Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Square root of 3

The square root of 3, denoted \sqrt{3}, is the positive r such that r^2 = 3. It is an , meaning it cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers. Its decimal expansion is approximately 1.7320508075688772935274463415059. \sqrt{3} is also known as Theodorus's constant, named after the Theodorus of Cyrene (c. 465–c. 398 BCE), who proved its as part of his work on the of square roots of non-square integers up to 17. The proof of proceeds by contradiction: assume \sqrt{3} = p/q where p and q are coprime positive integers; then p^2 = 3q^2, implying p^2 is divisible by 3 (so p is divisible by 3), and similarly q is divisible by 3, contradicting the assumption that p/q is in lowest terms. A geometric interpretation reinforces this, using areas of equilateral triangles to show that any rational approximation leads to a smaller positive solution, violating minimality. In mathematics, \sqrt{3} has a simple continued fraction expansion [1; \overline{1, 2}], which is periodic and characteristic of quadratic irrationals. This expansion provides good rational approximations, such as $7/4 = 1.75 and $26/15 \approx 1.73333. Geometrically, \sqrt{3} is fundamental: the height h of an equilateral triangle with side length a is h = (\sqrt{3}/2) a, and the area is (\sqrt{3}/4) a^2. These relations arise from dividing the triangle into two 30-60-90 right triangles, where the side ratios are $1 : \sqrt{3} : 2. Beyond geometry, \sqrt{3} appears in trigonometry (e.g., \sin 60^\circ = \sqrt{3}/2) and various algebraic identities.

Fundamentals

Definition

The square root of 3, denoted mathematically as \sqrt{3}, is the positive whose square equals 3. It represents the principal (non-negative) solution to the x^2 = 3, or equivalently x^2 - 3 = 0. This value is approximately 1.732, though its exact form is the symbolic \sqrt{3}. As a , \sqrt{3} cannot be expressed as a of integers and satisfies a with integer coefficients, specifically the minimal polynomial x^2 - 3 = 0.

Numerical Value

The square root of 3, denoted √3, is a positive approximately equal to 1.73205080757. This value lies between the consecutive integers 1 and 2, and its decimal expansion is infinite and non-terminating. Simple bounds for √3 can be obtained by squaring approximations and comparing to 3. For instance, since
$1.732^2 = 2.999824 < 3
and
$1.733^2 = 3.003289 > 3,
it follows that $1.732 < \sqrt{3} < 1.733.
Early rational s provide tighter bounds through fractions whose squares bracket 3. One such pair is $19/11 \approx 1.72727 < \sqrt{3} < 26/15 \approx 1.73333, since (19/11)^2 = 361/121 \approx 2.98347 < 3 and (26/15)^2 = 676/225 \approx 3.00444 > 3. A closer from the continued fraction convergents is $97/56 \approx 1.73214, which slightly exceeds √3 because (97/56)^2 = 9409/3136 \approx 3.000319 > 3. Archimedes established even narrower bounds using polygonal methods related to circle approximations, yielding $265/153 \approx 1.732026 < \sqrt{3} < 1351/780 \approx 1.732177.

