Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ukrainian phonology

Ukrainian phonology encompasses the sound system of the , an East Slavic tongue spoken by over 40 million people primarily in , featuring a compact inventory of six phonemes and a robust system distinguished by palatalization contrasts, including a distinctive category of semi-palatalized or "half-soft" consonants, alongside mobile word stress that plays a key role in lexical differentiation. The Ukrainian vowel system consists of six monophthongal phonemes: /i/, /ɪ/ (often realized as [ɨ] or [ɪ]), /ɛ/, /a/, /ɔ/, and /u/, with no phonemic vowel length but notable reductions and centralizations in unstressed positions, such as /ɛ/ raising to before certain stressed vowels due to harmony effects. Stressed vowels maintain more peripheral articulatory positions, for instance, /a/ as a low back [ɑ] with formant frequencies around 1000-1200 Hz for the second formant, while unstressed variants shift toward central [ɐ] or [ɜ], reflecting acoustic invariants like formant ratios that preserve phonemic identity across contexts. These vowels correspond to the graphemes <і, и, е, а, о, у> in the Cyrillic orthography, where orthographic <і> typically denotes and <и> [ɪ] (often realized as [ɨ]), though realizations vary slightly based on surrounding consonants and stress. In contrast, the consonant inventory is more elaborate, comprising approximately 31 phonemes across manners of , with a core feature being the phonemic opposition between hard (non-palatalized) and soft (palatalized) variants for most coronal and velar , notated in as plain versus those with [ʲ], such as /t/ [t̪] versus /tʲ/ [t̪ʲ]. uniquely incorporates a third palatalization degree—semi-soft or half-palatalized , like [pʲ] or [vʲ] before /i/ or /ɛ/ without full —distinguishing it from related like , which primarily feature binary hard-soft contrasts. Voicing is contrastive and regressively assimilatory, with no final devoicing (e.g., /b/ remains voiced word-finally), and fricatives like /x/ (voiceless velar) and its voiced counterparts /ɦ/ or /ʕ/ exhibit positional allophony, such as [ɣ] intervocalically. Plosives /p t k/ are unaspirated voiceless, while /b d ɡ/ are fully voiced, and include affricates like /t͡s t͡sʲ t͡ʃ d͡ʒ/. Prosodically, employs free, mobile that can distinguish meanings (e.g., ˈmuka 'torment' vs. muˈka '') and shifts within inflectional paradigms, often falling on the last two syllables in nouns but varying elsewhere, with possible secondary stresses in longer words to maintain . This mobility interacts with , centralizing unstressed vowels and potentially deleting them in certain historical or dialectal contexts, though standard phonology preserves the full inventory. Overall, these features reflect 's evolution from Common Slavic, with innovations like the semi-palatalization and g-loss (merger of /g/ into fricatives) setting it apart from neighbors like or .

Suprasegmental features

Stress

Ukrainian employs a movable system characterized by free, dynamic word that can occur on any and shifts across inflectional paradigms, making its placement largely lexical and unpredictable without morphological . This mobility distinguishes from fixed- languages, as position is not tied to phonemic contrasts but influences phonetic realization, particularly through vowel quality. While itself is not phonemic, its position can create minimal pairs that differentiate meanings, such as ˈkury ('chickens', nom. pl.) versus kuˈry ('smokes', 3sg. pres.). Another example is póˈvodyty ('conducts', imper.) versus povoˈdɨty ('leads around', imper.), where shifts alter the verb's interpretation. Stress placement in nouns follows paradigmatic patterns that often involve shifts between singular and plural forms. Nouns are classified into types such as AA (fixed stem stress across cases and numbers, e.g., korová 'cow'), BB (ending stress in singular, stem-final in plural, e.g., kovbasá 'sausage' nom. sg. vs. kolbásy gen. pl.), and CC (mobile in singular, initial in plural, e.g., holová 'head' nom. sg. vs. góloʋy nom. pl.), with Ukrainian showing innovations like increased singular-plural opposition compared to related languages. In verbs, stress alternates based on tense, aspect, or person, as in roˈbity ('to work', inf.) versus ˈrobʲyš ('you work', 2sg. pres.), or aspectual pairs like dɔˈbʲixaˈtɨ (perf. 'run up') versus ˌdɔbʲiˈxaˈtɨ (imperf.). Adjectives typically exhibit fixed stress that remains constant within their paradigms and agrees with the noun they modify, without the shifts seen in nouns or verbs. Phonetically, primary enhances duration—stressed vowels are roughly twice as long as unstressed ones—and promotes full, peripheral , while unstressed vowels reduce to more central positions with shorter duration and potential toward neighboring stressed vowels (e.g., unstressed /ɛ/ raises to before a stressed /i/). This reduction is gradient and context-dependent, occurring more prominently in fluent speech, and consonants adjacent to stressed syllables also show slight lengthening (1.2–1.3 times longer). Such effects underscore 's role in prosodic , with secondary stresses possible in longer words to avoid lapses of more than two unstressed syllables. patterns under stress are further detailed in discussions of quality.

