Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Shore durometer

The Shore durometer is a standardized designed to measure the of elastomers, rubbers, plastics, and similar non-metallic materials by assessing the depth of of a specified indenter under a defined spring force, as outlined in the ASTM D2240 test method. This empirical measurement, which ranges from 0 (softest) to 100 (hardest) on various scales, provides a relative indication of material resistance to indentation rather than absolute , and it is widely used for , , and compliance testing in industries such as manufacturing and . Developed in the 1920s by American engineer Albert Ferdinand Shore, the durometer addressed the need for a consistent method to evaluate the of rubber and elastomeric compounds, leading to the establishment of multiple scales tailored to different material properties. The ASTM D2240 standard, first published in 1964 and regularly updated, recognizes twelve durometer types—including the common Shore A for soft rubbers and gels, Shore D for harder plastics, and others like Shore O for soft gels or Shore OO for extremely soft foams—each defined by unique indenter geometries, spring forces, and applicable material ranges. In practice, the test involves pressing the durometer's indenter perpendicularly against a flat, homogeneous sample at least 6.4 mm thick under controlled conditions (typically 23°C and 50% relative ), with the value read within one second of firm contact to minimize viscoelastic effects. While the method is non-destructive and quick, results can vary based on factors like sample thickness, , and operator technique, and it is often complemented by other tests for comprehensive material characterization. Applications span automotive seals, medical devices, footwear, and consumer products, where precise ensures performance, durability, and safety.

Introduction and History

Definition and Purpose

The Shore durometer is a handheld instrument designed to measure the of non-rigid materials, such as elastomers, rubbers, plastics, and foams, by pressing a spring-loaded indenter into the sample and recording the depth of penetration on a dimensionless scale from 0 to 100, where lower values indicate softer materials and higher values denote harder ones. This method provides a quick, portable assessment of material properties without requiring complex laboratory setups. The primary purpose of the Shore durometer is to evaluate a material's resistance to localized deformation, enabling informed selection of elastomers and polymers for applications requiring specific levels of flexibility and durability, such as in tires, , and devices. By standardizing measurements, it supports and ensures consistency in processes across industries reliant on these materials. At its core, the device operates on the principle that is inversely related to the indentation depth achieved under a calibrated spring force, with shallower penetration corresponding to greater . Developed in the by Albert F. Shore for in rubber production, it addressed the need for reliable testing of industrial elastomers. Various scales within the Shore system accommodate different material ranges, though the device itself remains fundamentally consistent in design.

Development and Patents

The Shore durometer was developed in the early 1920s by Albert Ferdinand Shore, an metallurgist, while he worked on testing the of rubber and elastomers at the Shore Instrument and Manufacturing Company, which he founded in Jamaica, New York. Shore's innovation addressed the need for a reliable, portable device to measure material resistance to indentation, building on prior indentation-based tests but introducing a standardized scale specifically for elastomers. The first practical Shore durometer emerged around 1925, coinciding with the filing of the initial patent on March 16, 1925. This culminated in US Patent 1,770,045, granted on July 8, 1930, to Albert F. Shore (with co-inventor Charles P. Shore), which described the core mechanism: a spring-loaded indenter that gauges hardness by the depth of penetration into the material under controlled force. The device featured a dial indicator for direct reading, marking a significant advancement in non-destructive testing for soft materials like rubber. Subsequent refinements included US Patent 2,421,449, granted on June 3, 1947, to J.G. Zuber, which introduced an improved portable hardness measuring instrument with enhanced accuracy through better stabilization and reduced friction in the indenter assembly. Early models relied on analog spring-loaded designs for simplicity and portability. In the late , the technology evolved to include versions, incorporating sensors for higher precision and data logging capabilities.

