Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Surface gravity

Surface gravity is the acceleration due to gravity experienced by an object at the surface of an astronomical body, such as a , , or , arising from the body's and determined by its size and shape. For most celestial , it is quantified by the g = \frac{GM}{r^2}, where G is the , M is the of the body, and r is the to the surface. This value dictates the effective weight of objects on that surface and plays a critical role in phenomena like atmospheric retention, , and . In the context of planets, surface gravity varies significantly across the Solar System, reflecting differences in mass and radius. For rocky bodies like , the surface is the solid crust, yielding g \approx 9.81 m/s² at the equator. On Mars, it is much weaker at 3.71 m/s², while experiences 8.87 m/s², nearly matching Earth's. Gas giants present a challenge due to their lack of a ; by convention, their surface gravity is measured at the 1-bar pressure level in the atmosphere, equivalent to Earth's sea-level pressure. For , this yields 24.79 m/s², the highest among planets, driven by its immense mass, whereas Saturn's is 10.44 m/s² despite its lower density. These variations influence everything from the retention of light gases in atmospheres—low gravity on smaller bodies like (0.62 m/s²) leads to tenuous or absent atmospheres—to the structural integrity of planetary interiors. Beyond planets, surface gravity is a fundamental parameter in stellar , often denoted as \log g in spectroscopic analyses, which helps classify and model their evolutionary stages. For main-sequence like the Sun, g \approx 274 m/s², decreasing for giants due to expanded radii. In the extreme case of holes, surface gravity refers to the at the event horizon, \kappa = \frac{c^4}{4GM} (where c is the ), linking it to temperature and thermodynamic properties. Overall, surface gravity provides insights into the formation, evolution, and physical conditions of diverse astronomical objects.

Newtonian Fundamentals

Definition and Physical Meaning

Surface gravity, denoted as g, is defined as the proper acceleration due to experienced by a stationary observer at the surface of a celestial body. This represents the magnitude of the gravitational force per unit mass at that location, equivalent to the an object would undergo in near the surface, neglecting air resistance or other effects. In Newtonian physics, this concept stems from Isaac Newton's universal law of gravitation, which describes the attractive force between masses, first published in his in 1687. Surface gravity is distinct from an object's , which is the force mg where m is , as weight can vary in non-inertial reference frames such as accelerating elevators or rotating platforms due to fictitious forces, whereas g remains the intrinsic . Physically, it governs key processes like the needed to overcome the body's gravitational pull, the ability to retain an atmosphere by preventing thermal escape of gases, and the compressive stresses affecting a body's geological or structural integrity. For instance, on , surface gravity causes free-falling objects to accelerate at approximately 9.8 m/s², enabling human-scale activities like walking while keeping loose materials in place. The standard unit for surface gravity is meters per second squared (m/s²), with values often expressed in multiples of Earth's , where 1 equals exactly 9.80665 m/s² as defined by international convention. Historically, surface gravity was first accurately measured using simple pendulums, whose oscillation period T relates to g via g = 4\pi^2 l / T^2 (with l as length), a method employed by the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey starting in for global surveys. Modern determinations use sensitive gravimeters, which detect variations to within microgals (1 μGal = 10^{-8} m/s²), providing precise local values. For spherical bodies, surface gravity can be related to the central mass and radius under Newtonian assumptions, though quantitative details follow from the universal gravitation law.

Relation to Mass and Radius

The surface gravity g on a spherically symmetric, non-rotating body arises directly from Newton's law of universal gravitation, which states that the gravitational force F between two masses M and m separated by distance r is F = G \frac{M m}{r^2}, where G is the gravitational constant. For a test mass m at the body's surface, the acceleration due to gravity is g = \frac{F}{m} = G \frac{M}{r^2}, with M as the body's total mass and r as its radius. The value of G is $6.67430 \times 10^{-11} \, \mathrm{m^3 \, kg^{-1} \, s^{-2}}. This formula relies on the assumption of spherical symmetry, allowing the body's outside its to be equivalent to that of a point mass at the center, as established by Newton's . The theorem applies to uniform spherical shells and, by extension, to spherically symmetric mass distributions with uniform or varying , provided the observer is exterior to the body. However, the point mass approximation holds only if the density distribution is spherically symmetric; deviations from this symmetry alter the field. Additionally, the formula assumes a well-defined r, which poses limitations for diffuse objects like extended gaseous envelopes where the boundary is ambiguous, preventing a precise surface definition. Surface gravity scales linearly with mass M and inversely with the square of radius r, so g \propto \frac{M}{r^2}. For bodies of constant average density \rho, the mass M = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3 \rho, substituting yields g = \frac{4}{3} \pi G \rho r, showing g proportional to both density and radius. As an illustrative example, consider a hypothetical uniform with average \rho = 3000 \, \mathrm{kg/m^3} and r = 1000 \, \mathrm{km} = 10^6 \, \mathrm{m}. The is M = \frac{4}{3} \pi (10^6)^3 \times 3000 \approx 1.26 \times 10^{22} \, \mathrm{kg}, yielding g = G \frac{M}{r^2} \approx 0.84 \, \mathrm{m/s^2}, comparable to about 8.6% of Earth's surface gravity.

Applications to Stellar and Planetary Bodies

Solid and Terrestrial Bodies

Surface gravity on solid and terrestrial bodies, such as rocky planets and moons, is determined primarily by the body's and , following the Newtonian relation g = GM/r² as outlined in prior sections. These bodies exhibit a well-defined physical surface, allowing direct application of the formula to compute at or near the surface. For the terrestrial planets in the Solar System, values range from about 0.38 g on Mercury and Mars to 1.00 g on , reflecting variations in their internal structures and sizes. The following table summarizes equatorial surface gravity for the terrestrial planets and Earth's , computed from and measurements:
BodySurface Gravity (m/s²)Relative to Earth (g)
Mercury3.700.38
8.870.90
9.801.00
Mars3.710.38
1.620.166
These values are derived from spacecraft-derived masses and radii, with updates based on the CODATA 2014 gravitational constant. Measurement of surface gravity on these bodies typically involves indirect techniques, as direct ground-based gravimetry is limited to Earth. On Earth, historical determination of the gravitational constant G via the Cavendish experiment in 1798 enabled computation of planetary masses and thus surface gravities when combined with radius data. For other bodies, spacecraft accelerometers during descent or landing phases, such as those on Apollo missions to the Moon or Viking landers on Mars, provide direct readings of local acceleration. Orbital perturbations from satellites or flybys allow inference of the body's total mass M, which, paired with radius r from imaging or radar, yields g via the Newtonian formula. Seismic data from landers, like NASA's InSight mission on Mars, further refines interior density models to validate gravity estimates. Internal structure significantly influences surface gravity through factors like core-mantle . During planetary formation, denser iron-rich materials sink to form a metallic , while lighter silicates form and crust, increasing overall and thus M for a given , which elevates g compared to a homogeneous body. For instance, 's iron (about 32% of its ) contributes to its relatively high 1 g value among terrestrial planets. Additionally, planetary oblateness due to causes slight variations in g with latitude; on , the results in g being about 0.5% weaker at the (9.78 m/s²) than at the poles (9.83 m/s²), as the increased equatorial reduces gravitational pull while centrifugal effects further diminish effective acceleration. Stellar examples of solid bodies include main-sequence stars like , with a photospheric surface gravity of approximately 274 m/s² (28 g), arising from its immense mass concentrated in a compact . White dwarfs, the remnants of low- to medium-mass stars, exhibit extremely high surface gravities due to their compactness—packing roughly into Earth-sized —reaching about 100,000 g, which compresses their atmospheres into thin layers dominated by or .