Intonation patterns

Ukrainian intonation is characterized by contours that convey types, , and pragmatic functions within the of autosegmental-metrical theory, often analyzed using ToBI annotation for accents and boundary tones. Basic patterns include falling contours for declarative statements, rising contours for yes/no questions, and level or alternating patterns for listings, with phonetic realizations involving (F0) movements aligned to stressed syllables. These contours are composed of high () and low () tones, where pre-nuclear accents are typically rising (L*+H), nuclear accents vary by (e.g., falling H+L* for broad focus), and boundary tones mark phrase ends (L% for continuation or finality, H% for openness). In declarative statements, the intonation typically features a falling with a low tone, signaling completion; for example, in the broad- phrase Ja idu ("I am going"), the is H+L* on the stressed of idu, followed by L- phrasal accent and L% , resulting in an overall descending F0 . Narrow focus shifts the to H*+L on the focused , boosting the fall for emphasis, as in JA idu with H*+L L% to highlight the . Yes/no questions employ a rising , often L*+H on the final stressed , paired with L% or H% tones to indicate inquiry; for instance, Idesh ty? ("Are you going?") shows L*+H on idesh with rising F0 to mid or high level, distinguishing it from the declarative counterpart. Wh-questions align more closely with declaratives, using H+L* or H*+L s on the wh-word for focus, followed by L%, as in Kudy ty idesh? ("?") with H*+L on kudy and descending F0 thereafter. Listings feature level or slightly rising pre-final contours with downstepped tones for non-final items, maintaining a mid-level F0 plateau via successive L*+H accents and downstepped L- phrasal tones, such as in Jabluka, hrushy, vishni... ("Apples, pears, cherries..."), where each item receives L*+H but with progressively lower peaks until a final falling H+L* L%. Emphasis or involves upstepped pitch ranges, often with higher H tones or additional L*+H accents, elevating F0 on the emphasized to convey prominence, as seen in emphatic declaratives like Malen'ka MARYNA namaljuje malynu with upstepped L*+H on MARYNA. influences these patterns by anchoring pitch accents to stressed syllables, where the peak or valley of the tone (e.g., H in L*+H) aligns with the stressed onset, integrating word-level prosody into phrasal intonation. Overall, these contours use three primary tone levels—high (H), mid (via plateaus or downstep), and low (L)—to delineate boundaries and functional contrasts in standard Ukrainian.

Vowel system

Vowel inventory

The Ukrainian vowel system consists of six monophthongal phonemes: /i/, /ɪ/, /ɛ/, /a/, /ɔ/, and /u/. These form the core of the language's vocalic inventory, with no phonemic distinction for vowel length; stressed vowels are typically longer than unstressed ones. The following table summarizes the phonemes, their articulatory descriptions based on tongue height, frontness/backness, and rounding, primary orthographic representations in the Cyrillic alphabet, and representative examples:
PhonemeDescriptionOrthographyExample
/i/High front unrounded<і>двір [dʲˈvir] 'yard'
/ɪ/Near-high near-front unrounded<и>сир [ˈsɪr] 'cheese'
/ɛ/Mid front unrounded<е>весна [ˈwɛsnɐ] 'spring'
/a/Low central unrounded<а>мама [ˈmɑmɐ] 'mom'
/ɔ/Mid back rounded<о>мова [ˈmɔ.vɐ] 'language'
/u/High back rounded<у>рука [ˈrukɐ] 'hand'
These phonemes are distinguished by minimal pairs that highlight their contrasts, such as /i/ versus /ɪ/ in місто [ˈmʲisto] 'city' and мі́ст [mʲɪst] 'bridge'. Similar distinctions exist for other pairs, like /ɛ/ and /a/ in век [wɛk] 'century' versus вак [wak] 'vacuum' (borrowed). In unstressed positions, these vowels exhibit reduction, leading to centralized or neutralized realizations (detailed in the section on vowel quality and distribution).

