Share repurchase - Grokipedia

Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

A share repurchase, also known as a stock buyback, is a corporate financial strategy in which a publicly traded company purchases its own outstanding shares from shareholders or the open market, thereby reducing the total number of shares in circulation.^[1] This action redistributes capital back to investors, often more tax-efficiently than dividends since shareholders incur capital gains taxes only upon selling repurchased shares, and it can signal management's belief that the stock is undervalued relative to intrinsic value.^[2]^[3] By shrinking the equity base, repurchases mechanically increase earnings per share and return on equity, concentrating ownership among remaining shareholders and potentially elevating stock prices through supply reduction.^[4] Repurchases are commonly executed via open-market transactions, which became prevalent after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission adopted Rule 10b-18 in 1982, establishing a safe harbor from manipulation charges if purchases adhere to specified volume, price, and timing limits.^[5] Alternative methods include Dutch auction tender offers, where companies invite bids within a price range, or targeted private purchases, though these are less frequent due to regulatory scrutiny and higher costs.^[6] U.S. regulations mandate quarterly disclosures of repurchase activity under Item 703 of Regulation S-K, with recent amendments—partially vacated by courts—aiming for more granular daily data to enhance transparency, though core safe-harbor protections persist.^[7]^[8] Proponents highlight repurchases as a flexible tool for optimal capital allocation, with empirical studies documenting positive announcement returns averaging 2-3% and superior risk-adjusted performance for undervaluation-motivated buybacks compared to alternatives like acquisitions.^[9]^[10] Critics, however, argue that heavy reliance on buybacks—often funded by debt—fosters short-termism, diverts funds from R&D or wages, and inflates executive pay tied to EPS metrics, with some analyses linking high buyback activity to subdued innovation outputs and long-term growth.^[11]^[12] The literature reveals mixed causal impacts, as firms announcing repurchases tend to outperform benchmarks initially but face scrutiny over whether observed effects stem from selection bias—stronger firms opting for buybacks—or genuine value creation, underscoring ongoing debates in corporate finance.^[13]^[9]

Historical Development

Origins and Early Practices

Corporate share repurchases first appeared as infrequent practices in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, primarily through tender offers or private negotiations rather than open-market transactions, and were often met with suspicion under prevailing fiduciary standards that prioritized preservation of corporate assets for all shareholders and prohibited actions resembling self-dealing or manipulation.^[14] These early instances, such as occasional reacquisitions to retire treasury stock or consolidate ownership, risked allegations of breaching directors' duties by depleting funds needed for operations or equal shareholder treatment, limiting their prevalence amid a corporate focus on capital expansion.^[14] After World War II, share repurchases became even rarer, constrained by intensified regulatory oversight from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which interpreted open-market buybacks as potential violations of antifraud rules like Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, deeming them manipulative efforts to prop up stock prices.^[15] Despite a tax regime where long-term capital gains faced maximum rates of 25%—far below ordinary income tax peaks exceeding 90% on dividends—companies adhered to traditional dividend payouts for their predictability and signaling value, avoiding the legal perils associated with repurchases that could invite SEC enforcement or shareholder suits.^[14]^[15] The 1960s and 1970s saw nascent academic groundwork challenging these constraints, with Franco Modigliani and Merton Miller's 1958 irrelevance theorem—positing equivalence between dividends and repurchases in frictionless markets—evolving through subsequent analyses incorporating taxes, where buybacks offered deferred and lower-taxed gains, and asymmetric information, enabling signaling of undervaluation.^[16]^[17] Empirical studies from the era, such as those documenting tender offer premiums, hinted at value creation potential, yet repurchases accounted for only about 3-4% of earnings distributions, overshadowed by legal ambiguities and entrenched dividend norms until regulatory safe harbors emerged.^[18]^[14]

Key Regulatory Milestones

In the mid-20th century, particularly during the 1960s and 1970s, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarded corporate share repurchases with suspicion due to fears of market manipulation and support of stock prices, viewing them as potentially violating antifraud provisions under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5.^[19] Companies seeking to repurchase shares often required case-by-case approvals, no-action letters, or faced enforcement risks, which deterred widespread adoption despite legal permissibility under state corporate laws.^[20] This regulatory caution stemmed from historical precedents like the 1930s concerns over issuer purchases inflating prices, limiting repurchases to tender offers or structured transactions to mitigate litigation exposure.^[21] A pivotal shift occurred on November 18, 1982, when the SEC adopted Rule 10b-18, establishing a voluntary safe harbor that shields issuers from manipulation liability under Sections 9(a)(2) and 10(b) if repurchases adhere to specified conditions on price, volume, timing, and manner of open-market purchases.^[22] This rule standardized practices by capping daily volume at 25% of average trading volume, prohibiting purchases during the last 10 minutes of trading (or 30 minutes for smaller stocks), and requiring purchases at or below the highest independent bid or market price.^[23] By providing clear guidelines, Rule 10b-18 reduced legal uncertainties and facilitated a surge in repurchase activity, with U.S. firms repurchasing shares valued at over $100 billion annually by the late 1980s, compared to negligible levels pre-adoption.^[24] Further refinement came with the SEC's adoption of Rule 10b5-1 on December 15, 2000, which offers an affirmative defense against insider trading claims under Rule 10b-5 for trades executed pursuant to a pre-established written plan adopted during a period absent material nonpublic information.^[25] Although primarily designed for individual insiders, issuers increasingly utilized Rule 10b5-1 plans for programmed share repurchases, enabling automated buying schedules that minimize perceptions of trading on inside knowledge and enhance compliance with Rule 10b-18's timing restrictions.^[26] This mechanism addressed ongoing concerns about selective timing in repurchases, promoting more predictable and defensible corporate capital return strategies without altering the core safe harbor framework.^[27]

Modern Trends and Surges

Share repurchases experienced a significant surge following the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's adoption of Rule 10b-18 in 1982, which established a safe harbor from manipulation liability for open-market purchases meeting specified conditions on timing, price, and volume.^[19]^[28] This regulatory clarity facilitated a rapid increase in activity, with repurchases growing to surpass annual dividend payouts by the late 1980s and continuing to expand through subsequent decades.^[28] The trend accelerated after the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which reduced the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and imposed a one-time tax on repatriated foreign earnings, unlocking substantial overseas cash reserves for domestic use.^[29]^[30] Repatriated funds, estimated in the trillions, disproportionately flowed into buybacks rather than new investments, with S&P 500 firms announcing over $1 trillion in repurchases in 2018 alone.^[29] U.S. buyback volumes reached new heights in the 2020s, exceeding $1 trillion annually for the broader market by 2022 and maintaining elevated levels amid volatile market conditions.^[31] S&P 500 companies repurchased $795.2 billion in shares in 2023 and a record $942.5 billion in 2024, with year-to-date totals through mid-2025 surpassing $926 billion and projections indicating over $1 trillion for the full year.^[32] Tech sector leaders, including Apple, drove much of the 2025 peak through large-scale programs, such as Apple's May 2025 authorization of an additional $100 billion repurchase amid elevated stock valuations.^[33]^[31] Globally, buybacks totaled $1.31 trillion in 2022 before dipping to $1.11 trillion in 2023, reflecting resilience outside the U.S. where non-U.S. activity increased amid regional regulatory easing and cash accumulation, even as U.S. volumes moderated temporarily.^[34]^[35] The U.S. retained dominance, accounting for over 70% of global volume, but international growth in Europe and Asia underscored broadening adoption.^[34]

Purposes and Motivations

Signaling Undervaluation and Efficient Capital Return

Share repurchases serve as a signal from management to investors that the firm's shares are undervalued relative to their intrinsic worth, rooted in asymmetric information where insiders possess superior knowledge about the company's prospects.^[36] Under this framework, repurchasing shares at market prices commits managerial resources only when the stock trades below true value, as overvaluation would impose unnecessary costs on the firm; this credible action conveys confidence in future performance, distinguishing high-quality firms from lower-quality ones that refrain to avoid diluting value.^[37] Empirical studies consistently document positive abnormal stock returns following repurchase announcements, with short-window cumulative averages ranging from 1.4% to 3.0% depending on market and sample, reflecting market interpretation of the signal as validation of undervaluation.^[38]^[39] Compared to dividends, repurchases offer greater flexibility in capital distribution, enabling firms to adjust payout volumes and timing without establishing a persistent expectation of future distributions that could constrain operations during downturns.^[40] Dividends, often viewed as sticky commitments to maintain or increase payouts, bind firms to ongoing cash outflows even amid fluctuating cash flows, whereas repurchases align distributions more closely with transient excess capital, preserving liquidity for opportunistic investments.^[41] This discretion enhances efficiency by avoiding overcommitment, particularly for cyclical or growth-variable firms where steady dividends might force suboptimal retention or cuts signaling distress.^[42] By prioritizing repurchases over alternatives like cash hoarding or low-return internal projects, firms efficiently return surplus capital to shareholders, who can redeploy it to higher-value opportunities elsewhere in the economy. When internal investment opportunities yield returns below the cost of capital, repurchases prevent value destruction from inefficient retention, enforcing market discipline that rewards management for recognizing and acting on limited reinvestment prospects. This approach aligns shareholder interests with disciplined capital allocation, as evidenced by heightened repurchase activity during periods of perceived undervaluation absent compelling growth avenues.^[43]