Mathematical Properties

Irrationality Proof

The irrationality of \sqrt{3} can be established through a proof by contradiction, a method rooted in elementary number theory. Assume, for the sake of contradiction, that \sqrt{3} is rational, so \sqrt{3} = p/q where p and q are positive integers with no common factors (i.e., \gcd(p, q) = 1) and q \neq 0. Squaring both sides yields $3 = p^2 / q^2, or equivalently, p^2 = 3q^2. This equation implies that p^2 is divisible by 3, and since 3 is prime, p must also be divisible by 3 (by Euclid's lemma). Let p = 3k for some positive integer k. Substituting gives (3k)^2 = 3q^2, so $9k^2 = 3q^2, or q^2 = 3k^2. Similarly, q^2 is divisible by 3, so q is divisible by 3. But then both p and q are divisible by 3, contradicting the assumption that \gcd(p, q) = 1. Therefore, \sqrt{3} cannot be rational and must be irrational. Since \sqrt{3} is irrational, it is an algebraic number of degree 2 over the rationals \mathbb{Q}, as it satisfies the monic irreducible polynomial x^2 - 3 = 0. This polynomial is the minimal polynomial of \sqrt{3} over \mathbb{Q}, because it is quadratic, has integer coefficients, and \sqrt{3} is one of its roots; moreover, no linear polynomial with rational coefficients can have \sqrt{3} as a root (which would imply rationality). The fact that the minimal polynomial has degree 2 confirms that \sqrt{3} is a quadratic irrational. Adjoining \sqrt{3} to \mathbb{Q} generates the quadratic field extension \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3}), which has degree 2 over \mathbb{Q}. A basis for \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3}) as a vector space over \mathbb{Q} is \{1, \sqrt{3}\}, and every element can be uniquely expressed as a + b\sqrt{3} with a, b \in \mathbb{Q}.

Algebraic and Diophantine Properties

The quadratic field \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3}) has ring of integers \mathcal{O}_K = \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{3}], consisting of elements a + b\sqrt{3} with a, b \in \mathbb{Z}. The norm map N: \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3}) \to \mathbb{Q} is defined by N(a + b\sqrt{3}) = a^2 - 3b^2, which is multiplicative and takes integer values on \mathcal{O}_K. This norm plays a central role in determining units and factorization properties, as elements with norm \pm 1 are units in \mathcal{O}_K. The unit group \mathcal{O}_K^\times is given by \{\pm \varepsilon^n \mid n \in \mathbb{Z}\}, where \varepsilon = 2 + \sqrt{3} is the fundamental unit with N(\varepsilon) = 1. Powers of \varepsilon yield solutions to the Pell equation x^2 - 3y^2 = 1: writing \varepsilon^n = x_n + y_n \sqrt{3}, the pairs (x_n, y_n) satisfy the equation for n \geq 1, with the trivial solution (1, 0) for n = 0. The fundamental solution is (x_1, y_1) = (2, 1), and subsequent solutions follow the recurrence relations x_{n+1} = 2x_n + 3y_n, y_{n+1} = x_n + 2y_n, or equivalently, s_n = 4s_{n-1} - s_{n-2} for the sequences \{x_n\} and \{y_n\}. For example, (x_2, y_2) = (7, 4) and (x_3, y_3) = (26, 15). The negative Pell equation x^2 - 3y^2 = -1 has no integer solutions, reflecting that all units have positive norm. As a Dedekind domain, \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{3}] is a unique factorization domain if and only if its ideal class group is trivial, which occurs precisely when the class number h_K = 1. For \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3}), the class number is 1, making \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{3}] a principal ideal domain and thus a unique factorization domain. The norm facilitates unique factorization by ensuring that irreducible elements with prime norms are prime ideals, and the trivial class group implies all ideals are principal.

Geometric Interpretations

Equilateral Triangles

In an equilateral triangle with side length a, the height h—the perpendicular distance from a vertex to the opposite side—plays a central role in its geometric properties. To derive this height, consider drawing an altitude from one vertex to the base, which bisects the base into two segments of length a/2 and divides the original equilateral triangle into two congruent right triangles. Each of these right triangles has angles of 30°, 60°, and 90°, with the hypotenuse equal to a and one leg equal to a/2. Applying the Pythagorean theorem to this configuration yields h = \sqrt{a^2 - (a/2)^2} = \sqrt{a^2 - a^2/4} = \sqrt{(3a^2)/4} = (\sqrt{3}/2) a. This height formula directly informs the area of an equilateral triangle. The area A is calculated using the standard triangle area formula A = (1/2) \times \text{base} \times \text{height}, where the base is a and the height is (\sqrt{3}/2) a. Substituting these values gives A = (1/2) \times a \times (\sqrt{3}/2) a = (\sqrt{3}/4) a^2. This derivation underscores the intrinsic connection between the triangle's uniformity and the appearance of \sqrt{3} in its area expression. The involvement of \sqrt{3} in equilateral triangles stems from the side ratios in the 30°-60°-90° right triangles formed by the altitude. In such a triangle, the side opposite the 30° angle (half the base) has length x, the side opposite the 60° angle (the height) has length x\sqrt{3}, and the hypotenuse (the full side of the equilateral triangle) has length $2x. This 1 : \sqrt{3} : 2 ratio encapsulates the geometric essence of equilateral triangles, with \sqrt{3} governing the scaling between the shorter leg and the height.

