Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Tap code

Tap code is a rudimentary signaling system for encoding and transmitting alphabetic messages via sequences of taps, typically on cell walls, pipes, or bars, employing a 5×5 grid () that maps 25 letters of the —usually combining C and K or I and J—to row and column positions, with each letter signaled by the corresponding pair of tap counts separated by a brief pause. Introduced to American prisoners of war in in June 1965 by Captain Carlyle "Smitty" Harris and Lieutenants Phillip , Robert , and Robert Shumaker while confined in (the "Hanoi Hilton"), the code enabled isolated inmates to exchange personal messages, intelligence, and directives for resisting interrogations and maintaining military structure. By August 1965, it had proliferated among most POWs despite detection risks, transforming into a network of subtle communication that fostered unity, humor, and defiance against captors' psychological tactics. Its adoption underscored the code's ease of memorization and execution—requiring no tools beyond rhythmic tapping—allowing even severely tortured prisoners to participate, with pauses delineating letters and an "X" (5-2 taps) serving as punctuation to structure transmissions.

System and Mechanics

The Polybius-Inspired Grid

The tap code utilizes a 5×5 grid, adapted from the ancient , to assign each letter of the a unique pair of coordinates corresponding to row and column positions. This structure enables encoding by translating letters into sequences of taps, where the first group of taps indicates the row and the second the column, separated by a pause. The grid excludes the letter K—typically represented by C in decoding when needed—to fit 25 letters into the matrix, allowing I and J to occupy distinct positions. The standard arrangement follows in row-major sequence:
12345
1ABCDE
2FGHIJ
3LMNOP
4QRSTU
5VWXYZ
This layout traces its inspiration to the , documented by the Greek historian (c. 200–118 BC) in his Histories as a method for long-distance signaling via torch positions, where coordinates replaced letters to facilitate transmission by observers. In tap code applications, the grid's numerical coordinates convert to auditory or tactile signals: for instance, "A" (row 1, column 1) is conveyed as a single tap, a pause, then another single tap; "R" (row 4, column 2) as four taps, pause, two taps. Variations in grid filling or letter omission exist across implementations, but the alphabetical row-wise order predominates in documented prison and military uses for its memorability and simplicity.

Encoding and Transmission Methods

Tap code encodes letters using a 5×5 where each letter corresponds to a unique row and column coordinate, with the letters I and J typically combined in a single cell. To transmit a , the sender produces a series of taps equal to the row number (1 to 5 quick taps), followed by a brief pause, then another series equal to the column number, with a longer pause signaling the end of the letter. For instance, the "A" at position (1,1) requires one tap, pause, one tap; "S" at (4,3) requires four taps, pause, three taps. Transmission occurs through physical on rigid surfaces to propagate vibrations or sounds to adjacent cells, commonly using metal bars, , or concrete walls in or settings. Senders often employ knuckles, rings, or small objects to generate distinct, audible knocks, ensuring the rhythm distinguishes intra-number taps (minimal pause), inter-coordinate pauses (short), and inter-letter pauses (long). This method relies on auditory or tactile reception by the recipient, who listens or feels the vibrations through shared structural elements.

Decoding and Error Correction

Decoding in tap code requires the recipient to interpret sequences of taps as coordinates on a 5x5 grid, which maps the 25 letters of the (typically combining C and K in one cell, omitting J). The sender transmits each letter by tapping a number of times equal to the row (1 to 5 taps), pausing briefly to signal the transition, then tapping the column number (1 to 5 taps), followed by a longer pause or silence to delineate the letter. The recipient counts the taps in the first group to identify the row, awaits the pause, counts the second group for the column, and cross-references the intersection on the memorized grid to retrieve the letter; this process repeats letter-by-letter for the message, with word separations often indicated by longer silences or contextual spacing. Error correction in tap code lacks formal parity checks or redundancy schemes typical of engineered codes, relying instead on informal, interactive protocols adapted to the medium's constraints. Senders signal transmission errors—such as miscounts or interruptions—by producing a burst of rapid, irregular taps (e.g., several quick taps in succession) to alert the recipient, after which the sender restarts the affected or . Recipients, upon detecting ambiguities through or unfamiliar combinations, can request clarification by tapping back a predefined signal (e.g., a repeat query like "" for "repeat") or echoing the received for , enabling bidirectional adjustment in adjacent cells. In prolonged uses, such as among U.S. POWs in from 1965 onward, integrity was further maintained through deliberate repetition of critical content, slow pacing to minimize miscounts, and reliance on shared linguistic to infer and correct minor distortions without explicit codes.

