Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

True shooting percentage

True shooting percentage (TS%) is an advanced statistic that measures a player's or team's scoring efficiency by accounting for all points produced from field goals, three-point shots, and free throws relative to the opportunities used to generate those points. It provides a single, comprehensive metric that adjusts for the different values and attempt costs of various shot types, offering a more holistic view of offensive production than simpler percentages. The formula for calculating TS% is PTS / (2 × TSA), where PTS represents total points scored and TSA (true shooting attempts) is defined as FGA + 0.44 × FTA; FGA stands for field goal attempts and FTA for free throw attempts. This structure effectively normalizes scoring attempts by treating two-point field goal attempts as costing one full , while scaling free throw attempts by 0.44 to approximate their partial value, such as in cases of and-ones or multiple free throws per . The result is expressed as a , allowing direct comparisons across players and eras. TS% is particularly valuable because it addresses limitations in traditional metrics like field goal percentage (FG%), which ignores the extra point value of three-pointers, and effective field goal percentage (eFG%), which adjusts for threes but excludes free throws. By incorporating free throws—often shot at higher success rates than field goals—TS% better reflects overall shooting proficiency, especially for players who draw fouls or rely on perimeter shooting. In modern NBA analysis, it serves as a key indicator of offensive efficiency, helping scouts, coaches, and fantasy managers identify undervalued performers who maximize points per opportunity. Historically part of the rise in basketball analytics during the early , TS% has become a staple in evaluating player development and team strategies, with league-wide averages typically ranging from 57% to 58% in recent seasons as three-point shooting and pace have evolved. Elite scorers like have posted TS% above 65% in peak seasons, underscoring its role in highlighting sustainable high-efficiency play.

Definition and Calculation

Formula

The true shooting percentage (TS%) is calculated using the formula: \text{TS\%} = \frac{\text{PTS}}{2 \times (\text{FGA} + 0.44 \times \text{FTA})} where represents the total points scored by a player or team, FGA denotes field goal attempts, and indicates free throw attempts. This formula provides a comprehensive measure of scoring efficiency by incorporating all scoring methods—field goals worth 2 or 3 points and free throws worth 1 point each—into a single that normalizes for the varying point values and attempt structures. The 0.44 multiplier applied to FTA accounts for the average contribution of free throw attempts to possession-ending shots, derived empirically from play-by-play data across NBA seasons from 2002–03 to 2005–06, where approximately 43.8% of free throws terminated a possession. This adjustment reflects typical foul scenarios, such as two-shot fouls (yielding about 2 FTA per possession), and-1 opportunities (1 FTA after a made field goal), or single technical free throws, ensuring that free throws are weighted relative to field goal attempts in terms of possession usage rather than treating each free throw as a full equivalent to a field goal attempt. To derive the formula step by step from basic scoring components:
  1. Total points scored () aggregate all contributions: 2 points per made two-point field goal, 3 points per made , and 1 point per made .
  2. Field goal attempts (FGA) each represent a full possession-ending opportunity, typically normalized by multiplying by 2 in the denominator to scale the metric comparably to traditional (which ignores free throws and three-point value), yielding a baseline of PTS / (2 × FGA) for field goals alone.
  3. Free throw attempts (FTA) must be adjusted because they often occur in multiples per possession and do not always end possessions (e.g., due to offensive rebounds on misses). The empirical factor of 0.44 approximates the average number of free throw possessions as 0.44 × FTA, based on the observed rate at which free throws conclude plays.
  4. Combining these, the total "true shooting attempts" (TSA) become FGA + 0.44 × FTA, and dividing PTS by twice this value produces TS%, which estimates points per equivalent two-point field goal attempt across all shot types.
For example, consider a player who scores 25 points on 20 attempts and 5 attempts. The calculation is: \text{TS\%} = \frac{25}{2 \times (20 + 0.44 \times 5)} = \frac{25}{2 \times (20 + 2.2)} = \frac{25}{44.4} \approx 56.3\% This result indicates the player's overall shooting efficiency on a scale similar to .

