Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Equity

Equity denotes the principle of fairness and , applied across domains to ensure impartial treatment beyond rigid uniformity. In , it constitutes a distinct body of civil remedies and procedures originating from English courts, designed to mitigate the inflexibility of by invoking conscience and equitable maxims, such as granting or injunctions where monetary damages prove inadequate. In , shareholders' equity represents the net assets attributable to a company's owners after subtracting liabilities from total assets, serving as a key indicator of financial health and value creation for investors. In contemporary social and , equity emphasizes differential to individuals or groups based on their unique circumstances—such as or historical disadvantages—to foster comparable outcomes, in contrast to equality's uniform distribution irrespective of need. This approach, prominent in initiatives, aims to rectify disparities but has sparked significant debate over its implementation, with critics arguing it prioritizes engineered results over merit and individual agency, often yielding like diminished incentives, organizational inefficiencies, or heightened intergroup tensions, as demonstrated in empirical examinations of such policies. Proponents highlight potential gains in opportunity access, though rigorous evidence remains contested, particularly given methodological challenges in isolating causal effects amid confounding variables like cultural and behavioral factors.

Equity in Law

Historical Origins

The concept of equity in English law traces its etymology to the Latin aequitas, signifying fairness, impartiality, or evenness, derived from aequus, meaning equal or just. This term, influenced by Roman praetorian law where aequitas supplemented rigid civil codes to achieve substantive justice, entered English jurisprudence through ecclesiastical and canon law traditions administered by chancellors, who were often clerics versed in Roman principles. Unlike the formalistic writ system of common law courts established post-1066 Norman Conquest, equity emphasized conscience and moral fairness to mitigate harsh outcomes. Equity jurisdiction emerged in the late 12th and 13th centuries amid growing dissatisfaction with 's procedural barriers, such as the need for precise writs and its failure to , , or undue hardship. Subjects petitioned the King directly for extraordinary relief, invoking his prerogative as fount of justice; the King delegated these to the , leading to decisions based on equity principles rather than . By the , this practice institutionalized, with records documenting equity suits from the late 1300s onward, as petitioners bypassed for remedies like or injunctions unavailable at law. The solidified as a parallel tribunal by the , handling discretionary justice in cases where formalism produced inequity, such as enforcing trusts—initially "uses" devised in the 12th-13th centuries to transfer land to intermediaries (feoffees to uses) for Crusaders or to evade feudal wardship fees, with compelling feoffees to honor intents despite legal transfer. Similarly, in mortgages, treated default as absolute conveyance, forfeiting redemption rights; equity courts, from the 15th-16th centuries, recognized the mortgagor's perpetual , allowing repayment post-deadline to avert , as evidenced in decrees prioritizing debt satisfaction over strict forfeiture. Prior to 19th-century codification via , processed thousands of annual petitions—peaking at over 20,000 by 1800—focusing on trusts (enforcing against over 70% of disputed uses by 1500) and mortgages, thereby tempering without supplanting it.

Core Principles and Distinctions from Common Law

Equity developed as a supplementary to the , guided by principles aimed at achieving fairness where the strict application of legal rules produced unjust outcomes due to their rigidity or generality. A foundational tenet is that equity follows the law ( sequitur legem), meaning it adheres to established rules and rights unless requires mitigation of their harshness, as articulated in practices from the onward. This ensures equity supplements rather than overrides the law, intervening only to correct deficiencies, such as when universal rules fail to address specific circumstances empirically demanding adjustment. Key maxims encapsulating these tenets include "equity regards the substance rather than the form," prioritizing intent and reality over technicalities, and "equity regards as done that which ought to be done," treating moral obligations as legally effective to prevent unconscionable results, with in equitable doctrine. In contrast to common law's precedent-bound formalism, which emphasized procedural writs and standardized judgments derived from judicial decisions, equity emphasized discretionary application based on the chancellor's , allowing flexibility to achieve substantive . evolved through adversarial proceedings focused on historical precedents, often resulting in outcomes detached from equitable considerations when rules proved empirically inadequate, such as in enforcing informal agreements where formalities barred relief. Equity's approach, conversely, incorporated maxims like "he who comes into equity must come with ," requiring moral probity from claimants, and "equity will not aid a volunteer," limiting to those with legitimate expectations, thereby grounding decisions in causal assessments of fairness over mechanical rule application. This distinction arose historically from the common law's limitations in adapting to complex social realities, prompting the to provide remedies aligned with underlying obligations rather than strict legal titles. The interplay reflects a causal in equity's design: it emerged to rectify instances where common law's empirical shortcomings—such as overly technical barriers to —undermined fairness, without supplanting the law's core structure, as affirmed in foundational texts like those influencing 17th-century . Thus, equity maintains a subordinate yet corrective role, ensuring legal outcomes align with conscientious standards where alone proves deficient.

Equitable Remedies and Modern Jurisdiction

Equitable remedies encompass court-ordered relief designed to address situations where monetary damages at common law prove inadequate, such as when the harm involves unique property or ongoing violations. Specific performance compels parties to fulfill contractual obligations, particularly for land sales where substitutes are unavailable, as courts recognize real estate's inherent uniqueness. Injunctions, either prohibitory to halt actions or mandatory to require them, prevent irreparable harm, while rescission voids contracts tainted by fraud or mistake, restoring parties to pre-agreement positions. Tracing enables beneficiaries to follow trust assets through substitutions or mixtures, recovering value from wrongdoers without relying solely on compensation. These differ fundamentally from common law's preference for quantifiable damages, prioritizing fairness over rigid precedent. Reforms in the 19th and 20th centuries integrated equitable administration into unified court systems without fully subsuming substantive principles. The of 1873 and 1875 in the abolished separate courts of and , creating a single with , stipulating that equitable rules prevail in conflicts. In the United States, the , adopted in 1938, merged law and equity procedures into a single "civil action" framework, eliminating distinct forms of action while preserving equitable remedies' availability where legal relief suffices not. This procedural fusion streamlined litigation but maintained equity's discretionary nature, applied by generalist judges assessing adequacy of legal alternatives case-by-case. Contemporary applications span contract enforcement, where resolves breaches involving irreplaceable goods; intellectual property disputes, favoring injunctions against infringement to avert ongoing harm; and family law, including equitable distribution of marital assets or constructive trusts for breaches. In U.S. federal courts, equitable claims appear in diverse civil filings, often alongside legal ones under the merged rules. Critics argue that expanded equitable post-fusion risks judicial overreach through broad , potentially yielding inconsistent outcomes as non-specialist judges apply flexible standards absent strict evidentiary thresholds. Empirical checks, including appellate , constrain excesses, with higher courts overturning discretionary errors to uphold uniformity.

