Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Spontaneous magnetization

Spontaneous magnetization refers to the intrinsic net magnetization that arises in ferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic materials below their Curie temperature in the complete absence of an external magnetic field, resulting from the parallel alignment of atomic magnetic moments due to quantum mechanical exchange interactions between electrons.^[1]^[2]^[3] This phenomenon is a hallmark of ferromagnetism, where unpaired electron spins in materials such as iron (Curie temperature of 1043 K), cobalt (1403 K), and nickel (631 K) align spontaneously to produce a significant magnetic moment, often on the order of 10^6 A/m at low temperatures.^[3]^[2] The exchange interaction, rooted in the Pauli exclusion principle, effectively generates an internal field equivalent to thousands of teslas, far exceeding typical laboratory fields, which stabilizes this ordered state.^[2]^[1] The magnitude of spontaneous magnetization is temperature-dependent, reaching a maximum at absolute zero (e.g., approximately 1.7 × 10^6 A/m for iron) and decreasing to zero at the Curie temperature, above which thermal agitation randomizes the spin orientations, transitioning the material to a paramagnetic state with susceptibility following the Curie-Weiss law: χ = C / (T - T_C).^[3]^[1] In theoretical models like the mean-field approximation, this behavior is described by the Brillouin function, capturing the alignment probability under effective internal fields.^[2] Macroscopically, spontaneous magnetization does not always manifest as a bulk magnetic field because ferromagnetic materials subdivide into magnetic domains—microscopic regions of uniform magnetization—to minimize magnetostatic energy; these domains' random orientations often cancel out externally, but an applied field can align them to achieve saturation magnetization.^[2]^[1] This domain structure explains hysteresis and remanence in ferromagnetic materials, underpinning technologies like permanent magnets, transformers, and data storage devices.^[3]

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition

Spontaneous magnetization refers to the emergence of a net magnetization in a material in the absence of an external magnetic field, resulting from the collective alignment of atomic magnetic moments below a critical temperature known as the Curie temperature.^[2] This phenomenon is characteristic of ferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic materials, where the internal ordering produces a macroscopic magnetic moment even at zero applied field.^[1] In contrast to induced magnetization, which arises solely from the response to an external magnetic field H and vanishes when H = 0, spontaneous magnetization persists intrinsically due to interatomic interactions that favor alignment.^[2] Induced magnetization is typically linear in H for small fields and reversible, whereas spontaneous magnetization represents a stable, ordered state independent of external influence.^[4] The atomic magnetic moments responsible for this alignment originate from the spin and orbital angular momenta of electrons in unfilled atomic shells, particularly in transition metals and rare-earth elements.^[2] Each electron contributes a magnetic moment on the order of the Bohr magneton, \mu_B = e \hbar / 2m_e, with spin providing the dominant contribution in many cases.^[4] This ordering involves spontaneous symmetry breaking, where the rotational invariance of the system's Hamiltonian is not preserved in the ground state; instead, the magnetization selects a preferred direction, yielding a continuum of degenerate ground states corresponding to different orientations.^[5]

Occurrence in Materials

Spontaneous magnetization is a characteristic property of ferromagnetic materials, where the atomic or ionic magnetic moments align spontaneously in the same direction, producing a net macroscopic magnetization in the absence of an external magnetic field. This alignment results from cooperative interactions among the moments, leading to long-range magnetic order below the Curie temperature. Common examples include elemental metals such as iron, nickel, and cobalt, as well as certain alloys like permalloy.^[6] Ferrimagnetic materials also exhibit spontaneous magnetization, albeit through a different mechanism involving antiparallel alignment of moments on distinct sublattices with unequal total magnitudes, yielding a nonzero net moment. Representative examples include ferrites such as magnetite (Fe₃O₄), where iron ions in tetrahedral and octahedral sites contribute oppositely but asymmetrically to the overall magnetization. This behavior mirrors ferromagnetism in key aspects, including the presence of a Curie temperature and hysteresis, but arises from the crystallographic arrangement of magnetic ions.^[7] In contrast, paramagnetic materials do not display spontaneous magnetization, as their magnetic moments remain randomly oriented without an applied field, responding only weakly to external influences. Similarly, antiferromagnetic materials lack net spontaneous magnetization due to perfect antiparallel cancellation of moments across equivalent sublattices, resulting in zero macroscopic magnetization despite local order.^[8] The occurrence of spontaneous magnetization was historically linked to studies of iron's magnetic properties. In 1895, Pierre Curie identified the critical temperature above which ferromagnetic materials lose their magnetic order, marking a key step in understanding thermal effects on magnetism. The concept of spontaneous magnetization itself was formalized in 1907 by Pierre-Ernest Weiss, who proposed that ferromagnetic materials consist of domains with aligned atomic moments, enabling net magnetization without external fields.^[9]^[10] For spontaneous magnetization to arise, materials must possess unpaired electrons to generate intrinsic magnetic moments, combined with sufficiently strong exchange coupling to favor aligned configurations over thermal disorder. This exchange interaction enables the collective ordering essential for the phenomenon.^[1]