Interpretation

True shooting percentage (TS%) provides a comprehensive measure of scoring efficiency by accounting for the differential value of two-point s, three-point s, and s, thereby rewarding and teams that optimize their selection toward higher-value attempts. In the NBA, TS% values typically range from around 40% for inefficient shooters to over 65% for elite performers, with league-wide averages increasing over time to approximately 57-58% in recent seasons due to improved three-point and proficiency. To contextualize performance, TS% below 50% generally indicates poor shooting efficiency, often seen in high-volume but low-percentage shooters, while 55-60% represents average to solid output aligned with league norms, and values above 60% signify elite efficiency that outperforms typical scoring thresholds. This metric adjusts for scoring types by effectively valuing three-pointers more highly—since they yield three points from one possession—compared to two-pointers, and by incorporating free throws to penalize poor finishing at the line while crediting and-1 opportunities or drawn fouls. For instance, a player achieving 60% TS% demonstrates superior overall efficiency compared to one limited to 50% without significant free-throw contributions, as the former leverages threes and free throws to maximize points per attempt; exemplified this in a game with just 32.4% FG% but 62.9% TS%, boosted by perfect 100% free-throw shooting on 24 attempts. Thus, high TS% highlights not just accuracy but strategic scoring that elevates a player's impact beyond raw rates.

Comparison to Other Efficiency Metrics

Versus Field Goal Percentage

Field goal percentage (FG%) is calculated as the ratio of made field goals to field goal attempts, expressed as FG% = FGM / FGA. This metric evaluates a player's or team's success in converting field goal attempts into points but treats all field goals equally, regardless of whether they are two-pointers or three-pointers, and completely disregards free throws. A key limitation of FG% is that it overvalues two-point shots and ignores free throw efficiency, often leading to misleading assessments of overall scoring efficiency. For instance, a player who shoots 50% on two-point attempts but has a poor free throw percentage, such as below 70%, may appear more efficient than they truly are, as FG% does not penalize missed free throws or reward the additional value of three-pointers. True shooting percentage (TS%) addresses these shortcomings by incorporating all scoring attempts—field goals, three-pointers, and free throws—into a single, holistic efficiency measure that adjusts for the point values and volume of each. This provides a more accurate representation of a player's scoring impact, as it penalizes inefficiency at the free-throw line and accounts for the bonus from successful three-point shooting. In the 2020s NBA, top FG% leaders have often posted lower TS% than expected due to high free throw volume and subpar free throw accuracy; for example, in the 2023-24 season, posted a 66.1% FG% but had a TS% of 67.5%, reflecting his 63.8% free throw shooting on 390 attempts.

Versus Effective Field Goal Percentage

The effective field goal percentage (eFG%) adjusts to account for the increased value of three-point shots, using the eFG% = (FGM + 0.5 × 3PM) / FGA. This metric provides a more accurate representation of by treating each three-point make as equivalent to 1.5 two-point makes, but it excludes free throws entirely from the calculation. As a result, eFG% can undervalue players who frequently draw fouls and attempt many free throws, as their contributions from the line are not factored into the efficiency measure. True shooting percentage (TS%) builds upon this foundation by integrating free throw performance, creating a holistic assessment of scoring efficiency that includes field goals, three-pointers, and free throws. A player with average field goal shooting but a high volume of free throw attempts may thus show a modest eFG% while achieving a higher TS%, emphasizing the role of foul-drawing in overall production. This dynamic was prominent among big men in the , such as , whose career eFG% stood at .588—elite for his position—but whose TS% reached .602, aided by frequent trips to the line despite a 56.7% free throw rate. In contrast, TS% exposes limitations in for players reliant on three-point volume but weak at the line, where high rankings may not translate to superior overall . Such discrepancies appeared regularly in NBA player statistics from the onward, as the era's emphasis on three-point shooting amplified advantages without crediting accuracy. For instance, maintained an exceptional of .674 through dominant interior finishing but posted a TS% of .644, tempered by his 63.3% percentage and high attempt volume.