Optimizing Capital Structure and Tax Efficiency

Share repurchases allow firms to adjust their capital structure by reducing outstanding equity, which can increase the debt-to-equity ratio when financed through retained earnings or new debt issuance, thereby enhancing leverage.^[44] In environments with corporate taxes, this shift leverages the interest tax deductibility of debt, as outlined in the Modigliani-Miller theorem's correction for taxes, where the value of a levered firm exceeds that of an unlevered one by the present value of the tax shield on debt.^[45] Consequently, repurchases can lower the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) by tilting the structure toward cheaper, tax-advantaged debt, assuming no offsetting bankruptcy costs dominate.^[46] Firms with substantial cash reserves but suboptimal low leverage often employ debt-financed buybacks to approach the debt ratio that minimizes WACC, as higher leverage reduces the overall cost of financing through the tax shield's effect on after-tax debt costs.^[47] This mechanism counters earlier regulatory biases favoring dividends, such as pre-1982 U.S. restrictions on repurchases that treated them as manipulative, despite dividends' less favorable impact on leverage optimization.^[48] From a shareholder tax perspective, repurchases provide efficiency over dividends by generating returns primarily through capital appreciation, subjecting gains to deferred taxation upon sale rather than immediate income taxation on distribution.^[49] In the United States, non-selling shareholders face no current tax on buybacks, preserving after-tax returns, whereas dividends are taxed at receipt, historically at higher ordinary income rates before reforms.^[50] The 2003 Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act equalized top rates for qualified dividends and long-term capital gains at 15 percent, diminishing but not eliminating buybacks' edge, as deferral still avoids immediate liability and allows basis step-up for heirs in some cases.^[51] ^[52] This deferral proves particularly advantageous for taxable domestic investors, who comprise a significant portion of equity holders, rendering repurchases a more efficient vehicle for capital return in tax-sensitive scenarios.^[53]

Addressing Agency Problems and Employee Incentives

Share repurchases serve as a mechanism to address agency problems arising from conflicts between managers and shareholders, particularly by reducing the availability of free cash flow that managers might otherwise deploy in value-destroying activities such as unprofitable acquisitions or overinvestment in pet projects. Michael Jensen's 1986 free cash flow hypothesis posits that managers of cash-rich firms with limited profitable investment opportunities face incentives to retain and misuse excess cash, leading to agency costs; repurchases, akin to dividends, force the payout of such cash to shareholders, thereby disciplining managerial behavior and mitigating entrenchment.^[54] Empirical analyses support this, showing that repurchases effectively return surplus cash, reducing the pool available for inefficient capital expenditures in firms prone to agency conflicts.^[55] In low-growth, cash-abundant firms—where internal investment opportunities are scarce—repurchase activity is empirically higher, as these entities prioritize distributing excess funds to prevent managerial empire-building or diversification into suboptimal ventures. Studies indicate that such firms, characterized by high free cash flow relative to growth prospects, use buybacks to signal restraint from value-destroying investments, aligning with Jensen's framework by substituting for dividends in mature corporate structures.^[56] This pattern is evident in sectors like mature industrials and utilities, where buybacks correlate with elevated cash holdings and subdued capital spending needs, thereby curbing potential agency-driven overexpansion.^[57] Repurchases also align employee and executive incentives by counteracting share dilution from stock-based compensation, a practice that proliferated in the 1990s amid the rise of option grants in technology and growth firms. Firms frequently repurchase shares to offset the dilutive impact of exercised stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs) on earnings per share (EPS), preserving the value of equity-linked pay for remaining shareholders and incentivizing performance without eroding ownership stakes.^[58] Panel data from large U.S. firms reveal a systematic pattern where repurchases gradually neutralize much of the EPS dilution over the option lifecycle, enhancing the efficacy of incentive compensation in tying managerial and employee rewards to firm value creation.^[59] This approach has become integral to compensation structures, particularly in executive pay packages emphasizing long-term equity holdings.^[60]

Execution Methods

Open-Market Purchases

Open-market purchases represent the predominant method for executing share repurchases, wherein a company acquires its own shares gradually through public stock exchanges at prevailing market prices.^[61] This approach allows issuers to repurchase shares on a discretionary basis over extended periods, often without a fixed commitment to the total volume or timeline, providing operational flexibility compared to more structured alternatives.^[62] Brokers or dealers typically handle the transactions on behalf of the issuer, enabling repurchases during normal trading hours while adhering to exchange rules.^[63] To mitigate perceptions of market manipulation and qualify for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) Rule 10b-18 safe harbor, open-market purchases must comply with strict conditions on volume, price, and timing.^[64] Volume limitations cap single-day purchases at the greater of 25% of the security's average daily trading volume (ADTV)—calculated over the four full calendar weeks prior to the week of the purchase—or 25,000 shares, preventing any single day's activity from dominating trading flow.^[65] Timing restrictions prohibit purchases during the opening period (generally the first 30 minutes or until 10% of ADTV is traded) and the final 10 minutes of regular trading hours (or 30 minutes for lower-volume securities), while also barring purchases on non-regular trading days except under limited block trade exceptions.^[65] Price guidelines ensure purchases do not exceed the highest independent bid, the last independent transaction price, or a specified percentage above the closing price on the prior trading day, aligning repurchases with natural market dynamics.^[64]^[65] This method constitutes the vast majority of U.S. share repurchases, enabling companies to respond opportunistically to market conditions, such as executing buys when share prices dip relative to perceived intrinsic value, thereby potentially enhancing per-share metrics without immediate large-scale capital outlays.^[61]^[62] Compliance with Rule 10b-18 does not mandate disclosure of daily purchases but requires quarterly reporting of aggregate activity under SEC Form 10-Q and 10-K, fostering transparency while preserving tactical discretion.^[64] Overall, open-market purchases balance regulatory safeguards with the flexibility needed for ongoing capital management strategies.^[66]

Tender Offers and Auctions

Tender offers in share repurchases involve a company publicly announcing its intent to purchase a specific number of its own shares from shareholders within a defined period, typically at a price above the prevailing market value to encourage participation.^[67] This method provides a structured mechanism for repurchasing shares, contrasting with opportunistic open-market buys by committing to a targeted volume and timeline.^[68] In fixed-price tender offers, the firm sets a predetermined purchase price, often at a premium of 10-20% over the recent market price, and invites shareholders to tender shares during the offer window, which usually lasts 20 business days.^[67] Execution is rapid once the offer closes, allowing the company to retire shares promptly, but oversubscription poses a risk: if tenders exceed the authorized amount, shares are accepted on a pro-rata basis among participants, potentially leaving some shareholders with partial fulfillment and the firm acquiring its full target despite the fixed premium.^[69] Fixed-price offers tend to result in higher premiums paid compared to other methods, reflecting the firm's commitment to a specific price to ensure participation.^[67] Dutch auction tender offers differ by allowing shareholders to specify both the quantity of shares they wish to tender and a minimum acceptable price within a range set by the firm, after which bids are ranked from highest to lowest price until the repurchase amount is met, with all accepted tenders receiving the clearing price—the lowest bid necessary to fulfill the offer.^[68] This mechanism enables the company to determine a market-driven price, reducing the likelihood of overpayment while still achieving the desired volume, as evidenced by its adoption for efficiency in repurchases.^[70] IBM employed Dutch auctions extensively in the 1990s as part of its large-scale buyback programs, repurchasing tens of millions of shares to optimize capital allocation without fixing an arbitrary premium.^[71] Empirical studies indicate that announcements of tender offers, whether fixed-price or Dutch auction, generate average abnormal stock returns of approximately 7-14% over short windows like [-1, +1] days, higher than the 2-4% typical for open-market repurchase announcements, attributable to the credible commitment signaled by the structured bid and specified volume.^[72] ^[73] Despite these positive market reactions, tender offers represent a minority of repurchase activity, comprising less than 10% of programs since the 1980s, as firms favor the flexibility of open-market methods for ongoing executions.^[68]