Equity in Finance and Economics

Owner's Equity and Accounting

Owner's equity represents the residual interest in a business entity's assets after deducting all liabilities, serving as the owners' claim on net assets under principles. It is computed via the fundamental : total assets minus total liabilities equals owner's equity. In sole proprietorships and partnerships, this encompasses capital contributions, withdrawals, and undistributed profits; for corporations, it manifests as shareholders' equity, including paid-in capital from stock issuances, , and adjustments, as standardized under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and (IFRS). This metric provides a snapshot of ownership value on the balance sheet, distinct from transient income statements. The concept emerged with double-entry bookkeeping in 13th-century Italian merchant practices, where proprietary capital was segregated from creditor claims to track investments and profit allocations accurately. Luca Pacioli's 1494 publication Summa de arithmetica, geometria, proportioni et proportionalita codified these methods, emphasizing equity as the balancing residual in ledgers. With the proliferation of joint-stock companies from the 17th century—such as the Dutch East India Company in 1602—the framework adapted to represent diffused shareholder interests, gaining formal structure in 19th-century corporate statutes that mandated equity disclosures for investor protection. In non-corporate contexts, illustrates the principle: a homeowner's stake equals the property's appraised minus the remaining principal and any liens. occurs when liabilities surpass assets, as seen in the 2008 U.S. housing crisis, where falling prices left about 23% of mortgaged residential properties—roughly 10.7 million homes— as of September 2009, per property data analytics. This condition amplified defaults, with analyses linking deeper to higher strategic default rates amid elevated transaction costs. Fundamentally, owner's equity quantifies the economic buffer absorbing losses before creditors, enabling assessments via ratios like , which gauge risk from financing relative to stakes. Positive equity signals and capacity for reinvestment, while erosion through losses or distributions can constrain operations or trigger .

Corporate Equity and Capital Structure

Corporate equity represents stakes in a through shares of , forming a core component of its alongside . provides holders with voting rights on corporate matters, such as electing directors, and entitles them to residual claims on assets after debts and preferred claims are satisfied in , though dividends are variable and not guaranteed. , by contrast, typically offers fixed dividend preferences paid before common dividends and priority in proceeds, but usually lacks voting rights unless dividends are in arrears. These distinctions influence investor preferences, with appealing to those seeking growth and control, while attracts income-focused investors prioritizing stability. In theory, the Modigliani-Miller theorem, proposed in 1958, posits that in perfect markets—absent taxes, costs, and asymmetric information—a firm's value remains invariant to its debt-equity mix, as investors can replicate effects personally. Proposition I states that firm value equals the present value of expected operating cash flows, independent of financing; Proposition II adjusts equity cost upward with to offset debt's lower cost, keeping constant. However, empirical deviations arise in real markets, where debt's interest deductibility creates tax shields that reduce effective costs, favoring higher ratios, as evidenced by studies showing tax-induced debt biases in corporate financing decisions. Non-debt tax shields, like , can substitute for debt shields but often insufficiently, per analyses of firm-level data. Equity issuance funds growth without fixed repayment obligations, unlike debt, but dilutes existing ownership and control, potentially exacerbating problems where managers prioritize short-term gains over long-term value. The of 2001 illustrated this, as executives used entities requiring massive equity issuances—58 million shares for one vehicle alone—to mask losses, diluting while hiding , contributing to the firm's collapse amid misaligned incentives. Despite such risks, equity better aligns incentives for and residual risk-sharing, supporting long-term value creation in uncertain environments. Global equity markets reached approximately $127 trillion in capitalization as of mid-2025, reflecting resilience post-volatility. Initial public offerings (IPOs), a key equity issuance mechanism, rebounded in 2025 with increased activity among high-growth firms, driven by favorable conditions and AI sector momentum, per forecasts anticipating sustained capital raising. This contrasts with debt's contractual rigidity, positioning equity as vital for scalable ventures where cash flows are unpredictable.

Private Equity Investments and Market Dynamics

Private equity encompasses investments in illiquid ownership stakes in non-public companies, typically structured as limited partnerships where general partners manage funds raised from institutional investors to acquire, improve, and exit portfolio companies. Common strategies include leveraged buyouts (LBOs), where acquirers use substantial debt—often 60-80% of the purchase price—financed against the target's assets and cash flows, and venture capital, targeting early- or growth-stage firms with high growth potential but limited revenue. In LBOs, value extraction occurs through operational enhancements, cost reductions, and eventual exits via sales or initial public offerings, with holding periods averaging 4-6 years. A seminal example is Kohlberg Kravis Roberts' (KKR) 1988 LBO of RJR Nabisco for $31 billion, financed with heavy leverage that highlighted both the strategy's amplification of returns and risks of over-indebtedness. Performance metrics emphasize , accounting for irregular cash flows and illiquidity premiums, with historical net IRRs for U.S. funds averaging 11-15% over long horizons ending in 2023, outperforming public equities by 4.8% annually on a risk-adjusted basis from 2000-2023. Top-quartile funds have delivered 20%+ net IRRs, driven by selective deal sourcing and , though median funds often lag public benchmarks post-fees and expenses, which can exceed 2% management plus 20% . Empirical analyses attribute much of this alpha to operational improvements—such as revenue growth via add-on acquisitions and efficiency gains—rather than alone, with studies showing operational levers contributing 40-60% of value creation in buyouts since the 2000s. amplifies returns by reducing equity outlay but introduces default risks, as debt service consumes without underlying improvements. Market dynamics in 2025 reflect recovery amid challenges, with global private equity assets under management surpassing $5 trillion, fueled by dry powder exceeding $2.5 trillion and a shift toward growth equity in AI and technology sectors. AI-driven investments have surged, with private transactions in AI exceeding $140 billion in the first half of 2025 alone, prioritizing scalable software and data infrastructure over traditional buyouts. Valuations have compressed 50-70% from 2021 peaks due to higher interest rates and exit slowdowns—global PE exits fell 71% in value from 2021 highs—prompting disciplined deployment and focus on resilient mid-market deals. Fundraising hit records pre-2022 but slowed to $340 billion in the first three quarters of 2025, a projected 25% annual decline, as limited partners demand proven track records amid public market competition. Criticisms center on leverage-induced fragility, exemplified by Toys "R" Us's 2017 bankruptcy after and Bain Capital's 2005 LBO loaded $5 billion in and extracted $470 million in fees, contributing to insolvency despite market dominance. Post-fee outperformance remains debated, with research indicating diminished alpha since the 2000s and many funds matching public indices after illiquidity adjustments, particularly for non-top performers. Causal evidence underscores that sustainable returns stem from verifiable operational causal chains—like optimizations yielding 2-5% EBITDA margins—over , as excessive correlates with higher rates (twice that of public firms in ). Notwithstanding biases in academic critiques toward underemphasizing selection effects, data affirm private equity's edge in transforming underperforming assets through hands-on , though systemic risks from in hot sectors like warrant scrutiny.