Vowel quality and distribution

Ukrainian vowels exhibit variations in quality primarily influenced by stress, position within the word, and surrounding phonetic context, resulting in distinct allophones that maintain phonemic contrasts while adapting to prosodic conditions. The language has six monophthongal vowel phonemes—/i/, /ɪ/, /ɛ/, /a/, /ɔ/, /u/—with no phonemic length distinctions, but realizations shift in unstressed positions toward more centralized articulations. For instance, the high front /i/ is typically retracted and lowered to [ɪ] in most contexts, distinguishing it from Russian [ɨ]. Vowel reduction in unstressed syllables is milder than in closely related languages like Russian, preserving more peripheral quality while centralizing to varying degrees based on the stressed vowel's influence, a process akin to vowel harmony. Unstressed /ɛ/ often raises to , particularly before a stressed /i/, as in мені [mɛˈnʲi] or [meˈnʲi] 'to me'. Similarly, unstressed /ɔ/ may raise toward before a stressed /u/, as in зозу́ля [zɔˈzulʲɐ] 'cuckoo'. For /ɛ/, unstressed variants centralize to [ɜ̝] or raised central [ɜ̝⁺], reflecting harmonic assimilation to nearby vowels, while /o/ in unstressed positions like the first and third syllables of молоко [mɔˈlɔkɔ] 'milk' shows slight centralization to [ɔ̽] without full laxing to . This reduction affects duration and timbre but avoids extreme neutralization, ensuring intelligibility. Positional allophones further condition vowel quality; for example, /a/ realizes as a more fronted [ä] in word-initial position, contrasting with the backer [ɑ] in medial or final contexts, as seen in або [ˈäbɔ] 'or' versus книга [ˈkniɦɐ] 'book'. Distributional constraints govern vowel occurrence relative to consonants: /ɪ/ does not appear after palatalized consonants, appearing only after non-palatalized ones (e.g., мир [mɪr] 'world' after /m/, but мить [mʲitʲ] with /i/ after /mʲ/), a rule tied to the palatalization contrast in the consonant system. Vowel harmony subtly influences unstressed vowels, pulling their quality toward the stressed vowel in the word, as in anticipatory shifts where unstressed mid vowels adjust frontness or height to match a following high vowel. Phonotactic rules restrict distribution, prohibiting clusters of s without intervening consonants and favoring simple structures. syllables typically follow a (C) template, with s obligatorily forming the and open syllables (CV) preferred over closed ones (CVC); complex onsets or codas with up to four consonants are possible but disfavored if they violate sonority sequencing. For example, sequences like /a i/ in май [mɑj] 'May' involve a glide, ensuring no true , while direct VV clusters are resolved through or avoidance in native words.

Consonant system

Consonant inventory

Ukrainian has a consonant inventory of 32 phonemes, comprising stops, fricatives, affricates, nasals, liquids, and glides, with a prominent distinction between hard (non-palatalized) and soft (palatalized) variants for most consonants. This system reflects the language's East Slavic heritage, where palatalization serves as a key phonemic contrast, particularly affecting non-sibilant consonants. The phonemes are articulated across various places, including bilabial, labiodental, alveolar, post-alveolar, velar, and glottal, with voicing contrasts in most series. The following table presents the consonant phonemes organized by manner and , distinguishing hard and soft pairs using notation; soft variants are marked with superscript ʲ. Note that /ɡ/ occurs primarily in loanwords via the orthographic <ґ> and is marginal in native vocabulary, while /ʋ/ (often realized as or ) corresponds to <в>. Affricates are , and their palatalized forms exist but are less contrastive in some contexts compared to non-. Postalveolar sibilants and affricates /ʃ ʒ tʃ dʒ/ are inherently palatalized and lack non-palatalized phonemic counterparts. The palatal /j/ is included separately.
MannerBilabialLabiodentalDental/AlveolarPost-alveolarVelarGlottal
Stopsp, b, pʲ, bʲt, d, tʲ, dʲk, ɡ, kʲ, ɡʲ
Affricatests, dz, tsʲ, dzʲtʃ, dʒ
Fricativesf, ʋ, fʲ, ʋʲs, z, sʲ, zʲʃ, ʒx, xʲɦ, ɦʲ
Nasalsm, mʲn, nʲ
Trillr, rʲ
Laterall, lʲ
j
All non-sibilant consonants except the sibilant affricates /ts/ and /dz/ maintain phonemic palatalized counterparts, where softness involves raising the tongue blade toward the , as in hard /t/ [t̪] versus soft /tʲ/ [tʲ]. The sibilant affricates /ts/ and /dz/ do have palatalized allophones before front vowels, and the contrast is phonemic in certain contexts. Orthographically, the /ɦ/ is represented by <г>, which is distinct from the rare stop /ɡ> (<ґ>), and the /x/ by <х>; these are unique to among in their glottal realization for /ɦ/. The palatal glide /j/ appears as <й> or in digraphs like <я ю є і>. The hard-soft distinction is phonemically contrastive, illustrated by minimal pairs such as "том" [tɔm] 'volume' (hard /t/) versus "ти́м" [tʲim] 'by that' (soft /tʲ/), where the vowel quality and palatalization differentiate meaning. Another example is "кот" [kɔt] 'cat' (hard /k/) versus "кі́т" [kʲit] 'whale' (soft /kʲ/).

Palatalization

Palatalization plays a central role in Ukrainian phonology as a phonemic feature that creates contrasts between hard (non-palatalized) and soft (palatalized) consonants, altering word meanings in minimal pairs such as том [tɔm] 'volume' versus тінь [tɪnʲ] 'shadow', where /t/ contrasts with /tʲ/. Consonants possess distinct soft/hard pairs, including labials like /p pʲ/, dentals like /t tʲ d dʲ/, and others such as /k kʲ g gʲ f fʲ v vʲ m mʲ n nʲ s sʲ z zʲ x xʲ ɦ ɦʲ ts tsʲ dz dzʲ r rʲ l lʲ/, though the degree of contrast varies by place of articulation. Orthographically, these distinctions are marked by the soft sign <ь> after the consonant (e.g., день [dɛnʲ] 'day') or by preceding front vowels like <і>, <є>, <ю>, <я> (e.g., дитина [dɪtɪˈnɑ] 'child', with /tʲ/ and /nʲ/). Phonetically, palatalized consonants involve a secondary articulation characterized by raising and fronting of the body toward the , increasing the contact area between the and palate compared to hard counterparts. For instance, the palatalized nasal /nʲ/ is realized as [nʲ] with this raised position, particularly before front vowels like /i/, while hard /n/ lacks this elevation. Ukrainian also features a third category of half-palatalized (semi-soft) consonants, which are allophonic variants of labials (/pʲ bʲ mʲ/), velars, and glottals before /i/ or /j/, but these do not form phonemic contrasts. Certain constraints limit palatalization: the postalveolar sibilants /ʃ ʒ/ and affricates /t͡ʃ d͡ʒ/ are inherently soft, lacking non-palatalized counterparts and always realized with palatalization (e.g., /ʃ/ as [ʃ]). The alveolar affricates /t͡s d͡z/ have palatalized variants before front vowels, though remaining hard in other contexts. Historically, palatalization represents a partial retention from Proto-Slavic, where multiple waves of conditioned palatalization before front vowels led to the phonemicization of soft/hard distinctions in daughter languages, though shows less extensive phonemic spread compared to .