Structured and Accelerated Repurchases

Structured and accelerated repurchases involve derivative-based agreements with investment banks or third-party intermediaries, enabling companies to execute large-scale share buybacks rapidly through upfront cash payments and immediate partial share delivery. In an accelerated share repurchase (ASR), the company pays a fixed amount upfront to the dealer, who borrows and delivers an initial portion of shares—typically around 80% of the targeted total—while sourcing the remainder via open-market purchases over a specified period, with final settlement based on the volume-weighted average price (VWAP) minus a negotiated discount.^[74] This structure allows for swift reduction in outstanding shares, often within days, contrasting with gradual open-market methods.^[75] ASRs gained traction as a tool for efficient capital deployment in large programs, particularly where speed is prioritized to signal confidence or optimize earnings per share (EPS) through immediate share count reduction. The dealer assumes market risk during the repurchase phase, hedging via derivatives, while the company benefits from upfront delivery without direct market exposure.^[74] For instance, in a $10 million ASR, the dealer might deliver 800,000 shares initially, adjusting the final tally at maturity.^[74] Structured variants, such as collared or equity forward repurchases, incorporate hedging elements like price collars to mitigate volatility. In a collared forward repurchase, parties agree on an aggregate notional amount with a floor (minimum per-share price) and cap (maximum), enabling the company to pay upfront for a range of shares—delivering a minimum initially and settling the rest based on VWAP within the bounds—thus capping repurchase costs and share variability.^[76] Equity forwards function as commitments to repurchase a fixed number of shares at a predetermined future price, often integrated into ASRs for deferred settlement, providing precision in large-scale executions where market fluctuations pose risks.^[74] These methods are employed in significant buyback initiatives to achieve targeted outcomes with reduced timing uncertainty.^[62]

Theoretical Foundations

First-Principles Economic Rationale

Share repurchases align with the foundational economic principle of capital allocation to maximize value creation, wherein firms deploy scarce resources toward ends yielding returns above their opportunity cost. When internal projects fail to meet this threshold—exhibiting net present values below zero—retaining surplus cash imposes an implicit tax on shareholders equivalent to the foregone gains from alternative investments across the broader economy. By executing repurchases, corporations redistribute this idle capital to owners, facilitating its redirection via competitive securities markets, where decentralized decision-making harnesses dispersed knowledge to identify and fund higher-productivity ventures.^[77] This process underscores capital's inherent scarcity and the imperative for fluid reallocation to sustain economic growth, as stagnant holdings within any single entity distort resource distribution and diminish aggregate wealth. Market prices, emerging from voluntary exchanges, encode probabilistic assessments of future cash flows and risks, providing superior guidance for capital flows compared to insular corporate planning, which lacks the aggregating power of millions of informed participants. Repurchases thus embody a commitment to economic realism, prioritizing causal chains of productive investment over retention that might otherwise subsidize underperforming assets or unproven expansions.^[77] In contrast to compelled reinvestments in marginal pursuits, which compound inefficiencies by locking resources into diminishing returns, repurchases enforce discipline by compelling firms to confront the limits of their competitive advantages. This avoids the logical error of escalating commitments to initiatives where marginal benefits trail costs, ensuring capital migrates toward frontiers of innovation and efficiency elsewhere. Such mechanisms reinforce the shareholder's role as residual claimant, entrusting ultimate allocation authority to market participants rather than hierarchical directives.^[78]^[79]

Agency Theory Applications

Share repurchases address principal-agent conflicts by limiting managers' access to free cash flows that could otherwise fund value-destroying activities, such as overinvestment in unprofitable projects or excessive perks. Under agency theory, managers may prioritize personal empire-building over shareholder returns when internal funds exceed high-return opportunities, leading to inefficient capital allocation. Repurchases counteract this by committing excess cash to shareholder payouts, akin to dividends but with greater flexibility, thereby enforcing fiscal discipline and aligning managerial incentives with value maximization. This mechanism echoes Michael Jensen's free cash flow hypothesis, which emphasizes that distributing surplus cash reduces the agency costs of managerial discretion. Public repurchase announcements further serve as a bonding commitment, signaling managers' alignment with owners and lowering the costs of shareholder oversight. By voluntarily reducing corporate cash holdings through open-market or tender offers, executives demonstrate confidence in the firm's intrinsic value and constrain their own future opportunism, as repurchased shares cannot be easily reversed without market scrutiny. This application builds on Frank Easterbrook's framework for payout policies, where such commitments mitigate monitoring expenses and deter suboptimal investments by tying managerial reputation to efficient capital return.^[80] In theoretical terms, agency models predict repurchases as a substitute governance tool in settings with deficient external protections, such as dispersed ownership or lax board oversight, where traditional mechanisms fail to curb entrenchment. Firms facing heightened agency risks—due to weak incentives or information asymmetries—benefit disproportionately from buybacks as a self-imposed restraint, theoretically elevating their use relative to dividends in low-governance environments to preserve shareholder wealth.^[81]

Empirical Evidence

Impacts on Shareholder Returns and Firm Valuation

Share repurchase announcements typically generate positive abnormal stock returns, with empirical studies reporting average cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) of approximately 2-4% over short windows surrounding the announcement date, reflecting market perceptions of undervaluation signals and improved future prospects.^[82] This effect arises from the informational content of repurchases, where managers repurchase shares when they believe the stock is undervalued relative to intrinsic value, prompting investor underreaction that drives immediate price adjustments.^[83] These returns are more pronounced for open-market programs compared to other methods, as they allow flexibility in execution and are less disruptive to market dynamics.^[84] Long-term performance further supports value creation, particularly for value-oriented firms, where repurchases exploit mispricings more effectively. Analysis of U.S. open-market repurchases announced between 1980 and 1990 reveals average four-year buy-and-hold abnormal returns of about 12%, escalating to 45% for value stocks characterized by high book-to-market ratios, indicating sustained outperformance due to gradual market correction of undervaluation.^[85] Completion of authorized programs reinforces this by reducing outstanding shares, enhancing per-share metrics without necessitating equivalent reductions in operational spending, thereby elevating return on equity (ROE) through earnings per share (EPS) accretion when repurchase prices are below the firm's forward earnings yield.^[86] Firm valuation metrics improve post-repurchase, as evidenced by increases in Tobin's Q, a proxy for market-perceived growth opportunities, alongside ROE gains from concentrated ownership and efficient capital deployment.^[86] EPS accretion occurs mechanically from fewer shares diluting earnings less, boosting ROE without proportional offsets in total earnings, provided repurchases align with cash flows exceeding reinvestment needs.^[87] Compared to dividends, repurchases demonstrate superior total shareholder returns in empirical reviews spanning the 1990s to 2020s, owing to tax deferral advantages—capital gains taxed only upon sale versus immediate dividend taxation—and the ability to time purchases during dips, yielding higher compounded returns for patient investors.^[88] This edge holds in meta-assessments of payout policies, where buyback-heavy firms outperform dividend-reliant peers by 1-2% annually on risk-adjusted bases, driven by signaling credibility and reduced agency costs.^[58]

Effects on Investment, Innovation, and Employment

Empirical analyses of U.S. firms from 1987 to 2018 reveal no systematic reductions in capital expenditures or research and development (R&D) following share repurchases, with regression coefficients on lagged repurchases showing positive or insignificant associations with investment levels when controlling for firm characteristics like Tobin's Q and equity-based pay.^[89] Share repurchases tend to occur in mature firms with elevated free cash flows and fewer high-return investment opportunities, enabling managers to distribute surplus capital without forgoing positive net present value projects, thus avoiding crowding out of productive investments.^[89] Studies examining innovation outputs, such as patents, indicate neutral or positive effects from repurchases, particularly among innovation-efficient firms that reallocate resources toward higher-value projects.^[90] For instance, analysis of 2,312 U.S. non-financial firms from 1988 to 2015 found that efficient repurchasers increased patent counts and citations by approximately 2.5% post-buyback, alongside expansions in product categories by 4%, as they pruned low-impact R&D to enhance overall efficiency under earnings discipline.^[91] While less efficient firms may cut R&D spending, aggregate evidence does not support broad suppression of innovation proxies like patenting activity.^[90] Employment levels remain stable or exhibit positive associations with repurchases in comprehensive samples, with no empirical link to declines in labor share even among top repurchasing firms since 1982.^[89]^[92] Reductions, when observed, often align with efficiency improvements in overstaffed operations rather than repurchase activity per se, and exogenous tests around earnings announcements confirm no causal erosion of workforce size or compensation shares.^[92] Overall, repurchases do not systematically harm employment, as they frequently coincide with firms funding employee stock options and aligning incentives without displacing labor.^[89]

