Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Virtual photon

In quantum electrodynamics (QED), the fundamental theory describing electromagnetic interactions, a virtual photon is a transient, off-shell excitation of the electromagnetic field that mediates the force between charged particles, such as electrons, without being directly observable as a free particle.^[1] Unlike real photons, which are massless, on-shell quanta of light that propagate at the speed of light and satisfy the relation E = pc where E is energy, p is momentum, and c is the speed of light, virtual photons violate this relation due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, allowing them to exist briefly with effective mass and arbitrary energy-momentum values.^[2] They manifest as intermediate states in perturbative calculations, depicted as internal lines in Feynman diagrams, where charged particles exchange these "messenger" particles to produce effects like repulsion or attraction.^[1] Virtual photons underpin key QED predictions, including the Lamb shift in hydrogen atom energy levels and the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, where their virtual fluctuations contribute to precise measurements matching experiment to high accuracy.^[1] In the context of static fields, such as the magnetic field around a moving charge, virtual photons form a dynamic cloud constantly emitted and reabsorbed by the particle, enabling long-range interactions that follow the inverse-square law.^[3] Although not "real" in the sense of being detectable independently, virtual photons are physically meaningful as field disturbances, providing a quantum explanation for classical electromagnetic phenomena and avoiding instantaneous action-at-a-distance.^[1] Their role extends to processes like electron-positron annihilation, where a virtual photon intermediate state can produce particle pairs, highlighting their integral place in relativistic quantum field theory.^[1]

Fundamentals

Definition

In quantum electrodynamics (QED), virtual photons are intermediate states within the framework of perturbation theory, serving as mathematical representations of fluctuations in the electromagnetic field that mediate interactions between charged particles.^[4] These entities arise during the calculation of transition amplitudes for processes such as electron scattering, where they act as propagators linking initial and final states in the perturbative expansion.^[5] Unlike real photons, which manifest as observable, on-shell excitations of the electromagnetic field capable of propagating freely, virtual photons do not satisfy the standard energy-momentum relation for free particles and thus cannot be directly detected.^[6] Virtual particles in general, including virtual photons, function as non-observable intermediaries that facilitate the description of forces in quantum field theory, embodying the quantum fluctuations inherent to field interactions rather than constituting physical entities with definite trajectories or lifetimes.^[7] They emerge from the mathematical structure of QED's Lagrangian and the associated Feynman rules, enabling the computation of probabilities for particle interactions without implying the literal exchange of transient particles. This conceptual tool is indispensable for deriving precise predictions, such as the fine-structure constant's influence on atomic spectra, though virtual photons themselves elude empirical observation.^[4] The notion of virtual photons was pioneered in the 1940s by Richard P. Feynman, Julian Schwinger, and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga during their independent yet convergent efforts to reformulate QED into a relativistically covariant and renormalizable theory.^[8] Feynman's space-time approach, articulated through path integrals and diagrammatic representations, explicitly incorporated these intermediate photon states to resolve divergences in earlier perturbation calculations.^[5] Schwinger's operator formalism and Tomonaga's invariant extension of wave equations similarly highlighted the role of such field disturbances in maintaining gauge invariance and causality. Their collective work, recognized by the 1965 Nobel Prize in Physics, established virtual photons as a cornerstone of modern particle physics, essential for computing scattering amplitudes despite their non-physical nature.^[8]

