Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Select Portfolio Servicing

Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) is a U.S. loan servicing company headquartered in , specializing in the management of single-family residential portfolios, with a focus on high-risk accounts such as nonperforming loans and re-performing loans. Originally founded in as Fairbanks Capital Corp., SPS has operated as a subservicer for institutional clients, handling payment processing, delinquency management, and proceedings amid a history of regulatory scrutiny over practices including alleged misapplication of payments and inadequate responses to borrower inquiries under laws like the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). The company entered into settlements with federal agencies, such as a 2007 modified judgment with the addressing deceptive servicing tactics inherited from its predecessor entity. In recent years, SPS has faced class-action lawsuits and consumer complaints alleging violations of mortgage servicing regulations during loan modification reviews and , including improper notices of trustee sales and "pay-to-pay" fees. As of April 2025, SPS was acquired by a led by Sixth Street, continuing its role in the subprime servicing sector despite persistent documentation of operational challenges in regulatory filings and borrower disputes.

Overview

Company Profile

Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) is a servicing company headquartered in , , with an additional office in . Founded in 1989, the firm specializes in the servicing of non-prime and subprime single-family residential loans. SPS operates primarily as a subservicer for institutional investors, handling operational aspects such as borrower processing, account management, and loss mitigation strategies for portfolios that frequently include distressed assets. This focus positions SPS within the subprime segment, where it maintains significant portfolio concentrations in higher-risk loans. As of April 2025, services over 900,000 loans with an unpaid principal balance exceeding $200 billion, establishing it as a leading non-prime residential servicer in the United States. The company supports high-volume operations through established servicing infrastructure, enabling efficient administration for investor-owned portfolios.

Core Business Focus

Select Portfolio Servicing (SPS) specializes in the subservicing of non-prime residential mortgages, with a primary emphasis on high-risk accounts including nonperforming loans (NPLs) and re-performing loans (RPLs). This niche distinguishes SPS from mainstream prime servicers, which typically handle lower-delinquency portfolios; instead, SPS employs specialized default management processes to address elevated delinquency rates through targeted loss mitigation and compliance-focused strategies. As a servicer, SPS prioritizes efficient resolution of distressed assets for third-party investors, outsourcing select tasks while maintaining core oversight to optimize timelines and recovery rates. The company's model supports scalability for investors pursuing yields from non-prime and subordinate-lien loans, managing portfolios that demand robust adaptation to post-2008 regulatory reforms such as enhanced servicing standards under the and CFPB guidelines. As of April 2025, SPS services over 900,000 loans with an unpaid principal balance exceeding $200 billion, reflecting its capacity to handle large-scale, riskier volumes without the operational scale of prime-focused entities. Earlier metrics indicate a portfolio of nearly 800,000 subprime, special, and subordinate-lien accounts as of June 2022, underscoring consistent focus on non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). SPS has demonstrated proficiency in government-backed stabilization efforts, notably participating in the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), where it completed 84,899 permanent modifications to facilitate borrower retention amid widespread defaults. This involvement highlights its role in processing modifications for foreclosed or modified loans, leveraging proprietary tools for eligibility assessment and trial-period to align with program metrics without relying on unsubstantiated claims.

History

Founding and Early Development (1989–2004)

Fairbanks Capital Corp. was incorporated in 1989 with its principal operations based in , . The firm initially targeted the niche market for servicing subprime and high-risk mortgage loans, acquiring rights to manage delinquent and non-performing portfolios from originating banks and financial institutions. This approach addressed the rising volume of such loans amid the post-Savings and Loan crisis environment, where lenders sought to outsource the handling of troubled assets to specialized entities equipped for collections and resolution. Throughout the and into the early , Fairbanks expanded its servicing operations by securing additional subprime portfolios through targeted acquisitions, demonstrating steady growth prior to the mid-decade expansion. A notable milestone occurred in March 2002, when the company completed the acquisition of a subprime mortgage servicing from , enhancing its scale and operational footprint. The firm honed internal processes for borrower outreach, loss mitigation, and proceedings, establishing expertise in managing defaulted loans without reliance on advanced platforms that would emerge later. By 2004, these efforts had positioned Fairbanks as a key player in third-party loan servicing, servicing millions in unpaid principal balance across its accumulated assets.

Rebranding and Expansion (2005–2010)

In June 2004, Fairbanks Capital Corp. changed its name to , reflecting a shift toward emphasizing in its nonprime residential servicing operations. This rebranding preceded the company's acquisition by (USA), Inc. on October 4, 2005, which integrated SPS into a larger financial group and facilitated access to expanded subservicing contracts for subprime and other high-risk loans amid the peak of the U.S. . The acquisition positioned SPS to handle increased volumes of mortgage delinquencies as unraveled during the , with the company servicing loans originated by major lenders and backed by private-label securitizations. By 2009, as foreclosure rates escalated nationwide, SPS had signed a servicer participation agreement with , the administrator for the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), on April 13, enabling modifications for eligible delinquent loans. Initial HAMP data for SPS showed approximately 62,094 loans with 60+ days delinquency eligible for review, of which 37,695 underwent initial assessments, highlighting the scale of default management during this period. SPS's operations scaled to address the crisis-driven surge in nonperforming loans, focusing on subservicing for government-sponsored enterprises like and private investors, without direct ownership of mortgage servicing rights. This expansion phase capitalized on the post-acquisition to process higher volumes of troubled assets, though specific metrics on employee headcount or technology deployments remain undocumented in contemporaneous public filings.