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Modern Origins

The , the encoding foundation of tap code, originated in during the Hellenistic period, circa 200–150 BCE. Credited to the scholars Cleoxenus and Democleitus, it was documented by the historian in Book X of his Histories, where he described its use for coordinating military signals over long distances. The system organized the Greek alphabet (excluding certain letters or combining them) into a 5x5 grid, with letters identified by their row and column positions—typically signaled visually by holding torches in corresponding spots on a pair of frames, one for rows and one for columns. This allowed sentinels on hilltops to transmit messages letter by letter, enabling rapid communication across battlefields or cities without verbal shouts or messengers, as demonstrated in Polybius's account of its potential to convey complex intelligence like enemy movements. Originally designed for optical rather than auditory transmission, the emphasized discrete, coordinate-based encoding to minimize errors in noisy or distant environments. Polybius highlighted its efficiency for naval and land forces, noting that with practiced operators, it could rival the speed of while resisting interception by non-equipped observers. Archaeological and textual , including references in later adaptations, confirms its practical deployment in and Hellenistic military contexts, predating similar coordinate systems by over two millennia. However, no contemporary sources indicate its use for tactile or methods in ; such innovations required confined, silent settings absent from ancient descriptions. Pre-modern adaptations of grid-based codes remained sparse and undocumented until the , with no verified instances of tapping on walls or pipes prior to industrialized incarceration systems. Early prisoner communications often relied on simpler sequential knocks (e.g., A as one tap, B as two), as reported in accounts from European gaols, but these lacked the grid's positional efficiency. The square's revival for covert signaling appears in military cryptography during conflicts like the Boer War (1899–1902), where British forces employed it for basic , though again primarily in written or visual forms rather than percussive. This historical gap underscores that while the algorithmic core traces to , tap code's practical auditory form crystallized in 20th-century captivity, adapting ancient principles to modern isolation.

Adoption in Prison Environments

Tap code, also known as knock code, emerged as a covert communication method in settings where verbal interaction was prohibited or severely restricted, such as or high-security isolation units. Inmates transmit messages by tapping on walls, pipes, metal bars, or floors, leveraging the acoustic properties of infrastructure to propagate sounds between cells. This system allows for letter-by-letter encoding without visual or spoken cues, making it suitable for environments enforcing silence to prevent coordination or morale-building among . Its adoption stems from the practical need for and in dehumanizing conditions, predating formalized applications and rooted in the simplicity of the 5x5 grid adapted for auditory signals. Documented instances of tap code use in civilian prisons date to the , including among political prisoners who employed similar knocking systems to share intelligence and maintain solidarity under tsarist repression. In modern examples, Somali physician Adan Abokor utilized a knock-based code during his imprisonment in the 1980s under the regime; isolated in , he tapped out the entire text of Leo Tolstoy's —approximately 350,000 words—to sustain the of a neighboring inmate on the verge of , demonstrating the code's role in . Such adaptations highlight tap code's versatility in non-Western penal systems, where guards often overlooked rhythmic tapping as mere noise rather than structured language. In Western prisons, including U.S. facilities, tap code persists in supermax and administrative segregation units, where in adjacent cells exchange names, warnings, or plans despite electronic focused on verbal or visual signals. Adoption proliferates organically through inmate subcultures, as the code requires no tools beyond or improvised objects like cups, and its low-tech nature evades detection in analog-heavy older prisons. However, prison administrations have countered it with , irregular cell layouts, and disciplinary measures against detected tapping, limiting its reliability in contemporary high-tech facilities.