Durometer Scales

Common Scales

The Shore durometer employs several scales tailored to different material hardness levels, with the most common being Types A, D, and O, each defined by distinct indenter geometries and spring forces as specified in ASTM D2240-15(2021). These scales measure indentation depth under controlled force, producing readings from 0 (softest) to 100 (hardest), where the response is non-linear, meaning small changes in reading can signify substantial differences in material hardness. Type A is the most widely used for soft elastomers, such as rubber bands, natural rubber, and flexible thermoplastic elastomers, with a typical effective range of 20 to 90. Its indenter is a truncated cone with a 35° included angle and 0.79 mm diameter flat tip, applying an initial spring force of 0.55 N and a total force of 8.05 N at full indentation. This configuration suits materials that deform easily under light pressure, providing reliable assessments for applications like seals and gaskets. Type D addresses harder materials, including semi-rigid rubbers, hard plastics like , and rigid thermoplastics, often for readings above 90 on the A scale. The indenter features a sharp 30° cone with a 0.1 mm radius tip, with no initial spring force and a total force of 44.45 N. It is essential in industries evaluating structural components where greater penetration resistance is expected. Type O is designed for very soft materials like gels, foams, and medium-density windings, typically below 20 on the A scale. It uses a spherical indenter with a 1.2 mm radius, sharing the same spring forces as Type A: 0.55 N initial and 8.05 N total. This lighter setup prevents excessive deformation in delicate samples, making it suitable for medical and cushioning applications. Conversions between scales are approximate due to differing geometries and forces, with no exact equivalence; for instance, a reading of 95A roughly corresponds to 45D. All common scales require consistent pressure during measurement to ensure accuracy.

Specialized Scales

The Shore DO scale is designed for measuring the of moderately hard materials such as rubbers and dense windings, featuring a 3/32-inch (2.38 mm) spherical indenter and a total force of 44.45 N. This configuration makes it suitable for moderately hard rubbers, thermoplastic elastomers, and very dense windings, where the larger indenter minimizes issues on uneven surfaces. For very soft materials, the Shore OO and OOO scales employ lighter forces to avoid excessive deformation. The OO scale uses a 3/32-inch (2.38 mm) spherical indenter with an initial force of 0.203 N and total force of 1.111 N, targeting light foams, sponge rubber, gels, and animal tissue. The OOO scale features a larger 1/2-inch (12.7 mm) spherical indenter under the same force profile, ideal for ultra-soft gels, open- or closed-cell foams, and extremely soft elastomers. A variant, the OOO-S scale, adjusts to an initial force of 0.167 N and total force of 1.932 N with a 15/32-inch (11.9 mm) spherical indenter extended 5.00 ± 0.04 mm, specifically for viscoelastic polymers in medical applications like pads and wheelchair cushions. The Shore E scale addresses porous materials with a 0.200-inch (5.08 mm) spherical indenter, applying an initial force of 0.55 N and total force of 8.05 N, making it appropriate for and rubber as well as soft vulcanized rubber and elastomers. This low-force setup ensures accurate indentation without compressing the material's cellular structure. The Shore M scale utilizes a truncated cone indenter with a 30° included angle and 1.25 ± 0.02 mm extension, delivering an initial force of 0.324 N and total force of 0.765 N, suited for medium-hard materials including thin or irregularly shaped rubbers, plastics, and fireproof coatings. It is particularly useful for specimens as thin as 0.050 inches, where standard scales might cause excessive penetration. The Shore R scale is one of the twelve types defined in ASTM D2240, but it has seen limited use since the due to overlaps with more versatile scales. Scales B and C, intended for medium-hard rubbers and soft-to-medium plastics respectively, are rarely used today owing to their redundancy with the broader applicability of A and D scales.

Measurement Procedure

Equipment Components

The Shore durometer consists of several key physical components designed to ensure precise and repeatable measurements in accordance with ASTM D2240 standards. The indenter is a spring-loaded probe, typically shaped as a truncated cone for Type A scales or a spherical tip for others, constructed from (to 500 HV10) or occasionally for enhanced durability. It protrudes 2.50 ± 0.04 mm below the presser foot to penetrate the test material, with the shape and dimensions varying slightly by scale to suit different material hardness ranges. The is a flat annular surface that applies uniform pressure around the indenter, ensuring stable contact with the sample; for Type A, it features an outer of 18 ± 0.5 mm (0.71 ± 0.02 in.) with a central for the indenter. This component minimizes lateral movement and requires a flat sample surface for application to achieve accurate results. The dial or measures the depth of indentation, calibrated to display units from 0 to 100, with a resolution of 0.025 mm per division for Type A scales, converting the probe's retraction into a standardized reading. The spring mechanism provides a consistent , such as 8.05 N at full extension for Type A, calibrated precisely to the specific durometer scale to maintain uniformity across measurements. The housing encases these elements in an ergonomic handheld design, typically weighing around 200 g for portability, with many modern models incorporating dual scales (e.g., A and D) and USB connectivity for data logging and transfer.