Microscopic Origins

Exchange Interaction

The exchange interaction is a quantum mechanical phenomenon that arises from the interplay of the Pauli exclusion principle and Coulomb repulsion between electrons, leading to an effective coupling between their spins. In systems where electron wavefunctions from neighboring atoms overlap, the requirement for antisymmetric total wavefunctions under particle exchange results in lower energy states when spins are aligned in a specific manner—parallel for ferromagnetic coupling or antiparallel for antiferromagnetic coupling. This interaction favors spin alignment without relying on classical magnetic forces, providing the microscopic origin of cooperative magnetic ordering in materials.^[11]^[12] The physical origin of the exchange interaction lies in the overlap of atomic orbitals, which allows electrons to virtually exchange positions. Due to the Pauli exclusion principle, electrons with parallel spins cannot occupy the same spatial state, effectively increasing their average separation and reducing the Coulomb repulsion energy compared to the antiparallel case, where the symmetric spatial wavefunction brings them closer together. This energy lowering for parallel spins in certain materials, such as transition metals, promotes ferromagnetic alignment. Werner Heisenberg first formalized this concept in 1928, recognizing it as the basis for the Weiss molecular field that drives long-range spin order.^[11]^[13] The exchange interaction is commonly modeled by the Heisenberg Hamiltonian, which describes the energy associated with spin alignments on a lattice:

H = -\sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} J_{ij} \mathbf{S}_i \cdot \mathbf{S}_j

Here, \mathbf{S}_i and \mathbf{S}_j are the spin operators at sites i and j, the sum is over nearest-neighbor pairs \langle i,j \rangle, and J_{ij} is the exchange constant; positive J_{ij} indicates ferromagnetic coupling, favoring parallel spins and lowering the system's energy. This form captures the isotropic nature of the interaction in simple cubic lattices, where directional dependence is minimal.^[13]^[11] Unlike the classical magnetic dipole-dipole interaction, which originates from the orbital motion and intrinsic magnetic moments of electrons and scales as $1/r^3 (with typical strengths around $10^{-16} erg at interatomic distances), the exchange interaction is orders of magnitude stronger—often $10^{-14} erg or more—due to its quantum electrostatic roots. This dominance makes exchange the primary mechanism for spontaneous magnetization in ferromagnets, while dipole effects contribute only perturbatively to anisotropy.^[13]^[11]