Gas Giants and Extended Atmospheres

For gas giants like , Saturn, , and , which lack a , the "surface" is conventionally defined at the pressure level of 1 bar in the atmosphere, approximating Earth's sea-level pressure to enable consistent comparisons of planetary properties such as temperature and composition across solar system bodies. This standard, established through measurements from Voyager spacecraft, provides a reference horizon where atmospheric models can be anchored without relying on an arbitrary optical or density boundary. At this 1-bar level, surface gravities vary significantly among the gas giants due to differences in and . Jupiter exhibits the highest value at approximately 24.79 m/s² (2.53 times Earth's ), followed by Neptune at 11.15 m/s² (1.14 g), Saturn at 10.4 m/s² (1.06 g), and Uranus at 8.87 m/s² (0.90 g). Deeper within these atmospheres, where pressures exceed 1 , gravitational increases because the effective decreases while the enclosed remains substantial, leading to stronger fields closer to the planetary cores. Defining the at the 1-bar level presents challenges due to the gradual increase in from the outer atmosphere to the interior, with no distinct separating gaseous and denser or icy layers. The hydrogen-helium composition, which dominates in and Saturn but includes more ices and heavier elements in and , influences atmospheric opacity and temperature profiles, thereby affecting the precise altitude of the 1-bar horizon and complicating uniform measurements. The relatively high surface gravities of gas giants contribute to their ability to retain extensive atmospheres over billions of years by elevating escape velocities—such as Jupiter's 59.5 km/s compared to Earth's 11.2 km/s—making it energetically difficult for light gases like and to reach thermal speeds sufficient for hydrodynamic escape. This gravitational binding enables the accumulation of massive envelopes during formation, distinguishing gas giants from smaller bodies that lose volatiles more readily.

Non-Spherical and Rotating Bodies

Irregular Shapes and Topography

For non-spherical celestial bodies, the gravitational field deviates from the simple inverse-square law due to asymmetries in mass distribution, which are quantified using multipole expansions of the gravitational potential. The leading correction beyond the monopole term is the quadrupole moment, characterized by the coefficient J₂, which primarily accounts for oblateness in planets and moons. This term introduces latitudinal variations in surface gravity, with the potential expressed as V ≈ -GM/r [1 - J₂ (R/r)² P₂(cos θ)], where P₂(cos θ) = (3 cos² θ - 1)/2 is the Legendre polynomial of degree 2, R is the reference radius, and θ is the colatitude. For Earth, J₂ ≈ 1.0826 × 10⁻³ reflects its equatorial bulge, leading to measurable perturbations in the gravity field. On bodies like Mars, irregular shapes such as impact craters produce localized gravity anomalies detectable through spacecraft measurements. For instance, large craters exhibit positive or negative Bouguer anomalies depending on their depth and infill density, with unrelaxed craters showing prominent negative anomalies due to mass deficits in the basin compared to surrounding terrain. In Gale Crater, surface gravity measurements from the Curiosity rover indicate low bedrock density (≈1680 kg/m³), contributing to negative anomalies that highlight subsurface porosity and sedimentary structure. These variations arise from the crater's irregular topography disrupting the otherwise smoother planetary gravity field. Topographical features like mountains and valleys further perturb local surface gravity on solid bodies, with elevations increasing the distance from the center of and thus reducing g, while depressions do the opposite. On , the planet's oblateness causes gravity to be higher at the poles (≈9.832 m/s²) than at the (≈9.780 m/s²), partly due to the shorter polar bringing closer. For small perturbations on an oblate spheroid, the latitudinal variation due to the J₂-induced effect (without rotational contributions) can be approximated as δg ≈ -(3 G M a² J₂ / (2 r⁴)) (3 sin² φ - 1), where φ is the geocentric . This captures the angular dependence, with maximum enhancement at the poles. For highly irregular small bodies such as asteroids and moons, surface gravity exhibits extreme spatial variability because the assumption of spherical symmetry fails entirely. , Mars' inner moon, exemplifies this with its potato-like shape scarred by craters, resulting in average surface gravity of ≈0.001 g_Earth (≈0.006 m/s²) but varying by factors of several across its surface due to local mass concentrations and slopes exceeding 45°. Computing gravity on such bodies requires over a discretized mass distribution, often using polyhedral shape models to sum contributions from triangular facets representing the surface. These methods reveal gravity lows in craters and highs near dense ridges, influencing dynamics and landing site selection. Satellite missions enable precise mapping of these irregularities through gravity gradiometry and field recovery. The GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) mission, using twin satellites in , measured Earth's field to degree and order 60+, resolving anomalies from topography and internal structure with centimeter-level water equivalent sensitivity. Data from GRACE highlight how mountainous regions like the produce positive gravity anomalies from excess , while ocean trenches show deficits, aiding in separating topographical from deeper effects. Similar techniques, adapted for planetary orbiters, have mapped irregularities on Mars and the .

