Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Tangential speech

Tangential speech, also referred to as tangentiality, is a disturbance in the thought process manifested as verbal communication in which the speaker repeatedly diverges from the original subject, providing excessive or irrelevant details without ever returning to the central point or directly answering a question.^[1] This pattern arises from disorganized thought processes or impaired ability to maintain focus, resulting in oblique speech that constantly digresses to unrelated topics.^[2]^[3] In clinical contexts, tangential speech is distinguished from similar speech disturbances, such as circumstantiality, where the individual includes unnecessary details but eventually circles back to the main idea.^[1] Unlike circumstantial speech, tangential responses never reach the intended goal, leaving the original query unresolved and often frustrating communication.^[4] It is assessed as part of the mental status examination, particularly under the evaluation of thought process, where normal cognition is linear and goal-directed.^[4] Tangential speech is commonly associated with various psychiatric and neurological conditions, including psychotic disorders like schizophrenia, mood disorders with psychotic features such as bipolar I disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizotypal or narcissistic personality disorders, temporal lobe epilepsy, and neurodegenerative diseases.^[1] It serves as a marker of formal thought disorder, which can impair social and functional interactions, and its presence or severity may indicate disease progression or response to treatment.^[1] In some cases, such as mania or early psychosis, it may appear alongside other irregularities like flight of ideas, where thought connections are rapid but loosely associated.^[4]

Definition and Characteristics

Definition

Tangential speech, also known as tangentiality, is a disorder of thought and communication characterized by the speaker's responses deviating from the original topic or question, instead wandering to unrelated or loosely associated ideas without ever returning to the central point. This pattern reflects a disruption in the logical flow of discourse, where the individual fails to maintain relevance to the inquiry posed. Within psychiatry, tangential speech is classified as a form of formal thought disorder, distinguished by its lack of goal-directedness in speech production, whereby associations between ideas become oblique and indirect, preventing the attainment of a coherent response. It differs from other speech anomalies by emphasizing the complete evasion of the topic rather than mere digression or elaboration. The term "tangential speech" derives its name from the geometric concept of a tangent, which describes a line that touches a curve at a single point but does not intersect it further, metaphorically illustrating the speech's departure from the main topic without reconnection. This etymology underscores the abrupt and non-intersecting nature of the communicative divergence observed in affected individuals. It is frequently noted in clinical evaluations when patients respond to direct questions, highlighting its relevance in diagnostic interviews.

Key Characteristics

Tangential speech is characterized by a response that begins in a manner relevant to the original question or topic but then diverges into peripheral or irrelevant associations without ever returning to the central point.^[1] This primary trait results in a failure to address the query directly, often leaving the listener without resolution or closure on the intended subject.^[5] The underlying mechanism involves loose associations in the thought process, where connections between ideas are indirect, semantically distant, and non-goal-directed, leading to a drift away from the conversational aim.^[6] Observable signs include sentences that remain grammatically coherent and logically structured on their own, yet the overall discourse lacks thematic unity, with abrupt shifts to unrelated tangents lacking smooth transitions.^[1] These features can manifest as over-inclusion of extraneous details that seem loosely connected through thematic or associative links but ultimately derail the response.^[7] For instance, when asked, "What did you do today?", a person exhibiting tangential speech might respond by discussing the history of clocks and their invention, vaguely linking it to the concept of time, without ever describing their personal activities.^[1] Such patterns are typically assessed during clinical interviews as part of evaluating thought form and content.^[4]

Differentiation from Similar Phenomena

Comparison with Circumstantiality

Tangential speech and circumstantiality are both forms of formal thought disorder characterized by deviations in speech patterns, but they differ fundamentally in their trajectory and resolution. In tangential speech, the speaker veers off into irrelevant detours that completely derail the conversation, never returning to the original topic or point, resulting in no resolution to the initial query.^[1]^[8] In contrast, circumstantiality involves overly inclusive narratives laden with excessive, often parenthetical details and tangential asides, yet the speaker eventually circles back to the relevant point after a delay.^[1]^[9] This core distinction—permanent derailment in tangentiality versus delayed but achieved relevance in circumstantiality—highlights how tangential speech manifests as a more fragmented and associative breakdown, while circumstantiality retains a looser but intact thread of connectivity.^[10] Clinically, distinguishing between these patterns is crucial, as misidentification can lead to inaccurate diagnostic assessments; tangential speech often signals more severe thought disorganization, potentially indicating greater impairment in psychotic or neurocognitive conditions compared to the relatively preserved goal-directedness in circumstantiality.^[9]^[1]

