Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Use tax

Use tax is a consumption tax imposed by U.S. states on the storage, use, or other consumption of tangible personal property or taxable services within the state when the vendor did not collect and remit the equivalent sales tax, typically due to the purchase occurring out-of-state, online, or from an exempt seller.^[1]^[2]^[3] The tax rate generally mirrors the state's sales tax rate, applied to the purchase price or fair market value of the item, ensuring that goods consumed locally bear equivalent fiscal burdens regardless of acquisition origin.^[4]^[5] Enacted as a complement to sales taxes since the 1930s, use tax addresses revenue leakage from interstate commerce by requiring consumers or businesses to self-report and pay directly to the state, thereby protecting in-state retailers from competitive disadvantages posed by untaxed out-of-state competitors.^[6]^[7] Compliance relies on purchaser diligence, with states providing schedules for common items like vehicles or large appliances, though enforcement often involves audits, penalties for nonpayment, and increasing reliance on vendor collection post the 2018 South Dakota v. Wayfair Supreme Court decision, which expanded nexus rules for remote sellers.^[8]^[9] Despite these mechanisms, empirical collection rates remain low—often below 10% for individual filers—highlighting systemic underreporting driven by behavioral avoidance rather than legal exemptions.^[10]

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

Use tax is a consumption tax imposed on the storage, use, or consumption of tangible personal property or taxable services within a U.S. state when the equivalent sales tax has not been paid to the vendor at the time of purchase.^[2] It applies to items acquired from out-of-state sellers, online retailers without sufficient nexus in the state, or tax-exempt sources, ensuring taxation occurs upon the item's utilization rather than solely at the point of sale.^[4] Rates typically match the state's sales tax rate, varying by jurisdiction—for instance, 6.25% in Texas as of 2023 or 4% base plus local add-ons in New York.^[2]^[9] The core purpose of use tax is to complement sales tax by eliminating incentives for consumers to evade taxation through cross-border or untaxed purchases, thereby maintaining revenue neutrality and market equity between in-state and out-of-state goods.^[11] Without it, residents could systematically avoid state taxes by sourcing from vendors not obligated to collect sales tax, distorting competition for local retailers who bear the collection burden and eroding state fiscal bases—estimated losses exceeding $8 billion annually across U.S. states pre-Wayfair ruling in 2018.^[12] This mechanism enforces a uniform consumption tax principle: taxation based on where the good is used, not sold, aligning with causal incidence on end-users rather than intermediaries.^[3] Use tax thus serves both protective and revenue-securing functions, safeguarding domestic commerce from undercutting by untaxed imports while capturing fiscal leakage from direct consumer actions like personal imports or business acquisitions.^[1] It applies broadly to individuals for household goods and to businesses for equipment or supplies, with self-reporting obligations underscoring its role in promoting compliance over evasion.^[5] Enacted in most states since the mid-20th century, it addresses inherent limitations in sales tax collection amid growing interstate trade.^[9]

Relation to Sales Tax

Use tax functions as the complement to sales tax by imposing a tax on the storage, use, or consumption of tangible personal property or taxable services within a state when sales tax was not paid at the point of purchase.^[9] ^[13] This mechanism ensures that all intra-state consumption is taxed equivalently, regardless of whether the transaction occurred with an in-state retailer or an out-of-state vendor.^[14] For instance, purchases from online sellers lacking sufficient nexus in the buyer's state, or direct imports, trigger use tax liability to prevent revenue loss and competitive disadvantages for local sellers.^[15] The rate of use tax mirrors the applicable sales tax rate in the jurisdiction, typically ranging from 4% to over 10% when including local add-ons, applied to the purchase price or fair market value of the item.^[8] ^[5] This parity avoids double taxation while closing gaps exploited by interstate commerce; without use tax, consumers could evade taxation by sourcing from low-tax or non-collecting jurisdictions, undermining the sales tax base.^[16] Historically, use taxes emerged in the 1930s as sales taxes proliferated during the Great Depression, with California enacting the first in 1935 to safeguard in-state merchants from out-of-state competition and curb tax avoidance.^[17] Key distinctions lie in collection and administration: sales tax is typically remitted by the seller at the time of sale, whereas use tax requires self-reporting and payment by the purchaser, often annually or with income tax returns.^[18] ^[19] Sellers may also incur "seller's use tax" obligations if they have nexus but fail to collect sales tax, shifting some burden back to vendors.^[20] Compliance relies on buyer diligence, leading to widespread underreporting, though states enforce via audits and cross-referencing purchase records.^[14] The 2018 South Dakota v. Wayfair Supreme Court decision expanded remote seller nexus requirements, increasing sales tax collection and reducing some use tax reliance, yet use tax persists for untaxed acquisitions like business-to-business transfers or international purchases.^[14]

Historical Development

Origins and Early Adoption

The use tax originated in the United States during the 1930s, coinciding with the widespread adoption of state sales taxes amid fiscal pressures from the Great Depression. States faced declining property tax revenues and sought alternative sources, but interstate commerce allowed residents to evade sales taxes by purchasing goods from out-of-state vendors not liable for in-state collection. To address this avoidance and ensure equivalent taxation on all intrastate consumption, legislatures introduced use taxes on the storage, use, or consumption of tangible personal property bought in non-taxable transactions, typically mirroring sales tax rates and bases.^[21]^[17] Louisiana enacted the nation's first recognized use tax in 1934, applying it to merchandise purchased from out-of-state sellers and requiring self-assessment by consumers to report and remit the tax directly to the state.^[22]^[17] This measure complemented Louisiana's earlier sales tax experiments, though both were temporarily repealed in 1940 before reinstatement in 1948.^[17] The self-reporting mechanism reflected early enforcement challenges, as compliance relied on individual honesty without robust auditing capabilities. Early adoption spread quickly to other states integrating sales and use taxes into unified frameworks. California implemented its use tax effective July 1, 1935, alongside its sales tax, to capture revenue from untaxed interstate acquisitions.^[23] Washington State codified a combined general sales and use tax in 1935, building on its 1933 excise tax origins.^[17] By the end of the decade, as 22 states had adopted sales taxes, use taxes became standard companions, promoting uniformity in taxing consumption irrespective of purchase origin and safeguarding state revenues against cross-border shopping.^[21]

Key Legal Milestones

The first use tax statute in the United States was enacted by Louisiana in 1934, designed to tax the use of property purchased outside the state to complement its sales tax and prevent evasion.^[17] California followed in 1935 with its Retail Sales and Use Tax Act, effective July 1, imposing a use tax at the same rate as its sales tax on tangible personal property used within the state if no equivalent tax had been paid elsewhere.^[23] Washington State adopted a similar compensating use tax that same year, which became the subject of early constitutional challenges.^[17] In Henneford v. Silas Mason Co. (1937), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Washington's 2% use tax on equipment purchased out-of-state and used in the state, ruling it nondiscriminatory under the Commerce Clause because it applied equally to in-state and out-of-state purchases and provided credits for sales taxes paid to other jurisdictions. The decision affirmed that use taxes serve as compensatory measures to protect local revenue without burdening interstate commerce, provided they mirror sales tax rates and structures.^[24] Subsequent rulings addressed enforcement against out-of-state sellers. In National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of Illinois (1967), the Court held that states could not compel mail-order sellers lacking physical presence (beyond common carrier use) to collect and remit use taxes, limiting nexus to tangible connections within the state.^[17] This was reaffirmed in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota (1992), where the Court struck down a use tax collection requirement on an out-of-state vendor with no physical presence, emphasizing that such mandates unduly burden interstate commerce despite the complementary nature of use taxes.^[25] In Associated Industries of Missouri v. Lohman (1994), the Supreme Court invalidated portions of Missouri's use tax statute where the flat 1.5% additional rate resulted in total use taxes exceeding varying local sales taxes in certain jurisdictions, deeming it discriminatory against interstate commerce without uniform compensation.^[26] The ruling underscored that use taxes must align precisely with sales tax frameworks to avoid Commerce Clause violations.^[27] The landscape shifted with South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. (2018), where the Court overruled Quill and Bellas Hess, permitting states to establish economic nexus for sales and use tax collection based on in-state sales volume or transactions (e.g., $100,000 or 200 transactions annually) rather than physical presence alone.^[28] This decision facilitated greater enforcement of both sales and use taxes on remote sellers, reducing reliance on consumer self-reporting for use taxes while respecting state taxing authority.^[17]