Effects of Rotation

The rotation of a planetary body generates a centrifugal force that acts outward perpendicular to the axis of rotation, reducing the effective surface gravity experienced by objects on its surface. This effect is most pronounced at the equator, where the distance from the rotation axis is greatest, and diminishes toward the poles. The effective gravitational acceleration g_{\eff} at latitude \lambda (with \lambda = 0^\circ at the equator) is approximated by g_{\eff}(\lambda) = g - \omega^2 R \cos^2 \lambda, where g is the purely gravitational acceleration (directed toward the center), \omega is the angular velocity, and R is the planetary radius. The centrifugal term \omega^2 R \cos^2 \lambda represents the component of the outward acceleration along the local radial direction. This not only alters the magnitude of effective but also drives the planet's deformation into an oblate spheroid, with an and polar flattening. The resulting oblateness redistributes mass away from the , further decreasing equatorial while increasing it at the poles beyond the simple centrifugal correction. For , these combined effects yield an effective of approximately 9.78 m/s² at the compared to 9.83 m/s² at the poles, a variation of about 0.5%. , with its rapid 10-hour rotation period, exhibits a more pronounced difference of roughly 0.1g (where g is Earth's surface ), where the raw at the is about 2.53g but reduced to an effective 2.31g due to the centrifugal contribution of 0.22g. Subsequent observations through 2025 have further refined Jupiter's field, confirming deep zonal flows and a dilute structure. Rotation indirectly influences the planetary gravity field through interactions with forces. The oblateness created by spin makes the body asymmetric, allowing gravitational torques from and to act on the equatorial bulge and induce of the axis, as seen in Earth's 26,000-year of the equinoxes. Additionally, for orbiting satellites or loosely bound bodies, rapid can stresses, lowering the threshold for disruption within the —the orbital distance beyond which a satellite's self-gravity overcomes differential forces from the primary. If rotation accelerates sufficiently, centrifugal forces can dominate at the , leading to structural instability and breakup. The critical for breakup occurs when \omega^2 R \approx g, or \omega \approx \sqrt{g/R}; for an Earth-like body, this corresponds to a of about 1.4 hours, beyond which equatorial material would be ejected. Observed planets, such as (rotating at ~28% of its breakup rate), remain stable well below this limit.

Relativistic Surface Gravity

Schwarzschild Black Holes

In , the surface gravity \kappa of a Schwarzschild black hole, describing a spherically symmetric, non-rotating, and uncharged mass, is defined as the magnitude of the at the event horizon as measured by a observer, accounting for infinite . This quantity arises in the framework of black hole mechanics, where \kappa plays the role analogous to in . The spacetime geometry is given by the Schwarzschild metric: ds^2 = -\left(1 - \frac{2GM}{c^2 r}\right) c^2 dt^2 + \left(1 - \frac{2GM}{c^2 r}\right)^{-1} dr^2 + r^2 (d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta \, d\phi^2), where M is the mass of the black hole, G is the , and c is the . The event horizon occurs at the Schwarzschild radius r_s = 2GM/c^2. To derive \kappa, consider the timelike Killing vector \xi = \partial / \partial t, whose norm \xi^\mu \xi_\mu = -(1 - 2GM/(c^2 r)) vanishes at the horizon. The surface gravity is obtained from the relation \xi^\nu \nabla_\nu \xi^\mu = \kappa \xi^\mu on the horizon, or equivalently from the normalization condition involving the gradient of the norm, yielding the explicit formula \kappa = c^4 / (4 G M) in SI units (or \kappa = 1/(4M) in geometrized units with G = c = 1). Physically, \kappa remains finite despite the infinite proper acceleration for stationary observers approaching the horizon, as it measures the redshifted gravitational pull that governs behavior and horizon stability. For a solar-mass black hole (M \approx 1.989 \times 10^{30} kg), \kappa \sim 10^{13} \, \mathrm{m/s^2}, vastly exceeding typical planetary values and highlighting the tidal forces near the horizon. In the Newtonian limit at large r \gg r_s, this reduces to the familiar GM/r^2. Additionally, \kappa connects to in curved , where the Hawking temperature is T_H = \hbar \kappa / (2\pi k_B), endowing s with thermal properties.

