Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Steven Sadow

Steven H. Sadow is an American criminal defense attorney specializing in high-profile, white-collar, and complex criminal cases, with over 44 years of practice as a sole practitioner in , . A 1979 graduate of , Sadow has represented a range of prominent clients, including hip-hop artists such as T.I., , , and , as well as former player , often leveraging 's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations () statutes in defense strategies. Sadow's national prominence escalated in 2023 when he was appointed lead counsel for former President in the Georgia election case, stemming from allegations of in the 2020 certification. In this role, he has filed motions challenging the prosecution's validity, including appeals to dismiss the and disqualify Fulton County on grounds of . His approach emphasizes aggressive pretrial litigation and scrutiny of prosecutorial conduct, consistent with his track record in securing dismissals or acquittals in prior RICO-involved matters. Recognized by peer-reviewed legal directories for excellence in criminal defense, Sadow maintains a reputation for handling cases involving and charges, including drug conspiracies, financial crimes, and corruption probes, often representing clients against what he describes as overreach by law enforcement. While his celebrity defenses have drawn attention for dramatic courtroom tactics, such as uncovering procedural errors in T.I.'s arrest, the representation has positioned him at the center of ongoing debates over the application of laws to political speech and election challenges.

Early Life and Education

Upbringing and Family Background

Steven Sadow was raised in , a suburb of Dayton. His father graduated from the Georgia Institute of Technology at age 18 and later contributed to the Dyna-Soar Project, a U.S. initiative for a reusable in the early . Sadow's mother was actively involved in . During his youth, Sadow played as a middle linebacker in high school, engaging in a physically demanding activity that highlighted his competitive nature. This environment in a midwestern contributed to his early development of and self-reliance, traits evident in his independent move to at age 22.

Academic Achievements

Steven Sadow completed his undergraduate education at in , earning a degree in 1976. He subsequently attended , where he received his in 1979, completing a program emphasizing foundational and analytical skills essential for litigation practice. Upon graduation, Sadow secured admission to the State Bar of that same year, facilitating his immediate pursuit of a career centered on criminal defense advocacy.

Personal Life

Marriage and Family

Steven H. Sadow married Susan J. Sadow, a , in 1980 after meeting her at in 1978. The couple has maintained their for over 44 years as of 2024, emphasizing mutual support, compromise, and aligned goals in public reflections on their partnership. Sadow and his wife have two sons, Rob and Jon, raised with a focus on Jewish heritage and independence; the sons attended The Epstein School and before attending college out of state. The family includes five grandchildren, with Sadow and known affectionately as "Papi" and "Grammy." As members of Congregation B’nai , they prioritize family-oriented activities such as travel and dining, sustaining domestic stability alongside professional commitments. Sadow has credited his wife with providing foundational support, noting her own legal prowess while highlighting their shared family-centric life.

Community and Philanthropic Activities

Steven Sadow maintains active involvement in the Jewish community alongside his wife, , both prominent attorneys who have shared insights into their family life and professional paths through local Jewish media. Their participation in community-oriented discussions, such as a 2024 podcast episode on Jewish Time hosted by the Atlanta Jewish Times, highlights their engagement in events blending personal narratives with communal ties. Sadow's presence in such forums underscores a commitment to Jewish cultural and social networks in , where they reside and raise grandchildren. While Sadow's public profile centers on legal advocacy, his community roles align with broader emphases on individual rights and , though specific philanthropic donations or non-professional initiatives remain undocumented in available records. No verified instances of organized charitable giving or civic board service outside professional affiliations appear in recent reporting from Atlanta-based outlets.

Entry into Practice and Early Cases

Steven Sadow was admitted to the State Bar of on November 1, 1979, and entered private practice that year by joining the Atlanta firm of renowned criminal defense attorney Ed Garland, committing his career solely to defending clients in criminal matters without any stint as a . From the outset, Sadow's Atlanta-based practice centered on general criminal defense cases in state and federal courts, including contributions to appellate litigation such as Black v. State (1986), where he served as co-counsel for the appellant in a conviction appeal before the Georgia Supreme Court. In 1986, Sadow founded his own firm, Steven H. Sadow, P.C., operating as a sole practitioner thereafter and handling a variety of criminal cases through the 1980s and 1990s that sharpened his litigation techniques in demanding environments.

