Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Shunga Empire

The Shunga Empire (c. 185–73 BCE) was an ancient Indian dynasty of Brahmin origin that succeeded the Maurya Empire, controlling territories in northern, central, and eastern India with its capital initially at Pataliputra and later Vidisha. Founded by Pushyamitra Shunga, commander-in-chief of the Mauryan forces, who assassinated the last Mauryan ruler Brihadratha during a military parade, the dynasty emphasized the revival of Vedic rituals, including two Ashvamedha horse sacrifices performed by Pushyamitra to assert imperial authority. Under Shunga patronage, significant advancements occurred in and , particularly in Buddhist monuments; the Great Stupa at was enlarged with a stone casing, added balconies, railings, and ornate gateways depicting jataka tales and Buddhist symbols, while similar embellishments graced sites like and Bhaja. Military efforts included repelling incursions by Indo-Greek (Yavana) forces, as referenced in the Malavikagnimitra and inscriptions, maintaining control over core Mauryan provinces amid regional fragmentation. Although later Buddhist texts like the Divyavadana allege persecution by Pushyamitra, such claims lack contemporary corroboration and contradict archaeological evidence of Shunga-era Buddhist sponsorship, suggesting instead a policy favoring Brahmanical traditions without wholesale suppression. The empire declined through internal strife and was overthrown by the Kanva dynasty around 73 BCE after roughly 112 years of rule.

Etymology

Name Origins and Historical Designations

The name "Shunga" derives from the gotra or clan affiliation of its founder, Pushyamitra Shunga, a Brahmin general who established the dynasty after assassinating the last Mauryan emperor, Brihadratha, around 185 BCE. Puranic literature, such as the Vishnu Purana and other texts like the Gargi Samhita, explicitly designates the lineage as the Shunga (Śuṅga) dynasty, enumerating ten rulers from Pushyamitra to Devabhuti over approximately 112 years. These sources portray the Shungas as a Magadhan ruling house succeeding the Mauryas, with the clan name appearing in Vedic references to Shunga teachers predating the dynasty, suggesting an established Brahminical family tradition rather than a novel invention. In contemporary , Shunga rulers are not collectively labeled as a "dynasty" or ""—terms anachronistic to the period—but identified via personal names, epithets like Mahārājādhirāja (great king of kings), and familial ties in inscriptions from sites such as , , and . For instance, the inscription of Dhanabhuti, a provincial under a king circa 115–100 BCE, records his donations without dynastic , relying instead on royal oversight implied by and cross-referenced with Puranic king lists. This scarcity of explicit designations in stone reflects the era's focus on individual patronage and legitimacy through Vedic rituals, with dynastic continuity inferred from literary genealogies that align with numismatic and archaeological evidence of control over and adjacent regions until circa 73 BCE. The modern English term "Shunga Empire" is a retrospective construct emphasizing territorial extent from westward to and , but ancient designations emphasized the Shungas' Brahmanical restoration of orthodox against perceived Mauryan decline, as noted in texts like the , without imperial pretensions comparable to the Mauryas. Puranic accounts, while valuable for chronology, exhibit inconsistencies in king names and regnal lengths, necessitating corroboration with inscriptions to establish reliable historical sequence.

Foundation and Early History

Mauryan Decline and Succession

The Mauryan Empire began to weaken following the death of in 232 BCE, as his successors proved unable to maintain the centralized control and administrative efficiency established under earlier rulers. Subsequent emperors, including (r. 232–224 BCE), a grandson of who ruled from but focused on limited territorial patronage evident in rock edicts, and (r. 224–215 BCE), who promoted but oversaw further fragmentation, lacked the military and fiscal prowess to sustain the empire's vast extent. Financial strain arose from the costs of maintaining a large , extensive bureaucracy, and welfare policies initiated under , compounded by reduced agricultural revenues and trade disruptions in peripheral regions. Provincial governors increasingly asserted independence, with northwestern territories succumbing to Indo-Greek incursions under rulers like I around 180 BCE, while southern satrapies detached under emerging local powers such as the Satavahanas. Later Mauryan kings—, Devavarman, , and finally (r. circa 187–185 BCE)—presided over a shrunken core domain centered on , marked by internal instability and diminished royal authority, as recorded in Puranic genealogies and Buddhist chronicles. Economic policies emphasizing state control over resources, without adaptive reforms, exacerbated vulnerabilities to famines and rebellions, eroding the empire's cohesion without a unifying figure like . The dynasty's end came in 185 BCE when Brihadratha, the last Mauryan emperor, was assassinated by his senapati (commander-in-chief) Pushyamitra Shunga during a military parade in Pataliputra, an event detailed in the Buddhist text Divyavadana and corroborated by Puranic accounts. Pushyamitra, a Brahmin general possibly motivated by perceptions of Mauryan favoritism toward heterodox sects like Buddhism, exploited the review to strike down Brihadratha publicly, thereby seizing the throne and establishing the Shunga dynasty without immediate widespread resistance, reflecting the empire's prior enfeeblement. This coup transitioned power from the Mauryan line, which had ruled for 137 years since Chandragupta's founding in 322 BCE, to a new Brahmanical-oriented regime amid the empire's territorial contraction.

Pushyamitra Shunga's Ascension

, a general serving as (commander-in-chief) of the Mauryan army under Emperor , capitalized on the empire's weakening central authority in the decades following Ashoka's death in 232 BCE. Brihadratha's ineffective rule, amid provincial fragmentation and administrative decay, created opportunities for ambitious military leaders like Pushyamitra, whose loyalty shifted amid perceived Mauryan vulnerabilities. The pivotal event occurred circa 185 BCE during a review in , where inspected his troops. According to the Harsha-charita, a 7th-century biography by Banabhatta, Pushyamitra exploited the parade by advancing with concealed intent, striking down the before the assembled forces and securing their allegiance through swift consolidation of power. This account, echoed in like the , portrays the assassination as a calculated usurpation rather than open rebellion, though later sources introduce interpretive biases reflecting sectarian tensions. No contemporary inscriptions corroborate the details, highlighting reliance on retrospective narratives prone to embellishment. Following the , Pushyamitra proclaimed himself emperor, founding the Shunga dynasty and retaining as capital while inheriting much of the Mauryan territorial framework in the . To affirm legitimacy, he conducted the sacrifice, a Vedic ritual symbolizing unchallenged , as referenced in Puranic genealogies and dramatic works like Kalidasa's Malavikagnimitra, underscoring his emphasis on Brahmanical orthodoxy. This transition marked a shift from Mauryan imperial universalism toward decentralized, ritual-reinforced rule, with Pushyamitra's military prowess enabling initial stability against emerging threats.

