Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Task Force 6-26

Task Force 6-26, also designated Task Force 626, was a under the (JSOC) that conducted counterinsurgency operations during the , primarily from 2004 to 2006, with a focus on raids to capture or kill high-value targets (HVTs) linked to insurgent networks and (AQI), especially in the region and central . Operating as part of the Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force–Arabian Peninsula, it integrated units such as elements from the 5th Group, Navy SEALs, and allied forces like Polish GROM, leveraging multi-source intelligence for synchronized missions against figures tied to bombings, linguist murders, and AQI facilitation. Headquartered at Balad Airbase, Task Force 6-26 executed numerous nightly raids across , establishing a nationwide fusion network and coordinating with conventional forces through division-level centers to enable rapid targeting of AQI leadership and support structures. Under Stanley McChrystal's leadership from 2003 to 2008, the eviscerated key insurgent cells, including captures of HVTs such as an insurgent bomb-maker in June 2004 and another in a daylight raid in August 2004, while disrupting operations linked to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's network through missions like the August 2004 raid on a former Iraqi general serving as his associate. Its most significant accomplishment was the -driven operation that tracked and eliminated al-Zarqawi, AQI's leader, via an near Baquba on June 7, 2006, marking a major degradation of the group's command structure and announced as a strategic victory by Iraqi Nouri al-Maliki. The task force's aggressive tactics, including point-of-capture detainee processing, contributed to broader military inquiries into practices amid the insurgency's intensity, as documented in Department of Defense and command investigations. Despite frequent redesignations for operational security—evolving into entities like Task Force 145—its model of persistent, intelligence-led raids exemplified JSOC's adaptation to urban counterterrorism, prioritizing immediate threats over distant figures like .

History

Formation and Early Operations

Task Force 6-26 was established in the summer of 2003 as a joint special operations unit under the (JSOC), comprising elite U.S. military personnel from units such as and the , along with intelligence elements including CIA operatives, tasked primarily with capturing or killing high-value targets (HVTs) amid the escalating following the U.S. invasion of Iraq. The unit emerged as a successor to , which had been formed earlier in 2003 to hunt senior regime figures and terrorists, with the renaming occurring around mid-2004 in response to heightened operational demands after the public disclosure of detainee abuses in April 2004. Its headquarters were established at , a restricted facility adjacent to , which served as a for rapid raids and initial detainee processing. Early operations centered on intelligence-driven raids targeting leadership, particularly , the group's operational commander responsible for numerous bombings and beheadings, as well as remnants of Saddam Hussein's Ba'athist network. By 2003, the was conducting field interrogations and detentions during missions in central , including , where personnel extracted information from captured suspects to generate leads on HVT locations. These efforts involved small-team assaults, often at night, leveraging helicopter insertions and ground mobility to seize individuals based on , , and tip-offs, with detainees initially held at for short-term questioning before transfer to other facilities. The unit's activities contributed to the capture of several mid-level insurgents and financiers in late 2003 and early 2004, though Zarqawi evaded direct engagement until later phases. Operational tempo intensified in as the integrated with broader Multinational Force-Iraq efforts, relocating elements to Balad Airbase for expanded coverage of the , where it coordinated with conventional forces for joint HVT sweeps. Initial missions emphasized speed and lethality, with reports indicating dozens of raids per month by mid-, focusing on disrupting (IED) networks and foreign fighter inflows. Despite its classified nature, the 's early effectiveness in generating actionable intelligence was noted in military assessments, though it operated with significant autonomy, bypassing standard protocols for HVT-related captures.

