Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Variance swap

A variance swap is an over-the-counter (OTC) financial contract that enables one party to pay a fixed amount based on an agreed-upon , while receiving payments based on the of an underlying asset's returns over a specified period, such as an equity index, , or commodity price. The is typically calculated as the annualized squared logarithmic returns of the asset, observed at discrete intervals like daily closes, providing a direct measure of price movement magnitude without exposure to the asset's directional bias. At maturity, the payoff is determined by the difference between the and the strike, multiplied by a notional amount (often in variance units, e.g., notional divided by 2 times strike), resulting in cash settlement where the long position profits if realized variance exceeds the strike and . Variance swaps differ from volatility swaps in that they are based on variance (the square of ), leading to a payoff profile that amplifies gains for the buyer during high- periods but also increases the fair relative to levels. This arises because variance is additive over time, allowing the contract to be replicated statically using a of put and call options weighted inversely by the square of their prices, a key insight from the replication formula derived in the late and popularized in the early 2000s. Pricing the fair involves integrating the surface from the options market, making variance swaps model-independent for valuation purposes, though adjustments may be needed for discrete monitoring, dividends, or jumps in the underlying asset. The first variance swap was traded in 1993 at , with the product gaining prominence in the late 1990s following the LTCM crisis and in the 2000s as tools for institutional investors and hedge funds to trade as an asset class, particularly in dispersion strategies where short index variance swaps are paired with long single-stock variance swaps to bet on breakdowns. They serve multiple purposes, including directional speculation on spikes (e.g., during market crashes), hedging short exposures from structured products like equity-linked notes, and calendar spreads to trade term structure changes in implied versus . Despite their simplicity and lack of delta-hedging requirements compared to options, variance swaps carry risks such as path dependency in return calculations and sensitivity to large price jumps, which can disproportionately inflate . Recent advancements, including data-driven pricing methods like signature transforms based on rough path theory, have enhanced calibration accuracy for high-dimensional surfaces in modern markets.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

A variance swap is an over-the-counter (OTC) financial contract in which one party agrees to pay a fixed variance while receiving the of an underlying asset's returns over a specified period, or . This instrument enables direct exposure to the variability of the asset's price movements, typically calculated from logarithmic returns, without requiring ownership of the underlying asset such as an equity index, , or . The primary purpose of a variance swap is to allow investors to speculate on or against the magnitude of an underlying asset's price fluctuations—essentially its —while maintaining neutrality on the direction of the price change. This makes it particularly valuable for participants seeking pure plays, such as managers hedging against unexpected spikes in turbulence or traders betting on regimes without the complexities of directional . Unlike other swap instruments that might focus on interest rates, returns, or even itself, a variance swap specifically targets variance, which is the square of , providing a exposure to price movements. This distinction arises because variance can be more straightforward to replicate and price using options portfolios, emphasizing the instrument's role in trading rather than linear measures. For instance, consider a variance swap on an equity index where the fixed is set at 20% annualized variance; if the over the contract period exceeds this level, the buyer (long variance) receives a equal to the difference multiplied by the notional amount and a variance multiplier, such as 2/T to annualize the result, with T representing the time to maturity in years. This settlement mechanism underscores the swap's utility in isolating bets.