Role in Ordered Magnetic Structures

In ferromagnetic materials, spontaneous magnetization drives the formation of multidomain structures to minimize the magnetostatic or demagnetization energy associated with stray fields. Without domains, a uniformly magnetized sample would produce significant surface magnetic charges, leading to a strong internal demagnetizing field that opposes the alignment; instead, the material subdivides into regions, each with uniform saturation magnetization but oriented such that flux lines close internally, reducing overall energy. These domains are separated by domain walls—narrow transition zones (typically ~100 nm wide) where the magnetization direction rotates coherently between adjacent domains, balancing exchange energy (favoring gradual rotation) and magnetocrystalline anisotropy (favoring abrupt changes).^[14]^[15] The historical concept of Weiss domains, proposed by Pierre Weiss in 1907, provided an early explanation for the absence of bulk magnetization in unmagnetized ferromagnets despite their intrinsic spontaneous magnetization. Weiss postulated that ferromagnets consist of numerous tiny, spontaneously magnetized regions (domains) whose random orientations result in zero net moment until aligned by an external field, resolving discrepancies between atomic-scale theory and macroscopic observations. This idea laid the foundation for modern domain theory, emphasizing how domain reconfiguration enables large magnetization changes at low fields.^[16] In ferrimagnets, spontaneous magnetization emerges from the ordered antiparallel alignment of magnetic moments on two inequivalent sublattices, yielding a net magnetization due to their unequal magnitudes. Louis Néel's two-sublattice model describes this as the vector difference between sublattice magnetizations, M_s = | \mathbf{M}_A - \mathbf{M}_B |, where antiferromagnetic exchange couples the sublattices; for instance, in magnetite (Fe₃O₄), the tetrahedral (A) and octahedral (B) sites contribute opposing moments mediated by superexchange through oxygen ions, resulting in a saturation magnetization of approximately 90-92 Am²/kg at room temperature. This structure parallels ferromagnetism but introduces compensation points where M_s vanishes if sublattice moments balance at certain temperatures.^[1]^[17] The domain structure profoundly affects macroscopic properties, particularly in bulk samples where irreversible domain wall motion under applied fields produces magnetic hysteresis—the lag of magnetization behind the field cycle—and coercivity, the reverse field needed to reduce remanent magnetization to zero. Hysteresis loops reflect energy dissipation during wall pinning at defects or grain boundaries, with multidomain configurations yielding low coercivity (<10 mT) and narrow loops in soft magnets, while single-domain states exhibit high coercivity (10-40 mT) due to uniform reversal mechanisms. These behaviors underpin applications like data storage, where controlled domain stability enhances remanence and resistance to demagnetization.^[1]^[14]

Theoretical Descriptions

Mean-Field Approximation

The mean-field approximation, pioneered by Pierre Weiss in 1907, provides a foundational theoretical framework for understanding spontaneous magnetization in ferromagnetic materials by treating the local magnetic field experienced by each spin as an average over all others. In this approach, Weiss postulated the existence of an effective internal field, H_{\text{eff}} = H + \lambda M, where H is the external applied field, M is the magnetization, and \lambda is the phenomenological molecular field constant that accounts for exchange interactions between neighboring spins. When the external field H = 0, this effective field H_{\text{eff}} = \lambda M enables spontaneous magnetization M \neq 0 below a critical temperature, marking the transition from paramagnetic to ferromagnetic order. For quantum spins, the magnetization is derived from a self-consistent equation incorporating the Brillouin function, which generalizes the classical Langevin function for spin S. The total magnetization is given by

M = N g \mu_B S B_S \left( \frac{g \mu_B S \mu_0}{k_B T} (H + \lambda M) \right),

where N is the number of magnetic atoms, g is the Landé g-factor, \mu_B is the Bohr magneton, k_B is Boltzmann's constant, T is the temperature, and B_S(x) is the Brillouin function for spin S, defined as

B_S(x) = \frac{2S+1}{2S} \coth\left( \frac{2S+1}{2S} x \right) - \frac{1}{2S} \coth\left( \frac{x}{2S} \right).

In the absence of an external field (H = 0), the equation simplifies to a reduced form by defining the reduced magnetization m = M / (N g \mu_B S) and the Curie temperature T_c = \lambda N g^2 \mu_B^2 S(S+1) \mu_0 / (3 k_B), yielding

m = B_S \left( \frac{3S}{S+1} \frac{T_c}{T} m \right).

This transcendental equation is solved numerically or approximately; near T_c, a small-argument expansion of B_S(x) \approx \frac{(S+1)}{3S} x linearizes it, confirming the onset of spontaneous magnetization for T < T_c.^[18] The Curie temperature in the mean-field approximation can be explicitly related to microscopic parameters by expressing the molecular field constant \lambda = 2 z J / (N g^2 \mu_B^2 \mu_0), where z is the coordination number (number of nearest neighbors) and J is the exchange integral. Substituting this into the expression for T_c yields