Rulers and Administration

Chronology of Shunga Emperors

The chronology of Shunga emperors is derived mainly from later Puranic texts, which enumerate ten rulers over a collective span of 112 years, from circa 185 BCE to 73 BCE, though contemporary inscriptions and archaeological evidence confirm few details beyond the founder and select successors. Epigraphic records, such as those from and , attest to viceroys or subordinates like and Dhanabhuti, but the precise succession order and individual reign lengths remain reconstructed approximations, with potential overlaps due to regional satrapies and internal fragmentation. The dynasty's end came when minister assassinated the last emperor, , installing the short-lived . Puranic accounts attribute 36 years to (r. c. 185–149 BCE), the dynasty's founder and a former Mauryan general who usurped power by assassinating Emperor during a military parade; he is credited with two sacrifices to assert imperial authority and repel Indo-Greek incursions. His son (r. c. 149–141 BCE) succeeded him, governing amid ongoing threats from western kingdoms, as dramatized in Kalidasa's Malavikagnimitram, though the play's historicity is debated. Vasujyeshtha (r. c. 141–131 BCE) followed, with limited records suggesting administrative continuity in the core region. Vasumitra (r. c. 131–124 BCE), possibly a grandson of Pushyamitra, is referenced in Patanjali's (c. 150 BCE) for conducting a amid Indo-Greek hostilities near the , indicating active military engagement to secure northwestern frontiers. Later rulers—Andhraka (r. c. 124–122 BCE), Pulinda (r. c. 122–119 BCE), (r. c. 119–116 BCE), and Vajramitra (r. c. 116–109 BCE)—are shadowy figures known primarily from Puranic genealogy, with inscriptions linking some to provincial governance or donations, such as at stupa. (r. c. 109–83 BCE) appears in a inscription at Besnagar (c. 113 BCE), where a Yavana attests to his sovereignty, highlighting diplomatic ties with Indo-Greek realms. (r. c. 83–73 BCE), the final emperor, faced ministerial intrigue, culminating in his overthrow by , as per Puranic tradition; his reign saw cultural patronage but territorial erosion.
EmperorApproximate Reign (BCE)Key Attestations and Events
Pushyamitra185–149Assassinated ; two Ashvamedhas; wars with Indo-Greeks.
149–141Son of Pushyamitra; featured in play.
Vasujyeshtha141–131Administrative role; limited epigraphic evidence.
131–124 per Mahabhashya; northwestern campaigns.
Andhraka124–122Puranic mention; possible regional .
Pulinda122–119Brief rule; scant records.
119–116Dynastic continuity; no major inscriptions.
Vajramitra116–109Possible patronage links to Buddhist sites.
109–83Besnagar pillar with Yavanas.
83–73Overthrown by minister; end of dynasty.

Governance and Territorial Extent

The Shunga Empire operated under a hereditary monarchical system, with kings exercising centralized authority from the capital at Pataliputra in Magadha. Pushyamitra Shunga, who founded the dynasty circa 185 BCE after usurping the Mauryan throne, ruled for approximately 36 years and legitimated his rule through Vedic rituals, including two Ashvamedha sacrifices. Administrative practices retained Mauryan elements, such as the use of amatyas (ministers) for counsel and kumara (princes) for provincial governance, but shifted toward greater decentralization amid regional challenges. Local rulers and governors, often semi-autonomous, managed districts, as evidenced by inscriptions acknowledging Shunga overlordship while asserting regional control. The empire's territorial extent initially covered much of the former Mauryan core, spanning the Gangetic plain from in the east to and in the west, and northward to areas like . At its peak under early rulers like Pushyamitra, control extended over , , and , though effective dominion was contested in the northwest by Indo-Greek incursions starting around the 180s BCE, leading to losses beyond the . Southern boundaries reached into parts of the Deccan but did not encompass the full Mauryan reach, with independent kingdoms emerging in and Kalinga. Epigraphic evidence, such as the Dhanabhuti inscription at , confirms Shunga influence in during the mid-2nd century BCE. By the dynasty's later phases, fragmentation reduced the realm primarily to and adjacent territories until its fall circa 73 BCE.

Military History

Campaigns Against Indo-Greeks

, founder of the Shunga Empire circa 185 BCE, launched defensive campaigns against Indo-Greek expansions into northern , prompted by the power vacuum after the Mauryan decline. Indo-Greek rulers, including Demetrius I (c. 200–180 BCE), advanced from through and , capturing territories up to Saketa () and the region, as detailed in the Yuga Purana section of the Gargi Samhita. This text describes Yavana forces besieging (Pushpapura), the Shunga capital, but retreating amid a Greco-Bactrian , limiting their hold to northwestern fringes rather than enabling permanent of the Gangetic core. Patanjali's (c. 150 BCE) corroborates these hostilities, noting Shunga military preparations against Yavana incursions and Pushyamitra's role in repelling them, including references to battles near the Sindhu River. To assert sovereignty, Pushyamitra conducted two sacrifices (c. 180–170 BCE), ritual expeditions requiring armed protection of a sacrificial horse across frontiers; during one, Shunga princes and reportedly defeated Indo-Greek squadrons attempting to seize the horse, as dramatized in Kalidasa's Malavikagnimitram. These operations, involving and , checked Indo-Greek probes eastward, preserving Shunga dominance in and , though no archaeological battle sites confirm specifics, with evidence limited to textual accounts and the absence of Indo-Greek coin hoards beyond . The campaigns yielded no total expulsion of Indo-Greeks, who maintained control in and until later pressures, but they stabilized Shunga borders and facilitated Vedic revival through demonstrated martial success. Subsequent Shunga rulers faced reduced threats, transitioning to diplomatic exchanges by c. 113 BCE, as implied by Indo-Greek ambassadorial activity.

Internal and Regional Conflicts

The Shunga Empire encountered significant regional conflicts with neighboring Indian powers that had detached from Mauryan . Shortly after Pushyamitra Shunga's ascension in 185 BCE, his son , appointed viceroy of , waged war against the kingdom of , which had declared independence under King Yajnasena. besieged Vidarbha's capital, capturing Princess Malavika and defeating the Vidarbhan forces, thereby reasserting Shunga influence over the region, as recounted in Kalidasa's Malavikāgnimitram based on earlier historical accounts. This campaign exemplified the dynasty's efforts to stabilize its western frontiers amid post-Mauryan fragmentation. Further south, the Shungas clashed with the emergent , which expanded from the into territories contested by Shunga control, including parts of . These protracted engagements, spanning much of the 2nd century BCE, involved territorial disputes and weakened Shunga hold on peripheral regions, contributing to the dynasty's gradual contraction. In the east, conflicts arose with the independent Kalinga kingdom, which resisted reintegration and maintained autonomy following its traumatic conquest under two centuries prior, forcing Shunga rulers to divert resources to border defenses rather than consolidation. Internally, the Shungas grappled with provincial rebellions and succession disputes that eroded central authority. Pushyamitra maintained a large of approximately 600,000 , 30,000 , and 9,000 —echoing Mauryan scales—to suppress uprisings in restive areas like and Kalinga provinces. Later rulers faced intensified factionalism; by the reign of (circa 83–73 BCE), court intrigues culminated in his assassination by minister , who usurped the throne and founded the , signaling the empire's internal collapse after roughly a century of rule. These dynamics highlight how regional autonomy and dynastic infighting, rather than solely external pressures, precipitated the Shungas' decline.

Epigraphic and Archaeological Military Evidence

Epigraphic records from the Shunga period offer limited direct references to military campaigns, primarily consisting of donative inscriptions that imply territorial control maintained through armed force. The Ayodhya inscription of Dhanadeva, dated to the late 2nd or early 1st century BCE, attributes to Pushyamitra Shunga the performance of two Ashvamedha sacrifices, Vedic rituals symbolizing imperial sovereignty and victorious expansion, which required military enforcement of unchallenged authority over vast regions. This inscription also confirms Shunga administrative reach into northern India, as far as Ayodhya, suggesting sustained military presence to secure peripheral territories against rivals like the Indo-Greeks. However, no Shunga-era inscriptions explicitly detail specific battles or troop deployments, with most epigraphs focusing on religious donations rather than martial exploits. Archaeological findings provide tangible evidence of Shunga military infrastructure and iconography. Excavations at Katragarh in , , uncovered fortifications dating to the Shunga period, including ramparts constructed from burnt bricks, indicative of defensive strategies against internal rebellions and external incursions. Sculptural reliefs at stupa, commissioned under Shunga patronage around 100 BCE, depict horsemen and elephant-borne warriors, highlighting the empire's reliance on units and war elephants—key components of ancient Indian armies for and sieges. Similar motifs appear in remains, where Shunga-era additions to stupas include balustrades possibly symbolizing protective military railings, though primarily architectural. These artifacts underscore a professionalized force capable of projecting power, yet the absence of widespread caches or sites points to a military oriented more toward consolidation than aggressive conquest, corroborated by the era's fragmented political landscape.

Religious Developments

Revival of Vedic Brahmanism

The Shunga Empire's establishment under (r. c. 185–149 BCE) facilitated a deliberate resurgence of Vedic Brahmanical traditions, reversing the Mauryan dynasty's prior favoritism toward and non-Vedic cults. As a general who usurped the Mauryan throne, Pushyamitra prioritized orthodox rituals to legitimize his rule and restore Vedic primacy in state ceremonies. Central to this revival was the performance of the , an elaborate affirming imperial dominion, which Pushyamitra conducted twice—once around 178 BCE and again circa 158 BCE. This rite, dormant since the and condemned in , was explicitly revived by him, as corroborated by the 1st-century BCE Ayodhya inscription of Dhanadeva, a Shunga descendant, which praises Pushyamitra for executing the sacrifices and thereby rekindling ancient Brahmanical prestige. Puranic accounts further align with this, listing Pushyamitra's Ashvamedhas as key acts in reestablishing Vedic sovereignty post-Mauryan decline. Patanjali's (c. 150 BCE), composed during Pushyamitra's era, provides contemporaneous literary evidence of active Vedic patronage, including the phrase "iha Puṣyamitra yajayāmaḥ" ("here we perform sacrifices for Pushyamitra"), reflecting priestly involvement in state rituals for the ruler. Such endorsements underscore support for scholars and Vedic , fostering a cultural shift where Brahmanism regained institutional prominence in governance and . Subsequent Shunga rulers sustained this trajectory, sponsoring yajnas and Vedic learning, which bolstered orthodox Hinduism's endurance against heterodox challenges. Archaeological and epigraphic records from Shunga sites indicate expanded ritual infrastructure, though textual sources emphasize the ideological pivot toward causal efficacy of Vedic rites in maintaining cosmic and political order. This revival laid groundwork for later classical Hindu syntheses, prioritizing empirical ritual continuity over Mauryan-era innovations.

Buddhist Patronage and Contributions

The Shunga Empire (c. 185–73 BCE) facilitated notable advancements in Buddhist monumental , primarily through the addition of stone facings and decorative elements to pre-existing Mauryan-era brick stupas. Archaeological evidence from sites such as and demonstrates that during the Shunga period, these structures were enlarged and encased in durable stone, marking a transition from perishable materials to permanent masonry that preserved and elevated Buddhist sacred spaces. At the Great Stupa (Stupa No. 1) in , Shunga-era modifications included encasing the original hemispherical dome with stone slabs, nearly doubling its size, and constructing a flattened summit along with a circumambulatory vedika railing to enclose the processional path. These enhancements, executed in the 2nd century BCE, not only protected the relic mound but also introduced ornate balustrades and staircases, reflecting technical proficiency in attributable to Shunga oversight. Inscriptions on the vedika and related elements, though sparse, align with the dynasty's temporal span, underscoring patronage by regional administrators or affiliates under imperial authority. The Bharhut Stupa exemplifies Shunga contributions through its extensive railing (vedika) and gateways adorned with narrative reliefs depicting and Buddhist motifs, carved in the 2nd–1st centuries BCE. Prominent donor inscriptions credit Vatsiputra Dhanabhuti, identified as a Shunga or local potentate, with funding the eastern , evidencing direct involvement of empire-aligned figures in Buddhist endowments. These sculptures represent some of the earliest surviving examples of figural , transitioning from symbolic to illustrative representations of the Buddha's life and teachings. Such initiatives, alongside similar works at , indicate that while the Shungas promoted Vedic rituals, they tolerated and materially supported Buddhist institutions, countering textual claims of antagonism with tangible epigraphic and structural proof of coexistence and investment.

Evaluation of Persecution Allegations

Allegations of Buddhist persecution by the dynasty, particularly under founder (r. c. 185–149 BCE), originate primarily from later Buddhist texts such as the and , which date to several centuries after the events and portray him as offering rewards for the heads of monks and destroying thousands of stupas and monasteries. These accounts, composed in a hagiographic favoring Buddhist narratives, lack contemporary corroboration and reflect sectarian biases rather than verifiable , as noted in scholarly analyses questioning their reliability due to chronological distance and propagandistic intent. Archaeological evidence contradicts widespread persecution claims, revealing instead Shunga-era expansions and donations to major Buddhist sites. At , the Great Stupa's vedika (railing) and gateways were constructed or embellished during Shunga rule, with inscriptions attributing contributions to Shunga officials and local guilds, indicating active rather than suppression. Similarly, the features donations from Dhanabhuti, a Shunga viceroy, inscribed around 100 BCE, underscoring continuity in Buddhist institutional support. No layers of destruction or mass abandonment specific to Shunga violence appear in these sites; reported debris in some contexts likely stems from natural decay, invasions, or later events, not systematic anti-Buddhist campaigns. While Pushyamitra's revival of Vedic rituals, including two Ashvamedha sacrifices documented in Puranic texts, prioritized Brahmanical traditions—possibly reducing state favoritism toward inherited from the Mauryas—tolerance for pluralistic practice prevailed, as adapted through merchant and lay sponsorship. Limited conflicts may have targeted politically aligned monks supporting Indo-Greek incursions, but these do not equate to empire-wide eradication, a view unsupported by epigraphic or numismatic records showing Buddhist prosperity into the period. Modern , drawing on such material evidence, dismisses the persecution narrative as exaggerated mythology, emphasizing instead a competitive religious landscape without wholesale violence.

Cultural and Artistic Legacy

Architectural Advancements

The Shunga dynasty (c. 185–73 BCE) advanced through the extensive renovation of earlier Mauryan-era stupas, transitioning from brick and wood constructions to more durable stone encasements and embellishments. At the Great Stupa at , Shunga patrons nearly doubled the structure's diameter to approximately 120 feet (36.6 meters) by applying a stone casing over the original brick dome, added a circumferential stone railing (vedika), and constructed a (prasara) around the summit topped with an umbrella (chhatra) on the harmika. These modifications enhanced structural integrity and aesthetic elaboration, incorporating symbolic elements like the vedika to demarcate sacred processional paths (pradakshina). Innovations in railing and gateway (torana) construction marked a key development, with Shungas pioneering the use of carved panels featuring narrative reliefs of , yaksha figures, and Buddhist motifs. At Bharhut Stupa, Shunga-affiliated donor Dhanabhuti, identified in inscriptions as a regional or , sponsored the erection of ornate s and railings in the 2nd–1st century BCE, providing some of the earliest preserved examples of stone gateways in Indian architecture. These s, often arched and adorned with makaras (mythical aquatic creatures) and vegetal motifs, served both functional enclosure and didactic purposes, visually narrating without anthropomorphic depictions of . Shunga stonework emphasized precision in masonry, with tightly fitted blocks and shallow techniques that influenced subsequent schools like those at and . Such patronage, evident across sites like Bhaja's halls, reflected a blend of Vedic revival under rulers like and continued Buddhist support, fostering a vernacular style of aniconic art that prioritized symbolic and narrative depth over monumental scale alone.

Sculpture, Iconography, and Art Styles

Shunga sculpture primarily manifested in stone reliefs adorning Buddhist stupas, transitioning from the polished monumental style of the Mauryan era to more ornate, narrative-driven carvings executed in low relief on railings (vedikas) and pillars. At sites like and , artisans employed buff-colored sandstone to depict scenes from , the life of , and symbolic motifs, with the vedika measuring approximately 3 meters in height and 20 meters in circumference, featuring carvings on columns, crossbars, and coping stones. These works exhibit a linear with continuous , often using overlapping figures to denote spatial planes, and a somewhat naive aesthetic that prioritized over anatomical precision. Iconography in Shunga art adhered to an aniconic tradition for , representing him through symbols such as empty thrones, wheels, footprints, Bodhi trees, and riderless horses rather than human forms, reflecting early Buddhist doctrinal emphasis on the teacher's teachings over personal depiction. beings like and yakshis—nature spirits associated with and protection—appeared prominently, as seen in the Patravahaka Yaksha sandstone figure from (ca. 50 BCE) and railing carvings at , alongside floral lotuses, makaras (mythical aquatic creatures), and realistic animals treated with lively detail. These elements blended indigenous folk traditions with Buddhist themes, evidencing Shunga patronage of religious architecture despite the dynasty's Brahmanical leanings. Terracotta figurines complemented stone , offering portable expressions of daily , deities, and possibly household , with molded pieces like a 1st-century BCE goddess figure (likely Sri Lakshmi) from showcasing rounded forms and decorative jewelry. This medium allowed for via molds, featuring plump female forms, children, and animals, which captured a more vernacular art style less constrained by monumental scale. Overall, Shunga art styles emphasized decorative elaboration and symbolic depth, laying groundwork for later Indian sculptural traditions through regional workshops, particularly in and , where craftsmen innovated in relief techniques and thematic integration.

Script Evolution and Literary Patronage

The , inherited from the Mauryan era, underwent incremental refinements during the Shunga period (c. 185–73 BCE), as evidenced by inscriptions at Buddhist sites such as and , where letter forms show a transition toward more angular and standardized shapes compared to earlier Ashokan edicts. These developments, including fuller vowel notations and consonant adaptations, positioned the Shunga variant as a foundational prototype for subsequent northern Indian Brahmi derivatives, facilitating greater precision in rendering and emerging texts. Most Shunga-era epigraphs, such as those on railings and gateways at , were composed in using this evolving Brahmi, though the script's adaptability supported the inscription of phrases in select cases, marking a linguistic shift from the predominantly Prakrit-focused Mauryan inscriptions. Shunga rulers actively patronized Sanskrit literary traditions, aligning with their promotion of Brahmanical orthodoxy amid a revival of Vedic practices. The dynasty's support for grammatical scholarship is exemplified by Patanjali's , a comprehensive commentary on Pāṇini's , composed around 150 BCE during the reign of (r. c. 185–151 BCE). Patanjali, identified in sources as a contemporary and possibly the royal priest who performed Vedic sacrifices for Pushyamitra, references the king and Shunga military campaigns in his text, underscoring direct patronage ties that preserved and systematized classical grammar. This era's emphasis on linguistic rigor contributed to the consolidation of Sanskrit as a vehicle for philosophical and ritual texts, countering Prakrit's dominance in administrative and Buddhist contexts, though primary literary output remained focused on commentaries rather than new poetic compositions.

Economy and Society

Trade Networks and Currency

The Shunga Empire (c. 185–73 BCE) sustained internal networks inherited from the Mauryan Empire, primarily along the route linking the Valley to northwestern regions and the extending southward, facilitating the exchange of agricultural surplus, metals, and crafts between and peripheral kingdoms. These overland paths supported commerce in commodities like iron, textiles, and horses, with evidence from contemporary inscriptions referencing Yavana (Indo-Greek) interactions that likely involved border despite military conflicts. Eastern maritime access via ports such as Tamralipti in , under intermittent Shunga influence, enabled limited overseas exchange with , though the dynasty's core territory focused more on riverine than expansive sea routes controlled by rivals in the west. The Shunga economy relied on a monetized system of karshapana coins, cast primarily in copper with occasional silver variants, marking a transitional phase from Mauryan punch-marked silver to more symbolic, die-struck designs. Denominations included the quarter karshapana (c. 2–3 grams, featuring motifs like an elephant facing a standard), half karshapana, and full karshapana (c. 10–14 grams), often depicting animals, trees, chaityas, or geometric symbols without royal portraits or names, emphasizing standardization for local circulation over imperial propaganda. These coins, produced across mints in Magadha and Vidisha, circulated widely in urban centers and supported taxation, market transactions, and artisanal production, as evidenced by hoards from sites like Bharhut. Gold coinage remained absent, reflecting an economy oriented toward base metals and barter supplements rather than high-value international bullion trade dominant in later eras.

Social Organization and Daily Life

The Shunga social structure adhered to the traditional system, comprising s, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras, with the dynasty's Brahmanical origins emphasizing the priestly class's supremacy. , a general who founded the dynasty circa 185 BCE, performed Vedic rituals such as the to legitimize rule and reinforce hierarchical norms, aligning political authority with religious orthodoxy. This revival countered Mauryan-era cosmopolitanism, prioritizing endogamous divisions and ritual purity over fluid observed under earlier Buddhist . In the post-Mauryan context encompassing rule (185–73 BCE), the framework began evolving toward more localized jatis or sub-castes, reflecting occupational specialization and regional variations that stratified communities further. dominance manifested in land grants and advisory roles to kings, while military elites, including Shunga rulers, maintained control over governance and warfare. Evidence from inscriptions and texts like the , contemporaneous or near-contemporary, underscores efforts to codify duties () tied to varna, promoting social stability through prescribed roles in , , and service. Daily life under the Shungas centered on agrarian routines in villages, supplemented by urban commerce in centers like and , where terracotta figurines and railings depict commonplace activities such as farming, , and household tasks. Patriarchal family units prevailed, with women primarily engaged in domestic duties and textile production, as inferred from sculptural motifs showing draped attire and scenes from the Mauryan-Shunga transition (circa 320–73 BCE). Religious observances, including Vedic sacrifices for elites and worship of yakshas among commoners, intertwined with subsistence economies reliant on monsoon-dependent crops like and , though direct archaeological data on diets remains sparse.

Decline and Aftermath

Factors Leading to Collapse

The Shunga Empire experienced significant territorial fragmentation following the death of , the second ruler after founder (r. c. 185–151 BCE), as provincial governors and local rulers asserted independence, evidenced by contemporary inscriptions and coinage distributions indicating loss of central control over much of northern . This disintegration was exacerbated by a succession of weak kings after the early rulers, who lacked the military prowess and administrative acumen of Pushyamitra, leading to ineffective and inability to suppress regional rebellions or maintain imperial cohesion across diverse territories. External military pressures further eroded Shunga authority, particularly from Indo-Greek incursions in the northwest under rulers like Demetrius I (c. 200–180 BCE) and (c. 155–130 BCE), who expanded into and the Gangetic plains, prompting defensive campaigns that strained resources without fully restoring lost domains. Concurrently, the rise of autonomous powers such as the Satavahanas in the Deccan and declarations of independence in regions like Kalinga undermined Shunga suzerainty in the south and east, fragmenting the empire into semi-independent principalities. The dynasty's collapse culminated in the overthrow of the last king, Devabhuti (r. c. 83–73 BCE), by his Brahman minister Vasudeva Kanva around 73 BCE; historical accounts describe Devabhuti as dissolute and militarily inept, enabling Vasudeva to orchestrate the coup and establish the short-lived Kanva dynasty (73–28 BCE). This internal betrayal, amid ongoing fragmentation, marked the definitive end of Shunga rule, transitioning Magadha to further political instability without a robust revival of centralized authority.

Transition to Successor Dynasties

The last Shunga ruler, , was overthrown around 73 BCE by his minister , marking the immediate transition to the in . , a , established the Kanva line after exploiting Devabhuti's reported indulgence in pleasures, which weakened central authority. The , primary textual sources for these dynasties, list four Kanva kings: Vasudeva (c. 73–66 BCE), Bhumimitra (c. 66–52 BCE), (c. 52–40 BCE), and Susarman (c. 40–28 BCE), indicating a brief rule of approximately 45 years focused on maintaining Brahmanical traditions in the core Shunga territories. The Kanva regime represented a continuity in Brahmanical governance but lacked the expansive military vigor of the Shungas, leading to territorial contraction amid rising regional challengers. By 28 BCE, the from the Deccan overthrew the last Kanva king, Susarman, effectively ending centralized Magadhan control and fragmenting the former Shunga domains. In the east, the Mahameghavahana (Chedi) dynasty under of Kalinga asserted independence around the mid-1st century BCE, as evidenced by his detailing conquests that encroached on Magadhan influence. This dynastic shift facilitated the proliferation of successor states, with the Satavahanas dominating , Indo-Greek remnants and later influencing the northwest, and localized powers like the emerging in by the late 1st century BCE. The transition underscored the causal role of internal usurpation and external pressures in dissolving imperial cohesion, paving the way for a decentralized political landscape until the Kushan consolidation in the 1st century CE.

Historical Significance

Long-Term Impacts on Indian Civilization

The Shunga Empire's emphasis on Brahmanical orthodoxy, exemplified by Pushyamitra Shunga's performance of the sacrifice around 185 BCE, facilitated the resurgence of Vedic rituals and following the Mauryan era's Buddhist dominance, thereby strengthening the institutional framework for classical Hindu traditions that shaped subsequent dynasties like the Guptas. This revival prioritized and temple patronage, influencing the evolution of devotional practices and philosophical schools such as Mimamsa, which emphasized ritual efficacy over Mauryan-era heterodoxies. In , Shunga-era innovations in stone construction, including the addition of vedikas (railings), toranas (gateways), and narrative friezes at sites like (circa 150–100 BCE) and , transitioned Indian building from perishable wood to durable masonry, setting standards for structural integrity and symbolic decoration that persisted in and medieval Hindu-Buddhist monuments across South and . These advancements promoted aniconic representation in , where symbolic motifs like the empty throne or conveyed doctrinal meaning without anthropomorphic deities, a style that endured in early Buddhist despite the dynasty's Brahmanical leanings. Although Buddhist texts like the allege persecution under Pushyamitra, including the destruction of monasteries and bounties on monks' heads, archaeological evidence of Shunga donations to stupas—such as expansions at during the 2nd century BCE—contradicts claims of systematic suppression, indicating pragmatic coexistence that allowed to adapt and spread via refined artistic expressions rather than state favoritism. This duality fostered a competitive religious landscape, spurring innovations in both Hindu and Buddhist spheres that contributed to India's pluralistic civilizational resilience against later invasions.

Modern Scholarly Assessments

Modern scholars regard the Shunga Empire (c. 185–73 BCE) as a pivotal transitional dynasty that restored Brahmanical orthodoxy following the Mauryan era's emphasis on heterodox sects like Buddhism and Jainism, while fostering significant advancements in art and architecture despite political instability. The dynasty's founder, Pushyamitra Shunga, is credited with military campaigns that repelled Indo-Greek incursions, maintaining control over core regions of Magadha and parts of northern India, though the empire's extent is debated due to reliance on fragmentary inscriptions rather than comprehensive records. Assessments highlight the Shungas' patronage of Vedic sacrifices and Sanskrit grammar, exemplified by Patanjali's Mahabhashya composed during their reign, as evidence of intellectual revival amid post-Mauryan fragmentation. A central historiographical debate concerns allegations of under Pushyamitra, drawn from later like the and Taranatha's 17th-century accounts, which claim he destroyed monasteries and offered bounties for monks' heads. These narratives, composed centuries after the events by sources antagonistic to Brahmanical rulers, lack corroboration from contemporary inscriptions or archaeological strata showing widespread destruction; instead, evidence points to Shunga-era enhancements at Buddhist sites, such as the vedikas (railings) and toranas (gateways) at and stupas, funded by Shunga officials like Dhanabhuti. Scholars including H.C. Raychaudhuri and Etienne Lamotte have dismissed mass persecution as sectarian exaggeration, arguing it reflects Buddhist polemics against a dynasty that prioritized Hindu rituals without eradicating rival faiths, as Buddhism continued to thrive regionally. This view aligns with : Shunga Brahmanism emphasized ritual continuity rather than iconoclastic erasure, contrasting with later Indo-Muslim destructions documented by Persian chronicles. Recent archaeological and epigraphic studies underscore the Shungas' underappreciated role in proto-classical , transitioning from to intricate narrative sculptures that influenced aesthetics. Excavations at sites like reveal Shunga stone masonry techniques, including perforated balustrades and symbolic motifs, which prefigure later temple architecture. Economic assessments portray the as stabilizing trade networks disrupted by Mauryan overextension, with coinage and inscriptions evidencing continuity in urban centers like . Critiques of earlier Marxist-influenced , which framed Shungas as feudal regressors, have given way to recognition of their adaptive resilience against Hellenistic pressures, though internal succession struggles and regional revolts precipitated decline by the mid-1st century BCE. Overall, contemporary evaluations, informed by interdisciplinary evidence, position the Shungas not as mere but as architects of cultural that fortified traditions against external influences.