Evolution and Reorganization

Task Force 6-26 originated from (JSOC) units deployed during the , initially operating under designations such as to support conventional forces and conduct early reconnaissance. Following the fall of in April 2003 and the shift to operations, these elements were reorganized into in mid-2003, with a primary mandate to pursue high-value targets (HVTs) including and emerging insurgent leaders like . This restructuring integrated , SEAL Team 6, and intelligence assets from the CIA's Special Activities Division, emphasizing rapid raid capabilities over broader support roles. By early 2004, as the insurgency intensified and abuses at facilities like Abu Ghraib drew scrutiny, Task Force 121 was redesignated Task Force 6-26 to enhance operational secrecy and focus exclusively on dismantling al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) networks under Zarqawi's leadership. The name change, reportedly tied to internal JSOC protocols for periodic redesignations, allowed for expanded personnel—reaching approximately 1,000 operators—and refined tactics, including 24/7 targeting cycles that conducted hundreds of raids monthly by mid-2004. This evolution prioritized intelligence-driven HVT captures over detention, with the task force basing operations at Balad Air Base and maintaining a temporary detention site at Camp Nama near Baghdad International Airport. In late 2005 or early 2006, amid ongoing adaptations to AQI's decentralized structure and post-Zarqawi leadership shifts, Task Force 6-26 transitioned into Task Force 145, incorporating additional aviation and reconnaissance elements to sustain high-tempo operations against evolving threats. This reorganization reflected JSOC's broader strategic pivot under General Stanley McChrystal, who commanded from 2003 to 2008, toward , with TF 145 conducting over 300 raids per month by 2006 and contributing to the capture or elimination of dozens of AQI mid-level commanders. The changes maintained the task force's core HVT mission while addressing logistical strains from prolonged deployments and integrating lessons from early interrogation controversies, though specific details remain classified.

Organization and Personnel

Component Units

Task Force 6-26 primarily comprised elite counterterrorism operators from the U.S. (JSOC), drawn from Tier 1 special mission units tasked with raids and captures in . Its core assault elements included squadrons from the 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta (), specializing in and intelligence-driven operations, alongside assaulters from the Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU, commonly referred to as ). These units formed the vanguard for missions, leveraging their expertise in small-team insertions and extractions under cover of night or in urban environments. Support for raids was provided by elements of the , which handled perimeter security, quick-reaction forces, and helicopter assault operations to facilitate rapid ingress and egress. The 24th Special Tactics Squadron contributed combat controllers and pararescuemen for airfield seizures, coordination, and during engagements. Intelligence integration involved CIA personnel embedded within the for real-time targeting and collection, enhancing the operational tempo against insurgent networks. The task force's modular structure allowed for flexibility, with teams rotating from bases like , , and adapting to evolving threats from groups such as . Personnel numbers were classified, but operations typically involved 20-50 operators per mission, emphasizing speed, surprise, and minimal footprint to minimize civilian exposure. Due to the secretive nature of JSOC activities, detailed subunit breakdowns remain limited to declassified accounts and whistleblower reports, with primary sourcing from military interrogators and participants.

Command Structure

Task Force 6-26 operated as a subordinate element of the (JSOC), which exercised overall command authority and provided strategic oversight for its operations in . JSOC, headquartered at , , directed the task force's mission integration with broader U.S. counterterrorism efforts under U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM). From its formation in early 2004—evolving from —through its peak activities until mid-2006, JSOC was led by then-Major General (later Lieutenant General) , who assumed command of JSOC on September 6, 2003, and maintained direct involvement in task force operations, including frequent visits to forward sites. McChrystal's leadership emphasized rapid, intelligence-driven raids, with Task Force 6-26 functioning as his dedicated unit for pursuing and associated networks. At the operational level, Task Force 6-26 maintained a forward headquarters at , adjacent to , where tactical were centralized for detention, interrogation, and mission planning. Deployed personnel, including forces from units such as and Navy SEAL Team 6, reported through a task force-specific chain of command that superseded standard battalion-level authority, often involving colonel-level officers who relayed directives from JSOC or CENTCOM superiors. This structure incorporated joint military and CIA elements, enabling fused intelligence and execution but complicating accountability lines due to interagency protocols. The 's command hierarchy prioritized compartmentalization and operational security, limiting public documentation of mid-level leaders; however, accounts from participants describe a as a key figure in disseminating and handling detainee protocols, attributing such guidance to general officers like McChrystal or Multi-National Corps-Iraq commanders. By late 2006, as JSOC reorganized into 714 under McChrystal's continued oversight, elements of 6-26's structure were absorbed into expanded efforts.