Operational Steps

To perform a Shore hardness measurement, the sample must first be prepared according to established guidelines to ensure accurate and reproducible results. The material specimen should be at least 6 mm thick to minimize the influence of the underlying support, with flat and parallel surfaces free of defects, scratches, or irregularities that could affect indentation. Measurements should be taken at least 12 mm from any edges to avoid boundary effects, and the sample must be conditioned in accordance with ASTM D618 Procedure A at 23 ± 2°C for 40 hours prior to testing. Once prepared, the durometer is positioned perpendicular to the sample surface on a firm, flat, and level support, such as a glass plate, to prevent any rocking or tilting during application. The of the durometer is held firmly against the material to establish initial contact, engaging the spring mechanism to deliver the full specified force (e.g., 8.05 N for Shore A). Care must be taken to ensure the instrument remains vertical and parallel to the surface throughout the process, either by hand or using an operating stand for consistency. The reading is obtained by pressing the indenter to achieve full force, allowing a of 1 second after seating the , after which the value is recorded from the . The permits measurements based on initial indentation or after a specified period if required for particular materials. For reproducibility, at least five readings should be taken on the same sample, spaced a minimum of 6 mm apart to avoid overlapping deformation zones, with outliers discarded before calculating the or median value. If the recorded falls below 10 or above 90 on the chosen , a different durometer type (e.g., switching from Shore A to Shore D) is recommended to stay within the optimal measurement range. In variants of the durometer, the process is enhanced with automatic recording of the reading along with a and dwell duration, reducing operator variability while maintaining with the . This automated feature logs data directly, facilitating of multiple measurements without manual transcription errors.

Standards and Calibration

Governing Standards

The primary standard governing Shore durometer measurements in the United States is ASTM D2240, titled "Standard Test Method for Rubber Property—Durometer Hardness," with the latest edition being D2240-15(2021), reapproved in 2021. This standard specifies twelve durometer scales (Types A, B, C, D, DO, E, M, O, OO, OOO, OOO-S, and R) for assessing the hardness of rubbers, elastomers, and soft plastics through indentation under controlled conditions. It defines force tolerances of ±0.5 N for the indentor presser foot and mandates test environments at 23°C ± 2°C and 50% ± 5% relative to ensure . The 2021 reapproval incorporated guidelines for digital durometers, including electronic indicators and data logging, alongside enhanced environmental control requirements to accommodate modern instrumentation. Internationally, the equivalent is ISO 48-4:2018, "Rubber, vulcanized or —Determination of hardness—Part 4: by durometer method (Shore hardness)," which replaced ISO 7619-1:2010 and aligns closely with ASTM D2240 for testing vulcanized or rubbers and plastics. This edition outlines durometer types, calibration procedures, and test piece preparation, emphasizing operator proficiency through training requirements to minimize variability in measurements. It specifies that the hardness reading shall be taken one second after firm contact to ensure consistency across global applications. In , DIN 53505:2000-08, "Testing of rubber—Shore A and Shore D hardness test," serves as the national but has been harmonized with ISO 48-4 and is now considered inactive for new implementations, focusing primarily on Types A and D for elastomers. All these recommend periodic of durometers, typically annually, to maintain to national institutes, with non-compliance potentially invalidating results in regulated sectors such as automotive where material specifications demand verified hardness data.