Significance in Basketball Analysis

Player Evaluation

True shooting percentage (TS%) plays a crucial role in scouting by highlighting players who convert scoring opportunities efficiently, independent of shot volume, allowing evaluators to identify undervalued talents with superior offensive impact. For instance, Stephen Curry's career TS% of 62.6% underscores his elite efficiency, particularly from three-point range, where his ability to generate high-value shots has made him a model for modern perimeter scorers in draft assessments and roster building. TS% integrates into broader advanced metrics like (PER), developed by John Hollinger, where it serves as a foundational component to adjust for shooting efficiency across field goals, three-pointers, and free throws, providing a normalized view of per-minute productivity. Similarly, in calculations on Basketball-Reference, TS% informs offensive contributions by measuring points produced relative to possessions used, helping quantify a player's value in team success beyond raw scoring totals. In historical contexts, such as MVP voting, elevated TS% has bolstered cases for players like , whose 66.1% mark in the 2021-22 season highlighted his scoring versatility and efficiency, contributing to his second consecutive award amid debates over individual impact. Jokić's sustained high TS%—leading the league at 70.1% in 2022-23—further exemplified how the metric supports recognition of multifaceted big men in the . Despite its strengths, TS% has limitations, as it evaluates only offensive shooting efficiency without incorporating defensive contributions or the contextual difficulty of shots beyond their type, necessitating pairing with metrics like defensive rating for comprehensive player assessment. Additionally, while pace-independent, it can vary based on team schemes and foul-drawing tendencies, requiring broader statistical context to avoid overemphasizing isolated efficiency.

Team Strategy

In team strategy, true shooting percentage (TS%) serves as a key metric for optimizing lineups by identifying combinations that enhance overall scoring efficiency, particularly in high-pressure scenarios such as moments. Coaches analyze lineup data to prioritize players with elevated individual TS%—often above the league average of approximately 57%—to ensure that possessions end in higher-value outcomes, minimizing turnovers and low-efficiency shots. For instance, models applied to NBA data have shown TS% as a primary differentiator for quality lineups, alongside rebounding, when predicting net rating in playoff contexts like the 2023 postseason. Play-calling decisions leverage TS% to exploit opponent weaknesses, such as intentionally fouling players with subpar free-throw accuracy to disrupt their scoring rhythm. This tactic, popularized as the "hack-a-Shaq" strategy, forces low-efficiency free-throw shooters (typically below 53% from the line, compared to the NBA average of around 78%) into situations where their effective TS% drops below league norms, yielding fewer points per possession for the defense. Additionally, offensive schemes emphasize floor spacing to generate open three-point attempts for shooters, as successful threes inflate team TS% by accounting for the shot's higher point value relative to twos, often pushing group efficiency above 60% in optimized sets. Roster construction in the post-2010 era has increasingly incorporated during drafts, with teams college prospects exhibiting strong shooting to align with the league's evolving emphasis on versatile scorers. This shift correlates with a sustained rise in NBA-wide average TS%, from 54.3% in the 2009-10 season to 58.0% by 2023-24, driven by selections favoring players who demonstrate TS% above 55% in pre-draft evaluations. Such data-informed approaches help build rosters capable of sustaining high-efficiency offenses amid the three-point revolution. A prominent is the ' dominance in the , where small-ball lineups—featuring multiple perimeter-oriented players—were validated through superior TS%, reaching 59.8% in their 2015-16 season, the league's highest. This strategy maximized spacing and assisted threes, resulting in a 46-3 record when team TS% hit or exceeded 56.0%, underscoring how TS%-centric tactics propelled four titles by elevating offensive efficiency against varied defenses.

Usage Across Leagues

National Basketball Association

In the (NBA), true shooting percentage (TS%) serves as a critical metric for assessing offensive efficiency, with league-wide averages showing a marked historical progression. During the , the average TS% hovered around 52-53%, reflecting a shot distribution dominated by two-point attempts and mid-range jumpers. By the 2020s, this figure had risen to approximately 57.5% as of the 2024-25 season, driven primarily by the league's strategic shift toward three-point shooting, which increased from about 15 attempts per team per game in the early to over 35 in recent seasons. This evolution has elevated overall scoring efficiency, as teams prioritize high-value shots that better account for the added points from threes and free throws in the TS% calculation. Among NBA players, standout TS% leaders highlight the metric's value in identifying elite scorers, particularly when adjusted for volume. holds a career TS% of 60.5% over 1,217 games, renowned for his playmaking and accurate shooting that maximized efficiency. Modern stars like exemplify this further, posting a 62.0% career TS% across more than 1,000 games, combining elite three-point and free-throw shooting with drives to the rim. These figures surpass average by significant margins, underscoring how TS% distinguishes players who optimize scoring opportunities. Since the mid-2000s, NBA teams have integrated TS% into their analytics frameworks, building on John Hollinger's introduction of the statistic in his 2004 book Basketball on Paper, which emphasized its role in evaluating true scoring impact. This adoption has influenced front-office decisions, including allocations and evaluations, where high TS% performers often command premium contracts due to their proven efficiency in contributing to wins. For instance, analytics-driven teams like the under in the late used metrics like TS% to prioritize value in roster construction and negotiations. Recent trends in NBA TS% reflect the impact of rule changes aimed at enhancing offensive flow, such as the 2018-19 implementation of stricter freedom-of-movement guidelines that reduced peripheral contact on drives. These adjustments led to an offensive boom, with league TS% climbing from 56.0% in 2018-19 to 58.1% by 2022-23, remaining around 58.0% in 2023-24 and 57.6% as of November 2025 in the 2024-25 season, as players benefited from cleaner paths to the basket and more free-throw opportunities relative to field goal attempts. This has further reinforced the three-point revolution, making TS% above 60% a benchmark for star-level efficiency in the current era.