Kerr and Kerr-Newman Solutions

The Kerr metric, discovered by Roy Kerr in 1963, describes the spacetime geometry around a rotating, uncharged, axially symmetric black hole and extends the Schwarzschild solution to include angular momentum. In this framework, the surface gravity κ at the event horizon is given by \kappa = \frac{r_+ - r_-}{2(r_+^2 + a^2)}, where a = J/M is the spin parameter (with J the angular momentum and M the mass), and r_\pm = M \pm \sqrt{M^2 - a^2} are the outer (r_+) and inner (r_-) horizon radii. This expression, derived from the general definition of surface gravity for stationary black holes, shows that rotation reduces κ compared to the non-rotating case, as increasing a decreases the difference r_+ - r_-. The Kerr geometry introduces frame-dragging effects, manifesting in the ergosphere—a region between the event horizon and the static limit where spacetime is dragged along with the black hole's rotation, preventing stationary observers from remaining at rest. Orbits in this spacetime differ for co-rotating (prograde) and counter-rotating (retrograde) particles, with prograde orbits achieving closer stable radii to the horizon due to the alignment with the black hole's spin. The Kerr-Newman metric generalizes the Kerr solution to include electric charge Q, representing a rotating, charged black hole, as introduced in 1965. The surface gravity retains the form \kappa = \frac{r_+ - r_-}{2(r_+^2 + a^2)}, but with modified horizons r_\pm = M \pm \sqrt{M^2 - a^2 - Q^2}, requiring M^2 \geq a^2 + Q^2 for real horizons to exist. Charge further alters the horizon structure, potentially reducing κ more significantly when combined with spin, as the term under the square root diminishes. For maximal spin where a = M and Q = 0, the horizons coincide at r_+ = r_- = M, yielding \kappa = 0, indicating an extremal black hole with vanishing surface gravity. In astrophysical contexts, Kerr and Kerr-Newman solutions are relevant to supermassive black holes powering quasars, where measured spins near the maximal value influence accretion disk efficiency and jet formation in active galactic nuclei.

Dynamical and Charged Black Holes

In the Reissner–Nordström spacetime, which models a spherically symmetric, charged, non-rotating , the surface gravity \kappa at the outer is given by \kappa = \frac{r_+ - r_-}{2 r_+^2}, where r_+ and r_- are the radii of the outer and inner horizons, respectively, determined by the black hole's mass M and charge Q as r_\pm = M \pm \sqrt{M^2 - Q^2}. This expression reduces to the Schwarzschild value \kappa = 1/(4M) when Q = 0. In the extremal limit where |Q| = M, the horizons coincide (r_+ = r_- = M), yielding \kappa = 0, corresponding to a zero-temperature state. However, astrophysically realistic charged black holes are unlikely, as any net charge would discharge rapidly due to the attraction of opposite charges in the electrically neutral or through processes like near the horizon. For dynamical black holes, such as those undergoing merger in binary systems observed by / (e.g., GW150914), the absence of a timelike Killing vector precludes the use of definitions of surface gravity. Instead, quasi-local formulations are employed, focusing on apparent or horizons rather than horizons. The isolated horizons provides a framework for non-expanding, weakly isolated horizons in equilibrium within dynamical spacetimes, defining \kappa via the of null generators on the horizon cross-sections, ensuring constancy on weakly isolated horizons in Einstein-Maxwell theory. For more general evolution, the dynamical horizons extends this to spacelike horizons that evolve under gravitational , allowing \kappa to vary locally along the horizon while satisfying area increase theorems analogous to black hole mechanics. simulations of binary mergers track apparent horizons using these quasi-local tools, revealing time-dependent \kappa that evolves from initial values set by individual parameters to a final value post-merger. Challenges in defining \kappa for dynamical cases arise from the horizon's local nature and potential non-constancy; for instance, in highly dynamical regimes like mergers, \kappa may exhibit spatial variations across the horizon surface, requiring regularization or averaging in computations. research explores \kappa variations during accretion, where infalling alters the horizon and increases \kappa temporarily before relaxation, or during Hawking , where \kappa decreases as the diminishes, with charged cases preferentially shedding charge to approach neutrality. These evolutions, informed by post-2015 data, highlight the limitations of static approximations and underscore the role of in probing non-equilibrium .