Calibration and Maintenance

Calibration of Shore durometers involves verifying the instrument's accuracy against certified standards to ensure reliable measurements. The primary method uses certified elastomer test blocks with nominal values, such as 30A, 50A, 80A, and 90A, where the durometer readings are compared to these values and must fall within ±1 unit for acceptance. This verification process, distinct from full , is recommended weekly for instruments in regular use to detect any drift early. Routine checks include a daily zero verification by placing the durometer on a smooth, hard metal or plate, ensuring the reading is at or near zero (≤1 point above). Full , which adjusts the indenter extension and spring , should occur every 6-12 months or based on usage , performed by accredited laboratories conforming to ISO/IEC 17025. Tools for this include micrometers or gage blocks to measure indenter protrusion (e.g., 2.50 ± 0.04 mm for Type A), and specialized software for digital durometers to analyze and correct outputs. Maintenance practices are essential to prolong accuracy and prevent . After each use, the should be cleaned gently with a soft cloth to remove any residue from test samples, avoiding abrasive materials that could damage the surface. Instruments must be stored in a protective case in a controlled , away from direct , extreme temperatures, high , and to minimize degradation. The spring requires replacement if force measurements drift by more than 5% from specifications during checks. ISO 18898:2016 provides detailed specifications for the and verification of durometers, including test blocks used in rubber hardness equipment, emphasizing measurement and estimation. For certified devices, all calibrations must demonstrate to NIST standards through an unbroken chain of comparisons to national references. Per ASTM D2240 requirements, these procedures ensure the durometer's spring compliance and indenter alignment remain within tolerances. A common issue affecting long-term accuracy is wear on the indenter tip, which can lead to reduced penetration depth and measurement errors of 2-3 units after approximately 10,000 uses, necessitating inspection and replacement at calibration intervals.

Material Properties Correlation

Hardness and Elastic Modulus

Shore hardness values serve as an indirect measure of an elastomer's stiffness, approximating the Young's modulus E, which quantifies the material's resistance to elastic deformation under stress. This correlation arises because both properties stem from the material's ability to resist local indentation or global tensile loading, allowing hardness readings to estimate modulus without requiring destructive tensile testing. The foundational relationship was established through theoretical analysis of indentation mechanics, rooted in Hertzian contact theory, which treats the durometer indenter as a rigid sphere pressing into an elastic half-space. For the Shore A scale, commonly used for softer elastomers, derived an empirical equation relating hardness S_A to : E \approx 0.0981 \times \frac{56 + 7.66 \times S_A}{254 - 2.54 \times S_A} where E is in ; this fit applies within the 35–85 Shore A range, where the response is approximately linear. For harder materials measured on the Shore D scale, analogous empirical relations exist, such as \log_{10} E = 0.0235 (S_D + 50) - 0.6403 (E in ), enabling similar stiffness estimates from durometer readings. These correlations rely on assumptions of material and incompressibility, typical for vulcanized rubbers, but their accuracy diminishes to ±10–20% outside the specified hardness ranges or for materials exhibiting significant or .

Comparisons with Other Tests

The Shore durometer, particularly the Shore A scale, is commonly used for assessing the of soft polymers and elastomers through of indentation depth under a spring-loaded indenter, making it suitable for materials like rubber where flexibility is key. In contrast, the Rockwell hardness employs a or indenter under major and minor loads to measure the net depth of penetration, which is more appropriate for harder plastics and metals, with scales such as Rockwell R (0-150) providing values that do not directly convert to Shore readings due to differences in indenter geometry and load application. For instance, Shore A values below 90 typically correspond to softer materials unsuitable for Rockwell testing, while Rockwell scales like M or R are preferred for rigid plastics such as or , where deeper indentations reveal structural integrity under load. The International Rubber Hardness Degrees (IRHD) method, standardized under ISO 48, uses a dead-weight with a spherical indenter and two sequential loads to determine non-destructively, offering higher precision for rubber specifications compared to the Shore A durometer's spring-based approach, which can introduce variability from operator pressure. IRHD values are approximately equivalent to Shore A in the 30-85 range—for example, an IRHD reading of 50 corresponds closely to Shore A 52—but diverge at extremes due to the non-linear IRHD scale tied more directly to , making IRHD preferable for thin or finished rubber products like O-rings where minimal deformation is needed. No universal conversion exists, as results vary by material composition and thickness, with IRHD equipment being more costly and less portable than Shore devices. For composites and hard plastics, the (ASTM D2583) utilizes a sharp, rigid conical indenter under a fixed spring load to gauge surface resistance on a 0-100 scale, providing sensitivity for fiber-reinforced materials where Shore D (for harder elastomers) may lack resolution due to its broader applicability to semi-rigid rubbers. A Barcol value of 60 roughly equates to Shore D 80, but the Barcol method excels in detecting cure inconsistencies in laminates, as its shallow indentation avoids damaging underlying fibers, unlike Shore D's deeper penetration. Shore D remains quicker for field use on uniform hard plastics, while Barcol is favored in for composites requiring microstructural awareness. Overall, the Shore durometer's portability and rapid readings (typically seconds per measurement) distinguish it from alternatives like the Rockwell or tests, which often require benchtop setups and optical for precise depth or microstructure analysis in metals and alloys, though Vickers is rarely applied to polymers due to its micro-indentation focus. Shore correlates loosely with in elastomers, similar to some Rockwell scales, but selections depend on material type: Shore for soft-to-medium polymers, Rockwell for rigid ones, IRHD for precise rubber gauging, and Barcol for composites.