References

  1. [1]
    Shunga Dynasty (ca. Second–First Century B.C.)
    Oct 1, 2000 · Around 185 B.C., Pushyamitra Shunga, the principal military officer of the last Mauryan king, assassinated his ruler and assumed control.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  2. [2]
    AFTER ASHOKA AND THE MAURYA EMPIRE - Facts and Details
    In 185 BC, Pushyamitra Shunga, a general, assassinated the last king of the Mauryan dynasty, Brihadratha. In the years that followed India divided again into a ...
  3. [3]
    Sungas and Kanvas - self study history
    Mar 7, 2015 · The Puranas describe Pushyamitra as belonging to the Shunga family. There are several references to Shunga teachers in Vedic texts, and the ...
  4. [4]
    Shunga, Śuṅga, Śuṅgā: 14 definitions
    Śuṅga (शुङ्ग).—A dynasty. Puṣyamitra was the founder of this dynasty. Puṣyamitra was the military commander of Bṛhadaśva, the last King of the Maurya dynasty. It ...
  5. [5]
    Shunga dynasty | Mauryan Empire, Pataliputra, Magadha - Britannica
    Shunga dynasty, Indian ruling house founded by Pushyamitra about 185 bce, which replaced the Mauryan dynasty. Pushyamitra assassinated Brihadratha, the last ...
  6. [6]
    Mauryan Empire: Origin, Sources and Decline - Unacademy
    After the demise of Ashoka, bad governance led to the decline of the Mauryan Empire in 185 B.C. The historical evidence which authenticates the power and ...
  7. [7]
    Disintegration of the Mauryan Empire - UPSC Notes - LotusArise
    Aug 9, 2023 · According to Kosambi, the primary cause ot the downfall of the Maurya Empire was its financial weakness. The Mauryas had a vast empire and it ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] A Study of the Disintegration of the Maurya Empire - RAIJMR
    This happened because the state ceased to exist or because the power of the state declined as parts of the empire became independent of its control. Because ...
  9. [9]
    Decline of the Maurya Empire | Early World Civilizations
    The Maurya Empire lost control over its territories. The different cultures and economies began to break apart, although the kings maintained Buddhism as the ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Study of The Mauryan Empire, and causes of its Decline : A Review
    This was the classical age of the history of ancient India, a time of religious ferment when two new faiths, Buddhism and Jainism, appeared. Page 2. © UNIVERSAL ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] a study on the declination of maurya dynasty - aarf.asia
    Mauryan Empire started to decline after the death of Ashoka in 232 BC. The last king was. Brihadratha was killed in 185 BC-183 BC by his overall Pushyamitra ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    The zenith of shunga empire in Indian subcontinent - Academia.edu
    The period between 185-75BCE, saw the emergence of the rule of a new dynasty in the Indian subcontinent. The rule of Shunga dynasty, founded by Pushyamitra ...
  13. [13]
    PUSHYAMITRA SUNGA AND THE BUDDHISTS - jstor
    Pushyamitra Sunga persecuted the Buddhists. The historical evidence adduced by scholars in support of their views that Pushyamitra Sunga persecuted the ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Unjust identification of Pushyamitra-A critical study into the incident ...
    Apr 19, 2019 · It is not as simple as just because he killed his master. No Brahmin becomes an. Anarya by doing the act of killing a person that was said to ...
  15. [15]
    Sunga, Kanva and Satavahana dynasties – Outlines of Indian history
    It is known from the Puranic evidence that four rulers of this dynasty ruled over Magadha for forty five years. They are Vasudeva, Bhumimitra, Narayana and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Post-Mauryan India – Sunga Dynasty - BYJU'S
    Pushyamitra Sunga's capital was at Pataliputra. He successfully countered attacks from two Greek kings namely, Menander and Demetrius. He also thwarted an ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  17. [17]
    Sunga Dynasty: History, Origin, Rulers and Decline ( UGC NET ...
    Following the Maurya Empire was the ancient Indian kingdom known as the Shunga Dynasty. The Shunga kings were renowned for restoring temples and promoting ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  18. [18]
    Sunga Dynasty Post Mauryan India: NCERT Notes For UPSC Exam.
    Rulers of Sunga Dynasty, Reign ; Pushyamitra Sunga, 185 – 149 BCE ; Agnimitra, 149 – 141 BCE ; Vasujyestha, 141 – 131 BCE ; Vasumitra, 131 – 124 BCE.
  19. [19]
    Chronological orders of dynasties and kings after Mahabharata as ...
    Sep 13, 2017 · The Shunga Dynasty will rule for 112 years and its kings will be Pushpamitra, Agnimitra, Sujoyshreshta, Vasumitra, Pulinda, Ghosha, Vrajamitra, ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Sunga Dynasty, Rise, Politics, Governance, Culture, Religion
    May 31, 2024 · Sunga Dynasty (185 BCE - 73 BCE) rose after the Maurya Empire's fall, reviving Brahmanism, expanding art and architecture, facing Indo-Greek invasions.
  21. [21]
    Pushyamitra Shunga: The Founder of the Shunga Dynasty
    Jun 3, 2025 · Consolidation of Power: Pushyamitra unified the core Mauryan territories, including Magadha, Kosala, and Vidisha (modern Madhya Pradesh), though ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  22. [22]
    Shunga Dynasty - IAS Google – Cracking IAS Academy
    Jan 3, 2025 · Devabhuti (83–75 BCE)​​ The last ruler of the Shunga dynasty. His reign marked the decline of the Shunga dynasty, characterized by internal ...Missing: scholarly emperors<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Shunga Empire - Historic India | Encyclopedia of Indian History
    The Shunga Empire was an ancient Indian dynasty of Magadha that controlled areas of the central and eastern Indian subcontinent from around 174 to 75 BCE. The ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  24. [24]
    Rule of Pushyamitra Sunga after Brihadratha Maurya
    Pushyamitra Sunga maintained his authority over the territory which he inherited from the last Maurya monarch.Missing: Shunga | Show results with:Shunga
  25. [25]
    The Account of the Yavanas in the Yuga-Purāṇa
    Mar 15, 2011 · ... Yavanas or Indo-Bactrian Greeks, important because it speaks of a Yavana invasion of Puṣpapura (i.e. the city of Pāṭaliputra, the capital of ...Missing: Purana | Show results with:Purana
  26. [26]
    the account of the yavanas - in the yuga-purana - jstor
    This would suggest that the Indo-Bactrian Greeks who invaded. Pu?papura were led by Demetrius (c. 190-165 B.C.), son of Euthy demus (c. 215-190 B.C.), that ...
  27. [27]
    Yavana invasion - jstor
    Yavana battle on the bank of the Sindhu provides supplementary evidence to that in the Yuga Purana and Patanjali s Mahabhashya of the same event, namely ...
  28. [28]
    Pushyamitra Shunga, the expeller of Yavanas and restorer ... - Ithihas
    May 12, 2022 · According to N.N.Ghosh there were two Yavana wars under two different Yavana leaders. The first one was the siege of Pataliputra and the Yavana ...
  29. [29]
    Shunga Dynasty - CG Competition Point
    Mar 9, 2019 · The Dhanadeva-Ayodhya inscription records that Pushyamitra performed two Ashvamedhas (victory sacrifices) in Ayodhya. Tagged Shunga Dynasty ...
  30. [30]
    History of Forts in Ancient India | INDIAN CULTURE
    Fortifications belonging to the Shunga period were identified at Katragarh, in Muzaffarpur district, Bihar which included ramparts made of burnt brick walls ...
  31. [31]
    "Birth of Classic Form" (Maurya Period + Bharhut) - Online Darshan
    The railings of Bharhut have the earliest known representations of the "Jataka", stories of the Buddha in his previous lives, in the form of different men and ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] 15506.pdf - IGNCA
    The monuments of Bharhut and Sañchi symbolise that feeling and way of Indian life, which is nearest to the soil-robust, fresh, buoyant, simple and ...Missing: Shunga military evidence
  33. [33]
    [PDF] 10809.pdf - Review of Research Journal
    PUSHYAMITRA SUNGA (185-148 B.C.):. The rulers of the Shunga dynasty ruled for about 122 years (185-73 B.C.). There were ten kings in this family but ...
  34. [34]
    The Historical and Philosophical Exegesis on Yagya in Ancient India
    An inscription from Ayodhya also confirms the performance of two Ashwamedha yagyas by a Shunga ruler. In this age, Shungas, Kanvas (a ruler named Gajayana ...<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Ayodhya inscription written by Dhanadeva, the descendant of King...
    Ayodhya inscription written by Dhanadeva, the descendant of King Pushyamitra Sunga [21] (pp. 96). · Figure 1: Archaeological Ashwamedha site of Jagatgram, ...Missing: Shunga | Show results with:Shunga
  36. [36]
    [PDF] A Case Study of Sanchi Stupa History in Madhya Pradesh - IJNRD