T_c = \frac{2 z J S(S+1)}{3 k_B},

which provides a direct link between the transition temperature and the strength of exchange interactions, predicting higher T_c for larger z, J, or S. This derivation assumes a lattice with isotropic nearest-neighbor interactions and aligns the phenomenological theory with the Heisenberg model in the high-temperature limit.^[18]^[19] Despite its simplicity and qualitative success, the mean-field approximation has notable limitations. It overestimates the Curie temperature by neglecting thermal fluctuations, which reduce the effective ordering tendency, leading to discrepancies of up to 50% or more compared to experimental values in low-dimensional or strongly correlated systems. Additionally, the theory predicts a critical exponent \beta = 1/2 for the spontaneous magnetization near T_c, where M \propto (T_c - T)^\beta, but experimental measurements for three-dimensional ferromagnets typically yield \beta \approx 0.36, closer to the 3D Heisenberg universality class, highlighting the approximation's failure to capture fluctuation effects and long-range correlations.^[20]^[21]

Microscopic Spin Models

Microscopic spin models provide a lattice-based framework for describing spontaneous magnetization by incorporating quantum mechanical exchange interactions between localized spins, offering a more detailed treatment than mean-field approximations that neglect spatial correlations. These models represent magnetic atoms or ions as spins arranged on a regular lattice, with interactions limited to nearest neighbors to capture the essential physics of ordered magnetism. The Heisenberg model is a fundamental quantum mechanical description of interacting spins in isotropic magnetic systems. Its Hamiltonian is given by

H = -J \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} \mathbf{S}_i \cdot \mathbf{S}_j - g \mu_B \mu_0 H \sum_i S_i^z,

where J > 0 denotes the ferromagnetic exchange constant, \mathbf{S}_i are the spin operators at lattice sites i, the sum is over nearest-neighbor pairs \langle i,j \rangle, H is an external magnetic field, g is the Landé g-factor, and \mu_B is the Bohr magneton. For J > 0 in the absence of an external field, the ground state is fully ferromagnetic, with all spins aligned parallel, leading to maximum spontaneous magnetization. This model was introduced by Heisenberg to explain ferromagnetism through quantum exchange effects.^[22] The Ising model simplifies the Heisenberg framework by restricting spins to classical up or down orientations along a single axis, suitable for highly anisotropic systems. Its Hamiltonian reads

H = -J \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} \sigma_i \sigma_j,

where \sigma_i = \pm 1 are Ising spins and the sum again covers nearest neighbors. In one dimension, the model admits an exact solution showing no spontaneous magnetization at any finite temperature due to thermal fluctuations destroying long-range order. In two dimensions, Onsager's exact solution reveals a finite-temperature phase transition to a ferromagnetic state with spontaneous magnetization below the critical temperature T_c = 2J / k_B \ln(1 + \sqrt{2}), where k_B is Boltzmann's constant. The three-dimensional case exhibits a phase transition but lacks a closed-form solution, though numerical methods provide accurate results. The model originated with Ising's work on one-dimensional chains, later extended by Onsager for two dimensions. These models relate to real materials based on their isotropy: the Heisenberg model applies to isotropic ferromagnets like metallic iron, where spins can precess freely, while the Ising model better describes uniaxial anisotropy in systems like certain antiferromagnets or thin films. For complex cases without exact solutions, such as the three-dimensional Heisenberg model, Monte Carlo simulations numerically evaluate thermodynamic properties by sampling spin configurations according to the Boltzmann distribution, as pioneered in early computational studies of the Ising model. These simulations confirm phase transitions and magnetization profiles. Unlike mean-field theory, which overestimates critical temperatures and ignores fluctuations, microscopic spin models incorporate spatial correlations and quantum effects, yielding more accurate low-temperature magnetization behavior and critical exponents that match experimental observations in ordered magnets.

Temperature Dependence

Low-Temperature Regime

In the low-temperature regime, well below the Curie temperature T_c, spontaneous magnetization in ferromagnets decreases gradually from its zero-temperature value due to thermal excitations that partially disrupt spin alignment.^[23] These excitations primarily arise from spin waves, also known as magnons, which represent quantized transverse fluctuations of the spin lattice around the ordered ferromagnetic ground state.^[24] In contrast to the mean-field approximation, which predicts a nearly constant magnetization at low temperatures, spin-wave theory accounts for these low-energy modes that become thermally populated, leading to a measurable reduction in net magnetization.^[23] Spin waves in ferromagnets exhibit a quadratic dispersion relation, \omega \sim k^2, where \omega is the frequency and k is the wavevector, enabling a continuum of low-energy excitations that contribute significantly to thermal disorder even at modest temperatures.^[23] This dispersion arises from the Heisenberg exchange interaction dominating at long wavelengths, allowing magnons to reduce the z-component of the total spin by one unit each, thereby diminishing the spontaneous magnetization.^[24] The temperature dependence in this regime is captured by Bloch's T^{3/2} law, which describes the magnetization as