Comparison with Other Thought Disorders

Tangential speech is distinguished from derailment, also known as loosening of associations, primarily by the nature of the thought progression. In tangential speech, the individual begins with a relevant response but gradually diverges through increasingly loose and irrelevant associations, ultimately failing to return to the original topic or answer the question posed.^[1]^[3] In contrast, derailment involves abrupt, illogical interruptions where thoughts jump suddenly to unrelated or obliquely connected ideas, often resulting in fragmented and disconnected speech without any gradual buildup.^[11]^[12] This difference highlights tangential speech as a more meandering form of disorganization, while derailment reflects a sharper break in logical flow, frequently observed in schizophrenia.^[1] Compared to flight of ideas, tangential speech lacks the accelerated, pressured quality typical of manic states. Flight of ideas manifests as a rapid succession of superficially related thoughts expressed in hurried speech with frequent, abrupt topic shifts, often driven by heightened arousal.^[13] Tangential speech, however, proceeds at a normal or slower pace with a wandering, digressive pattern that builds irrelevant details without the frantic connectivity or speed.^[1]^[3] This distinction underscores tangential speech's association with disorganized thinking rather than the goal-directed but overactive ideation in mood disorders.^[14] Tangential speech can be viewed as a subtype of loose associations, but it differs in the degree of thematic relevance. While loose associations feature thoughts that are entirely unrelated or minimally connected, leading to incoherent and disjointed discourse, tangential speech retains some superficial thematic links that veer off into irrelevance without resolving the core inquiry.^[12]^[1] In tangentiality, the progression starts logically but drifts via associative tangents, whereas pure loose associations exhibit no discernible logical thread from the outset.^[3] Within the spectrum of formal thought disorders, tangential speech occupies a moderate position, bridging milder forms like circumstantiality—where the topic is eventually reached—and more severe fragmented disorders such as incoherence or word salad.^[15] This placement reflects its role in broader disorganized thinking patterns, often signaling underlying psychotic processes without the extreme disjunction seen in higher-severity variants.^[1]

Clinical Significance

Associated Conditions

Tangential speech is primarily associated with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, where it manifests as a key indicator of disorganized thinking and formal thought disorder (FTD).^[16] In these conditions, formal thought disorders including tangential speech contribute to communication breakdowns and are observed in up to 50% of patients based on large-scale assessments using scales like the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).^[16] Among other psychiatric conditions, tangential speech appears in bipolar disorder, particularly during manic phases, where it often accompanies pressured speech and flight of ideas, reflecting rapid and associative thought processes.^[17] It is also linked to schizotypal personality disorder, in which milder forms of FTD, including tangentiality, emerge as part of odd or vague speech patterns that impair social interactions.^[18] Additionally, it can occur in obsessive-compulsive disorder due to digressions related to obsessions, and in narcissistic personality disorder as part of grandiose or evasive communication styles.^[1] In neurological contexts, tangential speech is associated with temporal lobe epilepsy, where seizures may disrupt thought organization, and neurodegenerative diseases such as dementia, leading to impaired discourse coherence.^[4] In neurodevelopmental contexts, tangential speech has been observed in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), where it may stem from challenges in sustaining focus and organizing thoughts during discourse, though it is not a core DSM-5 symptom.^[19] Similarly, it is noted in autism spectrum disorder, often under stress, leading to disorganized or one-sided conversational patterns.^[20] For traumatic brain injury (TBI) affecting the frontal lobes, tangential speech arises from disruptions in executive functions like planning and inhibition, resulting in digressive and poorly structured narratives.^[21] Overall, while more characteristic of psychotic disorders, tangential speech in these conditions highlights underlying cognitive impairments.^[16]