International and College Basketball

In international basketball under FIBA rules, true shooting percentage (TS%) typically registers slightly lower league averages of around 54-56% compared to the NBA's higher marks, attributable to a slower overall and reduced volume of three-point attempts that emphasize and interior efficiency. This stylistic difference is evident in major competitions like the Olympics, where team TS% in the 2024 Paris Games hovered in the mid-50s for medal contenders such as (55.2%) and the (56.8%), reflecting defensive schemes that limit high-efficiency shots. In the , similar trends hold, with league-wide TS% averaging approximately 55% across recent seasons, as teams prioritize balanced offenses amid physical play and shorter shot clocks. In NCAA , TS% exhibits greater variance due to disparities in levels across programs, allowing elite scorers to post standout figures while average teams lag behind league norms of about 53-55%. For instance, Duke's achieved an exceptional 70.2% TS% during the 2018-19 season, underscoring his dominance in converting possessions near the rim amid weaker competition. This variability highlights how TS% can amplify the impact of top prospects in college, where defensive gaps inflate efficiency for skilled players. Applying TS% across these leagues presents challenges stemming from divergent foul rules, which alter free-throw attempt (FTA) rates and thus the weighting of free throws in the ; FIBA's stricter limits—five personal fouls per and bonus free throws only after four team fouls per quarter—result in 20-25% fewer FTAs per game than in the NBA, necessitating league-specific benchmarks to avoid understating shooting prowess. Analysts recommend pace-adjusted and rule-normalized variants of TS% for cross-league comparisons, ensuring fair evaluation of efficiency in contexts with fewer and-1 opportunities. Since the , TS% has seen growing adoption in international and college scouting for NBA prospects, with teams leveraging it to identify efficient scorers adaptable to pro paces, as seen in evaluations of standouts like , whose high TS% (over 60%) in FIBA play foreshadowed his NBA success. This metric's emphasis on holistic scoring has become integral to draft models, contrasting with NBA trends where even higher thresholds define elite performance.

History and Development

Origins

True shooting percentage (TS%) emerged in the early 2000s amid the growing field of analytics, building on work from the where statisticians sought to refine shooting efficiency metrics beyond the limitations of (FG%), which failed to account for the differential value of three-pointers and free throws. Analysts like Dean Oliver, who began contributing to scouting and statistical analysis during that decade, played a pivotal role in developing advanced stats to capture a more holistic view of scoring efficiency. Oliver's early work emphasized the need for metrics that integrated all forms of shooting attempts, laying the foundation for TS% as a tool to evaluate how effectively players or teams converted possessions into points. TS% is commonly attributed to analyst John Hollinger, who developed it as part of his advanced metrics framework. The conceptualization of TS% drew inspiration from John Hollinger's (PER) framework, introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s, which aimed to quantify overall player contributions but highlighted the importance of shooting as a core component. TS% was crafted as a streamlined "points per shooting attempt" measure, adjusting for possessions and three-point bonuses to provide a league-average benchmark around 52% for balanced offenses. This approach addressed FG%'s bias toward two-point shots, offering a neutral efficiency gauge that aligned with PER's goal of isolating skill from opportunity. Hollinger's emphasis on adjusted shooting metrics in his writings influenced the drive to standardize such calculations for broader analytical use. TS% first gained visibility through publications and online discussions around , coinciding with the rise of sabermetrics-inspired analysis on platforms like , where Hollinger incorporated it into player and team evaluations. It appeared in early datasets compiled by analytics enthusiasts, predating its formal integration into sites like Basketball-Reference.com, which began tracking and displaying the stat systematically shortly thereafter. These initial exposures marked TS% as a practical extension of theoretical work, enabling comparisons across eras and players without the distortions of era-specific rule changes. Contributions from key innovators, including statisticians involved in pre-conference efforts that foreshadowed the MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference (launched in 2007), further shaped TS%'s origins. These pioneers, often working independently or in small groups during the and early , tested efficiency models in academic and consulting contexts, refining TS% through iterative discussions on valuation and scoring impacts. Their high-impact efforts prioritized verifiable data from NBA play-by-play logs, establishing TS% as a cornerstone of evidence-based evaluation before widespread adoption.