Phonological processes

Vowel-consonant alternations

In Ukrainian, vowel-consonant alternations occur primarily in morphological environments, reflecting historical developments such as the resolution of the Common Slavic yat' vowel (*), which surfaces as /i/ in strong positions and /e/ or /o/ in weak positions within paradigms. For example, in noun declensions, "bone" (nominative singular, [kʲisˈtka]) alternates with кісток (genitive plural, [kʲisˈtɔk]), showing /i/ ~ /o/ variation tied to structure and stress, rather than direct influence Shevelov 1993. Similarly, "year" (nominative singular, [rɪk]) contrasts with року (genitive singular, [rɔˈku]), where the stem vowel shifts from /i/ to /o/ in open s Kida 2023. These patterns include mid-vowel raising in closed syllables and deletion or lowering in open syllables, as analyzed in frameworks. Mid vowels /e/ and /o/ raise to /i/ and /u/ respectively in closed syllables for avoidance, e.g., мед "" (nominative singular, [mɛd]) vs. меду (genitive singular, [mɛˈdu]) where no raising occurs due to exceptionality, but generally high vowels prevail in closed contexts Kida 2023. The /j/ participates in palatalization of preceding consonants and forms diphthong-like sequences, such as /ij/ in мій "my" ([mij]), functioning as a glide without triggering vowel height changes Shevelov 1993. In verb conjugations, similar alternations appear, often preserving high vowels in stems, as in любити "to love" (, [lʲuˈbɪtɪ]) and люблю "I love" ([lʲuˈblʲu]), maintaining /u/ across forms without mid-vowel elevation Rubach 2005. Mid-vowel fronting may interact in derived forms under palatal constraints, but is conditioned by syllable closure rather than glides Rubach 2005. These processes optimize structure, favoring high vowels in closed syllables across the vowel inventory Kida 2023.

Consonant assimilation and other rules

In Ukrainian phonology, consonant primarily involves regressive processes affecting and other consonants in clusters, both within words and across word boundaries (). Regressive voicing is a key rule, whereby the voicing feature of the first matches that of the second in a sequence. A voiceless becomes voiced before a voiced , as in the phrase ot že pronounced [ˈɔd ʒɛ] 'therefore'. Conversely, a voiced devoices before a voiceless ; for instance, the /z-/ devoices to [s-] before voiceless stops, yielding [spɪsɔm] for z pyskom 'with a '. This applies across and word boundaries, such as in borotʹba [bɔrɔdʲba] 'struggle', where /tʲ/ voices to [dʲ] before /b/, but does not affect sonorants, as seen in vid domu [ʋid dɔmu] 'from the house', where no voicing change occurs. Place assimilation also occurs regressively, particularly involving dentals adjusting to the articulation of following sibilants or other consonants. For example, the dental fricative /z/ assimilates to the postalveolar place of /ʃ/ in zšyty [ʃʃɪtɪ] 'to sew'. Similarly, the alveolar nasal /n/ undergoes place assimilation before velar consonants, becoming the velar nasal [ŋ]; this is evident in loanwords and clusters like bank [bɑŋk] 'bank', where /n/ shifts to match the velar place of /k/. Such changes facilitate smoother in consonant clusters and apply in both internal and boundary contexts. Other consonant rules include degemination and haplology, which simplify redundant or repeated sounds in clusters. Geminates, often arising at morpheme boundaries, may simplify to single s in rapid speech, though their phonemic status remains debated; for example, bez + zvučno is realized as [ˈbɛzːʋu nɔ] 'soundless', but simplification can occur in sequences like double /n/ in znannja [znɑnʲa] 'knowledge', reducing to a single [nʲ]. Haplology similarly eliminates repeated elements in clusters, preventing excessive lengthening, as in potential reduplications across boundaries that resolve to non-geminated forms for ease of . These processes contribute to the fluid realization of Ukrainian consonant sequences without altering underlying phonemes significantly.