Equity in Social Policy and Philosophy

Philosophical Foundations and Equity vs. Equality

Equity's philosophical origins lie in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics (circa 350 BCE), where he posits equity (epieikeia) as a virtue correcting the rigidity of universal legal justice by applying proportional rather than arithmetic equality—treating unequals unequally according to relevant differences in merit or circumstance to achieve fairness. Aristotle contrasts this with strict equality, which applies the same rule uniformly without regard for particulars, arguing that equity better approximates true justice by mitigating the law's inevitable generality. In contemporary , John Rawls's (1971) reframes equity through "," employing a veil of ignorance in the original position to derive principles prioritizing equal basic liberties and permitting socioeconomic inequalities only if they maximally benefit the least advantaged via the difference principle. This outcome-oriented approach seeks to rectify arbitrary disparities in natural endowments or starting positions, but critics contend it disregards causal incentives for innovation and effort by imposing patterned distributions that override voluntary exchanges. Robert Nozick's (1974) counters redistributive equity with an , holding that in holdings arises from legitimate acquisition and transfer, not from end-state patterns like equal outcomes or needs-based adjustments, thereby preserving individual agency against coercive redistribution. Nozick argues such theories violate by treating people as means to distributional ends, favoring historical processes over hypothetical fairness constructs. Philosophically, equality emphasizes identical treatment or inputs regardless of variance, while equity demands tailored interventions to equalize outputs, for disparate circumstances; yet causally, this overlooks heritable individual differences, as twin studies indicate 40-50% for socioeconomic outcomes like , suggesting innate factors beyond environmental equity measures influence disparities. of opportunity, via meritocratic processes, aligns with causal by rewarding differential inputs, whereas equity's outcome focus correlates with empirical backlash, including declining support for related initiatives, with U.S. worker approval for efforts falling to 52% in 2024 from 56% in 2023.

Applications in Education, Welfare, and Affirmative Action

In education, equity initiatives have emphasized resource allocation tailored to perceived group needs, exemplified by of the , which prohibits sex-based discrimination in federally funded programs and athletics. This led to a rise in female intercollegiate athletes from approximately 30,000 in 1971 to over 215,000 by 2012, alongside increased women's enrollment in higher education from 42% of undergraduates in 1970 to 57% by 2010. The of 2001 further advanced equity by requiring states to report test scores disaggregated by race, income, and other subgroups to close achievement gaps through accountability sanctions on underperforming schools. However, (NAEP) data indicate persistent racial gaps, with the Black-White reading gap at grade 8 holding steady at 25-30 points since the 1970s despite expanded interventions, and recent post-2019 declines exacerbating disparities for low-income and minority students. Welfare applications of equity rely on means-testing to direct benefits toward those with greater economic disadvantage, a framework established during the with the of 1935, which created Aid to Dependent Children as a federal-state program providing cash assistance scaled to family income and need. This approach contrasted with universal entitlements like Old-Age Insurance, prioritizing redistribution based on thresholds; by 1996, reforms under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act converted it to , maintaining means-testing while adding work requirements to promote self-sufficiency. Proponents argue such targeting enhances inclusion for the vulnerable, yet empirical reviews link long-term reliance on means-tested aid to reduced labor participation among recipients, with causal analyses showing work disincentives from benefit cliffs where small income gains trigger sharp eligibility losses. Affirmative action embodies equity through preferential treatment to counteract historical inequities, originating in the United States with President Kennedy's on March 6, 1961, which mandated federal contractors to "take affirmative action" to recruit and employ without regard to , creed, color, or . Expanded under President Johnson via in 1965, it influenced education and employment by encouraging quotas or preferences in admissions and hiring, though the in Regents of the v. Bakke (1978) barred rigid quotas while permitting as a factor. Internationally, South Africa's (BEE) policy, initiated in the mid-1990s under Nelson Mandela's government and codified in the 2003 Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, requires companies to meet ownership, management, and skills development targets favoring black to redress apartheid-era exclusions. Empirical outcomes of affirmative action in education reveal increased access—such as Black enrollment in selective colleges rising from 4% in 1970 to 14% by 2010—but limited gains in completion rates or professional outcomes, with NAEP and graduation data showing sustained achievement disparities uncorrelated with enrollment surges. Research on mismatch theory, advanced by Richard Sander, analyzes data finding that racial preferences place beneficiaries in environments where academic credentials lag peers by 1-2 standard deviations, correlating with bar passage rates dropping 20-30% below credentials-predicted levels and higher attrition, suggesting causal harm from overplacement rather than underrepresentation. While advocates cite metrics like diversified campuses fostering inclusion, critics, drawing on regression discontinuity designs, attribute persistent gaps to equity-driven dilutions in admission standards and rigor, which undermine skill acquisition without addressing foundational causes like family structure or pre-college preparation.

Empirical Evidence, Outcomes, and Policy Impacts

Affirmative action policies in , introduced in the 1960s and expanded in the 1970s, increased underrepresented minority enrollment by over 20% at selective institutions through race-conscious admissions practices. This expansion correlated with a steady rise in college enrollment from about 4% of total students in 1970 to higher shares by the , though disparities in completion rates persisted, with minority graduation rates at elite schools often lagging behind non-minority peers due to academic mismatch effects. Empirical analyses, including those from the v. Harvard case, revealed that race-based preferences imposed higher admissions standards on Asian American applicants—evidenced by statistical models showing penalty equivalents of 140 SAT points relative to other groups—while enabling demographic targets at the expense of . Despite gains in access, socioeconomic outcomes show limited closure of gaps; U.S. data from 2024 indicate raw median weekly for Black full-time workers at approximately 80% of white counterparts ($1,023 vs. $1,278), with workers at 73%, persisting even after controls for and in peer-reviewed adjustments that attribute much but not all to observable factors like and hours worked. Randomized evaluations of comprehensive equity interventions, such as the Children's Zone's Promise Academy charters, demonstrate short-term gains in test scores (e.g., 0.15-0.25 standard deviations in math and reading via lottery-based assignment) but negligible impacts on long-term metrics like or , suggesting that intensive support alone does not fully overcome baseline disparities without sustained causal drivers. Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) training programs, mandated in many organizations, yield short-term reductions in implicit bias per meta-analyses of over 400 studies but fail to produce lasting behavioral changes or diversity improvements, with effects dissipating within months due to backlash or habituation. Claims of economic benefits from workforce diversity, such as McKinsey & Company's reports linking ethnic diversity to 35% higher profitability, have been critiqued for and reverse causality—firms with superior performance attract diverse talent, not —as replication attempts in independent analyses find no robust causal link after controlling for confounders. Estimates of affirmative action's fiscal costs, including compliance and inefficiency losses, range from hundreds of millions in regulatory burdens to broader economy-wide figures exceeding $200 billion annually when factoring mismatched allocations and productivity drags, though precise attribution remains debated due to confounding variables. The 2023 Supreme Court ruling in v. Harvard underscored causal evidence of equity policies crowding out merit, with regression-based models indicating that eliminating race preferences would reduce Black and Hispanic admits by 50-70% at Harvard while increasing Asian admits, without proportionally harming overall institutional quality but highlighting opportunity costs for high-achieving applicants. Post-ruling data from states like , which banned race-based admissions in 1996, show initial enrollment dips followed by recovery via class-based alternatives, with no collapse in minority STEM participation and arguments that merit-focused systems better sustain long-term outcomes by avoiding overplacement mismatches that elevate dropout risks. Overall, while equity initiatives have expanded access, causal studies emphasize trade-offs in efficiency and persistence of gaps, prioritizing empirical metrics over intent-based narratives.