Post-Financial Crisis Operations (2011–Present)

Following the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, Select Portfolio Servicing (SPS) implemented operational adjustments to comply with enhanced mortgage servicing standards enforced by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), particularly under Regulation X of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). These rules mandated timely responses to borrower inquiries, error resolution within specified timelines (typically 30-45 business days), and structured processes for evaluating loss mitigation options amid elevated foreclosure activity in the post-crisis environment. SPS integrated these requirements into its servicing protocols, offering documented pathways for loan modifications and alternatives to foreclosure, such as deed-in-lieu arrangements, to address delinquency while minimizing regulatory violations. This compliance focus causally linked to reduced operational risks, as non-adherence could trigger CFPB enforcement actions, prompting servicers like SPS to prioritize automated systems for document review and borrower communication over manual processes prevalent pre-2011. SPS sustained its core emphasis on non-prime servicing while pursuing measured diversification into prime segments, evidenced by growth in non-agency markets. In the second quarter of , SPS expanded its servicing rights by over 14%, primarily through acquisitions in private-label securitizations, which allowed resolution of delinquencies via specialized workout strategies. By March 2021, its comprised approximately 75% subserviced private-label securitizations (non-prime), 8% whole loans, and 4% (GSE) loans indicative of prime exposure, reflecting a strategic balance that leveraged post-crisis market recovery without fully pivoting from higher-risk assets. Delinquency resolution metrics during this period showed SPS achieving a promise-to-pay success rate of 75.37% for delinquent loans as of 2014, marginally below peer averages but aligned with the causal demands of regulatory scrutiny favoring documented mitigation over expedited foreclosures. The 2025 acquisition of by a led by Sixth Street, completed on , underscored private equity's attraction to servicers exhibiting compliance-driven efficiency and stability in a normalized . This transaction followed UBS's divestiture efforts and stabilized SPS's servicer ratings outlook from negative to stable, as affirmed by in October 2025, attributing the shift to mitigated integration risks and sustained operational performance under Dodd-Frank frameworks. Such developments highlight how regulatory reforms indirectly fostered a sector favoring scalable, low-error servicers, enabling SPS to maintain delinquency management amid evolving economic conditions without core strategic overhauls.

Services and Operations

Mortgage Servicing Portfolio

Select Portfolio Servicing (SPS) operates primarily as a subservicer for third-party investors, managing residential mortgage loans on their behalf rather than originating them. This role emphasizes post-origination activities such as collecting payments, administering escrow accounts for taxes and insurance, and ensuring compliance with investor-specific guidelines to maximize cash flows. Unlike originators, SPS focuses on operational efficiency in handling diverse loan portfolios, including fixed-rate mortgages, adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs), and second-lien loans, often acquired from banks or GSEs like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The includes a significant volume of distressed and defaulted loans, such as subordinate liens revived after borrower bankruptcies—commonly termed "" second mortgages—where pursues recovery aligned with investor mandates rather than borrower retention. As of April 2025, 's servicing exceeded $200 billion in unpaid principal (UPB), encompassing over 800,000 loans serviced for institutional investors. This scale reflects growth from $156 billion UPB in 2021, driven by boarding new portfolios amid market shifts post-financial crisis. SPS employs targeted strategies for defaulted assets, including proficient collection practices and workout options like modifications or liquidations, which have historically improved delinquency profiles despite expansion. These efforts prioritize investor-directed outcomes, such as principal and fee minimization, over systemic borrower relief, with and hazard oversight ensuring uninterrupted streams. Empirical metrics indicate effective , as SPS maintains approvals from GSEs for special servicing of high-risk loans.

Technology and Customer Management Tools

Select Portfolio Servicing provides borrowers with the My SPS online portal and mobile application, enabling features such as one-time or recurring payments, auto-draft setup and modifications, statement viewing, information review, and document uploads. These tools, accessible via the customer dashboard, also allow users to monitor account details, important messages, and an information hub for guidance on billing and statements. By facilitating 24/7 account management without agent interaction, the platform supports reduced reliance on phone-based , which handles initial inquiries at 800-258-8602. SPS integrates automation and to enhance operational efficiency, particularly in payment posting and analysis amid high-delinquency portfolios. Collaboration with developed and AI algorithms that improved data accuracy for payment application, addressing inconsistencies in borrower-submitted information. The Customer 360 HUB tool analyzes loan data to predict inquiries and generate pre-populated responses, minimizing manual intervention in servicing nonperforming and re-performing loans. These systems contribute to error reduction in environments with elevated risks, where precise adjustments and payment allocation are critical for and borrower accounting. The platform supports loss mitigation processes, including short sales and loan modifications, through features like secure document submission and account status tracking, which streamline evidence provision for hardship evaluations. While these tools aid in retaining borrowers via structured workflows, their effectiveness depends on case-specific eligibility under investor guidelines, without guaranteed outcomes in foreclosure-prone scenarios.

Ownership and Corporate Structure

Key Acquisitions and Ownership Shifts

In October 2005, (USA), Inc., completed the acquisition of Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., and its parent , SPS Holding Corp., marking the company's transition from independent operation to a wholly owned of Group AG. This ownership shift provided SPS with institutional backing, facilitating expanded servicing of non-prime residential mortgage loans amid a pre-crisis market boom in securitized products. The move aligned with Credit Suisse's broader strategy, where controlling servicing operations enabled more efficient management of advances, delinquencies, and portfolio retention for mortgage-backed securities originators. During Credit Suisse's tenure as parent, SPS experienced no reported divestitures, spin-offs, or major internal restructurings directly tied to banking regulations, maintaining stable status focused on scaling volumes. Ownership incentives emphasized operational leverage, as Credit Suisse's capital infusion supported SPS in handling larger portfolios—reaching billions in unpaid principal balance—while minimizing external subservicing costs through in-house control. A subsequent indirect shift occurred in March 2023, when Group AG acquired amid the latter's financial distress, effectively transferring ultimate control of to without altering its direct subsidiary structure. designated as a non-core legacy asset, reflecting regulatory demands for optimization post-merger, including capital relief from high-risk servicing exposures under frameworks. This parental change prioritized divestiture potential over expansion, driven by 's focus on efficiencies rather than specialized operations.

Current Ownership Post-2025 Acquisition

In April 2025, a consortium led by completed the acquisition of Select Portfolio Servicing () from Group AG, marking the company's transition to ownership. The deal, announced earlier and finalized on April 30, 2025, involved co-investors including LP, shifting from its prior structure under banking institutions like (acquired by in 2023). This structure positions as a non-bank servicer, emphasizing operational flexibility in a market characterized by persistent high interest rates that have elevated delinquency rates and demand for specialized default management. Unlike its previous bank-affiliated ownership, which often prioritized and capital constraints typical of deposit-taking institutions, the Sixth Street-led ownership enables more nimble strategic responses to evolving servicing demands, such as portfolio expansions amid industry consolidation. backing, evidenced by stable post-acquisition ratings from agencies like Fitch, supports investments in and scale without the pressures of public or banking oversight. This shift aligns with broader trends where non-bank servicers gain traction in handling subprime and distressed assets, potentially enhancing SPS's competitiveness in a regulatory-intensive landscape. The consortium's composition, dominated by alternative asset managers focused on and , underscores a long-term orientation toward value extraction through efficiency gains rather than short-term management. Financing elements, such as a $475 million secured from , facilitated the transaction without disclosed public terms on equity stakes or purchase price, reflecting the opaque nature of private deals. Overall, this ownership evolution equips to navigate heightened servicing volumes driven by elevated borrowing costs, fostering agility in a consolidating sector where non-banks increasingly absorb from retreating traditional lenders.

Controversies and Criticisms

Allegations of Improper Foreclosure Practices

In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, Select Portfolio Servicing (SPS) faced multiple borrower allegations of improper foreclosure practices, including dual-tracking, where servicers advanced foreclosure proceedings while simultaneously reviewing borrowers' applications for loan modifications. For instance, in Reese v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (filed in California Superior Court, appealed 2024–2025), plaintiff Jeanie Reese, acting as conservator for borrower Leoma Musil, claimed SPS violated California's former Civil Code section 2923.6 by initiating foreclosure during an ongoing modification review process in 2015–2016. The California Court of Appeal upheld dismissal of the claim in December 2024, finding SPS had remedied any potential violation by delaying the foreclosure sale until after completing the review, though Reese argued the delay was insufficient to cure the initial breach. Similar dual-tracking accusations surfaced in other cases during the 2010s, such as Brown v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (U.S. District Court, , 2018), where the plaintiff alleged SPS violated the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) by pursuing while loss mitigation was pending, contributing to patterns of ignored hardship applications reported by borrowers. Consumer complaints filed with the (CFPB) echoed these issues, with borrowers claiming SPS misled them into believing modification reviews were underway only to proceed with , as in a June 2025 complaint detailing unprocessed repayment plan applications leading to rushed eviction threats. Watchdog groups and plaintiffs contended such practices exacerbated borrower distress, particularly for those facing temporary hardships, by prioritizing timelines over viable alternatives. SPS has defended its actions as adherence to contractual obligations and duties to investors, such as those holding or Freddie Mac-backed loans, arguing that unchecked delays in could incentivize prolonged defaults and among borrowers. In the Reese case, SPS maintained that any procedural missteps were corrected promptly and did not prejudice the borrower, emphasizing that loan contracts require timely enforcement to protect principal recovery. Proponents of this view, including industry analysts, assert serve as necessary mechanisms to mitigate systemic risks from non-performing loans, countering claims of impropriety by noting borrowers' initial defaults as the causal root rather than servicer conduct alone. These defenses highlight tensions between borrower relief efforts and the responsibilities of servicers to avoid eroding in mortgage-backed securities.