Evolution and Adoption

True shooting percentage began gaining prominence in basketball analytics during the mid-2000s, largely through the efforts of analysts like John Hollinger at , who integrated it into player statistics and evaluations starting with the 2003-04 season. This metric was further popularized by platforms such as NBA.com, where it featured in advanced stat breakdowns by 2010, allowing fans and media to assess shooting efficiency more comprehensively beyond traditional field goal percentages. By that point, TS% had become a staple in media coverage, with routinely using it to highlight player and team performance in articles and broadcasts. The rise of TS% paralleled the broader analytics revolution inspired by the 2003 publication of , which emphasized data-driven decision-making in and influenced NBA front offices to adopt similar approaches. In , this led to TS% becoming a standard tool in fantasy leagues for evaluating scorer efficiency and in betting models for predicting outcomes based on shooting trends. , as general manager of the from 2007 onward, championed its use in team strategy, crediting it with refining player acquisition and in-game tactics amid the growing emphasis on advanced metrics. Adoption accelerated in the as all 30 NBA teams established dedicated departments, incorporating TS% into scouting, roster construction, and performance analysis. For instance, the formalized their group around 2013, leveraging TS% to optimize lineups during ' return and their 2016 championship run. This widespread institutionalization marked TS% as an essential metric for professional evaluation, shifting focus from raw scoring volume to efficient shot creation. Globally, TS% spread to international competitions, with integrating advanced statistics including shooting efficiency measures like TS% into official player and team data by the mid-2010s to align with NBA-style analytics. Academic research further validated its value, demonstrating strong between team TS% and win percentages—for example, studies showing it as a superior predictor of success compared to , with a correlation of approximately 0.82 with win percentages in NBA seasons.

