Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Starchild skull

The Starchild skull is the deformed cranium of a human child approximately 4 to 5 years old, discovered in the 1930s inside a mine tunnel in Mexico's Copper Canyon region alongside a normal adult female skeleton, and radiocarbon dated to roughly 900 years old.^[1] Acquired in 1998 by author and researcher Lloyd Pye, who founded the Starchild Project to investigate it, the skull measures about 13 cm from base to crown—roughly half the size of an average adult human skull—and displays distinctive anomalies such as unusually thin yet denser bone structure, the complete absence of frontal sinuses and brow ridges, shallow and widely spaced eye sockets, a reduced facial region, and an estimated cranial capacity 30% larger than expected for its size.^[1]^[2] Pye promoted the artifact as the remains of a human-alien hybrid, citing preliminary genetic tests that reportedly identified non-human DNA sequences and structural differences incompatible with known pathologies, which fueled public interest and alternative theories about extraterrestrial intervention in human evolution.^[1] Subsequent scientific examinations revealed human mitochondrial DNA (analyzed in 2003) consistent with Native American ancestry. Earlier analysis by forensic odontologist Dr. David Sweet at the University of British Columbia in 1999 detected human nuclear DNA, including the Y chromosome, confirming the individual was a human male, with no evidence of non-human genetic material.^[3]^[4] Experts attribute the skull's morphology to severe congenital hydrocephalus—a condition causing excessive cerebrospinal fluid buildup that deforms the cranium—rather than artificial cranial binding or extraterrestrial origins, though proponents continue to dispute these findings due to limited access for further testing.^[3]^[2]

Discovery and Provenance

Initial Discovery in Mexico

The Starchild skull was reportedly discovered in the 1930s near a mine in Mexico's Copper Canyon region, an area approximately 100 miles southwest of Chihuahua. A local young woman of Mexican heritage, visiting relatives from El Paso, Texas, found it during an informal exploration of an abandoned mine tunnel. She encountered a shallow grave containing the unusual skull of a child, partial skeletal remains including a small jawbone and other bones, alongside the skeleton of a normal adult female.^[5] The discoverer collected the fragile remains in a cloth wrapping and transported them back to her family in the United States, where they were preserved as a private artifact for several decades. The skull and associated fragments remained out of public view, passed down through the family without formal documentation or analysis.^[6] Radiocarbon dating of the skull material, performed in 2004 by Beta Analytic in Miami, Florida, estimated the age of the remains at around 900 years old (±40 years), consistent with the burial context near the discovery site.^[5] In the 1990s, the artifacts were acquired by individuals in El Paso, Texas, eventually leading to their handover to researcher Lloyd Pye.^[6]

Acquisition and Promotion by Lloyd Pye

In late 1998, the Starchild skull came into the possession of Ray and Melanie Young of El Paso, Texas, through an anonymous source linked to the family of the original discoverer in Mexico.^[7] The Youngs, with Melanie's background as a neonatal nurse recognizing the skull's unusual features, sought expert analysis.^[7] In February 1999, the Youngs entrusted the skull to Lloyd Pye, an author and researcher interested in human origins, to oversee scientific testing and promotion.^[8] Pye subsequently founded the Starchild Project, an informal organization dedicated to funding examinations of the skull and publicizing its potential significance through donations, lectures, a dedicated website (starchildproject.com), and related merchandise.^[8]^[7] Pye's early promotional activities emphasized the skull's distinctive physical appearance to highlight its anomaly status and encourage donor support.^[8] He detailed these efforts in his 2007 book, The Starchild Skull: Genetic Enigma or Human-Alien Hybrid?, which chronicled the initial investigations and aimed to broaden public interest.^[8] Beginning in 2000, Pye traveled extensively for presentations at UFO conferences, including events in the United States and internationally, such as the 2010 congress in Zurich, Switzerland, where he showcased the skull to audiences seeking evidence of extraterrestrial connections.^[9]

