Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Table stakes

Table stakes is a term derived from poker, where it refers to the minimum amount of or a player must have on the table to participate in a hand, limiting bets to what is already committed without allowing players to reach for more funds during play. In business strategy, table stakes describes the essential, non-differentiating requirements—such as basic , pricing, or compliance standards—that a must meet simply to enter a or have its offerings considered viable by customers, without providing a competitive edge on their own. The term has been used in business contexts since at least the , with increased adoption noted since 2010. The concept underscores the distinction between mere participation and true , drawing from the of strategy, where table stakes represent commoditized resources easily replicated by rivals. In practice, failing to meet table stakes can exclude a entirely, as illustrated in sectors like where basic reliability in scheduling has been emphasized as a foundational requirement. Conversely, exceeding these minima through innovation enables and . These elements evolve with market dynamics; for instance, features like mobile responsiveness have become standard expectations in digital industries by the . Identifying table stakes is crucial for , helping firms allocate resources away from redundant basics toward high-impact innovations.

Definition and Origins

Core Meaning

In business , "table stakes" refers to the minimum resources, investments, or capabilities that a must possess to enter and participate in a given or competitive arena without being immediately disqualified. Borrowed metaphorically from poker, where it refers to the amount of or a player has on the table to participate in a hand, limiting subsequent bets to that initial , the term represents non-negotiable prerequisites such as essential , outlays, or core skills that form the baseline for engagement. These elements ensure a firm can operate viably but do not inherently provide a competitive edge, as they are typically expected or easily replicable by rivals. Key characteristics of table stakes distinguish them from optional enhancements or "nice-to-haves." They encompass must-have requirements that buyers or regulators demand as standard, including to meet legal standards, basic for operational functionality, and standard features in product offerings that align with market expectations. For instance, in B2B contexts, table stakes often involve delivering products that meet specifications at an acceptable while adhering to ethical and regulatory norms, without which a supplier is excluded from consideration. This contrasts with differentiators, which build upon these foundations to create unique value. Conceptually, table stakes function as a in competitive frameworks: failing to meet them results in market exclusion, as potential customers or partners dismiss non-compliant entities outright. Conversely, merely achieving table stakes positions a to compete on , while investments beyond this level—such as innovative processes or superior —enable and sustainable advantage. This dynamic underscores their role in resource-based views of , where baseline entry barriers separate viable participants from outsiders.

Etymology and Historical Development

The term "table stakes" derives from poker, a that originated during the early from European precursors like poque and . In this context, "table stakes" denotes the minimum amount of or a player must place on the table to participate in the game, with bets thereafter limited to that initial stake to prevent additional funds from being added mid-hand. This rule, which approximates no-limit play but enforces practical boundaries based on visible chips, has been integral to poker since its formative years. The phrase transitioned into business jargon in the mid-20th century, metaphorically extending the poker concept to denote essential prerequisites for market entry. An early documented instance appears in a New York Times article on the cereal industry, where intense advertising competition was likened to "battle of the breakfast table stakes," illustrating the high baseline investments required to vie for consumer attention. By the and , the term gained traction in corporate discussions, capturing the idea of unavoidable minimum commitments in competitive arenas. A 1990 Washington Post article, for instance, applied it to the sector, portraying the need for prime locations and as "table stakes" for survival amid economic pressures. While not coined by , the expression resonated with contemporaneous management literature emphasizing entry barriers and basic competitive necessities, such as Porter's analyses of industry rivalry published in the . A key milestone occurred during the dot-com era of the late 1990s and early 2000s, when "table stakes" proliferated in tech and consulting vernacular to describe the foundational technology infrastructure—such as web presence and basic capabilities—deemed essential for startups to enter the market. This period's boom in digital ventures amplified the term's relevance, framing it as the ante for participation in the nascent online economy.