Primary Objectives and Operations

High-Value Target Hunts

Task Force 6-26's (HVT) hunts constituted its core operational focus, involving intelligence-driven raids to capture or kill designated insurgents, former Ba'athist leaders, and affiliates deemed critical to disrupting Iraq's post-invasion networks. These missions, conducted primarily in the region from mid-2003 onward, relied on joint elements including U.S. Army operators and Navy SEALs, who executed nighttime assaults on suspected HVT locations using helicopters for insertion and extraction. The hunts targeted individuals on U.S. military priority lists, such as high-ranking remnants of Saddam Hussein's regime and foreign fighters linked to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's network, with the objective of decapitating command structures and yielding intelligence for subsequent operations. Operations were often short-duration, high-risk actions informed by , human sources, and interrogations from prior captures, emphasizing speed to minimize civilian exposure and enemy reaction time. Task Force 6-26, evolving from , integrated civilian intelligence analysts from agencies like the CIA to refine target packages, though public details remain limited due to the unit's classified status. Success in these hunts contributed to broader efforts by removing key facilitators of attacks and bombings, though specific attribution of captures to the is obscured by inter-unit coordination and . By early 2004, as violence escalated, the hunts intensified around International Airport's vicinity, where detainees from raids were processed for actionable leads on higher-echelon targets.

Key Engagements and Captures

Task Force 6-26 conducted raids targeting high-value insurgents, emphasizing rapid assaults on suspected safehouses to capture operational leaders and facilitators within networks. These operations, often executed by small teams under cover of darkness, relied on real-time intelligence to locate targets in urban areas like and its outskirts. From early 2004 onward, the task force carried out scores of such engagements, detaining individuals suspected of coordinating attacks against coalition forces and Iraqi civilians. Captured suspects were processed at forward sites including near , where initial interrogations aimed to yield actionable for follow-on missions. Between July 2004 and February 2007, these targeted raids resulted in the capture of over 800 extremists and members, disrupting command chains and bomb-making cells in central . The operations prioritized high-value targets linked to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's organization, though detailed public accounts of specific individuals remain limited due to operational security. Successes included the neutralization of mid-level operatives whose detention provided leads on broader insurgent financing and .

Detention and Interrogation Practices

Camp Nama Facility

, situated at , functioned as the central detention and preliminary interrogation hub for Task Force 6-26 during counter-insurgency operations in . Established by repurposing a pre-existing originally built under Saddam Hussein's regime, the facility was adapted by U.S. personnel starting in early to handle the surge in captured insurgents. It served primarily as a transient processing center, where detainees—often high-value targets linked to groups like —underwent initial screening and intelligence gathering before relocation to permanent sites such as . The 's operations aligned with Task Force 6-26's mandate to dismantle terrorist networks, including efforts targeting figures like . Key infrastructure at Camp Nama included a Joint Operations Centre for coordinating raids and analysis, alongside specialized interrogation areas designed for controlled environments. Prominent among these was the "Black Room," a windowless,漆 black enclosure roughly the size of a garage, which had originated as a torture chamber during the Saddam era and was retained for high-stakes questioning sessions. Additional features comprised categorized rooms (denoted as blue, red, black, and "soft" variants for varying interrogation intensities), kennel-style wire-mesh holding cells for short-term confinement, and soundproofed shipping containers repurposed for isolated sessions. These elements supported rapid throughput, with the facility processing dozens of detainees weekly during peak insurgency periods in 2004. Task Force 6-26 maintained control of through the majority of 2003 and into 2004, integrating it into broader joint operations that occasionally involved allied for capture and transport . By late 2004, as operational needs evolved, the detention functions were transferred to , where the site was reconfigured as a Temporary Screening Facility to continue similar temporary holding roles. This shift reflected adaptations in U.S. military strategy amid ongoing intelligence-driven pursuits in .