Physical Characteristics

Cranial Morphology

The Starchild skull features an elongated cranium characterized by pronounced ballooning of the parietal bones and a flattened occipital region, resulting in a symmetrical yet aberrant overall shape. The skull measures about 13 cm from base to crown, roughly half the height of an average adult human skull. Its internal volume measures approximately 1,600 cc, representing about 30% more capacity than the average for a pediatric human skull of comparable estimated age.^[5]^[10]^[11] The cranial bones exhibit unusual thinness, with an average thickness of 1.5–3 mm, thinner than the typical 3–5 mm in pediatric human skulls of similar age.^[10] The sagittal suture shows partial fusion with an atypical fossa, effectively lacking a distinct line of separation, while a large triangular fontanelle-like opening is present at the rear of the cranium.^[10]^[12] The eye sockets are positioned low on the facial aspect, with shallow orbits measuring about 0.5–0.7 inches in depth, and the frontal bone appears flattened without prominent brow ridges. The nasal cavity is notably reduced, lacking typical indentation and structural depth.^[10]^[12] In comparison to normal human pediatric skulls, the Starchild specimen is markedly lighter, weighing approximately half as much as a comparable example, yet demonstrates enhanced durability attributable to reinforcing fibers integrated within the bone matrix.^[5]^[12]

Associated Remains and Age Estimation

The associated remains accompanying the Starchild skull consist of a partial skeleton, including a mandible featuring unerupted teeth that indicate the individual was approximately 4-5 years old at the time of death, along with fragments of a femur and ribs consistent with those of a small child.^[13] No signs of trauma or pathological conditions were evident in the preserved bone elements, and reconstruction suggests an overall stature of 3-4 feet (about 0.9-1.2 meters) had the full skeleton been intact.^[13] Age estimation for the remains relies primarily on dental development, as the unerupted permanent teeth in the mandible align with that of a child aged 4-5 years, corroborated by the size and morphology of the postcranial fragments.^[14] Radiocarbon dating using accelerator mass spectrometry on bone samples, conducted by Beta Analytic in Miami, Florida, in 2004, yielded a conventional radiocarbon age of 900 ± 40 years BP for both the Starchild skull and the accompanying adult skull (calibrated to roughly A.D. 1040-1260).^[14]^[15] Dating efforts faced challenges from potential contamination due to post-discovery handling and environmental exposure, leading to initial broad estimates of 800-1,000 years before more precise accelerator mass spectrometry clarified the chronology.^[14]

Claims of Extraterrestrial Origin

Lloyd Pye's Hybrid Theory

Lloyd Pye, the primary promoter of the Starchild skull, asserted since 2000 that the artifact represents the remains of a child born from interbreeding between a human mother and an unknown "star" species, likely extraterrestrial in origin.^[16] He proposed that this hybridization occurred through either natural mating or deliberate genetic engineering, resulting in a novel species that blended human and non-human traits, with the Starchild serving as the inaugural discovered specimen.^[13] According to Pye, the process involved a dominant contribution from the alien parent, potentially resembling the "grey" extraterrestrial archetype, leading to offspring exhibiting approximately 90% alien genetic characteristics.^[16] Pye's suspicion of the skull's anomalous nature began in 1998 upon its acquisition by collectors Ray and Melanie Young, who enlisted him to investigate its origins.^[13] By 2003, following preliminary genetic analyses, he fully developed his hybrid theory, positing that "atavistic" traits—such as unusual bone structure and absent frontal sinuses—stemmed from alien DNA overriding human genetic expectations.^[16] These features, Pye argued, illustrated a reversion to ancestral alien physiology rather than typical human variation.^[13] Pye, who died in 2013, explicitly rejected explanations attributing the skull's morphology to human cranial deformation practices or known medical conditions, contending that its characteristics were far too sophisticated and structurally integral to fit such categories.^[16] He maintained that the skull's pronounced elongation and other anomalies could not result from cultural interventions like cradleboarding, as the bone formation displayed natural, seamless integration inconsistent with artificial shaping.^[17]