Business Applications

Strategic Entry Requirements

In business strategy, identifying table stakes plays a crucial role in entry barrier analysis by enabling firms to assess the foundational requirements necessary for viability. These include essential elements such as securing to protect , establishing reliable access to ensure operational continuity, and committing to minimum R&D investment levels to meet technological standards. For instance, in industries like , a clear portfolio and freedom-to-operate analysis are table stakes for attracting and entering the , as they mitigate legal risks and demonstrate competitive readiness. Similarly, high fixed costs for R&D and , such as IT systems in smart connected products, act as table stakes that elevate entry barriers, deterring under-resourced entrants. Strategically, table stakes inform key decision-making frameworks by defining the baseline conditions for participation, particularly in evaluating the threat of new entrants within Porter's Five Forces model. Meeting these stakes ensures a firm can compete without immediate disadvantage, but failure to do so amplifies external threats and internal weaknesses in , where they highlight potential vulnerabilities in capabilities or resources. In practice, operational effectiveness—encompassing efficient supply chains and basic R&D proficiency—serves as table stakes across strategies, requiring firms to achieve minimum proficiency in low-cost , product , and customer focus to avoid erosion of market position. This baseline integration helps strategists prioritize investments that align with industry key success factors, such as capital outlays exceeding certain thresholds to match incumbents' scale. Practical assessment of table stakes often involves structured checklists and audits to quantify entry feasibility. These methods include evaluating cost thresholds, such as minimum requirements for initial outlays (e.g., or R&D budgets estimated at averages), and conducting capability audits to verify access to patents, supply chains, and skilled . Firms typically begin with environmental scans of trends and competitor benchmarks to identify these thresholds, followed by audits of and resource gaps. For example, in high-tech sectors, audits confirm whether a firm's R&D spend meets benchmarks, often 3-8% of , common as table stakes for innovation-driven markets. This systematic approach allows for , ensuring decisions are grounded in verifiable data rather than assumptions.

Competitive Analysis and Market Positioning

In competitive benchmarking, businesses compare their offerings against rivals' table stakes to identify performance gaps and ensure they meet minimum market expectations. For instance, in the sector, mobile responsiveness has become a standard table stake, as over 60% of originates from mobile devices, requiring companies to prioritize mobile-first designs to remain viable against competitors. This process involves analyzing industry peers' baseline features, such as integration capabilities in software products, to avoid and pinpoint areas where rivals excel or fall short. Market positioning strategies table stakes as a while emphasizing to achieve . Companies often bundle essential table stakes with unique value propositions, such as advanced analytics or customized user experiences, to elevate their offerings beyond mere compliance. In the , for example, top-performing firms position themselves in vertical markets by combining baseline retention metrics with specialized go-to-market approaches, outperforming horizontal competitors through focused innovation. This approach enables firms to command and build by addressing unmet needs while rivals remain at parity. To quantify table stakes, businesses rely on tools like customer surveys and industry reports, which provide data on baseline satisfaction levels. (NPS), a widely used metric, serves as a key indicator of foundational customer loyalty, with scores below industry averages signaling gaps in meeting expectations. For example, in , benchmarking digital engagement via surveys reveals table stakes like accessibility, where as of 2024, Medicaid members report the highest satisfaction with offerings among different insurance types, guiding strategic investments. These methods ensure decisions are data-driven, drawing from authoritative reports to align with evolving market standards.

Examples and Case Studies

Industry-Specific Illustrations

In the technology sector, particularly for software-as-a-service (SaaS) products, table stakes encompass essential capabilities such as seamless cloud integration to support scalability and global accessibility, stringent data security compliance including adherence to regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to safeguard user privacy, and robust API compatibility to facilitate interoperability with third-party systems and ecosystems. These requirements ensure that SaaS providers can meet baseline customer expectations for reliability and integration in a competitive digital landscape, where failure to comply risks market exclusion. In and , table stakes revolve around delivering a frictionless , including an presence that unifies online, in-store, and mobile interactions to meet evolving consumer demands for consistency across touchpoints. Fast shipping options, such as same-day or next-day delivery, have become non-negotiable, with expectations for fulfillment times under two days across major categories to avoid losing to agile competitors. Additionally, secure payment gateways supporting diverse methods like cards, digital wallets, and buy-now-pay-later options are , as seamless and protected transactions form the for trust and conversion in high-volume online sales. The imposes particularly rigorous table stakes due to its emphasis on and regulatory oversight, where obtaining approvals from bodies like the (FDA) for medical devices and software is mandatory to ensure efficacy and risk mitigation before market entry. (EHR) is another core requirement, enabling secure data exchange across providers to support coordinated care and comply with standards like HL7, which has elevated basic connectivity to an essential operational norm. Basic telemedicine capabilities, including video consultations and remote monitoring, now represent table stakes for accessibility, especially post-pandemic, as virtual care integration has shifted from optional to integral for comprehensive service delivery. Table stakes vary significantly by industry maturity, escalating in established sectors where regulatory and consumer pressures enforce higher baselines, while remaining more fluid in nascent fields focused on foundational governance. In mature markets like automotive, compliance with electric vehicle (EV) mandates—such as the European Union's targets for 100% zero-emission sales by 2035—has raised the entry bar, making EV production capabilities and battery integration indispensable for competitiveness. Conversely, in emerging domains like , table stakes center on guidelines, including frameworks for mitigation, transparency, and as outlined in international standards, which are increasingly required to build trust and avoid reputational risks in rapidly evolving applications. This dynamic underscores how table stakes intensify with market consolidation, demanding proactive adaptation to sustain viability.