Interrogation Methods Employed

Task Force 6-26 employed aggressive techniques at , a detention facility at , primarily to extract intelligence on high-value targets amid the intensifying in 2003-2004. These methods, often conducted in a converted Iraqi known as the "Black Room," emphasized rapid information gathering over detainee welfare, with interrogators instructed to avoid leaving visible injuries under an informal "no blood, no foul" guideline. Soldiers assigned to the reported using physical , including punches, kicks, and strikes with rifle butts, during sessions to break detainee resistance. Additional techniques involved psychological and environmental stressors, such as prolonged , forced stress positions, and exposure to extreme cold or heat, including ice baths. Detainees were routinely hooded upon arrival and confined in small wire-mesh cells resembling dog kennels, sometimes for extended periods without access to lawyers or family. Interrogations frequently occurred in sound-proofed shipping containers, where inmates emerged in states of extreme distress, with accounts of threats of and tactics like yelling, spitting, or using detainees for mock "paintball" target practice nearby. Army investigative documents detail specific incidents, such as a detainee in April 2004 being suspended by the thighs, hooded, restrained, and beaten with a cable or rope while under custody, resulting in visible marks noted during a medical exam. Another case involved a detainee thrown against a wall upon capture, denied food for three days, and kicked in the head during questioning by personnel. British military observers at witnessed electric shocks and beatings, including one instance where a detainee's prosthetic was removed and used as an instrument of before transport. These practices, drawn from soldier testimonies and declassified reports, were part of a "no good cop" approach rejecting rapport-building in favor of , though official reviews found limited prosecutable evidence due to the unit's classified operations.

Controversies and Investigations

Allegations of Detainee Abuse

Task Force 6-26, operating a detention facility at near from mid-2003 onward, faced allegations of systematic detainee abuse during interrogations aimed at extracting on high-value targets such as . Reports described a "Black Room"—a windowless,漆 black-painted space used for harsh questioning—where detainees were subjected to beatings with butts, including yelling and spitting, and other physical mistreatment designed to avoid visible injuries under the unit's reported "No Blood, No Foul." These practices allegedly persisted despite early warnings from U.S. Army investigators and personnel starting in August 2003. Soldier testimonies detailed additional methods, including stress positions, via loud music, and routine physical beatings, with some accounts indicating these techniques were authorized by higher command within the task force. British special forces personnel who handed over detainees to reported witnessing hooding, electric shocks, and confinement in cells approximately two feet wide and chest-high, akin to dog kennels, with one incident involving a detainee beaten with his own prosthetic leg. Interrogations often occurred in soundproofed shipping containers, after which detainees emerged in visible physical distress. Army documents released through Act requests corroborated claims of stripping, humiliation, and abuse to the point of unconsciousness by members, including in locations like , with efforts to obstruct investigations via pseudonyms and reported data losses affecting 70% of files. Detainees were frequently held for weeks without access to lawyers or family notification and without formal charges, contributing to allegations of indefinite incommunicado . These accounts, drawn from U.S. , allied forces, and declassified records, highlighted a pattern of aggressive tactics amid the unit's high-stakes mission.

Legal and Official Responses

The U.S. Department of Defense initiated multiple investigations into allegations of detainee mistreatment at , the primary detention facility operated by from 2003 to mid-2004. The Army's Command () probed specific incidents, including a May 11, 2004, case involving four or five non-interrogator personnel from the task force accused of detainee in violation of the during operations in . These inquiries were part of broader Detainee Abuse efforts established to examine reported violations across U.S. facilities in . A 2006 Department of Defense review assessed DoD-directed probes into detention and operations stemming from allegations, including those at special operations sites like . The report evaluated management responses and investigative processes but concluded that while some procedural lapses occurred, systemic oversight failures were not uniformly substantiated, though it acknowledged ongoing concerns about authorized techniques bordering on mistreatment. Early warnings, such as an 2003 investigator's alert on abusive practices at the site, prompted internal reviews, yet operations continued without immediate cessation of the reported methods. Legal outcomes were limited, with no documented court-martials or high-level prosecutions directly tied to Task Force 6-26 personnel at Camp Nama, despite released Army documents confirming investigations into the unit's "special access program" activities and potential cover-ups of abuse. Critics, including civil liberties organizations, argued that accountability mechanisms proved inadequate, as special operations' classified nature shielded many actions from full scrutiny, resulting in administrative actions rather than criminal penalties for implicated individuals. By late 2004, the facility's role diminished, with detainees transferred and interrogation protocols reportedly aligned more closely with emerging DoD guidelines prohibiting certain harsh techniques, though enforcement remained inconsistent.