M(T) = M(0) \left[1 - a \left(\frac{T}{T_c}\right)^{3/2}\right],

where M(0) is the saturation magnetization at absolute zero, a is a material-specific constant related to the spin-wave stiffness, and the T^{3/2} term originates from the integration over the magnon density of states proportional to \omega^{1/2}.^[23] The saturation value is given by M(0) = N g \mu_B S, with N the number density of magnetic ions, g the Landé g-factor (typically near 2 for electrons), \mu_B the Bohr magneton, and S the spin quantum number per ion.^[24] Deviations from the pure T^{3/2} behavior occur due to magnetic anisotropy, which introduces a gap in the magnon spectrum and modifies the low-energy density of states, often altering the effective exponent or adding exponential factors. At very low temperatures, higher-order interaction terms among magnons further contribute, leading to corrections beyond the simple Bloch form.

Behavior Near Critical Temperature

As the temperature approaches the Curie temperature T_c from below, the spontaneous magnetization M, serving as the order parameter for the ferromagnetic phase transition, vanishes according to a power law: M(T) \propto (T_c - T)^\beta, where \beta \approx 0.325 for systems belonging to the three-dimensional Ising universality class, which describes many real uniaxial ferromagnets. This exponent reflects the influence of thermal fluctuations, which become dominant near T_c and cause the magnetization to diminish continuously to zero at the transition point. Above T_c, in the absence of an external magnetic field, the spontaneous magnetization is exactly zero, marking the onset of the paramagnetic phase where thermal disorder overcomes the exchange interactions aligning the spins. In the paramagnetic regime above T_c, the magnetic susceptibility \chi follows the Curie-Weiss law: \chi = C / (T - \theta), with C being the Curie constant and \theta \approx T_c the Weiss temperature, which is positive for ferromagnets.^[25] This law indicates that \chi diverges as T approaches \theta from above, signaling the instability of the paramagnetic state and the emergence of spontaneous magnetization below T_c, where long-range order stabilizes without an applied field. The divergence underscores the critical nature of the transition, where susceptibility enhancements arise from cooperative spin alignments.^[25] To analyze and fit experimental data near T_c, techniques such as Arrott plots are employed, plotting M^2 versus H/M (where H is the applied field) at various temperatures to extrapolate the spontaneous magnetization and precisely locate T_c as the isotherm intersecting the origin. Empirical interpolation formulas, such as M(T)/M(0) = [1 - (T/T_c)^{3/2}]^{1/2}, provide approximate descriptions of the temperature dependence but are often adjusted to incorporate the true critical exponent \beta rather than the mean-field value of $1/2, which overestimates the magnetization drop due to neglect of fluctuations. These methods highlight deviations from mean-field theory in universality classes like the 3D Ising model, where fluctuation effects render the classical \beta = 1/2 invalid close to T_c.