Notable Corporate Examples

In the 2000s, Blockbuster's inability to fully embrace the emerging table stakes of digital streaming via delivery and subscription-based models contributed significantly to its downfall against . While pioneered rentals in 1998 and transitioned to streaming in 2007, offering unlimited access without late fees, Blockbuster initially dismissed the threat and rejected a $50 million acquisition offer from in 2000. Blockbuster's late entry into online rentals in 2004 and streaming in 2008 was hampered by its reliance on physical stores and a fee-heavy model, failing to capitalize on widespread adoption that enabled seamless delivery. By 2010, Blockbuster filed for Chapter 11 with over $1 billion in debt, as its in video rentals plummeted from near-monopoly dominance—serving approximately 65 million customers at its peak—to irrelevance, while 's subscriber base grew to 20 million, including millions shifting to streaming. This misjudgment highlighted how ignoring digital table stakes led to a 91% drop in Blockbuster's stock value from 2002 to 2010, ultimately resulting in the closure of thousands of stores and the company's acquisition by for a mere $320 million. Tesla redefined the table stakes for the automotive industry in the 2010s by prioritizing electric vehicle (EV) battery range exceeding 200 miles per charge and a proprietary Supercharger network for rapid infrastructure support, compelling legacy automakers to accelerate their EV transitions. Launching the Roadster in 2008 with a 245-mile range and scaling to the Model S in 2012 with up to 265 miles, Tesla addressed key consumer barriers like range anxiety through advanced lithium-ion batteries and vertical integration of production. By 2015, Tesla's deployment of approximately 400 Supercharger stations across North America provided free, high-speed charging, setting a benchmark that traditional manufacturers lacked, as their early EVs offered shorter ranges and relied on sparse, incompatible networks. This forced companies like General Motors and Ford to invest billions in EV platforms; for instance, GM announced a $27 billion EV commitment in 2021 partly in response to Tesla's dominance. Tesla's U.S. EV market share peaked at 80% in 2019 before declining to around 50% by 2023 as competitors adapted, and further to around 45% as of early 2025. but the initial shift resulted in legacy firms like Volkswagen pledging €30 billion for electrification by 2023 to meet the new standards. The impact underscored table stakes' role in disruption, with Tesla's market capitalization surpassing $1 trillion in 2021—eclipsing the combined value of the top seven automakers—while prompting industry-wide battery tech advancements and infrastructure builds. In the , established GPS-enabled mobile apps with real-time tracking as essential table stakes for ride-sharing, rapidly outpacing traditional services that depended on dispatch phones and fixed stands. Founded in , 's platform used GPS to match riders with drivers instantly and provide live location updates, offering transparency and convenience absent in medallion-based systems. This technological edge allowed to expand globally, capturing by reducing wait times from 10-15 minutes for taxis to under 5 minutes in urban areas. By 2015, 's valuation reached $50 billion, while traditional revenues in major U.S. cities declined by 20-50%, with medallion values crashing from $1 million in to under $200,000 by 2017 due to oversupply and lost ridership. The disruption led to industry bankruptcies and protests, such as City's firms filing for protection in 2017 after ride-sharing services captured approximately 70% of the ; 's gross bookings grew from $0.7 billion in 2013 to $20 billion in , illustrating how failing to adopt digital tracking table stakes eroded incumbents' 80% market control in pre- eras.