Counterarguments and Contextual Defenses

Official investigations by Army Criminal Investigation Division personnel into abuse allegations against Task Force 6-26 members substantiated misconduct in only five of 29 reported cases dating back to , with the remainder lacking sufficient evidence for prosecution. This outcome suggests that while isolated incidents occurred, systemic was not corroborated by forensic and testimonial review, countering narratives of widespread violations. The task force's operations at involved techniques approved under evolving military guidelines for high-value targets, including stress positions and , which were justified as necessary to elicit time-sensitive intelligence amid an responsible for over 8,000 civilian deaths in alone through bombings and executions. officials noted that interrogators operated under directives requiring justification of harsh measures as "militarily necessary" to disrupt imminent threats, such as vehicle-borne attacks that killed hundreds of coalition and Iraqi forces monthly. The "No Blood, No Foul" placards at the facility, often cited critically, encapsulated an operational ethos aimed at avoiding visible injuries that could trigger legal scrutiny, reflecting adherence to boundaries set by Department of Defense rules prohibiting lasting harm while prioritizing non-lethal coercion in a context where detainees were frequently linked to networks conducting beheadings and suicide operations. Task force personnel maintained that such approaches yielded actionable intelligence leading to captures, averting attacks in a theater where conventional failed against ideologically committed . Critics' reliance on anonymous soldier accounts, as in reports, has been challenged for lacking corroboration against official probes, underscoring discrepancies between anecdotal claims and evidentiary standards.

Achievements and Strategic Impact

Contributions to Counter-Insurgency

Task Force 6-26, operating under the from 2003 to 2008 and based at Balad Airbase, contributed to counter-insurgency by conducting targeted operations against high-value individuals, (AQI) leadership, and facilitation networks, as well as Iranian-backed elements like the . Led by Lieutenant General Stanley McChrystal, the task force executed nightly raids across , establishing intelligence fusion centers in 2005 to integrate data from U.S. divisions and produce actionable leads on insurgent activities. These efforts focused on disrupting command structures, foreign fighter inflows, and suicide bomber operations, aligning with broader security objectives to neutralize former regime elements and foreign terrorists. The task force's targeting process proved effective in hunting individual terrorists, yielding intelligence that supported major campaigns such as the November 2004 operation, which cleared a key insurgent safe haven and enabled secure elections in January 2005. By maintaining persistent small-unit actions, it prevented insurgent massing in areas like and , while countering Iranian influence through captures that exposed ties to Shia militias and advanced weaponry like explosively formed penetrators. Military assessments indicate these operations reduced overall attacks by approximately half between June and November 2005, with daily incidents dropping from 299 in January 2005 to 90 on day, loosening AQI's control over Sunni regions and facilitating local political engagement. Additionally, 6-26's disruption of cross-border networks and facilitation cells limited insurgent logistics and recruitment, contributing to temporary stabilization in central hotspots like . This intelligence-driven approach emphasized precision to minimize civilian impact while maximizing pressure on adaptive adversaries, though public on exact capture numbers remains limited due to operational . Overall, the task force's with conventional forces enhanced counter-insurgency adaptability, providing empirical gains in degrading networked threats amid evolving .