Applications and Limitations

Practical Uses

Shore durometers are widely employed in the to assess the of elastomeric components, ensuring they meet performance requirements for durability and functionality. rubber is typically tested to achieve a of 70 Shore A or higher, providing the necessary traction and wear resistance under varying loads. Seals and are evaluated to confirm their ability to maintain in dynamic environments like compartments. In the medical field, Shore durometers play a critical role in characterizing materials for and mechanical suitability. prosthetics are commonly formulated to 20-40 Shore A to balance flexibility with structural support, allowing natural movement while resisting deformation. materials undergo hardness testing around 40-60 Shore A to ensure safe insertion and patient comfort without compromising flexibility during use. Consumer goods manufacturing relies on Shore durometer measurements for quality control of everyday flexible products. Shoe soles are tested to approximately 70 Shore A to verify cushioning and longevity under foot pressure. Phone cases around 60-70 Shore A and foam cushions using softer elastomers (20-40 Shore A) are assessed to guarantee drop protection and ergonomic feel. Within broader manufacturing processes, Shore durometers facilitate inline monitoring during plastic and rubber extrusion to maintain consistent material properties throughout production. This testing helps optimize flow and final product uniformity in applications like tubing and profiles. For specifying O-rings in plumbing systems, hardness levels of 70-90 Shore A are standard, ensuring reliable sealing against pressure and fluid exposure. In , Shore durometers evaluate vibration dampers, typically targeting 35-75 Shore A elastomers to absorb shocks and reduce noise transmission in structures. Since the , digital durometers have been integrated with robotic systems for high-volume testing, enabling automated, precise assessments in production lines across these industries, often using the Shore A scale for softer components.

Constraints and Accuracy Factors

Shore durometer measurements are subject to several material constraints that can compromise accuracy. The method is inaccurate for thin samples less than 6 mm thick, as the indenter may penetrate through to the underlying support, leading to erroneously high readings. Similarly, anisotropic samples, such as plied or layered materials, yield inconsistent results due to uneven surface contact and varying directional properties. The test is unsuitable for viscous liquids, which lack the solid structure required for reliable indentation resistance assessment, and for very hard materials exceeding 95 on the D scale, where readings above 90 become unreliable due to minimal indenter penetration. Environmental factors significantly influence measurement reliability. Temperature sensitivity is pronounced, with standard testing prescribed at 23 ± 2°C; deviations can significantly alter readings, as rubber softens with heat and hardens with cold. Humidity affects hygroscopic polymers like , where high moisture absorption causes swelling and reduced hardness, while low leads to drying and increased hardness. Operator variability introduces errors in handheld applications, where inconsistent pressure application can cause variations; using fixtures or stands is recommended to ensure force and enhance . Scale limitations further complicate interpretations, as overlaps between scales—such as 90A approximating 40D—can lead to incorrect selection, and the method provides no absolute hardness measure, only relative indentation resistance. Under ideal conditions, Shore durometer is within a few units. Outdated analog models require regular to prevent drift. Modern automated durometers reduce human error through consistent force application and digital readout.