Historical Development

Variance swaps emerged in the early as part of the burgeoning field of derivatives, with the first known trade occurring in 1993 when Michael Weber at (UBS) structured a variance swap on the to the bank's short exposure in its trading book. This instrument allowed for direct exposure to , distinguishing it from earlier swaps that required dynamic hedging. By the late , amid heightened market turbulence from the Asian Financial Crisis and the collapse, variance swaps gained traction on , with initial over-the-counter (OTC) trades reported around 1998-1999, pioneered by investment banks including JPMorgan for managing discrepancies between implied and . Theoretical foundations solidified during this period through replication strategies using portfolios of vanilla options, as detailed in seminal works by Demeterfi, Derman, Kamal, and Zou (1999) and Derman (1999), enabling model-independent pricing and hedging. Liquidity in variance swaps expanded significantly post-2000, transitioning from a niche product to a OTC , driven by in , booking, and replication processes at major banks. By 2006, daily traded volumes for major equity indices like the reached $3-5 million in notional, with bid-offer spreads tightening to around 0.5 , reflecting a 5-10 times increase from 2003 levels; this growth extended to single stocks and emerging markets. Market adoption accelerated in the , with notional traded totaling $7.2 billion between 2013 and June 2014, predominantly in maturities from 6 months to 5 years, underscoring their role in broader trading ecosystems. Market size continued to scale, estimated at approximately $19.6 billion globally in 2024, as variance swaps became integral for hedging and speculative purposes across equities and other . Following the , which temporarily disrupted markets due to extreme swings, variance swaps integrated more deeply into comprehensive trading frameworks, enhancing their utility for amid heightened uncertainty. Post-crisis regulatory reforms and improved infrastructure further commoditized these instruments, with banks like JPMorgan expanding their use in and relative value trades. Recent developments as of 2025 include greater adoption in dispersion trading strategies, where variance swaps on indices are paired with those on components to exploit discrepancies, alongside advancements in automated platforms such as the Cboe Variance Futures launched in 2024 to mirror OTC trading on exchanges. Additionally, academic research has advanced pricing techniques, notably through 2023 studies applying signature methods—rooted in rough path theory—to model path-dependent features in variance swaps, offering more precise calibration for high-dimensional data. These innovations have sustained market growth, positioning variance swaps as a cornerstone of modern derivatives portfolios.

Contract Mechanics

Payoff Structure

A variance swap is a whose payoff at maturity depends on the difference between the of the underlying asset's returns and a fixed variance strike agreed upon at . The payoff to the long position is calculated as Notional × ( - Variance Strike), where the notional amount determines the economic exposure to each point of variance difference, often specified in currency units per variance point (e.g., USD per squared). Realized variance captures the actual experienced by the underlying asset over the contract period and is computed as the annualized average of squared logarithmic returns: \sigma^2 = \frac{252}{N} \sum_{i=1}^N \left( \ln \frac{S_i}{S_{i-1}} \right)^2, where N is the number of periods (typically daily), S_i denotes the asset at the i-th , and the factor of 252 assumes 252 trading days per year for annualization. This discrete sampling approximates the continuous of the asset's log-price process. The variance strike is the fixed annualized variance level set at contract initiation, typically derived from the square of the from the options market, ensuring the contract has zero value at inception under fair pricing. To express payoffs in volatility terms, the notional relates to the variance notional by vega notional = variance notional × 2 × variance strike. In the presence of effects, such as , the fair variance strike incorporates adjustments like those accounting for the linear dependence of on strike (e.g., K_{\text{var}} = \Sigma_0^2 (1 + \frac{1}{3} T b^2), where b parameterizes the ). These adjustments address discrepancies between linear and variance measures but do not alter the core payoff formula.

Settlement and Parameters

Variance swaps are typically cash-settled instruments, where the payoff at maturity is determined by the difference between the of the underlying asset over the period and a pre-agreed variance, multiplied by the variance notional amount. If the exceeds the , the variance buyer receives a from the seller; otherwise, the buyer pays the seller, with occurring shortly after the end date, such as or T+3 business days. Physical delivery is rare, as the contract focuses on the exchange of a amount reflecting the variance differential rather than any underlying asset transfer. Key parameters defining a variance swap include the underlying asset, typically an equity index such as the or , single stocks, or occasionally commodities and pairs. The tenor, or contract duration, commonly ranges from three months to five years, with liquidity concentrated around quarterly option expiration dates. Observation frequency is generally daily, based on close-to-close returns of the underlying, annualized assuming 252 trading days per year. For multi-period swaps, reset dates mark the boundaries of successive observation periods, allowing the contract to be structured as a series of shorter tenors. The variance multiplier, often expressed through the relationship between notional and variance notional, ensures the payoff aligns with quoting conventions; for instance, notional equals variance notional times two times the variance , facilitating trades in percentage terms such as 100 × sqrt(variance). Operationally, realized variance calculations often rely on third-party variance calculators or designated calculation agents, such as those provided via terminals or by broker-dealers like JPMorgan. Corporate actions, including s on single stocks, are handled by adjusting returns in the variance computation, such as incorporating dividend yields into the fair or ex-dividend price adjustments per rules. Market disruptions during observation periods, such as trading halts or closures, typically result in the exclusion of affected days or the use of the prior observation date's price to maintain continuity in the variance series.

Pricing and Valuation

Theoretical Pricing Framework

The theoretical pricing framework for variance swaps at centers on determining the fair variance , which ensures the has zero initial . This is defined as the expected over the contract's life under the , allowing the payoff to be unbiased in . In continuous-time settings, the corresponds to the of the logarithm of the underlying asset price, normalized by time. A key insight is the static replication of variance swaps using a portfolio of out-of-the-money European put and call options across all strikes. This replication exploits applied to the logarithmic contract, where the infinitesimal change in variance relates to the asset's via d(\text{var}) = \frac{2}{S^2} d\langle S \rangle, with d\langle S \rangle = \sigma_t^2 S^2 dt under the assumption. The option weights are inversely proportional to the square of the strike ($1/K^2), enabling the portfolio to synthetically capture the expected without dynamic adjustments beyond the initial setup. The framework builds on the Black-Scholes model extended to stochastic volatility processes, assuming continuous paths for the underlying asset and no jumps. Under these conditions, the fair variance strike is the time-averaged expected instantaneous variance over the contract period: K_{\text{var}} = \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T \mathbb{E}^Q[\sigma_t^2] \, dt, where T is the time to maturity, \sigma_t denotes the instantaneous volatility, and \mathbb{E}^Q is the expectation under the . This formula yields the annualized expected variance. The factor of 2 arises in the Itô correction for the log contract replication using options, where the portfolio value equals \frac{2}{T} \left[ \int_0^F \frac{P(K)}{K^2} \, dK + \int_F^\infty \frac{C(K)}{K^2} \, dK \right]. In stochastic volatility models, such as , the fair strike reflects the term structure of implied variances, equivalent to the time-weighted average along the variance swap curve derived from market option prices. This integral captures forward-looking volatility expectations, distinguishing it from constant-volatility cases where K_{\text{var}} = \sigma^2.

Discrete Sampling Adjustments

In variance swaps, is typically computed using discrete sampling of asset returns rather than continuous monitoring, necessitating adjustments to the theoretical continuous pricing framework for accurate valuation. The discrete realized variance is given by \sigma_N^2 = \frac{252}{N} \sum_{i=1}^N \left( \ln \frac{S_{t_i}}{S_{t_{i-1}}} \right)^2, where N is the number of sampling points over the contract period, t_i = i \Delta t with \Delta t = T/N, and the factor of 252 annualizes the variance assuming 252 trading days per year. This discrete approximation introduces a sampling bias, as the sum of squared log returns overestimates the true continuous quadratic variation due to higher-order terms in the expansion of the log return under the stochastic price process. The bias stems from the drift and variance contributions in Itô's lemma, leading to a systematic upward adjustment that must be corrected in pricing to align with the expected payoff. Using a Taylor expansion around the continuous limit, the leading-order correction term for the expected discrete variance is approximately \frac{1}{3} \Delta t \, \sigma^4 for small \Delta t, where \sigma denotes the instantaneous volatility; this term reflects contributions from higher moments of the Brownian increments. To incorporate this into valuation, the fair variance under sampling is adjusted from its continuous counterpart via an analytical that accounts for the time-varying nature of . Specifically, K_{\text{var}}^N = K_{\text{var}}^{\text{cont}} + \frac{2}{T} \int_0^T f(\sigma_t, \Delta t) \, dt, where f(\sigma_t, \Delta t) encapsulates the discretization error derived from the Taylor expansion, including the \frac{1}{3} \Delta t \, \sigma_t^4 term and higher-order contributions that converge as O(1/N). This adjustment ensures the swap's initial value remains zero under the , bridging the discrete contract specification to the continuous theoretical model outlined in the pricing framework. Such discrete sampling adjustments are typically modest in magnitude for common market conventions, with the difference between discrete and continuous fair strikes ranging from 1% to 5% for daily sampling frequencies on indices; however, the effect amplifies for shorter contract tenors (e.g., intraday or weekly sampling) or during episodes of elevated , where the \sigma^4 dependence heightens the bias. In high- regimes, neglecting these corrections can lead to mispricing on the order of several volatility points when converted to swap equivalents.

Replication Using Options

Variance swaps can be replicated statically using a portfolio of vanilla European options on the underlying asset. This approach involves holding a continuum of put options for strikes below the forward price F and call options for strikes above F, with each option weighted inversely proportional to the square of its strike price, i.e., by $1/K^2. The weighting ensures that the portfolio's payoff matches the realized variance accumulated over the contract's life, providing a hedge against variance risk without directional exposure to the underlying asset's price. The of the variance swap, or its , is determined by the value of this replicating portfolio under the . Specifically, the expected is given by K_{\text{var}} = \frac{2}{T} \left[ \int_0^F \frac{P(K)}{K^2} \, dK + \int_F^\infty \frac{C(K)}{K^2} \, dK \right], where T is the time to expiration, P(K) and C(K) are the prices of the out-of-the-money put and call options with strike K, respectively. This integral captures the market's implied variance across the entire volatility skew, allowing the swap's price to be derived directly from observable option prices. In monitoring cases, where variance is realized at fixed intervals rather than continuously, the static provides an to the replication, with the converging as sampling frequency increases. sampling introduces a small , but the static option is typically used without further adjustments, as the difference is minor for standard daily conventions. Practical implementation faces challenges related to option , particularly in the "wings" of out-of-the-money strikes, where sparse trading can lead to wider bid-ask spreads and higher transaction costs. For index-based variance swaps, such as those on the , replication often incorporates futures, which provide efficient exposure to implied variance derived from the same option strip, enhancing liquidity and reducing the need for illiquid far-wing options.

Market Applications

Hedging Strategies

Variance swaps serve as effective instruments for managers seeking to mitigate exposure, particularly in protecting against sudden spikes in market associated with events. By entering a long position in a variance swap on an underlying index, investors can receive a payoff that increases quadratically with , thereby offsetting potential losses in equity holdings during periods of heightened market turbulence. For instance, a manager holding a long equity tracking the might purchase a variance swap on the index to hedge against drawdowns induced by surges, as the swap's positive payoff during such events compensates for the portfolio's decline. This approach has been recognized as a straightforward hedging strategy, where a basket of variance swaps on the provides direct exposure to realized without the path-dependency issues of options. In 2024, the Cboe Futures Exchange launched Variance Futures, an designed to replicate the economics of OTC variance swaps. These futures settle based on the of the Index, offering centrally cleared trading with simplified settlement and expanded listing cycles, which enhances accessibility for hedging exposure in portfolios. In addition to portfolio-level protection, variance swaps are widely employed by insurers and derivatives dealers to hedge convexity-related risks, such as gamma and exposures arising from option books. These entities often maintain large portfolios of options, where gamma (the sensitivity to changes) and (sensitivity to changes) can lead to significant rebalancing costs during volatile periods; a short position in variance swaps allows dealers to neutralize these risks by replicating the inverse of the inherent in delta-hedged option strategies. For example, an insurer writing variable annuities with embedded options can use forward-starting variance swaps to lock in current levels and hedge against future increases, thereby stabilizing the economic value of their liabilities. This hedging efficacy stems from the ability to dynamically adjust variance swap positions to match the convexity profile of the option , reducing hedging errors to under 0.4% in standard models with a finite set of supporting options. As of 2025, variance swaps have seen increased integration into dispersion trading strategies, where they facilitate hedging the differential volatility between single-stock and index levels. In these applications, market participants long single-stock variance swaps while shorting index variance swaps to isolate and hedge idiosyncratic volatility risks against broader market movements, particularly amid rising equity correlations driven by sector-specific events like AI-driven sell-offs. This setup allows for targeted risk mitigation in multi-asset portfolios, with variance swaps serving as proxies for efficient intraday rebalancing and dynamic adjustment of dispersion exposures.

Speculative and Relative Value Uses

Variance swaps provide traders with opportunities to speculate on the divergence between realized and implied variance, allowing directional bets on future without the complexities of options path-dependency. For instance, a trader anticipating elevated realized —such as prior to corporate announcements or releases—might enter a long position in a variance swap on an individual stock, profiting if the realized variance exceeds the agreed level. Conversely, in environments expected to remain calm, such as post-event stabilization periods, a short variance swap position can capitalize on realized variance falling below the strike, though this carries the risk of unlimited losses from unexpected volatility spikes. These speculative trades are particularly appealing for expressing macro views, like purchasing variance ahead of potential recessions where historical patterns suggest volatility surges. Relative value strategies with variance swaps often exploit mispricings across the term structure or between related assets, enabling arbitrage-like positions with controlled . One common approach involves spreads, where a trader might go long a longer-dated variance swap (e.g., two-year maturity at a strike of 19.50 on the ) and short a shorter-dated one (e.g., one-year at 18.50), betting on the forward implied by the curve's shape. Another key relative value application is dispersion trading, which targets discrepancies in by shorting an index variance swap and longing variance swaps on its individual components, such as weighting the long legs to achieve neutrality at . This strategy profits when correlations decrease ( widens), as index variance embeds higher correlation premiums than the sum of single-name variances; for example, a vega-neutral dispersion trade on the might yield positive returns if component volatilities realize independently. Dispersion trades maintain constant exposure without the rebalancing required in traditional options-based straddles, making them efficient for , though they remain sensitive to second-order effects like volatility of (). Risks in these relative value strategies include breakdowns, where sudden market-wide events cause components to move in tandem, eroding the dispersion bet, as well as jump risks from discrete price shocks that inflate unevenly across the portfolio. Additionally, constraints and wide bid-ask spreads can amplify costs, particularly for customized structures like forward-starting or swaps used in these trades. Overall, while speculative uses offer high-reward potential for timing, relative value applications emphasize mean-reversion in surfaces, with historical backtests showing consistent edges in low- regimes.

Volatility Swaps

A volatility swap is a on the realized of an underlying asset, where the payoff at maturity is given by the notional amount times the difference between the realized and a fixed . Realized is typically computed as the of the annualized realized , based on the squared daily log returns of the asset over the contract period. This structure provides linear exposure to , contrasting with the quadratic payoff of variance swaps, which settle based on the difference between realized and a fixed variance . The primary structural difference lies in the payoff: volatility swaps offer a linear payoff in realized , while variance swaps are linear in variance but in due to the squaring function. This makes variance swaps easier to replicate statically using a of European options weighted inversely by the square of their strikes, whereas volatility swaps require dynamic replication strategies, such as continuously rebalancing a position in the underlying asset or variance swaps to account for the concavity of the function. For instance, dynamic hedging of a volatility swap often involves a constant proportion that adjusts to the evolving path, introducing sensitivity to the of . Pricing volatility swaps presents challenges absent in variance swaps, as there is no model-independent static replication using options alone. The fair volatility strike is approximately the of the fair variance strike from a corresponding variance swap, but requires a downward adjustment, since the of the square root of a is less than the square root of its expected value: \mathbb{E}[\sqrt{X}] < \sqrt{\mathbb{E}[X]}, where X represents . This convexity bias implies that the volatility swap rate is lower than the square root of the variance swap rate, reflecting the risk-neutral uncertainty in . Both instruments serve overlapping purposes in volatility trading, such as speculating on future levels or hedging exposures from structured products like variable annuities. However, variance swaps are generally preferred in practice for their simpler replication and hedging properties, leading to greater , particularly in equity indices.