References

  1. [1]
    Planetary Physical Parameters - JPL Solar System Dynamics
    Equatorial surface gravity values were computed from updated mass and equatorial radius values. Escape velocities were also updated based on computed values ...
  2. [2]
    Surface Gravity on Jupiter - University of Oregon
    The surface gravity on a planet can be determined from Newton 's Law of Universal Gravitation: F = G m1m2 / R.Missing: physics | Show results with:physics
  3. [3]
    [PDF] The Importance of Planet Mass In Assessing Planetary Habitability
    To determine the planet's surface gravity (log g), which facilitates the retrieval of abundances from atmospheric spectra. • To assess atmospheric loss rates. • ...
  4. [4]
    How strong is the gravity on Saturn? | Cool Cosmos
    The surface gravity on Saturn is about 107% of the surface gravity on Earth, so if you weigh 100 pounds on Earth, you would weigh 107 pounds on Saturn.
  5. [5]
    Understanding the interior structure of gaseous giant exoplanets ...
    Following the interior models of gas giants in our Solar System, we define the surface of gaseous giant exoplanets as the 1-bar pressure level and set the ...
  6. [6]
    Asteroseismic surface gravity for evolved stars
    One of the important characteristics of stars is their surface gravity (g), which can be determined in several independent ways, such as from stellar spectra or ...
  7. [7]
    On black hole surface gravity | The European Physical Journal C
    May 5, 2023 · In general terms, given an object and its surface, we can define surface gravity as the (gravitational) acceleration a test particle in the ...
  8. [8]
    Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica
    Dec 20, 2007 · The second edition appeared in 1713, twenty six years after the first. It had five substantive changes of note. First, the structure of the ...
  9. [9]
    Laws of Motion and Gravity – Astrobiology
    Explain what the surface gravity of a world means. Give an example of two planets or Moon's with different surface gravities and explain how they differ.<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    standard acceleration of gravity - CODATA Value
    standard acceleration of gravity $g_{\rm n}$. Numerical value, 9.806 65 m s-2. Standard uncertainty, (exact). Relative standard uncertainty, (exact).
  11. [11]
    The Downs and Ups of Gravity Surveys - NOAA
    Sep 26, 2025 · The Coast Survey started its first investigation of gravity using pendulums in 1872. This article traces the development of gravity measurements ...
  12. [12]
    13.1 Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation - OpenStax
    Sep 19, 2016 · Calculate the gravitational force between two point masses ... We examine the force of gravity near Earth's surface in the next section.
  13. [13]
    Newtonian constant of gravitation - CODATA Value
    Newtonian constant of gravitation $ G $. Numerical value, 6.674 30 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2. Standard uncertainty, 0.000 15 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2.
  14. [14]
    Gravity - National Space Society
    Mars, 3.7 m/s2 or 12.2 ft/s ·.38 G ; Venus, 8.87 m/s2 or 29 ft/s · 0.9 G ; Jupiter, 24.5 m/s2 or 80 ft/s · 2.54.
  15. [15]
    The curious case of the gravitational constant - PNAS
    Sep 6, 2016 · Using a newly designed device called a torsion balance, Cavendish measured the almost-infinitesimal gravitational attraction between two spheres ...
  16. [16]
    Core formation, mantle differentiation and core-mantle interaction ...
    Jun 5, 2019 · Core and mantle compositional estimates for the terrestrial planets are provided. Melting and silicate-metal partitioning led to magma oceans (MO) and cores.
  17. [17]
    Earth's oblateness and its temporal variations - ScienceDirect.com
    On the Earth surface, together with the centrifugal force field, the oblateness gives the surface gravity a slight latitudinal dependence which is actually the ...
  18. [18]
    White Dwarf Stars - Imagine the Universe! - NASA
    With a surface gravity of 100,000 times that of Earth, the atmosphere of a white dwarf is very strange. The heavier atoms in its atmosphere sink, and the ...
  19. [19]
    Planet Compare - Solar System Exploration - NASA
    Surface Gravity(m/s2), 3.7, 8.87, 9.80665, 3.71, 24.79, 10.4*, 8.87, 11.15. Escape Velocity(km/h), 15,300, 37,296, 40,284, 18,108, 216,720, 129,924, 76,968 ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] N87- 17647 ! - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