Diagnosis and Assessment

The diagnosis of tangential speech primarily occurs through observation during psychiatric interviews, where clinicians employ open-ended questions to elicit spontaneous speech patterns and assess the patient's ability to maintain topic relevance.^[4] This approach allows for the passive evaluation of speech throughout the session, focusing on how responses deviate in real-time interactions.^[22] Key criteria for identifying tangential speech emphasize responses that are oblique, irrelevant, or distantly related to the probe without returning to the original topic, specifically in a stimulus-response mode such as immediate replies to interviewer questions.^[8] For instance, if asked about their hometown, a patient might shift to unrelated personal history without addressing the query directly. This pattern is often assessed in the context of conditions like schizophrenia, where it contributes to broader disorganized thinking.^[23] A standardized tool for assessment is the Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language, and Communication (TLC Scale), developed by Nancy Andreasen, which rates tangentiality on a 0-4 scale: 0 indicates no tangentiality, 1 mild (occurring once), 2 moderate (2-4 times), 3 severe (5-10 times), and 4 extreme (more than 10 times or rendering the interview incomprehensible).^[23] Ratings are derived from a structured 50-minute interview using predefined questions, with interrater reliability reported as good (weighted kappa of 0.58).^[8] Challenges in diagnosis include the inherent subjectivity of rating speech deviations, as judgments about relevance can vary between clinicians despite standardized scales like the TLC.^[23] Additionally, multiple observations across sessions are often necessary to differentiate pathological tangentiality from normative cultural or stylistic variations in communication, such as indirect or elaborate narrative forms in certain backgrounds.^[24]

Management

Treatment Options

Treatment of tangential speech primarily targets the underlying conditions through a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing thought disorganization and improving communication coherence. Management strategies vary by the associated disorder, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or temporal lobe epilepsy.

Pharmacological Interventions

Antipsychotic medications are commonly used to treat the underlying psychotic disorders associated with tangential speech, such as schizophrenia, by addressing positive symptoms including formal thought disorders. Second-generation antipsychotics, such as risperidone and olanzapine, are frequently prescribed. While these medications can help manage psychotic symptoms, those with high D2 receptor occupancy, like risperidone, may worsen language disturbances such as reduced speech fluency. In contrast, olanzapine and clozapine, with lower D2 occupancy, have a more favorable profile for minimizing adverse effects on speech production. Clozapine is reserved for treatment-resistant cases. Symptom improvement may occur within weeks to months, but side effects including sedation or extrapyramidal symptoms can impact speech.^[25] For tangential speech in bipolar disorder during manic or mixed episodes, mood stabilizers like lithium or valproic acid, often combined with antipsychotics, are standard to control symptoms like flight of ideas and pressured speech that may manifest as tangentiality.^[26] In temporal lobe epilepsy, antiseizure medications such as carbamazepine or levetiracetam target seizure control, which can reduce interictal language disturbances including tangential speech.^[1]

Psychotherapeutic Approaches

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) adapted for psychosis focuses on enhancing topic maintenance and structured thinking, helping individuals with tangential speech recognize and redirect off-topic digressions during conversations. Meta-analyses indicate that CBT, when added to antipsychotic treatment, yields small to medium effect sizes in reducing positive symptoms, including disorganized speech, with benefits persisting up to 18 months post-treatment. Speech-language therapy interventions, though less established, target communication skills by addressing pragmatic and discursive deficits, such as improving narrative coherence and turn-taking in dialogue. Emerging evidence supports integrating speech therapy to bolster verbal working memory and reduce tangential patterns linked to cognitive impairments.^[27]^[28]

Supportive Interventions

Social skills training (SST) programs teach practical strategies for maintaining conversational relevance, such as active listening and summarizing key points, which directly counteract tangential tendencies in group or social settings. SST has demonstrated efficacy in improving interpersonal communication for individuals with schizophrenia, leading to better social functioning and reduced isolation from speech-related challenges. These interventions are often delivered in group formats and combined with pharmacotherapy for optimal results.^[29] Studies on combined antipsychotic and CBT approaches report that approximately 40-50% of schizophrenia patients exhibit meaningful symptom reduction in thought disorders, including improved speech patterns, highlighting the value of multimodal treatment.^[30]^[31]