References

  1. [1]
    Standard Test Method for Rubber Property—Durometer Hardness
    Jul 23, 2021 · This test method is based on the penetration of a specific type of indentor when forced into the material under specified conditions.
  2. [2]
    Shore Hardness ASTM D2240 - Intertek
    Durometer Hardness Shore Hardness ASTM D2240 · Scope: Durometer Hardness is used to determine the relative hardness of soft materials, usually plastic or rubber.
  3. [3]
    ASTM D2240: Shore Hardness Testing for Plastics and Polymers
    The ASTM D2240 test is used to measure the hardness of various materials, mainly elastomers, plastics and other polymers.
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    Material Hardness - University of Maryland
    Shore hardness [15] is a measure of the resistance of material to indentation by 3 spring-loaded indenter. The higher the number, the greater the resistance.
  7. [7]
    ASTM D2240 Durometer Hardness - NAMSA
    In medical device development, this test supports material selection, quality control, and regulatory compliance.
  8. [8]
    What is Durometer? Material Selection Guide - Kemal Manufacturing
    In the medical industry, durometer hardness plays a significant role when selecting materials for tubing, catheters, and other medical devices. A certain level ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Understanding Durometers: Measuring Material Hardness - Imada Inc.
    Jul 26, 2024 · Shore A Durometer​​ Type A durometers use a truncated cone or flat indentor and are ideal for materials like car tires, rubber tubing, and soft ...
  10. [10]
    US1770045A - Apparatus for measuring the hardness of materials
    The present invention is an improvement upon the device shown, described and claimed in a joint application of Albert F. Shore and William F. Shore, filed ...Missing: 1920s | Show results with:1920s
  11. [11]
    Shore hardness
    The method for measuring Shore hardness was developed by Albert Ferdinand Shore, an American engineer. Shore developed his hardness testing method in the 1920s ...Missing: F. invention source
  12. [12]
    [PDF] EXPERT KNOWLEDGE TEST PROCEDURES OF ELASTOMER ...
    Shore as the sole inventor of the Shore durometer. The "quadrant type" and the round durometer were very popular. By 1957, 15,000 "quadrant type" durometers ...
  13. [13]
    Indentation Hardness Measurements at Macro-, Micro-, and ...
    Dec 28, 2016 · 2.5 Shore Durometer. The durometer scale was defined by Albert Ferdinand Shore in 1927 when he filed a patent for a device to measure hardness.
  14. [14]
    US2421449A - Hardness measuring instrument - Google Patents
    My invention relates to instruments for measuring the hardness or compressibility of materials, such as soft rubber, and has reference more particularly to ...
  15. [15]
    Understanding Shore Hardness Scales in Rubber Components
    Mar 17, 2025 · Named after Albert Ferdinand Shore, who developed the measurement method in the 1920s, it provides a quick, non-destructive way to evaluate ...Missing: patents | Show results with:patents<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    [PDF] ASTM-D2240-Durometer-Hardness.pdf - Plan Tech
    May 9, 2017 · Scope. 1.1 This test method covers twelve types of rubber hardness measurement devices known as durometers: Types A, B, C, D,.
  17. [17]
    Durometer Shore Hardness Scale - Smooth-On
    The Shore A Hardness Scale measures the hardness of flexible mold rubbers that range in hardness from very soft and flexible, to medium and somewhat flexible.
  18. [18]
    None
    ### Shore Durometer Scales Specifications
  19. [19]
    Durometer Technical Information - Checkline.com
    DO, Dense granular material and textile windings. 3/32" Spherical ; O, Very soft elastomers, textile windings and soft granular materials. Use below 20 A scale.
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    Sponge Foam Hardness Tester Durometer for Soft ... - Amazon.com
    Shore E Durometer · Shore OO ... This type sponge durometer is suitable forthe determination of soft foam, polyurethane foam rubber products' hardness.
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    What is Shore Hardness? How is Rubber Hardness measured?
    Nov 26, 2019 · Named after its inventor, Albert Ferdinand Shore, Shore hardness offers different scales for measuring the solidity of different materials.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    Shore Durometer - WorldofTest.com