Distinctions from Similar Terms

The term "table stakes" refers to the minimum requirements necessary for a to enter and participate in a without gaining a distinct edge over competitors, such as basic compliance or essential operational capabilities. In contrast, an "economic moat," a concept popularized by investor , describes sustainable competitive advantages—like strong or proprietary technology—that protect a company's long-term profitability and after entry. While table stakes enable initial market access, they do not deter rivals or provide enduring protection, unlike moats which create barriers to imitation and foster superior returns. Table stakes represent the lowest viable threshold for market participation, often involving fundamental resources or standards that all players must meet, whereas "barriers to entry" encompass broader, more substantial obstacles that significantly hinder new entrants, such as high capital requirements, , or regulatory hurdles. For instance, obtaining necessary licenses might qualify as table stakes in a regulated , but achieving the scale to compete on cost efficiency acts as a true barrier. This distinction is critical in , as overcoming table stakes merely allows , while navigating barriers preserves market incumbency. In , table stakes align with "must-have" features in the —essential elements expected by users that prevent dissatisfaction but offer no , such as reliable basic functionality in software. These differ from "delighters," which are unexpected innovations that exceed expectations and drive loyalty, like advanced in an app. Failing to include must-haves results in rejection, but exceeding them alone does not create a competitive wow factor; instead, it shifts them toward the performance category over time. A key differentiator of table stakes is their dynamic nature: they evolve as market standards rise, eventually incorporating what were once differentiators, yet they inherently fail to confer a competitive edge on their own, requiring additional strategies for superiority. This evolution underscores the need for businesses to continually reassess and innovate beyond these baselines to avoid .

Limitations and Evolving Usage

One key limitation of the table stakes concept is the risk of , where essential baseline requirements become so ubiquitous that they fail to drive profitability or , turning offerings into interchangeable commodities. In dynamic markets like , an overemphasis on meeting these minimums can overlook the imperative for ongoing , as broad productivity gains from AI tools have evolved into expected standards rather than competitive edges. Critics argue that prioritizing table stakes often fosters "me-too" strategies, where firms mimic competitors' basics without pursuing unique value, resulting in homogenized markets that stifle creativity. This approach can also ignore niche opportunities by fixating on broad entry barriers, potentially leading to missed targeted innovations. Furthermore, in the gig economy, the concept feels dated, as platforms have drastically lowered traditional barriers to entry through low-overhead models and flexible access, rendering conventional table stakes less relevant for independent workers. The usage of table stakes has evolved significantly post-2020, accelerated by amid the , where capabilities like remote operations and data analytics shifted from differentiators to universal necessities for business continuity. For instance, cybersecurity has emerged as a core table stake due to escalating threats, including nation-state attacks and vulnerabilities, with global costs projected to reach $10 trillion annually and response times lagging behind rapid . Similarly, integration of (ESG) factors has become a , as investors and stakeholders increasingly demand sustainable practices to mitigate risks and ensure long-term viability.