Debt Collection and Payment Application Disputes

Select Portfolio Servicing (SPS) has faced allegations of aggressive practices, including the imposition of "pay-to-pay" fees for processing payments via phone or online portals, which critics claim burdens borrowers unnecessarily. In a 2025 filed in the U.S. District Court for of , plaintiffs Sukari Hardnett and Lisa Dennis accused SPS of violating the District's Procedures Act by charging such fees, prompting a federal judge to deny SPS's motion to dismiss on , 2025, allowing the case to proceed to . Similar complaints have surfaced in consumer filings, asserting that these fees, often $10–$15 per transaction, exploit borrowers facing financial hardship without providing equivalent value. Borrowers have also raised concerns over SPS's pursuit of so-called "zombie debts," particularly dormant second mortgages from the subprime era that SPS seeks to revive through collection or actions. In , SPS has initiated proceedings on such loans, which plaintiffs argue were effectively abandoned or discharged but revived after statutes of limitations expired, potentially misleading homeowners into believing the debts were extinguished. These efforts align with broader industry trends where servicers of non-performing loans encounter disputes over debt validity, though SPS contends such pursuits are lawful when based on enforceable liens. Payment application disputes form a core of complaints, with accusations of misallocating funds—such as applying payments to fees before principal or —and escrow mismanagement leading to uncredited balances or improper / disbursements. In the 2025 bankruptcy case Napper v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. in the U.S. for the Middle District of , the court denied SPS's motion to dismiss on July 22, 2025, finding plausible claims under the Debt Collection Act that SPS misrepresented account status by alleging despite proper plan payments and omitted key details in communications. Class actions invoking Regulation X of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) have similarly targeted SPS for alleged failures to correct servicing errors in payment posting, as seen in cases like Brown v. Select Portfolio Servicing (2018), where courts examined RESPA violations tied to inaccurate account handling. The (CFPB) database logs thousands of complaints against SPS related to payment application, including failures to credit forbearance-era submissions and escrow shortfalls that inflated borrower obligations. For instance, multiple filings from 2024–2025 describe SPS's delays in applying payments or miscalculating , resulting in unwarranted late fees or demands. Such volumes may stem from SPS's specialization in servicing high-risk, distressed portfolios—often subprime or government-backed loans prone to delinquency—rather than systemic malfeasance, as elevated dispute rates correlate with borrower s involving frequent modifications or hardships. SPS maintains internal resolution mechanisms, including an process for escalated disputes, and argues in litigation that its practices comply with federal servicing rules, with many complaints resolved through documentation reviews. Empirical patterns suggest that while complaints persist, resolution often occurs post-filing, underscoring operational challenges in high-volume servicing over intentional misconduct.

Regulatory Scrutiny and Resolutions

Federal and State Settlements

In August 2007, the (FTC) reached a modified stipulated final judgment with Select Portfolio Servicing (SPS), building on the original 2003 settlement that required a $40 million for redress to consumers affected by unfair subprime mortgage servicing practices. The modifications, approved by the U.S. District Court for the District of , imposed a five-year prohibition on marketing optional products such as home warranties, mandated refunds for certain optional product fees and unperformed attorney services dating back to November 2003, and established revised limits on attorney fees with requirements for full disclosures and post-payoff reconciliations. Additional terms included permanent implementation of consumer-tested monthly mortgage statements and annual independent compliance audits extending through 2013, alongside provisions allowing SPS to hold or reject payments more than $25 short of required amounts with prompt borrower notification. At the state level, the Department of Financial Services (NY DFS) entered a settlement agreement with SPS in May 2017 addressing violations of state mortgage banking regulations. SPS agreed to pay a $20,000 civil monetary penalty for operating unauthorized branches in , , that serviced mortgage loans between March and December 2013, contravening Part 418.5(a) of the ’s Regulations. The agreement required SPS to submit and implement updated compliance policies within 90 days, including staff training on branch authorization rules, with no explicit consumer restitution outlined but ongoing enforceability by the NY DFS . These resolutions reflect a pattern of federal and state enforcement spanning from the mid-2000s into the , with the FTC's extended audit requirements through 2013 preceding the NY DFS action by four years, indicating sustained regulatory oversight of SPS's servicing operations despite prior mandated reforms. No further major federal settlements have been documented post-2007 modifications, though state-level scrutiny persisted into later years.

Compliance Challenges and Reforms

Following the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in 2010, Select Portfolio Servicing (SPS) was required to align its operations with new federal mortgage servicing standards under Regulation X (12 CFR § 1024), which prohibited dual-tracking—simultaneously advancing while reviewing a complete loss mitigation application—and mandated servicers to evaluate for available loss mitigation options prior to initiation. SPS responded by developing a consolidated loss mitigation workflow tool by 2014, designed to integrate pooling and servicing agreements (PSAs) alongside investor-specific guidelines, thereby streamlining reviews and ensuring compliance with these protocols to avoid regulatory violations. However, implementation challenges persisted, as evidenced by multiple legal actions alleging dual-tracking breaches, including a 2016 violation cited in Reese v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., where SPS advanced proceedings amid an ongoing modification review, and a 2019 Napa County ruling finding SPS in violation of California's dual-tracking prohibitions under the . To address these and broader scrutiny, SPS enhanced its quality-control processes, incorporating regular monitoring and s to track adherence to CFPB servicing rules and related settlement obligations. The company established a dedicated that generates monthly risk control and reports, drawing on findings from servicing , client audits, and regulatory examinations to identify and mitigate gaps in payment processing and loss mitigation execution. Verifiable reforms included bolstering record-keeping requirements, such as maintaining comprehensive documentation for all servicing activities—including payment applications and loss mitigation evaluations—as stipulated in agreements with entities like , which demand accurate audit trails to support program and facilitate third-party reviews. These measures extended prior commitments from a 2007 FTC settlement modification, which mandated annual independent audits of fee assessments and servicing practices, adapting them to post-Dodd-Frank demands for transparency in borrower interactions. While these adaptations demonstrably strengthened SPS's operational safeguards against penalties—evidenced by sustained servicer ratings from agencies like and Fitch citing improvements in compliance frameworks and loss mitigation timelines—they also imposed significant administrative burdens. Industry analyses of Dodd-Frank servicing rules indicate that enhanced protocols, such as extended review periods and documentation mandates, prolong timelines and elevate servicing costs, which servicers often allocate to investors via higher fees or indirectly to borrowers through elevated operational overheads. For SPS, this dual nature of reforms—corrective in rectifying prior lapses but resource-intensive—has supported regulatory navigation amid ongoing CFPB proposals to further refine loss mitigation cycles, reflecting persistent tensions between borrower protections and servicing efficiency.