Broader Economic and Market Influences

Share repurchases contribute to market stabilization by enhancing liquidity and supporting accurate price discovery. Empirical studies indicate that realized repurchases reduce bid-ask spreads and improve trading depth, thereby increasing overall stock liquidity for repurchasing firms.^[93] Additionally, buybacks lower short-term excess volatility while aiding price efficiency, as evidenced by analyses of European and U.S. markets where repurchases provide price support near fundamental values.^[94] These effects aggregate across markets, with high volumes of buybacks—such as S&P 500 firms' $922.7 billion in 2022, $795.2 billion in 2023, and a record $942.5 billion in 2024—damping broader volatility through consistent demand.^[95]^[32] At the macroeconomic level, repurchases facilitate efficient capital reallocation by returning excess funds from mature firms to shareholders, who can redirect them toward higher-growth opportunities rather than allowing corporate hoarding. This mechanism counters critiques of unproductive retention by enabling market-driven flows to innovative sectors, as seen post-1982 SEC reforms that expanded buyback viability and improved overall capital allocation efficiency.^[5] Unlike fixed dividends, buybacks' flexibility allows firms to distribute capital without committing to ongoing payouts, promoting dynamic resource shifts that bolster economic productivity.^[96] Globally, rising non-U.S. buyback activity underscores enhanced cross-border efficiency, with worldwide repurchases by top firms reaching a record $1.31 trillion in recent years, nearly matching dividend totals and tripling in value over the past decade.^[97] In Asia, buybacks surged to $266 billion in the first eight months of 2025 alone, up 70% from comparable prior periods, reflecting broader adoption that integrates emerging markets into efficient capital cycles.^[98] This trend supports global price discovery by aligning valuations across regions, mitigating fragmentation from localized retention practices.^[99]

Criticisms and Counterarguments

Allegations of Short-Termism and Earnings Manipulation

Critics, including economist William Lazonick, have alleged that share repurchases foster short-termism by prioritizing immediate boosts to earnings per share (EPS) over long-term investments in operations or innovation. Lazonick argues in his 2014 analysis that buybacks enable executives to manipulate stock prices upward through artificial demand for shares, often timing announcements to coincide with earnings releases, which inflates EPS by reducing outstanding shares without corresponding revenue growth. ^[100] This practice, he contends, diverts corporate cash from productive uses, framing repurchases as a mechanism of "value extraction" that benefits insiders at the expense of sustainable strategy. ^[14] Such allegations intensify when linking buybacks to executive compensation structures, where bonuses and equity awards are frequently benchmarked against EPS targets. A 2015 Reuters investigation found that amid a buyback surge, CEO pay rose even in underperforming firms, as repurchases mechanically elevated EPS metrics tied to incentive payouts, prompting claims of opportunistic timing aligned with fiscal-year bonus cycles. ^[101] For instance, during the 2018-2019 period, S&P 500 companies announced over $1 trillion in repurchases annually, peaking at $806 billion in 2018, often clustered toward quarter-ends when EPS reporting pressures mount and compensation evaluations occur. ^[102] Critics portray this as executives gaming short-term metrics to secure personal gains, with repurchases serving as a tool to meet performance hurdles without underlying business improvements. ^[103] In media and academic discourse influenced by these views, share repurchases are routinely characterized as "financial engineering" rather than genuine capital allocation, contrasting with investments in R&D or capital expenditures that might yield enduring competitive advantages. Lazonick's framework, echoed in outlets like the Financial Times, posits that this EPS-focused approach erodes incentives for strategic patience, as executives chase quarterly optics over decade-spanning growth. ^[104] Empirical observations from the late 2010s buyback boom reinforce these claims, with repurchases comprising up to 90% of S&P 500 earnings in some quarters, allegedly sidelining reinvestment in favor of metric manipulation. ^[105]

Claims of Harm to Workers, Inequality, and Long-Term Growth

Critics contend that stock repurchases divert corporate cash flows away from investments in employee wages, training programs, and job preservation, contributing to wage stagnation amid rising productivity. Labor organizations, such as the Communications Workers of America, assert that prior to the surge in buybacks since the 1980s, excess profits were more commonly allocated to worker pay raises, benefits enhancements, and workforce expansion rather than share repurchases. ^[106] Analyses from policy advocates have linked higher buyback activity to correlations with layoffs and diminished spending on employee development initiatives. ^[107] Proponents of restrictions on buybacks argue that these programs widen income inequality by boosting stock prices and earnings per share, which in turn inflate executive compensation packages heavily weighted toward equity grants, while median worker pay lags. A 2025 study documents that CEO-to-worker pay ratios escalated sharply after 1982, coinciding with the liberalization of buyback rules, as repurchases enabled stock value manipulation that enriched top executives at the expense of broader wage growth. ^[108] Reports indicate that at low-wage S&P 500 firms, CEO pay rose 34.7% from 2019 to 2024, outpacing median worker pay increases of 16.3%, with buybacks cited as a mechanism funneling value to shareholders and management over labor. ^[109] Such practices are further criticized for impeding long-term economic growth by substituting reinvestment in research and development, capital expenditures, and innovation for financial engineering that yields temporary stock gains. Economist William Lazonick has argued that open-market buybacks, which accounted for over 50% of corporate profits in some years, erode firms' productive capabilities and U.S. competitiveness by prioritizing shareholder distributions over sustainable value creation. ^[100] This redirection is said to foster underinvestment in assets that could drive future productivity and global market leadership. ^[110] The 1% excise tax on stock repurchases enacted via the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act was advanced by its supporters as a tool to mitigate these effects, positing that buybacks often function as speculative activities rather than productive allocations, thereby incentivizing firms to channel funds toward operational enhancements like hiring and infrastructure over pure capital returns to investors. ^[111] In contrast to the U.S. shareholder primacy model, European Union regulations impose volume caps (typically 10% of share capital within 12 months), mandatory shareholder approvals, and time restrictions on buybacks, embodying a stakeholder perspective that seeks to safeguard employee and societal interests against perceived excesses of market-driven distributions. ^[11]

Evidence-Based Rebuttals and Alternative Perspectives

Empirical research indicates no systematic causal relationship between share repurchases and declines in firm innovation or productivity. A comprehensive study of U.S. firms from 1987 to 2018 found that repurchasing companies do not exhibit reductions in capital expenditures, research and development spending, or employment compared to non-repurchasing peers, with repurchase activity showing positive or insignificant correlations to subsequent investments after controlling for growth opportunities.^[89] Similarly, analyses of repurchase legalization across jurisdictions reveal no consistent negative effects on corporate investment or R&D, with some evidence of investment increases by 8-10% in cash-constrained firms, contradicting claims of crowding out productive activities.^[112] Large-sample examinations further demonstrate that buybacks align managerial incentives with shareholders by mitigating free cash flow misuse, without evidence of harm to innovation or long-term value creation.^[113] Concerns over inequality from repurchases overlook their distribution to diverse investors, including pension funds and 401(k plans holding broad equity exposure. U.S. public pension assets, totaling over $4.8 trillion as of 2023, derive significant returns from market-wide buyback activity, enhancing retirement security for millions of workers.^[114] Repurchases provide tax-efficient capital returns to these institutional holders, far broader than executive compensation ties, and outperform alternatives like value-destroying mergers, where acquiring firms historically underperform benchmarks by 1-2% on average post-deal.^[115] Regulatory interventions, such as taxes or restrictions on buybacks, risk distorting market price signals of undervaluation or excess cash, potentially forcing suboptimal reinvestments. Eras of elevated repurchase activity, including annual S&P 500 buybacks exceeding $500 billion since 2019, have coincided with market outperformance, as evidenced by the S&P 500 Buyback Index delivering 5.5% annualized excess returns over the S&P 500 from 2000 to 2020.^[58] This resilience underscores buybacks' role in efficient capital reallocation without broader economic fragility.^[113]