Role in Targeting Abu Musab al-Zarqawi

Task Force 6-26 was established as part of efforts to pursue high-value targets in , with a primary operational focus on locating and neutralizing , the Jordanian-born leader of responsible for numerous bombings and insurgent attacks. The unit's mission prioritized intelligence extraction to disrupt Zarqawi's network, which had orchestrated attacks killing over 1,000 people by mid-2004, including the beheading of American contractor Nicholas Berg in May 2004. Operators pursued leads aggressively, with one former member stating that "anytime there was even the smell of Zarqawi anywhere, we were on it like white on rice." Central to this effort was the task force's use of at as a and site from 2003 through much of 2004, where detainees suspected of ties to Zarqawi's group were held and questioned to yield actionable intelligence on his movements, associates, and safe houses. This facility supported raids and captures that degraded Zarqawi's operational capacity, including the elimination of several of his lieutenants through tips derived from interrogations. The task force's work built a cumulative intelligence picture of Zarqawi's evasion tactics, such as his reliance on couriers and rural hideouts north of , informing subsequent JSOC operations under evolving designations like Task Force 145. These intelligence-driven activities contributed to the broader campaign that enabled a precise U.S. on June 7, 2006, which killed Zarqawi and his spiritual adviser Abd-Al-Rahman at a near , confirmed by biometric identification and facial recognition. Prior captures by Task Force 6-26 elements had yielded data on Zarqawi's inner circle, facilitating the network penetration that produced the final tip from a captured , though direct attribution of the terminal remains classified. The operation involved two F-16s dropping 500-pound bombs, demonstrating the integration of ground with air assets in elimination. Zarqawi's death disrupted temporarily, reducing suicide bombings by over 50% in the following months, though his successors adapted the group's tactics.

Dissolution and Legacy

Transition to Successor Units

Task Force 6-26 underwent a redesignation to Task Force 145 in early 2006, reflecting the evolving operational needs of (JSOC) in amid ongoing high-value target (HVT) pursuits. This change incorporated enhanced intelligence fusion and structural refinements to address insurgent adaptations following intensified raids. The successor unit, Task Force 145, retained the core mandate of capturing or neutralizing HVTs, including Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's lieutenants and emerging leaders after Zarqawi's elimination on June 7, 2006. Operations expanded to include more integrated special operations elements, such as and SEAL Team 6, focusing on precision strikes and network disruption in volatile areas like Anbar Province. By late , 145 had conducted hundreds of raids, yielding key intelligence that supported the U.S. troop strategy, though specific metrics remain classified. The marked a shift toward sustained persistence rather than a full dissolution, with the 's framework persisting into subsequent JSOC entities like Task Force 88 for advisory roles until the 2011 withdrawal from . This evolution prioritized adaptability over static structure, enabling continuity in degrading insurgent capabilities despite scrutiny over prior methods.

Long-Term Evaluations

Retrospective analyses of Task Force 6-26's operations emphasize their role in disrupting (AQI) networks through (HVT) raids and interrogations, yielding measurable reductions in insurgent violence during the 2007-2008 period. Interagency HVT teams, including elements akin to those in TF 6-26, facilitated the elimination of key leaders like in June 2006, supported by over 600 hours of persistent intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR), which fragmented AQI command structures and enabled broader (COIN) efforts. Civilian deaths in declined by approximately 70% in 2007 and an additional 80% in , attributed in part to these targeted operations that cleared space for population security and Iraqi force development. However, long-term critiques highlight limitations in sustainability and ethical trade-offs. HVT strategies proved tactically effective but required integration with conventional forces and non-kinetic measures to prevent network reconstitution; standalone raids often led to temporary disruptions followed by insurgent adaptation, as seen in early post-invasion periods before refinements. Allegations of detainee mistreatment at facilities like , documented in military investigations, eroded operational legitimacy and fueled for insurgents, with a Pentagon review acknowledging patterns of within TF 6-26 units despite no criminal prosecutions. These incidents, while not negating intelligence gains, underscored causal risks of aggressive tactics in alienating local populations and complicating long-term stabilization. The task force's innovations, such as the F3EAD (find, fix, finish, exploit, analyze, disseminate) cycle for rapid intelligence cycling, influenced subsequent U.S. doctrine, prioritizing fused intelligence-operations teams over siloed efforts. Evaluations from defense analysts note that TF 6-26's model accelerated the transition to Iraqi-led via training counterparts in the Iraqi Forces, contributing to enduring capabilities against ISIS remnants, though institutional fragility—dependent on leadership—limited scalability without doctrinal codification. Overall, while empirically effective in kinetic disruption (e.g., thousands of militia detentions in by mid-2007), the approach's long-term success hinged on complementary reforms, revealing HVT operations as a necessary but insufficient pillar of .