Prognosis and Outcomes

The prognosis for tangential speech, a form of formal thought disorder, varies significantly depending on the underlying condition and timeliness of intervention. In neurodevelopmental disorders such as ADHD, early behavioral and speech therapy can lead to substantial improvements in speech organization and fluency, often resulting in better long-term communication outcomes when initiated in childhood.^[32]^[33] In contrast, when associated with chronic psychotic disorders like schizophrenia, the prognosis is generally poorer, particularly without consistent treatment adherence, as negative forms of thought disorder tend to persist beyond acute episodes.^[34] Key factors influencing outcomes include the severity of tangential speech at onset, presence of comorbidities such as executive function deficits, and individual response to pharmacological interventions. For instance, disorganized dimensions of formal thought disorder in first-episode psychosis predict increased hospitalizations and reduced social functioning, with severity correlating to longer inpatient stays. In schizophrenia, approximately 40-60% of patients may achieve partial symptomatic remission with antipsychotic treatment, though negative thought disorders show lower response rates and higher persistence.^[35] Comorbid negative symptoms further exacerbate poor adherence and functional decline.^[36] Long-term effects of persistent tangential speech often include social isolation and impaired occupational functioning, as disrupted communication hinders interpersonal relationships and daily interactions.^[34] Untreated or severe cases are linked to higher relapse rates and diminished quality of life.^[37]

Historical Development

Early Descriptions

The concept of tangential speech traces its origins to 19th-century psychiatric observations of thought and language disruptions, particularly within the framework of emerging classifications of mental disorders. Emil Kraepelin, in his seminal 1896 description of dementia praecox—a term he used for what would later be recognized as schizophrenia—identified disturbances in the form of thought, including "derailment," characterized by a deviation from logical sequences and an inability to maintain coherent associations.^[38] This early conceptualization positioned such derailments as core features of the illness, arising from underlying brain deterioration and manifesting in fragmented verbal expression.^[39] Building on Kraepelin's work, Eugen Bleuler expanded these ideas in his 1911 monograph Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias, introducing the term "loosening of associations" to describe a fundamental disruption in the connections between ideas, which often resulted in speech that veered off-topic without returning to the original point—phenomena akin to modern tangentiality.^[40] Bleuler viewed this as a primary symptom, rooted in an organic alteration of psychic functions, and emphasized its role in distinguishing schizophrenia from other psychoses.^[41] Prior to these formalizations, earlier psychiatrists noted similar patterns in manic states during asylum-based studies, though without the specific label of tangentiality. In the early 19th century, Jean-Étienne Dominique Esquirol documented manic states, while in the late 19th century, Kraepelin described "flight of ideas" in mania, where rapid shifts in thought led to digressive and incoherent discourse, observed among patients in institutional settings.^[42] These informal accounts highlighted excessive verbosity and tangential drifts as hallmarks of elevated mood episodes, often contrasting them with more structured delusions.^[43] These early descriptions emerged amid broader 19th-century investigations into aphasia and thought disturbances in asylums, where clinicians like Paul Broca and Carl Wernicke explored links between brain lesions and language impairments, influencing psychiatric views on deviant speech as symptomatic of deeper cognitive unraveling.^[44] Such observations laid the groundwork for later refinements in understanding tangential speech as a distinct formal thought disorder.

Modern Conceptualization

In 1979, Nancy C. Andreasen formalized the concept of tangentiality within her pioneering work on thought, language, and communication disorders, defining it as a response to a question that is oblique or irrelevant, where the speaker digresses without directly addressing the query, though they may circle back in extended discourse. This definition was embedded in the Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language, and Communication (TLC), a structured tool designed to quantify formal thought disorders by rating speech samples on a 0-4 scale for severity, thereby enhancing inter-rater reliability from low levels (kappa <0.4) to moderate agreement (kappa >0.6) in clinical assessments. Post-1979 developments integrated tangential speech into standardized diagnostic frameworks, beginning with the DSM-III (1980), which categorized it under disorganized speech as an example of derailment—loose associations leading to irrelevant shifts—essential for diagnosing schizophrenia and related disorders. Subsequent editions, including DSM-IV and DSM-5, retained and refined this, emphasizing tangentiality's role in indicating impaired thought organization. Concurrent research linked tangential speech to neuroimaging evidence of frontal lobe dysfunction, such as reduced prefrontal activation during language tasks in schizophrenia patients, supporting models of executive control deficits in speech production. As of 2022, the DSM-5-TR continues to position tangential speech within disorganized speech criteria for psychotic disorders, specifying it as indirect or off-topic replies that hinder communication coherence. This formalization has profoundly influenced research, enabling quantitative longitudinal studies that correlate tangentiality severity with executive function impairments, such as deficits in cognitive flexibility measured via tasks like the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and tying modern views back to Bleuler's early notions of associative disturbances.^[21]