Notable High-Profile Defenses

Sadow has represented a range of high-profile clients in the sector, frequently achieving resolutions that mitigate severe penalties through dismissals, pleas, or strategic defenses. Among these, he defended rapper (Clifford Harris Jr.) in a 2008 federal case involving illegal firearms possession, where T.I. publicly acknowledged Sadow's role in navigating the charges stemming from a 2007 arrest for purchasing suppressed machine guns without registration. The case resolved via guilty plea to gun possession and counts, resulting in a sentence of and rather than prolonged . In another instance, Sadow handled the defense of rapper (William Leonard Roberts II) following a 2015 incident at his estate, where Ross and an associate faced state charges of , aggravated , and for allegedly detaining and beating a groundskeeper. Sadow advanced a argument, asserting Ross protected his property from intruders, leading to a no-contest in 2017 that avoided a full trial and secured without jail time. Similarly, for rapper (Sergio Kitchens) in the 2022 RICO prosecution tied to the Young Stoner Life collective, Sadow negotiated an allowing release after eight months of in December 2022, without an admission of guilt or cooperation impacting co-defendants' trials. A recent success involved reality television personality Karlie Redd (Shakada Taishay Robinson), arrested on April 24, 2025, for first-degree after an alleged unauthorized entry into her estranged husband's DeKalb County home amid a contentious . Sadow secured the full dismissal of charges on October 22, 2025, maintaining Redd's innocence throughout. Sadow's early exposure to federal organized crime probes came via his lead representation of Gold Club owner Steve Kaplan in United States v. Kaplan, a 1999 indictment alleging conspiracy through , , , and violence at the Atlanta venue frequented by athletes and entertainers. Kaplan resolved the matter with a guilty plea to racketeering conspiracy on August 2, 2001, receiving a 36-month prison term and fines, averting a that had already acquitted co-defendants on related counts. This case underscored Sadow's proficiency in white-collar and entertainment-linked matters under intense federal scrutiny, foreshadowing his handling of analogous complex litigation.

Specialization in Complex Litigation

Steven H. Sadow has maintained a solo criminal defense practice for over 44 years, specializing in complex white-collar crimes, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) violations, and high-profile felony cases. His approach emphasizes dissecting prosecutorial theories from foundational evidentiary requirements, building defenses on core legal principles such as specificity in charging documents and chain-of-custody integrity for physical and testimonial proof. This methodical evolution stems from decades of handling multifaceted prosecutions involving financial fraud, organized criminal enterprises, and public-figure allegations, where he prioritizes pre-trial suppression of inadmissible evidence over reactive trial tactics. Sadow's expertise is evidenced by peer-recognized proficiency in motion practice, where he routinely files targeted challenges to suppress unlawfully obtained materials or dismiss counts lacking acts, as well as in appellate advocacy to secure reversals or relief. His handling of witnesses focuses on exposing inconsistencies through grounded in documented timelines and corroborative records, a technique honed across federal and state venues. National media profiles highlight these strategies in intricate defenses, underscoring his adaptation to procedural complexities without reliance on volume-based litigation. Professional accolades affirm Sadow's standing in complex litigation, including continuous listing in The Best Lawyers in America since 1993 for criminal defense and white-collar matters, alongside Super Lawyers selection for white-collar crimes. These recognitions, derived from attorney surveys and client outcomes, reflect his sustained success in navigating evidentiary labyrinths and jurisdictional hurdles inherent to high-stakes cases.

Involvement in Georgia RICO Cases

Representation of Donald Trump

Steven Sadow was retained as lead counsel for in the Fulton County Superior Court case on August 24, 2023, days before Trump's surrender and on charges related to alleged efforts to overturn 's 2020 results. He replaced , who had previously handled initial negotiations including Trump's $200,000 bond, with Sadow filing a formal notice of appearance that morning. In his initial statement, Sadow asserted that Trump "should never have been indicted" and was "completely innocent of all charges," framing the case as an unwarranted application of 's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act () to routine post-election inquiries. As lead counsel, Sadow coordinated with Trump's broader legal team, including co-counsel Jennifer Little, to file initial protective orders and responses emphasizing that the alleged conduct—such as phone calls to state officials and requests for alternative electors—involved protected political speech and executive prerogatives rather than criminal conspiracy. He argued in court filings that the indictment conflated lawful advocacy for electoral integrity with racketeering, lacking the requisite predicate acts of fraud or coercion under Georgia law. This approach sought to establish that causal chains of intent imputed by prosecutors did not demonstrate criminality, but instead reflected standard political contestation absent evidence of illicit enterprise. Sadow advanced multiple motions to dismiss, including a December 1, 2023, hearing where he contended the charges violated the First Amendment by criminalizing core political expression, such as 's public statements urging recounts and investigations. He further challenged the indictment's breadth, arguing it improperly extended to non-criminal acts like litigation and official communications, constituting prosecutorial overreach in a politically motivated probe. These efforts yielded partial successes: on March 13, 2024, Judge dismissed six counts against (among others for co-defendants) for failing to provide sufficient notice of the alleged criminal conduct, though he allowed prosecutors to seek re-indictment. Subsequently, on September 12, 2024, dismissed two additional counts against related to false statements in filings to the , ruling that state prosecutors lacked authority over federal election documents. Throughout, Sadow's strategy highlighted evidentiary gaps in proving a enterprise, insisting that isolated communications and legal challenges did not form a pattern of activity but rather constituted defensible responses to perceived irregularities in the 2020 vote tabulation, including hand recounts and signature audits already conducted by authorities. He has maintained that the prosecution's narrative inverts causality, portraying legitimate skepticism about election processes as premeditated subversion without direct proof of falsified outcomes or coerced participation. As of late 2024, Sadow continued pressing for full dismissal via appeals, including a December 2024 filing to the Georgia Court of Appeals seeking to quash remaining charges pre-inauguration.