Operational Mechanics

Self-Assessment and Reporting

Use tax requires self-assessment by the purchaser, who calculates the amount owed based on the purchase price of taxable goods or services acquired without payment of equivalent sales tax, typically applying the state's sales tax rate to that value.^[29] This process shifts the burden from sellers—who may lack nexus or collection obligations—to buyers, ensuring taxation on in-state consumption regardless of transaction location.^[18] Self-assessment demands accurate record-keeping of receipts, shipping costs, and any partial taxes paid to other jurisdictions, with deductions allowed only for verifiable credits against the destination state's rate.^[12] For individuals, reporting occurs primarily through annual state income tax returns, where dedicated lines or schedules capture aggregate use tax liability on personal purchases exceeding de minimis thresholds, such as out-of-state online or catalog orders.^[30] States like Massachusetts integrate this via Form 1, enabling filers to compute and remit owed amounts alongside income taxes, often with simplified worksheets for common items like vehicles or boats.^[30] Compliance relies on taxpayer initiative, as no automatic withholding applies, though some states provide online calculators or amnesty periods to facilitate voluntary payment.^[4] Businesses with sales tax permits self-assess and report use tax on periodic returns—monthly, quarterly, or annually—covering untaxed acquisitions for business use, such as equipment from exempt or remote vendors.^[4] These returns aggregate sales collections and use tax remittances, with liability accruing in the period of purchase or inventory withdrawal, requiring segregation of taxable versus exempt transactions.^[31] In jurisdictions like New York, filers use unified sales and use tax forms to declare and pay, offset by credits for taxes paid to suppliers, ensuring alignment with operational cash flows and audit trails.^[4] Failure to report accurately triggers interest from the due date, compounded by penalties up to 25% for negligence or higher for intent, underscoring the administrative onus on entities with higher transaction volumes.^[29]

Calculation Methods

Use tax liability is determined by multiplying the applicable state or local use tax rate—typically equivalent to the corresponding sales tax rate—by the taxable value of the property, which is generally the purchase price excluding any sales or use tax already paid.^[15] ^[18] If the purchase price is unavailable or the property is acquired through means other than purchase, such as gifts or fabrication, the fair market value at the time of acquisition serves as the taxable basis.^[4] For interstate purchases, taxpayers receive a credit against use tax for any sales or use tax paid to the seller or another jurisdiction, but only up to the amount of the destination state's use tax; any excess tax paid out-of-state does not yield a refund, while a shortfall requires payment of the difference.^[11] ^[14] This credit mechanism ensures equalization without double taxation, though administrative variations exist by state, such as limitations on creditable taxes from non-reciprocal jurisdictions.^[32] Individuals commonly calculate use tax annually on state income tax returns for qualifying out-of-state purchases exceeding exemption thresholds, such as California's $1,500 annual limit for reporting via worksheet or table methods that aggregate purchases and apply tiered rates.^[33] Businesses, by contrast, accrue and report use tax periodically on sales and use tax returns, applying the rate in effect at the location of delivery, storage, or use, often integrating it into broader compliance systems for inventory or capital assets.^[4] ^[32] Special calculations apply to certain assets, like vehicles or aircraft, where depreciation or appraised values may adjust the base over time.^[34]

Enforcement Mechanisms

State Enforcement Strategies

States primarily enforce use tax through self-assessment mechanisms, as tracking individual out-of-state purchases is administratively challenging. Most states with sales taxes complement this by requiring residents to report and remit use tax on their annual individual income tax returns, often providing estimation tools such as lookup tables based on adjusted gross income to simplify calculations.^[35] For instance, California and New York include dedicated lines for use tax on Form 540 and IT-201, respectively, where taxpayers declare amounts owed on untaxed purchases like vehicles or online goods.^[35] Approximately 27 states mandated or facilitated such reporting as of 2012, a practice that persists in most today, though voluntary compliance remains low at around 1-2% of filers nationally, yielding modest collections such as $33.5 million in New York and $18.6 million in California that year.^[35] To bolster enforcement, states conduct targeted audits, particularly of businesses and high-value individual consumers, leveraging third-party data sources like shipping records, credit card transactions, and DMV registrations for taxable items such as automobiles.^[36] Aggressive auditing has increased in recent years, with states like Maine and Massachusetts employing external vendors to analyze purchase patterns and issue assessments, often focusing on periods up to three years prior under standard statutes of limitations.^[36] Penalties for underreporting include interest at rates of 0.5-1% per month and fines up to 25-50% of the tax due, though collection success varies due to resource constraints. Some states offer managed audit programs, allowing taxpayers to self-review records under agency guidelines to reduce penalties.^[37] Additionally, several states impose obligations on remote sellers not required to collect sales tax, mandating them to notify customers of use tax liability, furnish annual purchase summaries exceeding thresholds (e.g., $10,000 in sales or 200 transactions), and file reports with the state.^[38] As of recent data, states including Alabama, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Louisiana, Nevada, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Vermont maintain such "notice and reporting" regimes, with penalties for seller non-compliance ranging from $100 per violation to 1-5% of unreported sales; however, several like Georgia and Pennsylvania repealed these post-2019 due to streamlined collection under economic nexus rules from South Dakota v. Wayfair.^[38] These measures aim to indirectly prompt consumer remittance but have yielded limited revenue, underscoring persistent evasion rates estimated below 10% for self-reported use tax.^[39] Public awareness campaigns and voluntary disclosure programs further support enforcement, with initiatives like Maine's 2006 targeted mailings to non-reporters boosting participation to 10.2% temporarily.^[35] Despite these efforts, overall compliance hovers at low levels, attributed to taxpayer unawareness and the perceived low risk of detection for small purchases.^[35]

