Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Shah Alam II

Shah ʿĀlam II (1728–1806), born Mīrzā ʿAbdallāh ʿAlī Gowhar, was the seventeenth emperor who reigned from 1759 until his death, during the empire's final disintegration as effective authority devolved to Maratha confederates, invaders, regional nawabs, and the British East India Company. Ascending the throne after the assassination of his father, ʿĀlamgīr II, he initially sought to reclaim but spent years in exile, allying with the , , against British forces; defeat at the in October 1764 compelled him to grant the Company diwani rights over , , and Orissa through the in 1765, establishing British revenue control and his status as their pensioner. Returning to in 1771 under Najib-ud-Daulah's protection and later employing capable commanders like to briefly restore order, his rule saw further humiliation when blinded by the Qadir during the 1788 sack of the capital; subsequently propped up by Maratha regents and finally British forces after the Second Anglo-Maratha War, he embodied the dynasty's reduction to symbolic impotence.

Early Life and Accession

Birth, Family, and Education

Ali Gauhar, who later adopted the regnal name Shah Alam II, was born on 25 June 1728 in to Prince Aziz-ud-Din (later Emperor ) and an unnamed consort from the . His father was a son of the short-reigned Emperor , positioning Ali Gauhar within the extended Timurid lineage amid the Empire's accelerating fragmentation following the death of Emperor in 1707. The family resided in the imperial capital, where internal rivalries and external pressures from regional powers like the Marathas and constrained princely privileges. From infancy, Ali Gauhar grew up in semi-captivity within the Salatin quarters of the , a segregated section reserved for lesser royals under surveillance by dominant court factions. This environment limited his exposure to broader administrative or military roles typical for crown princes, fostering a life marked by caution and dependence on paternal protection rather than independent authority. Records indicate no formal education for Ali Gauhar, diverging from the conventional Mughal princely training in , Islamic , , and horsemanship under court tutors. Nonetheless, he achieved literacy in , languages essential for imperial correspondence and poetry, likely through informal palace instruction or self-study amid the restricted confines of his upbringing. This rudimentary proficiency equipped him for later poetic endeavors, though it paled against the scholarly depth of earlier Mughals like or .

Murder of Alamgir II and Escape from Delhi

In the late 1750s, Mughal Emperor faced increasing antagonism from his , Ghazi-ud-din Imad-ul-Mulk, who sought to consolidate power amid the empire's fragmentation. Imad-ul-Mulk, having orchestrated 's installation in 1754, grew resentful of the emperor's reluctance to endorse his aggressive policies against regional powers like the Marathas and Rohillas, leading to plots against the imperial family. 's sons, including the Ali Gauhar (later Shah Alam II), became targets, prompting Ali Gauhar to flee in 1758 out of fear for his life, heading eastward toward and to rally support from local governors and avoid Imad-ul-Mulk's assassins. Tensions culminated in Alamgir II's assassination on 29 November 1759, orchestrated by Imad-ul-Mulk to eliminate opposition and install a more pliable puppet. Deceived into visiting a purportedly pious saint outside , Alamgir II was stabbed to death by Balabash Khan, a subordinate of Imad-ul-Mulk, in a premeditated that shocked loyalists and underscored the vizier's ruthless bid for control. Following the murder, Imad-ul-Mulk swiftly enthroned the nominal as emperor in , but this move failed to legitimize his regime among broader imperial factions wary of his tyranny. Meanwhile, Ali Gauhar, already in in , proclaimed himself under the title Shah II shortly after his father's death, dating his from 1759 to challenge Imad-ul-Mulk's usurpation and assert continuity of the Timurid line. This self-proclamation, supported by provincial zamindars and in eastern who rejected Delhi's puppet regime, marked Shah Alam II's emergence as an in , initiating campaigns to reclaim while evading Imad-ul-Mulk's forces. His escape preserved the imperial succession, preventing total consolidation under the vizier and setting the stage for alliances with powers like the of , though it exposed the throne's vulnerability to internal betrayal.

Proclamation as Emperor in Exile

Ali Gauhar, the eldest son of Mughal Emperor Alamgir II, escaped Delhi prior to the assassination of his father by the vizier Imad-ul-Mulk on 10 November 1759. Seeking refuge with Shuja-ud-Daula, the Nawab of Awadh, Ali Gauhar proclaimed himself emperor later that year, adopting the regnal title Shah Alam II to assert his legitimacy over the Mughal throne. This proclamation occurred amid the installation of a puppet ruler, Shah Jahan III (also known as Shah Jahan Sadiq), by Imad-ul-Mulk in Delhi, rendering Shah Alam II's claim one of imperial authority exercised from exile. Despite lacking control over the capital, Shah Alam II's status as the rightful heir garnered recognition from regional powers wary of Imad-ul-Mulk's instability and the vizier's alliances with Afghan interests. His exile base in provided temporary security, allowing him to issue firmans and coinage in his name, though effective governance remained nominal without military enforcement. Shah Alam II initially aimed to reclaim through alliances, but internal factionalism and the rising influence of Maratha and forces prolonged his displaced rule until 1772. This period marked the formal beginning of his 47-year reign, characterized by dependence on provincial allies rather than direct imperial dominion.

Campaigns in Bengal and Defeat at Buxar

Alliance Against the British East India Company

Following his proclamation as emperor in November 1759, Shah Alam II advanced into Bihar in early 1760 with an army of approximately 30,000 soldiers, capturing Patna and asserting nominal control over parts of Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa to challenge British influence in the region. However, defeats by British forces under John Caillaud and local allies forced his retreat, though he continued to seek restoration of Mughal authority over revenue collection in these subahs. By 1763, tensions escalated when , the -installed Nawab of since 1760, clashed with the over trade privileges and interference in internal affairs, leading to his defeat in battles such as those near and the subsequent restoration of . fled westward to the territory of , Nawab of Awadh, who viewed expansion as a direct threat to his own domain and revenues. In early 1764, and formalized an alliance, inviting Shah Alam II to join for imperial legitimacy, as the emperor's endorsement could rally support and validate their claims against , which lacked formal sanction for its growing territorial and fiscal dominance. Shah Alam II, positioned near Allahabad and eager to reclaim diwani rights in and , accepted, providing nominal command while the allied forces totaled around 40,000 men, primarily drawn from Awadh's and Mir Qasim's reformed infantry. The coalition aimed to expel troops from and restore pre-Plassey administrative structures, with Shah Alam II poised to appoint loyal subahdars. This represented a concerted response to the Company's aggressive expansion, combining prestige, Awadh's military resources, and Bengal's deposed leadership, though internal coordination issues and superior British discipline ultimately undermined their campaign culminating in the .

Battle of Buxar and Its Consequences

The took place on October 22, 1764, near in present-day , , involving approximately 7,000 troops commanded by Major Hector Munro against a combined allied force exceeding 40,000 soldiers from the under , the , and the . The allied army, despite numerical superiority, suffered from poor coordination and leadership disunity, while the British employed disciplined infantry tactics and artillery effectively. The engagement ended in a of the Indian alliance, with casualties numbering around 850 dead, wounded, or missing, and the allies fleeing after sustaining significantly higher losses that compelled their dispersal. This victory solidified military dominance in eastern , as the defeated parties, including Shah Alam II, were unable to regroup effectively against the Company's advancing control. The immediate aftermath saw the reinstatement of as of under oversight and the pursuit of separate peace agreements. On August 12, 1765, Shah Alam II signed the with at Benares, granting the the diwani—the right to collect land revenue—in , , and Orissa, provinces yielding substantial annual income estimated at over 5 million rupees at the time. In exchange, the Company committed to an annual payment of 2.6 million rupees to the , alongside protection, effectively reducing Shah Alam II to a nominal reliant on stipends for sustenance. A concurrent treaty with Shuja-ud-Daula required him to recognize suzerainty, pay an of 5 million rupees, and cede Allahabad and Korah districts to Shah Alam II, providing the emperor a modest territorial foothold under Company guarantee, though real administrative shifted decisively to the . These accords marked the Mughal Empire's forfeiture of fiscal over its richest provinces, accelerating imperial decline by subordinating the emperor's authority to a commercial entity and paving the way for expanded territorial and economic in .