Supporting Arguments Presented

Proponents of the Starchild skull's non-human origins, led by Lloyd Pye, highlighted microscopic examinations revealing unusual red fibers or residue embedded within the bone matrix, which they interpreted as a form of structural reinforcement absent in known earthly biology.^[18] These fibers, observed via scanning electron microscopy, were described as extraordinarily durable and woven into the bone like rebar in concrete, contributing to the skull's enhanced strength despite its thinner walls compared to human bone.^[19] Pye argued that such features could not arise from human genetic variation or pathology, positioning them as evidence of extraterrestrial genetic engineering within his broader hybrid theory.^[13] Another key assertion involved the skull's estimated cranial capacity of approximately 1,600 cubic centimeters, significantly larger than the average adult human brain of around 1,350 cc, paired with a notably smaller and more recessed facial structure.^[20] Supporters claimed this configuration—featuring shallower eye sockets (approximately half the depth of a human's) and positioned higher on the cranium—deviated from human evolutionary norms, suggesting an alien-human hybrid physiology incompatible with terrestrial development.^[13] These proportions were said to indicate advanced cognitive potential while maintaining structural integrity, further challenging explanations rooted in human congenital conditions.^[2] To fund independent testing, Pye launched public appeals through the Starchild Project to support analyses including DNA sequencing and imaging.^[21] Results from a 2003 CT scan were selectively emphasized, revealing the absence of fused cranial sutures—contrary to expectations in severe hydrocephalus— to argue for the viability of a hybrid origin without pathological deformation.^[19] These interpretations were disseminated via lectures, publications, and the project's website to bolster the case for extraterrestrial involvement.^[13]

Scientific Analyses

Morphological and Anatomical Studies

In 2003, CT scans of the Starchild skull were performed as part of the Starchild Project investigations, revealing the absence of typical cranial sutures, a notably thin vault, and atypical positioning of the eye sockets. These features were interpreted by project proponents as deviations from standard human morphology, such as reduced bone density in the vault region, though mainstream experts attribute them to severe cranial deformation from conditions like hydrocephalus.^[22] Comparative anatomical examinations in 2004, funded by the Starchild Project, identified structural similarities between the Starchild skull and hydrocephalic human skulls recovered from archaeological sites. These analyses emphasized matching patterns of cranial expansion and asymmetry, attributing the elongation to pathological growth rather than artificial modification, while noting the overall human-like bone composition; however, no independent mainstream institutions, such as the Smithsonian, have verified these findings.^[10] Fiberscope examinations conducted in 2005 as part of the Starchild Project examined the internal structure of the bone matrix, uncovering unusual porosity levels that suggested extensive remodeling processes. Subsequent interpretations linked this porosity to adaptive changes in deformed crania, where irregular bone deposition occurs in response to prolonged pressure or fluid accumulation, without evidence of non-human materials.^[17] Panoramic X-rays of the Starchild skull demonstrated normal human dental development, with tooth formation and eruption patterns aligned with those of a child approximately 4-5 years old, despite the associated cranial elongation. These images confirmed the presence of standard deciduous dentition and developing permanent teeth, providing anatomical evidence of human origin independent of the skull's distorted shape.^[23]

DNA Sequencing and Genetic Testing

Genetic investigations of the Starchild skull began with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) extraction in 2003 by Trace Genetics in Davis, California, which yielded a sequence that was entirely human and aligned with Native American haplogroup C, a common maternal lineage among indigenous populations of the Americas.^[5] This result established the maternal genetic heritage as unequivocally human, tracing back to prehistoric migrations across Beringia.^[3] Efforts to analyze nuclear DNA proved more challenging due to the skull's age and environmental degradation, resulting in fragmented and low-yield samples. An initial 1999 test at the Bureau of Legal Dentistry, University of British Columbia, identified both X and Y chromosomes, confirming the remains belonged to a human male with human parents.^[3] Subsequent attempts in 2010 and 2011 employed shotgun sequencing techniques at independent laboratories, recovering short segments of nuclear DNA; early reports noted approximately 1.3% of sequences that did not match human references, prompting claims of anomalous genetic material.^[24] However, reexamination attributed these discrepancies to bacterial and fungal contamination, common in ancient bone samples, rather than non-human origins.^[24] By 2013, comprehensive reanalysis affirmed the nuclear genome as fully human, dispelling earlier interpretations of hybrid traits.^[2] Promoter Lloyd Pye, who funded much of the testing at a cost exceeding $10,000 through private donations, initially highlighted the "unknown sequences" in project reports to support extraterrestrial hypotheses, but independent scientific scrutiny consistently rejected these as artifacts of sample degradation and contamination.^[25] No peer-reviewed publications in mainstream anthropology journals, such as the Anthropological Review, have endorsed non-human genetic claims, emphasizing instead the skull's human pathology.^[26]