    Rating 4.8 (256) ASTM D2240 Shore A: This is the proper choice for softer, pliable materials like rubber seals and flexible silicones. The pin on an ASTM D2240 Shore A durometer ...
  26. [26]
    PosiTector SHD - Shore Hardness Durometers - DeFelsko
    Handheld electronic instrument measures the indentation hardness of non-metallic materials. Two durometer models are available for different hardness ranges.
  27. [27]
    Shore hardness / durometer hardness: ASTM D2240 | ISO 48-4
    ASTM D2240 and ISO 48-4 describe the test method for determination of the indentation hardness of rubber, elastomers and plastics with the use of a durometer.
  28. [28]
    Shore Hardness for Plastics and Rubbers: Shore A and Shore D
    Sep 3, 2024 · The Shore D scale is often used to measure the hardness of more rigid plastics and elastomers such as vulcanized rubber, hard TPEs, and ...
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    ASTM D2240 testing - Industrial Physics
    The twelve models of durometer covered in ASTM D2240 testing are types A, B, C, D, DO, E, M, O, OO, OOO, OOO-S, and R. ASTM D2240 testing equipment. So, how can ...
  31. [31]
    ISO 48-4:2018 - Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic
    In stock 2–5 day deliveryThis document specifies a method for determining the indentation hardness (Shore hardness) of vulcanized or thermoplastic rubber using durometers.
  32. [32]
    DIN 53505 - 2000-08
    In stockDIN 53505:2000-08 Testing of rubber - Shore A and Shore D hardness test. Buy Subscribe from 43.40 EUR VAT included from 40.56 EUR VAT excluded.
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Shore A durometer - Bareiss North America
    Testing Standards: Compliant as per ASTM D2240 and ISO 7619 for Shore A hardness testing. Testing Industry: Rubber & Polymer Manufacturing, Material Quality ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Durometer & IRHD Hardness Tester
    (1) In case that outer dial can not be read due to dirt of crystal, please wipe stains from the crystal by using a dry cloth or a cloth dampened with neutral ...
  36. [36]
    Maintenance & Precautions on use of Durometer (Rubber/Plastic ...
    Jun 22, 2023 · Keep the products away from direct sun light, excessive high or low temperature, and high humidity or dust. Avoid using and storing the products under the ...Missing: Shore | Show results with:Shore
  37. [37]
    ISO 18899:2013 - Rubber — Guide to the calibration of test equipment
    2–5 day deliveryISO 18899:2013 outlines the principles of calibration of rubber test equipment and gives guidance on the general requirements for ensuring measurement ...
  38. [38]
    NIST Policy on Metrological Traceability
    Feb 12, 2010 · Metrological traceability [3] requires the establishment of an unbroken chain of calibrations to specified reference standards: typically ...
  39. [39]
    Shore® Replacement Indentors - ccsi-inc.com
    It is highly recommended that the indentor be replaced at each calibration interval, or when it suspected that damage has occurred. Replacement of the indentor ...Missing: clean presser spring
  40. [40]
    On the Relation between Indentation Hardness and Young's Modulus
    On the Relation between Indentation Hardness and Young's Modulus · A. Gent · Published 1 September 1958 · Materials Science · Rubber Chemistry and Technology.
  41. [41]
    Characterisation and Modelling of an Artificial Lens Capsule ... - NIH
    Nov 12, 2021 · The moulded strips had stable shapes (Figure 1b) with a tolerance thickness of ± 0.08 mm. E = 0.0981 56 + 7.66 S 0.137505 254 − 2.54 S ,, (1) ...
  42. [42]
    Convert Durometer to Young's Modulus - Computer Aided Technology
    Jul 14, 2011 · There is a simple calculation to convert a Shore durometer to Young's Modulus, which is sufficient to get you started with your analysis work.
  43. [43]
    Shore Hardness - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The standard test method for measuring the durometer hardness of rubbers according to ASTM D2240–05 [6] is based on the penetration of a specified indenter ...Missing: inventor | Show results with:inventor<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Can You Estimate Modulus From Durometer Hardness for Silicones ...
    Oct 3, 2019 · We approximate the Young's modulus from the Shore A hardness using the famous Gent model [20], which has been shown to be highly accurate ...