Criticisms, Debates, and Causal Analyses

Critics of policies argue that group-based remedies overlook individual differences in ability, effort, and circumstance, often resulting in against high-performing non-favored groups. For instance, in the 2023 decision Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, evidence showed Harvard's admissions process penalized Asian American applicants through subjective "" ratings that correlated with , effectively imposing quotas despite formal denials, which disadvantaged Asians who comprised 25-30% of qualified applicants but were capped lower. This ruling highlighted how equity frameworks prioritize demographic proportionality over merit, leading to reverse claims; post-decision analyses revealed minimal drops for Asians at affected , yet persistent biases in holistic reviews suggest ongoing issues. Debates over equity pit conceptions of "fairness through outcomes" against equality of opportunity, with empirical data indicating broad public skepticism toward race-conscious measures. Surveys framing policies as "racial preferences" rather than "affirmative action" reveal majority opposition, as Americans distinguish between remedying past discrimination and current group entitlements; for example, a 2023 Cato Institute analysis of multiple polls found 50-74% opposition across demographics when preferences are explicitly described. Asian Americans exhibit divided views, with Pew Research in 2023 showing 53% supporting race in admissions but higher opposition among Indian and Chinese subgroups due to direct impacts. Proponents from left-leaning perspectives, often in academia, defend equity as essential for addressing systemic disparities, yet such sources frequently underemphasize individual agency and overattribute outcomes to historical factors, as critiqued in labor economics literature. From a causal standpoint, equity policies can distort incentives by rewarding group identity over personal agency, fostering dependency and grievance cultures. George Borjas' research demonstrates that high levels, often justified under equity rationales for economic , depress wages for low-skilled native workers by 3-5% per 10% immigrant influx, shifting focus from skill-building to redistributive claims and eroding labor market dynamism. Similarly, post-2020 (DEI) initiatives surged after protests, mandating demographic targets in corporations, but by 2024-2025, firms like terminated DEI programs amid legal risks and inefficacy, citing no measurable productivity gains and internal divisions; abandoned specific underrepresented group hiring goals, reverting to merit-based principles after failing to meet 30% leadership targets by 2025. These reversals reflect causal failures: DEI correlated with backlash and flight, as voluntary merit systems historically yielded diverse outcomes without , per pre-2020 hiring data. While some targeted interventions, such as conditional cash transfers in programs like Mexico's Progresa (reducing poverty by 10% via school and health incentives), demonstrate successes in alleviating extreme deprivation without broad , broader equity regimes introduce like social fragmentation. U.S. expansions since 1965 lifted millions via means-tested aid but coincided with family structure breakdowns and persistent urban poverty traps, as single-parent households rose from 8% to 25% among affected groups, per longitudinal data, suggesting causal links between disincentivizing work and marriage and entrenched dependency. Empirical reviews indicate such policies often boomerang, with low uptake and negligible health improvements despite billions spent, underscoring that equity's group-focus amplifies division over universal opportunity enhancements like .

Named Entities and Specialized Uses

Professional Associations like Actors' Equity

The Actors' Equity Association (AEA), established on May 26, 1913, in New York City by 112 professional theater actors seeking better working conditions, functions as the primary labor union for live stage performers and stage managers in the United States. Initially lacking formal employer recognition, the union achieved bargaining authority through the landmark strike commencing August 7, 1919, which halted 37 Broadway productions and compelled producers to concede an eight-hour standard workday, minimum salary scales starting at $35 weekly for principals, and prohibitions on blacklisting. This action, involving over 7,000 participants nationwide by September 1919, marked the first successful actors' strike in American theater history and established foundational contracts emphasizing safety protocols, rehearsal limits, and grievance procedures. AEA's ongoing role centers on negotiating multi-employer agreements that secure wages, health benefits, pension contributions, and protections against unsafe venues or excessive hours, with contracts tailored to production scales from to regional tours. As of 2023, membership exceeds 51,000, encompassing , singers, dancers, and stage managers, enabling the union to enforce standards that have incrementally raised baseline compensation—such as 2023 Production Contract minimums of $2,213 weekly for performers—amid fluctuating industry demands. These efforts have demonstrably elevated earnings for unionized stage workers compared to non-union counterparts, aligning with broader findings that union representation correlates with 10-20% higher median weekly wages across occupations. In the , Actors' Equity, formed in 1930 by West End performers dissatisfied with fragmented representation, mirrors AEA's mission by safeguarding stage artists' interests through contract negotiations, fee minimums, and advocacy against exploitative terms like indefinite non-compete clauses in freelance agreements. With approximately 50,000 members, the union has pursued mergers with related groups for broader coverage and maintains ties to the , facilitating cross-border protections and strikes, such as those addressing post-Brexit touring rights. Both organizations prioritize performer welfare over non-union work allowances, enforcing internal rules that restrict members from undercutting negotiated rates, thereby sustaining industry-wide labor standards.

Equity in Entertainment and Media Financing

Equity financing in production entails investors providing in exchange for interests, granting them a share of net profits after recoupment rather than fixed repayments typical of instruments. This approach contrasts with loans, where lenders prioritize principal and irrespective of commercial outcomes, making equity suitable for speculative projects with uncertain streams from , streaming, or ancillary sales. Producers often structure deals via companies (LLCs) or private placements, offering investors participation points or backend percentages once distribution fees and costs are covered. Slate financing deals proliferated in after the early , pooling funds to underwrite portfolios of and thereby dispersing risk across multiple titles, as individual project failure rates exceed 80% based on historical data. For instance, between 2000 and 2008, structured slate arrangements enabled studios to external for diversified production pipelines, with funds committing billions to mitigate inherent in content hits. Independent producers typically raise 30-50% of budgets through such equity sources, complementing , tax incentives, or gap financing, though this varies by project scale and market conditions. Entities like Equity Pictures KG, a German financier active until around 2012 with ties to U.S. production houses such as , exemplified this model by channeling investor funds into mid-budget action and drama films since 2005, though many slates underperformed amid economic downturns and shifting viewer preferences. Equity stakes facilitate high-risk endeavors banks avoid, enabling diverse storytelling unbound by immediate commercial mandates, yet they impose causal trade-offs: creators cede partial decision-making to investors seeking returns, potentially compromising artistic autonomy, while flops amplify losses without recourse, underscoring the sector's zero-sum dynamics where successes subsidize widespread failures.