References

  1. [1]
    Glossary | Basketball-Reference.com
    TS% - True Shooting Percentage; the formula is PTS / (2 * TSA). True shooting percentage is a measure of shooting efficiency that takes into account field ...
  2. [2]
    NBA STATS | True Shooting Percentage (TS%) Explained - NBAstuffer
    True Shooting Percentage Formula. TS%=0.5*(Total Points)/{(Total Field Goal Attempts) + 0.44*(Total Free Throw Attempts)} True Shooting Percentage Formula.
  3. [3]
    The Ultimate Guide to True Shooting Percentage (TS ... - Data4Basket
    Sep 17, 2025 · In short: TS% = the real measure of how much value each scoring possession brings. EuroLeague 2024/25: Leaders in True Shooting %. Looking at ...What Is True Shooting... · Why True Shooting Matters · NBA 2024/25: TS% Leaders<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Explaining True Shooting Percentage (TS%) - The Spax
    Feb 12, 2020 · True Shooting Percentage (TS%) measures scoring efficiency based on points scored over possessions attempted, and free throws are weighed as ...
  5. [5]
    Using True Shooting Percentage helps uncover hidden fantasy values
    Dec 5, 2019 · While volume is king in fantasy basketball, efficiency matters as well. John Cregan explains how a closer look at True Shooting Percentage ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] A Starting Point for Analyzing Basketball Statistics - ViSH
    Mar 2, 2016 · Effective field goal percentage accounts for made three pointers (3PM), whereas true shooting percentage accounts for both three pointers and ...
  7. [7]
    Stat Glossary | Stats | NBA.com
    Name: 3 Point Field Goal Percentage ; Definition: The percentage of 3 point field goal attempts that a player makes ; Formula: (3PM)/(3PA) ; Type: Traditional ...
  8. [8]
    2024-25 NBA Player Stats: Advanced - Basketball-Reference.com
    League Average .566 .411 .278, 5.2, 14.8, 10.0, 15.0, 1.6, 2.0, 12.0, 19.8. Bold season totals indicate player led league. Black Ink appears for stats with a ...
  9. [9]
    2023-24 NBA Player Stats: Advanced | Basketball-Reference.com
    Checkout the Advanced player stats for 2023-24 NBA Season and more on Basketball-Reference.com.
  10. [10]
    2023-24 NBA Leaders - Basketball-Reference.com
    20. Norman Powell • LAC .594. Show #2-20. View all players in this category. True Shooting Pct. 1. Daniel Gafford • TOT .731. 2. Grayson Allen • PHO .679. 3.
  11. [11]
    Statistical Analysis Primer | Oklahoma City Thunder - NBA
    Jan 19, 2005 · Kevin Pelton, SUPERSONICS.COM | updated September 12, 2007 Statistical analysis of the NBA is still gaining attention, both inside the ...
  12. [12]
    Relationship Between TS% and eFG% | Squared Statistics
    Oct 10, 2017 · In this article, we focus on an advanced statistic called the True Shooting Percentage (TS%). To understand this metric, we focus on the simplistic field goal ...
  13. [13]
    DeAndre Jordan Stats, Height, Weight, Position, Draft Status and more | Basketball-Reference.com
    ### DeAndre Jordan Career Advanced Stats Summary
  14. [14]
    Steph Curry's True Shooting Percentage and Average Shot Distance
    Jun 23, 2024 · Steph Curry holds the 6th highest career true shooting percentage (TS%) in NBA history at 62.6%. His average shot distance is 18.4 feet.Missing: typical | Show results with:typical
  15. [15]
    Looking Back: Warriors' Vets Pre-Draft Scouting Reports - NBA
    Jun 20, 2023 · Stephen Curry was drafted seventh overall by the Warriors in the ... shooting 72.8 percent at the basket. "First step is average at ...
  16. [16]
    Hollinger's NBA Player Stats - National Basketball Association - ESPN
    True Shooting Percentage = Total points / [(FGA + (0.44 x FTA)] ... PER: Player Efficiency Rating is the overall rating of a player's per-minute statistical ...TS% · Rookies · EWA · PG
  17. [17]
    Basketball Analytics: Predicting Win Shares - Medium
    Feb 14, 2019 · True shooting percentage (TS%) measures a player's shooting efficiency by calculating two- and three-point field goals and free throws. I ...
  18. [18]
    Inside the numbers behind Nikola Jokic's repeat as Kia NBA MVP
    May 11, 2022 · Inside the numbers behind Nikola Jokic's repeat as Kia NBA MVP ; Effective FG %, 60.2, 62.0 ; True Shooting %, 64.7, 66.1 ; Usage Rate, 29.3, 30.9.
  19. [19]
    [Koreen] Nikola Jokic leads the league with a 70.3 true shooting ...
    Mar 5, 2023 · Nikola Jokic leads the league with a 70.3 true shooting percentage. He's taken 192 non-paint shots. The next five guys have taken 89. Total.r/nba on Reddit: Which MVP winners of the 21st century had a better ...Top 10 High-Volume Scorers with Ridiculous True Shooting ... - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  20. [20]
    What Is True Shooting Percentage (TS%) In Basketball - BetUS
    Jul 19, 2024 · The Drawbacks of Using TS% · Doesn't Account for Defense: TS% focuses solely on scoring efficiency. · Dependent on Context: A player's TS% can be ...
  21. [21]
    True Shooting Percentage: A Key Stat for NBA Fantasy Bettors
    Sep 24, 2021 · True shooting percentage (abbreviated TS%) measures the efficiency with which a player shoots the ball. It is an advanced statistic that looks to more ...
