover, non-member ...Missing: recession competition
  67. [67]
    Purpose of the Schuman Proposal
    ... make war 'materially impossible' · War would become 'unthinkable' amongst cooperating interests · Increased cooperation is only the first step to other fruitful ...Missing: Declaration | Show results with:Declaration
  68. [68]
    Schuman Declaration: 70 years on | European Parliament
    Feb 5, 2024 · The Schuman Declaration proposed cooperation among European countries in two key economic areas central to rearmament and warfare: coal and steel.
  69. [69]
    From the ECSC to the EEC (1945-1957) - jstor
    While France's steel output was rising above prewar levels thatof West Germany was lagging. 10. They were upset by what appeared to be French attempts to ...
  70. [70]
    The Nine-Power Conference (London, 28 September–3 October 1954)
    From 28 September to 3 October 1954, a conference attended by the Foreign Ministers of the United States, Canada, Italy, the Federal Republic of Germany and ...
  71. [71]
    A European Community - EU Learning - Carleton University
    Furthermore, it eased tensions between France and Germany. The success of the ECSC led to other, more drastic proposals to integrate the original six member ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    The Franco-German Relationship: From Animosity to Affinity
    The intense antagonism between Germany and France reached its apex in the horrors of the World War I trenches, memories of which would haunt Germans and French ...
  73. [73]
    War, Peace and Memory: Franco-German Reconciliation (Chapter 17)
    Both states saw in European integration a means to break the cycle of Franco-German wars and provide a concrete solution to specific French and German problems.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  74. [74]
    The ECSC's financial system and its relevance today - thefederalist.eu
    [3] The crisis in the coal and steel sector led to a gradual lowering of the levy rate, which fell from 0.9 per cent in 1953 to 0.35 per cent in 1957.Missing: mitigation | Show results with:mitigation
  75. [75]
    The economic and social role - From the Schuman Plan to the Paris ...
    Jean Monnet, the founding father of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), became the first President of the High Authority (1952-1954). Mr Monnet ...Missing: institutions | Show results with:institutions
  76. [76]
    [PDF] Lorraine and the Ruhr
    There can be little question that during these years of rapidly increasing steel production there had not been a pro- portionate increase in coke-oven capacity.Missing: synergies | Show results with:synergies
  77. [77]
    [PDF] The European Coal and Steel Community: the Path Towards ...
    As the Second World War came to a close, Western Europe, particularly France and Germany, was faced with the enormous task of rebuilding their nearly destroyed ...
  78. [78]
    50 years of the ECSC treaty - Coal and Steel Statistics (PDF)
    This publication presents ECSC coal and steel statistics: summary tables, production bases, production, external trade , investment and capacity.Missing: 1955 | Show results with:1955
  79. [79]
    Ratification of the ECSC Treaty | Europeana
    The ratification of the ECSC Treaty went fairly smoothly in the six countries. Only the Communists were strongly opposed to the Schuman Plan.
  80. [80]
    [PDF] The Schuman Declaration to the Treaties of Rome
    The French government and leading French citizens, most notably Jean Monnet and. Foreign Minister Robert Schuman, were instrumental in the creation of the ...
  81. [81]
    The Schuman Plan: Sovereign Powers of the European Coal ... - jstor
    To any realist, Schuman's fundamental proposition, that the nations of. Europe should surrender their sovereign powers over their coal and steel industries to a ...Missing: erosion | Show results with:erosion
  82. [82]
    Britain and the EEC - jstor
    Treaty that created the European Coal and Steel Community. (ECSC) on April 18,1951. Britain, under Labour's leadership, refused to join because she was not ...
  83. [83]
    The United Kingdom's absence from the negotiations on the ECSC ...
    On 2 June 1950, the British daily newspaper The Manchester Guardian sets out the reasons for the United Kingdom's absence from the negotiating table for the ...
  84. [84]
    The European Union as a Sovereignty Association of a Special Nature
    From all three viewpoints, the EU has, over the last 50 years, developed, from its beginnings as the European Coal and Steel Community, into a complex ...
  85. [85]
    5 The Theory and Reality of the European Coal and Steel Community
    Oct 31, 2023 · The Schuman Plan was designed to alleviate concerns that Germany's dominance in coal and steel could be used to harm European reconstruction ...Missing: erosion | Show results with:erosion
  86. [86]
    Full article: The European Union and diminished state sovereignty
    Mar 4, 2022 · The member states no longer have exclusive and supreme authority with respect to the delegated issue. Take the movement of citizens between ...Missing: refusal | Show results with:refusal
  87. [87]
    The Theory and Reality of the European Coal and Steel Community
    The European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) was the first step in the process of European integration. Its founders had lofty aspirations.