Variation and history

Dialectal deviations

Ukrainian dialects exhibit notable phonological variations from the , primarily in segmental features such as and consonants. These differences are most prominent across the three major dialect groups: northern (Polissian), southeastern (southern), and southwestern (). In northern dialects, particularly the eastern Polissian subgroup, akanye is a characteristic feature, involving the merger of unstressed /o/ and /a/ into or a similar . This unstressed contrasts with the standard language's clearer distinction between these . Additionally, central Polissian dialects display dzekan'e, where /t͡s/ is realized as [d͡z], and partial ukan'e, a variant of vowel centralization similar to akanye. These features reflect closer ties to Belarusian and northern phonological patterns. Southern (southeastern) dialects show stronger vowel reduction overall, with unstressed vowels tending toward schwa-like [ə] or further centralization in fluent speech, exceeding the standard's moderate reductions. Iotation, the palatal glide insertion or consonant softening before front vowels, is often weakened or lost in certain morphological contexts, leading to simpler alternations (e.g., standard *dim > dialectal [dim] without palatal effects). In some southern areas, the standard /ɦ/ (voiced glottal fricative) may be realized closer to [ɡ] or [ɣ], influenced by bordering Russian dialects. Western dialects, including Transcarpathian varieties, bear Polish influences, introducing or emphasizing alveolo-palatal fricatives /ɕ ʑ/ alongside standard sibilants, and retroflex sibilants /ʂ ʐ/ in place of affricates in some positions. Vowel shifts, such as fronting of /u/ to [ʉ] or diphthongization remnants, also occur, diverging from the standard monophthongal system. These changes highlight contact-induced innovations in border regions. Beyond regional groups, urban versus rural spoken varieties show deviations in casual speech, with rural dialects preserving more elision of unstressed vowels (e.g., /a/ deletion in clusters like *moloko > [mlok]) and simplifications of consonant clusters (e.g., /trst/ > [ts]). Urban speech, influenced by standard norms and , tends toward less extreme reductions but still features occasional cluster .

Historical development

The historical development of Ukrainian phonology traces its roots to Proto-Slavic, undergoing significant sound changes in the Common Slavic period and later divergences within East Slavic. By the mid-10th century, Proto-Slavic nasal vowels had denasalized and shifted: *ę developed into *ja before hard consonants or *e/*a in other positions, while *ǫ became *u or *ja, marking the loss of nasalization as a phonemic feature in early East Slavic varieties that would become Ukrainian. The reduced vowels, or yers (*ъ and *ь), were lost in weak positions around 1150 CE, with *ъ typically disappearing (∅) and *ь often yielding /ɪ/ or ∅, leading to extensive vowel-zero alternations and the opening of syllable structures; for instance, in consonant + r/l + yer + consonant sequences, *u emerged, as in Proto-Slavic *krovь > Ukrainian krov 'blood'. Additionally, pleophony—a process of vowel epenthesis—affected liquid diphthongs, transforming Proto-Slavic *or, *er, *el, *ol into full vocalic sequences like /oro/, /ere/, /olo/ in East Slavic, exemplified by *morъzъ > moroz 'frost' and *beregъ > bereh 'shore', distinguishing Ukrainian from West and South Slavic languages where such insertions were absent or limited. Consonant evolution featured progressive and regressive palatalizations inherited from Proto-Slavic, with the second palatalization (circa 8th-9th centuries) converting velars before certain front vowels: /k/ > /t͡s/, /g/ > /d͡z/ (later /z/), and /x/ > /s/, as seen in forms like Proto-Slavic *nočь > Ukrainian nič 'night' (from *nokь with second palatalization). A key innovation in Ukrainian was the development of /ɦ/ from Proto-Slavic /g/ in the late 12th or early 13th century, shifting it to a fricative [ɦ] or approximant [ɣ] in most positions, while /g/ was reintroduced via loanwords (e.g., Proto-Slavic *golvă > holova 'head'); this change, unique among East Slavic languages, reflects a regional depalatalization and spirantization. Sibilants underwent mergers, particularly in East Slavic, where reflexes of the second and third palatalizations (e.g., *k' > *ć > /t͡sʲ/) consolidated, preserving a palatalized /t͡sʲ/ in Ukrainian from Late Common Slavic *c', unlike Russian's depalatalized /ts/. The Proto-Slavic labiodental /v/ lost its strict fricative quality in certain positions, evolving into a bilabial or labio-velar approximant [ʋ] or , especially intervocalically or before back vowels, contributing to Ukrainian's softer articulation compared to Russian. From the 14th to 19th centuries, Ukrainian phonology was shaped by external contacts under the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (14th-18th centuries), introducing Polish loanwords and reinforcing western dialect features like preserved /i/ from *ě; Russian influence grew in the 18th-19th centuries via imperial administration, promoting akanye-like reductions in some northern varieties, while Church Slavonic, used in liturgy and literature, maintained archaisms such as unreduced yers in formal registers until the 19th-century standardization efforts. These influences layered onto the core East Slavic base, with Polish contributing to sibilant distinctions and Russian accelerating /g/-retention in borrowings, ultimately solidifying modern Ukrainian's phonological profile by the late 19th century.