Strategic Arguments and Case Developments

In March 2024, Sadow, as lead counsel for , filed a motion to dismiss the on First Amendment grounds, contending that the charges impermissibly criminalized core political speech and advocacy related to the 2020 election, including statements urging election officials to scrutinize results. During a hearing on March 28, 2024, Sadow argued that even false statements about election integrity constituted protected expression under precedents shielding political debate, rejecting prosecutors' claims of a criminal scheme as overreach into advocacy. Fulton County Superior Court Judge denied the motion on April 4, 2024, ruling that while much of the alleged conduct warranted First Amendment scrutiny, sufficient non-speech elements like solicitation overt acts survived dismissal. Sadow simultaneously advanced presidential immunity defenses, asserting in filings that Trump's official acts as president, including communications with state officials, were shielded from state prosecution per the and emerging federal immunity doctrines post- . These arguments intersected with pretrial maneuvers, contributing to the quashing of six counts against and co-defendants on , 2024, for insufficient specificity in alleging overt acts. Further, on September 12, 2024, dismissed two additional false statements counts against , finding prosecutors lacked authority under law to charge violations of federal filing requirements. Amid these efforts, Sadow supported challenges to Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis's continued role, appealing McAfee's March 15, 2024, order that permitted Willis to proceed if special prosecutor Nathan Wade was removed due to their romantic relationship. The Court of Appeals, in a December 19, 2024, ruling, disqualified Willis and her office from the prosecution, citing an appearance of impropriety that undermined public trust, a decision upheld when the denied review on September 16, 2025. Following Trump's November 2024 election victory, Sadow filed a December 4, 2024, motion with the Georgia Court of Appeals to dismiss the remaining charges, arguing they unconstitutionally interfere with presidential duties and violate immunity principles affirmed in Trump v. United States, rendering prosecution untenable during his term. This maneuver built on prior appeals, including a January 17, 2025, appellate affirmation of the six dismissed solicitation counts. As of October 2025, the case remains stalled without a trial date, pending resolution of disqualification fallout, immunity appeals, and prosecutorial reassignment, with eight counts against Trump surviving prior rulings.

Critique of RICO Application

Steven Sadow has argued that Georgia's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations () statute, enacted in 1980 and modeled on the federal Act of 1970, was intended to dismantle structured criminal enterprises akin to syndicates, not to prosecute isolated or political acts lacking such continuity and enterprise-like qualities. In filings related to the 2023 indictment of and co-defendants under Georgia for alleged election interference, Sadow contended that the charges impermissibly expand the law's scope by treating protected political speech and advocacy—such as challenges to election results—as predicate acts forming a "pattern of racketeering activity," deviating from the statute's legislative history focused on combating operations through enhanced evidentiary rules. He emphasized that this application risks chilling core First Amendment activities, as the indictment's 98 pages detail overt acts primarily consisting of public statements and meetings, which do not evince the required criminal enterprise under the law's original design. Prior to the Trump case, Sadow voiced concerns in 2021 about the statute's overbroad application, telling that Georgia prosecutors had "overused" "to the point where it's become a catch-all for prosecutors to bring in evidence that otherwise would not be admissible." Drawing from his experience defending clients in complex litigation, including cases where charges were leveraged against non-organized crime defendants, Sadow highlighted how the law's allowance for "pattern" evidence incentivizes prosecutors to aggregate unrelated allegations, lowering the evidentiary threshold and enabling narratives untethered to traditional elements like economic motive or hierarchical structure. This critique aligns with broader legal scholarship noting 's usage has shifted since the 1990s toward white-collar and public corruption prosecutions, with over 1,000 indictments filed annually by the mid-2010s, often criticized for diluting the statute's focus on endemic criminality. In the Trump defense, Sadow's motions further illustrated these incentives, arguing that without RICO's umbrella, many overt acts—such as phone calls and emails contesting certification—would fail as standalone crimes, yet the statute permits their inclusion to construct a conspiratorial enterprise unsupported by direct causal links to . He supported this with historical analysis of federal precedents, like Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co. (1985), which while broadening civil applications, still required proof of distinct injury from , a standard Sadow claimed the indictment sidesteps by prioritizing prosecutorial narrative over empirical enterprise evidence. Such overuse, per Sadow's filings, fosters , where political motivations can masquerade as legal strategy, as evidenced by the case's reliance on post-hoc interpretations of routine election disputes rather than verifiable criminal continuity.