Compliance Challenges and Evasion

Compliance with use tax obligations presents significant difficulties primarily due to its reliance on voluntary self-assessment by taxpayers, who must track, calculate, and remit taxes on taxable purchases where no sales tax was collected at the point of sale.^[40] This system contrasts with sales taxes, which are typically withheld by vendors, leading to inherently lower enforcement efficacy and taxpayer adherence. Estimates indicate that individual compliance rates for use tax in the United States range from 0% to 5%, reflecting widespread non-reporting of out-of-state or untaxed purchases such as vehicles, electronics, and business equipment.^[40] Businesses exhibit somewhat higher compliance, often through accrual processes during audits or accounting reviews, yet underreporting persists due to challenges in identifying and valuing taxable acquisitions across complex supply chains.^[41] Key challenges include low taxpayer awareness and the administrative burden of record-keeping, as individuals rarely receive invoices prompting use tax payment, and calculating rates—often mirroring varying state and local sales tax structures—requires cross-referencing purchase locations with destination-based liabilities.^[42] The perception of minimal audit risk further exacerbates non-compliance, with state revenue departments lacking resources for comprehensive individual-level verification, relying instead on income tax return integrations or sporadic data matches from shipping records.^[43] For instance, in states like Washington, use tax registers among the lowest compliance rates among major taxes due to its "low visibility" to taxpayers, who view it as an abstract obligation rather than an immediate deduction from funds.^[43] Post-2018 South Dakota v. Wayfair ruling, while marketplace facilitators now collect sales taxes on many remote sales, gaps remain for direct business-to-consumer shipments or imports where sellers do not register, shifting the burden back to self-reporting and sustaining evasion opportunities.^[44] Evasion tactics commonly involve deliberate underreporting or omission of taxable uses, particularly for high-value items like boats, aircraft, or construction materials, where taxpayers exploit jurisdictional ambiguities or classify purchases as exempt without documentation.^[45] Empirical studies attribute this to factors such as weak social norms around remittance, low perceived detection probabilities (often below 1% for non-business filers), and sanctions that, while including penalties up to 25-30% plus interest, are infrequently applied absent audits.^[45] Businesses may evade by failing to segregate taxable versus exempt purchases or by routing acquisitions through tax-friendly jurisdictions, contributing to estimated annual revenue losses in the billions across states.^[46] Efforts to curb evasion, such as simplified reporting tools or pre-filled estimates on tax forms, have shown modest gains in experimental settings, increasing compliance by reducing effort and bolstering deterrence signals, but systemic understaffing at tax agencies limits scalability.^[42] Overall, these dynamics result in use tax representing a substantial component of state tax gaps, underscoring the causal link between enforcement feasibility and voluntary adherence.^[47]

Exemptions and Exceptions

Standard Exemptions

Use tax exemptions in the United States generally parallel those for sales tax, applying to the same categories of tangible personal property to maintain consistency in state tax policy and prevent undue burden on essential goods or certain transactions.^[48]^[5] These exemptions are codified in state statutes and aim to exempt necessities, facilitate business inputs, or honor immunities for specific entities, with the rationale rooted in economic relief for low-income households, support for resale and production activities, or federal preemption.^[49] For instance, groceries and unprepared food items are exempt in 46 states (with reduced rates in some others), reflecting a policy to mitigate regressivity on basic sustenance, while prescription drugs are universally exempt across all states imposing sales or use taxes.^[50]^[49] Purchaser-based exemptions form a core standard category, extending to federal, state, and local government entities due to constitutional immunities under the Supremacy Clause, which prohibits states from taxing federal operations.^[51] Nonprofit organizations, particularly those qualifying under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, receive exemptions in most states for purchases used in exempt activities, though documentation like resale certificates or exemption letters is required to claim them.^[52] Resale exemptions are standard for tangible property acquired for subsequent sale, allowing businesses to defer tax until the final consumer transaction, provided the purchaser holds a valid resale permit issued by the state department of revenue.^[53]^[54] Purpose-driven exemptions target inputs in production or agriculture, such as machinery, raw materials, or fuel used directly in manufacturing or farming, which are exempt in approximately 40 states to avoid cascading taxes that distort supply chains.^[49] Exports of tangible property are exempt nationwide, aligning with international trade norms under the Export Clause of the U.S. Constitution, ensuring no state use tax applies to goods shipped out-of-state or abroad for consumption elsewhere.^[48] Casual or occasional sales by non-regular vendors, such as yard sales, are exempt up to specified thresholds in most states (e.g., $1,000 annually in California), distinguishing them from commercial retail to limit administrative burdens.^[54] These standard exemptions require substantiation through records or certificates, with failure to comply potentially triggering audits and back taxes plus penalties.^[55]

Special Permits and Proof Requirements

Businesses seeking exemption from use tax on purchases intended for resale must typically hold a valid sales tax permit, also known as a seller's permit or resale certificate, issued by the state department of revenue where they are registered to collect sales tax. This permit serves as authorization to acquire tangible personal property without paying use tax, on the condition that the goods are resold in taxable transactions within the state, thereby shifting the tax burden to the end consumer.^[56] To invoke this exemption with an out-of-state vendor, the purchaser issues a resale certificate documenting the intent to resell, which the vendor may require to forgo collecting tax at the point of sale.^[57] The Multistate Tax Commission (MTC) provides a Uniform Sales and Use Tax Resale Certificate, accepted by 36 states as of 2023, allowing multistate businesses to use a single form for proof across jurisdictions rather than state-specific variants.^[58] States mandate that resale certificates include details such as the purchaser's permit number, description of goods, and expiration date—often valid for one year or until revoked—and require retention for audit purposes, generally 3 to 5 years depending on the jurisdiction.^[59] Failure to maintain valid documentation can result in the exemption being disallowed, with the purchaser liable for back use taxes plus penalties.^[56] For non-resale exemptions, such as those for qualified nonprofit organizations, governmental entities, or specific uses like agricultural production, purchasers must furnish an exemption certificate demonstrating eligibility. These certificates often require supporting evidence, including IRS determination letters for 501(c)(3) status or official charters for public bodies, submitted to the vendor or retained for self-assessed use tax filings.^[60] ^[61] Some states issue specialized direct pay permits to high-volume users, such as manufacturers, permitting self-assessment and direct remittance of use tax to the state, bypassing vendor collection; eligibility typically demands detailed application processes and ongoing compliance reporting.^[62] Proof of equivalent tax payment in another jurisdiction can offset use tax liability, requiring submission of invoices or receipts evidencing sales tax remitted at a comparable rate, with credits limited to the differential if the origin tax exceeds the destination rate.^[63] Taxpayers must verify exemption validity at the time of purchase and update documentation periodically, as expired or fraudulent certificates expose them to assessments during state audits, which prioritize record substantiation over self-reported claims.^[64]

Legal and Jurisdictional Framework

State Variations in the United States

Forty-five states, plus the District of Columbia, impose use taxes to complement their sales taxes, applying the tax to tangible personal property purchased from out-of-state sellers who do not collect the state's sales tax or to items used within the state after tax-free acquisition.^[65] ^[66] These taxes generally match the applicable sales tax rate, ensuring parity between in-state and interstate consumption, though the five states without statewide sales taxes—Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, and Oregon—do not levy statewide use taxes, with Alaska permitting certain local options.^[66] ^[67] State-level use tax rates, mirroring sales tax rates, range from 2.9 percent in Colorado to 7.25 percent in California as of mid-2025, with many states authorizing local additions that can push combined rates above 9 percent or even 10 percent in high-tax jurisdictions like parts of Tennessee or Louisiana.^[66] ^[68] For instance, California's base rate applies uniformly, but local districts add up to 3.25 percent, while Colorado's lower state rate sees localities contributing variably up to 8.3 percent combined in some areas.^[66] Rates are subject to periodic adjustments; as of July 1, 2025, states like Maryland expanded taxation to certain services under use tax rules, and local changes occurred in jurisdictions such as Florida and Alaska boroughs.^[69] ^[70] Reporting obligations differ significantly by state, with most requiring individuals to self-assess use tax on annual income tax returns or dedicated forms for purchases exceeding de minimis thresholds, such as Massachusetts's mandate for 6.25 percent on untaxed out-of-state tangible property used in the state, crediting any lower tax paid elsewhere.^[30] ^[71] States like California demand reporting of all due use tax without a minimum threshold for individuals, often via Form 540, while others, such as Illinois, tie it to specific events like vehicle titling or provide simplified schedules for common items like boats and aircraft.^[39] Non-compliance can trigger penalties ranging from 5 percent per month in some states to flat fines, though voluntary disclosure programs exist in jurisdictions like New York to encourage reporting.^[34] Enforcement strategies vary in aggressiveness and methods, with states like California and New York utilizing data analytics from shipping manifests, DMV registrations, and third-party purchase records to pursue audits and assessments, yielding millions in recovered revenue annually.^[72] In contrast, enforcement in lower-rate states like Colorado relies more on periodic amnesties and educational campaigns rather than routine individual pursuits, contributing to historically low voluntary compliance rates below 10 percent nationwide for consumer use tax prior to enhanced seller collection post-2018 Wayfair ruling.^[14] Some states, including those with notice-and-report provisions for remote sellers, shift partial burden to vendors by requiring them to notify buyers of use tax liability or remit seller's use tax on non-collected amounts, as in variations seen in over 20 states by 2025.^[38] ^[39] These differences reflect fiscal priorities, with higher-tax states investing more in compliance infrastructure to capture revenue from e-commerce and cross-border purchases estimated at tens of billions annually.^[20]