    rounded to Fo,jr significant figures) refer to the 1-bar pressure level of their atmospheres. Values for. Jupiter and Saturn have been derived by Lindal et al.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] 4 Gas Giants - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
    Clouds and hazes form around the 1 bar altitude pressure level and extend vertically, according to the thermo- chemical models, in a layer with a thickness of ...
  22. [22]
    Escape of an Atmosphere - Astronomy Notes
    Mar 20, 2022 · Atmosphere escape depends on gravity and temperature. Weaker gravity and higher temperature allow molecules to escape. If molecule speed is ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] 5 Gravity
    The gravitational field of this spheroid is the reference gravitational field of the Earth. Topography and density inhomogeneities in the Earth lead to local ...
  24. [24]
    A surface gravity traverse on Mars indicates low bedrock density at ...
    Feb 1, 2019 · The density of the sedimentary rocks in Gale crater is 1680 ± 180 kilograms per cubic meter. This value is lower than expected, indicating a high porosity.<|control11|><|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Gravity and Magnetic Field Signatures in Hydrothermally Affected ...
    Apr 7, 2025 · Craters with minimal relaxation are characterized by their large depth-to-diameter ratio and prominent Bouguer gravity anomalies. Additionally, ...
  26. [26]
    Surface environment of Phobos and Phobos simulant UTPS
    Dec 10, 2021 · Phobos' overall shape is very irregular due to several large craters, which cause significant variations in local slopes. Even with a ...
  27. [27]
    GRACE (Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment) - eoPortal
    As revealed in the article, the GRACE mission precisely measured changes in Earth's gravitational field, offering insights into Earth's water dynamics and ...
  28. [28]
    What is gravity - Keele University
    Feb 10, 2022 · The earth's gravity is an acceleration generally between 9.78 and 9.83 metres per second per second. ... The force of gravity over the surface of ...The Earth's Gravity · Data Acquisition · Gravity Plans
  29. [29]
    How strong is the gravity on Jupiter? | Cool Cosmos
    Although Jupiter is a great deal larger in size, its surface gravity is just 2.4 times that of the surface gravity of Earth.
  30. [30]
    Jupiter's Gravity Field Halfway Through the Juno Mission - Durante
    Feb 3, 2020 · We provide an update on Jupiter's gravity field, its tidal response and spin axis motion over time.
  31. [31]
    Precession - PWG Home - NASA
    Oct 10, 2016 · The cause of the precession is the equatorial bulge of the Earth, caused by the centrifugal force of the Earth's rotation (the centrifugal force ...Missing: oblateness | Show results with:oblateness
  32. [32]
    Tidal Disruption of Asteroids and Comets - SwRI Boulder Office
    His result, now called the Roche limit, showed that a strengthless body will only disrupt near a planet if it orbits very close to that planet (e.g., a ...
  33. [33]
    An Extremely Low-density Exoplanet Spins Slow - IOP Science
    Nov 18, 2024 · For reference, Jupiter and Saturn spin at 28% and 36% of their breakup spin rates, respectively. If the spin of Kepler-51d is substantially ...
  34. [34]
    The four laws of black hole mechanics
    This analogy suggests the formulation of four laws of black hole mechanics which correspond to and in some ways transcend the four laws of thermodynamics.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Schwarzschild: Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes
    Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der EiNSTEiNsehen Theorie. Von K. Schwarzschild. (Vorgelegt am 13. Januar 1916 [s. oben S. 42].) § i . Hr ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Dynamical surface gravity. - arXiv
    Nov 9, 2007 · This is for example, how the surface gravity is calculated for a Schwarzschild black hole. This works well in stationary situations but breaks ...
  37. [37]
    Journey into and through a Reissner-Nordström black hole - JILA
    Real black holes probably spin, but probably have almost no electric charge, because our Universe appears to be electrically neutral, and a charged black hole ...
  38. [38]
    Isolated Horizons: A Generalization of Black Hole Mechanics - arXiv
    Dec 18, 1998 · Abstract: A set of boundary conditions defining a non-rotating isolated horizon are given in Einstein-Maxwell theory.Missing: formalism | Show results with:formalism
  39. [39]
    Black-hole binaries, gravitational waves, and numerical relativity
    Nov 16, 2010 · Black-hole mergers are monumental astrophysical events, releasing tremendous amounts of energy in the form of gravitational radiation.