Other Variance-Based Instruments

Corridor variance swaps extend the standard variance swap by accumulating realized variance only when the underlying asset remains within a predefined corridor, such as a range around the initial . This structure allows traders to gain exposure to in range-bound scenarios while ignoring contributions from extreme movements outside the corridor, making it suitable for strategies targeting moderate without . The payoff is calculated as the notional amount times the annualized accrued solely during periods when the asset is inside the corridor, typically monitored daily. These instruments are replicated using a static of options whose strikes lie within the corridor, combined with dynamic hedging in the underlying asset, similar to variance swaps but with corridor-specific adjustments. Gamma swaps provide variance weighted by the level of the underlying asset, differing from unweighted variance swaps by scaling each squared log-return by the normalized to its initial value. This weighting emphasizes variance contributions during upward movements, effectively approximating to the gamma of a dynamic option and reducing sensitivity to downside . The payoff is the notional times the annualized sum of these weighted squared returns, often used in trading where a long position in single-stock gamma swaps is paired against a short index gamma swap to exploit differences in component versus aggregate . Replication involves a of out-of-the-money options across all strikes, with dynamic trading in the underlying to capture the gamma effect, enabling model-independent pricing. Recent innovations in variance-based instruments include path-dependent variants that incorporate the full trajectory of the asset price using signature methods, which encode path information via iterated integrals of Brownian motion to model complex dependencies in volatility. These approaches allow for pricing and hedging of options whose payoffs depend on integrated variance along non-Markovian paths, extending traditional discrete sampling to capture trajectory-specific risks in stochastic volatility environments like the rough Bergomi model. Numerical Fourier inversion techniques facilitate efficient valuation of such path-dependent variance swaps, demonstrating superior accuracy for European and Asian-style options compared to Monte Carlo methods. Conditional variance swaps, which accrue variance only under specified triggers like price thresholds, have also been developed. Additionally, research has identified correlations between variance risk premiums and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores, enabling tailored exposure in sustainable asset portfolios. In 2024, the Cboe launched redesigned S&P 500 Variance Futures, aiming to migrate over-the-counter variance swap trading to the exchange-listed market for simplified settlement and improved liquidity. These instruments primarily trade over-the-counter (OTC), offering customized variance exposure beyond swaps through added path or condition monitoring, while maintaining replication strategies based on option portfolios for .