Interstate Commerce Considerations

The Dormant Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution restricts states from imposing taxes that discriminate against interstate commerce or impose undue burdens on it, requiring any such tax to be applied to activity with a substantial connection to the taxing state rather than purely extraterritorial elements.^[73] State use taxes, which target the storage, use, or other consumption of tangible personal property within the state after an out-of-state purchase, are evaluated under this framework to ensure they tax local activity without interfering with the free flow of interstate trade.^[74] The U.S. Supreme Court has consistently upheld use taxes as valid when structured as compensatory measures mirroring in-state sales taxes, thereby leveling the competitive field without favoring intrastate transactions.^[75] In Henneford v. Silas Mason Co. (1937), the Court affirmed the constitutionality of Washington's 2% use tax on materials purchased out-of-state and used in-state for construction, ruling that it taxed the privilege of use within Washington rather than the prior interstate sale, thus avoiding a direct burden on commerce.^[76] Similarly, McLeod v. J. E. Dilworth Co. (1944) clarified that while a state cannot impose its sales tax on an interstate transaction where title passes outside its borders, it may validly apply a use tax to the subsequent consumption by its residents, preserving the distinction between taxing sales (interstate) and use (intrastate).^[77] These rulings establish that use taxes do not violate the Commerce Clause when they focus on in-state effects, provided they do not attempt to regulate or tax the interstate movement itself.^[78] The validity of use taxes is further assessed through the four-prong test articulated in Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady (1977), which sustains a state tax on interstate commerce if it (1) applies to an activity with substantial nexus to the taxing state, (2) is fairly apportioned to reflect in-state activity, (3) does not discriminate against interstate commerce, and (4) is fairly related to the services provided by the state.^[79] For resident purchasers, the nexus prong is satisfied by the property's physical presence and use within the state, while apportionment limits the tax to the value consumed locally; non-discrimination is achieved by aligning use tax rates with sales tax rates, avoiding preferential treatment for in-state purchases.^[80] The relation to state services prong holds because use taxes fund public goods benefiting consumers, such as infrastructure supporting consumption.^[81] However, this test constrains states from extending collection obligations to remote sellers without their own substantial nexus to the taxing jurisdiction, as extraterritorial enforcement would exceed state authority and risk multiple or inconsistent taxation across borders.^[82] Interstate considerations also encompass risks of cumulative taxation, where goods used across multiple states could face overlapping use tax claims, though mitigation occurs through state practices allowing credits for taxes paid to other jurisdictions on the same purchase. Such credits, common in state tax codes, ensure apportionment by reducing the effective rate to the higher of the origin or destination state's levy, aligning with the fair apportionment requirement.^[83] Nonetheless, without federal uniformity, variations in nexus definitions and credit mechanisms can still impose compliance costs on interstate transactions, prompting scrutiny under the undue burden standard where administrative complexity demonstrably hinders commerce.^[84]

Economic and Policy Analysis

Revenue Generation and Fairness Claims

Use taxes aim to generate revenue equivalent to state sales taxes on tangible personal property purchased out-of-state and used within the taxing jurisdiction, capturing fiscal contributions from consumption that evades point-of-sale collection. In fiscal year 2020, state and local governments collectively reported general sales and use tax revenues exceeding $500 billion, though the use tax component—distinct from vendor-collected sales taxes—relies heavily on self-assessment and yields far less due to underreporting.^[85] Business entities contribute the majority of reported use tax through mandatory filings and audits, while individual consumer compliance remains critically low, with average reporting rates across sampled states estimated at approximately 1.9 percent.^[86] Nationally, uncollected use taxes from remote and interstate purchases represented tens of billions in lost revenue prior to expanded remote seller obligations, with 2015 estimates indicating nearly $26 billion in uncollected amounts from non-collecting remote sales alone.^[87] Post-2018 Wayfair decision, economic nexus rules have shifted more collection responsibility to remote vendors via sales tax, modestly reducing the use tax gap but leaving self-reported liabilities—particularly for direct imports or non-compliant sellers—largely unrealized.^[88] Advocates maintain that use taxes promote fairness by enforcing horizontal equity, ensuring equivalent taxation on similar consumption irrespective of purchase origin and thereby leveling the competitive field for in-state retailers burdened by sales tax collection obligations.^[89] This mechanism purportedly prevents revenue erosion from cross-border shopping, where untaxed goods benefit from state-provided infrastructure, education, and public services without reciprocal contribution, sustaining fiscal capacity for essential expenditures.^[90] Such claims align with principles of causal accountability, positing that consumption within a jurisdiction imposes measurable costs on its governance structures, warranting uniform tax incidence to avoid subsidizing evasion through compliant payers' burdens.^[91] Skeptics challenge these fairness assertions, arguing that pervasive non-compliance—often below 2 percent for individuals—renders use taxes inequitable in execution, as local sellers face mandatory collection while out-of-state alternatives effectively escape taxation, distorting markets and eroding the intended parity.^[92] The voluntary nature imposes asymmetric administrative costs on aware consumers and businesses, fostering perceptions of arbitrariness and selective enforcement, while empirical evasion rates indicate systemic failure to achieve stated equity goals.^[42] Furthermore, as a consumption levy mirroring sales taxes, use taxes exhibit regressivity, with lower-income households bearing higher effective rates relative to income spent on taxable goods, complicating vertical fairness despite horizontal rationales.^[93] Pre-Wayfair data underscored this disparity, with uncollected sums disproportionately impacting state budgets reliant on consumption taxes, yet post-Wayfair vendor collections have not fully mitigated consumer-side gaps, sustaining debates over the policy's real-world equity.^[87]^[45]

Criticisms and Economic Distortions

Critics of use tax argue that its self-assessment requirement results in chronically low voluntary compliance rates, undermining its purpose of ensuring tax neutrality between in-state and out-of-state purchases. In Washington state, for instance, use tax noncompliance amounted to approximately $64 million annually, representing nearly 20 percent of total use tax liability, as identified in a state Department of Revenue compliance study covering sales and use tax periods from 2013 to 2015.^[94] Broader estimates suggest even higher evasion, with some analyses placing state use tax noncompliance as high as 70 percent, drawing parallels to shadow economy behaviors where self-reported taxes are minimal without enforcement.^[95] This evasion creates inequities, as compliant in-state retailers bear the full tax burden while out-of-state sellers effectively gain a competitive edge until remote collection mandates like the 2018 Wayfair decision intervene, though gaps persist for non-digital or unregistered transactions.^[96] Economically, use tax distorts consumer and business behavior by incentivizing tax avoidance strategies, such as structuring purchases to evade reporting or favoring untaxed channels, which fragments markets and reduces efficiency. Businesses face unpredictable liability shifts post-purchase based on usage location or type, complicating cash flow and accounting, as highlighted in analyses of consumer use tax dynamics where invoiced exemptions can reverse upon audits or reallocations.^[97] For individuals, the cognitive and record-keeping demands of tracking and remitting use tax on myriad small transactions—often from online or cross-border buys—lead to widespread non-remittance, effectively subsidizing non-compliance at the expense of state revenues and distorting local retail competition.^[98] These distortions compound administrative costs for states, which must ramp up audits to capture revenue, yet yield diminishing returns given the decentralized nature of consumption; Washington's study, for example, underscored use tax as the highest noncompliance area among consumption taxes, straining enforcement resources without proportional fiscal gains.^[94] Further critiques focus on the regressive incidence and enforcement biases of use tax, which disproportionately burdens lower-income households less likely to engage in high-value interstate purchases but more sensitive to price signals encouraging evasion. Empirical research on use tax reporting behaviors indicates that voluntary compliance explains a larger variance in adherence than audit threats or penalties alone, pointing to normative and informational failures rather than purely deterrent shortcomings.^[45] In practice, this fosters a "tax gap" where uncollected use taxes erode fiscal capacity, potentially necessitating higher rates elsewhere to compensate, thereby amplifying deadweight losses—estimated in general consumption tax models as higher than idealized neutral systems due to imperfect enforcement.^[99] Proponents of reform, including analyses post-Wayfair, question the net value of standalone use tax reliance, arguing it perpetuates complexity without achieving the intended leveling of interstate commerce.^[96]