Experimental Aspects

Observation Methods

Spontaneous magnetization in ferromagnetic materials is typically confirmed through magnetometry techniques that measure the magnetization as a function of applied magnetic field, revealing a non-zero remnant magnetization at zero field below the Curie temperature. The vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM), developed by Simon Foner in 1956, operates by vibrating a sample in a uniform magnetic field and detecting the induced voltage in pickup coils via Faraday's law of induction, allowing precise determination of hysteresis loops where the intercept at zero field corresponds to the spontaneous magnetization.^[26] Similarly, superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometers provide ultrasensitive measurements of magnetic moments down to 10^{-8} emu, enabling the detection of spontaneous magnetization in small or weakly magnetic samples by recording field-cooled or zero-field-cooled magnetization curves that exhibit finite values below the ordering temperature.^[27] Neutron scattering techniques probe the microscopic spin alignments underlying spontaneous magnetization, distinguishing ordered states through the appearance of magnetic Bragg peaks in diffraction patterns below the critical temperature, which arise from the periodic arrangement of spins in the ferromagnetic lattice. Above the Curie temperature, diffuse magnetic scattering dominates due to paramagnetic fluctuations, while below it, sharp peaks indicate long-range order; inelastic neutron scattering further reveals magnons as low-energy spin-wave excitations confirming the collective nature of the magnetization.^[28] Small-angle neutron scattering complements this by mapping nanoscale magnetic structures, such as domain walls or vortices, that accommodate the spontaneous magnetization in bulk samples.^[28] Mössbauer spectroscopy detects spontaneous magnetization locally by measuring the hyperfine magnetic fields at atomic nuclei, such as ^{57}Fe, which split the nuclear energy levels due to the internal field generated by aligned electron spins. In ferromagnetic materials below the Curie temperature, the six-line spectrum characteristic of magnetic splitting confirms the presence of spontaneous magnetization, with the internal field magnitude scaling with the average spin alignment; this method is particularly useful for inhomogeneous samples where bulk magnetometry might average over variations.^[29] Direct visualization of magnetic domains provides spatial evidence of spontaneous magnetization, as domains form to minimize magnetostatic energy from the aligned moments. The Bitter pattern technique involves applying a colloidal suspension of ferromagnetic particles to a polished surface, where particles accumulate at domain walls due to stray fields, revealing maze-like patterns indicative of multi-domain structures with internal spontaneous magnetization.^[30] The magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) offers non-contact imaging by detecting changes in the polarization of reflected light from a magnetized surface, allowing real-time observation of domain walls and hysteresis in thin films or surfaces where spontaneous magnetization induces Kerr rotation proportional to the out-of-plane component. Observing spontaneous magnetization faces challenges from demagnetization fields, which arise from surface magnetic poles and oppose the internal alignment, effectively reducing the measured bulk magnetization in high-demagnetization-factor geometries like thin films or spheres. To mitigate this, samples are often shaped into elongated forms (e.g., needles) with low demagnetization factors along the measurement axis, or single-domain configurations are achieved through high fields or nanostructures to eliminate domain walls and reveal the intrinsic spontaneous moment clearly.

Material Examples

Iron (Fe) is a classic example of a ferromagnet exhibiting spontaneous magnetization, with a Curie temperature T_c = 1043 K and a zero-temperature saturation magnetization M(0) \approx 2.22 \, \mu_B per atom.^[31]^[32] Near the critical temperature, the spontaneous magnetization follows M \sim (T_c - T)^\beta with \beta \approx 0.34, consistent with three-dimensional Heisenberg universality class behavior.^[33] Nickel (Ni) also displays strong spontaneous magnetization as a transition metal ferromagnet, characterized by T_c = 627 K and M(0) \approx 0.606 \, \mu_B per atom.^[34] The critical exponent \beta \approx 0.37 describes its magnetization decay near T_c, consistent with three-dimensional Heisenberg universality class behavior.^[35] Nickel is widely utilized in magnetic alloys due to its tunable properties and corrosion resistance. Gadolinium (Gd), a rare-earth metal, represents another key material with spontaneous magnetization, featuring T_c = 293 K and notable magnetic anisotropy arising from its localized 4f electrons.^[36] This proximity to room temperature makes Gd valuable for applications like magnetic refrigeration, where its strong magnetocaloric effect is exploited. In ferrimagnetic materials, yttrium iron garnet (YIG), with chemical formula \mathrm{Y_3Fe_5O_{12}}, exhibits spontaneous magnetization up to T_c = 559 K and is prized for microwave devices owing to its exceptionally low magnetic damping.^[37]^[38] Recent advancements in spintronics have highlighted half-metallic ferromagnets such as Heusler alloys (e.g., Co₂MnSi), which maintain spontaneous magnetization with near-100% spin polarization at the Fermi level, enabling efficient spin injection in devices.^[39]