Trigonometric Functions

The square root of 3 appears prominently in the exact values of trigonometric functions for angles related to 60° and 30°, which can be derived using the geometry of an or the unit circle. In an equilateral triangle with side length 1, the height splits the base into two segments of length 1/2, forming two 30°-60°-90° right triangles where the side opposite the 30° angle is 1/2 and the hypotenuse is 1. Thus, \sin 30^\circ = \cos 60^\circ = \frac{1}{2} and \sin 60^\circ = \cos 30^\circ = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}. The tangent function for these angles further highlights the role of \sqrt{3}: \tan 60^\circ = \frac{\sin 60^\circ}{\cos 60^\circ} = \sqrt{3}, while \tan 30^\circ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}. This value of \tan 60^\circ represents the slope of a line inclined at 60° to the horizontal, a fundamental ratio in coordinate geometry for calculating rises over runs in such orientations. Multiple-angle identities also involve \sqrt{3}, particularly the triple-angle formula for sine: \sin 3\theta = 3\sin\theta - 4\sin^3\theta. Setting $3\theta = 60^\circ so \theta = 20^\circ and \sin 60^\circ = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} yields the cubic equation $4x^3 - 3x + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} = 0 where x = \sin 20^\circ, illustrating how \sqrt{3} connects to the roots of irreducible cubics in trigonometric solving.

Approximations and Expansions

Continued Fraction

The continued fraction expansion of \sqrt{3} is the infinite regular continued fraction [1; \overline{1, 2}], where the partial quotients are a_0 = 1, followed by the repeating sequence a_1 = 1, a_2 = 2. This can be expressed as \sqrt{3} = 1 + \cfrac{1}{1 + \cfrac{1}{2 + \cfrac{1}{1 + \cfrac{1}{2 + \cfrac{1}{1 + \cdots}}}}} The expansion arises from the Euclidean algorithm applied to \sqrt{3} and its conjugate, leading to the periodic form characteristic of quadratic irrationals. The convergents of this continued fraction, denoted h_n / k_n, are computed recursively via h_n = a_n h_{n-1} + h_{n-2} and k_n = a_n k_{n-1} + k_{n-2}, with initial conditions h_{-2} = 0, h_{-1} = 1, k_{-2} = 1, k_{-1} = 0. These yield successively better rational approximations to \sqrt{3}. The first few convergents are listed below, along with their approximation errors: | n | Convergent h_n / k_n | Decimal Value | Error |\sqrt{3} - h_n / k_n| | |-------|--------------------------|---------------|----------------------------------| | 0 | 1/1 | 1.000 | 0.732 | | 1 | 2/1 | 2.000 | 0.268 | | 2 | 5/3 | 1.667 | 0.065 | | 3 | 7/4 | 1.750 | 0.018 | | 4 | 19/11 | 1.727 | 0.005 | For example, the convergent $7/4 = 1.75 approximates \sqrt{3} with an error less than 0.02, demonstrating the rapid convergence typical of continued fractions for quadratic irrationals. Lagrange's theorem establishes that the continued fraction expansion of any quadratic irrational, such as \sqrt{3}, is eventually periodic, with the period length here being 2. Moreover, the convergents h_n / k_n provide the best rational approximations to \sqrt{3} in the sense that any rational p/q with q \leq k_n satisfies | \sqrt{3} - p/q | > | \sqrt{3} - h_n / k_n |. This property ensures that these fractions minimize the approximation error for a given denominator size, making them optimal for practical computations involving \sqrt{3}.