Prominent Use in 20th-Century Military Captivity

Tap code achieved its most widespread and documented use among U.S. prisoners of war in North Vietnamese captivity during the , enabling covert inter-cell communication in facilities like , dubbed the "Hanoi Hilton." U.S. Air Force Captain Carlyle A. "Smitty" Harris, captured after his F-105 Thunderchief was shot down on April 4, 1965, during a strike on the , introduced the system shortly after arrival. Harris had memorized the 5x5 grid from a pre-war Air Force instructor who described its application by POWs tapping on shared water pipes. Prisoners encoded letters by tapping row and column numbers sequentially—pausing between pairs—with the grid omitting J and combining it with I to fit 25 characters. Harris covertly taught the code to early arrivals like Navy Lieutenant Commander Shumaker, who disseminated it further despite risks of detection and . By August 1965, tapping echoed through walls and across cells, allowing transmission of names, ranks, shoot-down dates, and resistance guidelines. This network sustained morale amid isolation, torture, and propaganda efforts, as messages relayed compliance standards like the "four big things" to avoid (no false confessions, no harming fellow POWs, no accepting , no fraternizing with captors). Over 2,871 days for Harris until release on February 12, 1973, the linked hundreds of POWs across camps, preserving command structure and unity—evident when synchronized Christmas carol taps defied guards. Its efficacy stemmed from simplicity and adaptability, evolving from WWII precedents but scaled systematically in to counter enforced silence.

Applications and Contexts

Communication in Incarceration

Tap code, also referred to as knock code, enables incarcerated individuals to transmit messages between cells by tapping sequences on shared walls, pipes, or bars, circumventing restrictions on verbal or visual communication. Each letter is represented by a pair of taps corresponding to its position in a 5-by-5 grid of the alphabet, with pauses distinguishing row from column counts, allowing slow but reliable exchange of full sentences over time. This technique persists in solitary confinement or high-security settings where guards monitor overt interactions, as isolated taps blend with ambient prison noises like footsteps or clanging doors. Historical records document its use among political prisoners in Tsarist Russia, where nihilists adapted a Cyrillic variant to convey revolutionary plans and personal messages through thick cell walls, predating its documented military applications. In the Soviet era, inmates in facilities like Moscow's Lefortovo Prison employed similar knocking systems; American prisoner Alexander Dolgun, held from 1975 to 1978, learned and used it to decode messages by associating taps with letters via memorized aids like matchstick grids. These codes facilitated morale maintenance, information sharing on guard routines, and subtle resistance, with users developing protocols like rhythmic pauses to confirm receipt and minimize detection risks. In contemporary civilian prisons, tap code variants aid in coordinating illicit activities, relaying warnings, or sustaining social bonds despite isolation protocols; for instance, systems in U.S. facilities involve pipes to signal arrivals or threats, though wardens counter with or surveillance. Its simplicity requires no tools beyond body or improvised objects like cups, making it adaptable across languages via grid modifications, but transmission speed—often 1-2 letters per minute—limits it to essential, non-urgent exchanges. Despite occasional guard awareness, the code's persistence underscores its role in preserving agency amid enforced silence, with documented instances in supermax units where alternatives like notes are infeasible.