Distinction from real photons

Real photons are fundamental quanta of the electromagnetic field that satisfy the on-shell condition, adhering strictly to the energy-momentum relation E = pc for massless particles, where E is the energy, p is the magnitude of the three-momentum, and c is the speed of light.^[9] These photons exhibit only transverse polarizations, with two independent polarization states perpendicular to their direction of propagation.^[9] As physical entities, real photons are directly observable in various experiments; for example, they manifest in the photoelectric effect, where incident photons transfer their energy to electrons in a material, ejecting them if the photon energy exceeds the material's work function./University_Physics_III_-Optics_and_Modern_Physics(OpenStax)/06%3A_Photons_and_Matter_Waves/6.03%3A_Photoelectric_Effect) In contrast, virtual photons are off-shell intermediaries in quantum electrodynamic processes, failing to satisfy the relation E^2 = p^2 c^2 (since the photon rest mass m = 0) and thus possessing four-momentum squared q^2 \neq 0.^[10] Their momentum can be spacelike (q^2 < 0) or timelike (q^2 > 0), allowing them to carry configurations incompatible with free propagation.^[9] Unlike real photons, virtual photons can exhibit longitudinal polarization components in addition to transverse ones, as their off-shell nature relaxes the constraints imposed by gauge invariance on free fields.^[11] These properties enable virtual photons to mediate interactions without being free-propagating particles. A common misconception portrays virtual photons as short-lived real photons that briefly exist before annihilating; however, they are not physical particles but rather mathematical constructs representing internal propagators in Feynman diagrams used for perturbative calculations in quantum electrodynamics.^[12] While virtual photons may appear to violate energy conservation at intermediate stages—borrowing energy for short times permitted by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle \Delta E \Delta t \gtrsim \hbar/2—the overall process strictly conserves energy and momentum.^[12] Consequently, virtual photons cannot be detected individually in experiments, distinguishing them sharply from real photons, which are routinely observed in detectors.^[9] This distinction underscores that virtual photons arise from quantum fluctuations in the electromagnetic field, serving as tools to describe force mediation rather than as tangible entities.^[12]

Theoretical Framework

Role in quantum electrodynamics

Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is the relativistic quantum field theory describing the interactions of electromagnetism, where charged particles such as electrons interact via the exchange of virtual photons. These virtual photons serve as mediators of the electromagnetic force between fermions, enabling processes that classical electrodynamics cannot fully explain, such as the precise structure of atomic spectra and scattering amplitudes. In QED, the fundamental interaction Lagrangian couples the photon field to the Dirac field of fermions through the minimal substitution, leading to virtual photon exchanges in all perturbative calculations.^[13] In the perturbative expansion of QED, virtual photons emerge in higher-order terms beyond the tree-level Dirac equation for free charged particles, contributing to self-energy corrections and vertex modifications.^[13] The S-matrix elements are expanded in powers of the fine-structure constant α ≈ 1/137, with virtual photon loops appearing starting at order α for processes like electron anomalous magnetic moment.^[13] These corrections refine the predictions of the non-interacting Dirac equation, accounting for radiative effects that shift energy levels and scattering cross sections. A representative example is Møller scattering, the process of electron-electron repulsion, where the leading-order amplitude arises from the exchange of a single space-like virtual photon between the incoming fermions. This exchange yields the Coulomb repulsion term in the differential cross section, with the virtual photon's four-momentum satisfying q² < 0, ensuring the interaction is instantaneous in the center-of-mass frame. Higher-order virtual photon contributions, including loops, introduce logarithmic corrections that are essential for precision agreement with experiments. Gauge invariance in QED mandates that physical observables remain unchanged under gauge transformations of the photon field, a principle upheld by the inclusion of virtual photons in all orders of perturbation theory to preserve Lorentz covariance.^[13] Virtual photon loops generate ultraviolet divergences in integrals, which are absorbed through renormalization procedures developed by Dyson and others, redefining bare parameters like charge and mass to match observed values.^[13] This framework ensures the theory's consistency, with virtual photons visualized in Feynman diagrams as internal lines representing off-shell propagators.^[13]