Regulatory and Policy Framework

Core U.S. Regulations and Safe Harbors

Rule 10b-18, adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 1982 pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, provides a non-exclusive safe harbor from liability for manipulation under Section 9(a)(2) of the Act for issuer repurchases of certain equity securities in the open market or through block trades, subject to limits on manner, timing, price, and volume.^[65] The rule applies to purchases by or for the issuer or affiliated purchasers, executed via one broker or dealer per day (or multiple under a single plan), excluding privately negotiated or derivative transactions.^[65] Timing restrictions prohibit purchases at the opening of trading or during the final 10 minutes of regular trading hours (or 30 minutes for qualifying exchanges with lower average daily trading volume), or on days of earnings announcements or material news, to avoid signaling intent or distorting prices.^[65] Price conditions limit buys to no higher than the highest independent bid, the last independent transaction price, or a specified percentage of a volume-weighted average price, while volume caps restrict daily purchases to 25% of the security's average daily trading volume (ADTV) over the prior four weeks, with higher allowances for initial block trades followed by limited additional volume.^[65] Issuer tender offers, distinct from open-market repurchases, fall under Section 13(e) of the 1934 Act, which empowers the SEC to regulate self-tenders to prevent fraud or inequitable treatment of shareholders.^[116] Issuers must file a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO prior to commencement, detailing the offer's terms, purpose, source of funds, financial condition, and any material interests of affiliates, and disseminate this via press release or other means to reach security holders promptly.^[116] Amendments to the offer or responses to withdrawals require prompt SEC filings and updates, ensuring transparency while prohibiting coercive practices.^[116] All share repurchases remain subject to overarching insider trading prohibitions under Section 10(b) of the 1934 Act and SEC Rule 10b-5, which bar purchases based on material nonpublic information that could mislead the market or disadvantage other traders. Compliance demands that repurchases avoid trading on inside knowledge, such as pending mergers or earnings shortfalls, to prevent artificial price inflation or unfair advantages. Item 703 of Regulation S-K requires quarterly and annual disclosure in Forms 10-Q and 10-K of all issuer equity security purchases, including monthly totals of shares acquired, average price paid, and total cost, irrespective of Rule 10b-18 compliance.^[117] Issuers must also indicate purchases under publicly announced plans or programs, specifying the dollar value remaining, to inform investors of repurchase activities and intentions without endorsing manipulation.^[117]

Recent U.S. Policy Changes

In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act imposed a 1% excise tax on the fair market value of stock repurchased by publicly traded domestic corporations and certain foreign corporations treated as domestic for tax purposes, effective for repurchases after December 31, 2022.^[118]^[119] The tax base equals the aggregate value of repurchased stock minus the aggregate value of stock issued during the taxable year (with issuances limited to certain equity), but not below zero, aiming to raise revenue estimated at $74 billion over a decade while discouraging excessive buybacks.^[120]^[49] Proposed Treasury regulations issued in April 2024 clarified application to complex transactions like repurchases involving derivatives but largely followed statutory language without broadening scope.^[121] In May 2023, the SEC adopted amendments to modernize share repurchase disclosures, requiring publicly traded issuers to report quarterly aggregate daily quantitative data on buyback activity, including timing, volume, price, and broker execution details in a new tabular format, with the stated goal of enhancing transparency and deterring manipulative practices. The rule faced legal challenge from business groups arguing the SEC exceeded statutory authority under the Exchange Act by mandating overly granular daily data without clear evidence of benefits outweighing costs.^[122] On December 19, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated the rule in its entirety, ruling it arbitrary and capricious due to inadequate consideration of economic impacts and reliance on flawed assumptions about buyback timing.^[7]^[123] In March 2024, the SEC issued technical amendments to remove references to the vacated provisions from forms and rules, effectively reverting to prior quarterly narrative disclosures without daily data requirements.^[124] Corporate buybacks reached a record $942.5 billion in 2024 and accelerated in 2025, surpassing $1 trillion by mid-year at a pace projected to exceed $1.2 trillion annually, driven by strong cash flows and favorable market conditions among S&P 500 firms.^[125]^[126] These developments have fueled ongoing congressional and regulatory debates over potential further restrictions, including proposals to raise the excise tax rate or reinstate disclosure mandates, though critics argue such measures distort capital allocation without addressing underlying incentives like tax preferences for debt financing.^[127] No major new curbs have been enacted as of October 2025, with evidence suggesting the 1% tax has had minimal deterrent effect on aggregate repurchase volume.^[128]

International Comparisons and Global Trends

In the European Union, share repurchase programs typically require prior shareholder approval, contrasting with the greater managerial flexibility afforded under U.S. regulations. For instance, Italian law mandates advance authorization from a shareholders' meeting for buybacks, as stipulated in the Italian Civil Code.^[129] Similar requirements apply across much of the EU under national implementations of the Market Abuse Regulation, which imposes stringent safe harbors for trading arrangements to prevent market abuse.^[130] This leads to lower repurchase volumes compared to the U.S., though activity has risen; European issuers repurchased around €200 billion in the 12 months to June 2024, reflecting a narrowing gap with U.S. levels.^[131] In Asia, particularly Japan, share repurchases have gained traction following structural reforms under Abenomics, which emphasized improved corporate governance and capital efficiency since 2012.^[132] These reforms, including incentives for better shareholder returns, have encouraged a shift from traditional lifetime employment norms toward more market-oriented practices, boosting buyback announcements on platforms like the Tokyo Stock Exchange's ToSTNeT system.^[133] While direct tax incentives for repurchases are limited, broader policies like the Nippon Individual Savings Account (NISA) program, expanded under Abenomics, have indirectly supported equity market activity by promoting investment.^[134] Japanese, alongside French and German firms, saw continued increases in buyback activity into 2023, contributing to regional growth outside the U.S.^[135] Globally, repurchase volumes totaled $1.11 trillion in 2023, down 14% from the prior year but with non-U.S. markets showing resilience and convergence toward U.S.-style practices.^[34] Pressures for harmonization arise from International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which many non-U.S. jurisdictions adopt for accounting consistency in repurchase disclosures, though the U.S. maintains leadership in scale due to its equity market orientation and fewer procedural hurdles.^[136] Developed markets outside the U.S., including Europe and Asia-Pacific, have seen rising participation rates since the 1990s, driven by post-financial crisis capital return preferences.^[58] This trend underscores a gradual alignment, albeit with persistent regional variations in regulatory stringency.^[137]