  45. [45]
    Measuring Rubber Hardness
    For highly elastic rubbers, Shore A and IRHD give comparable values. A comparison of hardness values for IRHD and Shore A Hardness is shown in the table below.Why Use Hard Materials? · How Is Material Hardness... · Shore Hardness Scales<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    A Comparison of Type A and Type M Hardness Measurements on ...
    It is acknowledged that IRHD is more suitable for hardness measurements on O-rings; however, the IRHD equipment is expensive, and its use is relatively uncommon ...
  47. [47]
    What is Barcol Hardness test and it's units? - ResearchGate
    Oct 28, 2022 · Barcol hardness is measured on a scale from 0 to 100B. A measurement of 60B is roughly equivalent to a Shore hardness of 80D.
  48. [48]
    Analysis of the Statistical Comparability of the Hardness and ... - NIH
    Methods: Four commercial materials were compared. Shore hardness tests and a scratch test with a Rockwell indenter were performed. A sliding wear test was ...
  49. [49]
    Understanding Gasket Material Hardness
    Very soft materials like a rubber band will be around 20, a pencil eraser is between 30 to 40, and car tires measure 60 to 70 Shore A. Compression force ...
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    Elkem RTV-4040 Silicone Elastomer (A-RTV-4040) - Factor II, Inc.
    In stockA-RTV-4040 is a high-grade, Shore A 40 durometer, 10:1 platinum silicone elastomer. It bonds well to acrylic, is pourable, and has multi-crosslinker options. ...
  52. [52]
    Silicone Catches Up with Counterparts
    Mar 1, 2009 · Silicone Extrusion. Silicone tubing is available in a wide durometer range (20–90 Shore A hardness), and its color characteristics can ...
  53. [53]
    Rubber Hardness Chart, Rubber Durometer Scale - Mykin Inc
    Welcome to our Rubber Durometer Scale Section · a. Shore 20A = Rubber Band · b. Shore 40A = Pencil Eraser · c. Shore 60A = Car Tire Tread · d. Shore 70A* = Running ...Missing: M | Show results with:M
  54. [54]
    Durometer - Shore IRHD Hardness Tester Range - WorldofTest.com
    Rating 4.8 (256) Consumer Products. Everyday items such as shoe soles, phone cases, and sporting goods are tested for their hardness to ensure durability and user satisfaction.
  55. [55]
    Use of Shore Hardness Tests for In-Process Properties Estimation ...
    Aug 8, 2025 · The work shows that shore hardness can be used as an effective way to monitor the materials properties during amoulding process for process optimisation and ...Missing: inline extrusion
  56. [56]
    Understanding O-Ring Gaskets: Types, Applications, and Benefits
    Aug 28, 2025 · Standard hardness levels for O-rings typically range from 40 to 90 on the Shore A durometer scale, with 70 being the most common hardness as it ...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Durometer vs. Stiffness - Hutchinson Aerospace
    Elastomers used in vibration and shock isolators generally fall in the range of 35-75 durometer on the Shore A scale. (ASTM. D2240 establishes 12 durometer ...
  58. [58]
    Automatic digital Durometer - ASTM D2240 - Bareiss North America
    ASTM D2240 is a standard test method established by ASTM International for measuring the hardness of rubber, elastomers, and plastics using a durometer. This ...Missing: 2025 | Show results with:2025<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    How Does Temperature Affect a Rubber's Shore Durometer?
    Temperature changes drastically alter rubber hardness, leading to costly product failure. Our guide explains the rubber durometer vs temperature effect.
  60. [60]
    Understanding the Effects of Temperature and Humidity on Rubber ...
    High humidity levels can cause rubber to swell as it absorbs water, resulting in a decrease in hardness. On the other hand, low humidity conditions can lead to ...Missing: hygroscopic | Show results with:hygroscopic
  61. [61]
    What Is the Shore Durometer Scale? | Marco Rubber and Plastics
    Jul 8, 2025 · The Shore durometer scale measures material hardness. In other words, it measures how resistant a material is to indentation.
  62. [62]
  63. [63]
    Automatic Shore IRHD Hardness Tester, a Collaboration between ...
    Mar 19, 2024 · While Durometer Hardness Test with automatic durometers may have a higher initial cost compared to manual durometers, they can be cost-effective ...