Period Under British Influence in Allahabad

Treaty of Allahabad and Grant of Diwani

Following the Mughal Empire's defeat at the on 22 October 1764, Emperor Shah Alam II, previously allied with the and the against the , shifted his position under the influence of Company forces led by . In August 1765, at Allahabad, Shah Alam II formalized this pivot through the , signed on 16 August 1765, which acknowledged British protection and granted significant concessions. The treaty stipulated that the Company would provide military support to the emperor against internal and external threats, while , compelled to sign a separate but concurrent agreement, recognized British overlordship, paid an indemnity of 5 million rupees, and ceded the districts of Allahabad and Kora to Shah Alam II as a revenue assignment for his maintenance. Central to these arrangements was the grant of diwani on 12 August 1765, by which Shah Alam II issued a firman conferring upon the East India Company the right to collect and administer land revenues—known as diwani—in the provinces of Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa, encompassing an annual revenue yield exceeding 2.6 million rupees. In exchange, the Company committed to remitting an annual tribute of 2.6 million rupees to the emperor, though this figure represented only a fraction of the total collections, allowing the Company to retain substantial profits while maintaining the facade of Mughal sovereignty. This delegation effectively transferred fiscal control to the Company without assuming direct administrative responsibilities, establishing the dual government system where the Nawab of Bengal retained nominal civil authority but the Company held the purse strings. The and diwani grant marked a pivotal erosion of authority, enabling the to amass unprecedented economic power in eastern and laying the groundwork for broader territorial expansion. Shah Alam II, residing in Allahabad under guarantee until 1771, received these territorial assignments—yielding approximately 600,000 rupees annually—as compensation, but his effective autonomy remained curtailed by dependence on Company forces for security. Primary accounts from the period, including Company records, underscore that the emperor's concessions were pragmatic responses to military vulnerability rather than voluntary alliances, with the diwani functioning as a of rights that fueled imperial growth.

Life and Governance from Allahabad

Following the signed on 12 August 1765 within the confines of , Shah Alam II took up residence there, remaining under the protection of the British East India until his departure in 1771. The fort served as the seat of his reduced court, where he maintained imperial ceremonies and protocol amid a contingent of Company troops that ensured his security but also limited his autonomy, rendering him effectively a pensioned sovereign confined to the premises. This arrangement provided relative stability after years of exile and warfare, allowing Shah Alam II to engage in personal scholarly pursuits, including the composition of Persian poetry under the takhallus () Aftab, as recorded in contemporary tazkiras (biographical anthologies of poets). In terms of governance, Shah Alam II's authority during this phase was largely symbolic, with leveraging his imperial legitimacy to administer revenue collection—known as diwani—in , , and , provinces over which he held nominal but no direct control. Firmans (imperial decrees) issued from Allahabad were instrumental in this process, authorizing officials to collect taxes and suppress local resistance, thereby transferring de facto fiscal power to the while preserving the facade of overlordship. Coins continued to be minted in his name across Company-controlled mints, such as those in Calcutta and , reinforcing his titular role without restoring substantive or administrative capacity. Efforts to influence regional allies, such as the , were undermined by his dependence on mediation, as had annexed Allahabad and districts in a parallel treaty, further eroding his territorial base. Shah Alam II's court in Allahabad functioned on an annual stipend of approximately 26 rupees provided by , sufficient for ceremonial upkeep but insufficient to rebuild an independent army or challenge encroachments. Internal court intrigues persisted, yet the emperor's primary focus shifted toward negotiating a return to , culminating in secret overtures to the Marathas by 1770. On 13 April 1771, he departed Allahabad, escorted by a , marking the end of this interlude of guarded quiescence and the resumption of his quest for the imperial capital.

The Bengal Famine of 1769–1770

The Famine of 1769–1770 devastated the provinces of and under administration, claiming an estimated 10 million lives, or roughly one-third of the regional population. Initial crop failures from deficits in 1768–1769 triggered scarcity, but the catastrophe intensified due to Company revenue policies that prioritized extraction over relief. These included a sharp increase in land taxes post-1765, enforced even amid harvest shortfalls, which depleted reserves and forced grain sales to meet demands. Shah Alam II's 1765 grant of diwani (revenue collection rights) in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa to the Company via the Treaty of Allahabad formalized its fiscal dominance, though the emperor resided in Allahabad under British protection and exerted no direct oversight. Company officials, lacking administrative capacity, outsourced tax farming to intermediaries who exacted harsh collections, often seizing foodstuffs and livestock, while exporting rice to profit from global markets despite local shortages. This systemic rapacity, coupled with monopolistic grain hoarding by Company agents anticipating price surges, transformed a manageable drought into mass starvation; by early 1770, urban poor and rural laborers faced tripling mortality rates as bodies accumulated unburied. Relief efforts were minimal and belated, with the Company initially dismissing the crisis as exaggerated while sustaining tax quotas that yielded record revenues in 1769–1770. Population collapse reached 20–30% in affected districts, eroding agricultural output and sparking rural depopulation, with survivors resorting to cannibalism and child abandonment in extreme cases. The famine's legacy included a global financial ripple, as Bengal's disrupted trade strained Company finances and influenced imperial reforms, underscoring the perils of unchecked commercial governance in nominally Mughal territories.

Return to Delhi and Maratha Patronage

Alliance with Mahadji Shinde

![The Royal Chamber in the Public Audience Hall... with Shah Alam II][float-right] Following his prolonged stay under protection in Allahabad after the of 1765, Shah Alam II sought Maratha assistance to return to and reassert nominal imperial authority. In early 1771, negotiations culminated in an agreement between the Maratha Confederacy, led by Mahadji Shinde, and the emperor's representatives, including his son acting as regent on 15 February 1771. Mahadji Shinde's forces advanced on , defeating elements controlling the city and escorting Shah Alam II back in May 1771. By January 1772, the emperor was reinstated on the throne, marking the restoration of a fragile imperial presence under Maratha military occupation. In recognition of Shinde's support, Shah Alam II conferred upon him the title of Naib , or deputy regent of the empire, effectively granting administrative and military oversight while retaining the emperor as a ceremonial figurehead. This arrangement subordinated governance to Maratha influence, with Shinde exercising de facto control over and surrounding territories, including the collection of imperial revenues to fund Maratha operations. The alliance stabilized Shah Alam's position temporarily but highlighted the emperor's dependency on regional powers, as Maratha garrisons permanently occupied key sites in to enforce the partnership and counter threats from , Rohillas, and residual influences.

Attempts to Reform the Mughal Military

Upon returning to in 1771 under Maratha protection, Shah Alam II focused on revitalizing the military, which had deteriorated into ineffective, undisciplined forces amid fiscal shortages and regional autonomy. In 1772, he appointed , a seasoned commander with prior service in and against the Marathas, as mir bakshi and leader of imperial forces. Najaf Khan initiated reforms by purging corrupt elements, enforcing regular salaries to ensure loyalty, and organizing a new blending traditional with enhanced and units influenced by contemporary European tactics for better coordination and firepower. Najaf Khan's restructured army, often termed a "new model" force, demonstrated effectiveness in campaigns to reassert control. By 1773, it expelled Afghans from key territories in , including , securing supply lines to . Further successes included halting Sikh incursions; in 1779, forces under his command inflicted heavy casualties on Sikh raiders near , killing over 5,000 and temporarily stabilizing northern frontiers from the to the . These operations relied on disciplined maneuvers and , marking a brief resurgence in imperial coercive capacity. However, the reforms proved fragile, dependent on Khan's personal authority rather than institutional changes. Chronic treasury deficits limited army size to around 20,000-30,000 troops, insufficient against larger threats like the Marathas or resurgent . Khan's death from natural causes in April 1782 dissolved the reformed structure, as successors lacked his acumen, leading to rapid decay and renewed vulnerabilities for the court.