References

[1]
2. Classes of Magnetic Materials | College of Science and Engineering
Oct 14, 2025 · The spontaneous magnetization is the net magnetization that exists inside a uniformly magnetized microscopic volume in the absence of a field.
[2]
The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. II Ch. 37: Magnetic Materials
In this chapter we will discuss the behavior and peculiarities of ferromagnetic materials and of other strange magnetic materials.
[3]
Spontaneous Magnetization - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
In subject area: Engineering. Spontaneous magnetization is defined as the magnetization of a material at zero temperature, represented as m(0, 0), indicating ...
[4]
[PDF] SOLID STATE PHYSICS PART III Magnetic Properties of Solids - MIT
a spontaneous magnetization (i.e., which exhibit a magnetization ~M without application of a magnetic field) typically have much larger values for χ and can ...
[5]
[PDF] 221B Lecture Notes - Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking 1 ...
Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking is an ubiquitous concept in modern physics, especially in condensed matter and particle physics. It is a phenomenon.
[6]
Spontaneous magnetization of ferromagnets - AIP Publishing
Dec 1, 2005 · The determination of the spontaneous magnetization is based on measurements of the saturation magnetization of a polycrystalline sample. Under a ...
[7]
5.1.3: Ferrimagnetism - Engineering LibreTexts
Jul 28, 2022 · The spontaneous magnetization of ferrimagnetic materials originates from the non-zero net magnetic moments when filling up the d orbitals of ...
[8]
Spin Seebeck effect in paramagnets and antiferromagnets at ...
Aug 23, 2019 · In paramagnets and antiferromagnets, the magnetization is not the order parameter. ... not possess spontaneous magnetization [26] . In the ...
[9]
Universality - MIT Press Direct
Around 1895, Pierre Curie showed that magnetic materials lost their magnetism when they were heated above a critical temperature, later called the Curie ...
[10]
[PDF] Chapter 3 Magnetic Domains
3.1.2 Weiss domain theory. Weiss (1906, 1907) postulated that atoms in ferromagnetic materials had permanent magnetic moments which were aligned parallel to ...<|separator|>
[11]
[PDF] Exchange interaction [tln94]
– The formulation of quantum mechanics by Heisenberg, Born, Schrödinger,. Dirac, and others (beginning in 1925) provided the basis for cooperative magnetism.
[12]
An attractive theory | Nature Physics
Feb 28, 2008 · Werner Heisenberg solved the mystery of ferromagnetism using the concept of spin plus the exclusion principle formulated by Wolfgang Pauli.
[13]
[PDF] Heisenberg and Ferromagnetism - Indian Academy of Sciences
It was. Heisenberg who showed that the interaction between electrons, called the exchange energy was the basis of the Weiss molecular field. GENERAL I ARTICLE.
[14]
4. Domain Theory | College of Science and Engineering
Oct 14, 2025 · A ferro- or ferrimagnetic material may be generally defined as one that possesses a spontaneous magnetization, Ms, dependent on temperature, but ...
[15]
[PDF] Physics of Modern Materials Chapter 8: Magnetic Materials
... magnetization when the applied field H is zero. This is called the spontaneous magnetization and is characteristic of the ferromagnetic state. Thus, Eq ...
[16]
[PDF] DSpace@MIT
... domains was the 1907 paper of. Pierre Weiss, in which he introduced magnetic domains to account for gross magnetization changes in ferromagnetic media, even ...
[17]
[PDF] MAGNETIC MOMENT AND MAGNETIZATION - andrew.cmu.ed
In addition to the orbital moment, there is an addi- tional contribution to the magnetic moment of an elec- tron, due to spin. Spin is a purely quantum ...<|separator|>
[18]
[PDF] Mean Field Approximation (MFA) in the theory of magnetism.
i.e., a sizable ...<|separator|>
[19]
[PDF] Mean Field Theory - Physics Courses
MEAN FIELD THEORY OF PHASE TRANSITIONS. Figure 7.9: Results for h = 0. Upper panels: graphical solution to self-consistency equation m = tanh(m/θ) at.
[20]
[PDF] Mean field theory - bingweb
Jun 22, 2006 · Spontaneous magnetization y as a function of t. The value of y is obtained from the equation y = tanh(y/t). t = T/Tc. y = 1 at t = 0. 8. Mean ...
[21]
Zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus | Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons ...