Computational Algorithms

The Babylonian method, also known as Heron's method, provides an efficient iterative approach for computing the square root of 3 to high precision. Starting with an initial positive guess x_0 (such as 2, which is reasonably close to \sqrt{3} \approx 1.732), the method applies the x_{n+1} = \frac{1}{2} \left( x_n + \frac{3}{x_n} \right). This iteration converges quadratically to \sqrt{3}, meaning the number of correct decimal digits roughly doubles with each step, allowing rapid achievement of arbitrary precision using standard floating-point or multiprecision arithmetic. This Babylonian iteration is a special case of applied to the function f(x) = x^2 - 3, where the general Newton-Raphson update x_{n+1} = x_n - \frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)} simplifies to the same formula, with f'(x) = 2x. For an initial guess x_0 > 0, the sequence is monotonically decreasing and bounded below by \sqrt{3} if x_0 > \sqrt{3}, ensuring convergence to the positive root. Quadratic convergence implies that, starting from a modest initial approximation, only about \log_2 n iterations are needed to obtain n correct digits; for example, seven iterations from x_0 = 1 yield over 60 accurate digits for \sqrt{2}, and similar performance holds for \sqrt{3}. For arbitrary-precision computations, such as thousands or millions of digits, these iterative methods are implemented using multiprecision arithmetic libraries, where each step involves multiplication and division at increasing precision levels. The overall time complexity is \tilde{O}(M(n) \log n), where M(n) is the cost of multiplying two n-bit numbers (often O(n \log n \log \log n) via FFT-based methods), and the \log n factor arises from the number of iterations. Specialized algorithms, like those avoiding explicit multiplications in favor of shifts and adds, further optimize high-precision square roots while preserving quadratic convergence. Initial guesses can be refined using continued fraction approximations for even faster startup.

Historical and Applied Contexts

Historical Development

The ancient Babylonians, circa 2000 BCE, employed a (base-60) numeral system and developed iterative algorithms for computing square roots as part of solving equations on clay tablets. One such for the square root of 3 appears as 1;45 in sexagesimal notation, equivalent to 1 + 45/60 = 1.75 in , achieved through their standard method of averaging an initial guess with the quotient of the number divided by that guess. In during the 5th century BCE, the Pythagorean school grappled with the concept of incommensurable lengths, recognizing that the square root of 3 is through geometric constructions, particularly those involving the height of an , which equals (√3/2) times the side length. While of (c. 450 BCE) is traditionally associated with the discovery of irrational numbers—sparking the Pythagorean crisis by revealing that not all line segments are commensurable in rational ratios—later figures like Theodorus of Cyrene extended proofs of irrationality to √3 and other non-square integers up to 17 using spiral constructions. Medieval Islamic mathematicians advanced approximations of square roots significantly, building on and traditions. In the , Jamshīd al-Kāshī (c. 1380–1429) detailed iterative methods for extracting square roots in his treatise Miftāḥ al-ḥisāb (Key to Arithmetic, 1427), including algorithms that allowed for high-precision calculations using fractions, which he systematically applied to arithmetic operations. Al-Kāshī's work facilitated more accurate approximations of √3 in astronomical and geometric contexts, marking a key step toward modern computational techniques. During the in (14th–17th centuries), the adoption of Hindu-Arabic numerals and the development of fractions revolutionized approximations of numbers like √3. Mathematicians such as (1540–1603) employed notations in algebraic and trigonometric computations, enabling finer rational bounds for √3, while Simon Stevin (1548–1620) advocated for a full system in De Thiende (1585), which supported practical root extractions without sexagesimal conversions. These innovations bridged medieval methods to early modern , emphasizing precision for quantities.