Controversies

Accusations from Prosecutors

In January 2024, prosecutors in Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis' office accused Steven Sadow, lead defense counsel for Donald Trump in the Georgia election interference case, of sending emails that were disrespectful and condescending toward African American women, implying racial and gender bias. Executive District Attorney Daysha Young, in a January 10 email, stated that over the prior month, communications from some defense attorneys, including Sadow, lacked "professionalism and decorum," and highlighted the added difficulty of being treated respectfully as African American women in the legal field. Willis affirmed this in her own email to Sadow, asserting that "in the legal community... some people will never be able to respect African Americans and/or women as their equal and counterpart," framing the lack of responses to certain inquiries as a broader pattern of disrespect. Sadow rebutted the claims in responses dated the same day, describing Young's accusation of as "offensive, uncalled for and untrue," and emphasizing that race and gender were irrelevant to his professional communications, which he maintained were courteous. He argued that the prosecutors' failure to respond to his emails on case matters, such as discovery disputes following a motions hearing, reflected haughtiness rather than any impropriety on his part, stating that "no defense counsel has treated you or your prosecutors with anything other than the utmost respect and ." These exchanges occurred amid heightened scrutiny of Willis' office, including a filing alleging an improper romantic and financial relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, which raised questions of ethical conflicts and potential misuse of funds in the case. No formal sanctions, disciplinary actions, or adjudications against Sadow resulted from these accusations, which remained confined to the parties' correspondence without escalation to on this specific issue, as evidenced by subsequent case proceedings focused elsewhere.

Public and Media Scrutiny

Sadow's restrained public posture in defending against Georgia election interference charges elicited commentary on its tactical implications. A November 30, 2023, New York Times article highlighted how this minimalist approach generated "dramatic tension" within the proceedings, contrasting it with more vocal strategies by co-counsel, though internal Trump team sources praised its discipline. Such coverage from mainstream outlets, which exhibit systemic left-leaning bias in political litigation reporting, tended to underscore potential for prolonged delays rather than strategic restraint. Critiques have also targeted Sadow's selection of clients from entertainment and sports sectors, including rappers and , R&B singer , and associates linked to figures like and Gold Club owner Michael Tattersall amid allegations. These choices invited scrutiny for associating with individuals facing serious accusations, such as violence or ties, yet Sadow secured a full for Joseph —co-defendant in the 2000 double-murder case—demonstrating a track record of favorable jury outcomes as a measurable indicator of efficacy. Portrayals of Sadow diverge sharply by outlet ideology, with right-leaning and legal-focused profiles framing him as a tenacious "pit-bull" advocate akin to a warrior upholding client against overreach. Left-leaning , conversely, has depicted his tactics in politically charged cases as enabling evasion through procedural focus, reflecting broader institutional tendencies to prioritize narrative over empirical defense results. This polarization underscores causal influences of on public perception, where success metrics like acquittals receive less emphasis in adversarial coverage.

Positions on Prosecutorial Overreach

Steven Sadow has practiced exclusively as a criminal defense attorney since earning his J.D. from in 1979, maintaining a focused on white-collar and high-profile cases without ever serving in a prosecutorial role. This defense-only orientation aligns with his repeated critiques of prosecutorial incentives to pursue charges lacking sufficient merit, particularly where financial or motives appear to drive indictments over evidence of guilt. In the prosecution of Gold Club owner Steve Kaplan, which began in 1999 and culminated in a plea to a single count, Sadow contended that prosecutors fabricated elements of the case to justify seizing Kaplan's estimated $50 million in assets, framing routine business practices as to achieve forfeiture goals. This challenge reduced felony and charges—initially carrying potential decades in —to a minor offense, highlighting Sadow's emphasis on prosecutorial overextension in applying to entertainment venues. Sadow extended similar arguments to hip-hop-related cases, such as his representation of rapper (Sergio Kitchens) in Fulton County's YSL indictment unsealed in May 2022, where he and co-counsel asserted that prosecutors falsely equated lyrical content and artistic associations with enterprise conduct, inflating non-criminal expression into predicate acts. 's subsequent acceptance of an in December 2022 to one charge—allowing release on bond without admitting guilt—underscored Sadow's strategy of contesting evidentiary overreach in culturally charged prosecutions. These efforts reflect a consistent against the erosion of evidentiary standards, where prosecutorial ambition risks conflating protected activities with criminality to secure high-profile convictions.