References

[1]
Share Repurchase - Overview, Impact, Signaling Effect
A share repurchase refers to when the management of a public company decides to buy back company shares that were previously sold to the public.
[2]
Share Repurchase - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Share repurchases, or buyback plans, refer to firms' strategies to buy back their own shares from the market to reward shareholders, signal undervaluation, ...
[3]
[PDF] CHAPTER 11 ANALYZING CASH RETURNED TO STOCKHOLDERS
There are two potential benefits that stockholders might perceive in stock buybacks: • Equity repurchases may offer tax advantages to stockholders, since ...
[4]
The Impact of Share Repurchases on Financial Accounting
A share repurchase, also known as a “buyback,” is when a publicly traded company purchases its own stock shares in the marketplace.Share Repurchases and EPS · They Drive Value for... · Share Repurchases vs...
[5]
[PDF] The effect of buybacks on capital allocation - Stanford University
Open market stock buybacks were rare due to the regulatory ambiguity and associated litigation risk linked to price manipulation. In 1982, SEC Rule 10b-18 ...
[6]
[PDF] Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization - SEC.gov
Before the adoption of this rule, Regulation S-K required corporate issuers that file on domestic forms to disclose, on a quarterly basis, any purchase made ...
[7]
Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization - SEC.gov
May 20, 2025 · The court's vacatur of the Repurchase Rule was effective as of December 19, 2023, and had the legal effect of reverting to the rules and forms ...
[8]
[PDF] Legal Update - SEC Adopts New Share Repurchase Disclosure Rules
May 8, 2023 · The Amendments revise and expand the buyback disclosure currently required by Item 703 of Regulation S-K, Item 16E of Form 20-F and Item 14 of ...<|separator|>
[9]
Stock Buyback Motivations and Consequences: A Literature Review
Feb 9, 2022 · The growing importance of stock buybacks has raised many questions about their costs and benefits. This analysis reviews relevant research, ...
[10]
Making Sense of Stock Buybacks - Knowledge at Wharton
Mar 7, 2023 · Fundamentally, stock buybacks are aimed squarely at returning money to the investors taking the risk of providing capital to firms. What Are ...
[11]
Examining Corporate Priorities: The Impact of Stock Buybacks on ...
Oct 22, 2019 · Two studies demonstrate the harm of stock buybacks to long-term shareholders: Keasler and Byerly show that buyback announcements lead to short- ...
[12]
[PDF] Stock Buybacks and Innovation: An Analysis of the Effects of Share ...
May 2, 2018 · The primary goal of this research paper is to examine what effect stock buybacks have, if any, on the innovation of large multi-national ...
[13]
[PDF] Does Share Repurchase Legalization Really Harm Corporate ...
First, this study does not rule out the possibility that some public companies abuse stock buybacks to enrich executives or to the detriment of long-term ...
[14]
[PDF] Profits Without Prosperity: How Stock Buybacks Manipulate the ...
In the 1960s, the “go-‐go years” of conglomeration and takeovers,15 the SEC sought to extend this anti-‐ manipulative regulation to open-‐market repurchases ...
[15]
The Dangers of Buybacks: Mitigating Common Pitfalls
Oct 23, 2020 · Regulators also have lamented that the current governance environment has contributed to a large increase in stock buybacks, a decline in ...
[16]
Why Merton Miller Remains Misunderstood | Chicago Booth Review
The equations in Miller-Modigliani allow the net issue of new shares to be either positive (new share issues) or negative (share buybacks). Modigliani-Miller, ...
[17]
The (Non-)equivalence of dividends and share buybacks
Jul 28, 2025 · In our baseline setup, we demonstrate a Modigliani-Miller-style equivalence, where both dividend payouts and share buybacks result in the same ...
[18]
[PDF] Changing Motives for Share Repurchases 20021219
Dec 19, 2002 · It shows that in the 1970s share repurchases were a small percentage of cash dividend payouts. A large upward shift took place in 1984. Between ...
[19]
Rule 10b-18 and Purchases of Certain Equity Securities ... - SEC.gov
Rule 10b-18 provides a safe harbor for issuers to repurchase their common stock without liability for manipulation, if they follow the rule's conditions.
[20]
Stock Market Trading Rules and Corporate Share Repurchases
One explanation is that the capital gains that buybacks generate for investors are generally taxed less heavily than dividend payments. However, the tax rate ...Missing: 20th | Show results with:20th
[21]
Tax cuts and stock buybacks, explained | Vox
Aug 2, 2018 · In the 1960s and '70s, ideas about changing the laws around stock buybacks began to bubble up, and the SEC began to consider moderate rule ...
[22]
[PDF] 53330 Federal Register / Vol. 47, No. 228 / Friday, November 26 ...
Nov 26, 1982 · announced the adoption of Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of. 1934 (“Act”) to provide a “safe harbor” from liability for ...
[23]
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions Concerning Rule 10b-18 ...
Oct 11, 2017 · Rule 10b-18, which was adopted in 1982, provides a voluntary "safe harbor" from liability for manipulation under Sections 9(a)(2) and 10(b) of the Securities ...
[24]
Dividends, Share Repurchases, and the Substitution Hypothesis - jstor
We could argue that if we just look at the sources and uses of funds iden- tity, share repurchases and dividends should be substitute payout methods. This ...Missing: 1960s | Show results with:1960s
[25]
SEC Adopts Amendments to Modernize Rule 10b5-1 Insider Trading ...
Dec 14, 2022 · The Securities and Exchange Commission today adopted amendments to Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and new disclosure requirements.
[26]
SEC Issues Proposed Rules on 10b5-1 Trading Plans and Share ...
Rule 10b5-1, which was adopted in 2000, allows insiders (e.g., officers and board members) to transact in their company's securities by establishing prearranged ...
[27]
SEC Amends Rules for Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans and Adds New ...
Dec 20, 2022 · Notably, the amendments do not address issuer Rule 10b5-1 plans for share repurchases by issuers. The SEC proposed rules on issuer share ...
[28]
Disclosures and Share Repurchase: Did SEC Rules Curb ...
Apr 9, 2025 · Prior to the SEC enactment of Rule 10b-18 in 1982, which provided ... stock price and were deemed to be illegal. Since Rule 10b-18 was ...Missing: legality | Show results with:legality
[29]
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Failed To Deliver Promised Benefits
Apr 30, 2024 · An important body of evidence shows that the corporate tax changes in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act failed to produce promised investment or wage increases.The 2017 Tax Cuts Have Not... · The Tcja's Business Tax... · Stock Buybacks Increased...
[30]
[PDF] The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and the Increase of Stock Buybacks
Aug 23, 2024 · The TCJA decreased corporate tax rates and imposed a one-time tax on offshore assets, incentivizing repatriation, which the research ...
[31]
Visualizing the Biggest Stock Buybacks of 2025 - Visual Capitalist
Sep 9, 2025 · U.S. stock buybacks have already surpassed the $1 trillion mark in 2025, making it the fastest pace on record.
[32]
S&P 500 Q4 2024 Buybacks Increase 7.4% and ... - Press Releases
Mar 19, 2025 · For the full year 2024 buybacks set an annual record of $942.5 billion, up from $795.2 billion in 2023; the 12-month peak was in June 2022 with ...
[33]
Apple reports second quarter results
May 1, 2025 · ... 2025. The board of directors has also authorized an additional program to repurchase up to $100 billion of the Company's common stock. Apple ...
[34]
Global share buybacks fell by one seventh in 2023, while dividends ...
Global share buybacks fell to $1.11 trillion in 2023 – down by $181 billion or 14.0%; Dividend growth continued even as buybacks fell; US ...
[35]
Global share buybacks surge to a record $1.31 trillion almost ...
Share buybacks jumped 22% to a record $1.31 trillion in 20221(latest data available); Share buybacks have tripled in value in ten years, compared to a 54% ...Missing: non- | Show results with:non-
[36]
Evidence in share repurchases and market efficiency - ScienceDirect
Akerlof (1978) first proposed the groundbreaking concept of asymmetric information: If stock repurchases and asymmetric information are combined, managers may ...
[37]
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=878434
[38]
[PDF] Are Buybacks Good for Long-Term Shareholder Value? Evidence ...
Table IV shows that the average abnormal announcement return of the overall sample of buybacks outside the U.S. is 1.42% over the (-1,+1) window, 1.59% over ...
[39]
[PDF] The determinants of the effect of share repurchase announcements ...
They found that short-term results support the signaling hypothesis as firms announcing stock repurchases earn significant abnormal returns of 3.02% percent on ...
[40]
Paying back your shareholders | McKinsey
May 1, 2011 · Share repurchases also signal confidence but offer more flexibility because they don't create a tacit commitment to additional purchases in ...
[41]
The cost of financial flexibility: Evidence from share repurchases
Unlike dividends, which are sticky, repurchases provide managers flexibility with respect to the amount and timing of payouts.<|control11|><|separator|>
[42]
Financial flexibility and the choice between dividends and stock ...
Stock repurchases are very pro-cyclical, while dividends increase steadily over time. Dividends are paid by firms with higher “permanent” operating cash flows, ...
[43]
Why Do Companies Share Buybacks? Evidence from the UK - MDPI
Oct 8, 2024 · Their asymmetric information models demonstrate that dividends and stock repurchase are reliable signs of the company's prospects. The signaling ...2. Literature Review And... · 2.1. Free Cash Flow Theory... · 4. Models And Results
[44]
[PDF] CHAPTER 8 - NYU Stern
The debt ratio at which the cost of capital is minimized is the optimal debt ratio. In this approach, the effect on firm value of changing the capital structure ...Missing: optimizing | Show results with:optimizing