Other Domain-Specific Entities

In real estate , equity platforms enable individual investors to acquire fractional stakes in developments, a practice facilitated by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act signed into law on April 5, 2012, which relaxed securities regulations to permit equity offerings to non-accredited investors. , established in 2012 as one of the earliest such platforms, allows participation in diversified funds, including commercial and multifamily properties, with investors purchasing eREITs that have collectively raised billions in capital through Regulation A+ exemptions. In the , equity release products, primarily lifetime mortgages for individuals aged 55 and older, permit homeowners to borrow against accumulated equity without monthly repayments until death or care entry, releasing funds for or other needs. Total lending via these schemes reached £636 million in Q2 2025, marking a 10% increase from £578 million in Q2 , driven by higher lump-sum drawdowns amid stable rates.

References

  1. [1]
    equity | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
    In law, the term "equity" refers to a particular set of remedies and associated procedures involved with civil law.
  2. [2]
    Jurisdiction: Equity - Federal Judicial Center |
    Equity was a centuries-old system of English jurisprudence in which judges based decisions on general principles of fairness in situations where rigid ...
  3. [3]
    Shareholders' Equity - Definition, Formula, Calculate
    Shareholders' equity refers to the owners' claim on the assets of a company after debts have been settled. It is also known as share capital.What is Shareholders' Equity? · Understanding Shareholders... · How to Calculate...
  4. [4]
    Equity vs. Equality: What's the Difference? | Online Public Health
    Nov 5, 2020 · Equality means each individual or group of people is given the same resources or opportunities. Equity recognizes that each person has different circumstances.
  5. [5]
    EQUALITY VS. EQUITY | American Journal of Law and Equality
    Sep 1, 2021 · Equity is fair treatment, access, opportunity, and advancement for all people, while at the same time striving to identify and eliminate ...
  6. [6]
    the unintended consequences of equity-based policies
    This dissertation examines this phenomenon through three empirical analyses, each demonstrating how equity-focused policies can produce unintended consequences ...
  7. [7]
    3 Things You Should Know About the Unintended Consequences of ...
    Why do organizational policies and procedures fail to improve diversity outcomes? The purpose of diversity initiatives is to help groups that face disadvantages ...
  8. [8]
    A systematic review of diversity, equity, and inclusion and antiracism ...
    Oct 19, 2023 · The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate training characteristics, measures, and results of peer-reviewed studies (published between 2000 and 2022) ...
  9. [9]
    Equity - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating from Latin aequitas via Old French equite, early 14c., meaning equality, fairness, or impartiality, and just conduct toward others.
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    "Origin of Equity Jurisdiction and Jurisprudence" by Edward Murphy
    We propose to treat rather of the nature of Equity as it existed in the Roman Law,its influence in the English law, the primitive condition of the law at the ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Historical Nature of Equity Jurisprudence
    [In] England the term 'equity,' means either natural justice or that particular branch of. English law which was developed and applied by the Court of Chancery.
  13. [13]
    History of Equity Law - UOLLB
    Jul 14, 2024 · Equity law has its origins in medieval England, notably during the reigns of King Richard the Lionheart and King John in the late 12th and early 13th centuries.
  14. [14]
    The Historical Development of Equity Law | LawTeacher.net
    Equity arose in the 13th century due to common law limitations. The King delegated power to the Chancellor, who developed the Court of Chancery. By the 19th ...
  15. [15]
    Civil court cases: Chancery equity suits before 1558
    This guide will help you to find, understand and interpret records of civil disputes heard by the court of Chancery from the late 14th century to 1558.
  16. [16]
    Trusts, And How They Came To Be | Appleby
    Apr 25, 2024 · Trusts trace their history to Ancient Rome, and were developed further in England in response to injustice experienced by early Crusaders.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] The Trust in English law p.1 1.1. The historical origin and evolution ...
    According to the definition, this instrument is classified as "equitable," which means that it may be enforced in equity. Equity is a legal discipline ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] English Doctrine of Equitable Mortgages by Deposit of Title Deeds ...
    At an early date, the severity of the common law mort- gage led to interference by Chancery, by giving the debtor an equity of redemption.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Controversies over Chancery Courts and Equity Law in the ...
    (2) Equity supplies omissions in the jurisdiction of the common law. It deals with uses and trusts, and, especially, with mortgages and equities of ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Early History of Equity
    No doubt the root _idea of equity, the idea that law should be administered fairly and that hard cases should so far as possible be avoided, is common to many.
  21. [21]
    The Law of Equity and Equitable Remedies | LawTeacher.net
    Equity follows the law: Courts will firstly apply common law and if this is not fair then an equitable remedy will be provided. This maxim sets out that equity ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    Reasons for the Creation of Equity and its Common Law Differences
    Another important distinction between equity and common law lies in the source of the rules governing the decisions that are made in each of the systems ( ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] The Place and Function of Pure Equity in the Structure of Law
    If law is to be harmonized across national boundaries on the basis of the equitable content of legal systems, we must understand fully the nature of the ...
  25. [25]
    Maxims of equity - Oxford Reference
    equity follows the law (i.e. equity follows the rules of common law unless there is a good reason to the contrary);. • equity looks at the intent not at the ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Historical perspective—the law / equity divide—England and the USA
    Historical perspective—the law / equity divide—England and the USA. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui—Spring. A. England—origins and up to the late th century.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Nineteenth Century Equity - A Study in Law Reform - Part I
    The first part of this study, therefore,, will deal with matters leading up to the nineteenth century and the basis upon which equity and the practice of the ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] The System of Equitable Remedies - UCLA Law Review
    The conventional wisdom is that the distinction between legal and equitable remedies is outmoded and serves no purpose. This Article challenges that view.
  29. [29]
    Equitable Remedies Archives - Irish Legal Guide
    Tracing is an equitable remedy by which a claimant may claim assets which have become mixed with those of another or have changed their original form.<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    The Judicature Acts of 1873 and 1875 - UK Parliament
    The higher court system, which had existed since the Middle Ages, was completely reorganised by the Judicature Acts passed by Parliament in 1873 and 1875.
  31. [31]
    Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Merge Equity and Common Law