Defense of Political Speech

In court filings and hearings in the Georgia election interference case, Steven Sadow argued that the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations () charges against impermissibly criminalize core political speech protected by the First Amendment, asserting that statements challenging election results—such as claims of fraud or irregularities—represent the "zenith of political speech" and cannot form the basis of absent concrete overt acts. During the March 28, 2024, hearing before Fulton County Judge , Sadow contended that the conflates protected advocacy with , emphasizing that "falsity alone is not enough" to establish liability under or related statutes, as political discourse on elections inherently involves contestation and cannot be prosecuted merely for inaccuracy or intensity. Sadow's position drew on precedents distinguishing speech from actionable conduct, maintaining that election-related communications, including calls to investigate or legislative efforts to verify results, fall squarely within First Amendment safeguards unless paired with non-expressive acts demonstrating intent to subvert lawful processes through force or fraud. He highlighted that applying to such advocacy risks chilling democratic participation, as historical applications of the statute to political contexts have required evidence of tangible criminal enterprises beyond rhetorical challenges, underscoring that protected expression lacks the inherent criminal intent prosecutors alleged without supporting overt acts like or violence. Following the April 4, 2024, denial of the First Amendment motion to dismiss—where Judge McAfee acknowledged potential protections for certain statements but upheld the indictment's framing of a broader scheme—Sadow reaffirmed in subsequent case proceedings that the prosecution's reliance on speech as predicate acts undermines causal links to criminality, insisting that empirical outcomes in free speech jurisprudence demand separating expressive conduct from prosecutable deeds to preserve electoral debate. This advocacy positioned the case as a precedent-testing boundary for First Amendment robustness, countering trends toward interpreting as implicit threats under expansive statutes.