[45]
M&M Theorem - Overview, Assumptions, Propositions
The M&M Theorem, or the Modigliani-Miller Theorem ... Therefore, the company with a 100% leveraged capital structure does not obtain any benefits from tax- ...
[46]
Understanding the Modigliani-Miller Theorem: An Investor's Guide
Learn why the Modigliani-Miller Theorem argues that a company's value depends on future earnings, not capital structure. Explore its history, assumptions, ...What Is the Modigliani-Miller... · History · Key Assumptions
[47]
Setting the Optimal Capital Structure in Practice - Dawgen Global
Dec 20, 2023 · Companies often use debt to finance share buybacks, which can increase earnings per share by reducing the number of shares outstanding.
[48]
Understanding Stock Buybacks — Should We Tax Them?
May 23, 2023 · Instead, buybacks are favored over dividend payments due to tax and financial advantages. The tax advantages stem largely from the deferral of ...Differences between Stock... · Economic Effects of Stock...
[49]
How the U.S. Taxes Stock Buybacks and Dividends
Jul 23, 2024 · Companies may prefer buybacks because they are tax-advantaged, since taxes are due when income is realized as dividends but are deferred until realized when ...
[50]
The Excise Tax on Stock Repurchases - Penn Wharton Budget Model
Mar 9, 2023 · Before 2023, the ability to defer capital gains taxes created a tax preference for buybacks over dividends, which was especially valuable for ...
[51]
Dividends, Share Repurchases, and Tax Incentives | NBER
The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (JGTRRA) reduced the maximum tax rate on dividends from 39 percent to 15 percent for individuals. It ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[52]
[PDF] the economic effects of cutting dividend and capital gains taxes in ...
Mar 14, 2006 · In May of 2003, Congress passed, and the President signed, the Jobs and Growth Tax. Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, which reduced the double ...
[53]
[PDF] Equalizing the Tax Treatment of Stock Buybacks and Dividends
Apr 15, 2021 · Stock buybacks allow foreign shareholders to avoid U.S. withholding tax on corporate cash distributions. Stock buybacks also allow U.S. taxable ...
[54]
Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers
Managers with substantial free cash flow can increase dividends or repurchase stock and thereby pay out current cash that would otherwise be invested in low- ...
[55]
[PDF] Do Repurchasing Firms Shave Capital Expenditures When Signaling?
Share repurchases can mitigate this agency problem by returning excess cash flows to shareholders (Grullon and Michaely, 2004; Richardson, 2006).
[56]
new evidence on the agency costs of free cash flow - ScienceDirect
In this paper we examine tender offer share repurchases to differentiate between the information signaling and free cash flow hypotheses.
[57]
[PDF] The value of share buybacks - McKinsey
Investors are generally relieved to learn that companies don't intend to do something wasteful—such as make an unwise acquisition or a poor capital expenditure— ...
[58]
[PDF] Examining Share Repurchases and the S&P Buyback Indices
If a company has limited investment opportunities, it may distribute its excess cash flow, if any, back to shareholders to mitigate the conflicts of interest ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[59]
[PDF] Corporate Share Repurchases: What Role Do Stock Options Play?
Section 6 concludes. 1. Previous Research on Options and Their Effect on Payout Policy. Most of the previous literature has focused on whether executive ...
[60]
[PDF] Share Repurchases and Employee Stock Options and their
We estimate the effects of share repurchases and employee stock option exercises on net share retirements for large S&P 500 companies.
[61]
https://www.bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/how-the-u-s-taxes-stock-buybacks-and-dividends/
[62]
Revisiting Share Repurchases in Volatile Times - Skadden Arps
Mar 17, 2022 · Most share repurchases are effected over time through open market purchases. ... time without being subject to the volume limitations under ...
[63]
Issuer Stock Repurchases Under Rule 10b-18 - Practical Law
It also identifies the types of securities covered by Rule 10b-18. This Note identifies other considerations for an issuer when conducting a stock buyback ...Missing: market details<|separator|>
[64]
Rule 10b-18 Definition and How Compliance Works - Investopedia
Rule 10b – 18 is an SEC rule that protects companies and affiliated purchasers by providing a safe harbor when they repurchase the company's stock.
[65]
17 CFR § 240.10b-18 - Purchases of certain equity securities by the ...
However, for purposes of this section, the issuer may use one broker or dealer to effect Rule 10b-18 purchases during this period that may be different from the ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[66]
Structuring Share Repurchases Under Rules 10b-18 and 10b5-1
Aug 14, 2025 · Structuring Share Repurchases: Rule 10b-18 and Rule 10b5-1 Applied to Open-Market Share Repurchase Programs, Accelerated Share Repurchase ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[67]
Dutch auction versus fixed-price self-tender offers for common stock
This paper studies distinctions between fixed-price and Dutch auction self-tenders for common stock. We find that fixed-price tenders pay higher premiums.
[68]
[PDF] Dutch Auction Repurchases: An Analysis of Shareholder ...
In Dutch auctions the purchase price is determined by shareholder tendering responses rather than being set by the firm. Therefore, an offer is not always pro- ...
[69]
Is a Share Buyback Right for Your Company?
Share Buybacks have become commonplace in the business world. In 1999 alone, 1,253 companies on the New York Stock Exchange repurchased their own shares, ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[70]
What's a Dutch Auction Tender Offer? | Stash Learn
Mar 4, 2020 · A company will decide to purchase a set dollar amount of shares from existing investors. But instead of setting a fixed price, it will set a range.
[71]
The buyback monster - Forbes
Nov 17, 1997 · In the early 1980s IBM began a big buyback program. Between 1985 and 1990 it bought back nearly 50 million shares, shrinking its common ...
[72]
Do share buyback announcements influence stock prices? A multi ...
Apr 7, 2025 · Share buybacks are commonly believed to inject buoyancy into stock prices. This study addresses gaps in the literature by examining price ...
[73]
[PDF] Earnings signals in fixed-price and Dutch auction self-tender offers1
The relative signaling power of Dutch-auction and fixed-price self-tender offers and open-market share repurchases. Journal of Finance 46, 1243—1271 ...
[74]
[PDF] Share Buybacks - Mayer Brown
Jul 24, 2018 · What Is an ASR? • An accelerated share repurchase, or ASR, is a structured, privately negotiated transaction, usually documented as a “ ...
[75]
What Is an Accelerated Share Repurchase (ASR)? - Investopedia
An accelerated share repurchase (ASR) is a strategy a company uses to buy back its shares quickly by using an investment bank as a go-between.Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
[76]
[PDF] Share Repurchase Programs, Rule 10b-18 and SEC-Proposed ...
Mar 7, 2022 · ... collared structure) or, alternatively, either a maximum or ... Collared forward share repurchase (cont'd). • Parties agree aggregate ...
[77]
The Economics of Stock Buybacks - Econlib
Mar 12, 2023 · Using a large sample of US stocks covering more than three decades, we empirically examine common criticisms of and rationales for stock ...
[78]
[PDF] STOCK BUYBACK MOTIVATIONS AND CONSEQUENCES
Many researchers have analyzed the evolution of corporate payouts over ... Robinson, says that the company repurchased $286 million of its shares in the first.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[79]
The value of share buybacks - McKinsey
Aug 1, 2005 · In most cases, buybacks create value because they help improve tax efficiency and prevent managers from investing in the wrong assets or pursuing unwise ...<|separator|>
[80]
Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends - jstor
Dividends may align managers' and investors' interests, and are costly. This paper explores agency-cost explanations of dividends, despite their costs.
[81]
Share reacquisitions, surplus cash, and agency problems
Share repurchases help alleviate agency costs of surplus cash by restricting management's scope to waste corporate resources. But why do self-interested ...
[82]
Information content of repurchase signals: Tangible or intangible ...
Empirically, the average abnormal returns around repurchase announcements are roughly 2–4%. ... Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: the empirical power and ...
[83]
[PDF] Market Underreaction to Open Market Share Repurchases
We find that the average abnormal four-year buy-and-hold return measured after the initial announcement is 12.1 percent. For "value" stocks, companies more ...
[84]
[PDF] Market Underreaction to Open Market Share Repurchases
We find that the average abnormal four-year buy-and-hold return measured after the initial announcement is 12.1%. For 'value' stocks, companies more likely to ...
[85]
Market underreaction to open market share repurchases
For 'value' stocks, companies more likely to be repurchasing shares because of undervaluation, the average abnormal return is 45.3%. For repurchases announced ...
[86]
[PDF] Does Share Repurchase Legalization Really Harm Corporate ...
Sep 27, 2025 · Legalization is also associated with improvements in sales growth, ROE, ROA, Tobin's Q, and buy-and- hold stock returns, consistent with ...
[87]
corporate finance | impact of share buybacks on EPS - Vernimmen
When a company buys back its own shares, it increases its earnings per share (EPS) when its reverse P/E is higher than the after-tax interest rate on its debt.Missing: Tobin's Q ROE<|separator|>
[88]
The power of stock buybacks for creating shareholder value
Apr 29, 2024 · Stock buybacks are a time-tested means of increasing shareholder value · Case study: how an auto parts retailer turbocharged its stock ...
[89]
Share Repurchases and Investment Policies - Wiley Online Library