    Under the new rules, suits in equity and suits at common law were grouped together under the term “civil action.”
  32. [32]
    Rule 1. Scope and Purpose | Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
    The merger of law, equity, and admiralty practice is complete. There is no need to carry forward the phrases that initially accomplished the merger. The former ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Equitable remedies for breach of contract | Clifford Chance
    ▫ Equitable remedies have an important role to play in supplementing common law remedies and should not be overlooked in breach of contract cases. ▫ The need ...
  34. [34]
    Federal Judicial Caseload Statistics 2024 - United States Courts
    Civil case filings in the U.S. district courts increased 22 percent (up 63,771 cases) to 347,991. This growth occurred because of several multidistrict ...U.S. Courts Of Appeals · Civil Filings · Criminal Filings
  35. [35]
    “A Sword in the Bed”: Bringing an End to the Fusion of Law and Equity
    ... equity jurisdiction on generalist judges has led to substantial misapplication of equitable remedies. Further, making every trial-level judge in the country ...
  36. [36]
    Accounting Equation: What It Is and How You Calculate It
    The shareholders' equity number is a company's total assets minus its total liabilities. It can be defined as the total number of dollars that a company would ...
  37. [37]
    Shareholder Equity (SE): What It Is and How It Is Calculated
    Shareholder equity is a company's net worth and the total amount available for return to shareholders after paying off all debts.What Is Shareholder Equity... · Why It Matters · Positive vs. Negative SE · Examples
  38. [38]
    Stockholders Equity - Corporate Finance Institute
    Stockholders Equity (also known as Shareholders Equity) is an account on a company's balance sheet that consists of share capital plus retained earnings.What is Stockholders Equity? · Components of Stockholders...
  39. [39]
    The Genesis of Double Entry Bookkeeping | The Accounting Review
    Jan 1, 2016 · We know with certainty that the technique of double entry emerged in the 13th century in Italy. Unfortunately, no complete set of documentation ...
  40. [40]
    Luca Pacioli and the Birth of Modern Accounting
    Oct 1, 2024 · The modern system of accounting known as “double-entry” bookkeeping was an invention of the famous Italian mathematician, educator, author, and Franciscan ...
  41. [41]
    Home Equity: What It Is, How It Works, and How You Can Use It
    Home equity is the current market value of your home, minus any liens such as a mortgage. You can leverage your home equity by using it to back a home ...
  42. [42]
    Nearly One In Four U.S. Homes With Mortgages 'Underwater' - NPR
    Nov 24, 2009 · Nearly 10.7 million, or 23 percent, of all residential properties with mortgages were in negative equity as of September, 2009. An additional ...
  43. [43]
    The Depth of Negative Equity and Mortgage Default Decisions
    This result suggests that borrowers face high default and transaction costs. Our estimates show that about 80 percent of defaults in our sample are the result ...
  44. [44]
    Shareholders Equity | Formula + Calculator - Wall Street Prep
    The formula to calculate shareholders equity is equal to the difference between total assets and total liabilities.How to Calculate... · What are the Components of... · How Do Stock Buybacks...
  45. [45]
    Common And Preferred Stock - principlesofaccounting.com
    Recall that preferred dividends are expected to be paid before common dividends, and those dividends are usually a fixed amount (e.g., a percentage of the ...
  46. [46]
    Differences Between Preferred Stock vs. Common Stock - Carta
    Jun 5, 2025 · Common shares are typically the last to receive proceeds based on liquidation preference, which means that preferred stockholders and creditors ...Missing: dividends | Show results with:dividends
  47. [47]
    Common stock vs. preferred stock: What's the difference? - Bankrate
    Apr 28, 2025 · Common stock has higher long-term growth potential than preferred stock but also has lower priority for dividends and a payout in the event of a liquidation.Common stock vs. preferred... · Key differences · How stock classes work<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Understanding the Modigliani-Miller Theorem: An Investor's Guide
    The Modigliani-Miller theorem asserts the irrelevance of a company's capital structure to its market value, based on the present value of future earnings ...What Is the Modigliani-Miller... · History · Key Assumptions
  49. [49]
    M&M Theorem - Overview, Assumptions, Propositions
    The main idea of the M&M theory is that the capital structure of a company does not affect its overall value.
  50. [50]
    Costs of debt, tax benefits and a new measure of non-debt tax shields
    This study examines whether the costs of debt and non-debt tax related issues might shed some light on the apparent “conservative leverage puzzle” for Spanish ...
  51. [51]
    How Share-Price Fixation Killed Enron - Harvard Business Review
    Jul 11, 2013 · Enron had created multiple non-consolidated Special Purpose Entities (SPEs) that were levered 97/3, meaning $97 of debt to each $3 of equity.
  52. [52]
    The $127 Trillion Global Stock Market in One Giant Chart
    Aug 25, 2025 · The global stock market has a total value of $127 trillion. · Nearly half of that value is in America, with a total of $62.2 trillion. · China and ...
  53. [53]
    IPO Market Trends: AI and Capital | Morgan Stanley at Work
    With more IPOs of high-growth companies in 2025 than in the past three years and the solid trading performance of recently public companies, raising capital in ...
  54. [54]
    10 Largest Leveraged Buyouts in History (+5 Recent Examples)
    Oct 9, 2025 · RJR Nabisco (1989): $31 billion. The RJR Nabisco LBO by KKR is one of the most famous leveraged buyouts, often cited as a classic example of how ...RJR Nabisco (1989): $31 billion · Heinz (2013): $28 billion · Alltel (2007): $25 billion
  55. [55]
    Corporate Kleptocracy at RJR Nabisco - Investopedia
    In 1988 the firm KKR acquired RJR Nabisco for $25 billion, in one the largest leveraged buyouts in U.S. history. Johnson was fired as CEO after he had ...Record-Breaking Merger · In Play · Battling for Oreos and Camels · Nabisco Lives on
  56. [56]
    Long-Term Private Equity Performance: 2000 to 2023 - CAIA
    Apr 23, 2024 · The study finds that private equity produced a meaningful 4.8% annualized excess return over public equity. We test for any diminution of excess ...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Private Equity Versus Public Equity Returns - - Alpha Architect
    Dec 13, 2024 · Cliffwater found that private equity allocations by state pensions produced a 11.0% net-of-fee annualized return over the 23-year period ending June 30, 2023.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  58. [58]
    Study – Value Creation in Private Equity - Capital Dynamics
    Jun 24, 2014 · Our new findings demonstrate that operational improvements remained the key driver of value creation and consistently contributed to value creation in private ...
  59. [59]
    Global Private Markets Report 2025 - McKinsey
    May 20, 2025 · In McKinsey's latest annual Global Private Markets Report we look at some of the biggest trends shaping private equity in 2025 and beyond.
  60. [60]
    4 Reasons for a resurgence in growth equity
    Sep 16, 2025 · Sector-specific dealmaking is surging: AI-related private transactions topped $140 billion in the first half of this year, up dramatically from ...
  61. [61]
    A big role for small and middle-market private equity investments
    The global value of PE exits in 2023 was down 71% from the peak in 2021 and 24% below the prior year. Global buyout deal volume dropped 60% from 2021 to ...
  62. [62]
    The Big Investment Firms That Lost $1.3 Billion In The Toys "R" Us ...