References

  1. [1]
    Steven H. Sadow - Criminal Defense: General Practice Lawyer
    Steven H. Sadow is a nationally known, high profile defense attorney who has been practicing law for over 43 years. He is a sole practitioner at his firm, ...
  2. [2]
    Top Rated Atlanta, GA White Collar Crimes Attorney | Steve Sadow
    Steven H. Sadow is a nationally known, high-profile criminal defense attorney who has been practicing law for 43 years. He is a sole practitioner at his firm, ...
  3. [3]
    Steven H. Sadow - Criminal Defense Lawyer | Lexinter Law Directory
    Steve Sadow is a well-known criminal defense attorney with 44 years of experience in high-stakes, high-profile cases. A 1979 J.D. graduate of Emory ...
  4. [4]
    Who is Steven Sadow, Trump's new lead lawyer in Georgia? - Reuters
    Aug 24, 2023 · Former President Donald Trump's new lead criminal defense lawyer in Georgia is known for representing hip-hop performers and other ...
  5. [5]
    Trump's Georgia lawyer Steve Sadow has long celebrity client list
    Aug 23, 2024 · Steve Sadow, Trump's attorney in the Georgia election interference case, has represented rapper T.I., Ray Lewis and the owner of the Gold ...
  6. [6]
    Who is Steve Sadow? - Atlanta Journal-Constitution
    Aug 24, 2023 · Defense attorney Steve Sadow will replace Drew Findling as Trump's top Atlanta lawyer, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has learned.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  7. [7]
    Trump's lawyers ask Georgia Court of Appeals to dismiss Fulton ...
    Dec 6, 2024 · The latest court filing by Trump's attorney Steve Sadow asks the Georgia Court of Appeals to dismiss Trump's pending case, as well as the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Fani Willis hearing: Trump attorney Steve Sadow | FOX 5 News
    Mar 1, 2024 · Steve Sadow, attorney for former President Donald Trump in the Georgia election interference case, asked the judge who has the most to lose ...
  9. [9]
    What to know about Steve Sadow, Trump's new Georgia lawyer - Axios
    Aug 25, 2023 · Veteran defense attorney Steven Sadow has represented the likes of Rick Ross and Usher, and has experience working cases involving the state's RICO law.
  10. [10]
    Steve Sadow - Attorney - Steven H. Sadow, P.C. | LinkedIn
    I am honored to be nationally recognized as a preeminent defense attorney. My 44+ year career includes numerous high profile cases and clients, ...
  11. [11]
    T.I.'s Arrest & Lawyer Steve Sadow's Genius Discovery! - YouTube
    Jun 22, 2025 · SUBSCRIBE ▶︎ https://bit.ly/expediTIouslySubscribe Listen to the full episode now on Apple Podcasts ▶︎ https://apple.co/expediTIouslypod ...
  12. [12]
    Who Is Steve Sadow, Trump's New Defense Lawyer?
    Aug 24, 2023 · The former president has hired Steven H. Sadow, a veteran Atlanta defense lawyer who has handled a number of high-profile cases, to lead his team there.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  13. [13]
    Who is Trump's new Atlanta lawyer, Steve Sadow?
    Aug 24, 2023 · He was born in Ohio: Sadow grew up in Trotwood, Ohio, a suburb of Dayton and he played football as a middle linebacker. He attended Marietta ...
  14. [14]
    'That's What I Do': Trump Lawyer Sadow Discusses High-Profile ...
    Sep 11, 2023 · Sadow grew up in the Dayton, Ohio, suburb of Trotwood. He earned his undergraduate degree from Marietta College in Ohio and remained in Atlanta ...
  15. [15]
    The Lowdown: Susan & Steve Sadow - Atlanta Jewish Times
    May 15, 2024 · Steve is a nationally recognized criminal defense attorney. His 44-plus year career includes numerous high-profile clients including 45th President Donald J. ...
  16. [16]
    Steven H. Sadow Profile | Atlanta, GA Lawyer | Martindale.com
    Rating 5.0 (1) Law School Attended: Emory University, J.D., 1979 ; Year of First Admission: 1979 ; Admission: 1979, Georgia; U.S. District Court, Northern, Middle and Southern ...
  17. [17]
    Atlanta Power Couple Shares Love, Law and Family
    Aug 6, 2024 · Steve was raised in Trotwood, Ohio, and graduated from Marietta College in Marietta, Ohio, before moving to Atlanta in 1976 to attend Emory Law ...Missing: early upbringing background<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    The Lowdown! I Bet You Didn't Know Susan & Steve Sadow.
    May 21, 2024 · Steve is a nationally recognized criminal defense attorney. His 44-plus year career includes numerous high-profile clients including 45th President Donald J. ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Steve Sadow - X
    Dec 24, 2024 · Susan Sadow, my wife of 44 yrs, who is the real lawyer in the family and the best workers comp claimants' attorney in Ga, just settled a ...Missing: marriage | Show results with:marriage
  20. [20]
    The Best Lawyer Bobby Lee Cook Has Seen
    Feb 19, 2015 · In fact, he relishes it.” “He lives and breathes this stuff,” says his wife, Susan J. Sadow, a workers' compensation attorney whom her husband ...Missing: marriage | Show results with:marriage<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Atlanta's 500 Most Powerful Leaders in 2025: Professionals
    Jan 30, 2025 · ... Steven H. Sadow. Steven H. Sadow Criminal Defense Attorney Steven H. Sadow PC. The sole practitioner at the firm Steven H. Sadow PC, Steve Sadow ...
  22. [22]
    Mr. Steven H. Sadow - Find a Lawyer - RELIAGUIDE
    The State Bar of Georgia does not recommend, approve or endorse any lawyer. ... State of Admission: GA. Admitted On: November 1, 1979. Active Member in Good ...
  23. [23]
    Black v. State :: 1986 :: Supreme Court of Georgia Decisions
    Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided April 9, 1986. Garland, Nuckolls & Catts, Steven H. Sadow, Donald F. Samuel, for appellant. Lewis R ...
  24. [24]
    Steve Sadow :: Grabien - The Multimedia Marketplace - Grabien
    Feb 15, 2024 · Steven H. Sadow is an American criminal defense attorney. He is the lead counsel for Donald Trump during his Georgia election racketeering prosecution.Missing: background | Show results with:background