References

[1]
Circumstantiality - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Dec 11, 2024 · Tangentiality is a disturbance in the thought process that causes an individual to relate excessive or irrelevant detail that never reaches the ...Definition/Introduction · Issues of Concern · Nursing, Allied Health, and...
[2]
tangential speech - APA Dictionary of Psychology
verbal communication that repeatedly diverges from the original subject. Resulting from disorganized thought processes or a diminished ability to focus ...
[3]
tangentiality - APA Dictionary of Psychology
Apr 19, 2018 · a thought disturbance that is marked by oblique speech in which the person constantly digresses to irrelevant topics and fails to arrive at the ...
[4]
Mental Status Examination - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
A normal thought process is typically linear and goal-directed. Common descriptions of irregular thought processes are circumstantial, tangential, the flight of ...
[5]
Psychosis - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Tangential thought is where a person continually drifts from the topic of conversation, never to return to the original point. Word salad is an unintelligible ...
[6]
A Cognitive Neuroscience View of Schizophrenic Symptoms
There are several subcategories of thought disorder. Derailment or loose associations, tangential speech, incoherence or word salad (as in posterior aphasia), ...
[7]
None
### Summary of Tangential Speech and Loose Associations from Mental Status Exam Definitions
[8]
[PDF] Scale-for-the-assessment-of-thought-language-and-communication ...
Language behaviors such as associative loosening, clanging, blocking, over- concrete or repetitive speech, and poverty of speech also occur in other psychiatric ...
[9]
Circumstantial Thought Process: What It Is, and What Causes It
Aug 25, 2024 · A circumstantial thought process is also known as circumstantiality. It's when you include a lot of unneeded and unimportant details when you talk or write.
[10]
Formal Thought Disorders | Signs - MedSchool
Circumstantiality: overly detailed speech with eventual return to the topic of focus after many digressions. · Tangentiality: continuous diversion from the topic ...
[11]
derailment - APA Dictionary of Psychology
Apr 19, 2018 · n. a symptom of thought disorder, often occurring in individuals with schizophrenia, marked by frequent interruptions in thought and jumping ...
[12]
loosening of associations - APA Dictionary of Psychology
a thought disturbance demonstrated by speech that is disconnected and fragmented, with the individual jumping from one idea to another unrelated or indirectly ...
[13]
Flight of ideas - APA Dictionary of Psychology
Apr 19, 2018 · a rapid, continuous succession of superficially related thoughts and ideas, manifest as hurried speech with frequent abrupt shifts in topic.
[14]
How to Identify Flight of Ideas in Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia
Feb 24, 2020 · Tangential speech: Also known as tangentiality, this describes the phenomenon in which a person constantly digresses to random, irrelevant ...
[15]
Thought Disorder - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Thought disorder may be described along a spectrum of severity, with tangential and circumstantial thinking at the milder end, and loosening of associations ...
[16]
The Epidemiology and Associated Phenomenology of Formal ... - NIH
... formal thought disorder in schizophrenia. ... The psychosis of schizophrenia: prevalence, response to atypical antipsychotics, and prediction of outcome.
[17]
Thought and language disturbance in bipolar disorder quantified via ...
Oct 3, 2019 · Pressure of speech, with increased rapidity of speech and racing thoughts, is a common symptom of mania, second only to elevated mood. Manic ...
[18]
Formal thought disorder in childhood onset schizophrenia ... - PubMed
The Kiddie Formal Thought Disorder Rating Scale (K-FTDS) was examined in a sample of 29 schizophrenic, 10 schizotypal, and 54 normal children, aged 5-12.5 yrs.
[19]
Acoustic and Text Features Analysis for Adult ADHD Screening
... ADHD tend to engage in tangential speech patterns when compared to normal controls. Consequently, the dataset contains a larger volume of ADHD-related data ...
[20]
Recognizing and Treating Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders in People ...
Aug 29, 2019 · When people with ASD are under stress they can have more disorganized and tangential speech, which is typically attributable to anxiety ...
[21]
Neurocognitive Implications of Tangential Speech in Patients with ...
In summary, the present study aimed to explore, in patients with focal brain injuries, if TS is associated with cognitive, emotional or behavioral impairments ...1. Introduction · 2. Material And Methods · 5. Discussion<|control11|><|separator|>
[22]
Psychiatric Interview: Overview, Identification and Chief Symptom ...