Sep 29, 2025 · Overall, our study finds no evidence for the claim that share repurchases lead to systematic reductions in real investments. Our answer to the ...
[90]
Do stock buybacks stifle innovation? - China Business Knowledge
### Summary of Findings on Buybacks and Innovation
[91]
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109024000358
[92]
Corporate Share Repurchase Policies and Labor Share
### Summary of Evidence on Share Repurchases and Labor Share, Employment Effects
[93]
Stock repurchases and liquidity - ScienceDirect.com
We analyze how realized repurchases affect the liquidity of firms' market in their own stock and find that this influence is unequivocally positive.
[94]
Stock repurchases and treasury share sales: Do they stabilize price ...
Our paper shows that repurchasing has a positive effect on liquidity, by reducing spread, and on price discovery, by lowering short-term excess volatility ( ...
[95]
S&P 500 Q4 2022 Buybacks Tick up, As 2022 Sets A Record
Mar 21, 2023 · For the 12-months ending December 2022, buybacks were $922.7 billion, setting a new annual record, and up 4.6% from 2021's $881.7 billion, but ...
[96]
The Economics of Stock Buybacks | Tax Foundation
Sep 19, 2018 · Stock buybacks supplement capital investments, as they can help reallocate capital from old, established firms to new and innovative ones.Stock Buyback Basics · The Top 1,000 Retirement... · NotesMissing: macroeconomic | Show results with:macroeconomic
[97]
Global share buybacks surge to a record $1.31 trillion almost ...
The world's top 1,200 companies bought back a record $1.31 of their shares, almost equal to the $1.39 trillion the same firms paid in dividends during the year.Missing: trends stock non-
[98]
Can Asian corporates newfound love of buybacks last? - Reuters
Sep 3, 2025 · Asian companies have bought back shares worth around $266 billion in the first eight months of 2025, almost 70% more than they did in all of ...
[99]
An Opportune Moment for International Buyback Achievers - Nasdaq
Buybacks globally have tripled in value in ten years, compared to a 54% increase in dividends, with almost every region and sector across the globe increasing ...
[100]
Profits Without Prosperity - Harvard Business Review
In general, when a company buys back shares at what turn out to be high prices, it eventually reduces the value of the stock held by continuing shareholders. “ ...Missing: rarity | Show results with:rarity
[101]
Stock buybacks enrich executive pay even when business sags
Dec 10, 2015 · As corporate America engages in an unprecedented buyback binge, soaring CEO pay tied to short-term performance measures like EPS is prompting ...
[102]
[XLS] S&P 500 Stock Buybacks
S&P 500 20 LARGEST Q2 2025 BUYBACKS, $ MILLIONS. 3, Company, Ticker, Sector, Q2 2025, Q1 2024, Q2 2024, 12-Months, 12-Months, 5-Year, 10-Year, Indicated. 4 ...
[103]
[PDF] How share repurchases boost earnings without improving returns
1 Rather, we find that many executives have come to believe that share repurchases create value just by increasing EPS. The logic seems to be that earnings.
[104]
[PDF] Effective Public Management - Brookings Institution
See William. Lazonick, “Everyone is paying the price for share buy-backs” Financial Times, September 26, 2008, p. 25; William Lazonick, “The buyback boondoggle, ...
[105]
The Curse of Stock Buybacks - The American Prospect
Jun 25, 2018 · With share prices inflated by stock buybacks, the richest US households will extract even more value from the economy, making America's rampantly unequal ...Missing: post rarity
[106]
Stock Buybacks Hurt Workers - CWA-Union.org
Before the stock buyback explosion, companies would often use excess profits to increase worker pay and benefits, to invest in new equipment, or to expand into ...
[107]
Pro-Worker Tax Policies to Rein in CEO Pay and Wasteful Stock ...
Analysts have documented the association between buybacks and worker layoffs, as well as reduced capital investment and innovation and wage stagnation.
[108]
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5404796
[109]
New Report on CEO-Worker Pay Gaps at the 100 Largest Low ...
Aug 21, 2025 · The average pay gap of the Low-Wage 100 widened to 632 to 1 in 2024, with CEOs raking in average pay of $17.2 million, while average median ...
[110]
Share buybacks and corporate tax cuts - ScienceDirect.com
We investigate whether buybacks, in fact, undermine the macroeconomic effects of corporate tax cuts. Following the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the 2017 Jobs Act), ...Share Buybacks And Corporate... · Introduction · Corporate Tax Effects...
[111]
The New US Stock Repurchase Excise Tax
Imposing an excise tax on such repurchases has at least three policy justifications: (1) it will encourage reinvestment of profits into the business; (2) it ...
[112]
None
Summary of each segment:
[113]
The Case Against Restricting Stock Buybacks
Jul 17, 2023 · A large-sample study of share repurchasing finds that most criticisms against the practice appear to be unfounded.Missing: rebuttals | Show results with:rebuttals
[114]
Who Benefits from Stock Buybacks? - Tax Foundation
These pension funds, through investments in domestic equities, have a significant stake in the U.S. stock market, and thus have the potential to benefit from ...
[115]
The Case for Stock Buybacks - Harvard Business Review
Sep 15, 2017 · Rather than eroding long-term firm value, buybacks create value by ensuring that surplus capital is not wasted.
[116]
17 CFR § 240.13e-4 - Tender offers by issuers. - Law.Cornell.Edu
An issuer tender offer is a request for tenders of equity securities by an issuer or affiliate. Issuers must comply with filing, disclosure, and dissemination ...
[117]
17 CFR § 229.703 - (Item 703) Purchases of equity securities by the ...
Instruction to paragraph (b)(1) of Item 703: Include in this column all issuer repurchases, including those made pursuant to publicly announced plans or ...
[118]
Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 | Internal Revenue Service
May 29, 2025 · The Inflation Reduction Act changed a wide range of tax laws and provided funds to improve our services and technology to make tax filing easier for you.
[119]
Inflation Reduction Act includes excise tax on stock buybacks | EY - US
The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 (H.R. 5376) includes an excise tax that imposes a 1% surcharge on corporate stock buybacks.
[120]
https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/what-did-2022-inflation-reduction-act-do
[121]
Newly Proposed Regulations on Stock Buyback Excise Tax Largely ...
Apr 18, 2024 · The tax imposed is generally equal to 1% of the fair market value of the repurchased stock (determined based on a “shares in, shares out” ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale<|separator|>
[122]
Court Vacates SEC's Share Repurchase Disclosure Rule
Dec 21, 2023 · On November 22, 2023, the SEC issued an order indefinitely staying the rule. On December 1, 2023, the SEC wrote the court to state that it could ...
[123]
Fifth Circuit Appeals Court Vacates SEC Stock Repurchase Rules
Jan 5, 2024 · The Fifth Circuit vacated the rule on December 19, 2023, after denying the SEC's request for an extension to the November 30, 2023, deadline. As ...
[124]
SEC Releases Technical Amendments Related to Vacated Share ...
Mar 21, 2024 · The SEC has released technical amendments to reflect the December 19, 2023, vacatur of its May 2023 share repurchase disclosure modernization final rule.
[125]
https://markets.financialcontent.com/buffnews/article/marketminute-2025-10-20-the-buyback-boom-us-corporations-navigate-record-repurchases-amidst-scrutiny
[126]
https://www.wsj.com/finance/stocks/stock-buybacks-2025-3b0ddedd
[127]
Stock Buybacks Archives - Tax Foundation
Research shows that a tax on stock buybacks would not be the right policy solution to encourage long-term investment or lift wages.<|control11|><|separator|>
[128]
Corporate share repurchases and the 2023 excise tax - ScienceDirect
By increasing the cost of share repurchases, legislators believe the tax will persuade managers to reduce the amount of cash distributed to shareholders via ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
[129]
Share buybacks: A valuable tool for Italian listed companies
Oct 7, 2025 · European laws governing share buybacks set forth into MAR provide two types of defences to govern market abuses, that is the “safe harbour” ...Missing: stakeholder | Show results with:stakeholder
[130]
How Regulation of Share Buybacks and Insider Trading Compare in ...
Apr 21, 2023 · Unlike the UK and EU, however, the U.S. has rejected the equal access approach since the Supreme Court decision in Chiarella, which required a ...
[131]
The challenge of share buybacks - Global Trading
Dec 4, 2024 · The market is huge. S&P 500 issuers repurchased $877 billion in the 12 months to June 2024, while European issuers purchased around €200 billion ...
[132]
What has led to Japan's come-back? - LSEG
May 21, 2024 · Abenomics effects are promoting sustainable growth. To pull Japan out of two decades of economic stagnation, raise the country's real potential ...
[133]
Share repurchases on the Tokyo Stock Exchange Trading Network
ToSTNeT is a unique market in Japan in which firms can repurchase their shares during off-auction hours at a fixed price within a very short timeframe.
[134]
[PDF] Japanese Equities: Is Now the Time? - Lazard Asset Management
Aug 24, 2023 · (NISA) system, a program launched under Abenomics in 2014 that uses tax incentives to encourage savers to invest in risk assets. By tripling ...<|separator|>
[135]
2023 share buybacks: activity continues to rise outside of the US
The trend of increasing buyback activity among Japanese, French, and German companies which has been in place for a number of years continued in 2023. The level ...Missing: IFRS harmonization
[136]
Accounting Harmonisation through IAS/IFRS and Internationalisation
Abstract. The process of accounting harmonisation via International Accounting Standards/International Financial Reporting Standards (IAS/IFRS) adoption is very ...
[137]
The increasing popularity of share buybacks outside the US
Aug 30, 2023 · Based on our calculations, 45% of large US companies bought back at least 1% of their shares during 2022 (net of any shares that were issued).