Internal Rebellions and Regional Threats

Conflicts with Jats and Sikhs

Under , Shah Alam II's effective commander-in-chief from 1772 to 1782, Mughal forces launched campaigns to reassert control over -held territories south of , targeting the rising power of the Bharatpur state under . In 1773, Najaf Khan expelled garrisons from key forts and invaded lands, capturing Bhawani Khera and before advancing further. By late 1774, his forces defeated at , north of , on 30 October, inflicting heavy casualties and seizing strongholds, which continued until 1777 when multiple fortifications were subdued, temporarily curtailing their expansion. Parallel efforts targeted Sikh misls in , where Khan's armies confronted raiding Sikh forces allied at times with Rohillas. He subdued several Sikh principalities through sieges and battles, including a 1779 campaign that killed over 5,000 and repelled invasions toward . However, setbacks occurred, such as the 1781 Battle of Sirhind, where annihilated 10,000 to 15,000 troops and captured artillery. Following Najaf Khan's death in April 1782, a power vacuum enabled Sikh karors under to invade in February 1783, defeating fragmented defenses and occupying the for two months. Shah Alam II, unable to resist effectively, negotiated a treaty permitting the construction of seven Sikh gurudwaras in —marking sites of and Tegh Bahadur's visits—in exchange for Sikh withdrawal, highlighting the emperor's diminished authority.

Rohilla and Afghan Invasions

After the death of Najib-ud-Daula on 30 October 1770, his son sought to preserve dominance over and adjacent areas, but Maratha armies commanded by Mahadji , supporting , seized the capital in early 1771, expelling the garrison and restoring the emperor's foothold. Rohilla power persisted as a challenge via their base in , prompting the in 1774, wherein of , bolstered by detachments, overran the region. The conflict peaked with the rout of Rohilla defenders at Miranpur Katra, where their chief Hafiz Rahmat Khan fell in combat on 23 April 1774, paving the way for Rohilkhand's absorption into Awadh. Surviving elements mounted further resistance against the Mughal-Maratha nexus but suffered a crushing setback from imperial forces in 1777. Concurrently, pressures mounted from the realm, as Shah initiated punitive forays into from 1774 onward, ravaging territories under loose Mughal overlordship and heightening insecurity for II's tenuous dominion despite primary clashes with Sikh militias.

Captivity, Blinding, and the Ghulam Qadir Crisis

Invasion of Delhi by Ghulam Qadir

Ghulam Qadir, a chieftain and son of the late , harbored resentment toward the Mughal court following the defeat and dismemberment of Rohilla territories in the of 1774, which involved , , and Maratha forces. Seeking to exploit the power vacuum in after the death of the capable Mughal commander in 1782, Ghulam Qadir initially positioned himself near the capital in 1787, defeating Maratha agents under Mahadji Sindhia and securing appointment as Mir Bakhshi (paymaster of the forces) and regent by September 5, replacing Sindhia's influence. By July 1788, amid ongoing factional strife and the weakening of Maratha garrisons in due to internal Maratha conflicts, Ghulam Qadir reemerged with an army of approximately 2,000 horsemen, allying with the Turkic adventurer Ismail Beg and leveraging treason from the nazir (steward) Manzur Ali Khan, who opened the city gates. On July 18, 1788, these forces occupied with minimal resistance, as the imperial defenses—comprising scattered troops and depleted Maratha contingents loyal to Sindhia—failed to mount an effective opposition, reflecting the emperor's nominal authority and reliance on unreliable patrons. Ghulam Qadir's troops swiftly advanced to the , compelling Shah Alam II to submit; on July 30, 1788, the emperor was formally deposed in favor of the pliable prince as a puppet ruler, allowing Ghulam Qadir to assume control over the Mughal administration and treasury. This , enabled by the absence of unified imperial forces and the distraction of potential Maratha reinforcements under Sindhia, who was engaged elsewhere, underscored the fragility of Mughal sovereignty amid regional warlordism.

Atrocities, Blinding, and Mughal Humiliation

During Ghulam Qadir's occupation of in July and August 1788, the leader unleashed a campaign of terror against the imperial family and court, driven by personal vendetta and greed for treasure. He seized the with approximately 2,000 troops after corrupt guards opened the gates, immediately plundering the palace treasury and demanding vast sums of gold from Shah Alam II, who was imprisoned alongside his kin. When payments fell short, Ghulam Qadir stripped elderly begums, including Malika-i-Zamani, of their jewels and finery, leaving some exposed to the sun in acts of calculated degradation. Princes were compelled to don female attire and perform dances for the invaders' amusement, while daughters and other royal women faced stripping, , and , with reports indicating that up to 21 princes and princesses were tortured or killed in the ensuing violence. The blinding of Shah Alam II epitomized the savagery, occurring around 30 July 1788 as retribution for the emperor's prior humiliations of Ghulam Qadir's family. Historical accounts, including those by , describe Ghulam Qadir first ordering the emperor's eyes pierced with needles before personally extracting one eyeball with a and directing an subordinate to remove the other, rendering the 70-year-old permanently sightless. Contemporary observers labeled these acts the "unspeakable and indescribable" nadir of degradation, with Ghulam Qadir even ascending the imperial throne and blowing tobacco smoke into the captive emperor's face to mock his authority. These events inflicted profound humiliation on the , symbolizing the erosion of its prestige amid regional power vacuums. The of royal heirs, of sanctity, and violation of imperial women shattered the of Timurid sovereignty, as chronicled in works like William Dalrymple's analysis of the era's . Ghulam Qadir's two-month reign of plunder and brutality, unchecked until Maratha intervention, underscored the fragility of Shah Alam's nominal rule, paving the way for further dependencies on external protectors.

Rescue and Aftermath

Mahadji Scindia, responding to Shah Alam II's pleas for aid amid the Ghulam Qadir crisis, mobilized his Maratha forces from central India toward Delhi in late 1788. As Scindia's army approached, Ghulam Qadir evacuated the Red Fort on October 30, 1788, fleeing northward with his Rohilla and Afghan supporters to evade confrontation. Scindia's troops pursued the retreating forces, engaging them in skirmishes, and ultimately captured Ghulam Qadir near Mathura on December 18, 1788, after cornering him in a village hideout. Ghulam Qadir was then transported in a cage to Scindia's headquarters for interrogation and punishment. Upon Qadir's delivery to , Shah Alam II, despite his blindness and frailty, personally directed his mutilation as retribution for the atrocities inflicted on the imperial family. On March 3, 1789, at under Maratha oversight, executioners severed Qadir's ears, nose, lips, and feet sequentially, with the severed parts reportedly displayed in the to symbolize restoration of dignity. This prolonged torment culminated in his death, an act reflecting the era's norms of among Indian rulers rather than any formalized . Shah Alam II's ceremonial re-coronation occurred on February 7, 1789, signaling the nominal recovery of authority in , though real power now rested firmly with Scindia. The crisis entrenched Maratha dominance over the court, with Scindia assuming regency and extracting revenues from imperial territories to sustain his military presence, thereby reducing Shah Alam II to a reliant on external for survival. This dependency exacerbated the Empire's fragmentation, as regional powers like the Marathas prioritized their strategic interests over imperial revival, foreshadowing further erosions of central authority.