References

  1. [1]
    Ukrainian | Journal of the International Phonetic Association
    Nov 4, 2016 · Ukrainian is specific in so far as it has a third category, namely 'half-palatalized' sounds also called 'semi-soft' consonants, which are ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] ukrainian consonant phones in the ipa context - Phil.muni.cz
    Aug 22, 2019 · Abstract: The acoustic and articulatory properties of Ukrainian consonant phones were investigated, and a full set of relevant IPA notations ...
  3. [3]
    (PDF) Ukrainian vowel phones in the IPA context - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · Acoustic and articulatory properties of Ukrainian vowels are investigated in this study and a full set of relevant IPA notations are proposed.
  4. [4]
    Perception of European Portuguese Mid-Vowels by Ukrainian ...
    Nov 18, 2024 · The most well-known description of the Ukrainian vowel system comes from Pompino-Marschall et al. (2017), who identify six Ukrainian vowels: /i ...
  5. [5]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  6. [6]
    Timing patterns in a hybrid metrical system - ScienceDirect.com
    Stress in Ukrainian is weight insensitive and can appear on any syllable in the word, as exemplified by numerous minimal pairs, e.g. kózy 'she-goat' (nom. pl.) ...
  7. [7]
    None
    ### Summary of Stress Placement Rules in Ukrainian Nouns, Verbs, Adjectives, and Paradigmatic Shifts
  8. [8]
    [PDF] The Prosodic Grammar of Contemporary Standard Ukrainian
    For instance, Matvienko (2012) and. Butsʲka (2003) argued that Ukrainian substantives (nouns and their derived adjectives) have two kinds of lexical accent.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Writing system in Ukrainian - arXiv
    It is commonly accepted that Ukrainian has 38 phonemes: 6 vowels and 32 consonants (Bilodid 1969; Ponomariv 2001; Žovtobrjukh and Khomenko 2004). The deviations ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Palatalization in Ukrainian, Polish and Russian. A pilot 3D ...
    Introduction. The phonetic descriptions of palatalization refer characteristically to tongue body fronting and raising (e.g., Crystal 2008:347, Sagey 1986,.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Russian and Ukrainian: Like Two Drops of Water - Eagle Scholar
    Jan 9, 2023 · Introduction to the phonological history of the Slavic languages. Columbus,. Ohio: Slavica Publishers. Coker, Adam. 2020. Russia's French ...
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    (PDF) From g to h and again to g in Ukrainian between the West ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · From g to h and again to g in Ukrainian between the West European and Byzantine tradition? January 2005; Die Welt der Slaven 50(1):33-56.
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    Birch Bark Letters and the Second Slavic Palatalization, part 2
    Sep 13, 2011 · Let's now return to the Second Slavic Palatalization. It turned the original velar sounds /k/, /g/ and /x/ into /ts/, /dz/ (or even /z ...
  17. [17]
    Ukrainian — Russian: Poles Apart?
    My intent here is to make use of advances in Slavic historical linguistics since the publication of Shevelov's encyclopedic Ukrainian historical phonology three ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] On “historical unity” of Russian and Ukrainian
    Thus, Ukrainian (an East Slavic language) developed for three centuries under the influence of Polish (a West Slavic language), followed by another three ...