Modern Applications

In physics, particularly in , the square root of 3 emerges prominently in the of materials with hexagonal lattices, such as . The tight-binding model for graphene's π-electrons yields an energy dispersion relation that incorporates √3 due to the 60° angles in the lattice geometry: E(\mathbf{k}) = \pm t \sqrt{3 + 2 \cos(\sqrt{3} k_y a) + 4 \cos\left( \frac{\sqrt{3} k_y a}{2} \right) \cos\left( \frac{3 k_x a}{2} \right)}, where t is the nearest-neighbor hopping , a is the carbon-carbon , and \mathbf{k} = (k_x, k_y) is the wave in the . This formula arises from the summation over the three nearest-neighbor vectors in the , leading to √3 factors in the phase terms that describe the Dirac-like linear near the Fermi points, crucial for graphene's exceptional electrical conductivity and applications in . Similarly, in broader systems, such as those modeling quantum Hall effects or photonic crystals, √3 appears in the Bloch wave functions and eigenvalues, reflecting the 's and influencing phenomena like flat bands in twisted superlattices. In engineering, √3 plays a key role in structural calculations for trusses incorporating 60° angles, common in efficient load-bearing designs like roof frameworks or bridges. When analyzing forces via the method of joints, the vertical and horizontal components of member forces involve trigonometric factors where \sin 60^\circ = \sqrt{3}/2 and \cos 60^\circ = 1/2, directly yielding √3 in equilibrium equations; for instance, resolving a compressive force F in a 60° inclined member contributes F \sqrt{3}/2 to the vertical reaction. This is evident in equilateral triangular truss units, where the height h = s \sqrt{3}/2 (with s as side length) determines stability and material stress distribution. In antenna design, hexagonal lattice arrays—preferred for uniform coverage and reduced sidelobes in phased arrays—incorporate √3 in element positioning; the basis vectors of the lattice are typically \mathbf{a}_1 = d (1, 0) and \mathbf{a}_2 = d (1/2, \sqrt{3}/2), optimizing spacing to d \approx \lambda / \sqrt{3} (λ as wavelength) to minimize grating lobes while maximizing gain in applications like radar and 5G communications. For signal processing, √3 factors into the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) via radix-3 algorithms, where butterfly operations use twiddle factors W_3^k = e^{-j 2\pi k / 3} = -1/2 \pm i \sqrt{3}/2 for k = 1, 2, enabling efficient decomposition of signals in filters, audio analysis, and telecommunications with O(N log N) complexity. In , √3 facilitates coordinate transformations for hexagonal tilings, widely used in simulations, games, and for natural patterns like honeycombs or . Converting axial coordinates (q, r) to space for flat-top hexagons involves offsets like x = size \cdot (3/2 \cdot q), y = size \cdot (\sqrt{3} \cdot (r + q/2)), where the √3 term accounts for the vertical spacing between rows, ensuring seamless tiling without overlaps or gaps. For rotations, particularly those by 60° around an (e.g., for animating symmetric objects like crystals), the includes √3 via values; a z-axis rotation by 60° is \begin{pmatrix} 1/2 & -\sqrt{3}/2 & 0 \\ \sqrt{3}/2 & 1/2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}, applied to vertex coordinates to achieve precise angular transformations in rendering pipelines.