References

  1. [1]
    Table Stakes | Poker Terms - PokerNews
    All casino poker is played as table stakes. The definition sometimes also includes the rule that a player may not remove chips from the table during a game.
  2. [2]
    Betting On 'Table Stakes' : The Protojournalist - NPR
    Jun 18, 2013 · In the poker world, table stakes is a term that puts a limit on bets. In other worlds, it usually connotes the basic necessities.
  3. [3]
    Table-Stakes Touchpoints: Powerful Strategy That Can Define The ...
    Oct 13, 2024 · Lauren Richards' take on Jan Carlzon's concept is that there are table-stakes touchpoints that disproportionately impact the brand's overall ...
  4. [4]
    Table stakes - Oxford Reference
    Are the resources that a company requires in order to enter a product market but which do not themselves confer competitive advantage.
  5. [5]
    Building an Insights Engine
    But today those capabilities are table stakes. The new source of competitive advantage is customer centricity: deeply understanding your customers' needs ...
  6. [6]
    "Table Stakes" in Business: definition and examples - BMB
    Jan 31, 2020 · The term table stakes in business refer to the minimum offering on any aspect of a product before it is considered for purchase by a customer.
  7. [7]
    A Quick Guide to Table Stakes in Business - Under30CEO
    Dec 4, 2024 · Table stakes refer to the base offering on some part of a product before a customer possibly buys it.Synonyms Of Table Stakes · Table Stakes And... · Faqs
  8. [8]
    What It Really Takes to Attract Top Talent
    Nov 24, 2015 · Not really. Once everyone offered them, they simply raised the table stakes for getting a good hire.
  9. [9]
    The B2B Elements of Value
    The B2B Elements of Value ... How to measure—and deliver—what business customers want by Eric Almquist, Jamie Cleghorn and Lori Sherer.
  10. [10]
    Poker | Principles, Types, Rules, Strategy, & History | Britannica
    Sep 20, 2025 · Poker originated in North America and evolved from earlier games like ... However, Texas hold'em tournaments almost always use table stakes ...The World Series of Poker · Principal forms · Omaha · Skillful play
  11. [11]
    What is the origin of the all-in bet? - Poker Stack Exchange
    Jul 3, 2015 · "Table stakes" rules are essentially as old as poker itself. My copy of Foster's Practical Poker (1905) says that some games would allow ...
  12. [12]
    Battle of the Breakfast Table - The New York Times
    Oct 22, 1972 · ... table-stakes-big-so-cereal-producers-pour.html. Share full article ... Curiously, what seems to have given the whole business a boost is the July, ...
  13. [13]
    PLAYING FOR TABLE STAKES - The Washington Post
    Apr 1, 1990 · PLAYING FOR TABLE STAKES. FOR RESTAURATEURS, LIFE WOULD SURE BE FINER IF THEY ONLY HAD MORE DINERS. April 1, 1990More than 35 ...
  14. [14]
    Lessons from the giddy and stupid days of the Dot.com crash.
    Mar 10, 2025 · Having a presence on the internet was now table stakes for any company. The stock market would take over fifteen years to recover from the Dot.Missing: startups | Show results with:startups
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition
    Oct 31, 2014 · ... Michael Porter's “Strategy and the Internet,” HBR, March 2001). This ... OE is the table stakes of competition. If a company is not ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Selecting a Strategy for Market Leadership - Chief Outsiders
    This illustrates the table stakes idea – companies must have a minimum level of all three strategies. The ability to manufacture obsolete cell phones at ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] A Leader's Guide to Capturing the Potential of Artificial ... - Innosight
    These can take two forms: “table stakes imperatives” and “leadership imperatives.” For industries more vulnerable to near-term disruption by AI, table-stakes.<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    10 Top Ecommerce Customer Experience Tactics (+ Examples)
    Oct 5, 2023 · Since 60% of internet traffic comes from mobile devices, mobile-first design is table stakes. If your ecommerce site isn't easily accessible ...
  20. [20]
    Rule of 40 Lessons from the Top Performers in Software | BCG
    May 20, 2025 · ... benchmarking analysis of a wide variety of SaaS companies held in their portfolios. ... table stakes for an efficient sales and marketing ...
  21. [21]
    Measuring customer experience: 6 metrics to do it right - Zendesk
    Oct 2, 2024 · But the metrics below are table-stakes across all industries. 1. Net Promoter Score® ... By collecting CSAT scores for multiple touchpoints, ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Doing More with Less in Health Care - Boston Consulting Group
    Today, adapt your market positioning and your stance on ... peers are offering, what offerings are table stakes, and where they can be differentiated.<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Best SaaS Tech Stack Guide 2025 | Build Scalable SaaS - Brights
    Nov 3, 2025 · Discover the best SaaS tech stack for 2025. Learn which tools, frameworks, and cloud solutions power scalable SaaS products.
  24. [24]
    Comprehensive Guide to GDPR Compliance for SaaS Companies
    This article will explore the crucial steps to manage GDPR compliance for Software as a Service (SaaS) and strategies to minimize risks associated with GDPR in ...
  25. [25]
    Data, privacy, and GDPR for SaaS partnerships
    Aug 20, 2020 · As a partnership leader in the cloud software industry, you singularly negotiate the collection, integration, distribution, resale, and management of customer ...
  26. [26]
    Top 5 file storage APIs to integrate with in 2025 - Apideck