  22. [22]
    None
    ### Summary of True Shooting Percentage (TS%) in NBA Lineup Optimization
  23. [23]
    Ugly basketball: How the NBA can get rid of the Hack-a-Shaq - ESPN
    May 4, 2015 · The Hack-a-Shaq, employed on poor free throw shooters like DeAndre Jordan, makes NBA games longer and less entertaining.
  24. [24]
    NBA League Averages - Per Game | Basketball-Reference.com
    Shooting, Advanced. Rk, Season, Lg, Age, Ht, Wt, G, MP, FG, FGA, 3P, 3PA, FT, FTA, ORB, DRB, TRB, AST, STL, BLK, TOV, PF, PTS, FG%, 3P%, FT%, Pace, eFG%, TOV% ...
  25. [25]
    Why The Warriors Are So Tough To Beat | FiveThirtyEight
    a TS% of .560 or higher. · Poor shooting — a TS% of .510 or lower. · Average shooting — anything in between.
  26. [26]
    NBA & ABA Career Leaders and Records for True Shooting Pct
    Checkout the complete list of NBA & ABACareer Leaders and Records for and more on Basketball-Reference.com.
  27. [27]
    Rules changes have led to an NBA offensive boom this season, as ...
    Apr 2, 2019 · “More driving possessions, more efficiency within those possessions, leads to more scoring,” said McCutchen. “Does the freedom of movement play ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Euroleague All-time Stats and League Average - Hack a Stat
    The data includes traditional and advanced stats for teams and players from 2000/2001 to 2019/2020, and seasonal league averages.
  29. [29]
    International Basketball 101: Olympic vs. NBA rules
    Jul 15, 2024 · Technical Fouls: FIBA – One free throw and possession of the ball at center; NBA – One free throw per technical foul; play resumes ...
  30. [30]
    FIBA vs NBA rules differences explained - Basketnews.com
    Jul 26, 2024 · The personal foul limit in the NBA is set at six, while FIBA grants only five personal fouls. There are technical fouls in both rulesets.
  31. [31]
    How NBA Teams Use Advanced Stats to Draft Smarter - NBAstuffer
    This article examines how NBA teams utilise advanced statistics in developing a more effective draft strategy.
  32. [32]
    2025 NBA draft big board rankings: Top 100 prospects - ESPN
    Jun 21, 2025 · Notes: True shooting percentage (TS%) is a formula that blends field goal percentage with free throw shooting and 3-point shooting into one ...
  33. [33]
    Dean Oliver on Quantitative Analysis - SLAM Magazine
    Oct 16, 2010 · He served as an assistant coach there for three years after graduating, then worked for a basketball scouting service from 1990-94. Once he ...
  34. [34]
    What is PER? - ESPN
    Aug 8, 2011 · What is PER? John Hollinger. Aug 8, 2011, 07:10 PM ET. Copy Link; Email · Print. The player efficiency rating (PER) is a rating of a player's ...Missing: introduction date
  35. [35]
    Calculating PER | Basketball-Reference.com
    The Player Efficiency Rating (PER) is a per-minute rating developed by ESPN.com columnist John Hollinger.Missing: true | Show results with:true
  36. [36]
    State of Analytics: How the 'Idiots Who Believe' in the ... - Stats Perform
    Soon, basketball teams realized this mindset could indeed translate to the court and success could likewise be mined from the data. Because technology wasn't ...
  37. [37]
    2003-04 Hollinger NBA Player Statistics - ESPN
    TS%: True Shooting Percentage - what a player's shooting percentage would be if we accounted for free throws and 3-pointers. True Shooting Percentage = Total ...
  38. [38]
    An introduction into the world of advanced basketball analytics - NBA
    Mar 11, 2010 · It really comes down to the fact that the traditional barometer of a player's shooting ability (field goal percentage) weighs 2-pointers and 3- ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  39. [39]
    NBA Analytics: Definitive Guide to Moneyball in Basketball
    NBA analytics, or 'Moneyball,' uses data to make decisions, like player evaluation, contract negotiations, and in-game decisions.
  40. [40]
    What True Shooting Percentage reveals about players like Paul ...
    Feb 4, 2021 · TS% is a formula that artfully conflates field goal percentage, 3-point percentage and free throw percentage into a single all-encompassing percentage.
  41. [41]
    Why Rockets GM Daryl Morey Is the Last Person the NBA ... - Fortune
    Oct 18, 2019 · In the analytics world, he's credited with the invention of true shooting percentage, an advanced statistic that measures shooting ...Missing: create | Show results with:create
  42. [42]
    Basketball analytics investment is key to NBA wins and ... - MIT News
    Mar 25, 2025 · An MIT study finds NBA teams that hired more analytics staff, and invested more in data analysis, tended to win more games.Missing: true percentage
  43. [43]
    Cleveland Cavaliers Staff & Executives - RealGM
    Team Draft History · Draft Rights · Lottery Winners · Lottery History · Team Lottery ... Director of Analytics 2013-14 to 2021-22. Vice President of Basketball ...
  44. [44]
    NBA Analytics - What's in a Win? - Life Is Study
    Feb 20, 2015 · True shooting percentage is an even stronger indicator of wins than points per game, which has a correlation of 0.77 to wins.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies