Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Transatlantic relations

Transatlantic relations denote the extensive political, economic, military, and cultural linkages between —primarily the and —and the nations of , solidified after to deter Soviet expansionism. This partnership, embodying shared commitments to , , and market economies, manifests through institutions like the Organization (NATO), established in 1949 to provide collective defense under Article 5, which deems an attack on one member an attack on all. Economically, the transatlantic bond represents the world's preeminent and relationship, with EU- trade surpassing €1.68 trillion in 2024, underpinning over 16 million jobs across the region and dwarfing other global pairings. Militarily, has anchored Western security, expanding from 12 original members to 32 by 2024 amid post-Cold War adaptations, though persistent disparities in defense spending—where only a minority of European allies met the 2% of GDP guideline until recent upticks—have fueled debates on burden-sharing, with the consistently allocating far higher proportions. Key achievements include the and eventual without direct hot war, fostering decades of stability and prosperity via mechanisms like the Marshall Plan's reconstruction aid, though controversies persist over trade frictions, such as US tariffs on steel, and geopolitical divergences, including the 2003 Iraq intervention and approaches to and . These tensions underscore causal realities of mismatched strategic priorities and economic interdependencies, yet the alliance's resilience—evident in coordinated responses to threats like Russian aggression in —highlights its enduring geopolitical utility despite evolving multipolar challenges.

Definition and Scope

Conceptual Foundations

Transatlantic relations refer to the multifaceted ties between —primarily the and —and , encompassing security, economic, diplomatic, and cultural dimensions, with conceptual foundations rooted in a commitment to shared democratic values including individual liberties, the , and . These principles underpin the transatlantic , which emphasizes mutual defense against external threats and promotion of a rules-based , as evidenced by the enduring emphasis on mechanisms that prioritize democratic over mere geographic proximity. The ideological core draws from Enlightenment-derived notions of and free markets, fostering cooperation to counter , though empirical divergences in policy implementation—such as on tariffs or regulatory standards—highlight that these values serve as aspirational anchors rather than uniform practices. At its base, the transatlantic conceptual framework embodies "," an orientation advocating deep integration across the Atlantic to advance common interests in stability and prosperity, forged through historical contingencies like the devastation of , which necessitated allied reconstruction efforts grounded in liberal democratic norms. This is not merely sentimental but causally linked to the post-1945 institutionalization of alliances, where shared adherence to and open societies provided the rationale for burden-sharing in defense expenditures, with NATO's Article 5 collective defense clause exemplifying the operationalization of these ideals since its invocation once in 2001 following the . Sources from official alliance documents consistently attribute the partnership's resilience to this value alignment, which empirically correlates with coordinated responses to crises like the 2022 , where transatlantic unity imposed sanctions totaling over $300 billion in frozen Russian assets by mid-2023. Critically, while mainstream institutional narratives—often from entities like or bodies—portray these foundations as unassailable, closer examination reveals tensions arising from differing interpretations of "rules-based order," with U.S. unilateral actions (e.g., the 2003 intervention) occasionally straining European multilateral preferences, yet the underlying causal persists: mutual , valued at over $1.2 trillion in annual as of 2023, reinforces the partnership's viability beyond ideological rhetoric. This framework prioritizes empirical alignment on threats like Chinese economic coercion, where joint initiatives since 2018 have targeted vulnerabilities, underscoring that transatlantic relations function as a strategic for interests rather than an uncritical affinity.

Geographical and Institutional Boundaries

The geographical scope of transatlantic relations centers on the North Atlantic region, encompassing —principally the and —and Europe, with a focus on countries bordering or proximate to Ocean, including the 27 member states of the , the , and other allies such as and . This delineation reflects shared maritime connectivity across , which has historically facilitated , , and military cooperation since the colonial era, though the core emphasis remains on Western and Central European nations rather than extending to or the Mediterranean periphery unless tied through institutional frameworks. Institutionally, transatlantic boundaries are primarily defined by multilateral organizations that formalize cooperation between North American and European entities, most notably the Organization (NATO), founded in 1949, which unites the U.S., Canada, and 28 European members under collective defense commitments as per Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. The serves as the principal European counterpart, engaging the U.S. through frameworks like the U.S.-EU summits and sectoral dialogues on trade, energy, and digital policy, while bilateral ties with individual European states, such as the U.S.-UK Special Relationship, further delineate relational boundaries outside broader alliances. These institutions exclude non-Atlantic actors, such as Asian or Latin American nations, unless involved in secondary multilateral forums like the , thereby maintaining a distinct transatlantic institutional perimeter centered on democratic, market-oriented allies sharing historical and strategic interests.

Historical Development

Colonial Era and Early Ties (Pre-20th Century)

European powers initiated transatlantic ties through exploration and colonization of the beginning in the late , with Christopher Columbus's voyages under sponsorship reaching the in 1492, followed by sustained settlements by , , , , and the . These efforts established colonies primarily for resource extraction and mercantilist trade, linking metropoles with North American outposts such as in 1607 by the English and in 1608 by the French. By the 17th century, British North American colonies developed economies centered on tobacco, fur, and later cotton exports to , fostering interdependence despite imperial controls like the of 1651 onward. The Atlantic economy crystallized around the system from the 16th to 19th centuries, wherein European manufactured goods were shipped to , enslaved Africans transported to the , and American raw materials like , , and returned to , generating immense wealth for colonial powers. This network involved approximately 12.5 million Africans forcibly transported across between 1526 and 1867, with ships dominating the trade after 1650, underpinning the labor-intensive systems in the southern colonies. Economic ties extended to northern colonies through shipping and provisioning, creating a web of commercial relations that persisted even as political tensions mounted. The (1775–1783) marked a pivotal rupture and reconfiguration of transatlantic political relations, as thirteen British colonies declared independence in 1776, securing French alliance via the 1778 Treaty of Amity and Commerce, which recognized U.S. sovereignty and promoted mutual trade while France supplied critical military aid. and the also provided support, isolating diplomatically and contributing to the 1783 , which ended hostilities and expanded U.S. territory. Post-independence, relations with remained strained over issues like Loyalist compensation and frontier boundaries but evolved through resumed commerce, while French involvement sowed seeds for later U.S.-French tensions culminating in the of 1798–1800. In the , transatlantic bonds shifted toward economic and demographic flows amid U.S. westward expansion and European industrialization. The , articulated in President James Monroe's 1823 address to , warned European powers against new colonizations or interventions in the , asserting U.S. primacy in the while implicitly endorsing Europe's existing possessions and non-interference in North . Trade volumes grew, with U.S. exports to —primarily and —reaching significant shares of total by mid-century, complemented by massive : between 1820 and 1900, over 13 million Europeans arrived in the U.S., fueling industrial labor needs and cultural exchanges. These migrations, predominantly from , , , and , reinforced familial and economic networks across the Atlantic, even as U.S. neutrality policies during European upheavals like the 1848 revolutions underscored an emerging divergence in political trajectories.

World Wars and Immediate Postwar Period (1914–1950s)

During , the maintained neutrality from 1914 until April 6, 1917, when President requested a against in response to unrestricted submarine warfare and the proposing a German-Mexican alliance against the U.S. American forces, exceeding one million troops under General John Pershing, arrived in Europe in 1917 and contributed decisively to the Allied victory by bolstering British and French efforts against German advances, particularly in the Meuse-Argonne Offensive of 1918. However, postwar U.S. policy shifted toward ; the Senate rejected the and membership in 1919 and 1920, citing concerns over Article X's obligations that could entangle the U.S. in future European conflicts, thereby limiting transatlantic institutional ties. The interwar period (1919–1939) saw U.S. isolationism deepen, with policies emphasizing non-intervention in European affairs amid domestic priorities like economic recovery from the 1929 crash and aversion to "entangling alliances" rooted in . passed Neutrality Acts in 1935, 1936, and 1937 prohibiting arms sales and loans to belligerents, which strained relations with and as they faced rising threats from and , while the U.S. provided only limited economic engagement through private trade. This stance reflected public sentiment influenced by perceptions and the high cost of WWI (over 116,000 U.S. deaths), fostering a reluctance to underwrite European stability despite shared democratic values. World War II marked a pivotal realignment, beginning with the Lend-Lease Act of March 11, 1941, which authorized President Franklin D. Roosevelt to supply $50 billion in military aid (equivalent to about $700 billion today) to Britain, the Soviet Union, and other allies deemed vital to U.S. defense, circumventing neutrality laws by framing aid as a "lend-lease" arrangement rather than outright grants. This was reinforced by the Atlantic Charter, signed August 14, 1941, by Roosevelt and Winston Churchill, outlining postwar goals like self-determination and free trade, signaling a de facto transatlantic partnership before U.S. entry following Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. U.S. industrial output, including 300,000 aircraft and 100,000 tanks, sustained European theaters, with American troops liberating Western Europe alongside British and Commonwealth forces, culminating in Germany's surrender on May 8, 1945. In the immediate postwar era (1945–1950s), the U.S. transitioned from wartime ally to guarantor of European recovery amid Soviet expansionism, exemplified by the of March 12, 1947, pledging aid to nations resisting communism, starting with $400 million to Greece and Turkey. The , formally the European Recovery Program, provided $13.3 billion in grants and loans from 1948 to 1952 to 16 Western European nations, enabling infrastructure rebuilding and averting economic collapse that could invite Soviet influence; participating countries like received $3.3 billion and $2.3 billion, fostering intra-European cooperation via the Organisation for European Economic Co-operation. Security ties solidified with NATO's founding on April 4, 1949, when the united the U.S., , and 10 European states (including , , and ) in collective defense under Article 5, committing members to treat an attack on one as an attack on all, directly countering the 1948 Soviet blockade of and establishing a transatlantic military framework.

Cold War Dynamics (1940s–1989)

The onset of the Cold War solidified transatlantic security ties through U.S.-led initiatives to counter Soviet influence in Europe. In 1947, U.S. Secretary of State George Marshall proposed a comprehensive aid program, enacted as the European Recovery Program (Marshall Plan) from 1948 to 1952, disbursing $13.3 billion to 16 Western European countries including the United Kingdom, France, West Germany, and Italy to rebuild infrastructure, stabilize economies, and mitigate communist insurgencies. This economic assistance fostered interdependence, with European recipients achieving industrial growth rates averaging 35% in some sectors by 1951, while tying reconstruction to democratic governance and market reforms. Security cooperation crystallized with the signed on April 4, 1949, founding as a mutual defense pact among the U.S., , and 10 European nations to deter Soviet aggression. Article 5 enshrined collective defense, deeming an attack on one ally an assault on all, a principle tested early during the Soviet from June 1948 to May 1949, when U.S. and British forces executed the Berlin Airlift, delivering over 2.3 million tons of supplies to via 278,000 flights without armed confrontation. This non-violent success reinforced alliance cohesion, prompting West German integration into in 1955 amid rearmament debates. Early fissures emerged over and strategic priorities, notably the 1956 , where the U.S. under President Eisenhower opposed the Anglo-French-Israeli invasion of to reclaim the nationalized , threatening and withholding support that compelled British and French withdrawal by November. This episode strained relations with London and Paris, highlighting U.S. prioritization of stability and anti-colonial optics over European imperial interests, though it preserved unity by avoiding direct superpower entanglement. French President pursued greater autonomy, vetoing entry into the in 1963 and withdrawing from NATO's integrated command structure on March 7, 1966, expelling foreign troops from soil and relocating SHAPE headquarters to . De Gaulle's force de frappe nuclear deterrent and independent diplomacy sought equidistance from superpowers, yet retained treaty obligations and cooperation, reflecting broader European desires for burden-sharing amid U.S. dominance. The 1960s and 1970s saw divergences over U.S. escalation, with European governments and publics voicing criticism; Britain and limited involvement to non-combat aid, while anti-war protests eroded solidarity, amplifying perceptions of U.S. overreach. West German Chancellor Willy Brandt's from 1969 emphasized with , normalizing relations via treaties like the 1970 Moscow Treaty renouncing force; initial U.S. skepticism under Nixon evolved to tacit endorsement, as it stabilized the intra-German border without undermining . The 1980s marked renewed alignment under U.S. President and UK Prime Minister , who coordinated on deploying U.S. missiles in Europe against Soviet SS-20s, endorsing the , and pressuring the USSR economically, contributing to Mikhail Gorbachev's 1985 reforms and the 1987 INF Treaty eliminating intermediate-range missiles. Their partnership emphasized ideological confrontation with communism, with Thatcher publicly affirming Reagan's "evil empire" rhetoric in 1983, bolstering transatlantic resolve until the Berlin Wall's fall on November 9, 1989.

Post-Cold War Realignments (1990s–2010s)

Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, transatlantic relations adapted to a unipolar world order dominated by the United States, with NATO evolving from a Cold War defensive alliance to an instrument for crisis management and enlargement. NATO's first expansion in 1999 incorporated Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, followed by seven more nations in 2004, integrating former Warsaw Pact states into Western security structures to prevent instability and promote democratic consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe. This process, driven by U.S. leadership and supported by European allies, stabilized the continent but sowed seeds of tension with Russia, as Moscow viewed eastward expansion as encroachments on its sphere of influence, despite assurances to Eastern Europeans prioritizing sovereignty over great-power accommodations. In the 1990s, joint interventions in the exemplified transatlantic cooperation, with NATO's in Bosnia in 1995 halting and enforcing the Dayton Accords, followed by the 1999 Kosovo air campaign against Serbian forces, which compelled withdrawal without ground troop commitments from most allies. These operations marked NATO's first "out-of-area" actions, relying heavily on U.S. capabilities while fostering emerging EU-NATO ties through frameworks like the 1992 NATO-EU agreements, though European contributions remained limited, highlighting persistent burden-sharing asymmetries. The September 11, 2001, attacks initially unified the alliance, invoking Article 5 for the first time and leading to collective operations in under ISAF, where European troops joined U.S.-led efforts, committing over 50,000 non-U.S. personnel by the mid-2000s. The 2003 Iraq invasion exposed profound fissures, as the U.S.-led coalition included willing Europeans like the and but faced staunch opposition from and , who prioritized UN authorization and viewed unilateral action as undermining , resulting in a transatlantic crisis dubbed the "divorce" and intra-European splits between "old" and "new" members. This divide persisted into the , compounded by differing threat perceptions and U.S. emphasis on preemption versus European preferences for . The 2008 global financial crisis further tested economic interdependence, with European banks suffering $1 trillion in losses from U.S. subprime exposures, prompting coordinated responses but divergent regulatory paths—U.S. Dodd-Frank reforms versus fragmented efforts—exacerbating transatlantic debates on and liberalization attempts like the stalled TTIP negotiations. By the 2010s, these realignments underscored a maturing marked by in but growing divergences in economic and strategic autonomy aspirations within the .

Institutional Pillars

Security Frameworks (NATO and Bilateral Agreements)

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization () serves as the cornerstone of transatlantic security, established on April 4, , through the signing of the in , by 12 founding members including the , , and ten Western European nations. The treaty's primary objective was to provide collective defense against the perceived threat of Soviet expansionism in Europe, with Article 5 stipulating that an armed attack against one member shall be considered an attack against all, thereby committing allies to mutual assistance. This framework has expanded to 32 members as of 2024, incorporating former countries, and remains operational under the 1949 treaty, which has no fixed expiration but requires unanimous consent for amendments. NATO's structure includes the for political consultation, military committees for operational planning, and integrated command structures like (SHAPE), headquartered in since 1967. The alliance has invoked Article 5 only once, on September 12, 2001, following the terrorist attacks on the , leading to NATO-led operations in under the from 2003 to 2014. While NATO embodies multilateral commitment, persistent disparities in defense spending— with the accounting for approximately two-thirds of allied expenditures as of 2023—have prompted internal debates on burden-sharing, though the treaty itself does not mandate specific spending levels. Complementing NATO are bilateral defense agreements between the United States and individual European allies, which facilitate specific military cooperation outside the alliance's multilateral umbrella. The 1958 US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement, signed on July 3, enables the exchange of nuclear materials, technology, and classified information to enhance atomic weapon capabilities for mutual defense purposes, amended periodically to include submarine propulsion and extended through 2024. Similar Defense Cooperation Agreements (DCAs) exist with countries like Germany (1959 supplementary status-of-forces arrangements), Italy, and more recently Nordic states: Denmark and Finland in December 2023, and Sweden following its 2024 NATO accession, granting US forces access to facilities for training, prepositioning equipment, and rapid response. These pacts, often building on NATO's framework, address regional contingencies such as Baltic Sea security amid Russian threats, with 18 such US-European DCAs operational by 2025. Bilateral frameworks also include security of supply arrangements, such as the 's 18 bilateral pacts with nations for prioritized delivery of during crises, underscoring interdependence while allowing flexibility for non- aligned activities. These agreements reinforce transatlantic deterrence without supplanting , as evidenced by their role in hosting rotational deployments in post-2014 annexation.

Economic and Trade Institutions

The Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC), established on April 30, 2007, during the EU-U.S. summit in , functions as the principal forum for high-level economic dialogue between the and the . Chaired by senior officials from both sides, including the U.S. Secretary of Commerce and EU commissioners, the TEC oversees a workplan addressing regulatory convergence, , and barriers to enhance , which exceeded €1.2 trillion in goods and services in 2023. It has driven initiatives in secure trade supply chains, enforcement, and standards alignment, convening at least annually to monitor progress, though outcomes have often been incremental due to differing approaches to regulation and subsidization. Complementing the TEC, the U.S.-EU (TTC) was launched on June 15, 2021, at the EU-U.S. Summit in , amid rising geopolitical tensions with and disruptions from the . Co-chaired by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce, U.S. Trade Representative, and EU commissioners for trade and competition, the TTC coordinates on security, trade standards, and such as semiconductors and , aiming to bolster transatlantic competitiveness while countering economic coercion. By April 2024, it had conducted six ministerial meetings, establishing working groups that produced joint roadmaps on critical minerals diversification—reducing reliance on single suppliers from 98% for certain rare earths in 2020—and climate-neutral technologies, though frictions persist over U.S. subsidies under the and EU market regulations. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (), tracing its origins to the 1948 Organisation for European Economic Co-operation (OEEC) formed to administer U.S. aid totaling $13 billion (equivalent to $150 billion in 2023 dollars), remains a foundational institution for economic alignment. Evolving into a 38-member body in 1961 with U.S. and Canadian accession, the facilitates policy , tax coordination—such as the 2021 global minimum corporate tax agreement at 15% covering €220 billion in annual profits—and trade facilitation among its predominantly membership, which accounts for over 60% of global GDP. Its reports and standards have informed responses to challenges like post-2008 financial reforms and digital taxation, underscoring enduring cooperation despite the organization's broadening global mandate. These institutions operate without a comprehensive free trade agreement, as negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), initiated in July 2013 under the TEC framework to eliminate tariffs on €800 billion in annual trade, stalled in 2016 amid public opposition to regulatory harmonization and investor-state dispute mechanisms. Instead, progress has centered on sectoral pacts, such as the 2020 U.S.-EU deal averting Airbus-Boeing tariffs through €11 billion in concessions, reflecting pragmatic adjustments to WTO disputes rather than wholesale liberalization. Overall, they sustain a relationship where the U.S. and EU represent 33% of world GDP and 28% of global merchandise trade as of 2023, prioritizing resilience over deeper integration amid diverging industrial policies.

Diplomatic and Multilateral Mechanisms

The primary diplomatic framework governing United States-European Union relations is the Transatlantic Declaration of November 1990, which established regular consultations on foreign policy, security, and economic issues between the US and the European Community, the EU's predecessor. This was expanded by the New Transatlantic Agenda adopted at the 1995 US-EU Summit in , which created structured mechanisms including annual summits, biannual ministerial troikas, and sector-specific dialogues to address political cooperation, trade, and global challenges. These frameworks emphasize coordinated responses to international crises, with summits serving as high-level venues for leaders to align strategies; for instance, the October 2023 US-EU Summit joint statement committed both sides to upholding democratic values and countering authoritarian influences through enhanced dialogue. Multilateral institutions complement these bilateral structures by providing broader forums for transatlantic diplomatic engagement. The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), founded on the 1975 Helsinki Final Act and encompassing 57 participating states from to , functions as the inclusive platform for , verification, and human dimension commitments across the Euro-Atlantic area. The OSCE's consensus-based decision-making enables ongoing diplomatic negotiations on conflict prevention and post-conflict rehabilitation, as evidenced by its monitoring missions in since 2014, where and participants collaborate to document ceasefire violations and facilitate Minsk Agreement implementation. Its emphasis on indivisible security—linking military, economic, and humanitarian aspects—has sustained transatlantic unity amid regional tensions, though effectiveness is constrained by veto powers among members like . The Group of Seven (G7), comprising the , , , , , , and the (with the as a non-enumerated member), offers an informal yet influential multilateral setting for coordination on and transnational threats since its in 1975 amid oil crises and recession. summits facilitate preemptive diplomacy, such as the 2014 commitments to isolate post-Crimea annexation through synchronized sanctions, reflecting shared priorities in upholding rules-based despite occasional divergences over or policies. These gatherings often precede or inform broader alliances like , enabling European states to amplify their influence alongside the in shaping global responses to issues like and digital governance. Additional mechanisms include specialized dialogues under the US-EU framework, such as the High-Level Consultations on Jobs and Growth initiated in to tackle competitiveness, though these intersect with economic pillars. Overall, these instruments underscore a preference for institutionalized consultation over responses, fostering while navigating asymmetries in power and priorities between the and fragmented actors.

Economic Dimensions

Trade Volumes and Agreements

The trade partnership between the and the constitutes the world's largest bilateral commercial , encompassing , services, and investment flows that underpin mutual . In 2023, total EU-U.S. trade in alone reached €851 billion, with EU exports to the U.S. at €503 billion and imports from the U.S. at €348 billion, yielding a goods trade surplus for the EU. Services trade added significant volume, contributing to an overall EU surplus of €50 billion in 2024 when combining , equivalent to less than 3% of total . From the U.S. perspective, goods trade with the EU in 2024 totaled approximately $976 billion, including $370 billion in exports and higher imports reflecting the EU's goods surplus, while U.S. strengths in services like financial and digital exports help balance the . Historical attempts to deepen integration through comprehensive agreements have faced substantial hurdles. The (TTIP), launched in July 2013, aimed to eliminate s, reduce non-tariff barriers, and enhance regulatory convergence across sectors, potentially boosting transatlantic GDP by 0.5% annually according to initial economic modeling. Negotiations stalled by 2016 due to domestic opposition in over perceived threats to labor standards, environmental protections, and , compounded by the U.S. presidential transition and rising protectionist sentiments. Earlier frameworks, such as the 1995 New Transatlantic Agenda, laid groundwork for dialogue but did not yield binding reductions. In lieu of a broad pact, the U.S.-EU (TTC), established at the June 2021 U.S.-EU , has emerged as the primary institutional mechanism for managing trade dynamics. The TTC focuses on coordinating policies in technology standards, , and , with achievements including aligned export controls on advanced semiconductors to curb dependencies on non-market economies, joint roadmaps for governance, and collaborative responses to Russia's invasion of through sanctions harmonization. It has also addressed specific irritants, such as resolving and aluminum tariffs via a 2021 quota agreement that suspended retaliatory measures, though persistent divergences in digital services taxes and subsidies for green technologies underscore ongoing frictions. Unlike traditional agreements, the TTC emphasizes voluntary cooperation over enforceable obligations, reflecting pragmatic adaptation to political constraints while preserving high trade volumes amid global shifts.

Investment and Financial Interdependence

The investment relationship constitutes the largest bilateral (FDI) nexus globally, characterized by deep mutual penetration that fosters economic resilience and job creation. As of 2023, the cumulative U.S. FDI stock in totaled approximately $4 trillion on a basis, while Europe's FDI stock in the United States reached $3.5 trillion, representing over half of total U.S. FDI outflows directed toward recipients. This interdependence surpasses U.S.- ties, where U.S. FDI stock in China stood at just $126 billion in 2022, underscoring 's primacy as a destination for American capital despite geopolitical shifts. These investments span , , and services, with firms accounting for nearly 60% of new FDI inflows into the U.S. in 2023, amounting to $170 billion. Portfolio investments further entwine finances, with substantial cross-holdings of equities, bonds, and securities amplifying exposure to mutual market fluctuations. U.S. holdings of securities contribute to a total U.S. of foreign assets valued at $15.8 trillion at year-end 2024, while foreign (including ) holdings of U.S. securities exceeded $30 trillion by mid-2024, reflecting accelerated inflows post-2023. entities, particularly from the , represent the largest non-U.S. bloc in U.S. Treasury holdings, with aggregate claims around $1.6 trillion as of late 2023, exceeding those of or individually and providing a buffer for U.S. fiscal deficits through diversified demand. This structure exposes both sides to synchronized risks, as evidenced by correlated asset price movements during the 2022 , yet it also enables liquidity sharing via integrated capital markets in hubs like and . Cross-border banking claims reinforce this financial linkage, with U.S. entities reporting $4.24 trillion in loans from BIS-reporting banks in 2024, a significant portion involving counterparts amid claims growth of $1.1 trillion in early 2024. banks maintain extensive exposures to U.S. non-banks, while U.S. institutions hold claims on sovereigns and corporates, facilitating and derivatives clearing through shared infrastructures like and DTCC. This interdependence has proven causal in crisis transmission, such as the 2008 Lehman fallout originating in the U.S. but amplifying bank stresses, yet it also supports stability through coordinated oversight by bodies like the . Regulatory divergences, including EU data protection rules and U.S. sanctions enforcement, occasionally strain flows but have not diminished the underlying volume, which grew 3.4% year-on-year in cross-border claims by mid-2024.

Sector-Specific Cooperation (Energy, Technology)

Transatlantic energy cooperation has primarily revolved around (LNG) supplies, with the stepping in as the European Union's largest external provider following Russia's 2022 invasion of and the subsequent weaponization of energy exports. In 2023, U.S. LNG exports to the EU totaled 56.3 billion cubic meters (bcm), accounting for over half of the bloc's LNG imports and enabling a sharp reduction in reliance on Russian pipeline gas, whose share in EU imports dropped from more than 40% in 2021 to approximately 11% by 2024. This shift aligned with the EU's plan, launched in May 2022, which aimed to phase out Russian fossil fuels by accelerating diversification, infrastructure upgrades, and renewable energy deployment, with U.S. supplies filling critical gaps during the 2022-2023 when European gas prices spiked to over €300 per megawatt-hour. U.S. LNG export capacity expansions, including new terminals operationalized since 2022, supported sustained deliveries, with exports to Europe reaching record levels of 8.35 million tons in February 2025 alone, comprising 82% of total U.S. LNG shipped that month. By mid-2025, U.S. LNG constituted 28% of total EU gas imports and 55% of LNG imports, underscoring the transatlantic link's role in stabilizing European energy security amid ongoing geopolitical tensions. However, this cooperation has faced challenges, including EU regulatory hurdles on U.S. exports and debates over long-term contracts, as Europe pursues net-zero goals that could limit future fossil fuel demand. In technology, the U.S.-EU (TTC), established in June 2021, coordinates on standards, supply chains, and emerging fields like semiconductors and () to counter dependencies on adversarial suppliers, particularly . TTC initiatives have included joint roadmaps for trusted AI governance, semiconductor production scaling, and controls on dual-use technologies, with alignments on restricting advanced chip access to non-allied nations since 2022. For instance, TTC coordination supported the U.S. (2022) and EU Chips Act (2023), fostering transatlantic investments exceeding $50 billion in domestic fabrication facilities by 2025, though divergences persist over EU data privacy rules like GDPR potentially hindering U.S. tech firms' operations. Further TTC efforts emphasize 6G research collaboration and critical mineral supply chains, with 2024-2025 ministerial meetings yielding commitments to interoperable standards and reduced reliance on single-country dominance in rare earths. In , joint principles promote risk-based regulation over blanket restrictions, as outlined in TTC statements, aiming to balance with while addressing concerns over state-subsidized competitors. Despite achievements in aligning sanctions against Russia's tech-enabled aggression, transatlantic tech ties remain strained by subsidy competitions and differing regulatory philosophies—U.S. market-driven versus EU precautionary approaches—necessitating ongoing dialogue to prevent fragmentation.

Security and Defense Cooperation

Joint Military Operations and Exercises

Joint military operations between the United States and European NATO allies have primarily occurred under the NATO framework since the end of the Cold War, focusing on crisis response, peacekeeping, and counterterrorism in regions such as the Balkans, Afghanistan, and Libya. These operations underscore transatlantic interoperability, with the U.S. providing strategic enablers like airlift, intelligence, and special forces, while European allies contribute ground troops, logistics, and regional expertise. For instance, in Bosnia and Herzegovina, NATO launched Operation Joint Endeavor (IFOR) in December 1995 with approximately 60,000 troops from 32 nations, implementing the Dayton Peace Accords and marking NATO's first major post-Cold War ground deployment; this transitioned to Stabilization Force (SFOR) in 1996, ending in 2004 after stabilizing the region. Similarly, the Kosovo Force (KFOR) began in June 1999 with over 50,000 troops initially, led by NATO to maintain peace following the Kosovo War, with ongoing U.S.-European rotations emphasizing multinational battlegroups. In , NATO's (ISAF), invoked under Article 5 after the September 11, 2001 attacks—the only time in NATO's history—expanded from 2001 to 2014, peaking at around 130,000 troops with significant European contributions including over 40,000 from the , , , and others alongside U.S. forces for combat, training, and stabilization. in from March to October 2011 involved air and naval assets enforcing a UN-mandated and arms embargo, with European nations like , , and conducting over 26,000 sorties while U.S. capabilities provided critical refueling and intelligence support, demonstrating coalition airpower without ground troops. These operations highlighted transatlantic divisions over endgames, such as European fatigue in leading to earlier withdrawals, but reinforced collective defense commitments. NATO exercises have evolved to simulate large-scale reinforcements and deterrence, particularly emphasizing transatlantic mobility from to . Steadfast Defender 2024, conducted from January to May, involved over 90,000 personnel from all 32 members—including substantial U.S. deployments via sea and air—testing rapid reinforcement against a high-intensity peer threat, marking the alliance's largest exercise since the Cold War-era REFORGER drills. Preceding this, Trident Juncture 2018 featured 40,000 troops, 70 ships, and 130 aircraft across and adjacent areas, focusing on and between U.S. and European forces. Other notable drills include Air Defender 2023, 's largest post-Cold War air exercise with 250 aircraft from 25 nations practicing defensive operations over , and the U.S.-led -Europe series, such as 25 in 2025, which integrates Swift Response, Immediate Response, and Saber Guardian to hone multinational rapid deployment. These activities have intensified since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, with exercises like Steadfast Defender validating NATO's revised deterrence strategy, including enhanced forward presence battlegroups in manned by rotating U.S. and allied troops. Joint training emphasizes multi-domain operations, from and integration to across the Atlantic, addressing capability gaps like European shortfalls in strategic lift compensated by U.S. assets. Despite successes in , challenges persist, including varying national caveats on force employment observed in past operations like , where some European allies restricted missions to non-offensive roles.

Intelligence and Counterterrorism Collaboration

Following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, transatlantic intelligence and counterterrorism collaboration intensified, driven by the discovery of networks in and NATO's invocation of Article 5, which prompted Allied support including AWACS surveillance over U.S. airspace under . This marked a shift toward formalized sharing mechanisms, with the U.S. and European partners exchanging data on terrorist financing, travel, and operational threats to disrupt plots transnationally. Central to this cooperation are bilateral and multilateral agreements between the U.S. and the . The 2009 EU-U.S. Terrorist Finance Tracking Program (TFTP) agreement enables the U.S. Treasury to financial transaction from the messaging system, routed through European banks, facilitating the identification of over 2,000 terrorist-related leads by , including disruptions of funding to groups like . Renewed in 2010 and 2023 with EU oversight via a "Supervisory " to and , the TFTP has generated approximately 19,000 leads annually as of recent evaluations, though critics in have raised concerns over bulk potentially infringing on proportionality under EU law. Complementing this, the EU-U.S. (PNR) agreement, first signed in 2012 and updated in 2016, mandates airlines to share up to 19 fields on transatlantic passengers with U.S. authorities, yielding over 1.5 million leads on potential terrorists by 2017, aiding operations against foreign fighters returning from and . Within NATO, intelligence fusion occurs through entities like the Terrorist Threat Intelligence Unit (TTIU), established post-9/11 to aggregate and analyze member states' data on evolving threats, including jihadist radicalization and lone-actor attacks. 's 2024 Counter-Terrorism Policy Guidelines emphasize enhanced sharing on terrorist use of emerging technologies, such as drones and cyber tools, while integrating lessons from operations in and against , where transatlantic exchanges prevented dozens of attacks in . Bilateral channels, particularly the U.S.-UK "special relationship" under the , extend to continental via ad-hoc partnerships with agencies like France's DGSE and Germany's BND, though European reliance on U.S. has persisted, as evidenced by Germany's dependence on CIA tips for thwarting plots like the 2016 attack. Challenges persist, including tensions from U.S. surveillance disclosures in 2013, which eroded trust and prompted data protection reforms like GDPR, yet cooperation endures due to mutual vulnerabilities— provided critical on regional threats, while U.S. technical capabilities offer unparalleled breadth. Recent evaluations affirm the agreements' efficacy, with TFTP and PNR contributing to a 30-50% increase in actionable leads post-renewal, underscoring causal linkages between shared data and prevented attacks amid ongoing jihadist threats.

Burden-Sharing and Capability Gaps

Burden-sharing within has historically centered on the disproportionate contributions of the compared to its European allies, with the U.S. providing the majority of alliance capabilities despite spending a smaller relative share of its economy on defense in absolute terms. In 2014, allies pledged to allocate at least 2% of GDP to defense by , a target met by only three members at the time; by , 23 of 32 allies achieved it, driven by Russia's invasion of , with European and Canadian allies' collective spending rising from 1.66% of GDP in 2022 to 2.02% in . By 2025, all allies were projected to meet or exceed the 2% threshold for the first time, though only a few—such as at 4.1% and at 3.43%—surpassed it significantly, while the U.S. maintained around 3.4%. At the June 2025 , allies committed to a more ambitious 5% GDP target by 2035, including 3.5% for core defense investments, signaling recognition of ongoing disparities amid heightened threats from and . Despite these spending gains, U.S. administrations, particularly under President Trump, criticized European free-riding, arguing that even compliant nations offload strategic burdens like nuclear deterrence and global onto , which accounted for over two-thirds of 's total capabilities historically. European responses have accelerated post-2022, with countries like and increasing expenditures—Poland's defense budget reaching €40 billion in 2024—but aggregate European spending still trails the U.S. in absolute terms ($454 billion versus U.S. $997 billion in 2024), perpetuating debates over fair contributions to collective defense. Critics from U.S.-based think tanks contend that metrics like GDP percentages overlook qualitative imbalances, such as Europe's underinvestment in readiness and , which strain . Capability gaps persist among allies, stemming from decades of underfunding that prioritized social spending over modernization, resulting in deficiencies in strategic enablers like , , and precision munitions. nations operate 174 major weapons systems compared to the U.S.'s 33, fostering inefficiencies, duplication, and challenges that hinder rapid deployment. From 2020 to 2024, 64% of procurement originated from U.S. suppliers, underscoring reliance on for high-end capabilities amid Europe's fragmented sector. Assessments indicate that closing these gaps requires not just higher spending but targeted investments in areas like and , with 's 2024 Washington Summit pledging industrial expansion to address shortfalls exposed by the conflict. While progress has been made—such as enhanced mobility initiatives—doubts remain about Europe's ability to independently deter threats without U.S. assets, potentially necessitating capabilities equivalent to 300,000 U.S. troops for full regional autonomy.

Political and Ideological Relations

Shared Democratic Values and Human Rights

The United States and European allies maintain a foundational alignment on core democratic principles, including representative government, the rule of law, and safeguards for individual freedoms, which originated in post-World War II institutions like NATO. The North Atlantic Treaty of 1949 explicitly invokes these shared values as a basis for collective defense, emphasizing democracy, individual liberty, and human rights as bulwarks against authoritarianism. This consensus has underpinned joint advocacy for democratic norms globally, as evidenced by recurring U.S.-EU high-level consultations on human rights, such as the June 2024 dialogue reaffirming cooperation to promote rule of law and counter democratic erosion in third countries. Official statements from both sides, including the U.S. State Department's integrated country strategy for the EU, highlight these values as the bedrock of transatlantic partnership, with objectives centered on unified global promotion of democratic institutions. In practice, this alignment manifests in coordinated tools, such as sanctions against regimes violating —e.g., the parallel U.S. and measures targeting Belarusian officials following the election fraud, which affected over 100 individuals and entities by 2021. Both partners participate in multilateral forums like the UN Council, where they have co-sponsored resolutions condemning arbitrary detentions and electoral manipulations, as in the 2022 joint statement on Myanmar's . The Biden administration's 2021 , attended by leaders, further operationalized this by committing $2.4 billion in U.S. pledges for global democracy aid, complemented by allocations exceeding €1 billion annually through instruments like the European Instrument for Democracy and . These efforts reflect empirical convergence on causal mechanisms for stability, prioritizing and support over ideological diffusion alone. Notwithstanding rhetorical unity, substantive divergences arise in domestic interpretations of rights, often rooted in constitutional variances. The U.S. Constitution's First Amendment affords near-absolute protection to political speech, rejecting categorical bans on "" as incompatible with democratic deliberation, whereas frameworks, including the 2008 Framework Decision, criminalize to hatred based on race or religion, leading to prosecutions in cases like the 2019 conviction of a comedian for insulting a foreign leader. On , enforces a continent-wide abolition via Protocol 13 to the (ratified by all states), viewing it as an inherent rights violation, while the U.S. has upheld its constitutionality in cases like (1976), with 23 states executing offenders as of 2024. These gaps extend to treaty adherence: the U.S. has not ratified key instruments like the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, citing sovereignty concerns over federalism, in contrast to universal ratification. Such differences, while not eroding the overarching democratic bond, highlight tensions between and European supranational harmonization, with critics arguing that Europe's regulatory approach risks prioritizing over individual autonomy. Transatlantic cooperation on abroad also reveals limits, as U.S. unilateral actions—like the 2003 Iraq intervention framed partly as —have clashed with EU preferences for and conditionality, contributing to post-2011 divergences over where Europe supported airstrikes but later critiqued outcomes for lacking robust institution-building. Recent analyses note that while both prioritize countering authoritarian influence from and , European aid often emphasizes governance metrics (e.g., EU's €17 billion in funding since 2009), whereas U.S. programs integrate security imperatives, as in the $1.5 billion annual allocation under the 2022 National Security Strategy. These patterns underscore a shared empirical stake in resilient democracies for geopolitical stability, tempered by differing causal assessments of intervention efficacy.

Foreign Policy Alignments and Divergences

Transatlantic partners exhibit robust alignment in confronting Russian aggression, exemplified by unified support for Ukraine following Moscow's full-scale invasion on February 24, 2022, including synchronized imposition of economic sanctions and provision of over $200 billion in combined military and financial aid by mid-2025. This coordination has reinforced NATO's Article 5 collective defense commitment as the alliance's foundational principle, with European allies increasing defense expenditures to an average of 2.1% of GDP by 2025 in response to the threat. Divergences persist on China policy, where the United States prioritizes systemic rivalry and pursues decoupling in semiconductors and critical technologies through measures like the CHIPS Act of 2022, contrasting with the European Union's strategy of "de-risking" that maintains substantial trade volumes—exceeding €800 billion annually—while imposing targeted restrictions. Europe's hedging reflects economic dependencies, such as importing nearly all rare earths from , limiting alignment with Washington's more confrontational posture despite shared concerns over Beijing's assertiveness in the . In the Middle East, historical and ongoing splits are evident, notably the United States' withdrawal from the (JCPOA) in May 2018 under President Trump, which European signatories like , , and the opposed, attempting to preserve the deal through mechanisms like INSTEX to circumvent U.S. sanctions. These differences stem from divergent threat assessments, with Europe favoring diplomatic engagement with Iran to avert and regional escalation, while the U.S. emphasizes maximum pressure campaigns, as seen in the 2020 assassination of , highlighting transatlantic gaps in coercive versus incentive-based approaches. Burden-sharing within underscores persistent tensions, as the accounts for approximately 68% of alliance defense spending despite representing only about 20% of 's population, prompting repeated U.S. administrations to criticize underinvestment—only 23 of 32 members met the 2% GDP target by 2024. This imbalance fuels U.S. demands for greater capability contributions, including troop deployments and , amid debates over whether raw spending metrics adequately capture outputs like deployable forces. Under the second administration inaugurated in January 2025, these fissures risk widening, with U.S. skepticism toward multilateral commitments threatening reduced support for and demands for European allies to shoulder more costs, potentially straining unity on global threats while exposing Europe's hedging tendencies toward actors like .

Influence of Domestic Politics

Domestic politics in the United States profoundly shape transatlantic relations through shifts in presidential priorities and congressional influence on foreign policy. The 2016 election of Donald Trump introduced an "America First" approach that prioritized domestic economic protectionism and NATO burden-sharing, leading to a 2018 imposition of 25% tariffs on European steel and 10% on aluminum imports, which prompted EU retaliatory measures and exacerbated trade tensions. Trump's 2024 reelection has intensified these dynamics, with announcements of broad tariffs on EU goods starting in early 2025 and renewed demands for European allies to increase defense spending to 5% of GDP, raising uncertainties over U.S. commitment to NATO's collective defense. In contrast, the Biden administration (2021–2025) emphasized alliance revitalization, exemplified by the 2022 Strategic Concept reaffirming U.S. leadership amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, though domestic legislation like the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act subsidized U.S. industries in ways that disadvantaged European competitors in green technology. These electoral cycles illustrate how U.S. internal debates over isolationism versus global engagement directly alter security guarantees and economic cooperation, with Trump's transactional style compelling Europe to boost military expenditures—NATO Europe's aggregate defense spending rose from 1.4% of GDP in 2014 to approximately 2% by 2024, partly in response to such pressures. In Europe, fragmented domestic politics across member states hinder cohesive transatlantic policymaking, as national elections amplify divergences in threat perceptions and economic priorities. The surge of populist and Euroskeptic parties—such as France's , which garnered 31.4% in the 2024 European Parliament elections, and Germany's (AfD), polling around 20% in 2025 regional votes—has fueled advocacy for "" and reduced reliance on U.S.-led alliances, driven by voter concerns over , costs, and . These movements often criticize as an unequal burden and prioritize bilateral deals over EU-wide commitments, as seen in Hungary's blocking EU aid to in 2023–2024 due to domestic nationalist appeals. Meanwhile, pro-Atlantic voices in , bolstered by domestic security fears post-2022, contrast with Western European hesitancy; for instance, Poland's 2023 election of a more EU-aligned government strengthened Warsaw's push for U.S. troop presence, yet overall EU internal divisions delayed unified responses to U.S. threats in 2025. This politicization of , where domestic electoral gains incentivize leaders to frame ties as concessions to foreign powers, erodes alliance predictability. The interplay between U.S. and domestic trends has fostered both strains and unconventional alignments, particularly through populist networks that challenge multilateral institutions. Trump's resonates with right-wing leaders, enabling informal coalitions—such as endorsements from Italy's and Hungary's Orbán—that prioritize migration control and trade reciprocity over traditional , as evidenced by joint statements at the 2025 critiquing EU bureaucracy. However, this convergence risks deepening EU fractures, with analyses from EU-centric think tanks warning of erosion, though empirical data shows sustained U.S. military presence in (over 100,000 troops as of 2025) despite rhetorical threats, underscoring that domestic posturing often stops short of outright withdrawal. exemplifies this influence, as the UK's 2016 referendum-driven exit reshaped its orientation toward bilateral U.S. pacts, bypassing EU mechanisms and highlighting how plebiscitary domestic politics can realign historical partnerships.

Cultural and Societal Interconnections

Migration Patterns and Demographic Impacts

European-born individuals comprised approximately 4.7 million of the 46.2 million immigrants in the in 2022, accounting for 10% of the total foreign-born population, with the largest groups originating from the , , and . This stock reflects modest annual inflows; between 1998 and 2013, an average of 61,649 nationals received lawful permanent resident status in the each year, primarily through and family-based channels. Flows have since stabilized at lower levels, dominated by skilled professionals in technology, academia, and finance, amid Europe's ongoing brain drain of high to North American opportunities. Reverse migration from the and to remains smaller but notable, with around 5 million residing in as of recent estimates, often in retirement or professional relocations to countries like and . In , inflows from the surged in 2024-2025, particularly among non-citizen skilled workers holding graduate degrees, driven by economic principal applicant programs. By mid-2025, research funding cuts prompted a potential influx of scientists to institutions, with reports of increased applications from -based talent seeking stability. These patterns mitigate demographic pressures in recipient countries, where low fertility rates (around 1.5 in the and 1.6 in the as of 2023) necessitate to sustain working-age populations and GDP growth. In , migrants—often highly educated and culturally aligned—bolster without the integration strains seen from non-Western sources, preserving transatlantic affinities in and society. Conversely, Europe's net loss of exacerbates aging and dependency ratios, projected to rise to 50% by 2050 without offsets, while amplifying calls for intra- mobility reforms. Policy divergences underpin relational tensions: the US prioritizes , yielding higher-skilled transatlantic flows, whereas 's emphasis on (1.5 million intra-EU movers in 2023 alongside non-EU arrivals) results in diverse but lower-skilled demographics, fostering debates over border security and cultural cohesion. Such differences, evident in the EU's 2015-2023 migrant surges versus US enforcement measures, strain cooperation on returns and screening, though shared aging imperatives encourage joint skilled mobility initiatives like the US-EU frameworks. Overall, intra-Western migration reinforces elite networks across the Atlantic but underscores causal risks of unselective policies eroding demographic stability in .

Media, Education, and Public Opinion

Public opinion across the Atlantic has historically been favorable, with majorities in the expressing positive views toward key European allies such as the , , and , where approximately 60-70% held favorable opinions in surveys conducted in 2024. Reciprocally, views of the in European nations have averaged around 50% favorability in multi-country polls through mid-2025, though with variations by country and issue, such as higher approval in amid shared security concerns. However, favorability toward the U.S. in declined sharply following the 2024 U.S. presidential election, dropping by 6 to 28 percentage points in nations like the UK, France, and Germany between August 2024 and February 2025, reflecting sensitivities to American domestic political shifts. Media coverage significantly shapes these perceptions, often amplifying divergences rather than commonalities. media outlets have frequently emphasized negative aspects of U.S. policies, such as domestic inequality or foreign interventions, contributing to a "media divide" observed in coverage of events like the , where reporting exhibited greater skepticism toward U.S. actions compared to American outlets. U.S. , in turn, tends to portray regulatory frameworks as overly bureaucratic or economically stifling, with sporadic attention to affairs unless tied to major crises. This selective framing, compounded by ideological biases in mainstream outlets—such as left-leaning tendencies in much of that critique U.S. —can erode mutual trust, as evidenced by differing narratives on summits where U.S. coverage focused on alliance burdens while reports highlighted American unreliability. Educational exchanges counteract some media-driven misconceptions by fostering direct interpersonal ties. In the 2022-2023 academic year, 280,716 U.S. students studied abroad for credit, a 49% increase from prior levels, with over 66% choosing European destinations in recent cycles, underscoring Europe's role as the primary hub for outbound mobility. Conversely, European students comprised about 7% of the 1.1 million international enrollees in U.S. during 2023-2024, totaling roughly 77,000 individuals, many pursuing graduate studies amid specialized opportunities. Programs like Fulbright facilitate targeted scholarly exchanges, sending approximately 800 U.S. academics annually to over 130 countries, including numerous European hosts, to promote understanding through research and teaching collaborations. These initiatives, while modest in scale relative to total student populations, yield long-term diplomatic benefits by building networks less susceptible to episodic media narratives.

Scientific and Technological Exchanges

The United States and the European Union maintain a longstanding bilateral Scientific and Technological Cooperation Agreement, originally signed in 1997 and renewed periodically, which facilitates joint research initiatives across fields such as health, environment, and information technology. This framework has enabled collaborative projects addressing shared challenges, with the EU and US collectively accounting for nearly 50% of global research and innovation funding, emphasizing values like openness and excellence. In January 2025, both sides issued a joint statement reaffirming their commitment to transatlantic research ties, highlighting the US as a top non-EU partner in the EU's Horizon Europe program, where American entities participated in 1,037 instances across 760 projects by early 2025. Space exploration represents a cornerstone of transatlantic scientific exchanges, exemplified by partnerships between NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA). Joint missions include the Sentinel-6/Jason-CS satellite, launched in 2020 and operational through 2025 for precise sea-level monitoring, developed collaboratively by NASA, ESA, NOAA, and EUMETSAT to support climate and navigation data needs. In 2025, NASA and ESA consolidated cooperation on the ExoMars Rosalind Franklin rover mission, with US contributions ensuring rover landing capabilities after prior delays, aiming for a Mars surface launch in the late 2020s. Additionally, the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) project, a joint ESA-NASA gravitational wave observatory slated for the 2030s, involves US scientists on the science team to advance detection of cosmic phenomena. Emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and semiconductors are advanced through the EU-US Trade and Technology Council (TTC), established in 2021, which coordinates standards and investments to counter dependencies on non-Western suppliers. TTC efforts include joint roadmaps for AI governance and 6G networks, with a 2024 statement committing to explore trade opportunities in green technologies and critical minerals. In quantum technologies, NATO frameworks complement civilian exchanges by fostering transatlantic secure communication links, as demonstrated in 2025 trials between NATO DIANA accelerators in North America and Europe. These initiatives prioritize interoperable standards amid global competition, though divergences persist over regulatory approaches, such as EU data privacy rules impacting US tech firms.

Challenges and Controversies

Trade Disputes and Protectionist Policies

Transatlantic trade disputes have frequently arisen from accusations of unfair practices and protectionist measures, even as bilateral trade remains substantial, with EU-US goods trade totaling approximately €800 billion and services trade €746 billion in 2023. These conflicts often stem from domestic pressures to safeguard industries, leading to tariffs and retaliatory actions that temporarily disrupt flows but are typically negotiated toward resolution. Key flashpoints include metals tariffs, aviation subsidies, digital services taxation, and emerging green industrial policies, where both sides prioritize national economic security over multilateral liberalization. A prominent example involves US tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, imposed in March 2018 under 232 of the Expansion Act of 1962, citing threats from excess global capacity. The measures applied 25% duties on steel and 10% on aluminum from the EU and others, prompting the EU to retaliate with tariffs on €2.8 billion of US exports like , motorcycles, and starting June 2018. Negotiations under the Biden administration yielded a suspension agreement in October 2021, replacing tariffs with a system and launching talks on sustainable steel trade, extended through March 2025. However, following the 2024 US election, President Trump reinstated the full 25% steel and 10% aluminum tariffs on February 10, 2025, targeting non-market distortions, which the EU has warned could harm its €3.1 billion in annual metal exports to the US and provoke countermeasures. The Boeing-Airbus subsidy dispute, spanning 2004 to 2021, exemplifies long-standing transatlantic friction over state support for civil aircraft manufacturing. The challenged launch aid loans to as illegal subsidies under WTO rules, while the contested tax breaks and defense contracts benefiting ; WTO panels ruled against both sides, authorizing $7.5 billion in tariffs on goods in 2020 and $4 billion in countermeasures. Resolution came in June 2021 with a mutual suspension of tariffs for five years, alongside commitments to WTO-compliant practices, averting escalation amid shared supply chain dependencies exposed by the . Digital services taxes (DSTs) implemented by several members have fueled tensions by targeting revenues of tech giants, perceived in as extraterritorial and discriminatory. enacted a 3% DST in 2019 on digital advertising, data sales, and intermediation revenues exceeding €25 million domestically and €750 million globally, collecting over €400 million annually before partial suspensions. Similar levies in , , , and the —retained post-Brexit despite pressure—prompted threats of 25% retaliatory tariffs on €1.3 billion of exports under , paused under Biden but resurfacing in 2025 talks. The argues these taxes circumvent negotiations on global digital taxation, disproportionately burdening American firms that generate 80% of affected revenues, while proponents defend them as addressing profit-shifting amid stalled multilateral progress. Protectionist tendencies have intensified in green and industrial policies, with the US (IRA) of August 2022 allocating $369 billion in subsidies and tax credits for clean energy, mandating domestic content for eligibility, which the EU views as discriminatory against its exporters. In response, the EU's (CBAM), entering transitional phase October 1, 2023, and fully effective January 2026, imposes fees on carbon-intensive imports like and equivalent to EU ETS prices—potentially €50-100 per ton—to prevent , but criticized by US stakeholders as a veiled favoring European producers. These measures reflect causal drivers like electoral demands for job preservation and , yet risk fragmenting transatlantic cooperation; the EU-US , established 2021, has sought mitigation through joint standards, though progress remains limited amid divergent regulatory philosophies.

Disagreements on Global Threats (Russia, China)

Transatlantic partners have exhibited notable divergences in assessing and responding to the Russian threat, particularly since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022. While both sides imposed extensive sanctions and provided military aid, the United States has prioritized shifting focus to the Indo-Pacific amid perceptions of China as the pacing challenge, urging European allies to assume greater responsibility for continental defense. In contrast, European nations, facing direct geographic proximity to Russia, have viewed Moscow's aggression as an existential risk, leading to heightened emphasis on deterrence and long-term containment rather than rapid de-escalation. This disparity intensified under the second Trump administration in 2025, with U.S. advocacy for negotiated settlements criticized by European leaders as potentially legitimizing Russian gains, while American policymakers highlighted European underinvestment in defense as evidenced by only 23 of 32 NATO allies meeting the 2% GDP spending target by mid-2025. On Ukraine specifically, aid commitments reveal both cooperation and friction. From January 2022 to June , European countries collectively disbursed $165.7 billion in total support, surpassing the U.S. figure of $130.6 billion, with Europe compensating for temporary U.S. pauses in through accelerated deliveries from nations like the Nordics. However, U.S. has emphasized high-end capabilities such as missiles and F-16 training, while contributions often focused on shells and financial packages, reflecting divergent strategic priorities: Washington's interest in avoiding prolonged entanglement versus Europe's insistence on sustained pressure to prevent . Internal divisions further complicated alignment, with eastern members favoring unconditional victory over and western states like open to diplomatic off-ramps, exacerbating tensions over risks. Regarding China, threat perceptions diverge markedly, with the framing as the foremost systemic rival necessitating economic decoupling across technology, supply chains, and investment. The , conversely, designates China a "partner for cooperation, economic competitor, and systemic rival," prioritizing "de-risking" to mitigate vulnerabilities without severing €739 billion in annual bilateral trade as of 2023, which deepened in select sectors like electric vehicles amid U.S. restrictions. This approach stems from Europe's lesser sense of immediate military threat from China compared to , coupled with that renders full alignment with U.S. tariffs—such as the 100% duties on Chinese EVs imposed in 2024—politically untenable for export-oriented economies. A prominent flashpoint has been , exemplified by 's equipment. The U.S. banned in 2019 citing risks tied to Chinese laws mandating corporate intelligence cooperation, and pressured allies through export controls and warnings of intelligence-sharing exclusion. European responses varied: the excluded in 2020, but extended phase-out deadlines to 2029 for existing networks, balancing concerns against projected €62 billion in operator costs from abrupt bans, while opted for gradual restrictions without outright . These inconsistencies strained transatlantic coordination, as U.S. officials viewed European hesitancy as undermining collective defense against Chinese technological coercion, particularly in dual-use technologies critical to interoperability. Broader policy rifts extend to export controls and Taiwan contingencies. The U.S. has led multilateral regimes restricting and transfers to since 2022, but Europe's fragmented implementation— with the EU's Chips Act aiming for self-sufficiency yet lagging in enforcement—highlights differing urgency, as seeks to avoid U.S.-style extraterritorial sanctions that could invite Chinese retaliation on critical minerals. On , American commitments to arming the island contrast with Europe's more declaratory support, limited by trade dependencies and aversion to economic fallout from a potential , underscoring causal asymmetries in driven by geography and economic stakes.

Regulatory and Value-Based Conflicts (e.g., Privacy vs. Security)

Transatlantic regulatory conflicts often stem from divergent priorities between the 's emphasis on individual as a fundamental right under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), enacted in 2018, and the ' prioritization of national and law enforcement access to data. These tensions manifest in disputes over cross-border data flows, where EU law requires adequacy decisions or safeguards to ensure equivalent protection, while U.S. statutes like Section 702 of the (FISA) enable bulk surveillance without individualized warrants, raising concerns about indiscriminate access to EU citizens' data. The Court of Justice of the Union (CJEU) has repeatedly invalidated U.S.-EU data transfer mechanisms when U.S. surveillance practices fail to provide sufficient safeguards, underscoring a core incompatibility between EU data minimization principles and U.S. imperatives. A pivotal example is the evolution of adequacy frameworks for transatlantic data transfers. The EU-U.S. Safe Harbor Framework, established in 2000, facilitated data flows by certifying U.S. companies' compliance with EU standards but was invalidated by the CJEU in 2015 (Schrems I) following revelations of U.S. programs like , which enabled access to data without adequate oversight or redress for EU residents. Its successor, the Privacy Shield agreement of 2016, incorporated executive assurances on surveillance limits and an ombudsperson mechanism but was struck down in 2020 (Schrems II) for similar deficiencies, including the lack of judicial remedies for non-U.S. persons under U.S. law. In response, the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (DPF) was adopted in July 2023, bolstered by Biden administration executive orders limiting intelligence access and enhancing redress via the Data Protection Review Court; however, it faced immediate legal challenges and survived a CJEU dismissal in September 2025, though critics maintain underlying U.S. surveillance risks persist. The U.S. Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act, signed into law in March 2018, exacerbates these frictions by authorizing U.S. authorities to compel production of data stored abroad by U.S.-based providers, regardless of location, and permitting executive agreements for mutual access without full judicial oversight. EU regulators, including the European Data Protection Board, have criticized the CLOUD Act for conflicting with GDPR's territorial scope and proportionality requirements, as it could mandate disclosure of EU data to U.S. agencies without EU member state consent or equivalent protections, potentially undermining data sovereignty. Efforts toward a U.S.-EU e-evidence agreement, initiated in 2018, aim to resolve such clashes through streamlined mutual legal assistance, but progress has stalled amid disputes over encryption access and bulk data requests, with no bilateral pact finalized by 2025. Beyond data flows, value-based divergences influence regulatory approaches to . The EU's () and (), effective from 2023 and 2024 respectively, impose obligations on U.S. tech firms to curb and , which U.S. policymakers view as extraterritorial overreach favoring European competitors. In contrast, U.S. frameworks like the 2022 on cybersecurity prioritize voluntary industry standards over mandates, leading to transatlantic pushback on EU demands for backdoors in for security purposes, as seen in debates over under the proposed EU Regulation. These conflicts reflect deeper philosophical rifts: the EU's precautionary principle-driven regulation versus the U.S. innovation-first model, often resulting in fines totaling billions against U.S. firms—such as €4.34 billion against in 2018 for Android antitrust violations—while U.S. challenges to EU rules highlight reciprocal trade barriers. Ongoing negotiations, including under the 2025 , seek harmonization, but persistent asymmetries in enforcement and surveillance priorities continue to strain cooperation.

Recent Developments (2020s)

Geopolitical Crises and Responses (Ukraine, Middle East)

The Russian full-scale invasion of on February 24, 2022, elicited a coordinated response emphasizing deterrence, sanctions, and support for Kyiv's . The , , and allies swiftly imposed unprecedented on , targeting its energy sector, financial institutions, and oligarchs, which reduced Russia's GDP by approximately 2-3% in 2022 and constrained its war financing. enhanced its eastern flank through , deploying additional battlegroups in the and , while Allies committed to resetting long-term deterrence at the and subsequent gatherings. Military and financial aid underscored transatlantic burden-sharing, though compositions varied: the prioritized lethal assistance, providing $66.9 billion in security cooperation since February 2022, including advanced systems like HIMARS and defenses that enabled counteroffensives. European nations delivered a broader mix, with the committing €11.1 billion via the European Peace Facility for munitions and training, and collective European aid totaling $165.7 billion from January 2022 to June 2025—exceeding the 's $130.6 billion over the same period, largely through bilateral grants from , the , and . The also mobilized $43 billion in macro-financial assistance to stabilize Ukraine's , including €745 million for healthcare amid wartime disruptions. Strains emerged over sustainability and equity, with US appropriations reaching $113.4 billion by late 2023 and accelerating defense spending— and , for instance, ordering F-35s and air defenses to meet NATO's 2% GDP target amid calls for greater European self-reliance. dipped sharply in July-August 2025 despite NATO's Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List, reflecting donor fatigue, procurement delays, and shifting US priorities under the second administration, which conditioned further packages on European contributions and concessions in potential peace talks. Overall, the crisis reinforced NATO's Article 5 credibility but exposed dependencies on US and , prompting initiatives like the 2025 on defense readiness. In the Middle East, Hamas's October 7, 2023, attacks—killing 1,200 Israelis and taking over 250 hostages—prompted initial transatlantic consensus on 's right to self-defense, with the airlifting munitions and intercepting Iranian drones alongside naval patrols in the to counter Houthi threats to shipping. Divergences surfaced over 's Gaza operations, which displaced 1.9 million and caused over 40,000 reported deaths by mid-2025: the vetoed multiple UN Security Council cease-fire resolutions and provided $17.9 billion in supplemental aid to since October 2023, framing the conflict as existential against Iranian proxies. responses were more fragmented, with the suspending aid to amid concerns over diversion to but advocating humanitarian corridors, recognizing a Palestinian state (as , , and did in May 2024), and critiquing settlement expansions as obstacles to a . These gaps reflected causal differences in threat perceptions—the prioritizing alliance deterrence against , emphasizing multilateral and domestic pressures from Muslim migrant communities fueling protests and antisemitism spikes. A -brokered ceasefire on October 9, 2025, halted major fighting, releasing remaining hostages and enabling phased Israeli withdrawals, with the administration's plan integrating Arab normalization and governance reforms. The , initially sidelined, recommitted to border monitoring via its Rafah mission restart and reconstruction funding, contingent on reforms, signaling tentative realignment but underscoring persistent tensions over enforcement mechanisms like potential warrants against Israeli leaders. Both crises highlighted resilience in countering authoritarian aggression yet revealed fault lines in risk tolerance and resource allocation, with 's regulatory focus contrasting unilateralism.

US Political Transitions and Trade Deals (2024–2025)

The 2024 United States presidential election resulted in Donald Trump's victory over incumbent Vice President Kamala Harris, with Trump securing 312 electoral votes to Harris's 226, alongside Republican majorities in both the House and Senate. This outcome marked a significant political transition from the Biden administration's emphasis on multilateral alliances to Trump's "America First" doctrine, which prioritized transactional diplomacy and skepticism toward European commitments on defense spending and trade imbalances. European leaders expressed concerns over potential U.S. withdrawal from NATO support for Ukraine and reduced reliability in collective security, with a Pew Research Center survey indicating a 12.9% drop in favorable European attitudes toward the U.S. between late 2024 and mid-2025. Trump's inauguration on January 20, 2025, accelerated shifts in transatlantic dynamics, as the administration imposed initial tariffs under the (IEEPA) on select imports, including threats of 25% duties on automobiles and steel to address perceived deficits exceeding $200 billion annually. President responded by initiating consultations to avert escalation, emphasizing the €1.2 trillion volume's mutual benefits while critiquing U.S. as disruptive to global supply chains. Negotiations intensified amid Trump's public demands for to increase purchases of U.S. (LNG) and reduce regulatory barriers, framing the relationship as one requiring "fair and reciprocal" terms rather than unconditional alliance. Culminating these efforts, on July 27, 2025, and von der Leyen announced a U.S.-EU Trade Framework Agreement, establishing a baseline 15% on most EU exports to the U.S. while exempting certain categories like pharmaceuticals under most-favored-nation (MFN) rates; in exchange, the EU committed to $750 billion in U.S. purchases over the next decade and $600 billion in investments, aiming to narrow the trade gap. Existing 50% U.S. tariffs on EU steel, aluminum, and copper were retained, with reciprocal safeguards against surges, though critics in the argued the deal favored U.S. leverage without resolving underlying disputes over digital services taxes. The agreement, effective August 7, 2025, was hailed by U.S. officials as a "big win" for American workers but drew mixed reactions in Europe, with some viewing it as a pragmatic amid fears of broader wars.

Emerging Strategic Realignments

In the wake of the and the return of to the , transatlantic strategic alignments have undergone notable shifts, characterized by increased European emphasis on defense self-reliance amid perceived American retrenchment. European allies, facing demands for higher burden-sharing, have accelerated rearmament efforts, with collective defense spending surpassing 2% of GDP targets for many members by 2025, driven by the ongoing conflict and skepticism toward unconditional U.S. security guarantees. This has manifested in initiatives like the European Union's push for "," including proposals for a €100 billion defense fund and localized production of munitions to reduce dependency on U.S. supplies, as evidenced by Germany's 2022 Zeitenwende policy committing €100 billion to military modernization. A key realignment involves divergences in threat perceptions regarding . While the U.S. has adopted a more confrontational posture, viewing as a systemic rival, states have pursued "de-risking" rather than full , maintaining economic ties worth over €800 billion in annual trade as of 2024, even as the imposed tariffs on electric vehicles in 2024. This hedging reflects Europe's energy and vulnerabilities exposed by the Russia-Ukraine , prompting bilateral deals like the March 2025 EU- post-BRI agreement to secure critical minerals, which has strained coordination with Washington's Indo-Pacific pivot. NATO's 2024 Washington declaration acknowledged as enabling Russia's efforts but stopped short of designating it a direct threat, highlighting transatlantic frictions over alliance focus. On , unity persists in sanctions and aid totaling over €100 billion from the by mid-2025, yet emerging cracks appear in burden distribution, with U.S. contributions to 's Deterrence Initiative exceeding $4 billion annually while allies debate assuming more operational command roles. The "" concept has gained traction, envisioning greater EU-led battlegroups in and joint procurement frameworks, as proposed in the EU's 2025 Strategic Compass update, to mitigate risks from potential U.S. policy fluctuations. These developments signal a pragmatic recalibration: bolstering capabilities to deter aggression independently, while the U.S. redirects resources toward , potentially fostering a more balanced but transactional partnership.

Future Outlook

Opportunities for Reinvigoration

The shared imperative to counter aggression and economic coercion has catalyzed renewed cooperation, particularly through , where European allies committed at the 2024 Washington Summit to reach 2% of GDP in defense spending by 2025, with several nations like exceeding 4%. This surge, driven by Russia's of in 2022, has prompted over 23 allies to meet or approach the target by October 2025, enabling enhanced forward deployments and joint exercises that bolster collective deterrence without sole reliance on U.S. forces. Furthermore, 's pathway for 's eventual membership, outlined in the 2024 summit declaration, aligns U.S. and European strategies to integrate Kyiv's reforms and reconstruction, fostering long-term stability in . Energy interdependence presents a pragmatic avenue for resilience, as U.S. (LNG) exports to reached 7.1 billion cubic feet per day in 2024, comprising over 40% of LNG imports and displacing gas that previously accounted for 40% of 's supply. The August 2025 U.S.- on Reciprocal, Fair, and Balanced mandates purchases of $750 billion in U.S. products through 2028, including LNG and technologies, to sustain this diversification while supporting American producers amid global volatility. This arrangement not only mitigates 's vulnerability—evident in 2022 price spikes exceeding €300 per megawatt-hour—but also aligns with mutual goals of phasing out fossil fuels by 2027. Trade liberalization under the same 2025 framework eliminates tariffs on U.S. industrial goods and grants preferential access for American agricultural products like , potentially boosting bilateral goods , which neared $1.2 trillion in 2024, by reducing non-tariff barriers in sectors such as digital services. Reciprocal commitments, including €600 billion in EU investments into U.S. for , chips, and , underscore economic complementarity, with direct investment stocks at $7.5 trillion supporting millions of jobs on both sides. Technological alignment against China's dominance offers strategic depth, as evidenced by joint U.S.-EU initiatives on semiconductors and rare earths, where coordinated responses to Beijing's export restrictions on critical minerals aim to secure supply chains controlling 80% of global processing. The Tech 2030 Roadmap proposes harmonized standards for and , leveraging combined R&D investments exceeding $100 billion annually to maintain Western leadership, rather than divergent regulations that fragment markets. This cooperation, building on the established in 2021, counters China's "" ambitions by prioritizing allied resilience over unilateral dependencies.

Risks of Fragmentation and Alternatives

The risk of fragmentation in transatlantic relations stems primarily from diverging strategic priorities and uneven burden-sharing within . The has increasingly prioritized the region amid competition with , while allies remain focused on immediate threats from , particularly following the 2022 invasion of . This misalignment is exacerbated by persistent shortfalls in defense spending; as of 2024, only 23 of 's 32 members met the alliance's 2% of GDP target, leaving the U.S. to shoulder approximately 68% of total defense expenditures. Such imbalances foster resentment in the U.S., where public support for extended security guarantees has waned, with polls indicating that a majority of Americans view as outdated or overly burdensome. Economic divergences further heighten fragmentation risks, particularly through protectionist policies that disrupt integrated supply chains. trade in neared $2 trillion in 2024, underpinned by $7.5 trillion in mutual direct investments, yet proposed U.S. tariffs under the second administration—ranging from 10% to 20% on imports—threaten to impose moderate short-term output losses while prompting firms to relocate production or pivot markets. These measures, justified by U.S. concerns over imbalances and , could fragment supply chains historically reliant on transatlantic cooperation, as seen in sectors like automobiles and pharmaceuticals. Regulatory clashes, such as U.S. demands for alignment on versus Europe's continued economic ties (with EU-China exceeding €800 billion annually), compound these tensions, potentially eroding the alliance's cohesive economic foundation. Politically, populist shifts on both sides undermine unity, with U.S. questioning commitments and European skepticism viewing the U.S. as a "necessary partner" rather than a trusted ally. A potential U.S. retrenchment could weaken deterrence against Russian aggression, exposing to heightened vulnerability given its current conventional force gaps—estimated at needing 300,000 additional troops for credible defense. Globally, fragmentation risks amplifying divisions, as outlined in assessments of escalating geopolitical shocks that elevate credit, market, and liquidity risks for intertwined economies. Alternatives to the transatlantic framework center on European strategic autonomy, though feasibility remains constrained by capability deficits. Initiatives like the 's (PESCO) and European Defence Fund aim to bolster independent capabilities, with proposals for defense spending targets rising to 5% of GDP by 2035 (3.5% military, 1.5% security-related). Proponents argue this "de-Americanization" of would necessitate rapid European military buildup, potentially including a dedicated to address gaps in air defense and logistics. However, such autonomy faces causal hurdles: Europe's fragmented defense industries and reliance on U.S. , deterrence, and enablers like render full independence illusory in the near term. Other pathways include multilateral diversification, such as deepened ties with partners like or states to offset U.S. unreliability, or selective engagement with despite security risks. Yet analyses emphasize no viable substitute exists for the U.S.- partnership, given the unique scale of American and the multilateral imperative for Europe's survival amid threats from autocratic powers. Scenarios project outcomes ranging from U.S. neglect prompting European bloc formation to cooperative rebalancing, but persistent divergences on issues like aid—where U.S. clashes with European commitments—suggest fragmentation may persist absent mutual concessions.

References

  1. [1]
    Topic: Relations with the European Union - NATO
    Jun 20, 2025 · The European Union (EU) is an essential partner for NATO. The two organisations share common values, strategic interests and a majority of member countries.
  2. [2]
    EU-US trade: facts and figures - Consilium
    In 2024, transatlantic trade in goods and services reached over €1.68 trillion. Both the EU and US are top trading partners in goods for each other.
  3. [3]
    3. Views of trans-Atlantic allies and US-Europe relations
    May 8, 2024 · Most Americans view the UK, France and Germany favorably. Roughly half believe European allies should increase their defense spending.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] The Impact of Evolving Transatlantic Relations on International ...
    Mar 7, 2022 · ABSTRACT. This paper investigates the impacts of recent, macro-level developments in transatlantic relations on the.
  5. [5]
    Transatlantic Relations Under Trump: An Uneasy Peace - CSIS
    Oct 6, 2025 · President Trump's transactional stance and skepticism toward Europe has shocked transatlantic ties linking trade, security, and Ukraine.
  6. [6]
    Topic: NATO's purpose - NATO
    May 29, 2024 · These shared values unite a diverse group of Allies on both sides of the Atlantic. NATO embodies the transatlantic bond between them ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Seven Building Blocks for a Resilient Transatlantic Relationship
    Jul 14, 2022 · Common values such as democracy, human rights, and adherence to a rules-based international order are the basis of the transatlantic ...
  8. [8]
    FACT SHEET: NATO Summit: Revitalizing the Transatlantic Alliance
    Jun 13, 2021 · The Transatlantic relationship is built on a foundation of shared democratic values. NATO's strength comes not only from its military might, ...
  9. [9]
    The Transatlantic Relationship - Why it Still Matters Today - CIRSD
    THE aftermath of World War II produced a global order defined at Yalta and Potsdam, ushering in the Cold War period—a nearly five decade-long standoff between ...
  10. [10]
    The Past, Present, and Future of Transatlanticism | Politics & Society
    Jun 20, 2023 · The foundations of transatlanticism were laid, through the Bretton Woods Agreement to dictate how the international monetary system would ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] The State and Trajectory of Transatlantic Relations
    Nov 4, 2024 · The transatlantic alliance is founded on a commitment to shared values, aimed at building a fairer and more just world, rather than focusing on ...
  12. [12]
    A strong transatlantic partnership based on the common values of ...
    A strong transatlantic partnership based on the common values of democracy and the rule of law, key in tackling global challenges and preserving international ...Missing: conceptual | Show results with:conceptual
  13. [13]
    The Future of Transatlantic Relations – Restoring Trust and Building ...
    This report, based on a series of EPC working group meetings involving experts from both sides of the Atlantic, assesses the nature of current EU-US disputes.
  14. [14]
    Transatlantic Relations: U.S. Interests and Key Issues
    May 31, 2019 · Transatlantic relations encompass the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the European Union (EU), close U.S. bilateral ties with most ...
  15. [15]
    The Triangular Trade | American Battlefield Trust
    Feb 21, 2019 · The Atlantic Slave Trade was interwoven into a vast, intercontinental mercantile system commonly called the Triangular Trade.
  16. [16]
    The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade · African Passages, Lowcountry ...
    The trans-Atlantic slave trade was the largest long-distance forced movement of people in recorded history. From the sixteenth to the late nineteenth ...
  17. [17]
    Local and Global Economy of Slavery - Salem Maritime National ...
    Aug 24, 2022 · The most common routes formed what is now known as the "Triangle Trade" connecting Europe, Africa, and the Americas. From 1560 to 1850, about ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  18. [18]
    French Alliance - Office of the Historian
    The Treaty of Amity and Commerce promoted trade between the United States and France and recognized the United States as an independent nation.
  19. [19]
    France in the American Revolution | American Battlefield Trust
    Jan 6, 2021 · Most importantly, French involvement in the American Revolution strained France's finances, exactly as many had predicted. The economic collapse ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    The Monroe Doctrine, 1823 | Gilder Lehrman Institute of American ...
    President James Monroe's 1823 annual message to Congress included a warning to European powers not to interfere in the affairs of the Western Hemisphere.Missing: transatlantic | Show results with:transatlantic<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Immigration to the United States, 1851-1900 - The Library of Congress
    Those from Europe generally came through East Coast facilities, while those from Asia generally entered through West Coast centers.Missing: trade | Show results with:trade
  22. [22]
    Destination America . When did they come? - PBS
    European Emigration Between 1815 and 1915, some 30 million Europeans arrived in the United States. For many it was a long and arduous journey.Missing: trade | Show results with:trade
  23. [23]
    U.S. Entry into World War I, 1917 - Office of the Historian
    On April 2, 1917, President Woodrow Wilson went before a joint session of Congress to request a declaration of war against Germany.
  24. [24]
    U.S. Participation in the Great War (World War I) | Library of Congress
    The United States sent more than a million troops to Europe, where they encountered a war unlike any other—one waged in trenches and in the air, and one marked ...
  25. [25]
    1914–1920: World War One and Wilsonian Diplomacy
    Wilsonian diplomacy focused on ideals and democracy, the US engaged in WWI, and the US declined to join the League of Nations due to Article X.
  26. [26]
    Milestones: 1937-1945 - American Isolationism in the 1930s
    Isolationists advocated non-involvement in European and Asian conflicts and non-entanglement in international politics.Missing: 1919-1939 | Show results with:1919-1939
  27. [27]
    Isolationism and U.S. Foreign Policy After World War I
    The U.S. government sought to enact greater limits on immigration after World War I because of strong anti-European sentiment, exacerbated by the “Red Scare” ...
  28. [28]
    Lend-Lease Act (1941) | National Archives
    Jun 28, 2022 · Passed on March 11, 1941, this act set up a system that would allow the United States to lend or lease war supplies to any nation deemed vital to the defense ...
  29. [29]
    The Atlantic Conference & Charter, 1941 - Office of the Historian
    The Atlantic Charter was a joint declaration released by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill on August 14, 1941.Missing: transatlantic | Show results with:transatlantic
  30. [30]
    Marshall Plan (1948) | National Archives
    Jun 29, 2022 · The Marshall Plan, named after George Marshall, provided $13.3 billion in US aid to restore Europe's economy after WWII, signed on April 3, ...
  31. [31]
    Marshall Plan, 1948 - Office of the Historian
    The Marshall Plan generated a resurgence of European industrialization and brought extensive investment into the region.
  32. [32]
    The Road to NATO: Building the Transatlantic Alliance
    On April 4, 1949, representatives of the United States, Canada, and 10 Western European nations met in Washington, DC, to sign a mutual defense pact against ...
  33. [33]
    Official text: The North Atlantic Treaty, 04-Apr.-1949 - NATO
    Oct 19, 2023 · For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack: on the territory of any of the ...
  34. [34]
    Berlin Crises - state.gov
    The United States and its allies responded with a massive airlift that delivered supplies to the people of Berlin and generated overwhelming popular support in ...
  35. [35]
    The Suez Crisis, 1956 - Office of the Historian
    Concurrently, U.S. worries about the continued viability of European (particularly British) political and military power in the Middle East in the aftermath of ...
  36. [36]
    Declassified: France and NATO - 1949 - NATO
    In 1966, President Charles de Gaulle withdrew France from NATO's integrated military command structure (a decision that was reversed in 2009). Charles de Gaulle ...
  37. [37]
    Western Europe and the Vietnam War (Chapter 26)
    Jan 2, 2025 · The Vietnam War cut deeply into West European domestic politics, aggravated political and societal tensions and diminished the righteousness of the American ...
  38. [38]
    Conference Report: "Ostpolitik,1969-1974: The European and ...
    May 30, 2006 · Eastern bloc in order to formulate a cohesive response to Brandt's Ostpolitik as a means to keep Germany divided and limit its strength.
  39. [39]
    The Nixon Administration and Willy Brandt's "Ostpolitik", 1969–72
    memorandum in September 1970 that by accepting the principle of four-power talks on Berlin, the US government was indirectly giving Ostpolitik its blessing.
  40. [40]
    Morality and Foreign Policy: Reagan and Thatcher - Imprimis
    Their joint leadership during the Cold War resembled in many ways the collaboration between Roosevelt and Churchill during World War II.
  41. [41]
    The Reagan-Thatcher affinity: a warmth that won the cold war
    Apr 9, 2013 · Ronald Reagan acknowledged that defeating Soviet communism was a team effort – with Margaret Thatcher a key player.
  42. [42]
    The Evolution of NATO, 1988–2001 - Office of the Historian
    NATO enlargement was widely debated through the mid-1990s, as policymakers and analysts explored its implications, costs, and likely results. NATO conducted a ...
  43. [43]
    Topic: Enlargement and Article 10 - NATO
    Oct 3, 2024 · The Study also concluded that enlargement would strengthen the Alliance's ability to contribute to European and international security and ...
  44. [44]
    NATO Expansion: What Gorbachev Heard - National Security Archive
    Dec 12, 2017 · The documents show that multiple national leaders were considering and rejecting Central and Eastern European membership in NATO as of early ...
  45. [45]
    What Washington Got Wrong About NATO Expansion in the 1990s
    Oct 16, 2023 · Rather than accept Russia's key interests, the United States bypassed them: it enshrined an enlarging NATO as the core of Europe's security ...
  46. [46]
    Peace support operations in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1995-2004)
    Mar 21, 2024 · NATO's involvement in Bosnia and Herzegovina began in 1992. In ... These agreements provide the overall framework for NATO-EU cooperation.
  47. [47]
    Decision to Intervene: How the War in Bosnia Ended
    By the end of 1995, U.S. leadership had transformed Bosnia into a country at relative peace—a peace enforced by 60,000 U.S. and NATO forces. (Remarkably, the ...Missing: cooperation | Show results with:cooperation
  48. [48]
    NATO and the 2003 campaign against Iraq
    May 19, 2022 · The March 2003 campaign against Iraq was conducted by a coalition of forces from different countries, some of which were NATO member countries and some were ...
  49. [49]
    The Crisis in the Alliance - Brookings Institution
    The debate about whether or not to invade Iraq has provoked one of the worst transatlantic crises—and one of the worst intra-European crises—of the entire ...
  50. [50]
    Transatlantic crisis | European Union Institute for Security Studies
    Feb 27, 2003 · Iraq, Iraq, Iraq - a code word for the crisis across the Atlantic and discord within Europe. Yet, though the divide across the Atlantic is ...
  51. [51]
    Transatlantic Relations in Times of Transition - Policy Center
    Oct 22, 2024 · For transatlantic relations to remain relevant, multiple areas of interaction should be expanded – trade, investments, education, tourism, in ...
  52. [52]
    Unfinished Business: The North Atlantic crisis and its aftermath - CEPR
    Sep 22, 2017 · The European banking system decayed from within as the northern universal banks became increasingly fragile, while the US commercial banking ...
  53. [53]
    Transatlantic Financial Regulation - SpringerLink
    Examines the cooperation between the US and the EU on financial regulatory reform, notably during the 2008 financial crisis · Provides a new perspective on ...
  54. [54]
    Topic: Founding treaty - NATO
    Sep 2, 2022 · The foundations of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) were officially laid down on 4 April 1949 with the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty.<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), 1949
    The North Atlantic Treaty Organization was created in 1949 by the United States, Canada, and several Western European nations to provide collective security ...Missing: transatlantic | Show results with:transatlantic
  56. [56]
    A short history of NATO
    Jun 3, 2022 · In 1991 as in 1949, NATO was to be the foundation stone for a larger, pan-European security architecture. In December 1991, the Allies ...
  57. [57]
    Topic: Collective defence and Article 5 - NATO
    Jul 4, 2023 · In 1949, the primary aim of the North Atlantic Treaty – NATO's founding treaty – was to create a pact of mutual assistance to counter the risk ...Missing: transatlantic | Show results with:transatlantic
  58. [58]
    UK-USA Mutual Defence Agreement - House of Commons Library
    Oct 20, 2014 · The Mutual Defence Agreement allows the US and UK to exchange nuclear materials, technology and information in order to improve their atomic weapon design.
  59. [59]
    The Significance of U.S. Defense Cooperation Agreements in ...
    Feb 6, 2024 · In December 2023, the United States signed three separate defense cooperation agreements (DCAs) with Sweden, Finland and Denmark, solidifying ...<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    Bilateral Defense Cooperation Agreements (DCAs) with the US and ...
    Mar 10, 2025 · These bilateral agreements grant the US access to military facilities for joint training exercises and the prepositioning of equipment, ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The EU's new bilateral security and defence partnerships
    The United States, for example, has established a network of some 18 bilateral Security of Supply Agreements (SOSA) in order to facilitate priority delivery of ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Role of Bilateral Defense Agreements in Maintaining the European ...
    Deployment of U.S. forces to European countries, from the begin- ning, has been based on the consent of the host country through bilat- eral agreements.
  63. [63]
    Transatlantic Economic Council - United States Department of State
    The Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) is the primary plenary forum for economic dialogue between the United States and the European Union.
  64. [64]
    EU trade relations with United States - European Union
    The EU and US have issued a Joint Statement establishing a framework for fair, balanced and mutually beneficial transatlantic trade and investment. This Joint ...
  65. [65]
    About the Transatlantic Economic Council - State.gov
    The TEC works to facilitate agreement on a wide range of economically important issues managed through its Current Workplan. Meeting at least once per year, the ...
  66. [66]
    Untapping the EU-US trade potential: Taking the Transatlantic ...
    May 7, 2010 · The EU Trade Commissioner, Karel De Gucht, sees the Transatlantic Economic Council as an important mechanism to address non-tariff regulatory ...
  67. [67]
    U.S.-E.U. Trade and Technology Council (TTC)
    The TTC's overall objective is to promote US and EU competitiveness and prosperity and the spread of democratic, market-oriented values.
  68. [68]
    EU-US Trade and Technology Council - European Commission
    The EU-US Trade and Technology Council serves as a forum for the United States and European Union to coordinate approaches to key global trade, economic, and ...
  69. [69]
    U.S-EU Joint Statement of the Trade and Technology Council
    Apr 5, 2024 · The sixth ministerial meeting of the Trade and Technology Council (“TTC”) took place in Leuven, Belgium, on 4 and 5 April 2024. It was co ...<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council: Background and Issues
    Nov 1, 2024 · The US-EU Trade and Technology Council (TTC) is a high-level forum between the United States and European Union (EU) that aims to enhance cooperation on global ...
  71. [71]
    OECD: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and ...
    The OECD designs international standards and guidelines for development co-operation, based on best practices, and monitors their implementation by its members.About the organisation · United States · Contact us · Careers
  72. [72]
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
    The OECD provides a setting where governments can compare experiences, seek answers to common challenges, identify good practices, and develop high standards ...
  73. [73]
    The Last Economic Stronghold of the Atlantic Alliance: OECD
    Apr 10, 2025 · The OECD has evolved into a multilateral institution that seeks to promote economic cooperation, trade liberalization, and sustainable ...
  74. [74]
    Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
    The OECD carries out a number of regional and bilateral cooperation programs. The Trade Committee hosts a meeting of OECD member country trade ministers ...
  75. [75]
    U.S.-EU Trade Relations - Congress.gov
    Feb 7, 2025 · EU officials have characterized the U.S.-EU relationship as mutually beneficial, supporting jobs and trade on both sides of the Atlantic. Some ...
  76. [76]
    EU relations with the United States - Consilium
    The transatlantic relationship is a key artery of the world economy. Together, the European Union and the US represent almost 30% of global trade in goods ...
  77. [77]
    History - U.S. Mission to the European Union
    The NTA contains four broad objectives for U.S.-EU collaboration: promoting peace and stability, democracy and development around the world; responding to ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  78. [78]
    U.S.-EU Summit Joint Statement - U.S. Mission to the European Union
    Oct 20, 2023 · The United States and the European Union are committed to strengthening the transatlantic marketplace to support decent jobs and economic opportunities.
  79. [79]
    Who we are - OSCE
    The OSCE works for stability, peace and democracy for more than a billion people, through political dialogue about shared values and through practical work.
  80. [80]
    Topic: Relations with the OSCE - NATO
    Jul 31, 2023 · The OSCE establishes the principles that govern international relations in the Euro-Atlantic area and embodies a comprehensive approach to human security.
  81. [81]
    [PDF] The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)
    Growing tensions, especially since Russia's 2014 illegal annexation of Crimea, have revived the OSCE's role as a forum for pan-European security cooperation.
  82. [82]
    The OSCE: An Essential Component of European Security | ASIL
    Of first and foremost importance, the OSCE is the most inclusive Euro-Atlantic forum for consultation and joint action. Its geographical diversity stretches ...
  83. [83]
    What Does the G7 Do? | Council on Foreign Relations
    The G7 is an informal grouping of advanced democracies that meets annually to coordinate global economic policy and address other transnational issues. Due to ...
  84. [84]
    What did not happen at the G7 Summit in Canada (and why it matters)
    Jun 17, 2025 · The absence of a joint communiqué at this week's G7 summit starkly illustrates the deepening policy divisions among leaders of the world's most powerful ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  85. [85]
    Key Topics – Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs
    The U.S. has a strong strategic partnership with the EU reflected in our close cooperation on regional crises and conflicts, and our extensive collaboration on ...
  86. [86]
    https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1125
  87. [87]
    Trade in Goods with European Union Available years: 2025 | 2024
    2024 : U.S. trade in goods with European Union ; March 2024, 32,598.1, 50,598.8 ; April 2024, 30,500.6, 54,508.3 ; May 2024, 30,505.7, 50,305.3 ; June 2024 ...2024 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005
  88. [88]
    TPP? TTIP? Key trade deal terms explained - Brookings Institution
    May 20, 2015 · Negotiations for the TPP (originally called the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement, or TPSEP) began in 2005. There are ...
  89. [89]
    From early explorers to Trump – a history of the transatlantic ...
    Jan 12, 2017 · The 1990s trade agreements​​ In 1995 President Clinton signed the New Transatlantic Agenda (NTA). This provided for further joint action between ...
  90. [90]
    EU-US Trade and Technology Council (2021-2024)
    May 3, 2024 · TTC achievements · Advancing transatlantic leadership in emerging technologies · Enhancing our respective economic security · Addressing Russia's ...
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Report-The U.S.EU Trade and Technology Council (006118)
    Key TTC achievements include: • Imposing Costs for Russia's War on Ukraine: Cooperation through the TTC has helped bring about a continuous alignment of our ...
  92. [92]
    The US-EU Trade and Technology Council has been a success ...
    Feb 22, 2024 · The TTC should aim to avoid future trade barriers arising from new technologies, and it should work to promote US and EU shared values globally.
  93. [93]
    [PDF] AmCham EU · The transatlantic economy 2025
    In 2023, U.S. FDI stock in Europe on a historic cost basis stood at $4 trillion; Europe's FDI stock in the United States stood at $3.5 trillion. • More U.S. ...
  94. [94]
    [PDF] European Countries: US-Related Jobs, Trade and Investment 7
    Data as of January 2024. Europe's share of U.S. FDI outflows. 55.9%. 100 - THE TRANSATLANTIC ECONOMY 2024. Page 7. 7. European Countries: U.S.-Related Jobs ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] THE TRANSATLANTIC ECONOMY 2024 - Daniel S. Hamilton
    U.S. investment stock in the EU of $2.7 trillion in 2022 was 21 times greater than U.S. FDI stock in China of $126.1 billion. • U.S. investment stock in the UK ...
  96. [96]
    [PDF] Shaken, Not Stirred: The Transatlantic Economy 2024
    EU FDI stock in US is 3x more than Asian investment stock in the US. • New European FDI in US 2023: $170 billion – half of global FDI flowing to the US.<|separator|>
  97. [97]
    Preliminary Annual Report on U.S. Portfolio Holdings of Foreign ...
    The survey measured the value of U.S. holdings of foreign securities at year-end 2024 at approximately $15.8 trillion, with $12.1 trillion held in foreign ...Missing: EU interdependence
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Foreign Portfolio Holdings of U.S. Securities
    Building on a $2 trillion increase in 2023, foreign holdings of U.S. securities surged another $4 trillion, reaching $30.9 trillion at end-June 2024 in this ...Missing: interdependence | Show results with:interdependence
  99. [99]
    [PDF] Foreign Holdings of Federal Debt - Congress.gov
    This report presents current data on ownership of U.S. Treasury securities and major holders of federal debt by country. Federal debt represents the ...
  100. [100]
    United States - Cross-border Loans From BIS Reporting Banks
    Cross-border loans from BIS reporting banks in United States was reported at 4240565169000 in 2024, according to the World Bank collection of development ...
  101. [101]
    BIS international banking statistics and global liquidity indicators at ...
    Aug 15, 2024 · Banks' global cross-border claims increased by $1.1 trillion during Q1 2024, driven by bank credit (ie loans and holdings of debt securities).
  102. [102]
    Cross-border Payments - Financial Stability Board
    Cross-border payments have faced four particular challenges: high costs, low speed, limited access and insufficient transparency.
  103. [103]
    EU-United States of America energy cooperation
    In 2023, the U.S. exported 56.3 bcm of LNG to the EU. The U.S. has consistently been the EU's main LNG supplier since 2021, and played an important role in ...
  104. [104]
    Where does the EU's gas come from? - Consilium
    Russia's share of EU imports of pipeline gas dropped from over 40% in 2021 to about 11% in 2024. For pipeline gas and LNG combined, Russia accounted for less ...
  105. [105]
    https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/10/20/council-agrees-its-position-on-rules-to-phase-out-russian-gas-imports-under-repowereu/
  106. [106]
    Europe's messy Russian gas divorce - Brookings Institution
    Jun 18, 2024 · After Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Europeans scrambled to end their dependency on Russian gas—but two years later, much remains to be done.Russia weaponizes energy... · Geography is key to Europe's...
  107. [107]
    US LNG Exports To Europe Hit Record Levels In February 2025
    US liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports saw a significant increase in February 2025, with approximately 82% of the 8.35 million tons exported directed to Europe.Missing: cooperation statistics<|separator|>
  108. [108]
    Viability of LNG trade growth under the EU-US trade deal - Events-HH
    Aug 17, 2025 · During this period, US LNG accounted for 28% of total EU gas imports and 55% of LNG imports, on track to reach record levels by the end of 2025.
  109. [109]
    Bridging the US-EU Trade Gap with US LNG Is More Complex than ...
    Feb 20, 2025 · In 2024, US LNG exports to the EU were around $13 billion, according to the US Census Bureau (Figure 2), around 5.4 percent of the trade deficit ...Missing: cooperation statistics
  110. [110]
    [PDF] Transatlantic Cooperation on Semiconductors: A US Perspective
    Feb 26, 2024 · The EU and US have coordinated, largely through the Trade and Technology Council (TTC), on semiconductor-related policies, including early- ...
  111. [111]
    Transatlantic Cooperation on Semiconductors and AI in 2024 - CSIS
    Jan 17, 2024 · Scaling up chips production and regulating artificial intelligence (AI) will better position the transatlantic alliance to navigate this new era.
  112. [112]
    What drives the divide in transatlantic AI strategy? - Atlantic Council
    Sep 29, 2025 · The second pillar addresses energy capacity by upgrading the electric grid, restoring domestic semiconductor manufacturing, building secure data ...Missing: cooperation | Show results with:cooperation
  113. [113]
    The Future of the EU– US Trade and Technology Council
    Jan 17, 2025 · The US–EU Trade and Technology Council (TTC) was launched in 2021 as a forum to promote transatlantic cooperation and navigate trade tensions.
  114. [114]
    NATO operations and missions
    Jul 30, 2025 · NATO conducts a variety of operations and missions in the Euro-Atlantic area and beyond. These crisis prevention and management activities ...NATO Mission Iraq · NATO's role in Kosovo · Russian · Ukrainian
  115. [115]
    [PDF] NATO military interventions in Kosovo, Libya, Afghanistan and their ...
    This thesis examines how NATO military interventions in Kosovo, Libya, and Afghanistan negatively affected relations with Russia after the Cold War.
  116. [116]
    Steadfast Defender 2024 - NATO
    Mar 8, 2024 · Steadfast Defender 24 is NATO's largest military exercise since the Cold War. It demonstrates the unbreakable bond between NATO Allies in Europe and North ...
  117. [117]
    NATO to hold biggest drills since Cold War with 90,000 troops
    Jan 18, 2024 · The last exercises of a similar size were Reforger - during the Cold War in 1988 with 125,000 participants - and Trident Juncture in 2018 with ...
  118. [118]
    NATO exercises
    Jul 27, 2023 · Exercises cover the full range of military operations, from combat to humanitarian relief and from stabilisation to reconstruction. They can ...Steadfast Defender 24 · Trident Juncture 2018 · Steadfast Defender 2021
  119. [119]
    Military exercises on NATO's north-eastern flank. Moving towards ...
    Dec 28, 2023 · Air Defender 23, which was held in June 2023 in Germany, was the largest air force exercise in NATO's post-Cold War history, involving some 10, ...
  120. [120]
    Press Release - US assets depart for DEFENDER 25 exercise ...
    Apr 14, 2025 · After arriving in Europe, U.S. forces take part in three major exercises—Swift Response, Immediate Response, and Saber Guardian. These drills ...
  121. [121]
    https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_136388.htm
  122. [122]
    Operations & Exercises - European Command
    US European Command, alongside NATO Allies and partners, executes globally-integrated, multi-domain operations and exercises as part of US commitment to ...<|separator|>
  123. [123]
    NATO OUP Caveats in Libya Archives - MILITARY CAVEATS
    ... NATO missions around the world over two decades, in Bosnia, Kosovo, Somalia, Libya and most notoriously in Afghanistan. It will next describe the crux of NATO's ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  124. [124]
    Topic: Countering terrorism - NATO
    Aug 6, 2025 · Terrorism is the most direct asymmetric threat to the security of the citizens of NATO countries, and to international peace and prosperity.
  125. [125]
    U.S.-EU Cooperation Against Terrorism - EveryCRSReport.com
    The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States and the subsequent revelation of Al Qaeda cells in Europe gave new momentum to European Union ...
  126. [126]
    [PDF] between the united states of america - and the european union
    European Union Member States ("Member States");. NOTING the importance of the TFTP in preventing and combating terrorism and its financing in the European Union ...Missing: PNR | Show results with:PNR
  127. [127]
    EU-US agreements: Commission reports on TFTP and PNR
    Nov 26, 2013 · Today the Commission adopted the Terrorist Finance Tracking Programme (TFTP) evaluation report and a report on the joint review of the US ...
  128. [128]
    The EU-US Data Privacy and Counter-Terrorism Agreements
    Nov 28, 2017 · The paper examines the forms of governance that the EU-US PNR, TFTP, Privacy Shield and Umbrella Agreement have established in the ...
  129. [129]
    [PDF] EU-US Counter-Terrorism Agreements for Tracking Money and ...
    Aug 8, 2011 · This article examines the lawfulness of the EU-US Terrorist Finance Tracking and. Passenger Name Records Agreements which provide for the ...
  130. [130]
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) - state.gov
    A Terrorist Threat Intelligence Unit has been created to improve intelligence-sharing and analysis on terrorism. This Unit draws on civilian and military ...
  131. [131]
    NATO's Policy Guidelines on Counter-Terrorism , 10-Jul.
    Jul 25, 2024 · Terrorists and terrorist groups2 continue to commit or inspire horrendous attacks, and undermine security in Allies' own territory as well as in ...
  132. [132]
    [PDF] NATO COUNTER-TERRORISM COOPERATION WITH PARTNERS
    The. Alliance coordinates and consolidates its counter-terrorism efforts and focuses on three main areas: Awareness of the threat, Capabilities to address it ...
  133. [133]
    Europe worries about its dependence on U.S. intelligence
    Jun 5, 2025 · The sequence underscores a level of dependence on U.S. intelligence that has persisted in Germany and other Western countries for years. Over ...
  134. [134]
    Liaisons Dangereuses? - RAND
    Liaisons Dangereuses? Transatlantic Intelligence Cooperation and the Global War on Terrorism. William Rosenau. ResearchPosted on rand.org 2007Published in: ...
  135. [135]
    https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/their-own-two-feet
  136. [136]
    Defence expenditures and NATO's 5% commitment
    Aug 27, 2025 · They will allocate at least 3.5% of GDP annually based on the agreed definition of NATO defence expenditure by 2035 to resource core defence ...2024 · Funding NATO · Russian · Ukrainian
  137. [137]
    NATO Defense Spending Tracker - Atlantic Council
    Jun 20, 2025 · European and Canadian defense spending as a share of GDP has increased from 1.66 percent in 2022 to 2.02 percent in 2024. Twenty-three NATO ...
  138. [138]
    NATO countries' budgets compared: Defence vs healthcare and ...
    Jun 25, 2025 · Poland leads NATO countries in defence spending, committing 4.1 percent of its GDP, followed by Estonia and the United States at 3.4 percent each.
  139. [139]
    The Hague Summit Declaration issued by NATO Heads of State and ...
    Jun 25, 2025 · Allies agree that this 5% commitment will comprise two essential categories of defence investment. Allies will allocate at least 3.5% of GDP ...
  140. [140]
    NATO's new spending target: challenges and risks associated with a ...
    Jun 27, 2025 · The average military burden for all NATO members in 2024 stands at 2.2 per cent of GDP, equivalent to approximately US$1.5 trillion. At 3.5 per ...
  141. [141]
    NATO's Underspending Problem: America's Allies Must Embrace ...
    Mar 31, 2025 · NATO's Underspending Problem: America's Allies Must Embrace Fair Burden Sharing ... NATO members dismiss spending figures as an outdated or ...
  142. [142]
    Sharing the burden: How Poland and Germany are shifting the dial ...
    Apr 14, 2025 · Sharing the burden: How Poland and Germany are shifting the dial on European defence expenditure ... The defence posture of NATO member countries, ...
  143. [143]
    [PDF] Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2024 - SIPRI
    Apr 28, 2025 · European NATO members spent $454 billion in total. Of the 32 NATO members, 18 spent at least 2.0 per cent of GDP on their militaries in 2024, ...
  144. [144]
    Understanding NATO's Burden-Sharing Debate: Political Rhetoric ...
    May 6, 2025 · Despite considerable progress in burden-sharing for collective defense, some members still fall short. In 2014, 3 of 28 members met the 2% goal, ...
  145. [145]
    Progress and Shortfalls in Europe's Defence: An Assessment
    Sep 3, 2025 · This concluded that, while European NATO allies had begun to address capability gaps, significant challenges remained, and doubts persisted ...
  146. [146]
    Preparing for the Next Conflict: How NATO is Fortifying Its Defenses
    Jan 28, 2025 · While the US operates 33 major weapons systems, European nations maintain 174, creating inefficiencies that hinder joint operations.
  147. [147]
    The Future of European Defense | Goldman Sachs
    Jun 30, 2025 · From 2020 – 2024, approximately 64% of the defense procurement of European NATO countries came from the US. The US defense and aerospace ...
  148. [148]
    NATO's role in defence industry production
    Jun 26, 2025 · At the 2024 Washington Summit, Allies agreed a new NATO Industrial Capacity Expansion Pledge, which will strengthen transatlantic defence ...<|separator|>
  149. [149]
    https://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/briefs/road-readiness-how-eu-can-strengthen-military-mobility
  150. [150]
    Defending Europe without the US: first estimates of what is needed
    Feb 21, 2025 · A realistic estimate may therefore be that an increase in European capacities equivalent to the fighting capacity of 300,000 US troops is needed ...
  151. [151]
    EEAS Human Rights: US-EU Consultations Demonstrate Continued ...
    Jun 7, 2024 · The United States and EU agreed to continue to strengthen their cooperation to promote and protect human rights, democracy, and the rule of law worldwide.
  152. [152]
    [PDF] US Mission to the European Union - State Department
    Description | The transatlantic relationship is underpinned by a shared commitment to democracy, rule of law, and human rights, and the belief that these ...
  153. [153]
    European and U.S. Democracy Support: The Limits of Convergence
    May 2, 2024 · Europe and the United States share a fundamental tension in their foreign policies between stated commitments to supporting democracy globally ...
  154. [154]
    Hate speech: Comparing the US and EU approaches | Think Tank
    Jun 3, 2025 · The First Amendment to the US Constitution provides almost absolute protection to freedom of expression. By contrast, European and EU law ...
  155. [155]
    Comparing the support of the EU and the US for international human ...
    Feb 9, 2016 · Most international lawyers would think that support for international human rights law (IHRL) is stronger in the European Union than in the United States.Abstract · Introduction · Support for what? · Comparing EU and US...
  156. [156]
    Democracy and Human Rights in U.S. Foreign Policy - Congress.gov
    Jan 7, 2025 · U.S. law states that the promotion and protection of democracy and human rights are "principal" and "fundamental" goals of U.S. foreign policy.
  157. [157]
    Transatlantic solidarity in the shadow of the Russian–Ukrainian war
    To conclude, the 2024 US presidential election comes at a critical juncture for transatlantic relations as the Russian-Ukrainian war is far from over.
  158. [158]
    Consequences of the Russia-Ukraine War and the Changing Face ...
    May 22, 2025 · The Russia-Ukraine war's main geostrategic effect has been to weaken relationships between Europe and Russia and, to a lesser extent ...
  159. [159]
    Between Washington and Beijing: How Europe fits into US-China ...
    Sep 11, 2025 · Europe has taken a more competitive position toward China—not as a favor to the United States, but because it is in its interest to do so and ...
  160. [160]
    Disengagement from China: United States and European Union ...
    The China policies of the European Union and some of its member states substantially differ, not least due to diverging threat perceptions and economic ...
  161. [161]
    https://euobserver.com/eu-and-the-world/ar0c1ca88c
  162. [162]
    Bridging US-EU interests and action for the Indo-Pacific and China
    Oct 7, 2024 · The EU's room for maneuvering is highly dependent on the United States' tariff policies, extraterritorial sanctions, or entity-based export ...
  163. [163]
    Transatlantic divergence in the Middle East - Encompass Europe
    From Libya to Iran, Donald Trump has re-orientated US policy in the Middle East, opening a rift with Europe. In May 2018, he withdrew from the nuclear deal ...
  164. [164]
    Europe's Defence of the Iran Nuclear Deal: Less than a Success ...
    Feb 19, 2021 · Between 2003 and 2015, the Europeans played an important role in facilitating US-Iran nuclear diplomacy and eventually the agreement itself.
  165. [165]
    A troubled partnership: The US and Europe in the Middle East
    Jul 10, 2019 · While Europe and the US have disagreed on policy towards Iran, Israel-Palestine, Syria and Libya, their policies towards the rest of the region ...
  166. [166]
    As the Mideast Comes Apart, America and Europe Come Together
    On Iran, the US talked about an “axis of evil” while the Europeans wanted to trade and talk. On Israel-Palestine, Europeans denounced American “disengagement” ...
  167. [167]
    Burden Sharing for What? NATO Implications of Three US Visions
    Dec 18, 2024 · To that end, the article unpacks the diverging motivations behind US calls for greater European defense spending and better NATO burden sharing.
  168. [168]
    Rethinking the NATO burden-sharing debate - Atlantic Council
    Jun 20, 2024 · With commitments in East Asia stretching US resources, the time had come for Europe to bear its share of the burden of collective defense. In ...
  169. [169]
    Low trust: navigating transatlantic relations under Trump 2.0
    Oct 15, 2025 · The transatlantic relationship has changed profoundly. Europe must recognise it and act accordingly. We explore how the EU can move ...
  170. [170]
    The Transatlantic Alliance in the Age of Trump: The Coming Collisions
    Feb 14, 2025 · From NATO to Ukraine, climate to trade, tech regulations to China, the United States and Europe will likely clash, repeatedly and continuously.Missing: geographical | Show results with:geographical
  171. [171]
    MAGA goes global: Trump's plan for Europe | ECFR
    May 7, 2025 · The first quarter of 2025 saw an onslaught on European interests: the indiscriminate tariffs, the pressure on Ukraine to accept land losses, ...
  172. [172]
    Keeping EU-NATO cooperation alive under Trump 2.0
    Nov 20, 2024 · Under Trump, the US commitment to European defence and NATO is under question. The EU should work to ensure the American presence endures ...
  173. [173]
    After the Ballots: What the U.S. Elections Mean for NATO - CSIS
    Sep 26, 2024 · ... Impact of the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election. The report features a set of essays assessing the meaning of the election for Europe, Russia ...
  174. [174]
    [PDF] The US elections and the future of NATO - Clingendael Institute
    Oct 3, 2024 · His research focuses on European security and defence issues, EU-NATO, military forces and capability development, defence industry and other ...
  175. [175]
    Rise to the challengers: Europe's populist parties and its foreign ...
    Jun 12, 2025 · Europe's “challengers”, or populist parties, are increasingly influencing the continent's foreign policy.
  176. [176]
    The Other Transatlantic Alliance | Internationale Politik Quarterly
    Jan 8, 2025 · A new generation of transatlantic right-wing populists are networking and looking to attack the establishment, as developments in France show.
  177. [177]
    Trump and his growing number of European allies threaten the ...
    Nov 8, 2024 · Trump's growing number of European allies and the increase of illiberalism and populism is perhaps the most worrying development for Europe.<|separator|>
  178. [178]
    Why the U.S. Presidential Election Matters for Central and Eastern ...
    The US election, whatever its result, will have serious repercussions for the domestic and foreign policy of Central and Eastern European countries.
  179. [179]
    Foreign Policy as the Continuation of Domestic Politics by Other ...
    Jan 5, 2024 · This article argues that populism in power translates into a greater tendency to politicize foreign policy.
  180. [180]
    A New Transatlantic Alliance Threatens the EU | Emissary
    Feb 20, 2025 · The rise of revisionist, far-right parties in Europe, alongside the reelection of Donald Trump, signals a shift toward a new transatlantic alliance.
  181. [181]
    Your questions on the consequences of Trump's election for Europe ...
    Nov 14, 2024 · Some Europeans fear that under a Trump presidency, the US might withdraw from NATO, but that seems highly unlikely, as NATO is also useful to ...
  182. [182]
    Transatlantic alliance enters most challenging period since Suez crisis
    Feb 18, 2025 · The recent change in tone from across the Atlantic has certainly jolted many European leaders out of their complacency, but awareness of the ...
  183. [183]
    [PDF] Globalization, domestic politics, and transatlantic relations
    Rising nationalism, widening inequality, declining trust, and indeed, rising illiberalism on both sides of the Atlantic are weakening the domestic foundations ...
  184. [184]
    European Immigrants in the United States | migrationpolicy.org
    Jan 11, 2024 · Europeans comprised 10 percent, or slightly more than 4.7 million, of the 46.2 million immigrants living in the United States in 2022.
  185. [185]
    EU immigration to the US: where is it coming from, and is brain drain ...
    Sep 16, 2015 · In the period between 1998 and 2013, an average of 61 649 EU nationals received lawful permanent resident status in the US each year.<|separator|>
  186. [186]
    Migration in and from America: current statistics - PERCEPTIONS
    The US has 51 million international migrants. In 2019, 6 million EU immigrants came to the US, while 5 million Americans emigrated to Europe. 2.3 million ...
  187. [187]
    Recent trends in migration flows from the United States to Canada
    Mar 26, 2025 · Among economic principal applicants, 89% of U.S. non-citizen residents held a graduate degree, compared with 47% of U.S. citizens who were ...
  188. [188]
    Brain drain? Trump cutbacks force scientists to seek jobs in Europe
    Apr 11, 2025 · Reuters spoke to 13 European universities and research institutes that reported seeing an increase in U.S-based employees considering crossing ...Missing: North | Show results with:North
  189. [189]
    Europe can capture the US brain drain — if it acts fast - Nature
    if it acts fast. Countries must cooperate to seize a once-in-a-generation opportunity to become the top ...
  190. [190]
    Migration to and from the EU - Statistics Explained - Eurostat
    Migration flows: Immigration to the EU was 4.3 million in 2023. In 2023, 4.3 million immigrants came to the EU from non-EU countries and 1.5 million people ...Highlights · Immigration by citizenship · Immigration by country of birth
  191. [191]
    Navigating immigration policy: U.S. vs Europe - GIS Reports
    Mar 19, 2025 · Recent US and European developments have sparked heightened debates over immigration policy, highlighting distinct cultural, economic and security challenges.
  192. [192]
    https://www.ifri.org/en/immigration-eu-and-us-comparing-border-policies
  193. [193]
    Views of the US in 24 nations | Pew Research Center
    Jun 11, 2025 · Roughly half of adults across the countries surveyed view the US favorably. The US receives its most favorable rating from Israel, where 83% see it positively.Missing: transatlantic | Show results with:transatlantic
  194. [194]
    More Turbulence Ahead: Polls on the US and EU in Europe
    Apr 1, 2025 · In the YouGov EuroTrack survey conducted in February 2025, US favorability in Europe has fallen by between six and 28 percentage points since August 2024.
  195. [195]
    A Crisis in Confidence: European Public Opinion in the Trump Era
    Jul 17, 2025 · A survey conducted by YouGov, fielded February 5-18, 2025, found that European favorability of the United States has fallen markedly since the ...Missing: Gallup | Show results with:Gallup<|control11|><|separator|>
  196. [196]
    [PDF] Exploring the Transatlantic Media Divide over Iraq: How and Why ...
    Krugman saw two possible explanations for “the great transatlantic media divide”: either a “pervasive anti-American bias” of the. European media or the American ...
  197. [197]
    U.S. Elections: Media credibility is the biggest loser - GIS Reports
    Nov 11, 2020 · However, the nature of U.S.-EU ties is unlikely to undergo a profound change. The greatest loser of the elections is media credibility.
  198. [198]
    The NATO Summit and the Contest for Media Narratives
    Jul 26, 2025 · Traditional media coverage of the NATO Summit revealed pronounced differences between the U.S. and Europe. In the U.S., major networks ...
  199. [199]
    Trends in U.S. Study Abroad - NAFSA
    Nationally, the number of U.S. students studying abroad for credit during the 2022-23 academic year increased by 49% to 280,716 students studying abroad.
  200. [200]
    College Study Abroad Statistics | BestColleges
    Sep 1, 2023 · Over 66% of U.S. college students who studied abroad in 2020-2021 went to Europe. Read more about study abroad statistics, including study ...
  201. [201]
    Nearly 20 Percent Fewer International Students Traveled to the U.S. ...
    Oct 6, 2025 · Students from Europe make up about 7 percent of U.S. international students. But they made up about 16 percent of international student arrivals ...
  202. [202]
    United States Hosts More Than 1.1 Million International Students at ...
    Nov 18, 2024 · Over a half million international graduate students (502,291) pursued study in the United States in 2023/2024, an 8% increase and an all-time ...
  203. [203]
    Fulbright U.S. Scholar Program | Exchange Programs
    The Fulbright US Scholar Program sends approximately 800 American scholars and professionals per year to approximately 130 countries.Missing: transatlantic statistics
  204. [204]
    United States - Research and innovation - European Union
    Jan 17, 2025 · The Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America ...
  205. [205]
    European Union and United States sign a Joint Statement ...
    Jan 17, 2025 · The U.S. is a key non-EU / non-Associated international partner country in Horizon Europe with 1037 participations in 760 projects. The ...
  206. [206]
    New U.S.-European Sea Level Satellite Will Help Safeguard Ships ...
    Sep 11, 2025 · Sentinel-6/Jason-CS was jointly developed by ESA, EUMETSAT, NASA, and NOAA, with funding support from the European Commission and technical ...
  207. [207]
    https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/FutureEO/FutureEO_at_ESA_s_Ministerial_Council_2025
  208. [208]
    LISA – Laser Interferometer Space Antenna – NASA Home Page
    NASA's Astrophysics Division has selected six US scientists to serve on the joint ESA-NASA LISA Science Team, which will provide overall scientific stewardship ...LISA Project Home · For Scientists · NASA Reveals Prototype... · FAQ<|separator|>
  209. [209]
    U.S-EU Joint Statement of the Trade and Technology Council
    Apr 8, 2024 · The United States and the European Union to explore how to create new trade and investment opportunities, notably to contribute to the green transition.
  210. [210]
    Topic: Emerging and disruptive technologies - NATO
    Jun 25, 2025 · Technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), autonomous systems and quantum technologies are changing the world and the way NATO operates.
  211. [211]
    Tech 2030: A Roadmap for Europe-US Tech Cooperation - CEPA
    Sep 30, 2025 · A United States-Europe tech partnership is key to independence from China and maintaining Western tech leadership.
  212. [212]
    Expanded Section 232 Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum - Congress.gov
    Sep 26, 2025 · In 2018, President Trump proclaimed a 25% tariff on steel and a 10% tariff on aluminum imports from most trading partners under Section 232.
  213. [213]
    EU says its countermeasures to Trump's tariffs will go into effect on ...
    Mar 12, 2025 · President Donald Trump officially increased tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports to 25% on Wednesday, promising that the taxes would help ...
  214. [214]
    EU and US suspend steel and aluminium trade disputes
    Oct 30, 2021 · EU and US agree to start discussions on a Global Arrangement on Sustainable Steel and Aluminium and suspend steel and aluminium trade disputes.
  215. [215]
    Europe and US extend trade truce over Trump tariffs - BBC
    Dec 19, 2023 · The Biden administration pauses levies on EU steel and aluminium until after the US election.
  216. [216]
    Steel meets fire: How the EU might respond to Trump's tariffs
    Feb 13, 2025 · The incoming tariff on aluminum and steel would hurt Europe. It threatens the EU's $3.1 billion worth of metal exports across the Atlantic.
  217. [217]
    The EU's Possible Response to Trump II Tariffs
    Mar 4, 2025 · On February 10, President Trump announced a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports,[1] and is preparing “a comprehensive plan” to tackle “non- ...
  218. [218]
    WTO | dispute settlement - DS353: United States
    On 28 April 2011, the United States notified the DSB of its decision to appeal to the Appellate Body certain issues of law covered in the panel report and ...
  219. [219]
    WTO | dispute settlement - DS316: European Communities
    The panel report in that dispute was circulated to WTO Members on 31 March 2011.
  220. [220]
    U.S. and EU resolve 17-year Boeing-Airbus trade dispute - CNBC
    Jun 15, 2021 · The United States and European Union said Tuesday they have resolved a 17-year-long fight over aircraft subsidies, agreeing to suspend tariffs for five years.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  221. [221]
    Digital taxes put US-EU trade talks under pressure - DW
    Sep 1, 2025 · While there's no EU-wide tax on digital services, seven EU states have so far introduced national levies, including France, Italy, and Spain.
  222. [222]
    Digital Services Tax | DST vs VAT | Tax Foundation Europe
    Mar 31, 2025 · Digital services taxes levied by EU countries have drawn criticism from US President Donald Trump. Learn more from Tax Foundation Europe.
  223. [223]
    US still pushing to scrap UK's tech tax - Politico.eu
    May 9, 2025 · White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said Thursday that the Trump administration is still pressing the United Kingdom to lift its tax on digital services.
  224. [224]
    Trade wars and digital taxation - Institute of Economic Affairs
    France was one of the European frontrunners in trying to introduce a 3% digital 'GAFA' tax on revenues generated by said companies and other larger digital ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  225. [225]
    Testimony: Digital Services Taxes in the European Union
    Oct 16, 2025 · Expert testimony on the taxation of digital taxations in the EU before the FISC Interparliamentary Committee. See EU digital services taxes.<|separator|>
  226. [226]
    [PDF] EU-US relations after the Inflation Reduction Act, and the challenges ...
    The paper discusses current efforts to manage longstanding pre-IRA disputes, the Trade and Technology Council, the US Chips and Science Act and the EU's ...
  227. [227]
    Transatlantic Cues: How the United States and European Union ...
    Sep 27, 2024 · From 2026 onward, charges based on the EU ETS price will be levied, but the CBAM will not yet have its maximum impact during this decade: free ...
  228. [228]
    US-EU Trade Agreement: No Sea Change for CBAM, Yet
    Aug 28, 2025 · But European officials have offered no indication that they are amenable to modifying the CBAM to limit its application or reduce compliance ...
  229. [229]
    Putting progress over protectionism in climate policy | PIIE
    Dec 19, 2023 · The prospect of US protectionism without carbon pricing also risks undermining support for the EU CBAM and carbon pricing in the rest of the ...
  230. [230]
    Are Carbon Border Adjustments a Dream Climate Policy or ...
    Jul 30, 2024 · One of the more recent proposals is the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), which would impose a tax on the carbon emissions of imported ...<|separator|>
  231. [231]
    The EU Squeezed Between the US and China - The Diplomat
    Mar 3, 2025 · The United States and Europe have different threat perceptions: while the EU sees Russia as an existential threat, the utmost threat for the ...
  232. [232]
    Putin rejected Trump's generous deal. Time to try peace through ...
    Oct 6, 2025 · Many Ukrainians agree with US President Donald Trump's criticism of the Russia policies adopted by his predecessors.Missing: disagreements | Show results with:disagreements
  233. [233]
    How much has the US given to Ukraine? - BBC
    Aug 18, 2025 · Between January 2022 and the end of June 2025, Europe as a whole spent $165.7bn on Ukraine, compared to the US's $130.6bn over the same period, ...
  234. [234]
    Ukraine Support: Europe largely fills the US aid withdrawal, lead by ...
    Jun 16, 2025 · Average monthly aid from January to April 2025 slightly surpassed the 2022–2024 average. "It is remarkable that Europe has filled the gap," ...
  235. [235]
    Evolution of military assistance to Ukraine
    Jul 17, 2025 · In 2025, military assistance to Ukraine has been evolving as the US, under the Trump administration, has adopted a different approach to the ...
  236. [236]
    The dilemma that follows the war - CIDOB
    One year after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, a strategic divergence is growing in the European Union. On one side, there are the champions of an outrigh.
  237. [237]
    [PDF] Quest for Strategic Autonomy? Europe Grapples with the US
    Jun 4, 2025 · Presently, the EU and the US have substantially different threat perceptions of China. The US is trying to “fight” a hegemonic competitor ...
  238. [238]
    [PDF] De-risking or de-coupling - the future of the EU strategy towards China
    Mar 15, 2024 · To evaluate the European Union's (EU) policy framework towards China, this study analyses the varied facets of bilateral relations and the EU's ...
  239. [239]
    While the US and China decouple, the EU and China deepen trade ...
    Aug 27, 2024 · The United States has decreased its dependence on China for all types of imported manufactured goods since 2018, according to recently released 2023 customs ...
  240. [240]
    The EU has a playbook to de-risk from China. Is it working?
    Sep 3, 2024 · The EU approaches de-risking from China from a different strategic position, with different tools, and with a different sense of urgency.
  241. [241]
    U.S. Restrictions on Huawei Technologies: National Security ...
    Jan 5, 2022 · The U.S. government has taken steps to remove Huawei from U.S. networks, restrict exports to Huawei, and cease providing Huawei—an entity ...
  242. [242]
    Germany goes soft on China, dragging out Huawei ban until 2029
    but pushed back the effective dates ...
  243. [243]
    Europe divided on Huawei as US pressure to drop company grows
    Jul 13, 2020 · France has said it will not ban Huawei equipment outright from the country's 5G network but is encouraging operators not to use it and granting ...
  244. [244]
    Germany's Embarrassing Dance Around China's Huawei - CEPA
    Jun 7, 2024 · German legislators began advocating a ban due to China's surveillance legislation and Huawei's character as a state-subsidized and state-guided ...
  245. [245]
    Hard Then, Harder Now: CoCom's Lessons and the Challenge of ...
    Sep 15, 2025 · Will the US-led technology control regime against China have a meaningful impact on the emerging great power competition?
  246. [246]
    Will the United States Push Europe Toward China? - CSIS
    Jul 18, 2025 · A less reliable relationship with the United States and the threat of economic pain undermines the European Union's leverage vis-a-vis China in ...
  247. [247]
    China braces for tensions with Trump on tech, trade, Taiwan
    150% to 200% — on Chinese goods: if China invades Taiwan, a ...Missing: rift | Show results with:rift
  248. [248]
    What is GDPR, the EU's new data protection law?
    GDPR is the EU's tough privacy law, the General Data Protection Regulation, imposing obligations on organizations handling EU data, even if not in the EU.Does the GDPR apply to... · GDPR and Email · Article 5.1-2Missing: conflicts | Show results with:conflicts
  249. [249]
    EU-US Data Privacy Framework: A brief history | Blog - OneTrust
    Oct 31, 2022 · For over a decade, organizations relied on the Safe Harbor agreement to move data from the EU to the US without having to rely on SCCs or other ...
  250. [250]
    Cross-Border Data Flow: The EU-US Privacy Shield's Demise
    Jan 16, 2025 · The EU-US Privacy Shield was a 2016 framework for transatlantic data transfers, invalidated in 2020 due to inadequate protection against US ...
  251. [251]
    Adoption of EU/U.S. Data Privacy Framework - Byte Back
    Jul 12, 2023 · 2000: The EU and U.S. establish the EU-U.S. Safe Harbor Framework (“Safe Harbor”) as an alternative means of cross-border transfer adequacy ...
  252. [252]
    Adequacy of the EU–U.S. Data Privacy Framework Survives ...
    Sep 12, 2025 · Critics argue that fundamental tensions between U.S. national security imperatives and EU privacy rights persist. Legal challenges to the ...
  253. [253]
    [PDF] ANNEX. Initial legal assessment of the impact of the US CLOUD Act ...
    Jul 10, 2019 · Impact of the US CLOUD Act on the EU legal framework for the protection of personal data. The US Congress enacted the US CLOUD Act in March ...<|separator|>
  254. [254]
    The CLOUD Act and Transatlantic Trust - CSIS
    Mar 29, 2023 · Without a U.S.-EU agreement on access to e-evidence, conflicts between the CLOUD Act and EU regulation remain. An initial assessment ...
  255. [255]
    United with Ukraine - United States Department of State
    Jan 15, 2025 · The United States provides assistance, advocates diplomacy, and enforces economic measures to counter Russia's actions against Ukraine.
  256. [256]
    [PDF] operation atlantic resolve - USAID OIG's
    The U.S. Congress appropriated approximately $113.4 billion for the U.S. response between February 2022 and December 2023.
  257. [257]
    Topic: NATO summits - NATO
    Jun 25, 2025 · NATO summit meetings provide periodic opportunities for the Heads of State and Government of NATO member countries to discuss important issues facing the ...
  258. [258]
    U.S. Security Cooperation with Ukraine - State Department
    On September 6, 2023, the Secretary announced an additional $100 million in Foreign Military Financing to support Ukraine's longer-term military requirements.Missing: differences | Show results with:differences<|separator|>
  259. [259]
    Military assistance to Ukraine (February 2022 to January 2025)
    Jul 17, 2025 · This research briefing sets out the headline military commitments to Ukraine by its main allies and partners between February 2022 and January 2025.
  260. [260]
    EU Assistance to Ukraine (in U.S. Dollars) - EEAS - European Union
    In April 2025, the EU made available an additional $2.3 billion generated from immobilized Russian assets, $3.9 billion in total; $3.5 billion for military ...Missing: differences | Show results with:differences
  261. [261]
    [PDF] EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 10.7.2025 COM(2025) 392 ...
    Jul 10, 2025 · Between 2022 and early 2025, the EU disbursed EUR 745 million to provide basic healthcare to crisis- affected and disadvantaged groups. These ...<|separator|>
  262. [262]
    Ukraine Support Tracker - Kiel Institute
    Military aid to Ukraine saw a sharp decline in July and August 2025, despite the introduction of NATO's Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List (PURL) initiative.
  263. [263]
    Ukraine Support Tracker: Military aid falls sharply despite new NATO ...
    Oct 14, 2025 · Military aid to Ukraine saw a sharp decline in July and August 2025, despite the introduction of NATO's Prioritized Ukraine Requirements ...Missing: amounts | Show results with:amounts<|separator|>
  264. [264]
    [PDF] White Paper.pdf - Defence Industry and Space - European Union
    Mar 19, 2025 · It sets out the necessary steps to rebuild European defence, to support Ukraine, address critical capability shortfalls and establish a strong ...
  265. [265]
    Gaza and after: a transatlantic security perspective
    Jan 23, 2024 · This analysis discusses the implications of the ongoing war in Gaza for transatlantic relations. Summary. The October 7 2023 Hamas attacks and ...Missing: differences | Show results with:differences
  266. [266]
    Israel and Hamas Conflict In Brief: Overview, U.S. Policy, and ...
    The Israel-Hamas war has presented several challenges for U.S. policy in the Middle East. These include how to bolster Israel's security from attacks and ...Missing: transatlantic | Show results with:transatlantic
  267. [267]
    EU position on the situation in the Middle East - Consilium
    The European Union will continue to support the Palestinian Authority, including in its ongoing reform and with a view to its return to Gaza. The European ...
  268. [268]
    Full article: EU Policy towards the Israel-Palestine Conflict
    Feb 23, 2024 · The EU has aimed at resolving the Israel-Palestine conflict through its Foreign and Security Policy (EUFSP) tools, with the 'two-state solution' as the over- ...
  269. [269]
    https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/israelpalestine/b97-gazas-ceasefire-vital-only-start
  270. [270]
    EU Will Boost Its Role in Gaza Following US-Led Peace Deal
    Oct 13, 2025 · The European Union will restart its monitoring operation of the border crossing between Gaza and Egypt on Wednesday, Kaja Kallas, the bloc's ...
  271. [271]
    Meeting on the implementation of the US Peace Plan aimed ... - EEAS
    Oct 9, 2025 · Meeting on the implementation of the US Peace Plan aimed at ending the war in Gaza: press remarks by High Representative / Vice-President Kaja ...Missing: positions | Show results with:positions
  272. [272]
    U.S.-EU Tariffs and Trade Framework Agreement - Congress.gov
    Sep 18, 2025 · Since January 2025, the Trump Administration has imposed additional tariffs on U.S. imports. The President invoked the International Emergency ...
  273. [273]
    The EU-US trade deal: Restoring stability and predictability
    On 27 July 2025, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald J. Trump agreed a deal on tariffs and trade.
  274. [274]
    The art of the transatlantic deal - Atlantic Council
    Mar 3, 2025 · During the second Trump administration, there are likely to be three distinct types of US-EU consultation mechanisms: A very specific, working- ...
  275. [275]
    Fact Sheet: The United States and European Union Reach Massive ...
    Jul 28, 2025 · The EU will purchase $750 billion in U.S. energy and make new investments of $600 billion in the United States, all by 2028. Through ...
  276. [276]
    U.S.-EU Deal Receives Widespread Praise
    Jul 29, 2025 · Through his leadership, the EU will buy $750 billion of U.S. energy and make new investments in our country to the tune of $600 billion.
  277. [277]
    The US-EU trade deal, explained | World Economic Forum
    Jul 30, 2025 · The US and EU have reached a deal which sets a 15% tariff for most exports into the US. But what do European leaders think and what does it ...
  278. [278]
    Joint Statement on a United States-European Union framework on ...
    Aug 21, 2025 · Additionally, effective as of 1 September 2025, the United States commits to apply only the MFN tariff to the following products of the European ...
  279. [279]
    Trump announces EU trade deal with 15% tariffs - CNBC
    Jul 27, 2025 · President Donald Trump announced Sunday that the U.S. reached a trade deal with the European Union, following pivotal discussions with European ...
  280. [280]
    Instant View: Reaction to US and EU trade deal | Reuters
    Jul 28, 2025 · "President Trump said the trade deal with the EU is the biggest of all the deals. Whether it's imports or exports, Mexico, China, and Canada are ...<|separator|>
  281. [281]
    Defending Europe with less America | ECFR
    Jul 3, 2024 · ... European NATO pillar. This should not be an EU caucus but rather a European pillar that combines burden sharing and responsibility sharing.
  282. [282]
    The United States Now Wants European Strategic Autonomy - CSIS
    Nov 8, 2024 · The Trump administration should want a stronger Europe, not a weaker one, and that will require some engagement on its part.
  283. [283]
    Keep NATO focused on Europe, not China - Defense Priorities
    Jul 24, 2025 · NATO's turn against China might generate undue tensions with the PRC, deepen Sino-Russian cooperation, and cause controversy in the Global South ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  284. [284]
    The State of the Transatlantic Alliance
    Sep 19, 2025 · US-EU relations face turbulence under Trump 2.0. Learn how trade, security, and digital policy shifts are redefining the Transatlantic ...
  285. [285]
    https://nato-veterans.org/not-de-coupling-but-de-risking-nato-europes-bid-for-strategic-autonomy/
  286. [286]
    Transition 2025 Series: The Future of Transatlantic Relations
    Panelists discuss transatlantic ties under a second Trump administration, NATO burden-sharing, and the future of European strategic autonomy.
  287. [287]
    NATO's support for Ukraine
    Oct 14, 2025 · In the longer term, the Alliance is committed to assisting Ukraine and supporting efforts on its path of post-war reconstruction and reforms.
  288. [288]
    2025 - RESOLUTION 500 - NATO PA
    2025 - RESOLUTION 500 - STRENGTHENING TRANSATLANTIC ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AND SECURITY AFTER THE NATO SUMMIT IN THE HAGUE. 13 October 2025.Missing: frameworks bilateral
  289. [289]
    The Future of European Security: What is Next For NATO - CEPA
    Bringing an independent and democratic Ukraine into NATO and European institutions will strengthen the transatlantic alliance and the values it espouses.
  290. [290]
    EU-US trade agreement establishes framework for transatlantic ...
    Aug 26, 2025 · The deal also encompasses cooperation on AI chip purchases and military equipment procurement, though specific volumes and timelines remain ...
  291. [291]
    https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/energy-trade-deal/
  292. [292]
    Trade Explainer: The August 2025 US-EU Joint Statement on Trade
    Aug 29, 2025 · Goods · The EU will grant preferential market access for various US agricultural goods and seafood (including lobster), but not chicken or beef.
  293. [293]
    Position on the EU–US framework agreement - ETUC
    Oct 6, 2025 · Procurement and investment commitments: the target of 600bn € of EU investments into the US economy and to procure energy, AI chips and military ...<|separator|>
  294. [294]
    EU seeks US alliance to counter China rare earth crackdown - Reuters
    Oct 14, 2025 · The European Union is seeking to coordinate with the United States and other G7 partners a response to tighter Chinese controls on the ...
  295. [295]
    A Transatlantic G2 Against Chinese Technology Dominance | ITIF
    Apr 5, 2024 · The reality is that the United States cannot adequately prevent Chinese global technological dominance without full and unstinting cooperation ...
  296. [296]
    [PDF] Rebalancing Transatlantic Relations—A Roadmap for 2030
    In 2024, transatlantic trade in goods and services approached $2 trillion, and mutual direct investment reached $7.5 trillion. Both factors supported roughly ...
  297. [297]
    Geopolitical shifts and their economic impacts on Europe: Short-term ...
    Sep 18, 2025 · The short-term output impact of tariff and policy uncertainty since the beginning of the second Trump Presidency is expected to be moderate.<|separator|>
  298. [298]
    The looming transatlantic trade war
    The US runs a large and persistent trade deficit with the EU. In 2024, it recorded a US$161bn trade deficit in goods and services with the bloc of 27 ...
  299. [299]
    A New Transatlantic Bargain: The Case for Building a Strong ...
    Feb 12, 2025 · The report argues that Europe must take on a significantly greater role in its own defense, both to safeguard the continent from Russian aggression.Missing: conceptual foundations
  300. [300]
    Global Risks 2025: A world of growing divisions
    Jan 15, 2025 · The Global Risks Report 2025 analyses global risks to support decision-makers in balancing current crises and longer-term priorities.
  301. [301]
    [PDF] Four scenarios for the future of transatlantic relations
    At the June 2025 Hague. Summit, NATO members agreed on a new target to raise defence and security-related spending to 5% of. GDP by 2035 (3.5% defence and 1.5% ...
  302. [302]
    De-Americanizing NATO: Could We? - CEPA
    Jun 23, 2025 · The US administration's diminishing interest in the North Atlantic alliance means Europe needs an alternative, and quickly.
  303. [303]
    The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?
    Feb 19, 2025 · ... US holds the military keys. Unlike China, Russia, or the US, Europe can only survive as a multilateral project. The EU is the most ...
  304. [304]
    The U.S.-Europe Partnership Can't Be Replaced
    Mar 5, 2025 · Misplaced rhetoric and bruised egos aside, no viable alternative exists to a strong transatlantic alliance. Any major deviation from this ...<|separator|>
  305. [305]
    Taking the Pulse: Is the Transatlantic Relationship at a Breaking ...
    Feb 20, 2025 · The transatlantic relationship is undoubtedly at a breaking point. A new transatlantic project is emerging on both sides of the Atlantic—beyond ...Missing: scope | Show results with:scope
  306. [306]
    Understanding the Future of the Transatlantic Partnership
    Sep 24, 2025 · The history of the transatlantic alliance between the US and its European partners is littered with moments of tension, mistrust, and crisis. ...