Download PDF · Zeitschrift für Physik. Zur Theorie des ... Cite this article. Bloch, F. Zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus. Z. Physik 61, 206–219 (1930).Missing: Felix | Show results with:Felix
[22]
Field Dependence of the Intrinsic Domain Magnetization of a ...
In this paper, the variation of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnetic with the external magnetic field, is obtained.
[23]
[PDF] Low temperature deviation from Bloch's T law in Co nanoparticles.
The experimental observation leads to the conclusion that Bloch's law is valid at temperatures higher than the spin-wave energy gap. However, it is not ...
[24]
Low-temperature deviations from Bloch's law in BaFe12O19 ...
Deviations from Bloch's 3/2 power law are found in the temperature range 4.2–77 K. These deviations cannot be described on the basis of the behavioral ...
[25]
Tutorial: a beginner's guide to interpreting magnetic susceptibility ...
Apr 19, 2022 · Ferromagnets order at the Curie temperature (TC), which is marked by a divergent susceptibility due to the moments spontaneously aligning with ...
[26]
Magnetization of magnetically inhomogeneous Sr2FeMoO6-δ ...
Sep 30, 2021 · An empirical interpolation formula of m (T) for iron whiskers was presented [ 15 ]:. (7). which matches the experimental behavior m (T) = (1 ...
[27]
Vibrating Sample Magnetometer | Review of Scientific Instruments
A vibrating sample magnetometer for use with a solenoid. In this case, the pickup coil is again positioned coaxial with the magnetic field.
[28]
A SQUID Magnetometer for Simultaneous Measurements of ...
A cryostat for simultaneous measurements of spontaneous magnetization and AC susceptibility by using a SQUID with a temperature control system was ...
[29]
Magnetic small-angle neutron scattering | Rev. Mod. Phys.
Mar 4, 2019 · This review summarizes the recent applications of the SANS method to study magnetism and magnetic materials.
[30]
Mössbauer Spectroscopy of Magnetic Ordered - JPS Journals
Mössbauer spectroscopy is a powerful tool used to study local magnetic ... For comparison, the solid line shows the normalized spontaneous magnetization.
[31]
[PDF] Techniques to Measure Magnetic Domain Structures
Jun 16, 1999 · In Bitter pattern imaging a thin colloidal suspension of magnetic particles is painted on a magnetic surface. The particles collect and ...Missing: spontaneous | Show results with:spontaneous
[32]
[PDF] FERROMAGNETIC MINERALS
Saturation magnetization decreases with increasing temperature, becoming zero at the Curie tempera- ture, TC, which is characteristic of the particular ...
[33]
The magnetization of pure iron and nickel - Journals
The saturation magnetizations of very pure iron and nickel have been measured absolutely by a force method at room temperature. The values are 217.6 and ...
[34]
Factors determining the shape of the temperature dependence of ...
Mar 6, 2006 · ... temperature dependence of spontaneous magnetization, M s ( T ) . Expressed in reduced variables, m = M s ∕ M 0 and τ = T ∕ T C , this dependence ...
[35]
The spontaneous magnetization of nickel + copper alloys - Journals
Measurements of spontaneous magnetization and Curie temperature (θf) of nickel + copper alloys containing up to 54·11 at. % of copper using the purely magnetic ...
[36]
Microwave transmission measurement of the critical exponent beta ...
The critical exponent β was also measured for an iron‐silicon alloy (6% Si), yielding β=0.383±0.016. The agreement of these two values supports universality.
[37]
Magnetic Behavior of Gadolinium Near the Curie Point
Magnetization measurements on a single crystal of gadolinium have established that the Curie temperature T c is 292.5±0.5°K.
[38]
Interfacial Origin of the Magnetisation Suppression of Thin Film ...
Sep 18, 2017 · The Curie temperature is determined by a fit to the Bloch T3/2 law (panel c) and gives a value close to the bulk value of 559 K. Full size image.
[39]
[PDF] JMMM-YIG.pdf - Ov
One of the materials with the lowest microwave damping is. Yttrium Iron Garnett (YIG). Single crystalline YIG thin films have been extensively ...
[40]
Coexisting structural disorder and robust spin-polarization in half ...
Half-metallic ferromagnets (HMFs) are one of the most promising materials in the field of spintronics due to their unique band structure, consisting of one ...Abstract · Article Text · INTRODUCTION · RESULTS AND DISCUSSION