  88. [88]
    None
    ### Summary of Economic Flaws, Failures, and Structural Problems in the ECSC (1950s)
  89. [89]
    The ECSC in difficulties - Subject files - CVCE Website
    Coal markets were thrown into disarray: mine closures and redundancies were the most tragic consequences. Miners were either condemned to seek training for a ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  90. [90]
    Politicization without democratization: How the Eurozone crisis is ...
    ... High Authority, forerunner of the European Commission. This body consisted of unelected technocrats accountable to national executives as represented in the ...
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Identifying Changing Trends Post-Treaty of Lisbon - PDXScholar
    member states—the High Authority (HA; executive) of the ECSC was unelected, consequently creating a democratic deficit. In a domestic context, the rational.
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Why the European Union Strengthens the State - Princeton University
    It was to be administered by a supranational institution, the High Authority, with decisions taken by an intergovernmental Council of Ministers. Among the most ...
  93. [93]
    The Messina Conference (1 to 3 June 1955)
    The Messina Conference, attended by ECSC ministers, aimed to create a common market, and adopted a resolution for a united Europe, and to develop nuclear ...
  94. [94]
    The Rome Treaties: towards an 'Ever Closer Union' | Epthinktank
    May 9, 2017 · On 25 March 1957, the six member countries of the ECSC came together to sign the Rome Treaties, ´determined to lay the foundations of an ever ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] The First Treaties | European Parliament
    The ECSC Treaty expired on 23 July 2002 at the end of the 50-year validity period laid down in Article 97. In accordance with the Protocol (No 37) annexed to ...
  96. [96]
    Treaty of Brussels (Merger Treaty) | EUR-Lex - European Union
    Mar 21, 2018 · The Brussels Treaty establishing a single Council and single Commission of the European Communities (known as the 'Merger Treaty') was signed ...
  97. [97]
    The history of the High Authority of the European Coal and Steel ...
    Jan 27, 1994 · This is the history of the High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community from its creation in 1952 up to its merger in 1967.
  98. [98]
    European Parliament - European organisations - CVCE Website
    In the Community legal order, the European Parliament takes its origin from the Common Assembly, a purely consultative parliamentary institution created by the ...
  99. [99]
    EUROPA - Expiry of the ECSC Treaty
    It was concluded for a period of fifty years and, having entered into force on 23 July 1952, is due to expire on 23 July 2002.
  100. [100]
    The expiry of the ECSC Treaty in 2002 - European organisations
    It came into force on 23 July 1952 and expired on 23 July 2002. By the pooling of the coal and steel sectors, the ECSC became the foundation stone in the ...
  101. [101]
    Europe Day – May 9 | European Union
    Europe Day held on 9 May every year celebrates peace and unity in Europe. The date marks the anniversary of the 'Schuman declaration'.
  102. [102]
    Europeans celebrate 75 Years of unity and solidarity on Europe Day ...
    Apr 30, 2025 · On 9 May, Europeans will celebrate Europe Day as 2025 marks the 75th anniversary of the Schuman Declaration.
  103. [103]
    Europe day - 75th Anniversary of the Schuman Declaration with Luc ...
    May 9, 2025 · On the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the Schuman Declaration, Luxembourg's Prime Minister Luc Frieden, European Parliament President Roberta Metsola, ...
  104. [104]
    EU resources - Schuman Declaration - EC Library Guides
    Oct 13, 2025 · 75th Anniversary. €2 commemorative coins | website. European Central Bank, website (accessed 4 March 2025). Commemorative €2 coins mark the ...
  105. [105]
    Celebrating Europe Day 2025: 75 years since the Schuman ...
    May 9, 2025 · It commemorates the 75th anniversary of the Schuman Declaration, the 1950 proposal that laid the foundations for lasting unity and cooperation between European ...Missing: commemorations | Show results with:commemorations
  106. [106]
    Taking back control of globalisation: Sovereignty through European ...
    Mar 28, 2018 · In Europe, Brexit and Euroscepticism have challenged the notion of the European Union (EU) as a political construct based on shared sovereignty ...Missing: critiques Declaration
  107. [107]
    Taking back control of globalisation: Sovereignty through European ...
    In Europe, Brexit and Euroscepticism have challenged the notion of the European Union (EU) as a political construct based on shared sovereignty, freedom of ...Missing: critiques Declaration
  108. [108]
    EU Constitution Vote 2005 France - Fondation Robert Schuman
    The democratic exercise of 29th May 2005 clearly shows that the referendum is still an instrument that can easily be used as a means of deflection.Missing: legacy | Show results with:legacy
  109. [109]
    EU Constitution Vote 2005 Netherlands - Fondation Robert Schuman
    Referendum on the european constitution in the Netherlands, 1st june 2005.Missing: accountability legacy
  110. [110]
    [PDF] Democratic Accountability in the EU
    The mechanisms for ensuring the. European Union institutions are accountable to EU citizens are complex and not well understood. This paper seeks to describe ...<|control11|><|separator|>