References

  1. [1]
    None
    Below is a merged response summarizing all mentions of Task Force 626 or 6-26 based on the provided segments. To retain all information in a dense and organized format, I will use a table in CSV format, followed by a concise narrative summary that integrates the details. This approach ensures maximum detail retention while maintaining readability.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Strategic Reflections - GovInfo
    Jul 1, 2004 · Muqtada al-Sadr had established a safe haven in Najaf, and terrorists and insurgents had established a safe haven in Fallujah. Coalition and.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  3. [3]
    Zarqawi and Task Force 145 - FDD's Long War Journal
    Apr 29, 2006 · The Army Times' Sean Naylor has a fascinating article on Task Force 145, which has replaced Task Force 626 and 121, and the hunt for Abu ...
  4. [4]
    The Task Force 121 Connection - Human Rights First
    ... Iraq and Afghanistan, and the role and responsibility of senior officers ... Task Force 121 (or TF-121), which has also been referred to as Task Force 6-26 ...
  5. [5]
    Camp Nama: British personnel reveal horrors of secret US base in ...
    Apr 1, 2013 · ... Iraq after the invasion have, for the first time, spoken about ... A few days later Task Force 121 was renamed Task Force 6-26. Shortly ...
  6. [6]
    In Secret Unit's 'Black Room,' a Grim Portrait of U.S. Abuse
    Mar 19, 2006 · As the Iraqi insurgency intensified in early 2004, an elite Special Operations forces unit converted one of Saddam Hussein's former military ...
  7. [7]
    Soldiers' Accounts of Detainee Abuse in Iraq - Human Rights Watch
    Through most of 2003 and 2004, the task force maintained a detention and interrogation facility within Camp Nama, at the Baghdad International Airport (often ...
  8. [8]
    Iraqi Prisoner Abuse Reported After Abu Ghraib Disclosures
    Dec 8, 2004 · Admiral Jacoby wrote that one of his officers had witnessed an interrogator from the special operations unit known as Task Force 6-26 "punch ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Strategic Reflections: Operation Iraqi Freedom July 2004-February ...
    Feb 8, 2007 · Task Force 6-26,* our special operations task force, resided at Balad Airbase. We felt that we had a good plan for joining MNF-I and Embassy.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] IRAQ - Department of Justice
    Oct 31, 2006 · “The torture and ill-treatment of detainees by US forces were highlighted in ... as Task Force 20, Task Force 121, Task Force 6-26, and Task Force ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Report to Defense Alleged Abuse Prison Interrogation Teams - The ...
    ... Task Force 121, and more recently renamed Task Force 6-26 -- was beating detainees and using a secret facility to hide its interrogations. The task force ...
  12. [12]
    British torture in the 'war on terror' - Ruth Blakeley, Sam Raphael, 2017
    Jun 16, 2016 · Task Force 121, later renamed Task Force 6-26, was a key US interagency unit comprising US Army, Navy and Air Force Special Forces and the ...
  13. [13]
    The Dark Legacy of Gen. McChrystal - Antiwar.com
    Jul 13, 2010 · During McChrystal's time, JSOC's missions in Iraq– particularly what has become known as Task Force 6-26 or Task Force 121, at the ...
  14. [14]
    Chapter 3 - NC Torture Report
    Detainees were brought to Camp Nama by a joint U.S.-U.K. special forces unit called Task Force 121. Its successor, Task Force 6-26, engaged in kicking, punching ...
  15. [15]
    https://www.hrw.org/report/2006/04/05/no-blood-no-foul/soldiers-failures-investigate-torture
  16. [16]
    4 soldiers punished for abuse of Iraqi prisoner - Chron