References

  1. [1]
    Square Root -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    A square root of x is a number r such that r^2=x. When written in the form x^(1/2) or especially sqrt(x), the square root of x may also be called the radical ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] IRRATIONALITY FROM THE BOOK - Williams College
    But this is a smaller solution3, contradiction! 3. THE SQUARE-ROOT OF 3 IS IRRATIONAL. We generalize Tennenbaum's geometric proof to show /3 is irrational.
  3. [3]
    A002194 - OEIS
    The square root of 3 is the length of the minimal Y-shaped (symmetrical) network linking three points unit distance apart.
  4. [4]
    Theodorus's Constant -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    Theodorus's Constant ; sqrt(3) , i.e., the square root of 3. It has decimal expansion ; sqrt(3) . ; sqrt(3) has continued fraction [1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, ...] (OEIS ...Missing: properties | Show results with:properties<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    week166 - UCR Math Department
    Mar 27, 2001 · If its continued fraction expansion eventually repeats, like this: sqrt(3) = 1 + 1 --------- 1 + 1 -------- 2 + 1 ------- 1 + 1 ------ 2 + 1 -- ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Continued Fractions - UCLA Math Circle
    Apr 28, 2024 · Find continued fraction expansions for the square root of each natural number: 1. /. 3. 2. /. 4. 3. /. 5. 4. /. 6. 5. ···. 3. Page 4. 3 ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Section 7.2 - Area of a Triangle In this section, we'll use a familiar ...
    Equilateral Triangles: 0. 2. 2. 1. 1. 3. 3 sin(60 ). 2. 2. 2. 4. Area. a a a a. = ∙. = = Or: Area of an equilateral triangle is side squared times. 3. 4. Page ...
  8. [8]
    Square Root of 3 -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    Algebra Applied Mathematics Calculus and Analysis Discrete Mathematics Foundations of Mathematics Geometry History and Terminology Number Theory Probability ...
  9. [9]
    Square Root of 3 - GeeksforGeeks
    Jul 23, 2025 · Square root of 3 is a positive real number which will give the number 3 when multiplied by itself. The square root of 3 is an irrational number.
  10. [10]
    How to Find the Square Root of 3? - Cuemath
    The square root of 3 rounded up to 7 decimal places is 1.7320508. It is the positive solution of the equation x 2 = 3.
  11. [11]
    Quadratic Surd -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    Quadratic surds are sometimes also called quadratic irrationals. In 1770, Lagrange proved that any quadratic surd has a regular continued fraction which is ...Missing: irrational | Show results with:irrational
  12. [12]
    Area of equilateral triangle (video) - Khan Academy
    Aug 15, 2016 · That is the square root of 3 times s squared. And the denominator, we have a 2 times a 2. All of that over 4. So for example, if you have an equilateral ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] prospective mathematics teachers' making sense of the decimal ...
    ... square root of 3 for finding the interval of √3. By going this way they obtained nested intervals as (1.7, 1.8) ⊃(1.73, 1.74) ⊃(1.732, 1.733) ⊃....<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    A001075 - OEIS
    The upper principal convergents to 3^(1/2), beginning with 2/1, 7/4, 26/15, 97/56, comprise a strictly decreasing sequence; numerators=A001075, denominators= ...
  15. [15]
    Archimedes and the Square Root of 3 - MathPages
    ... bounds is a simple linear fractional iteration. Imagine that their first estimate for the square root of 3 was 5/3, perhaps based on the fact that 52 = 25 ...
  16. [16]
    The Irrationality of square root of 3
    The Irrationality of square root of three · Problem: Prove that is an irrational number. · Solution: The number,, is irrational, ie., it cannot be expressed as ...
  17. [17]
    Algebraic Number Minimal Polynomial -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    The minimal polynomial can be computed in the Wolfram Language using MinimalPolynomial[zeta, var]. For example, the minimal polynomial of sqrt(2) is x^2-2 . In ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Algebraic Number Theory - James Milne
    the ring of integers in the number field, the ideals and units in the ring of.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] NUMBER RINGS
    May 13, 2019 · exercises 9–11) that 2 + √3 is in fact a fundamental unit in Z[√3], meaning that −1 and 2 +. √3 generate the full group Z[√3]∗. This implies ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] pell's equation, ii - keith conrad