Later Dependencies and Nominal Rule

Shifting Patronage from Marathas to British

Following his reinstatement in in 1771 under the protection of Mahadji Scindia, Shah Alam II remained nominally sovereign while the Marathas exercised control over the Mughal court and northern India, formalized by a treaty granting Scindia authority to station troops and collect revenues. This arrangement persisted after Scindia's rescue of the emperor from Ghulam Qadir's captivity in 1788, with Maratha garrisons occupying and Scindia holding the title of Vakil-ul-Mutlaq, or absolute deputy, effectively managing imperial affairs until Mahadji's death in 1794. Under Daulat Rao Scindia, Maratha influence continued, though internal divisions and external pressures eroded their dominance over the Mughal territories. The shift in patronage accelerated during the Second Anglo-Maratha War (1803–1805), as British East India Company forces under General Gerard Lake advanced northward to challenge Maratha hegemony in Delhi. On 11 September 1803, at the Battle of Patparganj (also known as the Battle of Delhi), British troops defeated a combined Maratha-Mughal army, resulting in approximately 3,000 Maratha casualties compared to 464 British losses, decisively weakening Maratha defenses around the capital. Three days later, on 14 September 1803, British forces entered Delhi unopposed, where the blind and aged Shah Alam II, seated under a tattered canopy, formally accepted British protection, marking the end of Maratha oversight. This transition was cemented by the Treaty of Surji-Anjangaon, signed on 30 December 1803 between Daulat Rao Scindia and the , in which the Marathas ceded , the , and territories east of the River to the . The Company subsequently garrisoned the , installing Shah Alam II as a pensioned under their direct administration, thereby transferring imperial patronage from the Marathas to the and reducing the emperor to a symbolic role without substantive authority. This arrangement persisted until Shah Alam's death in 1806, reflecting the broader consolidation of paramountcy in northern .

Impact of Anglo-Maratha Wars on Mughal Authority

Prior to the Anglo-Maratha Wars, the Marathas, particularly under Mahadaji Scindia, had provided de facto protection to Shah Alam II since restoring him to Delhi in 1771, exercising control over the Mughal court while maintaining the Emperor as a nominal sovereign. This arrangement preserved a semblance of Mughal authority amid regional fragmentation, with Scindia appointed as deputy regent and commander-in-chief. The First Anglo-Maratha War (1775–1782), ending with the Treaty of Salbai, restored the status quo without immediate alteration to Maratha oversight of Delhi but strained Maratha resources and foreshadowed British expansion in northern India. The Second Anglo-Maratha War (1803–1805) decisively shifted this balance. In September 1803, forces led by General Lake defeated Daulat Rao Scindia's army at the , capturing the city and terminating Maratha dominance over the Mughal capital. Shah Alam II, already blinded and aged, transitioned from Maratha patronage to protection, with troops entering on 14 September 1803. The Treaty of Surji-Anjangaon, signed on 30 December 1803, compelled Scindia to cede territories north of the Yamuna River and explicitly placed the Mughal Emperor under safeguard, while the subsequent Treaty of on 27 February 1804 enforced a on Scindia, further entrenching paramountcy. This transfer eroded the last vestiges of Mughal autonomy, rendering Shah Alam II a pensioner of the confined to the , with no effective control beyond ceremonial functions. The wars' outcome facilitated British consolidation in northern , subordinating the Mughal throne to Company authority and symbolizing the empire's reduction to a powerless relic amid European ascendancy.

Death, Succession, and Immediate Legacy

Final Years and Death

In the final years of his reign, Shah Alam II, permanently blinded since the Qadir of , resided in as a nominal sovereign with no real authority, subsisting on from regional powers that had shifted over time. Following the defeat of the Marathas in the Second Anglo-Maratha War, forces under Lord Lake entered on 14 September 1803, placing the emperor under direct protection; he was provided a of 160,000 rupees annually and a resident was appointed to oversee affairs at the . This arrangement formalized the Company's dominance over the Mughal court, reducing Shah Alam to a ceremonial seated beneath a tattered canopy in the audience hall. Shah Alam II died of natural causes on 19 1806, at the age of 78. His remains were interred in , , adjacent to the of the Sufi saint , marking the end of a 47-year tenure characterized by repeated humiliations and the effective dissolution of imperial power.

Succession by Akbar II

Shah Alam II died on 19 November 1806 in Delhi at the age of 78, succumbing to natural causes after a prolonged period of nominal rule under British influence. His death marked the end of a 47-year reign characterized by the Mughal Empire's effective reduction to a ceremonial institution confined to the Red Fort. Akbar Shah II, born Mirza Akbar on 22 April 1760 as the son of Shah Alam II and his consort Qudsia Begum, ascended the Mughal throne immediately upon his father's death. As the eldest surviving son and designated heir-apparent since the execution of his brother Prince Jahandar Shah in 1788, Akbar II's succession faced no significant internal challenges, reflecting the dynasty's diminished capacity for intrigue amid British oversight. The British East India Company, which had established a Resident at the Mughal court following the 1803 capture of Delhi, promptly recognized Akbar II as emperor to maintain the facade of Mughal sovereignty while ensuring administrative control. This recognition perpetuated the pension system initiated under Shah Alam II, providing the imperial household with financial support in exchange for political acquiescence, thereby solidifying the transition without disruption to the status quo of puppet monarchy. Akbar II, already familiar with court protocols from his earlier brief tenure as acting emperor during his father's captivity in 1788–1789, assumed ceremonial duties, though real power resided with the Company authorities.

Personal Character, Vices, and Cultural Role

Poetry, Intellectual Pursuits, and Patronage

Shah Alam II composed poetry in , , and under the () Aftāb, reflecting his personal engagement with literary traditions amid political turmoil. His known works include a dīwān (collection of poems) and Nāderāt šāhī (Royal witticisms), the latter featuring verses noted for their ribald and lyrical qualities. These compositions were guided and compiled by court figures such as Mirza Fakhir Makin, demonstrating structured literary output even as the emperor's authority waned. He received training from poet Abdul Rahman Ehsan Dehlvi, underscoring a deliberate cultivation of poetic skill. During his extended residence in Allahabad from 1765 to 1771, under the protection of the following the , Shah Alam II immersed himself in artistic and literary activities as documented in various tazkiras (biographical compendia of poets). This period of relative isolation from Delhi's throne allowed focus on intellectual endeavors, including writing alongside , maintaining Mughal cultural continuity despite military defeats. His multilingual poetic output bridged Persianate with emerging forms, adapting to the empire's fragmented linguistic landscape. As a patron, Shah Alam II sustained Mughal courtly support for literature and arts, hosting poets and scholars in after his 1771 return and fostering an environment where gained prominence in the . His assemblies attracted literati, continuing imperial traditions of mushairas (poetic symposia) and scholarly discourse, even as fiscal constraints limited grander artistic commissions. Later in his reign, from the onward, he revived for painters and miniaturists in , commissioning works that depicted court life and imperial symbolism amid declining resources. This support, though modest compared to earlier emperors, preserved cultural institutions against regional warlords' encroachments.

Personal Flaws, Addictions, and Moral Criticisms

Shah Alam II was frequently depicted in contemporary accounts as possessing a fundamentally weak character, characterized by , servility, and an inability to assert independent amid intrigues and external threats. European observers noted his tendency to flee repeatedly—such as during the Rohilla incursions in the 1760s and the Maratha sack in 1771—rather than confront adversaries directly, prioritizing personal safety over imperial defense. This pattern of evasion extended to political double-dealing, where he oscillated between alliances with Marathas, , and eventually the British East India Company, often sacrificing long-term interests for short-term patronage. Historical narratives, drawing from eyewitness reports, highlight Shah Alam II's personal addictions, particularly to , which exacerbated his detachment from effective rule and contributed to administrative neglect. His in sexual excesses, described as all-encompassing depravity, further eroded his capacity for , with accounts portraying a rife with unchecked licentiousness under his nominal oversight. Moral criticisms leveled against him emphasized a profound shamelessness, exemplified by his of protection post-1803 despite prior humiliations, including the 1788 blinding by Ghulam Qadir Khan, which some viewed as a betrayal of for mere subsistence. These traits, while enabling survival in a fractured , invited scorn from chroniclers who saw them as symptomatic of , contrasting sharply with the martial vigor of earlier Mughals.