    The four soldiers were part of an elite secret unit known as Task Force 6-26, which was assigned to hunt down and capture high-value targets of Saddam Hussein's ...
  17. [17]
    American Torture Task Force 6-26 - In These Times
    Mar 18, 2006 · It's official mission was to extract information to help hunt down Iraq's most-wanted terrorist, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Its unofficial mission, ...Missing: early JSOC
  18. [18]
    New Army Documents Confirm Black Ops "Special Access Program ...
    Jan 12, 2006 · NEW YORK -- The American Civil Liberties Union today released new documents obtained from the Defense Department detailing abuse at U.S. ...
  19. [19]
    Army Documents (released by the government12/30/2004 ... - ACLU
    Jan 24, 2005 · Investigation into allegation by detainee that US forces had punched him in the stomach while transporting him to Abu Ghraib. Investigation ...
  20. [20]
    Log of Select Documents Received from DIA/DOS/FBI - ACLU
    Detainee abuse in violation of Geneva Conventions during TF 6-26 operations in Baghdad: 1. (5/11/04) Four or five non-interrogator personnel from the Task Force ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] DOD-044418
    Jul 30, 2004 · CO)Investigation by this office and review by Headquarters, U.S. Army Criminal. Investigation Command (USACIDC), determined there was ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Review of DoD-Directed Investigations of Detainee Abuse (U ...
    Aug 25, 2006 · investigate detention and interrogation operations initiated as a result of allegations of detainee abuse. We considered management comments on ...
  23. [23]
    Soldiers Not Held Accountable For Abuse - NYCLU
    The New York Civil Liberties Union is co-counsel in the case. Many of the documents released today implicate Special Forces, including Task Force 6-26 and Task ...
  24. [24]
    Detainees abused in 'Black Room' - Deseret News
    Mar 19, 2006 · As the Iraqi insurgency intensified in early 2004, an elite Special Operations forces unit converted one of Saddam Hussein's former military ...Missing: facility | Show results with:facility
  25. [25]
    IRAQ: Interrogation and Torture | Council on Foreign Relations
    Interrogators must justify that harsh treatment is “militarily necessary,” according to accounts of the document. Once approved, the treatment must be ...
  26. [26]
    Abu Ghraib not beginning, end of abuse – East Bay Times
    The Black Room was part of a temporary detention site at Camp Nama, the secret headquarters of a military unit known as Task Force 6-26. Located at Baghdad ...
  27. [27]
    Coalition forces kill Abu Musab al-Zarqawi - AF.mil
    Jun 8, 2006 · Gen. George W. Casey Jr., Multi-National Force-Iraq commanding general, announced the death of al-Qaida in Iraq leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi ...
  28. [28]
    The Ploy - The Atlantic
    May 1, 2007 · The inside story of how the interrogators of Task Force 145 cracked Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's inner circle—without resorting to torture—and hunted ...
  29. [29]
    Task Force 145 (TF 145) - GlobalSecurity.org
    Dec 8, 2011 · Task Force 145 is a secretive collection of the US elite troops, operating under Joint Special Operations Command, which was tasked with hunting down Abu Musab ...Missing: transition 6-26
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Secret Weapon: High-value Target Teams as an Organizational ...
    The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National. Defense University's (NDU's) dedicated research arm. INSS includes.Missing: 626 | Show results with:626
  31. [31]
    Pentagon Study Describes Abuse by Units in Iraq
    Jun 17, 2006 · ... Task Force 6-26, a subject of extensive allegations of misconduct that were reported by The New York Times in March. General Formica ...