Performance and Reception

Industry Ratings and Achievements

Standard & Poor's (S&P) Global Ratings has consistently ranked Select Portfolio Servicing (SPS) as a STRONG servicer for residential subprime, special, and subordinate-lien mortgages, reflecting robust operational capabilities, experienced staff tenure, and declining delinquency rates across its portfolios. This assessment, updated as of December 2023, highlights SPS's above-average performance in servicing non-prime loans compared to peers, with fine experience levels and effective controls for high-risk assets. Fitch Ratings affirmed SPS's U.S. residential -backed securities (RMBS) primary and special servicer ratings in October 2025, revising the outlook to from Negative following ownership changes, citing the firm's long tenure—over 36 years in residential servicing—and stable operational platform. These ratings, including RPS2 (Above Average) for primary servicing of subprime and similar products, underscore SPS's capacity to manage complex non-prime portfolios effectively. In market analyses, has been recognized as a leading servicer in non-agency mortgage-backed securities, retaking the top position in servicing volume for newly issued non-agency in the first quarter of 2025, demonstrating strong client portfolio retention and operational efficiency in independent servicing.

Customer Feedback and Complaint Trends

Select Portfolio Servicing () has faced elevated volumes of customer relative to prime servicers, with 429 complaints filed through the () over the three years preceding mid-2024, predominantly concerning billing disputes, payment processing delays, and difficulties in resolving default-related issues. The customer review rating stands at 1.06 out of 5 stars based on 190 evaluations as of late 2024, reflecting dissatisfaction with communication and error correction, though the company maintains an A+ business rating due to operational longevity rather than complaint resolution metrics. aggregates similarly low scores, averaging 1.0 from over 930 reviews through 2024, highlighting patterns of alleged mismanagement and unresponsive support during financial hardship. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) data reveals ongoing servicing complaints against , with examples from 2022 to 2025 involving untimely payment crediting, inaccurate statements, and challenges in modification requests, often from borrowers in delinquency. While aggregate CFPB figures for are not publicly tallied in a single metric, servicing complaints industry-wide declined 12% from 2021 to 2022, yet persist at higher rates for non-prime portfolios like 's, where borrower-initiated disputes correlate with underlying financial distress rather than servicer-specific malfeasance. Internal perspectives from a 2019 AMA by an employee underscore operational constraints in handling high-risk loans, noting resistance to modifications amid investor guidelines and borrower non-cooperation, which amplifies perceived unresponsiveness but aligns with the causal dynamics of distressed servicing—where defaulted parties disproportionately file grievances irrespective of servicer performance. 's in non-prime residential mortgages, self-described as the sector's highest-rated, inherently elevates density compared to prime servicers, as empirical trends show financially unhealthy borrowers lodge 117 points lower on average across the industry. Positive feedback, though sparse in , occasionally references user-friendly portals, contrasting with bottlenecks during peak default periods.