Consensus and Explanations

Hydrocephalus and Cranial Deformation

The Starchild skull's unusual morphology has been attributed by medical experts to congenital hydrocephalus, a condition characterized by the abnormal accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid within the brain, leading to increased intracranial pressure and expansion of the cranium in infants before skull sutures fully fuse.^[3] This buildup exerts outward pressure on the developing skull, resulting in anomalies such as delayed suture fusion and overall cranial enlargement.^[27] Untreated cases, particularly in historical contexts without modern surgical intervention, often prove fatal in early childhood due to complications like brain compression and infection.^[28] Key features of the Starchild skull align closely with hydrocephalus symptoms, including its elongated posterior vault from fluid pressure, shallow eye orbits due to forward displacement of facial bones, and notably thin cranial walls indicative of accelerated bone growth under stress.^[3] Craniofacial specialists, such as Dr. Mary Manhein of Louisiana State University's Forensic Anthropology and Computer Enhancement Services Laboratory, have examined the specimen and concluded it represents a human child affected by such pathology, potentially combined with cultural practices.^[29] DNA sequencing further supports its fully human origin, ruling out non-human genetic contributions. Cultural cranial deformation practices among ancient Mesoamerican societies, such as the Maya, could have exacerbated these effects, as infants' heads were intentionally bound or compressed using wooden boards or cloth to achieve elongated shapes symbolizing status or beauty.^[30] These techniques, applied during the malleable period of skull development, often interacted with underlying medical conditions like hydrocephalus, amplifying distortions without altering the fundamental human anatomy.^[31] Historical precedents for cranial deformation appear in archaeological finds from Andean sites dated approximately 500–1000 A.D., including Tiwanaku culture remains, where similar elongated skulls show suture anomalies consistent with deliberate practices.^[32] These cases underscore the prevalence of the condition in pre-modern populations, where high child mortality rates from untreated hydrocephalus were common, mirroring the Starchild skull's estimated age at death around 4–5 years.^[33]

Criticisms of Non-Human Claims

Criticisms of the non-human claims surrounding the Starchild skull have centered on methodological flaws, biased interpretations, and a lack of rigorous scientific validation. Lloyd Pye, the primary promoter of the extraterrestrial hybrid theory, lacked formal credentials in anthropology, genetics, or related fields, relying instead on his background in alternative history and speculative writing, which led to accusations of selective data presentation that ignored contradictory evidence.^[3] Pye's approach often dismissed natural explanations in favor of extraordinary ones, such as attributing unusual cranial features to alien ancestry without supporting peer-reviewed data.^[5] Regarding DNA analyses, Pye frequently invoked contamination to explain results that contradicted his hypothesis, particularly after early tests identified standard human mitochondrial DNA consistent with Native American haplogroup C. Independent reviews of these tests, including those from forensic labs, have refuted such claims, affirming the extraction of fully human genetic material without evidence of non-human sequences, as contamination would likely affect all samples uniformly rather than selectively supporting a hybrid narrative.^[5] For instance, a 1999 analysis at the University of British Columbia detected both X and Y chromosomes, confirming the skull's human male origin, which Pye rejected as contaminated despite no detailed substantiation.^[3] Later claims by Pye in 2011 of anomalous nuclear DNA were similarly critiqued for lacking independent verification and relying on incomplete sequencing that failed to isolate viable non-human markers.^[24] Ethical concerns have also arisen from Pye's commercialization of the skull, including through books, lectures, and donations solicited via the Starchild Project, which delayed objective peer review by prioritizing public promotion over academic scrutiny. This approach raised questions about the artifact's handling and accessibility for unbiased study, with critics arguing it exemplified pseudoscientific exploitation of a potentially sensitive human remain. Following Pye's death in 2013, ownership transferred to Melanie Young, the original custodian, further complicating efforts for transparent research. As of 2025, the skull remains in Young's possession, with no further independent scientific testing reported, maintaining the consensus on its human origin.^[34] In broader anthropological discourse, the extraterrestrial claims lack any peer-reviewed endorsement, with consensus viewing the promotion as akin to a hoax through sensationalism rather than evidence-based inquiry. Reviews in skeptical and scientific literature, such as those examining pseudoarchaeological artifacts, consistently label the Starchild narrative as unsupported, emphasizing the need for rigorous, independent validation absent in Pye's work.^[3] This perspective aligns with established findings that attribute the skull's morphology to known human variations, underscoring the absence of extraordinary evidence required for non-human hypotheses.^[5]