Military and POW Scenarios

Tap code gained prominence as a covert communication method among American prisoners of war (POWs) during the , enabling isolated captives to exchange information despite and guard surveillance. In the , derisively called the "Hanoi Hilton" by inmates, U.S. Captain Carlyle "Smitty" Harris, shot down over on April 4, 1965, introduced the system to fellow POWs after recalling it from survival training. Harris shared the code with Phillip A. Butler, Lieutenant William M. "Bill" Lawrence, and Lieutenant in June 1965, marking its initial dissemination among the early shoot-downs held there. By August 1965, the method had proliferated across the facility, with POWs tapping sequences on cell walls, metal beds, or plumbing pipes to convey letters via the 5x5 grid, where the first tap series indicated the row and the second the column (combining C and K in position 1-3). This allowed transmission of critical updates, such as resistance strategies, names of new arrivals, and morale-boosting messages, fostering a sense of unity among the approximately 500 American POWs eventually held in prisons, predominantly downed aviators. Harris himself endured 2,871 days in captivity, during which the code facilitated underground coordination that undermined captor efforts to break prisoner cohesion. Guards periodically detected the tapping—audible as rhythmic knocks—and responded with , including beatings and extended , yet the system's simplicity and deniability ensured its persistence as a psychological lifeline. During events like the on July 6, 1966, where 52 POWs were paraded through streets before crowds, pre-march tap code exchanges reinforced the "" adherence, emphasizing name, rank, service number, and date of birth only. Beyond Hỏa Lò, the code spread to other North Vietnamese camps, sustaining communication networks that preserved operational security and mental resilience until the facilitated releases starting in 1973. Its efficacy stemmed from low-tech execution requiring no tools beyond a knuckle or fingernail, making it adaptable to the austere, monitored conditions of military detention.

Survival and Non-Institutional Uses

Tap code has been recommended in as a low-tech method for communicating through physical barriers or over short distances in emergencies, such as being trapped in collapsed structures, caves, or during disasters like earthquakes or accidents. By tapping out the row and column numbers corresponding to letters on a 5x5 grid, individuals can spell messages on available surfaces like walls, pipes, or the ground, enabling coordination with rescuers or companions without voice or equipment. This approach requires only basic memorization of the grid, making it accessible for rapid deployment in high-stress or scenarios where verbal signals fail due to noise, injury, or separation. In wilderness contexts, extends beyond auditory knocks to improvised signals, such as rhythmic strikes with sticks on trees or rocks to alert distant group members of location or distress, serving as a simpler alternative to that avoids the need for distinguishing dots from dashes. guides emphasize its utility for pre-planned team signaling during hikes, hunts, or expeditions, where participants agree on the beforehand to transmit coordinates, warnings, or requests for aid. For example, it can convey essential phrases like "HELP" (4-3, 2-3, 2-4, 3-4) through patterned taps, potentially critical in or remote terrain where visibility is limited. Non-institutional adaptations include its promotion in civilian preparedness for scenarios like home invasions, kidnappings, or improvised situations, where subtle wall-tapping allows discreet message relay between separated victims. Additionally, some response training incorporates tap code for aiding those with temporary communication impairments, such as in entrapments or floods, prioritizing its error-resistant paired-tap structure over more complex systems. While primarily auditory, variations using light flashes or drum beats have been suggested for open environments, though efficacy diminishes beyond close range without .

Strengths and Limitations

Operational Advantages

Tap code facilitates communication across physical barriers, such as cell walls or pipes, enabling isolated individuals to exchange messages without line-of-sight or verbal interaction, which is particularly advantageous in high-security incarceration where guards restrict direct contact. In the Hoa Lo Prison during the , U.S. POWs utilized taps on shared structures to propagate signals discreetly, allowing coordination among cells separated by despite protocols. This acoustic transmission method leverages vibrations in solid materials, reducing the need for proximity and minimizing visual cues that could betray the activity to observers. The system's design, based on a 5x5 grid assigning letters A-I to rows and columns (with C/K sharing position 2-3 and J omitted or merged with I), promotes ease of encoding and decoding under , as operators need only count taps for row and column positions separated by a pause, without requiring external aids like paper or instruments. POWs in , starting from Navy Roberson's introduction in August 1965, rapidly disseminated the code through initial verbal teaching, enabling widespread adoption by over 200 captives by late 1965 for relaying personal updates, intelligence, and morale-boosting affirmations. Its mnemonic simplicity—tied to the familiar alphabetic sequence—allowed quick mastery, even by personnel fatigued from interrogation or injury, contrasting with more complex ciphers that demand prolonged study. Operationally, tap code offers resilience against interception, as soft taps can mimic incidental noises like shifting restraints or coughing, evading detection unless captors maintain constant auditory surveillance, which proved impractical in understaffed facilities like Hỏa Lò. During punitive phases from 1967 to 1969, when overt signaling risked torture—such as three days of beatings—prisoners defaulted to this method for 90% of inter-cell exchanges, sustaining operational continuity for resistance efforts like synchronized protests. The protocol's built-in pauses and repeatable sequences further enhance error detection, permitting clarification taps to resolve ambiguities from distance-attenuated signals or ambient interference, thereby upholding message fidelity in austere conditions.