Historical Assessments and Controversies

Role in Mughal Decline: Achievements Versus Failures

Shah Alam II's efforts to arrest the Empire's decline yielded limited achievements, primarily through capable military subordinates, but were undermined by strategic miscalculations and structural frailties that accelerated fragmentation. Ascending nominally after the Third in 1761, where Afghan forces under defeated the Marathas and installed him in , Shah Alam initially leveraged alliances to assert authority. A key achievement occurred under , appointed commander-in-chief in 1772, who reformed the Mughal army and secured victories against forces led by , recapturing and parts of the region by 1773–1774. Khan's campaigns halted Sikh incursions in 1777 and expanded imperial control temporarily, restoring a semblance of centralized power around the capital for nearly a decade. These successes depended heavily on Najaf's personal loyalty and acumen, as the emperor lacked resources for independent action; upon Najaf's death in 1782, territorial gains evaporated within two years due to incompetent successors and renewed invasions. In contrast, profound failures defined Shah Alam's role in the decline, epitomized by the 1764 , where his coalition with of and Shuja-ud-Daula of suffered decisive defeat by British forces. The ensuing on 12 August 1765 compelled Shah Alam to grant the Company diwani rights—the revenue collection authority—over , , and Orissa for an annual payment of 26 rupees, legitimizing British fiscal dominance over these prosperous provinces without immediate territorial conquest. This concession provided the Company with an estimated annual of over 5 million rupees by 1766, funding further expansion and eroding Mughal , as regional nawabs increasingly ignored imperial oversight. Broader institutional decay compounded these setbacks: chronic poverty afflicted the court, with historian noting that by the late , the royal family could scarcely afford basic sustenance, reflecting collapsed tax revenues and assignments. Shah Alam's reliance on transient patrons—shifting from to Marathas, then —failed to forge lasting loyalty, as evidenced by the empire's territorial contraction from nominal control over much of northern in 1765 to fragmented pockets by 1795. While pragmatic alliances preserved his throne amid blindness after 1784 and repeated sackings of , they institutionalized the emperor's puppet status, causal to the Mughal transition from sovereign power to by 1803.

Alliances with Europeans: Pragmatism or Betrayal?

Shah Alam II initially pursued alliances against the British East India Company, joining forces with Nawab Mir Qasim of Bengal and Nawab Shuja-ud-Daula of Awadh to challenge their expanding influence in the lead-up to the Battle of Buxar on 22 October 1764. Following the coalition's defeat, Shah Alam, recognizing his precarious position as a nominal emperor lacking military power, negotiated the Treaty of Allahabad on 12 August 1765 with Robert Clive, granting the Company diwani rights—the authority to collect revenue—in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa in exchange for an annual tribute of 2.6 million rupees and British military protection against regional rivals. This arrangement enabled Shah Alam to secure recognition of his imperial title and partial recovery of influence, as the Company pledged loyalty and provided troops to safeguard his court. The alliance marked a strategic pivot, as Shah Alam's earlier overtures to European powers, including French officers like Jean Law de Lauriston who aided his campaigns to reclaim eastern provinces in the 1760s, yielded limited results amid France's setbacks in the Seven Years' War. By contrast, the British commitment proved more enduring; Company forces under commanders like Mirza Najaf Khan's successors later reinforced defenses, culminating in interventions such as the 1803 defense of against Maratha incursions, which reinstated Shah Alam's authority in the capital after years of exile and internal strife. French ties persisted peripherally through figures like Admiral , who coordinated with —whom Shah Alam titled Shams ul-Mulk in 1780s firmans—and interests against British expansion in the south, reflecting opportunistic balancing rather than exclusive loyalty. Historians interpret these maneuvers as pragmatic adaptations to the Empire's fragmentation, where , bereft of a viable native after the in 1761, leveraged European military prowess to counter threats from , Marathas, and Rohillas, preserving nominal amid fiscal collapse. Critics, however, contend the diwani grant constituted a of imperial revenue streams, empowering the to amass wealth—estimated at over 5 million rupees annually by 1770—and entrench colonial administration, thereby accelerating subordination without reciprocal enforcement of protections, as evidenced by 's blindness in 1788 and dependency on British subsidies thereafter. Empirical records, including firmans and correspondence, underscore the asymmetry: while extracted short-term stability, the alliances eroded central authority, with British non-interference clauses in later treaties like 1795 exposing the limits of his agency. Such dynamics align with causal patterns in 18th-century Indian politics, where weakened sovereigns like Shah Alam employed divide-and-rule tactics with Europeans—mirroring earlier Mughal engagements with Portuguese and Dutch traders—but underestimated the commercial-military fusion enabling British hegemony, rendering the partnerships instrumental for survival yet contributory to irreversible decline.

Interpretations of Weakness and Causal Factors in Empire's Fall

Historians such as Jadunath Sarkar have characterized Shah Alam II's personal conduct as marred by excessive sensuality and poor fiscal management, interpreting these traits as disgracing his leadership and accelerating the empire's collapse through unsustainable familial expenditures amid shrinking revenues. Sarkar further viewed the mounting obligations to an expanding royal household without corresponding income as a vicious cycle that undermined any remnants of imperial authority during his 47-year reign from 1759 to 1806. Such assessments attribute weakness to Shah Alam's inability to curb court extravagance or assert independence, exemplified by his prolonged dependence on transient protectors like Mirza Najaf Khan until 1782, after which factional strife left Delhi vulnerable to the 1788 blinding by Ghulam Qadir. Broader causal factors in the empire's fall under Shah Alam II stemmed from pre-existing structural decay, including the jagirdari crisis where available land grants failed to match the proliferation of nobles and claimants, eroding military loyalty and administrative efficiency inherited from Aurangzeb's era. Muzaffar Alam argues that the failure to balance power among mansabdars, jagirdars, and provincial governors permitted regional fragmentation, transforming provinces like and into semi-autonomous entities by the mid-18th century. External shocks compounded this: Ahmad Shah Durrani's invasions from 1748 to 1761 demolished central finances and prestige, while the on 23 October 1764 decisively shifted eastern revenues to the via the 1765 diwani grant, depriving the emperor of core economic leverage. These elements converged in interpretations emphasizing causal realism over singular blame: Shah Alam II inherited an overextended polity riddled with succession wars and military stagnation, unable to counter the rise of Marathas, , and forces that exploited internal disunity. Rather than reversing decline through reforms, his pragmatic alliances—such as seeking protection post-1803—formalized subordination, rendering the throne a ceremonial shell by his death on 19 November 1806. Contemporary chronicles and observers alike noted the emperor's depleted authority, coining phrases like "the kingdom of is from to " to underscore territorial contraction to mere environs of the capital.