  25. [25]
    Rapper Rick Ross pleads no contest in kidnapping, assault case
    Apr 4, 2017 · The plea comes after the rapper and his bodyguard were accused of attacking a grounds keeper at his Fayette County estate.
  26. [26]
    Gunna's Attorney Asserts He Didn't Snitch On Young Thug - VIBE.com
    Jan 3, 2025 · Sadow asserted that Gunna is the furthest thing from a snitch and that he actually “kept his mouth closed,” as Durk previously recommended the ...
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    Steven H. Sadow, P.C. - Criminal Defense Law Firm
    With over four decades of experience, the firm provides high-level representation in complex and high-stakes cases involving white collar crime, RICO, ...
  31. [31]
    Trump replaces top Georgia lawyer ahead of surrender | CNN Politics
    Aug 24, 2023 · In replacing Drew Findling with Steven Sadow, an Atlanta-based attorney whose website profile describes him as a “special counsel for white ...
  32. [32]
    Meet Steven Sadow, Donald Trump's new Atlanta attorney
    Aug 24, 2023 · Steven Sadow, an Atlanta-based attorney whose website profile describes him as a “special counsel for white collar and high-profile defense.”Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  33. [33]
    Trump's attorney argues Georgia election case should be dismissed ...
    Dec 1, 2023 · Former President Trump's lawyer argued Friday that the Georgia election interference indictment against Trump "needs to be dismissed" due to ...
  34. [34]
    Trump Georgia 2020 election case motions hearing - CNN
    Dec 1, 2023 · A Fulton County judge is hearing motions Friday from former President Donald Trump and his co-defendants to dismiss charges in the Georgia ...
  35. [35]
    Trump lawyers say Georgia charges violate 'free speech' and that he ...
    Dec 1, 2023 · Former President Donald Trump's lawyers argued in court Friday that his Georgia election subversion indictment should be thrown out.
  36. [36]
    Trump's lawyers move to dismiss Georgia election interference case
    Dec 4, 2024 · Attorneys for President-elect Donald Trump asked a Georgia appeals court Wednesday to dismiss the Fulton County racketeering case against ...
  37. [37]
    Judge dismisses some Trump Georgia election subversion charges ...
    Mar 13, 2024 · The presiding judge in the Georgia criminal case against Donald Trump and his allies has thrown out some of the charges against the former president and ...
  38. [38]
    Georgia judge dismisses two criminal counts against Trump, court ...
    Sep 12, 2024 · A Georgia judge on Thursday dismissed two criminal counts in the U.S. state's 2020 election interference case against Republican ...
  39. [39]
    Georgia judge tosses some charges against Trump and others in ...
    Mar 13, 2024 · A Fulton County judge on Wednesday tossed out several counts brought against former President Donald Trump and five others.
  40. [40]
    Trump asks Georgia court to end election interference case - CNBC
    Dec 4, 2024 · President-elect Donald Trump faced four criminal cases going into the 2024 election against Vice President Kamala Harris.
  41. [41]
    Trump's team cites First Amendment in contesting charges in ...
    Mar 28, 2024 · The charges against Donald Trump in the Georgia election interference case seek to criminalize political speech and advocacy conduct that ...
  42. [42]
    Trump's Defense Team Argues First Amendment Prohibits Georgia ...
    Mar 28, 2024 · Fulton County prosecutors say Donald J. Trump's comments about the 2020 election were meant to advance a broad criminal scheme to overturn ...
  43. [43]
    Donald Trump's lawyer in Georgia: election lies are protected speech
    Mar 28, 2024 · Donald Trump's lawyer contends the former president can't be prosecuted for election interference because the First Amendment shields even ...
  44. [44]
    Georgia Trump case: Lawyer argues Trump's remarks 'zenith of ...
    Mar 28, 2024 · Attorneys for former president Donald Trump will be back in court to argue that Georgia's election interference case should be dismissed on ...
  45. [45]
    Judge rejects Trump's bid to get Georgia election subversion ... - CNN
    Apr 4, 2024 · An Atlanta-area judge upheld the criminal indictment against former President Donald Trump in Georgia Thursday, rejecting the argument that ...
  46. [46]
    Georgia election interference case: Judge denies motions from ...
    Apr 4, 2024 · Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee has denied former President Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the Georgia election ...
  47. [47]
    Trump seeks to dismiss Georgia charges claiming free speech
    Mar 28, 2024 · An attorney for Donald Trump pressed the judge overseeing the Georgia election interference case to dismiss charges against the former president.
  48. [48]
    Judge in Trump's Georgia case quashes certain charges - NPR
    Mar 13, 2024 · The judge overseeing the Georgia election interference case against former President Donald Trump and his allies has thrown out six criminal counts from the ...
  49. [49]
    Judge dismisses two criminal counts against Trump in Georgia ...
    Sep 12, 2024 · Scott McAfee finds state prosecutors did not have authority to bring charges related to alleged filing of false documents.
  50. [50]
    Georgia judge tosses 2 more counts against Donald Trump ... - ABC7
    Sep 12, 2024 · The Fulton County judge overseeing Donald Trump's election interference case has tossed out two more counts that he was facing in Georgia.
  51. [51]
    Trump, co-defendants appeal ruling allowing DA Fani Willis to ...
    Mar 29, 2024 · ATLANTA, Ga. (Atlanta News First) - Former President Donald Trump and the remaining defendants in Georgia's historic racketeering indictment ...
  52. [52]
    Appeals court disqualifies DA Fani Willis from prosecuting Trump ...
    Dec 19, 2024 · A Georgia appellate court disqualified Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and removed her from prosecuting Donald Trump and ...