Cultural and Media Impact

Documentaries and Publications

Lloyd Pye introduced the Starchild skull to a wider audience in his 2000 book Everything You Know Is Wrong: Human Origins, where he discussed its discovery and initial implications for alternative theories of human evolution.^[35] In 2007, Pye published The Starchild Skull: Genetic Enigma or Human-Alien Hybrid?, a detailed account of eight years of examinations and testing conducted under the Starchild Project, emphasizing anomalies in the skull's structure and composition.^[8] Pye produced the 2006 DVD Starchild: The Quest Continues, a documentary outlining the project's early research efforts and promotional lectures on the skull's potential significance. The skull also featured in the 2014 episode "The Star Children" of the television series Ancient Aliens (Season 7, Episode 3), which explored claims of extraterrestrial human hybrids through interviews and visual reconstructions.^[36] Following Pye's death in 2013, custody of the skull was transferred to trustees of the Starchild Project, formalized as a company to continue independent research and public outreach.^[37] In 2015, a revised edition of Everything You Know Is Wrong: Human Origins was released, incorporating updates on the Starchild investigations co-authored with Pye's collaborators.^[38] The official website starchildproject.com served as a primary hub for project updates, DNA summaries, and media until around 2020, hosting resources that supported ongoing dissemination of findings.^[13] Associated videos on the project's YouTube channel and related lectures by Pye have collectively amassed millions of views, contributing to the skull's visibility in alternative history discussions.^[39]

Public Reception and Ongoing Interest

The Starchild skull garnered substantial interest within UFO communities and internet forums during the late 1990s and 2000s, as proponents highlighted its unusual morphology as potential evidence of extraterrestrial origins or human-alien hybridization. Lloyd Pye, who acquired the artifact in 1998, actively promoted it through lectures, books, and media appearances, fostering discussions in paranormal circles that likened its features to depictions of "grey" aliens. This enthusiasm led to public campaigns for additional scientific testing, reflecting broader public curiosity about anomalous artifacts.^[40]^[21]^[41] Following Pye's death in December 2013, promotional efforts waned, contributing to a decline in mainstream visibility for the skull, though it persisted as a staple in pseudoscientific narratives. In the 2020s, sporadic revivals occurred through podcasts and online discussions exploring ancient mysteries, maintaining niche appeal among enthusiasts despite scientific consensus attributing the skull to human congenital conditions. The artifact's story has influenced similar unsubstantiated claims about anomalous remains, such as the 2023 presentation of purported "alien mummies" in Mexico, underscoring patterns in pseudoscientific interpretations of archaeological finds.^[21]^[3]^[42] As of 2025, the skull remains in private hands, held by Melanie Young, co-founder of the Starchild Project, with no new scientific tests reported since the early 2010s DNA analyses. It is increasingly cited in science education materials as a cautionary example of how anomalous objects can fuel pseudoscience, emphasizing the importance of rigorous verification over speculative claims.^[43]^[3]