Representation in Feynman diagrams

In quantum electrodynamics (QED), virtual photons are represented in Feynman diagrams as internal wavy lines connecting interaction vertices, symbolizing the exchange of these off-shell particles that mediate electromagnetic interactions without being directly observable. These diagrams provide a perturbative framework for calculating scattering amplitudes, where the virtual photon lines encode the propagation between charged particle interactions. The off-shell nature of virtual photons is captured through propagators that do not satisfy the on-shell condition q^2 = 0.^[14] The Feynman rules for QED specify the virtual photon propagator in momentum space as -i g^{\mu\nu}/q^2 in the Feynman gauge, where g^{\mu\nu} is the Minkowski metric tensor and q is the four-momentum transfer. This form arises from the free photon Lagrangian \mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}, where F_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu and A^\mu is the photon field. Quantizing in Lorentz gauge with gauge-fixing term -\frac{1}{2\xi} (\partial_\mu A^\mu)^2 (setting \xi=1 for Feynman gauge), the quadratic action in momentum space yields the inverse propagator (q^2 g^{\mu\nu} - q^\mu q^\nu (1-\xi)), which simplifies to q^2 g^{\mu\nu} for \xi=1. Inverting gives the propagator i D^{\mu\nu}(q) = -i g^{\mu\nu}/q^2. The gauge term vanishes when contracted with conserved currents.^[14] This propagator allows q^2 \neq 0, distinguishing virtual photons from real ones. At each vertex where a virtual photon couples to fermions (e.g., electrons), the interaction follows the QED vertex rule derived from the Lagrangian term -e \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi A_\mu, where e > 0 is the elementary charge, \psi is the Dirac field, \gamma^\mu are the Dirac matrices, and A_\mu is the photon field. The Feynman rule assigns a factor of -i e \gamma^\mu to the vertex, with the photon index \mu contracted across the diagram. Momentum conservation is enforced at each vertex, and external photon lines (for real photons) include polarization vectors \epsilon^\mu, but internal virtual lines use the full propagator.^[14] A representative example is the tree-level Compton scattering process e^- \gamma \to e^- \gamma, where the leading contribution involves virtual electron propagation (not photon exchange in the sense of internal photon, but the diagrams feature intermediate electron lines). The process has two tree-level diagrams: the direct (s-channel) where the incoming photon is absorbed by the electron, propagating virtually before emitting the outgoing photon, and the crossed (u-channel) where emission precedes absorption. The amplitude \mathcal{M} is the sum of these, given by

\mathcal{M} = e^2 \bar{u}(p') \gamma^\mu (\slashed{p} + \slashed{k} + m) \gamma^\nu u(p) \epsilon_\mu(k) \epsilon^*_\nu(k') / ((p+k)^2 - m^2) + e^2 \bar{u}(p') \gamma^\nu (\slashed{p} - \slashed{k}' + m) \gamma^\mu u(p) \epsilon^*_\nu(k') \epsilon_\mu(k) / ((p - k')^2 - m^2),

where p, k are incoming electron and photon momenta, p', k' outgoing, u are electron spinors, \epsilon are photon polarization vectors, and m is the electron mass (with +i\epsilon prescription implicit). Squaring and averaging over spins and polarizations yields the Klein-Nishina cross section, validating QED predictions against experiment.^[14] At higher orders, virtual photon loops appear, such as in vacuum polarization, where a photon line develops a closed fermion loop (e.g., virtual electron-positron pair). This one-loop diagram corrects the photon propagator by inserting \Pi^{\mu\nu}(q) = (q^2 g^{\mu\nu} - q^\mu q^\nu) \Pi(q^2), with \Pi(q^2) the polarization function computed as an integral over the fermion loop. Qualitatively, this effect screens the bare charge at short distances, leading to a running coupling constant \alpha(q^2) = \alpha(0) / (1 - \Pi(q^2)), where \alpha increases logarithmically with momentum scale |q^2|, enhancing the effective strength at high energies.^[14] The full set of Feynman diagrams, ordered by powers of the coupling e, sums to the Dyson series expansion of the S-matrix elements, \langle f | S | i \rangle = T \exp\left( i \int \mathcal{L}_\mathrm{int} \right), providing the perturbative solution to the interacting theory.^[14]