    Sanchi stupa is a Buddhist monument dedicated to Mahatma Buddha. It is located in Raisen district M.P. It is also known as oldest stupa.<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Architectural History Of Stupa - IJCRT.org
    Aug 8, 2024 · The proposal to give the Stupa a permanent form was carried out during the Sunga era, or the second century. A.D. Stone covered the stupas of ...
  38. [38]
    The stupa, an introduction - Smarthistory
    A stupa is a dirt burial mound faced with stone. In Buddhism, the earliest stupas contained portions of the Buddha's ashes.
  39. [39]
    Bharhut Stupa relief sculptures - Smarthistory
    These shallow relief carvings were made during the Shunga empire and are some of the earliest examples of narrative Buddhist art. They depict the teachings of ...
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    The Sunga dynasty contributed significantly to the cultural and social ...
    Feb 8, 2023 · ... Academic Faculty · UPSC Faculty · Careers · Awards & Recognition · Social ... Patronage to art: Bharhut, Bodhgaya and Sanchi bear evidence of the ...
  42. [42]
    Pushyamitra Shunga and the Alleged Persecution of Buddhism
    Oct 14, 2025 · Archaeological Evidence​​ Assessing Pushyamitra Shunga's alleged persecution requires examining the archaeological record. If large-scale ...
  43. [43]
    Ashoka And Pushyamitra Sunga: A Study In Mythmaking | IndiaFacts
    Nov 28, 2015 · A story of alleged Hindu persecution of Buddhism by Pushyamitra, a general in the service of the declining Maurya dynasty, who founded the Shunga dynasty after ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    How true was that Pushyamitra Shunga persecuted Buddhists on a ...
    Apr 14, 2018 · However, there is actually no reliable evidence to support this claim. Infact, there is no contemporary or even near contemporary text that ...Why did the Indian King Pushyamitra Shunga kill Buddhists? - QuoraWho was Pushyamitra Shunga and what was his impact on ... - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Art of the Sunga Empire Hello everybody and welcome to today's ...
    Shunga period Terakota was primarily made through the moulds and ... 'Vedika' was also constructed around it. Four gates, one in each direction ...
  46. [46]
    Gateway architrave with makara - India, Bharhut Great Stupa, Satna ...
    Spectacularly large gateways (toranas) marking the entrance to a fortified city or a monastery were a regular feature of early Indian architecture. The oldest ...Missing: innovations | Show results with:innovations
  47. [47]
    Sculpture: Mauryan and Shungan - Encyclopedia.com
    Late Mauryan and early Shungan folk art is represented by a group of yakshas, ring stones, and other pieces. Yakshas. The term yaksha is derived from yaj, "to ...
  48. [48]
    Aniconic vs. Iconic Depictions of the Buddha in India (article)
    In this anthropomorphic image of the Buddha's enlightenment, the artist depicts Prince Siddhartha seated on a throne, surrounded by the demon Mara and his army, ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Sunga Art and Contemporary Terracotta - NBU-IR
    ' Sunga art pieces can be classified into stone sculptures and terracotta. Sculptures ofthis age represent one of the most important epochs of the ancient ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Reflection of Hindu Philosophy in the Buddhist Art of Shunga Period
    RET Academy for International Journals of Multidisciplinary Research (RAIJMR) ... The Maura-Shunga art is the best specimen of this ideology of Vedas.
  51. [51]
    Sanchi inscriptions served as key to decipher Brahmi script
    Apr 4, 2015 · ... Shunga-period ... The inscriptions on and around Stupa 1 are distinctly from four periods and show the fast evolution of the Brahmi script, Vyas ...
  52. [52]
    Shunga script | Japanese, Ancient, Writing | Britannica
    The Shunga script was one of three prototypes of the North Indian subdivision of Brahmi script, out of which the Gupta scripts rose. This article was most ...
  53. [53]
    Shunga dynasty and Sanskrit…. - Sanjay Sonawani
    Apr 24, 2013 · In Bharhut inscription, in respect to a donation, his name appears as "Vacchiputa Dhanabhuti". Also in another Bharhut inscriptions, Shungas ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] unit 10 post-mauryan dynasties: shunga, kanva, satavahana, shaka ...
    Patanjali was the royal priest of Pushyamitra Shunga. In Patanjali's Mahabhashya, it is described that Patanjali conducted the Yajna for Pushyamitra Shunga. The ...
  55. [55]
    Tracing the Ancient Trade route from Rājagṛiha to Tāmraliptī during ...
    Trade is also a part of the economy. "Uttarapatha" and "Dakshinapatha" were the most popular commerce routes during this time period. Most academics researched ...
  56. [56]
    India - Shunga, Maurya, Magadha - Britannica
    Magadha was the nucleus of the Shunga kingdom, which succeeded the Mauryan. The kingdom extended westward to include Ujjain and Vidisha.
  57. [57]
    (PDF) Exchanges, Trade and Monasticism: Tracing the Commerce ...
    According to this article, the trade routes associated with Tāmraliptī took place across the Ganga river and overland. ... 62 Maurya Period - Shunga Period Shunga ...
  58. [58]
    Items from the Shunga Empire - Numista
    The Shunga Empire produced Karshapana coins, including 1½ Karshapana, Æ Masha, and ¼ Karshapana coins, some from the Sunga Dynasty.
  59. [59]
  60. [60]
    [PDF] The role of monetary networks in the trade between India and the ...
    Similar negoti- ation is also found in the respective value of coins and alternative forms of money. ... However, gradual changes are visible in the Shunga coins, ...
  61. [61]
    Sunga Dynasty Copper Coin | Mintage World
    This copper coin was issued during Sunga dynasty period. The obverse of this coin depicts the image of 'Elephant to left in front of Indra Dhvaja'.
  62. [62]
    Post Mauryan Age: Shunga, Kanva & Chedi Dynasties - NEXT IAS
    Sep 10, 2024 · Pushyamitra Shunga was the army chief of Brihadratha and the last Mauryan ruler. · He killed Brihadratha and established the Shunga dynasty. · He ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] POST MAURYAN DEVELOPMENTS - NIOS
    The last Mauryan king was killed by his Commander-in-Chief, Pushyamitra Shunga, ... varna system i.e. the four fold division of social structure. Page 7. 88.<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    Society of Post-Mauryan India (200 BC - Byol Academy
    May 10, 2025 · One of the most remarkable changes during this period was the creation of Jatis (sub-castes), which had a significant impact on India's social ...
  65. [65]
  66. [66]
    [PDF] THE INDO-GREEKS - IOSR Journal
    Jun 9, 2024 · Yuga Purana The text has described the Greek invasion and the war of Menander with Shunga. The text says that there was bloodshed in the ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Shunga rule after the downfall of Mauryans
    Gangetic plains, Sunga or Shunga dynasty replaced the Mauryas. The Shunga dynasty. (185 – 71 BC) was a Brahmin dynasty, established in 185 BCE, about 50 years ...Missing: nomenclature | Show results with:nomenclature
  68. [68]
    Vasudeva | Brahman minister - Britannica
    In India: The Shunga kingdom …overthrown by the Brahman minister Vasudeva, who founded the Kanva dynasty, which lasted 45 years and following which the ...
  69. [69]
    Kanva dynasty: Significance and symbolism
    Nov 23, 2024 · The Kanva dynasty in Hinduism represents a four-king lineage starting with Vasudeva, who overthrew the dissolute Shunga king Devabhuti, ruling ...
  70. [70]
    Kanva Dynasty - Eighth ruling dynasty of Magadha
    May 22, 2023 · Accession of Throne. The last Shunga king Devabhuti was very much fond of the company of his women and eventually this became the reason of his ...
  71. [71]
    Chapter 8 – The Sunga, Kanva, and Andhra Dynasties - Ibiblio
    The dynasty thus came to an unhonoured end after having occupied the throne for a hundred and twelve years. The Kanva or Kanvayana Dynasty. The plot which ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Post Mauryan period-Rise of regional dynasties - Vision IAS
    Jan 25, 2025 · The Shunga Dynasty emerged after the fall of the Mauryan Empire, preserving Indian culture, Brahmanical traditions, and influencing Buddhist art ...
  73. [73]
    Shunga Dynasty: A Major Hindu Dynasty after Mauryas | Swapnil's IAS
    Notable Shunga Rulers and Their Contributions. A. Pushyamitra Shunga (185 BCE – 149 BCE). Key Policies and Achievements: Religious Policy and Revival of ...
  74. [74]
    DID PUSYAMITRA SUNGA PERSECUTE THE BUDDHISTS ? - jstor
    C. Ray Chaudhuri, for example, who hold or seem to hold the view that. Pusyamitra Sunga was not a persecutor of Buddhism.Missing: Shunga debate
  75. [75]
    Shunga Empire - Smarthistory
    Dynasty that replaced the Mauryas and ruled parts of north, central, and eastern India. Dates. c. 185–73 B.C.E.. Places. Asia > South Asia > India.