  53. [53]
    Fulton County DA Fani Willis remains disqualified from Trump's ...
    Sep 16, 2025 · Fulton County DA Fani Willis will remain disqualified from prosecuting the election interference case against President Trump, ...
  54. [54]
    Steve Sadow - X
    Dec 4, 2024 · My comment as Lead Counsel for President Trump in the Fulton County GA case: "President Trump has filed a motion requesting the Georgia ...
  55. [55]
    Georgia appeals court upholds dismissal of 6 counts as Trump ...
    Jan 17, 2025 · A Georgia appeals court has upheld the dismissal of six of the charges brought in the 2020 Fulton County election interference case against ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    DA Fani Willis loses appeal in quest to lead Fulton County election ...
    Sep 16, 2025 · The state's highest court will not review the Georgia Court of Appeals' ruling that disqualified Willis from prosecuting the case involving ...
  57. [57]
    Trump asks Georgia court to dismiss election interference case ...
    Dec 4, 2024 · President-elect Donald Trump has asked a court to dismiss the criminal case against him related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election ...
  58. [58]
    Trump Moves to Quash Most Charges Against Him in Georgia
    Sep 19, 2023 · That motion gives a detailed critique of the 98-page indictment, arguing that its “defects” are “voluminous,” and that it is legally unsound.
  59. [59]
    Trump attorney, prosecutors spar over move to have Georgia case ...
    Mar 28, 2024 · Attorneys for former President Donald Trump will be challenging the Georgia case in court on Thursday, March 28, on First Amendment grounds.
  60. [60]
    Trump replaces top Atlanta attorney on day of Fulton surrender
    Aug 24, 2023 · In a 2021 interview with the AJC, Sadow contended that RICO was “overused” by Georgia prosecutors. ”I think it's been overused for quite a ...
  61. [61]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Attorney Steven Sadow argues for tossing out the Georgia election ...
    Mar 28, 2024 · Attorney Steven Sadow argues for tossing out the Georgia election interference case due to Trump's “protected speech.” The Recount. Thu, March ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  63. [63]
    Trump lawyers say Georgia charges violate 'free speech' and that he ...
    Dec 1, 2023 · Former President Donald Trump's lawyers argued in court Friday that his Georgia election subversion indictment should be thrown out.Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  64. [64]
    Expecting a Response to an Email Is Racist, Trump Prosecutor ...
    Jan 19, 2024 · ... the prosecuting attorneys were being treated with disrespect because they're black, Willis sent an email to Sadow affirming Young's charge.<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Trump attorney accused of racially disrespecting DA Fani WIllis
    Jan 24, 2024 · Fulton DA emails accuse Trump attorney of disrespecting African American women. By Randy Travis. Published January 24, 2024 8:43pm EST. I-Team.
  66. [66]
    Trump co-defendant accuses Fulton County district attorney of ...
    Jan 8, 2024 · Michael Roman, attorney accuse Fani Willis of having romantic relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade.<|control11|><|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Trump's Georgia Lawyer, Steven Sadow, May Soon Drop His Quiet ...
    Nov 30, 2023 · Steven Sadow's minimalist approach in the racketeering case against his client has created some dramatic tension, but his silence may be coming to an end.
  68. [68]
    Attorney for high-profile and celebrity clients now representing Trump
    Aug 24, 2023 · Former President Donald Trump has hired veteran criminal defense attorney Steven Sadow as his new Atlanta attorney to fight his Fulton County election ...Missing: activities | Show results with:activities
  69. [69]
    Simmons: An Idiot's Guide to the Gold Club Trial - ESPN Page 2
    Sep 27, 2007 · In November 1999, Gold Club owner Steve Kaplan was indicted on a full array of federal racketeering charges.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  70. [70]
    'Protect Black art': How the indictment of Young Thug, Gunna ... - 6ABC
    Oct 16, 2022 · The indictment falsely portrays his music as part of criminal conspiracy," the rapper's attorneys, Steve Sadow and Don Samuel, told ABC News.Missing: challenging | Show results with:challenging
  71. [71]
    D.A. Asks Court to Delay YSL RICO Trial Involving Young T...
    In a comment to Complex on behalf of Gunna on Friday, co-lead counsel Steve Sadow said, “Sergio Kitchens (Gunna) is not guilty of the one charge against him and ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Trump attorney argues Georgia charges target core political speech
    Mar 28, 2024 · Lawyers for former President Trump argued at a hearing Thursday that the charges he faces in Georgia target core political speech and urged ...
  73. [73]
    Trump's team cites First Amendment in contesting charges in ...
    Mar 28, 2024 · A lawyer for former President Donald Trump has argued that the charges against Donald Trump in the Georgia election interference case seek ...
  74. [74]
    Prosecutors say Trump team trying to 'rewrite indictment' in bid to ...
    Mar 28, 2024 · Nathan Wade resigns from Donald Trump Georgia election caseSpecial prosecutor Nathan Wade announced his resignation in a letter. Attorneys for ...
  75. [75]
    Donald Trump fights Georgia elections case on First Amendment ...
    Mar 28, 2024 · Donald Trump's defense attorney in the Georgia election interference case said during a hearing Thursday he cannot be tried for making false ...
  76. [76]
    Trump lawyers say Georgia charges violate 'free speech' and that he ...
    Dec 1, 2023 · Former President Donald Trump's lawyers argued in court Friday that his Georgia election subversion indictment should be thrown out because ...<|separator|>