    Sep 19, 2017 · KKR, Bain Capital and Vornado, the investment firms that saddled Toys "R" Us with debt and fees, have pushed it into bankruptcy court.
  63. [63]
    Private equity: The operational era of value creation accelerates
    Sep 22, 2025 · Our study confirms what many are already experiencing: operational improvement has surged to the top of the value creation agenda. It's the ...
  64. [64]
    Nicomachean Ethics by Aristotle - The Internet Classics Archive
    Hence the equitable is just, and better than one kind of justice-not better than absolute justice but better than the error that arises from the absoluteness of ...
  65. [65]
    John Rawls - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Mar 25, 2008 · Rawls constructs justice as fairness around specific interpretations of the ideas that citizens are free and equal, and that society should be ...Life and Work · Justice as Fairness: Justice... · The Law of Peoples: Liberal...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Anarchy, State and Utopia, pp. 149-231
    The general outlines of the theory of justice in holdings are that the holdings of a person are just if he is entitled to them by the principles of justice in ...
  67. [67]
    Robert Nozick's Political Philosophy.
    Anarchy, State and Utopia can also be seen as a critical response to John Rawls' Theory of Justice, which was published just three years earlier and was ...Life · Anarchy, State and Utopia · An Invisible Hand Justification...
  68. [68]
    Associations between common genetic variants and income provide ...
    Jan 28, 2025 · Twin studies have estimated income heritability in these societies to be around 40–50% (refs.). However, the heritabilities of ...<|separator|>
  69. [69]
    Heritability of class and status: Implications for sociological theory ...
    Most individual-level outcomes of interest to sociologists are indirectly influenced by genetics, including socioeconomic outcomes like education, income, ...
  70. [70]
    Views of DEI have become slightly more negative among U.S. workers
    Nov 19, 2024 · About half of workers (52%) now say focusing on increasing DEI at work is mainly a good thing, down from 56% in February 2023.
  71. [71]
    Title IX enacted | June 23, 1972 - History.com
    In addition, Title IX is credited with decreasing the dropout rate of girls from high school and increasing the number of women who pursue higher education and ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Equal Access to Education: Forty Years of Title IX
    Jun 23, 2012 · Title IX prohibits sex discrimination in education, ensuring equal opportunities, and was passed to address educational inequalities for women.
  73. [73]
    How Title IX transformed colleges, universities over past 50 years
    Jun 22, 2022 · It upended intercollegiate sports but also forced shifts in hiring, promotion, admissions, reckoning on sexual harassment, assault.
  74. [74]
    The Impact of Title IX - Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History |
    Title IX prohibits sex-based discrimination in education programs receiving federal funding, impacting areas like higher education, career education, and math/ ...
  75. [75]
    No Child Left Behind: An Overview - Education Week
    Apr 10, 2015 · Under the NCLB law, schools must break out results on annual tests by both the student population as a whole, and these “subgroup” students.
  76. [76]
    Left Behind? The Effect of No Child Left Behind on Academic ...
    One of the goals of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB; 20 U.S.C. § 6301) was to close racial and socioeconomic achievement gaps.
  77. [77]
    Methodology Studies - Achievement Gaps | NAEP
    Apr 3, 2024 · Explore NAEP achievement gaps among White, Black, and Hispanic students and how the gaps have changed over time.Black-White Gaps FAQs · 2011 Key Findings · Hispanic-White Gaps FAQs
  78. [78]
    Achievement Gap Dashboard - The Nation's Report Card
    The charts on this page show achievement gaps, which are significant differences in assessment scores between two groups of students.
  79. [79]
    [PDF] The US social welfare structure has been shaped both by
    The Act also provided Federal grants-in-aid to the States for the means-tested programs of Old-Age Assistance, and Aid to the Blind. These programs ...Missing: Deal | Show results with:Deal
  80. [80]
    What are the major federal safety net programs in the U.S.?
    Jan 15, 2014 · 1935: The Social Security Act · 1935: Unemployment Insurance · 1964: Head Start · 1964: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) · 1965: ...
  81. [81]
    The New Deal: Part II - Social Welfare History Project
    Benefits are paid regardless of an individual's income from saving, pensions, insurance, or other forms of ...
  82. [82]
    Biggest Means Tested Welfare Increase in U.S. History Would Hurt ...
    Nov 5, 2021 · The latest Democrat tax and spend reconciliation bill (also known as the Build Back Better bill), would increase means-tested welfare spending by $756 billion ...
  83. [83]
    Executive Order 10925—Establishing the President's Committee on ...
    Executive Order 10925—Establishing the President's Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity. March 06, 1961. WHEREAS discrimination because of race, creed, ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  84. [84]
    EEOC History: The Law | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity ...
    In March 1961, President John F. Kennedy signs Executive Order 10925 prohibiting federal government contractors from discriminating on account of race and ...
  85. [85]
    Why is South Africa's black economic empowerment policy so ... - BBC
    Mar 14, 2025 · Black Economic Empowerment was initially introduced by former South African president Nelson Mandela in the 1990s, as one of his government's ...
  86. [86]
    Black Economic Empowerment in South Africa
    Blacks socially and economically, hence the enactment of a number of acts and policies including the Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) policy in mid 1990s.
  87. [87]
    What the 2024 NAEP Results Reveal About Education in the United ...
    Jan 29, 2025 · Achievement gaps persist. Black, Latino, and low-income students continue to score significantly lower than their white and higher-income peers, ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] A Systemic Analysis of Affirmative Action - Stanford Law Review
    A growing body of evidence suggests that students who attend schools where they are at a significant academic disadvantage suffer a variety of ill effects, from ...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Does Affirmative Action Lead to “Mismatch”? A Review of the Evidence
    Several thinkers had floated the idea of mismatch during the 20th century, and there was even some research into related topics, but it was Richard Sander's ...
  90. [90]
    [PDF] The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Students, Teachers, and ...
    The overarching goal of NCLB has been to drive broad and substantive improvements in student achievement. This section discusses the available empirical ...
  91. [91]
    Affirmative action and its race-neutral alternatives - ScienceDirect
    Affirmative action increased underrepresented minority enrollment by over 20%. ... Affirmative action in education: Evidence from engineering college admissions ...
  92. [92]
    2. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: HISTORY AND RATIONALE
    Only in the wake of affirmative action measures in the late 1960s and early 1970s did the percentage of black college students begin to climb steadily (in 1970, ...
  93. [93]
    [PDF] SFFA-v.-Harvard-Complaint.pdf - Students for Fair Admissions
    Statistical evidence reveals that Harvard uses “holistic” admissions to disguise the fact that it holds Asian. Americans to a far higher standard than other ...Missing: discontinuity | Show results with:discontinuity
  94. [94]
    [PDF] Usual Weekly Earnings of Wage and Salary Workers