Practical Drawbacks and Criticisms

Tap code's primary practical limitation is its low transmission speed, typically achieving around 10 words per minute under optimal conditions with short intervals between taps, far slower than verbal speech or even equivalents adapted for tapping. This slowness arises from the need to encode each letter via two sequences of 1 to 5 taps separated by a pause, requiring up to 10 taps for letters like , which demands precise counting and rhythm to avoid errors or signal blending. Prolonged use for extended messages becomes tedious, as the repetitive tapping fatigues the sender and risks misinterpretation without strict timing discipline. The code mandates memorization of a 5x5 grid (omitting K or combining I/J), imposing a that, while simpler than for beginners in short bursts, hinders rapid adoption among uninitiated users and limits its utility in scenarios. Its reliance on auditory transmission through walls or pipes restricts range to adjacent cells, rendering it ineffective over distances or in isolated confinement without conductive mediums, and vulnerable to environmental noise that obscures faint taps. Detectability poses a security risk, as rhythmic patterns of taps can mimic construction noise but accumulate into suspicious volumes, as observed in Vietnam War POW camps where widespread use made facilities audibly active like workshops, potentially alerting guards to coordinated activity. Although rarely intercepted directly due to its simplicity masking intent, guards who learned the system could decode messages, as occurred when authorities understood related signals in some camps, leading to separations or punishments. The grid's exclusion of numbers, , and full variants further constrains expressiveness, necessitating workarounds that extend transmission time and introduce , making it unsuitable for precise or urgent data like coordinates or timestamps without predefined adaptations. Overall, while effective for morale-boosting brevity in , these constraints render tap code inefficient for substantive or high-volume exchanges compared to visual or alternatives.

Legacy and Representations

Influence on Modern Communication Techniques

The tap code's grid-based encoding has informed contemporary assistive communication devices and interfaces designed for individuals with motor impairments, where users input text via sequential taps on simplified grids rather than precise key presses. Researchers have adapted prison-derived knock codes into text entry systems that prioritize ease of use and minimal physical effort, enabling non-verbal signaling through vibrations or knocks detectable by sensors. For example, tap-code variants have been explored for communication tools, allowing users to convey letters by tapping anywhere on a device surface without targeting specific areas, thus accommodating tremors or reduced mobility. Similar decoding approaches leverage to interpret irregular tap patterns in , enhancing for those with severe communication disabilities. In and , tap code principles persist as a foundational for low-bandwidth, covert signaling in austere environments lacking aids. U.S. forces integrate tap code into resiliency programs, service members to encode and decode messages via wall or pipe taps to simulate POW isolation and foster mental endurance, as demonstrated in training sessions referencing Vietnam-era applications. This extends to broader curricula, where the method's reliance on auditory cues alone—without visual or dependencies—serves as a model for improvised communication during capture or scenarios, emphasizing memorization of the 5x5 for rapid deployment. The code's emphasis on discrete, deniable signals has parallels in modern pattern-based , such as knock code unlocks on devices, which require tapping grid positions in sequence to access functions, mirroring the tap code's positional encoding while adding layers of user-defined complexity for . However, these commercial implementations prioritize brevity over full alphabetic transmission, adapting the core idea for everyday frictionless interaction rather than prolonged clandestine messaging. Overall, tap code's legacy underscores the value of mnemonic, resource-light protocols in bridging gaps where advanced technology fails, influencing resilient design in both human-centered and tactical communication frameworks.

Depictions in Media and Culture

In the 2021 action thriller film , directed by , trapped miners in a collapsed Canadian diamond mine employ tap code by knocking on metal pipes to signal rescuers and convey critical information about their survival and the cause of the disaster. This portrayal underscores the code's utility in high-stakes, isolated environments beyond traditional incarceration, drawing on its historical association with covert signaling. Tap code appears in literary works depicting imprisonment and resistance. In Arthur Koestler's 1940 novel , the protagonist Nikolai Rubashov, confined in a , uses a rudimentary knock code to exchange messages with an adjacent inmate, facilitating subtle coordination amid and . The technique highlights themes of human endurance and clandestine defiance against authoritarian control, predating the code's widespread adoption in mid-20th-century military contexts. Non-fictional accounts have also influenced cultural representations, as seen in memoirs and documentaries. The 2019 book Tap Code by Carlyle "Smitty" Harris details the code's invention and use among U.S. POWs in Vietnam's ( Hilton), inspiring adaptations in educational media and veteran testimonies that emphasize its role in maintaining morale and command structure. Similarly, PBS's series features segments on the tap code in episodes about POWs, illustrating its transmission via taps on cell walls to share intelligence and resist captors. These depictions reinforce the code's legacy as a symbol of ingenuity in adversity, though fictional uses often simplify its 5x5 grid for dramatic effect.