References

  1. [1]
    Variance vs. Volatility Swaps: Definitions, Differences, and Mechanics
    Sep 20, 2025 · A variance swap is a financial derivative used to hedge or speculate on the magnitude of a price movement of an underlying asset.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Just what you need to know about Variance Swaps - sebastien bossu
    May 1, 2025 · A variance swap is an instrument which allows investors to trade future realized (or historical) volatility against current implied volatility.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Signature Methods in Variance Swap Pricing
    Oct 13, 2023 · Variance swap is a type of financial derivative that allows investors to trade or hedge against the volatility of an underlying asset.
  4. [4]
    Variance swap definition - Risk.net
    A variance swap is an over-the-counter derivative that offers exposure to the future volatility of an underlying asset such as an interest rate or an equity ...
  5. [5]
    Variance Swap - Overview, How It Works, Potential Uses
    Variance swap refers to an over-the-counter financial derivative that allows the holder to speculate on the future volatility of a given underlying asset.Missing: purpose | Show results with:purpose
  6. [6]
    Variance Swap | Definition, Importance, Uses, Risk, & Role
    Rating 4.4 (11) Aug 10, 2023 · A variance swap is a type of financial derivative that allows investors to speculate or hedge against the volatility of an underlying asset. It ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] An abridged, illustrated history of volatility - NYU Stern
    Feb 28, 2018 · According to Michael Weber, now with J.P. Morgan, the first volatility derivative appears to have been a variance swap dealt in 1993 by him at ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Volatility Derivatives
    Mar 3, 2021 · The emergence of variance swaps in 1998 is probably due to the historically high implied volatilities experienced in that year.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Variance Swaps - Derivatives Academy
    In this note we discuss the variance swap market, mechanics, pricing and uses. Variance swaps offer straightforward and direct exposure to the volatility of an ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The Price of Variance Risk - National Bureau of Economic Research
    In little more than a year, the variance swap market saw $7.2 billion of notional vega traded. Only 11 percent of the volume was traded in short maturity ...
  11. [11]
    Variance Swaps Market Research Report 2033 - Dataintelo
    According to our latest research, the global variance swaps market size reached USD 19.6 billion in 2024, reflecting robust momentum in the derivatives ...
  12. [12]
    Variance swaps with mean reversion and multi-factor variance
    May 16, 2024 · Introduction. Managing volatility risk has become increasingly important in recent years, particularly since the 2008 global financial crisis.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] VARIANCE SWAPS
    Although variance swaps were first traded as early as the late 1990s, liquid markets for these instruments did not fully take off for some time because of a ...
  14. [14]
    Harnessing the Benefits of Variance and Dispersion Trading | Numerix
    Sep 3, 2025 · Variance swaps represent one of the most straightforward instruments in volatility trading. ... The 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Quantitative Strategies Research Notes - Emanuel Derman
    A variance swap has a payoff proportional to realized variance. In this section, assuming the Black-Scholes world for stock and options mar- kets, we have ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Variance swaps - IVolatility.com
    A variance swap is a forward contract on annualized variance, the square of the realized volatility. VR = σR.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] ISDA® - International Swaps and Derivatives Association
    Nov 9, 2012 · The terms of a variance swap may specify that the realized variance ... Disclosure Statement for certain considerations regarding potential ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Pricing variance swaps by using two methods - DiVA portal
    Oct 19, 2008 · At expiration, the holder of a variance swap receives N dollars per every point by which realized variance is higher than Kvar. The fair value ...Missing: multiplier | Show results with:multiplier
  19. [19]
    [PDF] The Effect of Jumps and Discrete Sampling on Volatility and ...
    The variance swap payoff is defined as. (Vd(0, n, T) − Kvar(n)) × N where Vd ... Hence, from equation (18) the initial value of a discrete variance swap ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Hedging Variance Options on Continuous Semimartingales
    This paper includes extension and unification of the replication strategies for the various flavors of variance swaps (including gamma swaps, corridor ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] A constant volatility framework for managing tail risk
    A tail risk hedging strategy would simply involve purchasing a basket of variance swaps on the particular market which you are trying to hedge.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Pricing and Hedging Volatility Derivatives - Columbia University
    Jan 10, 2008 · In this paper we propose a methodology for hedging volatility swaps and variance options using variance swaps. Since the price of both variance ...
  23. [23]
    Hedging Variable Annuities: A Dealer's Perspective - SOA
    The forward starting variance swap allows the VA issuer to hedge against future increases in volatility while locking in at today's relatively low strike ...
  24. [24]
    Equity dispersion trading: how, what and when to trade
    Sep 26, 2025 · Risk mitigation – Intraday hedging techniques, dynamic rebalancing and the use of variance‑swap proxies are described to keep the strategy ...Missing: adoption | Show results with:adoption
  25. [25]
    None
    ### Summary of Dispersion Trading Using Variance Swaps (arXiv:1004.0125, Le Foll et al., 2010)
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Variance swaps - Risk.net
    These trades exploit pricing discrepancies between index options and the price of their constituent stock options. These 'vega-spread' transactions are used ...
  27. [27]
    Variance swap volatility dispersion
    These involve selling volatility on the index and buying volatility on the components. This trade was traditionally done using at the money (ATM) straddles. An ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Variance Risk Premia∗ - NYU Tandon School of Engineering
    volatility swap payoff, Jensen's inequality dictates that the variance swap rate is greater than the square of the volatility swap rate. The difference ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Corridor Variance Swap - UChicago Math
    Dec 29, 2008 · Corridor variance swaps accumulate only the variance that occurs while price is in the corridor. The buyer therefore pays less than the cost of ...
  30. [30]
    Efficient Pricing and Super Replication of Corridor Variance Swaps ...
    Apr 12, 2017 · This note proposes a method for over-hedging weighted variance using only a finite number of maturities.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Gamma Swap - UChicago Math
    Dec 29, 2008 · Gamma swaps allow investors to acquire variance exposures proportional to the underlying level. One application is dispersion trading of a ...
  32. [32]
    Gamma Swap - Lee - 2010 - Wiley Online Library
    May 15, 2010 · A gamma swap is a weighted variance swap, with weight given by the underlying level (normalized by the initial underlying level).
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Signature volatility models: pricing and hedging with Fourier - HAL
    Jun 2, 2025 · In this section, we show how Theorem 4.1 can be applied to price European options as well as q-Volatility swaps using Fourier inversion ...
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Knocking out corridor variance - Risk.net
    A corridor variance swap that is deeply out-of-the-money will no longer accumulate variance; however, it may continue to consume margin until the trade expiry, ...