References

[1]
Myths and mysteries: The Starchild skull - Newspaper - DAWN.COM
Sep 24, 2011 · There are about three billion base pairs of DNA in the skull and many thousand have been recovered by the database. But till more results are ...
[2]
Starchild—Alien-human Hybrid?
### Summary of Starchild Skull
[3]
The Starchild Project - The NESS
Conservative scientists are convinced that the skull represents a severe congenital abnormality, but require more thorough examination before they can be more ...Missing: credible sources
[4]
The “Starchild skull” - Bad Archaeology
Oct 21, 2012 · The “Starchild skull”, a real enough skull, is claimed to be physical evidence for a dead alien (or alien/human hybrid) right here on earth.Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
[5]
[PDF] WILDLIFE APOCALYPSE - Skeptical Inquirer
in Mexico found a burial ground of twenty-five skeletons; of those ... the “Starchild skull”—was found in the early 1930s in the arid region around.
[6]
[PDF] Lloyd Pye - Starchild Skull Essentials (2011).pdf - Avalon Library
In the past 12 years it has been analyzed by dozens of qualified scientists, none of whom have challenged its authenticity as a human-like relic. The debate ...Missing: reviewed | Show results with:reviewed
[7]
The Starchild Skull: Genetic Enigma or...Human-Alien Hybrid?
The Starchild Skull is a genuine 900-year-old bone skull found in Mexico in the 1930s. The Starchild Project is an informal organization which began in 1999.
[8]
The Starchild Skull Project: Lloyd Pye at congress in Zurich 12-Oct ...
Oct 22, 2010 · Arrivingsomewhere and Uforum.ch proudly presents: Lloyd Pye – the starchild skull ... Tags: 2010UFO and Aliens conferences. 15 years ago ...
[9]
[PDF] “Starchild Skull” An Osteological Evaluation Final Report
May 1, 2017 · Morphology of this skull is highly aberrant ... Thus, the. Starchild's skull shape could not have been caused by internal pressure resulting.
[10]
Fibers in Starchild Bone
Speculation is that these fibers act like the steel reinforcing rods in concrete, but so far the Starchild Project has not been able to isolate the fibers for ...
[11]
The Starchild Project
- **Partial Skeleton**: The Starchild Skull is a 900-year-old bone skull found in Mexico in the 1930s, with much of the face lost in a flood. Associated bones include the mandible, femur, and ribs, though details are limited.
[12]
The “Starchild skull” - Bad Archaeology
Oct 21, 2012 · Radiocarbon dating was carried out in 2004 by Beta Analytic of Miami (Florida, USA), which gave a determination of 900 ± 40 bp, which calibrates ...
[13]
Beta Analytic Carbon Dating Service, Stable Isotope Analysis
Radiocarbon dating lab Beta Analytic provides high-quality AMS dating results in 3-14 business days. The laboratory also provides stable isotope analysis.Contact Us · Radiocarbon Dating Cost · Lab Capacity & Detection Limits · LoginMissing: starchild skull
[14]
None
### Factual Anatomical Descriptions of the Starchild Skull's Cranial Morphology (Lloyd Pye's Perspective)
[15]
https://www.radiocarbon.com/
[16]
Starchild Skull Bone Composition
The elements that make up the Starchild Skull bone (calcium, oxygen etc.) compared to a normal human - the results will surprise you!
[17]
https://www.starchildproject.com/dr-robinson-deformity-study
[18]
Dr. Robinson vs Critics - The Starchild Project
Carbon 14 dating of the skull places its age at 900 years ago, plus or minus 40. · It is remarkably light and weighs about half of the weight of a human adult ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[19]
The Starchild Skull - Genetic Enigma or Human-Alien Hybrid?
The Starchild Skull chronicles eight-years of scientific testing of a highly unusual human-like skull.Missing: Quest Species 2001
[20]
Not for the Starry-Eyed: The Truth About the Starchild Skull - HuffPost
Jan 29, 2013 · Lloyd Pye and his investigation of the Starchild skull attempt to answers our deepest questions, such as where we come from, who are we... and where are we going?Missing: peer- reviewed
[21]
CT Scan of the Starchild Skull
CT Scans help rule out deformity, and confirms the thin bone of the Starchild Skull.
[22]
Is the Starchild a deformed human?
Adult Human Female (AF) X-Ray left, compared to Starchild Skull X-Ray on right. Is the Starchild Skull a deformed human? No. For proof, read Dr. Robinson's ...
[23]
The Starchild Skull and Its DNA Testing: No Proof of an Alien Hybrid