References

  1. [1]
    Shah Alam II | British Museum
    primary name: Shah Alam II. Details: individual; ruler; royal/imperial; Indian; Male. Life dates: 1728-1806. Other dates: 1759-1806 (reign AH 1174-AH 1221).Missing: birth sources<|control11|><|separator|>
  2. [2]
    ʿĀLAM II, SHAH - Encyclopaedia Iranica
    He was heir to a declining empire that was challenged by various ethnic groups in northern India and by the British in the east.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] shah alam ii - the east india company
    In the second chapter I have dis. cussed the significance of the battle of Buxar and of its logical sequel, the Diwani grant of 1765. The events and the circum-.Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  4. [4]
    Shah Alam II (1759-1806) - Modern India History Notes - Prepp
    Shah Alam II, often known as Ali Gohar or Ali Gauhar, was the seventeenth Mughal Emperor and Alamgir II's son, He ruled from 1759 to 1806.
  5. [5]
    Emperor Shah Alam II (r. 1760-1806) on the Peacock Throne
    Emperor Shah Alam II (r. 1760-1806) was born in 1728. His birth name was Ali Gauhar (or Ali Gohar). He was the Crown Prince of his father, Emperor Alamgir II (r ...Missing: background education
  6. [6]
    Shah ʿĀlam II | Reign, India, Mughal Dynasty - Britannica
    Shah ʿĀlam II was the nominal Mughal emperor of India from 1759 to 1806. Son of the emperor ʿĀlamgīr II, he was forced to flee Delhi in 1758 by the minister ...
  7. [7]
    Alamgir II (1754-1759) - Modern India History Notes
    Mulk's The death of Mughal Emperor Alamgir II was widely mourned across the Mughal Empire, particularly among Muslims. After the killing of Alamgir II in 1759 ...
  8. [8]
    Cursed by imperial birth - The Friday Times
    Mar 23, 2018 · Fearing for his life, Ali Gauhar fled Delhi in 1758, a year before his father was murdered and replaced with Shah Jahan III. Ali Gauhar (later ...
  9. [9]
    Alamgir II (1754-59) - Indian History
    Jan 4, 2014 · Alamgir II was trapped to visit a saint by the associates of Imad-ul-Mulk and was stabbed to death by Balabash Khan, one of the Wazir's ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  10. [10]
    The Making of Today: Assassination and Power in late-1700s ...
    Mar 3, 2024 · On November 29 1759 the Mughal emperor Alamgir II, the descendant of the great Babur and Akbar, was assassinated on the orders of his vizier, Imad ul-Mulk.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Fall Of The Mughal Empire Vol.2
    ... murder of another, the twelve years' banishment from capital and power of a third, and the ten months' reign of yet another crowned puppet in. Delhi. Horror.<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Prince Ali Gauhar invasion and zamindars of Bihar
    Sep 15, 2020 · So he proclaimed himself to be the new Mughal Emperor under the title of Shah Alam II and maintained that the year of his reign should be ...
  13. [13]
    THE DECLINE OF THE MUGHAL EMPIRE AND THE RISE OF THE ...
    He was son of Alamgir II and his actual name was Ali Gauhar. • At the time of his father's murder, he was in Bihar, where he proclaimed himself emperor ...
  14. [14]
    Aziz ud din Alamgir II - Mughal Library
    Since then, relations between Alamgir II and Imad-ul-Mulk's regime were so bad that the latter got him assassinated in November 1759. Death The newly appointed ...
  15. [15]
    Shah Alam II - Banglapedia
    Jun 17, 2021 · Shah Alam II (1761-1805) Prince Ali Gauhar, afterwards Emperor Shah Alam II, had been the heir apparent of his father, Emperor Azizuddin Alamgir II.Missing: primary sources
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Benares And The English East India Company(1764-1795)
    ... Mir Qasim sought shelter in the dominion of Shuja-ud- daula. Shah Alam II and Shuja-ud-daula readily agreed to help. Mir Qasim and threw a threatening ...
  17. [17]
    A Time of Trouble (Chapter 1) - Empire of Influence
    The fact that Shuja marched into battle alongside the Mughal emperor Shah Alam II and the deposed Nawab of Bengal Mir Qasim indicates his significance ...
  18. [18]
    Mir Qasim
    ... Historical Account of the Rise and. Progress of the Bengal Native Infantry, Broome's Rise and Progress of the B^gal army. General Letter to the Court, Jan. 3 ...Missing: Daula | Show results with:Daula
  19. [19]
    The Politics of Empire at the Accession of George III: The East India ...
    Mir Qasim, who had been raised to power by the EIC only three years earlier, allied his military forces with those of Shah Alam II and Shuja-ud-daula (the ...
  20. [20]
    Battle of Buxar (1764): Causes, Events & Significance - NEXT IAS
    Nov 16, 2024 · The Battle of Buxar was a significant conflict between the British East India Company and the combined forces of Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II, ...
  21. [21]
    Battle of Buxar 1764 - GeeksforGeeks
    Aug 21, 2025 · The force of Mir Qasim, Shuja-Ud-Daulah, and Shah Alam II amounted to 40,000 troops. · A major cause of the defeat was an absence of coordination ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Battle of Buxar (1764): Background, Events, Causes & More!
    It opened the door for Shah Alam II, the Mughal Emperor, to grant Diwani to the East India Company. After the British won the Buxar Battle, they crowned rulers ...Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  23. [23]
    Battle of Buxar - World History Encyclopedia
    Nov 28, 2022 · The EIC suffered around 850 dead, wounded or missing, an unusually high proportion (although some historians put the figure even higher, around ...
  24. [24]
    Battle of Buxar 1764 – UPSC Mains History - BYJU'S
    Mir Qasim, Shuja-Ud-Daula and Shah Alam-II lost the battle on October 22, 1764. Major Hector Munro won a decisive battle and Robert Clive had a major role in ...
  25. [25]
    [Solved] The treaty of Allahabad took place in - Testbook
    Oct 4, 2024 · The Treaty of Allahabad was signed on August 12, 1765, between Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II and Robert Clive of the British East India Company.
  26. [26]
    Battle of Buxar 1764, Causes, Impact, Consequences, UPSC Notes
    Oct 1, 2025 · Battle of Buxar fought on October 22, 1764, where British East India Company defeated combined forces of Mir Kasim, Nawab of Awadh, Shah Alam II.Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  27. [27]
    The Treaty of Allahabad: A Turning Point in Indian History - JeetMantra
    Aug 12, 2025 · In return for the Diwani rights, the Company agreed to pay an annual tribute of 2.6 million rupees to Shah Alam II. This amount was symbolic and ...
  28. [28]
    When did Shuja-ud-daulah and Shah Alam sign treaties at ... - Prepp
    This treaty was signed with the Nawab of Awadh, Shuja-ud-daulah. Key terms included: Shuja-ud-daulah had to surrender Allahabad and Kara to Emperor Shah Alam II ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    GENESIS OF THE "DIWANI" GRANT OF 1765 - jstor
    The year 1765 marked a turning-point in the history of the Bengal subah and also of India as a whole. In the month of August of this year. Shah Alam .II, the ...
  30. [30]
    https://advocatetanmoy.com/treaty-of-allahabad-between-mughal-emperor-shah-alam-ii-and-lord-clive-of-british-east-india-company-16-08-1765/
  31. [31]
    https://www.peepultree.world/livehistoryindia/story/places/the-british-legacy-in-allahabad
  32. [32]
    East India Company Treaty of Allahabad 1765
    Sep 6, 2025 · The treaty's most significant provision was the grant of Diwani rights, legitimizing what the Islamic Jazia-style taxation had once enforced ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  33. [33]
    Peeping into the Court of Shah Alam II—Part One - Different Truths
    Nov 8, 2024 · But you will be interested in the fact that Shah Alam II's ascension to the throne was not a cakewalk either.” Tapa yawned and his ...Missing: exile | Show results with:exile
  34. [34]
    What is the Treaty of Allahabad? - Quora
    Dec 17, 2017 · The Treaty of Allahabad was signed on 12 August 1765, between the Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II, son of the late Emperor Alamgir II, and Robert, ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Genocide or Disaster - UAB Digital Commons
    The Great Bengal Famine of 1770, killing over ten million, may have been caused by British imperialism, with the East India Company's taxes becoming profit, ...
  36. [36]
    The Total History of the Bengal Famine of 1769-70 | UCHRI
    The Bengal famine of 1769-70 was the deadliest in Indian history, killing about ten million. It led to a global financial crisis and influenced the North ...Missing: 1769-1770 causes toll scholarly sources
  37. [37]
    The British East India Company and the Great Bengal Famine of 1770
    Mar 14, 2024 · The British East India Company's (EIC) extraction of resources and imposition of brutal tax policies in Bengal exacerbated the disaster. By ...
  38. [38]
    The Great Bengal Famine of 1770: When Taxes Created a Genocide
    Mar 2, 2023 · The sudden rise of land revenue taxes, together with drought, caused what some now call a genocide, which killed from one to ten million Bengalis and Biharis.
  39. [39]
    Bengal 1770: Famine, Corruption, and the Climate of Legal Despotism
    Boatmen and rural artisans accounted for the highest concentration of deaths among the urban poor. By March 1770, the body count had tripled.14 ...Missing: toll | Show results with:toll
  40. [40]
    The British East India Company and the Great Bengal Famine of 1770
    The paper exposes how the Company ruthlessly imposed taxes even during the famine, exacerbating its impacts, and uncovers the Company's sys- tematic destruction ...
  41. [41]
    THE MARATHA CENTURY - eSamskriti
    Apr 8, 2021 · By January 1772, Shah Alam II, the Mughal king who was in exile at Prayag, had been brought back and placed on the throne. The same year, the ...
  42. [42]
    Shah Alam 2nd - Easy Mind Maps
    Apr 20, 2025 · Full Name: Abu'l-Fath Jalal-ud-din Muhammad Shah Alam II ; Birth Name: Ali Gauhar ; Born: 25 June 1728, Delhi ; Father: Alamgir II (Mughal emperor ...Missing: prince | Show results with:prince
  43. [43]
    Mahadji Shinde - the Maratha general who led Hindu revival after ...
    Aug 9, 2022 · With the Maratha ressurection, in May 1771, Mahadji' sarmy escorted Shah Alam back to Delhi.
  44. [44]
    Remembering the legacy of Mahadaji Scindia: Conquering Delhi ...
    Feb 11, 2023 · Scindia exercised imperial power; he was, after all, the custodian of the Mughal emperor of Delhi, who Scindia, in miserable poverty, kept.
  45. [45]
    MAHADJI SCINDIA - His Life and his Death - eSamskriti
    Feb 25, 2020 · After over a decade and a half spent in establishing Maratha influence in the north, Mahadji Scindia arrived in Pune in June 1792 and camped at ...
  46. [46]
    Mirza Najaf Khan | Military Wiki - Fandom
    Mirza Najaf Khan was one of the greatest reformers of the Mughal Army. The Mughal Army he created was on the European model backed by traditional Mughal ...
  47. [47]
    Najaf Khan and his tomb, Delhi - Pixelated Memories
    The first task that the valiant Mirza undertook on becoming the Commander-in-Chief was to expel the Rohilla Afghans of western Uttar Pradesh, ...
  48. [48]
    Full text of "Fall Of The Mughal Empire - Volume IV" - Internet Archive
    Of the four lieutenants of Mirza Najaf Khan, only two were now alive his ... New Model army. Holkar had done nothing to put down Ghulam Qadir or Ismail ...
  49. [49]
    Full text of "Shah Alam Ii And His Court" - Internet Archive
    ... history of north India during Shah Alam II's reign, is published. In ... Shah Alam left Allahabad on 13 April, 1771 and was accompanied by Sir Robert ...
  50. [50]
    In 1773, Mirza Najaf Khan merely started reconquest of Mughal land ...
    Nov 28, 2022 · But Mirza Najaf expelled the garrison and took war into Bharatpur territory. ... So great was the terror of Najaf Khan on jats that on mid day of ...Missing: suppression | Show results with:suppression
  51. [51]
    The tragic life of Emperor Shah Alam II : r/unitedstatesofindia - Reddit
    Feb 4, 2022 · Due to the terms of the treaty he had signed with the British, he lived away from Delhi. Shah Alam II resided in the fort of Allahabad for six ...On this date-The Treaty of Allahabad is signed in 1765 between ...Iconic painting capturing perhaps the most pivotal event in India ...More results from www.reddit.com
  52. [52]
    Rao Tofa Singh Of Sonkh - Jat Chiefs
    Apr 4, 2022 · Mirza Najaf Khan first expedition which ended in 1774 reduced the Sinsinwar king to present Bharatpur District, the Tewatia king controlled ...
  53. [53]
    Battle of Sirhind (1781) | Military Wiki - Fandom
    He went to Sirhind district and confronted the Sikhs.; The Sikhs defeated the imperial army, slew ten to fifteen thousand soldiers and seized all their guns.
  54. [54]
    Delhi Fateh Diwas: When Mughals fell and the holy symbol of ...
    Mar 21, 2018 · The second invasion was on July 17, 1775, when the Sikhs captured ... Emperor Shah Alam II reconciled with the Sikhs and offered treaty ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  55. [55]
    The Forgotten Conquest - Boloji
    Oct 28, 2023 · The tale of Baba Baghel Singh and the Sikh conquest of Delhi is not just a historical anecdote; it's a symbol of resistance, faith, and the ...
  56. [56]
    Delhi's Scindia age: 1771-1803 - Times of India
    Jan 1, 2023 · Shah Alam II the Mughal Badshah readily asked for British support on August 29, 1803 to free him from Scindia, he welcomed Lord Lake five ...
  57. [57]
    Full text of "Hastings and the Rohilla War" - Internet Archive
    ... defeat of the Rohilla forces, immediately despatched a mes- senger to Shuja-ud-daula, " requesting to know his pleasure with re- spect to her, whether he ...
  58. [58]
    The dancing girl: a novel by Hasan Shah and Qurratulain Hyder (tr)
    Jan 27, 2014 · In April 1774, the combined forces of Awadh and the Company routed the Rohilla forces at Meeranpur, and their leader was killed. Rohilkhand ...
  59. [59]
    Shah Alam II, Early Life, Father, Battle of Buxar, Key Details
    Aug 8, 2025 · Shah Alam II, also known as Ali Gohar, was the seventeenth Mughal Emperor and the son of Alamgir II. He ruled from 1759 to 1806, ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Fall Of The Mughal Empire Vol- Iii
    Apr 6, 2025 · Fall of the Mughal Empire, 2nd ed. Demy Octavo. Vol. I (1739—1754) ... Shah Alam II into his capital in I772i throu|h seventeen years of ...Missing: reorganization | Show results with:reorganization
  61. [61]
    The Blinding of a Mughal emperor - Mint
    Aug 30, 2019 · The reign of Shah Alam, one the last Mughal emperors, was upturned by the Rohilla chief Ghulam Qadir. The vengeful treatment of the emperor caused such outrage.
  62. [62]
    Warrior Ascetics and Indian Empires
    Ghulam Qadir was unpredictable: his hatred for the emperor, fueled by the humiliation his family had suffered years earlier, was matched only by his thirst ...
  63. [63]
    How did Rohilla Chief Ghulam Qadir disrespect the Mughal Emperor ...
    Aug 28, 2022 · This incident of Ghulam Quadir blinding Shah Alam took place in 1787-1788, when Delhi was under the control of Marathas and Maratha appointed puppet Mughal ...
  64. [64]
    9 - August - 1788 Gulam Kadir removed the eyes of Shah Alam 2nd ...
    Aug 8, 2021 · 9 - August - 1788 Gulam Kadir removed the eyes of Shah Alam 2nd, King of Delhi with a knife. #historyplus (A sketch showing Robert Clive ...
  65. [65]
    The blinding of a Mughal emperor (31 August 2019) - Manu S Pillai
    Sep 2, 2019 · In August 1788, the Red Fort in Delhi witnessed what one observer would recall as the most “unspeakable and indescribable” crimes.
  66. [66]
    persian documents pertaining to the tragic end of ghul 'm qadir ... - jstor
    Mahadaji Sindhia would have pardoned the crimes of Ghulam Qadir and allowed him to escape unscatch d and retain his ancestrel estate of. Ghausgarh in return ...
  67. [67]
    India's Real Life Game of Thrones the End of Mughal Independence
    Mar 20, 2022 · The barbaric behavior of the Mughals and Rohillas enabled the East India Company's conquest. One reason for the conquest was that many Indians ...
  68. [68]
    Cowardice, Servility, Sleaze and Shamelessness: A Brief Profile of ...
    Oct 9, 2025 · Born twenty-one years after Aurangzeb died, Shah Alam II, in 1760, became the eleventh and the thirteenth Mughal “emperor” after Aurangzeb. He ...
  69. [69]
    Fall Of The Mughal Empire Vol-iv
    measures from January 1789 to January 1792. When Ghulam Qadir was captured at the end of 1788, people naturally thought that Mahadji Sindhia would once again ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] THE RISE AND FALL OF MARATHA HEGEMONY IN DELHI, 1757 ...
    By late 1803, the East India Company garrisoned the Red Fort and installed Shah Alam II under British protection. • Maratha residual influence evaporated, ...
  71. [71]
    How the Battle of Patparganj shaped capital's history - The Asian Age
    Jul 16, 2017 · Around 3,000 Marathas were killed while the British company lost 464 men in the battlefield. After the battle, the Mughal emperor Shah Alam II ...
  72. [72]
    First, Second & Third Anglo Maratha War - LotusArise
    Nov 29, 2024 · Mughal emperor Shah Alam II came under British protection. The Treaty of Burhanpur was signed on 27 February 1804, in which Scindia agreed to ...
  73. [73]
    Anglo-Maratha Wars in India (1775-1819) - NEXT IAS
    Nov 13, 2024 · Second Anglo-Maratha War (1803-06) ... As a result of this war, the titular Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II was brought under English protection.
  74. [74]
    Ali Gauhar Shah Alam II (1728-1806) - Find a Grave Memorial
    Ali Gauhar Shah Alam II ; Birth: 25 Jun 1728. Old Delhi, Central Delhi District, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India ; Death: 19 Nov 1806 (aged 78). Old ...Missing: prince | Show results with:prince
  75. [75]
    Akbar II (1806-1837) - Modern Indian History Notes - Prepp
    When Shah Jahan IV fled, Mirza Akbar assumed the title of Akbar Shah II and remained acting emperor until January 1789, even after the restoration of his father ...
  76. [76]
    Akbar II as Pretender: A Study in Anarchy - jstor
    dir Khan in a.D. 1785. Akrar Sh?h.?Akbar Shah, the eldest surviving son of. Shah 'Alam, became heir-apparent after the death in June,. 1788, of Prince Jah?nd ...
  77. [77]
    The Mughals: Post-Aurangzeb - The History Files
    Jun 1, 2009 · Muazzam Bahadur Shah (b.1643-d.1712) was also known as Shah Alam I. He became emperor in 1707 after a brief struggle against his brothers, ...
  78. [78]
    Shah Alam II - Wikipedia
    1 Early life. 1.1 Escape from Delhi; 1.2 Bengal War · 2 Emperor from Allahabad. 2.1 Battle of Buxar; 2.2 Treaty of Allahabad · 3 Return to Delhi. 3.1 Reformation ...
  79. [79]
    Profile of Shah Aalam Sani | Sufinama
    The nickname was Aftab. Apart from poetry, he also wrote prose. He was trained in poetry by Abdul Rahman Ehsan Dehlvi. Shah Alam II had lost his sight at ...Missing: intellectual pursuits patronage
  80. [80]
    All writings of Aftab Shah Alam Sani - Rekhta
    Aftab Shah Alam Sani collection of poetry, ghazal, Nazm in Urdu, Hindi & English ... Mughal emperor, who introduced Urdu poetry in the Red Fort and his court.Missing: intellectual pursuits patronage
  81. [81]
    Shah Alam II Rise and Struggles Unveiled - Bangla Newspaper
    Dec 25, 2024 · Despite his political struggles, Shah Alam II was a patron of the arts and culture. His court became a hub for poets, musicians, and scholars, ...
  82. [82]
    Princes and Painters in Mughal Delhi, 1707–1857 - CAA Reviews
    Jul 18, 2013 · From the latter part of the reign of Shah 'Alam II (r. 1759–1806), Mughal patronage of painters in Delhi was once again revived; though, as ...
  83. [83]
    How the Boiling Loins of Shah Alam II Extinguished the Mughal ...
    Oct 13, 2025 · On September 14, 1803, the victorious English army officially ended this empire of alien Muslim invaders. Shah Alam II became a puppet, once ...
  84. [84]
    Third Battle of Panipat 1761, Background, Causes, Results
    Oct 1, 2025 · As a measure against the Afghan threat, Peshwa Balaji Bajirao sent Raghunathrao. He successfully removed Timur Shah in 1758 and his court ...
  85. [85]
    https://kevinstandagephotography.wordpress.com/2024/04/14/najaf-khans-tomb-delhi/
  86. [86]
    Najaf Khan's Tomb – Delhi - Kevin Standage
    Apr 14, 2024 · Their aim was to reinstall Shah Alam II as a nominal figurehead on the Delhi throne while they effectively governed Northern India. To ...
  87. [87]
    How did the Assumption of Diwani Benefit the East India Company?
    Feb 21, 2023 · In 1765, the British East India Company acquired the Diwani rights from the Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II. The Diwani rights were basically ...
  88. [88]
    Decline of the Mughal Empire - UPSC Notes - LotusArise
    Aug 31, 2023 · Describing the economic hardships of the royal family during the reign of Shah Alam II (1759-1806 CE) Sir Jadunath Sarkar writes, “No fire ...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] A HISTORY OF MODERN INDIA - Assets - Cambridge University Press
    Mughal emperor, Shah Alam II, to fight the East India Company in the Battle of Buxar in 1764, and had zealously guarded Awadh's autonomy till his death ...
  90. [90]
    Lost in a Global Narrative? - the Grant of the Diwani - jstor
    when Lord Lake released him and brought him under British protection. Shah ... on the khil'at sent by Shah Alam II in the presence of various dignitaries.
  91. [91]
    Shah Alam II and the Mughal Collapse - DharmaRenaissance Blog
    Oct 17, 2025 · Opium use, already entwined with ... For readers today, the history of Shah Alam II offers more than a chronicle of imperial decline.
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Fall of the Mughal Empire - BJP e-Library
    Peshwa's responsibility for defeat at Panipat,. 361-Holkar's conduct in battle examined, 365- historical sources on Panipat, 367-military notes,. 371. I'lans ...
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Decline of the Mughal Empire
    Muzaffar Alam concludes that the decline of the Mughal Empire was manifested both in Awadh and the Punjab in a kind of political transformation and in the ...<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    Factors leading to decline of Mughals - Vajiram & Ravi
    Oct 14, 2025 · Ineffectiveness in military matters: Emperor Alamgir II (1754-1759 AD) faced numerous military challenges during his brief reign but proved ...
  95. [95]
    Factors for the decline of the Mughal Empire - self study history
    Aug 22, 2016 · Irfan Habib suggests the agrarian contexts in which the Maratha movement had started which become great force and could singularly cause decline ...<|separator|>
  96. [96]
    DECLINE AND DISINTEGRATION OF THE MUGHAL EMPIRE
    In 1739 Nadir Shah invaded India and left the Mughal empire ‗prostrate and bleeding ‗. The next Mughal emperors Ahmad Shah (1748-54) and Alamgir II (1754- 59) ...