References

  1. [1]
    The Tap Code | American Experience | Official Site - PBS
    A secret code based on a five-by-five alphabet matrix. Each letter was communicated by tapping two numbers: the first designated the horizontal row and the ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  2. [2]
    So, Tap Code: A Simple Grid Guide
    Feb 15, 2022 · Tap code is a simple Morse code-like method to transmit a message—letter-by-letter—with a grouped series of tapping. The alphabet is broken up ...
  3. [3]
    The Vietnam Tap Code - National Veterans Memorial Museum
    Provide a brief history of Vietnam POWs, support a discussion on the importance of communication between people in dire times, teach the tap code to the group.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    Polybius and communication codes | Teaching London Computing
    Polybius was an Ancient Greek Historian born around 200 BC, but he wasn't just interested in history. He also perfected a useful communication code that could ...
  5. [5]
    Polybius Square - multiwingspan
    The Polybius square dates back to somewhere between 200 and 120BC and is an important tool for codes and ciphers. Depending on the means of communication, the ...
  6. [6]
    Polybius Square - Crypto Corner - Interactive Maths
    The Polybius Square is a very old technique for converting the letters of the alphabet into 2 digit numbers. Useful in lots of situations, like tapping a code
  7. [7]
    Tap Code - N6CC
    Dec 25, 2010 · First tap(s) indicated the ROW NUMBER, second tap(s) indicates the COLUMN NUMBER of the letter to be sent. Example: The letter S would be sent: ...
  8. [8]
    Tap Code Cipher - Knock Code - Online Decoder, Encoder, Translator
    The tap code cipher uses a grid of letters, usually 5x5, containing 25 of the 26 letters of the alphabet. The letter that is omitted is often J (replaced by I ) ...Tap Code Decoder · Tap Code Encoder · How to encrypt using Tap code...
  9. [9]
    Tap (Knock) Code - CacheSleuth
    The Tap Code (or Knock Code) is based on a 5×5 grid of letters, representing all the letters of the Latin alphabet except K (C is used instead).Missing: 5x5 | Show results with:5x5
  10. [10]
    No Such Puzzle: Tap Codes - National Security Agency
    Aug 10, 2024 · The tap code, sometimes called the knock code, is a way to encode text messages on a letter-by-letter basis. It has been used by prisoners to communicate with ...
  11. [11]
    Tap Code Translator - Boxentriq
    Tap code is a way to encode text messages, commonly used by prisoners. This tool translates text to and from tap code, using a Polybius square.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Vietnam Tap Code - National Veterans Memorial Museum
    Developed by four American POWs who were imprisoned in North Vietnam beginning in. 1965, the 5x5 grid system is separated by rows and columns.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] How to use the secret pow tap code
    To send a message using this tap code, tap out one letter at a time using the grid on the POW Tap Code Worksheet. First, start at the top of the grid and tap ...
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    Ancient Cybersecurity III: From Greek Fire-signalling to WWI Code ...
    Feb 12, 2022 · The Polybius square has reportedly been used for simple cryptographic communications of this kind by the British army in the Boer War, and by ...Missing: tapping evidence
  17. [17]
    He Was Imprisoned And Losing His Mind. 'Anna Karenina' Saved Him
    Mar 29, 2019 · How Tolstoy's 'Anna Karenina' Saved A Political Prisoner's Life In Somalia ... The person tapping back was Dr. Adan Abokor, the director of that ...
  18. [18]
    We survived 7 years of solitary confinement by tapping Anna ... - BBC
    Jun 21, 2016 · The incredible story of Adan Abokor who, through a code of knocks, tapped out the entirety of Tolstoy's epic Anna Karenina on a prison wall, ...Missing: doctor Somalia
  19. [19]
    The Secret Codes of Prisons: How Inmates Communicate
    Aug 22, 2025 · The system was famously used by American POWs in Vietnam, who tapped messages from cell to cell. But the method has much older roots.Missing: earliest | Show results with:earliest
  20. [20]
    8-year POW recalls return home 45 years later > Columbus Air ...
    Feb 7, 2018 · Harris spent 2,871 days in Vietnam as a POW after being shot down April 4, 1965, during a bombing run targeting the Thanh Hoa Bridge, one of ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  21. [21]
    Carlyle 'Smitty' Harris, Vietnam POW Who Originated 'Tap Code,' Dies
    Jul 14, 2025 · Harris was shot down over North Vietnam on April 4, 1965, while flying an attack run against the Than Hoa bridge in an F-105 during the Rolling ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  22. [22]
    The Code > > Display - Airman Magazine
    Jan 27, 2016 · An error occurred. Try watching this video on www.youtube.com ... At the Hanoi Hilton and other POW camps in Vietnam, the tap code was ...
  23. [23]
    Bio, Harris, Carlyle S. "Smitty" - P.O.W. Network
    captured and held in and around Hanoi until his release in February 1973. When the smoke cleared, observer aircraft found that the bridge still spanned the ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Prisoner of War Tap Code - WW2 Escape Lines Memorial Society
    The code was a means of transmitting intelligence and information to other prisoners; also it kept the prisoners occupied and helped to keep up their morale.
  25. [25]
    Russia's Prison Knocking Language - The Eurasian Knot
    Feb 16, 2024 · Prisoners used purposeful “tuks, tuks, tuks” in a coded pattern to communicate through their cells' thick granite walls. This syntax of taps ...
  26. [26]
    The Russian Prison Tapping Code - Futility Closet