Recent Developments and Impacts

Effects of the Wayfair Decision

The U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. on June 21, 2018, overturned the physical-presence rule from Quill Corp. v. North Dakota (1992), permitting states to require out-of-state sellers to collect and remit sales taxes based on economic nexus thresholds, such as exceeding $100,000 in annual sales or 200 transactions into the state.^[28]^[100] This shift directly bolstered use tax enforcement by proxy, as remote sellers' collection of sales tax on interstate transactions reduced consumer reliance on self-reported use taxes, which historically exhibited low compliance rates due to administrative burdens on individuals.^[101] States experienced measurable revenue gains from remote sellers post-Wayfair. By June 2022, North Dakota alone had collected $212.8 million in sales and use taxes from such vendors since the ruling.^[102] A 2022 Government Accountability Office survey of state revenue agencies confirmed attributions of sales tax revenue increases to expanded remote collections, though quantifying the exact Wayfair-specific increment proved challenging amid broader economic factors like e-commerce growth.^[101] By 2024, 45 states plus the District of Columbia had enacted economic nexus laws, standardizing thresholds around $100,000 in sales or 200 transactions to capture untaxed online activity previously evading use tax obligations.^[103] Compliance burdens escalated for e-commerce businesses, particularly smaller entities lacking resources for multi-state tax systems. Economic nexus prompted registration in numerous jurisdictions with divergent rates, filing frequencies, and exemptions, amplifying software, accounting, and audit costs.^[104] One small seller reported expending over $455,000 in compliance expenses to remit $173,000 in taxes since 2018, highlighting disproportionate impacts on low-volume remote vendors.^[105] Similarly, U.S. Government Accountability Office data cited instances of businesses facing $1,500 monthly compliance outlays to collect under $500 in tax, potentially distorting market competition by favoring larger firms with economies of scale in tax automation.^[106] Sales tax audit rates for affected businesses quadrupled from under 1% in 2021 to higher levels by 2023, as states pursued back collections.^[107] Proponents, including state governments, contended the ruling promoted fairness by equalizing tax burdens between local brick-and-mortar retailers and remote sellers, thereby curbing use tax avoidance that disadvantaged in-state commerce.^[108] Critics, drawing from empirical compliance cost data, argued it imposed regressive administrative loads on small businesses, potentially stifling interstate e-commerce innovation without corresponding consumer price reductions, as sellers often passed costs forward.^[105]^[109] Overall, while enhancing state fiscal capacity, the decision entrenched a patchwork of obligations that, absent federal simplification, sustained elevated use tax evasion risks for non-collected transactions.^[100]

Ongoing Compliance Trends

States have intensified use tax enforcement through expanded audit programs, driven by revenue shortfalls and broader economic nexus standards established post-South Dakota v. Wayfair (2018). In 2024, audit activity surged, with states like California, New York, Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, and Texas accounting for a majority of out-of-state use tax examinations, often targeting businesses with significant remote purchases or interstate acquisitions not subject to point-of-sale collection.^[36]^[110] This trend reflects states' efforts to capture unpaid use taxes on tangible personal property, such as equipment bought out-of-state or imported goods, where self-assessment compliance remains low—estimated at under 10% for many taxpayers due to tracking complexities.^[111] Businesses are increasingly adopting automated compliance tools to manage use tax liabilities amid these audits, incorporating AI-driven software for real-time transaction monitoring and exemption certificate validation across jurisdictions. Reports indicate that by 2025, over 70% of large enterprises plan to integrate such technologies to mitigate audit risks, particularly for multi-state operations involving drop shipments or vendor-managed inventory, which often trigger use tax obligations.^[112]^[113] However, smaller entities face persistent challenges, as manual accrual processes for use tax on non-taxed purchases—such as business machinery or software—lead to frequent underreporting, exacerbated by varying state definitions of taxable "use."^[114] Emerging trends include heightened scrutiny of use tax on digital downloads and services, with states like Maryland imposing new levies effective July 1, 2025, on IT-related items, prompting businesses to reassess historical accruals.^[115] Enforcement data from mid-2024 shows audit assessments rising by up to 20% in high-activity states, correlating with voluntary disclosure programs that have processed thousands of amended returns to avoid penalties, which can exceed 25% plus interest for willful non-compliance.^[116]^[117] Despite these measures, compliance gaps persist due to interstate variations, underscoring the need for centralized tracking systems to align with states' push for uniformity in reporting thresholds.^[118]