Properties

Off-shell characteristics

In quantum field theory, particles are classified as on-shell or off-shell based on whether their four-momentum p^\mu satisfies the mass-shell condition p^2 = m^2, where natural units with \hbar = c = 1 are used and p^2 = p^\mu p_\mu = E^2 - \mathbf{p}^2. For real photons, which are massless gauge bosons (m = 0), this condition simplifies to p^2 = 0, corresponding to light-like propagation along the light cone.^[15] Virtual photons, however, are off-shell, meaning p^2 \neq 0, allowing them to carry four-momenta that do not correspond to free-particle propagation.^[16] This off-shell nature arises in perturbative expansions of quantum electrodynamics (QED), where virtual photons appear as internal lines in Feynman diagrams, facilitating interactions between charged particles without being directly observable.^[17] The sign of p^2 for virtual photons distinguishes spacelike (p^2 < 0) and timelike (p^2 > 0) regimes, reflecting different kinematic roles in processes such as scattering or decay.^[18] Spacelike virtual photons, with E^2 < |\mathbf{p}|^2, typically mediate space-like momentum transfers, as seen in static electromagnetic fields. Timelike virtual photons, with p^2 > 0, can appear in time-like processes like pair production, where E^2 > |\mathbf{p}|^2.^[18] This flexibility in p^2 enables virtual photons to connect vertices in QED amplitudes while adhering to the theory's gauge invariance. The energy-time uncertainty principle, \Delta E \Delta t \geq \hbar/2, underpins the allowance for such off-shell propagators by permitting short-lived fluctuations in energy-momentum conservation during interactions, though virtual photons are mathematical constructs of the field theory rather than real particles temporarily violating the shell condition. Unlike real photons, which are transversely polarized with only two independent helicity states (\lambda = \pm 1) due to gauge symmetry and the on-shell condition, virtual photons can exhibit three polarization states, including a longitudinal mode (\lambda = 0).^[19] The longitudinal polarization arises because the off-shell condition relaxes the transversality requirement (p^\mu \epsilon_\mu = 0) imposed on real photons, allowing a component parallel to the momentum.^[19] This additional degree of freedom is crucial in QED calculations, such as those involving the photon propagator summed over polarizations. The Feynman propagator incorporates this off-shell behavior, encoding the full tensor structure for virtual photon exchange. The off-shell characteristics of virtual photons are essential for describing momentum transfer without net energy exchange in static fields, such as the Coulomb potential between charges.^[20] In this case, the virtual photon carries zero energy (q^0 = 0) but nonzero three-momentum (\mathbf{q} \neq 0), resulting in q^2 = -\mathbf{q}^2 < 0, which sustains the field without propagating as a real wave.^[20] This kinematic feature ensures the consistency of QED in reproducing classical electrostatics at low energies while capturing quantum corrections.^[21]

Energy-momentum relations

In quantum electrodynamics (QED), the four-momentum of a virtual photon is denoted as q^\mu = (E, \mathbf{p}), where E is the energy and \mathbf{p} is the three-momentum vector, satisfying the invariant q^2 = E^2 - |\mathbf{p}|^2 \neq 0, distinguishing it from real photons where q^2 = 0.^[22] This off-shell condition arises because virtual photons are intermediate states in perturbative expansions, not directly observable particles obeying the mass-shell constraint.^[22] The photon propagator in momentum space features a denominator of $1/q^2, which, upon Fourier transformation to position space, yields the potential mediating interactions. For massless photons (m = 0), this results in a Coulomb-like $1/r potential, whereas an effective mass would produce a Yukawa form e^{-mr}/r.^[22] In the Feynman gauge (\xi = 1), the propagator simplifies to -i \eta_{\mu\nu} / q^2, facilitating calculations in Feynman diagrams.^[22] This formulation derives from the Klein-Gordon equation for the photon field, obtained from the QED Lagrangian \mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2\xi} (\partial_\mu A^\mu)^2, where gauge fixing introduces the parameter \xi. For \xi = 1, the equation becomes (\square + i\epsilon) A^\mu = 0, analogous to the massless Klein-Gordon operator \square A^\mu = 0, with the propagator as its Green's function.^[22] In the static limit relevant to electrostatic interactions, the energy component q^0 \approx 0, so q^2 = -|\mathbf{q}|^2 < 0, corresponding to spacelike momentum transfer.^[22] Unlike real photons, virtual photons lack a fixed dispersion relation E = |\mathbf{p}| c, allowing E and |\mathbf{p}| to vary independently to satisfy internal lines in scattering processes.^[22]

Physical Implications

Mediation of electromagnetic forces

In quantum electrodynamics (QED), the electrostatic Coulomb force between two charged particles, such as electrons, arises from the tree-level exchange of a single virtual photon. This process is represented in Feynman diagrams as the lowest-order contribution to scattering amplitudes, like Møller scattering. The photon propagator in momentum space, \frac{-i g^{\mu\nu}}{q^2 + i\epsilon}, where q is the four-momentum transfer and g^{\mu\nu} is the Minkowski metric, leads to an interaction amplitude proportional to \frac{1}{q^2} for space-like q (with q^0 = 0). Performing the Fourier transform to position space yields the classical Coulomb potential V(r) = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi r} (for opposite charges), establishing the $1/r^2 force law through the inverse square dependence derived from the geometry of the exchange.^[22] For time-varying electric fields or moving charges, virtual photons with non-zero energy component q^0 \neq 0 mediate the interaction, resulting in retarded potentials that encompass both electric and magnetic effects. These dynamic exchanges incorporate the vector potential \mathbf{A} alongside the scalar potential \phi, producing the full Lorentz force law where magnetic fields exert forces perpendicular to charge velocities. The retardation arises naturally from the light-cone propagation in the photon propagator, ensuring causality and unifying electric and magnetic phenomena as relativistic aspects of the same underlying interaction.^[22] An important application in atomic physics is the Breit interaction, which provides relativistic corrections to the Coulomb potential between electrons by accounting for the finite propagation speed of virtual photons. This includes contributions from transverse virtual photons, leading to additional terms that modify the electron-electron repulsion and attraction in multi-electron systems, essential for accurate fine-structure calculations.^[23] Virtual photons mediate all electromagnetic forces, from static Coulomb repulsion to dynamic magnetic interactions, unifying them within the relativistic framework of QED where electric and magnetic fields emerge as components of the same photon field.^[22] Higher-order quantum corrections, such as those in one-loop Feynman diagrams involving virtual photon loops, contribute to effects like the Lamb shift—a small splitting of atomic energy levels arising from the electron's interaction with vacuum fluctuations mediated by these photons. These virtual photons are off-shell, with q^2 \neq 0, enabling the necessary momentum transfer for force mediation without adhering to on-shell conditions for real particles.^[22]

Manifestations in effects like Casimir

The Casimir effect manifests as an attractive force between two closely spaced, uncharged, parallel conducting plates arising from the restriction of virtual photon modes in the vacuum between them, compared to the unrestricted modes outside.^[24] This phenomenon stems from quantum vacuum fluctuations, where the electromagnetic field supports virtual photons whose wavelengths are quantized by the plate separation d, resulting in a lower zero-point energy density inside than outside. The attractive pressure arises from this energy difference, pushing the plates together. The magnitude of the Casimir force F on plates of area A is given by

F = -\frac{\pi^2 \hbar c A}{240 d^4},

where \hbar is the reduced Planck's constant and c is the speed of light.^[24] To derive this, one computes the zero-point energy of the electromagnetic modes between the plates, summing over allowed wavevectors perpendicular to the plates (with discrete k_z = n\pi/d for integer n), subtracts the continuum energy outside, and regularizes the divergent sum using a cutoff or zeta-function approach; the finite remainder yields the $1/d^4 dependence after differentiating with respect to d.^[24] Experimental verification came in 1997, when the Casimir force was measured between a flat plate and a curved surface over separations of 0.6 to 6 \mum, yielding agreement with theory to within 5%, confirming the role of virtual photons in this vacuum-induced attraction.^[25] In neutral atoms, retarded van der Waals forces—also known as London dispersion forces at longer ranges—arise from the exchange of virtual photons between fluctuating dipoles, leading to an attractive potential that transitions from $1/r^6 (non-retarded) to $1/r^7 (retarded) as separation r increases beyond atomic scales. An analogy to Hawking radiation in the electromagnetic context appears in the dynamical Casimir effect, where rapidly oscillating boundaries (such as moving mirrors) convert virtual vacuum photons into detectable real photons, mimicking the promotion of virtual pairs near a black hole horizon but confined to quantum electrodynamics. This effect was first experimentally observed in 2011 using an analog system with a superconducting circuit simulating rapid boundary motion.^[26] These effects illustrate how virtual photons, though not directly detectable, produce measurable forces on macroscopic scales through their influence on the quantum vacuum.^[25]

References

[1]
Are Virtual Particles Less Real? - PMC - NIH
Feb 2, 2019 · These exchanged particles are called virtual particles, and are not directly observable while they are being exchanged, because their creation ...
[2]
Fermilab | Science | Inquiring Minds | Questions About Physics
Apr 28, 2014 · Virtual photons pop up when something emits a photon which is almost immediately absorbed by another particle of some kind.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
Magnetic Field is Made of Photons | Physics Van | Illinois
Very close to an electron is a dense cloud of virtual photons which are constantly being emitted and re-absorbed by the electron. Some of these photons split ...
[4]
Virtual Particles: What are they? - Matt Strassler
Virtual particles are not particles, but disturbances in a field caused by other particles, and they will not exist on their own.
[5]
Space-Time Approach to Quantum Electrodynamics | Phys. Rev.
In this paper two things are done. (1) It is shown that a considerable simplification can be attained in writing down matrix elements for complex processes ...
[6]
Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
QED is a quantum field theory of the electromagnetic force. Taking the example of the force between two electrons.
[7]
Quantum Field Theory > The History of QFT (Stanford Encyclopedia ...
Photons are implicitly contained in the emission and absorption processes which have to be postulated, for instance, when one of an atom's electrons makes a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[8]
The Nobel Prize in Physics 1965 - NobelPrize.org
The Nobel Prize in Physics 1965 was awarded jointly to Sin-Itiro Tomonaga, Julian Schwinger and Richard P. Feynman for their fundamental work in quantum ...
[9]
[PDF] QFT Lectures Notes - Johns Hopkins University
May 3, 2016 · it cannot absorb an on-shell photon and transition to a new on-shell state. ... off-shell (virtual) photons. Then the part of the Feynman diagram ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[10]
[PDF] 3. Interacting Fields - DAMTP
In Section 6 of these lectures, we will see how the Coulomb force arises from quantum field theory due to the exchange of virtual photons. We could repeat the ...
[11]
Longitudinal virtual photons and the interference terms in ep collisions
Nov 8, 2002 · Abstract: The importance of the contributions of the longitudinally polarized virtual photon in ep collisions is investigated.
[12]
Some Frequently Asked Questions About Virtual Particles
The uncertainty principle opens up the possibility that a virtual photon could impart a momentum that corresponds to an attractive force as well as to a ...
[13]
The Matrix in Quantum Electrodynamics | Phys. Rev.
The covariant quantum electrodynamics of Tomonaga, Schwinger, and Feynman is used as the basis for a general treatment of scattering problems.<|control11|><|separator|>
[14]
https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429503559
[15]
[PDF] arXiv:quant-ph/0306185v1 26 Jun 2003
currents in classical electrodynamics corresponds exactly to the notion of “real” and. “virtual” photons in quantum electrodynamics. The charged currents ...
[16]
[PDF] Feynman Diagrams - University of Washington
For electron induced ionization, the incoming electron is on shell and the ioniza- tion occurs via the virtual photon exchange, but the potential off-shell ...
[17]
[PDF] Particle Theory - FSU High Energy Physics
Particles off mass-shell, virtual particles, are parts of diagrams, and we may even have some intuitive feeling about them, but we should never make the mistake ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[18]
Real and virtual photons within basis light-front quantization - arXiv
Feb 27, 2023 · After performing nonperturbative renormalization, we obtain a good quality description of the perturbative QED properties of the photon, as ...
[19]
[PDF] arXiv:2008.04372v1 [hep-ph] 10 Aug 2020
Aug 10, 2020 · three polarization states of the virtual photon,. Πµα(q) = X λ=0,±1. (−1)λ+1 λ ∗. µ (q) λ α(q) . (5). We will always use λ (and variants λ0 ...Missing: electrodynamics | Show results with:electrodynamics
[20]
[PDF] Class Notes for Quantum Field Theory: Section I
The photon gives rise to the E&M force between the two charged electrons (photons couple to charge). The photon in this diagram is “virtual” since it has q. 2.
[21]
[PDF] quantum electrodynamics and renormalization theory
First, every intermediate particle is on its mass shell, but energy is not conserved, while in the Feynman approach, energy is conserved but particles are off ...Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
[22]
[PDF] Quantum Field Theory
(Notice that to derive this result, Peskin and Schroeder instead send t → −∞ in a ... Finally, we have the Feynman rules for QED. For vertices and internal ...
[23]
[PDF] arXiv:0706.1661v3 [physics.class-ph] 17 Jul 2007
Jul 17, 2007 · In the CM frame of Møller scattering, the virtual photon has p > 0 for any non-zero scattering angle, but always E = 0. Therefore v is ...
[24]
The Effect of Retardation on the Interaction of Two Electrons
The Effect of Retardation on the Interaction of Two Electrons. G. Breit. Department of Research in Terrestrial Magnetism, Washington, D. C. PDF Share. X ...Missing: Gregory | Show results with:Gregory
[25]
[PDF] On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates
-. On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates. By H. B. G. CASIMIR. (Communicated at the meeting of May 29. 1948.) In a recent paper by POLDER ...
[26]
Demonstration of the Casimir Force in the 0.6 to 6 𝜇 ⁢ m Range
Jan 6, 1997 · Physical Review Letters · Demonstration of the Casimir Force in the 0.6 to 6 ⁢ 𝜇 ⁢ m Range · Outline · Information.