    Theorem 3.3 says integral solutions of x2 − 23y2 = 2 are powers of u times solutions where |x| ≤. √. 2(. √ u + 1/. √ u)/2 = 5 and |y| ≤. √. 2(. √ u − 1/. √ u)/( ...
  21. [21]
    Number field 2.2.12.1: \(\Q(\sqrt{3}) \) - LMFDB
    Invariants. This field is Galois and abelian over Q. This is not a CM field. This field has no CM subfields.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] a quick route to unique factorization in quadratic orders - Paul Pollack
    We let K be the fraction field of OD, so that K = Q(. √. D), and we denote conjugation in K with a bar. The norm of α ∈ K, denoted N(α), is defined by N(α) ...
  23. [23]
    Height of Equilateral Triangle - Formula, Method, FAQs - Cuemath
    If the side length of an equilateral is given as 6 units, its height can be calculated with the formula, Height of equilateral triangle, h = ½(√3a), where 'a' ...
  24. [24]
    Area of Equilateral Triangle - Derivation, Formula & Examples
    Therefore, the area of the equilateral triangle is 3 \sqrt 3 3 ​ square units which is approximately equal to 1.73 1.73 1.73 square units. Example 2: An ...
  25. [25]
    Area of Equilateral Triangle - Formula, Derivation, Examples
    Area of triangle = ½ × base × height. For finding the height of an equilateral triangle, we use the Pythagoras theorem (hypotenuse2 = base2 + height2). Here ...
  26. [26]
    30-60-90 Triangle - Rules, Formula, Theorem, Sides, Examples
    30-60-90-Triangle Formula​​ Another formula for this special triangle 1:2:3 which is the ratio of the three angles of the 30-60-90-Triangle​​​​​​.
  27. [27]
    30-60-90 Triangles | Properties, Formula & Examples - Study.com
    An equilateral triangle, which has three equal sides, can be split into two 30-60-90 triangles by the height from any angle to base. The Pythagorean Theorem ...
  28. [28]
    Let's Learn Right Triangle Trigonometry - Portland Community College
    60 ∘ . permalink An equilateral triangle is cut into two right triangles by dropping a ... sin(60∘)=OPPHYP=√32 sin ⁡ ( 60 ∘ ) = OPP HYP = 3 2.
  29. [29]
    3. Right triangle trigonometry - Pre-Calculus
    ... sec(π6)=2√3cot30∘=cot(π6)=√3. To find the trig values for the 60∘=π3 angle, draw the triangle: Using the definitions, we find: sin60∘=sin(π3)=√32cos60 ...
  30. [30]
    4-03 Right Triangle Trigonometry
    Answers ; sin60°=opphyp=√32, csc60°=hypopp=2√33 ; cos60°=adjhyp=12, sec60°=hypadj=2√3=21=2 ; tan60°=oppadj=√31=√3, cot60°=adjopp=1√3=√33 ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Trigonometry - UCCS
    Jul 28, 2023 · equilateral triangle, all the angles are the same measure (60◦. ) ... 2 sin(60◦) sin(30◦). = 2. √. 3 ≈ 3.46 units. As seen below, the side a ...
  32. [32]
    Why Trisecting the Angle is Impossible - cs.Princeton
    Dec 10, 1999 · The triple angle formula in trigonometry for the sine is: sin 3a = 3 sin a - 4 sin3a. We can rewrite this to 4 sin3a - 3 sin a + sin 3a = 0.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] TRIGONOMETRY NOTES By STEVEN SY Copyright 2008
    ... 20. Example 3: Simplify the difference quotient. Solution. Now. 3. 2 so. 3. 2 . Then ... triple-angle” formula for. 3. 4. Simplify. 2 2. 5. Simplify. 251. Page ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Periodic Continued Fractions
    Nov 10, 2024 · The proof that quadratic irrationals give rise to periodic continued fractions will come out of an algorithm for computing the continued ...
  35. [35]
    Rational number that approximates $\sqrt{3} - Math Stack Exchange
    Apr 9, 2015 · One way is: use decimal search to find the first 2 decimal places, then multiply by 100, truncate to an integer, and use this value over 100.sqrt{3}$ represented as continued fraction - Math Stack ExchangeRational function approximation to square root - Math Stack ExchangeMore results from math.stackexchange.com
  36. [36]
    Where do the "best" rational approximations come from?
    ... convergents of x. They are important in this context because the best rational approximations to an irrational number are always found among its convergents.
  37. [37]
    Continued Fractions - Convergence
    In some sense, the convergents are the best possible approximations for a given nonnegative real: Theorem: Let p / q be a convergent for the nonnegative real a ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Babylonian Method of Computing the Square Root
    Abstract—When computing a square root, computers still, in effect, use an iterative algorithm developed by the Babylonians millennia ago.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Square Roots via Newton's Method - MIT Mathematics