References

[1]
Use tax | Washington Department of Revenue
Use tax is a tax on the use of goods or certain services in Washington when sales tax has not been paid.
[2]
Use Tax - Texas Comptroller
Use tax is a nonrecurring tax that is complementary to sales tax and is imposed on the storage, use, or other consumption of tangible personal property or a ...
[3]
What is use tax? - Illinois Department of Revenue
Use tax is a tax imposed on the privilege of using, in Illinois, any item of tangible personal property that is purchased anywhere at retail.
[4]
Use Tax for Businesses - Department of Taxation and Finance
Jun 12, 2025 · Use tax is a tax imposed on the use of taxable items and services in New York when the sales tax has not been paid.
[5]
California Use Tax, Good for You. Good for California - CDTFA
California's use tax applies to the use, storage, or other consumption of those same kinds of items in the state.For Personal Use · California Use Tax Table · For Business Use · Foreign Purchases
[6]
Understanding Use Tax - Arizona Department of Revenue
The use tax was instituted to protect Arizona sellers who otherwise would be at a competitive disadvantage when out-of-state sellers make sales of goods to ...
[7]
Use Tax | Department of Revenue | Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Use tax is the counterpart of the state and local sales taxes. Commonly Asked Questions ...
[8]
Consumer Use Tax Guide | Department of Revenue - Colorado Tax
Colorado use tax is a complement to Colorado sales tax and is imposed for the privilege of storing, using, or consuming tangible personal property in ...<|separator|>
[9]
Sales and use tax - Department of Taxation and Finance - NY.Gov
Apr 17, 2025 · Use tax applies if you buy tangible personal property and services outside the state and use it within New York State. For information on the ...
[10]
Department of the Treasury - Division of Taxation - Use Tax FAQ
Apr 24, 2025 · Use Tax is owed by New Jersey residents and businesses that buy products out of state, online, or via the mail, and then bring the products to New Jersey.
[11]
Understanding Use Tax: Definition, Purpose, and Key Differences ...
Use tax is a sales tax levied on items bought tax-free outside a consumer's state but used locally. Learn its purpose and how it differs from sales tax.
[12]
What is the difference between sales tax and use tax?
Use tax applies to purchases made outside the taxing jurisdiction but used within the state. Use tax also applies to items purchased exempt from tax which are ...Missing: revenue | Show results with:revenue
[13]
Is it sales or use tax? | Washington Department of Revenue
Use tax is a tax on the use of products or services in Washington when sales tax has not been paid. Use of products or services in this state are subject to ...
[14]
Use tax vs sales tax: What to know - Avalara
Apr 8, 2025 · Use tax is a tax on taxable goods and services that are consumed, stored, or used in the taxing jurisdiction.
[15]
Defining Sales, Sellers Use, and Consumer Use Tax - Vertex, Inc.
to prevent someone from evading a sales tax by buying goods or taxable services ...
[16]
[PDF] US sales and use tax in a nutshell - KPMG International
Mar 3, 2021 · Sales tax is generally imposed on all sales of tangible personal property, but usually only certain enumerated services depending on the state.<|separator|>
[17]
[PDF] History of the Use Tax in the United States - NEIU Digital Commons
Abstract. The use tax was developed by states to complement the sales tax. The aim was to prevent residents from being able to avoid paying the sales tax by ...
[18]
Sales tax vs. use tax: The differences - Thomson Reuters
Jul 10, 2023 · Sales tax is applied to the purchase price of goods and services, while use tax is applied to the value of the item when it is first brought into the state.
[19]
Use tax vs sales tax: what's the difference? - TaxJar
Sales and use tax generally refer to the same thing: A percentage tax on the price of a sale that is collected by a merchant or consumer and remitted to the ...
[20]
Sales Tax vs. Use Tax, Explained. Who Reports What, and When?
Nov 19, 2024 · Also referred to as retailers use tax, it is collected by the seller when they have established nexus—a tax connection—in the buyer's state.
[21]
"History of Use Tax" by Christopher Jones, Yuyun Sejati et al.
The use tax was developed by states to complement the sales tax. The aim was to prevent residents from being able to avoid paying the sales tax by simply going ...
[22]
Consumer Use Tax - Louisiana Department of Revenue
This tax, referred to as the "use" tax, was enacted in 1934 and complements the sales tax by subjecting to tax merchandise purchased from an out-of-state ...Missing: first | Show results with:first
[23]
History of Statewide Sales and Use Tax Rates - CDTFA
The use tax was enacted effective July 1, 1935. Note: The rates above exclude district taxes. For more information on district taxes please see CDTFA-105, ...
[24]
[PDF] U.S. Reports: Henneford et al. v. Silas Mason Co., 300 U.S. ... - Loc
A State is at liberty to tax them all collectively or tax them separately, and calling a tax on the use alone an excise does not affect its validity under ...
[25]
Quill Corp. v. North Dakota | 504 U.S. 298 (1992)
The State's enforcement of the use tax against Quill places an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce.Missing: key | Show results with:key
[26]
Associated Indus. of Mo. v. Lohman, 114 S. Ct. 1815, 128 L. Ed. 2d ...
Out of state members of the organization must collect the additional use tax on sales made into the State. Petitioner Alumax Foils, Inc., is a manufacturing ...
[27]
Associated Industries of Missouri v. Lohman - Oyez
The Court held that the use tax was discriminatory in those localities where it exceeded the local sales tax. Such discrepancies, between certain localities' ...Missing: Revenue | Show results with:Revenue
[28]
[PDF] 17-494 South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. (06/21/2018) - Supreme Court
Jun 21, 2018 · Sellers are required to collect and remit the tax to the State, but if they do not then in-state consumers are responsible for paying a use tax ...
[29]
US Use Tax - Avalara
Use Tax is a self-assessed and declared levy on US consumers and businesses when they buy goods or services from out-of-state providers.
[30]
Sales and Use Tax - Mass.gov
Sep 25, 2024 · Individuals may report and pay any Massachusetts use tax due on their personal income tax return (Form 1, Form 1-NR/PY for part-year residents).Motor Vehicle and Trailer... · DOR Sales and Use Tax Forms · Remote SellerMissing: assessment | Show results with:assessment<|separator|>
[31]
Important Things to Know About Use Tax - Ketel Thorstenson - CPA
Jan 19, 2023 · Use Tax is owed in the filing period in which the business buys the product or removes the item from inventory. There is a use tax liability, ...
[32]
What is use tax? - Thomson Reuters
Jul 10, 2023 · Use tax is a tax that is imposed on the use, storage, or consumption of goods and services that were purchased without paying sales tax.
[33]
Use tax | FTB.ca.gov
Sep 24, 2025 · How to calculate. You can calculate your use tax by using one of the following methods: Use tax worksheet. Use tax table. Use tax worksheet.Missing: United | Show results with:United
[34]
What Is Use Tax and How Does it Differ From Sales Tax? - Taxually
The primary purpose of use taxes is to prevent tax evasion and to ensure that states can collect revenue on goods and services used within their borders.
[35]
[PDF] Use Tax Collection on Income Tax Returns in Other States
This policy brief explains the use tax, other states' efforts to collect it via the income tax return, and options for Minnesota to use the income tax return to ...
[36]
6 States Most Likely to Audit Sales Tax - Numeral
Mar 31, 2025 · Maine and Massachusetts, in particular, have been extremely aggressive in initiating sales tax audits. Both states use third-party sources to ...
[37]
Sales & Use Tax Foundations (part 11) - Audits and Assessments
Managed audits allow a taxpayer (or qualified third party) to perform an audit under guidelines set by the state. Jurisdiction, M.A.P, Comment, Citation.
[38]
State-by-state guide to non-collecting seller use tax - Avalara
Requirements: Non-collecting remote sellers are required to inform consumers in writing of their obligation to report and pay use tax on taxable purchases and ...Missing: United | Show results with:United
[39]
Sales tax by state: use tax notice and report laws - TaxJar
Currently 11 states have notice and report laws on the books, though only 6 have any type of penalty for non-collecting retailers who fail to comply.
[40]
[PDF] How Do Tax Evasion Opportunities Affect Prices?
Apr 22, 2025 · For example, the compliance rate for the 'use' tax in the United States is estimated to be between 0 to 5% among individuals (GAO 2000). Price ...