Mar 21, 2014 · This lengthy essay concerning alleged DNA evidence that the Starchild Skull was that of a human0alien hybrid child.
[24]
https://drmsh.com/the-starchild-skull-and-its-dna-testing-no-proof-of-an-alien-hybrid/
[25]
(PDF) Ancient Astronauts, Anthropology, and Pseudoscientific Claims
Jan 17, 2023 · ... Starchild skull should instead be classified. as a cranium, since no mandible is present, which makes it a cranium and not a complete skull.
[26]
Hydrocephalus - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Congenital hydrocephalus is usually present at birth. An unusually large head is a significant sign of congenital hydrocephalus. There are many more ...Missing: Starchild | Show results with:Starchild
[27]
Hydrocephalus - Symptoms and causes - Mayo Clinic
Sep 15, 2023 · A head that is larger than usual. · A rapid increase in the size of an infant's head. · A bulge or tense soft spot on the top of the head.Missing: shape | Show results with:shape
[28]
Could abnormal skull be from an alien? - Houma Today
Feb 27, 2013 · The so-called “Starchild skull” is a curiously shaped skull ... DNA testing indicated the Starchild is not the human male from the 1999 test.Missing: Lakehead University<|control11|><|separator|>
[29]
A look at Mayan artificial cranial deformation practices
The Mayans performed different types of cranial deformations and used different techniques and instruments to deform children's heads.
[30]
'Alien-Like' Skulls Excavated in Mexico | Scientific American
Dec 21, 2012 · Skull deformation of children was a common practice in Central America, but scientists are still struggling to solve the mystery of why ...
[31]
Artificial cranial deformation in Tiwanaku, Bolivia - PubMed Central
A brief historical review of the practice of artificial cranial deformation (ACD) in Tiwanaku, Bolivia, a pre-Columbian archeological ruin.Missing: Starchild | Show results with:Starchild<|control11|><|separator|>
[32]
Anatomy of Pseudoscience - The NESS
This is exactly what we find in the Starchild skull. Hydrocephalus builds up over time, so a child with this disorder could survive several years, and if ...Missing: diagnosis doctor<|separator|>
[33]
Interview with Melanie Young – Owner of the Starchild Skull
Jun 17, 2016 · The skull has been in my possession part of the time. I gave it to Lloyd Pye in Feb, of 1999 to do the research and find out exactly what it was ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[34]
Everything You Know Is Wrong, Book One: Human Origins: Pye, Lloyd
Everything You Know Is Wrong stakes out a solid, defendable, entirely new position in the debate about life origins and human origins. That position is ...
[35]
s07e03 - The Star Children - Ancient Aliens Transcript - TvT
Feb 8, 2014 · Narrator: Millions of people around the world believe we have been visited in the past by extraterrestrial beings. What if it were true? Did ...<|separator|>
[36]
History of the Starchild Skull
2013 the Starchild Project became a formal company, and now continues its work to complete the DNA testing on the Skull and to determine the truth about this ...
[37]
Lloyd Pye: books, biography, latest update - Amazon.com
The Starchild Skull: Genetic Enigma or...Human-Alien Hybrid? Hardcover. Other ... Everything You Know Is Wrong, Book One: Human Origins by Lloyd Pye(2015-10-28).
[38]
Starchild Project - YouTube
"Starchild Skull NOT Hydrocephalus" - Dr. Robinson · Dr. Ted Robinson on the Starchild Skull.
[39]
The Starchild Skull - McMenamins Blog
Jan 10, 2017 · The Starchild Skull is a 900-year-old bone that was found in a cave in Mexico in the 1930s. It was kept in private collections 'til 1998, when it came into ...Missing: analysis credible<|control11|><|separator|>
[40]
White House Petition Platform is Making it Easier to Mine Data on ...
... "SUPPORT GENETIC ANALYSIS OF AN ENIGMATIC SKULL KNOWN AS 'THE STARCHILD' FOR IMPORTANT ADVANCES IN HUMAN HEALTH." By Patrick Clark • 02/05/13 2:51pm.
[41]
A ufologist claims to show 2 alien corpses to Mexico's Congress - NPR
Sep 13, 2023 · A ufologist claims to show 2 alien corpses to Mexico's Congress ... Scientists have dismissed them as either ancient Peruvian mummies or ...Missing: Starchild skull influence
[42]
Melanie Young's Difficult Quest - The Starchild Project
Melanie Young, co-founder of the Starchild Project and a former neonatal nurse,. hopes that a strange 900 year old skull holds the secret to treating some of ...