    Feb 4, 2015 · This fantastic convergence rate means that we only need seven Newton iterations to obtain more than 60 accurate digits—the accuracy is quickly ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] 6.006 Lecture 12: Square roots, Newton's method
    This means the complexity of computing a square root will be Θ(dα lg d) if the complexity of multiplication is Θ(dα), given that we have shown that the ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] High Precision Division and Square Root
    We present division and square root al- gorithms for calculations with more bits than are handled by the oating point hardware. These algorithms avoid the.
  42. [42]
    Babylonian mathematics - MacTutor - University of St Andrews
    Babylonian math used a base-60 system, created tables for calculations, and developed formulas for multiplication, and went beyond arithmetic to algebra.<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Assignment 2 answers Math 105 History of Mathematics
    Use the assumed Babylonian square root al- gorithm of the text to show that the square root of 3 is about 1;45 by beginning with the value 2. Find a three-.
  44. [44]
    How a Secret Society Discovered Irrational Numbers
    Jun 13, 2024 · The ancient scholar Hippasus of Metapontum was punished with death for his discovery of irrational numbers—or at least that's the legend.Missing: root equilateral
  45. [45]
    square root of 3 - PlanetMath
    Mar 22, 2013 · The square root of 3 , also known as Theodorus's constant, is the number the square of which is equal to the integer 3.
  46. [46]
    (PDF) Root extraction by Al-Kashi and Stevin - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · In this paper, we study the extraction of roots as presented by Al-Kashi in his 1427 book “Key to Arithmetic” and Stevin in his 1585 book “Arithmetic”.
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
    Decimal Arithmetic - Muslim HeritageMuslim Heritage
    Sep 8, 2005 · In the fifteenth century, Al-Kashi provided a comprehensive and systematic treatment of arithmetic operations with decimal fractions. He used ...
  49. [49]
    Algebra - Islamic Contributions - Britannica
    Oct 24, 2025 · Islamic contributions to mathematics began around ad 825, when the Baghdad mathematician Muḥammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī wrote his famous treatise.<|control11|><|separator|>
  50. [50]
    The Math of the Renaissance - Alex's Blog
    Feb 21, 2019 · Other mathematical symbols were standardized during this era. Among them, the (totally radical) symbol √ for square root, which is credited to ...Missing: 3 | Show results with:3
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Tight-Binding Model for Graphene
    Sep 12, 2018 · The unit cell of graphene's lattice consists of two different types of sites, which we will call. A sites and B sites (see Fig. 1). Figure 1: ...
  52. [52]
    Controlled formation of an isolated miniband in bilayer graphene on ...
    Jul 13, 2016 · Title:Controlled formation of an isolated miniband in bilayer graphene on an almost commensurate \sqrt{3} \times \sqrt{3} substrate ; Cite as: ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Chapter 6: Analysis of Structures - Purdue Engineering
    For trusses, we have been using "formulas" such as (2n = m+r) for planar trusses, and (3n = m+r) for space trusses to judge the type of structure. For frames, ...
  54. [54]
    Space Truss - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Space truss is commonly used in three-dimensional structural element. The forces are subjected axially in space truss elements, which are assumed pin connected.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Planar Arrays on Lattices and Their FFT Steering, a Primer - DTIC
    Apr 29, 2011 · When working with the hexagonal lattice, many authors avoid three-dimensional representations and work with two array-plane coordinates only, ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Radix 3 FFT algorithms
    3- pt DFT. # of DFT'S. Stage. # of twiddle fac stage. (# of stages) with DETS. # of stages) with twildle factors. O(N). For. 开. 11. +. ~(x-1). +. N (log N = 1).
  57. [57]
    Hexagonal Grids - Red Blob Games
    Mar 11, 2013 · This guide will cover various ways to make hexagonal grids, the relationships between different approaches, and common formulas and algorithms.
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Three-Dimensional Rotation Matrices
    The most general three-dimensional rotation matrix represents a counterclockwise rotation by an angle θ about a fixed axis that lies along the unit vector n.