[41]
Sales and Use Taxes: Investigating the Administrative and ...
Sep 17, 2021 · This study explores the accounting and administrative burdens that the collection of Colorado sales and use taxes place on small and micro-sized entities.Missing: history | Show results with:history<|control11|><|separator|>
[42]
Improving Use-Tax Compliance by Decreasing Effort and Increasing ...
Mar 1, 2013 · Although it is predicted that each proposed remedy will increase the use-tax compliance rate, it is unclear what the effect on the compliance ...
[43]
A field experiment to explore the effects of detection and penalties ...
Use Tax has the lowest compliance rate of the major taxes imposed in Washington in part due to its low visibility; the B&O tax registers a higher compliance ...
[44]
States Adapt Tax Laws as Online Sales Surge - National...
Apr 16, 2024 · Once a remote seller passes the threshold, it is legally obligated to collect and remit sales and use tax in that state. Additionally, states ...
[45]
(PDF) Use tax compliance: The role of norms, audit probability, and ...
Aug 7, 2025 · ... use tax has a relatively lower compliance rate than other major. taxes because of its low visibility (e.g., Sanders et al., 2008; Washington ...
[46]
Why Use Tax is in the Spotlight and How to Stay Compliant - TaxValet
Dec 3, 2024 · Revenue Gaps: States depend on tax revenue, and use tax compliance helps capture revenue that could be missed if businesses don't self-report.Missing: United | Show results with:United
[47]
STATE COERCION, MORAL ATTITUDES, AND TAX COMPLIANCE
Tax evasion can come in many forms, but in the United States the average taxpayer evades income taxes in two ways: first, by overstating deductions and ...
[48]
U.S. Sales Tax Exemptions 101 - Avalara
Jul 31, 2025 · The three types of U.S. sales tax exemptions · 1. Exemptions based on the type of item sold · 2. Exemptions based on the purchaser · 3. Exemptions ...
[49]
What's Exempt from State and Local Sales Taxes? – ITEP
Exemptions for Services and Digital Goods · Exemptions for Business Inputs · Exemptions for Necessities · Sales Tax Holidays · Federal Law · Special-Interest Breaks.
[50]
Sales Tax Exemptions Exist in Every State | Wolters Kluwer
In every state, certain types of items, most commonly food and medicine, are exempt from sales tax or are taxed at lower rates.
[51]
Part 29 - Taxes | Acquisition.GOV
This subpart prescribes the policies and procedures regarding the exemption or immunity of Federal Government purchases and property from State and local ...
[52]
Nonprofit State Income & Sales Tax Exemptions - Harbor Compliance
Consider exemption in each state where your nonprofit operates. States may offer exemption from corporate income, sales, use, and other taxes that they levy.
[53]
Sales Tax Exemption Guide: Certifications, Purchases, & More
The most common exemption is “sale for resale,” which allows businesses with a valid certificate to purchase products free of tax. In this scenario, the buyer ...
[54]
Common Sales & Use Tax Nontaxable Sales and Partial Exemptions
A partial exemption from sales and use tax became available under section 6357.1 for the sale, storage, use, or other consumption of diesel fuel used in ...Sales for Resale · Food Products · Nontaxable Labor · Sales to the United States...
[55]
What are sales and use tax exemptions in the US? - Stripe
Apr 16, 2024 · Sales and use tax exemptions are criteria that prevent a customer from paying sales tax for a particular transaction.
[56]
Resale certificates by state: 2025 Guide - Avalara
Aug 1, 2025 · To get a resale certificate, a business must obtain a sales tax permit. Then that business can apply for the proper sales tax exemption forms, ...Key Takeaways · How Can I Get Information... · Managing Resale Exemption...<|separator|>
[57]
What is a resale certificate and who can use one? - Sales Tax Institute
A business which is registered for sales and use tax can use a resale certificate only when the merchandise being purchased is to be resold by the business. A ...
[58]
Uniform Sales & Use Tax Resale Certificate - MTC
The Commission has developed a Uniform Sales & Use Tax Resale Certificate that 36 States have indicated can be used as a resale certificate.
[59]
[PDF] UNIFORM SALES & USE TAX RESALE CERTIFICATE
Exemption certificates must be obtained from the purchaser at the time of the sale, but no later than 90 days subsequent to the date of sale. This resale ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[60]
What is an Exemption Certificate and Who Can Use One?
An exemption certificate is the form presented by an exempt organization or individual to the seller when making a tax-exempt purchase.
[61]
Nonprofit Organizations and Sales and Use Tax
Florida law requires that nonprofit organizations obtain a sales tax exemption certificate (Consumer's Certificate of Exemption, Form DR-14) from the Florida ...
[62]
Sales tax permits — What are they and who needs one? - Avalara
Aug 1, 2025 · Online businesses must obtain a seller's permit and comply with all applicable sales and use tax requirements in states where they have nexus.
[63]
US Sales Tax: Possible Exemptions and Documentation
Sep 27, 2023 · Resale exemption certificates are used by resellers to purchase goods for resale without paying sales tax. Some businesses are granted a direct ...
[64]
State guide to sales tax exemption certificates - Avalara
Are you making exempt sales or purchases? Find out which sales tax exemption certificates are accepted in each state.
[65]
What states impose sales/use tax? - Sales Tax Institute
The five states without general sales taxes are: Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire and Oregon. However, Alaska permits local sales taxes.Missing: enforce | Show results with:enforce
[66]
State and Local Sales Tax Rates, Midyear 2025 - Tax Foundation
Jul 8, 2025 · California has the highest state sales tax rate at 7.25 percent, followed by Indiana, Mississippi, Rhode Island, and Tennessee at 7 percent.Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
[67]
State-by-state guide to charging sales tax on services - Avalara
Five U.S. states (Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, and Oregon) do not impose any general statewide sales tax on goods or services. Of the 45 states ...
[68]
State by state sales and use tax rates - Wolters Kluwer
Rate listed below is the general state rate. Most states authorize additional local sales and use taxes, which are not included. ; Connecticut 2023 RATES: 6.35%.
[69]
July 2025 sales tax updates by state - Avalara
Jul 1, 2025 · Learn about new July 2025 sales tax rates, economic nexus rules, exemptions, and marketplace facilitator laws across over 25 states.Florida Provides New Sales... · Maryland Taxes It Services · Juneau Sets New Tax...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
[70]
State Tax Changes Taking Effect July 1, 2025 - Tax Foundation
Jun 25, 2025 · Some important tax policy changes take effect on July 1, which is the beginning of the fiscal year for all states except Alabama, Michigan, New York, and Texas.
[71]
Massachusetts Individual Use Tax | Mass.gov
May 10, 2024 · Use tax is a 6.25% tax paid on out-of-state or out-of-country purchases of tangible personal property that are used, stored or consumed in Massachusetts.
[72]
Sales and Use Tax enforcement: What your clients need to know | Blog
Sep 20, 2021 · Many states enacted their economic nexus laws within six months of that decision, and most have a three-year statute of limitations for ...Missing: United | Show results with:United
[73]
State Taxation and the Dormant Commerce Clause - Law.Cornell.Edu
The Dormant Commerce Clause initially restricted state taxation of interstate commerce, but now a balancing test is used, comparing burden on commerce with ...
[74]
Modern Dormant Commerce Clause Jurisprudence and State Taxation
Id. at 279. In reviewing Commerce Clause challenges to state taxes, our goal has instead been to 'establish a consistent and rational method of inquiry' ...
[75]
Henneford v. Silas Mason Co., 300 U.S. 577 (1937) - Quimbee
Henneford (defendant), the Tax Commission of Washington, charged Silas Mason Co. a 2 percent use tax on said equipment. A district court found the statute ...
[76]
HENNEFORD v. SILAS MASON CO., 300 U.S. 577 (1937) | FindLaw
A statute of Washington taxing the use of chattels in that state is assailed in this suit as a violation of the commerce clause (Constitution of the United ...
[77]
McLeod v. J. E. Dilworth Co. | 322 U.S. 327 (1944)
We are asked to reverse a decision of the Supreme Court of Arkansas holding that the Commerce Clause precludes liability for the sales tax of that State upon ...
[78]
Murray B. McLEOD, Commissioner of Revenue of the State of ...
For reasons of her own Arkansas describes her tax as a 'sales tax.' Iowa calls hers a 'use tax.' This court now is committed to the validity of 'use' taxes.