    Google Drive. With the cloud storage software category quickly becoming table stakes, big tech couldn't be left behind so it was only a matter of time before ...Missing: sector | Show results with:sector
  27. [27]
    Retail's need for speed: Unlocking value in omnichannel delivery
    Sep 8, 2021 · In the next three to five years, we believe table-stakes delivery times will generally be fewer than two days across all major categories—and it ...
  28. [28]
    How Retail Payment Processing Works: Complete Retailer's Guide
    It's retail table stakes. Customers expect to swipe, dip, or tap without hassle—whether they're in-store at your POS system or buying online through ...Why Seamless Retail Payment... · Key Payment Methods To... · Comparing Pricing Models &...
  29. [29]
    Use of Electronic Health Record Data in Clinical Investigations - FDA
    May 8, 2020 · EHR systems can be used to integrate real-time electronic health care information from medical devices and multiple health care providers ...
  30. [30]
    Telehealth in 2026: What's Next for Virtual Care?
    Jul 30, 2025 · The ability to move data across platforms and EHRs is table stakes for effective care coordination. ... Health systems are moving from telehealth ...
  31. [31]
    What's Next for Virtual Care | Life Expectancy Increases
    Mar 25, 2024 · Virtual care has become table-stakes for patients and providers, but a mature market doesn't mean that telehealth is for everyone.
  32. [32]
    A new 'ERA': An action plan for the European automotive industry
    Sep 8, 2025 · The European automotive industry plans to bring about 350 new EV models to market by 2032. ... table stakes in the United States and Europe.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Humans keeping AI in check – emerging regulatory expectations in ...
    One approach to meet this industry need is for regulators to provide compilation of emerging industry best practices on AI governance, where available, for each ...
  34. [34]
    A Look Back At Why Blockbuster Really Failed And Why It Didn't ...
    Sep 5, 2014 · Blockbuster failed because its leadership had built a well-oiled operational machine. It was a very tight network that could execute with extreme efficiency.<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Can Legacy Automakers Survive The New EV Era? - Forbes
    Jan 4, 2024 · Years of dominance with internal combustion engines led to delayed investments in dedicated EV platforms and battery technology for many legacy ...
  36. [36]
    Electric vehicles and the metamorphosis of an industry
    May 5, 2021 · Last December, Tesla's market capitalization surpassed the world's next nine carmakers combined, with some asset managers predicting a multi- ...
  37. [37]
    Uber: Resistance is Futile - Forbes
    Aug 5, 2015 · The killer app of course is ridesharing, which is disrupting taxis worldwide by matching drivers and riders in real time. ... GPS, mobile apps, ...
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
    How an Economic Moat Provides a Competitive Advantage
    Jan 19, 2025 · An economic moat refers to a company's ability to maintain competitive advantages to protect its long-term profits and market share from ...
  40. [40]
    Barriers to Entry in Business: Key Factors Limiting Market Access
    Barriers to entry are obstacles such as high startup costs and regulatory requirements that prevent new competitors from easily entering a market, protecting ...Missing: stakes | Show results with:stakes
  41. [41]
    Five Things People Get Wrong About the Digital Operating Basics ...
    Mar 8, 2025 · These are table stakes for being in a digital or digitizing business. ... Barrier to Entry. DOBs are the “operating performance you have to ...
  42. [42]
    Dan Olsen's Product Strategy Framework - Productboard
    Sep 16, 2019 · Must-have features are “table stakes” or “cost of entry”—boxes that must be checked for customers to be satisfied with your product. Delighters, ...
  43. [43]
    From product-led growth to product-led sales: Beyond the PLG hype
    Aug 8, 2023 · Today's differentiating factors may eventually become table stakes in the battle to win and engage customers and achieve above-average growth in ...
  44. [44]
    Agents for growth: Turning AI promise into impact | McKinsey
    Nov 3, 2025 · Broad productivity wins are table stakes. Impact comes from prioritizing the biggest growth problems and then solving them end to end in a ...
  45. [45]
    Creating a Differentiated Professional Services Brand
    Jul 17, 2022 · Table stakes messages deserve some place in the brand platform. ... Me-too branding may secure a seat at the professional services table.Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  46. [46]
    Differentiation strategy: what it is, why it's critical, and how to get it right
    Apr 14, 2025 · This definition is closely related to competition in business, which legendary Harvard Business School professor Michael Porter ... table stakes.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Gig Economy Work: Mind the protection gaps
    Mar 1, 2022 · the other hand, policymakers acknowledge that gig economy platforms often offer low barriers to entry and flexibility, which could benefit ...
  48. [48]
    Putting digital at the heart of strategy - Deloitte
    Apr 22, 2021 · ... digital technology is becoming table stakes. Before long, most organizations will have extensive digital capabilities. Nearly two-thirds of ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] 2025 CYBERSECURITY REPORT - Table Stakes, Trends, and Threats
    the foundational elements of cybersecurity ...
  50. [50]
    ESG is Now Table Stakes — Is Your Company Still On the Sidelines?
    Jul 12, 2022 · Put simply, ESG is a set of factors that position a company to create long-term, sustainable value for all stakeholders, and can be used by ...