    Jul 19, 2018 · When Yevgenia Ginzburg became a prisoner at Stalin's Black Lake prison in the 1930s, she and her cellmate noticed a curious pattern.Missing: earliest | Show results with:earliest
  27. [27]
    (PDF) "Tuk, tuk, tuk!": A History of Russia's Prison Knocking Language
    This was 'knocking language' [perestukivanie] – a coded system of knocks and taps used by incarcerated Russian revolutionaries to communicate with one another ...
  28. [28]
    Tap Code: The Epic Survival Tale of a Vietnam POW and the Secret ...
    May 26, 2023 · The author, Col. Carlyle Harris, affectionally known as “Smitty,” an Air Force F105 pilot in the Vietnam War, looks back at his time as a prisoner of war (POW).
  29. [29]
    The POW Story
    A “tap code” of knocks and a “deaf mute” code of hand signals were the only ways POWs could communicate. Hundreds of American POW's, mostly airmen, endured ...
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    Surviving an IED; Tap Code - Survival Dispatch
    Sep 26, 2023 · Use when distance, circumstances, or barriers prevent verbal conversation. With a series of knocks you can signal individual letters to create ...
  32. [32]
    Signaling 101 for Survival
    Dec 27, 2018 · ... Knock code or Tap code. The vertical index is sent first, then the horizontal, so the letter “L” would be three knocks (or mirror flashes) ...
  33. [33]
    Top 10 Signaling Techniques for Wilderness Survival
    If you don't want to spend the hours it takes to learn Morse Code, there's a much simpler code called Tap Code which has been used by soldiers, which can be ...
  34. [34]
    Signalling without Morse Code -- The Simple POW Tap Code - Reddit
    May 28, 2018 · ... POW tap code is very useful. Even if you don't know or ... You can rapidly tap or swipe your hand across the surface to indicate a mistake.TIL a quiet American POW was nicknamed "The Incredibly Stupid ...Man In The Iron Mask tap code. : r/FlashTV - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  35. [35]
    Tap Code Communication - Survivaltek
    Nov 21, 2015 · A code was developed using “taps” that were used by prisoners of war that could be used by tapping on anything such as a pipe, bar, wall... whatever produced a ...
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    [PDF] The Battle Behind Bars - Naval History and Heritage Command
    The most effective technique, and the one which became the most commonly used by. American prisoners in the North, was the tap code. Through this method, the ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Tap Code - Cloudfront.net
    Using the code, we could softly tap messages ... Smitty was the code bearer who enabled us to connect and communicate— the two most vital needs of every POW.
  39. [39]
    Faith in captivity: Vietnam War POW inspires Airmen - AF.mil
    Apr 30, 2013 · The punishment for communicating was three days and three nights of torture, but the prisoners communicated for hours using the tap code to ...Missing: advantages | Show results with:advantages
  40. [40]
    Social Support: Learning the Tap Code (Chapter 6) - Resilience
    Within months of its adoption, the Tap Code formed the backbone of the prisoners' communication network and resistance efforts at Hoa Lo and beyond. Here's ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] a code similar to Morse code for communication by tapping - arXiv
    Apr 18, 2013 · Tap code is a binary code for communication using only sound or silence, similar to Morse code, but using a short signal and a pause.
  42. [42]
    Kostas explores an alternative to Morse Code that's been used in ...
    Jun 8, 2022 · TAP disadvantages · Speed limit issues probably. TAP beginners achieve for sure faster speeds than Morse beginners. · Learning the table by heart, ...
  43. [43]
    Exploring Russian Tap-Code Text Entry Adaptions for Users with ...
    ... tap-codes, or knock codes, which were commonly used to communicate between prison inmates. Tapping does not require the user to hit a specific target. This ...Missing: contemporary | Show results with:contemporary
  44. [44]
    An Efficient Knock Code Decoding Approach to assist the People ...
    Jun 16, 2023 · 1: Knock code encoding scheme for English alphabet · 2: Overview of the proposed method · 3: Sound wave graph image of a knock sound pattern Fig.
  45. [45]
    Video - What's your Tap Code? - DVIDS
    Feb 4, 2018 · Jim Myers, the 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit chaplain, explains the 'Tap Code,' a secret communication code developed by U.S. prisoners of ...Missing: solitary confinement civilian examples
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Knock, Knock. Who's There? On the Security of LG's Knock Codes
    Aug 10, 2020 · Knock Codes are a knowledge-based unlock authentication scheme used on LG smartphones where a user enters a code by tapping or “knocking” a ...Missing: contemporary | Show results with:contemporary
  47. [47]
    The Ice Road (2021) Movie Script - SubsLikeScript
    The Ice Road (2021) - full transcript. After a remote diamond mine collapses ... That sounds like tap code. You men, give us a hand. Somebody had to ...
  48. [48]
    Tap Code - multiwingspan
    Tap code (or knock code) is a simple way to encode text messages using co-ordinates. It has been used by prisoners to communicate by tapping on walls, pipes or ...
  49. [49]
    Rediscover: Darkness at Noon | Shelf Awareness
    Jan 31, 2020 · Darkness at Noon by Hungarian British author Arthur Koestler ( ... Between these, Rubashov communicates with a neighboring prisoner via a tap code ...
  50. [50]
    Tap Code: The True Story of Vietnam POWs and Their Secret Code
    Tap Code is the epic story of Vietnam POW Carlyle "Smitty" Harris and the secret code that changed everything for those imprisoned in the "Hanoi Hilton."