Dec 17, 2018 · Tangential - If responses begin to relate to a question but veer off into unrelated topics. Circumstantial - The response eventually does answer ...
[23]
Scale for the assessment of thought, language, and ... - PubMed
Scale for the assessment of thought, language, and communication (TLC). Schizophr Bull. 1986;12(3):473-82. doi: 10.1093/schbul/12.3.473. Author. N C Andreasen.Missing: tangentiality | Show results with:tangentiality
[24]
Cultural Assessment and Treatment of Psychiatric Patients - NCBI
Cultural sensitivity remains a crucial aspect of diagnosing and treating psychiatric patients. There are many culture-specific syndromes and pharmacologic ...Missing: tangential speech
[25]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7477551/
[26]
Meta-analysis and Meta-regression of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ...
May 19, 2020 · Findings indicate small-to-medium effects of CBTp for psychotic symptoms, with increasing effectiveness across time for delusions.<|control11|><|separator|>
[27]
Schizophrenia: Communication Disorders and Role of the Speech ...
Integrating speech therapy in treatment for individuals with schizophrenia ... Treatment resistant schizophrenia and response to antipsychotics: A review.
[28]
https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00287
[29]
Response rates in patients with schizophrenia and positive ...
Dec 4, 2018 · Results revealed that CBT is efficacious for treating patients with schizophrenia who present positive symptoms, which had a significant benefit ...Missing: tangential speech
[30]
Antipsychotic drugs versus cognitive behavioural therapy ... - NIH
Efficacy did not differ significantly between the CBT group and the antipsychotic group, which is noteworthy given that CBT finished after 24 weeks whereas ...
[31]
ADHD and Speech Development & Delay
Oct 5, 2023 · Early intervention can improve outcomes and assist children in overcoming speech development delays while more effectively managing their ADHD ...
[32]
How Speech Therapy Can Help Children With ADHD | Washington DC
Oct 18, 2024 · For children with ADHD, early intervention through speech therapy can significantly improve communication skills, making a positive impact on ...
[33]
Thought Disorder as a Neglected Dimension in Schizophrenia - PMC
TD is a multidimensional construct, as it refers to thinking, language, and communication abnormalities. TD is found in many patients with schizophrenia during ...
[34]
Remission in schizophrenia: validity, frequency, predictors ... - NIH
The proportion of patients who met either remission criteria at any time during the study period (8 to 52 weeks) was 66% (n=1825; 902 patients met RSWG criteria ...
[35]
Relation of formal thought disorder to symptomatic remission and ...
In particular, negative FTD is associated with poor response to treatment [8], and it is less likely to achieve remission in patients with schizophrenia having ...
[36]
Detection of formal thought disorders in child and adolescent ...
Mar 16, 2025 · The presence of FTDs is also a poor prognostic factor, heralding a limited response to therapeutics and a decreased rate of remission. FTDs are ...
[37]
The prognosis of schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta ...
(2013) conducted a meta-analysis on follow-up studies of schizophrenia of varying durations with details on recovery and found a mean recovery rate of 16.4 %, ...<|separator|>
[38]
The Development of Kraepelin's Concept of Dementia Praecox
Nov 1, 2020 · Emil Kraepelin brought together 3 syndromes to form the first and second of his 2 prequels to dementia praecox (DP), a definitive version of which he would ...
[39]
https://journals.lww.com/jonmd/Fulltext/2011/02000/Thought_Disorder_Severity_in_Compromised%2C.8.aspx
[40]
Eugen Bleuler and the Schizophrenias: 100 Years After - PMC
Loosening of associations is of particular relevance in Bleuler's model of schizophrenia because this symptom is intended to be primary—close to the organic ...
[41]
Eugen Bleuler's Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias ...
We conclude that Bleuler's ideas on schizophrenia warrant reexamination in the light of current criticism of the emphasis on psychotic symptoms in the ...
[42]
Formal Thought Disorders–Historical Roots - Frontiers
Nov 8, 2018 · In this article the authors intend to review in an intelligible and comprehensive way the historical roots of Formal Thought Disorders.
[43]
signs and symptoms described in psychiatric texts from 1880 to 1900
Oct 11, 2017 · Most definitively, Kraepelin's first description of mania from 1883 included 21 of the 22 characteristic manic symptoms and closely resembled in ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
[44]
A historical perspective on the neurobiology of speech and language
Sep 18, 2024 · The purpose of this article is to trace the origins of the neurobiology of speech and language in the nineteenth century and explore its ...