[79]
Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady | 430 U.S. 274 (1977)
Appellant claimed that its transportation was but one part of an interstate movement, and that the taxes assessed and paid were unconstitutional as applied to ...
[80]
Nexus Prong of Complete Auto Test for Taxes on Interstate Commerce
The Court also upheld a state's application of a use tax to aviation fuel stored temporarily in the state prior to loading on aircraft for consumption in ...
[81]
The Benefit Prong of the Complete Auto Test for Taxes on Interstate ...
The Court held that a state tax on interstate commerce will be sustained “when the tax is applied to an activity with a substantial nexus with the taxing State.
[82]
Use Tax Collection on Interstate Sales: The Need for Federal ...
Nov 26, 2012 · A state tax is consistent with the dormant commerce clause if it “is applied to an activity with a substantial nexus with the taxing State ...
[83]
[PDF] Constitutional Restrictions on State Taxation The Prohibition on ...
The Commerce Clause prohibits states from placing an "undue burden" on interstate commerce, and state taxes cannot favor local businesses or activities. Taxes ...<|separator|>
[84]
The Dormant Commerce Clause at a Crossroads: Part 2 | Tax Notes
Feb 21, 2022 · Commerce clause nexus limited the reach of state tax authorities to protect business enterprises from undue burdens on their interstate business ...
[85]
Sources of State and Local Tax Collections (FY 2020)
Aug 25, 2022 · ... use tax. Unlike general sales taxes, selective sales taxes—often called excise taxes—are special taxes or rates on the sale of particular ...
[86]
[PDF] Testing the Models of Tax Compliance - Utah Law Digital Commons
The average reporting rate in the sampled states was approximately 1.9%. ... States with use-tax lookup tables already make some estimation of use-tax ...
[87]
[PDF] Uncollected Sales & Use Tax from Remote Sales: Revised Figures ...
For 2015, it is estimated that total U.S. uncollected sales and use taxes increased to almost $26 billion annually. Of the original $23 billion figure, the ...
[88]
Use Tax Revenues: How Much Are States Not Collecting?
Apr 28, 2012 · Many taxpayers opt not to pay use tax. View reported totals and estimated amounts uncollected for each state.
[89]
Senate Calls for Level Playing Field for Main Street Retailers
Mar 25, 2013 · Senate Calls for Level Playing Field for Main Street Retailers ... use tax laws.” Allowing states to do so would not impose new taxes ...
[90]
[PDF] Every workday your Missouri Municipal League staff answers ...
Is This a Fair Tax? Yes, the main purpose of the local use tax is to create a level playing field for your local retail businesses that must collect the ...
[91]
[PDF] Leveling the Playing Field for Remote Sellers: Missouri's Response ...
May 18, 2021 · before use tax could be collected.7 Bellas Hess concerned mail ... stores on a level playing field.67 However, in doing so, Kansas ...
[92]
[PDF] Table of Contents - Multistate Tax Commission
For the rest of the states, we assume 1% compliance rate on use tax collections from individuals. Later in discussions, we will run a sensitivity analysis.
[93]
Modernizing State Sales Taxes: A Policymaker's Guide
Sep 5, 2024 · The sales tax is the second-largest source of state tax revenue, but decades of base erosion threaten the tax's share of overall revenue.
[94]
Compliance study | Washington Department of Revenue
Use tax had the highest level of noncompliance ($64 million annually, equal to almost 20 percent of total use tax liability). Annual noncompliance for sales ...
[95]
State coercion, moral attitudes, and tax compliance: Evidence from a ...
The upper bound (i.e., 70 percent) was based on rates of tax evasion estimated for shadow economies, particularly state use tax reporting. State use taxes, ...
[96]
[PDF] AFTER WAYFAIR: WHAT ARE STATE USE TAXES WORTH?
The use tax matters differently across the sales taxing states. For comparison, in the only other analysis available of use tax yields, Criz (1941, 40) found.
[97]
Consumer use tax: a bane for businesses - Avalara
Consumer Use Tax liability can change dramatically after invoicing based on how and where products and services are used.
[98]
5 Tips for Consumer Use Tax Compliance - Avalara
Consumer use tax is owed by a buyer when sales tax is not paid in full by the seller. Unlike sales tax, use tax can be triggered after a transaction.
[99]
The Challenges of Use Tax Compliance - Avalara
As use tax compliance grows in importance, businesses suffer the consequence of having to manage cumbersome manual tax calculation.
[100]
South Dakota v. Wayfair — five years later - The Tax Adviser
Jun 1, 2023 · In this landmark decision, the Court overturned the “physical presence” requirement for sales tax nexus set forth in National Bellas Hess, Inc.
[101]
[PDF] REMOTE SALES TAX Initial Observations on Effects of States ...
Jun 14, 2022 · State revenue agencies responding to GAO's 2022 survey attributed some increases in sales tax revenue to remote sales following the Wayfair ...
[102]
Impacts of the Wayfair Decision Four Years Later
Jun 21, 2022 · Four years later in June 2022, the state of North Dakota has collected $212.8 million in sales and use taxes from remote sellers delivering products into the ...
[103]
Economic Nexus Treatment by State, 2024 - Tax Foundation
Mar 19, 2024 · Currently, 25 states limit economic nexus to sales meeting a dollar threshold (e.g., $200000). Compare economic nexus treatment by state.
[104]
How Wayfair's Economic Nexus Has Redefined Business Tax ...
Sep 2, 2025 · The most significant impact of Wayfair has been the increased registration, collection, and remittance of sales tax. Every state that has a ...
[105]
The High Cost of Wayfair Compliance for Small Sellers - Tax Notes
Apr 30, 2024 · Since the U.S. Supreme Court 's 2018 Wayfair decision, it has cost one small seller more than $455,000 to collect and remit $173,000 in ...
[106]
As Wayfair turns 6, what's happening with economic nexus? (part 1)
Jun 20, 2024 · For some, the cost has been high. The GAO reported one business incurred $1,500 in monthly compliance costs to remit less than $500 in sales ...Missing: e- commerce
[107]
Post-Wayfair Sales Tax Audits Spiking as States Search for Revenue
Nov 1, 2024 · Sales tax audit rates for its customers have quadrupled. In 2021, less than 1 percent of its customers faced a sales tax audit, while in 2023 that number rose ...Missing: data | Show results with:data
[108]
Impact of supreme court Wayfair decision | Wolters Kluwer
In Wayfair, the Court upheld South Dakota's sales tax law which required remote sellers (e.g., those with no physical presence in the state, such as online ...
[109]
The Impact of Economic Nexus on Small and Mid-Sized Businesses
Jun 13, 2023 · The financial impact can be substantial, draining resources and hindering growth. Moreover, businesses may find themselves subject to audits and ...
[110]
Sales and Use Tax Audits | Leyton
In particular, seven states made up 60% of out-of-state audits: · California · New York · Alabama · Arizona · Colorado · Georgia · Texas ...Missing: trends | Show results with:trends<|control11|><|separator|>
[111]
Use Tax Audits on the Rise - AAFCPAs
Jun 25, 2024 · AAFCPAs would like to make clients aware that there has been an increase in the number of use tax audits being conducted in various states.
[112]
Sovos Annual Tax Compliance Trends Report
Discover the top 2025 tax trends reshaping compliance. Learn how AI, real-time data, and new mandates are transforming tax into a strategic advantage.
[113]
3 trends, one solution: Tax leaders who embrace tech - PwC
Aug 22, 2025 · Discover 3 tax tech trends: AI, data strategy, and digital talent reshaping the tax function for 2025. Learn how leaders are turning ...
[114]
United States - Sales Tax Trends to Watch in 2025 - BDO Global
Jan 13, 2025 · Key among these challenges will be the expansion of the taxable base to encompass services and emerging technologies, reflecting a broader ...
[115]
Major Sales Tax Changes in 2025: New Rates and Rules - Sovos
Sep 9, 2025 · Effective July 1, 2025, Maryland applies a 3% sales and use tax on IT and digital services, including SaaS, data hosting, and software ...<|separator|>
[116]
10 observations about state tax entering the second half of 2024
Aug 5, 2024 · State tax dynamics halfway through 2024 are shaped by healthy state budgets, stagnating tax revenue collections and an increase in audit
[117]
Guide: Sales and Use Tax Trends for 2025 - Thompson Tax
Oct 15, 2024 · 1. Increased Focus on Sales and Use Tax Audits · 2. Services Taxation Expands (Yes, Again) · 3. Digital Goods – The Plot Thickens · 4. Economic ...
[118]
2025 sales tax changes guide - Avalara
The Avalara Tax Changes 2025 midyear update is here. With insights from industry professionals and Avalara experts, this timely supplement to our annual report