References

  1. [1]
    Servicer Evaluation: Select Portfolio Servicing I | S&P Global Ratings
    SPS focuses on high-risk accounts--generally nonperforming loans (NPLs) and re-performing loans (RPLs), although recent volume has been mostly RPLs. There are ...
  2. [2]
    Select Portfolio Servicing - LinkedIn
    Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) is a nationally recognized mortgage servicer specializing in the servicing of single-family residential mortgages.<|separator|>
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. Modified Stipulated Final Judgment ...
    SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVTClNG, INC. (formerly Fairbanks Capital Corp.), a Utah corporation, SPS HOLDll"!G CORP. (formerly Fairbanks Capital Holding Corp.),.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Select Portfolio Servicing - DFPI
    This class action brings suit against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS). The legal concerns relate to provisions of Regulation X and of the Real Estate ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Settlement Agreement with Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
    SPS, headquartered at 3217 S. Decker Lake Drive, West Valley City, UT 84119, was granted a registration by the Department on April 2, 2012 to engage in the ...
  6. [6]
    Select Portfolio Servicing Class Action Targets Debt Collection
    Debt collection company Select Portfolio Servicing is accused of sending debt collection letters that violate federal law, according to a class action lawsuit.
  7. [7]
    Judge compels Select Portfolio to justify 'pay-to-pay' fees in court
    Sep 12, 2025 · The homeowners argue that these “pay-to-pay” fees aren't just unfair—they're illegal under D.C. consumer protection laws and the D.C. Mortgage ...
  8. [8]
    Reese v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. :: 2025 - Justia Law
    Dec 19, 2024 · The dispute arose when SPS recorded a notice of trustee's sale while Reese's loan modification application was pending. Reese claimed that SPS ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  9. [9]
    Select Portfolio Servicing Announces Completion of Acquisition by ...
    Apr 30, 2025 · Select Portfolio Servicing (SPS), a mortgage servicing solutions provider, announced today the completion of the acquisition of the company by a consortium of ...
  10. [10]
    10205341 - Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
    Sep 22, 2024 · I have been trying to resolve my problems with Select Portfolio Servicing relating to missed mortgage payments because of Covid hardship.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  11. [11]
    Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. | BBB Complaints | Better Business ...
    429 total complaints in the last 3 years. 135 complaints closed in the last 12 months. If you've experienced an issue. Submit a Complaint.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  12. [12]
    Aboutus - Select Portfolio Servicing
    Founded in 1989, SPS is headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah with an office in Jacksonville, Florida. At SPS, our on-going mission is to provide servicing ...
  13. [13]
    Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. - Fitch Ratings
    Dec 7, 2023 · (SPS) is an established high touch servicer with over 30 years of industry experience. SPS was acquired by Credit Suisse Group AG (CS) in 2005.<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Select Portfolio Servicing Inc - Company Profile and News
    Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. operates as a mortgage servicing company. The Company specializes in the servicing of single-family residential mortgage loans.
  15. [15]
    Fitch Affirms Select Portfolio Servicing's U.S. RMBS Servicer Ratings
    Oct 8, 2025 · The servicing operation is headquartered in Salt Lake City, UT and SPS maintains a secondary servicing location in Jacksonville, FL. All ...
  16. [16]
    Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
    Oct 2, 2019 · SPS is a high-touch special servicer, providing effective servicing results for third parties by focusing on its core loss mitigation, compliance, and timeline ...Missing: business | Show results with:business
  17. [17]
    Prospectus Supplement - SEC.gov
    Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (“SPS”) will act as the servicer of the ... In connection with the servicing of mortgage loans, SPS outsources certain tasks and ...
  18. [18]
    Servicer Evaluation: Select Portfolio Servicing I | S&P Global Ratings
    Jan 24, 2023 · Ranking Overview. Subrankings. Servicing Category, Overall ranking, Management and organization, Loan administration, Outlook ranking.Missing: core | Show results with:core
  19. [19]
    [PDF] HOME AFFORDABLE MODIFICATION PROGRAM (HAMP) FACTS ...
    forms of mortgage assistance were completed with 1.5 million permanent HAMP ... Select Portfolio Servicing: i. HAMP Tier 1 Permanent Modifications: 84,899.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc - Treasury
    Fannie Mae acknowledges that ServiceI' may service mortgage loans for its own account or for the account ofone or more Investors and may be subject to ...
  21. [21]
    0001021408-02-000197.txt - SEC.gov
    Incorporated in 1989, Fairbanks Capital Corp. has established its reputation for performance over the past decade with the successful combination of people, ...
  22. [22]
    Fairbanks closes on deal and plans restructuring - Deseret News
    Mar 13, 2002 · Salt Lake-based Fairbanks Capital Corp. said Wednesday it has closed on the transaction to acquire Bank of America Corp.
  23. [23]
    Subprime-Mortgage Servicing Regulation and the Financial Crisis
    Nov 6, 2017 · The complaint noted the substantial growth of Fairbanks' servicing portfolio in the previous three years through acquisitions of subprime ...
  24. [24]
    424B5 - SEC.gov
    On June 30, 2004, SPS changed its name from Fairbanks Capital Corp. to Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. On October 4, 2005, Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), ...
  25. [25]
    Credit Suisse First Boston to acquire S.L.-based SPS - Deseret News
    Aug 13, 2005 · Credit Suisse First Boston to acquire S.L.-based SPS ... Salt Lake-based nonprime residential mortgage loan servicer Select Portfolio Servicing ...Missing: rebranding | Show results with:rebranding
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Making Home Affordable Program
    Oct 23, 2009 · Select Portfolio Servicing. 4/13/09. 62,094. 37,695. 61%. 18,156. 29%. US ... 1 HomeEq, Litton, OneWest and USBank began participation after July ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Making Home Affordable Program
    Jul 29, 2009 · 5 Estimated Eligible 60+ Day delinquencies based on the servicer registration form. 6 Other Servicers include entities with less than 1,000 ...
  28. [28]
    Mortgage Servicing Rules Under the Real Estate Settlement ...
    Jan 4, 2024 · This final rule implements provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act regarding mortgage loan servicing.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Regulation X Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
    The Dodd-Frank Act granted rule-making authority under RESPA to the Consumer Financial. Protection Bureau (CFPB) and, with respect to entities under its ...<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Home Retention Options Process - Select Portfolio Servicing
    Step 1: Submit required documents · Step 2: Speak to a Loan Servicing Representative · Step 3: Determine Eligibility · Step 4: Complete the Process.
  31. [31]
    https://www.spservicing.com/Services/deedinlieu
  32. [32]
    SPS grew its servicing rights 14% by targeting nonagency market
    Oct 5, 2017 · Select Portfolio Servicing grew its mortgage servicing rights portfolio by over 14% in the second quarter by targeting opportunities in the ...Missing: diversification | Show results with:diversification
  33. [33]
    Servicer Evaluation: Select Portfolio Servicing I | S&P Global Ratings
    Aug 9, 2021 · SPS performs servicing activities from Salt Lake City, Utah and Jacksonville, Fla. The Salt Lake City office is the largest site and ...
  34. [34]
    Servicer Evaluation: Select Portfolio Servicing I | S&P Global Ratings
    Oct 14, 2014 · The promise-to-pay success rates for delinquent loans was slightly lower than peers, at 75.37%. Opinion. Standard & Poor's Ratings Services' ...
  35. [35]
    CustomerDashboard - Select Portfolio Servicing
    From the Customer Dashboard, you can make a payment, view important messages, review account details, and use the Information Hub. The Information Hub provides ...
  36. [36]
    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sps.servicing
  37. [37]
    Manage Your Account - Select Portfolio Servicing
    Now more than ever, it's easy to manage your account online, including: Set up Automatic Payments; View Statements; Set up Third Party Access; Make a Payment ...
  38. [38]
    ContactUs - Select Portfolio Servicing
    Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. · 3217 S. Decker Lake Drive · Salt Lake City, UT 84119 · Please write your account number in the memo area of your check or money ...
  39. [39]
    How Digital Transformation Is Helping You Pay Your Mortgage
    Apr 6, 2021 · SPS worked with Infosys to produce unique NLP and AI algorithms to solve this problem. The result is that SPS knows from an accuracy standpoint ...
  40. [40]
    Sixth Street Consortium to Be Buyer of UBS Mortgage Unit - Swissinfo
    Aug 15, 2024 · UBS, which acquired Credit Suisse in an emergency rescue last year, has been managing Select Portfolio in its non-core and legacy business ...Missing: rebranding | Show results with:rebranding
  41. [41]
    Swiss bank UBS closes deal to sell U.S. servicer - HousingWire
    Aug 14, 2024 · SPS, bought by Credit Suisse in 2005, announced a deal in September 2022 to acquire some of the assets of Texas-based Rushmore Loan Management ...Missing: rebranding | Show results with:rebranding
  42. [42]
    A consortium of investors led by Sixth Street Partners, LLC and ...
    May 15, 2025 · ... Management LP completed the acquisition of Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. from Credit Suisse Group AG in March 2025. © S&P Capital IQ ...
  43. [43]
    Outlook for SPS Stable Following Ownership Change
    Oct 17, 2025 · Earlier this year, UBS sold SPS to a consortium led by Sixth Street and Davidson Kempner Capital Management. Fitch had a negative outlook of ...
  44. [44]
    UBS sells mortgage servicer to Sixth Street-led investor group
    Aug 15, 2024 · Credit Suisse acquired SPS in 2005 but was rescued by UBS last year. The Swiss bank added SPS to its division that is focused on non-core and ...Missing: rebranding | Show results with:rebranding
  45. [45]
    Select Portfolio Servicing 2025 Company Profile - PitchBook
    Provider of mortgage service carters to United States businesses. The company offers a wide range of services such as payment support, special request ...
  46. [46]
    CPP Investments Net Assets Total $714.4 Billion at 2025 Fiscal Year ...
    May 21, 2025 · Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPP Investments) ended its fiscal year on March 31, 2025, with net assets of $714.4 billion, compared to $632.3 billion ...Missing: UPB | Show results with:UPB
  47. [47]
    Sixth Street-Led Consortium Completes Acquisition of Select ...
    Oct 15, 2025 · Sixth Street-Led Consortium Completes Acquisition of Select Portfolio Servicing ... Simpson Thacher represented a consortium of buyers led by ...
  48. [48]
    Brown v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., No. 8:2018cv01664
    ... dual tracking” claim. Dual tracking occurs where a servicer moves towards foreclosure while the loss mitigation process is ongoing in violation of RESPA.Missing: lawsuits | Show results with:lawsuits
  49. [49]
    13856371 - Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
    Jun 2, 2025 · SPS misled us into thinking that they would review us for a possible repayment plan or a modification and just wanted to foreclose. We had to ...Missing: allegations improper
  50. [50]
    Some mortgage middlemen sued for abuses - NBC News
    Aug 5, 2009 · The largest mortgage servicing abuse lawsuit was brought against Select Portfolio Servicing, which was accused of imposing illegal fees and ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Victory In Napa County Against U.S. Bank & Select Portfolio Servicing
    Dec 20, 2019 · We believed this was a direct violation of the California Homeowner Bill of Rights, and more specifically, the dual tracking provision Cal.
  52. [52]
    SPS Loses Bid to Dismiss Lawsuit on Loan Payment Practices
    Sep 15, 2025 · Sukari Hardnett and Lisa Dennis, sued SPS over the so-called pay-to-pay fees. They claimed the practice violated DC's Consumer Protection ...
  53. [53]
    Select Portfolio must face class action over 'pay-to-pay' mortgage fees
    Sep 11, 2025 · (September 11, 2025) - A proposed class action accusing mortgage servicer Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. of charging illegal "pay-to-pay" fees ...
  54. [54]
    Select Portfolio Servicing EZ Pay Fee Litig.
    ... SPS and other loan servicing companies that harmed consumers. Please contact us to discuss your experiences. View the Complaint ​News: Press Release ...
  55. [55]
    Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. Pay-to-Pay Fees Investigation
    Jun 18, 2024 · Migliaccio & Rathod LLP is investigating Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. for charging pay-to-pay fees.Missing: complaints | Show results with:complaints
  56. [56]
    Select Portfolio Servicing Zombie Second Mortgage | Loan Lawyers
    Nov 1, 2023 · Select Portfolio Servicing is not accredited by the Better Business Bureau (BBB) and in fact, they have had thousands of complaints lodged ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  57. [57]
    Zombie Mortgages Saddle Homeowners With Large Unexpected ...
    Oct 6, 2025 · Zombie loans: Debt collectors are demanding outsized payments or foreclosing on American homeowners with canceled or abandoned second ...Missing: Select Portfolio subservicing
  58. [58]
    Bankr. M.D.N.C.: Oral Ruling Summary – Napper v. Select Portfolio ...
    Jul 22, 2025 · SPS allegedly misapplied plan payments, told the debtor she was behind when she wasn't, and then used that misrepresentation to try to collect ...
  59. [59]
    9517441 - Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
    Jul 15, 2024 · Consumer Complaints There are over XXXX complaints on file for SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING , INC.. Dated between XXXX and XXXX. Company ...
  60. [60]
    11495363 - Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
    Jan 14, 2025 · The Consumer Complaint Database is a collection of complaints about consumer financial products and services that we sent to companies for ...<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    8654187 - Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
    I am currently in a dispute with Select Portfolio Servicing ( SPS ) that took over the servicing of one of my properties from XXXX, while I was under XXXX ...Missing: operational changes
  62. [62]
    Ombudsman - Select Portfolio Servicing
    First-time issues should be directed to the SPS Customer Service Department at 800-258-8602; however, if you have a complaint or dispute that you feel is ...
  63. [63]
    FTC, Subprime Mortgage Servicer Agree to Modified Settlement
    Aug 2, 2007 · In November 2003, Fairbanks Capital Corp. and Fairbanks Capital Holding Corp. agreed to pay $40 million to settle with the FTC and the U.S. ...Missing: acquires 1989-2004
  64. [64]
    https://www.consumerfinance.gov/rules-policy/regulations/1024/41/
  65. [65]
    Servicer Evaluation: Select Portfolio Servicing I | S&P Global Ratings
    Oct 14, 2014 · SPS has developed a consolidated loss mitigation workflow tool that integrates pooling and servicing agreement (PSA) and other investor ...Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
  66. [66]
    [PDF] A Skeptical Look at Mortgage Reform Under the Dodd-Frank Act
    Jul 10, 2015 · New regulations relating to mortgage servicing are likely to extend the ultimate time to foreclosure. Re- searchers, as well as industry ...
  67. [67]
    Streamlining Mortgage Servicing for Borrowers ... - Regulations.gov
    The CFPB is issuing this proposed rule pursuant to its authority under RESPA and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), ...
  68. [68]
    Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. Credit Ratings
    Fitch Affirms Select Portfolio Servicing's U.S. RMBS Servicer Ratings; Outlook Stable. Rating Action Commentary / Wed 15 Nov, 2023. Fitch Affirms Select ...
  69. [69]
    SPS Retakes Lead Among Non-Agency MBS Servicers
    May 2, 2025 · Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing is, by far, the top servicer of non-agency MBS issued during the first quarter.
  70. [70]
    Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. | BBB Reviews | Better Business Bureau
    View BBB customer reviews of Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. Leave a review ... Customer Review Ratings. 1.06/5 stars. Average of 190 Customer Reviews. Want ...
  71. [71]
    Select Portfolio Servicing Reviews: Cost, Pros & Cons
    Rating 1.0 (933) Select Portfolio Servicing is a terrible company uninterested in providing any service to their customers. You should absolutely stay away from this company.
  72. [72]
    5860575 - Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
    Company information. Date complaint sent to company. 8/9/2022. Company name. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. Timely response? Yes. Company response to consumer.
  73. [73]
    Consumer Complaint and Compliance Trends for the Mortgage ...
    Overall, the number of mortgage complaints decreased 12% in 2022 vs. 2021. While the true cause of this decrease is unclear, it could likely be partially ...Missing: distressed | Show results with:distressed
  74. [74]
    I work for a controversial loan servicing company - Select Portfolio ...
    Aug 14, 2019 · Select Portfolio Servicing (SPS) has been involved in numerous class action lawsuits, often concerning issues like foreclosure, debt collection, ...Mortgage was just sold. Company has bad reviews. - RedditSelect Portfolio Servicing (SPS) : r/RealEstate - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  75. [75]
    Select Portfolio Servicing Citigroup : r/Mortgages - Reddit
    May 20, 2025 · In their own press releases SPS describes themselves as "the highest rated non-prime residential mortgage servicer in the industry." Non-prime = ...Missing: core business
  76. [76]
    2024 U.S. Mortgage Servicer Satisfaction Study | J.D. Power
    Jul 25, 2024 · Overall satisfaction scores among financially unhealthy borrowers are, on average, 117 points lower than among financially healthy borrowers.<|separator|>