    Apr 16, 2024 · Median earnings for Hispanic men were $914, or 72.9 percent of the median for White men. The difference was less among women, as Black women's ...Missing: gap | Show results with:gap
  95. [95]
    [PDF] 1 Are High-Quality Schools Enough to Increase Achievement ...
    We provide the first empirical test of the causal impact of HCZ charters on educational outcomes. Both lottery and instrumental variable identification ...
  96. [96]
    [PDF] Why Doesn't Diversity Training Work? - Harvard University
    A meta-analysis of 426 studies found weak immediate effects on unconscious bias and weaker effects on explicit bias. A side-by- side test of 17 interventions to ...
  97. [97]
    [PDF] McKinsey's Diversity Matters/Delivers/Wins Results Revisited
    First, we conclude that caution is warranted in relying on McKinsey's findings to support the view that US publicly traded firms can deliver improved financial ...
  98. [98]
    Cost of Affirmative Action | PDF - Scribd
    Rating 5.0 (1) It estimates the total economic costs of racial preferences and diversity policies to be over $225 billion annually. It also discusses how affirmative action ...<|separator|>
  99. [99]
    [PDF] 20-1199 Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows ...
    Jun 29, 2023 · evidence that Harvard could nearly replicate the current racial composition of its student body without resorting to race-based practices if ...Missing: discontinuity | Show results with:discontinuity
  100. [100]
    Affirmative Action in Higher Education: Relevance for Today's Racial ...
    Jan 6, 2020 · In the 1960s and 1970s, colleges and graduate schools began developing affirmative action policies to expand access to disadvantaged and ...
  101. [101]
    Asian Americans Got Played on Affirmative Action - Inside Higher Ed
    Feb 17, 2025 · In the lead-up to the 2023 Supreme Court ... discrimination because of the small decline in Asian American enrollment at those three universities.
  102. [102]
    Americans Say they Like “Affirmative Action” Yet Oppose Racial ...
    Aug 8, 2023 · Every survey that omitted the words “affirmative action” revealed majority opposition. Specifically, phrases such as “racial preferences” and “ ...Missing: 2024 | Show results with:2024
  103. [103]
    Asian Americans Hold Mixed Views Around Affirmative Action
    Jun 8, 2023 · The court is expected to decide the cases by the end of June 2023. ... Racial Bias & Discrimination. Share This Link: X; Facebook; Threads ...
  104. [104]
    Meta terminates its DEI programs days before Trump inauguration
    Jan 10, 2025 · As of Friday the company is also terminating its diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs, effective immediately.Missing: reverse | Show results with:reverse
  105. [105]
    Google drops diversity pledge, shifts DEI hiring strategy
    Feb 6, 2025 · The decision reverses Google's 2020 pledge to increase leadership representation from underrepresented groups by 30% by 2025. The company will ...
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Policies to Address Poverty in America | Brookings Institution
    wage setting to protect against the unintended consequences of raising the minimum wage. STATE-LEVEL POLICIES. State initiatives are a sensible strategy in ...
  107. [107]
    Handing Money to the Poor Is Never Enough - NIH
    Aug 14, 2024 · Both physical and mental health outcomes have remained largely unchanged, and some unintended negative effects, such as low participation in the ...
  108. [108]
    About Equity - Actors' Equity Association
    Executive Director: Al Vincent, Jr. Membership: Over 51,000 members, including singers, actors, dancers, stage managers. Founded: May 26, 1913, in New York City.Work at Equity · How We Operate · Political ActionMissing: British | Show results with:British
  109. [109]
    Actors Equity's First Strike, 100 Years Ago Today - New York Theater
    Aug 7, 2019 · Actors Equity went on strike for the first time on August 7, 1919 -- one hundred years ago today. The strike closed 37 plays, and prevented ...
  110. [110]
    When Actors' Equity Staged Its First Strike - American Theatre
    Mar 1, 2013 · On Monday, Aug. 18, 1919, the best stage show in New York wasn't on Broadway. It was raining in the city, and there was a subway strike.
  111. [111]
    One Hundred Years of Equity Strikes and Labor Solidarity
    Jan 31, 2019 · In August 1919, following months of stalled negotiations, the New York City section of Actors' Equity Association (Equity) called a strike ...Missing: founding | Show results with:founding
  112. [112]
    Contracts & Codes - Actors' Equity Association
    Equity negotiates and administers multi-employer national and regional collective bargaining agreements, as well as single-employer agreements with theatrical ...Small professional theatre (spt) · Production · Off Broadway · NY Showcase
  113. [113]
    Get to Know AFL-CIO's Affiliates: Actors' Equity
    Mar 31, 2025 · Mission: Actors' Equity Association is a national labor union, founded ... Equity launched the first actors' strike in American theater history.<|separator|>
  114. [114]
    16.2 million wage and salary workers were represented by a union ...
    Feb 2, 2024 · Among full-time wage and salary workers, union members had median usual weekly earnings of $1,263 in 2023, while nonunion workers had median ...Missing: actors | Show results with:actors
  115. [115]
    Every UK Actor Should Know These Guilds + Unions - StarNow
    Dec 1, 2023 · Equity. Equity is the main trade union for actors and performers in the UK and something of a grand dame in the industry. Founded in 1930 ...
  116. [116]
    International Solidarity - Equity
    International solidarity has been at the heart of Equity's mission since we were founded in 1930. Read more about our work across the globe here!Missing: Association | Show results with:Association
  117. [117]
    Codes, Guidelines and Internal Membership Rules
    They are internal Equity membership rules that outline the specific circumstances in which a member may work without the benefit of a contract.
  118. [118]
    What Is Equity Film Financing and How Does It Work in the Film ...
    Apr 22, 2025 · Equity film financing is a process where investors provide funds for a film project in exchange for a share of ownership and a percentage of the film's future ...
  119. [119]
    The Essentials of Film Financing: Equity, Debt & Soft Money
    Apr 16, 2025 · Equity refers to investment capital given in exchange for ownership in the film. This can come from individuals (often called angel investors), ...
  120. [120]
  121. [121]
    The Definitive Guide to Financing Your Film - Media Services
    Jun 3, 2021 · As a producer, you will typically have to raise 30-50% of the planned film budget on your own first, through equity financing.
  122. [122]
    Equity Pictures - Audiovisual Identity Database
    Sep 3, 2025 · KG (formerly Equity Pictures AG) was a German film financing company. They had close ties to Millennium Media, who funded their films since 2005 ...
  123. [123]
    Understanding Equity vs. Liability in Film Finance - Wrapbook
    Apr 14, 2025 · Equity financing carries significant risk for the investors, as there is no way to guarantee a film's financial success. Investors may see a ...
  124. [124]
    Crowdfunding - National Association of REALTORS®
    The Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act of 2012 eased various securities regulations to encourage more investment, including allowing non-accredited ...
  125. [125]
    Fundrise: Private Real Estate Investment For Everyone
    Mar 1, 2021 · The platform was founded in 2012 after the Jobs Act eased restrictions on security trading that made private real estate investment accessible ...
  126. [126]
    Council publishes Q2 Lending figures 2025 - Equity Release Council
    Jul 24, 2025 · This is a 10% increase in total lending when compared to Q2 2024 (£578m) and was driven by new lump sum mortgage customers taking on average ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics